Treasury SLFRF reporting data through March 31, 2023

Summary

Treasury State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) reporting data through March 31, 2023, whose Definitions sheet explains that it holds Project and Expenditure reporting for Quarter 1 of 2023, due to Treasury on March 31, 2023 from the largest recipients, covering January 1, 2023-March 31, 2023, together with the annual reports due the same day from smaller recipients, Tribal governments with allocations below $30 million and non-entitlement units, covering April 1, 2022-March 31, 2023. It notes that non-entitlement units with allocations greater than $10 million will report quarterly thereafter. The file reflects data received as of 6/30/2023 and includes approximately 98% of Tiers 1, 2 and 3 recipients reporting quarterly and 85% of Tiers 4 and 5 recipients.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text extracted from the spreadsheet file: one line per row, cells separated by tabs, each sheet headed by its name. Numbers appear as stored, without the workbook’s formatting.

Sheet: Definitions
Background: This State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) reporting data includes Project and Expenditure reporting data for Quarter 1 of 2023, which was due to Treasury on March 31, 2023. This includes reports from the largest SLFRF recipients (states, territories, and metro cities and counties with a population over 250,000 or an allocation over $10 million, non-entitlement units of local government allocated more than $10 million, and Tribal governments allocated over $30 million) covering the period of January 1, 2023-March 31, 2023. This reporting data also includes the Annual Project and Expenditure reports that were also due on March 31, 2023 from smaller SLFRF recipients (metro cities and counties with populations less than 250,000 and an allocation less than $10 million, Tribal governments with an allocation less than $30 million, and non-entitlement units of local government) covering the reporting period of April 1, 2022-March 31, 2023. Please note that going forward, non-entitlement units of local government with allocations greater than $10 million will report quarterly. This file reflects data received as of 6/30/2023, and includes approximately 98% of Tiers 1, 2 and 3 recipients (reporting quarterly) and 85% of Tiers 4 and 5 recipients (reporting annually). Data included in this file covers 99% of SLFRF awarded funds. This file reflects data that has been certified and submitted by recipients in their Project and Expenditure reports to Treasury, with limited exceptions outlined in the definitions below.
Field Name	Category	Definition
Recipient ID	Recipients, Project	Treasury specific ID code for the recipient
Recipient Name	Recipients, Project	Name of the Entity
State/Territory	Recipients, Project	State that the recipient is located in
Reporting Tier	Recipients, Project	The reporting tier that the recipient falls under (based on designation, size, population, and funding amount) - see https://home.treasury.gov/policy-issues/coronavirus/assistance-for-state-local-and-tribal-governments/state-and-local-fiscal-recovery-funds/recipient-compliance-and-reporting-responsibilities
Recipient Type	Recipients, Project	Entity designation (e.g. State, Local Government, etc.)
Number of Projects	Recipients	Count of the number of projects submitted by the recipient as of the targeted reporting cycle
Allocation	Recipients	The amount of SLFRF funds awarded to the recipient
Claiming Revenue Loss Standard Allowance? Yes/No	Recipients	Choice of whether the recipient has elected to take the standard allowance for revenue loss
Revenue Loss Claimed through Standard Allowance	Recipients	If electing "yes" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss reported
Estimated Revenue Loss 2020	Recipients	If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2020
Estimated Revenue Loss 2021	Recipients	If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2021
Estimated Revenue Loss 2022	Recipients	If electing "no" to the standard allowance, the revenue loss calculated using the formula for 2022
Project ID	Project	Treasury specific ID code for the project
Project Name	Project	Name given to project by the recipient
Expenditure Category Group (*1)	Project	Per guidance, this field represents the project expenditure category group selected by the recipient
Expenditure Category (*2)	Project	Detailed Expenditure Category selected by the Recipient, and based on Expenditure Category Group (total of 82 expenditure categories across the 7 category groups)
Completion Status	Project	Picklist for the status of the project. Choices include: not started, cancelled, completed, completed less than 50%, completed more than 50%
Project Description	Project	Narrative entered by recipient describing the project in sufficient detail to provide understanding of the major activities that will occur
Adopted Budget	Project	The adopted budget is the budget adopted by a recipient for each project associated with SLFRF funds. Recipients will enter the Adopted Budget based on information that exists currently in the recipient’s financial systems and the recipient’s established budget process. This field is only required for Tier 1 recipients
Total Cumulative Obligations	Project	Sum of all obligations to date. An obligation is an order placed for property and services, contracts and subawards made, and similar transactions that require payment
Total Cumulative Expenditures	Project	Sum of all expenditures to date. An expenditure is the amount that has been incurred as a liability of the entity (the service has been rendered or the good has been delivered to the entity)
Number of Households Served  (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	Number of households served (by program if recipient establishes multiple separate household assistance programs). Only applicable to Expenditure Categories 2.1-2.8
Number of Workers Served  (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	Number of workers served (by program if recipient establishes multiple separate Premium Pay assistance programs). Only applicable to Expenditure Categories 4.1 or 4.2
Number of Gov FTE Responding to COVID-19  (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	Number of government workers responding to COVID-19, as measured by Full Time Equivalents. Only applicable to Expenditure Category 3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers Note: (*) Denotes projects where the number is not published for governments that reported less than 6 FTE
Number of Gov FTE Rehired  (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	Number of FTEs rehired by the recipient. Only applicable to Expenditure Category 3.2-Public Sector Workforce: Rehiring Public Sector Staff Note: (*) Denotes projects where the number is not published for governments that reported less than 6 FTE
Community benefit agreement? (Infrastructure Only)	Project	For infrastructure projects, a yes/no picklist for if a Community Benefit Agreement has been established
Complying with David Bacon? (Infrastructure Only)	Project	For infrastructure projects, a yes/no picklist for if the project is complying with Davis-Bacon requirements (specifically, that all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors in the performance of the project are paid wages at rates not less than those prevailing, as determined by the U.S. Secretary of Labor in accordance with subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the “Davis-Bacon Act”), for the corresponding classes of laborers and mechanics employed on projects of a character similar to the contract work in the civil subdivision of the State (or the District of Columbia) in which the work is to be performed, or by the appropriate state entity pursuant to a corollary state prevailing-wage-in construction law
Project labor agreement? (Infrastructure Only)	Project	For infrastructure projects, a yes/no picklist for if a Project Labor Agreement whereby “the indicated project includes a project labor agreement, meaning a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement consistent with section 8(f) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C.  158(f))"
Does the Project have Capital Expenditures? (Yes/No) (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	For projects in Expenditure Category Groups 1, 2, and 3. A yes/no picklist for whether the project is expected to have capital expenditures
Type of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	For projects in Expenditure Category Groups 1, 2, and 3 that answered yes to expecting capital expenditures. A picklist of types that can be found in Appendix H of the Project and Expenditure Report User Guide
Total Expected Cost of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	For projects in Expenditure Category Groups 1, 2, and 3 that answered yes to expecting capital expenditures. The reported dollar amount of the expected capital expenditures
Primary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	The selected primary population served by this project in response to “What Impacted and/or Disproportionally Impacted population does this project primarily serve?” See pg. 20 of the Compliance and Reporting Guidance
Secondary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	The selected secondary population served by this project in response to “If this project primarily serves more than one Impacted and/or Disproportionately Impacted populations, please select up to two additional populations served below.” See pg. 20 of the Compliance and Reporting Guidance
Tertiary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project	The selected tertiary population served by this project in response to “If this project primarily serves more than one Impacted and/or Disproportionately Impacted populations, please select up to two additional populations served below.” See pg. 20 of the Compliance and Reporting Guidance
Project is conducting an evidence based program evaluation? (Yes/No)	Project	This field is only required for Tier 1 recipients. For relevant ECs identify whether there is a program evaluation of the project being conducted
Project Total Spending on Evidence Based Evaluation	Project	This field is only required for Tier 1 recipients. For relevant ECs identify the dollar amount of the total project spending that is allocated towards evidence-based interventions

Sheet: Recipients (Q1 2023) Submitted
Recipient-ID	Recipient Name	State/Territory	Reporting Tier	Recipient Type	Allocation	Number of Projects	Claiming Revenue Loss Standard Allowance? (Yes/No)	Revenue Loss Claimed through Standard Allowance	Estimated Revenue Loss 2020	Estimated Revenue Loss 2021	Estimated Revenue Loss 2022
RCP-036470	Town Of Gilbert, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	24159871	2	No		0	0	0
RCP-038668	Scottsdale City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	29244706	1	No		31621082	0	0
RCP-035855	St. Petersburg City, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	45413871	10	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036163	City Of Henderson, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	37368428	35	No		24991300	29264305	0
