Treasury SLFRF reporting data through March 31, 2024

Summary

Treasury State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) reporting data through March 31, 2024, whose Definitions sheet explains that it holds Project and Expenditure reporting for Quarter 1 of 2024, due to Treasury on March 31, 2024 from the largest recipients covering January 1, 2024-March 31, 2024, together with the annual reports due the same day from smaller recipients, Tribal governments allocated less than $30 million and non-entitlement units, covering April 1, 2023-March 31, 2024. The file reflects data received as of 6/28/2024 and includes approximately 99% of Tiers 1 and 2 recipients and 85% of Annual Tier 5 reporters. Project rows include State of Missouri lead service line inventory projects under expenditure category 5.12 for drinking water lead remediation.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text extracted from the spreadsheet file: one line per row, cells separated by tabs, each sheet headed by its name. Numbers appear as stored, without the workbook’s formatting.

Sheet: Definitions
Background: This State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) reporting data includes Project and Expenditure reporting data for Quarter 1 of 2024, which was due to Treasury on March 31, 2024. This includes reports from the largest SLFRF recipients (states, territories, and metro cities and counties with a population over 250,000 or an allocation over $10 million, non-entitlement units of local government allocated more than $10 million, and Tribal governments allocated over $30 million) covering the period of January 1, 2024-March 31, 2024. This reporting data also includes the Annual Project and Expenditure reports that were also due on March 31, 2024 from smaller SLFRF recipients (metro cities and counties with populations less than 250,000 and an allocation less than $10 million, Tribal governments with an allocation less than $30 million, and non-entitlement units of local government) covering the reporting period of April 1, 2023-March 31, 2024. Please note that going forward, non-entitlement units of local government with allocations greater than $10 million will report quarterly. This file reflects data received as of 6/28/2024, and includes approximately 99% of Tiers 1 and 2 recipients (reporting quarterly) and 85% of Annual Tier 5 reporters. This file reflects data that has been certified and submitted by recipients in their Project and Expenditure reports to Treasury, with limited exceptions outlined in the definitions below.
Field Name	Category	Definition
Recipient ID	Recipients, Project	Treasury specific ID code for the recipient
Recipient Name	Recipients, Project	Name of the Entity
State/Territory	Recipients, Project	State that the recipient is located in
Reporting Tier	Recipients, Project	The reporting tier that the recipient falls under (based on designation, size, population, and funding amount) - see https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/state-and-local-fiscal-recovery-funds/recipient-compliance-and-reporting-responsibilities
Recipient Type	Recipients, Project	Entity designation (e.g. State, Local Government, etc.)
Number of Projects	Recipients	Count of the number of projects submitted by the recipient as of the targeted reporting cycle
Allocation	Recipients	The amount of SLFRF funds awarded to the recipient
Claiming Revenue Loss Standard Allowance? Yes/No	Recipients	Choice of whether the recipient has elected to take the standard allowance for revenue loss
Revenue Loss Claimed through Standard Allowance	Recipients	If electing "yes" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss reported
Estimated Revenue Loss 2020	Recipients	If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2020
Estimated Revenue Loss 2021	Recipients	If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2021
Estimated Revenue Loss 2022	Recipients	If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2022
Estimated Revenue Loss 2023	Recipients	If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2023
Project ID	Project	Treasury specific ID code for the project
Project Name	Project	Name given to project by the recipient
Expenditure Category Group (*1)	Project	Per guidance, this field represents the project expenditure category group selected by the recipient
Expenditure Category (*2)	Project	Detailed Expenditure Category selected by the Recipient, and based on Expenditure Category Group (total of 124 expenditure categories across the 10 category groups)
Completion Status	Project	Picklist for the status of the project. Choices include: not started, cancelled, completed, completed less than 50%, completed more than 50%
Project Description	Project	Narrative entered by recipient describing the project in sufficient detail to provide understanding of the major activities that will occur
Adopted Budget	Project	The adopted budget is the budget adopted by a recipient for each project associated with SLFRF funds. Recipients will enter the Adopted Budget based on information that exists currently in the recipient’s financial systems and the recipient’s established budget process. This field is only required for Tier 1 recipients
Total Cumulative Obligations	Project	Sum of all obligations to date. An obligation is an order placed for property and services, contracts and subawards made, and similar transactions that require payment
Total Cumulative Expenditures	Project	Sum of all expenditures to date. An expenditure is the amount that has been incurred as a liability of the entity (the service has been rendered or the good has been delivered to the entity)
Number of Households Served  (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	Number of households served (by program if recipient establishes multiple separate household assistance programs). Only applicable to Expenditure Categories 2.1-2.8
Number of Workers Served  (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	Number of workers served (by program if recipient establishes multiple separate Premium Pay assistance programs). Only applicable to Expenditure Categories 4.1 or 4.2
Number of Gov FTE Responding to COVID-19  (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	Number of government workers responding to COVID-19, as measured by Full Time Equivalents. Only applicable to Expenditure Category 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Note: (*) Denotes projects where the number is not published for governments that reported less than 6 FTE
Number of Gov FTE Rehired  (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	Number of FTEs rehired by the recipient. Only applicable to Expenditure Category 3.2-Public Sector Workforce: Rehiring Public Sector Staff Note: (*) Denotes projects where the number is not published for governments that reported less than 6 FTE
Community benefit agreement? (Infrastructure Only)	Project	For infrastructure projects, a yes/no picklist for if a Community Benefit Agreement has been established
Complying with David Bacon? (Infrastructure Only)	Project	For infrastructure projects, a yes/no picklist for if the project is complying with Davis-Bacon requirements (specifically, that all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors in the performance of the project are paid wages at rates not less than those prevailing, as determined by the U.S. Secretary of Labor in accordance with subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the “Davis-Bacon Act”), for the corresponding classes of laborers and mechanics employed on projects of a character similar to the contract work in the civil subdivision of the State (or the District of Columbia) in which the work is to be performed, or by the appropriate state entity pursuant to a corollary state prevailing-wage-in construction law
Project labor agreement? (Infrastructure Only)	Project	For infrastructure projects, a yes/no picklist for if a Project Labor Agreement whereby “the indicated project includes a project labor agreement, meaning a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement consistent with section 8(f) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C.  158(f))"
Does the Project have Capital Expenditures? (Yes/No) (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	For projects in Expenditure Category Groups 1, 2 , 3 and 8. A yes/no picklist for whether the project is expected to have capital expenditures
Type of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	For projects in Expenditure Category Groups 1, 2,3 and 8 that answered yes to expecting capital expenditures. A picklist of types that can be found in Appendix H of the Project and Expenditure Report User Guide
Total Expected Cost of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	For projects in Expenditure Category Groups 1, 2, 3 and 8 that answered yes to expecting capital expenditures. The reported dollar amount of the expected capital expenditures
Primary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	The selected primary population served by this project in response to “What Impacted and/or Disproportionally Impacted population does this project primarily serve?” See pg. 22 of the Compliance and Reporting Guidance
Secondary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	The selected secondary population served by this project in response to “If this project primarily serves more than one Impacted and/or Disproportionately Impacted populations, please select up to two additional populations served below.” See pg. 22 of the Compliance and Reporting Guidance
Tertiary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	The selected tertiary population served by this project in response to “If this project primarily serves more than one Impacted and/or Disproportionately Impacted populations, please select up to two additional populations served below.” See pg. 22 of the Compliance and Reporting Guidance
Project is conducting an evidence based program evaluation? (Yes/No)	Project	This field is only required for Tier 1 recipients. For relevant ECs identify whether there is a program evaluation of the project being conducted
Project Total Spending on Evidence Based Evaluation	Project	This field is only required for Tier 1 recipients. For relevant ECs identify the dollar amount of the total project spending that is allocated towards evidence-based interventions