RCP-038204	Lincoln City, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	45949074	16	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035925	City Of Chandler, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	34560795	13	No		0	0	0
RCP-036096	City Of North Las Vegas, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	46340548	15	No		30451647.01	0	0
RCP-035877	Plano City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	36424316	9	No		92634304	0	0
RCP-035974	Gloucester County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56646874	41	Yes	10000000	3471841.2
RCP-037617	Ottawa County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56684556	5	No		19030058	20712572	16941926
RCP-038498	Ingham County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56796438	31	No		13716975.42	13716975.42
RCP-036479	Albany County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	59340959	3	No		30059144.45	0	0
RCP-035836	Greensboro City, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	59430051	2	No		31469722.38	27960328.62	0
RCP-036278	Stark County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71985871	4	No	0	11036061	13449877
RCP-036073	Wichita City, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	72422555	38	No		30878371	15443674	15443674
RCP-036395	Madison County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	72433202	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037168	Allen County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	73674384	5	No		12663237	13730700.73
RCP-036075	Lane County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74212036	44	No		56840199	74212036
RCP-035842	Forsyth County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74256322	57	No		27125319	0
RCP-036538	Butler County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74419288	14	No		18193667.47	17965810.22
RCP-036255	Morris County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	95535125	29	No		13175762	20536369	30831828
RCP-036158	Adams County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	100502964	116	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036847	County Of Sedgwick, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	100235109	28	No		15625944	29080199
RCP-040399	County Of Plymouth, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	101237378	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036177	Atlantic County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51214806	15	No		2969213.4	5703599.63	3594152.62
RCP-036181	Brown County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51384182	61	No		25652402	34035857
RCP-036080	County Of Greene, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56928520	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035911	Leon County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	57024862	20	No		15476739	7536058	2539536
RCP-036093	Guilford County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	104339752	26	No		17842744	23318818	29322353
RCP-036060	County Of Summit, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	105085433	9	No	0	142162637	0
RCP-035988	County Of Bucks, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	122034082	29	Yes	10000000
RCP-035963	City Of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	122507590	18	No		144165795.74	117814986.93	129225116.8
RCP-035870	Glendale City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	59516611	29	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040427	Henrico County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	64257518	33	No	0	71033672	0	0
RCP-035948	Clayton County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	66847995	21	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035964	Sarasota County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	84249299	20	No		30470849	2451710.15
RCP-036817	Monterey County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	84311261	64	No		250601050	385621079
RCP-035903	County Of Burlington, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	86503822	6	No		18090028	4944524
RCP-053564	County Of Santa Barbara, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	86727196	42	No		26574618	0	0
RCP-035987	Harford County,Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	49616420	42	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036130	Mclennan County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	49846009	35	Yes	10000000	1625876
RCP-036324	Dutchess County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	57148397	21	No		37636128	6648365	7634458
RCP-036152	Chester County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	101972959	107	No		33568263.21	23673029	43887072.79
RCP-035835	Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	105319216	48	No		18574257	17948889	30859263
RCP-036166	Rutherford, County Of	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	64542466	9	No		5904651	17885772
RCP-035972	Richland County Government, Sc	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	80756312	26	No		14611040	7756012	9903727
RCP-038435	York County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54576877	30	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035899	Winnebago County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54886298	78	Yes	10000000	6101508
RCP-036871	Cumberland County, Maine	Maine	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	57300874	51	Yes	10000000	1695999
RCP-035933	Pasco County Fl, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	107597711	8	No		57099406	17992683
RCP-036137	Will County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	134168730	40	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035931	Lake County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	135293758	51	No		18255426	0	17666571
RCP-036011	City Of Tucson, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	135696763	84	No		35128663	0	0
RCP-035997	Escambia County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	61829151	16	No		28358185.52	0	0
RCP-036094	Lancaster County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	61979492	49	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035826	City Of Corpus Christi, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	67553894	3	Yes	4050000	4050000
RCP-035952	Marion County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	67559569	20	No		14431286	5816785	9027438
RCP-036077	Brazoria County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	72696394	37	No		22797430	16555065	22978975
RCP-036054	Charleston County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	79910793	8	No		36262763	52305207	44317697
RCP-035901	Mobile County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	80261198	19	No		19331018.82	0
RCP-036047	City Of Madison, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	47197155	28	No		44649062	40769182	45575589
RCP-035999	Cherokee County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50263622	47	Yes	10000000	3195386
RCP-035973	Montgomery County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	103273967	39	No	0	22817825	30975381
RCP-036083	City Of Mesa, Arizona, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	105515724	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039848	Long Beach City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	135753078	7	No		205217000	181365000
RCP-036658	Virginia Beach City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	136429703	27	No		108623635	94672334	0
RCP-036052	Jackson County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	136551645	28	No		23898130	9790042	0
RCP-040461	Norfolk County, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	137282758	95	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035821	Mchenry County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	59781491	48	No		11057112	9380924
RCP-036120	Rockingham County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	60168997	33	No		3104491	9353758	12845490
RCP-036037	Douglas County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	68207548	7	No		6655265	11405264	19314491
RCP-035941	Bell County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	70493732	7	No		8361792	9061435	11288414
RCP-035848	Collier County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74762701	21	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036463	Orange County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	74770082	22	No		74196578	8568640	0
RCP-039765	Loudoun County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	80324909	11	No		40288042	45144306	227711550
RCP-036035	City Of Tampa, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	80373543	5	No		87761637	20760538	0
RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	81002217	30	Yes	10000000	7697320
RCP-036478	County Of Solano, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	86949405	58	No		35919857	5218884	5495485
RCP-036065	City Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	87826517	95	No		29285696	110362668	74472035
RCP-036069	City Of Chula Vista, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	57535251	28	No		31927355	30191977	57659412
RCP-035916	County Of Dane, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106189095	20	No		39170499	9500576
RCP-036030	Anaheim City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106630239	1	No		96000008	10630231	0
RCP-036123	Utah County, Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	123581190	61	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-035953	County Of Tulsa, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	126556338	70	No		30481408	0	0
RCP-036000	Arapahoe County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	127534910	65	No		24860025	37452961	52628443
RCP-035863	County Of Cumberland, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	65168690	20	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036038	Chesterfield County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	68527653	15	No		24051408	0	0
RCP-035951	Marion County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71009435	11	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040599	County Of York, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	87224252	144	No		20899865	29962355	36362032
RCP-035991	Washoe County, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	91587038	76	Yes	10000000	11221136
RCP-035923	Seminole County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	91646669	20	No		38231249	58521866
RCP-036227	San Luis Obispo County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54990993	38	No		40719630	20702880	23331388
RCP-039384	Lexington County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	58028685	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035862	Orlando City, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	58032405	3	No		92729824	170044019	143819646
RCP-036804	Kent County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	127605807	15	No		48154364	76336054	0
RCP-036339	Jefferson County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	127920085	20	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035949	Santa Ana City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	128360813	78	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035920	City Of Las Vegas, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	130568739	53	No		53263017	44908998	69700105
RCP-036183	Horry County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	68776083	41	No		147426927	110239667	91920693
RCP-036121	Davis County, Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	69048017	20	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036116	St. Johns County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51409433	18	Yes	7000000	0
RCP-038974	Kitsap County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	52730448	36	Yes	10000000	8000000
RCP-035856	St. Joseph County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	52799014	21	No		11025478.79	12639505.35	6896322.55
RCP-039165	Santa Cruz County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	53068422	15	No		42864801	18075068.86
RCP-036066	Ramsey County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106893403	21	No		1201349	79486074
RCP-036139	Union County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	130591801	30	No		31931342.1	50657590.32	68969497.77
RCP-036001	County Of Hudson, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	130604069	15	No		58556734.07	66110193.09	5937141.84
RCP-035868	Bernalillo County,  New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	131911293	23	No		17986816	0
RCP-036122	Clackamas County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	81227922	38	No		11719103	0
RCP-035982	Laredo City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	85558888	16	No		27293514	12002034
RCP-035889	Ada County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	93542629	41	Yes	10000000	2058799
RCP-038899	Kalamazoo County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51485963	6	No		31641047	19844916
RCP-035888	Omaha City, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	112591455	27	No		30762643	0	0
RCP-036165	Luzerne County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	112890152	2	Yes	10000000	8961430	0
RCP-037281	Spartanburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	62114487	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036107	Durham County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	62445275	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035943	Lake County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71308368	31	No		12135823	16030223
RCP-036016	Osceola County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	72985227	1	No		61828645	11156582	0
RCP-035866	City Of Raleigh, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	73292365	16	No		49106350	0	0
RCP-036024	County Of Marin, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50273916	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040583	Frederick County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50413962	56	No		50005097	24678044
RCP-036040	City Of Reno, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51519997	46	Yes	10000000	7555768
RCP-035998	Municipality Of Anchorage, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	103317366	59	No		25547969	0
RCP-036528	Lubbock County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	60324387	14	Yes	10000000	6744807
RCP-036050	Weld County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63028767	2	No		93351095	0	0
RCP-035885	Howard County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63261464	67	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036102	City of Colorado Springs, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	76039132	19	No		54084082	0	0
RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78052072	32	No		13849922	394324	9074732
RCP-038363	St. Charles County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78088061	21	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036004	Manatee County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78327168	30	No		36149014.6	33346276
RCP-038641	Lake County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	94301324	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036028	City Of Bakersfield, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	94517089	7	Yes	10000000	19000000
RCP-053071	Town Of Islip, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	47551642	18	No		21608390	24572318	0
RCP-036076	Durham City, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51881733	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036178	Webb County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	53736408	31	Yes	10000000	1885324
RCP-036385	County Of Merced, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	53936085	11	No		36039354	36240386	54437231
RCP-036475	Town Of Brookhaven, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	55026837	80	No		20298313	0	0
RCP-035993	Kane County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	103413041	17	No	0	7445589	7396278.88
RCP-036140	Mercer County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71368970	15	No		22320960	30791222
RCP-039394	Washtenaw County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71402185	40	No		27482769	22740776	21178640
RCP-036068	Alachua County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	52258449	8	No		21444462	0	0
RCP-035977	Cleveland County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	55166390	11	Yes	10000000	372867
RCP-036041	City Of Albuquerque, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	108810857	12	No		10042104	56867739	10042104
RCP-040228	New Castle County, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	108531220	44	No		27354000	0	0
RCP-038552	County Of Bristol, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	109786776	94	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035939	Jefferson County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	113217801	52	No		18116349.55	27316586.9
RCP-039735	Williamson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	114707609	28	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036100	Larimer County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	69323447	46	No		9317174	11224898	16718212
RCP-036417	Anoka County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	69327720	21	No		7376788	23386937	60816714
RCP-035934	Arlington City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	81498709	2	No		20465541	13098090	6596305
RCP-036097	Berks County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	81806170	1	No		17813979	34236564	29649840
RCP-035872	Onondaga County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	89452165	14	No		73808465	4907433	20445550
RCP-036022	Pinal County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	89891338	7	Yes	0	0
RCP-036203	Sonoma County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	96018973	51	No		36755179	0
RCP-035960	Dauphin County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54056318	4	No		40164139	13892179	0
RCP-036234	Benton County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	54219867	47	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035892	County Of Stanislaus, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	106959250	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036146	The County Of Volusia, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	107468931	37	No		16258801	22734272
RCP-036145	Delaware County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	110083961	31	No		17555008.67	22395131
RCP-036079	Washington County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	116852194	37	No		5493393	6234641
RCP-037261	Brevard County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	116920177	93	No		21735842	26760639
RCP-040106	County Of Rockland, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63280694	10	Yes	10000000	0	0	0
RCP-036179	Boulder County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63359749	40	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040598	Aurora City, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	65424806	25	No		70747159	0	0
RCP-035871	Nueces County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	70371362	52	Yes	10000000	4180962
RCP-037172	Genesee County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78824418	24	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036352	County Of Tulare, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	90552914	76	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036148	Knox County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	91352787	25	No		49572137	38513334	3267316
RCP-039723	Prince William County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	91357060	26	Yes	10000000	9178977
RCP-035883	Clark County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	94835091	33	No		2783116	12095268
RCP-036088	Polk County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	95208028	19	No		24804929.33	25529893.61	34305968.55
RCP-036002	Yakima County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	48729139	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036256	Jefferson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	48863552	10	Yes	10000000	2510209
RCP-035937	Chatham County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56218385	53	No		17422180	0	0
RCP-036805	Thurston County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56433212	40	Yes	10000000	2481235
RCP-040590	City Of Irvine, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56433217	2	No		34311637	23770672
RCP-036288	Douglas County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	110973572	13	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035853	City Of Sacramento, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	112313331	2	No		128019000	0	0
RCP-036187	Northampton County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	61187165	8	Yes	8298194	5201203.1
RCP-035846	Pulaski County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	76124117	37	Yes	10000000	3685532
RCP-036110	Placer County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	77370739	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036800	Waukesha County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	78510723	34	No		2344675	14534168	28634177
RCP-036133	Cameron County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	82194452	74	No		11675807	6784820	9811731
RCP-035983	Lucas County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	83201577	17	No		23192294.01	11239557.88	8981881.53
RCP-036149	Dakota County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	83332300	7	No		26698748	0	0
RCP-040603	County Of Passaic, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	97473818	32	No		29774544	50665705.65	17033568.35
RCP-040561	County Of Camden, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	98376054	14	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037020	St. Clair County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50440961	12	Yes	10000000	8596582
RCP-039111	Erie County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	52391502	35	No		10836209	0	0
RCP-036276	Johnson County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	117009332	16	No		22568349	62968251	11997733.28
RCP-131241	County Of Ocean, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	117938762	16	No		13496712	26491681	0
RCP-036374	Montgomery County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	117978581	25	Yes	10000000	21524641
RCP-040567	St. Lucie County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63767844	40	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036105	Somerset County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	63891573	5	Yes	10000000	8700000