Sheet: Recipients (Q1 2024) Submitted
Recipient-ID	Recipient Name	State/Territory	Reporting Tier	Recipient Type	Allocation	Number of Projects	Claiming Revenue Loss Standard Allowance? (Yes/No)	Revenue Loss Claimed through Standard Allowance	Estimated Revenue Loss 2020	Estimated Revenue Loss 2021	Estimated Revenue Loss 2022	Estimated Revenue Loss 2023
RCP-053169	Pocatello, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10700496	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-053175	City Of Lewiston, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20970428	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-053182	Pottawatomie County, Ok	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14100145	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-053189	City Of St. Cloud, Mn	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16463610	3	No		8948575	7515035	0	0
RCP-040550	Longmont, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12973267	18	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-036698	Alameda, City Of, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28679908	12	Yes	7480313
RCP-036707	Chester, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30357628	64	No		2640125.06	3031491.11	548413	0
RCP-036687	Appleton, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14891841	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-036414	Town Of Babylon, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27770292	38	No		1	1	1	1
RCP-040118	Alton City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21639201	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-000002	Argyle Town, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32596.8	1	Yes	32596.8
RCP-000003	Bakersfield Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46246.71	2	Yes	46246.71
RCP-000004	Baring City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22101.11	1	Yes	22101.1
RCP-000008	Edgar Springs City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39727.35	1	Yes	39727.35
RCP-000010	Ethel Town, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12223.8	1	Yes	12223.8
RCP-000011	Everton City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60915.27	3	Yes	60915.27
RCP-000013	Ferrelview Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	162576.54	11	Yes	33950
RCP-000015	Galena City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	89030.01	1	Yes	89030.01
RCP-000016	Gasconade City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29575.94	1	Yes	29575.94
RCP-000021	Knox City City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30735		No		0	0	0	0
RCP-000023	Leawood Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	137517.75		Yes	0
RCP-000024	Leonard Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8005.42	1	Yes	8005.42
RCP-000025	Lucerne Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9458.42	2	Yes	9458.42
RCP-000026	Mosby City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40746	1	Yes	40746
RCP-000030	Stewartsville City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	149334.09	4	Yes	149334.09
RCP-000031	Stotts City City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44209.41		Yes	44209.41
RCP-000032	Tuscumbia Town, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24362.28		Yes	24362.28
RCP-000033	Umber View Heights Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9982.77	1	No		0	1200	0	1500
RCP-000035	Utica Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32475	2	Yes	32475
RCP-000037	Viburnum City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	132628.23	2	Yes	132628.23
RCP-000038	Vienna City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	121015.62	1	Yes	121015.62
RCP-000042	Wooldridge Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2182.07	2	Yes	2182.07
RCP-000043	Worthington Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3599.64	1	Yes	1799.82
RCP-000928	Garrard County Fiscal Court, Ky, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3431413	1	Yes	3431413
RCP-000929	Ransom County, Nd, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1013535	10	Yes	1013535
RCP-000932	Pembina County Treasurer,	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1321015	5	Yes	1321015
RCP-000933	Washington County,	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4026365	23	Yes	4026365
RCP-000934	Washington County Of,	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	953321	1	Yes	953321
RCP-000935	Faulk County,	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	446554	2	Yes	446554
RCP-000936	Rhea County,	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6442301	4	Yes	6442301
RCP-000940	Caribou County,	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1389775	12	Yes	1389775
RCP-000941	County Of Smith,	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	695956	6	No		43084.99	0	0	0
RCP-000944	Mcmullen County,	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	144319	1	Yes	144319
RCP-000945	Rockcastle County Fiscal Court,	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3242808	1	Yes	3242808
RCP-000946	Armstrong County,	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	366528	3	Yes	366528
RCP-000948	Zavala County,	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2299781	2	Yes	2299781
RCP-000949	County Of Calaveras,	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8916508	4	Yes	8916508
RCP-000951	Jones County,	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	175397	1	Yes	175397
RCP-000952	Wilkes County,	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1899068	1	Yes	1899068
RCP-000953	Custer County,	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1742706	2	Yes	1742706
RCP-000954	City Of Cleveland, Tn,	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9313001	1	Yes	9313001
RCP-000955	County Of Dukes County,	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3366538	3	Yes	3366538
RCP-000956	Kidder County,	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481711	12	Yes	481711
RCP-000957	County Of Camden,	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2110787	4	Yes	2110787
RCP-000958	Eddy County,	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	444223	1	Yes	444223
RCP-000960	Osage County,	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3097906	1	Yes	3097906
RCP-000962	San Miguel County,	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5298237	40	Yes	0
RCP-000963	Nowata County,	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1957145	18	Yes	1957145
RCP-000965	Jefferson, County Of,	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3553589	1	Yes	3553589
RCP-000966	Layton City Corporation,	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9714265	1	Yes	9714265
RCP-000967	Mcintosh County,	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	485013	3	Yes	485013
RCP-000968	Town Of Apex,	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5257681	1	Yes	5257681
RCP-000995	Pierce Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1233740.47	9	Yes	1233740.47
RCP-000996	Springfield Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	671295.32		Yes	668626.01
RCP-000997	Bethlehem Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	117474.05	1	Yes	117006.94
RCP-000998	Camden Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	149024.83	4	Yes	149024.83
RCP-000999	Polk Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	203818.01	14	Yes	203818.01
RCP-001000	Yellow Creek Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	211179.85	5	Yes	211179.85
RCP-001097	County Of Niobrara,	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	457625	10	Yes	457625
RCP-001098	San Juan County,	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	141405	1	Yes	141405
RCP-001177	Greensboro Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25346.26	1	Yes	12673.13
RCP-001178	Mount Ayr Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26515.38	1	Yes	20000
RCP-001179	Spring Grove Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72973.94	1	Yes	72836.35
RCP-001210	Denmark Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	121705.03	1	Yes	121705.03
RCP-001211	Embden Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	100451.58	1	Yes	100451.58
RCP-001213	Franklin Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	164846.33	2	Yes	164846.33
RCP-001214	Bath City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	881647.68	2	Yes	761647.68
RCP-001216	Saco City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2110963.59	8	Yes	2110963.59
RCP-001217	Castle Hill Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41555.23	1	Yes	41555.23
RCP-001218	Chapman Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47053.63	1	Yes	47053.63
RCP-001220	Bradley Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	157338.9	2	Yes	157338.9
RCP-001221	Solon Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113774.63	1	Yes	113744.63
RCP-001222	Medford Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25482.98	5	Yes	25482.98
RCP-001224	Hancock Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	257050.31	5	Yes	257050.31
RCP-001226	Mexico Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	277986.54	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-001229	Whitefield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	241083.8	10	Yes	241083.8
RCP-001230	Doverfoxcroft Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426866.36	1	Yes	426370.99
RCP-001231	South Bristol Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92838.41	2	Yes	80000
RCP-001232	Surry Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	158819.24	4	Yes	158819.24
RCP-001233	Patten Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102566.36		Yes	102566.36
RCP-001236	Stacyville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40497.85		Yes	40497.85
RCP-001237	Westfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53820.9	3	Yes	53820.9
RCP-001238	Brunswick Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2171340.29	7	Yes	2023524.54
RCP-001240	Kennebunkport Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	386051.29	1	Yes	386051.29
RCP-001241	Livermore Falls Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	333816.48	1	Yes	333816.48
RCP-001242	Cushing Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	158079.07	6	Yes	158079.07
RCP-001243	Milford Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	315100.76	2	Yes	315100.76
RCP-001245	Wilton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	418724.49	1	Yes	418724.49
RCP-001246	Washington Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	160088.1	6	Yes	154995
RCP-001247	Dallas Plantation, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31298.6	1	Yes	31298.6
RCP-001249	Arrowsic Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48745.45	3	Yes	48745.45
RCP-001252	Gorham Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1900966.91	29	Yes	1900966.91
RCP-001253	Searsport Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	278515.23	1	Yes	278515.23
RCP-001254	Belfast City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	706227.5	1	Yes	706227.5
RCP-001255	Lake View Plantation, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8987.77	1	Yes	8987.77
RCP-001256	Danforth Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61011.12	1	Yes	61000
RCP-001257	Frankfort Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	125723.09		Yes	125723
RCP-001258	Stoneham Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26223.15	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-001259	Hiram Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	173622.64	2	Yes	173622.64
RCP-001260	New Vineyard Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82370.3	4	Yes	82370.3
RCP-001261	Lincolnville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	235373.92	1	Yes	235373.92
RCP-001262	Kennebunk Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1229210.16	3	Yes	1229210.16
RCP-001263	Warren Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	512197.33	2	Yes	512197.33
RCP-001264	Fryeburg Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	364903.59	1	Yes	364458
RCP-001265	Kingfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102989.31	4	Yes	102989.31
RCP-001268	Dennysville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34682.23		Yes	34682.23
RCP-001269	Guilford Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	153109.36	1	Yes	153109.36
RCP-001272	Cambridge Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47793.8	2	Yes	47738.34
RCP-001275	Frenchville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109650.84		Yes	109650.84
RCP-001277	Harrington Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	101931.93	5	Yes	101931.93
RCP-001278	Randolph Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	180707.12	9	Yes	180707.12
RCP-001281	Alna Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77612.07		Yes	77612.07
RCP-001282	Portage Lake Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39334.73	8	Yes	39334.73
RCP-001285	Thomaston Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	290252.21	10	Yes	290252.21
RCP-001286	Prospect Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	78880.93		Yes	78880.93
RCP-001287	Newcastle Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	186839.94	1	Yes	186839.94
RCP-001289	Carthage Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57310.27	4	Yes	57277.02
RCP-001290	Chelsea Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	290780.9	1	Yes	290780.9
RCP-038447	Scioto County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14628862	47	Yes	10000000
RCP-038480	San Marcos, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18101483	52	Yes	10000000
RCP-036168	Fresno County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	194063657	96	Yes	10000000
RCP-038059	Springfield, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33804013	48	No		32150890	1653123	0	0
RCP-036675	Rio Grande Municipio City, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26780515	37	Yes	10000000
RCP-038083	Sunnyvale, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28154030	1	No		139043214.98	160164402.47	138862414.59	234472206
RCP-038100	Rome, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11546686	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-038102	Worcester, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	146634604.2	40	No		11289523.11	4499999.89	0	0
RCP-053282	State Of South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	974478793	318	Yes	10000000
RCP-040521	Brunswick County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27741111	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-036683	Somerset County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14266219	11	Yes	7878878.94
RCP-036695	Longview, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17048510	13	Yes	9294040.32
RCP-039116	Ector County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32286869	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-039026	Sandusky County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11366435	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-039402	Shelby County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42286061	2	No		0	1	0	0
RCP-038741	Oakland County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	244270949	80	No		23627970	47127138	87339810	77995025
RCP-039287	Canton, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63613221	155	No		10145595.7	3938646.39	0	0
RCP-039244	Cleveland, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	511721590	31	No		0	108960480	215000000	140911000
RCP-039390	Warren County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12420372	84	Yes	10000000
RCP-039395	Lea County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13804514	2	Yes	5554647
RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	176667606	48	No		66320568.73	72974624	0	0
RCP-038796	Norwalk, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39249678.78	52	Yes	10000000
RCP-039276	Parma, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23734921	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-039169	St Clair Shores, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21247393	15	No		2498540	3021000	2856168	3333047
RCP-039258	Anderson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11214347	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-036657	Suffolk City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30065296	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-036166	Rutherford, County Of	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	64542466	9	No		5904651	17885772	0	0
RCP-036655	City Of St. Louis, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	498076054	342	No		180921333	176519934	128647971	-141149821
RCP-039180	Los Angeles City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1278900928	113	No		1053845679	1130379592	0	0
RCP-039189	Midland County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16152078	5	Yes	9200000
RCP-036091	State Of Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	6540417626.7	310	No		1848491965	0	0	0
RCP-039086	Grand Forks, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11439298	10	Yes	1749902.65
RCP-038980	City Of Clovis, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17291175	1	No		22390898	0	0	0
RCP-038965	Martin County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31272363	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-031300	Chelsea, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11863612.17	4	No		11863612	7351827	7923795	6940501
RCP-031335	Everett, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13884521.24	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-050665	Cooper City City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17930560	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-050670	Cutler Bay Town, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21896320	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-050672	Dania Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16163048	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-050675	Debary City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10670687	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-036344	City Of Fresno, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	170808029	111	No		37807037	51129356	0	0
RCP-036028	City Of Bakersfield, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	94517089	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-039820	Redwood City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18483063	1	No		16987610	65810636	0	0
RCP-039714	Paulding County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32761587	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-037330	Lauderdale County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18011521	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-037341	Woonsocket, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36388236.33	64	No		12954696	16032340	7401200.33	21282056
RCP-037059	Lake County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12506226	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-037010	Bend, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14076428	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-037058	Jones County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13227238	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-036275	Brazos County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44521550	4	No		6419821	8445192	6820921	0
RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22118301	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-035841	Palm Beach County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	290730026	1	No		196558609	94171417	0	0
RCP-037072	Otsego County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11555818	43	Yes	10000000
RCP-036127	Cabarrus County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42043458	65	Yes	10000000
RCP-037336	Strafford County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25373929	14	No		3616490.3	8044988.64	8877010.11	2298755.11
RCP-035974	Gloucester County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56646874	49	Yes	10000000
RCP-039471	Rome, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24134423	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-036902	Wheeling, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28197143	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-038204	Lincoln City, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	45949074	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-035977	Cleveland County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	55166390	24	Yes	10000000
RCP-040609	Hamilton County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	158784547	37	No		41935127	0	0	0
RCP-036874	Rio Rancho, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12873197	6	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-039473	Covington, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35914130	32	No		3366602	1538459	12500000	8846466
RCP-035957	Berkeley County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44268263	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037124	Miami Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23555418	1	No		23555418	0	0	0
RCP-037130	Wilmington, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25929952	35	Yes	10000000
RCP-035933	Pasco County Fl, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	107597711	8	No		57099406	17992683	868688.99	0
RCP-036818	Black Hawk County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25489501	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-039615	Houston County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30663037	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-035901	Mobile County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	80261198	39	No		19331018.82	0	0	0
RCP-036082	City Of Cincinnati, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	279590123	57	No		71216236.82	95341231.75	96860051.97	12176602.46
RCP-036026	County Of San Mateo, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	148897819	38	Yes	10000000
RCP-039818	North Little Rock, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16769719	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-035979	Commonwealth Of Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	2470061908	41	No		3488804000	1573789519	1485577446	2816233667
RCP-036094	Lancaster County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	61979492	60	Yes	10000000
RCP-039584	Rock Hill, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13179656	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-037223	Cape Girardeau County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15319767	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039773	Terre Haute, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35936890	17	No		10918291	14572078	10446521	0
RCP-035920	City Of Las Vegas, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	130568739	75	No		53263017	44908998	69700105	102051821
RCP-039774	Great Falls, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19472737	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-037630	Monterey Park, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15043184	3	No		8316784	6463796	4708139	2472631
RCP-000937	Payne County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15885583	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-037492	Warrick County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12236623	50	Yes	10000000
RCP-037496	State Of Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	4182827491.6	159	No		800389715	0	0	0
RCP-037779	Humboldt County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26330552	24	Yes	10000000
RCP-040093	Tamarac, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10897007	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-040091	Muncipality Of Aguada, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10959287.46	3	Yes	9043333.33
RCP-049357	Hamden, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24140337.11	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-040085	Pickens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24645730	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-036766	Sioux Falls, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25415071	15	No		19485561.57	0	0	0
RCP-036691	Story County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18863839	33	Yes	10000000
RCP-053085	Cattaraugus County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14784835	1	No		17268854	0	0	0
RCP-053256	Dallas County, Ia	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18152150	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-000947	City Of Jurupa Valley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28077013	11	No		361797	3712583	10565830	18157732
RCP-006371	Municipality Of Toa Alta, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33782434	5	No		2575873	2680165	2637534	7131834
RCP-006372	Wilson County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15888885	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-006414	City Of Mountain View, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15679080	1	No		36121906	141721281	121907756	0
RCP-038493	Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27457329	20	No		3063459	4640873	8286275	8286275
RCP-038293	Springdale, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21351596	12	No		9194245	2660616	0	0
RCP-037264	Wauwatosa, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24663875	30	Yes	9555115.22
RCP-040180	Martinsville, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15463451	9	Yes	4326173.74
RCP-040186	Moline, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20783977	48	No		9528199	6042865	5212913	8631404
RCP-040280	Portage County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31557116	32	Yes	10000000
RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21608872	35	Yes	10000000
RCP-037990	Royal Oak, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28107502	13	No		7519845	18455937	2131720	0
RCP-040292	City Of Revere, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30054398.11	46	Yes	10000000
RCP-040293	Williamsburg, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18419663	1	No		10866707	8305345	0	0
RCP-040294	Limestone County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19213079	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37686566.98	66	Yes	6897526.96
RCP-037388	Norwalk, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28046746	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-037377	Hancock County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15183218	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-035884	Prince George's County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	176626110	60	No		84993250	55330618	85519808	86735083
RCP-037686	Amherst Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15230415	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-037692	County Of Butler, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36488243	53	No		12713881	3359370	3277912	0
RCP-037876	St. Lawrence County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20927232	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-023660	Municipio De Moca, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10424982.9	19	Yes	9270129.74
RCP-023658	Municipio De Las Piedras, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11093890.58	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-023657	Municipio De Hatillo, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11743926.44	3	Yes	2063144.72
RCP-039340	El Cajon, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30399751	22	Yes	8488000
RCP-040121	Clark County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22978777	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-001295	Glenburn Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	482484.81	11	Yes	0
RCP-001296	Bradford Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	129846.88		Yes	129846.88
RCP-001297	Lincoln Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514100.63	2	Yes	394343.79
RCP-001298	Casco Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	415340.86	10	Yes	415340.86
RCP-001300	Hebron Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	150042.94	3	Yes	150042.94
RCP-001301	Hersey Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7930.39		Yes	7930.39
RCP-001302	Stockholm Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24531.34	3	Yes	24531.34
RCP-001303	Verona Island Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58473.4	1	Yes	10000
RCP-001304	Sebec Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62597.19	6	Yes	62597.19
RCP-001306	Madawaska Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	394933.33	1	Yes	394475.02
RCP-001307	Old Orchard Beach Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	953232.66	1	Yes	953232.66
RCP-001308	Mariaville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56887.32	6	Yes	56887.32
RCP-001309	Newfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	167595.54	1	Yes	167595.54
RCP-001311	Greenwood Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85330.97	1	Yes	85330.97
RCP-001312	Southwest Harbor Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	189483.41	1	Yes	189483.41
RCP-001315	Readfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	271853.71	1	Yes	271853.71
RCP-001316	Scarborough Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2219557.04	1	Yes	2219557.04
RCP-001320	Jonesboro Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62068.51	1	Yes	62068.51
RCP-001321	Porter Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	160722.54	9	Yes	160722.54
RCP-001322	Appleton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	144650.28	7	Yes	144560.08
RCP-001323	Liberty Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102354.88	2	Yes	102354.88
RCP-001324	China Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	454887.07	13	Yes	454887.07
RCP-001327	Mechanic Falls Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	314995.02	3	Yes	314995.02
RCP-001329	Moro Plantation, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3700.84		Yes	3700.84
RCP-001330	Brooksville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96539.26	4	Yes	96539.26
RCP-001331	Swanville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	142852.73	1	Yes	142852.73
RCP-001333	Eddington Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	233470.63		Yes	233199.68
RCP-001335	Freeport Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	904910.16	2	Yes	751260.73
RCP-001336	Farmington Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	820742.3	1	Yes	820742.3
RCP-001337	Columbia Falls Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56147.15	9	Yes	0
RCP-001340	Mount Chase Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20407.53		Yes	20407.53
RCP-001341	Fort Fairfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	347351	1	Yes	347351
RCP-001343	Eustis Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65346.4	1	Yes	65346.4
RCP-001344	Brooks Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	119801.73	1	Yes	119801.73
RCP-001345	Steuben Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	119695.99	2	Yes	119557.1
RCP-001347	New Sharon Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	149619.99	7	Yes	149619.99
RCP-001349	Limestone Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	229769.78	4	Yes	229769.78
RCP-001350	East Machias Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	137248.58	4	Yes	137248.58
RCP-001351	Ripley Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49802.84	1	Yes	49802.84
RCP-001352	Baldwin Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	171507.86	5	Yes	171408.34
RCP-001353	Lee Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92415.46		Yes	92415.46
RCP-001355	Gouldsboro Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	184090.74	3	Yes	184090.74
RCP-001357	Corinth Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	296490.78	4	Yes	47372.68
RCP-001362	Monroe Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	99711.41	1	Yes	99711.41
RCP-001363	Andover Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87868.71	4	Yes	87868.71
RCP-001364	Otisfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	190963.75	5	Yes	0
RCP-001365	Chesterville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	142746.98	6	Yes	142746.98
RCP-001368	Princeton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	83744.89		Yes	83744.89
RCP-001370	Starks Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	67249.69	4	Yes	67249.69
RCP-001371	Cutler Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54032.37	2	Yes	54032.37
RCP-001372	Perry Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98019.61	2	Yes	97905.86
RCP-001373	Jackson Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61857.02	1	Yes	61857.02
RCP-001375	Manchester Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	270267.63	9	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-001376	Edgecomb Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	133442	7	Yes	133442
RCP-001378	New Limerick Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50225.8	4	Yes	22338.24
RCP-001380	Alexander Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50754.48	3	Yes	50754.48
RCP-001382	Meddybemps Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15543.56	1	Yes	15543.56
RCP-001383	Yorktown, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1405264.78	6	Yes	1405264.78
RCP-001384	Waterville City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1750818.23	4	Yes	1750818.23
RCP-001385	Isle Au Haut Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7084.48	1	Yes	0
RCP-001386	Jefferson Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	259588.04	1	Yes	259588.04
RCP-001390	Vienna Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60588.16	1	Yes	60532.4
RCP-001391	Lebanon Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	675774.81	2	Yes	675774.81
RCP-001393	Burnham Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	130164.1	6	Yes	130164.1
RCP-001394	Industry Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98442.55	4	Yes	98442.55
RCP-001396	Palmyra Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	208833.56	3	Yes	208833.56
RCP-001399	Harmony Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94953.18		Yes	94953.18
RCP-001401	Beals Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52657.78	2	Yes	52657.78
RCP-001404	Carroll Plantation, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15437.83	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-001405	Seboeis Plantation, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3595.11		Yes	3595.11
RCP-001406	Windsor Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	275871.77	4	Yes	275871.77
RCP-001409	Addison Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	132596.1	5	Yes	0
RCP-001413	Cherryfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	122762.41	2	Yes	122762.41
RCP-001414	Parsonsfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	207458.95	9	Yes	0
RCP-001415	Orland Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	230615.68	9	Yes	230615.68
RCP-001416	Westmanland Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6027.09	2	Yes	5906.7
RCP-001418	Stonington Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109122.14		Yes	109122.14
RCP-001420	Pittston Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	289194.82	1	Yes	289194.82
RCP-001421	Lagrange Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	71796.45	6	Yes	71796.45
RCP-001422	Orient Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14803.39		Yes	0
RCP-001425	Mattawamkeag Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68835.77		Yes	0
RCP-001428	Gray Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	869487.76	3	Yes	823384.18
RCP-001429	Roxbury Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38171.6	1	Yes	38171.6
RCP-001430	Columbia Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49062.67	1	Yes	49062.67
RCP-001431	Long Island Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25165.76		Yes	25165.76
RCP-001432	Wellington Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25905.93	1	Yes	25905.93
RCP-001434	Albion Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	221416.44	2	Yes	221416.44
RCP-001435	Hudson Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	159982.37	3	Yes	159982.37
RCP-001600	Town Of Clear Lake, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94934.38	1	Yes	94934.38
RCP-001601	Town Of South Fork, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11304.2	1	Yes	11304.2
RCP-001624	Catahoula Parish Police Jury,	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1844098	3	Yes	1844098
RCP-001625	Allamakee, County Of,	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2658539	1	Yes	2658539
RCP-001626	Greenlee County,	Arizona	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1844875	1	Yes	1844875
RCP-001954	City Of Abbeville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2496189.62	2	Yes	2496189.62
RCP-001955	Town Of Arcadia Lakes, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	267562.5	1	Yes	267562.5
RCP-001957	Town Of Awendaw, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	718388.84	1	Yes	712000
RCP-001958	Town Of Aynor, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481415.1	4	Yes	481415.1
RCP-001959	City Of Barnwell, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2136248.44	1	Yes	2136248.44
RCP-001960	Town Of Batesburg-Leesville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2695825.04	1	Yes	2695825.04
RCP-001961	City Of Beaufort, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6689031.44	1	Yes	6689031.44
RCP-001962	City Of Belton, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2217894.84	1	Yes	2217894.84
RCP-001963	City Of Bennettsville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3848333.82	2	Yes	3848333.82
RCP-001964	Town Of Bethune, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	174245.38	1	Yes	174245.38
RCP-001965	Town Of Blacksburg, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	935946.64	1	Yes	935946.64
RCP-001966	Town Of Blackville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1089780.42	3	Yes	1089780.42
RCP-001967	Town Of Blenheim, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33206.24	1	Yes	33206.24
RCP-001968	Town Of Blythewood, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2008267.5	1	Yes	2008267.5
RCP-001969	Town Of Bonneau, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	241952.16	1	Yes	241952.16
RCP-001970	Town Of Bowman, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	442085.44	1	Yes	442085.44
RCP-036187	Northampton County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	61187165	9	No		0	8407280.67	30088060.5	0
RCP-038462	Cass County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35336410	6	Yes	0
RCP-038454	Elyria, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18780812	17	No		5542256	5039374	6114406	6253842
RCP-038466	Ouachita Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29772649	39	Yes	10000000
RCP-038032	Elmore County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15773896	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-038035	Wausau, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15586461	31	Yes	10000000
RCP-040555	Rowan County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27598928	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-038349	Lancaster, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12556172	16	Yes	1170420.25
RCP-039027	Hanover County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20932282	9	No		5751349	0	0	0
RCP-039410	Janesville, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11686560	9	Yes	4000000
RCP-039400	Lamar County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12303635	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039178	Skokie, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15267242	7	No		12620790	0	0	0
RCP-039040	Doral City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12878947	2	Yes	0
RCP-039187	Somerville, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77504170.23	128	No		48849489	22926292	51763319	0
RCP-038976	Johnson County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29357173	46	Yes	10000000
RCP-039126	Cascade County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15804392	39	Yes	10000000
RCP-039263	Cabell County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17859238	23	Yes	6000000
RCP-039192	Jackson County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42915782	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-039215	Belknap County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11907389	42	Yes	10000000
RCP-039036	North Bergen Township, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16736740	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-039045	Gallatin County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22227463	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-037252	Nampa, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17511452	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-037371	Pasadena, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40199596	16	No		8601915	9132043	16981380	8632689
RCP-038918	Mount Vernon, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41108657	34	Yes	10000000
RCP-036016	Osceola County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	72985227	1	No		61828645	11156582	0	0
RCP-037160	Muskegon County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33713161	17	No		10646762	16451469	4081202	0
RCP-035956	Jersey City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	139971935	41	No		28693937.54	101368961.95	0	0
RCP-039111	Erie County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	52391502	41	No		10836209	0	0	0
RCP-039109	Whitfield County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20322762	45	Yes	10000000
RCP-038981	Ascension Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24591343	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-035986	St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50583338	58	Yes	10000000
RCP-036196	Forsyth County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47443088	9	No		3000000	0	0	0
RCP-039003	Saginaw County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37009967	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-050678	Dunedin City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18299690	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-050682	Edgewater City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11979418	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-031772	Bothell City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13248730	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-031814	Edmonds City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11904718	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-031850	Issaquah City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11039632	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-031426	Natick, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10775591.28	18	Yes	7050841.28
RCP-036895	Seneca County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10717680	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-035910	Yavapai County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45665225	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-039509	Evanston, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43173654	29	No		13260956.14	7602681	0	5597823
RCP-039642	Whiteside County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10717097	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-036900	Irondequoit, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22454916	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-036081	State Of West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1355489988	36	No		1220903466	349793987.09	0	0
RCP-037367	Homestead City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19192087	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-035925	City Of Chandler, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	34560795	13	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-039354	Elkhart, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18042360	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-039355	Maui County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50042085	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-039352	Pearl River County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10787023	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-039365	Topeka, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45676831	76	No		6115256.7	3382527.12	1757068.67	4408291.87
RCP-037281	Spartanburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	62114487	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-040599	County Of York, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	87224252	149	No		30481743.06	31882823.16	24727467.78	0
RCP-036882	North Charleston City, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24317215	5	No		2127808	13124068	7184186	0
RCP-037045	West Lafayette, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11427539	5	Yes	2100000
RCP-036880	Chisago County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10989807	2	Yes	9522821
RCP-039490	Bowie County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18111748	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-039669	Lower Merion, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25503294	1	No		12707713	6930292	13584024	15000000
RCP-036128	City Of Miami, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	137639417	37	No		69659199	93989727	51408511	11123462
RCP-037172	Genesee County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78824418	52	Yes	10000000
RCP-037456	Blacksburg, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13364987	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-037352	Newport Beach, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10141272	5	No		18007069	0	0	0
RCP-040572	Pasadena, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52625975	11	No		96354820	85465086	89202236	0
RCP-039456	Blue Earth County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13140802	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-036113	St Joseph, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38704807	85	Yes	10000000
RCP-040597	Linn County Iowa, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44034983	74	Yes	10000000
RCP-037043	La Habra, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15828149	49	Yes	10000000
RCP-037113	Peoria, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47089976	36	No		20561566	0	0	0
RCP-039771	Orange City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28018188	1	No		27749752	24088105	0	0
RCP-036508	State of Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	4427709355.9	98	No		2213459284	999285708	1214964364	0
RCP-037114	East Lansing, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12170077	19	No		8632045	9118910	9624494	0
RCP-039593	Wicomico County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20124834	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037095	Citrus Heights, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15676972	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-039466	Woodland, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11114656	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039614	Parker County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27752377	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-035942	State of New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	12744981589	19	No		11861000000	0	0	0
RCP-040589	Dallas County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	511918088	109	No		46536240	76124888	151283031	104081289
RCP-039623	Bayonne, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35655886	10	No		4219301.34	11720409.42	5000000	0
RCP-053207	City Of Lake Forest, Ca	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12774385	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-053208	City Of Conway, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12233839	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-053209	State Of South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2499067328.5	325	No		514552955	0	0	0
RCP-000942	Town Of Cary, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16476072	13	No		17891826	40373851	0	0
RCP-053250	Laurel County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11812212	4	Yes	9775611.25
RCP-014355	Gallatin City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12734348.36	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-036099	Lafayette Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47469893	38	No		8445924	14003523	0	6054038
RCP-037792	Lima, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26371401	1	No		3542645	9167555	8538335	10085744
RCP-037617	Ottawa County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56684556	5	No		19030058	20712572	16941926	0
RCP-039119	Johnson City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13415440	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-037417	Monroe County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28830982	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-040277	Tulare, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18024068	58	Yes	9774068
RCP-040370	Liberty County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17135507	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-040461	Norfolk County, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	137282758	170	Yes	10000000
RCP-040453	State of Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2648024988	426	No		2993693000	0	0	245783397
RCP-040437	Walker County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14173761	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-036787	Delray Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10956323	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-037070	Taylor, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11593181	48	Yes	10000000
RCP-037374	Euclid, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25409948	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-040285	Edison, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15593864	4	No		4991210	5291836.58	5310817.42	707000
RCP-040522	State of Iowa	Iowa	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1480862558	107	No		603815000	0	0	0
RCP-053068	Municipio De San German, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19193080	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-037723	Athens County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12689004	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-037730	Waltham, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34952310.13	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-037733	Spokane Valley City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16006492	7	No		10784249	0	6348423	0
RCP-037732	Iberia Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13563659	13	No		2593846	4122026	2938734	0
RCP-037735	Madison County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19032243	2	No		9923766	8412851	0	0
RCP-040108	Lebanon, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16672455	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-036754	Kennewick, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16062005	19	No		12376991.57	8987346.2	0	0
RCP-049057	Town of Sahuarita, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10493989.86	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-055937	Bedford, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12177672.51	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-055969	Cedar Hill, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11899852.04	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-036965	State Of North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1007502515	1	No		1881933568	1795656461	810510629	1224007561
RCP-040198	Shiawassee County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13231900	22	No		6481936	5448809	1301155	1301155
RCP-040201	Trumbull County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38454129	56	Yes	10000000
RCP-040352	Penn Hills, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17129203	69	Yes	10000000
RCP-040359	Erie, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76098836	50	No		6066693	9558236	13808835	19445920
RCP-040330	Quincy, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45316692	12	No		14654136.6	0	0	0
RCP-040302	San Luis Obispo City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13564467	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-001971	Town Of Branchville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	474445.3	1	Yes	474445.3
RCP-001972	Town Of Briarcliffe Acres, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	295221.46	1	Yes	295221.46
RCP-001974	Town Of Burnettown, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	349275		Yes	349275
RCP-001975	City Of Camden, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3594433.4	4	Yes	0
RCP-001976	Town Of Campobello, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	295221.46	2	Yes	295221.46
RCP-001977	City Of Cayce, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6974296.04	39	Yes	6974296.04
RCP-001978	Town Of Central, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2680889.72	1	Yes	2680889.72
RCP-001979	Town Of Chapin, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	812979.18	5	Yes	812979.18
RCP-001980	Town Of Cheraw, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2769008.1	1	Yes	2769008.1
RCP-001981	City Of Chesnee, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	476436.66	1	Yes	476436.66
RCP-001983	Town Of Clover, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3245444.78	1	Yes	3245444.78
RCP-001985	Town Of Coward, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	383837.7	1	Yes	383837.7
RCP-001986	Town Of Cowpens, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	906426.74	12	Yes	906000
RCP-001987	City Of Darlington, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2957193.12	1	Yes	2957193.12
RCP-001988	City Of Dillon, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3141893.24	1	Yes	3141893.24
RCP-001989	Town Of Due West, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	598906.28	2	Yes	598906.28
RCP-001990	Town Of Duncan, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1805182.2	8	Yes	500000
RCP-001991	Town Of Eastover, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	338250	1	Yes	338250
RCP-001992	Town Of Edisto Beach, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	202124.64	1	Yes	0
RCP-001993	Town Of Elgin, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	789082.68	1	Yes	789082.68
RCP-001994	Town Of Elloree, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	319117.98	10	Yes	319117.98
RCP-001995	Town Of Estill, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	924496.24	10	Yes	924496.24
RCP-001996	Town Of Eutawville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	144374.74	2	Yes	144374.74
RCP-001997	City Of Folly Beach, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1324264.94	1	Yes	1324264.94
RCP-001998	City Of Forest Acres, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5126797.1	5	Yes	5126797.1
RCP-001999	City Of Gaffney, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6277314.5	9	Yes	6277314.5
RCP-002000	City Of Georgetown, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4352151.9	1	Yes	4352151.9
RCP-002002	Town Of Govan, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13082.6	1	Yes	13082.6
RCP-002003	Town Of Gray Court, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	408729.9	9	Yes	408729.9
RCP-002004	Town Of Great Falls, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	831976.5	1	Yes	831976.5
RCP-002007	Town Of Hampton, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1247099.12	1	Yes	1247099.12
RCP-002009	City Of Hardeeville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3623308.34	15	Yes	3623308.34
RCP-002010	Town Of Harleyville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	347992.92	1	Yes	347992.92
RCP-002011	City Of Hartsville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3754739.14	13	No		686275	1100525	309629	0
RCP-002012	Town Of Hemingway, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	196648.36	1	Yes	196648.36
RCP-002013	Town Of Hickory Grove, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	201117.02	1	Yes	201117.02
RCP-002014	Town Of Holly Hill, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	586460.18	1	Yes	586460.18
RCP-002016	Town Of Irmo, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5056297.44	1	Yes	5056297.44
RCP-002017	City Of Isle Of Palms, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2170599.66	2	Yes	2170599.66
RCP-002018	Town Of James Island, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3709261.5	6	Yes	3709261.5
RCP-002019	Town Of Jamestown, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40823.2	1	Yes	40823.2
RCP-002020	City Of Johnsonville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	739298.28	1	Yes	739298.28
RCP-002021	Town Of Jonesville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	417193.24	1	Yes	417193.24
RCP-002022	Town Of Kershaw, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1155495.84	10	Yes	1155495.84
RCP-002023	Town Of Kiawah Island, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	880685.96	1	Yes	880685.96
RCP-002024	Town Of Kingstree, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1524896.04	8	Yes	1491896.04
RCP-002025	Town Of Kline, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24670.5	1	Yes	24670.5
RCP-002026	City Of Lake City, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3234492.2	5	Yes	3234492.2
RCP-002027	City Of Lancaster, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4539839.08	1	Yes	4539839.08
RCP-002028	City Of Landrum, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1332728.28	19	No		238226	167775	98550	0
RCP-002031	City Of Liberty, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1570199.84		Yes	0
RCP-002033	Town Of Lockhart, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	227514.68	1	Yes	227514.68
RCP-002034	City Of Loris, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1374547.18	1	Yes	1374547.18
RCP-002035	Town Of Lowrys, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49761	1	Yes	49761
RCP-002036	City Of Manning, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1937608.7	10	Yes	1937608.7
RCP-002037	City Of Marion, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3149360.9	1	Yes	3149360.9
RCP-002039	Town Of Mcclellanville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	219487.5	1	Yes	219487.5
RCP-002040	Town Of Mccoll, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	980752.6		Yes	980752.6
RCP-002041	Town Of Mccormick, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	957808.5	6	Yes	957808.5
RCP-002042	Town Of Meggett, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	575437.5	1	Yes	0
RCP-002043	Town Of Moncks Corner, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5967157.7	1	Yes	5967157.7
RCP-002044	City Of Mullins, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2110360.54	7	Yes	2110360.54
RCP-002045	City Of New Ellenton, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1070862.36	8	Yes	1070862.36
RCP-002046	City Of Newberry, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5077510.54	1	Yes	5077510.54
RCP-002047	Town Of Nichols, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	166777.72	1	Yes	166777.72
RCP-002049	Town Of North, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	352473.52	1	Yes	352473.52
RCP-002050	Town Of Norway, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	153833.78	1	Yes	153833.78
RCP-002051	Town Of Olanta, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	277299.08		Yes	0
RCP-002052	City Of Orangeburg, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6299717.46	1	Yes	6299717.46
RCP-002053	Town Of Pacolet, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	764196.74	10	Yes	764196.74
RCP-002054	Town Of Pamplico, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	607369.64	1	Yes	607368.84
RCP-002055	Town Of Patrick, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	169266.94	1	Yes	169266.94
RCP-002056	Town Of Pawleys Island, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53767.14	1	Yes	53767.14
RCP-002057	Town Of Pelion, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	253725	2	Yes	253725
RCP-002058	Town Of Pelzer, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	697479.38	1	Yes	697479.38
RCP-002059	Town Of Pendleton, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1635417.4	1	Yes	1635417.4
RCP-002060	City Of Pickens, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1578165.36	9	Yes	1578165.36
RCP-002061	Town Of Pinewood, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	259533.75	1	Yes	259533.75
RCP-002062	Town Of Port Royal, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5412616.5	6	Yes	5412616.5
RCP-002063	Town Of Prosperity, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	643214.4	1	Yes	643214.4
RCP-002064	Town Of Quinby, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	237750	2	Yes	237750
RCP-002065	Town Of Ravenel, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	703027.5	1	Yes	703027
RCP-002066	Town Of Reevesville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30360		Yes	30360
RCP-002067	Town Of Richburg, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	129439.42	4	Yes	129439.42
RCP-002068	Town Of Ridge Spring, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	372387.28	11	Yes	372387.28
RCP-002069	Town Of Ridgeland, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1897283.34	2	Yes	1897283.34
RCP-002070	Town Of Ridgeville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	359323.6	1	Yes	359323.6
RCP-002071	Town Of Salley, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	206605.24	3	Yes	206605.24
RCP-002072	Town Of Saluda, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1315914.74	1	Yes	1315914.74
RCP-002074	Town Of Scranton, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	324032.24	1	Yes	324032.24
RCP-002075	Town Of Seabrook Island, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	928478.98	1	Yes	928478.98
RCP-002076	City Of Seneca, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4248102.5	10	Yes	4000000
RCP-002077	Town Of Sharon, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	176250	1	Yes	176250
RCP-002079	Town Of Springdale, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1360607.54	2	Yes	1360607.54
RCP-002081	Town Of Stuckey, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109027.82	1	Yes	109027.82
RCP-002082	Town Of Sullivan'S Island, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	957851.78	1	Yes	957851.78
RCP-002083	Town Of Summerton, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	461501.36	1	Yes	461501.36
RCP-002084	Town Of Surfside Beach, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2252743.92	2	Yes	2252743.92
RCP-002085	City Of Tega Cay, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5643061.28	1	Yes	5643061.28
RCP-002087	City Of Travelers Rest, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2661473.8		Yes	2661473
RCP-002088	Town Of Turbeville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	391803.2	1	Yes	391803.2
RCP-002089	City Of Union, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3803527.86	7	Yes	3803527.86
RCP-002090	Town Of Varnville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	805260	1	Yes	805260
RCP-002091	City Of Walhalla, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2226358.18	1	Yes	2200000
RCP-002092	City Of Walterboro, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2701301.32	1	Yes	2701301.32
RCP-002093	Town Of Ware Shoals, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1072355.88	1	Yes	1072355.88
RCP-002094	City Of West Columbia, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8960195.6	3	Yes	8960195.6
RCP-002095	Town Of West Pelzer, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	470960.38	1	Yes	470960.4
RCP-002096	Town Of West Union, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	166279.88	2	Yes	166279.88
RCP-002097	City Of Westminster, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1289913.7	1	Yes	1289913.7
RCP-002098	Town Of Whitmire, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	723865.12	2	Yes	699065.22
RCP-002099	Town Of Williamston, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2120815.26		Yes	2120815.26
RCP-002102	City Of Woodruff, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2199474.62	1	Yes	2199474.62
RCP-002104	City Of York, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4187863.4	5	Yes	4187863.4
RCP-003179	City Of Antelope, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11105.74	1	Yes	11105.74
RCP-003180	City Of Arlington, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	133268.94	1	Yes	133268.94
RCP-003181	Town Of Butte Falls, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	101506.52	14	Yes	101506.52
RCP-003182	City Of Cove, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	145041.04	3	Yes	145041.04
RCP-003183	City Of Gaston, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	160366.96	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003185	City Of Halfway, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64857.54	2	Yes	64000
RCP-003186	City Of Helix, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40869.14		Yes	40869.14
RCP-003187	City Of Idanha, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35760.5	6	Yes	35760.5
RCP-003189	City Of Long Creek, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42201.84	1	Yes	42201.84
RCP-003190	City Of North Powder, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102172.86	2	Yes	102172.86
RCP-003287	Town Of Clio, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	327581.32	1	Yes	327581.32
RCP-003294	Ocqueoc Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65155	9	Yes	65155
RCP-003295	Polkton Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	274491.74		Yes	274491.74
RCP-003296	Almer Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	206919.68		Yes	206919.68
RCP-003297	Novi Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15868.38		Yes	0
RCP-003298	Orleans Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	297085.8	1	Yes	297085.8
RCP-003299	Dorr Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	829885.62	6	Yes	829885.62
RCP-003300	Brown Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77660.56	1	Yes	77660.56
RCP-003301	Bainbridge Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	294563.68	2	Yes	294563.68
RCP-003302	Village Of Carney, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19126.16	1	Yes	19126.16
RCP-003303	Emerson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95000.18	4	Yes	95000.18
RCP-003305	Eaton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	373093.5		Yes	0
RCP-003306	Leonidas Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	125055.58	17	Yes	103531.07
RCP-040567	St. Lucie County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63767844	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-038044	Arlington, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35247893	32	Yes	10000000
RCP-038626	Waller County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10730888	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-038620	Youngstown, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82775370	61	Yes	3930400
RCP-036712	York County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40331830	25	Yes	0
RCP-038243	Carter County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10953291	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-038138	Orange County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16198695	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-038235	Tempe, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45869312	3	No		29210898	24836127	0	0
RCP-038159	Hendricks County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33080915	89	Yes	10000000
RCP-038164	Haywood County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12104347	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-039095	Minnehaha County, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37514015	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-039101	New Albany, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16927916	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-036014	City Of Boise, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36904682	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-039100	Joliet, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22207675	2	No		14330607	14000000	0	0
RCP-038999	Dayton, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	137976174	17	No		32926074.45	29754568.83	26552959.78	0
RCP-039005	Carroll County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23307039	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22144651	118	Yes	10000000
RCP-038691	Lapeer County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17016633	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-038774	San Rafael City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16088886	1	No		16187373	15773808	11868170	3086635
RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78052072	37	No		13849922	394324	9074732	0
RCP-039077	Yuma, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23071661	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-039069	Washington County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26423010	24	No		5718151	7869900	10370847	0
RCP-039075	Rock Island, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26506259	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-039103	Santa Monica, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28570125	1	No		139295423	143292372	70957141	24336525
RCP-038977	Vermilion County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14715103	44	Yes	10000000
RCP-037277	Pasco, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17464312	6	Yes	5389119.11
RCP-038922	Hamilton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17161883	56	Yes	10000000
RCP-053279	Town Of Stratford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25928479.41	1	No		7912144	14835494	3180841.41	0
RCP-038755	Edmond, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12741315	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-038874	Cranston, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42592330.15	6	No		12295535	20511624	4104451	61116571
RCP-036076	Durham City, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51881733	32	Yes	10000000
RCP-031490	Shrewsbury, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11515684.58	2	Yes	9964084.58
RCP-031529	Watertown, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10742412.62	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-031560	Woburn, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12024424.02	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-049080	Aberdeen City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15782871.82	21	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-031400	Marlborough, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11835813.82	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-031925	Puyallup City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11836538	12	Yes	2840000
RCP-039692	Glynn County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16566971	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-039517	Macon County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20202529	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-039483	Garden Grove, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48374570	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037064	Roseville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17644859	1	No		19278632	0	0	0
RCP-035888	Omaha City, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	112591455	36	No		30762643	0	0	0
RCP-037170	York County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13262590	2	No		14680254	9592842	313152	10789471
RCP-039848	Long Beach City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	135753078	8	No		205217000	181365000	789000	0
RCP-036194	Erie County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	178447094	15	No		131414748.69	0	0	0
RCP-036794	Auburn, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21395055	14	Yes	7750977.66
RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	355426891	94	No		191411155	119317901	20325255	0
RCP-035868	Bernalillo County,  New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	131911293	27	No		17986816	0	0	0
RCP-053031	St. Martin Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10378345	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-039691	Grand Rapids City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92279500	29	No		21565081	43164931	13261472	10787785
RCP-039510	Napa County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26755157	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-039501	Taney County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10863358	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-036985	Gilroy City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10964521	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037065	Santa Rosa County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35800640	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-035837	Mahoning County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44418992	108	Yes	10000000
RCP-036033	City Of New Orleans, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	387523049	6	No		114099494	114099494	114099494	114099494
RCP-036141	City Of Milwaukee, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	394226649	75	No		62761196	72343154	100457758	0
RCP-036795	Greenville, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17908547	1	No		23919005	27876046	42072693	0
RCP-036163	City Of Henderson, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	37368428	37	No		24991300	29264305	0	0
RCP-039595	San Marcos City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18279146	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-035902	Lorain County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	60181428	15	No		2213000.64	6546492.95	11249828.6	11715517.55
RCP-037334	Wood County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16222392	4	Yes	212000
RCP-040564	Haverford, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19840290	47	Yes	10000000
RCP-040586	St. Louis County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	193112666	18	No		94231660	84206032.41	0	57880412.34
RCP-037077	Mishawaka, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11883602	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-036956	County Of Burke, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17575650	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-040579	City and County of Denver, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	308048870	81	No		731010528	315166011	62297764	0
RCP-037218	Hollywood, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29390502	96	No		14636872	10360790	4392840	0
RCP-037020	St. Clair County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50440961	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-039809	Menifee, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13213674	16	No		18037867	0	0	0
RCP-035892	County Of Stanislaus, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106959250	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-040610	Ontario, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45609291	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039647	Allegan County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22935850	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	270661716	70	No		526464099	391345915	160710606	19589332
RCP-037311	Tehama County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12641804	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-039579	Superior, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17082059	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-039924	Schenectady, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52971798	63	No		9940467	2542661	0	0
RCP-039926	Cole County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14906817	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-037548	Pittsfield, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40602779.37	72	Yes	2600000
RCP-036658	Virginia Beach City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	136429703	27	No		108623635	94672334	0	0
RCP-037582	Union City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14099826	2	No		10889351	3210475	0	0
RCP-040532	Allen County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19880482	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-036731	Provo, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33880698	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-040024	Conroe, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15844218	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-036278	Stark County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71985871	5	No		11036061	13449877	21853287	0
RCP-037355	Manassas, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50606650	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-037413	Goodyear, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10350308	5	Yes	9955308
RCP-037550	Nash County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18316281	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-037554	Boone County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35052822	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-037559	Troy, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42879140	49	Yes	10000000
RCP-040427	Henrico County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	64257518	35	No		71033672	0	0	0
RCP-040415	Jackson, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31444825	29	Yes	6260938.67
RCP-036121	Davis County, Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	69048017	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-036140	Mercer County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71368970	43	No		15041207	26186653	30141110	0
RCP-047249	Covina City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11351049	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-047253	Cypress City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11723277	1	No		3619621	8098041	0	0
RCP-040478	Coffee County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10166820	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-036797	Miami County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20780971	66	Yes	10000000
RCP-053104	Lawrence County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11549991	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-053127	County Of Harnett, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26411744	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-037829	Costa Mesa, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26481513	1	No		35071318	25860522	26494923	33094300
RCP-040113	Lake Charles, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16918986	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-040098	Iron County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10651833	4	Yes	9791833
RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16738484	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24074863	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-040074	Broken Arrow City, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13768466	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-040316	Medford, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18283804	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-035877	Plano City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	36424316	10	No		92634304	0	0	0
RCP-037622	Port Huron, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17959874	39	Yes	10000000
RCP-040288	Knoxville, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42453411	55	No		18288197	0	0	0
RCP-053191	City Of Allen, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10159869	11	No		13724024	7206103	9264327	-2466686
RCP-053196	Canadian County, Ok	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28806702	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-000943	City Of Santa Fe, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15049631	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-053203	City Of Burlington, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11516517	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-049058	City Of San Luis, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11615161.18	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-003307	Village Of Perrinton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41194.76		Yes	41194.76
RCP-003308	Lowell Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	710925.18	2	Yes	710925.18
RCP-003309	Reno Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60846.36	4	Yes	60846.37
RCP-003310	Jefferson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	315371.24	3	Yes	315371.24
RCP-003311	Richmond Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	162677.34	2	Yes	162677.34
RCP-003312	Oneida Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	411842.68	16	Yes	0
RCP-003313	Hill Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	137035.7	3	Yes	137035.7
RCP-003314	Oliver Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31001.16	1	Yes	31001.16
RCP-003315	Grayling Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	609514.58	5	Yes	609514.58
RCP-003316	Alcona Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95630.74	1	Yes	95630.74
RCP-003317	City Of Vassar, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	267135.52	1	Yes	267135.52
RCP-003318	Green Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	124950.48	2	Yes	124950.48
RCP-003319	Rose Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	146283.5	1	Yes	146283.5
RCP-003321	Scio Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1883294.96	8	Yes	1883294.96
RCP-003322	Newton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	269762.74	6	Yes	269762.74
RCP-003323	Lexington Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	248534.82	1	Yes	248534.82
RCP-003324	Burr Oak Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	192942.88	3	Yes	192000
RCP-003325	Dover Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59795.48		Yes	0
RCP-003326	Comstock Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1638753.5	9	Yes	1638753.48
RCP-003327	Hiawatha Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	130310	5	Yes	130310
RCP-003328	Forest Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106665.04	1	Yes	106665.04
RCP-003329	Centerville Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	134198.3	1	Yes	134198.29
RCP-003330	Readmond Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62422.7	1	Yes	62422.7
RCP-003331	Village Of Kinde, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43506.72	2	Yes	43506.72
RCP-003332	Adams Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	186427.4	3	Yes	186427.4
RCP-003334	Forest Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	126001.38	5	Yes	126001.38
RCP-003335	Kawkawlin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	489713.44	2	Yes	489713.44
RCP-003336	Pittsford Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	164358.76	4	Yes	164358.76
RCP-003337	Village Of Kalkaska, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	220055.76	2	Yes	219176
RCP-003338	White Oak Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	126316.64	2	Yes	126316.64
RCP-003339	Village Of Lakewood Club, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	135774.62	6	Yes	135774.62
RCP-003340	City Of Mcbain, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70199.26	2	Yes	70199.26
RCP-003341	Shelby Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	171820.06	1	Yes	171000
RCP-003342	Belknap Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	74192.64	2	Yes	74192.64
RCP-003343	Merritt Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	143866.44	1	Yes	143866.45
RCP-003344	Star Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96891.8	2	Yes	96891.8
RCP-003345	Dwight Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44347.42	4	Yes	44347.42
RCP-003346	Carlton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	256311.38	3	Yes	256438.66
RCP-003347	Marenisco Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55697		Yes	55697
RCP-003348	Alabaster Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48445.9	1	Yes	48445.9
RCP-003349	Village Of Marion, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	89955.94	6	Yes	89955.94
RCP-003350	Village Of Parma, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	78186	3	Yes	78186
RCP-003351	Hume Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	73877.36	2	Yes	73877.36
RCP-003352	Arvon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44977.98	1	Yes	44977.98
RCP-003353	Cedar Creek Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	190315.66	2	Yes	190315.66
RCP-003354	Grant Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85962.58	1	Yes	85962.58
RCP-003355	Village Of Sand Lake, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56537.72	1	Yes	56537.72
RCP-003356	Nester Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31211.34	1	Yes	31211.34
RCP-003357	Moorland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	178020.28	7	Yes	178020.28
RCP-003358	Superior Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1501402.54	6	Yes	1501402.54
RCP-003359	Webber Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115702.68	6	Yes	115702.68
RCP-003360	Richland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	297506.16	15	Yes	297506.16
RCP-003361	Village Of Alanson, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80287.78	1	Yes	80287.78
RCP-003362	Montague Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	171399.7	2	Yes	171399.7
RCP-003363	Fraser Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	318629	14	Yes	273616.11
RCP-003364	Pierson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	325354.68	3	Yes	325354.68
RCP-003365	Garfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	117173.92	1	Yes	117173.92
RCP-003367	Saugatuck Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	353098.1	1	Yes	352390.03
RCP-003368	Albee Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	212384.3	2	Yes	212384.3
RCP-003369	Village Of Lake Ann, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28479.04		Yes	28479.04
RCP-003370	Richland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	157317.8	1	Yes	157317.8
RCP-003371	Kearney Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	120536.76	2	Yes	120536.76
RCP-003372	Thompson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	79762.32	2	Yes	79762.32
RCP-003373	Portland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	363817.16		No		0	0	0	334724.34
RCP-003374	Osceola Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	191261.46		Yes	191261.46
RCP-003375	Genoa Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2174285.62	5	Yes	2174285.62
RCP-003377	City Of Standish, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	145232.6	1	No		10000	0	0	0
RCP-003378	Kimball Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	973541.9	10	Yes	973541.9
RCP-003379	Cleveland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108556.66	1	Yes	108556.66
RCP-003380	Greenwood Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	162362.08	7	Yes	162362.08
RCP-003381	Wilcox Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	86855.26		No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003382	Custer Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	100990.26	1	Yes	100990.26
RCP-003383	Village Of Wolverine, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24590.76	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003384	Custer Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	103617.48	2	Yes	103617.48
RCP-003385	Cheshire Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	240968.44	1	Yes	240968.44
RCP-003386	Laketon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	805084.68	7	Yes	803470.75
RCP-003388	Village Of Howard City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	192312.36		Yes	192312.36
RCP-003389	Mendon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	193468.32	1	Yes	193468.32
RCP-003390	Walker Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33628.4	1	Yes	33628.4
RCP-003391	Muskegon Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1891596.96	8	Yes	1891596.94
RCP-003392	Echo Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	90481.38	1	Yes	90481.38
RCP-003393	Northfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	911434.46	5	Yes	604434.46
RCP-003394	Brant Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	199563.48	1	Yes	199560
RCP-003395	Humboldt Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48340.82		Yes	48340.82
RCP-003396	Bear Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	73036.66	6	Yes	73000
RCP-003397	Porter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	132832.12	1	Yes	132832.12
RCP-003398	City Of Manton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	163412.96	1	Yes	163412.96
RCP-003399	Venice Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	220791.38	1	Yes	220791.38
RCP-003400	Sagola Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113075.46	1	Yes	113075.46
RCP-003401	Arbela Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	306964.14	7	No		129746.16	64873	32431.04	39956.97
RCP-003402	Village Of Stevensville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	118645.16	1	Yes	118645.16
RCP-003403	Kingston Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	117279	7	Yes	117279
RCP-003404	Helena Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	103617.46	1	Yes	103617.46
RCP-003405	Schoolcraft Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	500117.2	1	Yes	500117.2
RCP-003406	Tilden Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105824.32	3	Yes	105824.32
RCP-003407	Frankenmuth Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	197566.8	1	Yes	197566.8
RCP-003408	Coloma Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	517667.04	2	Yes	0
RCP-003409	Superior Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	137456.04	2	Yes	137456.04
RCP-003410	Antwerp Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	886843.7	2	Yes	886843.7
RCP-003411	Woodhull Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	388828.26	16	Yes	262014.93
RCP-003412	Whitehall Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	184956.16	2	Yes	184956.16
RCP-003413	Slagle Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53279.98	2	Yes	53279.98
RCP-003414	Covington Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45713.6	13	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003415	Butman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	207865.48	3	Yes	207865.48
RCP-003416	Sumner Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	196305.72	5	Yes	196305.72
RCP-003417	City Of Eastpointe, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3371351.24	1	Yes	3371351.24
RCP-003418	Lima Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	415941.16	2	Yes	415941.16
RCP-003419	City Of Keego Harbor, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	355304.96	1	Yes	355304.96
RCP-003420	Chester Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	216167.5	12	Yes	216167.5
RCP-003421	Coldwater Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	360454.3	1	Yes	360454.3
RCP-003422	Plainfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	390509.68	1	Yes	388948
RCP-003423	Garfield Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1864273.9	1	Yes	1864273.9
RCP-003424	Hulbert Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17234.54	1	Yes	17234.54
RCP-003425	City Of Saugatuck, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	100885.16	1	Yes	100885.16
RCP-003426	Osceola Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112970.38	1	Yes	112970.38
RCP-003427	Village Of Emmett, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27323.06		Yes	27323.06
RCP-003428	Liberty Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88800	7	Yes	88800
RCP-003429	Sherman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108871.92	4	Yes	108871.92
RCP-003430	Washington Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2818164.2	7	Yes	2818164.2
RCP-003431	Spurr Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28479.04	3	Yes	28479.04
RCP-003432	Village Of Ashley, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57273.36	1	Yes	57273.36
RCP-003433	Oakland Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2054169.22	1	Yes	2054169.22
RCP-003434	Sheridan Township, Ulby, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70514.54		Yes	70514.54
RCP-003435	Mills Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	438430.14	2	Yes	375565
RCP-003436	Dewitt Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1640224.74	1	Yes	1640224.74
RCP-003437	City Of Gaastra, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34153.84		Yes	17000
RCP-003438	Sauble Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36360.7	3	Yes	36360.7
RCP-003439	City Of Allen Park, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2831090.12	1	Yes	2831090.09
RCP-003440	Gladwin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116858.64	1	Yes	116858.64
RCP-003441	Hamilton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	153954.96	7	Yes	153954.96
RCP-003442	Jasper Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	119590.96	11	Yes	119590
RCP-003443	City Of Wixom, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1476391.42	1	Yes	1476391.42
RCP-003444	Moore Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	118645.16	15	Yes	118645.16
RCP-003445	Castleton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	214065.72	1	Yes	214065.72
RCP-003446	Village Of Fairgrove, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55171.56	1	Yes	55171.56
RCP-003447	Soo Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	322727.44	2	Yes	322727.44
RCP-003448	Bertrand Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	273440.86	4	Yes	273440.86
RCP-003449	Masonville Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	176549.04	3	Yes	176549.04
RCP-003450	Jamestown Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	935394.7	1	Yes	935394.7
RCP-003451	Village Of Port Sanilac, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61056.54	2	Yes	0
RCP-003452	Waterloo Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	304652.2	9	Yes	304652.2
RCP-003453	Village Of Copemish, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20282.12	1	Yes	20282.12
RCP-003454	City Of Petoskey, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	604890.68		Yes	604890.68
RCP-003455	Ray Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426555.12	1	Yes	426555.12
RCP-003456	Village Of Custer, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29950.28	2	Yes	29950.28
RCP-003457	White River Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	146178.42	5	Yes	146178.42
RCP-003458	Village Of Blissfield, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	343219.76	1	Yes	343219.76
RCP-003459	Jefferson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	268922.02	3	Yes	268382.99
RCP-003460	Boardman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	170453.9	5	Yes	170453.9
RCP-003462	China Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	362556.08	10	Yes	362556.08
RCP-003463	Chapin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105614.16	3	Yes	105614.16
RCP-003464	Bushnell Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	124056.62	1	Yes	124056.62
RCP-003465	Village Of Holly, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	646190.54	1	Yes	646190.53
RCP-003466	City Of Pinconning, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	129259.12		Yes	129259.12
RCP-003467	Caldwell Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	141764.68	3	Yes	141764.68
RCP-003468	Village Of Vanderbilt, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59375.12	3	Yes	59375.12
RCP-038389	Yamhill County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20802919	8	Yes	7754909.65
RCP-036002	Yakima County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	48729139	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-036157	Riverside City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	73535189	32	No		74903216	0	0	0
RCP-036503	Buffalo City, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	331356932	31	No		95897484	51586372	39257535	77364032
RCP-038481	Wilson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28097926	13	Yes	3541319
RCP-038464	Eaton County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21418266	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-036175	Pittsburgh City, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	335070222	23	No		143644795	115149402	80561525	0
RCP-036676	San Juan Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	237708158	34	No		52735493	36828484	0	0
RCP-039009	Ft Lauderdale, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38133766	1	No		16642050	19560451	1931265	1931265
RCP-038998	Nassau County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17214367	3	No		16927566	9996589	0	0
RCP-039007	Comanche County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23454078	62	Yes	10000000
RCP-038756	Jefferson County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12688615	38	No		5338544	3706653	3643418	0
RCP-038759	Lasalle County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21107679	51	Yes	10000000
RCP-037086	Butler County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12996677	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-039139	Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11403341	2	No		9603711	0	0	0
RCP-039196	Woodbury County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20027326	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-039033	Raleigh County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14249514	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039034	Chattanooga, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38640506	4	No		23922557	14717949	0	0
RCP-039140	City Of Clarksville, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25531478	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43281853	35	Yes	10000000
RCP-037753	Oshkosh, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20514484	13	No		10201733	5289094	4675927	5250629
RCP-036842	Catoosa County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13126623	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-035195	Hamilton County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	65654674	99	Yes	10000000
RCP-038573	Caldwell County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15962113	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54536596	121	No		9891246.27	16714409.21	20154617.44	26384031.47
RCP-036105	Somerset County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63891573	34	Yes	10000000
RCP-038758	Pittsylvania County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11723057	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-037081	Lincoln Park, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19146461	18	Yes	3129001
RCP-037205	Hamilton County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71441615	75	No		25319000	37931000	8191615	0
RCP-037157	Roane County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10368828	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-037087	Monroe County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33073146	15	No		7911832	7752896.48	11723334.01	0
RCP-050685	Estero Village, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16964413		Yes	10000000
RCP-050705	Greenacres City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20593599	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-050714	Haines City City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13026702	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-050715	Hallandale Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19957515	51	No		9556703	10400812	0	0
RCP-050767	Lake Worth Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19295888	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-050770	Lauderdale Lakes City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18127897	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-037173	James City County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14863696	25	No		14545840.93	26040384.35	26689630.53	22049172.17
RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16465385	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-037240	Craighead County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21430698	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-037239	Allentown, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57132604	15	No		10079420	12061904	9507549	8694062
RCP-037411	Jackson County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14174927	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037412	Stearns County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31286930	19	No		2991561	9165154	6004547	0
RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15140874	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-035981	Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40726716	26	No		14672620	10234118	0	0
RCP-036063	Hall County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39710268	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-036861	Savannah, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55591247	2	No		42639776	16078292	0	0
RCP-036442	City Of Fremont, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44211563	1	No		26277479	60703523	35946063	47357605
RCP-036098	Anne Arundel County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	112509414	136	Yes	10000000
RCP-039697	Fayette County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25109959	2	No		9002450	14212052	1895457	1500000
RCP-036151	Commonwealth Of Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2183237290.9	333	No		595788895.56	0	0	0
RCP-037053	Grafton County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17459302	63	Yes	10000000
RCP-037090	Warren, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27318439	9	Yes	2000000
RCP-036035	City Of Tampa, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	80373543	5	No		87761637	20760538	0	0
RCP-035932	Spokane County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	101547383	68	Yes	9636329
RCP-036060	County Of Summit, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	105085433	10	No		142162637	0	0	0
RCP-035964	Sarasota County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	84249299	20	No		30470849	2451710.15	0	0
RCP-036276	Johnson County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	117009332	40	No		22568349	62968251	0	0
RCP-035991	Washoe County, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	91587038	116	Yes	10000000
RCP-040581	Grayson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26457584	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-035842	Forsyth County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74256322	68	No		27125319	0	0	0
RCP-039464	Burbank, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25547081	21	No		17365624	0	0	0
RCP-037012	Lakewood, Colorado, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21581066		No		16958421	9701546	0	0
RCP-037166	Onslow County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38447136	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-035844	Montgomery County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43992250	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-039868	Falls Church, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18004561	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-036491	Daviess County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19717322	3	Yes	9707622
RCP-039708	Jamestown, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28079145	60	No		2203463.57	2316210.82	2497930.57	2463018.26
RCP-036096	City Of North Las Vegas, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	46340548	20	No		30451647.01	0	0	0
RCP-037186	Pensacola, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19153643	15	No		11391460.37	7203058.65	7203058.65	7203058.65
RCP-036040	City Of Reno, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51519997	57	Yes	10000000
RCP-036010	State Of Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	4853535459.7	31	No		1421843620	0	0	0
RCP-036019	County Of Lehigh, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71735692	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-036777	Gordon County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11258633	7	Yes	9872391
RCP-035871	Nueces County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	70371362	66	Yes	10000000
RCP-036928	Utica, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60881737	31	No		11419823	15979805	0	0
RCP-036890	Ontario County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21322895	12	No		11922945.26	3297597.69	0	0
RCP-039884	Ashland County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10388640	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039877	Saginaw, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52089151	31	No		6126945	6578857	8788092	11145720
RCP-037571	Springfield, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40276290	24	No		28325177	44210694	25186597	0
RCP-037744	Scott County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33592150	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-037808	Pittsburg, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16290477	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-036023	City Of Jacksonville Duval County Portion, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	343695791	11	No		132738000	83921000	0	0
RCP-039984	Taylor County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26811486	10	No		6155471	5780444	0	0
RCP-037856	Lakewood Township, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31890666	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-040038	Palm Bay, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18009865	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-036720	Hancock County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14719959	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-037167	Blair County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23663855	3	No		2305444	3539935	8888100	8455392.43
RCP-039728	Bastrop County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17233403	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-037561	Paramount City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18895185	23	Yes	8106928.03
RCP-037520	Syracuse, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123076929	60	No		36546586	12643117	15173143	25387349
RCP-037512	Flagstaff, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13252816	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-037524	Fairfield, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19805577	2	No		20538784	0	0	0
RCP-037517	Brockton, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34590793	16	No		13318422	0	0	0
RCP-036167	County Of Ventura, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	164326748	5	No		43287691	68321123	75741779	58333095
RCP-047255	Danville Town, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10647738	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-047321	La Mirada City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11526398	5	No		11940013	0	11940013	11940013
RCP-047331	Lincoln City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11548406	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-047362	Morgan Hill City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10992695	1	No		7364378	13855381	9847811	2492433
RCP-038075	Christian County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17208540	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-037935	Parkersburg, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21850407	16	Yes	8875723
RCP-035899	Winnebago County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54886298	87	Yes	10000000
RCP-036739	Calhoun County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22066439	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-037838	Medina County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34913553	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-037761	Alhambra, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21848669	108	Yes	10000000
RCP-037649	Lee County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11999847	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-040161	Atlantic City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32417555	14	Yes	9600000
RCP-039240	Schenectady County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30165010	7	No		15082505	0	0	0
RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13109724	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-040350	Vacaville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12675830	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-040349	City Of Richmond, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27740723	28	No		17912870.26	15518990.99	27270371.44	0
RCP-053079	Sunrise, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17326004	45	Yes	10000000
RCP-037791	Gulfport, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19503534	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-038356	Tuscaloosa, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20529224	21	No		11086966.61	10426276.43	0	0
RCP-037669	Williamson County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12935687	40	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-047203	Azusa City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11954843	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037930	Cambridge, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88119386.58	37	Yes	10000000
RCP-037922	Lewisville, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19541144	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-037925	Weber County, Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50543325	17	No		13075648	10509109	8604042	0
RCP-003469	Meridian Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4539412.36	12	Yes	4539412.36
RCP-003470	Larkin Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	568109.62		Yes	568109.62
RCP-003471	Casnovia Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	290675.4	13	Yes	290675.4
RCP-003472	Wisner Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	67992.4	6	Yes	67992.4
RCP-003473	Village Of Mancelona, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	143551.18	5	Yes	143551.18
RCP-003474	City Of Buchanan, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	447993.2	1	Yes	447993.2
RCP-003475	Case Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	69253.46	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003476	Ausable Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26482.36	2	Yes	26482.36
RCP-003477	Grass Lake Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521660.4		Yes	521660.4
RCP-003478	Sage Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	255050.32	5	Yes	255050.32
RCP-003479	Spring Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1325694.22	7	Yes	1325694.22
RCP-003480	Inland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	221632.1	1	Yes	0
RCP-003481	Fife Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112970.38	11	Yes	112970.38
RCP-003482	Lawrence Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	238341.22	4	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003483	Mayfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	827783.84	1	Yes	827783.84
RCP-003484	Springvale Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	230459.56	2	Yes	230459.56
RCP-003485	Hamlin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	300782.26	7	Yes	300782.25
RCP-003486	Grant Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	97312.16		Yes	97312.16
RCP-003487	Mueller Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23434.78	3	Yes	23434.78
RCP-003488	Orange Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	137876.4	1	Yes	137876.4
RCP-003489	Leelanau Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	158053.42	2	Yes	158053.42
RCP-003491	Village Of Elsie, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102776.76		No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003492	Greendale Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	186217.22	1	Yes	186217.22
RCP-003493	City Of Sturgis, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1141368.58	1	Yes	1141368.58
RCP-003494	Tobacco Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	268816.94	2	No		0	0	268816.94	268816.94
RCP-003495	Columbia Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75874.06		Yes	75571
RCP-003496	Lincoln Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65575.36	1	Yes	65575.36
RCP-003497	Maple Valley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	205133.18	23	Yes	205133.18
RCP-003498	Hawes Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92162.8	3	Yes	92162.8
RCP-003500	Nadeau Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	97417.24	2	Yes	97417.24
RCP-003501	Gilmore Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47920.46	2	Yes	47920.46
RCP-003503	Blair Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	955466.64	1	Yes	477738.76
RCP-003504	Village Of North Branch, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105719.24	1	Yes	105719.24
RCP-003505	Village Of Carleton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	247378.86	1	Yes	247378.85
RCP-003506	Ingallston Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	93844.22	2	Yes	93844.22
RCP-003507	Village Of Morley, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51808.74	7	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003508	Sheridan Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	257887.7	1	Yes	257887.7
RCP-003509	Sherman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106244.68	1	Yes	106244.68
RCP-003510	Ensign Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75979.14	7	Yes	75979.14
RCP-003511	Village Of Lake Linden, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	99413.92	1	Yes	99413.92
RCP-003512	Koehler Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87570.48	1	Yes	87570.48
RCP-003513	Peaine Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30685.9	1	Yes	30685.9
RCP-003514	Imlay Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	324303.8	4	Yes	220000
RCP-003515	Clam Union Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	93528.94	3	Yes	93528.94
RCP-003516	Summit Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	99308.84	1	Yes	99308.84
RCP-003517	Pickford Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	165304.56	3	Yes	165304.56
RCP-003518	Village Of Barryton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37096.32	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003519	Village Of Boyne Falls, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31211.34		Yes	0
RCP-003521	Center Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61371.82	2	Yes	30686.26
RCP-003522	City Of Hudson, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	232246.06	1	Yes	232246.06
RCP-003523	Aetna Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	212489.4	1	Yes	212489.4
RCP-003524	City Of Escanaba, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1277878.84	1	Yes	1277878.84
RCP-003525	St Clair Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	740034.76	1	Yes	740034.76
RCP-003526	Irving Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	309801.54	9	Yes	100000
RCP-003527	Fremont Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	233402.04	3	Yes	233402.04
RCP-003528	Evart Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	156056.74		Yes	156056.74
RCP-003529	Camden Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102585	1	Yes	102585
RCP-003530	Highland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	131045.62	1	Yes	131045.62
RCP-003531	Village Of Benzonia, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53174.88	2	Yes	53174.88
RCP-003532	Chandler Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45818.68		Yes	45818.68
RCP-003534	Geneva Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107190.48	5	Yes	107190.48
RCP-003536	Lakefield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105193.8	3	Yes	105193.8
RCP-003537	Crystal Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	101410.62	1	Yes	101410.62
RCP-003538	Eagle Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	274281.56		Yes	274281.56
RCP-003539	Lee Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433280.78	1	Yes	433280.78
RCP-003540	Bliss Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66836.42	2	Yes	66836.42
RCP-003541	Weldon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26902.7	2	Yes	26902.7
RCP-003542	Au Gres Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92688.24	10	Yes	3600
RCP-003543	City Of Corunna, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	351416.68	1	Yes	351416.68
RCP-003544	Village Of Armada, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	180227.14	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003545	Village Of Pentwater, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	89115.22	1	Yes	89115.22
RCP-003546	Backus Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34469.1	1	Yes	34469.1
RCP-003547	Tecumseh Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	190800	1	Yes	190800
RCP-003548	City Of Fennville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	150171.78	1	Yes	150171.78
RCP-003549	Lyon Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2204235.9	1	Yes	2204235.9
RCP-003550	Bethany Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	141659.58	1	Yes	141659.58
RCP-003551	Norwood Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76084.22	5	Yes	76084.22
RCP-003553	Lynn Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	128418.4	4	Yes	128418.4
RCP-003555	Wilson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	206078.98		Yes	205475.98
RCP-003556	Sherman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107926.12	1	Yes	107926.12
RCP-003557	Bingham Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85647.3	1	Yes	85647.31
RCP-003558	Village Of Oakley, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28794.3	1	Yes	28794.3
RCP-003559	Freeman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	121587.66	1	Yes	121587.66
RCP-003560	Green Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	660797.86	7	Yes	660797.86
RCP-003561	Village Of Pinckney, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	254314.7	7	Yes	254314.7
RCP-003562	Village Of Almont, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	293722.96	3	Yes	293722.96
RCP-003564	City Of Owosso, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1517586.22	5	Yes	1517586.22
RCP-003566	Hartland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1594195.88	2	Yes	1594195.88
RCP-003567	Blendon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	714813.46	2	Yes	714813.46
RCP-003568	Grant Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	350891.24	1	Yes	350891.24
RCP-003569	Bridgeton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	227622.16	1	Yes	227662.16
RCP-003570	Pine Grove Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	309801.54	3	Yes	309801.54
RCP-003571	Gilead Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68728	1	Yes	68728
RCP-003572	Village Of Stockbridge, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	131360.88	1	Yes	131360.88
RCP-003573	Village Of Bellaire, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112024.58	2	Yes	112024.58
RCP-003576	Sherman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	222893.18	8	Yes	222893
RCP-003577	Village Of Ellsworth, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36465.78	2	Yes	36465.78
RCP-003578	New Haven Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	134828.84	9	Yes	134828.83
RCP-003580	Mastodon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50442.58	6	Yes	50442.58
RCP-003581	Aetna Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44032.16	2	Yes	44032.16
RCP-003582	Melrose Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	147859.84		Yes	0
RCP-003583	Jordan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	103512.38	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003584	Village Of Eau Claire, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62737.96	4	Yes	62737.96
RCP-003585	Holland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26797.62	3	Yes	26797.62
RCP-003586	Flowerfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	168247.04	2	Yes	168247.04
RCP-003587	Walton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	238274.26	1	Yes	238274.26
RCP-003588	Ida Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506947.98	2	Yes	506947.98
RCP-003589	Metamora Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	390509.68	8	Yes	390509.68
RCP-003590	Bowne Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	364447.68	1	Yes	364447.68
RCP-003591	Clyde Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571262.28	3	Yes	571262.28
RCP-003592	Village Of Clayton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34679.28	1	Yes	34679.28
RCP-003593	Deerfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	142632	5	Yes	142632
RCP-003594	Coldsprings Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	162046.8	9	Yes	162046.8
RCP-003595	Genesee Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2148013.44	7	Yes	2148013.44
RCP-003596	Village Of Alpha, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14081.88	1	Yes	14081.88
RCP-003597	Torch Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123899.6	1	Yes	123899.6
RCP-003598	Rapid River Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	127157.34	1	Yes	127157.34
RCP-003599	Johnstown Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	329348.04	1	Yes	329348.04
RCP-003600	Denmark Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	160050.12	7	Yes	160050.12
RCP-003601	Dafter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	130940.54	5	Yes	130940.54
RCP-003602	Hanover Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	343745.2	5	Yes	343056.14
RCP-003603	Convis Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	172555.68	2	Yes	172555.68
RCP-003604	Valley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	234032.56	1	Yes	234032.56
RCP-003605	City Of Munising, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	231510.44	6	Yes	0
RCP-003606	Dundee Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	288258.36	10	Yes	288258.36
RCP-003607	Aurelius Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	459342.78	7	Yes	459342.78
RCP-003608	Meade Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70619.62	2	Yes	70619.62
RCP-003609	Long Rapids Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102986.94	1	Yes	102986.94
RCP-003610	Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	298031.62	3	Yes	298031.62
RCP-003611	Selma Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	225100.04	5	Yes	225100.04
RCP-003612	Newkirk Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47500.1	7	Yes	47500.1
RCP-003613	Leslie Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	256416.46	4	Yes	256416.46
RCP-003615	Homer Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	419934.52		Yes	419934.52
RCP-003616	Mitchell Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35309.8	3	Yes	1
RCP-003617	City Of Walled Lake, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	749702.92	1	Yes	749702.92
RCP-003618	Hamlin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	366339.28	1	Yes	366339.4
RCP-003620	Village Of Owendale, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23539.88	1	Yes	23539.88
RCP-003621	Pleasantview Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88274.52	8	No		44096.38	29145.65	15032.5	0
RCP-003622	Village Of Shepherd, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	156161.82	1	Yes	156161.82
RCP-003623	Unadilla Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	363291.7	1	Yes	363291.7
RCP-003624	Wakeshma Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	142815.56	2	Yes	0
RCP-003625	Elbridge Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102986.94		Yes	102986.94
RCP-003626	Ovid Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	241914.22	3	Yes	241914.22
RCP-003627	Forest Home Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	128523.5		Yes	128523.5
RCP-003629	Benona Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	150697.22	1	Yes	150000
RCP-003630	Peacock Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54015.6	1	Yes	54015.6
RCP-003631	Wells Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	480558.76	3	Yes	479591.46
RCP-003632	Vienna Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58954.78	1	Yes	58954.78
RCP-003633	Noble Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53805.42	4	Yes	53805.42
RCP-003634	Baldwin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	172450.6	2	Yes	172450.6
RCP-003635	Bearinger Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36465.78		Yes	36465.78
RCP-003636	Fawn River Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	141134.14	2	Yes	141134.14
RCP-003637	Waverly Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46239.04	1	Yes	46239.04
RCP-003638	Village Of Kaleva, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48340.82	3	Yes	48340.82
RCP-003639	Village Of Fruitport, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	120746.94	1	Yes	120746.94
RCP-003640	Everett Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	194939.56	1	Yes	194939.56
RCP-038339	Bradford County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11717036	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-038301	Palmdale, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35445019	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-038060	Oconee County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15450878	8	Yes	4690166
RCP-038120	Middletown, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18925154	19	No		8895859	5536733	0	0
RCP-038062	Chemung County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16210350	63	No		16210350	0	0	0
RCP-036516	Hidalgo County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	212973405	139	No		18478428	973134	6999261	6999261
RCP-038463	College Station, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29478326	5	No		16140725.47	0	0	0
RCP-038381	Lafourche Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18960375	5	No		3970767.87	22931142.87	0	0
RCP-053283	City And County Of Honolulu, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	386252141	105	No		246789346	139462795	0	0
RCP-038384	Berkeley County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23147570	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-038380	Lauderdale County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14397912	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-037814	Carbon County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12466601	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-037469	Columbiana County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19789578	117	Yes	10000000
RCP-039153	Cochise County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24458872	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-039177	Gloucester, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23175467.78	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-039154	Jefferson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10585015	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039162	Perth Amboy, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16899892	19	No		4082037.1	5278703.27	83621249.61	87049720.84
RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13893451	75	Yes	10000000
RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	81002217	47	Yes	10000000
RCP-035906	Hinds County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45032202	31	No		5737122	0	13932913	0
RCP-039145	Gainesville, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32408804	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-038899	Kalamazoo County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51485963	6	No		31641047	19844916	0	0
RCP-038811	Skagit County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25096557	45	Yes	10000000
RCP-038590	Biloxi, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11098303	1	No		12084403	4728607	1715068	3279891
RCP-038592	Victoria County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17886237	15	Yes	8750448.3
RCP-038581	New Bedford, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64729754	50	Yes	10000000
RCP-039164	Lakewood, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47219575	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-039260	Pomona, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45366413	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-038586	Northumberland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17645188	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-038597	Redding, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18693433	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-038589	Franklin County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30112177	4	No		7144494	8247056	14275133	12813754.16
RCP-025759	Kennesaw, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12725590	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-025768	Lawrenceville, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11514536	16	Yes	9529491.86
RCP-050776	Leesburg City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11855707	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-050781	Lynn Haven City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10280021	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-025763	Lagrange, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11316988	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-050815	New Smyrna Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13945267	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-049085	Cambridge City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12079281.39	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-016385	College Park City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21972843	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-037408	Johnstown, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30716690	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-037464	Bangor, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20478297	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-035983	Lucas County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	83201577	21	No		23192294.01	11239557.88	8981881.53	4715237.8
RCP-037347	Vanderburgh County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35244730	24	No		15810729	3508917.77	5491001.87	0
RCP-036162	State Of Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1583680553.3	119	No		1233736540	497236552	101740338	715449135
RCP-036637	Alexandria, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59633833	37	No		0	62439382	68493947	0
RCP-036849	Cambria County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25288270	9	No		12285099	12005553	0	0
RCP-039850	Oswego County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22749964	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-035976	Broward County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	379304234	1	No		305783000	73521234	0	0
RCP-035970	State Of Idaho	Idaho	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1094018353.4	318	Yes	0
RCP-039735	Williamson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	114707609	47	Yes	10000000
RCP-039866	Evansville, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64483775	108	No		14500170	15225178	14498168	5605226.16
RCP-036079	Washington County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	116852194	58	No		5493393	6234641	0	0
RCP-036058	Jefferson County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43719346	89	Yes	10000000
RCP-036147	City of Modesto, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45897056	44	Yes	10000000
RCP-039811	Gainesville, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11718342	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-035872	Onondaga County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	89452165	17	No		73808465	4907433	17078931	29381243
RCP-036847	County Of Sedgwick, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	100235109	29	No		15625944	29080199	46480187	0
RCP-039841	Cherokee County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11129853	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-035969	Government Of Guam	Guam	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	603843132	63	No		92068367	92068367	92068367	92068367
RCP-035826	City Of Corpus Christi, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	67553894	6	Yes	4050000
RCP-036866	Ogden, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25612830	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-036807	Peoria County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34803420	11	No		15644260	17277374	1881786	17172505
RCP-036145	Delaware County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	110083961	39	No		62135951	79210450	76855314	0
RCP-039872	Nashua, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16138777	4	No		4227348	11885140	15282369	16138777
RCP-037083	Thornton, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21001371	13	No		11798733	7655786	0	778107
RCP-037163	Sparks, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16230272	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-039356	Alamance County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32925136	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-037349	Kosciusko County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15433397	52	Yes	8593000.24
RCP-037308	Iowa City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18325190	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-036123	Utah County, Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	123581190	63	Yes	10000000
RCP-037343	Fort Collins, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28118971	54	Yes	10000000
RCP-039682	Walker County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13550256	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-035903	County Of Burlington, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	86503822	18	No		18090028	10625186	6438263	0
RCP-037344	Pitt County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35107015	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-040600	Council Bluffs, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24810055	7	No		16262913	13282162	0	0
RCP-036992	Wayne County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12797195	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-035828	State of Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2533160626.5	219	No		1458919287	0	0	0
RCP-035821	Mchenry County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	59781491	73	No		11057112	9380924	9530827	6213673
RCP-036075	Lane County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74212036	44	No		56840199	74212036	52773900	101078043
RCP-036974	St. Clair County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30908749	86	Yes	10000000
RCP-040132	Lawrence, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57351844.87	1	No		82629738	0	0	0
RCP-040109	Bristol Township, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15886687	17	No		2409047.68	54646.2	57390.48	52540