RCP-035195	Hamilton County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	65654674	88	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035966	Galveston County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	66456490	50	No		8300462	5412267	8864089
RCP-037205	Hamilton County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71441615	65	No		25319000	37931000	8191615
RCP-036019	County Of Lehigh, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	71735692	20	Yes	10000000	8000000
RCP-035932	Spokane County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	101547383	62	No		9636329	0
RCP-036155	Greenville County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	101691896	14	No		32760841	23843564
RCP-037925	Weber County, Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50543325	15	No		13075648	10509109
RCP-035986	St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50583338	15	Yes	10000000	3684319
RCP-036039	Monmouth County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	120193675	8	No		25281466	38408317	58146412
RCP-036070	Lexington-Fayette Urban County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	121178058	89	No		43283305.18	27256076.1	0
RCP-036157	Riverside City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	73535189	32	No		74903216	0	0
RCP-039869	Jefferson Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	84006695	19	No		23270111.59	56201206.98
RCP-036397	County Of Cumberland, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	49214152	6	No		26421938	48156466	16821956
RCP-035823	Buncombe County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50733290	47	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035938	Fort Wayne City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50815327	98	No		27350327	9800000	0
RCP-035900	Washington County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	50975893	26	No		25284069	57282583
RCP-038097	Madison County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	51078063	20	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035880	Lubbock City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	56575324	14	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035822	City Of Memphis, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	161061490	30	No		39863596	0
RCP-039781	Pinellas County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	189381543	48	No		0	30843440
RCP-035992	Fulton County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	206657290	22	No		44883276	19056823.75
RCP-035971	Wake County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	215946541	49	No		15859936	0	15859936
RCP-036071	Fairfax County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	222894638	18	No		173987634	444778486	92432024
RCP-035876	County Of Contra Costa, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	224058903	13	No		362452612	235909888	524547354
RCP-036216	El Paso County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	139929837	40	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035944	County Of Monroe, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	144080127	14	Yes	0	0
RCP-035833	Clark County, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	440282817	28	No		221807389	455708801	0
RCP-036109	County Of Riverside, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	479874599	60	Yes	10000000	13300000
RCP-035819	Commonwealth Of The Northern Mariana Islands	Northern Mariana Islands	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	481876521	27	No		41293408	103969328	103969328
RCP-036326	Maricopa County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	871239088	110	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038709	State Of Montana	Montana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	906418527	371	No		189745947	0
RCP-036510	State Of Alaska	Alaska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1011788220	12	No		1768244804	1764905912	1803376944
RCP-036519	State Of Wyoming	Wyoming	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1068484768	96	No		584926766	0	0
RCP-036084	County Of Los Angeles, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1949978847	77	No		638786249	371154517	0
RCP-035845	Salt Lake County, Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	225401283	19	No		88255066	66164867
RCP-035969	Government Of Guam	Guam	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	603843132	53	No		92068367	92068367	92068367
RCP-036182	City Of Boston, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	558709038	117	No		51830675	131249236	132785599
RCP-035869	Fort Worth City, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	173745090	35	No		86720682	0
RCP-036056	Kern County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	174853685	14	No		100640966.97	0	0
RCP-036108	Seattle City, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	232341627	66	No		344322260	59149352	0
RCP-036566	American Samoa	American Samoa	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	494990988	49	Yes	0	0
RCP-036655	City Of St. Louis, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	498076054	256	No		180921333	176519934	112126523
RCP-035909	Harris County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	915508128	50	No		637577999	93119854	184810275.44
RCP-035970	State Of Idaho	Idaho	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1094018353	164	Yes	0	0
RCP-035859	State Of Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	5368386901	283	No		2006109910.11	0	0
RCP-035850	County Of Montgomery, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	161395498	110	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035852	El Paso County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	163012143	44	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035965	City Of San Antonio, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	326919408	19	No		477269000	501955000	356836000
RCP-036503	Buffalo City, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	331356932	29	No		95897484	51586372
RCP-036175	Pittsburgh City, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	335070222	22	No		143644795	115163888
RCP-039717	County Of Nassau, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	385003440	24	No		337368468	337368468	337368468
RCP-053283	City And County Of Honolulu, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	386252141	78	No		246789346	139462795	0
RCP-036031	City Of Houston, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	607769139	24	No		203411101	648386514	276074606
RCP-035897	County Of Orange, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	616840943	5	No		326477883	273220928	17142132
RCP-039507	State Of Delaware	Delaware	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	924597608	193	No		275159913	0
RCP-053282	State Of South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	974478793	274	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036029	State Of Nevada	Nevada	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2738837229	180	No		692296812	633233650	0
RCP-036428	State of Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2812288082	269	No		1993880866	147129658	0
RCP-036673	City Of New York, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	5878895712	57	No		4465000000	5909000000
RCP-035890	Pierce County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	175781756	88	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035884	Prince George's County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	176626110	55	No		369578954	369578954
RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	176667606	33	No		66320568.73	72974624	0
RCP-040586	St. Louis County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	193112666	10	No		94231660	81770513.94	0
RCP-036168	Fresno County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	194063657	43	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036676	San Juan Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	237708158	24	No		52735493	36828484	0
RCP-036033	City Of New Orleans, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	387523049	3	No		114099494	114099494	114099494
RCP-035843	Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	388295772	74	No		85638550	60824476	46874765
RCP-037115	State Of Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2833294345	90	No		2548637792	0	0
RCP-036106	State Of Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3011136887	30	No		1983712466	991620000
RCP-036087	State Of New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	6244537956	85	No		4699000000	2244300000	0
RCP-036091	State Of Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	6540417627	133	No		1848491965	0	0
RCP-036167	County Of Ventura, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	164326748	5	No		43287691	68321123	75741779
RCP-035927	Dekalb County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	147484541	1	No		66942834	0	96596077
RCP-040582	County Of Essex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	155191527	14	No		20718556	36518609
RCP-035905	Fort Bend County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	157660879	32	No		50009520	48496206
RCP-035915	State Of New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	994555877.6	214	No		445500000	219100000	62200000
RCP-036336	State Of Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1131061057	59	No		513646898	0	0
RCP-035860	State Of New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1751542835	59	No	0	2585984244	2585984244
RCP-035865	State of Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1641602610	99	No		680749000	1641450000	0
RCP-036032	State Of Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1806373346	71	No		286640464	0	0
RCP-036750	State Of Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1870417576	65	No		0	0	0
RCP-036151	Commonwealth Of Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2183237291	95	No		595788895.56	0
RCP-036074	State Of Alabama	Alabama	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2120279417	264	No		536796346	0	0
RCP-036114	District Of Columbia	District of Columbia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2312383930.2	290	No		796661000	917459000
RCP-036355	Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	7291328098	30	No		4661847152	0	0
RCP-035829	Baton Rouge City/Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	165443198	43	No		59884177	0	0
RCP-036194	Erie County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	178447094	13	No		47554040	47554040
RCP-036062	Dupage, County Of	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	179266585	81	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035958	City Of Portland Oregon, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	207895373	52	No		238355861.95	194368322.87	133357487.72
RCP-035893	Cuyahoga County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	239898257	1	No		263924401	0	0
RCP-038741	Oakland County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	244270949	43	No		25433998	52416232	94330655
RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	339789370	27	No		122568216.23	151328936.31	0
RCP-035956	Jersey City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	139971935	41	No		28693937.54	101368961.95
RCP-036164	Polk County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	140779436	63	No		28893318	853491304	0