RCP-040112	Champaign, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25277693	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-040081	Pontiac, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37717953	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-040193	Vista, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26178395	34	Yes	10000000
RCP-040310	Johnson County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30722086	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-036666	Humacao Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29998616	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-036665	Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44803757	29	No		16785217	584199	0	0
RCP-037896	Monroe, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18327658	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-036653	City Of Richmond, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	154879828	17	No		16013464	37350148	-29214413	-106960224
RCP-036669	City Of Kansas City, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87516516	126	No		23396855	7759544	0	0
RCP-036178	Webb County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	53736408	37	Yes	10000000
RCP-039991	Manteca City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13928377	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-040001	Michigan City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16549045	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-039990	Enid, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11854984	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-035952	Marion County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	67559569	37	No		14431286	5816785	9027438	4521352
RCP-039953	Muskegon Hts, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10684772	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-037984	Grays Harbor County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14579719	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-037932	Fitchburg, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31238459.95	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-040566	Lake County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44703745	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-035940	County Of Washington, Ar	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46459271	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-037445	St. Joseph County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11841542	6	No		3779934	2435004	5626604	0
RCP-037444	Galveston, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27371621	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-037637	Wyoming, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13155842	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-037549	West Haven, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29008575.69	40	Yes	10000000
RCP-037717	Waukesha, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10883993	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-037713	Elko County, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10251508	3	Yes	9788002
RCP-037587	East St Louis, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36379844	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-036671	Manati Municipio City, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24470030	14	No		4396301	7695569.52	11220151.45	14990592.17
RCP-040369	Coffee County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10978347	2	Yes	8813347
RCP-040510	The City Of Frederick, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10615913	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-053116	City Of Lakewood, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13766236	39	Yes	10000000
RCP-053118	Anderson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14952074	35	Yes	10000000
RCP-053137	Town Of Cheektowaga, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25316853	37	No		10804661	7730210	6781982	21256840
RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10498362	57	Yes	10000000
RCP-036144	Oklahoma County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	154892206	82	Yes	10000000
RCP-037473	Pico Rivera, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14772455	3	No		10227800	4110390	4544655	4544655
RCP-053033	Hays County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44711903	67	Yes	10000000
RCP-037274	Greene County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32814032	32	No		7811501.02	8569795.05	11696752.39	10552480.94
RCP-035966	Galveston County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	66456490	54	No		8300462	5412267	8864089	7438345
RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	121178058	96	No		43283305.18	27256076.1	0	0
RCP-037410	Salem, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35053419.78	46	Yes	10000000
RCP-003641	Briley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	186322.3	6	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003642	Doyle Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62632.88		Yes	0
RCP-003643	Delta Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3510803.96	6	Yes	3510803.96
RCP-003644	Lockport Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	391245.3	8	Yes	391245.3
RCP-003645	Maple Grove Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	265033.74	9	Yes	265033.74
RCP-003646	Indianfields Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	206154.24	1	Yes	206154.24
RCP-003647	Fremont Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	152063.38	1	Yes	152063.38
RCP-003648	Ada Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1558675.9	5	Yes	1558675.88
RCP-003649	Village Of Fife Lake, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50442.58	4	Yes	50442.58
RCP-003650	Wise Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	145547.86	1	Yes	145547.86
RCP-003651	Algoma Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1340091.36		Yes	1340091.36
RCP-003652	Rubicon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45923.78	1	Yes	45923.78
RCP-003653	Pavilion Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	676561.16	2	Yes	676561.16
RCP-003654	Bethel Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	149856.52	1	Yes	149856.52
RCP-003655	Village Of Clarksville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41615.12	1	Yes	41615.12
RCP-003656	Bay Mills Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	152063.38	3	Yes	152063.38
RCP-003657	Belvidere Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	234873.3	5	Yes	234873.3
RCP-003659	Ogemaw Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123689.42	5	Yes	123689.42
RCP-003660	City Of Milan, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	634946.04	4	Yes	634946.04
RCP-003661	Leighton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626959.3	1	Yes	626983
RCP-003662	Ellsworth Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77030.02	2	Yes	77030.02
RCP-003663	Butterfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52649.44	1	Yes	52649.44
RCP-003664	Cumming Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70829.8	1	Yes	70829.8
RCP-003665	Maple Valley Township, Brown City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	120221.48	8	Yes	120221.48
RCP-003666	Crystal Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	89325.4	1	Yes	89325.4
RCP-003667	City Of Croswell, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	240232.82	3	Yes	240232.82
RCP-003669	Village Of Garden, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22173.72	3	Yes	22173.72
RCP-003671	Middle Branch Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	89850.84	4	Yes	89850.84
RCP-003672	Stockbridge Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	291095.76	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003674	Lyons Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	177705.02	4	Yes	177705.02
RCP-003675	Mathias Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54541.04	1	No		1000	0	1000	3000
RCP-003676	Attica Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495283.14	14	Yes	495283.14
RCP-003677	City Of New Baltimore, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1297530.42	1	Yes	1297530.42
RCP-003679	Village Of Newberry, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	146808.94	2	Yes	146808.94
RCP-003680	Village Of Roscommon, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110343.16		Yes	110343.16
RCP-003681	Tyrone Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	395343.76	1	Yes	395343.76
RCP-003682	Village Of Harrietta, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15342.94	4	Yes	15342.94
RCP-003684	Big Prairie Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	277959.66	3	Yes	277959.66
RCP-003685	Chase Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	124635.22	3	Yes	124635.22
RCP-003687	City Of Algonac, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	424243.16	1	Yes	424243.16
RCP-003688	Alamo Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	414890.26	8	Yes	414890.26
RCP-003689	Sylvan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113600.9	1	Yes	113600.9
RCP-003692	Saline Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	236239.44	5	Yes	236239.44
RCP-003693	Mellen Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115072.14		Yes	115072.14
RCP-003694	Village Of Dansville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59795.48	1	Yes	59795.49
RCP-003695	Orange Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105509.06	1	Yes	105509.06
RCP-003696	Village Of Mesick, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42560.92	1	Yes	42560.92
RCP-003697	Trowbridge Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	270078	11	Yes	147211.27
RCP-003698	Dexter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	688751.46	6	Yes	688751.46
RCP-003699	Village Of Kingsley, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	170769.16	1	Yes	170769.16
RCP-003700	Baltimore Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	205658.62	11	Yes	205248.48
RCP-003703	Casco Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	324093.62	2	Yes	324093.62
RCP-003704	Summerfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48656.08	6	Yes	48656.08
RCP-003705	Almira Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	359792.26	1	Yes	359792.26
RCP-003707	Drummond Island Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109187.18	3	Yes	109187.18
RCP-003708	Wright Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114126.34	4	Yes	114126.34
RCP-003709	Croton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	345636.8	1	Yes	345636.8
RCP-003710	Brookfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50652.76		Yes	50450
RCP-003711	City Of Litchfield, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	139873.08	2	Yes	139873.08
RCP-003712	Village Of Edwardsburg, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	130099.82	1	Yes	130099.82
RCP-003713	Frenchtown Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2099672.64	1	Yes	2099672.64
RCP-003714	Ellington Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	132306.68	1	Yes	132306.68
RCP-003715	Village Of Lakeview, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105298.88	9	Yes	26000
RCP-003716	Wells Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24275.5	1	Yes	24275.5
RCP-003717	City Of Sylvan Lake, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	195254.82	1	Yes	195254.82
RCP-003718	Sunfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	151958.28		Yes	151958.28
RCP-003719	Village Of Ortonville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	151643.02	1	Yes	151643.02
RCP-003720	Village Of Fowler, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	128418.4	2	Yes	128418.41
RCP-003721	Richfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	384729.8	4	Yes	384729.8
RCP-003722	Greenwood Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63053.22	9	Yes	63053.22
RCP-003723	Leroy Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	100885.16	5	Yes	100885.16
RCP-003724	Village Of Richland, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87328.72	1	Yes	87328.72
RCP-003725	Blue Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42245.66	1	Yes	42245.66
RCP-003726	Orient Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	81653.92	1	Yes	81653.92
RCP-003727	Fairplain Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	195375	1	Yes	90000
RCP-003728	City Of Allegan, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527545.38	1	Yes	525436
RCP-003729	City Of Montague, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	248114.48	1	Yes	248114.48
RCP-003730	Home Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	143761.36	3	Yes	143761.36
RCP-003731	Bridgehampton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	67992.38	12	Yes	0
RCP-003732	Mt. Forest Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	143866.44	4	Yes	143866.44
RCP-003733	Newberg Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	171609.88		Yes	171609
RCP-003734	Village Of Goodrich, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	197987.16	1	Yes	197987.16
RCP-003736	Montrose Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622545.58	1	Yes	622545.58
RCP-003737	Day Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	103302.2	4	Yes	102889
RCP-003738	Village Of Posen, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22909.34	3	Yes	22909.34
RCP-003739	Escanaba Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	355725.32	9	Yes	355725.32
RCP-003740	Moffatt Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116123.02	1	Yes	116123.02
RCP-003741	Chester Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	186847.74	4	Yes	186847.74
RCP-003742	Village Of Hubbardston, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42035.48	1	Yes	42035.48
RCP-003743	Otto Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88799.96	1	Yes	88799.96
RCP-003744	Village Of Mendon, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	89430.5		Yes	89073
RCP-003745	City Of St Louis, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	763469.54	1	Yes	763469.54
RCP-003746	Lamotte Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	90901.74	2	Yes	90901.74
RCP-003747	Friendship Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95630.74	1	Yes	95630.74
RCP-003748	Village Of Deerfield, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	90061.02	4	Yes	90061.02
RCP-003751	Gourley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42245.66	1	Yes	42245.66
RCP-003753	Marilla Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41089.68	10	Yes	41089.69
RCP-003754	Henderson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17654.9	1	Yes	17654.9
RCP-003755	Kalamo Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	197461.7	1	Yes	197461.7
RCP-003756	Lincoln Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	221947.38	2	Yes	221947.38
RCP-003757	Village Of Millersburg, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20387.22	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003758	Eckford Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113250	1	Yes	113250
RCP-003759	Newark Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110027.9	1	Yes	110027.9
RCP-003762	South Branch Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	209967.26	3	Yes	209967.26
RCP-003763	Mackinaw Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24590.76		Yes	24590.76
RCP-003764	Gilford Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72406.12	7	Yes	72406.12
RCP-003765	Village Of Reese, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	143341	2	No		64029	70308	3777	2613.5
RCP-003766	Deerfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	334812.66	5	Yes	334812.66
RCP-003767	City Of Whittemore, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39408.26	2	Yes	0
RCP-003768	Village Of Capac, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	193047.98	1	Yes	193047.98
RCP-003769	Whiteford Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	464597.24	1	Yes	464597.24
RCP-003770	Porter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	403225.42	6	Yes	403225.42
RCP-003772	Banks Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	130835.44	1	Yes	130835.44
RCP-003773	Powell Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85752.4	13	Yes	85752.4
RCP-003775	Foster Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85647.3	2	Yes	85647.31
RCP-003776	Flint Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3190178.28	10	Yes	3190178.28
RCP-003777	Village Of Baldwin, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113390.72		No		55118.21	0	0	0
RCP-003778	Village Of Concord, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109292.28	2	Yes	109292.28
RCP-003779	Franklin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	335548.28	2	Yes	335548.28
RCP-003781	Village Of Lexington, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	117489.18	4	Yes	117489.18
RCP-003782	Chesaning Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	225100.04	9	Yes	225100.04
RCP-003783	City Of Scottville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	127262.44	4	Yes	127262.44
RCP-003784	Garfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	177389.76	1	Yes	177389.76
RCP-003785	Conway Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	379370.28	8	Yes	379370.28
RCP-003786	West Branch Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50127.32	3	Yes	50127.32
RCP-003787	Eden Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53805.42	2	Yes	53805.42
RCP-003788	Lakefield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	103932.74	3	Yes	103932.74
RCP-003790	Allis Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94054.4	2	Yes	94054.4
RCP-003791	Enterprise Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20702.48		Yes	0
RCP-003792	Coldwater Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	81864.1	2	Yes	0
RCP-003793	Village Of Sanford, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88694.88	1	Yes	88694.88
RCP-003796	Richland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	792789.32	1	Yes	792789.32
RCP-003797	Alpine Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1465041.86	9	Yes	1465041.86
RCP-003798	Greenbush Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	140293.44	2	Yes	140293.44
RCP-003800	Hayes Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	490238.88	1	Yes	490238.88
RCP-003801	Elmwood Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	81233.56		Yes	0
RCP-003803	Krakow Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	69463.62	2	Yes	69463.62
RCP-003804	Cohoctah Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	351101.42	3	Yes	351101.42
RCP-003805	Liberty Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	311588.06	8	Yes	311588.06
RCP-003806	Allegan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493706.8	1	Yes	493706.8
RCP-003808	Maple Ridge Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	172870.94	3	Yes	172870.94
RCP-003809	Winterfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48340.82	3	Yes	48340.82
RCP-003810	Charlton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	146178.42		Yes	146178.42
RCP-003811	Elmer Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98658	1	Yes	98658
RCP-003812	Wayland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	361610.3	1	Yes	361610.3
RCP-036662	Fajardo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17850216	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-038342	Buckeye City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10575465	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-036654	Roanoke City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64576671	33	No		11674418.74	17758133.45	3380342.36	22352935.03
RCP-038331	Culpeper County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10217905	17	Yes	625000
RCP-036661	Columbus City, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	78482038	21	No		3559470.84	10115312.88	0	0
RCP-038412	Overland Park, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18581302	16	No		32469765	9371061	0	0
RCP-038260	Walworth County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20175141	52	No		5923066	4708861	11796324	10658312
RCP-038273	Bannock County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17055675	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-035851	Yonkers City, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87486480	1	No		106373510	57429103	84020985	0
RCP-036437	Delaware County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40630180	8	No		12805499	2300215	16959361.8	0
RCP-039329	Peabody City, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21079949.38	15	No		12353159	7762782	4636430	10022038
RCP-039315	Dearborn, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47212828	6	No		19060257	23214584	4937987	0
RCP-036513	Mohave County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41213672	52	Yes	10000000
RCP-039297	Lorain, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32491585	29	No		5658572.24	5925518	5884940.09	6450545.22
RCP-039389	Plainfield City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23801983	42	Yes	6000000
RCP-039147	Ionia County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12566634	47	Yes	10000000
RCP-039055	Sterling Heights, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19837262	28	No		11828172	11232505	0	0
RCP-036645	Harrisonburg City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23834094	14	No		7212596	9193598	5669090	0
RCP-036193	Huntsville City, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34402593	10	No		29556852	0	0	0
RCP-038887	Natrona County, Wyoming	Wyoming	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15511480	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60233613	15	Yes	0
RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18140021	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	324636065	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-039166	Arvada, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11075818	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-039053	Bristol, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27831925.97	53	Yes	10000000
RCP-038969	Sumter County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20729303	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-038535	Huntington, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40628967	48	No		9330553	15491221	12204476	11524656
RCP-038536	Salem County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12117555	8	Yes	6058777.5
RCP-025812	Milton, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14783224	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-025665	Dunwoody, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18431324	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-016390	Easton Town, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16425261.01	35	No		3352295	2929798	6266652	1016995
RCP-016392	Elkton Town, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15391723.8	25	Yes	2336349
RCP-049104	Greenbelt City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22881666.47	43	Yes	10000000
RCP-049106	Havre De Grace City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13811367.58	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-050720	Hialeah Gardens City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11757038	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-050741	Jacksonville Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11834170	7	Yes	0
RCP-049183	Enfield, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12920906.6	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-040645	Cumberland, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10540351.61	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-040626	Coventry, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10407636.95	40	Yes	10000000
RCP-026329	Canton, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11400265	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-036039	Monmouth County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	120193675	9	No		25281466	38408317	54990163	34790107
RCP-035857	State Of North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	5439309692.2	352	No		3199000000	0	0	0
RCP-035965	City Of San Antonio, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	326919408	21	No		477269000	501955000	356836000	83573000
RCP-039827	Klamath County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13254432	91	Yes	10000000
RCP-039835	Gaithersburg, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11500277	2	No		6758699	2725931	0	0
RCP-035963	City Of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	122507590	19	No		144165795.74	117814986.93	129225116.8	65950285
RCP-039867	Charleston, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36801358	29	No		16656181.62	10901203.33	4068875.53	4527671.48
RCP-039617	Wise County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13593572	2	Yes	7834497
RCP-036850	Binghamton, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46184674	37	No		13634539	8039741	13459469	0
RCP-035928	Santa Clarita City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35148685	26	No		15058912	0	0	0
RCP-036806	Union Township, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15492274	20	Yes	9897109.08
RCP-036256	Jefferson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	48863552	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-039631	Springfield, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123684851.87	16	No		0	12080086	0	0
RCP-036470	Town Of Gilbert, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	24159871	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-039637	Watertown City, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22265728	45	No		8322913	11746989	0	0
RCP-039747	Imperial County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35198889	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-039858	Laramie County, Wyoming	Wyoming	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19326709	110	No		4057523	11372206	7069797	0
RCP-035859	State Of Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	5368386901	593	No		2006109910.11	0	0	0
RCP-037092	State Of Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1377866887.6	50	No		916687401	0	0	0
RCP-039856	Coconino County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27868531	38	Yes	10000000
RCP-039741	Effingham County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12488744	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-036054	Charleston County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	79910793	13	No		36262763	52305207	44317697	104062188
RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106189095	24	No		39170499	9500576	0	0
RCP-036813	Saline County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23781952	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-036854	Pearland, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11888971	6	Yes	3502468
RCP-039634	Ozaukee County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17330133	39	No		5292326	10815782	1222025	0
RCP-036051	County Of San Diego, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	648431468	67	No		176275023	0	0	0
RCP-036642	Danville City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29142851	62	Yes	10000000
RCP-037309	Tuscarawas County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17867396	51	Yes	10000000
RCP-035827	City Of San Diego, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	299714755	1	No		190816832	108897923	0	0
RCP-040538	Tazewell County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25601188	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-035921	Caddo Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46656811	13	No		20000000	5200000	0	0
RCP-036041	City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	108810857	14	No		10042104	56867739	0	0
RCP-036067	Milwaukee County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	183696189	75	No		69493372	69984659	95522991	109951433
RCP-037011	Santa Maria, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37190243	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-036986	Palo Alto, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13735071	2	No		64978869	79132986	81968650	85036146
RCP-037209	Wayne County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17465517	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-037528	York, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35304707	38	Yes	10000000
RCP-039602	Madison County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18061635	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039765	Loudoun County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	80324909	18	No		40288042	45144306	227711550	40288042
RCP-036183	Horry County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	68776083	50	No		147426927	110239667	91920693	147904964
RCP-035944	County Of Monroe, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	144080127	32	Yes	0
RCP-036095	City Of San Jose, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	212280152	45	No		131857093	432410880	331945900	576072509
RCP-035918	County Of San Bernardino, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	423455955	95	No		161878027	113873234	0	0
RCP-036049	Hillsborough County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	285912528	119	No		72534267	8928020	0	0
RCP-035905	Fort Bend County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	157660879	34	No		22589242	20661183	6463858	0
RCP-040399	County Of Plymouth, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	101237378	80	Yes	10000000
RCP-053066	City Of Largo, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12960041	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-038500	Marion County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10891329	26	Yes	1000000
RCP-040464	Bedford County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15344241	7	Yes	5406107.86
RCP-040465	Bay County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33934398	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-038808	Poquoson City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15114864	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-036744	Sumner County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37154480	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-036738	Lewis And Clark County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13486352	53	Yes	10000000
RCP-036710	Upland, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15213716	39	No		2894037	3554565	6822317	1962803
RCP-036722	Vancouver, Washington, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33135869	9	No		14027370	4376808	0	0
RCP-036746	Columbia, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27178358	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-037985	La Mesa, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10826584	4	Yes	9750000
RCP-036169	Washington County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98857371	15	No		15602305	21732994	6875235	12000000
RCP-040143	Upper Darby, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41761939	40	No		7776294	8677038	5139546	6275737
RCP-038540	Etowah County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19864360	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038377	Bellingham, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20925817	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-036341	Oneida County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44416661	40	No		40956048	11093982	0	0
RCP-037438	Grant County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12774857	5	Yes	240000
RCP-039978	Van Zandt County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10991944	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-037672	Port Arthur, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26731836	7	Yes	9101836
RCP-037678	Hood County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11973430	12	Yes	5986715
RCP-037589	Grant County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18983490	34	Yes	10000000
RCP-037705	Forrest County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14547864	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-037902	City Of Lowell, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76009996.05	121	Yes	7976729
RCP-040535	Livingston Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27346613	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-036723	Killeen, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29117907	34	Yes	10000000
RCP-040162	Harrison County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13063690	18	Yes	983690
RCP-047367	Newark City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11757485	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-047371	Oakley City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10177190	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-047401	Rohnert Park City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10356127	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-047407	San Bruno City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10240344	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-047414	San Jacinto City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11773274	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-032033	Town Middletown, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12363291.73	1	Yes	0
RCP-037797	Jefferson County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12979779	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-037734	Mclean County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33315167	74	No		8069652	8094157	1300262	3109867
RCP-037737	Dickson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10478767	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-040166	Westfield, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17302570.99	59	Yes	10000000
RCP-040124	Ward County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13138471	68	Yes	10000000
RCP-040129	Autauga County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10851898	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-040249	Warren County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20446881	44	No		4292716	8600974	7553191	11988015
RCP-040254	Lodi, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15764793	7	Yes	6954793
RCP-003813	Deerfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	432672.76		Yes	432672.76
RCP-003814	Wexford Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111052.5	1	Yes	111052.5
RCP-003815	Iosco Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	405642.46	3	Yes	405642.46
RCP-003816	Mount Morris Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2137084.22	9	Yes	2137084.22
RCP-003817	Pine Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	195149.74	3	Yes	188000
RCP-003818	Sanborn Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	212804.66		Yes	212804.66
RCP-003819	Sherman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106770.12	7	Yes	106770.12
RCP-003820	Frost Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110868.6	6	Yes	110868.6
RCP-003821	London Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	308435.38	13	Yes	308435.38
RCP-003822	Mckinley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	73141.74	6	Yes	73141.74
RCP-003823	Garden Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54435.94	2	Yes	46610.94
RCP-003824	City Of Carson City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116753.56	4	Yes	116753.56
RCP-003825	North Star Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87959.26		Yes	87959.26
RCP-003826	Village Of South Range, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76609.68		Yes	76609.68
RCP-003828	Seney Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12085.2	1	Yes	12085.2
RCP-003829	Logan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56012.28	1	Yes	43096.8
RCP-003830	Blumfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	191892	1	Yes	191892
RCP-003831	Fork Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	133777.94	1	Yes	133777.94
RCP-003832	Grant Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	259253.86	3	Yes	259253.86
RCP-003833	Fredonia Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	169297.92	4	Yes	131935
RCP-003834	Village Of Leroy, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26482.36	2	Yes	26482.36
RCP-003835	City Of Laingsburg, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	135039	1	Yes	135039
RCP-003836	Munro Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57798.8	1	Yes	57798.8
RCP-003837	Mayfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	177074.48	1	Yes	177074.48
RCP-003838	Portage Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	100885.16		Yes	100885.16
RCP-003839	Village Of Morrice, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95630.74	1	No		1	1	0	47815.92
RCP-003841	Village Of Ubly, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82494.66	2	Yes	82494
RCP-003842	Montmorency Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112234.76	1	Yes	112234.76
RCP-003843	Dover Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	173291.3	3	Yes	173291.3
RCP-003844	Vassar Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	408269.66		Yes	406637
RCP-003845	Austin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66100.8		Yes	66100.8
RCP-003846	Village Of Northport, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55171.56	1	Yes	55171.56
RCP-003847	Verona Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	124740.3	1	Yes	124740.3
RCP-003848	Evangeline Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	74928.26	1	Yes	74928.26
RCP-003849	Village Of Caledonia, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	171925.16	1	Yes	171925
RCP-003850	Village Of Otisville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87749.08	1	Yes	87749.08
RCP-003851	Village Of Honor, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34784.36		Yes	0
RCP-003852	Chester Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	138401.84	1	Yes	138401.84
RCP-003853	Mancelona Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	315791.6	5	Yes	315791.6
RCP-003856	Clarendon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	122113.1	4	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003857	Caseville Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	175813.42	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003858	City Of Stanton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	149436.16	10	Yes	149136.73
RCP-003859	Watertown Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	216587.84	11	Yes	216587.84
RCP-003861	Excelsior Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105719.24	4	Yes	105719.24
RCP-003862	Westphalia Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	153639.7	2	Yes	22198
RCP-003863	Stronach Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87749.08	1	Yes	0
RCP-003864	Colfax Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	189790.22	1	Yes	189790.22
RCP-003865	Clayton Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	745919.74	5	Yes	745919.74
RCP-003866	Cherry Grove Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	253473.98	3	Yes	253473.98
RCP-003868	Trout Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39408.26	1	Yes	39408.26
RCP-003869	Village Of Nashville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	176969.4	5	Yes	176969.41
RCP-003870	Presque Isle Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	164148.58	1	Yes	56658.77
RCP-003871	Rust Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56327.54	1	Yes	56327.54
RCP-003872	Village Of Lake Isabella, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	176128.7	2	Yes	176128.7
RCP-003873	Riverside Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	126526.82		Yes	126526.82
RCP-003874	Union Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1439820.56	4	Yes	1439820.56
RCP-003875	Village Of Tustin, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22804.26	7	Yes	22804.26
RCP-003876	Bloomfield Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4407946.38	1	Yes	4407946.33
RCP-003877	Bangor Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1465567.3	5	Yes	1465567.28
RCP-003878	Huron Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1707376.44	1	Yes	1707376.44
RCP-003879	Greenwood Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112339.84	2	Yes	112339.84
RCP-003880	City Of Essexville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	344480.82		No		0	0	0	20000
RCP-003881	City Of Tawas City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	187373.18	1	Yes	187373.18
RCP-003882	Negaunee Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	327141.18	3	Yes	327141.18
RCP-003883	Village Of Marcellus, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	119696.04	3	Yes	119696.04
RCP-003884	Inverness Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	230249.38		Yes	230249.37
RCP-003885	City Of Ferrysburg, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	318208.64	1	Yes	317570.51
RCP-003886	Colon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	227622.16	12	Yes	120201.99
RCP-003887	City Of Lowell, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	438325.06	6	Yes	438325.05
RCP-003888	Village Of Powers, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42560.92	1	Yes	42560.92
RCP-003889	Spalding Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	125791.2	2	Yes	125791.2
RCP-003890	Howard Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	641356.46	6	Yes	641356.46
RCP-003891	City Of South Lyon, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1242253.76	5	Yes	1242253.76
RCP-003892	City Of Howell, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1009272.08	1	Yes	1009272.06
RCP-003893	City Of Cheboygan, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	492445.74	3	Yes	492445.74
RCP-003894	Bridgeport Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1030815.24	3	Yes	1030815.24
RCP-003895	Hayes, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	283003.92	1	Yes	283003.92
RCP-003896	Big Rapids Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509365.02	3	Yes	509365.02
RCP-003897	Lincoln Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1415334.88	12	Yes	1415334.88
RCP-003898	City Of Riverview, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1264427.48	3	Yes	1264427.48
RCP-003899	Bismarck Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38252.28	9	Yes	38252.28
RCP-003900	Lincoln Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	260620.04	2	Yes	260620.04
RCP-003901	Harrison Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2624800.96	5	Yes	2624800.94
RCP-003902	Village Of Birch Run, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	155110.94	8	Yes	155110.94
RCP-003903	City Of Rockwood, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	331870.18	10	Yes	331870.18
RCP-003904	Village Of Rothbury, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47079.74		Yes	47079.74
RCP-003905	Village Of Milford, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	684653	3	Yes	684653
RCP-003906	Almont Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	431914.64	13	Yes	431914.64
RCP-003907	Benton Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1502768.7	1	Yes	0
RCP-003908	City Of South Haven, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	456925.76	4	Yes	456925.76
RCP-003909	Green Oak Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1690473.76	1	Yes	1690473.76
RCP-003910	Village Of Fowlerville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	304021.66	1	Yes	304021.66
RCP-003911	Carrollton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	593330.92	8	Yes	593330.92
RCP-003912	City Of Kingsford, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	520294.24	1	Yes	520294.24
RCP-003913	Village Of New Haven, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515670.36	2	Yes	515670.36
RCP-003914	Duplain Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	148805.62	1	Yes	40000
RCP-003915	Frederic Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	145547.86	3	Yes	145547.86
RCP-003916	Casco Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426239.86	4	Yes	426239.86
RCP-003917	City Of Southgate, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3043264.24	1	Yes	3043264.24
RCP-003918	Vevay Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	392821.64	5	Yes	392821.64
RCP-003919	City Of Crystal Falls, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	143341	1	Yes	143341
RCP-003920	Midland Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	232981.68	2	Yes	232981.68
RCP-003921	Locke Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	195254.82	1	Yes	195254.82
RCP-003922	City Of Grosse Pointe Farms, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	957778.6	1	Yes	957778.6
RCP-003923	Village Of Three Oaks, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	162362.08	1	Yes	162362.08
RCP-003924	City Of White Cloud, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	145758.04	1	Yes	145758.04
RCP-003925	Custer Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	118014.62	1	Yes	118014.62
RCP-003926	Oakfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	672462.72	8	Yes	672462.72
RCP-003927	Suttons Bay Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	249795.88	1	Yes	249795.88
RCP-003928	Blissfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65365.18	3	Yes	65365.18
RCP-003929	City Of Cedar Springs, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	389984.24	1	Yes	389984.24
RCP-003930	Millbrook Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	117279	2	Yes	117279
RCP-003931	Argentine Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	684547.92	7	Yes	684547.92
RCP-003932	Commerce Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4128095.12	5	Yes	4128095.12
RCP-003933	Bloomfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57693.72	2	Yes	57693.72
RCP-003935	Climax Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	184535.8	1	Yes	184535.8
RCP-003936	Springfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	168982.66	8	Yes	168982.66
RCP-003937	City Of Harper Woods, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1444549.54		Yes	722266.55
RCP-003938	Marcellus Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	138506.94	3	Yes	137578.4
RCP-003939	Village Of Mulliken, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58954.78		Yes	58954.78
RCP-003940	Kasson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	169508.1		Yes	0
RCP-003941	Fenton Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1648631.84	1	Yes	1648631.84
RCP-003942	City Of Marysville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1016418.1	1	Yes	1016418.1
RCP-003943	Golden Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	184115.44	5	Yes	184115.44
RCP-003944	City Of Alma, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	934238.72	1	Yes	934238.72
RCP-003945	Millington Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	322517.26	10	Yes	322517.26
RCP-003946	Overisel Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	317578.1	1	Yes	317578.1
RCP-003947	City Of Hart, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	217323.46	1	Yes	217323.46
RCP-003948	Burt Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51598.56		No		0	0	0	0
RCP-003949	Goodland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	190000.4	4	Yes	190000.4
RCP-003950	Village Of Cassopolis, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	178545.72	1	Yes	178545.72
RCP-003951	Mentor Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111000	2	Yes	94785.52
RCP-003952	Charleston Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	215116.6	1	Yes	215116.6
RCP-003953	Millen Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40774.42	3	Yes	40774.42
RCP-003954	Village Of Rosebush, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38042.12	1	Yes	38042.12
RCP-003955	Gilmore Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	153219.34		Yes	153219.34
RCP-003957	Caledonia Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1392845.9	1	Yes	1392845.9
RCP-003958	Village Of Muir, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64209.2		Yes	64209.2
RCP-003959	Village Of Port Austin, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65365.18	3	Yes	65365.18
RCP-003960	Albert Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	252107.84	2	Yes	252107.84
RCP-003961	City Of Flushing, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	828099.1	5	Yes	828099.1
RCP-003962	Benton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	299082.5	2	Yes	299082.5
RCP-003963	Henrietta Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	502744.44	11	Yes	502744.44
RCP-003964	East Bay Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1221236	2	Yes	1221236
RCP-003965	Cato Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	184430.7	5	Yes	184430.7
RCP-003967	Ravenna Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	179386.44	1	Yes	179386.44
RCP-003969	Amboy Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	121272.38	2	Yes	121272.38
RCP-003971	Highland Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2119849.66	3	Yes	2119849
RCP-003972	City Of Onaway, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87013.46	1	Yes	87013.46
RCP-003973	City Of Grand Blanc, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	827048.22	13	Yes	827048.22
RCP-003974	Raisin Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	815698.64	1	Yes	815698.64
RCP-003975	City Of Farmington, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1102485.76	1	Yes	1102485.76
RCP-003977	Ovid Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	234032.56	6	Yes	234032.56
RCP-003978	Village Of Lake Odessa, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	214380.98	1	Yes	214380.98
RCP-003980	Addison Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	651444.96	3	Yes	651444.96
RCP-003981	City Of Portland, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	414890.26	1	Yes	414890.26
RCP-003982	Mt Haley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	173606.56	4	Yes	173606.56
RCP-038327	Henderson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16070692	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-038332	Rankin County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30159572	3	No		2965029	2965029	0	0
RCP-038283	Craven County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19839303	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-038265	Hattiesburg, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12875821	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-038216	Duplin County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11409751	5	Yes	9335594.79
RCP-036670	Macon-Bibb County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75864910	63	Yes	10000000
RCP-038149	Kerr County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10216933	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-038097	Madison County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51078063	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-038148	El Centro, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14095734	43	Yes	6329846
RCP-038051	Fulton County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10369022	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039388	Van Buren County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14699370	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-036027	Augusta-Richmond, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82348868	3	No		44949123	37399563	0	0
RCP-039427	Sheboygan, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22006206	13	Yes	563489
RCP-039394	Washtenaw County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71402185	43	No		27482769	22740776	21178640	23427624
RCP-039686	Sarpy County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36360628	49	Yes	10000000
RCP-036333	Tacoma City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60969952	47	No		59413273	64994286	85703601	90000000
RCP-035917	Gwinnett County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	181855587	47	No		29764387.63	0	0	0
RCP-039699	Medford, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48547342.05	85	No		13121184	16876459	18549699	0
RCP-035955	Butte County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42574311	32	No		0	43517206	43517206	43517206
RCP-038992	Juneau City and Borough, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13949612.95	1	No		34551384	27925338	0	0
RCP-038845	Sullivan County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14651782	3	No		14470635	0	0	0
RCP-038876	Burleigh County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18574229	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-038847	Marietta, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11180581	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-038842	Ellis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35900284	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31063168	48	Yes	10000000
RCP-036077	Brazoria County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	72696394	45	No		22797430	16555065	22978975	10364924
RCP-039128	Cheshire County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14778619	34	Yes	10000000
RCP-039206	Rice County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13008526	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039211	Mccracken County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12706680	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-036634	Canovanas Municipio City, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26486925	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-039449	Washington County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10438365	22	Yes	9368292.42
RCP-035885	Howard County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63261464	81	Yes	6559598.84
RCP-039450	Campbell County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10660768	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-038902	Kokomo, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19893216	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-036632	Cabo Rojo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30281701	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-036022	Pinal County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	89891338	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-049109	Hyattsville City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17961280.56	42	Yes	10000000
RCP-049113	Laurel City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25253186.07	48	Yes	10000000
RCP-049131	Takoma Park City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17463724.52	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-025958	Tucker, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13591216	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-049047	Town Of Oro Valley, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15377781.4	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-026528	City of Monroe, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11326507.16	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-050819	North Lauderdale City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22168784	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-050820	North Miami Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21557242	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-050825	Oakland Park City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22639586	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-050828	Ocoee City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24172699	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-025859	Peachtree City, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13526985	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-025927	Statesboro, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12306221	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-036146	The County Of Volusia, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	107468931	37	No		16091818	21542253	4280670	0
RCP-036044	City Of Columbus,  Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	187030138	11	No		159795945	0	0	0
RCP-036132	City Of Garland, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53513994	20	No		7502198	10624397	0	0
RCP-035971	Wake County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	215946541	57	No		15859936	0	0	0
RCP-039621	Rock Island County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27558333	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-039620	Walton County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18373581	1	Yes	0
RCP-036844	Roanoke County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18294526	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-039588	Pulaski County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12621409	2	Yes	9818745.4
RCP-036137	Will County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	134168730	304	Yes	10000000
RCP-039752	Monroe, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11405523	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-035869	Fort Worth City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	173745090	37	No		86720682	0	0	0
RCP-036810	Thousand Oaks, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14008949	1	No		20788970	16126729	12954520	148935
RCP-039803	Abilene, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21455963	1	No		15119960	0	10264282	0
RCP-036817	Monterey County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	84311261	66	No		250601050	383587394	450086842	590066823.95
RCP-039683	Carlsbad, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12615746	1	No		33039977	61819966	92729991	52215496
RCP-040558	Hillsboro, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18014829	3	No		4847608	12989145.45	0	0
RCP-037185	Billings, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15940314	2	No		12742990	3197345	0	0
RCP-036660	Winchester City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12337682	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-036636	Carson City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20774006	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-036181	Brown County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51384182	155	No		25652402	34035857	0	0
RCP-036232	State Of Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3828761789.9	270	No		1139220251.27	2561224272.38	0	0
RCP-036326	Maricopa County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	871239088	139	Yes	10000000
RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39676317	26	No		14362120	11156799	0	0
RCP-037036	Shreveport, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48240338	15	No		34373108	7365502	0	0
RCP-040578	Coweta County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28846132	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-036102	City of Colorado Springs, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	76039132	19	No		54084082	0	0	0
RCP-037104	Mobile, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58203265	19	Yes	0
RCP-036068	Alachua County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	52258449	8	No		25388373	37111723	0	0
RCP-036110	Placer County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	77370739	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-035996	City Of Des Moines, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94824614	27	No		0	35038609	24485125.63	38337184
RCP-036106	State Of Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3011136886.6	30	No		1804700179	991624764	275030508	0
RCP-036155	Greenville County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	101691896	14	No		32760841	23843564	0	0
RCP-036846	Fauquier County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13834039	7	Yes	3335000
RCP-036852	Leavenworth County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15880533	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-036156	City Of Charlotte, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	141618325	19	No		120274952.53	317342455.7	170220580.96	0
RCP-035852	El Paso County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	163012143	54	Yes	10000000
RCP-036638	Bristol, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10027374	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-035822	City Of Memphis, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	161061490	30	No		39863596	0	0	0
RCP-036812	Washington County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11637009	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-036004	Manatee County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78327168	39	No		36149014.6	33346276	8831877.4	0
RCP-035854	City Of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1395292684	3	No		311044000	853941000	294349000	367024000
RCP-035948	Clayton County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	66847995	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-036000	Arapahoe County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	127534910	68	No		24860025	37452961	53369065	37003932
RCP-039846	Gastonia, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15661923	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-036673	City Of New York, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	5878895712	93	No		4465000000	5909000000	5984000000	5365000000
RCP-036017	Allegheny County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	380998452	47	No		154653288	39690062	67787479	0
RCP-039638	Escondido, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38808509	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-037256	Lynwood, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24446961	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-037190	Mendocino County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16849976	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-037279	Angelina County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16843372	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-040396	Lansing, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49924664	27	No		14960176	0	23000000	34641664
RCP-053126	Hawkins County, Tn	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11030015	5	No		4965691	5973172	10955631	0
RCP-035430	Boulder City City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21773790.18	57	Yes	10000000
RCP-040196	Cherry Hill, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11361785	12	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2685296130.8	1257	No		1698819430.39	0	0	0
RCP-036750	State Of Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1870417575.7	98	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-040501	San Patricio County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12961520	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-053214	Granville County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11740344	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-036172	City Of Port St. Lucie, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24739425	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-035840	County Of Johnston, NC	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40661647	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-036753	Greece, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11863368	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-036962	Casa Grande, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11403498	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-036779	Muskogee County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13207620	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-036776	Lancaster City, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39518923	19	No		4084666	4500000	6000000	6000000
RCP-037802	Lakeland, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22726368	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-037805	Auburn, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13545799	49	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-036148	Knox County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	91352787	41	No		49572137	38513334	3267316	0
RCP-040069	South Gate, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34556473	46	No		8787074	1993294	0	0
RCP-037812	State of California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	27017016860.1	26	No		16845253462	0	0	0
RCP-040145	Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37156228	28	No		9720873	4311260	4535446	4771289
RCP-040144	Tallahassee, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46468128	25	No		6535223	5678481	10465397	5565737
RCP-040106	County Of Rockland, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63280694	19	No		44015365	11296316	0	0
RCP-037359	Rusk County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10567728	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14239414	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-040228	New Castle County, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	108531220	97	No		4270964	23304852	0	25794535
RCP-036630	Athens-Clarke County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57588843	35	No		10997114	31433048	15158681	0
RCP-037386	Union City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26618182	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-037384	White County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15296847	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037382	Brooklyn Park City, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11052580	52	Yes	10000000
RCP-037396	Lee County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16594941	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-040262	Lancaster, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36340561	11	No		16423977.05	18888934.46	1027649.5	0
RCP-040267	County Of Broome New York, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37000061	60	No		34979648	0	0	0
RCP-040303	National City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18010907	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-036761	Lake Elsinore City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14967198	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-036941	New Braunfels, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10995314	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-040175	Lincoln County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16726052	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-003983	Burt Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68728	1	Yes	68728
RCP-003984	City Of Lake Angelus, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32262.24	4	Yes	32262.24
RCP-003986	Bentley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87959.26	3	Yes	87959.26
RCP-003987	North Branch Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	265769.36	13	Yes	265769.36
RCP-003988	Dallas Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123058.9	2	Yes	123058.9
RCP-003989	Lyon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	142395.2	2	Yes	142395.2
RCP-003990	Berlin Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	779758.3	1	Yes	778195.2
RCP-003991	Village Of Tekonsha, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76189.32	2	Yes	0
RCP-003992	Bellevue Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	189540.76	3	Yes	189540.76
RCP-003993	City Of Ovid, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	169508.1	2	Yes	169508.1
RCP-003994	Vergennes Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	498435.78	2	Yes	498435.78
RCP-003995	City Of Potterville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	289204.16		Yes	289204.16
RCP-003996	City Of Parchment, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	192102.18	5	Yes	192102.18
RCP-003997	Village Of Stanwood, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22278.8	4	Yes	22278.8
RCP-003998	Village Of Chesaning, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	235188.56	1	Yes	235188.56
RCP-004000	Village Of Mecosta, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47710.28	10	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-004001	Otisco Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	246222.86		Yes	246222.86
RCP-004002	Posen Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60741.28	1	Yes	60741.28
RCP-004003	Village Of Peck, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62527.78	14	Yes	62527.78
RCP-004004	Moltke Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29424.84	1	Yes	29424.84
RCP-004005	Central Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	129259.12	2	Yes	129259.12
RCP-004006	City Of Lapeer, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	896932.22	1	Yes	896932.22
RCP-004007	Whitney Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98783.4	4	Yes	98783.4
RCP-004008	Village Of Shelby, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	211438.5	1	Yes	0
RCP-004009	City Of Mt Pleasant, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2605885	1	Yes	2605885
RCP-004010	City Of Hancock, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	473529.76	3	Yes	473529.76
RCP-004011	Loud Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29529.92	1	Yes	29529.92
RCP-004012	Victor Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	370017.38	1	Yes	370017.38
RCP-004014	Lee Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123347.26	1	Yes	123347.26
RCP-004015	New Haven Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102566.58		Yes	102566.58
RCP-004016	Newfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	187163.02	9	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-004017	City Of Mount Clemens, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1698548.98	5	Yes	1695143.82
RCP-004018	Village Of Schoolcraft, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	162992.6	1	Yes	162000
RCP-004019	Lenox Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	635366.4	1	Yes	635366.4
RCP-004020	Springport Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	143866.44		Yes	143866.44
RCP-004021	Portsmouth Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	331554.9	6	Yes	331554.9
RCP-004022	Saginaw Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4114223.4	1	Yes	4114223.4
RCP-004023	City Of Gibraltar, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	474895.92	13	Yes	474895.92
RCP-004024	City Of Alpena, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1046263.3	12	Yes	1046263.3
RCP-004025	Village Of White Pigeon, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	160470.48	2	No		0	10000	100000	100000
RCP-004026	City Of Frankenmuth, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	581035.54	7	Yes	581035
RCP-004027	Pennfield Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	920997.54	4	Yes	920997.54
RCP-004028	Hope Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	143130.82	39	Yes	143130.82
RCP-004030	Village Of Romeo, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	378949.92	1	Yes	0
RCP-004031	Flushing Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1069908.26	1	Yes	1069908.26
RCP-004032	City Of St. Johns, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	834929.88	2	Yes	834929.88
RCP-004033	Ira Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	536477.9	1	Yes	536477.9
RCP-004034	Wheatland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	145575	1	Yes	145575
RCP-004035	Rock River Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	97942.68	4	Yes	97942.68
RCP-004036	Oscoda Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	710925.18	1	Yes	710925.18
RCP-004037	Sharon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	188844.42	2	Yes	188844.42
RCP-004038	Odessa Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	187793.54	4	Yes	187793.54
RCP-004039	Adams Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55381.74	1	Yes	55381.74
RCP-004040	Stanton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	145863.14	1	Yes	145863.14
RCP-004041	Lincoln Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	158263.6	5	Yes	158263.6
RCP-004042	Somerset Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	476051.9	4	Yes	476049
RCP-004043	City Of Negaunee, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	475526.46	2	Yes	475526.46
RCP-004044	Ontwa Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	563065.36	14	Yes	563065.36
RCP-004045	Bark River Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	160575.56	1	Yes	160575.56
RCP-004046	Salem Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	661323.3	1	Yes	661323.3
RCP-004047	Sidney Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	256731.74	3	Yes	256731.74
RCP-004048	Swan Creek Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	235293.64	4	Yes	235293.64
RCP-004049	City Of Leslie, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	199458.4	1	Yes	199458.4
RCP-004051	Lapeer Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527545.38	8	Yes	527545.38
RCP-004052	Kalkaska Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	299502.86	1	Yes	9000
RCP-004053	Wright Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	344796.08	9	Yes	344796
RCP-004054	Ferry Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	136089.9	2	Yes	136089.9
RCP-004055	Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80497.94	2	Yes	80497.94
RCP-004056	City Of Fremont, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	428761.98	2	Yes	427048
RCP-004057	Concord Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	174762.54	4	Yes	174762.54
RCP-004058	Norwich Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63683.76	1	Yes	63683.76
RCP-004059	Village Of Kingston, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42981.28		Yes	42981.28
RCP-004060	City Of Harbor Springs, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	126631.9	1	Yes	0
RCP-004061	Village Of Climax, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82284.46	1	Yes	82284.46
RCP-004062	Bengal Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	126421.72		Yes	0
RCP-004063	Deerfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68833.1	1	Yes	68833.1
RCP-004064	Turin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16183.66	2	Yes	16183.66
RCP-004065	Antrim Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	220476.12	6	Yes	0
RCP-004066	Lincoln Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	189685.14	11	Yes	189685.14
RCP-004067	City Of Plymouth, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	961982.14	3	Yes	961982.14
RCP-004068	Exeter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	345846.96	2	Yes	310229.71
RCP-004069	White Lake Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3295161.92	3	Yes	3295161.92
RCP-004070	Village Of Metamora, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59164.96		Yes	59164.96
RCP-004071	Port Austin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	74928.26	3	Yes	74928.26
RCP-004072	Village Of Dundee, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	483513.2	1	Yes	483513.2
RCP-004073	Village Of Hillman, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70304.36	3	Yes	70304.36
RCP-004074	Fort Gratiot Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1155030.12	9	Yes	1155030.12
RCP-004075	Felch Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76714.76	1	Yes	76714.76
RCP-004076	Denton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571052.1	1	Yes	569907.3
RCP-004077	City Of Madison Heights, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3140681.5	1	Yes	3140681.46
RCP-004078	Fruitport Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1391059.4	18	Yes	1391059.4
RCP-004079	Village Of Hesperia, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	97627.42	1	Yes	97627.43
RCP-004080	Crystal Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	285946.42	8	Yes	285946.42
RCP-004081	Davison Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2020961.16	4	Yes	2020961.16
RCP-004082	Village Of Elberta, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38987.9	2	Yes	38987.9
RCP-004083	Chesterfield Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4905541.46	5	Yes	4905541.46
RCP-004085	City Of Linden, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	413944.48	1	Yes	413944.48
RCP-004086	Acme Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497700.18	1	Yes	497700.18
RCP-004087	Elk Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88169.44	2	Yes	88169.44
RCP-004088	Village Of Sterling, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52439.26	1	Yes	52439.26
RCP-004089	Eden Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62527.78	2	Yes	62527.78
RCP-004090	City Of Caseville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77240.2	1	Yes	77240.2
RCP-004091	Summit Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2366387.8	6	Yes	2366387.8
RCP-004092	Lodi Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	691378.7	3	Yes	691378.7
RCP-004093	Village Of Casnovia, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33733.48		Yes	33733.48
RCP-004094	Charlevoix Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	174026.92		Yes	174026.92
RCP-004095	Village Of St Charles, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	199248.22	1	Yes	199248.22
RCP-004096	Reading Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	181067.86	1	Yes	181067.86
RCP-004097	Assyria Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	190706.26	2	Yes	190706.26
RCP-004098	City Of Trenton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1908095.88	2	Yes	1908095.87
RCP-004099	Ontonagon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98783.4	10	Yes	98783.4
RCP-004100	Alaiedon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	311903.32	2	Yes	311903.32
RCP-004102	City Of Fenton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1198326.68	2	Yes	1198326.68
RCP-004103	Village Of Leonard, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42981.28		Yes	42981.28
RCP-004104	Paradise Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	373380.2	2	Yes	373380.2
RCP-004105	Watson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	230144.28	4	Yes	230144.28
RCP-004106	St Joseph Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	929404.64	5	Yes	929404.64
RCP-004107	Manlius Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	337860.24	1	Yes	337856.38
RCP-004108	Maple Forest Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68622.92	1	Yes	68622.92
RCP-004109	Chestonia Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53490.14	1	Yes	2500
RCP-004111	Woodbridge Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	135984.8	4	Yes	135984.8
RCP-004112	Denver Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	171399.7	4	Yes	171399.7
RCP-004113	Garfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	271549.24	1	Yes	240000
RCP-004116	Riga Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	141659.58	3	Yes	141659.58
RCP-004117	Ewing Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16814.18	1	Yes	16814.38
RCP-004118	City Of Woodhaven, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1310351.24		Yes	1310351.24
RCP-004119	Lovells Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65260.08	1	Yes	65260.08
RCP-004120	Porter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	258518.24	4	Yes	258518.24
RCP-004121	Matchwood Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8196.92		Yes	8196.92
RCP-004123	Haynes Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	71460.34	18	Yes	71460.34
RCP-004126	Gustin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65470.26	2	Yes	65470.26
RCP-004127	Greenbush Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	228262.5	4	Yes	228262.51
RCP-004128	Ronald Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	204292.46	1	Yes	204292.46
RCP-004129	Turner Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35835.26	1	Yes	35835.26
RCP-004130	Mottville Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	150276.86	2	Yes	150276.86
RCP-004131	Flynn Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	103645.5	4	Yes	103645.5
RCP-004132	Emmett Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	246958.48	10	Yes	246958.48
RCP-004134	Rollin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	298977.42	14	Yes	298977.42
RCP-004136	Volinia Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114336.52	1	Yes	114336.52
RCP-004137	Ferris Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	151958.28	17	Yes	151958.28
RCP-004138	Hayes Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	202295.78	13	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-004139	City Of East Tawas, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	286156.58	1	Yes	286156.58
RCP-004140	City Of Harrison, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	217848.9		Yes	217848.9
RCP-004141	City Of Ionia, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1173630.84	1	Yes	1173630.84
RCP-004142	Thomas Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1204842.18	1	Yes	1204842.18
RCP-004143	Kinross Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	783331.32	1	Yes	783331.32
RCP-004144	City Of Hudsonville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	772191.92	3	Yes	772191.92
RCP-038215	Greenwich, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31399117.31	47	Yes	10000000
RCP-038179	West Jordan, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13388377	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038049	Easton City, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20665806	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-038182	Rapides Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25182604	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-038195	Clinton Township, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14816245	1	No		5467998	8999669	348578	0
RCP-038196	Calvert County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17971897	26	Yes	47000
RCP-038492	Portage County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13746631	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-038495	Albany, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20398505	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-038489	Davenport, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40896926	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-038496	Cumberland, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19595850	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-038498	Ingham County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56796438	41	No		13716975.42	13716975.42	13716975.42	13716975.42
RCP-039424	Waterbury, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75388037.99	45	No		19144145	17698007	20092644	18490293
RCP-039301	Chicopee, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39536150.29	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-039299	Roseville, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14393345	13	Yes	9990829.32
RCP-036964	Wichita County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25684127	35	Yes	10000000
RCP-040540	Warner Robins, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15026496	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039423	Lynn, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75134915.32	104	Yes	10000000
RCP-035860	State Of New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1751542835	72	No		2585984244	2585984244	0	0
RCP-036908	Mckinley County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13862203	3	Yes	6931101.5
RCP-038751	Bellflower, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21457498	14	No		4296913	7019231	4559101	226454
RCP-035941	Bell County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	70493732	7	No		8361792	9061435	11288414	3096889
RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	6244537955.5	190	No		4699000000	2244300000	0	0
RCP-038615	Paterson, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64668166	20	No		28094096.3	0	0	0
RCP-035943	Lake County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71308368	40	No		12135823	16030223	16419190	16419190
RCP-038612	Abington, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19107973	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-039060	Gadsden, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24042737	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-039062	Marathon County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26356580	45	No		8313632	15077870	2965078	500000
RCP-039080	Watsonville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18265428	10	No		2161942	12562928	3510558	10000000
RCP-038893	Torrance, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24074277	1	No		36256574	16920462	22087621	0
RCP-039008	South Bend, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58910047	3	No		26101418	29329398	0	0
RCP-038932	Greene County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13415844	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-038959	Eugene, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35908037	1	No		50821398	33468518	39418972	41274986
RCP-038864	Bonneville County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23126398	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038865	Island County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16537641	8	Yes	2112968.68
RCP-037231	Mcallen, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41922103	7	No		20210098	14446981	9040349	0
RCP-038714	Sandoval County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28504079	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-026731	City Of Wilson, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15762456.88	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-025860	Peachtree Corners, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16395722	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-025668	East Point, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13023592	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-049013	City Of Apache Junction, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14217868.38	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-049137	Westminster City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18365236.96	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-030120	Bozeman City, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12767080.73	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-025930	Stockbridge, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11167240	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-025999	Woodstock, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12337963	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-050865	Riviera Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17761773	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-050866	Rockledge City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14137596	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-050867	Royal Palm Beach Village, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20232484	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-026340	Chamblee, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11317735	5	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-036639	Charlottesville City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19609709	62	Yes	10000000
RCP-036804	Kent County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	127605807	15	No		48154364	76336054	58071906	92351287
RCP-037100	State of Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	4293727162.2	214	No		2179160000	1308710000	0	0
RCP-039816	Columbia, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25284624	5	No		7875745.76	3240764.34	1285478.54	2736816.74
RCP-039583	Marshall County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18797215	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-039592	West Valley, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26512139	1	No		2826944.65	3034094	0	0
RCP-036868	Indiana County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16330195	1	No		7654585.22	6996744.48	1678865.3	0
RCP-039586	Naperville, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13308689	8	No		20500792	0	0	0
RCP-039739	Pompano Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25694057	21	No		11693784	2568838	2568838	0
RCP-035913	State Of Vermont	Vermont	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1049287303	438	No		242787538	0	0	0
RCP-037033	Fairfield, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24830565.88	39	No		15240388	9176764	-568327	8446691
RCP-036124	Henry County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45560724	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-037027	Chapel Hill, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10668497	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-035838	Snohomish County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	159679985	152	No		25382234	0	3698053	5096592
RCP-039690	San Juan County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24077388	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-036893	Concord, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16255872	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-037278	Missoula, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14192996	31	Yes	10000000
RCP-038252	Ocala, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12202159	4	Yes	8173669
RCP-036953	City Of Chicago, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1886591388	93	No		1216614000	459885000	634302000	0
RCP-036112	Miami-Dade County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	527733745	1	No		1125064512	1102296281	437045351	376475662
RCP-036954	Santa Barbara, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21837523	25	No		28929690	0	0	0
RCP-036536	San Joaquin County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	148038314	68	No		251275532	231865666	192586966	210086730
RCP-036919	Salinas, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51567313	19	No		18491697	23373476	14982293	34118060
RCP-037076	Norwich, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28838728.45	66	Yes	2805561.21
RCP-036925	Bay City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31076578	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-036936	Stafford County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29695536	49	Yes	10000000
RCP-037361	Roswell, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11374757	3	No		20849481	32762002	0	0
RCP-039512	Lawton, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18202822	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-036216	El Paso County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	139929837	40	Yes	10000000
RCP-036800	Waukesha County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78510723	35	No		2344675	14534168	33233665	26199047
RCP-035867	County Of Yolo, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42829540	55	No		11561656	17649739	13618145	0
RCP-039738	Boone County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10400294	19	Yes	9900000
RCP-036427	Okaloosa County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40933386	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-036798	Flint, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94726664	40	No		32387528	37169068	0	0
RCP-036851	Muskegon, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22881894	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-037126	Pike County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11241735	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037024	Dougherty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17084422	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-037146	Everett, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20695570	4	No		50893824	0	378518243	398201192
RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30788709	43	Yes	10000000
RCP-039646	Missoula County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23230898	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-039746	San Angelo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16650136	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039851	Flagler County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22353135	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-036001	County Of Hudson, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	130604069	15	No		58556734.07	66110193.09	5937141.84	84635162.04
RCP-036848	Marion County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12643552	38	Yes	10000000
RCP-039616	Sharon, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14382307	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-039755	Oceanside, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32346514	38	Yes	10000000
RCP-056330	Coppell, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10283825.81	17	No		12918924	0	0	0
RCP-056505	Schertz, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10438004.98	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-032039	City Of Newark, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18094136.34	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-056282	Weslaco, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10335467.14	9	Yes	3371505.2
RCP-037825	Federal Way, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19216886	5	No		14512696	4704190	0	0
RCP-037824	Twin Falls County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16875033	3	Yes	9990000
RCP-053224	City Of Meridian, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12845509	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-053228	City Of Edinburg, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27132536	24	Yes	10000000
RCP-036770	Rockingham County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17677626	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-037833	Warren County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25813490	17	No		4819524	7376331	5708463	0
RCP-037219	Lancaster County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19037682	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-040176	Kingston, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17301385	54	Yes	10000000
RCP-040253	Inglewood, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31755095	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-040275	Starr County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12554203	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-040278	Surprise City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15545984	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-040276	Douglas County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28425412	31	Yes	10000000
RCP-039114	Meriden, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36359755.47	58	Yes	10000000
RCP-036038	Chesterfield County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	68527653	16	No		24051408	0	0	0
RCP-036773	Ashland, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13474388	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-037302	Palm Springs, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10820822	1	No		48274322	0	0	0
RCP-038246	Chicago Heights Illinois, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13654940	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-036107	Durham County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	62445275	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-036973	Flathead County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20163099	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-036853	Hawthorne, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30521654	13	No		17282589	0	0	0
RCP-053266	Talladega County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15534789	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037942	Cayuga County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14873990	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-036721	Anniston, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13291868	10	Yes	9903713.02
RCP-036073	Wichita City, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	72422555	51	No		30878371	15443674	25362867	0
RCP-037397	County Of Kings, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29706802	46	Yes	10000000
RCP-037875	Rogers, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11710729	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039930	Mckinney City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23115761	3	No		29202980	0	0	0
RCP-036261	Smith County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45209153	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-040163	St. Mary'S County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22047987	33	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-040528	Alliance, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15387409	121	Yes	10000000
RCP-036970	East Orange, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35984210	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039438	Hot Springs, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11370797	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-039442	Houston County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20566337	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-039446	Campbell County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18177595	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-035992	Fulton County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	206657290	24	No		44883276	19056823.75	25723757	0
RCP-004145	City Of St Clair, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	554763.36		Yes	554763.36
RCP-004146	Brighton Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1982498.7	8	Yes	1982498.7
RCP-004147	Marshall Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	327981.9	1	Yes	327981.9
RCP-004148	Buchanan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	369491.94	4	Yes	369491.94
RCP-004149	City Of Roosevelt Park, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	398916.76	1	Yes	398916.76
RCP-004150	Holland Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4065882.6	1	Yes	4065882.6
RCP-004151	City Of Brighton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	804559.22	3	Yes	804559.22
RCP-004152	City Of Rochester, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1397259.62		Yes	1397259.6
RCP-004153	City Of Dexter, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495493.32	1	Yes	495493.31
RCP-004154	City Of Brown City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	131360.88	1	Yes	131360.88
RCP-004155	Tuscola Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	203346.66	2	Yes	203346.66
RCP-004157	Oronoko Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	756638.78	1	Yes	756638.78
RCP-004158	Mundy Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1520949.04	1	Yes	1520949.04
RCP-004159	Village Of Sparta, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	462285.26	1	Yes	462285.26
RCP-004160	Zeeland Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1215245.96	1	Yes	1215245.96
RCP-004161	City Of Beaverton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123899.6	1	Yes	123899.6
RCP-004162	Chocolay Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	621809.96	1	Yes	621809.96
RCP-004163	City Of Perry, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	219845.6	3	Yes	219845.6
RCP-004164	Park Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1986702.26	1	Yes	1986702.26
RCP-004165	Laketown Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	625277.88	2	Yes	625277.88
RCP-004166	Hampton Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	986047.46		Yes	493029
RCP-004167	Ironwood Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	228042.52	1	Yes	49887
RCP-004168	Village Of Pewamo, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50862.94	2	Yes	50862.94
RCP-004169	Sands Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	243595.64	2	Yes	243595.64
RCP-004170	City Of East Grand Rapids, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1256440.74	3	Yes	1256440.74
RCP-004171	City Of Bridgman, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	232456.24	1	Yes	232456.24
RCP-004172	Plainfield Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3588464.54	2	Yes	3588464.54
RCP-004173	City Of Rockford, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	671622	1	Yes	671622
RCP-004174	Port Sheldon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495283.14	1	Yes	495283.14
RCP-004175	Pine River Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	232456.24	1	Yes	232456.24
RCP-004176	Dalton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	849642.3	1	Yes	849642.3
RCP-004177	City Of St. Joseph, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	874022.88	1	Yes	874022.88
RCP-004178	City Of Bloomfield Hills, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	420039.6	1	Yes	420039.6
RCP-004179	Roxand Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	138822.2		Yes	138822.2
RCP-004180	Village Of Mackinaw City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	83545.54	1	Yes	911395.59
RCP-004181	City Of Auburn Hills, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2600735.64	2	Yes	2600735.64
RCP-004182	Sanilac Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	180962.76	5	Yes	180962.76
RCP-004183	Gerrish Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	310116.8	1	Yes	310116.8
RCP-004184	City Of Greenville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	884847.02	1	Yes	884847.02
RCP-004185	City Of Dowagiac, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595747.96	1	Yes	595747.96
RCP-004186	Tittabawassee Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1049205.78	1	Yes	1049205.78
RCP-004187	Grand Blanc Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3845511.54	9	Yes	3845511.54
RCP-004188	City Of Rogers City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	278800.38	1	Yes	278800.38
RCP-004190	City Of Williamston, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	416676.78	1	Yes	416676.78
RCP-004192	Yates Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	83020.1	8	Yes	83020.1
RCP-004193	Moscow Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	151853.2	2	Yes	151853.2
RCP-004194	City Of Coldwater, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1283658.72	3	Yes	1283658.72
RCP-004195	Paw Paw Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	371698.8	4	Yes	371698.8
RCP-004196	Village Of Central Lake, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98678.3	3	Yes	98678.3
RCP-004197	Clark Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	207655.3	1	Yes	207655.3
RCP-004198	City Of Au Gres, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87118.54	5	Yes	0
RCP-004199	Sparta Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	557390.56	7	Yes	555162
RCP-004200	Plymouth Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2841073.56	7	Yes	2841073.56
RCP-004201	City Of Gaylord, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	387251.94	1	No		85522	0	0	0
RCP-004202	Village Of Franklin, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	341117.98	2	Yes	341117.98
RCP-004203	City Of Manistique, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	308855.74	1	Yes	308855.74
RCP-004204	Clam Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	230774.82	2	Yes	230774.82
RCP-004205	Olive Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	264403.22	3	Yes	264403.22
RCP-004206	City Of Ferndale, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2105242.34	1	Yes	2105242.34
RCP-004207	Village Of L'Anse, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	193573.42	2	Yes	0
RCP-004208	City Of Grandville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1666496.92		Yes	1666496.92
RCP-004209	City Of Oak Park, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3092866.12		Yes	692866.12
RCP-004210	Handy Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	587340.84	4	Yes	587340.84
RCP-004211	City Of Reed City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	251267.12	1	Yes	251267.12
RCP-004212	Madison Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	867507.38	1	Yes	867507.38
RCP-004213	Chikaming Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	323673.26	1	Yes	323673.26
RCP-004214	Hatton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98888.48	1	Yes	98888.48
RCP-004215	City Of Northville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626118.58	1	Yes	626118.58
RCP-004216	Pinora Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	79026.7	4	Yes	79026.71
RCP-004217	City Of Houghton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	814857.92	3	Yes	814857.92
RCP-004218	Big Creek Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	287207.48	4	Yes	287207.48
RCP-004219	Village Of Homer, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	172870.94	1	Yes	172870.94
RCP-004220	Village Of Saranac, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	139557.82		Yes	139557.82
RCP-004221	City Of Center Line, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	858679.94	1	Yes	858679.94
RCP-004223	Argyle Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75033.34	2	Yes	75033.34
RCP-004224	Putnam Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	632949.36	5	Yes	632949.36
RCP-004225	City Of Bronson, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	242019.32	2	Yes	242019.32
RCP-004226	City Of Plainwell, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	396920.08	1	Yes	395333
RCP-004227	Green Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	350050.54	2	Yes	350050.54
RCP-004228	Howell Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	759791.44	1	Yes	391386.8
RCP-004229	Niles Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1450329.42	6	Yes	1450329.42
RCP-004230	City Of Hamtramck, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2269811.26	2	Yes	2269811.26
RCP-004231	Long Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	989620.48	8	Yes	989620.48
RCP-004232	City Of Ludington, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	852059.34	1	Yes	852059.34
RCP-004233	Ingham Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	203767.02	2	Yes	203767.02
RCP-004234	Chippewa Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	127367.52	1	Yes	127367.52
RCP-004235	Cottrellville Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	362556.08	9	Yes	362556.08
RCP-004236	Mecosta Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	257677.54	3	Yes	257677.54
RCP-004237	City Of Mt Morris, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	298662.14	1	Yes	298662.14
RCP-004238	Lyndon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	292672.08	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-004239	City Of Dewitt, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	505266.56	1	Yes	505266.56
RCP-004240	Cascade Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2039351.7	4	Yes	2039351.7
RCP-004241	Rutland Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	424978.8		Yes	424978.8
RCP-004242	Texas Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1812780.42	5	Yes	1812780.42
RCP-004243	City Of Boyne City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	391875.84		Yes	391875.84
RCP-004244	Hagar Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	372539.5		Yes	371050
RCP-004245	Thornapple Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	516616.14	1	Yes	516616.14
RCP-004246	Grand Haven Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1851032.72	1	Yes	1851032.72
RCP-004247	Crockery Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	484564.08	3	Yes	0
RCP-004248	Village Of Vernon, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	81128.48	8	Yes	81128.48
RCP-004249	City Of Tecumseh, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	882535.08	16	Yes	882535.08
RCP-004250	Burns Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	293407.7	1	Yes	293407.7
RCP-004251	City Of Traverse City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1653886.26	1	Yes	1653886
RCP-004252	City Of Hillsdale, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	841025.02	4	Yes	841025.02
RCP-004253	Vienna Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1326850.18	1	Yes	1326850.18
RCP-004254	City Of Clare, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	323358	1	Yes	323358
RCP-004255	Chippewa Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21963.54	3	No		0	0	0	21000
RCP-004256	Village Of Manchester, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	226361.1	1	Yes	226361.1
RCP-004257	City Of West Branch, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	215431.88	1	Yes	215431.88
RCP-004258	City Of Huntington Woods, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	658380.82	3	Yes	658380.82
RCP-004259	City Of Pleasant Ridge, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	254840.14		Yes	254840.14
RCP-004260	City Of Berkley, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1614793.26	3	Yes	1614793.26
RCP-004261	Wilson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	207024.76	5	Yes	207024.76
RCP-004262	Leoni Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1433094.88	1	Yes	1433094.88
RCP-004263	Leroy Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	393241.98	1	Yes	393241.98
RCP-004264	Wheeler Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	146178.42	3	Yes	146178.42
RCP-004265	Watertown Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	576096.36	1	Yes	576096.36
RCP-004266	City Of Sandusky, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	264823.58	1	Yes	264823.58
RCP-004267	Amber Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	273125.58	1	Yes	273125.58
RCP-004268	Burlington Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	169297.92	1	Yes	169297.92
RCP-004269	Sturgis Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	232035.88	15	Yes	232035.88
RCP-004270	West Traverse Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	172976.04	1	Yes	172976.04
RCP-004271	City Of Clawson, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1244775.88	2	Yes	1244775.88
RCP-004272	Courtland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	930035.16	1	Yes	930035.16
RCP-004273	Brownstown Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3371351.24	1	Yes	3371351.19
RCP-004274	Elmwood Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	474790.82	2	Yes	474790.82
RCP-004275	Marengo Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	234558	1	Yes	234558
RCP-004276	Village Of Ravenna, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	133883.04	1	Yes	133348
RCP-004277	Mikado Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94790.02	3	Yes	94790.02
RCP-004278	Birch Run Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	446101.6	9	Yes	446101.6
RCP-004279	Pere Marquette Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	256416.46		Yes	256416.46
RCP-004280	Morton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	407639.14	1	Yes	407639.14
RCP-004281	Norvell Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	310432.06	3	Yes	310432.06
RCP-004282	Churchill Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	173291.3	3	Yes	133221.9
RCP-004283	Bergland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41720.22	1	Yes	41553
RCP-004284	Fairbanks Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28794.3	1	Yes	28794.3
RCP-004285	City Of Fraser, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1521684.66	2	Yes	0
RCP-004286	City Of Ishpeming, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	674249.22	1	Yes	674249.22
RCP-004287	City Of Grand Haven, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1160915.1	1	Yes	1160915.1
RCP-004288	Village Of Lake Orion, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	335127.92	1	Yes	335127.92
RCP-004289	Independence Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3891014.96	1	Yes	3891014.96
RCP-004290	White Pigeon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	241388.78	6	Yes	241388.78
RCP-004291	City Of Manistee, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	642512.44	1	Yes	642512.44
RCP-004292	Delhi Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2951101.44		Yes	2945218.5
RCP-004293	Bear Creek Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	667523.56	1	Yes	667523.56
RCP-004294	Southfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1366.14	1	Yes	1366.14
RCP-004295	Mcmillan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114651.78	1	Yes	114651.78
RCP-004296	City Of Burton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3002805.1	1	Yes	3002805.1
RCP-004297	Village Of Middleville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	365183.3	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-004298	Monroe Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1490473.32	1	Yes	1490473.32
RCP-004299	Gun Plain Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	644298.94	2	Yes	644298.94
RCP-004300	Tompkins Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	282373.38	1	Yes	282373.38
RCP-004301	Village Of Ontonagon, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	131360.88	1	Yes	131360.88
RCP-004302	City Of Wakefield, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	175287.98		Yes	175287.98
RCP-004303	City Of Marquette, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2206337.68	4	Yes	2206337.66
RCP-004304	Village Of Wolverine Lake, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	502639.36	4	Yes	501631.82
RCP-004305	City Of Iron Mountain, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	768093.46	2	Yes	768093.46
RCP-004306	City Of St Ignace, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	244121.08	1	Yes	244121.08
RCP-004307	Port Huron Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1088298.78	1	Yes	1088298.78
RCP-004308	Kochville Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493811.9	3	Yes	493811.9
RCP-004309	Augusta Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	764625.52	3	Yes	764625.52
RCP-004310	Ganges Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	280481.78		Yes	0
RCP-004311	Village Of Elkton, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	78711.44	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-004312	Kalamazoo Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2380364.6	16	Yes	2380364.6
RCP-004313	Columbus Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	423402.44	4	Yes	423402.44
RCP-004314	Brookfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	164779.1	21	Yes	0
RCP-004315	Orangeville Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	364552.78	12	Yes	364552.78
RCP-004317	James Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	197671.88		Yes	197671.8
RCP-004318	City Of Montrose, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	162782.42	2	Yes	162782.43
RCP-035995	City Of St Paul, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	166641623	57	No		35211905.02	65040331.12	44876914.45	44876914.45
RCP-038571	Otero County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13109141	5	Yes	3500000
RCP-038523	Jackson, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42098330	10	No		570000	0	2699999.96	0
RCP-036635	Carolina Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72224833	17	No		31044118	19748088	15444213	12513777
RCP-038512	Spartanburg, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16480273	4	Yes	5200000
RCP-037272	Cape Coral, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25439699	3	No		12629642	0	0	0
RCP-038486	Rogers County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17959077	51	Yes	10000000
RCP-038428	New Britain, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56132092.86	23	No		10074655.79	10074655.79	0	10074655.79
RCP-038409	Franklin County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18495757	37	Yes	10000000
RCP-038410	Buchanan County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16969433	27	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-038422	Glen Falls, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12008323	24	Yes	10000000
RCP-039425	Navajo County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21545687	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039426	Las Cruces, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24759826	19	No		6888670	0	0	0
RCP-039434	Kenosha, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26488543	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-039435	New Haven, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115807159.59	112	No		32334482	22608141	26563531	30294736
RCP-036385	County Of Merced, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	53936085	11	No		36039354	36240386	54437231	31756568
RCP-036681	Yauco Municipality, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20431068	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-038596	Lompoc, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12908901	5	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-038610	Ann Arbor City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24182630	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-038606	Glendale, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43521005	1	No		33418396	17371392	6168157	15381650
RCP-036255	Morris County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	95535125	46	No		13175762	20536369	30831828	0
RCP-039202	Rocky Mount, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11521180	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039222	Beaverton, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16859058	1	No		5967105.22	10981952.78	0	0
RCP-038721	Pennington County, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22099460	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-038733	Nacogdoches County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12665113	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039452	Porter County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33096066	58	Yes	10000000
RCP-039125	Milford Town, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29196724.91	40	Yes	10000000
RCP-036024	County Of Marin, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50273916	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-036108	Seattle City, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	232341627	66	No		344322260	59149352	0	0
RCP-039265	Cumberland County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29043867	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-035982	Laredo City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	85558888	24	No		27293514	12002034	0	0
RCP-039170	Hemet, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21674344	32	Yes	10000000
RCP-026398	Town Of Garner, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10009330.62	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-026438	Town of Holly Springs, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12050587.75	4	Yes	9590588
RCP-026444	Town Of Indian Trail, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12774525	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-026506	Town Of Matthews, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10560995.9	2	Yes	9707607.64
RCP-049016	City Of Bullhead City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13654443.89	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-049029	City Of El Mirage, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11940791.81	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-049263	Trumbull, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10557445.23	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-050753	Key West City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12079588	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-050800	Miami Lakes Town, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15710276	11	Yes	0
RCP-049267	Wallingford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13118305.66	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-050836	Oviedo City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20965734	49	Yes	10000000
RCP-025664	Duluth, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11057077	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-036143	Harrison County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40417101	32	Yes	1500000
RCP-039770	Camden County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10618230	6	Yes	9961387.28
RCP-039766	Logan, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13815781	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037122	Jackson County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27895919	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10886278	39	Yes	6417192.16
RCP-036120	Rockingham County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	60168997	48	No		3104491	9353758	12845490	11687947.14
RCP-039613	Colton City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14881400	1	No		17167734	0	0	0
RCP-039607	Richardson City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18285133	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-036428	State of Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2812288081.6	387	No		1993880866	147129658	0	1001775316
RCP-036896	Stamford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49056682.71	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-036643	Fredericksburg City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10782747	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-035878	City Of Indianapolis and Marion County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	419769453	123	No		133855441	79594839	9224000	16081093
RCP-039726	Frederick County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17348003	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-037291	Cape May County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17877497	27	No		2529093.28	0	0	0
RCP-039612	Charles County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31710758	158	Yes	10000000
RCP-039687	Nevada County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19376239	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-036173	Oxnard City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59540662	48	No		16520363	4712379	17480193	0
RCP-039601	Rock County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31729599	38	Yes	10000000
RCP-036122	Clackamas County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	81227922	53	No		11719103	0	0	0
RCP-035819	Commonwealth Of The Northern Mariana Islands	Northern Mariana Islands	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	481876521	27	No		41293408	103969328	103969328	103969328
RCP-035988	County Of Bucks, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	122034082	31	Yes	10000000
RCP-036170	Anderson County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39344517	12	No		13007053	0	0	0
RCP-039594	Hempstead Village, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16790322	44	No		6878491	10016625	7840427	9065704
RCP-039599	Montcalm County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12409495	13	Yes	6409495
RCP-035929	Clay County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42587131	33	Yes	10000000
RCP-040577	Santa Clara County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	374462651	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-035919	Cobb County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	147648478	139	Yes	10000000
RCP-036860	Borough Of State College, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13276247	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-036528	Lubbock County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	60324387	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-036062	Dupage, County Of	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	179266585	108	Yes	10000000
RCP-036647	Lynchburg City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33328529	1	No		9662829	16644886	11367125	8024825
RCP-036064	Pima County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	203421668	55	Yes	10000000
RCP-036130	Mclennan County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	49846009	59	Yes	10000000
RCP-036245	Gaston County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43612126	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-037040	Yuba City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15615517	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-040556	Municipality Of Bayamon, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	86005562	38	No		27832640	21400591	0	0
RCP-035823	Buncombe County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50733290	49	Yes	10000000
RCP-036025	City Of Detroit, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	826675290	74	No		236743195	287782638	127046007	109311832
RCP-039807	Benton County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18074454	37	Yes	10000000
RCP-036519	State Of Wyoming	Wyoming	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1068484768	221	No		584926766	0	0	0
RCP-039611	Santa Rosa, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34637465	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-039802	Harlingen, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21927374	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-039812	Napa City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15118910	23	No		22985432	11179893	0	0
RCP-039459	Washington County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10008516	3	Yes	9677616
RCP-038501	Josephine County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16993324	41	Yes	0
RCP-036679	Trujillo Alto Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31586878	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-038435	York County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54576877	47	Yes	10000000
RCP-037661	Kirkland City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10155994	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-037836	Worcester County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10154000	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-037789	Grand Traverse County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18081253	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-037629	Wagoner County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15789435	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037626	Robeson County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25372375	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-037628	Saratoga County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44648193	16	No		30674734	0	0	0
RCP-040172	Pekin, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11110631	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-036840	Potter County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22806487	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-037253	Guadalupe County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32408074	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-039234	Kootenai County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32184700	13	Yes	0
RCP-036960	Cidra Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21782715	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-040467	Temple, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14170861	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-037636	Aiken County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33189883	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-026747	Virgin Islands	Virgin Islands	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	547176884	139	No		103835859	111832692	107321725	305577728
RCP-037503	State of Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1573121580.8	237	No		1013578249.48	0	0	0
RCP-037260	Palm Coast, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12501879	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-037345	Tonawanda Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40351859	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-040170	Garfield County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11666145	5	No		3095827	8448953	9800664	0
RCP-037773	Carroll County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32718855	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-037774	Rockwall County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20378509	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-037772	Bloomington, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11396081	14	Yes	6146000
RCP-037480	Clinton County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15460396	6	Yes	5000000
RCP-037752	Barrow County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16168394	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-037447	Eagle County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10707773	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-040539	Mckeesport, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24753914	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-039627	Simi Valley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15325294	1	No		6734897.96	7014078.47	1576317.57	0
RCP-036631	City And County Of Broomfield, CO	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20727034	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-040391	Kankakee, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15052449	36	No		1591000	1591000	1591000	0
RCP-040375	Corona, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29158725	18	No		22559845	1649720	1649720	1649720
RCP-015802	City Of Boca Raton, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12199643	2	No		17441707	33196583	0	0
RCP-039381	Milpitas City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16736815	36	No		45006853	77771438	92458278	92627066
RCP-039439	Springfield, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13956221	31	No		8495682	5460539	0	0
RCP-039448	Valdosta, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16254692	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-035855	St. Petersburg City, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	45413871	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-035870	Glendale City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	59516611	45	Yes	10000000
RCP-004319	City Of Flat Rock, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1051307.56	1	Yes	1051307.56
RCP-004320	Village Of South Rockwood, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	174132.02		Yes	173783
RCP-004321	Bingham Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	310116.8	5	Yes	310116.8
RCP-004322	Manistee Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	375271.82	1	Yes	375271.82
RCP-004323	Prairieville Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	369912.28	10	Yes	369912.28
RCP-004324	Greenwood Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	124425.04	2	Yes	124425.04
RCP-004325	Egelston Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1085041.04	1	Yes	1085041.04
RCP-004326	Village Of Mattawan, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	208285.84	3	Yes	208285.84
RCP-004327	Village Of Pigeon, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	117699.36	2	Yes	117699.36
RCP-004328	Fruitland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	602999.08	9	Yes	602999.08
RCP-004329	Pittsfield Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4090158.1	18	Yes	4090158.1
RCP-004330	City Of Coopersville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	461024.2	1	Yes	461024.2
RCP-004331	City Of Swartz Creek, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	578093.06	4	Yes	578093.06
RCP-004332	Hastings Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	321676.56	4	Yes	321676.56
RCP-004334	Marion Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1173315.56	1	Yes	1173315.56
RCP-004335	City Of Stephenson, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	86803.28	1	Yes	86803.28
RCP-004336	St Ignace Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94790.02	9	Yes	94790.02
RCP-004337	City Of Mason, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	888840.4	1	Yes	888840.4
RCP-004338	Homestead Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	217848.9	3	Yes	217848.9
RCP-004339	Fulton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	212489.4	6	Yes	212489.4
RCP-004340	Wayne Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	274176.48	5	Yes	274176.48
RCP-004341	Northville Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3083513.22	1	Yes	3083513.22
RCP-004342	City Of Walker, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2613451.38	3	Yes	2613451.38
RCP-004343	Van Buren Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2984099.3	1	Yes	2984099.3
RCP-004344	Meade Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19126.16	2	Yes	19126.16
RCP-004345	City Of Grosse Pointe Woods, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1611220.26	1	Yes	1611220.26
RCP-004346	Otsego Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	615399.56	11	Yes	615399.56
RCP-004347	Sheridan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	201034.72	1	Yes	201034.72
RCP-004348	Hendricks Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24170.4		Yes	0
RCP-004349	Boston Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	471007.64	1	Yes	471007.64
RCP-004350	City Of Marshall, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	731837.84	5	Yes	731837.84
RCP-004351	Marquette Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	409425.64		Yes	409425.64
RCP-004352	Village Of Paw Paw, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	353728.64	1	Yes	353728.64
RCP-004353	Holton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	274701.92	2	Yes	274701.91
RCP-004354	Berlin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	336599.18	1	Yes	336599.18
RCP-004355	Hartford Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	336283.9	10	Yes	100000
RCP-004356	Crystal Falls Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	173711.66	3	Yes	173711.66
RCP-004358	City Of Zeeland, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	581771.16	1	Yes	581771.16
RCP-004359	Cooper Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1163016.86	4	Yes	1163016.86
RCP-004360	Village Of Onsted, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	99834.28	2	Yes	99634.08
RCP-004361	Cleon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	79972.5	1	Yes	79972.5
RCP-004362	Village Of Sheridan, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68307.66	1	Yes	68307.66
RCP-004363	Burnside Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	194729.38	6	Yes	194729.38
RCP-004364	Ridgeway Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96786.72	1	Yes	96786.72
RCP-004365	Emmett Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1221866.54	1	Yes	1216981
RCP-004366	Columbus Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19651.6	1	Yes	19651.6
RCP-004367	City Of Petersburg, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	118540.06	2	Yes	118540.06
RCP-004368	Ash Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	566848.56	1	Yes	566848.56
RCP-004369	Hadley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	470061.84		Yes	470061.84
RCP-004370	Arcadia Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	325039.42	3	Yes	325039.42
RCP-004371	Nahma Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50232.4	1	Yes	50232.4
RCP-004372	Brockway Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	207340.04	2	Yes	207340.04
RCP-004373	City Of Caro, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	419093.82		Yes	419093.82
RCP-004374	Springfield Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1522630.46	10	Yes	1522630.46
RCP-004376	City Of Ithaca, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	290675.4	1	Yes	290675.4
RCP-004377	Rolland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	124140	2	Yes	124140
RCP-004378	Algansee Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	205763.7	1	Yes	2835
RCP-004379	Breitung Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595958.12	1	Yes	595958.12
RCP-004380	Coe Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	164253.66		Yes	164253.66
RCP-004381	Galien Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92583.16	1	Yes	92583.16
RCP-004382	Hamburg Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2290303.58	1	Yes	2290303.58
RCP-004383	Fremont Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	212174.12	6	Yes	212174.12
RCP-004385	City Of Grant, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92898.42	1	Yes	92898.42
RCP-004386	Manchester Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	271864.5	1	Yes	271864.5
RCP-004387	Pentwater Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	67151.68		Yes	0
RCP-004388	Mullett Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	132937.22	1	Yes	132937.22
RCP-004389	Village Of Vermontville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	81023.4	1	Yes	81023.4
RCP-004390	Grand Rapids Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1967471.02	3	Yes	1967471
RCP-004391	Filer Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	240548.08	3	Yes	240548.08
RCP-004392	City Of Lake City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87959.26	1	Yes	87959.26
RCP-004393	City Of Galesburg, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	218689.62	1	Yes	218689.62
RCP-004394	Macon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	152168.46	3	Yes	152168.46
RCP-004395	Beaver Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	292672.08	1	Yes	292672.08
RCP-004396	Marathon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	356566.02	13	Yes	356566.02
RCP-004397	Clinton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	132832.12	3	Yes	132832.12
RCP-004398	Village Of Edmore, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	125265.76		Yes	125265.76
RCP-004399	Forest Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	375902.36	10	Yes	375902.36
RCP-004400	City Of Gladwin, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	304021.66	1	Yes	304021.66
RCP-004401	City Of The Village Of Douglas, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	141344.32	1	Yes	141344.32
RCP-004402	City Of Wayne, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1766961.74	9	Yes	1766961.74
RCP-004403	City Of Newaygo, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	217218.38	1	Yes	217218.38
RCP-004404	City Of Zilwaukee, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	160680.66	1	Yes	160680
RCP-004405	Village Of Springport, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82704.82	1	Yes	82704.82
RCP-004406	City Of Saline, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	981843.9	1	Yes	981843.9
RCP-004407	Grosse Ile Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1065284.36	7	Yes	965852.12
RCP-004408	Village Of Galien, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55591.92	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-004409	City Of Clio, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	262406.54	1	Yes	262406.54
RCP-004410	Village Of Kent City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	124740.3	1	Yes	124740.3
RCP-004411	City Of The Village Of Clarkston, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96786.72	1	Yes	96786.72
RCP-004412	Clarence Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	205973.88	1	Yes	205973.88
RCP-004413	City Of Grosse Pointe Park, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1161230.36	2	Yes	1161230.35
RCP-004414	Moran Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102356.4	3	Yes	102356.4
RCP-004415	L'Anse Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	177284.66	2	Yes	177284.66
RCP-004416	City Of Bad Axe, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	306228.52	6	Yes	306228.52
RCP-004417	Dryden Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	398286.24	2	Yes	398286.24
RCP-004418	Tyrone Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1109947.06	1	Yes	1109947.06
RCP-004419	Baraga Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	168141.94	1	Yes	168141.94
RCP-004420	Village Of Detour, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33313.12	2	Yes	33313.12
RCP-004421	Peninsula Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	613718.12	9	Yes	613718.12
RCP-004423	City Of Norway, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	288783.8	1	Yes	288783.8
RCP-004424	City Of Highland Park, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1132330.96		Yes	1132330.95
RCP-004425	Grattan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	414995.36	1	Yes	414995.36
RCP-004426	Milton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	412788.5	10	Yes	410000
RCP-004427	Hillman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	149541.24	1	Yes	149541.24
RCP-004428	Village Of Suttons Bay, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65049.92		Yes	65049.92
RCP-004429	Brady Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	194098.86	9	Yes	194098.86
RCP-004430	Eagle Harbor Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22383.9	3	Yes	22383.9
RCP-004431	Elkland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108031.2	15	Yes	108031.2
RCP-004432	Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56432.62	4	Yes	56432.62
RCP-004433	Yankee Springs Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	468380.42	1	Yes	468380.42
RCP-004434	City Of Albion, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	882955.44	1	Yes	882955.44
RCP-004435	Bridgewater Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	181908.56	1	Yes	16067.82
RCP-004436	Clearwater Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	268711.84		Yes	268711.84
RCP-004437	Lansing Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	866666.66		Yes	866666.66
RCP-004438	City Of Luna Pier, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	146703.86		Yes	146703.86
RCP-004439	Village Of Hanover, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44872.88	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-004440	Michigamme Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35940.34		Yes	0
RCP-004441	Laird Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56642.8	1	Yes	56416
RCP-004442	Wheatfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	174552.36	6	Yes	174552.37
RCP-004443	City Of Big Rapids, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1089034.4	1	Yes	1089034.4
RCP-004444	Tuscarora Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	306438.7	3	Yes	306000
RCP-004445	City Of Ironwood, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511782.06	1	Yes	511782.06
RCP-004446	City Of Evart, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	197776.98	1	Yes	197776.98
RCP-004447	Hazelton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	151327.76	7	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-004448	Jerome Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	403015.24	1	Yes	403015.24
RCP-004449	Empire Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85016.78		Yes	85016.78
RCP-004451	Cannon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1593880.62	10	Yes	1593880.62
RCP-004452	Matteson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	125686.1	2	Yes	125686.1
RCP-004453	Village Of Lincoln, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32997.86	1	Yes	0
RCP-004454	City Of Caspian, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88799.96	1	Yes	230000
RCP-004455	Village Of Centreville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	147754.74	3	Yes	147754.74
RCP-004456	City Of Frankfort, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	135564.46	9	Yes	135564.46
RCP-004457	City Of Marlette, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	185691.78	3	Yes	185691.78
RCP-004458	City Of Otsego, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	419724.34	1	Yes	419724.34
RCP-004459	Hebron Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27323.06	8	Yes	24164.9
RCP-004460	Taymouth Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	450200.08	3	Yes	450200.08
RCP-004461	City Of Whitehall, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	297611.24	2	Yes	50000
RCP-004462	City Of Harbor Beach, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	166775.8	1	Yes	166775.8
RCP-004463	Fremont Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	103302.2	4	Yes	103302.2
RCP-004464	City Of Romulus, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2477256.4	1	Yes	2477256.4
RCP-004465	Elk Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107400.66	6	Yes	107400.66
RCP-004466	Marquette Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61476.9	3	Yes	61476.9
RCP-004467	Erie Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	454823.98	12	Yes	454823.98
RCP-004468	Albion Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116438.3	1	Yes	116438.3
RCP-004469	Spring Arbor Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	827994.02	1	Yes	827994.02
RCP-004470	Armada Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	401123.64	1	Yes	401123.64
RCP-004471	Moose Creek Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25353.48	2	Yes	25353.48
RCP-004472	Bear Creek Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12458.17	2	Yes	6229.09
RCP-004473	Prior Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26664.86	8	Yes	26664.86
RCP-004475	North Star Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21200.75	1	Yes	21200.75
RCP-004476	Holst Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39888.01	1	Yes	39888
RCP-004477	Spring Prairie Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42510.79	1	Yes	42510.79
RCP-004478	Hornet Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25244.19	1	Yes	25244.19
RCP-004479	Alden City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	69831.35	1	Yes	69831.35
RCP-004480	Comfrey City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38685.92	1	Yes	38685.92
RCP-004481	Automba Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15845.93	1	Yes	15845.93
RCP-004482	Tara Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9070.42	1	Yes	9070.42
RCP-004483	Leenthrop Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25462.77	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-004486	Holt City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9507.55	1	Yes	9507.55
RCP-004487	Taunton City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14534.53	1	Yes	14534.53
RCP-004488	Eagle Point Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1857.8	1	Yes	1857.8
RCP-004489	Hartland City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33440.37	2	Yes	0
RCP-004490	Whiteford Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4917.7	1	Yes	4917.7
RCP-004491	Faxon Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76169.72		Yes	76169.72
RCP-004492	St. Olaf Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38248.79	2	Yes	38248.79
RCP-037538	Camden, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61648323	19	No		26871808	26547045	0	0
RCP-037465	Livingston County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37292778	38	Yes	10000000
RCP-039886	Washington County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11888160	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-038171	Canyon County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44645474	3	No		4891173	10297493	21989501	25330644
RCP-035972	Richland County Government, Sc	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	80756312	42	No		9903727	7756012	7501005.54	0
RCP-038421	Warwick, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39431837.39	5	No		14501240	14113424	3538039	0
RCP-038225	Sauk County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12517103	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-038282	Tom Green County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23153203	38	Yes	10000000
RCP-038268	St George, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15954196	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-038280	Davie, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17934700	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-036567	Hialeah City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66834253	8	No		13674651	19772634	26272727	33195811
RCP-039415	Clallam County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15020640	35	Yes	7000000
RCP-039429	Berkeley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66646289	5	No		49626591	14678925.26	0	44903746.56
RCP-036030	Anaheim City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106630239	1	No		95180380	11449859	0	0
RCP-039436	Brookline, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32406450	96	No		10926986	2627528.01	0	0
RCP-039437	Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16493877	9	No		9396872.05	4641509.4	6858934.65	10033106.92
RCP-038445	San Leandro, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18639484	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-039087	Porterville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19984717	12	No		6175073	11878682	1930962	0
RCP-038990	Kershaw County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12926752	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-038987	Cedar Rapids, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28190765	54	Yes	10000000
RCP-036628	Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49289120	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-036104	Lee County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	149675549	104	No		48241146	0	0	0
RCP-039267	Hamblen County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12612668	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-039168	Citrus County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29069118	48	Yes	10000000
RCP-039133	Monroe County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14417919	87	No		26194087	0	0	0
RCP-039068	Victoria, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14508296	1	No		7176453	7331843	0	0
RCP-039078	Belmont County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13015130	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039252	Bay County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20031017	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-039167	Crow Wing County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12636171	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-039165	Santa Cruz County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	53068422	15	No		42864801	18075068.86	0	0
RCP-038983	Gila County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10492363	8	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-035880	Lubbock City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56575324	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-038971	Otter Tail County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11410722	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-049044	Town Of Marana, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16375046.08	2	No		9519048	10660969	14414617	16676847
RCP-050893	Sunny Isles Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10920613	4	Yes	9999999.99
RCP-050896	Tarpon Springs City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12810334	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-050898	Temple Terrace City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13342240	7	No		2100000	0	0	0
RCP-026531	Town Of Mooresville, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12471268.37	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-026705	Town Of Wake Forest, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14541845.67	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-026333	Carrollton, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10179501	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-025660	Douglasville, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12693848	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-050842	Palmetto Bay Village, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12282434	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-025834	Newnan, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15527856	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-050844	Palm Springs Village, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12629526	58	Yes	10000000
RCP-050847	Parkland City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17114169	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-037035	Coos County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12525844	1	No		16206151.44	16206151.44	16206151.44	16206151.44
RCP-039468	Lyon County, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11170643	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-039591	Cathedral City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15572693	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-036897	Reading, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61134970	13	No		14028713	5907434	11478997	11478997
RCP-039458	Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26175162	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-039492	Middletown, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21731554.29	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-039486	Rockdale County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17655482	22	Yes	6186806
RCP-038202	Racine County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38131110	31	Yes	9685940
RCP-036877	City Of Sugar Land, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11115958	4	Yes	9976180
RCP-039590	Sanford, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13240884	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039703	Hernando County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37666687	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-039462	Duluth, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58117859	12	No		13815533.36	19543038.55	0	0
RCP-039495	Bradenton, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10791837	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-039521	St. Landry Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15951624	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-039506	Newton County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21704962	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-037007	Franklin County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10885502	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037061	Kaufman County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26446318	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-037323	Tipton County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11964884	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-036048	Rensselaer County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30828334	6	No		19931807	1959898	8936629	21926739
RCP-037136	Margate, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10849938	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-036165	Luzerne County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	112890152	135	Yes	10000000
RCP-039707	Genesee County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11125969	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-037135	Darlington County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12939766	2	Yes	9758300.92
RCP-036050	Weld County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63028767	2	No		93351095	0	0	0
RCP-039499	Cowlitz County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21481394	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-036886	Linn County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25202222	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-040561	County Of Camden, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	98376054	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-039635	Fort Smith, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21220634	3	Yes	6220634
RCP-039788	Chippewa County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12559059	14	No		6284399	6412366	870924	0
RCP-039454	Albemarle County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21236071	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-039776	Pulaski County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10218293	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039618	Clifton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30531115	17	No		7672239.88	5377763.31	16385708.02	0
RCP-036918	Peoria City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20769706	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-037335	Clinton County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15633268	21	No		14181757	14181757	14181757	14181757
RCP-039666	Beaufort County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37317446	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-036898	Williamsport, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25477801	24	Yes	10000000
RCP-036922	Christian County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13686223	2	No		2231236	2818254	3687097	3687096.53
RCP-036139	Union County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	130591801	42	No		31931342.1	50657590.32	68969497.77	81965346.39
RCP-035927	Dekalb County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	147484541	1	No		66942834	0	96596077	10000000
RCP-040596	Baldwin County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43360588	40	Yes	10000000
RCP-036426	Midland, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24988224	20	No		21763192	31474310	0	0
RCP-039830	Wichita Falls, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29091650	18	No		0	0	12475286	14713556
RCP-039671	Trenton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72913998	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-039723	Prince William County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	91357060	42	Yes	10000000
RCP-038963	Weirton, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10028924	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-036672	Mayaguez Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48680443	71	No		5188240	4851573	4199354	3389639
RCP-035990	Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39515058	24	Yes	10000000
RCP-131241	County Of Ocean, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	117938762	32	No		13496712	26491681	26588281	10004370
RCP-037516	Monongalia County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20513893	16	No		3207660	3332343	0	0
RCP-037569	City Of Ames, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14257623	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-039333	Allegany County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13677483	69	Yes	10000000
RCP-039230	Joplin, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13779739	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-039986	Silver Bow County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15727317.22	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039987	Johnson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34150391	94	No		13943427	1849401	0	3652227
RCP-037570	Steuben County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18526253	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-026746	City Of Temecula, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14079507	1	No		38805789	19888135	72966653	56522527
RCP-040450	Monroe County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29232861	52	Yes	10000000
RCP-040440	Massillon, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16373501	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-036116	St. Johns County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51409433	20	Yes	7000000
RCP-040441	Decatur, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10883767	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-053232	Murfreesboro, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24106035	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-040156	Pawtucket, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58270160.87	24	No		5357893	17605243	12792118	0
RCP-040318	Redlands City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11508106	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-040323	Fairfax, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29585521	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-037575	Hunterdon County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24157609	16	No		4276661	4220120	7998747	6499561
RCP-040404	Cherokee County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10225868	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-036755	Morgan County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23246243	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-035889	Ada County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	93542629	50	Yes	10000000
RCP-039918	Burien, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10806859	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037675	Columbia County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12618495	52	No		2070987	2070988.32	0	2070987
RCP-037682	Champaign County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40729630	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-036029	State Of Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2738837228.7	332	No		692296812	633233650	633233650	633233650
RCP-037591	Vega Alta Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10785725.54	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-040242	Cayey Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23384207	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-040413	Commerce City, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10505025	5	No		11805998	0	0	0
RCP-053081	City Of Bessemer, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13970941	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-053564	County Of Santa Barbara, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	86727196	46	No		26574618	0	0	0
RCP-053154	Municipality Of Dorado,	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10825831.44	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-053163	Mcminn County, Tn	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10448854	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037742	Lafayette County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10492557	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-037969	Burlington, Vermont	Vermont	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27176144.49	84	Yes	10000000
RCP-039443	Kenosha County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32935236	41	No		16694659	23270217	35767406	35767406
RCP-039432	Dothan, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12438636	3	No		6196357	0	0	0
RCP-039387	Mercer County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21254329	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-036352	County Of Tulare, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	90552914	78	Yes	10000000
RCP-004493	Wasioja Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	101632.48	5	Yes	101632.48
RCP-004495	Heron Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33112.52	1	Yes	33112.52
RCP-004496	Fairfield Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13441.71	1	Yes	13441.71
RCP-004498	Waltham Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38467.35	3	Yes	37856.67
RCP-004500	Boon Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38795.19	1	Yes	38795.19
RCP-004501	Glen Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48412.03	1	Yes	48412
RCP-004502	La Crescent Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	119882.61	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-004503	Onstad Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7759.04		Yes	7759.04
RCP-004505	Tamarac Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8305.45	1	Yes	8305.45
RCP-004506	Darfur City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11256.07	1	Yes	11256.07
RCP-004507	Eckvoll Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8305.45	1	Yes	8305.45
RCP-004508	East Park Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2513.49	1	Yes	2513.49
RCP-004509	Martin Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41090.12	1	Yes	41090.12
RCP-004510	Minnesota City City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20435.78	1	Yes	20435.78
RCP-004511	Clinton Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111686.45	2	Yes	111686.45
RCP-004512	Silverton Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19670.8	1	Yes	19670.8
RCP-004513	Dunn Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98463.3	1	Yes	98463.3
RCP-004514	Powers Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	81524.55	1	Yes	81524.55
RCP-004515	Viola Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64148.67	1	Yes	64148.67
RCP-004516	Hillman Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22075.01	1	Yes	22075.01
RCP-004517	Redwood Falls Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18796.55	1	Yes	18796.55
RCP-004518	Lake Grove Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21091.48	1	Yes	21091.48
RCP-004519	Ten Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	121303.28	1	Yes	121303.28
RCP-004520	Lincoln Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12567.46	1	Yes	12567.46
RCP-004521	Prairieville Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27211.28	1	Yes	27211.28
RCP-004522	Elm Creek Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19670.8	1	Yes	19670.8
RCP-004524	Osceola Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16173.77	1	Yes	16173.77
RCP-004525	Delavan City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18140.86	1	Yes	18140.86
RCP-004526	Wanamingo Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49286.29	1	Yes	49286.29
RCP-004527	Kanaranzi Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26446.3	1	Yes	26446
RCP-004528	Deer Creek Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37265.24	2	Yes	37265.24
RCP-004529	Sullivan Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19015.11	1	Yes	19015.1
RCP-004530	Oronoco City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	166655.41	3	Yes	166655.41
RCP-004531	Atlanta Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13769.56	1	Yes	13769.56
RCP-004532	Union Grove Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	69612.78	1	Yes	69612.78
RCP-004533	Lynden Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	226869.93	8	Yes	226869.93
RCP-004534	Bigelow City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25244.19	1	Yes	25244.19
RCP-004535	Zion Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39123.04	1	Yes	39123.04
RCP-004536	Elk Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27429.84	1	Yes	27429.84
RCP-004537	Veldt Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3278.47	1	Yes	3278.47
RCP-004539	Getty Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44150.03	2	Yes	44150.03
RCP-004541	Hampton Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	100867.5	1	Yes	100867.5
RCP-004542	Pillsbury Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26883.43	1	Yes	26883.43
RCP-004543	Linsell Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3169.18	1	Yes	3169.18
RCP-004544	Island Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26118.46	3	Yes	26118.46
RCP-004549	Thief Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4043.44	1	Yes	4043.44
RCP-004552	Hancock Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38576.63	2	Yes	38576.63
RCP-004553	Goodhue Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57591.74	1	Yes	57591.74
RCP-004554	Arthur Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	202609.27	1	Yes	202609.27
RCP-004555	Bruce Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63602.27	3	Yes	63602.27
RCP-004556	Norwegian Grove Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32784.67	5	Yes	32784.67
RCP-004559	Rushmore City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36609.55		Yes	36609.55
RCP-004560	Williams Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15518.08	1	Yes	15518.08
RCP-004561	Hector Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22839.99	1	Yes	22839.99
RCP-004562	Lynn Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58466	2	Yes	58466
RCP-004563	Wahkon City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23932.81	1	Yes	23932.81
RCP-004564	Hassan Valley Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	73765.51	1	Yes	73765.51
RCP-004565	Cormant Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17266.59	1	Yes	17266.59
RCP-004566	Malmo Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36718.83		Yes	0
RCP-004567	St. Johns Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45242.85	1	Yes	45242.85
RCP-004568	Fair Haven Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	176162.97	3	Yes	176162.97
RCP-004570	St. Hilaire City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28850.51		Yes	28850.51
RCP-004571	Garnes Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20545.06	2	Yes	20545.06
RCP-004572	Warrenton Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10928.22	1	Yes	10928.22
RCP-004573	Bruno City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10818.95	1	Yes	10818.95
RCP-004574	Germania Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54859.68	1	Yes	54859.68
RCP-004575	Gail Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11146.79	3	Yes	11146.79
RCP-004576	Randolph Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	81743.11	1	Yes	81743.11
RCP-004577	Clitherall City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11583.91	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-004578	Plummer City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31801.13		Yes	31801.13
RCP-004579	East Lake Lillian Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22293.57	1	Yes	22293.57
RCP-004580	Oakland Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33003.24	1	Yes	33003.24
RCP-004581	Spencer Brook Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	179987.84	4	Yes	179987.86
RCP-004583	York Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41855.1	2	Yes	41855.1
RCP-004585	San Francisco Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	93436.31	1	Yes	93436.31
RCP-004586	Lexington Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	81196.71		Yes	40598.36
RCP-004587	Dead Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54203.99	1	Yes	54203.99
RCP-004588	Morris Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44040.74	3	Yes	44040.74
RCP-004589	Schroeder Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23714.24	1	Yes	23714.24
RCP-004590	Folden Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32784.67	1	Yes	32784.67
RCP-004591	Emardville Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21200.75		Yes	21200.75
RCP-004592	Lessor Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19342.95	1	Yes	19342.95
RCP-004593	Field Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42510.79		Yes	42510.79
RCP-004594	Bygland Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30161.9	1	Yes	30161.9
RCP-004595	Vega Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13441.71	1	Yes	13441.71
RCP-004596	Ellington Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29287.64	1	Yes	29287.64
RCP-004597	Nelson Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31364.01	1	Yes	31364.01
RCP-004598	North Star Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30161.9	1	Yes	30161.9
RCP-004599	Collinwood Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	122396.1	2	Yes	122396.1
RCP-004600	Adrian Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14862.38	2	Yes	14862.38
RCP-004601	Young America Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77262.54	2	Yes	77262.54
RCP-004605	Rome Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14971.66	1	Yes	0
RCP-004606	Augsburg Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7977.6	1	Yes	7977.6
RCP-004607	Leavenworth Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30599.03	1	Yes	30599.03
RCP-004608	New Maine Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21419.32	1	Yes	21419.32
RCP-004609	Hilltop City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82726.66	1	Yes	82726.66
RCP-004610	Twin Lakes City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16173.77	2	Yes	16173.77
RCP-004611	New Folden Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24807.06	1	Yes	24807.06
RCP-004612	Swedes Forest Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12567.46		Yes	12567.46
RCP-004613	Iosco Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60870.21	1	Yes	60870.21
RCP-004614	Hamden Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23714.24	1	Yes	23714.24
RCP-004616	Beaver Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27648.41		Yes	27648.41
RCP-004617	Mound Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27429.84	1	Yes	27424.84
RCP-004618	Kandota Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80103.88	1	Yes	80103.88
RCP-004619	Sverdrup Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68192.11	1	Yes	68192.11
RCP-004620	Westerheim Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25462.77	1	No		0	12327.69	12327.69	0
RCP-004621	Gorman Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50597.68	6	Yes	50597.68
RCP-004622	Poplar Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19452.24	1	Yes	19452.24
RCP-004623	Macsville Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12239.61	1	Yes	12239.61
RCP-004624	Homer Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	147203.18	2	Yes	147203.18
RCP-004626	St. Mary Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50379.11	2	Yes	50379.11
RCP-004627	Lastrup City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10818.95	1	Yes	10818.95
RCP-004628	Kego Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58903.12	1	Yes	0
RCP-004629	Cerro Gordo Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19780.08	1	Yes	19780.08
RCP-004632	Olney Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21200.75	1	Yes	21200.75
RCP-004635	Balsam Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4589.85	1	Yes	4589.85
RCP-004636	Garfield Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14534.53	2	Yes	14534.53
RCP-004638	Marshan Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	124035.34	1	Yes	124035.34
RCP-004639	Gentilly Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30708.31	1	Yes	30708.31
RCP-004640	Northland Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18359.42		Yes	0
RCP-004641	Mount Pleasant Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48521.32	1	Yes	48521.32
RCP-004642	Winsted Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104255.26	2	Yes	104255.26
RCP-004643	Star Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45242.85	2	Yes	20821.43
RCP-004644	Wergeland Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15736.64	2	Yes	15736.64
RCP-004645	Onamia Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63383.7	2	Yes	63383.7
RCP-004646	Belvidere Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50160.54	6	Yes	50160.54
RCP-004647	Ball Bluff Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30161.9	1	Yes	0
RCP-004648	Malung Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45024.28	1	Yes	45024.28
RCP-004649	Featherstone Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84256.6	2	Yes	84256.6
RCP-004650	Sargeant Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35407.44	1	Yes	35407.44
RCP-004651	Crooked Creek Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31036.15	3	Yes	31036.15
RCP-004652	Clarks Grove City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75076.89	1	Yes	75076.89
RCP-004653	Moose River Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2732.06	1	Yes	2732.06
RCP-004654	Arlington City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	234519.68	1	Yes	234519.68
RCP-004655	Como Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4152.73	2	Yes	4152.73
RCP-004656	Clements City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15408.8	1	Yes	15408.8
RCP-004657	Fisher City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45789.26	1	Yes	45789.26
RCP-004658	Villard City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27648.41		Yes	27648.41
RCP-004659	Foldahl Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6884.78	1	Yes	6884.78
RCP-004660	Shelly City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19561.52	3	Yes	0
RCP-004663	Lake Benton Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25899.89		Yes	25899.89
RCP-004665	Emmet Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22184.3	2	Yes	22184.3
RCP-004666	Fieldon Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22402.86	2	Yes	22402.86
RCP-004668	Woodrow Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	69831.35	1	Yes	69831.35
RCP-004669	Middle River City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32893.95		Yes	32893.95
RCP-038526	Shawnee County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34355895	45	No		13029411	12594517	8731967	9912597
RCP-038668	Scottsdale City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	29244706	1	No		31621082	0	0	0
RCP-036527	Elkhart County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40079320	12	No		7221383	13749999	6203798	6203798
RCP-037458	Garfield County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11859412	27	Yes	0
RCP-038569	Greenwood County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13754207	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-036668	Juana Diaz Municipio City, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26632520	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-038111	Salem, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34127916	11	No		11837064	11753251	15378584	7693214
RCP-036674	Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84809114	54	Yes	10000000
RCP-036227	San Luis Obispo County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54990993	39	No		40719630	20702880	13685607	-20117124
RCP-038416	Northampton, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21747984.2	58	Yes	10000000
RCP-039121	Rancho Cordova City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15588333	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-035856	St. Joseph County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	52799014	21	No		11025478.79	12639505.35	6896322.55	8000000
RCP-039720	Madera County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30558925	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-036785	Rockingham County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15917438	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-036924	Morgan County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13691662	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039122	Berwyn, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31943759	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-038877	Woodbridge, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17920419	2	No		13446777	13446777	0	0
RCP-036013	City Of Baltimore, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	641170126	129	No		121498992	331909324	170122280	130738859
RCP-038763	Tyler, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20211586	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18887342	199	No		18133379	753963	0	0
RCP-038857	Denton, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23290438	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-039066	Plantation, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13042828	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-038888	Pharr, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28232868	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-036433	Whatcom County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44528542	65	No		8458440	19067980	0	0
RCP-038900	Yuba County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15280337	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-038894	Lee County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31960355	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-038896	Chino, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14978541	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039019	Panama City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10087173	9	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-035930	Franklin County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	255764417	43	No		60145000	58431000	96376000	0
RCP-038822	El Monte, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42556782	45	Yes	10000000
RCP-038829	Olathe City, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14918491	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-038837	Bryan, City Of Inc, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21183735	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-038826	Montebello, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16764058	10	No		6841356.33	6841356.33	3000000	3000000
RCP-049848	City Of Brighton, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10444587.62	1	No		5693085	0	0	0
RCP-049964	City Of Littleton, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12081125.98	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-035436	Fernley City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20972821.5	2	Yes	8972821.5
RCP-050895	Sweetwater City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10514921	50	No		3996832.07	-653706.59	0	0
RCP-050910	West Melbourne City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12150209	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-050919	Winter Garden City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23064811	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-050853	Plant City City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19905927	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-037169	Newton, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63589505.03	77	No		38889622	30289356	0	0
RCP-037178	Riley County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14418696	4	No		4143686.07	6241258.77	3616805.78	4383666.75
RCP-037353	West Allis, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30941771	68	No		1769912	4843876	10275695	4877740
RCP-037248	St. Charles Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10314053	3	Yes	6715586.16
RCP-037249	Grand Forks County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13490043	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-036065	City Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	87826517	137	No		29285696	110362668	3968681	3968681
RCP-039663	Cass County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10059018	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-037137	Walla Walla County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11801918	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-039834	Creek County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13892310	33	Yes	10000000
RCP-039636	Floyd County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19132082	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-036090	Irving City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54277494	75	No		38669222	40741691	22454296	0
RCP-040601	Palatine Village, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12012529	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-036875	Columbia County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30439857	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-035973	Montgomery County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	103273967	65	No		22817825	30975381	49480761	0
RCP-039373	St. Croix County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17614887	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-039374	Oak Park, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38984402	34	No		9739046	5698861	1628896	9256694
RCP-037052	Gardena, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15002061	2	No		11053614	0	0	0
RCP-036979	Dekalb, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10422954	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-036463	Orange County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74770082	23	No		74196578	573504	0	0
RCP-039346	Grand Prairie, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36709655	33	No		28583607.45	8126047.55	0	0
RCP-040571	Elmira, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28270386	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-035845	Salt Lake County, Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	225401283	19	No		88255066	66164867	45960427	0
RCP-039455	Fargo, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20205034	22	No		22683410.41	0	0	0
RCP-036097	Berks County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	81806170	1	No		17813979	34236564	29685675.84	0
RCP-039518	Boone County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25946543	3	Yes	7346543
RCP-039478	Columbia County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11549602	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-039694	Wood County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14179200	37	Yes	10000000
RCP-036873	Bossier City, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13428592	4	Yes	9323800
RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21339406	124	No		6475228	3694268	1928289	0
RCP-037168	Allen County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	73674384	43	No		12663237	13730700.73	9106117	8264319
RCP-037164	Crawford County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16438191	4	No		5029439	8484176.47	2924575.53	0
RCP-039540	Floyd County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15251978	44	Yes	10000000
RCP-036929	Rosemead, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17878653	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-039580	Chaves County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12550706	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039790	Gary, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80345314	16	No		11013357	-1481769	8930281	9000000
RCP-037079	Lawrence County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16609704	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-037080	New Brunswick, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20726375	4	No		6000000	0	0	0
RCP-035843	Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	388295772	77	No		85638550	60824476	46874765	58251301
RCP-036988	Highlands County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20632184	25	Yes	9999998
RCP-036538	Butler County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74419288	31	No		18193667.47	17965810.22	38259810.31	0
RCP-035915	State Of New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	994555877.6	241	No		445500000	219100000	62200000	194200000
RCP-040590	City Of Irvine, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56433217	2	No		34311637	23770672	0	0
RCP-037460	Santa Cruz, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14170321	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-037037	Dekalb County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13890562	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14891472	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-036083	City Of Mesa, Arizona, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	105515724	24	Yes	10000000
RCP-035900	Washington County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50975893	26	No		25269594	25706299	0	0
RCP-037565	Richland County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23532744	54	Yes	10000000
RCP-037573	East Chicago, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31172909	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-037579	Pembroke Pines, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25463361	3	No		24148595	1314766	0	0
RCP-037840	Mankato City, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10097143	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-037846	Norristown, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20140217	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-052674	Lafayette City, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38256658	32	No		19198563	18276006	0	0
RCP-040039	Aroostook County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13024648	44	No		198121	273859	79320	200000
RCP-040042	Hazleton, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17132482	13	Yes	2797440
RCP-040051	Catawba County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30990911	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-037948	Clearfield County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15394355	1	No		4514692	4514692	4514692	4514692
RCP-037947	La Crosse, City, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21748073	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-037959	Wood County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25409669	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-000938	City Of Fort Pierce, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13502665	10	Yes	1000000
RCP-000961	Johnson County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10500910	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-000964	Pender County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12248666	1	Yes	0
RCP-014401	La Vergne City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10597418.01	13	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-014406	Lebanon City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10823810.38	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-014448	Mount Juliet City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10987002.78	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-040498	Comal County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30341767	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-040500	Vermilion Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11559314	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-040483	Oldham County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12974923	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037227	Poughkeepsie, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20863783	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-036174	State Of Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3725832113	1250	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-015436	Blount County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25850784	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11933029	46	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-039578	Clark County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26044051	33	Yes	10000000
RCP-039837	Middletown, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11313784	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-039239	Baytown City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16345399	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-036651	Portsmouth City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56842564	30	No		5853730.46	18387245.65	18387245.65	18387245.65
RCP-053165	Bradley County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20999100	38	No		2248892.99	2248892.99	2248892.99	2248892.99
RCP-055899	Burleson, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11973093.37	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-055901	Kyle, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12014803.68	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-002008	City Of Hanahan, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11621668.5	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-014702	Town Of Fort Mill, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11093954.8	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-002078	City Of Simpsonville, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12058278.56	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-036074	State Of Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2120279417	735	No		536796346	0	0	0
RCP-037976	Knox County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12105318	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-039275	Lewis County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15676389	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-039278	Medina County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10019587	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-039288	Sandusky, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18091098	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-039271	Kingsport, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10356906	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-039281	Jasper County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23566542	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-004673	Mccrea Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25572.04	1	Yes	25572.04
RCP-004676	Round Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20982.19	6	Yes	20982.19
RCP-004677	Rutland Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45461.41	1	No		0	0	54245	0
RCP-004678	Farm Island Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	120319.74	1	Yes	120319.74
RCP-004679	Hillman Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47428.49	2	Yes	47428.49
RCP-004680	Seavey Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6884.78	4	Yes	6884.78
RCP-004681	Crow River Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38467.35	1	Yes	441.11
RCP-004682	Saratoga Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66443.6	3	Yes	66443.6
RCP-004683	Swede Grove Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43822.18	6	Yes	43822.18
RCP-004684	Rockwood Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47756.34	1	Yes	47756.34
RCP-004685	Elmore Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19015.11	1	Yes	19015.11
RCP-004686	Lake Lillian Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21310.04	1	Yes	21310.04
RCP-004687	Comfort Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	121521.85	1	Yes	121521.85
RCP-004688	Clayton Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17813	3	Yes	17813
RCP-004690	Cedar Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	331562.31	4	Yes	331562.31
RCP-004692	Wright Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12458.17	1	Yes	12458.17
RCP-004693	St. Joseph Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	146438.2	1	Yes	146438.2
RCP-004700	Macon City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1088121.95		Yes	1088121.95
RCP-005153	Advance Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116486.34		Yes	116486.34
RCP-005154	Altona Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44645.54	2	Yes	44645.54
RCP-005155	Bainbridge Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	169063.83	4	Yes	169063.83
RCP-005156	Battle Ground Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	447588.57	1	Yes	447588.56
RCP-005157	Bristol Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	383453.09	1	Yes	383453.09
RCP-005158	Brooklyn Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	290577		Yes	290577.6
RCP-005161	Coatesville Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	127817.7	1	Yes	127817.7
RCP-005162	Corydon Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	725433.42	2	Yes	725433.42
RCP-005163	Darmstadt Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	321825	8	Yes	321825
RCP-005164	Dunreith Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38299.98	1	Yes	0
RCP-005165	Economy Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39659.74	1	Yes	39659.74
RCP-005166	English Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	135673.5	2	Yes	135673.5
RCP-005167	Frankton Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	416087.4	3	Yes	416087.4
RCP-005168	Hymera Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	172463.24	1	Yes	172463
RCP-005170	Lafontaine Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	187647.26	4	Yes	187000
RCP-005174	Rocky Ripple Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102993.75	1	Yes	102993.75
RCP-005179	Cayuga Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	250196.34		Yes	0
RCP-005182	Lanesville Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	128044.32	1	Yes	128044.32
RCP-005183	Laurel Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96960		Yes	96960
RCP-005184	Milan Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	418806.92	10	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-005185	Osceola Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542633.25	3	Yes	542633.25
RCP-005186	Bryant Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43651.5	5	Yes	0
RCP-005215	City Of Kimball, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	121709.32	1	Yes	121709.32
RCP-005233	Alfred Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	334450.9	5	Yes	334450.9
RCP-005234	Alton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	90723.64	1	Yes	90723.64
RCP-005235	Amity Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22945.26	6	Yes	22945.26
RCP-005236	Anson Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	252080.6	3	Yes	252080.6
RCP-005238	Athens Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	103518.01	1	Yes	103518.01
RCP-005239	Augusta City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1976992.9	11	Yes	600000
RCP-005241	Belgrade Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	332970.57	1	Yes	389206
RCP-005242	Benton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	286868.59	1	Yes	286868.59
RCP-005243	Berwick Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	832373.54	6	Yes	832373.54
RCP-005246	Blaine Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70950.54	3	Yes	13544.11
RCP-005247	Blue Hill Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	280418.53	2	Yes	133620.13
RCP-005248	Bowdoinham Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	323136.89	1	Yes	323136.89
RCP-005250	Brewer City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	955347.43	7	Yes	955347.43
RCP-005251	Bridgton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	574583.06	1	Yes	574583.06
RCP-005252	Bristol Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	294693.23	7	Yes	294693.23
RCP-005253	Brooklin Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85859.67	4	Yes	85809.85
RCP-005254	Brownville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	125511.61	1	Yes	125511.61
RCP-005255	Buckfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	215812.3	2	Yes	212811.84
RCP-005257	Burlington Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48322.5	3	Yes	48322.5
RCP-005259	Calais City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	317744.22	1	Yes	317744.22
RCP-005260	Camden Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	505747.29		Yes	505747.29
RCP-005261	Canaan Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	229452.56	1	Yes	229452.54
RCP-005262	Cape Elizabeth Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	983791.09	1	Yes	983791.09
RCP-005264	Caribou City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	802872.5	4	Yes	802872.5
RCP-005265	Carmel Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	300826.06	1	Yes	300826.06
RCP-005266	Carrabassett Valley Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	83216.21	5	Yes	83216.21
RCP-005267	Clifton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95693.35	1	Yes	95693.35
RCP-005269	Corinna Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	226386.15	1	Yes	226386.15
RCP-005271	Cumberland Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	867901.68	1	Yes	867901.68
RCP-005273	Deer Isle Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	201537.6	2	Yes	201537.6
RCP-005274	Detroit Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87445.75	1	Yes	87445.75
RCP-005275	Dexter Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	391866.91	9	Yes	391866.91
RCP-005276	Dixfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	262865.93	6	Yes	262865.93
RCP-005278	Durham Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	422213.87	9	Yes	422213.87
RCP-005279	Eagle Lake Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84908.02	2	Yes	84908.02
RCP-005280	East Millinocket Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	172036.55	3	Yes	172036
RCP-005281	Eastbrook Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44092.96	1	Yes	44092.96
RCP-005282	Easton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	124877.18	1	Yes	124877
RCP-005283	Eastport City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	133759.21	1	Yes	133759.21
RCP-005284	Eliot Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	730441.62	16	Yes	730441.62
RCP-005285	Ellsworth City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	864941.01	1	Yes	113682.1
RCP-005286	Enfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	162414.35	5	Yes	0
RCP-005289	Fairfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	692798.71	5	Yes	692798.71
RCP-005290	Falmouth Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1301852.52	4	Yes	1301852.52
RCP-005291	Farmingdale Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	309285.14	6	Yes	291744.87
RCP-005292	Fort Kent Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	407727.69	9	Yes	407727.69
RCP-005294	Gardiner City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	597739.79	11	Yes	597739.79
RCP-005295	Georgetown Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113034.46	2	Yes	113034.46
RCP-005296	Greene Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	458799.39	12	Yes	458799.39
RCP-005299	Hampden Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	783733.83	2	Yes	728997.83
RCP-005300	Harpswell Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	520021.98	1	Yes	520021.98
RCP-005301	Harrison Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	296067.82	6	Yes	296067.82
RCP-005302	Hartford Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	128366.55	3	Yes	128000
RCP-005303	Hartland Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	182293.19	1	Yes	182293.19
RCP-005304	Hermon Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	637920.42	1	Yes	637920.42
RCP-005306	Holden Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	328212.33	1	Yes	328212.33
RCP-005307	Hollis Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	501940.7	2	Yes	501000
RCP-005308	Hope Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	178380.87	1	Yes	178380.87
RCP-005309	Houlton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	608207.9	9	Yes	608207.9
RCP-005311	Jackman Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	86176.89	1	Yes	86176.89
RCP-005312	Jay Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488829.13	1	Yes	488829.13
RCP-005313	Jonesport Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	139257.62		Yes	10000
RCP-005315	Kittery Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1038246.42		Yes	1038246.42
RCP-005316	Lamoine Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	180072.68	3	Yes	180072.68
RCP-005317	Limington Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	414283.48	4	Yes	414283.48
RCP-005320	Litchfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	386791.46	1	Yes	386791.46
RCP-005322	Lovell Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	119907.47	2	Yes	119761.1
RCP-005324	Lubec Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	133019.05	2	Yes	133019.05
RCP-005325	Lyman Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	477620.85	4	Yes	320176.53
RCP-005326	Madison Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488511.91	1	Yes	488511.91
RCP-005327	Mapleton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	193924.43	1	Yes	193924.43
RCP-005328	Mars Hill Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	155329.87	2	Yes	155329.87
RCP-005329	Masardis Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24002.64	3	Yes	24002.64
RCP-005330	Mercer Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	67355.43	1	Yes	67355.43
RCP-005331	Milbridge Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	136825.63	1	Yes	136825.63
RCP-005332	Millinocket Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	449600.14	1	Yes	449600.14
RCP-005333	Milo Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	241612.5	15	Yes	241612.5
RCP-005334	Minot Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	273439.78		Yes	273439.78
RCP-005336	Monson Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	69258.72	3	Yes	69258.72
RCP-005337	Montville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114937.76	3	Yes	114937.76
RCP-005338	Morrill Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94001.54	1	Yes	94001.54
RCP-005340	Mount Desert Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	223425.47	2	Yes	223425.47
RCP-005341	Naples Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	419676.15	4	Yes	419676.15
RCP-005342	New Gloucester Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614552.22	13	Yes	614552.22
RCP-005343	New Portland Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72748.09	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-005345	Newport Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	346082.14	2	Yes	346082.14
RCP-005347	Nobleboro Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	174785.76	1	Yes	174785.76
RCP-005348	Norridgewock Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	340689.47	1	Yes	340689.47
RCP-005349	North Berwick Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499931.67	1	Yes	499931.67
RCP-005350	North Yarmouth Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	408573.6	3	Yes	408573.6
RCP-005351	Northport Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	167172.58	1	Yes	0
RCP-005352	Norway Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527740.9	12	Yes	527740.9
RCP-005353	Oakland Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	667104.25	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-005354	Ogunquit Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98231.08	3	Yes	98231.08
RCP-036355	Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	7291328098.4	39	No		4661847152	0	0	0
RCP-038230	Long Branch, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11848909	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038236	Melbourne, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14263027	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-038228	Caldwell City, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12481887	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-038400	Cullman County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16270952	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-038321	Jefferson County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11099941	26	Yes	5000000
RCP-038397	Stanly County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12199329	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-036411	Auburn, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16523077	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-038340	Columbus County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10781778	9	Yes	9828747
RCP-037140	Malden, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45774149.62	64	No		11114182	22260547	12399000	0
RCP-036926	Montgomery County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19139269	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-035922	Baltimore County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	160706923	69	Yes	10000000
RCP-036966	White Plains, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23167555	1	No		31644552	0	0	0
RCP-037261	Brevard County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	116920177	98	No		21735842	26760639	26626501.7	26626501.7
RCP-037294	Franklin County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13535494	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-038607	Jefferson County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21333967	41	No		10743862	0	2853304	0
RCP-038619	Washington County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25129577	2	No		11129257	15377879	0	0
RCP-038548	Watauga County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10911724	2	Yes	9979131
RCP-036339	Jefferson County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	127920085	39	Yes	10000000
RCP-035949	Santa Ana City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	128360813	79	Yes	10000000
RCP-038930	Pueblo County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32714388	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-038933	Tippecanoe County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38018646	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-035999	Cherokee County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50263622	75	Yes	10000000
RCP-038951	Portsmouth, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12880280	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-038641	Lake County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	94301324	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038647	Deschutes County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38399353	66	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-039131	Haverhill, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37473649.09	79	No		13282626	0	0	0
RCP-039176	Huron County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11317487	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-039184	Pope County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12445235	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-050920	Winter Park City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15438814	1	No		10119494	5319320	0	0
RCP-050921	Winter Springs City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18687851	5	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-046972	Jeffersonville City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10906656.82	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-005171	Lawrence City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11209430.65	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-006971	New Iberia, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10540923.36	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-031257	Amherst, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11933556.32	38	Yes	10000000
RCP-037267	Lincoln County, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11873397	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-035824	Shelby County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	182033509	1	No		75815270	106218239	0	0
RCP-036158	Adams County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	100502964	139	Yes	10000000
RCP-039740	Niagara Falls, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57207528	85	No		17437801	11787513	12350782	13898693
RCP-036134	County Of Lancaster, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106000489	33	No		5689115	8899082	3835905	11122887
RCP-039862	Reno County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12042385	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-039582	Olmsted County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30746560	10	No		7866321	17431560	5448679	0
RCP-036053	Sacramento County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	301469072	85	No		37603761	0	0	0
RCP-039648	Sheboygan County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22403443	18	No		3908901	6791509	8504164	1362286
RCP-039467	Dubuque, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26522282	64	Yes	10000000
RCP-035997	Escambia County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	61829151	26	No		28358185.52	0	0	0
RCP-040575	Warren County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45568688	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-039384	Lexington County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	58028685	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-036133	Cameron County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	82194452	84	No		11675807	6784820	9811731	0
RCP-039371	Apache County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13963207	2	No		6329911	5405944	637658	6387293
RCP-039370	Fullerton, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32665301	34	No		6768481.63	8775370.85	4818799.17	4787333.26
RCP-036288	Douglas County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	110973572	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-039357	Armstrong County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12574015	1	No		4345229	6634359	1594427	0
RCP-014801	City Of Dunkirk, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10885109	50	Yes	10000000
RCP-039360	Penobscot County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29552965	34	Yes	10000000
RCP-036114	District Of Columbia	District of Columbia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2312383930.2	301	No		796661000	934000000	461218000	839780000
RCP-036887	Madison County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25167259	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-036152	Chester County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	101972959	125	No		33568263	23673029	13120613.75	31294383
RCP-036031	City Of Houston, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	607769139	37	No		195278901	645130943	271839017	62189953
RCP-039507	State Of Delaware	Delaware	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	924597608	269	No		275159913	0	0	0
RCP-037055	West Palm Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24530823	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29405927	52	No		3045257	13382069	12978601	107184660
RCP-039533	Albany, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80725433	12	No		17575810	16387293	22686808	26879719
RCP-039541	Eau Claire County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20326259	71	No		4591273	3792656	4973599	7045178
RCP-039542	Scott County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28944028	28	No		0	17857899	0	0
RCP-039538	Salem, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31164631	2	No		6784575	16283509	8096547	5278033
RCP-037078	Walton County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14387423	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-035936	Clermont County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40096219	16	No		7113866	5266817	14591054	7183552
RCP-037342	Westminster, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14548323	1	No		19483112.42	0	0	0
RCP-039487	Pine Bluff, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16044400	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037226	Kettering, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13851520	2	No		11577527	8570559	0	0
RCP-037228	Buena Park, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19622863	5	No		10769854	6839570	0	0
RCP-037406	Akron, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	145337626	43	No		20630819	34261679.76	34776737	33240545
RCP-037363	Spalding County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12956276	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-037365	Outagamie County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36494459	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-036395	Madison County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	72433202	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-035895	Tarrant County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	408388891	57	Yes	10000000
RCP-036042	City Of Spokane, Wa	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80991104	51	No		60017071	-22812008	34586349	0
RCP-035886	City Of El Paso, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	154345135	48	No		38163507	0	0	0
RCP-039782	Pueblo, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36407001	111	Yes	10000000
RCP-038315	Androscoggin County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21031538	73	Yes	10000000
RCP-037333	Cheyenne, Wyoming	Wyoming	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12191813	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037328	Fayette County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22224938	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-036667	Isabela Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26221362	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-040263	Carson, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17776763	9	Yes	1000000
RCP-040387	Coamo Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11497642.5	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-040368	Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18811783	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-040529	Hanford, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13077740	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-053247	County Of Hoke, Nc	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10728557	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039949	St. Francois County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13055726	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-039942	Lenoir County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10867437	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-035998	Municipality Of Anchorage, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	103317366	83	No		25547969	7833829	0	0
RCP-035829	Baton Rouge City/Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	165443198	43	No		59884177	0	0	0
RCP-038676	Portland City, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46290652	34	No		4139541.82	12536881.64	9730445.2	0
RCP-038674	Columbia County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11174917	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-014525	Spring Hill City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12986851.52	1	Yes	956372.5
RCP-047239	Coachella City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10942698	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-014360	Germantown City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11638585.55	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-038072	Crawford County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12286931	14	Yes	657784
RCP-037910	Jonesboro, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15579043	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-037612	Elk Grove, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21944605	56	Yes	10000000
RCP-015611	Chatham County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14464924	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-024386	Town Of North Hempstead, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10114020.88	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-024402	Town Of Oyster Bay, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24464541.83	9	Yes	5000000
RCP-024884	Town Of Smithtown, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11388581.15	48	Yes	10000000
RCP-048988	Roswell City, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11751501	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-002006	City Of Greenwood, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11651042.2	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-036732	Alexandria, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11290002	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037242	State of Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	15814388615	52	No		12154403291	3910963693	0	0
RCP-053105	Sumter County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25721033	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-053109	Robertson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13948833	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-053110	County Of Macomb, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	169758815	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-053128	Williamson County, Tn	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46308736	25	No		38352420	7956316	0	0
RCP-002038	City Of Mauldin, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12649717.18	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-002030	Town Of Lexington, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11030728.62	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-037602	Herkimer County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11910497	66	No		10332724.82	617567.71	0	0
RCP-037606	Garland County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19304565	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-036021	Salt Lake City City, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85411572	21	No		9854972.96	32446793.13	15720933.78	0
RCP-039957	Springfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44230364	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-035820	City And County Of San Francisco, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	624817342	1	No		1126205371	1042846338	0	0
RCP-037980	Harrison County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12927140	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039273	Deltona, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13972193	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-039285	Beaumont, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33084864	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039290	Indio City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20425061	7	No		23851317	0	0	0
RCP-039249	Isabella County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13571817	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-039250	Sutter County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18835480	10	No		13896577	4938903	0	0
RCP-005355	Old Town City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	785742.86	1	Yes	785742.86
RCP-005356	Orono Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1141870.16	1	Yes	1141870.16
RCP-005359	Paris Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544764.8	2	Yes	544764.8
RCP-005360	Parkman Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84062.11	1	Yes	84062.11
RCP-005362	Phillips Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108064.76	1	Yes	108064.76
RCP-005363	Phippsburg Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	239814.94	4	Yes	239814.94
RCP-005365	Pownal Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	163788.95	2	Yes	163788.95
RCP-005366	Presque Isle City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	952386.76	1	Yes	952386.76
RCP-005367	Rangeley Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	122127.98	2	Yes	122127.98
RCP-005368	Raymond Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	478255.28	5	Yes	0
RCP-005369	Richmond Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	366912.62	1	Yes	366912.62
RCP-005370	Robbinston Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59107.82	1	Yes	59039.22
RCP-005371	Rockland City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	757616.42	10	Yes	0
RCP-005372	Rockport Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	355598.6		Yes	0
RCP-005373	Rumford Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	607361.99	1	Yes	607361.99
RCP-005374	Sabattus Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532499.13	4	Yes	532499.13
RCP-005375	Sanford City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2244088.38	12	Yes	2244088.38
RCP-005376	Sangerville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	134182.17	1	Yes	134182.17
RCP-005377	Searsmont Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	149831.47		Yes	149831.47
RCP-005379	Sedgwick Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	124348.48	2	Yes	124348.48
RCP-005380	Shapleigh Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	291203.86	3	Yes	291203.86
RCP-005381	Sherman Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82264.56		Yes	0
RCP-005382	Sidney Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	472439.66	6	Yes	472439.66
RCP-005383	Skowhegan Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	871179.58	1	Yes	871179.58
RCP-005384	South Thomaston Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	170661.95	21	No		0	0	150000	0
RCP-005385	Southport Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63443.1	1	Yes	63443.1
RCP-005386	St George Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	272170.92	1	Yes	272170.92
RCP-005387	Standish Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1067853.2	7	Yes	844220.2
RCP-005388	Strong Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	122656.67	3	Yes	122656.66
RCP-005389	Sullivan Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	133864.95	2	Yes	133864.95
RCP-005390	Topsham Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	938746.49	1	Yes	938746.49
RCP-005391	Tremont Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	169075.88	10	Yes	118732.88
RCP-005392	Trenton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	164740.6	5	Yes	0
RCP-005393	Troy Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110708.21	3	Yes	110706.21
RCP-005395	Union Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	238440.34	3	Yes	238440.34
RCP-005397	Vinalhaven Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	119167.3	1	Yes	119167.3
RCP-005398	Wade Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27809.23	3	Yes	13904.61
RCP-005399	Waldoboro Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	535988.5	1	Yes	535334.25
RCP-005400	Wales Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	170979.17	1	Yes	170979.18
RCP-005401	Wallagrass Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55512.72	1	Yes	55512.72
RCP-005402	Washburn Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	162943.04	3	Yes	81472
RCP-005404	Waterford Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	168124.22	2	Yes	168124.22
RCP-005405	Weld Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44092.96	2	Yes	23594.41
RCP-005406	Wells Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1128758.58	9	Yes	1128758.58
RCP-005407	West Paris Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	178803.82	3	Yes	178803.82
RCP-005408	Westbrook City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2016856.32	8	Yes	515566.05
RCP-005409	Westport Island Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77189.12	1	Yes	77189.12
RCP-005410	Windham Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1960391.95	2	Yes	1958116.96
RCP-005411	Winslow Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	805515.96	5	Yes	805515.96
RCP-005412	Winterport Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	421367.96	1	Yes	421367.96
RCP-005414	Wiscasset Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	397894.01	6	Yes	397894.01
RCP-005417	Woolwich Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	336354.2	12	Yes	336354
RCP-005418	Yarmouth Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	908188.05	2	Yes	821688.05
RCP-005909	Russellville Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80679.25	1	Yes	80375.02
RCP-005910	Vera Cruz Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19489.93	8	Yes	19489.93
RCP-005912	Spring Lake Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51670.99	3	Yes	51476.14
RCP-005913	Staunton Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104032.5	1	Yes	104032.5
RCP-005914	Sulphur Springs Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84078.66		Yes	83920.15
RCP-005915	St. Joe Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107194.63	1	No		0	26465.47	0	0
RCP-005917	Demotte Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	942542.2	4	Yes	942542.2
RCP-006021	Town Of Addison, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	284874	10	Yes	284874
RCP-006025	Town Of Anmoore, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	324455.63	3	Yes	324455.63
RCP-006026	Town Of Ansted, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	352015.5	5	Yes	352015.5
RCP-006028	Town Of Auburn, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26245.5		Yes	26245.5
RCP-006030	Village Of Barboursville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1882196.24	1	Yes	1882196.24
RCP-006031	Town Of Barrackville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	300112.5	5	No		77000	0	0	0
RCP-006032	Town Of Bath, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	263454.43	1	Yes	263454.43
RCP-006034	Village Of Beech Bottom, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	207315.65		Yes	207315.65
RCP-006036	Town Of Belle, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497734.38	2	No		18106	48720	10000	0
RCP-006037	City Of Belmont, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	381036.44	1	Yes	210224.99
RCP-006039	Town Of Bethany, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	324182.94	1	Yes	324182.94
RCP-006040	Village Of Bethlehem, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1025969.35	6	Yes	1025969.35
RCP-006041	Town Of Beverly, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	212271	3	Yes	212271
RCP-006043	City Of Bluefield, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4256380.38	3	Yes	4256380.38
RCP-006044	Corporation Of Bolivar, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	351662.25	15	No		351662.25	351662.25	0	0
RCP-006046	Town Of Bramwell, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110739	1	Yes	110739
RCP-006048	City Of Bridgeport, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3908496.76	1	Yes	3908496.76
RCP-006050	City Of Buckhannon, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2384350.99	1	Yes	2384350.99
RCP-006052	Town Of Burnsville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	210851.95	8	Yes	210851.95
RCP-006053	Town Of Cairo, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112277.55	2	Yes	104331.55
RCP-006054	City Of Cameron, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	372637.73	3	Yes	372637.72
RCP-006055	Town Of Capon Bridge, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	161785.77	1	Yes	161785.77
RCP-006056	Town Of Cedar Grove, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	400928.14	12	Yes	224467.15
RCP-006057	Town Of Ceredo, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	562713.91	1	Yes	562713.91
RCP-006058	Town Of Chapmanville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	483589.17	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006061	City Of Chester, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	723984.75	16	Yes	723984.76
RCP-006062	City Of Clarksburg, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6730022.98	3	Yes	6447265
RCP-006064	Village Of Clearview, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	168541.5	1	Yes	20000
RCP-006065	Town Of Clendenin, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	364224.75	1	Yes	362224.75
RCP-006066	Town Of Cowen, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	150689.25	5	Yes	150689.25
RCP-006067	Town Of Danville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	266106.65	3	Yes	266106.65
RCP-006068	Town Of Davis, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	278925.75	1	Yes	6000
RCP-006071	City Of Dunbar, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3135372.94	7	No		0	0	0	6587901
RCP-006073	Town Of East Bank, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	384130.71	2	Yes	384130.71
RCP-006074	Town Of Eleanor, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	690722.75	1	Yes	690722.75
RCP-006075	Town Of Elizabeth, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	370427.53	2	Yes	370427.53
RCP-006076	Town Of Elk Garden, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	69252	1	Yes	69252
RCP-006077	City Of Elkins, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3089843.06	1	Yes	3089843.06
RCP-006078	Town Of Ellenboro, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	160459.66	1	Yes	160459.66
RCP-006079	City Of Fairmont, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8128188.01	4	Yes	4064094
RCP-006081	Corporation Of Falling Springs, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65738.25		Yes	21600
RCP-006082	Town Of Farmington, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	161343.74	9	Yes	161343.74
RCP-006083	Town Of Fayetteville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1202342.36	1	Yes	1202342
RCP-006084	Town Of Flatwoods, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	81723.75	16	Yes	81723.75
RCP-006086	City Of Follansbee, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1197921.99	1	Yes	1197921.99
RCP-006088	Town Of Franklin, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	283788.16	2	Yes	283788.16
RCP-006093	Town Of Gilbert, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	171068.56	1	Yes	171068.56
RCP-006094	Town Of Glasgow, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	325878	11	Yes	0
RCP-006095	City Of Glen Dale, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	606033.59	5	Yes	605552.11
RCP-006096	City Of Glenville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	633881.96	10	Yes	95000
RCP-006097	City Of Grafton, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2202231.49	31	Yes	2202231.49
RCP-006098	Town Of Grantsville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	226765.31	1	Yes	226765.31
RCP-006100	Town Of Granville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1387998.17	6	Yes	1387998.17
RCP-006102	Town Of Hamlin, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	302415.75	7	Yes	302415.75
RCP-006104	Town Of Harman, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61443.23	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006105	Corporation Of Harpers Ferry, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	124654.61	1	Yes	124654.61
RCP-006106	Town Of Harrisville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	739971	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006108	Town Of Hedgesville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	131285.18	7	Yes	0
RCP-006109	City of Okemah	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	549613.42	5	Yes	549606.92
RCP-006112	City Of Hinton, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1041882.7	10	Yes	569500
RCP-006113	Town Of Hundred, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115813.86	1	Yes	115813.86
RCP-006114	City Of Hurricane, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2842301.99	3	Yes	2842301.99
RCP-006115	Town Of Huttonsville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92827.9	1	Yes	527
RCP-006117	Town Of Jane Lew, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	170626.53	3	Yes	170478.66
RCP-006118	Town Of Junior, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123000	5	Yes	123000
RCP-006119	City Of Kenova, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1308873.44	33	Yes	1308873.44
RCP-006120	Town Of Kermit, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107683.5		Yes	0
RCP-006121	City Of Keyser, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2172614.97	1	Yes	2172614.97
RCP-038558	Kissimmee, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18069843	12	Yes	5314000
RCP-036324	Dutchess County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	57148397	24	No		37636128	6648365	7634458	35188494
RCP-053281	City Of Gresham, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25399647	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-036189	Commonwealth Of Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	5286067526.4	141	No		3898837971.25	0	0	0
RCP-038635	Hall County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11917101	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-038455	Anderson, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23105605	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-038362	Kent City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28172327	3	No		14523018	17754538	22028935	0
RCP-038363	St. Charles County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78088061	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-038360	Spotsylvania County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26458167	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038355	Hunt County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19150729	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-038237	El Dorado County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37457492	44	Yes	10000000
RCP-037262	Troup County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13581529	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-037263	East Providence, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27785912.31	6	No		8077399	16060841	3647672	1000000
RCP-037217	Charlotte County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36693553	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45543632	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-037315	Elizabeth, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40674250	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66817666	52	No		14528659	5661182	382126	7228174
RCP-038634	Harrisburg, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47073625	17	No		9127862	9524595	13031693	8476891
RCP-038632	Corvallis, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13085521	3	No		20363281	32309463	24554687	25415001
RCP-038545	Ft Myers, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15759486	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-039197	Tuscola County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10147979	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-039041	Boulder, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20153269	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-039190	Auburn, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14751231	8	No		18953997	7559568	5634906	0
RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27427882	23	Yes	1862784.34
RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16721002	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18132223	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50257113	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-038709	State Of Montana	Montana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	906418527	616	No		189745947	0	0	0
RCP-038974	Kitsap County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	52730448	42	Yes	10000000
RCP-039057	Dorchester County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31623740	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-038913	Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112218224.76	35	No		0	43782937	97449504	109554563
RCP-038915	Huntington Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22209010	1	No		16736168	8117512	13212390	13212390
RCP-038904	Taunton, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20992932	45	Yes	10000000
RCP-035960	Dauphin County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54056318	4	No		40164139	13892179	0	0
RCP-031258	Andover, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10867056.79	52	Yes	10000000
RCP-031277	Beverly, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12606096.73	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-050608	Altamonte Springs City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22109182	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-050618	Aventura City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18525074	34	Yes	10000000
RCP-050621	Bartow City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10090698	1	No		290683	0	290683	0
RCP-050629	Belle Glade City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10084187	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-035937	Chatham County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56218385	86	No		17422180	0	0	0
RCP-036126	Oakland City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	188081700	1	No		70781213	69046727	170583043	117726061
RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110710612.92	35	No		10000000	10000000	10000000	10000000
RCP-040576	City Of Kansas City, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	194776376	124	No		240532099	52287612	72167774	0
RCP-036858	State of Maine	Maine	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	997495130.1	145	No		188904063	0	0	0
RCP-036315	City Of Concord, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27040883	12	No		12634959	14405924	0	0
RCP-039479	Hamilton City, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33590200	1	No		30477228	27358187	0	0
RCP-039717	County Of Nassau, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	385003440	27	No		337368468	118392087	0	0
RCP-039696	Surry County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13943006	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039522	Iredell County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35313684	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-036374	Montgomery County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	117978581	75	Yes	10000000
RCP-036088	Polk County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	95208028	19	No		24784929.47	25549893.73	34305968.55	73116708
RCP-036320	Rochester City, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	202141319	62	No		68504626	27040247	46967265	73461634
RCP-036071	Fairfax County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	222894638	26	No		173987634	444778486	92432024	161552837
RCP-036037	Douglas County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	68207548	24	No		6655265	11405264	19314491	8040333
RCP-036863	Redford, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21962768	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-036462	Collin County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	200984172	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-036865	Bethlehem, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34467364	6	No		9495121	5497821	7241660	4232762
RCP-039756	Barnstable County, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41370811	65	Yes	10000000
RCP-039828	Livingston County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12220307	1	No		12220307	0	12220307	0
RCP-036047	City Of Madison, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	47197155	30	No		44649062	40769182	26977553	9637018
RCP-035846	Pulaski County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	76124117	49	Yes	10000000
RCP-037051	Pickaway County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11354587	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-037008	Tooele County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14035464	10	Yes	9252194.3
RCP-037089	Tuolumne County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10581713	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	175781756	108	Yes	10000000
RCP-040598	Aurora City, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	65424806	29	No		70747159	0	0	0
RCP-035934	Arlington City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	81498709	3	No		24404259	22778239	11690621	6576476
RCP-036656	Staunton City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12955826	22	No		3551334	7210124	2194368	3149438
RCP-039546	Delano City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14030801	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-035939	Jefferson County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	113217801	64	No		18116349.55	27316586.9	61656442.57	0
RCP-036084	County Of Los Angeles, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1949978847	78	No		638786249	371154517	0	0
RCP-037229	Owensboro, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13324175	1	Yes	8967689
RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38872877	61	No		9342881	16310779	1000000	0
RCP-039530	Dodge County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17061696	41	No		2297293	4783840	7471603	10373230
RCP-035839	County Of Bergen, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	261035747	35	No		30878459.61	39727928	39600000	39600000
RCP-035876	County Of Contra Costa, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	224058903	14	No		362452612	235909888	524737354	199193422
RCP-039847	Henderson County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22806876	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-035909	Harris County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	915508128	89	No		637577999	93119854	184810275.44	601913145
RCP-035831	Montgomery County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	204083827	37	No		173685173	0	84944359	0
RCP-053276	City Of Atlanta, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	170928821	42	No		438247659.39	386226249.45	0	0
RCP-036066	Ramsey County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106893403	21	No		1201349	79486074	0	0
RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1641611610.6	106	No		680749000	1641450000	0	660007000
RCP-040557	Winnebago County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33390919	24	No		5982223	16754576	29647232	31188888
RCP-037285	Bowling Green, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16584849	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-014308	Columbia City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11967937.49	2	Yes	2000000
RCP-014309	Cookeville City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10297737.41	7	Yes	9104161.67
RCP-014283	Brentwood City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12694292.04	4	Yes	7694292.04
RCP-053206	City Of Texas City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10309444	9	Yes	500000
RCP-053243	City Of Hesperia, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23403687		No		0	0	0	0
RCP-035433	Elko City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27476865.36	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-035441	Winnemucca City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10417348.62	12	Yes	6233423.75
RCP-035438	Mesquite City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26501498.44	37	Yes	10000000
RCP-024361	Town of Hempstead, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51413999.27	5	No		0	1	11000000	1
RCP-037788	High Point, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22699511	2	No		7531359	42785940	0	0
RCP-036945	Randall County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26749136	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16746253	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-036774	Gurabo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14152267.06	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-036775	Fayetteville, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17911418	20	No		6914393	0	0	0
RCP-036742	Morgantown, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11243509	19	Yes	0
RCP-040197	Mason County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12968901	44	Yes	10000000
RCP-040236	Baldwin Park, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22917903	72	Yes	10000000
RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16872443	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-037418	Cecil County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19978378		Yes	10000000
RCP-037428	Carteret County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13494316	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-037430	Wilkes County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13288229	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-037431	Desoto County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35923398	7	No		4805185	7046782	4068182	5599570
RCP-036398	Niagara County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40650381	26	No		9642610.11	0	0	0
RCP-037937	Kennebec County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23755730	56	Yes	10000000
RCP-037816	Tracy City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14798549	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-039915	Lakewood, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11309045	1	No		4654456	10176475	11690809	7576824
RCP-039911	Santa Clara, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26231326	2	No		108297937	159906516	87924750	38396069
RCP-037863	Grady County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10845100	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-037673	Cleveland County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19025057	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-053132	Putnam County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14474831	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-053134	City Of Scranton, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68746050	54	Yes	10000000
RCP-053268	Municipality Of Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands	Northern Mariana Islands	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19116644	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-015797	Sampson County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12340152	4	Yes	4000000
RCP-015798	Loudon County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10502075	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-014706	City Of Greer, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16614546.48	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039958	Walker County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12338210	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-037884	Daly City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25255343	24	No		1114187	13606033	6243726	692927
RCP-037885	Grand Junction, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10484608	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037746	Miami Gardens City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27114344	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039938	Oxford County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11260964	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-039940	Gobierno Municipal De Juncos, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11435176.24	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039284	Muncie, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32321058	36	Yes	6550000
RCP-040570	Yuma, County Of	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41525619	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-035830	City Of Fayetteville, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40427539	45	No		19181372	19181372	0	0
RCP-006129	Town Of Lost Creek, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	205105.46		Yes	205105.46
RCP-006131	Town Of Mabscott, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	358472.25	1	Yes	358472.25
RCP-006132	City Of Mcmechen, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	750137.87	6	Yes	750000
RCP-006133	City Of Madison, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1181566.6	29	Yes	1181566.6
RCP-006134	Town Of Carpendale, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	400044.06	1	Yes	400044.06
RCP-006135	City Of Mannington, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	894242.13	3	Yes	894242.13
RCP-006137	Town Of Marmet, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	603823.41	18	Yes	603823.41
RCP-006138	Town Of Mason, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	413747.23	2	Yes	0
RCP-006139	Town Of Masontown, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	237816.25	1	Yes	142922
RCP-006142	Town Of Middlebourne, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	326223.78	8	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006143	Town Of Mill Creek, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	281978.24	1	Yes	0
RCP-006146	Town Of Monongah, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507901.24	17	Yes	507901.24
RCP-006147	City Of Montgomery, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	666592.75	1	Yes	666592.75
RCP-006148	Town Of Montrose, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	67631.75	1	Yes	67631.75
RCP-006149	City Of Moorefield, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1068847	5	Yes	888847
RCP-006150	City Of Moundsville\xa0, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3647694.55	16	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006151	City Of Mount Hope, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	563155.94	1	Yes	563155.94
RCP-006153	Town Of Newburg, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	139241.86	3	Yes	33484.25
RCP-006154	City Of New Cumberland, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	444689.86	3	Yes	444689.86
RCP-006155	Town Of New Haven, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	394140.75	1	No		250000	25000	25000	25000
RCP-006156	City Of New Martinsville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2262348.61	10	Yes	2258753
RCP-006157	City Of Nitro, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2817105.84	4	Yes	2817105.84
RCP-006159	Town Of North Hills, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	303205.5	1	Yes	303205.5
RCP-006161	Oak Hill, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3579620.76	1	Yes	3579620.76
RCP-006163	Town Of Oceana, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532213.31	3	Yes	531790.48
RCP-006164	City Of Paden City, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1032599.91	15	Yes	1032599.91
RCP-006166	Town Of Paw Paw, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	134644.5	1	Yes	134644.5
RCP-006167	Town Of Pax, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	67189.72	3	Yes	67189.72
RCP-006169	City Of Peterburg, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1173609.92	1	Yes	1173609.92
RCP-006171	City Of Philippi, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1439716.57	2	Yes	1439716.57
RCP-006172	City Of Piedmont\xa0, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	354514.18	40	Yes	354232.53
RCP-006173	Town Of Pine Grove, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107079.75	1	Yes	107079.75
RCP-006174	Town Of Pineville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	253729.61	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006176	Town Of Poca, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	430544.66	5	Yes	430544.66
RCP-006179	City Of Princeton, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2508563.57	9	Yes	2508563.57
RCP-006181	Town Of Quinwood, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66429.75		Yes	32000
RCP-006182	Town Of Rainelle, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	671897.21	8	No		13989	87214	101203	150000
RCP-006183	City Of Ranson, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2315835.17	1	Yes	2315835.17
RCP-006184	City Of Ravenswood, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1610343.1	1	Yes	1610343.1
RCP-006185	Town Of Reedsville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	266990.73	3	Yes	266990.73
RCP-006187	City Of Richwood, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	613348.5	6	Yes	613348.5
RCP-006189	City Of Ripley, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1396396.89	2	Yes	1396396.89
RCP-006191	Town Of Romney, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	749253.79	4	Yes	749253.8
RCP-006192	City Of Ronceverte, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	738202.85	1	Yes	738202.85
RCP-006194	Town Of Rupert, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	233954.25	8	Yes	87858
RCP-006195	City Of Saint Albans, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4384129.25	4	No		488741	0	0	0
RCP-006198	Town Of Sand Fork, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35014.04	1	Yes	35014
RCP-006199	Corporation Of Shepherstown, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	844733.92	2	Yes	843366.96
RCP-006201	City Of Sistersville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	566692.25	1	Yes	566692.25
RCP-006202	City Of Smithers, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	324455.63	1	Yes	324455.63
RCP-006204	Town Of Sophia, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544148.33	1	Yes	544148.33
RCP-006205	South Charleston, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5325227.37	2	Yes	5041286.79
RCP-006206	City Of Spencer, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	900872.7	1	Yes	900872.7
RCP-006207	Town Of Star City, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	861089.31	6	Yes	861089.31
RCP-006208	City Of Stonewood, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	654338.25	1	Yes	654338.25
RCP-006209	City Of Summersville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1447231.21	1	Yes	1447231.21
RCP-006210	Town Of Sutton, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	269155.5	7	Yes	269155.5
RCP-006212	Town Of Terra Alta, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	397215.75	5	Yes	397215.75
RCP-006215	Town Of Triadelphia, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	336832.67	3	Yes	336832.67
RCP-006216	Town Of Tunnelton, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	130401.1	1	Yes	130401.1
RCP-006217	Town Of Union, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	238700.32	6	Yes	0
RCP-006218	Village Of Valley Grove, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	153829.1		Yes	76792.33
RCP-006219	City Of War, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	302795.78	5	Yes	302795.78
RCP-006220	Town Of Wardensville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114045.71	1	Yes	114045.71
RCP-006222	City Of Welch, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	726709.87	1	Yes	726132.51
RCP-006223	City Of Wellsburg, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1118355.21	12	Yes	266409.1
RCP-006224	Town Of West Hamlin, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	315614.87	1	Yes	315614.87
RCP-006225	Town Of West Liberty, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	188277.75	2	Yes	188277.75
RCP-006227	Town Of West Milford, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	268316.84	1	Yes	268316.84
RCP-006228	City Of Weston, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1704939.16	1	Yes	1354939.16
RCP-006230	Town Of West Union, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	353188.07	3	Yes	353188.07
RCP-006231	Town Of White Hall, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	294397.06	1	Yes	294397.06
RCP-006233	Town Of Whitesville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114015	1	Yes	114015
RCP-006235	City Of Williamstown\xa0\xa0, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1268205.98	1	Yes	1268205.98
RCP-006237	City Of Winfield, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	946431	1	Yes	946431
RCP-006239	City Of Worthington, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65421.57	1	Yes	65421.57
RCP-006246	City Of Timber Lake, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	90242.14	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006247	Town Of Isabel, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27488.6	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006248	City Of Salem, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	232387.04	2	Yes	232387.04
RCP-006249	City Of Vermillion, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1975922.8	9	Yes	1925922.8
RCP-006250	City Of Philip, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	138347.16	1	Yes	138347.16
RCP-006251	City Of Tea, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1090681.9	1	Yes	1090681.9
RCP-006252	City Of Plankinton, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	132017.54		Yes	132017.54
RCP-006253	City Of New Underwood, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	121709.32		Yes	121709.32
RCP-006257	Town Of Tabor, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72700.06	1	Yes	72700.06
RCP-006258	City Of Ipswich, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	161133.74	1	Yes	161133.74
RCP-006259	City Of Lead, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532229.62	1	Yes	0
RCP-006260	Town Of Raymond, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9765.68		Yes	0
RCP-006261	City Of Waubay, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	101273.74	1	Yes	101273.74
RCP-006262	City Of Summerset, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481050.22	1	Yes	481050.22
RCP-006264	City Of Parker, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	185005.4	2	Yes	93535.58
RCP-006265	City Of Scotland, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	145400.16	1	Yes	145400.16
RCP-006266	Town Of Lesterville, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23690.84	2	Yes	23690.84
RCP-006267	Town Of Roslyn, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30382.12	1	Yes	10418.43
RCP-006268	Town Of Pierpont, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21701.52		Yes	0
RCP-006270	City Of North Sioux City, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	529516.92	1	Yes	529516.92
RCP-006272	City Of Huron, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2419718.74	1	Yes	2419718.74
RCP-006274	City Of Marion, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	141059.84	2	Yes	141059.84
RCP-006276	Town Of Keystone, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62030.16		Yes	62030.16
RCP-006277	City Of Miller, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	241248.5		Yes	241248.5
RCP-006278	City Of St Lawrence, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33456.52	3	Yes	33456.52
RCP-006279	City Of Lennox, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	448317.12	1	Yes	448317.12
RCP-006280	South Shore Town, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38881.88	1	Yes	38881.88
RCP-006281	City Of Warner, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84635.9	5	Yes	0
RCP-006282	Town Of Pickstown, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40328.64	1	Yes	40328.64
RCP-006283	City Of Eagle Butte, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	243418.64		Yes	0
RCP-006284	City Of Elk Point, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	338362.76	1	Yes	338362.76
RCP-006285	Town Of Oacoma, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85178.44	2	Yes	85178.44
RCP-006286	City Of Webster, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	312140.1	1	Yes	312140.1
RCP-006287	City Of Iroquois, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46839.1	1	Yes	46839.1
RCP-006289	Town Of Gayville, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	71615	1	Yes	71615
RCP-006290	City Of Hurley, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72157.52	1	Yes	72157.52
RCP-006291	City Of Wall, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	158240.2	1	Yes	158240.2
RCP-006292	City Of Valley Springs, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	132017.54	1	Yes	132017.54
RCP-006294	City Of Martin, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	188984	3	Yes	188984
RCP-006295	City Of Spencer, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26584.36	1	Yes	26584.36
RCP-006296	Town Of Langford, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58955.78	1	Yes	58955.78
RCP-006297	Municipality Of Piedmont, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	163303.88	1	Yes	163303.88
RCP-006298	City Of Platte, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	227504.2	1	Yes	227504.2
RCP-006299	Town Of Humboldt, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102539.66	2	Yes	102539.66
RCP-006300	Town Of Pollock, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40690.34	2	Yes	40690.34
RCP-006301	City Of Mitchell, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2835483.58	1	Yes	2835483.58
RCP-006302	City Of Lake Preston, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	100369.5	1	Yes	100369.5
RCP-006303	City Of Irene, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	73423.46	1	Yes	73423.46
RCP-006304	City Of Redfield, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	411062.84		Yes	411062.84
RCP-006305	City Of Spearfish, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2126024.94	1	Yes	2126024.94
RCP-006306	City Of Mobridge, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622833.44	1	Yes	622833.44
RCP-006307	City Of Trent, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41594.56	3	Yes	41594.56
RCP-006309	Town Of Wasta, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14829.36	1	Yes	14829.36
RCP-006311	City Of Newell, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107965.04	3	Yes	107965.04
RCP-006312	City Of Presho, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88433.66	1	Yes	88433.66
RCP-006313	City Of Menno, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111039.42	1	Yes	111039.42
RCP-006314	Onida, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114656.32	1	Yes	114656.32
RCP-006315	City Of Volga, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	366755.58	1	Yes	366755.58
RCP-038550	Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21039307	13	Yes	6086467.74
RCP-036996	Madison County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20642090	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-038563	Lafayette, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15881059	5	Yes	7940529.5
RCP-036045	Union County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46589799	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-038570	Hoboken City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26137293	36	No		8084636.35	7734716	10014802	12244674
RCP-036976	Deerfield Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16284885	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-038385	Columbia County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13924165	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038162	North Miami, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19354517	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-036093	Guilford County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	104339752	45	No		17640815	24685301	29168742	18738288
RCP-038165	Pottawattamie County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18104173	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-038109	Orem, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16087350	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038118	Decatur, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33822135	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-038004	Santa Fe County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29205279	28	No		4202005	20940957	4062317	0
RCP-038014	Chelan County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14995195	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-038020	Wilmington, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55345780	76	No		8670207	17896831	0	0
RCP-039897	Toms River Township, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10345343	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-036052	Jackson County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	136551645	32	No		23898130	9790042	0	0
RCP-039331	Leominster, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19945242.96	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-036149	Dakota County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	83332300	10	No		26698748	0	0	0
RCP-039338	Racine, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46246465	23	No		8472579.85	11949155	17860538	0
RCP-036914	Howard County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16033204	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-038655	The Acadia Parish Police Jury, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12051514	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038905	Bartholomew County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16273089	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-036478	County Of Solano, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	86949405	59	No		35919857	5218884	0	0
RCP-014812	City Of Huntington Park, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27952355	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-035951	Marion County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71009435	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-038818	Hayward, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38465994	32	No		14500000.04	9311518	0	0
RCP-050652	Casselberry City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14403048	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-050660	Clermont City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19359997	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-031870	Lynnwood City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10936804	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-014696	City Of Easley, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10635938.36	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-056647	Rockwall, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11392873.15	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-035247	Town Of Culpeper, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19581052	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037108	Douglas County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21556564	11	No		3308532	6584500	11663531.68	0
RCP-037120	Euless City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10393946	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039761	Antioch, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21550900	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-036772	Randolph County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27905631	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-036117	Tuscaloosa County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40664754	51	Yes	10000000
RCP-039549	Sevier County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19083911	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-036164	Polk County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	140779436	63	No		28893318	15832369	0	0
RCP-039554	East Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24561068.33	43	No		14602783	14758153	20573557	24561068
RCP-039555	Westland, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25932032	1	No		15514238	10417794	0	0
RCP-039547	Davidson County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32556083	4	No		14184901	16993589	1377593	0
RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48549469	106	Yes	10000000
RCP-036417	Anoka County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	69327720	27	No		7376788	23386937	59815344	21931364
RCP-036078	City Of Minneapolis, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	271192484	69	No		129381000	280042000	280531000	280531000
RCP-036859	Downey, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25438407	14	No		19774606	3703892.53	0	0
RCP-039865	Colbert County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10729917	21	Yes	9704139.49
RCP-036329	Westchester County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	187926698	17	No		121385378	4522661	41791606	121619046
RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	105319216	90	No		19612526	32435028.1	30859263	30859263
RCP-036871	Cumberland County, Maine	Maine	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	57300874	58	Yes	10000000
RCP-037103	Hagerstown, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20421010	35	Yes	10000000
RCP-036814	Vineland, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11559382	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-036080	County Of Greene, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56928520	54	Yes	10000000
RCP-037129	Little Rock, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37713401	46	No		95264438	61046365	82342858	2023
RCP-035866	City Of Raleigh, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	73292365	40	No		49106350	0	0	0
RCP-040612	Lawrence, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19301467	1	No		11694722.24	5759638.48	11526448.99	0
RCP-039860	Barberton, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16441150	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-036821	Lowndes County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22804739	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-040603	County Of Passaic, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	97473818	37	No		29774544	50665705.65	17033568.35	0
RCP-037099	La Porte, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11476496	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-039606	Arlington County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46003782	19	No		64936560	144461793	127830285	97546145
RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	396080366	66	No		246000681	48357570	0	0
RCP-035989	Doña Ana County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42381821	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-036234	Benton County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54219867	55	Yes	10000000
RCP-036180	Denton County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	172329559	69	Yes	10000000
RCP-036977	Rochester, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17435537	1	No		17782949.33	0	0	0
RCP-039863	Sussex County, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45495460	22	Yes	5000000