RCP-036858	State of Maine	Maine	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	997495130.1	140	No		188904063	0	0
RCP-035979	Commonwealth Of Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	2470061908	36	No		3488804000	1573789519	1485577446
RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3071830673	160	No		2427977018.75	0	0
RCP-039624	State Of Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3717212336	28	No		2210610200	0
RCP-036174	State Of Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3725832113	83	No		0	0	0
RCP-035857	State Of North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	5439309692	193	No		3199000000	0
RCP-035994	State of Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	8127679949	103	No		3229400167.51	0	0
RCP-036061	State Of Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	8816581839	60	No		5113400000	0	0
RCP-035995	City Of St Paul, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	166641623	53	No		35211905.02	65040331.12
RCP-036095	City Of San Jose, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	212280152	43	No		131857093	432410880
RCP-036516	Hidalgo County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	212973405	117	No		15285406	6571334	24119647
RCP-036953	City Of Chicago, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1886591388	88	No		1216614000	459885000
RCP-053209	State Of South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2499067329	79	No		514552955	0	0
RCP-035820	City And County Of San Francisco, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	624817342	1	No		1126205371	1042846338
RCP-036055	Cook County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1000372385	75	No		322650350	15065714.51
RCP-036965	State Of North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1007502515	1	No		1881933568	1795656461	810510629
RCP-037496	State Of Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	4182827492	102	No	0	800389715	0	800389715
RCP-036232	State Of Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	3828761790	214	No		1139220251.27	2555432997.88	0
RCP-035942	State of New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	12744981589	16	No		11861000000	0	0
RCP-037242	State of Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	15814388615	41	No		12154403291	3910963693	0
RCP-037812	State of California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	27017016860	24	No		17247760772	0	0
RCP-053110	County Of Macomb, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	169758815	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036150	Toledo City, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	180948591	30	No		40812760	62776618	63094662
RCP-036067	Milwaukee County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	183696189	40	No		66253926	74844229	94682802
RCP-035917	Gwinnett County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	181855587	37	No		29764387.63	0	0
RCP-035824	Shelby County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	182033509	1	No		75815270	106218239	0
RCP-036044	City Of Columbus,  Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	187030138	9	No		159795945	0	0
RCP-039581	Hennepin County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	245875163	17	No		180015296	54757741
RCP-036188	Bexar County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	389166877	32	No		71764795	98439601	98653666
RCP-035919	Cobb County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	147648478	49	Yes	0	0
RCP-036536	San Joaquin County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	148038314	35	No		251275532	231865666	192586966
RCP-036026	County Of San Mateo, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	148897819	26	Yes	10000000	20000000
RCP-036013	City Of Baltimore, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	641170126	90	No		121498992	331909324	170122280
RCP-039180	Los Angeles City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1278900928	105	No		1053845679	1130379592	0
RCP-036081	State Of West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1355489988	13	No		1220903466	349793987.09	0
RCP-037100	State of Virginia	Virginia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	4293727162	151	No		2179160000	3487860	3487860
RCP-036508	State of Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	4427709356	95	No		2213459284	999285708	1214964364
RCP-036344	City Of Fresno, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	170808029	61	No		37807037	51129356
RCP-036018	Travis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	247450630	18	No		38209690	0
RCP-036007	City Of Dallas, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	355426891	87	No		191411155	119317901	20325255
RCP-036023	City Of Jacksonville Duval County Portion, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	343695791	11	No		132738000	83921000	0
RCP-040577	Santa Clara County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	374462651	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036141	City Of Milwaukee, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	394226649	51	No		62761196	72343154
RCP-036104	Lee County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	149675549	99	No		48241146	0
RCP-036051	County Of San Diego, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	648431468	64	No		186216546	7258385	0
RCP-036025	City Of Detroit, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	826675290	37	No		236743195	287782638	127046007
RCP-037092	State Of Utah	Utah	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1377866888	35	No		791061434	0	0
RCP-035854	City Of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	1395292684	2	No		328071000	868930000	327634000
RCP-035828	State of Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2533160627	203	No		1458919287	0
RCP-036010	State Of Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	4853535460	22	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-035930	Franklin County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	255764417	41	No		60145000	58431000
RCP-035849	Metropolitan Government Of Nashville And Davidson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	259810600	1	No		216112204	35547010
RCP-036053	Sacramento County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	301469072	74	No		38699633	0
RCP-040579	City and County of Denver, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	308048870	64	No		731010528	315166011	62297764
RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	324636065	25	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036128	City Of Miami, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	137639417	14	No		69659199	93989727	0
RCP-035886	City Of El Paso, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	154345135	40	No		38163507	0	0
RCP-040589	Dallas County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	511918088	97	No		46536240	76124888	160018520
RCP-039244	Cleveland, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	511721590	12	No		108960480	0	323960480
RCP-036112	Miami-Dade County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	527733745	1	No		1125064512	1102296281	437045351
RCP-026747	Virgin Islands	Virgin Islands	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Territorial Government	547176884	115	No		103835859	111832692	107321725
RCP-040522	State of Iowa	Iowa	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1480862558	73	No		603815000	0
RCP-037503	State of Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1573121581	147	No		1013578249.48	0	0
RCP-036162	State Of Kansas	Kansas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1583680553	40	No		1337898804	234258521	1337898804
RCP-036329	Westchester County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	187926698	16	No		121385378	4522661	0
RCP-036126	Oakland City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	188081700	1	No		70781213	69046727	168074344
RCP-036401	City Of Austin, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	188482478	31	No		407399326	449348505	0
RCP-035839	County Of Bergen, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	261035747	32	No		30878459.61	39727928	39600000
RCP-036059	Multnomah County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	157887555	19	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036189	Commonwealth Of Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	5286067526	43	No		3898837971.25	0
RCP-035896	Orange County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	270661716	59	No		526464099	391345915	160710606
RCP-036078	City Of Minneapolis, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	271192484	68	No		129381000	280042000
RCP-035864	City Of Phoenix, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	396080366	54	No		246000681	48357570	0
RCP-035895	Tarrant County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	408388891	57	Yes	0	0
RCP-035878	City Of Indianapolis and Marion County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	419769453	84	No		24954632	40795606	2767436
RCP-035918	County Of San Bernardino, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	423455955	62	No	0	108591213	225543951	9187272
RCP-040576	City Of Kansas City, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	194776376	117	No		96960738	125266304
RCP-036462	Collin County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	200984172	3	No		0	0	0
RCP-036020	Mecklenburg County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	215673636	123	No		8868181	39657382	69385568
RCP-039302	King County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	437576495	131	No		108715000	0
RCP-036156	City Of Charlotte, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	141618325	18	No		120274952.53	317342455.7	170220580.96
RCP-036144	Oklahoma County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	154892206	27	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040609	Hamilton County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	158784547	24	No		41935127	0
RCP-035838	Snohomish County, Washington	Washington	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	159679985	64	No		25382234	0	3698053
RCP-036186	County of Middlesex, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	160258621	18	Yes	0	6500000
RCP-035922	Baltimore County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	160706923	40	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036509	State Of Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1040157440	44	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035913	State Of Vermont	Vermont	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	1049287303	328	No	0	242787538	0	0
RCP-040453	State of Oregon	Oregon	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2648024988	363	No		2993693000	0	0
RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	2685296131	136	No		1698819430.39	0	0
RCP-053276	City Of Atlanta, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	170928821	40	No		438247659.39	386226249.45
RCP-036180	Denton County, Texas	Texas	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	172329559	43	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036064	Pima County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	203421668	48	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035831	Montgomery County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	204083827	29	No		173685173	0	346245439
RCP-036049	Hillsborough County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	285912528	33	No		72534267	8928020
RCP-036192	Suffolk County, New York	New York	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	286812434	6	No		277627963.52	0
RCP-036082	City Of Cincinnati, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	279590123	50	No		71216236.82	95341231.75	96860051.97
RCP-035841	Palm Beach County, Florida	Florida	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	290730026	1	No		196558609	94171417	0
RCP-035827	City Of San Diego, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	299714755	1	No	0	190816832	225902821
RCP-036017	Allegheny County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	380998452	47	No		154653288	39690062	0
RCP-026398	Town Of Garner, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10009330.62	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-035378	Town Of Warrenton, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10403180	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-039738	Boone County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10400294	8	Yes	9320272	0
RCP-035441	Winnemucca City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10417348.62	11	Yes	6000000
RCP-036979	Dekalb, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10422954	15	Yes	10000000	4254304
RCP-031529	Watertown, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10742412.62	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-031426	Natick, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10775591.28	12	Yes	7050841.28	0	0
RCP-038340	Columbus County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10781778	9	Yes	9828747	0	0
RCP-036643	Fredericksburg City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10782747	12	Yes	10000000	8440349
RCP-039352	Pearl River County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10787023	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039495	Bradenton, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10791837	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039278	Medina County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10019587	6	Yes	10000000	3255467
RCP-036638	Bristol, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10027374	2	Yes	10000000	4750565
RCP-037451	Jackson County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10027745	7	Yes	9726912.65	0
RCP-038963	Weirton, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10028924	5	Yes	10000000	565420
RCP-039449	Washington County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10438365	20	Yes	9368292.42	1913818
RCP-049848	City Of Brighton, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10444587.62	1	No		5693085	0	0
RCP-056505	Schertz, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10438004.98	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-053163	Mcminn County, Tn	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10448854	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-014406	Lebanon City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10823810.38	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037985	La Mesa, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10826584	4	Yes	9750000	9750000
RCP-037674	Pike County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10840244	2	Yes	10000000	4724551
RCP-037863	Grady County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10845100	30	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037136	Margate, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10849938	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037737	Dickson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10478767	3	Yes	10000000	3337217
RCP-037885	Grand Junction, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10484608	1	Yes	10000000	3967322.92
RCP-056074	Huntsville, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10487411.84	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038983	Gila County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10492363	8	Yes	0	0
RCP-037742	Lafayette County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10492557	3	Yes	10000000	756056
RCP-049057	Town of Sahuarita, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10493989.86	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-039978	Van Zandt County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10991944	9	Yes	10000000	1329326
RCP-047362	Morgan Hill City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10992695	1	No		7364378	13855381	9847811
RCP-036941	New Braunfels, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10995314	1	Yes	10000000	0		0
RCP-039037	Jackson County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11023022	19	Yes	10000000	1956582
RCP-053126	Hawkins County, Tn	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11030015	4	Yes	10000000	3480493
RCP-002030	Town Of Lexington, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11030728.62	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-053147	City Of South Portland, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10498362	35	Yes	10000000	3363191
RCP-000961	Johnson County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10500910	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-015798	Loudon County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10502075	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-040413	Commerce City, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10505025	1	No		11805998	0	0
RCP-053269	Jessamine County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10511204	10	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-050895	Sweetwater City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10514921	45	No		3996832.07	-653706.59
RCP-040129	Autauga County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10851898	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039501	Taney County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10863358	8	Yes	10000000	1863645.22
RCP-031258	Andover, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10867056.79	32	Yes	10000000
RCP-039942	Lenoir County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10867437	25	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039757	Normal, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10879113	10	Yes	10000000	6645736
RCP-040441	Decatur, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10883767	3	Yes	10000000	4865910
RCP-037717	Waukesha, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10883993	17	Yes	10000000	3200000
RCP-039663	Cass County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10059018	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-049262	Torrington, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10075341.7	9	Yes	9750777.93
RCP-050629	Belle Glade City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10084187	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-039093	Saline County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10532376	39	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040645	Cumberland, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10540351.61	7	Yes	10000000	250000	250000
RCP-006971	New Iberia, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10540923.36	27	Yes	9773779.34
RCP-049263	Trumbull, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10557445.23	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-035338	Town Of Purcellville, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10559844	15	Yes	10000000
RCP-037007	Franklin County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10885502	2	Yes	10000000	153000
RCP-039718	Box Elder County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10886278	37	Yes	6137069	0
RCP-038500	Marion County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10891329	21	Yes	1000000	0	0	0
RCP-056050	Haltom City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10892845.99	2	Yes	9429729
RCP-040093	Tamarac, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10897007	1	Yes	10000000	7810428.64
RCP-046972	Jeffersonville City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10906656.82	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-050621	Bartow City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10090698	1	No		290683	0	290683
RCP-037840	Mankato City, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10097143	7	Yes	10000000	6309495
RCP-039019	Panama City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10087173	9	No		0	0	0
RCP-024386	Town Of North Hempstead, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10114020.88	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039643	Sarasota, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10123762	10	Yes	10000000	22979753
RCP-038548	Watauga County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10911724	2	Yes	9979131	3086550.42
RCP-039767	La Plata County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10920270	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-050893	Sunny Isles Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10920613	3	Yes	9999999.99
RCP-031870	Lynnwood City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10936804	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-038243	Carter County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10953291	18	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037352	Newport Beach, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10141272	3	No		18007069	0	0
RCP-039197	Tuscola County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10147979	5	Yes	10000000	149383.53
RCP-037836	Worcester County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10154000	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036787	Delray Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10956323	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037994	Putnam County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10964751	1	Yes	0	0
RCP-040369	Coffee County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10978347	2	Yes	8813347	10000000
RCP-014448	Mount Juliet City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10987002.78	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037661	Kirkland City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10155994	3	Yes	10000000	18553300
RCP-053191	City Of Allen, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10159869	7	No		13724024	7206103
RCP-040478	Coffee County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10166820	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036703	Columbia County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10169151	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-047371	Oakley City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10177190	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-026333	Carrollton, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10179501	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-026506	Town Of Matthews, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10560995.9	2	Yes	9244604.9
RCP-037359	Rusk County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10567728	8	Yes	10000000	2500000
RCP-039785	Idaho Falls, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10570717	18	Yes	10000000	5575017
RCP-038342	Buckeye City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10575465	1	Yes	10000000	5152000