RCP-036109	County Of Riverside, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	479874599	119	Yes	10000000
RCP-039653	Putnam County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15586651	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30606902	55	Yes	10000000
RCP-035897	County Of Orange, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	616840943	5	No		326477883	273220928	17142132	0
RCP-037110	Coryell County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14752591	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039869	Jefferson Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	84006695	20	No		23270111.59	56201206.98	4535376.43	0
RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56433212	43	Yes	10000000
RCP-036203	Sonoma County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	96018973	55	No		36755179	0	0	0
RCP-037112	Green Bay, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23695516	59	Yes	10000000
RCP-035862	Orlando City, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	58032405	3	No		92729824	170044019	143819646	218723728
RCP-039658	Mission, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25044862	24	Yes	10000000
RCP-053244	City Of Greenville, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24689311	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-053269	Jessamine County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10511204	24	Yes	10000000
RCP-047207	Bell Gardens City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10050163	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-047218	Brea City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10347515	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-047233	Ceres City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11651510	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-035435	Fallon City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11614389.84	4	Yes	9601700.26
RCP-040019	Lycoming County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22007003	33	Yes	10000000
RCP-037855	New London, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26223863.59	62	Yes	419782
RCP-037854	Sebastian County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24828896	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-039575	Murrieta, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16463101	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-037811	Madera, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23070374	27	Yes	0
RCP-037981	Steubenville, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14598300	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-036328	Frisco City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16638254	10	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-040208	Brownsville, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65194854	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-040407	Belleville, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15792501	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-040268	Bloomfield, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25827441	4	No		4898000	5000000	4000000	0
RCP-040269	Cass County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20546525	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-040272	Odessa, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20322959	11	No		37295485	56820904	92528200	29132824
RCP-037502	Visalia, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29364455	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-037510	Ulster County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34491474	33	No		14031357	0	0	0
RCP-036627	Municipio De Aguadilla, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31488326	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-053037	City Of Danville, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24704857	10	Yes	7890000
RCP-037511	Chautauqua County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24649420	71	No		16857857	7791563	0	0
RCP-038885	Adams County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20008291	21	No		4479343.32	5585736	5377137	5377137
RCP-037674	Pike County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10840244	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-037699	Sioux City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40618687	18	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20995402	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-037706	Washington County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29339498	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-038089	Renton City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18113855	2	No		19731051	7219870	0	0
RCP-039093	Saline County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10532376	50	Yes	10000000
RCP-014725	City Of North Augusta, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11871089.22	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-056029	Farmers Branch, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11956458.88	7	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-056032	Friendswood, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10003026.04	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-056050	Haltom City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10892845.99	2	Yes	9429729
RCP-037757	Douglas County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23747378	51	Yes	9120468.48
RCP-037758	Shasta County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34978429	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-036663	Guayama Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23725180	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-039120	Lowndes County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11381392	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-038638	Russell County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11258245	39	Yes	0
RCP-039625	Midland County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34347543	8	No		33315233	1032310	0	0
RCP-040016	Union Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30477638	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-037182	Apple Valley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14883978	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-038156	Berrien County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29796346	6	No		6891044	8561041	3565695	0
RCP-036762	Mercer County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11413053	53	No		802468	412160.66	134638.51	0
RCP-036703	Columbia County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10169151	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-036725	Beaver County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	91978752	76	No		10458610	10545069	14957791	14957791
RCP-006319	City Of Milbank, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	561164.96	1	Yes	0
RCP-006320	City Of Watertown, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4010078	1	Yes	4010078
RCP-006322	City Of Roscoe, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52264.48	2	Yes	52264.48
RCP-006324	City Of Tyndall, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	184824.56	1	Yes	184824.56
RCP-006326	City Of Kadoka, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	129666.56	1	Yes	129666.56
RCP-006328	City Of Montrose, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80114.76	6	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006337	Millard County, Ut,	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2561614	24	Yes	2561614
RCP-006379	City Of Carbondale,	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7858667	9	Yes	7858667
RCP-006383	Jackson County, Sd,	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	649533	1	Yes	649533
RCP-006384	Mineral County, Mt, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	854066	2	Yes	854066
RCP-006394	Hancock County, Tn, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1285857	3	Yes	1001057
RCP-006472	City Of Hill City, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	186633.02	1	Yes	186633.02
RCP-006473	City Of Gettysburg, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	195494.46	1	Yes	195494.46
RCP-006474	City Of Wessington Springs, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	164750.66	1	Yes	0
RCP-006475	City Of Canistota, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115018.02	1	Yes	115018.02
RCP-006476	City Of Brookings, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4415353.76	1	Yes	4415353.73
RCP-006478	City Of Arlington, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	155346.68	1	Yes	155346.68
RCP-006479	City Of Doland, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32733.12	1	Yes	32733.12
RCP-006480	Town Of Chancellor, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47743.34	1	Yes	47743.34
RCP-006481	City Of Brandon, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1821842.06	2	Yes	1821842.05
RCP-006482	City Of Fort Pierre, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	400935.48	2	Yes	400935.48
RCP-006483	City Of Clark, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	191877.56	1	Yes	191877.56
RCP-006484	City Of Harrisburg, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1213476.3	1	Yes	1213476.3
RCP-006485	City Of Colman, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104709.8	4	Yes	104709.8
RCP-006486	City Of Gary, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41413.72	1	Yes	41413.72
RCP-006487	City Of Yankton, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2656084.4	1	Yes	2656084.4
RCP-006491	City Of Corsica, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	103986.42	1	Yes	103986.42
RCP-006492	City Of Faulkton, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	128219.78	1	Yes	128219.78
RCP-006493	City Of Belle Fourche, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1031183.58		Yes	1031183.58
RCP-006494	City Of Clear Lake, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	228227.58	1	Yes	228227.58
RCP-006495	City Of Chamberlain, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	427881.5	1	Yes	427881.5
RCP-006496	City Of Highmore, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	131294.16	1	Yes	131294.16
RCP-006497	City Of Britton, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	230216.9	1	Yes	230216.9
RCP-006498	City Of Eureka, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	149378.76		Yes	149378.76
RCP-006499	City Of Herreid, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75231.92	1	Yes	75231.92
RCP-006502	City Of Faith, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	74327.68	1	Yes	0
RCP-006503	City Of Box Elder, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1829980.12	1	Yes	0
RCP-006504	City Of Burke, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105975.72	1	Yes	105975.72
RCP-006505	City Of Armour, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	120985.94	1	Yes	120985.94
RCP-006506	Town Of Ravinia, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11574.14	3	Yes	11574.14
RCP-006507	City Of Bryant, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82104.08	1	Yes	82104.08
RCP-006509	City Of Groton, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	266747.78	1	Yes	266747
RCP-006510	City Of Bristol, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55700.56		Yes	55700.56
RCP-006511	City Of Canton, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	643811.58	1	Yes	643811.56
RCP-006512	City Of Crooks, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	239982.58	2	Yes	239982.58
RCP-006513	City Of Goodwin Inc., SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26765.2	1	Yes	26765.2
RCP-006514	City Of Garretson, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	207430.3	1	Yes	207430.3
RCP-006516	City Of De Smet, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	190249.94	1	Yes	190249.94
RCP-006517	City Of Hot Springs, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	633322.5	1	Yes	633322.5
RCP-006518	City Of Bonesteel, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49370.96	1	Yes	49370.96
RCP-006519	City Of Freeman, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	230578.6	2	Yes	230578.6
RCP-006521	City Of Garden City, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10489.06		Yes	10489.06
RCP-006522	City Of Bowdle, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84635.9	1	Yes	84163.38
RCP-006523	City Of Emery, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	81561.54	1	Yes	81561.54
RCP-006524	City Of Willow Lake, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43945.58	1	Yes	43700.22
RCP-006525	Town Of Hayti, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	69264	2	Yes	69264
RCP-006526	City Of Dante, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15552.76	1	Yes	15552.76
RCP-006527	Brant Lake City, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10850.76	1	Yes	0
RCP-006528	Town Of Pukwana, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55158.02	1	Yes	55158.02
RCP-006529	City Of Winner, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	510708.96	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006530	City Of Castlewood, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115922.26	1	Yes	115922.26
RCP-006531	City Of Gregory, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	224610.68	1	Yes	224610.68
RCP-006532	City Of Elkton, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	131294.16	1	Yes	131294.16
RCP-006533	Town Of Hermosa, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76859.54	1	Yes	76859.54
RCP-006534	City Of Conde, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25680.12	1	Yes	25680.12
RCP-006535	City Of Centerville, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	157697.66	1	Yes	157697.66
RCP-006536	City Of Aberdeen, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5110162.48	1	Yes	5110162.48
RCP-006537	City Of White, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88433.66	1	Yes	88433.66
RCP-006539	City Of Murdo, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	79210.52	1	Yes	79210.52
RCP-006540	City Of Carthage, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23509.98	1	Yes	23509.98
RCP-006541	City Of Whitewood, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	177048.2		Yes	177048.2
RCP-006542	City Of White Lake, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66732.16	1	Yes	66732.16
RCP-006544	City Of Dell Rapids, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	656109.08	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006545	City Of Bridgewater, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	83369.98	1	Yes	82439
RCP-006546	City Of Aurora, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	150825.54		Yes	150825.54
RCP-006547	City Of Hudson, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62391.86	1	Yes	62391.86
RCP-006548	City Of Mt. Vernon, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	78848.84	1	Yes	78848.84
RCP-006549	City Of Baltic, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	213036.54		Yes	0
RCP-006550	City Of Flandreau, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	418839.22	1	Yes	414162
RCP-006551	City Of Worthing, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	182111.88	1	Yes	182111.88
RCP-006684	Abbeville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4459535.93	1	Yes	4459535.93
RCP-006685	Abita Springs, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	968369.08		Yes	0
RCP-006686	Addis, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2304599.85	1	Yes	0
RCP-006687	Albany, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429357.22	1	Yes	429357.22
RCP-006689	Anacoco, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	217113.75		Yes	217113.75
RCP-006692	Arnaudville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	387495.82	1	Yes	387495.82
RCP-006694	Athens, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	99652.37	1	Yes	99652.37
RCP-006697	Baldwin, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	822039.39	5	Yes	822039.39
RCP-006698	Ball, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1457739.98	1	Yes	1457739.98
RCP-006699	Basile, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	660521.06	1	Yes	660521.06
RCP-006702	Belcher, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33075	2	Yes	16615
RCP-006703	Benton, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	770175.72	5	Yes	770175
RCP-006704	Bernice, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	590505.1	4	Yes	590505.1
RCP-006705	Berwick, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1637040.14	18	Yes	0
RCP-006707	Blanchard, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1163228.34		Yes	1163228.34
RCP-006710	Boyce, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	363045.78	1	Yes	363045.78
RCP-006711	Breaux Bridge, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3018466.41	5	Yes	3018466.41
RCP-006712	Broussard, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4704777.06	1	Yes	4704777.06
RCP-006713	Brusly, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	969480.43	1	Yes	969480.43
RCP-006715	Bunkie, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1429214.96	1	Yes	1429214.96
RCP-006716	Calvin, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39975		Yes	0
RCP-006718	Cankton, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	187079.73	1	Yes	187079.73
RCP-006719	Carencro, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3500428.23	1	Yes	3494735.05
RCP-006720	Castor, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	89650.07	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006721	Central, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7608266.53	1	Yes	7608266.53
RCP-006723	Chatham, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	203750.18	1	Yes	203750.18
RCP-006725	Choudrant, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	363416.24	3	Yes	363416.24
RCP-006730	Clinton, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	556423.24	2	Yes	556423.24
RCP-006731	Colfax, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542345.95	1	Yes	542345.95
RCP-006733	Columbia, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	135586.49	2	Yes	135476.23
RCP-006734	Converse, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	160406.96	31	Yes	160406.96
RCP-006735	Cotton Valley, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	346745.78	9	Yes	346463.8
RCP-006737	Coushatta, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	662002.89	2	Yes	662002.89
RCP-006738	Covington, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3913485.44	1	Yes	1384684
RCP-006739	Creola, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84093.27		Yes	84093.27
RCP-006740	Crowley, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4663286.11	1	Yes	4663286.11
RCP-006742	Delcambre, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	684971.09	1	Yes	684971.09
RCP-006743	Delhi, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1035421.41	4	Yes	1035421.41
RCP-006745	Denham Springs, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3613046.51		Yes	3613046.51
RCP-006746	Dequincy, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1143223.77	1	Yes	1143223.77
RCP-006747	Deridder, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3922376.35	31	Yes	3922376.35
RCP-006748	Dixie Inn, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	97429.63	5	Yes	97429.63
RCP-006749	Dodson, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111136.47	1	Yes	111136.48
RCP-006750	Donaldsonville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3127009.7	2	Yes	3124466.78
RCP-006754	Dubach, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	336002.58	3	Yes	336002.58
RCP-006755	Dubberly, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95206.9	3	Yes	87826.57
RCP-006758	Edgefield, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	71127.34	1	Yes	35563.67
RCP-006759	Elizabeth, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	198934.28	2	Yes	198934.28
RCP-036648	Newport News City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66794246	1	No		32142578.72	34651667.28	0	0
RCP-038497	Dearborn Heights, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24314463	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-038494	Vigo County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20790877	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-037250	Mesa County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29953485	5	No		16191196	9448824	12493306	14063631
RCP-036179	Boulder County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63359749	42	Yes	10000000
RCP-035883	Clark County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	94835091	36	No		2783116	12095268	18322698	18322698
RCP-038514	Rutherford County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13019597	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-038529	Bellevue, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20110630	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-038521	Laporte County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21344456	28	No		11228067	7186922	9368661.79	9368661.79
RCP-038021	Hardin County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11188513	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-039574	Asheville, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26293853	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-039573	Madison County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13779458	21	No		10585837	3193621	0	0
RCP-039314	Manitowoc County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15341133	60	Yes	10000000
RCP-036509	State Of Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1040157440.4	95	Yes	10000000
RCP-035893	Cuyahoga County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	239898257	1	No		263924401	0	0	0
RCP-035836	Greensboro City, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	59430051	2	No		31469722.38	27960328.62	0	0
RCP-039335	La Crosse County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22923224	20	No		9952224	14355983	22569189	22569189
RCP-039342	Altoona, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39258106	112	Yes	10000000
RCP-039307	Dubuque County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18901521	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-035987	Harford County,Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	49616420	47	Yes	10000000
RCP-039031	Valencia County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14895745	91	Yes	10000000
RCP-038789	Bartow County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20926843	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-038786	Scott County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11072359	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-038625	South San Francisco, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12278941	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-039136	Cleveland Heights, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38817062	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-039037	Jackson County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11023022	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	57535251	32	No		31927355	30191977	57535250	57535250
RCP-039079	Erie County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14425300	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-039072	Hardin County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21552291	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-039083	Warren, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28680143	95	Yes	10000000
RCP-039085	Putnam County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19097507	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-036061	State Of Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	8816581838.7	65	No		5113400000	0	0	0
RCP-036020	Mecklenburg County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	215673636	129	No		8868181	39657382	69385568	0
RCP-040519	Barry County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11955366	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-040547	Sandy Springs City, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13868305	1	No		20477207	0	0	0
RCP-037235	Ithaca, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16092137	46	Yes	8700000
RCP-037156	Waco, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34720687	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-037195	Augusta County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14676256	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-035267	Town Of Front Royal, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15851180	3	No		2487034	0	0	0
RCP-035283	Town Of Herndon, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25523946	32	No		5922496.64	3681826.43	6014437	632181.85
RCP-035338	Town Of Purcellville, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10559844	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-035373	Town Of Vienna, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17103462	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-035378	Town Of Warrenton, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10403180	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-050687	Eustis City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10669685	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-036906	Perris City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22171505	155	Yes	3964046
RCP-035849	Metropolitan Government Of Nashville And Davidson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	259810600	2	No		216112204	35547010	0	0
RCP-036778	Rapid City, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13024994	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	135696763	100	No		35128663	0	12412847	0
RCP-039754	Victorville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33500666	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-039640	Calhoun County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26058813	34	No		8215281	13985000	23119111	23119111
RCP-036479	Albany County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	59340959	26	No		30059144.45	0	0	0
RCP-039551	Florence County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26861794	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-039548	Charleston, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21092855	34	No		93105327	67784429	105947560	105947560
RCP-036059	Multnomah County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	157887555	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-036056	Kern County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	174853685	29	No		100640966.97	0	0	0
RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1011788220	12	No		1768244804	1764905912	1803376944	1634580533
RCP-039815	Bossier Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24675836	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-039609	Ashtabula County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18887924	31	Yes	10000000
RCP-036032	State Of Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1806373345.9	783	No		286640464	0	0	0
RCP-039702	San Buenaventura, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16321147	1	No		19657008	6115407	0	0
RCP-036055	Cook County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1000372385	79	No		322650350	15065714.51	0	0
RCP-039496	Wayne County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23916753	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-036192	Suffolk County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	286812434	14	No		277627963.52	0	0	0
RCP-036136	City Of Moreno Valley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48481233	3	Yes	0
RCP-035911	Leon County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	57024862	20	No		15476739	7536058	14415603	0
RCP-039581	Hennepin County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	245875163	18	No		131279363	103493674	0	0
RCP-036803	Rockford, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54822355	3	No		38429055	16239987.91	0	0
RCP-039643	Sarasota, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10123762	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-039785	Idaho Falls, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10570717	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-036809	Elgin, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19501332	6	Yes	0
RCP-036188	Bexar County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	389166877	61	No		71764795	98439601	98653666	98653666
RCP-039795	Miramar, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22053169	7	No		11331537	5689475	0	0
RCP-040583	Frederick County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50413962	57	No		50005097	24678044	0	0
RCP-039650	Mesquite, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27021425	15	No		14570625.27	17890027.65	7535868.87	5000000
RCP-019361	BOONE, COUNTY OF	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13177707	20	Yes	1000000
RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	247450630	33	No		38209690	0	59312403	10878432
RCP-036401	City Of Austin, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	188482478	31	No		407399326	449348505	0	0
RCP-039873	Maverick County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11406060	8	Yes	9853939.38
RCP-039859	Kenner, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13833851	1	No		15838740	8344743	0	0
RCP-039822	Washington County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34488172	11	Yes	5000000
RCP-036171	San Bernardino City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77656407	17	Yes	0
RCP-039608	Whittier, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16360631	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-035848	Collier County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74762701	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-036649	Norfolk City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	154141050	1	No		49332630	70526898	81169563	0
RCP-035853	City Of Sacramento, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	112313331	2	No		128019000	0	0	0
RCP-039781	Pinellas County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	189381543	55	No		0	30843440	30843440	30843440
RCP-039831	Bloomington, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13386924	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-037115	State Of Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2833294345.3	95	No		2548637792	0	0	0
RCP-039742	Manchester, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24985218.92	51	No		7607024	16759880	618314	0
RCP-039757	Normal, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10879113	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-036177	Atlantic County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51214806	17	No		2969213.4	5703599.63	3594152.62	3844152.62
RCP-002001	City Of Goose Creek, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21738356.5	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-056074	Huntsville, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10487411.84	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-056087	Keller, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11721838.39	6	Yes	8599053.39
RCP-056264	The Colony, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11032873.46		Yes	10000000
RCP-037919	Waterloo, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30284282	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-037920	Rancho Cucamonga, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26835530	1	No		27171372	5673134	0	0
RCP-040530	Davis, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19730600	2	No		13114805	5865795	0	0
RCP-036664	Guaynabo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37101450	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-038673	San Benito County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12199718	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-037901	Sangamon County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37812754	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-040136	Moore County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19594757	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-010714	City of Beloit, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15218991	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-040076	Maury County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18722045	4	No		19555351	0	0	0
RCP-053071	Town Of Islip, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	47551642	23	No		21929637.42	0	0	0
RCP-053098	Geauga County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18190220	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-053103	Lebanon County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27541628	11	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-032053	City Of Coral Springs, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20013374	46	No		8557164.84	11456209.16	0	0
RCP-040053	Urbana, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12974560	27	Yes	2500000
RCP-040054	Tompkins County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19847267	108	No		25918791	0	4291831	0
RCP-040059	Westminster, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23690019	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-040062	Faulkner County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24475383	33	Yes	10000000
RCP-038594	Newburgh, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21814339	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-038552	County Of Bristol, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	109786776	161	Yes	10000000
RCP-040064	Lenawee County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19122953	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-036680	Vega Baja Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30218807	23	Yes	10000000
RCP-037994	Putnam County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10964751	1	Yes	0
RCP-037996	Waukegan, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19705222	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-037992	Hamburg Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11538866	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-037592	San Lorenzo Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10751073.82	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-037581	Dekalb County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20375013	3	No		4160670	6517207	5423546	0
RCP-039883	Round Rock, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16397285	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-039113	Fall River, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	69599142	70	Yes	10000000
RCP-037452	Providence, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	166314129.1	58	No		38394941	66222730.26	48940621.5	69783179.09
RCP-037451	Jackson County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10027745	13	Yes	9726912.65
RCP-036475	Town Of Brookhaven, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	55026837	85	No		20298313	0	0	0
RCP-038881	League City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10385742	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-040328	Eau Claire, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13529002	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3071830673.2	167	No		2427977018.75	0	0	466364794
RCP-040377	Turlock, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15753190	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-040287	Methuen Town City, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19827491.1	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-053168	Cumberland County, Tn	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11755301	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-006761	Epps, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	214311.88		Yes	0
RCP-006762	Erath, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	755357.52	1	Yes	755357.52
RCP-006764	Estherwood, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	397868.55	2	Yes	285920.55
RCP-006766	Evergreen, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106691	1	Yes	106691
RCP-006767	Farmerville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1376980.82	10	Yes	1199535
RCP-006770	Fisher, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	81129.63	3	Yes	81129.63
RCP-006771	Florien, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	221902.47		Yes	221902.47
RCP-006773	Fordoche, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	289553.25		Yes	289553.25
RCP-006774	Forest, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15601.5	1	Yes	15601.5
RCP-006775	Forest Hill, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	312293.47	1	Yes	312293.48
RCP-006776	Franklin, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2485381.83	1	Yes	2485381.83
RCP-006778	Blue Lake City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	297830	3	Yes	297830
RCP-006879	French Settlement, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	223109.25		Yes	223109.25
RCP-006880	Georgetown, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	118545.56	1	Yes	118545.56
RCP-006881	Gibsland, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	325259.4	1	Yes	162679.7
RCP-006882	Gilbert, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	204861.56	3	Yes	181578.36
RCP-006884	Golden Meadow, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	726091.59	1	Yes	726091.59
RCP-006886	Gonzales, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4059074.2	1	Yes	4059074.2
RCP-006888	Gramercy, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1215462.49	1	Yes	1215462.49
RCP-006889	Grand Cane, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85252.5	1	Yes	85252.5
RCP-006891	Grand Isle, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532714.13	3	Yes	532714
RCP-006894	Greenwood, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1158782.89	3	Yes	1158782.89
RCP-006895	Gretna, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6537417.4	2	Yes	6537417.4
RCP-006896	Grosse Tete, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	233016.12	1	No		19928	0	0	0
RCP-006897	Gueydan, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499373.19	2	Yes	499373.19
RCP-006898	Hall Summit, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106320.55	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-006900	Harrisonburg, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	117434.2	2	No		25000	22150	17249	2200
RCP-006901	Haughton, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1221019.31	1	Yes	1221019.31
RCP-006902	Haynesville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	747948.42	1	Yes	747948.42
RCP-006904	Henderson, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	664966.52	1	Yes	664966.52
RCP-006905	Hessmer, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	277841.16	1	Yes	277841.16
RCP-006906	Hodge, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	161518.33	3	Yes	138616.33
RCP-006908	Hornbeck, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	161888.79		Yes	161888.79
RCP-006909	Hosston, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110766.02	1	Yes	110766.02
RCP-006910	Ida, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60975	1	Yes	60975
RCP-006912	Iota, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	530861.85	1	Yes	265430.93
RCP-006913	Iowa, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1172119.26	8	Yes	1172119.26
RCP-006916	Jean Lafitte, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	740909.78	1	Yes	740909.78
RCP-006918	Jena, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1258435.26	2	Yes	0
RCP-006919	Jennings, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3630457.89	1	Yes	3630457.89
RCP-006921	Jonesville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	740909.78	3	Yes	140000
RCP-006922	Junction City, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	205232.01	1	Yes	205232.01
RCP-006923	Kaplan, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1638151.52	1	Yes	1635487.18
RCP-006925	Kentwood, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	902428.11		Yes	902428.11
RCP-006928	Kinder, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	877237.17	1	Yes	877237.17
RCP-006929	Krotz Springs, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	435654.95	1	Yes	435654.95
RCP-006930	Lake Arthur, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1018010.03		Yes	1000000
RCP-006932	Lecompte, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429727.67	1	Yes	429727.67
RCP-006933	Leesville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2073806.47	6	Yes	2073806.47
RCP-006934	Leonville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	408241.29	2	Yes	407577.31
RCP-006936	Livonia, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518636.84	1	Yes	518636.84
RCP-006937	Lockport, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	890573.56	3	Yes	890573.56
RCP-006938	Logansport, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	569389.15	5	Yes	569389.16
RCP-006940	Loreauville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	311182.11	1	Yes	310675.99
RCP-006942	Lutcher, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1179157.91	1	Yes	1179157.91
RCP-006943	Madisonville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	314145.75	2	Yes	314145.75
RCP-006945	Mandeville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4621424.72	2	Yes	4617666.52
RCP-006946	Mangham, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	233757.03	10	Yes	233757.03
RCP-006947	Mansfield, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1712983.4	1	Yes	1712983.4
RCP-006948	Mansura, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	500855		Yes	500855
RCP-006949	Many, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	996523.66	3	Yes	996523.66
RCP-006950	Maringouin, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	368232.16	3	Yes	368232.16
RCP-006951	Marion, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	273395.71	2	Yes	273395.71
RCP-006952	Marksville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1977488.19	1	Yes	1977488.19
RCP-006953	Maurice, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	596061.92	1	Yes	596061.92
RCP-006956	Mer Rouge, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	203379.73	2	Yes	203379.73
RCP-006957	Mermentau, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	233016.12	2	Yes	233016.12
RCP-006959	Minden, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4386185.86	1	Yes	4386185.86
RCP-006961	Montpelier, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	89279.62		No		7930	6286	0	0
RCP-006962	Mooringsport, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111338.7	1	Yes	0
RCP-006963	Moreauville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	317479.84	1	Yes	317479.84
RCP-006964	Morgan City, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3979426.4	5	Yes	3325108
RCP-006965	Morganza, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	213011.55	1	Yes	213011.55
RCP-006966	Morse, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	297104.82	2	Yes	297104.82
RCP-006967	Mount Lebanon, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19659.02	1	Yes	0
RCP-006972	New Llano, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	819446.2	1	Yes	819446.2
RCP-006973	New Roads, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1659637.9	1	Yes	1659637.9
RCP-006975	Noble, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21675	2	Yes	21675
RCP-006976	North Hodge, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	139291.03	1	No		7862	0	0	0
RCP-006977	Norwood, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107802.38	1	Yes	107802.38
RCP-006978	Oak Grove, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	575316.43	1	Yes	575316.43
RCP-006979	Oakdale, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2801009.41	1	Yes	2692002.74
RCP-006980	Oberlin, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	640886.96	2	Yes	568615.24
RCP-006981	Oil City, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	359341.24		Yes	359341.24
RCP-006982	Olla, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509375.47	1	Yes	509375.47
RCP-006984	Palmetto, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59272.78	1	Yes	59272.78
RCP-006985	Parks, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	258947.97	1	Yes	258737.39
RCP-006987	Pearl River, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	966887.25	2	Yes	0
RCP-006988	Pine Prairie, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	538641.41	5	Yes	538500
RCP-006992	Plaquemine, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2422404.51	2	Yes	0
RCP-006993	Plaucheville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84834.17	2	Yes	84834.17
RCP-006994	Pleasant Hill, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	254872.97	8	Yes	254872.97
RCP-006998	Port Barre, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	782030.27	2	Yes	782030.27
RCP-006999	Port Vincent, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	279693.44	2	Yes	279693.44
RCP-007003	Rayne, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2960675.46	6	Yes	2960675.46
RCP-007005	Reeves, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	90391	6	Yes	90391
RCP-007006	Richmond, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	201527.45	1	Yes	201527.45
RCP-007007	Richwood, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1109680.5	3	Yes	1109680.5
RCP-007008	Ridgecrest, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	223384.3	1	Yes	100000
RCP-007009	Ringgold, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507523.19	1	Yes	507523.19
RCP-007012	Rosedale, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	275247.99	2	Yes	275247.99
RCP-007014	Rosepine, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	570130.08	2	Yes	570130.08
RCP-007015	Ruston, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8095921.1	2	Yes	8095921.1
RCP-007016	Saline, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102616.01		Yes	102616.01
RCP-007017	Sarepta, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	305995.74	8	Yes	305995.74
RCP-007018	Scott, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3213696.15	8	Yes	3213696.15
RCP-007019	Sibley, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429727.67	1	Yes	429727.67
RCP-007020	Sicily Island, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	172261.53	1	Yes	171981.35
RCP-007022	Simmesport, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	763137.06	2	Yes	763137.06
RCP-007023	Simpson, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	157012.5		Yes	157012.5
RCP-007024	Simsboro, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	301506	1	Yes	301506
RCP-007025	Slaughter, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	335632.13	2	Yes	335632.13
RCP-007026	Sorrento, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	631255.12	3	Yes	630228
RCP-007027	South Mansfield, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	132252.4	1	Yes	132037.3
RCP-007028	Spearsville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15765	1	Yes	15765
RCP-007030	Springhill, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1767810.73	2	Yes	1767810.73
RCP-007031	St. Francisville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	601989.2	2	Yes	601989
RCP-007032	St. Gabriel, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2763593.46	1	Yes	2763593
RCP-007034	St. Martinville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2156047.43	1	Yes	2156047.43
RCP-007035	Stanley, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2863.5	1	Yes	2863.5
RCP-007036	Sterlington, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1085803.28	2	Yes	1085803.28
RCP-007037	Stonewall, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	766837.5	4	Yes	596987.5
RCP-007038	Sulphur, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7433177.31		Yes	7433177
RCP-038186	Newton County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11311660	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-036677	San Sebastian Municipio County, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22524361	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-038476	West New York Town, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18144801	27	No		5684324	6919564	5540913	0
RCP-038472	Union County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11457727	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-038474	Orange County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28839722	26	Yes	10000000
RCP-036640	Chesapeake City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76025897	39	No		36001783	34455650	18691967	0
RCP-035994	State of Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	8127679948.7	119	No		3229400167.51	0	0	0
RCP-038392	Kendall County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25054795	111	Yes	10000000
RCP-038406	Lincoln County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11462583	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038427	Sullivan County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30757243	22	No		9352676	30041000	0	30757243
RCP-036678	Toa Baja Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40283034	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-038110	St. Clair County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17386657	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-039324	Vallejo, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25727736	45	Yes	10000000
RCP-039326	Delaware County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22169386	34	Yes	10000000
RCP-039306	Centre County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31541383	15	No		7035958.2	4513185.46	4902555.44	4902555.44
RCP-039302	King County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	437576495	139	No		105778000	0	41745000	0
RCP-039317	Kenton County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32437404	17	Yes	10000000
RCP-039339	Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13792153	32	Yes	10000000
RCP-036150	Toledo City, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	180948591	32	No		40812760	62776618	63094662	0
RCP-039320	South Fulton, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11352517	1	Yes	500000
RCP-039322	Norman, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22245542	8	Yes	1114329
RCP-039316	Passaic, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31131607	22	No		5844418.34	9794143.26	12891188.2	0
RCP-039283	Bulloch County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15462921	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-039226	Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20084821	31	No		3321152	5816378	5736456	6193166
RCP-039191	Eddy County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11355170	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-039216	West Sacramento, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11773300	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-039198	Yellowstone County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31330634	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-038684	Sussex County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27288147	11	No		3769398	6562166	9193594	10684930
RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	339789370	35	No		122568216.23	151328936.31	0	0
RCP-039014	Manassas Park, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21528613	33	Yes	10000000
RCP-036566	American Samoa	American Samoa	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	494990988	67	Yes	0
RCP-038944	Hammond, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51395851	16	No		17047990.2	7135500.94	20095232.51	18605978.01
RCP-038588	Franklin County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20194371	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-038583	New Rochelle, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36938483	31	No		13208604	11834169	0	0
RCP-036092	City Of Birmingham, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	141272354	33	No		42603048	471779	42603048	42603048
RCP-039155	County Of Bullitt, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15864606	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-049187	Glastonbury, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10204968.08	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-049247	Shelton, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12172151.62	38	Yes	10000000
RCP-049252	Southington, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12972697.96	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-049262	Torrington, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10075341.7	16	Yes	9823497.31
RCP-031278	Billerica, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12962692.57	4	Yes	9947819.83
RCP-031299	Chelmsford, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10578611.69	39	Yes	335000
RCP-039767	La Plata County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10920270	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-037149	Blount County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11232023	35	Yes	8353640
RCP-039751	Tustin, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19380784	11	No		13512339	0	0	0
RCP-036811	City Of Clearwater, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22483893	1	No		34124364	39908000	0	0
RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	69323447	46	No		9317174	11224898	16718212	0
RCP-035945	Winston-Salem City, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51732065	10	No		11901280.05	35632093.65	4198691.3	0
RCP-036336	State Of Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1131061056.7	85	No		513646898	0	0	0
RCP-035923	Seminole County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	91646669	20	No		38231249	58521866	0	0
RCP-036182	City Of Boston, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	558709038	122	No		51830675	131249236	132785599	0
RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	126556338	94	No		30481408	0	0	0
RCP-037293	Marquette County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12955499	1	No		7958637	4996862	0	0
RCP-035938	Fort Wayne City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50815327	99	No		27350327	11928153.78	0	0
RCP-039711	Hancock County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10680580	41	Yes	10000000
RCP-038254	West Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37234783.09	29	No		8654493	2712348	4207061	4259915
RCP-036397	County Of Cumberland, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	49214152	7	No		26421938	48156466	68630418	63246526
RCP-037060	Anderson, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14507668	11	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-036644	Hampton City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48660418	30	No		25564155	17913559	5182704	0
RCP-036752	Battle Creek, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30545339	63	Yes	10000000
RCP-039684	West Covina, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19566027	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-039585	Cicero, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42882464	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039679	Huntington Beach, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29606925	2	No		18138284	34573656	37471143	0
RCP-035833	Clark County, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	440282817	28	No		221807389	455708801	0	0
RCP-036186	County of Middlesex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	160258621	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-039660	Clay County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12474371	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-036760	Licking County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34353370	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-035863	County Of Cumberland, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	65168690	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-037287	Wright County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26878110	47	Yes	10000000
RCP-035993	Kane County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	103413041	36	No		9384269	4676625.75	492384.26	500000
RCP-036845	Kanawha County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34598499	59	No		0	3919453.15	8526899	0
RCP-036815	Yakima, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26195479	8	No		15753593.76	0	13453551.93	0
RCP-053030	Platte County, Mo	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20281972	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-037109	Carver County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20412306	7	No		17640424	0	0	0
RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	155191527	14	No		20718556	36518609	16297950	43785640
RCP-039759	Manhattan City, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12757377	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039878	Avondale City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17887327	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-039641	Kent County, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35115561	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39700361	24	Yes	10000000
RCP-035931	Lake County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	135293758	83	No		18255426	0	17666571	17666571
RCP-035850	County Of Montgomery, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	161395498	133	Yes	10000000
RCP-039529	Georgetown County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12174855	22	Yes	7866157
RCP-039624	State Of Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3717212336.4	28	No		2854255596	0	0	0
RCP-039826	Cache County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24918634	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	207895373	53	No		238355861.95	194368322.87	133357487.72	433127788.15
RCP-036801	Daytona Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15010544	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-037945	Greeley, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20991595	12	No		24518952	0	0	0
RCP-037604	Highland City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14895107	6	Yes	1040000
RCP-036650	Petersburg, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20961839	27	Yes	6613648.01
RCP-037611	Independence, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21485924	27	Yes	5000000
RCP-007040	Sunset, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1059871.43	18	Yes	1054925
RCP-007041	Tallulah, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2469452.28	5	Yes	2469452.28
RCP-007044	Tullos, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	144847.86	1	Yes	144847.86
RCP-007045	Turkey Creek, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	171891.06	3	Yes	171000
RCP-007046	Urania, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481961.81	1	Yes	481961.81
RCP-007048	Vidalia, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1413285.39	4	Yes	1413284
RCP-007049	Vienna, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23637		No		0	0	0	0
RCP-007050	Ville Platte, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2605409.22	2	Yes	1300618.84
RCP-007051	Vinton, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1198051.1		Yes	1198051.1
RCP-007052	Vivian, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1289923.91	1	Yes	1289923.91
RCP-007053	Walker, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2314602.13	1	Yes	2314602.13
RCP-007054	Washington, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	338595.77		Yes	338595.77
RCP-007055	Waterproof, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	205602.47	1	Yes	205602.47
RCP-007056	Welsh, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1195457.92	1	No		500000	500000	100000	500000
RCP-007057	West Monroe, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4529551.91		Yes	4529551.91
RCP-007058	Westlake, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1834122.14	2	Yes	1834122.14
RCP-007059	Westwego, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3084407.39	1	Yes	3084407.39
RCP-007060	White Castle, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626439.22	1	Yes	626439.22
RCP-007061	Wilson, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	210047.91		Yes	209706.29
RCP-007065	Woodworth, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	423059.49	1	Yes	423059.49
RCP-007066	Youngsville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5447168.67	3	Yes	5447168.67
RCP-007067	Zachary, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6649294.77	2	Yes	6649294.77
RCP-007068	Zwolle, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	717571.12	1	Yes	717571.12
RCP-007233	Forest River, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19131.17	1	Yes	19131.17
RCP-007234	Hope, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39843.42	1	Yes	39843.42
RCP-007235	Monango, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6008.14		Yes	5966.32
RCP-007236	Hazelton, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33360.95	2	Yes	33360.95
RCP-007237	Coleharbor, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12964.92		Yes	12964.92
RCP-007238	Leonard, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36365.02	5	Yes	36365.02
RCP-007239	Page, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36365.02		Yes	36111.93
RCP-007240	Dodge, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15652.77	1	Yes	15652.77
RCP-007241	Berthold, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76050.33	1	Yes	76050.33
RCP-007242	Colfax, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24032.54		No		0	0	0	0
RCP-007243	Tioga, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	211707.68	1	No		375018.36	221082.83	0	0
RCP-007244	Maddock, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59765.12	1	Yes	59765.12
RCP-007245	Buffalo, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29092.01		Yes	28889.54
RCP-007246	Anamoose, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38578.55	1	Yes	38578.55
RCP-007247	Lakota, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98818	1	Yes	98130.25
RCP-007248	Walhalla, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	143404.68	1	Yes	143404.68
RCP-007249	Reynolds, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47274.53	2	Yes	47274.53
RCP-007250	Belfield, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	160006.11	1	Yes	158892.5
RCP-007251	Venturia, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1897.3	1	Yes	1897.3
RCP-007252	Tappen, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31937.98	1	Yes	31937.98
RCP-007253	Sharon, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14229.8	1	Yes	14130.76
RCP-007254	Selfridge, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26246.06	1	Yes	26246.06
RCP-007255	Grenora, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52492.12	1	Yes	52492.12
RCP-007256	Sentinel Butte, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9960.86	1	Yes	9960.86
RCP-007257	Oriska, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16470		Yes	16470
RCP-007258	Clifford, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6798.68	1	Yes	6798.68
RCP-007259	St. Thomas, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49171.84	1	Yes	49171.84
RCP-007260	Starkweather, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18182.52	8	Yes	18180.87
RCP-007262	Makoti, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22767.67		Yes	22767.67
RCP-007263	Alexander, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59290.8		Yes	59290.8
RCP-007264	Rutland, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24664.97	1	Yes	24664.97
RCP-007265	Streeter, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25613.63	1	Yes	25613.63
RCP-007266	Aneta, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33202.84	1	Yes	33202.84
RCP-007267	Gackle, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43163.7	1	No		0	43163.7	0	0
RCP-007268	Kensal, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24664.97	1	Yes	24664.97
RCP-007269	Galesburg, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16127.1		Yes	16127.1
RCP-007271	Killdeer, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	180876.46	1	Yes	180876.46
RCP-007273	Mcclusky, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57551.61	1	Yes	57551.61
RCP-007274	Lansford, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37946.11		Yes	37682.01
RCP-007275	Reile'S Acres, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110676.16	1	Yes	110676.16
RCP-007276	Taylor, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26878.5		Yes	26691.43
RCP-007277	Glenburn, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	67986.78	1	Yes	67986.78
RCP-007278	Sheyenne, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30198.78	3	Yes	30198.78
RCP-007279	Arthur, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52492.12	1	Yes	52492.12
RCP-007280	Center, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	91386.88		Yes	90750.85
RCP-007281	South Heart, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	67828.67		Yes	67356.6
RCP-007283	Spiritwood Lake, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15494.66	2	Yes	15494.66
RCP-007284	Edgeley, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87908.49	1	Yes	87908.49
RCP-007285	Landa, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5691.91	1	Yes	5691.91
RCP-007286	Ashley, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104509.92	4	Yes	104509.92
RCP-007287	Medora, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20396.03	1	Yes	20396.03
RCP-007288	Wing, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29408.23		Yes	29203.56
RCP-007289	Hebron, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106723.44	1	Yes	106723.44
RCP-007290	Golva, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10751.4		Yes	10676.57
RCP-007291	Flasher, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32412.3	2	Yes	32412.3
RCP-007292	Karlsruhe, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13597.35	2	Yes	13597.35
RCP-007293	Robinson, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7273.01		Yes	7273.01
RCP-007295	Berlin, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5533.8	2	Yes	5533.8
RCP-007296	Wolford, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5059.48	3	Yes	5059.48
RCP-007297	Wildrose, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23558.21	1	Yes	23394.25
RCP-007298	Rocklake, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15494.66		Yes	15494.66
RCP-007299	Harwood, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	131072.19		Yes	131072.19
RCP-007300	North River, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8537.87		Yes	8537.87
RCP-007301	Almont, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18814.95		Yes	18814.95
RCP-007302	Briarwood, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11225.73	1	Yes	11225.73
RCP-007306	Town Of Bloomfield, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110739.33		Yes	110739.33
RCP-007502	City of Bartlesville	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6342665.2	1	Yes	6342665.2
RCP-007503	City of Blackwell	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1151520.84	1	Yes	1151520.84
RCP-007504	Town of Buffalo	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	225846.9		Yes	225844.22
RCP-007505	Town of Calera	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	415895.22		Yes	415895.19
RCP-007506	City of Chickasha	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2883364.65	7	Yes	2883364.65
RCP-007507	City of Ada	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3024453.16	5	Yes	3024417.34
RCP-007508	City of Altus	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3218011.14	2	Yes	3218011.14
RCP-007509	City of Alva	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	869168.35	1	Yes	869168.35
RCP-007510	City of Anadarko	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1141342.82	3	Yes	1141342.82
RCP-007511	City of Antlers	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	407296.54	1	Yes	407296.54
RCP-007512	City of Ardmore	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4334084.36	1	Yes	4334084.36
RCP-007513	City of Atoka	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	529081.89	1	Yes	529081.89
RCP-007514	City of Barnsdall	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	201805.69	5	Yes	201805.69
RCP-007515	City of Beggs	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	217072.74		Yes	0
RCP-007516	City of Bethany	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3372962.81	1	Yes	3372962.81
RCP-007517	City of Bixby	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4903702.87	1	Yes	4903702.87
RCP-007518	City of Blanchard	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1563028.96	1	Yes	1563028.96
RCP-007519	City of Boise City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	190399.28	2	Yes	190399.28
RCP-007520	Town of Braman	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35447.62	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-007522	City of Bristow	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	737029.49	5	Yes	737029.49
RCP-007523	Town of Burns Flat	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	333593.58	1	Yes	333589.64
RCP-007524	City of Cache	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493283.31	5	Yes	493277.46
RCP-007526	City of Catoosa	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1220134.77	2	Yes	1220134.77
RCP-007527	City of Cedar Valley	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20212.5		Yes	20212.5
RCP-007529	City of Chandler	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	541365.71	2	Yes	541365.71
RCP-007530	City of Checotah	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	543120.54	1	Yes	543136.75
RCP-007531	City of Cherokee	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	261294.51	1	Yes	261294.51
RCP-007532	City of Choctaw	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2224074.23	2	Yes	2224074.23
RCP-007533	City of Claremore	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3289081.84	2	Yes	3289042.88
RCP-007534	City of Cleveland	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	548385.04	2	Yes	548385.04
RCP-007535	City of Clinton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1594615.95	1	Yes	1594615.95
RCP-007536	City of Coalgate	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	314465.92		Yes	157237.66
RCP-007537	City of Collinsville	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1269796.52	3	Yes	1269834.43
RCP-007538	City of Comanche	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	273578.33	11	Yes	273578.33
RCP-007539	City of Commerce	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	440462.87		Yes	440457.66
RCP-007540	City of Coweta	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1760447.58	5	Yes	1760447.58
RCP-007541	City of Crescent	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	273929.3		Yes	273929.3
RCP-007542	City of Cushing	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1336304.66	8	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-007544	City of Davis	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	508199.38	1	Yes	508199.38
RCP-007545	City of Del City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3810091.49	4	Yes	3810091.49
RCP-007546	Town of Depew	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84056.46	2	Yes	56375
RCP-007547	Town of Dewar	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	149687.19	1	Yes	149691.65
RCP-007548	City of Dewey	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	593835.19	1	Yes	593835.19
RCP-007549	City of Drumright	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497494.91	1	Yes	497494.91
RCP-007550	City of Duncan	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3920996.88	1	Yes	3920997
RCP-007551	City of Durant	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3276798.02	1	Yes	3276798.02
RCP-007552	Town of Eakly	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57032.04	1	Yes	57032.04
RCP-007553	City of Elgin	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	558563.06	1	Yes	558563.06
RCP-007554	City of Elk City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2031569.15	1	Yes	2031569.15
RCP-007555	City of El Reno	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3503522.32	1	Yes	3503522.32
RCP-007556	City of Erick	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	175307.73	1	Yes	175307.73
RCP-007558	City of Fairview	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	455203.45		Yes	455203.45
RCP-007559	Town of Forest Park	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	187591.56	1	Yes	187597.16
RCP-007561	City of Frederick	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622088	1	Yes	622088
RCP-007562	City of Garber	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	141614.95	1	Yes	141614.95
RCP-007564	City of Glenpool	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2445534.04	1	Yes	2445534.04
RCP-007565	City of Grandfield	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	163725.84	1	Yes	163725.84
RCP-007567	City of Grove	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1254529.48	4	Yes	1254566.93
RCP-007568	City of Guthrie	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2046309.74	1	Yes	2046309.74
RCP-007569	City of Haileyville	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	131787.89		Yes	131475.05
RCP-007570	Town of Hardesty	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36851.48	2	Yes	25951.48
RCP-007571	City of Healdton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	470821.46	3	Yes	0
RCP-007572	City of Heavener	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	579270.08	2	Yes	579270.08
RCP-007573	City of Henryetta	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	976739.56	2	Yes	976739.56
RCP-007574	City of Hobart	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	601380.97	2	Yes	601380.97
RCP-007575	City of Holdenville	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	965333.15		Yes	965333.15
RCP-007576	City of Hollis	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	328680.06	13	Yes	328680.06
RCP-007577	City of Hominy	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	594537.13	4	Yes	594530.08
RCP-007578	City of Hooker	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	323591.05	2	Yes	323591.05
RCP-007579	City of Hugo	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	893560.51	3	Yes	893560.51
RCP-007580	City of Idabel	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1200831.62	1	Yes	1200831.62
RCP-007581	City of Jay	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	446078.32	1	Yes	446078.32
RCP-007582	City of Jenks	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4170709.49	1	Yes	4170709.49
RCP-007583	City of Kaw City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64402.34	2	Yes	64402.34
RCP-007584	City of Kingfisher	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	861271.6	4	Yes	861271.6
RCP-007585	City of Konawa	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	210053.41	10	Yes	210053.41
RCP-007586	City of Krebs	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	341314.85	1	Yes	341314.85
RCP-007587	Town of Lahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108273.14	6	Yes	108271.86
RCP-007589	City of Lexington	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	383430.82		Yes	383430.82
RCP-007591	City of Lone Grove	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	898649.54	5	Yes	898638.9
RCP-007592	City of Madill	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	707372.83	1	Yes	707372.83
RCP-007593	City of Mangum	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	473453.71	23	Yes	473453.71
RCP-007594	Town of Mannford	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	560493.38	3	Yes	560493.38
RCP-007595	City of Marlow	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	775635.8	1	Yes	775626.62
RCP-007596	City of Maud	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	186187.69	12	Yes	0
RCP-007597	City of McAlester	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3126057.94	8	Yes	3126057.94
RCP-007598	City of McLoud	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	832316.87	3	Yes	832316.87
RCP-007599	City of Medford	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	164778.74	1	Yes	164778.74
RCP-007600	City of Miami	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2296724.28	2	Yes	2296724.28
RCP-007601	City of Minco	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	289196.34	7	Yes	289196.34
RCP-007602	City of Morris	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	249186.16	5	Yes	249186.16
RCP-007603	Town of Mulhall	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45450.16	2	Yes	45450.16
RCP-007604	City of Muskogee	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6512708.44	3	Yes	6512708.44
RCP-007605	City of Mustang	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4028919.05	3	Yes	4028871.34
RCP-007606	City of Newcastle	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1869773.62	4	Yes	1869773.62
RCP-007607	City of New Cordell	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	479771.1	1	Yes	479771.1
RCP-007608	City of Newkirk	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	380798.57	3	Yes	380798.57
RCP-007609	City of Nichols Hills	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	691052.9	1	Yes	691052.9
RCP-007610	City of Nicoma Park	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	432917.09		Yes	432911.96
RCP-007611	City of Noble	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1237683.09	4	Yes	1237683.09
RCP-007612	City of Nowata	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	623316.37	6	Yes	623316.37
RCP-007615	City of Okmulgee	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2055083.9	1	Yes	2055083.9
RCP-007616	City of Owasso	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6485333.05	4	Yes	6485333.05
RCP-007617	City of Pauls Valley	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1072202.43	2	Yes	1072202.43
RCP-007618	City of Pawhuska	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	599275.17	2	Yes	599275.17
RCP-007619	City of Pawnee	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	369567.64	12	Yes	369567.64
RCP-007620	City of Perkins	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	494336.21	15	Yes	494336.21
RCP-007621	City of Perry	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	848812.3	3	Yes	848812.3
RCP-007622	City of Piedmont	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1500556.95	1	Yes	1500556.95
RCP-007623	City of Ponca City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4151932.78	1	Yes	4151932.78
RCP-007624	City of Pond Creek	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	146353	2	Yes	146353
RCP-007625	City of Poteau	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1555307.71	1	Yes	1555289.3
RCP-007626	City of Prague	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	415368.76	1	Yes	415368.76
RCP-007627	City of Pryor Creek	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1645857.04	1	Yes	1645857.04
RCP-007628	City of Purcell	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1126602.22	2	Yes	1126635.85
RCP-007629	City of Sallisaw	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1491080.85	3	Yes	1491080.85
RCP-007630	City of Sand Springs	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3492993.33	3	Yes	3492951.96
RCP-007631	City of Sapulpa	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3733931.78	3	Yes	3733887.56
RCP-007632	City of Sayre	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	787217.69	4	Yes	787217.69
RCP-007633	City of Seminole	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1235577.29	3	Yes	1235577.29
RCP-007634	City of Shidler	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75457.78	1	Yes	38000
RCP-007635	City of Skiatook	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1412990.83	1	Yes	1412990.83
RCP-007636	City of Snyder	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	224092.06		Yes	224092.06
RCP-007637	City of Spencer	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	696317.39	6	Yes	684268
RCP-007638	City of Stigler	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	469768.57		Yes	469763
RCP-007639	City of Stillwater	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8826630.06	3	Yes	8826630.06
RCP-007640	City of Stilwell	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	712461.84	2	Yes	712461.84
RCP-007641	City of Stroud	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	473804.67	10	Yes	473804.67
RCP-007642	City of Sulphur	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	884961.84		Yes	884961.84
RCP-007643	City of Tahlequah	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2951452.15	1	Yes	2951452.15
RCP-007644	City of Tecumseh	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1164506.59	1	Yes	1164541.36
RCP-007645	City of Thomas	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	210228.9	5	Yes	210228.9
RCP-007647	City of Tonkawa	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	522939.98	1	Yes	522939.98
RCP-007648	City of Tupelo	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53171.41	1	Yes	53171.41
RCP-007649	City of Tuttle	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1332444.03	2	Yes	40791.36
RCP-007650	City of Vinita	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	931991.34	5	Yes	931980.3
RCP-007651	City of Wagoner	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1611813.3	2	Yes	1611813.3
RCP-007652	Town of Washington	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105465.42		Yes	105468.57
RCP-007653	City of Watonga	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	498547.8	1	Yes	498547.8
RCP-007654	City of Waurika	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	330785.86	1	Yes	330785.86
RCP-007655	City of Waynoka	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	160391.65	1	Yes	160391.65
RCP-007656	Town of Wellston	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	135824.01	9	Yes	135824.01
RCP-007657	City of Wetumka	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	210930.82		Yes	210930.82
RCP-007658	City of Wewoka	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	565757.88	3	Yes	565757.88
RCP-007659	City of Wilburton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	446078.32	2	Yes	446078.32
RCP-007660	City of Wilson	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	297444.05	4	Yes	297444.05
RCP-007661	City of Woodward	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2127032.01	1	Yes	2127032.01
RCP-007662	City of Wynnewood	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	386589.53	2	Yes	386589.53
RCP-007663	City of Yale	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	214966.94	2	Yes	214966.94
RCP-007664	City of Yukon	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4928270.52	11	Yes	4928270.52
RCP-007665	Town of Earlsboro	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108975.08	1	Yes	108975.08
RCP-007666	Town of Elmore City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	124944.06	11	Yes	124944.06
RCP-007667	Town of Francis	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56154.63	1	Yes	56153.96
RCP-007669	City of Guymon	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1929613.4	1	Yes	1929613.4
RCP-007670	City of Hartshorne	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	344473.55		Yes	344469.48
RCP-007671	Town of Lone Wolf	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70017.81		Yes	70017.81
RCP-007672	Town of Luther	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	308674.98	1	Yes	308674.98
RCP-007674	Town of Porter	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	119679.56	3	Yes	119679.56
RCP-007675	Town of Shattuck	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	220582.4	4	Yes	220579.78
RCP-007676	Town of Talihina	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	190223.81		Yes	190221.56
RCP-007677	Town of Texhoma	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	158110.38		Yes	158110.38
RCP-007678	City of The Village	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1678321.44	2	Yes	1678321.44
RCP-007680	Town of Adair	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	142316.89	2	Yes	133334
RCP-007681	Town of Addington	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18776.7	1	Yes	18776.7
RCP-007682	Town of Afton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	178992.89	4	Yes	178992.89
RCP-007683	Town of Agra	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60366.23		Yes	60366.23
RCP-007685	Town of Alderson	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50714.66	1	Yes	50714.66
RCP-007686	Town of Alex	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96164.8	12	Yes	95711.11
RCP-007688	Town of Allen	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	162497.46		Yes	162501.31
RCP-007689	Town of Amber	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84231.94	1	Yes	84230.96
RCP-007690	Town of Ames	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42291.46	2	Yes	42291.46
RCP-007691	Town of Amorita	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6668.36	2	Yes	6668.36
RCP-007693	Town of Arapaho	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	140913.02		Yes	140913.02
RCP-007697	Town of Arnett	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84407.43	1	Yes	84407.43
RCP-007698	Town of Asher	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72299.09	1	Yes	72299.09
RCP-007700	Town of Atwood	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12108.34	1	Yes	12108.34
RCP-007703	Town of Beaver	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	245501.02	6	Yes	245501.02
RCP-007704	Town of Bennington	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64226.86	1	Yes	64074.4
RCP-007705	Town of Bernice	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	101780.26	1	Yes	101780.26
RCP-007706	Town of Bessie	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30534.08	2	Yes	30534.08
RCP-007707	Town of Bethel Acres	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	240067.5	1	Yes	240067.5
RCP-007708	Town of Big Cabin	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43870.81	1	Yes	43870.81
RCP-007709	Town of Billings	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87039.68	5	Yes	87039.68
RCP-007710	Town of Binger	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110905.39	3	Yes	110905.39
RCP-007712	Town of Blair	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	130208.55	3	Yes	130208.55
RCP-007713	Town of Bluejacket	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56330.11	4	Yes	56330.11
RCP-007715	Town of Bokoshe	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87215.16	5	Yes	87215.16
RCP-007716	Town of Boley	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	206017.29		Yes	206000
RCP-007717	Town of Boswell	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	119679.56	8	Yes	119679.56
RCP-007721	Town of Braggs	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44397.25		Yes	44397.25
RCP-007722	Town of Bray	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52165.5	1	Yes	52165.5
RCP-007723	Town of Breckenridge	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42993.39	2	Yes	42993.39
RCP-007725	Town of Bromide	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29130.21	2	Yes	29130.21
RCP-007727	Town of Burbank	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24392.17	1	Yes	24277.09
RCP-007728	Town of Burlington	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27901.83	2	Yes	27901.83
RCP-007730	Town of Byars	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47906.91	1	Yes	47906.91
RCP-007731	Town of Byng	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	210228.9	2	Yes	209729.85
RCP-007732	Town of Byron	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6141.91	1	Yes	6141.91
RCP-007733	Town of Caddo	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	193733.47	1	Yes	97481.47
RCP-007734	Town of Calumet	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105991.87		No		0	0	0	0
RCP-007736	Town of Camargo	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31762.47	1	Yes	31762.47
RCP-007738	Town of Canadian	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35623.09	1	Yes	35623.09
RCP-007739	Town of Caney	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34745.68	1	Yes	34745.68
RCP-007740	Town of Canton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	103359.61	2	Yes	103359.61
RCP-007741	Town of Canute	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	91075.79		Yes	91075.79
RCP-007743	Town of Carmen	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62822.99	2	Yes	62822.99
RCP-007744	Town of Carney	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109326.04	4	Yes	109326.04
RCP-007746	Town of Carter	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44046.3	6	Yes	44046.3
RCP-007747	Town of Cashion	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	152845.88	1	Yes	152845.88
RCP-007749	Town of Cement	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	83354.53	1	Yes	83354.53
RCP-007750	Town of Central High	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72970.5	1	Yes	72970.5
RCP-007751	Town of Chattanooga	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	79493.89	4	Yes	79493.89
RCP-007752	Town of Chelsea	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	334646.49	10	Yes	334642.52
RCP-007753	Town of Cheyenne	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	135824.01	3	Yes	135824.01
RCP-007754	Town of Chouteau	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	367286.36	11	Yes	367286.36
RCP-007756	Town of Clayton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	137929.8		Yes	137929.8
RCP-007757	Town of Clearview	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8423.2		Yes	8423.2
RCP-007758	Town of Cleo Springs	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58611.39	2	Yes	58611.39
RCP-007759	Town of Colbert	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	219704.98	3	Yes	219704.98
RCP-007760	Town of Colcord	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	148985.25	12	Yes	148985.25
RCP-007761	Town of Cole	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105114.44		Yes	105114.44
RCP-007762	Town of Colony	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22637.34		Yes	22637.34
RCP-007763	Town of Cooperton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2632.25	4	Yes	2632.25
RCP-007765	Town of Corn	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82828.08		Yes	82828.08
RCP-007768	Town of Covington	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	93708.04		Yes	93708.04
RCP-007770	Town of Coyle	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65279.75	1	Yes	65279.75
RCP-007771	Town of Cromwell	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48082.4	6	Yes	48082.4
RCP-007772	Town of Crowder	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70895.22	1	Yes	70895.22
RCP-007773	Town of Custer City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66508.15	1	Yes	66508.15
RCP-007774	Town of Cyril	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	177413.53	2	No		23133.8	0	0	0
RCP-007775	Town of Dacoma	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18952.19		Yes	18952.19
RCP-007776	Town of Davidson	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50539.17		Yes	50539.17
RCP-007778	Town of Delaware	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70017.81		Yes	70017.81
RCP-007779	Town of Devol	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24743.14	2	Yes	24743.14
RCP-007781	Town of Dickson	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	219003.04	1	Yes	219003.04
RCP-007782	Town of Dill City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	93532.55	1	Yes	93532.55
RCP-007784	Town of Dougherty	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38957.27	2	Yes	38957.26
RCP-007785	Town of Douglas	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5966.43	1	Yes	0
RCP-007786	Town of Dover	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	83354.53	2	Yes	83354.53
RCP-007787	Town of Drummond	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	79844.87	3	Yes	79844.87
RCP-007788	Town of Dustin	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64928.79	2	Yes	64930.73
RCP-007789	Town of East Duke	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	67912.01	2	Yes	67912.01
RCP-007790	Town of Eldorado	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	71246.19	4	Yes	71246.19
RCP-007792	Town of Empire City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	149433	5	Yes	149433
RCP-007795	Town of Fairland	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	180923.19		Yes	180923.19
RCP-007796	Town of Fairmont	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22988.31	1	Yes	22988.31
RCP-007799	Town of Fanshawe	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	71070.7	2	Yes	71070.7
RCP-007800	Town of Fargo	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60366.23	1	Yes	60366.23
RCP-007801	Town of Faxon	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22812.82		Yes	22812.82
RCP-007803	Town of Fletcher	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	200577.32	1	Yes	200577.32
RCP-007805	Town of Forgan	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92830.61	3	Yes	92830.61
RCP-007806	Town of Fort Cobb	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106869.28	1	Yes	106869
RCP-007808	Town of Fort Gibson	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	694562.56	5	Yes	694562.56
RCP-007809	Town of Fort Supply	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56154.63	1	Yes	56154.63
RCP-007810	Town of Foss	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25445.06	2	Yes	25445.06
RCP-007811	Town of Foster	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28252.81	1	Yes	28252.81
RCP-007812	Town of Foyil	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66332.66	1	Yes	0
RCP-007813	Town of Freedom	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51065.61	4	Yes	51065.61
RCP-007815	Town of Gage	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	71597.16	2	Yes	71597.16
RCP-007819	Town of Geronimo	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	213212.11	3	Yes	213212.11
RCP-007820	Town of Gerty	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7815		Yes	7815
RCP-007821	Town of Glencoe	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106518.31		No		32234.59	0	0	0
RCP-007822	Town of Goldsby	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	430635.8	1	Yes	430630.7
RCP-007823	Town of Goltry	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44397.25	2	Yes	44397.25
RCP-007824	Town of Goodwell	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	222863.68	3	Yes	222863.68
RCP-007826	Town of Gotebo	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36675.99	3	Yes	36675.99
RCP-007827	Town of Gould	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22637.34	4	Yes	22637.34
RCP-007828	Town of Gracemont	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53697.87	2	Yes	53697.87
RCP-007831	Town of Granite	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	343420.65	7	Yes	343420.65
RCP-007832	Town of Grayson	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27375.38	2	Yes	27375.38
RCP-007833	Town of Hallett	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21759.91		Yes	21000
RCP-007834	Town of Hammon	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	97744.16	1	Yes	97744.16
RCP-007836	Town of Haskell	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	338682.6	2	Yes	338682.6
RCP-007837	Town of Hastings	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18911.82		Yes	18911.82
RCP-007839	Town of Headrick	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15442.53		Yes	15442.53
RCP-007840	Town of Helena	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	248308.75	1	Yes	248308.75
RCP-007842	Town of Hennessey	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	390099.19	2	Yes	390099.19
RCP-007844	Town of Hillsdale	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21408.96	1	Yes	21408.96
RCP-007845	Town of Hinton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	564880.47	3	Yes	564880.47
RCP-007846	Town of Hitchcock	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20005.09		Yes	20005.69
RCP-007852	Town of Howe	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	138456.26	5	Yes	138456.26
RCP-007853	Town of Hulbert	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102131.23	1	Yes	102130.02
RCP-007854	Town of Hunter	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29305.7		Yes	29305.7
RCP-007855	Town of Hydro	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	164427.77	1	Yes	164425.82
RCP-007856	Town of Indiahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57909.47	3	Yes	57909.47
RCP-007857	Town of Indianola	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19125	1	Yes	19125
RCP-007861	Town of Jennings	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62121.05	1	Yes	62121.05
RCP-007862	Town of Jet	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38079.85	4	Yes	38079.85
RCP-007863	Town of Johnson	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	393.53	1	Yes	393.53
RCP-007868	Town of Kemp	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5843.86	1	Yes	5843.86
RCP-007871	Town of Keota	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96340.28	4	Yes	96340.28
RCP-007872	Town of Ketchum	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	73878.43	1	Yes	73878.43
RCP-007873	Town of Keyes	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48608.85		Yes	48608.85
RCP-007874	Town of Kiefer	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	354476.08	1	Yes	354476.08
RCP-007876	Town of Kingston	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	293934.38	1	Yes	293934.38
RCP-007878	Town of Kiowa	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	118626.65		Yes	118626.65
RCP-007879	Town of Knowles	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1754.84	1	Yes	1754.84
RCP-007880	Town of Kremlin	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44748.22	1	Yes	44748.22
RCP-007881	Town of Lake Aluma	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11433.75	1	Yes	11433.75
RCP-007882	Town of Lamar	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15804	1	No		0	0	15804	0
RCP-007884	Town of Lamont	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68789.41	1	Yes	68789.41
RCP-007885	Town of Langley	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	144247.21	2	Yes	144247.21
RCP-007886	Town of Langston	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	326398.77	1	Yes	326398.77
RCP-007887	Town of Laverne	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	233041.7	2	Yes	233041.7
RCP-007889	Town of Leedey	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77739.07	3	Yes	77739.07
RCP-007890	Town of LeFlore	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8182.5	1	Yes	8182.5
RCP-007891	Town of Lenapah	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49135.31		Yes	49136.77
RCP-007894	Town of Lima	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7404	1	Yes	7404
RCP-007896	Town of Locust Grove	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	244799.09	3	Yes	244799.09
RCP-007897	Town of Longdale	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46503.05		Yes	46503.05
RCP-007898	Town of Lookeba	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28428.28	1	Yes	28427.94
RCP-007901	Town of Loyal	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14565.11	1	Yes	14565.11
RCP-007903	Town of Manchester	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17372.84	1	Yes	17373.36
RCP-007904	Town of Manitou	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28779.25	1	Yes	28779.25
RCP-007906	Town of Maramec	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15793.49	1	Yes	15793.96
RCP-007908	Town of Marland	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36000	2	Yes	36000
RCP-007909	Town of Marshall	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53873.35		Yes	53873.35
RCP-007910	Town of Martha	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26147		Yes	26147
RCP-007911	Town of May	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7194.82		Yes	7194.82
RCP-007912	Town of Maysville	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	211106.31	9	Yes	211106.31
RCP-007913	Town of McCurtain	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88092.58	3	Yes	88092.58
RCP-007916	Town of Meeker	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	200226.34	8	Yes	200226.34
RCP-007917	Town of Meno	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41589.53		Yes	41589.53
RCP-007919	Town of Milburn	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55979.15	2	Yes	55846.27
RCP-007920	Town of Mill Creek	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55979.15	1	Yes	55715.05
RCP-007921	Town of Millerton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55277.22		Yes	55278.87
RCP-007923	Town of Mooreland	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	205139.88	1	Yes	205137.46
RCP-007925	Town of Mounds	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	221459.82	10	Yes	221457.2
RCP-007926	Town of Mountain Park	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66859.1	3	Yes	66859.1
RCP-007927	Town of Mountain View	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	128980.16	1	Yes	128980.16
RCP-007928	Town of Muldrow	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	570495.92	2	Yes	570495.92
RCP-007929	Town of Mutual	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10325.25		Yes	10325.26
RCP-007930	Town of Nash	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34043.74	1	Yes	34043.74
RCP-007931	Town of New Alluwe	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12844.51		Yes	12844.51
RCP-007933	Town of Norge	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26250	1	Yes	26250
RCP-007934	Town of North Enid	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	161620.05	4	Yes	161618.14
RCP-007935	Town of North Miami	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61500	2	Yes	61500
RCP-007936	Town of Oakland	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	200050.86	8	Yes	0
RCP-007938	Town of Ochelata	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	74404.88		Yes	74000
RCP-007939	Town of Okarche	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	233568.16	1	Yes	233568.16
RCP-007941	Town of Okeene	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	199699.9	2	Yes	199699.9
RCP-007942	Town of Oktaha	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68087.49		Yes	68087.49
RCP-007943	Town of Olustee	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	97393.18	1	Yes	97393.18
RCP-007944	Town of Oologah	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	206192.78		Yes	206190.34
RCP-007945	Town of Optima	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65279.75	2	Yes	65279.75
RCP-007946	Town of Orlando	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29305.7	2	Yes	29305.7
RCP-007947	Town of Osage	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27199.9	1	Yes	27199.9
RCP-007948	Town of Paden	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80020.35	4	Yes	80020.35
RCP-007949	Town of Panama	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	239008.13	8	Yes	239008.13
RCP-007950	Town of Paoli	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107571.22	3	Yes	107571.22
RCP-007951	Town of Paradise Hill	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14038.67	2	Yes	14038.67
RCP-007952	Town of Pensacola	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22286.37	1	Yes	22286.37
RCP-007955	Town of Pink	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	382728.89	1	Yes	382728.89
RCP-007956	Town of Pittsburg	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34570.19	2	Yes	34570.19
RCP-007958	Town of Pocola	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	723166.32	5	Yes	723166.32
RCP-007959	Town of Porum	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123013.73	1	Yes	123013.73
RCP-007960	Town of Prue	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82477.11	2	Yes	82477.11
RCP-007962	Town of Quapaw	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	153723.29	2	No		23660.61	0	0	0
RCP-007963	Town of Quinton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	172850.97	1	Yes	172850.97
RCP-007966	Town of Randlett	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72474.57		Yes	72474.57
RCP-007967	Town of Ratliff City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20531.54	1	Yes	20531.54
RCP-007969	Town of Ravia	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92128.69	1	Yes	92128.69
RCP-007971	Town of Red Oak	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	83880.98	2	Yes	83880.98
RCP-007974	Town of Rentiesville	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21759.91	2	Yes	21759.91
RCP-007975	Town of Reydon	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36149.54		Yes	36149.54
RCP-007976	Town of Ringling	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	167410.98	1	Yes	167410.98
RCP-007977	Town of Ringwood	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	89320.95	1	Yes	89320.95
RCP-007978	Town of Ripley	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	71772.65	1	Yes	71772.65
RCP-007979	Town of Rock Island	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21703.5	1	Yes	21703.5
RCP-007980	Town of Rocky	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26673.46	13	Yes	26673.46
RCP-007982	Town of Roland	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	686314.84	2	Yes	686306.72
RCP-007983	Town of Roosevelt	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40361.14	2	Yes	40361.14
RCP-007986	Town of Rush Springs	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	220406.92	21	Yes	220406.92
RCP-007987	Town of Ryan	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	131612.41	1	Yes	131610.86
RCP-007988	Town of Salina	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	244623.6	5	No		0	250000	0	0
RCP-007989	Town of Sasakwa	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24041.2	4	Yes	24041.2
RCP-007990	Town of Savanna	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113186.68	2	Yes	113186.68
RCP-007991	Town of Sawyer	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54926.25	6	Yes	54926.25
RCP-007992	Town of Schulter	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47775	1	Yes	47775
RCP-007993	City of Seiling	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	150038.14	1	Yes	150038.14
RCP-007994	Town of Sentinel	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	148283.31	2	Yes	148283.31
RCP-007995	Town of Shady Point	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	175307.73	2	Yes	175312.96
RCP-007999	Town of Slaughterville	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	606310.5		Yes	606310.5
RCP-008000	Town of Slick	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31937.96	2	Yes	31937.96
RCP-008002	Town of Soper	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44397.25	1	Yes	44397.25
RCP-008004	Town of Sparks	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30007.63	5	Yes	30007.63
RCP-008005	Town of Spaulding	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1279.25	1	Yes	1279.24
RCP-008006	Town of Spavinaw	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75282.31		Yes	75281.42
RCP-008007	Town of Sperry	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	234796.54	4	Yes	234793.76
RCP-008008	Town of Spiro	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	378692.77	8	Yes	378692.77
RCP-008009	Town of Sportsmen Acres	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54048.83		Yes	54050.44
RCP-008012	Town of Sterling	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	135648.53	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-008014	Town of Stonewall	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	91426.75	1	Yes	91425.66
RCP-008015	Town of Strang	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15618	1	Yes	15618
RCP-008016	Town of Stratford	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	267611.89	2	Yes	267611.89
RCP-008017	Town of Stringtown	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70719.74		Yes	70553.97
RCP-008018	Town of Strong City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8072.22		Yes	8072.22
RCP-008019	Town of Stuart	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29130.21	1	Yes	29130.21
RCP-008021	Town of Summit	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24041.2	2	Yes	24041.92
RCP-008023	Town of Taft	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41765.01	5	Yes	41765.25
RCP-008024	Town of Talala	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48784.34	1	Yes	48785.8
RCP-008025	Town of Taloga	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54750.76		Yes	54750.76
RCP-008026	Town of Tamaha	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10701.75	1	Yes	10701.75
RCP-008028	Town of Temple	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	159163.28	1	Yes	159163.28
RCP-008030	Town of Terral	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	67561.04	15	Yes	67561.04
RCP-008031	Town of Texola	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6141.91		Yes	6141.91
RCP-008032	Town of Thackerville	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	90198.37	1	Yes	90198.37
RCP-008033	Town of Tipton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	133191.76	2	Yes	133191.76
RCP-008036	Town of Tullahassee	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19303.16	1	Yes	19303.73
RCP-008038	Town of Tyrone	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	130033.07	2	Yes	130033.07
RCP-008039	Town of Union City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	378517.28	8	Yes	378512.8
RCP-008043	Town of Velma	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104412.52		Yes	60000
RCP-008044	Town of Vera	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43344.35		Yes	43344.35
RCP-008046	Town of Verdigris	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	805467.95	3	Yes	805467.95
RCP-008048	Town of Vici	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123540.18	4	Yes	123540.18
RCP-008050	Town of Wakita	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57207.53	2	Yes	57209.23
RCP-008051	Town of Wanette	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62998.48	1	Yes	62998.48
RCP-008052	Town of Wann	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21057.99	2	Yes	21057.99
RCP-008053	Town of Wapanucka	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77739.07	1	Yes	77739.07
RCP-008056	Town of Watts	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54926.25	1	Yes	54925.6
RCP-008057	Town of Wayne	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	128102.74	11	Yes	0
RCP-008058	Town of Webb City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9558.32		Yes	9558.32
RCP-008059	Town of Welch	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	102482.2	1	Yes	102482.2
RCP-008061	Town of Westport	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51943.03	1	Yes	51819.73
RCP-008062	Town of West Siloam Springs	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	150740.08	1	Yes	150740.08
RCP-008063	Town of Westville	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	272174.46	7	Yes	272174.46
RCP-008064	Town of Whitefield	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	67912.01	1	Yes	67912.01
RCP-008065	Town of Willow	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23514.75	2	Yes	23514.75
RCP-008067	Town of Wister	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	186363.17	2	Yes	186363.17
RCP-008069	Town of Wright City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	128980.16	11	Yes	128980.16
RCP-008071	City of Walters	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	413789.41	1	Yes	413784.52
RCP-008072	City of Warr Acres	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1775539.14	2	Yes	1775539.14
RCP-008073	Town of Waukomis	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	227426.25	1	Yes	227426.25
RCP-008074	Town of Webbers Falls	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104061.54	4	Yes	104061.54
RCP-008076	Town of Wynona	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76159.72	5	Yes	76159.72
RCP-008440	Algoma, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	157795.5	4	Yes	157795.5
RCP-008441	Bassfield, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52119.18		Yes	52119.18
RCP-008442	Batesville, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1774510.45		Yes	1774510.45
RCP-008444	Benoit, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	103992.51	1	Yes	103992.51
RCP-008445	Bolton, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	130543.79	1	Yes	130543.79
RCP-008447	Chunky, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77441.23		Yes	77441
RCP-008448	Coldwater, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	376880.65		Yes	85000
RCP-008450	Courtland, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82172.59	3	Yes	82172.59
RCP-008454	Decatur, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	419166.02	2	Yes	419166.02
RCP-008455	De Kalb, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	247566.09		Yes	247566.09
RCP-008458	Durant, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	556101.78		Yes	150000
RCP-008461	Falkner, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	120218.29		Yes	120218.29
RCP-008466	Glen, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	101779.9		Yes	0
RCP-008468	Grenada, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3003982.16	3	No		1000000	0	1000000	0
RCP-008470	Hazlehurst, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	917002.49		Yes	917002.49
RCP-008472	Horn Lake, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6704689.54	6	Yes	0
RCP-008473	Houston, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	842511.41		Yes	0
RCP-008474	Jonestown, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	270429.69	3	Yes	270429.69
RCP-008476	Kosciusko, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1652079.56	1	Yes	1652079.56
RCP-008477	Kossuth, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37500	1	Yes	37500
RCP-008478	Lake, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	79653.84	1	Yes	75000
RCP-008479	Lambert, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	330170.07	3	Yes	330170.06
RCP-008480	Leland, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	925852.92	1	Yes	925825.92
RCP-008481	Lena, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33434.94		Yes	33434.94
RCP-008482	Lexington, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	357213.04	1	Yes	357213.04
RCP-008483	Louin, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63673.9	2	Yes	62000
RCP-008484	Lyon, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70803.41	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-008485	Maben, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	206509.94		Yes	0
RCP-008487	Macon, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595191.16	2	Yes	595191.16
RCP-008488	Marietta, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	62690.52		Yes	62690.52
RCP-008490	Meadville, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	103500.82	4	Yes	103500.82
RCP-008491	Merigold, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92683.63	1	Yes	92683.63
RCP-008494	Morgan City, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58511.15	2	Yes	58511.15
RCP-008495	North Carrollton, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105467.58	1	Yes	105467.58
RCP-008496	Noxapater, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107680.19		Yes	0
RCP-008497	Osyka, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	101042.37	4	Yes	101042.37
RCP-008498	Pace, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59002.84		Yes	59002.84
RCP-008501	Picayune, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2680695.76	11	Yes	2680695.76
RCP-008503	Pittsboro, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47202.27	1	Yes	47202.27
RCP-008504	Polkville, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	201838.89	2	Yes	0
RCP-008505	Pope, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60969.6		Yes	60969.6
RCP-008507	Prentiss, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	229373.55	1	Yes	229373.55
RCP-008508	Renova, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	183646.34	2	Yes	183646.34
RCP-008510	Rolling Fork, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	474235.34		Yes	237117.67
RCP-008512	Sallis, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24159		No		0	0	0	0
RCP-008514	Satartia, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12292.26		Yes	0
RCP-008517	Shubuta, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	99813.14		Yes	99813.14
RCP-008519	Sidon, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75692.29	1	Yes	75692.29
RCP-008521	Sledge, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	117022.3	1	Yes	117022.3
RCP-008522	State Line, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	136689.92	1	Yes	273379.84
RCP-008523	Sturgis, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64657.28		Yes	64657.28
RCP-008524	Sylvarena, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5490		Yes	5490
RCP-008525	Taylor, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80328.75	10	Yes	80328.75
RCP-008526	Terry, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	301652.03		Yes	0
RCP-008527	Tremont, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113774.25	2	Yes	104115
RCP-008529	Vardaman, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	314435.98	1	Yes	314435.98
RCP-008530	Walthall, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33926.63		Yes	8450
RCP-008531	West, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36630.93	1	Yes	36630.93
RCP-008533	Thaxton, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65610.75	7	Yes	55304.61
RCP-008818	Old Bennington Village, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39251.31	2	Yes	39251.31
RCP-008819	Morrisville Village, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	619819.74	1	Yes	619819.74
RCP-008821	Ludlow Village, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	229928.31		Yes	229874.11
RCP-010707	Wharton County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8071766	12	Yes	8071766
RCP-013713	Ausable Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	207655.3	1	Yes	207655.3
RCP-013714	City Of Imlay City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	375061.64	1	Yes	375061.64
RCP-013715	Village Of Freeport, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52544.36	1	Yes	52334
RCP-013716	Silver Creek Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	331660	1	Yes	331660
RCP-013717	Sylvan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	314425.46	3	Yes	314425.46
RCP-013719	Curtis Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	118632.46	2	Yes	22573.23
RCP-013720	St James Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38252.28	1	Yes	38252.28
RCP-013721	City Of Hazel Park, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1717885.3	1	Yes	1717885.3
RCP-013722	Richfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	875704.3	2	Yes	875704.3
RCP-013723	Cedar Creek Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	348999.64	6	Yes	348999.64
RCP-013724	Richland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66100.8	6	Yes	0
RCP-013725	Ossineke Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	168036.86	2	Yes	168036.86
RCP-013726	Ann Arbor Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	442738.78	6	Yes	442738.78
RCP-013727	Benzonia Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	199353.3	2	Yes	199353.3
RCP-013728	City Of Adrian, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2164827.64	1	Yes	2164827.64
RCP-013729	Olive Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	557495.66		Yes	557495.66
RCP-013731	Palmyra Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	209441.82	5	Yes	209441.82
RCP-013732	Grant Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	155741.48	6	Yes	1
RCP-013733	Summerfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	335127.92	5	Yes	333000
RCP-013734	Oceola Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1556574.12	3	Yes	1556574.12
RCP-013735	Resort Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	290570.3	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-013736	Faithorn Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24275.5	1	Yes	24275.5
RCP-013737	Vermontville Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	139032.38	2	Yes	139032.38
RCP-013738	City Of Olivet, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	185166.32	3	Yes	185166.32
RCP-013739	Lasalle Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493076.28	1	Yes	493076.28
RCP-013740	Roscommon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	455034.16	4	Yes	455034.16
RCP-013741	Village Of Empire, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39513.36		Yes	39513.36
RCP-013742	Austin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	166145.26	1	Yes	166145.26
RCP-013743	Daggett Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46239.04		Yes	11711.85
RCP-013744	Denver Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	121272.38	1	Yes	0
RCP-013745	York Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	970179.08	4	Yes	970179.08
RCP-013746	City Of Ecorse, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1005699.04	1	Yes	1005699.04
RCP-013747	Limestone Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43506.72	1	Yes	43420
RCP-013748	Village Of Deckerville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82074.28	8	Yes	82074.28
RCP-013749	Calvin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	216692.94	10	Yes	216692.94
RCP-013750	Village Of Calumet, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72195.96	1	Yes	72195.96
RCP-013751	Arcadia Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66310.98	1	Yes	66310.98
RCP-013752	City Of Charlevoix, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	261460.74	5	Yes	261460.74
RCP-013753	Rogers Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	97417.24	1	Yes	97417.24
RCP-013754	Eveline Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	155531.3	5	Yes	155531.3
RCP-013755	Village Of Hopkins, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63788.84	3	Yes	63788.84
RCP-013756	Village Of Woodland, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46869.58	8	Yes	46869.58
RCP-013757	Clay Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	935499.78	2	Yes	935499.78
RCP-013758	Markey Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	243595.64	1	Yes	243595.64
RCP-013759	Reeder Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	121062.2	5	Yes	121062.2
RCP-013760	City Of Richmond, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614663.92	1	Yes	614663.92
RCP-013762	Decatur Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	197671.88	1	Yes	197671.88
RCP-013763	City Of Coloma, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	148280.18	1	Yes	63875
RCP-013764	City Of Grosse Pointe, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	541627.26	1	Yes	541627.26
RCP-013765	Bingham Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	222973.64	1	Yes	222973.64
RCP-013766	Edenville Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	267030.44	7	Yes	267030.44
RCP-013767	Martiny Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	172135.32	1	Yes	172135.32
RCP-013768	Blackman Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2466432.28	1	Yes	2466432.28
RCP-013769	Winsor Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68307.66	2	Yes	68307.66
RCP-013770	Springdale Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	89850.84	5	Yes	89850.84
RCP-013771	Fillmore Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	290990.66	1	Yes	290990.66
RCP-013772	Webster Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	715549.08	1	Yes	715549.08
RCP-013773	Village Of Hersey, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36360.7	3	Yes	36360.7
RCP-013774	Free Soil Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70829.8	2	Yes	70829.8
RCP-013775	Deep River Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	160995.92		Yes	160995.92
RCP-013776	Bay Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	118224.8	9	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-013777	Jonesfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88064.34	5	Yes	0
RCP-013778	Nottawa Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	238131.04	1	Yes	238131.04
RCP-013779	Fairgrove Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85016.78	3	Yes	85016.78
RCP-013780	Metz Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30055.36	1	Yes	30055.36
RCP-013781	Merrill Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	70619.62		Yes	70619.62
RCP-013782	Pokagon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	207550.22	1	Yes	207550.22
RCP-013783	Napoleon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	711135.36	3	Yes	711135.36
RCP-013784	Rome Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	186322.3	1	Yes	186322.3
RCP-013785	Rose Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	678032.4	1	Yes	678032.4
RCP-013786	Koylton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	150592.14	3	Yes	150592.14
RCP-013787	Marlette Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	173606.56	2	Yes	173606.56
RCP-013788	Williamstown Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544779.92	1	Yes	544779.92
RCP-013789	Nunda Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88589.78	1	Yes	88589.78
RCP-013790	Allouez Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	146914.04	1	Yes	146914.04
RCP-013791	Fabius Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	340697.62	2	Yes	340697.62
RCP-013792	Village Of Breckenridge, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	133777.94	1	Yes	133777.94
RCP-013793	Three Oaks Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96786.72	6	Yes	96786.72
RCP-013794	Girard Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	185061.24		Yes	92531.67
RCP-013795	Rich Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	166880.88	3	Yes	166880.88
RCP-013796	Leland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	214486.08	2	Yes	214486
RCP-013797	Village Of Vandalia, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29635	5	Yes	29635
RCP-013798	Village Of Lyons, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84806.6	1	Yes	84468
RCP-013799	Forsyth Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	649448.28	1	Yes	649448.28
RCP-013800	Riley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	344165.56	17	Yes	344165.56
RCP-013801	Atlas Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	627589.82		Yes	627589.82
RCP-013802	Village Of Oxford, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	373695.48	2	Yes	372946.11
RCP-013803	City Of Sault Ste Marie, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1410290.62	3	Yes	1410290.6
RCP-013804	Village Of Berrien Springs, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	181488.2	2	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-013805	Village Of Mayville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	93003.5	4	Yes	93003.51
RCP-013806	City Of Coleman, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	126421.72	2	Yes	126421.72
RCP-013807	Covert Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	303811.48	3	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-013808	Milford Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1091871.8	1	Yes	1091871.8
RCP-013809	Deerfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	449569.54	1	Yes	449569.54
RCP-013810	Juniata Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	155426.2	2	Yes	155426.2
RCP-013811	Hudson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	71565.42	1	Yes	71565
RCP-013812	Worth Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	381682.22		Yes	380156
RCP-013813	Village Of Elk Rapids, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	169718.28		Yes	169718.28
RCP-013814	Mussey Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	236975.06	4	Yes	236975.06
RCP-013815	Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84070.98	1	Yes	84070.98
RCP-013816	City Of Belleville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	409425.64		Yes	407789
RCP-013817	Almena Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544464.66	3	Yes	544464.66
RCP-013818	Village Of Union City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	164358.76	1	Yes	164132.85
RCP-013819	Village Of Webberville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	137666.22	1	Yes	137666.22
RCP-013820	Mason Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	73982.46	4	Yes	73982.46
RCP-013821	Blue Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	258413.16	1	Yes	258413.16
RCP-013822	City Of Orchard Lake Village, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	259884.4	1	No		0	0	0	259884
RCP-013823	Pleasanton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85542.22	2	Yes	85542.22
RCP-013824	City Of North Muskegon, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	398601.5	1	Yes	398601.5
RCP-013825	Benton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	325775.04	8	Yes	325775.03
RCP-013826	Littlefield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	240653.16	3	Yes	240653.16
RCP-013827	Fairhaven Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109817.72	1	Yes	109597.74
RCP-013828	Hay Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	142605.38	8	Yes	142321
RCP-013829	Houghton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8512.18	2	Yes	8512.18
RCP-013830	Gaines Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	644719.3		No		0	0	0	0
RCP-013831	Clyde Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	225730.58	2	Yes	225730
RCP-013833	Wakefield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31106.24		No		0	0	0	0
RCP-013834	Homer Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	142815.56	1	Yes	142815.56
RCP-013835	Heath Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	387357.02	3	Yes	385808
RCP-013836	Arenac Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88169.44	1	Yes	88169.44
RCP-013837	Thetford Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	698419.62	16	Yes	698419.62
RCP-013838	Hersey Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	168667.38	5	Yes	168667.38
RCP-013839	Dover Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43191.46	2	Yes	43191.46
RCP-013840	Hudson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	142710.48	1	Yes	142710.48
RCP-013841	Forester Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	100569.9	4	Yes	100569.9
RCP-013842	City Of Springfield, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	546251.16	2	Yes	546251.16
RCP-013843	Mckinley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43506.72	1	Yes	43506.72
RCP-013844	Bloomfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44452.54	3	Yes	44452.54
RCP-013845	Bloomer Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	216684	1	Yes	216684
RCP-013846	Oliver Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66836.42	1	Yes	66836.42
RCP-013848	Billings Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	250741.68	2	Yes	250741.68
RCP-013849	Village Of Athens, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104668.36	1	Yes	104668.36
RCP-013850	Village Of Beulah, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36255.6	1	Yes	36255.6
RCP-013851	Evergreen Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	256626.64	4	Yes	256626.64
RCP-013852	Lilley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85437.12	4	Yes	85437.12
RCP-013853	Windsor Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	605311.02	1	Yes	605311.02
RCP-013854	Village Of Dryden, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98573.22	1	Yes	98573.22
RCP-013856	Brandon Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1536186.9	1	Yes	1536186.9
RCP-013857	Rockland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20071.94	1	Yes	20071.94
RCP-013858	Monterey Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	258308.06		Yes	0
RCP-013860	City Of Marine City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426450.02	1	Yes	426450.02
RCP-013861	Inwood Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	73667.2	1	Yes	73667.2
RCP-013862	Groveland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595642.86	3	Yes	595642.86
RCP-013863	Brampton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108136.3	4	Yes	2000
RCP-013864	Village Of Millington, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104773.44	1	No		34191	0	0	0
RCP-013865	Brady Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	404801.74	1	Yes	404801.74
RCP-013866	Cambridge Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497490	5	Yes	497490
RCP-013867	Village Of Decatur, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	182013.66		Yes	182013.66
RCP-013868	Ingersoll Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	279325.82	1	Yes	279325.82
RCP-013869	City Of Memphis, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123689.42	4	Yes	123441.52
RCP-013870	City Of Garden City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2775182.92	1	Yes	2775182.92
RCP-013871	Village Of Bingham Farms, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	120641.86	1	Yes	120641.86
RCP-013872	Garfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	199038.04	5	Yes	199038.04
RCP-013873	Village Of Walkerville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27323.06	1	Yes	27268.37
RCP-013875	City Of Reading, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109712.62	1	No		0	0	0	0
RCP-013876	Iron River Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	100885.16	1	Yes	100885.16
RCP-013877	Sullivan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	270498.36	2	Yes	270498.36
RCP-013878	City Of Mackinac Island, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49496.78	12	Yes	49496.78
RCP-013880	Village Of Maple Rapids, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	71565.42		Yes	71565.42
RCP-013881	South Haven Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	419619.26	2	Yes	419619.26
RCP-013882	Pulaski Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	221632.1	12	Yes	221632.1
RCP-013883	City Of Melvindale, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1076949.2	1	Yes	1076949.2
RCP-013884	Allendale Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2806814.62	1	Yes	2806814.62
RCP-013885	Republic Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111604.22		No		5000	7000	0	0
RCP-013886	Sigel Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45608.5	1	Yes	45608.5
RCP-013887	Royal Oak Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	254104.52	1	Yes	254104.52
RCP-013888	City Of River Rouge, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	779653.2		Yes	779653.2
RCP-013889	City Of Hastings, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	768198.54	2	Yes	768198.54
RCP-013890	Union Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	135564.46	3	Yes	135564.46
RCP-013891	Riverton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	122428.36	1	Yes	122428.36
RCP-013892	Bennington Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	322096.92	2	Yes	322096.92
RCP-013893	Wellington Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31211.34	1	Yes	31211.34
RCP-013894	Sheridan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	167931.76	1	Yes	167931.76
RCP-013895	City Of East Jordan, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	246748.3	1	Yes	246748.3
RCP-013896	Village Of Michiana, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19021.06	1	Yes	19021.06
RCP-013897	Riley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	216482.76	1	Yes	216482.76
[truncated: rows 5001-26533 of 26533 not shown; row cap 5000 per sheet]