RCP-031299	Chelmsford, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10578611.69	35	Yes	335000	0	0	0
RCP-037089	Tuolumne County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10581713	1	Yes	10000000	8097179
RCP-036880	Chisago County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10989807	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-049187	Glastonbury, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10204968.08	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-038149	Kerr County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10216933	6	Yes	10000000	0	0
RCP-038331	Culpeper County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10217905	9	Yes	625000	0
RCP-039776	Pulaski County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10218293	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040404	Cherokee County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10225868	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039154	Jefferson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10585015	2	Yes	10000000	4200000
RCP-014401	La Vergne City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10597418.01	7	No		0	0	0
RCP-040510	The City Of Frederick, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10615913		Yes	10000000	4095013
RCP-039770	Camden County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10618230	6	Yes	9961387.28	10000000
RCP-014696	City Of Easley, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10635938.36	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-047255	Danville Town, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10647738	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-056330	Coppell, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10283825.81	14	No		12918924	0	0
RCP-014309	Cookeville City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10297737.41	5	Yes	8723000
RCP-037713	Elko County, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10251508	3	Yes	9788002	9748202
RCP-050781	Lynn Haven City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10280021	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-053206	City Of Texas City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10309444	8	No		6373691.83	500000	0
RCP-037248	St. Charles Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10314053	2	Yes	5157053	0	0	0
RCP-040098	Iron County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10651833	4	Yes	9791833	10000000
RCP-039450	Campbell County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10660768	2	No		0	0	0
RCP-037027	Chapel Hill, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10668497	20	Yes	10000000	4175297.91
RCP-050687	Eustis City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10669685	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-050675	Debary City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10670687	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-039897	Toms River Township, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10345343	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-047218	Brea City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10347515	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-037413	Goodyear, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10350308	5	Yes	9955308	0
RCP-047401	Rohnert Park City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10356127	1	Yes	10000000	20882819	26811555	20882819
RCP-039711	Hancock County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10680580	20	Yes	10000000	500000
RCP-053169	Pocatello, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10700496	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037447	Eagle County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10707773	1	Yes	10000000	9958265
RCP-039642	Whiteside County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10717097	20	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036895	Seneca County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10717680	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053247	County Of Hoke, Nc	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10728557	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039865	Colbert County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10729917	12	Yes	9704139.49	0
RCP-039918	Burien, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10806859	2	Yes	10000000	6200000
RCP-037302	Palm Springs, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10820822	1	No		48274322	0	0
RCP-039271	Kingsport, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10356906	24	Yes	10000000	8754285
RCP-037157	Roane County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10368828	17	Yes	10000000	772919
RCP-038051	Fulton County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10369022	3	Yes	10000000	3282244
RCP-039459	Washington County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10008516	3	Yes	9677616	0
RCP-053031	St. Martin Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10378345	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038881	League City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10385742	24	Yes	10000000	205000
RCP-039884	Ashland County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10388640	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037120	Euless City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10393946	2	Yes	10000000	3893946
RCP-038626	Waller County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10730888	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-056264	The Colony, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11032873.46		Yes	10000000
RCP-031850	Issaquah City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11039632	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-014702	Town Of Fort Mill, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11093954.8	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038590	Biloxi, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11098303	1	No		12084403	4728607
RCP-039466	Woodland, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11114656	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036877	City Of Sugar Land, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11115958	3	Yes	9969200.82	30670714
RCP-037382	Brooklyn Park City, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11052580	31	Yes	10000000	1500000
RCP-025664	Duluth, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11057077	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-038321	Jefferson County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11099941	22	Yes	5000000
RCP-040172	Pekin, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11110631	1	Yes	10000000	7999788
RCP-039707	Genesee County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11125969	7	Yes	10000000	7032667
RCP-039841	Cherokee County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11129853	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-025930	Stockbridge, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11167240	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-038786	Scott County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11072359	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039166	Arvada, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11075818	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038674	Columbia County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11174917	3	Yes	10000000	1152766
RCP-038847	Marietta, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11180581	13	Yes	10000000	2301375.43
RCP-038021	Hardin County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11188513	20	Yes	10000000	1000000
RCP-039468	Lyon County, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11170643	29	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039258	Anderson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11214347	13	Yes	10000000	9500000
RCP-036742	Morgantown, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11243509	17	Yes	0	0
RCP-037126	Pike County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11241735	4	Yes	10000000	4347124
RCP-038638	Russell County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11258245	30	Yes	0	0
RCP-036777	Gordon County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11258633	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039938	Oxford County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11260964	5	Yes	10000000	1803550
RCP-036732	Alexandria, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11290002	4	Yes	10000000	11044984
RCP-039915	Lakewood, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11309045	1	No		4654456	10176475	11690809
RCP-037149	Blount County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11232023	30	Yes	8353640	0
RCP-005171	Lawrence City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11209430.65	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-038186	Newton County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11311660	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039837	Middletown, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11313784	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-025763	Lagrange, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11316988	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039320	South Fulton, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11352517	1	Yes	500000
RCP-039176	Huron County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11317487	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-026340	Chamblee, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11317735	4	No		0	0	0
RCP-047249	Covina City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11351049	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-026528	City of Monroe, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11326507.16	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-037099	La Porte, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11476496	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039835	Gaithersburg, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11500277	2	No		6758699	2725931	0
RCP-040318	Redlands City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11508106	18	Yes	10000000	9326519
RCP-026329	Canton, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11400265	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039139	Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11403341	2	No		9603711	0	0
RCP-031490	Shrewsbury, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11515684.58	2	Yes	9964084.58
RCP-053203	City Of Burlington, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11516517	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039438	Hot Springs, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11370797	8	Yes	3418337	1042636
RCP-037361	Roswell, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11374757	2	No		20849481	32762002	0
RCP-037045	West Lafayette, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11427539	4	Yes	2100000	1376833
RCP-039086	Grand Forks, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11439298	9	Yes	1266733.38	1266733.38
RCP-038472	Union County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11457727	1	Yes	10000000	1920528.91