Sheet: Projects (Q1 2024) Submitted
Project ID	Recipient-ID	Recipient Name	State/Territory	Reporting Tier	Recipient Type	Completion Status	Project Name	Expenditure Category Group	Expenditure Category	Project Description	Adopted Budget	Total Cumulative Obligations	Total Cumulative Expenditures	Number of Households Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Number of Workers Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Number of Gov FTE Responding to COVID-19 (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Number of Gov FTE Rehired (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Community benefit agreement? (Infrastructure Only)	Complying with Davis Bacon? (Infrastructure Only)	Project labor agreement? (Infrastructure Only)	Does the Project have Capital Expenditures? (Yes/No) (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Type of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Total Expected Cost of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Primary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Secondary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Tertiary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project is conducting an evidence based program evaluation? (Yes/No)	Project Total Spending on Evidence Based Evaluation
TPN-211953	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Newton County/ Roselawn	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	New project - waiting on final application	1000000	0	0
TPN-072009	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay Minor Structural Managed By: Seymour District Location: SR 129, US 50 to SR 48 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	7993402.52	7993402.52	7927382.3
TPN-072067	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Small Structure Replacement Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: SR 930, UNT of Martin Ditch, 0.10 Miles west of I469 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	10415902	10415902	10165602.37
TPN-012293	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Health Issues and Challenges Grant Program	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	This $50 million appropriation shall be used to issue grants to eligible entities to prevent and address health issues and challenges.  This program will allow grantees to develop evidence-based programming to address emerging health issues in their communities over 3 to 4 year periods.   Grants under this program are made primarily for the purpose of increasing health outcomes by, and preventing or reducing the prevalence of, the following: (1) Training concerning mental health. (2) Tobacco or nicotine use and the pulmonary and cardiac effects from the use. (3) Food insecurities. (4) Adverse behavioral and mental health outcomes. (5) Lead exposure. (6) Obesity. (7) Diabetes. (8) Cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension and hyperlipidemia. (9) Hepatitis C. (10) Cancer. (11) Other critical health issues for a specific: (A) region; (B) county; (C) sex; or (D) ethnicity; that ranks in the bottom quintile for that specific health issue metric. Funding opportunity announcements and grant application guidance is in development. Projects will be added in future reports as grants are awarded.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public			Yes	0
TPN-097102	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Indiana Law Enforcement Academy Campus Renovation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Indiana Department of Administration (IDOA), on behalf of the Indiana Law Enforcement Academy (ILEA), requests funding to initiate phase 1 construction of the campus renovation at the Indiana Law Enforcement Academy. The main building on the ILEA campus was completed in 1974, making the facility almost 50 years old.  The 200,000 sq ft main building sits on 310 acres in Plainfield, Indiana. Results of the completed design study identified operating deficiencies and lack of proper capacity to meet the current and future demands of law enforcement officers in Indiana.	15609486	15609486	13362545
TPN-097103	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Secretary of State Election Security	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Secretary of State requests funding for the continuation of election security and integrity improvements as required by HEA 1116-2022. These improvements include $12,361,100 for Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) equipment for county election machines. VVPAT systems connect to Direct Record Electronic voting machines and produce a paper trail verification mechanism for post-election audits. This request also includes $3,200,000 to improve the cybersecurity position of the Secretary’s office and all 92 county offices.	15561100	15180000	15180000
TPN-097105	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	State Budget Agency Subrecipient Monitoring	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Indiana State Budget Agency requests review of American Rescue Plan Act funding to contract with a vendor(s) to assist the agency subrecipient monitoring as defined in federal guidance. The U.S. Department of Treasury ARPA State Fiscal Recovery Funds are subject to the Single Audit Act and 2 C.F.R 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Noncompliance may result in a finding in the Agency’s Single Audit.	0	0	0
TPN-097108	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	State Board of Accounts Federal Audits of Local Units	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The State Board of Accounts (SBOA) requests review of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding to contract with accounting firms to perform audits on state and local units of government. Recent disbursements of federal funding to state and local units have increased the annual number of audits SBOA is required to perform. To ensure all units of government are audited in a timely manner as required by State and Federal Law, SBOA plans to contract with private examiners to complete a portion of those required audits.	0	0	0
TPN-097109	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	State Budget Agency Enterprise Grants Management	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The State Budget Agency requests funding to implement a statewide grants management system. Currently, systems are fragmented across agencies. The system will streamline grants management by creating like systems across all agencies. The system will allow agencies to manage grants through the entire grant lifecycle: application through final close-out. The funding will provide for a fit-gap analysis, project management, implementation, user licenses and training over a five-year period. Failure to implement a grant management system may lead to non-compliance issues that could result in payback of funds to the Federal Government.	5757425.67	5619280	2326783
TPN-012240	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Broadband Grants	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	The $46.9 million appropriation shall be used for a program to expand the availability of broadband Internet connectivity throughout Indiana by: (1) entering into agreements with broadband service providers under which broadband service providers agree to accept subsidy payments distributed by the office as a form of payment for the provision of eligible broadband service; and (2) distributing subsidy payments to broadband service providers with whom the office enters into agreements under subdivision (1), to be used as a form of payment for eligible broadband service provided before July 1, 2025, to the following, as prioritized in this subdivision: (A) First, to public school corporations to pay for eligible broadband service to any building: (i) that is used primarily for educating students; and (ii) with respect to which a connection to eligible broadband service first becomes available at the building after December 31, 2020. (B) Second, to rural health clinics to pay for eligible broadband service for which a connection to the eligible broadband service first becomes available at a building after December 31, 2020. (C) Third, to eligible students to pay for eligible broadband service for which a connection to the eligible broadband service first becomes available at the primary residences of those students after December 31, 2020. Grant applications have been received and are under review.  Evaluation for coordination with the Capital Projects Fund award is ongoing. $203 million of this $250 million is planned to come from the Capital Projects Fund, so this budget has been adjusted to $46.9 million.	46867851	0	0					No	Yes
TPN-012251	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Trails	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project shall fund $60 million in grants for the development of regionally and locally significant trails throughout Indiana. Next Level Trails is designed to incentivize collaborative efforts to accelerate trail connections. The Department of Natural Resources will administer the program.  Projects are still under review and will be added in future reports.	60000000	59999999	9180902
TPN-012255	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Bridge, Other Managed By: Greenfield District Location: US 31, .97 miles N of SR 28 over the N/S Railroad NB Bridge This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	16516992.03	16516992.03	16355678.79
TPN-012266	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	48500000	48500000	7992395.56
TPN-012277	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Conservation Land Acquisition	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	$25 million appropriation to be used for preservation, conservation and recreational projects in the state. Programming plans will include local participation and are anticipated to become part of public trusts to ensure generational enjoyment. Projects are still under review and will be added in future reports.	25000000	10779717	10779717
TPN-012268	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Flights	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	$10 million planned for the continued development of domestic and international air service to and from Indiana. Projects are still under review and will be added in future reports.	10000000	750000	24864
TPN-097301	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative READI program is established to provide 500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that when implemented will attract develop and retain talent in Indiana To achieve this vision regions will develop data-driven actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities To help regions achieve their goals the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to 50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth	12500000	5462401.29	5316615.41
TPN-012275	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This $231 million appropriation is planned for the non-federal matching contribution to major transit projects in NW Indiana including new service lines in Lake County and adding express lines from Gary to Michigan City.	0	0	0
TPN-075517	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Transportation and Water Infrastructure Local Grants	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	The Indiana General Assembly allocated $60 Million of federal Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to the Indiana Finance Authority (IFA) to provide grants to utilities and/or communities for stormwater/flooding projects that impact State Roads in their local communities. The IFA will administer these grants under the Transportation and Stormwater Grant program. The State seeks to make an impact on communities by providing Transportation and Stormwater Grants to communities to complete necessary projects. In order to prioritize projects for Transportation and Stormwater Grants, the IFA will first look to communities with existing plans in place to complete projects that meet the funding eligibility criteria. Grants awards are being finalized and will be added in future reports.  This project represents the amount that has not been awarded as of 3/31/2022.	0	0	0
TPN-072073	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Concrete Pavement Restoration (CPR) Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: I 69, From 0.41 Miles S of SR 26 to 1.29 miles N of US 35/SR 22. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	13614312.19	13614312.19	13614312.19
TPN-072044	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Small Structure Replacement Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 6, 3.90mi  W of US 31 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	1424628.48	1424628.48	1271730.38
TPN-072045	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Concrete Pavement Restoration (CPR) Managed By: Vincennes District Location: I 69, From 2.3 mi E of US 41 to I-64 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	13458792.27	13458792.27	5266993.82
TPN-072053	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Deck Replacement Managed By: Crawfordsville District Location: I 65, NB Bridge over SR 43, 3.13 mi N of SR 25 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	93875346.2	93875346.2	84262696.73
TPN-072060	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Functional Overlay on PCCP Managed By: Vincennes District Location: US 50, From E. Jct of US-41 SBL to 4.75 east of E Jct of US-41 SBL This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-072068	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Concrete Pavement Restoration (CPR) Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: SR 930, From 0.71 miles W of I-469 to I-469. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	2553757	2553757	2199461.96
TPN-072075	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay, Preventive Maintenance Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: US 6, From 3.52 miles East of SR 3 East Jct to I-69. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	6675165.96	6675165.96	6675165.96
TPN-072077	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace Superstructure Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: I 69, Bridge over Salamonie River, Road, 1.31 miles S of SR 5, Northbound This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	26512936.43	26512936.43	15346541.08
TPN-072082	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Small Structure Replacement Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 30, 4.73 mi E of SR 51 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-072081	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Small Structure Pipe Lining Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 30, 1.13 mi E of US 41 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	2040859.58	2040859.58	315670.87
TPN-072160	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	4850000	4850000	41920.13
TPN-072161	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	19400000	19400000	9610531.72
TPN-072112	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	48500000	44800000	7768312.85
TPN-072117	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	29100000	29100000	899707.41
TPN-072120	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	19400000	17097357	2828107.69
TPN-072133	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	29100000	29099999.8	5604077.15
TPN-072140	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	48500000	48500000	7661100.18
TPN-072143	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	48500000	48499999	19896289.34
TPN-072135	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	14550000	14550000	1952991.91
TPN-072163	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	14550000	14550000	5599122.96
TPN-072156	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	19400000	19400000	2560973.06
TPN-072162	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	29100000	27300000	9011088.97
TPN-072165	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	51000000	49742500	21127474.42
TPN-071820	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Thin Deck Overlay Managed By: Vincennes District Location: I 69, over Pigeon Creek, 1.75mi N SR 68- NBL This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	6561073.64	6561073.64	5828619.1
TPN-071846	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Thin Deck Overlay Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 20, US 20 WB over US 20 WB/EB LINCOLN WAY, 01.69 S I-90 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	1230007.54	1230007.54	1132744.2
TPN-071849	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Thin Deck Overlay Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: US 30, Bridge over Deeds Creek, EB, 0.96 miles E of SR 15. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	1062331.44	1062331.44	974622.2
TPN-071879	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Substructure Repair And Rehabilitation Managed By: LaPorte District Location: SR 16, 02.44 W US 31 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	211434.59	211434.59	211434.59
TPN-071953	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Substructure Repair And Rehabilitation Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: US 30, EB Bridge over SR 15, 09.12 Miles West of SR 13. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-071975	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Bridge Construction Managed By: Central Office Location: PR 69, New Terrain Approach from Indiana State Line in Vanderburgh County to I69 south of Evansville. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	12076157.05	12076157.05	9980496.77
TPN-071978	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Added Travel Lanes Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: US 20, US 20 from SR 15 to 4.14 miles E of SR 15 (CR 35) This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	47931880.17	47931880.17	39655804.36
TPN-071979	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Slide Correction Managed By: Seymour District Location: SR 156, 0.7 miles W of SR 56/SR 156 W Junction This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	13850000	13850000	199974.54
TPN-071983	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay Minor Structural Managed By: Crawfordsville District Location: US 231, From 0.03 mi S of SR 240 to 1.61 mi N of SR 240 (Greencastle) This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	13902825.82	13902825.82	3914954.53
TPN-071989	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay, Structural Managed By: Crawfordsville District Location: SR 55, From 0.59 mi N of US 52 N Jct to US 24 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	19917720	19917720	18289679.9
TPN-071991	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay, Preventive Maintenance Managed By: Seymour District Location: SR 156, 0.13 miles W of SR 101 to 1.8 miles E of SR 101 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	6933544.5	6933544.5	6332967
TPN-072004	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Auxiliary Lanes, Two-way Left Turn Lanes Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 20, US20 from 4.8 miles east of SR39 (CR300E) to 7.2 miles east of SR39 (CR500E) This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-071998	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Interchange Construction Managed By: Greenfield District Location: US 31, at 236th Street/Jackson St. 2.50 miles N of SR 38 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	22025868.34	22025868.34	21372509.8
TPN-072130	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	19400000	17654000	4087226.58
TPN-072013	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Added Travel Lanes Managed By: Seymour District Location: US 31, from South Main St. to Israel Lane This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-072028	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace Superstructure Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: SR 22, Over Central RR Co of Indy, 1.53 miles West of SR 26. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	16088830.32	16088830.32	682146.15
TPN-072026	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Road Construction Managed By: Central Office Location: PR 69, Johnson Co Segment, From 1 mi S of SR144 to 0.5 mi N of Wicker Rd Contract 4 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	172469794.81	172469794.81	164966034.04
TPN-072030	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Interchange Modification Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: I 469, I-469 at I-69 N Jct. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	22112180	22112180	16691275.14
TPN-072035	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Auxiliary Lanes, Passing Managed By: Crawfordsville District Location: US 231, From 4.19 mi N of I-74 to 2.53 mi N of SR 28 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	15861361.17	15861361.17	9804347.11
TPN-072024	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Road Construction Managed By: Central Office Location: PR 69, Marion Co Segment, 0.5 miles N of Wicker Rd via SR 37 to I-465 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	339855731.63	339855731.63	214804846.98
TPN-072150	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	29100000	28400000	4397483.21
TPN-072152	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	14550000	14550000	2435011.49
TPN-072039	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Replacement Managed By: Greenfield District Location: US 31, NB over Little Cicero Creek, 06.69 N SR 38 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	34782866.64	34782866.64	30698368.84
TPN-190884	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Wheatland	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Installation of approximately 27,000 LF of 8-inch gravity sewer, including manholes, and approximately 190 sanitary sewer laterals to serve residents within the Town of Wheatland; Construction of a 175-gpm regional lift station and associated 4-inch force main, discharging to the proposed WWTP; Construction of an approximately 0.06 MGD extended aeration package WWTP with influent screening, UV disinfection, post-aeration, and outfall to an unnamed tributary to Nimnicht Creek; Construction of aerobic digestion and a sludge drying bed; and Installation of site utilities, construction of a WWTP control and storage building, and completion of other miscellaneous site civil improvements.	1420835	1420835	0
TPN-114340	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Tippecanoe River State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Project includes analysis of a drinking water system and wastewater sanitary sewer system. This will identify existing and future system demands resulting in improvements needed for the existing utility facilities. These measures will improve the cost effectiveness of the current system and desirable methods needed for future system demands.	168059	168059	168059
TPN-114337	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Shakamak State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Project consists of analysis of decommissioning existing wastewater treatment facility that currently includes a sanitary sewer collection system consisting of a combination of grinder pump stations and low pressure sewers and gravity sewers. Regionalization with the City of Jasonville wastewater utility which will decommission the existing Shakamak State Park treatment facility.	82500	82500	82500
TPN-114335	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	McCormick's Creek State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.7-Clean Water: Energy conservation	McCormick’s Creek State Park has needed a replacement generator. This project is purchasing a new, energy efficient, generator. Removing the existing generator and preparation of the area the new equipment will be installed. Installation labor and equipment needed to install the new generator and providing an operational check on the newly installed generator.	167948	167948	167948
TPN-114333	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Lieber State Recreation Area	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	A new lift station to collect all SRA flows for pumping to the Cloverdale system. Force main routes are to be determined from the new SRA main lift station to the existing Cloverdale system. Analysis of the collection system and determine upgrades and improvements needed to convey the additional flows to the treatment facility.	46975	46975	46975
TPN-114343	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Potato Creek	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	There are two water fill stations and dump stations located at Potato Creek State Park. The location  for the main campground is split, with the water fill station on the east side of the roadway and the dump station on the west side of the roadway. Construction appear to have been done in the late 1970's. DNR has determined that the water fill stations and dump stations require immediate replacement.	1285332	1285332	1285332
TPN-116294	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Co-location Blind & Deaf Schools	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The State Budget Agency requests authorization to transfer $190,134,810.53 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) dollars from the Economic Stimulus Fund to the Capital Reserve Account for identified projects.	190134810	14085811	722996
TPN-194877	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Austin Meadowbrook	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	This project includes constructing gravity sewers using updated materials and installation procedures that dramatically reduce the amount of I/I entering the Sanitary Sewer System. The project will also allow additional users to connect to the system and help maintain the sewer rate  at its current level. The reduced I/I will eliminate SSO's in the proposed collection system which will prevent public exposure to untreated sewage and prevent degradation of water quality in the associated drainage area.	502000	0	0
TPN-194889	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Westport Wastewater Utility Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Collection system improvements including CIPP for non-lined sewers point repairs addressing manhole lining grout existing liners and sewer lateral repairs Collection system improvements for new lift station and an additional force main will include new force main wet weather pumping station generator electrical and controls Wastewater Treatment Plant improvements; SAGR Treatment system sludge removal influent force main connection influent flow meter and structure for new force main to plant Chemical feed system improvements lagoon maintenance device mechanical screen generator electrical and controls	2500000	0	0
TPN-130799	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Harmonie State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The replacement and upgrade of the wastewater master lift station which includes concrete wet well, pumps, electrical panels and controls, site piping, connection to existing force main, site construction, and demolition/removal of the existing lift station.	684006	684006	668114
TPN-073170	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Montgomery County Nucor Tempur Corridor Water Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Extending water main with approximately 22500 feet of 20-inch diameter water main. Approximately 2000 feet of pipe will be at the existing treatment plant site, approximately 15000 feet of pipe will be placed along Nucor Road and approximately 5300 feet of pipe will be placed west along CR 200S. Construction of a high service pumping station includes related electrical gear, backup generator, controls, and site access. Installing a one-million-gallon water tower, which is a critical component for fire protection and reliable water supply.	3000000	3000000	3000000
TPN-073220	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Montgomery County Mace Stormwater Flooding	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Installation of size-appropriate pipe, inlets, and manholes and removing obstructions to handle typical weather event caused drainage at the intersection and further downstream. Near CR200S, create a drainage outlet by installing size-appropriate pipes, inlets, riprap, headwalls, and manholes. Project design will include positive overland flow grading in the event a storm larger than the design storm occurs to safely convey flows to the downstream channel. In addition to storm sewers, vegetated swales will be installed.	466200	466200	466200
TPN-073359	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	New Castle Force Main Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The Force Main that is currently feeding the New Castle prison is failing. This feeds other areas and is affecting those as well as the prison. Replacing 16" failing Force Main to connect to jail. This is a partial replacement and addition of water main in the corridor. This will provide additional hook ups for county areas (subdivision) to tie in at a later date.	5275348	5275348	4890819
TPN-072773	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Atlanta Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Installation of stormwater management plan; involving drainage and stormwater system. Extend storm sewers along street sides, intersections and other critical points to properly direct storm flow. Replace and reroute under sized sewers. Replace trunk line, inlets, structures, etc. This improved drainage and storm water system will eliminate problem areas, extend storm sewers, reroute existing legal drains or drainageways and, rehab the system, which will insert erosion control.	800000	800000	800000
TPN-072800	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Bluffton Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.4-Clean Water: Combined sewer overflows	City of Bluffton improving the wastewater treatment plant that has exceeded its twenty-year usable life. Project includes a combination of new sewers, new pump station, new force main inflow/infiltration projects, complete replacement of a lift station, rehab of another lift station, and several Wastewater Treatment Plant improvements. This project will protect the environment and human health.	2000000	2000000	2000000
TPN-072781	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Bedford 5th Street SR 58 Flooding Minimization Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Lincoln Avenue and 5th street (SR 58) would flood during heavy rains. The City of Bedford completed a large storm water project at the intersection as well as along Lincoln Avenue North and South as part of Bedford's Agreed Order with IDEM beginning in 2014 to develop a compliance plan to resolve SSO issues with additional I/I analysis and capital projects accordingly. This Bedford project alleviated the flooding at the intersection but flooding still occurs on SR 58. There is a sanitary sewer overflow point that overflows to the storm sewer during heavy rains taking up capacity from the storm sewer to handle the SSO. Additionally, this project would allow a connection from General Motors. Currently, connection from General Motors has not been allowed, in part, because of the SSO that exists at SR 58 between the proposed connection point and Spider Creek Lift Station.	2609170	2609170	2609170
TPN-072822	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Brown County SR 45 & Helmsburg School Road Flood Control Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Two issues: the safety hazard of a flooded SR 45 and the public health issues caused by standing water. SR45 and Helmsburg School RD has recently seen an unusual amount of stormwater flooding. The project will include raising SR45 bed in the area above the floodplain elevation and pavine new travel lanes. Stormwater improvements will also be made in the project area to insure proper drainage.	0	0	0
TPN-073411	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Parke County Little Raccoon Creek Preservation Lee Allen Bryant	5-Infrastructure	5.9-Clean Water: Nonpoint source	Project is to protect groundwater underlying the site, Little Raccoon Creek, and nearby surface waters from potential migration of contaminants. Project will complete the removal of friable asbestos containing material from the interior of the onsite powerhouse. Remove friable ACM from the exteriors of the powerhouse smokestack and complete it’s subsequent demolition. Removing and landfilling of the historical waste dumping area consisting of coal waste and trash present to the north of the onsite powerhouse per a work plan prepared by a certified engineer specializing in landfills.	3938101	3938101	3639155
TPN-073665	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	South Bend Hidden Creek & Phillips Ditch	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Construct a road that ties into Hidden Creek Dr. and modifies a portion of Jackson Rd. with multiple structures allowing Philips Ditch to flow under the roadway and maintain Jackson Rd flood-free for a 100-year design storm. New road grade will be 0.3% on Hidden Creek Dr., the lengthen of the new road will be 625 feet, the primary structure crossing Philips Ditch will be a 9 feet x 12 feet arch and 10 additional structures below the improved roadway will be boxes ranging in size from 4 feet x 10 feet to 1.5 feet x 10 feet.	0	0	0
TPN-074349	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Sunman SR 101 Stormwater Improvement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Inspect and clean current system; clearing all above ground stormwater conveyances and removal of obstructions, such as trees, large rocks, heavy vegetation and other intrusions. Jetting and inspection of all subsurface stormwater conveyances, including video of 100% of system and grading condition of existing pipes. Clearing of all outfall areas to ensure no blockages exist. Engineer to assess drainage system master plan, evaluation of current conditions based on watershed evaluation and sewer televising/cleaning.	169500	169500	143259
TPN-072794	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Big Cicero Creek Bank Stabilization Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Big Cicero Creek lacks the capacity to convey even the 10-year storm without flooding surrounding areas, and continuing erosion exacerbates this issue. This flooding has increased over recent years due to severe rainfall events (large volumes of rain in short time periods). And the erosion along the stream banks due to the flooding threatens several private properties as well as municipal infrastructure and utilities. Several critical facilities and major roadways are located within the floodplain, most significantly Tipton Hospital, which, if flooded, could be a major public health and safety concern. A severe flood event in May 2013 caused approximately $2.5 million in damage to the community. Tipton is a part of Block Group 5, Census Tract 204. The Big Cicero Creek Joint Drainage Board oversees the region's approximately 135 sq mi watershed.	3227625	3227625	3227625
TPN-072796	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Blackford County Culvert Replacement & Cassel Regulated Drain Flood Mitigation I	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	"Proj 1 - Industrial Park Mitigation, consists of constructing a flood mitigation. Cutting the existing embankments on the NW side of Cassel Drain and NE side of the unnamed tributary to the ordinary high-water mark and excavating an off-line flood mitigation facility to reduce peak flows from the upstream drainage area. Proj 2 - Upsizing an aluminized steel bridge on Little Lick Creek at CR N 400 E with a CON/SPAN structure and stabilizing the embankments as necessary.  "	3361500	3361500	0
TPN-072845	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Brownsburg Northside Drainage Project Phase IV	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Improving drainage and separation of combined sewers along US136, Grant St., and Jefferson St, which intersect on the north side of US136. Lack of a separated sewer system, during periods of intense precipitation and snow melt the street/yard drainage in this area is inadequate. When intense rain events do occur, the flows can overwhelm the combined sewer storage tank and discharges flow into White Lick Creek. The CSO discharge is upstream of a public park as well as neighboring communities causing both public health as well as water quality concerns. Drainage improvements eliminates these conditions.	793146	793146	793146
TPN-072985	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Frankton SR 128 Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Project consist of a new storm sewer system consisting of approximately 3,000 feet of 12-inch, 3,800 feet of 15-inch, 500 feet of 24-inch, 1,200 feet of 54-inch pipe and an expanded existing detention facility. The storm sewer will serve a significant area of town as it nearly extends from the west end to the east end of Frankton. The 54-inch pipe provides a means to convey runoff from SR128 to a discharge point south of town, runoff from the south central portion of town, and provides an outlet for the proposed residential subdivision.	1428334	1428334	1428334
TPN-072993	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Hammond US41 Calumet Avenue at 129th Street	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The project proposes to install a new storm sewer on 129th Street, from US 41 / Calumet Avenue to Sheffield Avenue to connect to an existing 42 inch storm sewer to alleviate roadway flooding of on US 41 / Calument Avenue. Installing new catch basins, inlets, manholes, curbs, and gutters to address roadway flooding of the highway and local street.	0	0	0
TPN-073415	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Pendleton Regulated Drain Reconstruction	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Reconstruct the regulated drain pipe and improve the capacity for future development. Project will abandon the existing pipe and install a new up-sized drain in place of the existing drain. New drain will be bored under SR 67 and the Indiana Railroad crossing. A pond where the drain outlets will be reconstructed to better manage the inflow of water coming from the drain.	784225	784225	633643
TPN-073506	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Portland Meridian Street Drainage	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Install a new storm sewer along Meridian St. from Race St to the Salamonie River. Replace existing lines that run along Miller Branch and will connect the existing catchments at Arch, High, and Walnut St. The storm lines will be 36-inch to 48-inch in diameter. New inlets and structures will be installed in existing locations. The outlet will be replaced with a headwall and pipe with flap gate. This will provide better drainage and reduce the backflow into the system.	902000	902000	902000
TPN-074006	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	State Fair Commission Fall Creek Pavilion Stormwater	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Indiana State Fair Commission is improving the subsurface stormwater drainage system on the 200+ acre Indiana State Fairgrounds campus. A new subsurface stormwater system has been designed for the south half of the campus. It includes replacing again and undersized infrastructure with new subsurface pipes to support an existing 36" culvert pipe that runs under Fall Creek Parkway, as well as the addition of a new 42" culvert pipe (that will also run under Fall Creek Parkway and discharge into Fall Creek) and new subsurface infrastructure.	2669833.2	2669833.2	2669833.2
TPN-074286	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Sullivan Vigo Water Loop Completion	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Sullivan-Vigo Rural Water Corporation will extend eight miles of waterlines in Vigo County to create looping within the system. This project will create a total of eight loops. Approximately 22 miles of water lines will be installed. This will address the lack of looping within the water system and permit the utility to operate more efficiently and provide water to many unserved families. This improves quality of residual chlorine levels.	0	0	0
TPN-072761	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Adams County New Collection System	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Project involves the installation of municipal sanitary sewers in five primary areas where the residents are currently served by failing, on-site septic systems. The District plans on the installation of collection systems coupled with discharge to municipal sewers for ultimate treatment disposal in each area. This will improve environmental and public health.	3600000	3600000	3591364.15
TPN-072767	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Town of Arcadia Wastewater and Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Installing cured-in-place piping on the top 25% of severely deteriorated sections of an existing collection system. Disconnecting the sanitary to storm interconnections, preventing raw, untreated wastewater and water treatment plant backwash from discharging into open water bodies. Upsizing storm trunk lines through town to address reginal drainage problem, benefitting the Town and County.	3210000	3210000	3210000
TPN-072865	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Charlestown SP Closing Ranney Wells	5-Infrastructure	5.9-Clean Water: Nonpoint source	The Ranney Collector Wells (CW-1 through CW-7) are water wells installed during World War II to obtain water for the former Indiana Army Ammunition Plant. The seven wells are located along the Ohio River and at the time of installation was the largest single well field ever operated in the Midwest with production of 50 million gallons per day during 1942 and 1943. After the war effort, some of the wells were used intermittently for operations of the ammunition plant until operations ceased. Approximately, 5,100 acres including the Ranney well field were transferred to the State of Indiana in 1996 and 2002.  The wells are constructed of concrete walls of 18 inches thick and are 13 ft in diameter and range in depth from 67 ft to 93 ft. Today, the wells are a potential environmental problem to the integrity of the aquifer since the well pump houses contain asbestos, lead based paint, hazardous and nonhazardous fluids, liquids, fuels, oils, and sludges. The pump houses are in poor condition due to age and vandalism for salvageable metals and need to be demolished. This project will be eliminating the potential environmental hazards from migrating into the aquifer and contaminating the local drinking water supply and the Ohio River.	1983312	1983312	1983312
TPN-073604	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Posey County New Plant and Collection System	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Construction of a new Wastewater Treatment Plant capable of providing treatment to the communities of Blairsville and Wadesville. The WWTP will be build as a modular facility to enable it to be expanded as demand increases. Project will provide sanitary sewers, gravity and force main to tow communities who have been dealing with failing septic systems. This Regional Sewer District has been created to help address the lack of sanitary infrastructure through Posey County.	5000000	5000000	4836970
TPN-072991	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Gary US Hwy 20 Drainage Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Proposed project will include adding curb and gutter to the existing roadway (US Hwy 20) section including some associated adjacent pavement reconstruction. New inlets will be installed per standard INDOT gutter spread requirements. Dedicated storm sewers would be installed throughout the project limits. Due to lack of an available waterway outlet, perforated pipes, a storage/infiltration chamber system, and/or oversized storm sewers will be installed adjacent to the roadway to store and infiltrate stormwater into the soils below. This will capture all stormwater that drains into the roadway waterway and infiltrate stormwater to the maximum extent possible.	3262500	0	0
TPN-072998	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Huntingburg Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Construction of new headworks screening facility, and a new four tank Sequencing Batch Reactor. Replacing existing chlorine disinfection with a new UV system. Construction of cascade aeration and miscellaneous improvements inclusive of a new emergency generator, sludge bed roof, a non-potable water system and installation of approximately 3000 linear feet of 24 inch gravity sewer along First Street to the Wastewater Treatment Plant.	5000000	0	0
TPN-073010	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	LaGrange Region C Phase 2 Wastewater Plant	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Project includes two new pressure sewer systems with grinder pump stations serving Still Lake and CR 600N area and North Twin Lake, South Twin Lake, Pigeon Lake, and areas along SR 120 and CR 600N. Force main piping extending along a county road to the existing gravity sewer which flows to the Region C wastewater treatment plant. Expanding of the existing extended aeration Region C WWTP, including replacing pumps in main pump station.	0	0	0
TPN-073608	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Scottsburg Water and Wastewater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	First is sewer rehabilitation to address Inflow and Infiltration. This will address the current Agreed Order mandating the fixing of the sewers and pump stations in the collection system which are overflowing as SSO events. This includes sewer lining, sewer replacement, lift station rehabilitation and sump pump eliminations. Second, repairing the clear well tank at the water treatment plant. Repair leaks currently occurring which are leading to approximately leaking 100,000 gallons per day. And replacing water lines to eliminate asbestos lines and address high occurrence of water main breaks.	4000000	4000000	4000000
TPN-074360	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Trafalgar Plant and Collection System Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Project includes expanding the current Wastewater Treatment Plant. Expansion will include improvements to headworks, grit removal, oxidation ditch, construction of two clarifiers, additional of sludge lift station, replacement of UV disinfection equipment, lab remodel, installation of all necessary piping and improved sludge handling facilities. Current Inflow and Infiltration issue will be addressed by rehabilitation lift stations, force main relocation, and manhole rehabilitation.	2500000	2500000	2500000
TPN-074428	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Wells County Murray Paving and Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Installing a new storm sewer mains and catch basin to adequately service the Murray community. The proposed storm sewer mains will range in tile size 12 inches - 36 inches. The catch basin structures will be placed strategically in the low areas and main drainage swales to collection the storm water runoff. The storm sewer will be aligned within the existing County rights-of-way except for the storm sewer tie into the existing tributary swale.	700000	700000	700000
TPN-071673	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Replacement Managed By: Vincennes District Location: US 41, Over CSX Railroad, SBL, 2.85 miles S of SR-64 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-072857	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Butler Storm Sewer Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Upgrade/enlarge undersized storm sewers on SR1 to eliminate local flooding that frequently occurs along SR1 and in particular at the intersection of SR1 and Monroe St., in conjunction with replacement of aging sanitary sewers. Install a storm sewer on SR1. Precipitation events and freezing during winter create unsafe conditions. Constructing a storm sewer on the south side will eliminate the flooding and icing conditions.	2625000	2625000	1828366
TPN-072859	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Camden Legal Drains Relocation Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Relocate the drains along and under SR75 / SR218 and reroute them off of SR75 so they drain to Deer Creek. This will remove drains from the State Hwy 75 and eliminate the aged and deteriorating pipe from under a major state route in central Carroll County. A new drain segment will be built off the state highway right of way. Drains will be connected to this new segment, eliminating the route where the drains travel under SR 75. The SR75 segment will be filled with flowable fill or other approved material and capped.	375000	375000	308750
TPN-072869	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Charlestown SP Water Treatment Plant and Well Field Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.10-Drinking water: Treatment	This project includes the design of water main extension from River Ridge Development Authority to serve Charlestown State Park. Project consists of water main construction and connection from Charlestown State Park to River Ridge Development Authority. Construction consists of piping and other water related materials to properly connect the State Park to the already existing River Ridge Development Authority.	6739567	6739567	6235269.5
TPN-073000	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Jasper SR 164 Storm Sewer Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Project will consist of replacement of failed storm sewer structures and pipes within SR 164 from the intersection of US 231 to the intersection of Mill Street. Storm sewers will be replaced and new N-12 HDPE of equal diameter allowing for improved capacity within the pipes. INDOT will be reconstructing the road in the near future and the City desires to replace storm structures prior to the INDOT project.	131250	131250	131250
TPN-073006	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Kokomo SR931 Storm Sewer Extension	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Increase the size of a 36 inch storm sewer, which will improve drainage at the intersection of Boulevard Street and State Road 931. Extending a storm sewer west on Boulevard St. to connect the existing inlets west of the intersection. The City is expecting to increase the 36 inch  storm sewer to a 60 inch and extend a 30 inch storm sewer to the inlets on Boulevard. A hydrodynamic separator is proposed on the 30 inch pipe to reduce contaminants into Kokomo Creek.	562500	562500	562500
TPN-073003	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Jasper SR 231 Storm Sewer Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Existing storm sewer located within the project area consist of vitrified clay and concrete, which are broken and collapsing under the State Highway. Project will consist of replacement of failed storm sewer structures and pipes within SR 231 from the intersection of Hoffman Road to the intersection of 6th Street. Storm sewers will be replaced with new N-12 HDPE of equal diameter allowing for improved capacity within the pipes.	56250	56250	56250
TPN-071686	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Replacement Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 30, Us 30@.-Dyer Ditch, 01.10 W US 41 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-073012	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Lakeside Improvement Assn. I-65 Flood Mitigation Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Lakeside Improvement Assn. I-65 Flood Mitigation Project Design and install 7500 LF of low pressure sewer system piping and appurtenances. Install up to 59 grinder pump stations, lateral ines, & abandonment of septic existing septic tanks. Connection of low pressure sewer system to existing g gravity sewers. Design and site prep, install of temporary siphon system, and installation of temporary and/or permanent sheet piling in Trader's Point Lake. Stabilization of existing storm water spillway. Remove spillway, regrading and construction of concrete earthen spillway. Silt removal from Trader's Point Lake, removal of in-situ earth, and final re-grading of disposal location.	3665000	2710950	1919205
TPN-073017	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Lawrence Water Main Replacement and Sewer	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Water main replacement for the current water system. This project identifies and prioritizes water mains for replacement based on the probability and consequence of failure. Replacement mains have been documented as having high number of main breaks, leaks, and customer complaints. Replacement will provide improved public health and water quality by reducing low pressure and boil orders resulting from breaks and repairs.	1922844	1922844	1922844
TPN-073032	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Martinsville Stormwater Control Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Martinsville is protected from flooding of West Fork White River by an inadequate stormwater control system. A new system segment will be constructed along the south section of SR 39 and will provide direct protection for approximately 15% of the population of Martinsville. This stormwater control system will tie in to the existing north segment to complete the Martinsville system from storm water flooding caused by the West Fork White River.	20191500	20191500	141881
TPN-071696	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Replacement Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 30, Us 30@.-Crooked Creek, 03.52 E SR 49 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	5575067.91	5575067.91	518981.16
TPN-072881	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Clarksville Broadway District Basin Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Project will be completed in two phases. Phase one will provide relief within the overall system by expanding the basin to accept additional stormwater by expanding the basin and diverting the upstream convenance into the expanded basin by rerouting the primarily collector pipe into the basin instead of the trunk line. The stormwater will be pumped out of the basin and into the existing trunk line that has sufficient downstream capacity to prevent surface flooding. Phase two will provide relief within the overall system because the expanded basin will be able to accept additional stormwater at Lincoln Park neighborhood and surrounding area which experiences surface flooding during minor rain events due to the system’s undersized later pipes.	5000000	5000000	3612002
TPN-073029	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Lewisville Reconstruction Project US40 - SR103	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Provide stormwater outlets at Flatrock River and Applebutter Creek. A stormwater outlet coming from the west will follow Third Street and Cardinal Lane to reach Applebutter Creek. Most of the stormwater will flow to US40 to be captured within the storm sewers within US40. The far north portion of the project drains to a natural low area that drains to the Flatrock River.	1000000	1000000	0
TPN-071711	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Small Structure Replacement Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: US 31, US 31 Carries UNT of Rife Creek, 3.00 miles N of SR 218, North Junction. Un This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	20255911.29	20255911.29	15837779.35
TPN-072889	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Clinton County Water Development Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Project is to develop a wellfield with ten high-capacity wells, permitted and constructed to public water supply well standards. The resulting wells will be ready for equipping and incorporation into a local groundwater supply system. Project is to identify areas within seven parcels for wellfield development, performing well site survey on identified parcels to ensure each property is suitable for locating a well. Wells will be placed on property within safe distances from potential sources of contamination. A drilling company will test and construct wells.	887546	887546	887546
TPN-072891	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Daleville Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Construction of new stormwater conveyances to provide outlets for water which currently has nowhere to go. This project will address residents issues of moving water into the sanitary system to try and eliminate the standing water. Also, there are no water quality elements in the existing stormwater system. This project will address that by incorporating water quality elements such as bioswales, hybrid ditches, and stormwater detention. Some of these include new storm pipes with catch basins and bioswales near existing baseball fields. Storm pipes / catch basins / hybrid ditches is also planned to include detention for water quality improvement.	2130750	2130750	1967232
TPN-072892	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Elkhart County Foraker and Southwest Wastewater System	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The project includes the installation of approximately seventy-four individuals grinder pumps to collect wastewater from properties that currently have onsite septic systems that are in various stages of failure. The grinder pumps will discharge into a low-pressure sewer system that conveys sewage to a regional pump station. The regional pump station will convey the sewage to the existing wastewater system.	1875000	1875000	0
TPN-071590	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Rehabilitation Or Repair Managed By: Central Office Location: I 64, Sherman Minton Bridge over Ohio River 3.95 miles W of I-65, Painting, MOT, Interchanges and Pavement This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	49140218.75	49140218.75	40408743.06
TPN-072912	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Fort Wayne Arts Campus Lafayette St. Stormwater improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Design and construction of a new, separate, stormwater outfall to the St. Mary's River. The new storm sewer will remove inlets from the combined sewer system. This will also remove parking area, private storm sewers, and other hard surface drains from the combined sewer, reducing flooding and the risk of basement backups. Provide safer commutes for vehicular and non-motorized traffic.	750000	750000	750000
TPN-072917	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Fountain City Stormwater Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project includes new storm sewers and drainage structures to reduce flooding and improve water quality in the Town of Fountain City. Including approximately 7,500 feet of new storm sewers ranging from 12 (twelve) to 60 (sixty) inches and 66 (sixty-six) new inlets. Asphalt, curb, and sidewalks will be replaced around the new improvement locations.	1800000	1800000	1800000
TPN-073072	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Mecca East Pressure Zone Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Installation of approx. 8,500 feet of water main replacement. Installing a new booster station at an elevation lower than the existing booster station and replacing 2-inch and 3-inch water main with 8-inch water main to enable booster station to pump more flow while the suction pressure remains above 40 psi. Addressing the Indiana Administrative Code requirement that water main pressure not be less than 20 psi.	950000	0	0
TPN-073076	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Michigan City White Ditch Drainage Improvement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Project consists of tree cutting, brush clearing, and sediment removal from White Ditch from Fryer Road to approximately 792 feet south to the Outfall of the Sandin Industries stormwater retention pond. Sandin Industries is located along State Road 212 and the poor drainage in White Ditch not only affects drainage along State Road 212, it also affects Sandin Industries.	120452	120452	0
TPN-073311	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Nashville Plant and Collection System	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	This project includes cast in place pipe lining of the gravity collection system, lining of existing manholes, and raising of existing manhole castings. Additionally, treatment capacity improvements are included for the sludge treatment portion of the existing Wastewater Treatment Plant. The relocation of the Wastewater Treatment Plant phosphorus removal chemical storage tanks outside the floodplain are included in this project. Finally, a new lift station and force main to the WWTP are included.	2133226	2133226	0
TPN-073122	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Michigan City US Hwy 12 Stormwater Drainage Improvement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Various locations are affected in this one project identified as the US Hwy 12 Stormwater Drainage Improvement Project. Raise shoulder and sidewalk and slope runoff to storm drain on Custer Ave. and install a new drainage system and connect this system to existing storm infrastructure on south side of US Hwy 12 near Custer Ave. To address water ponds after rainfall at intersection of US Hwy 12, install new stormwater inlets that could be connected to this storm sewer.	62370	62370	62370
TPN-074364	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Upland Jefferson Street Storm Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Upland Jefferson Street Storm Improvements Installation of approximately 4,520 feet of pipe, 11 inlet structures, and 11 storm manholes. The proposed facilities will replace the existing, undersized storm sewers and will extend storm sewer to a few areas. The new facilities will have capacity for the 10-year design storm and will reduce flooding and associated hazards in the Jefferson Street Drainage Basin during common rain events.	1175105	1175105	831817.75
TPN-071738	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Bridge Construction Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 31,  NB At Elkhart Western Railroad This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	29420011.68	29420011.68	12682561.06
TPN-130800	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Hamilton County	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	The county intends to create a Regional Utility District to serve the US 31 corridor in northern Hamilton County with water and sewer service. To provide financial flexibility the County intends to construct the project in two phases. Phase 1 will serve the existing residents in Bakers Corner community, 234th Street and the 236th Street interchange. The phase of the project will include new water mains, water booster pumps and an elevated water storage tank to provide storage and fire protection, a new sanitary sewer system and a 0.50 Million Gallon per Day (MGD) Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Install. The County will purchase water wholesale via a metered connection. Phase 2 will serve the planned Indiana National Guard Armorey and residents at the 276th Street interchange. This phase of the project will include new sewer and water infrastructure from Bakers Corner north to the 276th Street interchange and install a second elevated water storage tank at 276th St interchange to provide storage and fire protection. Sewage will be pumped from 276th St interchange back to the WWTP.	10000000	10000000	10000000					Yes	Yes
TPN-110143	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Health Issues and Challenges Grant Program	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This $50 million appropriation shall be used to issue grants to eligible entities to prevent and address health issues and challenges. This program will allow grantees to develop evidence-based programming to address emerging health issues in their communities over 3 to 4 year periods. Grants under this program are made primarily for the purpose of increasing health outcomes by, and preventing or reducing the prevalence of, the following: (1) Training concerning mental health. (2) Tobacco or nicotine use and the pulmonary and cardiac effects from the use. (3) Food insecurities. (4) Adverse behavioral and mental health outcomes. (5) Lead exposure. (6) Obesity. (7) Diabetes. (8) Cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension and hyperlipidemia. (9) Hepatitis C. (10) Cancer. (11) Other critical health issues for a specific:                 (A) region; (B) county; (C) sex; or (D) ethnicity;                 that ranks in the bottom quintile for that specific health issue metric.	50000000	47521670	21399081
TPN-110144	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Mental Health Grants	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The appropriation shall be used to address a range of mental health needs across the state. Planned program areas include 988 Crisis Hotline establishment, a competency restoration pilot, assessments and technical assistance, development of regional and local capacity building grant program, and workforce development initiatives.	100000000	83095508	25476753
TPN-109802	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	State Budget Agency Subrecipient Monitoring	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	"The Indiana State Budget Agency requests review of American Rescue Plan Act funding to contract with a vendors to assist the agency subrecipient monitoring as defined in federal guidance The US Department of Treasury ARPA State Fiscal Recovery Funds are subject to the Single Audit Act and 2 CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Noncompliance may result in a finding in the Agency's Single Audit"	500000	448197	98745
TPN-094293	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Columbus Collection System Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The Southeast Sanitary Sewer Improvements project will upgrade lift stations, install higher head individual grinder pumps for homeowners with septic tank effluent pumps, and install new force mains to improve capacity constraints in the southeast portion of the collection system. The Westside Interceptor project will eliminate the State Road 46 lift station and force main and replace it with a new interceptor sewer to the Southside lift station. Improvements to the Southside lift station are also included to allow it to accept the new interceptor.	470000	470000	460000
TPN-094311	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Fort Wayne/Allen Co.	5-Infrastructure	5.4-Clean Water: Combined sewer overflows	The project updates infrastructure  combined sewer overflows in 9 locations and will reduce overflows to the St. Mary's, Maumee, and St. Joseph Rivers. Flow will be diverted from CSOs into the consolidated sewer where it will then be conveyed into the 3RPORT tunnel at various shaft locations. All nine locations include installation of piping, tunnel vent piping, diversion structures, floatables control and screens at gate structures. Pump station and water main upgrades are neccssary to support the CSO updates.	5000000	5000000	5000000
TPN-094315	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Jasonville, Town of	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Project includes rehabilitating approximately 3745 LF of 6" thru 12" gravity sewers in Shakamak's collection system and upgrading Lift Station No. 5 and installing approximately 6,000 LF of 6" force main and 10,000 LF of 8" force main to Jasonville's WWTF for regionalization. Also includes improvements to Jasonville's WWTF consisting of removal of the lagoon cover system	318000	318000	318000
TPN-094328	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Ridgeville, Town of	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Project improves the WWTP including phosphorus removal, headworks rehabilitation/reconstruction, sludge handling improvements, replacements of skimmer and clarifiers, digester tank rehabilitation, chlorination system replacement, and effluent piping/outfall rehabilitation	1406500	1406500	0
TPN-094330	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	West Terre Haute, City of	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	The project will include improvements to the WWTF inclusive of the installation of a new influent macerator, flowmeter and mechanical fine screen; replacement of DO sensors and effluent weir; conversion of the current chlorine tank to manually cleaned UV disinfection; and replacement of the sludge transfer pumps, diffusers and decant weir gates.	1652000	1652000	1373112
TPN-083318	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Water Infrastructure Grant Fund	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	As directed by the Indiana Legislature via HEA 1001 2021 the Indiana Finance Authority “IFA” will make available 100 million of the state-allocated federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 funds to eligible entities for drinking water wastewater and stormwater infrastructure projects via a new program called the State Water Infrastructure Fund or “SWIF” Program The goal of the program will be to finance projects that protect and improve Indiana’s water resources and provide substantial rate relief to Indiana utility customers most in need The funds will be provided in the form of matching grants to communities Funds on hand a community’s allocation of their own American Rescue Plan Act funds or a State Revolving Fund loan may be used to match an awarded SWIF Grant Grant awards have been announced and projects will be added in future reports as the awards are finalized  This project represents the amount that has yet to be awarded as of 3312022	0	0	0					Yes	Yes
TPN-105318	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will expand the South Shore Line commuter service by 8 miles and establish 4 new service stations between Dyer, IN and Millennium Station in Chicago. Collectively, the Double Track and West Lake Corridor will induce an estimated $2.7 Billion in capital investment in Northwest Indiana, improve access to the Chicago Labor Market, and improve local environmental outcomes by increasing ridership.	32882475.34	32882475.34	32882475.34
TPN-105320	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will extend parallel tracks from Gary to Michigan City to allow for express routes and increased reliability. Three high level platforms will be installed at Michigan City, Portage/Ogden Dunes and Miller in Gary to reduce boarding times. Additional platform improvements will be performed at Dune Park and Beverly Shores. Tracks in Gary and Michigan city will be rerouted to speed up travel times. Collectively, the Double Track and West Lake Corridor will induce an estimated $2.7 Billion in capital investment in Northwest Indiana, improve access to the Chicago Labor Market, and improve local environmental outcomes by increasing ridership.	198117524.66	198117524.66	198117524.66
TPN-073802	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Spurgeon Collection System and Regionalization with Lynnville	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	A low pressure collection system with lift station and force main to pump collected wastewater to neighboring town, Lynville Wastewater Treatment Plant. 14,400 feet of sewer main, 27,500 feet of force main to convey wastewater. Grinder stations and lift stations. This project will eliminate the failing septic systems in the Town of Spurgeon.	1150000	1150000	1150000
TPN-074121	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Sullivan Industrial Park and Hospital Lift Station Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Replace and upgrade two lift stations, eliminate double pumping, provide force main re-direction for Hospital, and provide a new gravity sewer service line extension north along Section Street. Project will serve the new county jail and will allow for additional development of the close-by nursing facilities and the construction of 26 additional assisted living and independent living projects serving the elderly community. New sewer line will allow for additional sewer line service connections for businesses located in the county that are currently serviced by septic facilities.	1789715	1789715	1789715
TPN-074806	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Whitley County New Collection and Interceptor Sewers	5-Infrastructure	5.4-Clean Water: Combined sewer overflows	Dunfee, Coesse, Churubusco (W & S), and E County Line Road S. are residential communities that have existing septic systems is desperate need of repairs or are non-compliant. Project consists of pressure sewer systems in all 5 communities involving approx. 14,700 (combined) LFT of mainline pressure sewer and 97 grinder station units. Dunfee will connect to a private utility, Aqua Indiana. Coesse will connect to the municipality of Columbia City, Churubusco, West & South, will connect to Town of Churubusco WWTP, and East County Line Road South community will connect to Aqua Indiana, all providing wastewater treatment for the service areas.	4234176	4234176	4012602
TPN-074600	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Western Wayne WTTP Plant Upgrade	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	All parts of treatment train will be addressed. Upgrades to the headworks screening and grit removal processes. Improved raw wastewater pumping and influent and effluent flow metering. Additional of a new extended aeration system and replacing the existing clarification system with new circular clarifiers. Rehabilitating the existing Biolac basin as a sludge storage tank. Upgrading the UV disinfection system to treat proposed peak flows. Replacing the existing solids handling processes with updated facilities and equipment and rehabilitating the existing digesters. Replacing the genset and automatic transfer switch. Along with electrical system improvements and adding supervisory control and data acquisition system.	2000000	2000000	2000000
TPN-074730	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Westport Wastewater Utility Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Collection system improvements including CIPP for non-lined sewers, point repairs, addressing manhole lining, grout existing liners, and sewer lateral repairs. Collection system improvements for new lift station and an additional force main will include new force main, wet weather pumping station, generator, electrical and controls. Wastewater Treatment Plant improvements; SAGR Treatment system, sludge removal, influent force main connection, influent flow meter and structure for new force main to plant. Chemical feed system improvements, lagoon maintenance device, mechanical screen, generator, electrical and controls.	0	0	0
TPN-190883	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Potato Creek State Park-North Liberty Wastewater	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Installation of approximately 13,000 lineal feet of 12-inch diameter gravity sewer from the new Inn at Potato Creek State Park to the east limits of the Town of North Liberty with associated appurtenances, Construction of a new lift station at the east end of North Liberty and 3,500 lineal feet of 6-inch diameter force main and associated appurtenances to connect to the Town’s collection system, and Decommissioning and closure of existing State Park Wastewater Treatment Plant.	8424712	8424712	0
TPN-003189	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Indiana Internet of Things (IoT) Lab - Statewide Initiatives	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will foster the collaboration of Indiana’s entrepreneurs, startups, and established partners for the development of Internet of Things (IoT) solutions to bring to the market and programming for workforce, education and citizen engagement.	1000000	1000000	200000
TPN-003195	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Indiana State Police COVID-19 Hazard Pay Stipends	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	This appropriation shall be used to provide a pandemic related premium pay to 1,285 state troopers and state capitol police officers.	2089879.2	2085009.2	2085009.2		1285
TPN-003196	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Department of Correction COVID-19 Hazard Pay Stipends	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The IDOC will pay each person who acted in the capacity of correctional officer a one-time hazard pay bonus of $1,600. The eligibility for this hazard bonus was primarily derived from the eligibility of the State’s Temporary Conditions Pay and from there, individuals were deemed eligible  if they served in the capacity of a correctional officer between March 2020 and July 1, 2021.	8500000	7619600	7619600		5312
TPN-002241	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Stab Vests	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This appropriation shall be used to purchase stab vests for Indiana Department of Correction personnel.	7000000	3460312	3240127
TPN-002245	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Indiana State Police Body Cameras	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The above appropriation are to be used for the acquisition of body and in-car cameras and peripheral equipment for Indiana State Police.	19910121	19910121	17160118
TPN-002247	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Local Unit Body Camera Grants	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The above appropriations are for the purpose of providing matching grants to city, town, and county law enforcement agencies for the acquisition of body cameras.  Grant proceeds may only be used for the purchase of body cameras and may not be used to purchase video storage equipment or services. Eligible law enforcement agencies may apply for grants in accordance with procedures established by the Indiana State Police.  The grant opportunity has been published and the application period is open.	10000000	1300423	1293187
TPN-002277	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Deposit to Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.28-Contributions to UI Trust Funds	Deposit to Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund	500000000	500000000	500000000								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-002279	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Mental Health Grants	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The appropriation shall be used to address  a range of mental health needs across the state. Planned program areas include 988 Crisis Hotline establishment, a competency restoration pilot, assessments and technical assistance, development of regional and local capacity building grant program, and workforce development initiatives.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002288	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Inter-modal Transportation Study	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The appropriation shall be used to fund the final analysis for a light manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, and logistics district along Buffington Harbor. The study must be conducted to determine the expected market demand, provide transportation and logistics operational modeling, and analyze the need for environmental remediation. The project shall be accomplished through a public private partnership to further advance the development opportunities.	1200000	1100000	1100000
TPN-190882	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	North Dearborn Water	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Construction of approximately 11,035 linear feet of new water mains, fittings, valves, grading, boring and jacking, and site work as necessary for a complete and operational water main along the State Road 1 corridor serving Dearborn County and Franklin County.	363089	363089	0
TPN-093063	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay Managed By: Vincennes District Location: SR61 from SR 241 to 0.20 miles E of US 41, US41 from 0.58 miles S of intersection with US50, US41 over Snapp Creek This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-190881	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Milan	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Replacement of approximately 5,500 LF of existing water main with new 8- and 12 inch water main from the intersection of SR 350 and Main Street east to the intersection with SR 101, south along SR 101 to the intersection with E Carr Street, and east along E Carr Street to approximately Lakeside Drive near South Hogan Creek. Replacement of approximately 3,000 LF of existing water main with new 6-inch water main along W Ellis Street from N CR 625 E to Josephine Street. Replacement of approximately 1,400 LF of existing water main with new 6-inch water main along Josephine Street from W Carr Street to W Ellis Street. Replacement of approximately 1,500 LF of existing water main with new 6-inch water main along Catherine Street from W Carr Street to W Ellis Street. Replacement of approximately 1,100 LF of existing water main with new 6-inch water main along Vine Street from W Ripley Street, underneath the railroad, to the north end of Ellsworth Street. Replacement of approximately 1,000 LF of existing water main with new 2- and 6 inch on Willow Street and Rose Street and along SR 101 north of Willow Street. Replacement of approximately 700 LF of existing water main with new 6-inch water main along Hickory Lane and Locust Drive. Construction of an approximately 300 LF water main extension along SRF 101 north of Locust Drive to loop the existing system. Rehabilitation of Water Tank No. 1, including exterior and interior coatings, and structural repairs.	500000	500000	0
TPN-105550	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Concrete Pavement Restoration Managed by LaPorte District	439462.54	439462.54	350791.65
TPN-105552	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay Managed by Vincennes District	7288882	7288882	5225463.06
TPN-110867	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	State Board of Accounts Federal Audits of Local Units	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	The State Board of Accounts SBOA requests review of American Rescue Plan Act ARPA funding to contract with accounting firms to perform audits on state and local units of government Recent disbursements of federal funding to state and local units have increased the annual number of audits SBOA is required to perform To ensure all units of government are audited in a timely manner as required by State and Federal Law SBOA plans to contract with private examiners to complete a portion of those required audits.	6200000	6200000	6200000
TPN-003827	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Multi Agency Academic Cooperative (MAAC) Firefighter Regional Training Pilot	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project shall provide training opportunities for firefighters, first responders, and EMS through the offerings of combined classroom and practical application programs that provide advanced levels of critical thinking and functioning in preparedness and response.  It is a collaborative process that allows for better coordination of efforts.	500000	500000	500000
TPN-186470	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Intercom System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Installation of an intercom with video for the front secure entrance.	2350	2350	2350
TPN-186471	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Doorstrike and Passcode Access on Chamber Doors	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Atlas Security will wire and install keycard and passcode security access on seven chamber doors.	22133.68	22133.68	22133.68
TPN-186473	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Digital Government Transformation Lease Payments for Mainframe Storage Backup	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Implementation of modern enterprise level architecture to support the digital government transformation that focuses on increasing the usability of the States Information Technology IT systems from the citizens perspective. Will enhance citizen experience and support improved efficiency and collaboration across the public sector workforce. This will be 73 of three lease payments on ITSD Lease Mainframe Storage  Backup 3001123215.	620723.33	620723.33	206907.75
TPN-186469	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Kansas Citys Missouri Korean War Veterans Memorial	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project was added as a passthrough funding to the KC Missouri Korean War Veterans Memorial. This will require a 5050 match rate. This funding will be used to commission a new sculpture. The organization is currently working on fundraising and will provide additional project details. For maintenance repairs expansion and improvements for the official Korean War veterans memorial located in Kansas City. Pursuant to section 10.230 of SB 656 2020 the Missouri Korean War Veterans Memorial located in Kansas Citys Washington Square Park dedicated on 9282011 is the official Korean War veterans memorial for the state of Missouri.	10000000	10000000	438396
TPN-186476	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Temporary Staffing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	As a result of the COVID19 pandemic the state entered in to a contract with vendors for Alternate Care Sites infusion centers  healthcare staffing augmentation  DMH utilized the healthcare staffing augmentation services through this contract	27000000	27000000	17106217.42								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-186785	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0100	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	77252.88	77252.88	0
TPN-186786	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0101	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	57705.71	57705.71	0
TPN-186787	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0102	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	6043	6043	0
TPN-186788	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0103	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8766.16	8766.16	0
TPN-186789	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0104	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	68267	68267	0
TPN-186790	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0105	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	204626.71	204626.71	0
TPN-186791	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0106	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	5000	5000	0
TPN-186792	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0107	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	12552.78	12552.78	0
TPN-186793	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0108	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7783.68	7783.68	0
TPN-186794	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0109	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	372589.06	372589.06	0
TPN-186795	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0110	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	319023	319023	0
TPN-186796	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0111	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	16707.83	16707.83	0
TPN-186797	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0112	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	5593.58	5593.58	0
TPN-186798	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0113	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	17382	17382	0
TPN-186799	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0114	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	24444.82	24444.82	0
TPN-186800	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0115	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	19962	19962	0
TPN-186801	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0116	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	1209.2	1209.2	0
TPN-186802	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0117	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	1209.2	1209.2	0
TPN-186803	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0118	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	16155.19	16155.19	0
TPN-186804	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0119	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11652	11652	0
TPN-186805	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0120	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	15254.59	15254.59	0
TPN-186806	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0121	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	109162.86	109162.86	0
TPN-186807	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0122	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	303078.96	303078.96	0
TPN-186808	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0123	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	22418.47	22418.47	0
TPN-186809	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0124	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	120318.05	120318.05	0
TPN-186810	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0125	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	13658.06	13658.06	0
TPN-186811	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0126	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	12307.16	12307.16	0
TPN-186812	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0127	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11447.49	11447.49	0
TPN-186813	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0128	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9748.63	9748.63	0
TPN-186814	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0129	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	41945.17	41945.17	0
TPN-186815	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0130	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	68472	68472	0
TPN-186816	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0131	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10853.92	10853.92	0
TPN-186817	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0132	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	44421.82	44421.82	0
TPN-186818	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0133	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	32000	32000	0
TPN-186819	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0134	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	85624	85624	0
TPN-186820	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0135	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	70000	70000	0
TPN-186821	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0136	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	41515.33	41515.33	0
TPN-186822	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0137	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	1971.48	1971.48	0
TPN-186823	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0138	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	390253	390253	0
TPN-186824	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0139	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	16293.68	16293.68	0
TPN-186825	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0140	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9257.39	9257.39	0
TPN-186826	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0141	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	129651.56	129651.56	0
TPN-186827	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0142	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	4500	4500	0
TPN-186828	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0143	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	42661.56	42661.56	0
TPN-186829	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0144	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7804.15	7804.15	0
TPN-186830	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0145	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	15254.59	15254.59	0
TPN-186831	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0146	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	5095	5095	0
TPN-186832	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0147	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	350000	350000	0
TPN-186833	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0148	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9339.27	9339.27	0
TPN-186834	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0149	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7524	7524	0
TPN-186835	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0150	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8970.84	8970.84	0
TPN-186836	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0151	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	2197.8	2197.8	0
TPN-186837	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0152	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14067.43	14067.43	0
TPN-186838	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0153	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	792	792	0
TPN-186839	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0154	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	46223.03	46223.03	0
TPN-186840	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0155	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14272	14272	0
TPN-186841	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0156	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0156	14000	14000	0
TPN-186842	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0157	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10546.89	10546.89	0
TPN-186843	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0158	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9419	9419	0
TPN-186844	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0159	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	17117.2	17117.2	0
TPN-186845	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0160	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	6473.71	6473.71	0
TPN-186846	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0161	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT  Q0161	27576.47	27576.47	0
TPN-186847	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0162	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8274.92	8274.92	0
TPN-186848	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0163	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	100361.52	100361.52	0
TPN-186849	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0164	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	1149092	1149092	0
TPN-186850	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0165	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	5612.2	5612.2	0
TPN-186851	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0166	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	105662.79	105662.79	0
TPN-186852	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0167	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	50746	50746	0
TPN-186853	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0168	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	34023.96	34023.96	0
TPN-186854	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0169	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	31833.86	31833.86	0
TPN-186855	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0170	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10505.96	10505.96	0
TPN-186856	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0171	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	100300	100300	0
TPN-186857	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0172	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11038.13	11038.13	0
TPN-186858	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0173	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11304.22	11304.22	0
TPN-186859	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0174	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	12450.44	12450.44	0
TPN-186860	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0175	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	81551.21	81551.21	0
TPN-186861	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0176	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	83106.76	83106.76	0
TPN-186862	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0177	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	136915.39	136915.39	0
TPN-186863	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0178	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	69884.31	69884.31	0
TPN-186864	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0179	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	100	100	0
TPN-186737	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0052	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	18857	18857	0
TPN-186738	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0053	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	153500	153500	0
TPN-186739	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0054	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0054	61144.37	61144.37	0
TPN-186740	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0055	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10342.41	10342.41	0
TPN-186741	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0056	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT  Q0056	12389	12389	0
TPN-186742	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0057	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8200	8200	0
TPN-186743	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0058	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	108139.45	108139.45	0
TPN-186744	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0059	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	23810	23810	0
TPN-186865	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0180	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	33734.4	33734.4	0
TPN-186866	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0181	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7619.93	7619.93	0
TPN-186867	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0182	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9462.08	9462.08	0
TPN-186868	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0183	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	89913.35	89913.35	0
TPN-186869	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0184	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	34085.36	34085.36	0
TPN-186870	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0185	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14394.92	14394.92	0
TPN-186871	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0186	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14353.98	14353.98	0
TPN-186872	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0187	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10035.19	10035.19	0
TPN-186745	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0060	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	17649.37	17649.37	0
TPN-186746	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0061	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	3982.49	3982.49	0
TPN-186747	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0062	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	191483.55	191483.55	0
TPN-186748	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0063	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14333.52	14333.52	0
TPN-186749	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0064	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	131800.73	131800.73	0
TPN-186750	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0065	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	18099.67	18099.67	0
TPN-186751	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0066	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	36000	36000	0
TPN-186752	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0067	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	74960.43	74960.43	0
TPN-186873	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0188	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11017.66	11017.66	0
TPN-186874	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0189	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	42211.25	42211.25	0
TPN-186875	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0190	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	20412.58	20412.58	0
TPN-186876	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0191	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	19716.66	19716.66	0
TPN-186877	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0192	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	511547.92	511547.92	0
TPN-186878	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0193	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	660	660	0
TPN-186879	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0194	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	47778.61	47778.61	0
TPN-186880	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0195	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	3148.2	3148.2	0
TPN-186753	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0068	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	527	527	0
TPN-186754	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0069	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9216.46	9216.46	0
TPN-186755	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0070	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11795.45	11795.45	0
TPN-186756	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0071	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	26737.27	26737.27	0
TPN-186757	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0072	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	26737.27	26737.27	0
TPN-186758	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0073	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11611.24	11611.24	0
TPN-186759	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0074	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	73650.47	73650.47	0
TPN-186760	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0075	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	2117.88	2117.88	0
TPN-186761	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0076	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	51360.56	51360.56	0
TPN-186881	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0196	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	3145	3145	0
TPN-186882	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0197	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	27330.85	27330.85	0
TPN-186883	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0198	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	2370.4	2370.4	0
TPN-186884	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0199	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10894.85	10894.85	0
TPN-186885	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	T231701 - Wappapello Training Site-Design & Construct Lagoon Expansion	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Renovate and expand existing lagoon structure to accommodate newly constructed buildings and future expansion at the Wappapello Training Site	500000	500000	0
TPN-186886	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	T230102 - Camp Clark Training Site 1-Connect Swr System to City of Nevada Sewer	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Extend City of Nevada sewer line 5000 feet to the vicinity of Camp Clark Hookup camp Clark Sewer lines to City sewer piping lift station etc Close down the lagoon	1500000	1500000	0
TPN-186887	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Water Infrastructure Permits	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This will cover operating permit fees on ARPA funded projects	20000	20000	600
TPN-186762	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0077	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9114.12	9114.12	0
TPN-186763	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0078	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	20166.96	20166.96	0
TPN-186764	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0079	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9482.54	9482.54	0
TPN-186765	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0080	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	214942.71	214942.71	0
TPN-186766	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0081	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	658284.71	658284.71	0
TPN-186767	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0082	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	126540.39	126540.39	0
TPN-186768	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0083	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	5306.02	5306.02	0
TPN-186769	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0084	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	16000	16000	0
TPN-186770	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0085	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9523.48	9523.48	0
TPN-186771	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0086	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14045.96	14045.96	0
TPN-186772	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0087	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	1009	1009	0
TPN-186773	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0088	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	16564.55	16564.55	0
TPN-186774	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0089	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	18959.94	18959.94	0
TPN-186775	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0090	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	15377.4	15377.4	0
TPN-186776	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0091	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	53325.51	53325.51	0
TPN-186777	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0092	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7456.19	7456.19	0
TPN-186778	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0093	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9236.93	9236.93	0
TPN-186779	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0094	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9236.93	9236.93	0
TPN-186780	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0095	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	16278	16278	0
TPN-186781	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0096	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11800	11800	0
TPN-186782	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0097	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	58581.94	58581.94	0
TPN-186783	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0098	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	3200	3200	0
TPN-186784	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0099	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	5000	5000	0
TPN-186735	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Boonville Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The City shall establish an inventory as follows1Gather existing databuild inventories to include Work Orders Contractors Tap Data Capital Improvement Projects and Historical Records2Run Predictive Model3Validate InventoriesaInterior activitiesprojects include  Door to door inspection Residential Surveys and photos Inspection during compliance sampling Contractor inspection Scratch and magnet tools and Water Quality SamplingbExterior activitiesprojects to include Field Validation potholing hydrovacing and Planned capital projects water main rehabilitation4Rerun Predictive Model5Generate Report	200000	200000	0
TPN-186736	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Cape Girardeau Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The City of Cape Girardeau is currently working on the Lead Service Line Inventory to satisfy Federal EPA requirements to inventory all service lines in the distribution system by October 16 2024  The City has nearly 20000 water service lines with over 8800 residential services in place prior to 1989  Due to the lack of material type records the City will need to pothole services in these areas in order to determine the service line material for both the City and private portions	161887.77	161887.77	0
TPN-186578	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Mound City Downtown Restoration and Revitalization Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Mound City Downtown Restoration and Revitalization are going to develop Mound City as a tourist destination This will be done by establishing a tourism route and pursuing a national historic registry designation They will also be restoring a bank within Mound City that will house a museum gallery and venue space Through the rehabilitation renovation and maintenance on the abandoned bank property negative on the local tourism industry will be reduces as well as allow for the use of the building to grow local tourism	1075596	1075596	0								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	1075596	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-186579	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Kirksville Regional Economic Development Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.23-Strong Healthy Communities: Demolition and Rehabilitation of Properties	The KV Revitalization Program will provide financial assistance up to seventy five percent of the total cost for property owners to overcome barriers associated with renovating restoring improving building facades in the Downtown District to reflect the original architecture of the building whenever possible utilizing methods and materials that are not only effective for preserving functional aspects of the building but also aesthetically complement traditional design standards and qualities of the district	500000	500000	0								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	500000	21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-186580	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	County of Adair	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	The County of Adair is planning the create a space to educate landlords and property owners The proposed project will address the need of a public space to hold public meetings and trainings specifically reaching out to citizens and businesses located within QCTs Many businesses had to close their doors during the pandemic some for a short time and some permanently  Many of the local businesses have not bounced back specifically small businesses The pandemic put a lot of strain on citizens and neighborhoods became more dilapidated and run down as citizens moved away took on extra jobs and were unable to keep their properties well maintained	615788	615788	0								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	615788	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-197680	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Kansas City's Starlight Theater	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	For capital improvements and programmatic expansion of a nonprofit performing arts center that delivers accessible live entertainment for all audiences superior theatre arts education impactful outreach programs and events that utilize the venue and helps sustain community engagement programming that impacts nearly twentyfive thousand locals each year located in Kansas City	2000000	2000000	2000000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-197766	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Capital Improvements and Interoperable Communications Equipment Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	"To provide grant funding for first responder agency capital improvement projects and interoperability equipment projects.  First responder agencies include fire protection entities law enforcement agencies employing peace officers and emergency medical service providers._x000D_"	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-197767	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Third Class County First Responder Equipment Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	To provide grant funding for first responder agencies located within third class counties to support equipment needs for first responder activities. First responder agencies include fire protection entities law enforcement agencies employing peace officers and emergency medical service providers.	5000000	5000000	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-199876	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0311	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9155.05	9155.05	0
TPN-199877	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0312	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	92442.52	92442.52	0
TPN-199878	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0313	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	29746.1	29746.1	0
TPN-199879	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0314	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	57521	57521	0
TPN-199880	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0315	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	26901.01	26901.01	0
TPN-199881	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0316	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7866.02	7866.02	0
TPN-199763	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Salisbury Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The City of Salisbury recognizes the importance of lead line inventory There are approximately 850 connections to our water main Inventory plans include identifying and recording of each meter set by use of GPS digging approximately 5 feet on either side of the meter to identify piping material document such piping investigate if permitted pipe type entering the home or business photos of lead service lines goosenecks pigtails and white lead joints document on the Departments Required Lead Line Inventory Spreadsheet Grant funds will also be used to repair dig site back to or better than prior to digging This will require soil straw seed etc Work will be completed prior to the compliance date of 101624	79000	79000	0
TPN-199764	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Galena	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Galena city sewer connection project to MoDOT facility	450000	450000	0
TPN-199765	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0200	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	142546.55	142546.55	0
TPN-199766	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0201	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11938.73	11938.73	0
TPN-199767	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0202	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8111.17	8111.17	0
TPN-199768	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0203	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	96779.57	96779.57	0
TPN-199769	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0204	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	5148	5148	0
TPN-199770	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0205	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	347478	347478	0
TPN-199771	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0206	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	23585.16	23585.16	0
TPN-199772	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0207	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	270391.16	270391.16	0
TPN-199773	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0208	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	48454.07	48454.07	0
TPN-199774	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0209	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7374.32	7374.32	0
TPN-199775	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0210	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	19000	19000	0
TPN-199776	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0211	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	62843.24	62843.24	0
TPN-199777	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0212	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	49825.44	49825.44	0
TPN-199778	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0213	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	19839.47	19839.47	0
TPN-199779	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0214	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8500	8500	0
TPN-199780	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0215	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	446458.93	446458.93	0
TPN-199781	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0216	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	94548	94548	0
TPN-199782	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0217	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	317979.81	317979.81	0
TPN-199783	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0218	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	46079.75	46079.75	0
TPN-199784	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0219	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	13780.87	13780.87	0
TPN-199785	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0220	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	159780.81	159780.81	0
TPN-199786	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0221	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10000	10000	0
TPN-199787	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0222	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	29459.54	29459.54	0
TPN-199788	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0223	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8786.62	8786.62	0
TPN-199789	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0224	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7374.32	7374.32	0
TPN-199790	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0225	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	5000	5000	0
TPN-199791	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0226	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	1500	1500	0
TPN-199792	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0227	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	513	513	0
TPN-199793	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0228	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	6432.78	6432.78	0
TPN-199794	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0229	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	27000	27000	0
TPN-199795	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0230	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	52363.5	52363.5	0
TPN-199796	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0231	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	5000	5000	0
TPN-199797	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0232	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	6002.94	6002.94	0
TPN-199798	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0233	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10833.45	10833.45	0
TPN-199799	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0234	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	17649.37	17649.37	0
TPN-199800	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0235	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	23012.05	23012.05	0
TPN-199801	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0236	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	5962.01	5962.01	0
TPN-199802	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0237	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8970.84	8970.84	0
TPN-199803	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0238	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	45752.26	45752.26	0
TPN-199804	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0239	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	39550.38	39550.38	0
TPN-199805	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0240	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	60141.43	60141.43	0
TPN-199806	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0241	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	3085.6	3085.6	0
TPN-199807	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0242	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7016.46	7016.46	0
TPN-199808	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0243	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	19084	19084	0
TPN-199809	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0244	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	2640	2640	0
TPN-199810	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0245	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	36377.81	36377.81	0
TPN-199811	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0246	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	24977	24977	0
TPN-199812	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0247	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	45486.17	45486.17	0
TPN-199813	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0248	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	71787.59	71787.59	0
TPN-199814	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0249	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	55658.89	55658.89	0
TPN-199815	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0250	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	67571.4	67571.4	0
TPN-199816	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0251	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	17587.97	17587.97	0
TPN-199817	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0252	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	20000	20000	0
TPN-199818	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0253	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	68308.26	68308.26	0
TPN-199819	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0254	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	31772.45	31772.45	0
TPN-199820	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0255	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	87036.69	87036.69	0
TPN-199821	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0256	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	18242.95	18242.95	0
TPN-199822	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0257	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	24915.59	24915.59	0
TPN-199823	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0258	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	22786.9	22786.9	0
TPN-199824	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0259	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	250189.01	250189.01	0
TPN-199825	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0260	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	46796.14	46796.14	0
TPN-199826	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0261	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8295.39	8295.39	0
TPN-199827	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0262	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	158041.01	158041.01	0
TPN-199828	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0263	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	6961	6961	0
TPN-199829	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0264	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9800	9800	0
TPN-199830	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0265	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	24293.5	24293.5	0
TPN-199831	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0266	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9287.66	9287.66	0
TPN-199832	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0267	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	121177.71	121177.71	0
TPN-199833	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0268	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	16994.39	16994.39	0
TPN-199834	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0269	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	425633.2	425633.2	0
TPN-199835	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0270	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	48249.38	48249.38	0
TPN-199836	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0271	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	158923.95	158923.95	0
TPN-199837	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0272	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	5750	5750	0
TPN-199838	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0273	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	19000	19000	0
TPN-199839	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0274	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	45220.09	45220.09	0
TPN-199840	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0275	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	13494.32	13494.32	0
TPN-199841	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0276	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	16769.24	16769.24	0
TPN-199842	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0277	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14497.26	14497.26	0
TPN-199843	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0278	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	3663	3663	0
TPN-199844	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0279	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11309.62	11309.62	0
TPN-199845	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0280	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7804.15	7804.15	0
TPN-199846	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0281	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	1000	1000	0
TPN-199847	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0282	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	15623.01	15623.01	0
TPN-199848	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0283	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8500.07	8500.07	0
TPN-199849	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0284	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	42743.43	42743.43	0
TPN-199850	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0285	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14435.86	14435.86	0
TPN-199851	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0286	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8684.28	8684.28	0
TPN-199852	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0287	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	84908	84908	0
TPN-199853	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0288	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	2994.52	2994.52	0
TPN-199854	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0289	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	41290	41290	0
TPN-199855	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0290	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	15213.65	15213.65	0
TPN-199856	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0291	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7271.97	7271.97	0
TPN-199857	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0292	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14128.83	14128.83	0
TPN-199858	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0293	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	44831.19	44831.19	0
TPN-199859	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0294	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	33205.23	33205.23	0
TPN-199860	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0295	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	21558.8	21558.8	0
TPN-199861	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0296	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	27351	27351	0
TPN-199862	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0297	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	20187.43	20187.43	0
TPN-199863	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0298	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	94998.84	94998.84	0
TPN-199864	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0299	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14292.58	14292.58	0
TPN-199865	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0300	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	31833.86	31833.86	0
TPN-199866	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0301	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11467.96	11467.96	0
TPN-199867	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0302	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	96742.55	96742.55	0
TPN-199868	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0303	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	19786	19786	0
TPN-199869	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0304	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14231.17	14231.17	0
TPN-199870	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0305	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	389413.96	389413.96	0
TPN-199871	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0306	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	27944.89	27944.89	0
TPN-199872	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0307	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	3000	3000	0
TPN-199873	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0308	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	35088.31	35088.31	0
TPN-199874	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0309	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	19123.08	19123.08	0
TPN-199875	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0310	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	18263.42	18263.42	0
TPN-200182	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	O236601 - Supreme Court Building-Install Emergency Generator	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install an emergency generator disconnects transfer switches and necessary wiring Reconfigure existing electrical distribution system to accommodate the new generator and improve distribution network	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-200187	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Sweet Springs Restoration Foundation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Sweet Springs Restoration Foundation will restore and renovate the colonnade buildings downtown Sweet Springs The project will be completing Mattinglys building 323 Main Entrance 321 construction with bathrooms elevator and renovated features inside and out Any remaining funds remaining if allowed will be used to further improve renovate restore buildings 319 and 317	250000	250000	58250.36
TPN-200175	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Springfield-Greene County Public Library District	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For maintenance and improvements of a library district that serves Greene County and Springfield	6000000	6000000	488629.53
TPN-200184	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	JOH05 O230105 State of MO Special Inspections Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Consultant shall provide Special Inspection services during construction activities for a combined four story 208000 SF facility as to be defined in the Issue Sets and Project Specifications developed by the States design consultant The Consultant shall observe the work assigned for conformance with the Issue Sets and Project Specifications as defined under a Special Inspections Schedule provided in the Issue Set in compliance with the latest edition of the International Building Code andor as specified within the Project Specifications	1895000	1895000	0
TPN-199918	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0353	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11038.13	11038.13	0
TPN-199919	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0354	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	16973.92	16973.92	0
TPN-199920	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0355	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	41515.33	41515.33	0
TPN-199921	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0356	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	113317.91	113317.91	0
TPN-199922	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0357	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	153722.21	153722.21	0
TPN-199923	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0358	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	32246.17	32246.17	0
TPN-199924	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0359	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14824.75	14824.75	0
TPN-199925	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0360	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	48535.94	48535.94	0
TPN-199926	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0361	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	13166.83	13166.83	0
TPN-199927	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0362	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	19573	19573	0
TPN-199928	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0363	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	22316.13	22316.13	0
TPN-199929	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0364	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	6985.42	6985.42	0
TPN-199930	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0365	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9052.71	9052.71	0
TPN-199931	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0366	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8725.22	8725.22	0
TPN-199932	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0367	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	18447.83	18447.83	0
TPN-199933	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0368	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	53120.82	53120.82	0
TPN-199934	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0369	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	6500	6500	0
TPN-199935	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0370	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	132025.88	132025.88	0
TPN-199936	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0371	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	5695.92	5695.92	0
TPN-199937	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0372	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	6739.8	6739.8	0
TPN-199938	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0373	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14231.17	14231.17	0
TPN-199939	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0374	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7292.44	7292.44	0
TPN-199940	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0375	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	36193.59	36193.59	0
TPN-199941	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0376	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	36152.66	36152.66	0
TPN-200011	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0446	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	67428.12	67428.12	0
TPN-200012	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0447	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	56375.27	56375.27	0
TPN-200013	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0448	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7824.62	7824.62	0
TPN-200014	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0449	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10000	10000	0
TPN-200015	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0450	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	20596.8	20596.8	0
TPN-199942	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0377	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	54962.97	54962.97	0
TPN-199943	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0378	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	13207.76	13207.76	0
TPN-199944	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0379	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	15070.37	15070.37	0
TPN-199945	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0380	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	13494.32	13494.32	0
TPN-199946	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0381	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	37564.96	37564.96	0
TPN-199947	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0382	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8254.45	8254.45	0
TPN-199948	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0383	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	24874.66	24874.66	0
TPN-199949	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0384	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	129119.39	129119.39	0
TPN-200016	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0451	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	3321	3321	0
TPN-200017	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0452	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	153476.59	153476.59	0
TPN-200018	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0453	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	16482.68	16482.68	0
TPN-200019	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0454	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	16134.72	16134.72	0
TPN-199950	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0385	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	36275.47	36275.47	0
TPN-199951	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0386	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9482.54	9482.54	0
TPN-199952	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0387	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11774.99	11774.99	0
TPN-199953	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0388	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7394.78	7394.78	0
TPN-199954	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0389	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	57930.86	57930.86	0
TPN-199955	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0390	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	103882.05	103882.05	0
TPN-199956	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0391	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	2865	2865	0
TPN-199957	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0392	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	18181.54	18181.54	0
TPN-199958	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0393	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	22623.14	22623.14	0
TPN-199959	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0394	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	12982.61	12982.61	0
TPN-199960	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0395	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	20678.67	20678.67	0
TPN-199961	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0396	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	99993.09	99993.09	0
TPN-199962	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0397	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	18263.42	18263.42	0
TPN-199963	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0398	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	3678.5	3678.5	0
TPN-199964	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0399	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	168418.4	168418.4	0
TPN-199965	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0400	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	23052.98	23052.98	0
TPN-199966	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0401	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	14906.63	14906.63	0
TPN-199967	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0402	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	12491.37	12491.37	0
TPN-199968	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0403	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	19245	19245	0
TPN-199969	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0404	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	13105.42	13105.42	0
TPN-199970	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0405	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	17362	17362	0
TPN-199971	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0406	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	6494.18	6494.18	0
TPN-199972	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0407	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11181.41	11181.41	0
TPN-199973	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0408	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8377.26	8377.26	0
TPN-199974	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0409	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	2641	2641	0
TPN-199975	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0410	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	31404.03	31404.03	0
TPN-199976	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0411	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7271.97	7271.97	0
TPN-199977	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0412	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	35784.23	35784.23	0
TPN-199978	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0413	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8745.69	8745.69	0
TPN-199979	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0414	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	135751.1	135751.1	0
TPN-199980	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0415	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	3128.4	3128.4	0
TPN-199981	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0416	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	12327.63	12327.63	0
TPN-199982	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0417	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	26737.27	26737.27	0
TPN-199983	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0418	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	312810	312810	0
TPN-199984	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0419	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	51667.58	51667.58	0
TPN-199985	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0420	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10833.45	10833.45	0
TPN-199986	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0421	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	43725.9	43725.9	0
TPN-199987	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0422	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	13228.23	13228.23	0
TPN-199988	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0423	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	19962.28	19962.28	0
TPN-199989	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0424	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	32304.63	32304.63	0
TPN-199990	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0425	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	25672	25672	0
TPN-199991	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0426	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	23073.46	23073.46	0
TPN-199992	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0427	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7194.8	7194.8	0
TPN-199993	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0428	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7926.96	7926.96	0
TPN-199994	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0429	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	39120.55	39120.55	0
TPN-199995	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0430	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	50193.87	50193.87	0
TPN-199996	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0431	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	28357.65	28357.65	0
TPN-199997	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0432	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	31097	31097	0
TPN-199998	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0433	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	52527.25	52527.25	0
TPN-199999	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0434	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9932.85	9932.85	0
TPN-200000	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0435	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7926.96	7926.96	0
TPN-200001	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0436	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9155.05	9155.05	0
TPN-200002	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0437	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	15152.25	15152.25	0
TPN-200003	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0438	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	32059.01	32059.01	0
TPN-199882	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0317	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	306000	306000	0
TPN-199883	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0318	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	30000	30000	0
TPN-199884	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0319	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	6801.2	6801.2	0
TPN-199885	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0320	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9543.95	9543.95	0
TPN-200004	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0439	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	40450.99	40450.99	0
TPN-200005	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0440	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	59527.38	59527.38	0
TPN-200006	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0441	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	21456.46	21456.46	0
TPN-200007	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0442	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9155.05	9155.05	0
TPN-200008	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0443	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	26123.22	26123.22	0
TPN-200009	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0444	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9910	9910	0
TPN-200010	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0445	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	17526.56	17526.56	0
TPN-199886	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0321	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7271.97	7271.97	0
TPN-199887	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0322	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	30912.79	30912.79	0
TPN-199888	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0323	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10792.51	10792.51	0
TPN-199889	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0324	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	70000	70000	0
TPN-199890	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0325	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	20000	20000	0
TPN-199891	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0326	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	18079.2	18079.2	0
TPN-199892	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0327	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	6719.33	6719.33	0
TPN-199893	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0328	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	32120.41	32120.41	0
TPN-199894	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0329	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	17383.28	17383.28	0
TPN-199895	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0330	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	34494.73	34494.73	0
TPN-199896	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0331	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	8622.88	8622.88	0
TPN-199897	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0332	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10117.06	10117.06	0
TPN-199898	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0333	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9666.76	9666.76	0
TPN-199899	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0334	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	225627.12	225627.12	0
TPN-199900	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0335	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	18468.1	18468.1	0
TPN-199901	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0336	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	20801.48	20801.48	0
TPN-199902	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0337	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11549.84	11549.84	0
TPN-199903	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0338	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	102879.11	102879.11	0
TPN-199904	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0339	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	7271.97	7271.97	0
TPN-199905	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0340	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	12409.5	12409.5	0
TPN-199906	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0341	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	186032.72	186032.72	0
TPN-199907	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0342	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	9175.52	9175.52	0
TPN-199908	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0343	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	74018.89	74018.89	0
TPN-199909	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0344	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	343851.66	343851.66	0
TPN-199910	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0345	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	12429.97	12429.97	0
TPN-199911	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0346	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	10567.36	10567.36	0
TPN-199912	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0347	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	17833.58	17833.58	0
TPN-199913	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0348	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	15000	15000	0
TPN-199914	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0349	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	47614.87	47614.87	0
TPN-199915	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0350	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	240.5	240.5	0
TPN-199916	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0351	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	12389.03	12389.03	0
TPN-199917	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT Q0352	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	GET THE LEAD OUT OF SCHOOL DRINKING WATER REIMBURSEMENT	11160.94	11160.94	0
TPN-200684	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Anti-Ballistic Security Enhancements to Doors and Glass	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Installing antiballistic glass and steel bars to all glass entry areas and doors	188000	188000	0
TPN-200463	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Current Inc. - Oregon County PR	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Current Electric Heating and Air Inc will construct a fiber optic project utilizing an ARPA Broadband Grant of 198900000 in Pole Replacement funding This project will provide speeds of at least 1 Gbps  100 Mbps to 1510 locations in the county of Oregon outside the cities of Alton Woodside Thomasville and Many Springs	1989000	1989000	58785.58
TPN-060652	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	ARPA Consulting Services	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	ARPA Grant Management	178026	178026	178026								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-060653	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	SLS Temporary Staffing Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	As a result of the COVID19 pandemic the state entered in to a contract with SLS for Alternate Care Sites infusion centers  healthcare staffing augmentation  DMH utilized the healthcare staffing augmentation services through this contract	38525922.2	38525922.2	38525922.2								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-060654	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	BROADBAND CAPACTY BLDG EE	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Administrative expenditures to rapidly deploy ARPA funding requested in the State FY 2023 budget.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-113741	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Gallatin	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Gallatin city sewer connection project to MoDOT facility	501833	501833	215193.65
TPN-114005	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Community Provider Capital Improvement Contracts	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Capital improvement grants to Federally qualified health centersCertified Community Behavioral Health Organizations and CMHCs capital improvements grants Grants would support COVID accommodations and allow programs to meet increased demand for mental healthSUD services A match is required from FQHCCCBHO	148713118	148713118	53478031.98					Yes	Yes		Yes	Medical equipment and facilities	148713118	1 Imp General Public
TPN-163742	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"United Way of Greater St. Louis, Inc."	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	The United Way of Greater St Louis UWGSL United for Families Program UFF helps families at risk of losing their housing to regain selfsufficiency so that they can stay in their homes and so that their children can avoid disruptive school transfer Program outcomes are achieved through a combination of flexible financial assistance and case management provided by highquality partner organizations supported and funded by UWGSL as well as linking clients to other community resources Services are provided to families who reside in defined geographic areas that have been determined to be especially in need and important to UWGSLs strategic goals for the Missouri region Referrals to the program can come from a variety of sources including schools service providers United Ways 211 information and referral system health systems or self referral word of mouth	260500	260500	0	0							No		0	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations		No	0
TPN-163743	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Agape Community Outreach	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	Project Safety Net is a program that will assist Warren Countys most vulnerable residents Meeting basic human needs such as access to nutritious food and safe and stable housing is unfortunately a challenge for many Warren County residents Project Safety Net will address both of these primary issues The first component of Project Safety Net is increasing access to food for Warren County residents This will be done through expanding our existing facilitys ability to receive store and distribute larger amounts of food and by creating the first ever Mobile Food Pantry in this county Our mobile food pantry will provide access to nutritious foods for those who have a transportation barrier and our elderly residents who are not able to travel The second component of Project Safety Net will be to address the growing homeless population This program will assist individuals and families stay in their existing homes if possible or rapidly rehouse those already homeless	706576	706576	9084.13	1591							Yes	Food banks and other facilities	275000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity		No	0
TPN-163750	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Southeast Missouri Food Bank	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	SEMO Food Bank is expanding with a satellite volunteer facility in Jackson dedicated to volunteer services and food preparation with additional food storage to meet increased hunger demand SEMO Food Bank will continue to be headquartered at its Sikeston location but one of the things we learned in responding to the pandemic was that there were some gaps in our infrastructure This expansion facility will serve as a hub specifically for packing senior food boxes and packaging our Backpacks for Fridays for school aged children and ensure we can meet increased demand through additional storage We currently have had to rely on outsourcing our packaging for these programs but with this new volunteer center we will be able to do our own packaging inhouse for these major programs saving us on packaging expenses We are requesting funds to purchase delivery trucks as expansion during the pandemic lead to increased building costs meaning we no longer have funds for delivery costs	350000	350000	0	0							Yes	Food banks and other facilities	350000	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations		No	0
TPN-163751	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	"The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri, Inc."	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	The Food Bank for Central  Northeast Missouri The Food Bank is renovating a vacant grocery store and relocating its Central Pantry to the larger and more centralized location Increased visibility will improve awareness of this resource while the larger space will expand opportunities to serve households disproportionately impacted by the pandemic The facility will enlarge The Food Banks cold storage capacity allowing the organization to purchase handle and distribute an increased amount of nutritious yet perishable foods such as produce meatsproteins and lowfat dairy across its service area Improving food security among households negatively impacted by the pandemic will help families make ends meet in tight economic times and lead to healthier communitiesThe Food Bank is requesting Community Revitalization Grant funds for this project Specifically the funds requested are for the purchase and installation of the cold storage portion of this project	1625000	1625000	1615390	6389							Yes	Food banks and other facilities	1625000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	No	0
TPN-163744	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Catholic Charities of Kansas City St Joseph Inc	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	This project expands Catholic Charities existing food program to feature a fullservice pantry located in the Ruskin Heights neighborhood of Kansas City MO The ServeLift Center will serve the surrounding area as a walk in source of fresh and shelf stable foods and provide distribution to Henry St Clair and Johnson County via regular mobile delivery to partner locations in those counties The programs client choice model allows at risk families to select food to meet nutritional needs as well as taste preferences This dignified way to access pantry services also serves as an entry point to other wrap around social services to support an individuals employment family or housing needs Our funding request is both focused on a remodel of an existing building to house the walkin pantry along with expansion of a successful rural mobile distribution program currently serving northwest counties to bring food and services to communities in rural counties south of Kansas City	1335182	1335182	538783.86	0							Yes	Food banks and other facilities	1335182	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts			No	0
TPN-163745	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Naylor	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	The new Naylor Nutrition Center will be an approximate 3000 square foot metal structure with a standing seam metal roof located immediately east of the existing center at 118 Broad Street  The structure will be erected upon an elevated concrete slab to avoid storm and flood water infiltration  The exterior of the onestory structure will be trimmed in masonry and furnish a 100 squarefoot vestibule  A kitchen congregate meal area glassedin administrators office for enhanced visibility and activity room for quilting games and computer usage will be incorporated into the buildings design  Ample street parking already existing will be available at the front of the center and directly across Broad Street along the city park	753551	753551	271216.26	0							Yes	Food banks and other facilities	655441	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations			No	0
TPN-163739	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Harvesters--The Community Food Network	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	The Community Food Network is seeking support to distribute food across the Kansas City Region Harvesters expertise focuses on acquiring storing and distributing food so our network partners can distribute food to community members facing hunger Distribution of food to foodinsecure Missourians at no cost to the recipient As the regions only food bank Harvesters distributes food on a scale unparalleled in the western portion of the state	5000000	5000000	0	0							No		0	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity		No	0
TPN-163740	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"Operation Food Search, Inc."	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	Operation Food Searchs MetroMarket mobile grocery store is poised to increase the number of individuals it serves who live in disproportionally impacted areas of St Louis City and County with littleno access to grocery stores through purchase of second mobile farmers market  When installed and staffed for the 2024 season the electric bus will alleviate food insecurity and elevate equitable access to fresh affordable fruits vegetables eggs meats etc Approximately 23 of individuals served use SNAP benefits many access vouchers for free food supplied by funding partners Curbside nutrition educationtastings and Veggie Van distributions of free fresh produce December  April will increase awareness of nutrition shopping and cooking skills as well as consumption of fresh produce Each of the 16 weekly stops 8 per bus will be promoted by a variety of news and social media as well as a targeted mailing to lowincome residents within a onemile radius of each stop	635000	635000	0	0							No		0	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts		No	0
TPN-163741	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"United Way of Greater Kansas City, Inc."	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	United Way UW will provide emergency financial assistance for households in Kansas City Missouri KCMO who are facing eviction or homelessness Targeted beneficiaries include  1 households where landlords have filed an eviction in housing court and 2 vulnerable households at elevated risk for eviction or homelessness referred by community partner organizations eg older adults people with disabilities survivors of domestic violence families with young children and recent immigrants The requested funds will allow the continuation of work the UW has been doing since 2021 The scope includes UWs prior and ongoing administration of financial assistance to households through a contractual relationship with the City of Kansas City for their Emergency Rental and Utility Program ERAP as well as funding from local funders The requested funds will supplement these nearly diminished dollars and help a total of 2588 households avoid homelessness	3350000	3350000	0	0							No		0	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	0
TPN-163746	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"Council of Churches, Inc."	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The Council of Churches of the Ozarks CCO is awarded grant funds of 1946000 to build a permanent facility for unsheltered women in need This program also helps women transition from congregate shelter to permanent housing Grant funds will be used for the construction acquisition expansion and renovation of buildings for the shelter The shelter will serve homeless women and children including victims of domestic violence	1946860	1946860	0	0							Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	1946860	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs		No	0
TPN-163747	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Prairie Chapel Church of Hickory County Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	As a 501c3 faithbased organization Prairie Chapel Church of Hickory Countys overall mission is to focus on the spiritual physical emotional educational and health needs of the residents of the City of Urbana as well as Hickory Dallas Polk and Camden counties  The proposed project aims to mitigate the effects of the COVID rising costs of living and lack of critical programs for residents of all ages by constructing a communitycentric facility that meets the various needs of residents within the service area This project will serve LMI households disproportionately impacted communities and will create space required to accommodate the following programs of expanded food pantry services Family Life Center senior services and life and work skills training center recreational use areas and community space for use in the event of natural disasters and emergency situations	798013	798013	0	0							Yes	Food banks and other facilities	798013	20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	No	0
TPN-163748	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Second Harvest Community Food Bank	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	Second Harvest plans a cold storage expansion project that will add an estimated 11500 square feet of capacity to our nonprofit food distribution center  The expansion will include two new high docks currently there is only one with the capacity to add one more in the future along with a multiheight loading dock  The multiheight loading dock will facilitate the loading and unloading of trailers pickups and other vehicles used by partner agencies and local donors  The expanded square footage will include a highefficiency space that will allow storage of approximately an additional 360 pallets of product  This project will allow Second Harvest to better meet current and future needs by allowing a higher volume of fresh produce proteins and dairy products to be received and distributed  The project will also relieve the congested and precarious incoming and outgoing delivery movements	1589638	1589638	0	0							Yes	Food banks and other facilities	1589638	16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	No	0
TPN-163749	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	"SERVE, Inc."	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	SERVE will purchase and renovate a property to expand our food pantry expand emergency assistance services secure parking for our public transportation buses SERVE Tran and bring all operations under one roof to increase efficiency The capital project will purchase and improve a mostly vacant 25008 sq foot facility with an additional 17620 sq feet in parking that meets the deficits of our current space and allow us to grow our operations to meet the growing needs of residents All services will be at one facility the SERVE Tran fleet will be secure staff will have space to provide high quality impactful services and we will have space to increase our numbers served Since the COVID19 pandemic began SERVE has seen an increase of 34 in individuals requesting food and services but SERVE is at capacity in our current location This purchase is the most economic and efficient option for expansion The expansion will provide ample space for all operations for years to come	645000	645000	645000	0							Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	645000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	No	0
TPN-117464	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Sexual Assault Kit Testing	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The Missouri State Highway Patrol Crime laboratory will utilize the appropriated funds to outsource testing and review of sexual assault kits In addition the laboratory will purchasing additional sexual assault kits and supplies to ensure proper collection and testing of future sexual assault evidence	1125000	1125000	1125000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-117465	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	MOSWIN Zone 5	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	This project will expand the capacity of the Missouri Statewide Interoperability Network to allow more agencies to join the system with a higher degree of functionality by allow more RF sites and more console sites to be added	3100000	3100000	242255.76								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	3100000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-117467	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Accounting PS Payroll	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Assist State of Missouri in Administrative Capacity with distributions of ARPA payments and reporting	888000	888000	369412.46								No
TPN-117468	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Conduct the ARPA Procurements for Product and Services required by Chapter 34	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Conduct the ARPA Procurements for Product and Services required by Chapter 34	541044	541044	45847.13								No
TPN-117469	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	FMDC PS Payroll	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	FMDC PS Payroll for 4 FTEs	945690	945690	706817.18								No
TPN-117511	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Jefferson City Special Learning Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The project will provide 50 percent funding up to the award amount for a new facility for the Capital City Area Council for Special Services known as the Jefferson City Special Learning Center JCSLC The JCSLC serves over 800 children and young people with disabilities annually The COVID19 Pandemic restricted JCSLCs ability to deliver services to their clients often because parental concerns prevented them from sending their children for help The reduced level of services drove a significant increase in need outstripping JCSLCs capacity and creating a waiting list Ideally the new facility will comprise approximately 30000 square feet all on one level and fully handicap accessible The facility must provide adequate and appropriate space for classrooms and socialization spaces as well as spaces for physical occupational and medical therapies	3500000	3500000	36138.15								Yes	Schools and other educational facilities	3500000	10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-117740	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	F230201 - MO State Fair-Improvements to Storm Water & Wastewater Collection Syst	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Identify storm water inefficiencies around the Cattle barn Rabbit  Poultry Bldg and Donnelly Arena areas Repair and or replace any deteriorated storm water drain lines and redirect to appropriate storm water collection points Ensure no storm water is infiltrating the sanitary sewer system repair and or replace any damaged or deteriorated lines in the Carnival Midway area and along Maple Street Regrade grounds as needed to ensure storm water properly drains away to appropriate storm water collection points	3211602	3211602	23492.5
TPN-119838	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Northern Region Security Camera Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacing security camera systems at Northern region facilities.	5841759.5	5841759.5	2882230.84
TPN-120069	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Digital Gov Transformation Citizen Journey Mapping	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Customer Journey Mapping of the most common Government services to aid in digital government transformation from the Citizen’s Perspective.	2000000	2000000	1392191.12
TPN-119847	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	O230101 - Construct New Laboratory Campus Multi Agency	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Design and construct a centralized state laboratory campus housing multiple agencies to provide one approach to human, animal, environmental, and criminal testing in Missouri	178484636.25	178484636.25	4555448.59
TPN-120067	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Auto Child Support System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Missouri Automated Child Support System (MACSS) has been used to distribute more than $750 million dollars annually, for over 20 years.  MACSS handles collection and disbursement of child support through enforcement of existing judicial and administrative orders; location activities; paternity establishment; establishment of orders; and various other activities. Since implementation of centralized collections, this system distributes child support for all of Missouri's children, not just those receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).  The current system has been in production since 1997 and was the consolidation of multiple county run applications across the state into a single unified system.  Due to the age of the system, the language it was written in, has since fallen out of use, and likewise, has seen a drastic decrease in IT professionals who are able to work within a system written in the language. DSS is seeking to have their current system rewritten in a modern programming language that will ensure that this system is supported for the foreseeable future.	24900260	24900260	5168004.31
TPN-120075	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Digital Gov Transformation Citizen Portal Development	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Implementation of online portal giving citizens more direct access to government services in one place making the citizen experience more streamlined and effcient	9000000	9000000	833379.78
TPN-120088	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Digital Gov Transformation O365	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Implementation of Microsoft 365 enterprise wide to support improved efficiency and collaboration across the public sector workforce with the use of modern productivity and collaboration tools	36000000	36000000	21357455.8
TPN-119841	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Southern Region Security Camera Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacing security camera systems at our southern region facilities.	5841759.5	5841759.5	2198923.53
TPN-120079	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Digital Gov Transformation Infrastructure	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Implementation of modern enterprise-level architecture to support the digital government transformation that focuses on increasing the usability of the State’s Information Technology (IT) systems from the citizen’s perspective. Will enhance citizen experience and support improved efficiency and collaboration across the public sector workforce.	78479276.67	78479276.67	46261329.28
TPN-119849	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Folly Theater	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Payment of Funds Appropriated to the Office of Administration in House Bill 3020, Section 20.894 from the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery – Revenue Replacement Fund, pursuant to Agreement entered into between the Missouri Arts Council, the Office of Administration, and the Folly Theater, dated October 18, 2022, for Enhancements to the Venue	400000	400000	400000
TPN-119853	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	East Prairie School Building Remediation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The East Prairie R-II School District intends to provide the City of East Prairie with land and a building for use as a health clinic. This building may either be remediated and remodeled or may be demolished for new construction purposes.	0	0	0
TPN-119850	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Missouri Home Visiting Outcomes Rate Card Contractor - Social Finance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Missouri Children's Trust Fund Statewide Home Visiting Initiative	500000	500000	500000
TPN-120146	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Modernize Missouri Job Centers	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	1 Learning Management System LMS software for Job Centers This will provide ELearning opportunities for clients who utilize the Job Centers2 The LightCast Labor Insights tool provides job posting data used to support workforce research products comprehensive program review tracking the economy and data for the Departments strategic plan  3 Virtual Job Fair Software will be purchased to assist the linkage between employers and job 4 The purchase of updated headsets needed for transition to softphone in the job centers 4 Wireless KeyboardMouse combos Web Cams and USB Ports for the Job Centers	500000	500000	485141.16								No			1 Imp General Public	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment		No	0
TPN-119844	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	O230102 - ALTA Survey for New Laboratory Campus Multi Agency	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Perform an ALTA survey for the new Laboratory Campus Multi-Agency	27090	27090	27090
TPN-120064	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Child Support Portal	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Today, Department of Social Services (DSS), Family Support Division (FSD), Child Support (CS) clients have limited points of contact to obtain information about their case and/or update their demographics or request a review of their order. FSD CS operates a call center for incoming inquiries and has 15 locations offering walk-in service throughout the state to service approximately 766 clients monthly. This volume causes client frustration with long wait times and/or long drive times to be seen in person. It is vital FSD CS remain accessible to clients to provide a positive customer experience in a timely manner. This request is to use American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for a self-service portal to be added to the Missouri Automated Child Support System (MACSS) to provide an additional point of contact clients can access any time of day without long drive times or long call center wait times. A self-service portal will improve communication with clients, timeliness of information received and reduce the number of phone calls and written requests to the agency	2349740	2349740	1262008.55
TPN-119845	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Capital City MOSWIN	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will enhance the coverage and capacity of the Missouri Statewide Interoperability Network throughout Missouri's Capital City by adding 4 radio sites, adding available channels, and simulcasting the radio transmissions from the transmitter sites.	4000000	4000000	311976.99
TPN-119855	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	O230103 CONSTRUCT NEW FMDC GROUNDS & MAINTENANCE BUILDING FOR AGENCY	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Construction of a new Grounds and Maintenance building to be located at FMDC Industrial Drive Complex.  Existing Grounds and Maintenance buildings must be demolished to make space for the new One Health Lab Complex	2852173.75	2852173.75	2534126.8
TPN-119889	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Capital City FirstNet	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will enhance the public safety dedicated FirstNet commercial service in the capital city in state facilities and outdoor throughout the capital city.	12326602	12326602	3409278.6
TPN-177786	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	DeSoto Public Library	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project was added as a passthrough funding for the DeSoto Public Library. This will require a 50/50 match rate. For the planning design maintenance or construction for a library located in [De Soto]	400000	400000	341734.5
TPN-177785	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Springfield Public School Ag & Youth Education Center at Empire Fairgrounds	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	These fairgrounds provide yearround entertainment education and serve as an event venue that can be rented. The fairgrounds hosts events such as youth educational programs charity fundraisers youth archery tournaments livestock shows community expos business showcases and festivals.  The fairgrounds is seeking to build a new arena onsite. The estimated total cost is $12M$15M. The arena will seat 28006800 guests and features a 93000 sq. ft. arena a 20000 sq. ft. lower level youth ag education center concessions and a catered mezzanine.  The Ozark Empire Fair Foundation appears to also be fund raising to support the costs of construction. The GA categorized this as Revenue Replacement.	10000000	10000000	10000000
TPN-177788	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Crowder Advanced Training Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Crowder College for a training center including related planning design acquisitions project management equipment and startup costs.	3000000	3000000	3000000
TPN-177771	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Kellison Pohlman LLC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177769	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	The Arts Asylum	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177772	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Gateway Theatre Corporation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177770	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Countryside Cinema LLC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177779	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Springfield Symphony Orchestra	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	81091	81091	81091								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177780	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Kansas City Actors Theater	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery pf the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177781	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"E201001 - Shady Grove State School-Replace HVAC, State School Building"	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Replace the facility heating ventilation and air conditioning systems including cooling tower heat pumps fan coil units required ductwork electrical and building automation system BAS	2994904	2994904	21460.5								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-177762	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	B & B Movie Theatres L.L.C.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177763	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Brannon Investment Co.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177773	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Strange Bedfellows Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177782	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Callaway Arts Council	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177783	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	DPS ARPA Staffing	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	For the Department of Public Safety administration of programs appropriated in HB 20	271081	271081	181734.65								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-177752	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Opera House Operator LLC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177753	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Stray Dog Theatre	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID1 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177754	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Old Rock House LLC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177755	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	The Duttons LC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177764	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Bagby Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177774	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Seymour Area Arts Council	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177775	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Famous 5 Theatres L.C.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177776	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	H230501 - Riverbend Treatment Center-Replace HVAC & Boiler	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Replace existing Building Automated System BAS with new webbased program to allow for remote access monitoring	459950	459950	10782.5								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-177777	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	City in Motion Dance Theater	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	98878	98878	98878								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177756	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	American Royal Association	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177757	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Hughes Entertainment Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177765	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	World Chess Museum Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177766	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Monett Cinema Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177767	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Missouri Cinemas L.L.C.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177751	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Ragtag Film Society	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177778	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Ozark Actors Theatre - NAE32	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177758	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Palace Entertianment	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177759	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Corey D. Nickson-Clark	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177768	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	PCA Enterprises LLC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177748	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	The Brett Family Singers	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	86969	86969	86969								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177761	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Miller Theatres LLC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177760	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	MX Movies LLC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177749	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Hamner Barber LLC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from the negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	91975	91975	91975								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177750	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Soli Deo Gloria Productions	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	The Entertainment Industry Grant Program is intended to further the statewide recovery of the entertainment industry from negative economic impact of COVID19 This grant program will help existing entertainment venues	100000	100000	100000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-177787	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	O230104 - New Lab Campus Multi Agency Environmental Site Assement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Conduct Environmental Site Assessments  Phase 1 and Phase 2  for Complete Project Site for the new Laboratory Campus MultiAgency	29300	29300	29300
TPN-166229	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Carrollton Amtrak Station	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Planning and Design of an Amtrak Station at Carrollton	1000000	1000000	0
TPN-166230	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Jefferson County Courthouse Repairs	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Repairs to Jefferson County Court House	320000	320000	0
TPN-166232	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Hydrologic Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Establishes a new Missouri Hydrology Information Center MoHIC that will focus on direct service to the people and communities of Missouri by engaging in floodrelated projects drought mitigation aquifer characterization modeling and prediction to help Missourians understand their flood risk drought susceptibility water supply and be better prepared for flooding and drought The MoHIC will focus on providing a centralized information hub to help communities prepare and respond to floods and drought before they occur helping to minimize flood impacts and mitigate drought	10455502	10455502	186583.55
TPN-164130	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Cape Girardeau Career and Technology Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.25-Addressing Educational Disparities: Academic Social and Emotional Services	The project provides fifty percent of the cost of expanding the Cape Girardeau Area Career Center. The expansion will allow increased capacity to train professionals in allied healthcare welding plumbing fire science and emergency response and truck drivingdiesel.	3000000	3000000	0								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	3000000	1 Imp General Public			Yes	3000000
TPN-164118	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Lutheran Development Group Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	This project is focused on addressing multiple challenges impeding community health in the Dutchtown and Baden neighborhoods of St Louis City The project goal is improving the built environment creating affordable housing providing space and opportunities for local small businesses and activating public parks that are currently underutilized  We will accomplish this through the stabilization of eight vacant buildings full renovation of five vacant buildings and the improvement of Marquette Park through the replacement of the broken playground and the design and grant application for park investment through MSD Project Clear  This project is a strategic investment into strategic properties in strategically important neighborhoods of Saint Louis with widespread support from not only local stakeholders but the aldermen president of the board of aldermen mayor state representatives state senator US representative and multiple organizations and agencies	1984286	1984286	195296.3								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	1984286	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts		No	0
TPN-164119	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Peter & Paul Community Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	For 41 years our Soulard Shelter served thousands of homeless men in a barracksstyle bunk bed arrangement COVID19 crushed this model This project will relocate and reenvision our shelter It will increase the number of beds from 60 to 100 and expand to 24hours daily New daytime services will improve outcomes and stabilize clients on a broader scale More distance between beds and private rooms for ill and wounded men will create a healthier safer experience for all	3500000	3500000	1500000								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	3500000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			No	0
TPN-164120	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"Project 360 Youth Services, Inc. "	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Project 360 Youth Services Inc is renovating a blighted building in Lebanon to house homeless youth in Laclede and the surrounding counties In addition to now offering teen housing Project 360 plans to continue offering resources and services that allow homeless youth to make a better life for themselves including counseling tutoring mentoring group therapy meals clothing and more Once complete this facility will allow the organization to house up to 25 homeless youth at a time	500000	500000	0								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	500000	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts			No	0
TPN-164117	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Joplin Area Habitat for Humanity Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	We are planning to buildrenovate 10 Habitat for Humanity homes in the Joplin area for Covid19 impacted lowtomoderate income households Our request is 625000 accompanied with the required match of 625000 from our organization with a total project cost being 1250000 allowing for expenditures of 125000 for each of these ten projects Through these efforts we feel as if we can successfully meet the definition of lowtomoderate income households which will fall within the ARPA Program definition of Impacted Households Implementing additional housing opportunities through this program will not pose a difficulty again as the JAHFH will be working with clientele that meet current requirements for homeownership participation	625000	625000	70000								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	625000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-164121	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"The Kitchen, Inc."	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The Kitchen Inc TKI will build a 53million 12unit noncongregate Emergency Shelter addition on our campus The addition will shelter 2448 homeless persons at one time 75 peopleyr and 3750 people over the life of the project approx 50 years Each unit contains a kitchen living area bedrooms and bathroom to provide households safety and privacy as they work with an onsite case manager over the 90day program length to find and maintain permanent housing Participants will also have access to a laundry facility childrens playground computer lab and meeting room TKIs current 13unit shelter facility serves 80 people per year and its unique apartmentstyle noncongregate design prevented COVID19 outbreaks between participants since households were able to quarantine and shelter in place in the comfort of their own unit Together the two shelter facilities will serve 150 Greene Webster and Christian County residents experiencing homelessness each year	2500200	2500200	0								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	2500200	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations			No	0
TPN-164122	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	The Metropolitan St. Louis Equal Housing and Opportunity Council	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	EHOC is requesting funding to continue and expand its Eviction Defense Program EDP The project will provide emergency housing assistance services to prevent eviction or homelessness to lowincome individuals most impacted by housing instability due to the coronavirus pandemic Services will include 1 legal information advice and representation to individuals facing eviction or risk of eviction 2 assisting individuals facing eviction by providing client support and education as well as encouraging selfadvocacy and goalsetting throughout the process of finding and maintaining stable housing 3 provision of community resource navigation coordination and referral assistance and 4 conducting education and outreach activities to inform the community about fair housing and tenants rights to affirmatively prevent and lower the risk of evictions	1062880	1062880	0								No		0	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	No	0
TPN-164123	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	The Salvation Army Jeff City	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The Salvation Armys Center of Hope will renovate its existing approximately 14574 square foot facility Once complete the new facility will provide up to 18615 bed nights of shelter annually fully compliant with ADA and building codes The facility has been in continuous operation since 1999 and requires significant renovation and replacement of mechanicals to provide services that are safely securely privately and equitably provided When complete shelter services will all be provided on the main floor 11278 square feet and social services provided on the lower level 3296 square feet Facilities will include main level 51 dedicated shelter beds provided across 14 rooms seven ADA compliant bathrooms and one kitchen dining and laundry room with one meeting room and lower level one larger meetingactivity space three private offices and one food pantry storage area with ADA compliant entry and egress for both levels	1470683	1470683	0								Yes	Transitional shelters	1470683	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts			No	0
TPN-164124	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	The Salvation Army St. Louis	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The Salvation Armys Family Haven will complete the renovation of its existing facility expanding the number of beds available in the shelter from 95 to 119 nightly or expanding from 34675 to 43435 bed nights available annually Once complete the renovated facility will provide shelter and services in a facility that is both compliant with the ADA and building codes The facility has been in continuous operation First as Community in Partnership and later renamed Family Haven for almost 50 years and requires significant renovation and replacement of mechanicals and systems to safely securely privately and equitably provide services to homeless families throughout St Louis County An additional family restroom that is ADA compliant will also be available for shelter residents to use  The existing warmingcooling center that is provided for community use during periods of extreme cold and heat will also be available and is generally used by chronically homeless neighbors	1652935	1652935	0								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	1652935	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations			No	0
TPN-164108	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	St. Patrick Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	For the purpose of a nonprofit organization to acquire a building that will provide housing units to a center that works to end homelessness in any county with more than one million inhabitants provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds	890000	890000	799000								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	500000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity			No	0
TPN-164109	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	"Catholic Charities of Southern Missouri, Inc"	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Catholic Charities of Southern Missouri CCSOMO is seeking funding to assist with construction of a LifeHouse Crisis Maternity Home in Cape Girardeau Missouri Modeled after our LifeHouse in Springfield a 247 secure residential transitional housing facility for homeless pregnant women their infants and young children The program Core Team of social workers registered nurse counselor manager  247 staff provide comprehensive services   LifeHouse Cape Girardeau will span 18000 square feet and include 15 units each housing one resident mother and her children community space offices administrative space and CCSOMO housing and community pregnancy programs Plans to build CCSOMO LifeHouse Cape Girardeau and offices began in 2020  The Construction Drawings are 100 complete and the City has approved the permit CCSOMO selected a General Contractor with the goal of completion and occupancy in February 2024 Visit ccsomoorg to view a video highlighting LifeHouse Cape	2500000	2500000	0								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	2500000	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	0
TPN-164110	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"City of Joplin, Neighborhood Revitalization"	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	After actively soliciting community input the Neighborhood Revitalization Program was agreed to as the most critical project for relief funds which offers financial services to foster more affordable accessible housing and addresses critical infrastructure concerns Beneficiaries include four lowincome Qualified Census Tracts QCTs communities who were disproportionately impacted by COVID19 While dangerous structures undergo demolition Joplin will also advance revitalization by repairing and restoring affordable housing Repair efforts will focus on the following  roofs gas and electrical utilities faades and sidewalks Additionally eligible individuals will be able to pursue financial security through the Joplin Homebuyers Assistance Program JHAP assistance revitalizes the community by providing a unique inclusive ability to secure housing protecting vulnerable households from homelessness or displacement and promotes access to long term banking	3500000	3500000	0								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	3500000	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity		No	0
TPN-164111	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Kirksville	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	The proposed project would fund the Citys purchase of a blighted mobile home park removal and disposal of existing improvements construction of new roadways curb and gutter sidewalks water and sewer mains water and sewer service lines as well as legal costs engineering environmental clearances and grant administration Through a partnership with the construction trades classes at the Kirksville Area Technical Center KATC located on the Kirksville RIII School campus four tiny homes would be constructed and ready for sale by the end of the grant project with 10 more slated for future construction If the budget allows the grant would assist with the concrete slab construction on each of the four sites otherwise the City would obtain other sources or partnerships to assist with the costs of the slabs Applications will be accepted from lowincome households for the purchase of each of the four affordable singlefamily tiny homes	396240	396240	0								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	396240	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts			No	0
TPN-164112	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of St Joseph	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.23-Strong Healthy Communities: Demolition and Rehabilitation of Properties	The City of St Joseph proposes to revitalize its historic westside corridor to increase the quality of life and generate more small business revenue furthering pandemic recovery efforts and strengthening the community This includes improving five major cultural and recreational landmark sites and 16 blighted properties rehabilitating three vacant properties to increase affordable housing and operating a cold weather shelter with supportive services for individuals experiencing homelessness	2500000	2500000	0								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	2365402	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts		No	0
TPN-164113	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Columbia Community Housing Trust	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	The Columbia Housing Authority is submitting this proposal under its Columbia Community Housing Trust CCHT component 501c3 entity that it utilizes for receiving grants to develop affordable housing  The proposal includes construction of 34 affordable housing units for very lowincome populations disproportionately impacted by the COVID19 pandemic  The mixed finance project includes ten 1bedroom units eight 2bedroom units six 3bedroom units ten 4bedroom units and a 4000 square foot community facility for supportive services and onsite staffing This project will expand CHAs ability to serve homeless and housing insecure populations further meeting the growing need for affordable housing  CHAs waitlist for housing is 1235 households  This proposal directly aligns with local City and County plans to address affordable housing  CHA is Columbias most experienced nonprofit affordable housing provider and the project has support exceeding 50 of estimated costs	3000000	3000000	0								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	3000000	16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	No	0
TPN-164114	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	DeSales Community Development	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	The Affordable Housing Preservation project will allow DeSales to perform needed major exterior repairs to 38 units of affordable housing within 14 buildings in South St Louis City The buildings that will be repaired are all over 100 years old and were rehabbed under the LowIncome Housing Tax Credit program between 1995 and 2005 The buildings are now in need of major capital repairs including new roofs tuck pointing and porches These repairs will not only ensure the longterm conservation of the buildings but will also make them more comfortable and energyefficient for residents By completing these exterior capital repairs now DeSales will be able to next turn its attention to additional improvements such as flooring kitchens and heating and cooling equipment	374717	374717	0								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	374717	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations			No	0
TPN-164115	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Elevate Branson	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Elevate Branson will provide affordable permanent supportive housing solutions through Elevate Community a masterplanned development of 400 squarefoot homes which is focused on chronically disabled individuals and families experiencing homelessness Funding provided by ARPA will allow for the construction of 18 homes which when combined with funding already secured will allow 50 homes to be built in 2023	1000000	1000000	0								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	1000000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-164116	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Habitat for Humanity of Kansas City	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Habitat for Humanity of Kansas City Habitat KC proposes to repair affordable housing in Jackson County Missouri through critical and minor home modifications as well as weatherization repair services through its Home Preservation Program HPP Through a regional partnership with Truman Heritage Habitat for Humanity Truman Habitat this project will contribute to equitable recovery from the pandemic for those in qualified census tracts as well as low and low to moderate income households This will include people of color and the aging population who suffered the most from inequities related to healthcare access job loss and the economic downturn Through targeted outreach and housing repairs this project will increase the quality of life for disproportionately impacted households increase access to safe and affordable housing keep people in their homes increase housing stock and ultimately revitalize neighborhoods in qualified census tracts	1408406	1408406	0								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	1408406	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	No	0
TPN-164161	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Emergency Medical Service Providers Grant (EMSPG)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	To provide grant funding for emergency medical service providers for emergency medical service activities as a proactive approach for the public safety of Missourians. For purposes of this funding opportunity emergency medical service providers include state licensed ambulance services as referenced in section 190.105 RSMo emergency medical response agencies EMRA as referenced in section 190.133 RSMo and other fire and rescue departments that respond to emergency medical incidents and provide basic emergency medical care.	9999999	9999999	803192.55								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-164162	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Fire Protection Grant (FPG)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	To provide grant funding for fire protection entities for fire protectionservice activities as a proactive approach for the public safety of Missourians. Fire protection entities include fire departments as defined in section 320.2003 RSMo as an agency or organization that provides fire suppression and related activities including but not limited to fire prevention rescue emergency medical services hazardous material response or special operation to a population within a fixed and legally recorded geographical area. The term fire department shall include any municipal fire department or any fire protection district as defined in section 321.010 RSMo or voluntary fire protection association as defined in section 320.300 RSMo engaging in this type of activity.	10000000	10000000	1967661.69								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-164163	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Peace Officer Grant (POG)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	To provide grant funding for peace officers for law enforcement activities as a proactive approach for the public safety of Missourians. Peace officer as defined in section 590.0103 RSMo is a law enforcement officer of the state or any political subdivision of the state with the power of arrest for a violation of the criminal code or declared or deemed to be a peace officer by state statute.	10000000	10000000	746872.14								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-164194	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Emmanuel Youth Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	For the construction of a new building for a family and child development center that provides early childcare services before and after school programs that provide youth assistance education and resources located any city with more than four hundred thousand inhabitants and located in more than one county provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds.	1000000	1000000	1000000								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	1000000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-164195	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care Q0047	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	"In December the Lebanon School District announced plans to open a dedicated early childhood and student innovative learning center in partnership with Jordan Valley Community Health Center. The new facility will include a comprehensive women and childrens health center including PT OT and an innovative GOCAPS Greater Ozarks Centers for Advanced Professional Studies learning center for high school workplace experiences._x000D__x000D_A LebanonJordan Valley fact sheet indicates that the total project will cost an estimated 22.5 million and will enhance access to education for children at an earlier age and provide necessary job training and skills as teens get ready to graduate high school. A facility has been purchased made possible by a 1M donation and through a 3.5M leasepurchase agreement. The design and renovation of the early childhood space is expected to cost approximately 4.5M. The project has also received approximately 8.6M in federal funds. In April 2022 a 2416 square foot potential outdoor playground area was added to the lease agreement. The partnership is also exploring other avenues for community investment."	5000000	5000000	4705482.72								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-127125	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	STL Family Forward	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	For the establishment of a campus providing training and research on trauma informed services as well as expending access to services to children and families who are victims of severe trauma in any county with more than one million inhabitants provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds	1200000	1200000	1200000					No	Yes		Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	1200000	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-127034	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	LTC Facility Payments	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	This funding will provide repair and renovations for transitional living and supportive housing for individuals in recovery from alcohol and drugs Recovery Lighthouse Warrensburg helps individuals and families find and sustain recovery from substance use disorders by providing services in a safe and supportive environment collaborating with community partners and engaging in advocacy  They offer individualgroup counseling faithbased programs recovery housing recovery court counseling and related parentinganger management courses for individuals in recovery	607524	607524	607524								Yes	Behavioral health facilities and equipment	607524	1 Imp General Public
TPN-127035	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Housing Provider Capital Improvements	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Capital improvements to the Amethyst Place in Kansas City	2000000	2000000	1059334.79								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	2000000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-127036	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Ferguson Homeless Shelter (The Center of Hope and Peace)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	For a nonprofit organization that provides summer food programs food pantry and safe houses for men and women who are victims of abuse located in any city with more than eighteen thousand but fewer than twenty thousand inhabitants and located in a county SS SCS HCS HB 3020 41 with more than one million inhabitants provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds	300000	300000	299521.5								No	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	300000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-128704	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Generator	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The generator replacement provides power redundancy in the case of a utility outage to one of the Judiciary's primary data centers.  The system is designed with the capacity to maintain an operational status for all Court related systems statewide that are hosted in our primary facility.	108950	108950	108950
TPN-128706	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Security Improvement-video intercom system	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacement of gate and rear door video intercom system	10695	10695	10695
TPN-128698	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Port Capital Improvement Grants - 2181-0000	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Capital Improvement grants to public port authorities in Missouri.	25000000	25000000	11349770.71
TPN-128682	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O6102	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The MACCO grant funds will be intended to fund the renovation and equipment needed to begin a secondary welding program at Eldon Career Center. ECC has solicited bids for the following: construction and installation of 15 welding booths, 2 grinding stations, an instructor station, a fume control system, electrical upgrades, gas installation, 2 downdraft tables, 16 welders, a plasma table and student safety materials (helmets, gloves, coats).	400000	400000	291401.5
TPN-128708	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Security Improvement-camera on roof	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install a camera on the SW corner of the roof of the Supreme Court building	3605	3605	0
TPN-128705	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Security Improvement-camera 2nd floor	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install a camera on the 2nd floor of the Supreme Court building.	2180	2180	2010
TPN-128712	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Security Improvement-panic buttons	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install wireless and wired panic buttons throughout the building	3220	3220	0
TPN-128236	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230301 - Womens Eastern R&D Correctional Center-Rebuild Cooling Tower Building	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	The Consultant shall provide a design to rebuild the existing 2 cell cooling tower and repair the structural system supporting itThe Consultants design shall include but not be limited to the repair or replacement of the fans fill basin piping and any necessary electrical or control system modifications The Consultants design shall also include an evaluation of the structural integrity of the concrete and steel support structure and provide the design for any improvements necessary to ensure the safety and continued operation of the specified equipment	844661	844661	43089.48								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	600189	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-128237	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	E190401 - HVAC Replacement Parkview School	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Replace inefficient ventilation system in State School for the severely disabled	1347500	1347500	993339.41								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-128238	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	M230701 - Bellefontaine Habilitation Center-Replace Boiler & HVAC	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Replace existing steam heating boilers in warehouse 2 industries bldg 2 and multipurpose bldg 2 with high efficiency heating hot water boilers Abate asbestos and demolish existing steam and condensate distribution piping Install new heating hot water Distribution piping in warehouse and industries bldg Replace existing Unit heaters 18 with heat only fan coil units Demolish existing steam to water heat exchangers 6 in multipurpose bldg install two Domestic hot water boilers Expand the existing building automation System from multipurpose bldg to warehouse and industries bldg Connect new and existing HVAC equipment and boilers to building automation system Include fire safety code review with fire barriers  Exit discharge  and area of refuge	5240763	5240763	262450.25								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	5240763	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-128239	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Aid to Local Public Health Q0042	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	This funding will be used to support LPHAs In addition to GR federal funding is made available to LPHAs for costs they submit for reimbursement through the CHIP program in four service areas immunizations lead testingprevention newborn home visiting and school health screenings and education	1717253.16	1717253.16	1717253.16								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128617	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	St. Louis County Law Enforcement Complex	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For providing a matching grant to a county with more than one million inhabitants to establish a regional intelligence and information center, a property control facility, and a training facility and range for law enforcement.	23000000	23000000	945046.28
TPN-128689	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Discovery Center of Springfield	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Remodel, repair and replacement of exhibits, roof, and infrastructure of Discovery Center in Springfield.  HB3020, Section 20.640.	500000	500000	201900.47
TPN-128688	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	DYS Case Management	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For the development of a case management system within DSS, Division of Youth Services (DYS) Division.	7000000	7000000	545400
TPN-128699	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Security improvements in the front entrance of the Eastern District courthouse	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Security improvements in the front entrance of the courthouse for the Eastern District Court of Appeals.	270714.67	270714.67	270714.67
TPN-128644	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	STL Regional Crime Commission Vacancy Mitigation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Includes the demolition of vacant and hazardous buildings, particularly in high-crime areas in St. Louis City.	15000000	15000000	141982.01
TPN-128687	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Biofuel Infrastructure Incentive Program (BIIP)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The purpose of the Biofuel Infrastructure Incentive Program (BIIP) is to increase the distribution and use of biofuels in the state of Missouri. Funds from the program will be awarded to fuel retailers, fuel distributors, terminal companies, and fleet operations that are dispensing, or have plans to store or dispense ethanol blends of E15 or higher, or biodiesel blends of B6 or higher.	4000000	4000000	1695034.69
TPN-128018	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0011	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	12941.14	12941.14	12941.14								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128019	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0012	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENTS PAYMENTS	49665.98	49665.98	49665.98								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128020	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0013	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA REIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	41971.25	41971.25	41971.25								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128021	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0014	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESiDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	8394.25	8394.25	8394.25								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128022	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0015	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT	13990.42	13990.42	13990.42								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128023	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0016	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	17488.02	17488.02	17488.02								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128031	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Rural Citizens Telehealth Access	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	For the Department of Social Services For providers of Medicaid services in rural counties for the purchase of necessary equipment and trainings for the purpose of increasing access to telehealth services for MO HealthNet participants	8500000	8500000	749992.9								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128032	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0024	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	18537.3	18537.3	18537.3								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128033	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0025	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	19936.34	19936.34	19936.34								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128034	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0026	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	16088.98	16088.98	16088.98								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128041	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0033	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	34276.52	34276.52	34276.52								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128042	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	ARPA RESIDENITAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT Q0040	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENITAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY  OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	8515586.8	8515586.8	3181017.66								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128043	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0041	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTEDLIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	405372.31	405372.31	405372.31								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128044	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Crisis Response Referral System	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	On going maintenance and software enhancement of bed registry that will allow agencies to see which entities have available beds for consumers that need immediate services	1081500	1081500	906500								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-128045	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	FQHC Repair and Renovation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Capital improvement of FQHC to increase safety and security The security upgrades and improvements may include but not be limited to the following examples lighting and signage in place including sidewalks parking lots and new pathways to deploy illuminated and interactive signature to improve visibility and safety for additional gating and security housing for the campus and new security camera detail to better capture images	500000	500000	279335								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	500000	1 Imp General Public			Yes	500000
TPN-128046	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	DED/DPS ARPA Staffing	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	For the Department of Public Safety administration of programs appropriated in HB 3020 2022 Reg Sess authorized by Interagency Spending Agreement Between the Department of Economic Development The Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Public Safety signed and executed on January 11 2023  The agreement was entered into to provide ARPA program administration personnel for the Department of Public Safety for the remainder of FY 2023 ending June 30 2023 with the Department of Economic Development providing the Department of Public Safety the authority to use PS funds from its HB 3020  20900 appropriation	55255.8	55255.8	55255.8								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128007	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	NG911 GIS Enhancements	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	For support of the statewide implementation of Next Generation 911	10000000	10000000	0								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	500000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-128010	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0001	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA Residential Care  Assisted Living Facility Operator Reimbursement Payments	27980.83	27980.83	27980.83								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128011	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	E190501 - Replace Rooftop Units - New Dawn State School	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Remove and replace the existing eight 8 rooftop AC units including building automation system controls	1116500	1116500	918146.54								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128692	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Chesterfield Sports Complex	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Missouri General Assembly appropriated, and the Governor approved HB3020, Section 20.868, $2,000,000 for DED “for the planning, design, maintenance or improvements to an athletic complex located on approximately eleven acres located in any city with more than forty-six thousand but fewer than fifty-one thousand inhabitants, provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds” for State Fiscal Year 2023 (July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023, “FY 23”) (House Bill 14, 14.215) (“Appropriation”).	2000000	2000000	2000000
TPN-128628	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Correctional Facilities Radio Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacing radios at correctional facilities.	4652237	4652237	3777689.29
TPN-128701	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O1091	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Kirksville Area Technical Center will use the funds to build a shop/classroom for our Construction Trades program.  This facility will be across the street from our center in a space that will provide opportunity for growth and area to store building supplies and materials.  This facility will have a shop for woodworking equipment and storage areas for the supplies needed for the house build.  There will be two classrooms that will be on each side of a corridor entering the facility.  This construction will alleviate some congestion in our east wing and agriculture shop.  A subsequent part of the project will include the updating of the space that was vacated by the Construction Trades that will be designed around improving our ability of offer up-to-date programs through the Agriculture Program.  This will include the updating/relocation of the computer lab, expansion/updating of the Agriculture Kitchen and the ability to improve our advance agriculture offerings.	400000	400000	109386.14
TPN-128680	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Historic Courthouse Museum	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace windows, doors and sidewalk at the McDonald County Historic 1871 Courthouse Museum and to replace windows, bathroom flooring and porch area at the McDonald County Historic 1920 Sheriff's House which is the Society headquarters.	97788.22	97788.22	97788.22
TPN-128012	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0002	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	77646.81	77646.81	77646.81								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128013	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0006	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA Residential CareAssisted Living Facility Operator Reimbursement Payments	13990.42	13990.42	13990.42								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128014	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0007	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTAL CAREASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REMIBURSMENT PAYMENTS	9793.29	9793.29	9793.29								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128015	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0000	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CAREASSISTED LIVING FACILIYT OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	23433.95	23433.95	23433.95								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128016	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0009	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	29030.11	29030.11	29030.11								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128017	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0010	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	20985.62	20985.62	20985.62								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128024	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0017	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	12941.14	12941.14	12941.14								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128026	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0020	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM	260221.75	260221.75	260221.75								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128027	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0021	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	27980.83	27980.83	27980.83								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128028	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0022	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	15389.46	15389.46	15389.46								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128029	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0023	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CAREASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	54912.39	54912.39	43461.31								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128036	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0028	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LVIING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	14689.94	14689.94	14689.94								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128037	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0029	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	21335.39	21335.39	21335.39								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128038	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0030	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBRUSEMENT PAYMENTS	41971.25	41971.25	41971.25								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128039	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0031	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	34276.52	34276.52	23084.19								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128040	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers Q0032	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	38823.41	38823.41	38823.41								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128047	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	E231901 - Prairie View SS Replace HVAC System	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Replace the HVAC system including the boiler air handlers and building automation system The installation shall include fresh air requirements and conditioning of the fresh air to maintain humidity levels	1410576	1410576	492721.25								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-128745	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Kirkwood Amtrak-2604	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project is to make improvements to the historic train station in Kirkwood, MO.	2500000	2500000	110442.34
TPN-128748	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O5128	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Update and maintain equipment needed in high demand occupation areas that include a frame rack for auto collision, lift and press for auto technology, update welders in welding, additional equipment in precision machining including a surface grinder and lathe package, modules for diesel technology, new equipment in culinary such as a smoker, grinder and sausage stuffer  and a renovation to create a new health occupations laboratory that will require equipment, wall gas panel and bathroom/shower for clinical practice.  Funds will also be utilized for necessary purchases to start up an aircraft maintenance program.	400000	400000	107423.83
TPN-128749	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Northland Tech Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project is for the construction of a new building, including acquisition of land, to provide advanced workforce development for Platte Co. R-III schools and the schools served by its Area Career Center. The project provides fifty percent of the cost of the center up to the award amount.	30000000	30000000	2236887.5
TPN-134096	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Small Business Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The Small Business Grant Program Program provides assistance to small businesses that were negatively impacted by the COVID19 pandemic.  Small businesses receive grant funds equal to decrease in gross revenues prepandemic to 2021 not to exceed 25000.	10000000	10000000	9927709								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-134058	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	C230502 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers Maryville Treatment Center	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint repair interior and exterior of water towers at the Maryville Treatment Center	237541.4	237541.4	237541.4
TPN-134059	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230601 & 2 - Algoa Correctional Centers-Repairs to Storm Drainage & Sewer Pipes	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Algoa upgrade sewer system and storm drain system	311388.47	311388.47	26967.69
TPN-134060	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	C230503 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers Ozark Correctional Center	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paintrepair interior and exterior of water towers at the Ozark Correctional Center	189732.5	189732.5	189732.5
TPN-134061	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230603 - Tipton Correctional Center-Repairs to Storm Drainage & Sewer Pipes	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Repairs to Storm Drainage and Sewer Pipes at the Tipton Correctional Center	720930.9	720930.9	26948.86
TPN-134062	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	C230504 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers Chillicothe Correctional Center	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paintrepair interior and exterior of water towers at the Chillicothe Correctional Center	115003.18	115003.18	115003.18
TPN-134063	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230604 - Boonville Correctional Centers-Repairs to Storm Drainage & Sewer Pipes	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Repairs to Storm Drainage and Sewer Pipes Boonville Correctional Center	187047.57	187047.57	51287.24
TPN-134064	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230505 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers Jefferson City Correctional Center	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers Jefferson City Correctional Center	298808	298808	298808
TPN-134065	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	C230506 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers Western  MO Correctional Center	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers Western Mo Correctional Center	276278.5	276278.5	276278.5
TPN-134066	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230507 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers Eastern Reception & Diagnostic CC	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers Eastern Reception  Diagnostic Correctional Center	290975.4	290975.4	1073
TPN-134067	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230508 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers Moberly Correctional Center	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers at Moberly Correctional Center	192693	192693	1073
TPN-134068	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	C230509 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers MO Eastern Correctional Cntr Tank 1	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers at the MO Eastern Correctional Center	244411.8	244411.8	244411.8
TPN-134069	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	C230510 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers Southeast Correctional Center	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers for the Southeast Correctional Center	281441	281441	281441
TPN-134070	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	C230511 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers Women's Eastern RDCC	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers for the Womens Eastern RDCC	299973	299973	299973
TPN-134071	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230101 - Babler State Park-Connect to MO American Water & Rebuild Lagoon	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Connect water system to Missouri American Water Rebuild Lagoon for Babler State Park	3600000	3600000	19408.44
TPN-134072	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230502 - Knob Noster State Park-Water Wastewater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Knob Noster State Park Rebuild group camp water system in order to maintain the aging system Campground lagoon repairs or connect to City if possible	1392000	1392000	22095.23
TPN-134073	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230602 - Onondaga Cave State Park-Water Wastewater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Onondaga Cave State Park Replace well house Repairreplace water storage system and controls Rebuild lagoon	1956000	1956000	75364.12
TPN-134074	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230801 - Harry S Truman State Park-Water Wastewater Improvements Lagoon	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Repair replace lagoon it has reached the end of its useful life	1800000	1800000	23088
TPN-134075	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230203 - Thousand Hills State Park-Replace Sewage Lift Stations Lagoon	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Thousand Hills State Park  Replace sewage lift stations throughout park	1031370	1031370	41857.71
TPN-134076	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230503 - Bothwell Lodge State Historic Site-Water Wastewater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Bothwell Lodge State Historic Site Rebuild lodge water system in order to maintain the aging system Evaluate sewer septic tanks at day use area	768000	768000	12190.48
TPN-134077	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230603 - Meramec State Park-Water Wastewater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Meramec State Park Replace well house Repair campground sewer lift station Construct the replacement of water lines throughout the park	1572000	1572000	40439.88
TPN-134078	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230204 - Battle of Athens State Historic Site-Rebuild Sewer System	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Battle of Athens State Historic Site  Rebuild sewer system in order to maintain the aging system and bring it up to current codes and regulations	787491	787491	56295.23
TPN-134079	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230504 - Confederate Memorial State Historic Site-Water Wastewater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Confederate Memorial State Historic Site Rebuild water system in order to maintain the aging system Rebuild sewer system and connect to Higginsville wastewater system	1620000	1620000	25714.29
TPN-134469	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Intercom-paging-audio system	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install new intercom/paging/audio system in the Court of Appeals building	76977.72	76977.72	76977.72
TPN-134479	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Laptop computers	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Laptop computers to allow marshals to access security system remotely	3947.55	3947.55	3947.55
TPN-134471	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Intrusion alarm	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install new intrusion alarm to replace obsolete system and rewire existing BA points to new panel.  Includes 5 year monitoring service.	13895.25	13895.25	13895.25
TPN-134476	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Fire Alarm	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace current combination fire/intrusion alarm panel and rewire new panel.  Includes 5 year monitoring service and inspections.	12637.75	12637.75	12637.75
TPN-135200	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	F230101 - MO State Fair-Design & Construct New Covered Arena	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This includes demolition of the existing arena and bleachers and design/construction of the new covered arena. The 300 x 400 ft. structure will all be under roof. The covered arena will include bleachers and seating for 30005000 spectators  concessions  restrooms and office space. This includes all electrical  lighting  ventilation and plumbing expenses.	29391000	29391000	699786.82					No	Yes		Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	29391000	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-135218	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230402 - Echo Bluff State Park-Water/Wastewater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Echo Bluff State Park Install water tower to eliminate need for generator Upgrade phase converter controls in campground well house	1320000	1320000	34398.1
TPN-137833	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	East Prairie School Building Remediation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The East Prairie R-II School District intends to provide the City of East Prairie with land and a building for use as a health clinic. This building may either be remediated and remodeled or may be demolished for new construction purposes.	94875	94875	94875
TPN-112549	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	C180601 - Moberly Correctional Center-Improvements to Wastewater System Lagoon	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Remove sludge from existing lagoon cells and repairsea all perimeter berms to correct leeching issues Replace worn components of the wastewater system such as lift pumps  aerators  grinders  bar screens  etc Install ultra violet UV disinfection in discharge outfall Bring the wastewater system into full compliance with all current USEPAIDNR regulations at the time of biddingconstruction of the project Replace sewer line from Laundry and Sign Shop north to manhole then east to the main	4682266.94	4682266.94	4061181.31
TPN-112553	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230202 - Long Branch State Park-Replace Lagoon	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Long Branch State Park  Replace lagoon	1211139	1211139	86338.06
TPN-166110	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Urban Agriculture Matching Grant	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	"The Urban Agriculture Matching Grant Program, funded through the Missouri Department of Agriculture, awards grants for reimbursement of expenses associated with urban agriculture. The Urban Agriculture grant encompasses projects that may include introducing a new crop or product to an area, or expanding the use of or adding value to agricultural products. This is a competitive grant program and funds may be used to: Develop small agribusinesses in urbanized areas Develop production infrastructure, direct distribution venues and workforce development Provide training and develop skills for agricultural business sustainability Provide training and develop skills for agricultural business sustainability	50000	50000	50000
TPN-166168	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O5115	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project will consist of modernizing kitchen equipment that serves both our CTE Culinary and Hospitality Programs  If funds are remaining we will purchase material items for the Business Program FBLASkillsUSA CTSOs	400000	400000	0
TPN-166119	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	International Flight Program	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The International Flight Program provides a minimum revenue guarantee incentive to help attract new trans-oceanic flights to Missouri.	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-166134	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Montgomery County Mega-site Site Development - 35548698	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	In partnership with Montgomery County Economic Development Council (EDC), Ameren Missouri, Norfolk Southern, Missouri Partnership, Montgomery County Port Authority (proposed) and Montgomery County PWSD, Montgomery County is working to establish a mega-site along the U.S. I-70 corridor between High Hill and New Florence in Montgomery County, MO. The EDC has been working on this initiative for more than seven years and has held numerous meetings with the partners listed above and DED to scope out the site and project details. Global Location Strategies identified this corridor as a priority development area. The Montgomery County Mega-site Project is the first phase of the site's development and will focus on site due diligence, master planning, expanding property control, and infrastructure development for roughly 4,200-acres. Initial infrastructure improvements will focus on improving site access and building a water line extension to bring water service to the site.	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-166174	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O6134	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	There are four major goals for this grant  The attached document includes a more detailed description for each goal1 Enhance and expand the outdoor lab for the new Electric Line Technology class2 Enhance and expand the current welding shop to accommodate a second concurrent welding class3  Provide funding for renovation and infrastructure improvements that will lead to a safer school environment4  Provide additional funding for updated instructional equipmentAgain please see the attached document for the detailed proposal	150000	150000	20597.95
TPN-166094	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	WEB OA-IT ARPA WEB APP MAINTENANCE MODE	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Online application/system for managing agency ARPA grant requests, awards and progress	319716.07	319716.07	33233.95
TPN-166102	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Atlas Security Door Access System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Security Door Access	36146.72	36146.72	36146.72
TPN-166128	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Premier 370 Business Park North Infrastructure Project - 35597037	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project includes the construction of 7,400 lineal feet of 3-lane roadway, 6,000 lineal feet of 12-inch water main, 4,000 lineal feet of sanitary sewer main with manholes, and a sanitary sewer pump station with appurtenances and 3,750 lineal feet of force main. The infrastructure project will serve 160 acres of undeveloped property in the Premier 370 Business Park. NorthPoint Development LLC is currently approved to build approximately 1.6 million square feet of new industrial space on 122 acres in the area that will be served by the proposed infrastructure project. This project is a continuation of economic development in the 950 acre Premier 370 Business Park in St. Peters that is home to 12 existing businesses operating in 4 million square feet of building space.	1576674	1576674	0
TPN-164007	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Community College District of Central Southwest Missouri	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Ozarks Technical Community College OTC proposes the development of a plumbing training program to meet the quickly changing needs of southwest Missouris plumbing industry This program will develop a fourlevel plumbing training program designed to both provide comprehensive training to new plumbers and also to upskill plumbers looking to take the National Center for Construction Education and Research NCEER plumbing credential levels 14	1341360	1341360	861135.2								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	1179950	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	No	0
TPN-163961	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Columbia Voluntary Action Agency	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	For the planning design maintenance or construction of a nonprofit social services agency located in any city with more than one hundred twentyfive thousand but fewer than one hundred sixty thousand inhabitants that assists residents who are experiencing hardships by providing resources for basic and emergency needs in aide to overcome hardships and maintain selfsufficiency provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for  state funds	6000000	6000000	2219875.39								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-163962	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Urban League St Louis Workforce Development	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	For repair and renovations of a workforce development site in a city not within a county that is operated by a century old organization that annually serves over one hundred thousand 100000 clients regionally and that advocates and empowers African Americans throughout the region to secure economic selfreliance social equality and civil rights through economic opportunity education excellence community empowerment and civil rights and advocacy provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds	2500000	2500000	2500000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-163963	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Mattie Rhodes	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	For a nonprofit community development organization dedicated to individual and family wellbeing through social services behavioral health counseling and the arts in any city with more than four hundred thousand inhabitants and located in more than  one county in order to address capital improvement needs provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds	500000	500000	500000								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	500000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-163964	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Boys and Girls Club Poplar Bluff	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	For a nonprofit organization serving youth for over twenty years that enables young people to reach their full potential as productive caring responsible citizens by providing a club experience including after school and summer programs that assures success located in any city with more than sixteen thousand but fewer than 8 eighteen thousand inhabitants and that is the county seat of a county with more than forty thousand but fewer than fifty thousand inhabitants provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds	2000000	2000000	0								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-163965	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Boys and Girls Club Kansas City	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	For a nonprofit organization that enables young people to reach their full potential as productive caring responsible citizens by providing a club experience that assures success that serves nearly eight thousand local kids located in any city with more than four hundred thousand inhabitants and located in more than one county provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds	200000	200000	200000								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	53710	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-163966	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Nonprofit Grant Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The Nonprofit Grant Program Program will support 501c3 and 501c19 nonprofits serving disadvantaged vulnerable or atrisk populations that have experienced negative economic impact due to the COVID19 pandemic	7500000	7500000	7475000								No			11 Imp Classes of NPs designated as negatively economically impacted
TPN-163967	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Law Enforcement Use of Force Training	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Funding of training on proper useofforce deescalation and constitutional policing provided by a basic training center or a continuing law enforcement education training provider licensed by the Director of Public Safety	1000000	1000000	0								No			13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify
TPN-163968	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Police Foundation of Kansas City - Violent Crime Reduction Equipment	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	For the purchase of equipment to help reduce the incident of violent crime and strengthen police services by researching and analyzing the best practices to help reduce violent crime	3000000	3000000	0								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	3000000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-163980	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	The Curators of the University of Missouri	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	To ease the nursing workforce shortage exacerbated by Covid19 the MU Sinclair School of Nursing will partner with MU Health Care to employ 300 prenursing students as Unlicensed Assistive PersonnelCertified Nurse Assistants This training usually occurs outside universities overlooking an undergraduate student workforce seeking healthcare employment This program will provide students employment and healthcare agencies with a robust pipeline of potential future registered nurses RNs	843697	843697	125335.68								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	267250	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	No	0
TPN-163998	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	NPower Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	NPower Missouris foundational Tech Fundamentals program is a metricsdriven marketbased and participantcentered solution to the lack of quality job opportunities and career pathways available to nontraditional job seekers while building a diverse pipeline to serve the growing need for IT talent in St Louis and surrounding communities Trainees who enter our nocost program earn industryrecognized certifications and graduate with the competencies of an IT professional with experience	250000	250000	146793.86								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	No	0
TPN-163995	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	The Community College District of Mid Missouri	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	State Fair Community College SFCC is requesting funding to purchase equipment to increase Commercial Driver Licenses CDL training opportunities for individuals seeking better job opportunities  Additional equipment from this grant would triple the number of CDL drivers graduating from SFCC per year The shortage of CDLqualified drivers is a component of the supply chain problems exasperated by the COVID pandemic and adversely affects many sectors of Missouri economy	999000	999000	670573.14								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	999000	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	No	0
TPN-164000	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Sikeston R6 School District	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The Sikeston Future Workforce project will give the Sikeston Career and Technology Center SCTC the capacity it needs to prepare additional students for the local workforce The expansion will rehabilitate existing buildings to accommodate at least two additional SCTC classes Welding Technician and FirefighterEMT Local industries municipalities and ambulance districts have expressed the need for additional employees especially in these fields and especially after the COVID19 pandemic	3000000	3000000	0								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	2313774	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	No	0
TPN-163993	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Chamber Foundation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The IndustryDriven HealthCare Apprenticeships Project IDHAP is an industry driven concept which addresses the skills gap and worker shortage from entry level to high skill employment It implements an employer outreach and recruitment effort to educate target populations about the health care industry and the many career path opportunities IDHAP utilizes a companytocompany mentoring model in setting up a training solution utilizing Department of Labor Registered Apprenticeships	3000000	3000000	193055.76								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	No	0
TPN-163936	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Sexual Crimes Against Children	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	For grants to local county law enforcement and local county prosecutors 4 in counties with a high percentage of alleged sexual crimes against children	1000000	1000000	223429.89								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-163937	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Covering House	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	For the purpose of renovating a facility gifted to a nonprofit agency that provides therapeutic recovery services to survivors of child sex trafficking located in any county with more than one million inhabitants provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds	4100000	4100000	859958.51								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-163983	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	MPUA Resource Services Corporation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	MPUA will use grant funding to provide utility industry specific training for individuals living in Qualified Census Tracts throughout Missouri nonmetro communities those seeking employment in the utility industry and those currently employed who are seeking economic advancement The program will create a direct pipeline for municipalowned utilities in Missouri to address the labor shortage of utility workers	1142145	1142145	200558.74								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	640000	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		No	0
TPN-164005	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	The Sewing Labs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The Sewing Labs respectfully requests funding for The Sewing Salon Training Program SSTP This program equips participants with the marketable skills and experience needed to secure employment in the sewing industry Additionally through SSTP a majority of participants graduate programming and secure paid apprenticeships and then fulltime employment in Kansas City with partnering employers	464189	464189	104560.86								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	80968	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	No	0
TPN-163988	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Ozark Action Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Our project will assist primarily lowincome individuals and public assistance recipients as well as local employers who have been affected by the shortage of qualified job applicants due to the pandemic to fill positions that area businesses have struggled to fill  These funds will assist individuals to gain employable skills of locally indemand positions and industry recognized credentials that will  increase the quality of their families lives and to provide skilled workers for businesses	300000	300000	77087.61								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	No	0
TPN-163990	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Sellenriek Construction Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The RETAIN Equity Diversity and Inclusion Program addresses the need for a collaborative culturally centered inclusive recruitment program and training curricula to effectively serve diverse populations to attract and engage minority disadvantaged and unemployed workers to the broadband infrastructure industry for high paying indemand jobs with long term career pathways	966740	966740	262414.01								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	190500	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	No	0
TPN-164003	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Northwest Missouri State University	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Northwest Missouri State University Northwest is proposing to increase the labor force for the manufacturing and agribusiness industry clusters by offering comprehensive Systems Management training and skill development and certifying those skills with industryrecognized stackable credentials To deliver the Systems Management credentials Northwest will renovate the McKemy Center to include labshop space equipment including welding simulators and safety and infrastructure upgrades	988211	988211	806956								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	585401	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts		No	0
TPN-164006	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Meet The Need Inc	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Meet The Need Inc Work Skills Training and Education Program WSTEP is a proposed workforce development program in Charleston MO that aims to improve the livelihood of residents in the Bootheel of Southeast Missouri and surrounding regions  The project provides job skills training for shipyard welding forklift training Class A  B CDL training and computer coding  Work skills education will also be provided to participants to give them tools to obtain and maintain gainful employment	2547421	2547421	0								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	506915	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	No	0
TPN-163991	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Emmanuel Family  Child Development Center and Emergency Shelter for Children	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	EFCDC seeks to create a sustainable pipeline that will connect  underemployed unemployed and lowincome beneficiaries with the early education sector  This comprehensive project will equip beneficiaries with the skills and credentials needed to flourish as early childhood teachers It will also help promote stability for EFCDC and partnering childcare centers by providing a pool of qualified candidates to fill staffing gaps and allow them to operate at full student enrollment capacity	2137085	2137085	207907.09								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	No	0
TPN-163984	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	St. Louis Community College	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	STLCC will provide commercial truck driver training and optional Hazardous Material Endorsement for CDL A and CDL B licensing Underemployed unemployed lowincome or those in qualified census tracts will receive good paying high demand jobs with short term training MoDOT hires will be paid by MoDOT during training  Some will continue training for a diesel technician certificate Trucking employers will partner with STLCC for recruiting events that lead to employment after licensing	2110040	2110040	0								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	1559267	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment		No	0
TPN-164008	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Incutech Foundation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Aspire MO 20  Warehouse Manufacturing  Supply Chain workforce trainingCertified instructorsIndustryrecognized certifications OSHA 10 CPT40 CPT and NC3 PMIDirectly to lowincome incarcerated women close to release disproportionally affected by COVID at the MO DOCPartner with companies experiencing COVID workforce disruption to interviewhire graduates  Eligible for high wage jobs w benefitsProvide economic advancementReduce recidivismWrap around supports to aide in successful reentry	1575021	1575021	359934.82								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	174139	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	No	0
TPN-163986	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	FreemanOak Hill Health System	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Freeman Health System the areas only teaching hospital will renovate and upgrade existing training facilities in Joplin MO to increase capacity by 330to train individuals to work in healthcare Target populations include K12 students medical students nurses unemployed individuals previously employed individuals and current healthcare professionals Training programs focus on highdemand careers for which there is a lack of qualified applicants in the current market	1788598	1788598	51810.35								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	1664132	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	No	0
TPN-164001	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Codefi Foundation on Rural Innovation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The Southern Missouri Digital Workforce Training System connects over 100 employers and strategic partners who will provide employable skills training to nearly 500 unemployed and underemployed adults who were impacted by COVID19 and live in the 47 southernmost rural counties in Missouri The training will lead to 178 new software development and cybersecurity jobs with salaries 60 above average that will generate over 13 million in annual earnings and 113 million in annual tax revenue	1457178	1457178	351958.39								No		0	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	No	0
TPN-163982	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	BioSTL	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	With equitable crosssectoral partnerships BIOTECH for MO will scale industryled training programs for biotechnology and biomanufacturing strengthening Missouris workforce to secure domestic drug supply chains and create quality jobs With a 4 million investment of ARPA funds and leveraging nonSLFR Funds BioSTL MOBIO BioNexus KC and their statewide partners will place at least 900 individuals into quality middleskill jobs with career mobility into highskill jobs within 42 months	2089340	2089340	100487.99								No			15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	No	0
TPN-163992	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Practical POCUS LLC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	MO Ultrasound Training Initiative a hybrid training program offered by Practical POCUS focuses on the practice of point of care ultrasound POCUS and its application in the healthcare industry Course content constitutes a comprehensive accredited curriculum that strengthens participants functional capacities in the workplace This program will contribute to advancing the careers and increasing the household incomes of eligible beneficiaries by expanding their knowledge base and skill sets	2999975	2999975	1034406.77								Yes	Job and workforce training centers	340820	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	No	0
TPN-164010	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	St. Louis Employment and Training Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The center is a strategic partnership between the St Louis Economic Development Partnership St Louis County and the nonprofit Family  Workforce Centers of America	4000000	4000000	3561.47								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	4000000	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment			No	0
TPN-166092	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	MDA Grain Regulatory Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Grain Regulatory Services (GRS) is seeking a replacement system for their current business processing applications.  They currently have a suite from a vendor that is able to do the functions required for them to work, however it has been brought to their attention that the software may soon be out of support from the vendor.  This vendor has been a sole source provider for many states, as the department is aware of no other company that provides a suitable replacement software.  They are seeking an inspection software for their auditors to use in the field, as well as handling the licensing of regulated entities and their respective payments.	1011870	1011870	483647.71
TPN-166097	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Court improvement projects to improve access to the courts	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project is providing closed captioning to video and audio streaming like oral arguments.	66031.4	66031.4	66031.4
TPN-166108	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	H230201 - Construct New Youth Day Treatment Center Rock Bridge	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This request is a collaboration with DNR-SP to construct a nature school/day treatment center at Rockbridge State Park in Columbia Missouri. The building may include two classrooms; commercial kitchen space; office space; restrooms; recreation space; and relevant parking space.	483109	483109	155839.75
TPN-166105	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Security for Marshals	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	upgraded gun safe for storing Marshal's firearms and ammo, 3 cases for ipads, 3 ipads for remote access to security system, 3 cases for laptops.	3994.92	3994.92	3994.92
TPN-166127	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Carthage Economic Development Park - 35612489	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase approximately 248 acres for an industrial and economic development park inside the city limits of Carthage.	1500000	1500000	1500000
TPN-166112	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	STL County Jamestown Mall site clean-up	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Clean-up and preparation for development of site at the old Jamestown Mall site.  HB3020, Section 20.844.	5994230	5994230	1413302.86
TPN-166214	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	South Kansas City Chamber Workforce Development Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	For capital improvements and workforce development needs for a nonprofit membership organization serving business in the south of any city with more than four hundred thousand inhabitants and located in more than one county provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds	350000	350000	211699.21								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-166176	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O6166	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Our project will revitalize and expand the secondary automotive technology program at Crowder College The current classroom was built in 1970 and has received only minor upgrades in that time The existing 400 square foot classroom space is a limiting factor on the number of students we can serve We are requesting funding to add an additional 600 square feet of classroom space and renovate the existing classroom and lab Notable additions will include updated technology in the classroom and a more advanced tool system in the lab The architectural drawings induced in this application clearly outline the scope of the building project Renovations to the existing lab will include the removal of outdated restroom facilities opening up additional space in the automotive lab We will also optimize the usability of the lab through the installation of a modern tool control system creating additional space and more effective lab management The current classroom and lab are only able to accommodate 32 students per year We anticipate that with the additional classroom space we will be able to serve at least 40 students per year in a safe and modern working environment	400000	400000	400000
TPN-166206	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri State University - West Plains Autism Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For completion and operational costs of an autism center	7500000	7500000	1670408.64
TPN-166211	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri University of Science & Technology-Helping Agricultural Workforce	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Develop a new course certificate program to give farmers the skills needed to collect analyze and apply remotely sensed data for precision agriculture applications  The certificate program will have four coursesThe first course  will cover Global Information Systems software for agricultural applicationsThe second course will focus on the acquisition and processing of dronebased data relevant for agricultureThe third course will teach farmers how to use data acquired from satellites for precision farming applicationsThe fourth course will focus on the practical application of remote sensing technologies drones and satellite to precision agriculture including the use of GPSdriven agricultural machineryAcquisition of drone fleet for lending plus free software and website for farmers use	765000	765000	0
TPN-166183	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O8073	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Our project will be focused on the improvement of infrastructure as well as safety improvements so we can continue to offer the programs to meet our high demand occupations as well as explore offering additional programs to meet workforce demands We need to replace our fire panel for safely connecting all of our on campus buildings We need to replace decaying parking lot and concrete that will provide safer walking surfaces for students and the operation of equipment We need to replace our walkway to the second floor in building C so our students can safely get to class We need to replace our HVAC unit in building C to enable programs to operate in additional space at adequate temperatures We also need to update parts of campus with aging carpet equipment and furniture to address increased student enrollment traffic and new technologies We anticipate needing to spend more than what the grant will allow but understand the grant amount will be limited to 400000 plus our matching portion	400000	400000	0
TPN-166159	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O4045	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Lex LaRay Technical Center is hosted by the Lexington School District  Due to age of the facility interior and exterior upgrades to the facility are needed  The improvements are vital to meet the safety and educational needs of the students As our enrollment continues to increase the ARPA MACCO Grant Award will allow us to provide necessary expansion and upgrades  Programs impacted by the funds consist of Industrial Welding Automotive Technology and creating a designated space for students of special needs  In all the project will consist of new construction renovation and remodel of current facility spaces  Building Trades students will assist with some of the facility renovations	400000	400000	0
TPN-166100	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Security Improvements-Executive Wood Products	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Courtroom/entry security improvements and reconfiguration, to include NIJ III anti-ballistic work station, install NIJ III steel and glass, and provide training.	210168	210168	210168
TPN-166177	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O6426	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	State Fair Community Colleges Center for Advanced Agriculture and Transportation Technology will expand training programs and certifications in a newly constructed facility that prepares technicians for the agriculture and transportation industries The new construction and new additional equipment will provide drive in classrooms simulation labs and laboratory spaces for new and expanded programs in ag mechanics precision agriculture transportation logistics diesel technology ASE accredited automotive technology alternative future fuels and material handling equipment technologies  The new facility and added programs will complement State Fair Community Colleges intended ag program expansion of a two hundred acre farm  In addition the new Center will support the transportation and logistics needs of area manufacturers such as Nucor Gardner Denver WireCo Stanley Black and Decker and distribution centers  The project will be located adjacent to the Potter Ewing Ag building Along with the newly constructed Olen Howard Workforce Innovation Center and Fielding Technical Center Renovations the addition would complete nearly all of the career and technical education facility needs identified in the colleges master plan	400000	400000	0
TPN-166151	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O2074	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace the  HVAC units in the Ag Welding and Auto Mechanics shops  Replace the flooring in the Ag Welding Electrician and Auto Mechanics classrooms and offices  Replace the overhead doors in Ag Welding and Auto Mechanics shops	400000	400000	341694.83
TPN-166123	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Sikeston Industrial Park Wastewater Expansion - 35616992	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Sikeston Industrial Park Wastewater Expansion project will increase the waste water capacity in Sikeston's North Industrial Park. The current wastewater treatment plant has reached it's maximum capacity. This restricts our existing industries from expanding and prevents the recruitment of new industries to the Park. The project includes removal, disposal, and replacement of all basin liners; reshaping of the basin bottoms; replacement of the aeration laterals and all diffusers; and replacement of the floating aeration/mixers in the primary cells. Once complete, the project will more than double the existing wastewater capacity.	2500000	2500000	2500000
TPN-166155	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O2124	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will pay for building renovations including roof repair We will also address security issues with electronic gates added to the east side of the building Current outdoor storage area will be demolished and a new one will be built in its place Upgrade to electrical panel If there are remaining funds we plan to replace our existing sign one shop garage door and do some minor construction on a shop to prepare it for a new program	400000	400000	161290.79
TPN-166163	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O4114	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Grants funds will be used to improve the infrastructure of Ozark Mountain Technical Center by adding electrical panels to be able to run more equipment and by adding a new fire control system Funds will also be used to renovate and modernize the facilities with the following projects Upgrade greenhouse environmental controls and irrigation systems Addition of a concrete pad for outdoor construction space for the Carpentry program Building deterioration repairs and new guttering to prevent further deterioration Safety improvements to include upgraded doors openers gates locking storage addition of hot water for handwashing sinks and floor refinishing with safety striping Additionally grant funds will be used for the addition of industry relevant equipment to include welders metal roller training manikins hospital beds Promethean board saw stop three head shaper system wide belt sander jointer CNC router automotive scan tool sandblaster prep booth curtain metal band saw drill press bed dolly commercial mixers commercial refrigerator and freezer heat presses system sublimation printer insulated food transport carts proofing cabinet pipe threader and diagnostic scan tool	400000	400000	374484.5
TPN-166210	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Northwest Missouri State University-Growing Missouri's Dairy Workforce	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Project consists of construction of microcreamery within the new Agriculture Learning Center plus dairy process improvements at the Wright Farm  Increase in enrollment in Animal Science degree programs plus new Food Systems minor	1235000	1235000	0
TPN-166142	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O0121	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Career Center at Ozarks Technical Community college provides high school students with opportunity to begin their welding career through the welding technology program  This project involves renovation remodeling new and additional equipment  The intent is to add thirty six welding booths Renovation of current facility to create additional space for Welding Technology adding thirty six welding booths and purchase necessary equipment for the newly created space The program in in high demand from the twenty two sending schools and as evidenced by the shortage of welders in southwest Missouri	400000	400000	367093.18
TPN-166185	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O8112	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Renovate 14 classrooms some programs have double classroomsHealth Sciences Graphic Arts Building Trades  Replace windows shop heaters and garage doors on the four shop areas The rooms are exactly as they were in 1999 when the building was built  The district did remodel the career center office last summer with district moneyEquipmentWeldingPlasma Cutter  WeldersAutomotiveTire Mounter  Tire BalancerBuilding TradesLift for Building Trades  Van for Building Trades	400000	400000	0
TPN-166153	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O2101	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	PLTC Safety and Modernization UpdatesWe will be paving parking areas in our PLTC West campus and expanding the parking facilities in the main campus All buildings will be rekeyed and have electronic door access added to every exterior door  Camera systems will be updated and added to the PLTC West campus New computers will be purchased for the multimediaprogramming class Plans also include a driving simulator for the criminal justice program	400000	400000	233801.41
TPN-166172	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O6104	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The American Rescue Plan Act Missouri Area Career Center Opportunity grant funds will be used to complete a renovation for an emerging program in the area of Agriculture  Renovation of the current green house to a food science laboratory Electrical upgrades will also be funded  These include installation of Light Emitting Diode lighting fixtures plumbing Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning and commercial stainless food grade restaurant equipment as well as the necessary plumbing and sanitation areas	323500	323500	292247.49
TPN-166212	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	State Technical College of Missouri-Agriculture Technology Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The State Tech Agriculture Technology Center will have two phasesPhase A the Agriculture Demonstration Farm will be a working farm that provides handson experiences in row crops and beef production Through projectbased learning students will learn how to determine the best use of cropland maximize crop yield utilizing precision farming technology and apply the latest in livestock breeding and animal nutrition Funding will be utilized to purchase the farm acquire livestock and equipment and potentially construct structures needed to support crop and livestock productionPhase B the Agriculture Demonstration Center will be constructed on the State Tech campus and include classrooms a livestock arena wet and dry labs and a food processing lab Funds for this building will be pursued in FY24This proposal builds on 35 technical programs to support the agriculture workforce needs of Missouri and adds new programs in Agriculture Technology Ag Tech and Facilities Operations and Management Ag Tech graduates will have skills in agribusiness animal husbandry agriculture mechanics and precision farming which will enable them to start a career in multiple farm environments  Facilities graduates will be exposed to HVAC plumbing electrical building automation and specific facility management instruction and will be well suited for a wide range of facilities roles including food processing operations	2000000	2000000	2000000
TPN-166182	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O8066	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Career and Technology Center at Fort Osage is requesting new equipmentfacility specifically a 3story training facility with multiple entrances and interior and exterior stairways for our Fire Science EMT and Law Enforcement Programs to utilize  The tower will consist of 5 modular units and will be installed by the manufacturer WHP from Grandview MO  The Fire Training Tower requires a minimum foundation of concrete piers for each of the 4 corners of an 8x20 module with shared corners sharing a pier Our design has 3 modules on the base1st floor with a total of 8 concrete piers  A concrete slab will be poured by our Construction Trades students to meet the foundation requirementsThe Career and Technology Center is also requesting funds to build a new Construction Trades ShopClassroom  This new space will provide muchneeded space to expand our program offerings in the Construction Industry	400000	400000	0
TPN-166216	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	UM System:  University of Missouri-St. Louis: Building the Campus of the Future	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The University of MissouriSt Louis UMSL seeks to foster inclusive prosperity for its diverse student body by reimagining its campus infrastructure and enhancing access to leadingedge academic programs in highdemand fields including biotechnology cybersecurity data science education engineering entrepreneurship nursing and custom workforce development programs In addition the proposal will involve consolidating academic programs reducing the campus footprint and deferred maintenance to focus critical operations on its North Campus	40000000	40000000	13528127.27
TPN-166227	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Apron Reconstruct and Pavement Maintenance at Washington County-Potosi Airport	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Reconstruct Apron and Taxilane Pavements at the Washington CountyPotosi Airport 8WC State Project number AIR023060A1  These funds will be used in conjunction with FAA Airport Improvement AIP and Bipartisan Infrastructure Legislation BIL to make the project whole	1000000	1000000	0
TPN-166121	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	MRRPA Port/Industrial Park Development Project - 35617683	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Marion/Ralls Regional Port Authority (MRRPA), in association with public and private entities including Marion and Ralls Counties and the Hannibal Regional Economic Development Council are submitting this application to fund the construction of a public port/industrial park development located in rural Marion County, Missouri.	837766	837766	15570.6
TPN-166200	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Three Rivers College: Technical Education Expansion	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For Three Rivers College for the acquisition and improvement of land and construction andor renovation needs for technical education expansions including related planning design acquisitions project management equipment and startup costs provided that any grant awards disbursed from this appropriation shall be matched on a 5050 basis by the recipient for project costs up to sixty million 60000000 and further provided project costs over sixty million 60000000 shall be matched on a 2575 basis by the recipient	1500000	1500000	0
TPN-166213	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	University of Missouri-National Center for Applied Reproduction & Genomics	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Construction of the National Center for Applied Reproduction and Genomics which is a multidisciplinary partnership among faculty in MUs College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources and the College of Veterinary Medicine The Center will serve as a national training site for veterinary students practicing veterinarians genetics providers and pharmaceutical industry personnel and producers	2000000	2000000	0
TPN-166148	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O1096	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Rolla Technical Institute a part of the Rolla 31 School District will utilize the grant funds to add enhance and expand highdemand CTE areas  Construction of additional space will allow the opportunity to add Criminal Justice and Welding Technology  Newly constructed areas will create space for Heating Air Conditioning and Refrigeration programs and Masonry programs along with the expansion of Computer Servicing Technology and Early Childhood professions	400000	400000	0
TPN-166204	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Southeast Missouri State University: Various	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For Southeast Missouri State University for the demolition construction andor renovation needs for a dual role multiuse multifacility comprehensive development including related planning design acquisitions project management fixtures equipment systems furniture and startup costs provided that any grant awards disbursed from this appropriation shall be matched on a 5050 basis by the recipient for project costs up to sixty million 60000000 and further provided project costs over sixty million 60000000 shall be matched on a 2575 basis by the recipient	11000000	11000000	7815564.7
TPN-166226	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	New Madrid Port - 2794	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Port improvements including road construction land acquisition and construction of capital assets at New Madrid County Port Authority to support freight movement	5000000	5000000	1430311.1
TPN-166117	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Riverpointe Development - St. Charles	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Infrastructure development. HB3020 20.896	2500000	2500000	2500000
TPN-166219	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	UM System:  Missouri University of Science & Technology: Missouri Protoplex	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Missouri Protoplex will be the principal facility for a statewide initiative to drive economic activity around an expansion of manufacturing in Missouri Known as the Manufacture Missouri Ecosystem MME this initiative will bring together academic and industry experts innovators small and large businesses entrepreneurs educators and policymakers to develop and adopt the technologies to make Missouri a national leader in manufacturing   A reflection of the current statewide distributed ecosystem of small medium and large manufacturers it serves the Missouri Protoplex will be the hub where industry local state and federal government and academia come together to research and develop new materials and methods prototype and test new manufacturing processes and solve multidisciplinary problems that will elevate the states manufacturing sector and help make Missouri ST a national leader in manufacturing engineering and science httpsmasterplanmstedumissouriprotoplex	41250000	41250000	38012.82
TPN-166093	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Electronic Health Record (EHR) Systems	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This funding will be used to implement and/or replace the current EHR in all DMH state-operated facilities, including the hardware. This will allow DMH to meet all new CMS regulations regarding interoperability (the ability to transmit patient information to a health information network).	16000000	16000000	7223125.57
TPN-166106	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Laptop for video surveillance system	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Laptop to be used in conjunction with new video surveillance system.	643.3	643.3	643.3
TPN-166154	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O2109	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The ARPA MACCO grant will be utilized to work on the following slate of projects during the grant period The slate of projects totals more than the grant and will be evaluated by the District as RFPs are turned in projects are listed in priority as of the submission of this grant proposal  Security Entrances at all buildings 7 Entrances to buildings and grounds  gate and opener upgrade IP cameras for each entrance openers for doors and gates software for systems wires cabling and cardsremotes for entrances and installation of the system Estimated cost 9000000A Building Roof Replacement  Estimated cost 350000B Building Roof Replacement  Estimated cost 250000Internet Infrastructure New Air Conditioned Server Racks Generator Backup for Servers Switch and POE Expansion to improve network connectivity  Estimated cost 40000Epoxy Shop Floors  Auto Technology Auto Collision and HVACR floors Estimated cost 100000Total Slate of Approved Projects 83000000 of which 53333333 worth will be submitted for the 400000 grant award	400000	400000	0
TPN-166205	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Truman State University: Kirk Student Access & Success Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Student Access  Success Center will be located in renovated space in Kirk Building This facility is central to campus and will house services including the Student Health Center University Counseling Services Center for Academic Excellence advising and skill development classes Student Access and Disability Services Office Tutoring Center Speech Center and Writing Center This integration of services provides holistic support in one location helping to narrow racial gender and other gaps in retention and graduation rates The project includes demolition of a nearby building which currently houses the health clinic and counseling center removing 10215 square feet from the campus building inventory This new Student Access  Success Center is intentionally designed to meet student learning and development needs and empower students to achieve excellence and realize their full potential as independent learners and professionals	15767500	15767500	4261157.16
TPN-166114	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	NIC St. Louis Dutchtown Main Street	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For the purpose of ADA compliant renovations and improvements to a building that fosters innovation in place based neighborhood businesses, offers co- working space and a neighborhood talent pool, provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds.	50000	50000	0
TPN-166120	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	DED - Cell Tower Grant Program	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Missouri Cell Tower Grant Program (Program) helps improve accessibility for those without access to quality cellular service. Funds are available for projects that will serve areas lacking quality service prioritizing those tower projects which are located on public lands.	4067567.38	4067567.38	0
TPN-166220	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	UM System:University of Missouri-Columbia:NextGen Radiopharmaceuticals & Animal	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The University of Missouri MU Requests 115M in state funding to be matched with 243M to invest in building research programs that support statewide economic growth for Missouri  This transformative investment will enhance assets that are unique Nuclear Research Reactor College of Veterinary Medicine Animal Resources Center College of Agriculture Food and Natural Resources to Missouri and drive economic growth and be leveraged to attract industry partners to Missouri  Additionally this transformative investment will demonstrate a high level of commitment to research excellence from MU and the State to support our AAU standing	104500000	104500000	104500000
TPN-166223	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Golden Valley Memorial Hospital	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For capital improvement projects Golden Valley Memorial Hospital GVMH is located in Clinton GVMH has multiple specialty clinics throughout Clinton as well as clinics in Warsaw Osceola and Windsor In late September 2021 GVMH signed an agreement with Truman Regional Community Development Corporation to purchase the building at 1701 N 2nd Street where State Fair Community College SFCC is located in Clinton The acquisition is an investment in the Clinton community to ensure advanced educational opportunities remain locally through SFCC to safeguard existing jobs and continue the pipeline of highly trained medical graduates to GVMH to fill open positions and provide quality care to patientsA match is required for this project The match rate is 5050 The GA categorized this as Health  Economic Impact	1000000	1000000	1000000
TPN-166201	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	UCM Humphreys Building Renovation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For University of Central Missouri for the deferred maintenance construction andor renovation needs for the Humphreys Building including related planning design acquisitions project management equipment and startup costs provided that any grant awards disbursed from this appropriation shall be matched on a 5050 basis by the recipient for project costs up to sixty million 60000000 and further provided project costs over sixty million 60000000 shall be matched on a 2575 basis by the recipient	39850000	39850000	2167967.72
TPN-166224	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Hospital in Mississippi County	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For asbestos abatement and cleanup at a hospital that provides a ministry of healing wellness quality and love located in Mississippi County This appears to be for St Francis Hospital which is not in Mississippi County but in Cape Girardeau MHA has confirmed there are no hospitals in Mississippi County Ferguson Medical Group a partner of Saint Francis Healthcare operates two primary care offices in Mississippi County one in Charleston and one in East Prairie	500000	500000	0
TPN-166203	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Northwest Missouri State University: Martindale Hall	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For Northwest Missouri State University for the construction andor renovation needs for Martindale Hall and related health and allied sciences education program expansions and campus renovations including related planning design acquisitions project management equipment and startup costs provided that any grant awards disbursed from this appropriation shall be matched on a 5050 basis by the recipient for project costs up to sixty million 60000000 and further provided project costs over sixty million 60000000 shall be matched on a 2575 basis by the recipient	8500000	8500000	119673.61
TPN-166166	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O5046	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Most of the funds will be used for Instructional Equipment with a small portion used for new construction of a garage        New construction of a permanent garage facility to house Auto Technology and Light Duty Diesel Technology program vehicles and parts that occupy much classroomshop space will alleviate space issues for instruction  New equipment includes Plasma Table ProStar Lancer Cobot Welding Robot Forklift Potocentric 3D Printer and Bofa Fume Extractor for multiple classrooms Rack Server for Computer Networking program VR Gloves and Valve VR Kit Studio Lighting Grid AV Network Switches The Factory Five 35 Hot Rod Truck Kit Vehicle Auto Tech and Collision Repair The Delfield Front Service Line Culinary Nursing equipment Cargo Trailer Construction Technology Masonry  HVAC programs and a 20 Storage Container to store items without taking up student and shop space	400000	400000	126874.17
TPN-166160	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O4083	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The awarded funds along with local funds will be used for new construction of a facility to house two existing programs Welding Technology and Project Lead The Way Engineering  The Welding Technology program will consisting of a new classroom storage area and a handicapped accessible bathroom and safety shower  The new facility will also house Project Lead The Way Engineering complete with space for a robot station and allow space to be converted to a recording room for the Radio and Television Broadcasting program   Moving the two existing programs allows expansion opportunities for two of our fastest growing programs Power Sports and Construction Technology	400000	400000	116415.84
TPN-166158	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O4044	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Reeds Spring school district is constructing a new 80000 SF building of type IIB construction located north of the existing Reeds Spring High School The technical center features a culinary arts teaching kitchen seven standard classrooms six shop spaces and six clean labs combined with classroom spaces In addition the program contains a 60 seat lecture hall and a 112 seat commons space with tables and chairs to host visits from college and trade partners community gatherings and school wide events Fenced yard space adds an additional 36000 SF of work space for students working in construction automotive welding and marine tradesThe building is currently in the construction documents phase with construction scheduled to begin in the fall of 2022 The technical center will be a combination of masonry block and light gauge stud framing on polished concrete floors with long span structural systems to allow adequate open floor space in shops and classrooms The buildings HVAC system is comprised of dedicated outside air units a cooling tower boilers and water source heat pumps that will be tied into the existing campus loop Electrical needs have been coordinated with each program teacher to ensure proper power is supplied to each trade program The building is equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system  The technical center is hoping to be completed by fall of 2024  It will house our current 12 different programs	400000	400000	400000
TPN-166095	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Anti-ballistic glass	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Anti-ballistic glass fitted atop the counter and on the public (threat) side of the X-Ray in the area of the marshal.	17380	17380	17380
TPN-166162	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O4110	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Daily operation of the career center necessitates students moving in and out of the building to access shop areas equipment and instructional spaces This requires doors being unlocked In order to keep the back of campus secure we have fencing and a gate at either side of the building We also get multiple deliveries during the day and have classes such as automotive and construction that have to leave and return to the gates frequently All of this creates competing interests of security and functionality The current gates are manually operated and locked with padlocks If we keep them locked someone has to leave their class and open the gate every time someone needs to enter and exit With remotely operated gates we could monitor access from the office as well as giving our district employee access via code or fob This would take the burden off our instructors and students and allow them to access their own areas in a more secure environment  The grant funds will also allow the opportunity to remodel the Cosmetology program salon	234000	234000	156319.16
TPN-166133	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	EastGate Commerce Center - 35613987	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	EastGate Commerce Center is a 1026 acre site in Independence, MO located along Little Blue Parkway and Highway 78 approximately 3 miles north of I-70. The immediate project site requires some road and infrastructure improvements to fully develop the site. Additional access points are needed to facilitate the movement of traffic in and around the site, as well as additional turn lanes to provide access to various areas of the development (see budget and exhibits). This includes new intersections on both Little Blue Parkway and Highway 78 and the expansion and upgrade of Truman Road to city standards. Additionally, there are two significant road improvements in the immediate project area. The first is improving Bly Rd to a 36’ wide collector street consistent with Independence city standards. The second, and more meaningful, is the reinforcement of the existing Little Blue Parkway.	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-166195	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Metropolitan Community College: 21st Century Teaching and Learning Environment E	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For Metropolitan Community College for the construction andor renovation needs for the Blue River Campus including related planning design acquisitions project management equipment and startup costs provided that any grant awards disbursed from this appropriation shall be matched on a 5050 basis by the recipient for project costs up to sixty million 60000000 and  further provided project costs over sixty million 60000000 shall be matched on a 2575 basis by the recipient	15000000	4969199.98	3518061.73
TPN-166171	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O6096	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The ARPA MACCO grant will be utilized for the following projects during the grant period  The projects listed total more than the grant and will be evaluated by the district as request for proposals come in and according to priorityControlled access security measures additional swipe badges and installation for secured entrances Gates and openers to limit public access to shop areas  Estimated cost 60000Epoxy Shop Floors  Auto Technology Auto Collision HVAC Estimated cost 100000Additional Equipment and Renovationinstallation for the new Fire Science Program and Lab additional turnout gear breathing apparatusrenovation of lab  plumbing electric ventilation systemcontainerized live fire training system  Estimated cost 180000Expansion of Construction trades to include an outdoor lab area foundationportable awning for tiny homestorage shed projects built by construction trades  Estimated Cost 65000 Expansion of Automotive Technology to include two post lift diagnostic and precision measuring equipment torque equipment  Estimated cost 50000Expansion of Agriculture Program Drones  Estimated cost 20000ExpansionRenovation of Electrical trades Classroom automation equipment electric  Estimated Cost 50000 Culinary Arts Mobile Food Unit trailer  Estimated Cost 10000 Expansion of all 12 program areas simulated lab experience ARVR Learning using zSpace inspire devices Estimated Equipment Cost 200	400000	400000	0
TPN-166188	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O9077	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Design and construction of a 4th CTE building on our Career Center Campus that would house an existing CTE program Digital Media and a new CTE program Culinary Arts	400000	400000	0
TPN-166208	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	University of Central Missouri-Agricultural Certifications	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project consists of five sets of newly developed stackable or standalone agriculture workforce certificates addressing specific challenges and labor issues faced in agriculture Greenhouse ManagementAgritourismPrecision AgricultureAgricultural SafetyAgricultural Lab Research TechnicianProject includes construction of Greenhouse facility and repurposing of Mitchell Street storefront and barn	2000000	269049.35	18189.62
TPN-166147	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O1092	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds from this grant will be used to aid in the construction of a new 40000 sq ft 9250000 Current River Career Center located on Doniphan R1s main campus  Plans for this facility were approved by the Doniphan R1 Board of Education in a special board meeting on 1032022  Ground breaking for the new facility is expected in March of 2023 with an estimated completion date in January of 2024  The new facility will house and expand all programs currently offered to students from Naylor Neelyville Couch and Doniphan at CRCC It will also move Family Consumer Sciences  Human Resources from the Doniphan High School building into the new career center	400000	400000	400000
TPN-166173	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O6119	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Remodel former North Tech Architecture shop to become new Dental Assisting shop with four operatories dental chairs related equipment including cleaning tools exam tools and digital dental xray equipment Remodel former classroom space at South Tech into new Electrical trades lab with four defined work stations aligned to board approved curriculum	400000	400000	400000
TPN-166130	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	New Madrid Industrial Park Rail Extension - 35549507	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of New Madrid has acquired property within the city to attract industrial expansion opportunities. The proposed project will support the ongoing development of the New Madrid Industrial Park. Specifically, the project will construct a rail spur, turnout tracks, and spur extensions to provide rail access to the industrial park to support Circular Syn Tech and other potential industrial clients. The project will construct a mainline switch on the Union Pacific railway and provide turnout tracks to provide industry access.	2500000	2500000	0
TPN-166179	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O7062	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Renovation and expansion of the back shop lots to increase the instructional area of each program and add new instructional equipment such as a skid steer a track torch environment or medical equipment for the expanded instructional area	400000	400000	0
TPN-166222	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Texas County Memorial Hospital Surgical Cener	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Texas County Memorial Hospital TCMH will use these funds to replace an outdated 40 yearold surgery area at the Hospital This facility currently performs 1400 surgical proceduresyear Per Ozark Radio News in April of 2022 TCMH had secured a 1 million federal grant through the Emergency Rural Healthcare Grant for this purposeA local match is required The GA categorized this as Health  Economic Impact	1000000	1000000	1000000
TPN-166215	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	State Technical College- Supply Chain Workforce Education	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	COVID19 has exposed significant deficiencies in the nations supply chain  The speed of which processes are being automated is expected to increase significantly as a result of the pandemic  All of the academic programs utilizing this space will educate technicians for roles in a highly automated workplace  This project would renovate the Engineering Technology Center Welding Technology Center and add a structure that connects the two buildings  Space that would become available will be renovated as well   160000 SF would be constructed or renovated as a result of funding  This project would allow State Tech to grow from 2000 students to 3000 students	30000000	30000000	4385718.68
TPN-166207	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Western State University : Convergent Technology Alliance Center (CTAC)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For Missouri Western State University and North Central MissouriCollege collaborative efforts for the construction andor renovation needs for the Convergent Technology Alliance CenterCTAC including related planning design acquisitions project management equipment and startup costs provided that any grant awards disbursed from this appropriation shall be matched on a 5050 basis by the recipient for project costs up to sixty million 60000000 and further provided project costs over sixty million 60000000 shall be matched on a 2575 basis by the recipient	7500000	7500000	4737529.5
TPN-166221	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	University of Missouri - School of Medicine - Thompson Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For construction and sitework of a center for autism and neurodevelopmental disorders that provides clinical services research and training	31500000	31500000	0
TPN-166217	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	University of Missouri  - Delta Research Soils Lab	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For maintenance repair and capital improvements of the TE Jake Fisher Delta Research Center The Fisher Delta Research Extension and Education Center was established in 1959 in Portageville Mo to provide research and educational programs unique to the Southeast Delta Region of the state and to function as a Center for University programs educational meetings workshops short courses 4H training Future Farmers of America Field Days and Farmer Field DaysThe FDREEC facilities include 1119 acres of land at five locations representing the major soil types of the region Research studies are designed to improve production of crops that are of major importance to the region namely soybeans cotton rice grain sorghum wheat peanuts and possible new crops that could economically benefit the area	1000000	1000000	1000000
TPN-166101	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Atlas Security Camera System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	IP Camera System Installation	28262.04	28262.04	28262.04
TPN-166225	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Phelps Health EMS Helipad	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Phelps Health partners with Air Methods to provide Phelps County and surrounding areas with air ambulance services Per the Phelps County Focus in March of 2022 Phelps Health Board of Trustees approved a 54 million for the planning design maintenance or construction of an emergency medical services combined ambulance baseair ambulance helipad This construction would give Phelps Health an additional helipad Phelps Health plans to start construction during the first quarter of 2023 but has yet to raise the required 54 million	4000000	4000000	356210.61
TPN-166164	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O4201	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	We need more electrical supply to be able to meet the needs of a couple of our highdemand programs Adding threephase electrical service will allow us to expand our welding and fabrication program and will allow us to electrify our new greenhouse and meet the electrical needs in our Agriculture shop  We also are wanting to add an access road   The road would allow several things to happen   This would improve access to all of our shops and allow access to our new greenhouse  In doing so our productivity will increase as a drive completely around Northwest Technical School and Maryville High School will allow our greenhouse to be more of a production facility from our projectbased learning   Our Technical School is attached to Maryville High School   This road would also allow emergency vehicles quicker and better access to both our facilities if the need would ariseWe are already working with an architecture firm on a long range facilities use plan Incite Design Studio has given us estimates of 100000 on the electrical project and 300000 on the road	400000	400000	0
TPN-166125	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Moberly Industrial Park Site Development Project - 35614180	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Moberly in partnership with the Moberly Holding Company has 206 acres dedicated to Moberly's Industrial Park. The Industrial Park is located next to U.S. Highway 63 with 2 businesses already located in the park which utilize all the utilities required for today's large and medium sized businesses. This proposed project consists of expanding the accessibility of the industrial park by adding additional infrastructure to include roads, curb and gutter and lighting. In 2020 the City of Moberly was approved for an EDA grant which included the approval of an Environmental Review for the Industrial Park.	1085560	1085560	0
TPN-166218	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	University of Missouri Foundation Seed	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For equipment and facilities for the Missouri Foundation Seed program	3240000	3240000	832973.32
TPN-166189	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities 09117	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	We have been approved by our local board of education to do the following renovation  remodel to Grand River Technical School GRTS if we are approved for the 400000 from the ARPA MACCO Grant  There was an addition to GRTS in the early 1970s that included a 25 ft x 300 ft metal leanto  storage space along the entire west side of GRTS  The space is not insulated and the metal siding has many holes in it along with being discolored  Our initial project is to replace that metal insulate the inside of the space and install more lighting  We also plan to replace all the existing overhead doors  openers in that space that are all well over 50 years old  By doing these upgrades it will allow our programs to utilize this space for instruction all year long as opposed to just the months when the outside temperature is favorable  Most of the overhead doors are failing and becoming a safety hazard to open with fear of them failing and injuring a student  They are also not all secure so replacing them allows for more security of our students and equipment  In addition to this project we plan to replace the lighting within GRTS to more energy efficient LED lighting throughout  These projects allow for GRTS to utilize more of our space for instruction create a more safe environment for students and to create a more energy efficient building so we can utilize more of our local dollars educating students as opposed to energy costs	400000	400000	372160.48
TPN-166161	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O4089	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Use of the awarded funds will assist in renovation of existing space creating two career and technical education classrooms and career and technical education collaborative space  The funds will also assist in the addition of two new programs Physical Therapy and Law Enforcement   New equipment will be purchased for the two new programs  Upgrades will also be made to the current facility heating air conditioning and ventilation system fire and smoke alarm system and electrical upgrades	400000	400000	0
TPN-166190	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O9142	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Current plans are to expand early childhood center and our early childhood professions program to incorporate clinical setting experiences for CTE students This is a growing need within our community district and across the state of Missouri We hope that by offering these clinical experiences in working with early childhood students it will give relevant handson experiences to spur interest in the career field Other possibilities could include meeting facility needs that have come about due to our expanding digital media pathway upgrading and purchasing additional industry specific equipment for digital media updating equipment used by our ag and machining programs updating and improving the equipment within our Medical Lab and updating shooting simulator used criminal justice program	400000	400000	63252
TPN-166181	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O8013	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	RenovationRemodel    Funds will be used for renovation to the current facility  Student and public safety and security measures will    include a bellintecom system a wall separation from the student and public area of the Culinary Arts     restaurant and public services area	400000	400000	309470.65
TPN-166178	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O7061	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	With more student enrollment in our many Skilled Technical Science and Agriculture Education course offerings we need additional space within our gated compound for Automotive Technology Agriculture Education and Carpentry To create more space the school district will construct a new masonry screening wall to meet existing security fencing and entry gate Install separate man gate with access control and rework existing security fence to allow additional space for Boonville Technical Education Center student vehicles customer vehicles for practice exterior storage and improve traffic flow into security fence to address both safety and space concerns  Funds will also be used to construct a storage facility that will free laboratory space resulting in more student instructional space	400000	400000	0
TPN-166196	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	North Central Missouri College: Student Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For North Central Missouri College for the construction andor renovation needs for a student center including related planning design  acquisitions project management equipment and startup costs provided that any grant awards disbursed from this appropriation shall be matched on a 5050 basis by the recipient for project costs up to sixty million 60000000 and further provided project costs over sixty million 60000000 shall be matched on a 2575 basis by the recipient	1750000	1750000	759093.3
TPN-166184	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O8078	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds will impact four program areas  Health Science program area will receive an updated lab spaces and equipment for Certified Nursing Assistant certification and Emergency Medical Technician experiences Culinary Arts ProStart program equipment updates such as walkin freezers and other related culinary arts equipment Auto Collision program improvements result in purchasing new industry related equipment and Construction Technology program will benefit with improvements in tools and dust collection system	400000	400000	0
TPN-166228	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Fuel System and Airport Improvements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Airport repairs and improvements to include design land preparation construction and construction inspection of a Aviation Fuel system for tenant and itinerant users of the airport	686500	686500	0
TPN-166186	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O8142	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Proposed improvements at the Nevada Regional Technical Center will include a combination of new construction which will open up space for expansion into a new program pathway renovation and upgrades of existing facilities and the purchase of instructional equipment for current program enhancement Plans are to construct the new fulltime classroom and shop area housing one Ag instructor and all of hisher classes throughout the day In turn this will open up a classroom and large shop area on our main campus and provide an opportunity to expand our program offerings  With the new addition Nevada Regional Technical Center would have the space and opportunity for a new program such as Criminal Justice Law Enforcement  With the available space the Culinary Arts program would have the room and opportunity to incorporate a food trailer into the program allowing students much community engagement	400000	400000	0
TPN-166126	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	3rd & Mitchell Industrial Park Development Project - 35612751	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Chillicothe has purchased 314 acres for $2 million in order to develop a new industrial park. This project will construct municipal infrastructure to the acreage and will allow the city to being an immediate build out of infrastructure rather than performing the work incrementally over several years. This will allow the city to begin marketing and recruitment efforts upon completion. The existing industrial park consists of 172 acres and is basically full with only 12 acres available for development. All proposed infrastructure will be built to allow for the capacity required for future development. Work includes 12 and 15 sewer and waterlines, a lift station and force main, extension of pavement for egress and ingress of the acreage, curb, gutter and storm drainage system. Electric and gas will be extended to the site by providers. Environmental Assessment is currently being performed, while many of the other clearance reports have already been performed.	2500000	2500000	0
TPN-166197	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Moberly Area Community College: Next Century Networking:  Transforming Broadband	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For Moberly Area Community College for a Next Century Networking project across the five campus system to include the construction andor renovation needs for the network including related planning design acquisitions project management equipment and startup costs provided that any grant awards disbursed from this appropriation shall be matched on a 5050 basis by the recipient for project costs up to sixty million 60000000 and further provided project costs over sixty million 60000000 shall be matched on a 2575 basis by the recipient	2233722	2233722	210610.36
TPN-166157	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O3113	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This grant will allow building and program enhancement and expansion  More than four decades has passed since the last facility renovation  The awarded grant funds will be used for building and program enhancements including safety and hardware upgrades installing adequate ventilation and filtration system replacing welding booths and kitchen equipment for the new Culinary Arts program  Additional facility upgrades will provide better handicap accessibility and service yard improvements	400000	400000	0
TPN-166191	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O9148	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The equipment that will be purchased from this grant will be utilized by all Franklin Technology Center High Demand programs in order to enhance and expand their offerings  The Automotive programs will add items to enhance and expand their current workforce training needs  Other Skilled Technical Science Programs such as Construction Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning and Refrigeration and Welding will also upgrade machines needed and utilized by industry partners so that students can enter the workforce with the skills necessary to be successful  The Computer Science Information program will add additional technology as we progress from Computer Repair and Networking instruction to the inclusion of Gaming and Cyber Security training for our students as well The Advanced Manufacturing Program will add new lathes to update existing equipment  Additional equipment updates are planned for the Television and Audio Production program and the Culinary Arts program	400000	400000	0
TPN-166139	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O0063	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The current space is a shell  These funds will be used to build walls to divide off space for shops and classrooms  Funds will be used to add bathrooms run electrical internet install new HVAC install a sprinkler system and install security system  The building is a T shape  One end of the T will be cut in half by a fire wall to house Auto Collision including paint booth and paint storage room and the other half will be Construction Tech  The long part of the T will house Auto Mechanics  That space will have to have new insulation air lines sprinkler system security system internet and WiFi cabling and HVAC installed  In the middle section of the T a male and female restroom will have to be constructed  With this new water lines and septic lines will have to be installed  Grant funds will be used to purchase materials and installation of the materials   A portion of the building will be left open and unfinished at this time  It will be prepped for future programs once funding become available   The SCTC is currently working with the City of Sikeston on an additional grant for this project as well  We have full community support for this project	400000	400000	0
TPN-166122	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Twin Cities Industrial Park Expansion and Infrastructure - 35617240	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The proposed project will expand the existing Twin Cities Industrial Park in Texas County Missouri while using a combination of other federal dollars to complete wastewater, stormwater and roadway improvements at the existing site. Seven parcels have been identified for purchase with letters of intent in place covering each, adding approximately 274 acres to the existing site, creating a total industrial footprint of approximately 374 acres.	2500000	2500000	0
TPN-166129	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	St. Louis Brownleigh Site - 35566218	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The grant will fund redevelopment of the 106 acre Brownleigh Site in underinvested St. Louis County adjacent to Lambert Airport, disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. The funds will pay for site feasibility, planning, engineering, preparation, and infrastructure. Given the complexity and regulations necessary to redevelop next to an international airport, the grant will be critical in financing the costs of redevelopment to make it possible for The Boeing Company to prepare for advanced manufacturing aerospace projects that contribute to national security and bolster the state and region as an aerospace and defense hub.	2500000	2500000	0
TPN-166169	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O5145	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	ARPA funds are requested to update restroom facilities for high school CTE delivered through the Jefferson College Area Technical School programs There are two sets of existing restrooms in the Area Technical School that have not been updated since the building was constructed in 1999 and there are two and onehalf sets in the Career and Technical Education building that have not been significantly updated since the building was constructed in 1966 These restroom facilities are used extensively by high school CTE students The restrooms have outdated finishes that show wear from repeated graffiti removal deep grout between tiles that is difficult to keep clean stalls that have become damaged over the years and some plumbing problems The upgraded restrooms will provide modern sanitary facilities with durable easy to clean finishes that will serve the programs well for many years to come We are requesting the maximum award amount to restore all of these restrooms but the project scope could be reduced if the full amount is not awarded	400000	400000	147854.25
TPN-166156	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	STL School District Lead Fence Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project will provide fifty percent funding for the replacement of fences at schools to remediate lead paint	800000	800000	192329.78
TPN-166194	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Mineral Area College: Center for Excellence (Career and Tech Center Construction	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For Mineral Area College for the construction andor renovation needs for a Center for Excellence including related planning design acquisitions project management equipment and startup costs provided that any grant awards disbursed from this appropriation shall be matched on a 5050 basis by the recipient for project costs up to sixty million 60000000 and further provided project costs over sixty million 60000000 shall be matched on a 2575 basis by the recipient	7500000	7500000	7116346.47
TPN-166167	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O5102	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Facility Infrastructure Improvements new construction of a Culinary Arts ProgramBuildingEquipment	400000	400000	400000
TPN-166104	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Atlas Security Panic Button System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Panic button system installation with monitoring.	2020.19	2020.19	2020.19
TPN-166124	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Project 475A - 35616639	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of St. Joseph is seeking funding for construction of utility extensions that will service the Eastowne Business Park industrial site zoned as M1 (light manufacturing). The project will also improve the roadways of Pickett Road and Ag Expo Way to provide direct access to U.S. Highway 36. The proposed construction will directly benefit 95 acres of industrial use at the Eastowne Business Park that are shovel ready. The park is located at the intersection of Pickett and Riverside roads. This project will enhance the industrial zone by building a new pump station at the end of Pickett Rd. This project will further benefit the adjacent Capstone Technology Park, a new 130-acre development adjacent to the north of the site and the Missouri Premier Site, a 158-acre industrial site adjacent to the west. The Eastowne Business Park completed mass grading in the Summer of 2022. The site is zoned for industrial use, has been fully surveyed and is adjacent to developable land.	2500000	2500000	0
TPN-166115	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Buck O'Neil Center - Kansas City	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Nonprofit agency designated as the primary economic development arm for the renovation, maintenance and repair of historic structures.	1000000	1000000	0
TPN-166098	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Security improvement-first floor windows	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install anti-ballistic panels inside first floor windows for security.	40780.32	40780.32	40780.32
TPN-166152	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O2090	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The awarded grant funds will be used for new construction infrastructure improvements renovation and remodeling of the current facilities and new additional equipment  The Lewis and Clark Career Center consists of five career and technical education buildings  The funds will be used to improve ventilation in shop spaces Welding Technology will receive new gas piping and ventilation systems  Renovation of an exterior location will provide expansion to outdoor space for the Law Enforcement program  New equipment will be provided to the Brick and Stone Masonry program and interior energy efficiency upgrades will be provided to the buildings with the ARPA grant  funds	400000	400000	171289.36
TPN-166131	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	SEMO Industrial Park - 35544263	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project includes the development of 357 acres of ready-to-go land to promote economic growth and attract new businesses with the Scott/Cape County region. This park is designed for industrial and commercial development located in Northern Scott County allowing businesses and manufacturers' easy access to resources, such as infrastructure, transportation, utilities and a strong work force. We are proposing construction of roads; storm water drainage; water and wastewater infrastructure for this industrial site to enhance economic development growth. The first phase of the park offers 200 acres consisting of 18 lots ranging from four to 20 acres, with a second phase offering 157 acres. With committed key support industry partners secured and an outpour of regional support, this proposed project is an ideal investment for regional economic growth and promotion in Southeast Missouri.	2500000	2500000	0
TPN-166141	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O0093	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Columbia Area Career Center plans to utilize grant funds to remodel an Agriculture Education building The configuration of the current facility has limitations as a highquality learning space Some of the primary issues include storage is not adequate the main room is long and narrow and does not provide easy supervision the walkin cooler is inside the building and takes up valuable floor space and the other room is not large enough to be used for instruction After the remodel the walkin cooler will be replaced with an external model to open the space available for instruction interior walls will be removed to open up the interior space the restrooms will be remodeled a dedicated sink area will be created functional storage will be added in the building and other storage will be moved and two large classrooms will be reconstructed in the space The remodel will result in two useable classrooms for horticulture and floriculture classes which is an expansion of learning space for the program	400000	400000	0
TPN-166132	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Project Redbird Production Facility - 35626618	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Project will involve the construction and equipping of a manufacturing facility that will generate additional capacity of the Company's fiber cement board product to meet consumer demand. The Project is not expected to involve the relocation of jobs or equipment from any other existing facility of the Company.	2500000	2500000	0
TPN-166175	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O6139	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Four Rivers Career Center will use the funds to update seven of the career and technical education programs  Career and technical education programs impacted by the grant are Project Lead The Way Engineering Welding Technology Robotic arms will benefit the Project Lead The Way Engineering program Collision Repair Machine Tool Technology Building Trades Automotive Technology and Practical Nursing  New equipment such as training simulators computer technology and robotic arms will consume most of the grant funds	400000	400000	0
TPN-166107	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	VOCA Support	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For grants to organizations for services and programs to assist victims of crime, provided that such funds shall be awarded through a competitive grant process.	24000000	24000000	16655189.19
TPN-166118	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	KC Historical Redevelopment - Parade Park	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For the redevelopment, reconstruction, and rehabilitation of a historically designated cooperatively-owned project.	0	0	0
TPN-165720	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230404 - Crossroads Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	212500	212500	23670
TPN-165721	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230405 - Eastern R&D Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	437500	437500	0
TPN-165722	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230406 - Farmington Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	546875	546875	0
TPN-165723	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	C230407 - Fulton R&D Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	437500	437500	250464.63
TPN-165724	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	C230408 - Cremer Therapeutic Community Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	0	0	0
TPN-165725	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230409 - Jefferson City Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	350000	350000	0
TPN-165726	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230410 - Kansas City Reentry Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	8500	8500	0
TPN-165727	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230411 - Moberly Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	415625	415625	66460
TPN-165336	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Joplin DW Legislative Priority Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	1 Zora Street Water Main InstallationInstall 10000 of 12 water main on Zora Street to East of Hwy 249 for residential customers without access to reliable source of water supply 2 County Road 180 Water Main InstallationInstall 9000 of 12 water main on County Road 180 north of Apple Road for residential customers without access to reliable source of water supply 3 7th Street Water Main InstallationInstall 6400 of 12 water main on 7th Street from Duquesne Road to Kinser Road for residential customers without access to reliable source of water supply	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-165337	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Lee's Summit WW - Legislative Priority Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The project consists of upsizing replacement and extension of approximately 19000 linear feet of sanitary sewer  This work is located in several drainage basins around the City of Lees Summit and will be let in several projects based on the work in each basin  The pipes to be replaced and extended are in sizes ranging from 830 in diameter and the work will renew an aging system with capacity issues and will retire a pump station from the current system  Additional work will be done to renew the existing system using in situ methods for high inflow and infiltration areas for both collection system mains and manholes	10500000	10500000	0
TPN-165338	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Ozark WW - Legislative Priority Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	This project consists of constructing a new lift station south of Finley River near the 10th Street Siphon constructing an overflow basin at the Elk Valley Treatment Plant and redirecting Shop Lift Stations flow to the new Finley River Lift Station  The new Finley River Lift Station will eliminate the 10th Street Siphon and receive flow from the Shop Lift Station  The new Finley River Lift Station will pump to the Elk Valley Treatment Plant via approximately 23000 lineal feet of large diameter force main  Construct a 4 million gallon stormwater overflow basin at the Elk Valley Treatment Plant  The stormwater overflow basin will be needed to prevent hydraulic overload of the Elk Valley Plant during storm events  The Shop Lift Station should be redirected to the New Finley River Lift Station  This will require construction of approximately 3900 lineal feet of force main	3250000	3250000	0
TPN-165339	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	City of Republic Wastewater Legislative Priority Wastewater Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	This project includes the following CIP 3 Construction of a firm capacity 09 MGD duplex submersible lift station and approximately 3100 linear feet of 8inch discharge forcemain Project construction is expected to cost 248 M and begin May 2023 CIP 6 Construction of a approximately 13000 linear feet of 8 to 36 inch gravity sewer Project construction is expected to cost 9 M and begin July 2023 CIP 7 Construction of a firm capacity 50 MGD triplex submersible lift station and approximately 8000 linear feet of 18 inch discharge forcemain Project construction expected to cost 57 million and begin in late 2023 WWTP Blending Construction of screening improvements transfer pumping filtration disinfection system electrical systems etc as required to eliminate Outfall 002 Project construction expected to cost 150 million and begin in July 2023 and WWTP MBR Expansion Construction of influent pumping fine screens grit removal process basins membrane bioreactor outfall administrative and lab and associated chemical system electrical systems etc Project construction expected to cost 850 million and begin in February 2024	25000000	25000000	17354330.08
TPN-165340	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Rolla DW Priority Project B63D1890D459	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	This project includes water main replacement North of I44 near White Columns Drive water main replacement for Bishop Ave North of I44 and water main replacement 10th Street between Holloway and Forum	1100000	1100000	0
TPN-165341	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Rolla Legislative Priority Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Hypoint force main redundancy System extension to serve existing businesses Develop a facility plan to explore expanded service area CIPP sewer lining	900000	900000	12600
TPN-165342	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	St. Charles County Legislative Priority Stormwater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Procurement of equipment personnel engineering and construction services to inspect storm sewers in unincorporated areas of St Charles County Perform a watershed study encompassing the Heritage Subdivision Preparation of an engineers report containing a master plan for recommended stormwater improvement projects within the studied watershed Design and construction of a portion of the recommended stormwater improvement projects within the County found during the watershed study and CCTV inspections	2500000	2500000	0
TPN-165448	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Weaubleau Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Re lining main sewer lines	990000	990000	0
TPN-165449	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Wheatland Wastewater Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	This project consists of the rehabilitation of the existing manholes throughout the collection system in an effort to reduce the amount of inflow and infiltration repair the damaged centerpivot machine used to landapply the WWTP effluent replace the pumps and upgrade the electrical controls in the existing lift stations install sealed lids on manholes that are subject to occasional flooding and provide a System Control and Data Acquisition SCADA system on the existing lift stations	961779	961779	74067.23
TPN-165450	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Winona Wastewater System Rehabilitation Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The project includes major repairs within the Citys collection system to remove Inflow and Infiltration  In addition it includes substantial repairs to the Citys 1985 wastewater treatment facility which suffers from a number of systems that are past their design life	5000000	5000000	1262500.25
TPN-165728	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230412 - MO Eastern Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	175000	175000	0
TPN-165729	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230413 - Maryville Treatment Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	87500	87500	0
TPN-165730	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230414 - Northeast Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	350000	350000	0
TPN-165731	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230415 - Ozark Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	328125	328125	0
TPN-165732	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230416 - Potosi Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	262500	262500	0
TPN-165733	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230417 - South Central Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	262500	262500	0
TPN-165734	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	C230418 - Southeast Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	0	0	0
TPN-165735	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230419 - Tipton Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	330500	330500	0
TPN-165191	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233809 - Lake of the Ozarks State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165192	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233810 - Long Branch State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165193	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233811 - Mark Twain State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165194	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233812 - Montauk State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165343	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Union DW Legislative Priority Project	5-Infrastructure	5.14-Drinking water: Storage	Provide drinking water storage at the eastern extents of city limits	900000	900000	0
TPN-165344	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Warrenton WW Legislative Priority Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	This project will double our current plants capacity from 32MGD to 64 MGD  Improvements will be needed over the next 215 years due to the expected future growth  We have previously completed multiple interceptors for our sewer system updated lift stations and installed ultraviolet disinfection at our Waste Water Treatment Plant  Our current permitted design flow is 32 MGD with our average daily flow being 186 MGD leaving availability at approximately 134 MGD Our current approved developments would use an estimate of 955000 GD within 13 years and approximately 230000 GD more within 35 years  There is also an interest  we anticipate to be completed within 1 to 2 years that would total an estimate of 955000 GD as well as approximately 230000 GD more to be utilized within 35 years  These numbers will remain only if we stop approving development otherwise they will continue to increase  As everyone knows municipalities survive on development therefore we do not anticipate this stopping since we continue to grow Our plan would be to do this project in phases and each phase would increase our capacity until it has doubled	3159753	3159753	0
TPN-165345	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Bolivar Stormwater Improvements Project-AB82D393425B	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The City of Bolivar MO is proposing improvements to an approximately 1000foot drainage ditch along South Albany Avenue and downstream improvements to a lake and pond located just Northeast of the intersection of South Albany Avenue and East Walnut Street for additional stormwater detention and creation of a wetland area The improvements along South Albany Avenue include converting the drainage ditch to subsurface drainage improvements with a new walking space above The proposed additional detention areawetland area is located on a 725 acre parcel that was recently made a City Park This wetland area is planned to be used as an educational area with signage and other educational materials along a proposed walking path surrounding the lake and pond This project supports stormwater system resiliency by providing water storage and filtration benefits In addition to the stormwater improvements an ADA compliant multi use path and improvements to a hazardous 5 way intersection at the junction of S Albany S Springfield North South bound and E Buffalo Rd West East bound are included	850000	850000	0
TPN-165346	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Cape Girardeau Stormwater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The project will upgrade street crossings in the Lisa Branch Watershed  The street crossings to be upgraded include Westwood near Sherwood Glenridge Melrose near Randol and Lisa Near Randol  These street crossings were identified prior to the Parks Recreation and Stormwater Tax renewal vote in November 2018  The street crossing upgrades include new larger culverts in these locations as well as Ustructures upstream of the crossings to assist with erosion control	2306800	2306800	38006.9
TPN-165347	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Carterville Stormwater Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The city has a natural main arterial drainage channel running through the center of the city and has acquired all necessary drainage easements We are unable to fund needed improvements and have for many years needed a properly engineered concrete upgrade to prevent flooding both in this ditch and upstream as well	954078.6	954078.6	34882.5
TPN-165348	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of St. Charles-3317A6A3BC8B	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Boones Lick Storm Sewer Project will alleviate residential structure and property flooding in the area near Blanchette Creek on Boones Lick Road at Sixth Street and between Second Street and Riverside Drive by constructing a detention basin with associated drainage structures along the north side of Boones Lick Road west of Sixth Street in the area of Boones Lick Park	4800000	4800000	0
TPN-165349	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Columbia Stormwater Improvements Project - D614D92D0391	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The project consists of lining pipes which are near the end of their service lives but still sound enough to be lined in order to avoid the disruptions and risks inherent in a project with excavation Pipes are evaluated to determine if the reduction of diameter will still provide the level of service required to function without negatively impacting upstream infrastructure or creating a scenario that will cause flooding of the roadway Prioritizing infrastructure that is under major arterial roadways that would pose a life safety risk if failure would occur	796446.25	796446.25	0
TPN-166170	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O6006	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds awarded through the MACCO grant would be used to build a new shop for our Building Trades  Carpentry program and a new greenhouse for our Agriculture Department  Currently our Carpentry program does not have their own shop we have utilized a warehouse from our local Housing Authority that we rent out for 1 per month  Although the are fortunate to have this space the building is in very poor shape and the ceilings are much too low for the framing and building projects that we provide to our students  Our students are also losing valuable instructional time by having to travel to and from the offsite location every day  Having a new Building Trades shop on our campus would solve all of these issues  Please see the attached proposal that was submitted to the district previouslyThe remaining funds of the grant would be used to build a greenhouse for our Agriculture Education program  Currently we do not have a greenhouse and all horticulture labs must be done in our Ag lab inside our building that has limited resources compared to a fully operational greenhouse  We are in a very urban setting so we strongly feel that adding a greenhouse would not only gain more students interests and help with enrollment but also help engage the community with our program by having plant sales  The would also provide students with the valuable experience of running a professional greenhouse and how to administer proper care to plants	400000	400000	0
TPN-166113	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield Cooper Athletic Field	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Maintenance and improvements of a park and sports complex at Coopers Sports Field in Springfield.  HB3020, Section 20.852	13500000	13500000	0
TPN-165736	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230420 - Womens Eastern R&D Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	212500	212500	0
TPN-165737	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230421 - Western MO Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	350000	350000	0
TPN-165738	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230422 - Western R&D Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	175000	175000	0
TPN-165739	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230423 - Transition Center of St Louis-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	8500	8500	0
TPN-165740	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230424 - MVE Headquarters-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	25500	25500	0
TPN-165741	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230401 - Algoa Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	347000	347000	49030
TPN-165195	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233813 - Onondaga Cave State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165196	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233814 - Roaring River State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165197	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233815 - Thousand Hills State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165198	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233816 - Truman State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165199	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233817 - Washington State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165200	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233818 - Weston Bend State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165201	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230403- Montauk State Park-Water-Wastewater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Montauk State Park Replace water system in campground and cabins Replace 26 acre sewer spray field	1051472.79	1051472.79	58221.9
TPN-165202	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230703 - Water Wastewater Improvements - Ha Ha Tonka State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Extend water service to Post Office day use area and eliminate well	360000	360000	22289
TPN-165203	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X232203 - Crowder State Park-Improvements to Water and Wastewater Systems	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Rework large lagoon at Crowder State Park	663261	663261	13154.4
TPN-165350	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Columbia Stormwater Improvements Project-3096B2EC9C24	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The major component of this project is a new detention basin The basin is designed for the water quality storm event which will reduce sedimentation and erosion issues downstream The project includes approximately 2100 feet of stormwater pipe 13 stormwater inlets and two stormwater structures that will drain into the new basin The new stormwater infrastructure will address major flooding on a major arterial road Vandiver Drive  Refer to the engineering assessment for further details	2219928.2	2219928.2	33301.66
TPN-165351	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Columbia Storm Water Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The project consists of the rehabilitation of an existing stormwater system with approximately 316 LF of a new 7x4 Reinforced Concrete Box Culvert RCB which replaces an existing undersized deteriorated masonry box culvert Upgrades include extending the RCB upstream to the point of 3 intersecting inflow points Extension will help mitigate channel erosion and reduce maintenance efforts by the owners Subsequently safety is improved by eliminating the ravine which is a traffic hazard and improving mowing maintenance efforts Upgrades include new high capacity roadway inlets to address standing water in high intensity rain events  Upgrading deteriorated 24 Corrugated Metal Pipe CMP branch lines to Reinforced Concrete Pipe RCP lines that will connect the high capacity roadway inlets into the new 7x4 RCB As a result of upgrading the stormwater system pavement demolition and replacement is included in this project The project will also include channel stabilization efforts where erosion threatens building foundations downstream of the new RCB To treat parking lot runoff the RCB will be backfilled with a modified bioretention material around the top and sides	619660.6	619660.6	0
TPN-165352	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Crystal City-91F7FCDE52D9	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project will create a regional detention facility to promote development of an approximately 225 acre site in the southern section of the City The area includes a new major industry park development moving into the area Up to four stormwater detention basins will be built to store approximately 25 acrefeet of runoff when the property is fully built out These basins will be regional stormwater basins allowing adjacent existing industrial and commercial properties that currently do not have detention to connect to these regional stormwater basins  In addition to flood protection the basins will be designed to provide water quality benefits through the use of native plantings and vegetation Public access roads will also be improved to include lowimpact development elements such as bioswales tree box filters pervious pedestrian crosswalks and filter strips It is intended that when the project is completed it will serve as a demonstration for other developers as currently the local ordinance does not require water quality detention Note that the project also includes storm sewers to convey runoff to the basins outlet control structures and discharge outlet piping	4929100	4929100	0
TPN-165353	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Excelsior Springs Stormwater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project constitutes the first implementation phase of a larger watershed level plan being developed  to reduce frequent and sometimes severe flooding and streambank erosion within the downtown area of the City of Excelsior Springs This initial project begins to address the more frequent flood events while also providing water quality and stream stabilization benefits The incorporation of future projects will provide even greater cumulative flood reduction water quality and streambank stabilization benefits as future phases of the plan are implemented Specific elements of the initial project are discussed in the attached overview documentAdditionally the project includes a stormwater master plan that will assess the remaining storm infrastructure and assess the needs of the entire community  All are aimed at reducing flooding minimizing damage to homes and businesses and increasing property values	3891114	3891114	972778.5
TPN-165354	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Frontenac-B7843E7618D5	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The City of Frontenac Stormwater Master Plan has identified the need to make a number of stormwater improvements primarily in the Countryside subdivision as shown on Figure 32A B and C in the City of Frontenac Stormwater Master Plan Update 2020 For the purposes of this ARPA grant request these improvements will include 570 feet of creek restoration over 4000 feet of piping 11 stormwater best management practices and culvert replacement for emergency access and traffic restrictions due to flooding Issues resolved by the pipes inlets best management practices and creek restoration include home flooding at 2 11 18 27 34 43 45 Countryside Lane and street flooding yard flooding and or erosion at 2 3 10 11 14 15 16 18 23 26 27 29 30 34 36 39 42 43 44 45 Countryside Lane 11201 11209 Hermitage Hill Place 11102 11106 Hermitage Hill Road 2307 N Geyer Road 7 Fox Run Lane 26 Portland 120 124 126 Frontenac Forest Preliminary plans and a preliminary probable construction cost estimate have been completed for the project and are attached as the engineering report The City of Frontenac is only seeking money for construction not engineering Additional creek work is shown on the plans that will be funded separately	2215830	2215830	0
TPN-165355	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Fulton	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	A vary unsightly area in Fulton is bounded by old railroad facilities university property which includes a large equestrian center and two known brownfield sites  The area floods during heavy rain resulting in adjacent road closures  Along this road are multiple university housing complexes  Therefore a retentiondetention pond at this location would not only help control the runoff from this environmentally challenged area but also turn this area from unsightly to an aesthetically pleasing retentiondetention area  Further resulting runoff from this drainage area is conveyed to Stinson Creek through an old storm tunnel  Stinson Creek is listed as an impaired waterway by the EPA 303d list  Therefore a retentiondetention pond would help the City address the EPA listed environmental impairments while also alleviating pressure on this old conveyance tunnel until it can be replaced	316316	316316	0
TPN-165356	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Gladstone-0C60B4090509	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Completion of stormwater improvements in the vicinity of NE 68th Street and N Bellefontaine including new curb inlets and RCB at NE 67th Street west of N Bellefontaine and NE 68th Terrace and bank stabilization along the channel  Project goal is to maintain existing detention basins in service and lowimpact bank stabilization that preserves the existing vegetation	395000	395000	0
TPN-165204	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X232303 - Roaring River State Park-Improvements to Wastewater Systems	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Lagoon expansion and replacement of river sewer crossingPark lagoon as reached the end of its useful life	1998000	1998000	101181.5
TPN-165205	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Columbia Bottom Levee Setback and Road Relocation	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Sets back the private levee on Columbia Bottom Conservation Area at the confluence of the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers in St Louis County It will also reconnect the rivers with the historic floodplain at the confluence and provide nearly three thousand acres of forested wetland for additional flood storage The project will also relocate the damaged main road away from flood hazards and add flood resiliency features to keep access to a popular river access on the area	15000000	15000000	15000000					No	Yes	No
TPN-165206	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	"Testing, Filtration, and Remediation of Lead in Drinking Water Q0051"	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	For the testing filtration and remediation of Lead in Drinking Water	0	0	0
TPN-165207	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Edina	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Edina City sewer connection project to MoDOT facility	525000	525000	56555.39
TPN-165208	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Canton	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Canton city sewer connection project to MoDOT facility	675000	675000	63265.82
TPN-165209	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Harrisonville	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Harrisonville city sewer connection project to MoDOT facility	580000	580000	82547.35
TPN-165210	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Carthage	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Carthage city sewer connection project to MoDOT facility	600000	600000	12750.74
TPN-165211	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Piedmont	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Piedmont city sewer connection project to MoDOT facility	400000	400000	15794.57
TPN-165212	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	MoDOT Locations	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	City sewer connection project to MoDOT facilities	0	0	0
TPN-165357	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Hannibal Board of Public Works-106BB17EA79C	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The project will bring the spillway into compliance with MDNR regulations  This will include widening of the spillway to meet current standards	499999	499999	0
TPN-165358	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Hannibal-3D8A3E5C78F4	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Replacement of approximately 15 blocks of stone arch storm sewer that is failing under a street  This storm sewer conveys flows by gravity when the river is at normal levels and is pressurized when the river is at higher levels	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-165359	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Harrisonville Stormwater Project USHR1	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	James Street Storm Drainage Improvement Project The lack of adequate drainage facilities has resulted in flooding of homes in this residential neighborhood In addition to the overland flooding flood waters entering homes overload the sanitary sewer resulting in sewer backups and SSO  This project will address both issues These homes were flooded by three severe storms between 2017 and 2019 This project will address both the flooding of homes and the impacts of the sanitary sewer overflows	1233205	1233205	0
TPN-165360	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Harrisonville Stormwater Improvements Project-68CCD9C15DA5	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	BECKERDITE STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT The lack of adequate drainage facilities has resulted in flooding of homes in this residential neighborhood In addition to the overland flooding flood waters entering homes overload the sanitary sewer resulting in sewer backups and SSO This project will address both issues	1083515	1083515	0
TPN-165361	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Harrisonville Stormwater Improvements Project-428B47E534F5	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	ASH STREET CULVERT REPLACEMENT AND TOWN CREEK CHANNEL RESTORATION Flooding and erosion along Town Creek have long been a problem within this urban stream corridor Through the assistance of this grant the City would mitigate flooding and restore a native riparian corridor	1496282	1496282	99201.37
TPN-165362	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Independence Stormwater Project USIN1	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project is primarily a flood control project located in the City of Independence MO The project area is bounded by 23rd Street to the south Raymond Street to the west Hayward Ave to the north and Mills St to the east The proposed project includes the installation of field inlets new storm sewer open bottom gabion lined channel and associated sanitary sewer improvements  The City has a list of Customer Service Reports CSRs documenting historical flooding throughout the project area  The primary goal of the proposed improvements is to reduce the frequency of street yard and structural flooding  RIC has also held a public meeting and met individually with property owners on site to discuss flooding concernsIn addition to flood control the proposed project will improve several other hazards within the project area  Enclosure of existing open ditches along roadways will reduce hazards to pedestrians and vehicles  In one location the existing open channel has a vertical wall adjacent to the roadway and a depth of approximately 5  Enclosure of this system will make the roadway safer for all users The proposed gabion channel will utilize grade control structures and native plantings to provide slower storm velocities through the residential neighborhood and also provide filtering of pollutants and additional opportunity for infiltration within the system	931394.28	931394.28	0
TPN-165363	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Independence Stormwater Improvements Project - 2266672BA739	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	City of Independence Missouri Metal Pipe Repair Program MPRP The MPRP focuses on identifying assessing and prioritizing storm sewer pipe repair and replacement activities in the city The scope of this project is the establishment of the MPRP and proceeding to design and construction of pipe repair replacement activities in the most crucial watershed in the city the Rock Creek watershed The City of Independence has a significant amount of corrugated metal pipe CMP that was used for decades as stormwater conveyance throughout the City Replacing CMP with the MPRP will reduce flooding increase public safety and improve water quality As CMP degrades it collapses blocking stormwater conveyance and increases flooding upstream of the failed pipe Additionally collapsed CMP frequently creates dangerous sinkholes along public right of ways damaging roads sidewalks and private property Lastly as CMP degrades it deposits metals into waterways and as holes develop in the CMP sediment from around the pipe is washed downstream impacting downstream water quality By repairing or replacing corrugated metal pipe with a modern and stable product theses impacts to the community and environment are reduced	5000000	5000000	245482.53
TPN-165213	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Bowling Green Drinking Water Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Several waterline replacements	1236192	1236192	0
TPN-165214	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Butler County PWSD #3 Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The District needs to construct a new iron and manganese removal plant provide emergency backup power complete well repairs and tower painting for the water production to the system	401606.26	401606.26	0
TPN-165215	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Calhoun Drinking Water Infrastructure Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The City of Calhoun intends to upgrade aging infrastructure by replacing 170 direct read water meters with radio read meters  170 meter setters meter kegs rings and lids will also be replaced  In addition a service line inventory will be conducted for each line as meter setters and kegs are being installed	595754.5	595754.5	148938.63
TPN-165216	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Carrollton Municipal Utilities Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	This project consists of completing the approved water line replacements from the 2019 Water System Improvements project Along with several additional water line replacements to enhance water service to areas currently served by undersized or deteriorated water mains	5000000	5000000	1544229.45
TPN-165217	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	City of Clarkton Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The proposed project includes repairs to Clarktons existing water system to include water line replacements with values water service connections and meter replacements the construction of a new well and disinfection room and detention piping replacing the existing well with a new pump and motor and replace flush hydrants	925000	925000	925000
TPN-165218	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Fair Play Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Replacement of the remaining old ductile iron pipe within the system and rehabilitation of the existing water tower	5000000	5000000	1250000
TPN-165219	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Village of Flemington Drinking Water System Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The water system improvements proposed are as follows remove and replace the failing horizontal storage tank with modern standpipe that will increase system storage and regulate pressure without additional pumps and clean paint and update the well house piping as well as update controls the hypochlorite system and flow meter with the existing wellhouse Address unaccounted for water loss that exceeds 10 percent of the drinking water produced by identifying and replacing damaged and leaking lines Address dead end lines by providing new water lines to create a looping and stabilized water system Replace antiquated water meters with remote read meters and inspect and replace aged and leaking service connections	1678000	1678000	419500
TPN-165364	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Independence-6F24E0416790	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project is a flood control project located in the City of Independence MO  The project area is bounded by 23rd Street to the north Noland Road to the west Gudgell Avenue to the south and Crane Avenue to the east  The proposed project includes the installation of field inlets new storm sewer bank stabilization and rehabilitation of existing storm sewer  The City has a list of Customer Service Reports CSRs documenting historical flooding throughout the project area  The primary goal of the proposed improvements is to reduce the frequency of street yard and structural flooding  The proposed project will remove existing CMP pipe nearing failure which poses a hazard to roadway users  Also enclosure of the existing open channel will remove hazards to vehicles and pedestrians within the project area  Several areas of the project have existing open ditches with near vertical channel side slopes which present a significant hazard especially during poor weather	2511005.91	2511005.91	0
TPN-165365	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Independence Stormwater Project USIND	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Rockwood Neighborhood is located in southwest Independence Missouri northeast of the Clifford H Nowlin Middle School This singlefamily residential neighborhood was built in the 1950s with minimal stormwater conveyance infrastructure The study area is generally bound from north to south by East 25th Terrace South and East 28th Terrace South and from east to west by South Northern Boulevard and South Hardy Avenue Historically residents in the area have complained about street yard and house flooding The City has a completed engineering report that has identified conveyance issues contributing to flooding problems The report also identifies multiple alternatives and level of funding needed All of the improvement alternatives increase system capacity to reduce flooding and the improvements proposed will fully replace the failing storm sewer infrastructure in the project area The full replacement of the storm sewer significantly lowers the risk associated with flooding utility impacts and property impacts In addition the pipe replacement will improve water quality by removing the failing metal pipe currently contributing a sediment load downstream to Rock Creek	2076554	2076554	0
TPN-165366	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	County of Jefferson Stormwater Infrastructure Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The project proposes to replace an existing low water crossing structure along County maintained Boyce Lane with a new bridge structure This existing concrete slab structure crosses Plattin Creek at the confluence with Hocum Hollow Creek and is located approximately 3 miles south of the City of Festus and Crystal City Missouri and approximately 3 miles east of Olympian Village Missouri The new concrete slab on pile bridge structure would allow for low to moderate frequency storms to pass through the bridge opening The existing low water crossing cannot even pass the one year design frequency storm event prior to being overtopped The new concrete bridge structure will be able to pass the ten year design frequency storm event Beyond this storm event Plattin Creek floods the surrounding farmland and a larger reach of Boyce Lane itself	1757800	1757800	94918.16
TPN-165367	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Joplin Stormwater Project USJP1	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	17th Street and Annie Baxter Ave Install trapezoidal channel and lateral swale to improve capacity and reduce flooding of nearby structures   East Town Install trapezoidal channel and several road culverts to convey 2550 year storms 9th Street and St Louis Ave Install several culverts and a new ditch to increase capacity to the 25year storm and reduce nearby flooding12th Street and Wall Ave Replace over 300 of deterioated 6x4 RCB to prevent failureflooding5th Street and Porter Ave Replace a 5x4 box that collapsed during a storm with a larger box along with additional improvements to the earthen ditchTexas Ave 11th15th Street Install 4x4 RCB and various new storm pipes to convey the 10year storm along a 4 block stretch that causes 10 properties to flood	3183500	3183500	0
TPN-165368	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Joplin Stormwater Project USJP2	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	17th Street and Annie Baxter Ave Install trapezoidal channel and lateral swale to improve capacity and reduce flooding of nearby structures   East Town Install trapezoidal channel and several road culverts to convey 2550 year storms 9th Street and St Louis Ave Install several culverts and a new ditch to increase capacity to the 25year storm and reduce nearby flooding12th Street and Wall Ave Replace over 300 of deterioated 6x4 RCB to prevent failurefloodingMassachusetts Ave and Murphy Blvd Reduce nuisance groundwater in park by restoring channel to natural alignment installing french drains and geotextile cellular confinement5th Street and Porter Ave Replace a 5x4 box that collapsed during a storm with a larger box along with additional improvements to the earthen ditchTexas Ave 11th15th Street Install 4x4 RCB and various new storm pipes to convey the 10year storm along a 4 block stretch that causes 10 properties to flood	4268500	4268500	0
TPN-165369	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Joplin Stormwater Improvements Project E91549D192E6	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project includes the following 17th Street and Annie Baxter Ave Install trapezoidal channel and lateral swale to improve capacity and reduce flooding of nearby structures East Town Install trapezoidal channel and several road culverts to convey 2550 year storms 9th Street and St Louis Ave Install several culverts and a new ditch to increase capacity to the 25year storm and reduce nearby flooding 12th Street and Wall Ave Replace over 300 of deteriorated 6x4 RCB to prevent failureflooding Massachusetts Ave and Murphy Blvd Reduce nuisance groundwater in park by restoring channel to natural alignment installing french drains and geotextile cellular confinement 5th Street and Porter Ave Replace a 5x4 box that collapsed during a storm with a larger box along with additional improvements to the earthen ditch Ten Pin Lane Replace concrete channels with grass channels and install storm sewers to convey 100year storm and reduce flooding at nearby houses that happens multiple times per year Texas Ave 11th15th Street Install 4x4 RCB and various new storm pipes to convey the 10year storm along a 4 block stretch that causes 10 properties to flood and 26th Street Twin Culverts Located in an industrial park that continues growingadding runoff road floods during 2 year storm Replace twin 30 culverts with an 8x4 box culvert to convey the 10year storm	5000000	5000000	162833.83
TPN-165370	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Kansas City Stormwater Project USKC1	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project seeks to restore 200270 acres of riparian habitat along the Blue River restore green infrastructure in three nodes along the Blue River corridor Blue River Park Blue Valley Park and the Municipal Farm as well as the restoration of a 9acre wetland in Alex George Wetland Park and plant 20002500 trees in neighborhoods and business districts adjacent to the corridor	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-166099	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Supreme Court Building Generator	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide safety and security by installing a generator for the Supreme Court building.	1819700	1819700	0
TPN-165220	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Gainesville Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Construct system interconnection and booster pumps to accomplish system redundancy  Install new taller central water tower to achieve needed system pressures  Replace undersized and old lines	4252500	4252500	1063125
TPN-165221	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Gallatin Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The project will consist of approximately 50025 lf of sixinch 0 Class 200 PVC 1500 lf of sixinch 0 Class 200 PVC bored 300 lf sixinch 0 Class 200 PVC bored and cased 40 system connections 35 sixinch gate valves 70 fire hydrant assemblies 300 meter reconnects 12000 lf 34 inch service connections 1500 sy of pavement repairs 250 driveway repairs 40 capping and block of existing mains possible replacement of lead service lines and then final grading seeding and mulching	5000000	5000000	72076.16
TPN-165222	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Galt Drinking Water System Rehabilitation Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Repairreplace water mains valves fire hydrants addition of a booster pump station rehabilitation of a water storage standpipe and modifications to a master meter connection	1127000	1127000	43833.14
TPN-165223	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Hayti Heights Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.10-Drinking water: Treatment	need treatment plant inspected	1687900	1687900	0
TPN-165224	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Hartville Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Replacement and looping of existing watermains and installation of a chlorination system	4900998	4900998	1249525
TPN-165225	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Hayti Drinking Water Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The project includes the replacement of water lines throughout town which are undersized and antiquated  It is believed that some lead goosenecks andor pigtails may be in use in the older portions of town which need to be eliminated  New valves hydrants an tower rehabilitation will also be included	5000000	5000000	1262500.25
TPN-165226	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Jackson County PWSD No 1 Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Consistent with the requirements in the Notice of Funding Opportunity the project will replace aging lowdiameter distribution lines with 6 inch ductile iron pipe to increase system reliability and fire flow Associated appurtenances such as hydrants meters and valves will also be replaced	1188736	1188736	539624.28
TPN-165371	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Kansas City Stormwater Project USKC2	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project is focused on updating replacing and enhancing the existing flood control Alert system in Kansas City Missouri  Its primary focus is to modernize how the system operates and expand its coverage within Kansas City Missouri to build resiliency to wet weather events and their impacts on citizens	500000	500000	0
TPN-165372	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Kirksville Storm Water Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Installation of a bioswale within the downtown area of the City to assist in stormwater detention and improve runoff water quality This project is intended to be used as a pilot project in the downtown area for improved management of stormwater runoff If  the project is successful it will hopefully lead to future City partnerships with other public and private entities to construct bioswale installations around the City	447535	447535	0
TPN-165373	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Lebanon Stormwater Improvements Project 2404D8C33416	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Construction of a regional detention basin and installation of associated stormwater infrastructure inlets pipes box culverts	861097.83	861097.83	73724.02
TPN-165374	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Lebanon Stormwater Improvements Project D8A5E498C32C	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Box Culvert Replacement and Roadway Improvement to alleviate flooding	817036.83	817036.83	55582.7
TPN-165375	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Lee's Summit Stormwater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project will be a full replacement of the bridge structure on Sampson Road at Mouse Creek including abutments superstructure and decking and grading of stormwater swales along Sampson Road The existing bridge structure is single lane wood plank dilapidated and structurally near the end of its serviceable life  It has a history of poor safety crashes and does not accommodate motorcyclists and bicyclists well  The new bridge will be designed to not overtop in a 4 design storm as a minimum Currently the wooddecked bridge overtops during a 10 storm Roadside ditches will be graded along Sampson Road to reduce flow rates and increase storage of excess rainwater which helps reduce downstream erosion and the impact on stream habitat caused by suspended solids The detection of illicit discharges will be easier in an open ditch system than an enclosed pipe system	3791535.56	3791535.56	94620.06
TPN-165376	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (B551B95AB707) Stormwater Improvemnts	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Maline Watershed Streambank Stabilization Hallstead and Cedarhurst construct 1280 feet of 45 foot wide U shaped reinforced concrete channel 120 foot long riprap lined plunge pool and 1300 feet of toe protection and vegetated bank stabilization in Black Jack Creek in the Maline watershed to stabilize the creek bank and reduce erosion and sediment	5000000	5000000	218492.49
TPN-165377	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (DFEA6A122E7C) Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Larimore Parkway to Birmingham Ct Channel Improvements construct 535 feet of 912 foot high modular block retaining walls and 1715 feet of heavy stone revetment bank protection with biostabilization	3235466	3235466	172195.84
TPN-166135	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	KCI 29 Logistics Park Infrastructure Improvements - 35539009	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Port KC is partnering with Hunt Midwest to develop the KCI 29 Logistics Park in Kansas City Missouri. The development will create about 20 Million square feet of Class “A” industrial buildings. Infrastructure necessary to support this development includes over 5 miles of new public streets, storm sewer, and water mains, and over 2.5 miles of sanitary sewer main extension.	40000000	40000000	18123314.34
TPN-166192	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O9149	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Our desire is to address three significant needs for our facility through this grant opportunity  VRT HVAC project unit replacement ductwork and electrical rework pavilion project and shop insulation project 1 VRF HVAC UnitThe lower portion of the Cass Career Center requires a new VRF HVAC unit The original intent during bond construction work was to move the old unit and keep using it However because of the considerable additions to the new building classrooms and shop on the west the airflow would not work correctly and had to be completely redesigned Therefore the plan to simply replace the outside unit wont work The unit impacts four classrooms multiple bathrooms and offices and two hallway spaces The estimated cost to rework the HVAC ductwork and electrical and to replace the unit would be 2500002 Outdoor PavilionWe propose constructing a large outdoor pavilion with storage to expand our student opportunities and improve the functional space of existing instructional spaces The pavilion would match the paint and trim colors of the main building and fire tower The proposed structure would create an appealing and modern instructional and recreational space spanning approximately 60 x 90 feet with a 56 x 15foot storage shed on the back The shed would include one walkthru door and one roller door The space would feature electricity industrial ceiling fans and plumbing for a hydrant The anticipated seating capacity will be 300	385500	385500	199353.75
TPN-165227	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of La Belle Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Replace outdated water meters meter pits and lids and meter setters Also add radio readdrive by equipment Service line inventory will be conducted as part of the project	994500	994500	0
TPN-165228	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Lamar Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.13-Drinking water: Source	Construction of a redundant public water supply well Well 5 to supply drinking water for City customers Additionally the project includes the replacement of 4230 lineal feet of 6 and 8 diameter water lines gate valves fire hydrants and miscellaneous appurtenances	2340181	2340181	585045.25
TPN-165229	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Laurie Drinking Water Main Line Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The purpose of the project is to complete several water distribution system upgrades that were originally identified in the Citys 2012 Drinking Water Master Plan report completed by Bartlett  West The attached amendment details the projects to be completed In summary the upgrades consist of several two added system loops and 4 water main upsize projects in parts of the system that are currently choke points The project will result in improved redundancy and improved system pressures throughout the distribution system	2179660	2179660	550540
TPN-165230	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Licking-171FEFE52DD2	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	17518 LF of 8 inch and 6 inch PVC SDR 21 water main extensions replacing existing 3 inch 4 inch 6 inch and 8 inch cast iron and transite mains as well as hydrants valves wet taps road borings a 150000 gal elevated water tower Upgrading a 100000 gal pedesphere a well a well house an emergency generator a transfer switch and SCADA system	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-165231	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Mill Spring Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.13-Drinking water: Source	The project will involve the rehabilitation of the systems existing well well house and tower  It will also include the construction of a new well well house and tower for system backup  Finally the project will include minor repairs throughout the water distribution system	4217690.74	4217690.74	1054422.69
TPN-165232	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	PWSD #2 of Morgan Co. Drinking Water Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Water meters tracking customer water consumption Meter readers and necessary software registering and tracking customer consumption of water assisting in accurate billing water usage Hire appropriate company for installation Additional Well and supplies expand service area with expansion for future customers and greater storage overall to monitor daily usage	4893080	4893080	1248270
TPN-165233	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Naylor Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.13-Drinking water: Source	Construction of new water supply including well disinfection and water supply mains	1649800	1649800	75853.2
TPN-165378	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (B7AF6EE30AED) Stormwater Improvemnts	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Maline Watershed Streambank Stabilization Dellwood Creek and Ferguson Branch construct 1040 feet of modular block retaining wall and 430 feet of heavy stone revetment bank stabilization to stabilize creek banks at two locations and reduce erosion and sediment in the Maline Creek Watershed	4069214	4069214	238440.9
TPN-165379	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Macon Stormwater Improvments Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The City of Macon Macon Municipal Utilities MMU owns and maintains a combined sewer system CSS that was constructed in the 1800s  As flows to the CSS exceed the systems capacity to convey flows to the treatment system overflows to receiving streams occur  These overflows are known as combined sewer overflows CSO  MMU operates under a CSO LongTerm Control Plan under which Macon will develop improvements to the CSS to limit the impact of overflow events at the CSOs  Each of the three projects submitted for ARPA funding consists of stormwater improvements that will remove stormwater from the CSS thereby reducing the number of CSO events  The Oakwood storm sewer project will redirect stormwater to a drainage area outside the CSS drainage area  The South Area Storm Sewer and Bourke and Pearl Street Storm Sewer projects will remove stormwater from the CSS and direct stormwater to surface drainage  Each project will include a bioretention structure green infrastructure to slow hold and treat stormwater before it continues to flow into the watershed  This will diminish the impact of the stormwater discharge into the receiving stream	3457260	3457260	864315
TPN-165380	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Maryville Stormwater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The MaryvilleNorthwest Missouri State University Stormwater Improvement Project will upgrade critical stormwater infrastructure on campus and in the adjacent neighborhoods Drainage from hard surface areas collect in undersized stormwater infrastructure on campus and flow southeast through the drainage channels across First Street into Judah Park High volume rainfall events overwhelm the existing system create surface flooding and damage adjacent structures and property Northwest Missouri State University recently completed a Stormwater Management Planning Drainage Study with Snyder  Associates Inc The study focused on analyzing and reviewing seventeen 17 individual locations across campus with either overland flow or pipe and inlet capacity drainage issues Stormwater facilities reviewed for this study included inlets surface drainage pipe flow infiltration and outlet control pipes The study also indicates the urgent need to upsize drainage infrastructure in adjacent areas generally south of campus east of Munn Avenue west of Walnut Street and north of Judah Park Subsequently the City of Maryville hired KimleyHorn  Associates to complete a drainage study for adjacent stormwater infrastructure The study noted similar challenges with the age and size of the system surface flooding risk and limited ability to properly manage storm water with existing infrastructure	3726799	3726799	201169.55
TPN-165381	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Moberly Stormwater Improvements Project-D083E3E22938	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Stormwater drainage improvementsdetention for the Wabash Heights area	4999999	4999999	104942
TPN-165382	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Mexico Stormwater Improvements Project-E6ACF0D6A299	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project is targeting areas experiencing erosion maintenance and safety concerns  This project ranges in scope from work which will restore safe access for the largest dam in Mexico Teal Lake Dam to mitigating maintenance and erosion concerns throughout the City It includes the Teal Lake Access Road Culvert Project Pollock Road Culvert Project Fairground Culvert Lining North Washington Street Stormwater Improvements and LoveAbat Stormwater Improvements	1801201.94	1801201.94	450300.49
TPN-165383	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Mexico Stormwater Improvements Project -745E73C59FEE	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project is targeting areas experiencing erosion maintenance and safety concerns  This project ranges in scope from work which will replace poor condition structures in Mexico S Jefferson Rd to mitigating maintenance and erosion concerns throughout the City It includes stormwater improvements for North Calhoun Street East Anderson Street South Jefferson Road Small Bridges Lakeview Road Curtis Street and Kentucky Street	4940267.42	4940267.42	1235066
TPN-165384	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Moberly Stormwater Improvement Project - DF67F243F43C	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Seven Bridges Road increased capacity through raising of containment berm  conversion to dry storm storage with connection to Seven Bridges Lift Station to allow basin to be drained following wet weather events  Will require emptying of accumulated solids to allow for construction	1069000	1069000	0
TPN-165703	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Choctaw Telephone Company - Halltown	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Choctaw Telephone Company with funding from the Missouri Broadband Infrastructure Grant Program proposes an investment in expanding highspeed broadband infrastructure in Lawrence County to reach areas like Halltown Lawrenceburg and surrounding areas in a 69 square mile area All of the area lacks robust broadband access and defined as unserved and underserved The average speeds in the area are 16 Mbps download 4 Mbps upload The proposal passes 706 locations including 31 businesses and 7 anchor institutions with 89 miles of last mile fiber 100 percent Fiber to the home construction utilizing GPON technology passive splitters last mile fiber and fiber drops will be deployed Fiber to the home customers in these areas will be able to realize symmetrical speeds of 1Gbps down 1Gbps up with scalability to XGSPON providing 10Gbps in the future This infrastructure expansion will ultimately generate a better quality of life for local families while allowing business to pivot to remote operations The investment in highspeed broadband will continue to play a significant role in our communities now and into our future	5647923.2	5647923.2	2016529.24
TPN-165704	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Chariton Valley - Clarence - Ten Mile	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Chariton Valley Communications Corporations Chariton Valley vision is to provide premier communication services to enhance opportunities for rural communities Chariton Valleys vision mirrors the goal of the Missouri Broadband Infrastructure Grant Program Program to invest in building broadband infrastructure in unserved and underserved areas in the state Chariton Valley currently provides broadband in 10 counties in north Missouri and works with local and county officials to identify critical need communities The Proposed Service Area PSA includes 224 distinct census blocks in Macon and Shelby Counties The PSA is near one of Chariton Valleys existing fiber routes so all grant funds will be used to construct 143 miles of fiberoptic cable Chariton Valley has used the same fibertothehome FTTH model and construction process for the last 20 years Chariton Valley is dedicated to improving the quality of life meeting the communitys critical needs and increasing access to a global economy at an affordable price over a reliable network Chariton Valley will deploy fiberoptic broadband facilities to the last mile of each location in the PSA providing 1 Gig symmetrical broadband service to 829 locations 6 businesses 2 community anchor institutions CAI and 821 households and farms According to the FCC Form 477 and the map of existing services included in our application 29 of the 870 locations are unserved and 800 are underserved	4009354.01	4009354.01	3038018
TPN-165705	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Chariton Valley - Marion County West	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Chariton Valley Communications Corporations Chariton Valley vision is to provide premier communication services to enhance opportunities for rural communities Chariton Valleys vision mirrors the goal of the Missouri Broadband Infrastructure Grant Program Program to invest in building broadband infrastructure in unserved and underserved areas in the state Chariton Valley currently provides broadband in 10 counties in north Missouri and works with local and county officials to identify critical need communities The Proposed Service Area PSA includes 135 distinct census blocks in Marion and Ralls County The PSA is near one of Chariton Valleys existing fiber routes so all grant funds will be used to construct 172 miles of fiberoptic cable Chariton Valley has used the same fibertothehome FTTH model and construction process for the last 20 years Chariton Valley is dedicated to improving the quality of life meeting the communitys critical needs and increasing access to a global economy at an affordable price over a reliable network Chariton Valley will deploy fiberoptic broadband facilities to the last mile of each location in the PSA providing 1 Gig symmetrical broadband service to 684 locations 10 businesses and 674 households and farms According to the FCC Form 477 and the map of existing services included in our application 42 of the 684 locations are unserved and 642 are underserved	4623799.81	4623799.81	4428861.78
TPN-165706	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	STECommunications_Cherryville and Viburnum Broadband Infrastructure Project	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Steelville Telephone Exchange Inc dba STE Communications is requesting 7443921 of grant funding under the Missouri Broadband Infrastructure Grant Program to fund a 2year fiber broadband infrastructure project to construct a broadband network capable of speeds up to 1 Gbps for 1007 residential and business locations within the rural Ozark communities of Cherryville and Viburnum where 100 percent of premises are underserved without reliable access to a wirelinebased broadband service at speeds of at least 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload This project entails a great deal of community involvement beyond residential service STE Communications is the incumbent local exchange carrier in the area and has been providing voice and broadband service to the area since 1952 In addition STE Communications has the support of the Steelville  Iron County C4 School Districts the Iron County Commission  North Wood Schools for the proposed broadband project Additionally STE Communications is currently a member of the Steelville Chamber of Commerce and Meramec Regional Planning Commission Due to the need for fast affordable broadband access in these communities there is considerable community support from residents businesses and local governments This project will have a transformative effect on these communities in the areas of online education telework and virtual healthcareall which are now vital to fully participate and thrive in a postCovid America	7443921.06	7443921.06	3580559.34
TPN-165707	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Current Inc. - Oregon County	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Current Electric Heating and Air Inc will construct a fiber optic project with a total cost of 771704500 utilizing an ARPA Broadband Grant of 746704500 198900000 in Pole Replacement funding and 25000000 in local government support This project will provide speeds of at least 1 Gbps  100 Mbps to 1510 locations in the county of Oregon outside the cities of Alton Woodside Thomasville and Many Springs The estimate completion date for this project is December 31 2025	2708090.26	2708090.26	705896.01
TPN-166144	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O0300	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	With the grant funds the Dallas County Technical Center will allow renovation and remodeling for new and emerging programs as well as new additional equipment  The funds will also be used for design architect and engineer fees as we modernize an existing district owned facility  New and emerging program considerations are Cosmetology Culinary Arts and potentially Fire Science and Emergency Medical Technician The funds will also assist in updating and modernizing equipment for Welding Auto Technology Construction Trades Ag Education and Health Sciences	400000	400000	0
TPN-166150	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O1159	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Warrensburg Area Career Center is requesting funding through the Missouri Area Career Center Opportunity Grant as part of the American Rescue Plan Act Warrensburg Area Career Center serves Johnson County Missouri as the central hub for career and technical education serving seven schools across Johnson County  The grant funds will allow new construction of an annex building to house Construction Technology which currently operates at full capacity  The new annex will allow more students to be served  The new annex will also provide additional room for the Heating Air Conditioning and Ventilation and Electrical Technology programs  The addition of the new spacious annex allows the current programs to move out of the existing facility creating space for other new emerging programs	400000	400000	0
TPN-165234	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Neelyville Drinking Water Infrastructure Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Drinking water supply and storage improvements distribution system repairs to include replacing lines valves and hydrants	5000000	5000000	55109
TPN-165235	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Newburg Drinking Water Infrastructure Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Project includes a variety of improvements throughout the water system  Rehabilitation of the Well House No 1 including removal of existing contact tank chlorine pump replacement electrical improvements roof replacement and installation of underground chlorine contact chambers Construction of a new 75000 gallon ground storage tank to replace the failed Cave St tank and approximately 9600 lineal feet of water main replacement primarily in street with rock excavation new radio SCADA system permanent standby generator and miscellaneous improvements	2310000	2310000	99290.11
TPN-165236	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Novinger Drinking Water Improvement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	This project consists of the installation of water mains valving hydrants demolition of an existing elevated water storage tank construction of a new 75000 gallon elevated water storage tank and all appurtenances	4945000	4945000	1236250
TPN-165237	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Public Water Supply District #1 of Ozark County Drinking Water Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.10-Drinking water: Treatment	The project includes the construction of a hydrous manganese oxide treatment plant constructing lines to loop deadends  the construction of a dedicated water line and improvements to well number 1 as a backup source replacing existing meters and meter pits replacement of well house number 1 replacement of hydrants and valves and installation of security cameras at the well locations	4857740	4857740	1214435
TPN-165238	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Potosi Drinking Water Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Project includes replacement of approximately 11000 lineal feet of old undersized water mains with six and eight inch C900 PVC water main  Over one half 12 of the existing pipe to be replaced is galvanized steel which is known to be a significant source of lead in water systems  When replacing the water old water mains the service lines will be exposed and all lead or galvanized service lines should be replaced as well	1665000	1665000	9190.75
TPN-165239	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Public Water & Sewerage District #4 of Wayne & Butler Co Drinking Water Improve	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Replacement of an existing watermain from the water supply well to the main distribution system that is subject to very frequent failures and provide a generator for existing well No 1 and existing booster pump station No 1	1098000	1098000	68483.63
TPN-165240	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Rich Hill Drinking Water Improvement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.14-Drinking water: Storage	The project consists of site work at the raw water intake and the water storage basin and the relocation of the water line conveying water from the raw water intake to the storage basin Doing this will address issues caused by previous sloughing at these two locations as well as mitigate risk of future sloughing Moving the pipe further from the river bank is also recommended to ensure that the Citys water supply will not be affected should future sloughing at the intake occur	1607715	1607715	26353.37
TPN-165385	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (A31C40C53815) Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	River des Peres Channel Improvements construct bank stabilization improvements at numerous high priority locations in the River des Peres channel to stabilize the bank reduce erosion and reduce sediment in the river	5000000	5000000	588376.91
TPN-165386	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (9D4C8FA6ACEE) Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Maline Watershed Streambank Stabilization Maline and Dellwood Creek  West Florissant construct bank stabilization improvements at two locations on Dellwood Creek and Maline Creek consisting of 1060 feet of modular block wall 1380 feet of biostabilization and 150 feet of heavy stone revetment to reduce erosion and sediment loading in the watershed	4688353	4688353	297293.03
TPN-165387	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Neosho Stormwater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project consists of the construction of a new drainage ditch to mitigate flooding from Hatchery Branch and a series of infrastructure improvements along High School Branch to reduce flooding These improvements will help increase emergency vehicle accessibility and provide additional capacity for future stormwater management projects to take place The current proposed projects are a continuation of the planned and concerted effort to reduce flooding losses and protect property and life in Neosho  The Lower School Branch Stormwater project is located near Hickory Creek and is intended to provide controlled stormwater passage through a residential area and to eventually provide enhanced drainage to another upstream project that has been engineered and planned for as a future project  The Hatchery Stormwater project flows through a residential area that regularly sees flooding of various degrees and connects downstream with another stormwater project that is ready to enter its construction phase	4963886.06	4963886.06	199537.8
TPN-165388	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Oronogo-F39E9BA47C2E	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Since 2008 the City has constructed approximately threefourths of the recommended detention This project will entail the construction of the remaining recommended detention in order to realize the full benefit of the initial investment and to meet the recommendations of the original report	1588000	1588000	0
TPN-165389	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of St. Peters-0D6E607C4D9B	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project is located off of Timberidge Drive  This project will alleviate roadway flooding and yard flooding due to insufficient pipe capacity  The proposed improvements will include upsizing storm sewer pipes rerouting storm sewer pipe and increasing pipe slopes and pipe depths	242511.94	242511.94	0
TPN-165390	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of St. Peters-DCD47A1A84C1	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Colby Drive Storm Water Improvement Project is located on the west side of Spencer Road and extends from Sutters Mill Road north to Spencer Road and is almost onehalf mile in length  The southern reach of this project will address localized bank stability on 650 linear feet of channel south of Shadow Creek Drive  The concept plan includes the use of 21 vertical grade control structures as well as riparian renovation and honeysuckle management  The project will evaluate three options to stabilize the 1800 LF of northern reach of the creek from Shadow Creek Drive to Spencer Road ranging from pipe installation to vertical grade control structures	1228120	1228120	0
TPN-165391	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of St. Peters-B97FE04FB1FE	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Fairfax Drive Storm Water Project will replace three outfalls that have collapsing storm pipe infrastructure and will combine them into one stabilized outfall to Dardenne Creek  Replacing the failing pipe will stabilize homeowners side and rear yards as well as stabilize the creek bank at the existing outfall locations	431600	431600	0
TPN-166165	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O5022	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This grant would be used to help update some of our infrastructures  as well as provide funding to remain cutting edge in some of our high demand programs We plan to use the grant to update our auto technology program so that our students are able to be trained on Advanced Driver Assistance System ADAS Additionally we plan to use the project to support our agriculture program by installing a greenhouse sprinkler system cool cell and a meat cooler for our meat processing room Our law enforcement program would use the funding to purchase drones as recommended by our advisory committee The funding would help with some upgrades to our bellintercom system which is not currently supported nor is it audible from our lab spaces We would install a water softener for our building to help with some liming issues we are experiencing causing maintenance issues Our plans include adding a separate restroom for staff use so that students and staff are not using the same 3 stall restroom adding a connecting hallway between rooms and upgrading power to the building For additional information on the project please see the attached document	400000	400000	67476.22
TPN-165241	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Ripley County Public Water Supply District #1 Drinking Water Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.13-Drinking water: Source	Ripley County Water District 1 is proposing developing a new water supply to replace its existing Well 6 which is currently inoperable due to high levels of radionuclides The project also proposes rehabilitating its Old Highway 142E standpipe through sandblasting painting and upgrading safety features and mechanisms The Water District is also plans to install six 6 Variable Frequency Drives VFDs to create better water control and reduce water hammer effects and add one 1 generator to allow the system to continue to operate during power outages	1165709	1165709	291427.5
TPN-165242	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Ripley County PWSD No. 2 Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Ripley County Water District 2 proposes creating three 3 chlorine rooms one 1 for each of the three 3 well houses installing one 1 100000gallon storage tank for Well 2 and replacing an estimated 615 miles of deteriorated water lines throughout the district Currently the well houses include the chlorine treatment and well piping in one room this has created corrosion damage to the piping By reconfiguring the well houses to include a separate chlorine room from the well piping system will protect the piping any further corrosion damage There currently is no storage tank for Well 2 the addition of water storage will reduce the current water hammer effects and increase water pressure for residents The Water District is in dire need of water line replacements The Water District was established in 1971 and services an estimated 350 miles Many miles of these lines are original to the system and are constantly resulting in water line breaks These breaks have caused residents to lose access to water the district to experience extreme water loss creating a strain on the water system and has compromised the water quality of the Water District Each of the proposed activities will provide Water District 2 the ability to protect its water infrastructure and provide more consistent access to better quality potable water for Ripley County residents within their service area	4813350	4813350	1203337.5
TPN-165243	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Salem Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.13-Drinking water: Source	The City of Salem operable water wells do not adequate production to meet the current maximum day water demand of the system should the largest well be out of service  Furthermore the Citys elevated storage facilities do not have adequate volume to meet the average day demand not including any fire fighting reserve  The project includes construction of a estimated 450 gpm new drinking water well well house a 400000 gallon welded steel elevated storage tank and approximately 1500 lineal feet of water main with MoDOT Highway bore to connect to existing distribution system Several locations were considered for the new facilities  The chosen location will located in the northwest portion of the system and provide redundant service to the Salem Memorial Hospital that is currently served by an approximately 8000 lineal foot dead end main	3730000	3730000	186497.16
TPN-165244	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Seymour Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.10-Drinking water: Treatment	Seymours Public Water Supply proposes installation of a chlorination system for safety and stability of drinking water Seymours two water drinking tanks needs improvement to meet DNR recommendations and requirements such as power washing sandblasting painting and replacing much needed equipment	955855	955855	238963.75
TPN-165245	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Silex Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.13-Drinking water: Source	The proposed project will connect the Citys distribution system with a public water supply district for wholesale water purchase  The Citys water tower will be replaced with a taller tower to allow for pressures within the system to meet design guide standards  With the improved pressure some distribution mains will also require replacement since they are aged and will not withstand the increased pressure	4985000	4985000	44615.75
TPN-165246	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Stella Drinking Water Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The Village of Stella is losing 7387 of its water due to water lines and pipes that have reached the end of their service life The city is requesting assistance to replace the existing water lines valves fire hydrants water service lines water meters and elimination of dead end water lines	2849181	2849181	720217.75
TPN-165247	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Steele Drinking Water Improvement	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The proposed project would include addressing the water distribution supply and treatment of the 50year old Steele water system   This would be conducted through replacing 45145 LF of 4inch 6inch and 8inch water mains 75 hydrants 80 valves and 790 meter replacements repair existing wells and reconnections replace filter valves flow meters and controls update tank equipment and storage security to bring into compliance	4990045	4990045	120487.58
TPN-165392	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of St. Peters-E4819343B563	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Parkdale  Blackwood Storm Water Improvement project will make stream channel improvements to reduce flooding and erosion and improve conveyance and maintenance along two open channels between Mid Rivers Mall Drive and the Dardenne Creek Culverts under Grand Teton Drive  The Blackwood channel is approximately 1500 feet long and the Parkdale channel is approximately 1000 Feet long	1153600	1153600	0
TPN-165393	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Poplar Bluff Stormwater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The project includes a variety of stormwater collection and retention improvements throughout the City in addition to the purchase a new street sweeper that will include attachments for leaf collection	5000000	5000000	1250000
TPN-165394	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Raytown-97CB829327AA	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Raytown city staff has evaluated the citys stormwater system for maintenance and repair needs Information provided by engineering firm George Butler Associates GBA was compiled into a stormwater masterplan The data included in this information was analyzed by NEER using data analytics and artificial intelligence to score the risk and consequence of failure for the citys stormwater infrastructure City staff narrowed the scope to portions of the system that are in the high to very highrisk categories the project area has been prioritized due to this selection criteria The project area is from the intersection of 59th Street and Raytown Trafficway east down 59th Street and south to the intersection of 62nd Street and Raytown Road The existing pipes in the project area are corrugated metal that are corroding and the bottoms of the pipes are rusting out There are numerous places where the pipes have already failed and been patched but the system in this area needs removal and replacement to fully address the structural problems Additionally there are storm inlets that need repair or replacement to convey stormwater more efficiently and improve roadway flooding conditions during events of high precipitation	4314660	4314660	0
TPN-165395	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Rolla Stormwater Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project will rehabilitate 567 lineal feet of 66inch diameter and 322 lineal feet of 72inch Corrugated Metal Pipe using Cured in Place Pipe Lining The City will manage this project inhouse and the only contractor will be the CIPP installer The estimated cost for this project is Phase 1316630 Phase 2251500 and Phase 3351635 or a total of 919965  These are ranked to allow for a partial ARPA funding for less than all phasesAn existing corrugated metal pipe system partly running under the Gale Bullman Multipurpose Building and Parking Facilities is deteriorating The flowline of the pipe has disintegrated and is in the first stages of failure The location map also serves as in part as engineering assessment Pictures of the interior of the pipe along each reach of pipe depicting the condition of the pipe are shown on the location map In the last decade Rolla has used CIPP in the rehabilitation of both sanitary sewer and storm sewer pipes This option would allow us to rehabilitate these three reaches without disrupting the activities of these facilities and eliminate the need to remove and or fill the existing pipesThis proposed project is in keeping with the priorities established in the attached City of Rollas Integrated Management PlanThe bid documents for this project will be prepared inhouse by staff engineers	735812	735812	0
TPN-165396	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Springfield (8F26609AF1AD) Stormwater Infrastructure Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project consists of installation of an underground storm system generally located along S Roanoke Ave and E Delmar St The purpose of the project is to replace a section of collapsed box culvert located in the alley east of the property at 1112 S Roanoke Ave and realigning the new stormwater system to provide better access to it and the existing sanitary sewer	567077.18	567077.18	0
TPN-165397	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield 335194552F1E	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Loren and Karla Stormwater Improvements project is approved for construction by the City of Springfield after several years of citizen stormwater reports for flooding on private property and flooding in public rightofway The proposed project design will redirect approximately 2530 acres of runoff from South of Bennett into the underground Stormwater pipes on Meadowview Ave This will alleviate that runoff from draining through yards and pooling at Catalpa St The curb and area inlets installed along S Meadowview Ave and S Airwood Ave will collect more runoff from the lowest elevation areas and transport it the runoff underground to the Sinkhole Detention Basin Finally the increased storage volume at the Sinkhole Detention Basin will ensure that the increase in underground runoff does not overtop the S Belcrest Ave along the Sinkhole Detention Basin These measures will first and foremost alleviate private property damage to Springfield residents Secondly it will decrease the flooding danger to vehicles in high water areas at the intersections and maintain operations for emergency vehicles to access properties	838000	838000	0
TPN-165398	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	City of Springfield Stormwater 3EA3C8A640C1	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Construction of the proposed regional detention facility will involve largescale earth work including excavation and embankment of approximately 30000 CY of soil  Construction of the regional detention also includes reinforced concrete box culvert extensions construction of detention basin outlet structure erosion and sediment controls including temporary sedimentation basins and temporary stream crossing and restoration of the stream buffer vegetated riparian area adjacent to Jordan Creek  Stream buffer area will be reestablished with native plantings to restore the function of riparian areas along this segment of Jordan Creek after construction of the detention facility  Construction will need to comply with Stormwater Pollution Protection Plan SWPPP as well as requirements for United States Army Corps of Engineers USACE Section 404 permit	289037	289037	289037
TPN-166180	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O7125	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This grant will be used to address safety concerns with our existing facilities Focus areas include the exterior area outside of the shop new gate and fencing exterior lighting around the building including exterior shop area updating the front entranceoffice to create a less obstructed view allowing staff to better supervise students traveling between buildings increasing the amount of or repairing existing electrical outlets in classrooms Replace classroom windows to allow for emergency exits if needed replace classroom doors as a safety measure for students and staffOther uses for the grant would be updating facilities to accommodate a changing student population and a growing enrollment Focus areas could include updating the building to be ADA compliant and remodeling classrooms andor shops to accommodate larger enrollment numbers Utilizing this grant to address immediate needs would make a way for expansion for high demand areas in the future RenovationRemodel Update front entrance for safety purposes remodel restrooms to be ADA compliant Infrastructure Improvements replace fence and gate around lot replace exterior lighting replace windows and classroom doors program updates such as replacing garage doors in the shops and the sprinkler system in the greenhouse	400000	400000	0
TPN-165248	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Urich Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The Citys elevated storage tank has inadequately protected openings is not equipped with a duckbill valve on the overflow pipe and exhibits 1743 waterloss The Citys existing elevated storage tank will be replaced with a new 50000gallon elevated storage tank It will be designed to meet current MoDNR regulations and address the current storage deficienciesBased on current water losses the existing pipe network has reached the limits of useful life and needs replacement The system contains approximately 30500 feet of watermain that should be replaced with 6inch PVC watermains An additional 5200 feet of 6inch PVC watermain is proposed to be added to allow looping within the system A majority of 6inch watermains will reduce the need to replace or upgrade mains if the service area continues to grow and developThere are at least 60 meters in the distribution system that have reached the end of their useful life and shall be replaced	5000000	5000000	1265000
TPN-165249	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Van Buren Drinking Water Infrastructure Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The project includes replacement of asbestos cement and galvanized water mains throughout the downtown area as well as hydrant and valve replacement	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-165250	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Versailles Drinking Water Project	5-Infrastructure	5.13-Drinking water: Source	This project includes Water Meter Replacement  Project will consist of replacing 1000 aging customer water meters  The new water meters will improve system accounting by improved accuracy in customer water metering Well No 1  Fairgrounds W3 and Well No 2  Newton  Walnut W4 Control Panel Replacement  This project consists of replacement of motor control panels at the Well No 1  Fairgrounds and Well No 2  Newton and Walnut sites Projects will include demolition of existing panels new NEMA rated enclosures motor starters relays breakers switches equipment wiring and associated electrical work  The existing panels are in poor condition and have exceeded their useful life Well No 1  Fairgrounds W3 and Well No 2  Newton  Walnut W4 Security Fence Installation  This project consists of installation of security fencing at the Well No 1  Fairgrounds and Well No 2  Newton and Walnut sites	684258.5	684258.5	0
TPN-165251	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Village of Wilson City Drinking Water Distribution Rehabilitation Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	John Chittenden engineer at Waters Engineering Inc of Sikeston MO prepared a preliminary engineering report to reconstruct the aging water system for the Village of Wilson City to meet the present and future needs of the local residents The Village Board of Trustees have reviewed the engineering report and agree with the proposed project See engineering report The water project activities include the installation of new 6 inch lines gate valves fire hydrant service lines and emergency interconnection to Mississippi County PWSD1 The emergency interconnection will be placed 07 miles north of the Village and will allow Wilson City and Wyatt residents to receive potable water during an emergency and allow for future expansion of the rural water district See engineer report page 7 and maps The proposed project will meet the present and future needs of a underserved minority community with a LMI of 9091 percent The Village of Wilson City will contribute 378250 and 100 percent of their ARPA funds of 621750 for a combined total of 10000 for this much needed project The Village is without other cash reserves and have no other financing tools to generate any more funds to contribute to the funding of this project without creating a financial hardship to the residents of the Village which has a LMI of 9091 It should be noted that in 2018 the median household income was 9688 a small fraction as compared to the State of Missouri total of 57290 MHI in 2020	913000	913000	66771
TPN-165252	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Walker Drinking Water Improvement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	A proposed water supply interconnection with Consolidated PWSD 1 of Vernon County Upsizing and looping the system to provide better pressure flows water quality and fire protection Replacement of water meter setters within the system	1464159	1464159	106075.16
TPN-165253	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Wayne County Public Water Supply District #3 Drinking Water Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	New drinking water supply well well house water storage distribution system improvements replacing outdated meters valves and hydrants	4877049	4877049	76353
TPN-165254	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Winona Drinking Water System Rehabilitation Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	The project will involve the rehabilitation of the majority of the Citys drinking water system  This will include painting the existing towers constructing new well houses drilling a new well and replacing the majority of the City water distribution system which are outdated cast and galvanized lines	5000000	5000000	1262500.25
TPN-165399	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield 60E59733C719	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Proposed regional detention facility to modify existing Glenwood detention from approximately 3 acrefeet to approximately 25 acrefeet of total storage  Proposed stormwater improvements also include upgrading existing stormwater infrastructure along E Rockhurst Street to replace existing shallow roadside ditches with underground pipe network  Water quality and green infrastructure elements including micropools and native vegetation are planned to be incorporated into the detention basin to promote infiltration and pollutant uptake	2024755	2024755	0
TPN-165400	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Springfield Fairgrounds Stormwater Infrastructure Project 51F8B4530F02	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	To improve the water quality of stormwater runoff from the Fairgrounds site as well as off site stormwater with green infrastructure the project will incorporate educational signage to inform citizens about green infrastructure Based on preliminary site investigation the scope of the project is anticipated to include a large bioretention feature and tiered bioswale on the west side with potential for additional smaller bioretention features adjacent to parking lot areas The scope will also include evaluating the potential for changes to the concrete channel to incorporate water quality enhancement The project is anticipated to improve water quality for the Pea Ridge Creek Watershed Pea Ridge Creek is a tributary of the Little Sac River which has an EPA approved Watershed Management Plan to address water quality impairment The project area is within a priority subbasin identified through SWAT modeling completed as part of the watershed planning efforts Green infrastructure to address urban runoff is consistent with recommended practices in the watershed plan The project area will collect untreated stormwater runoff from approximately 32 acres of the Fairgrounds property including 20 acres of impervious area The project area will also collect runoff from off site for a total watershed area of approximately 130 acres as shown in the attached Total Area Draining to Project map	700000	700000	0
TPN-165401	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Sedalia Stormwater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The City of Sedalias Stormwater Master Plan reviewed annually provides a clear road map to address current and future stormwater management needs for flood control stream stability and water resource protection  The plan is used to prioritize budget and address immediate and long term stormwater problems in a systematic manner and achieve financial savings through comprehensive watershed based planning and coordination with other City projects and infrastructure master planning and assists in meeting the compliance requirements of the MDNR and US EPA Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System program This grant application seeks to fund improvements in older areas of the City where stormwater structures do not exist or were not adequately planned and sized	2272571.5	2272571.5	0
TPN-165402	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield 0CDF12998D87	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Project is an initial downstream phase in a planned multiphase project to revitalized Jordan Creek through downtown Springfield Missouri The primary objectives of the project are to reduce flood damages to property and infrastructure from recurrent flooding renew this area of downtown for enhanced economic development and improve water quality in Jordan Creek It is envisioned that daylighting of large portions of Jordan Creek which are currently confined to underground box culverts can transform Jordan Creek to community amenity by adding thoughtfully integrated greenspaces to the downtown environment The project will construct a new open naturalized channel along 1100 linear feet of Jordan Creek and restore adjacent land as green space with riparian plantings The City has acquired several miles of riparian buffer downstream of this property This project would represent another significant step in a healthy connected riparian corridor along Jordan Creek This project is also key to fulfilling the overall vision for Jordan Valley providing connectivity for the Jordan Creek and Wilsons Creek greenway trail system and enhancing the West Central neighborhood Historic Route 66 revitalization and Grant Avenue Parkway efforts	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-165403	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield ABBEFAE9D329	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project consists of improvements to the storm system generally located along Division This project will include conveyance improvements to reduce flooding to the business owner at 3300 W Division and reduce overtopping and flooding to Division St	555000	555000	0
TPN-165404	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield E3744C2050F5	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project will upgrade the existing storm sewer system along Scenic Avenue from Catalpa Street to Sunshine  This project will not replace the existing bridge over Wilsons Creek  This project will provide a storm sewer system along Scenic Avenue from Catalpa to Wilsons Creek and Sunshine Street to Wilsons Creek  This project will also bring the right of way up to City Standards	2178564	2178564	0
TPN-165405	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield 16AC7E180093	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project extends the storm drainage system along Hilton Avenue to Mt Vernon Street  This project also brings the right of way up to City Standards	838398	838398	0
TPN-166199	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	State Fair Community College: Center for Advanced Agriculture and Transportation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For State Fair Community College for the construction andor renovation needs for a center for advanced agriculture and transportation technology including related planning design acquisitions project management equipment and startup costs provided that any grant awards disbursed from this appropriation shall be matched on a 5050 basis by the recipient for project costs up to sixty million 60000000 and further provided project costs over sixty million 60000000 shall be matched on a 2575 basis by the recipient	7500000	7500000	0
TPN-165158	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C222302 - Chillicothe Correctional Center-Replace Sewer Screening System	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Chillicothe CC Replace current sewer screening system in waste pretreatment building Work to include any control  mechanical  civil and plumbing modification to meet all current codes and regulations	691700	691700	280136
TPN-165159	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C222303 - Western MO Correctional Centers- Design Replace Sewer Screening System	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Western MO CC Install sleeves in all metal culvert storm drains outside of the secure perimeter ranging from 32 in to 60 in approximately 1755 ft total	816374	816374	47.89
TPN-165160	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C231801 - South Central-Improvements to Water and Wastewater Systems	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Install a mechanical bar screen system on the sewage outfallThe City of Licking has complained that the content of sites effluent has negatively affected the operation of the Citys sewage treatment plant Plastics and other nonbiodegradable materials are not removed from the waste stream before reaching the Citys sewage treatment plant Damages to pumps sewage grinders and other equipment has been occurring Installation of a mechanical bar screen prior to reaching the sewage treatment plant would aid the Citys operation of the plant	3152496.54	3152496.54	22274.01
TPN-165161	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C231802 - Farmington Corr Cntr-Improvements to Water and Wastewater Systems	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Replace water distribution piping and sanitary sewer lines that were not replaced in 2001	872700	872700	37925.99
TPN-165162	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	C230512 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers MO Eastern Correctional Cntr Tank 2	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers at the MO Eastern Correctional Center Tank 2	243338.8	243338.8	242265.8
TPN-165163	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	C190701 - Ozark CC - Replace Sewer & Water Lines and Add Fire Hydrants	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Replace approximately 3000 linear feet of old clay sewer pipe with new 8 inch PVC sewer line Install precast manholes complete with all necessary concrete footers  coverts etc This work will begin from House 1 down the street working to the waste water plant This is to reduce II in the sewer system Replace water line and add fire hydrants	0	0	0
TPN-165255	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Adrian Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The City of Adrian will begin taking inventory of the lead service lines within its service area to comply with the state and federal guidelines The city will have the inventory complete and required documentation submitted by October 16 2024	160000	160000	0
TPN-165256	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Alton Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project will be conducted to create a service line inventory for lead lines in the system	200000	200000	7593.95
TPN-165257	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Arbyrd Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project involves creating a lead service line inventory for the system	197999	197999	7826.94
TPN-165258	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Belle Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project consists of developing an accurate GIS map of the water system locating and identifying all public and private service lateral pipe materials  GPS surveying will be conducted to locate water infrastructure including meters and identifiable service line routings  A written questionnaire will be sent to all residents asking for facility construction date service lateral pipe material entering the structure sketch of service lateral routing and repairs made on the service lateral  Interviews will be conducted with the utility personnel to determine the information they have on all service laterals  Once all the information is disseminated that can be obtained and the unknown service lateral pipe locations and materials are short listed field inspections will be conducted of the meter pits and of crawl spaces and basements where possible  Unknown service lateral line materials will be considered lead  Once an accurate GIS map is completed as much as is feasible a replacement plan will be developed	115000	115000	0
TPN-165259	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Bland Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project consists of developing an accurate GIS map of the water system locating and identifying all public and private service lateral pipe materials  GPS surveying will be conducted to locate water infrastructure including meters and identifiable service line routings  A written questionnaire will be sent to all residents asking for facility construction date service lateral pipe material entering the structure sketch of service lateral routing and repairs made on the service lateral  Interviews will be conducted with the utility personnel to determine the information they have on all service laterals  Once all the information is disseminated that can be obtained and the unknown service lateral pipe locations and materials are short listed field inspections will be conducted of the meter pits and of crawl spaces and basements where possible  Unknown service lateral line materials will be considered lead  Once an accurate GIS map is completed as much as is feasible a replacement plan will be developed	55000	55000	0
TPN-165260	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Brashear Lead Service Line Inventory Project-8A5FF0795480	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	This project will be to evaluate analyze and develop a lead service line inventory for the City	174999	174999	0
TPN-165261	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Calhoun Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	This project would cover the expenses of conducting a lead service line inventory	199999	199999	0
TPN-165262	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Carterville Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Carterville Public Water System will complete a lead service line inventory LSLI program in order to meet EPA and MDNR LCRR guidelines  Carterville will identify review document and verify the service connections on both sides of the residences meter  Our goal is to have a complete service line inventory which identifies all lead lines as well as galvanized that have a lead connection or have ever been downstream from lead	0	0	0
TPN-165292	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Lockwood Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Following the recent US Environmental Protection Agency EPA mandated Lead Service Line Inventory the City of Lockwood MO is seeking to comply fully and on schedule The proposed project will align with both federal and state guidelines as they become available The City of Lockwood is currently conducting background data gathering to expedite the completion of the inventory as soon as possible Additional funding is being requested to help organize and confirm asset information in regard to the inventory Once the quantities and locations of lines are known the City fully intends to follow additional guidance on remediation of lead service line to remain compliant with applicable regulations	200000	200000	0
TPN-165293	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Marceline Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The City Of Marceline is going to be locating and inventorying all of are services line to see if they are Lead Copper Galvanized or Plastic	196000	196000	0
TPN-165294	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Maryville Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The Maryville Service Line Inventory Project will hire a consultant to assist the City of Maryville in completing the Service Line Inventory Spreadsheet developed by MDNR The inventory will include all service lines connected to the public water supply distribution system and be made available for public review Each service line or portion will be inspected and categorized as lead galvanized requiring replacement nonlead or lead status unknown The lead service line inventory will assist the City of Maryville and Missouri Department of Natural Resources in compliance efforts with the Environmental Protection Agencys EPA Lead and Copper Rule Revisions LLRR of 2021	118800.01	118800.01	15896.05
TPN-165295	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Memphis Lead Service Lines Inventory	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Purchase Vacuum Excavator to facilitate water service line excavations to determine if service lines contain lead materials	116677.86	116677.86	0
TPN-165296	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Meta Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	This project would involve the inventory of lead service lines throughout the City The project would include the following Compile GIS map with survey sent to homeowners reviews surveys field investigations finalizing inventory and creating a replacement plan	52228.64	52228.64	7729.84
TPN-165297	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Miller Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Following the recent US Environmental Protection Agency EPA mandated Lead Service Line Inventory the City of Miller MO is seeking to comply fully and on schedule The proposed project will align with both federal and state guidelines as they become available The City of Miller is currently conducting background data gathering to expedite the completion of the inventory as soon as possible Additional funding is being requested to help organize and confirm asset information in regard to the inventory Once the quantities and locations of lines are known the City fully intends to follow additional guidance on remediation of lead service line to remain compliant with applicable regulations	200000	200000	0
TPN-165298	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	City of Mill Spring Lead Service Line Improvement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project includes a lead service line inventory for the system	50000	50000	44999
TPN-165406	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield 6931E6F0F224	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project extends the storm drainage system along Pacific Street to the Golden Avenue Intersection  This project also brings the right of way up to City Standards	604885	604885	0
TPN-165407	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield 79D574390D37	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project consists of installation of an underground storm system generally located along Clifton Avenue from Kearney Street to High Street  This will also try to bring the Right of Way up to city standards	187492	187492	0
TPN-165408	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield 21DE756D70FA	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The project extends the storm drainage system along Nichols Street to Hutchison Avenue This project also brings the right of way up to City Standards	205432	205432	0
TPN-165409	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield 3224C75DBC7E	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project will make storm water improvements along Scenic Avenue from Olive Street to Catalpa Street  This project will also make improvements along Lombard Street  This project removes some deep concrete ditches along side the roadway  It will reduce flooding complaints along Lombard Street since the existing ditch along Scenic Avenue discharges into a ditch that ends on Lombard Street  This project will install storm drainage pipe inlets and curb and gutter along Scenic Avenue and part of Lombard Street	2194138	2194138	0
TPN-165410	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield 289F109187A5	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project consists of improvements to the storm system generally located along Lone Pine Ave from Catalpa St to Cedar Ln and along Catalpa St from Lone Pine Ave to Willow Ln  The project will also include modifications to the sinkhole located just northeast of the intersection of Lone Pine Ave and Catalpa St The purpose of the project is to reduce flooding to the nearby properties This project was identified from the stormwater capital improvement projects unfunded needs list	734000	734000	0
TPN-165411	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Strafford Stormwater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Improvements to existing open ditches and culverts that are severely undersized  The undersized stormwater infrastructure is creating flooding issues across private property and causing damage to the Citys street infrastructure  This project will mitigate the flooding issues in the areas of concern The improvements include a variety of upgrades including new box culverts driveway repairs ditch regrading pavement repair etc The areas of concern are explained in the Engineering Report dated July 13 2022	202057.5	202057.5	0
TPN-165412	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Strafford-C44DAC30A19E	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Construct stormwater drainage improvements on the east and west side of Old Orchard from West Evergreen Street to Stan Harriman  The improvements include upgrades to the existing ditches and replacement of existing culverts underneath residential driveways and streets This will be accomplished by installing RCP Storm Sewer Box Culverts and regrading the ditch line Other improvements include driveway repairs Gravel asphalt  concrete These upgrades are further described in the Engineering Report dated July 13 2022	159582	159582	0
TPN-165164	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	T230101 - Connect Water to City of Nevada Sewer System Infrastructure	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Extend City of Nevada sewer line 5000 feet to the vicinity of Camp Clark Hookup camp Clark Sewer lines to City sewer piping lift station etc Close down the lagoon	1000000	1000000	65224.46
TPN-165165	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	T215002 - Connect Water - Bellefontaine Readiness Center	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Connect water to utilities sites at Bellefontaine Readiness Center	500000	500000	0
TPN-165166	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	U230901  - Improvements to Water and Wastewater systems Infrastructure	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Replace the exterior water and sanitary sewer lines which supply the facility and adjacent buildings Replace valves backflow preventers and hardwareAlthough the age of the facility is approximately 20 years old much of the domestic water line and sanitary sewer line that service the facility are from older infrastructure and currently leak	1812270	1812270	89950
TPN-165167	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230702 - Water Wastewater Improvements Lake of the Ozarks State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Upgrade water distribution lines throughout the park and replace McCubbins Point 2 cell lagoon	1805290	1805290	76336
TPN-165168	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X232101 - Graham Cave State Park - Improvement to Water & Wastewater Systems	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replacement of Well House 1 and 2 Rebuild LagoonReason for WorkWell houses have reached the end of their useful life Lagoon is past its useful life and needs to be rebuilt	2256000	2256000	19100
TPN-165169	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X232202 - Weston Bend State Park-Improvements to Water and Wastewater Systems	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Upgrade water distribution lines throughout park and Replace sewer septic system at campground at the Weston Bend State Park	1933466.21	1933466.21	9525.6
TPN-165170	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X232302 - Stockton State Park Improvements to Water System	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace well houseThe well house is past its useful life	528000	528000	34257
TPN-165171	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"X233201 - Washington State Park-Sewer Renovations, Infrastructure"	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace sewage lift stations throughout park and Repairreplace sewer lines at cabin area   Washington State Park	1776000	1776000	36320.14
TPN-165263	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Cassville Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project will include a review of available records which include construction dates meterservice sizes as well as best available data on materials most commonly used in a particular era ie beforeafter the federal lead ban in 1986 The inventory will be refined using the results of customer surveys as a component of utility field work and through test pit inspections The estimated project cost in this application will be directed towards datarecords review and manipulation contract test pit excavationsextractions digital mappingrecording of the field inspection results and completingsubmitting the LSLI spreadsheet	200000	200000	0
TPN-165264	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Carter County Public Water Supply District#1 Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project includes a lead service line inventory for the system	200000	200000	0
TPN-165265	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Cedar Co PWSD#1 Lead Service Lines Inventory	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project involves using various methods to collect and document data on the service lines throughout the drinking water system Collection methods consist of data acquisition by referencing existing historical records sending out ESRI ArcGIS customer surveys and performing field checks ESRI ArcGIS technology will be used to document the data and keep record throughout the inventory process through various maps apps and dashboards This data will be housed in a point layer with corresponding symbology representing the customer and utility side of the service line Data will also be recorded in the provided EPA spreadsheet Based on the data a replacement plan will be built	200000	200000	0
TPN-165266	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Village of Centertown Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project involves using various methods to collect and document data on the service lines throughout the drinking water system Collection methods consist of data acquisition by referencing existing historical records sending out ESRI ArcGIS customer surveys and performing field checks ESRI ArcGIS technology will be used to document the data and keep record throughout the inventory process through various maps apps and dashboards This data will be housed in a point layer with corresponding symbology representing the customer and utility side of the service line Data will also be recorded in the provided EPA spreadsheet Based on the data a replacement plan will be built	59492	59492	0
TPN-165267	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Charleston Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Lead Service Line Inventory	200000	200000	0
TPN-165268	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Chamois Lead Service Lines Inventory	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project consists of accurately locatingsurveying all public and private water service features and developing a GIS map of the water system   Survey grade instruments will be used to locate water infrastructure including meters and identifiable service line routings  Interviews will be conducted with the utility personnel to determine the information they have on all service laterals  Historic information will be reviewed such as Building Permits Infrastructure Construction Documents historic aerialsatellite images etc  Once all the information is disseminated that can be obtained and the unknown service lateral pipe locations and materials are short listed field inspections will be conducted of the meter pits and of crawl spaces and basements where possible  Some excavation may be used if deemed appropriate  Each service line will be categorized as Lead Galvanized Requiring Replacement NonLead or Lead Status Unknown  Once an accurate GIS map is completed as much as is feasible a replacement plan will be developed	118000	118000	0
TPN-165269	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Clarksburg Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Project consists of setup of ArcGIS Online inventory map input of City water system data into map determination of lead service line locations throughout the distribution system and development of a replacement plan for lead service lines See more detailed and itemized project description in the attached cost estimate	49204	49204	0
TPN-165299	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Moniteau County PWSD #1 Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project involves using various methods to collect and document data on the service lines throughout the drinking water system Collection methods consist of data acquisition by referencing existing historical records sending out ESRI ArcGIS customer surveys and performing field checks ESRI ArcGIS technology will be used to document the data and keep record throughout the inventory process through various maps apps and dashboards This data will be housed in a point layer with corresponding symbology representing the customer and utility side of the service line Data will also be recorded in the provided EPA spreadsheet Based on the data a replacement plan will be built	49059	49059	0
TPN-165300	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	City of Morehouse Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	excavation to determine service line materials on both sides of the meter for lead service line inventory using hydro excavation if possible	68739.91	68739.91	51266.41
TPN-165301	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Mountain View Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Conduct inventory of lead joints services and lines	198000	198000	0
TPN-165302	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Newburg Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project consists of accurately locatingsurveying all public and private water service features and developing a GIS map of the water system   Survey grade instruments will be used to locate water infrastructure including meters and identifiable service line routings  Interviews will be conducted with the utility personnel to determine the information they have on all service laterals  Historic information will be reviewed such as Building Permits Infrastructure Construction Documents historic aerialsatellite images etc  Once all the information is disseminated that can be obtained and the unknown service lateral pipe locations and materials are short listed field inspections will be conducted of the meter pits and of crawl spaces and basements where possible  Some excavation may be used if deemed appropriate  Each service line will be categorized as Lead Galvanized Requiring Replacement NonLead or Lead Status Unknown  Once an accurate GIS map is completed as much as is feasible a replacement plan will be developed	148000	148000	0
TPN-165303	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Neelyville Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project involves a lead service line inventory for the City	200000	200000	0
TPN-165304	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	City of Nevada Lead Service Lines Inventory	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Purchase rent or subcontract GPS equipment to establish a field coordinate of each water meter pit Once the GPS location of each meter pit is obtained a GIS map will be created that will include the lead service line inventory attribute fields based on MDNR guidelines Service laterals line on the downstream side of the meter will be excavated to determine the service line material All field obtained data for each water meter will be input into the GIS map to create the lead service line inventory assets management tool	0	0	0
TPN-165305	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	New Madrid Public Water Supply District No 5 Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Conduct a lead service line inventory	200000	200000	0
TPN-165413	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Valley Park-352773337B29	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project entails the construction of a new 16x8 box culvert a bioswale and drainage ditch improvements storm sewers pervious concrete shoulders with underdrains concrete shoulder and guard rail asphalt overlay and retaining walls	4050026.4	4050026.4	0
TPN-165414	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Alton Wastewater System Rehabilitation Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	The project includes major repairs within the Citys collection system to remove Inflow and Infiltration  In addition it includes substantial repairs to the Citys 1970s wastewater treatment facility which suffers from a number of systems that are past their design life	5000000	5000000	1262500.25
TPN-165415	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Brunswick Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The City of Brunswick is situated on the Grand River which poses unique challenges for the citys aging sewer system The original system built in 1925 used clay tile and brick lined manholes In 1984 approximately one third of the lines were upgraded with PVC and in 1996 and 2012 the lagoon was upgraded However no updates have been done since then and the system faces many challenges because it is located in the flood plain When the river rises above flood stage at 19 the ground water infiltrates the lines increasing flow to the lift stations and lagoon increasing costs for chemicals and electricity and increases wear and tear on lift stations Project includes Reduction of II Replacing or repairing existing manholes including lids Lining or replacing disjointed and broken clay tile sewers Update lift stations including adding SCADA Update lagoon facilities and treatment including aeration and replacement of disinfection equipment and facilities	4993826	4993826	1248456.5
TPN-165416	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Buffalo Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Lift Station replacement Sewer Line Rehab Overflow Reduction Capacity Improvements and misc main extensions	4231710	4231710	1057927.5
TPN-165417	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Butler Wastewater Infrastructure	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	This project includes The installation of chemical addition facilities and filtration to help ensure consistent P removal to the limits required Reaeration improvements to help insure DO requirements for the effluent is attained An engineering study to evaluate options to optimize treatment for BOD Ammonia and Total N reduction An evaluation of the existing peak flow basin to determine the integrity of the basins seal	2179000	2179000	0
TPN-165418	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Calhoun Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The City of Calhoun has approximately 6 miles of aging sewer lines  In order to address inflow and infiltration the city intends to reline the existing collection system  Problem areas will be repaired or replaced  111 manholes will also be rehabbed	2525467	2525467	631366
TPN-165419	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Clarence Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Raise berms of existing two cell lagoon to increase storage to handle II and prevent offsite drainage from entering lagoon  Install UV system to address E Coli compliance schedule	1628250	1628250	411062.5
TPN-165708	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Charter Communications - Jefferson County D	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Spectrum MidAmerica LLC by its Manager Charter Communications Inc will construct a fiber optic project with a total cost of 547003079 utilizing an ARPA Broadband Grant of 166754537 28414900 in Pole Replacement funding and 106200000 in local government support This project will provide speeds of at least 1 Gbps  100 Mbps to 1062 locations in the county of Jefferson outside the cities of Desoto Plattin and Hematite The estimate completion date for this project is September 30 2026	1650849	1650849	0
TPN-165709	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Osage Valley FTTH Project B	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	The Osage Valley FTTH Project B is a fibertothehome network that is in the process of being constructed across seven counties in westcentral Missouri Over 18000 of locations will be connected to a fast network with all locations receiving symmetrical 1GB service This service as well as construction management planning design and marketing is being provided via a partnership with Conexon and their subsidiary ISP Conexon ConnectOf the thousands of locations in the project 1055 request state funding and are the focus of this application These locations and the fiber being constructed to serve them are what is known in this application as the Funded Service Locations The locations that make up the remainder of the project not being considered for funding are simply Service Locations  State funding in the total of 470675442 will completely fund the build in the funded area while Osage Valleys matching funds cover the rest of the build It is imperative that these are viewed as a whole due to Conexon principles that maintain their commitment to deploying networks in their entirety  as opposed to a patchwork solution approached by other ISPs	4706754.42	4706754.42	2888730.06
TPN-165710	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	United Fiber - Holt County US-01	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	United Services Inc is a wholly owned subsidiary of United Electric Cooperative Inc which is a rural electric cooperative providing electric distribution to the Missouri counties of Andrew Atchison Buchanan Clinton Daviess Dekalb Harrison Holt Gentry Nodaway Platte and Worth United Electric Cooperative formed United Services Inc a Missouri corporation in 1994 to provide improved technology solutions to our membership and region Since 2013 United Services has offered world class data voice and video services to commercial and residential customers on our fiber network in Northwest Missouri Since 2013 United Fiber has constructed over 3100 miles of fiber serving over 40 communities and 25000 commercial and residential customers Currently United Services offers low latency internet speeds up to one Gbps interconnected VoIP voice services and digital television services across our fiber network United works with a thirdparty vendor to provide white label interconnected VoIP and video services United is now rolling out XGSPON fiber access equipment and will be offering up to 10Gbs residential and commercial services in 2023 This project will create a responsible onetime investment in a futureproof network scalable to 10Gbs and beyond as technology evolves United Fiber is a local provider with longterm stability financial capability technological expertise and over a decade of experience in providing advanced fiber services to the region	2599345.87	2599345.87	643259.08
TPN-165172	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"X233301 - Mark Twain State Park & Birthplace, Sewer Renovations"	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace sewage lift stations at group camp and New shrine sewer system at the Mark Twain State Park and Mark Twain Birthplace State Historic Site	618000	618000	10200
TPN-165173	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"X233401 - Finger Lakes State Park-Sewer Renovations, Track Lagoon"	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Track lagoon repairs at Finger Lakes State Park	396000	396000	10200
TPN-165174	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X233501 - Sam A Baker State Park-Water and Wastewater Renovations	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Renovation of the Sam A Baker State Park water system in order to maintain the aging system and bring it up to current codes and regulations	7978710	7978710	12000
TPN-165175	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	X233601 - Lake Wappapello State Park-Water and Wastewater Renovations	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace well house at Lake Wappapello State Park	528000	528000	14000
TPN-165176	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X2401 - Harry S Truman State Park Water Tower Painting	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Paint repair interior and exterior of water tower	200000	200000	0
TPN-165177	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X2402 - Knob Noster State Park Water Tower Painting	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Paint repair interior and exterior of water tower	200000	200000	0
TPN-165178	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X2403 - Lake of the Ozark State Park Water Tower Painting	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Paint repair interior and exterior of water towers	750000	750000	0
TPN-165179	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X2404 - Lake Wappapello State Park Water Tower Painting	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Paint repair interior and exterior of water tower	200000	200000	0
TPN-165180	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X2405 - Onondaga Cave State Park Water Tower Painting	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Paint repair interior and exterior of water tower	200000	200000	0
TPN-165270	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Clarksdale Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project will allow the City to meet EPA regulations by creating an inventory of the service lines  Note a recent improvement project has replaced the majority of the services from the water main to the meter  This eliminates the risk of lead on that side of the meter and provides efficient documentation for the project area  Additional effort is needed to identify and document the private side of the meter	40000	40000	13991.29
TPN-165271	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Carrollton Municipal Utilities Lead Service Lines Inventory	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project involves using various methods to collect and document data on the service lines throughout the drinking water system Collection methods consist of data acquisition by referencing existing historical records sending out ESRI ArcGIS customer surveys and performing field checks ESRI ArcGIS technology will be used to document the data and keep record throughout the inventory process through various maps apps and dashboards This data will be housed in a point layer with corresponding symbology representing the customer and utility side of the service line Data will also be recorded in the provided EPA spreadsheet Based on the data a replacement plan will be built	200000	200000	0
TPN-165272	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Crocker Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Lead ServiceLine Inventories	199999	199999	0
TPN-165273	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	City of Deepwater Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Lead Service Line Inventory	133000	133000	128107.5
TPN-165274	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Deer Run Reorg Common Sewer District Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project will include a lead service line inventory for the system	200000	200000	0
TPN-165275	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Dixon Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project consists of accurately locating surveying all public and private water service features and developing a GIS map of the water system Survey grade instruments will be used to locate water infrastructure including meters and identifiable service line routings Interviews will be conducted with the utility personnel to determine the information they have on all service laterals Historic information will be reviewed such as Building Permits Infrastructure Construction Documents historic aerial satellite images etc Once all the information is disseminated that can be obtained and the unknown service lateral pipe locations and materials are short listed field inspections will be conducted of the meter pits and of crawl spaces and basements where possible Some excavation may be used if deemed appropriate Each service line will be categorized as Lead Galvanized Requiring Replacement Non Lead or Lead Status Unknown Once an accurate GIS map is completed as much as is feasible a replacement plan will be developed	138600	138600	0
TPN-165276	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Eldon Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	This project will document the Lead Service Inventory of drinking water lines in the city of Eldon  It will also include the identification of GIS survey points to load into a GIS system for Eldon asset inventory and operational planning  The scope of the project will be to 1  Gather existing data and build inventories thru work orders contractors and historical records2  Run predictive models to determine where lead service assets exists3  Validate inventories thru door to door inspections water sampling and contractor inspections4 Generate Reports to be filed by the 2024 deadline	178000	178000	0
TPN-165277	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	City of Fair Play Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Complete service line inventories for submittal to the state	77999	77999	77999
TPN-165306	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Niangua Lead Service Lines Inventory	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project consists of developing an accurate GIS map of the water system locating and identifying all public and private service lateral pipe materials  GPS surveying will be conducted to locate water infrastructure including meters and identifiable service line routings  A written questionnaire will be sent to all residents asking for facility construction date service lateral pipe material entering the structure sketch of service lateral routing and repairs made on the service lateral  Interviews will be conducted with the utility personnel to determine the information they have on all service laterals  Once all the information is disseminated that can be obtained and the unknown service lateral pipe locations and materials are short listed field inspections will be conducted of the meter pits and of crawl spaces and basements where possible  Unknown service lateral line materials will be considered lead  Once an accurate GIS map is completed as much as is feasible a replacement plan will be developed	80000	80000	0
TPN-165307	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Novinger Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	This grant will help the completion of a lead service line inventory consistent with the requirements described in the Notice of Funding Opportunity	199999	199999	0
TPN-165308	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Newtown Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project will consist of development of a lead service inventory	104999	104999	0
TPN-165309	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Otterville Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Checking historical records and coming up with an inventory of possible lead service lines in the system  We have very little historical data No service cards and no long time employees	99208.28	99208.28	3420.9
TPN-165310	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	PWSD #1 of Ozark County Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The grant to the city will help fund the development of a lead service line inventory consistent with the requirements described in the Notice of Funding Opportunity	100000	100000	7270.26
TPN-165311	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	City of Portageville Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Lead service line inventory	200000	200000	158217.99
TPN-165312	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Potosi Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project consists of accurately locating surveying all public and private water service features and developing a GIS map of the water system Survey grade instruments will be used to locate water infrastructure including meters and identifiable service line routings Interviews will be conducted with the utility personnel to determine the information they have on all service laterals Historic information will be reviewed such as Building Permits Infrastructure Construction Documents historic aerial satellite images etc Once all the information is disseminated that can be obtained and the unknown service lateral pipe locations and materials are short listed field inspections will be conducted of the meter pits and of crawl spaces and basements where possible Some excavation may be used if deemed appropriate Each service line will be categorized as Lead Galvanized Requiring Replacement Non Lead or Lead Status Unknown Once an accurate GIS map is completed as much as is feasible a replacement plan will be developed	120000	120000	0
TPN-165313	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Rich Hill Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Purchase rent or subcontract GPS equipment to establish a field coordinate of each water meter pit Once the GPS location of each meter pit is obtained a GIS map will be created that will include the lead service line inventory attribute fields based on MDNR guidelines Service laterals line on the downstream side of the meter will be excavated to determine the service line material All field obtained data for each water meter will be input into the GIS map to create the lead service line inventory assets management tool	199843	199843	0
TPN-165420	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Dixon Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	This project includes improvements toward compliance with numerous issues at the WWTF  Included is a new influent screening structure to remove coarse solids that create issues throughout the facility  A new UV disinfection facility and associated intermediate pump station will be installed to meet the current SOC for disinfection  A new RASWAS pump station and aerobic digester will be constructed to improve solids handling to address MDNR violations and EPA Administrative Order for Compliance on Consent	442868	442868	80000.08
TPN-165421	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of East Prairie Wastewater Improvement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	The project is for Phase 1 Sewer Improvements including treatment plant upgrading to comply with an Abatement Order on Consent replacement of 3 lift stations with associated forcemain work portable standby power units and repair of collapsed main sewer lines at 2 existing locations	4850000	4850000	269728.55
TPN-165422	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Edgar Springs Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	On December 30 2021 the Missouri Department of Natural Resources issued a Notice of Violation for the WWTF citing instances of effluent limit exceedances for BOD Ammonia pH e coli and TSS percent removal intermittently from June 2018 through September 2020  Additionally the NOV cited evidence of SSOs caused primarily from failed pump stations in the collection system  In April 2022 MDNR referred the case to the Water Pollution Control Branch Compliance and Enforcement Section under RNOV CFO22009  WWTF improvements in this project include modifications to the influent pump station rehabilitation of the WAS Air Lift Pumps replacement of the tertiary filters replacement of the UV disinfection equipment purchase of a new sludge truck and addition of a standby generator  Collection system improvements include replacement of five 5 pump stations including new wet well and valve vaults new pumps and controls and a portable generator	3423000	3423000	0
TPN-165423	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Elsberry Wastewater Infrastructure Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	The project consists of construction of an extended aeration treatment plant The proposed project will be built on the 225 acres at the existing city lagoon site An area of 150 feet wide by 200 feet long will be filled 100 year flood plain level for the plant The existing cells will be utilized for construction and may be left open for long term storage or closed Three phase power will be brought to the site for the project These improvements will allow for compliance with the Citys operating permit and satisfy future ammonia levels with capacity for future population growth The mechanical plant alternative was the best option as land application was not possible due to no property available to be acquired by the City	5000000	5000000	417250.76
TPN-165424	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Fair Play Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	The project includes manhole and lift station rehabilitation gravity main lining sewer collection upgrades in problem areas and replacement and the construction of a nondischarge lagoon and spray field	4480995	4480995	1120248
TPN-165425	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Gainesville Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Construction of a new lab building and backup generator for the WWTP and grinder pump replacement	1436440	1436440	359100
TPN-165426	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Grant City Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Wastewater infrastructure improvements to include wastewater treatment facility and piping infrastructure improvements Wastewater Treatment Facility improvements consist of rehabilitation of the existing facultative lagoon facility with a lagoon technology upgrade Piping Infrastructure Improvements consists of connection of all structures within City limits that are not currently connected to the Citys sewer system Select sewer main extension to allow for structure connection I and I improvements  televising cleaning lining and spot repair as applicable	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-166146	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities O1082	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Hillyard Technical Center is owned and operated by the St Joseph School District and serves as the regional technical school for the area serving St Joseph and nineteen area school districts  Hillyard is requesting funding to fulfill our vision of constructing a Manufacturing Simulation Center on the existing Hillyard campus Hillyard Technical Center is currently at capacity in several strands of career and technical education classes  Do to capacity limits a wait list exists for interested students The most critical need of local employers is an available skilled workforce The need is particularly acute with manufacturing companies whose employees represent almost thirty three percent of the local workforce  The needs for a workforce today are not being met  Increasing capacity for career and technical training will create opportunities to grow our own workforce  It is estimated that the capacity for training could be increased by as much as twenty five percent annually or just over one hundred students	400000	400000	400000
TPN-165711	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Boone-West	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Socket Telecom LLC is applying for a grant to aid in the construction of a Fiber to the Premise FTTP network in the Western Boone County area Our proposal will pass 1062 households businesses and critical community institutions determined to be Unserved or Underserved under the Missouri Broadband Infrastructure Grant Programs definition Once the network is constructed Socket will provide reliable low latency synchrous 1Gbps Internet which is over 100 times faster than some of speeds internet service advertised to be available in Sockets proposed service area This grant is necessary in order to make it economically viable to construct this network and provide these High Speed internet Services The total cost of the project will be 5115860 Of that Socket is requesting a grant of 2557930 with Socket funding the remaining half That breaks the funding request down a grant request of 50 percent with Socket funding the remaining 50 percent Sockets project meets the goal of the states program which in this case is to provide an affordable reliable 1Gbps symmetric Internet service to a large number a households with an effective use of the grant funds Sockets proposed project has the support of consumers leaders and educational institutions Survey results shows consumers are eager to change service providers and the leading reasons are for faster speeds and better reliability	2557930	2557930	580188.25
TPN-165712	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Gateway Fiber - Winfield Greater NE	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Gateway Infrastructure LLC dba Gateway Fiber is proposing to deploy its fibertothehome broadband service to Winfield Greater NE The project brings 1 Gig symmetrical service to 920 homes 23 businesses and 2 CAIs with a total population of 2045 Based on the US Census American Community Survey dataset we determined that 713 percent of households in this project area are below 75000 in household income The project cost is 6507872 of which Gateway is requesting 5206298 from the Missouri Broadband Infrastructure Program Existing providers are not upgrading their networks based on Gateway Fibers discussions with municipal representatives The Serving Area requires a prohibitively expensive network build of 7304 per passing which has an unrealistic investment payback period Industry experts categorize this build cost as Rural  Complex Deployments to Most Expensive The requested funds make this project financially feasible providing these communities with reliable futureproof internet Gateway collected 819 speed tests for the Project Area resulting in 63 percent being classified UNSERVED and 92 percent being classified as UNDERSERVED PreExisting Majority Avg 55 download9 upload   Proposed Service Level 1000 download1000 upload   Anticipated Improvements 18x faster download 111x faster uploads	5206297.64	5206297.64	0
TPN-165713	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Gateway Fiber - Warren Greater N Central	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Gateway Infrastructure LLC dba Gateway Fiber is proposing to deploy its fibertothehome broadband service to Warren Greater N Central The project brings 1 Gig symmetrical service to 709 homes 10 businesses and 1 CAI with a total population of 6012 Based on the US Census American Community Survey dataset we determined that 654 percent of households in this project area are below 75000 in household income The project cost is 6611879 of which Gateway is requesting 5289503 from the Missouri Broadband Infrastructure Program Existing providers are not upgrading their networks based on Gateway Fibers discussions with municipal representatives The Serving Area requires a prohibitively expensive network build of 5598 per passing which has an unrealistic investment payback period Industry experts categorize this build cost as Rural  Complex Deployments to Most Expensive The requested funds make this project financially feasible providing these communities with reliable futureproof internet Gateway collected 3707 speed tests for the Project Area resulting in 52 percent being classified UNSERVED and 93 percent being classified as UNDERSERVED   PreExisting Majority Avg 79 download9 upload   Proposed Service Level 1000 download1000 upload   Anticipated Improvements 13x faster download 111x faster uploads	5289503.51	5289503.51	317216.04
TPN-165714	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Osage Valley FTTH Project A	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	The Osage Valley FTTH Project A is a fibertothehome network that is in the process of being constructed across seven counties in westcentral Missouri Ultimately more than 18000 locations will be connected to a fast and reliable network with all locations receiving symmetrical 1GB service This service as well as construction management planning design and marketing is being provided via a partnership with Conexon and their subsidiary ISP Conexon Connect Of the thousands of locations in the larger project 1224 are the focus of this application These locations and the fiber being constructed to serve them are what is known in this application as the Funded Service Locations The locations that make up the remainder of the project not being considered for funding are simply Service Locations  State funding in the total of 480394646 will completely fund the build in the funded area while Osage Valleys matching funds cover the rest of the build It is imperative that these are viewed as a whole due to Conexon principles that maintain their commitment to deploying networks in their entirety  as opposed to a patchwork solution approached by other ISPs The funded area is the area of southwestern Bates county and into northwestern Vernon County These areas will be connected to a network far exceeding the current service and they are located in moderate income census tracts More details of all this follow in the project narrative	4803946.46	4803946.46	0
TPN-165715	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	SEMO Fiber - Central Stoddard	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	SEMO Electric Cooperative and its subsidiary GoSEMO Fiber are requesting 506401697 to expand broadband services within Stoddard County Missouri bringing reliable fiberfast internet services to the most rural and unserved populations within this community Stoddard County is almost entirely rural with communities experiencing higher rates of poverty than other areas of Missouri making it difficult for families to access even the most basic of needs This project is expected to create 388 new passings with the goal of bringing on 173 new subscribers GoSEMO Fiber will construct 138 miles of underground fiber to their members as part of this FiberToTheHome project The project will be 100 percent fiber and will serve SEMO Electrics greater goal of providing fiberfast reliable and affordable services to even the most remote part of their service area For nearly 85 years SEMO Electric has directly partnered with members of the community  including healthcare providers school districts and local businesses  to ensure that every constituent has access to improved services This project will take place in communities that have been economically disadvantaged from the COVID19 pandemic The project promises affordable reliable and consistent broadband access for all	5064016.97	5064016.97	1819965.24
TPN-165716	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"The towns of Ewing, Lewistown & La Belle ARPA Grant Submission"	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Mark Twain Communications Company MTCC is a broadband service company with its main office located in Hurdland Missouri The company plans to utilize funds from the Missouri ARPA Broadband Infrastructure Grant Program to assist with financing the construction of fiber optic cable and associated electronics to improve broadband service in Lewis County Missouri The proposed new network will provide a minimum of 100 Mbps symmetrical service to approximately 1022 underserved homes and businesses located in the underserved towns of La Belle Lewistown and Ewing Missouri The proposed network will use 100 percent new buried fiber optic facilities and a Ten Gigabit Symmetrical Passive Optical Network XGSPON delivery platform to all customers within the proposed service area with current capabilities of up to 10 Gbps symmetrical service The proposed network will provide broadband service with 95 percent or more of all peak period measurements of network roundtrip latency below 80 milliseconds According to the NTIA BroadbandUSA Indicators of Broadband Need Map the median speed for broadband service in La Belle and Lewistown is 1484195 Mbps and 2127594 Mbps in Ewing According to the most recent FCC 477 data there are no providers reporting speeds equal to or greater than 10020 Mbps but a few reporting greater than 253 Mbps therefore the proposed project area is considered underserved	4434026.52	4434026.52	0
TPN-165717	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Broadband Grant Program - Line Extension	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	Remaining from Pole Replacement project allocation to be used in Line Extensions for internet access	5511000	5511000	0
TPN-166209	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri State University-Agricultural Innovation Hub	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	MSU will create academic programs in precision agriculture including a Precision Agriculture undergraduate certificate and a graduate teaching education certificate in Precision Agriculture Construction of a 9000 square foot precision agriculture education building to supplement current crop and plant science facilities	2000000	2000000	131654.14
TPN-165181	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X233706 - St. Francois State Park Water Tower Painting	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Paint repair interior and exterior of water tower	200000	200000	0
TPN-165182	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X2407 - Stockton State Park Water Tower Painting	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Paint repair interior and exterior of water tower	200000	200000	0
TPN-165183	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233801 - Babler State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165184	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233802 - Battle of Athens State Historic Site -Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165185	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233803 - Bothwell Lodge State Historic Site-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165186	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233804 - Confederate Memorial State Historic Site-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165187	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233805 - Crowder State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165188	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233806 - Finger Lakes State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165189	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233807 - Hawn State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165190	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	X233808 - Knob Noster State Park-Replace Septic Tanks	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Replace septic tanks	0	0	0
TPN-165278	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Gallatin Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The Gallatin Water Distribution System was built sometime in the late 1880 1890s according to the materials that we have replaced The system was originally made of cast iron lines later on and lead distribution lines The cast iron lines had swelled heated lead to seal them We replaced a fire hydrant two weeks ago on Park Street that dated back to 1895 as the manufacturers date We know for a fact that the downtown square area has lead lines to the buildings as well as the mains being lead We have some ideas of other areas that have lead lines but we wont know for sure without a full survey being performed We have been mandated to perform a full system survey by 2026 Gallatin cant afford the survey and replace those lines without financial assistance It should also be noted as stated above that our residents are already paying 209 percent of the MHI for the water service Our goal is to fully survey the City and create a report that would be acceptable to MoDNR on the identification of our water distribution system lines	200000	200000	0
TPN-165279	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Gerald Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project consists of developing an accurate GIS map of the water system locating and identifying all public and private service lateral pipe materials  GPS surveying will be conducted to locate water infrastructure including meters and identifiable service line routings  A written questionnaire will be sent to all residents asking for facility construction date service lateral pipe material entering the structure sketch of service lateral routing and repairs made on the service lateral  Interviews will be conducted with the utility personnel to determine the information they have on all service laterals  Once all the information is disseminated that can be obtained and the unknown service lateral pipe locations and materials are short listed field inspections will be conducted of the meter pits and of crawl spaces and basements where possible  Unknown service lateral line materials will be considered lead  Once an accurate GIS map is completed as much as is feasible a replacement plan will be developed	200000	200000	0
TPN-165280	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Galt Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Evaluate investigate and develop a lead service line inventory of the citys water service lines	138000	138000	0
TPN-165281	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Golden City Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Contracting professional services to conduct research and record review of water system records development of a GIS base map showing user locations original water system area additional water system expansion areas years of each development and results of field investigations home plumbing inspections with home owners after notification requesting access to property and physical meter pit review by checking inside of each meter pit and digging out to confirm piping into and out of the meter pits	58000	58000	0
TPN-165282	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Granby Lead Service Line Inventory	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Contracting professional services to conduct research and record review of water system records development of a GIS base map showing user locations original water system area additional water system expansion areas years of each development and results of field investigations home plumbing inspections with home owners after notification requesting access to property and physical meter pit review by checking inside of each meter pit and digging out to confirm piping into and out of the meter pits	130900	130900	0
TPN-165283	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	The City of Harrisonville Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The City of Harrisonville City is seeking assistance with the development of a lead service line inventory in compliance with Lead and Copper Rule Revision 40 CFR Part 141 Subpart I LCRR The Citys consultant will assist the City with the development of a defensible and prioritized plan that leads to the development of the initial lead service line inventory The delivered inventory will comply with the LCRR and include guidance for the Citys field staff to improve the accuracy of the inventory over time	200000	200000	0
TPN-165284	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Hayti Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project will be to complete an inventory of lead service lines throughout the City  The City is currently aware of quite a few service mains which have lead components involved	200000	200000	95425.84
TPN-165314	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Ridgeway Lead Service Line Inventory	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Lead service line inventory of cities water system	29999	29999	9999
TPN-165315	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Rolla Municipal Utilities Lead Service Lines Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Survey of the the approximately 7852 water meters connected to RMUs water distribution system to determine what if any locations have lead service lines in accordance with standards established by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources and United States Environmental Protection Agency  The inventory results will be integrated into RMUs water distribution system GIS	80000	80000	0
TPN-165316	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	City of Russellville Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Investigation of service line connections on private side of water meter and at entrance into structure and inside of structure as necessary to determine types of line installed and prepare inventory spreadsheet of findings	120541.53	120541.53	68317.86
TPN-165317	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Salem Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The project consists of accurately locating surveying all public and private water service features and developing a GIS map of the water system Survey grade instruments will be used to locate water infrastructure including meters and identifiable service line routings Interviews will be conducted with the utility personnel to determine the information they have on all service laterals Historic information will be reviewed such as Building Permits Infrastructure Construction Documents historic aerial satellite images etc Once all the information is disseminated that can be obtained and the unknown service lateral pipe locations and materials are short listed field inspections will be conducted of the meter pits and of crawl spaces and basements where possible Some excavation may be used if deemed appropriate Each service line will be categorized as Lead Galvanized Requiring Replacement NonLead or Lead Status Unknown Once an accurate GIS map is completed as much as is feasible a replacement plan will be developed	150000	150000	0
TPN-165318	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Slater Lead Service Line Inventory	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	The City of Slaters water distribution system dates back to the 1900s when the citys water did not kill a lab rat and was fit to drink  Slater has seen some growth on the East and West sides of the town but most has resulted in a mixed age structures  Slater currently has 826 residential meters and it is anticipated that approximately 60 percent or 495 water services may need to be replaced  The city has conversed with Blue Conduit in Ann Arbor MI about using a predictive water model to inform Slaters water system in how we can approach lead service replacement LSLR in a more efficient manner  At that point a plan will be developed and lead service line replacement will be implemented  Slater like many small towns have poor records and small staff so therefore most if not all identified lead services will be contracted for replacement  The city does have a Lead Ban Ordinance in effect to govern use of lead materials in the public drinking water system to protect Slaters residents from lead contamination	195375	195375	0
TPN-165319	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Spickard Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	locate and verify water service line materials to comply with Lead  Copper Rules	97900	97900	0
TPN-165320	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Springfield Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	In response to water system pipe material inventory requirements associated with the LCR this project will consist of City Utilities of Springfield MO obtaining a Vacuum Excavator which uses a HydroExcavation technique  The equipment will be used to expose existing water distribution facilities to either confirm or eliminate the presence of pipe lead material  The proposed hydroexcavation method allows for a much less disturbed area when excavating as well as a large reduction in the potential for damage to existing underground utilities  This equipment will also reduce the time needed to develop the inventory by investigating more areas in a shorter amount of time  In the event lead piping material has been identified in the water distribution system the Vacuum Excavator will also be used to quickly and efficiently excavate the area so that those existing lead materials can be removed from the distribution system  The use of the proposed Vacuum Excavator will reduce labor costs associated with the LCR response that translates to less total project cost for our customers	200000	200000	0
TPN-165427	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Hayti Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Haytis project includes the addition of a MBBR to the wastewater treatment system in addition to major overhauls of pretty much all of the ancillary equipment  The project also requires the rehabilitation of the entire collection system to reduce Inflow and Infiltration and replace antiquated lift station equipment	5000000	5000000	1250000
TPN-165428	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Joplin Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	THE PROJECT INCLUDES THE REPLACEMENT OF 4547 FEET OF CONCRETE INTERCEPTOR SEWER LINES EXISTING DIAMETERS ARE 10 THROUGH 18 WITH NEW 18 AND 24 DIAMETER INTERCEPTOR SEWER LINES AND MANHOLES INSTALLATION OF 37264 FEET OF 8 10 AND 12 DIAMETER CUREDINPLACE PIPE CIPP RENOVATION OF 100 MANHOLES AND INCIDENTAILS	3599782	3599782	89156.94
TPN-165429	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of La Belle Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY IS UNDER A SCHEDULE OF COMPLIANCE FOR AMMONIA AND E COLI UPGRADES ARE NECESSARY TO COMPLY INCLUDING INSTALLATION OF 3 PHASE ELECTRIC SERVICE TO THE LAGOON SITE THE PROJECT WILL ALSO ADDRESS REDUCTION OF SOURCES OF INFLOW AND INFILTRATION	4961000	4961000	1240250
TPN-165430	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Licking Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Project shall include  Replacement of existing maceratorgrinder and influent screening equipment construction of a new headworks facility to handle coarse solids loading of particular concern downstream of the South Central Corrections Center SCCC construction of a new secondary clarifier flow splitter to address flow imbalances and hydraulic restrictions in facility replacement of dilapidated surface filtration equipment construction of a new laboratory and office building to accommodate for space and safety concerns new emergency standby generator and ATS as well as miscellaneous electrical and site improvements	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-165431	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Marble Hill Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	The wastewater improvement project has multiple points The existing lagoon system will be upgraded utilizing what is known as The NitrOx Process The upgrade will use the existing lagoon infrastructure for 90 BOD removal The wastewater will be treated in the primary cell utilizing upgraded aeration equipment to ensure BOD is dropped to the proper level The proposed changes include new transfer structures that allow for improved water level control and enable the system easily accommodate the higher design flows contributed by inflow and infiltration The existing aeration system will be upgraded to include new blowers new lines and new aerators specifically within the primary cell the aerators for this system will not be installed on the floor of the lagoon cell and so sludge removal is not a requirement The effluent structure shall be reconfigured to include an ultraviolet disinfection system that will replace the existing chlorination and dechlorinating systems The ultraviolet disinfection system will provide for easier and less expensive long term maintenance The project will all also address the Citys inflow and infiltration problem by rehabilitating the manholes	4051249	4051249	1012812.25
TPN-165432	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Village of Mineral Point Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The Mineral Point Septic Tank Effluent Pump STEP sewer collection system is failing and untreated wastewater is discharging to the surface  This project would replace the STEP pumps and septic tanks with new grinder pumps that would connect to the existing force main and continue to pump to the City of Potosi WWTP No 3  MDNR has issued RNOV No SE2200019 referring the Village of Mineral Point to the WPCB Enforcement Section	2993000	2993000	55049.56
TPN-165433	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	City of Morehouse Wastewater Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	This project will rehabilitate the existing collection system by lining and replacing collection mains and force mains The project will also replace the current treatment system with a land application system and make upgrades to the existing wastewater plant including the addition of a mechanical bar screen The project is consistent with the requirements described in the Notice of Funding Opportunity	5000000	5000000	1250000
TPN-166096	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Microsoft Enterprise Agreement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Microsoft Enterprise agreement renewal	2055566.49	2055566.49	500000
TPN-165718	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230402 - Boonville Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	686000	686000	29790
TPN-165719	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230403 - Chillicothe Correctional Center-Upgrade Broadband Capacity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Upgrade existing broadband network to meet the current and future needs of the Department of Corrections Adult Institutions and MVE	212500	212500	0
TPN-165285	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Village of Humphreys Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	This project consists of investigations evaluations and development of a lead service line inventory	104999	104999	0
TPN-165286	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Jackson County Public Water Supply District1 Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Survey for possible Lead service lines in the oldest part of the Districts Service area	156000	156000	0
TPN-165287	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	La Belle Lead Service Line Inventory Project	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	SURVEY ALL SERVICE LINES WILL UTILIZE HYDROEXCAVATING IF POSSIBLE IF CITY RECEIVES THE DRINKING WATER GRANT THE CITY WILL FARGO THIS GRANT REQUEST	124999	124999	0
[truncated: output stopped at 2057508 bytes; size cap per file]

File and source

File

April-2024-Reporting-Data-through-March-31-2024.xlsx

Size

31,389,316 bytes

SHA-256

e4836766eff2f38e76c9ad76742186c5233a0545e67b3b822932add0fe081b76

Our copy

April-2024-Reporting-Data-through-March-31-2024.xlsx

Original

home.treasury.gov