RCP-038406	Lincoln County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11462583	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039191	Eddy County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11355170	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040196	Cherry Hill, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11361785	6	No		0	0	0
RCP-039026	Sandusky County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11366435	10	Yes	10000000	3646831
RCP-036762	Mercer County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11413053	40	No		802468	412160.66
RCP-039120	Lowndes County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11381392	5	Yes	10000000	500000
RCP-024884	Town Of Smithtown, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11388581.15	48	Yes	10000000
RCP-056647	Rockwall, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11392873.15	1	Yes	0	0
RCP-037772	Bloomington, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11396081	13	No		22072969	16866886
RCP-039202	Rocky Mount, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11521180	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039752	Monroe, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11405523	5	Yes	10000000	6175572.06
RCP-039873	Maverick County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11406060	8	Yes	9853939.38	2170761
RCP-038216	Duplin County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11409751	5	Yes	9335594.79	9270694.79
RCP-038971	Otter Tail County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11410722	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-025768	Lawrenceville, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11514536	16	Yes	9014536
RCP-047331	Lincoln City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11548406	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039478	Columbia County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11549602	1	Yes	5100000	5100000
RCP-053104	Lawrence County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11549991	10	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037072	Otsego County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11555818	43	Yes	10000000	10465961.17
RCP-040500	Vermilion Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11559314	1	Yes	10000000	938344.21
RCP-036814	Vineland, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11559382	5	Yes	3477930.65	1717930.65
RCP-038100	Rome, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11546686	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-014360	Germantown City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11638585.55	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-036774	Gurabo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11649765.03	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-047321	La Mirada City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11526398	5	No		11940013	0	11940013
RCP-037992	Hamburg Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11538866	13	Yes	10000000	1445981
RCP-049058	City Of San Luis, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11615161.18	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-002008	City Of Hanahan, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11621668.5	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-036812	Washington County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11637009	19	Yes	10000000	1294818
RCP-037070	Taylor, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11593181	25	Yes	10000000	6834991
RCP-035435	Fallon City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11614389.84	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039410	Janesville, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11686560	9	Yes	4000000	4740899
RCP-037875	Rogers, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11710729	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-047253	Cypress City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11723277	1	No		3619621	8098041	0
RCP-053214	Granville County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11740344	3	Yes	10000000	2192972
RCP-056087	Keller, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11721838.39	6	Yes	8599053.39
RCP-053168	Cumberland County, Tn	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11755301	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038339	Bradford County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11717036	5	Yes	10000000	5843152.79
RCP-038758	Pittsylvania County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11723057	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-048988	Roswell City, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11751501	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-002006	City Of Greenwood, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11651042.2	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-047233	Ceres City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11651510	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-040170	Garfield County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11666145	4	No		3527306	8404040	6834638
RCP-039811	Gainesville, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11718342	5	Yes	10000000	12097604.62
RCP-047367	Newark City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11757485	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-047414	San Jacinto City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11773274	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-039990	Enid, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11854984	2	Yes	10000000	1326511
RCP-039216	West Sacramento, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11773300	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-050776	Leesburg City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11855707	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-037458	Garfield County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11859412	7	Yes	0	0
RCP-036753	Greece, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11863368	1	Yes	2940179	10000000
RCP-037137	Walla Walla County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11801918	9	Yes	10000000	1856612
RCP-053250	Laurel County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11812212	3	Yes	9775611.25	1159686
RCP-050741	Jacksonville Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11834170	7	Yes	0
RCP-031400	Marlborough, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11835813.82	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038230	Long Branch, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11848909	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037267	Lincoln County, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11873397	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-031925	Puyallup City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11836538	10	Yes	2500000
RCP-037445	St. Joseph County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11841542	1	Yes	10000000	2557724
RCP-014725	City Of North Augusta, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11871089.22	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-037602	Herkimer County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11910497	29	No		10332724.82	617567.71
RCP-037077	Mishawaka, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11883602	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039886	Washington County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11888160	5	Yes	10000000	11119825
RCP-036854	Pearland, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11888971	5	Yes	1000000	1000000
RCP-055969	Cedar Hill, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11899852.04	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-031814	Edmonds City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11904718	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-039215	Belknap County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11907389	21	Yes	10000000	440000
RCP-038635	Hall County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11917101	16	Yes	10000000	644981
RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11933029	30	No		0	0	0
RCP-056029	Farmers Branch, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11956458.88	7	No		0	0	0
RCP-037323	Tipton County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11964884	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-014308	Columbia City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11967937.49	2	Yes	2000000
RCP-031257	Amherst, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11933556.32	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-049029	City Of El Mirage, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11940791.81	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-055899	Burleson, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11973093.37	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-047203	Azusa City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11954843	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-040519	Barry County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11955366	7	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039862	Reno County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12042385	15	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-026438	Town of Holly Springs, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12050587.75	4	Yes	9590588
RCP-038655	The Acadia Parish Police Jury, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12051514	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038422	Glen Falls, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12008323	10	Yes	10000000	1279306.05
RCP-040601	Palatine Village, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12012529	10	Yes	10000000	5847866
RCP-055901	Kyle, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12014803.68	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-031560	Woburn, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12024424.02	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-050753	Key West City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12079588	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-049964	City Of Littleton, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12081125.98	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-002078	City Of Simpsonville, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12058278.56	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-049085	Cambridge City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12079281.39	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-037678	Hood County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11973430	12	Yes	5986715	0
RCP-050682	Edgewater City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11979418	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037649	Lee County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11999847	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038252	Ocala, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12202159	4	Yes	8173669	2072589
RCP-039529	Georgetown County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12174855	11	Yes	7866157	0
RCP-037492	Warrick County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12236623	41	Yes	10000000	999653
RCP-000964	Pender County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12248666	1	Yes	0
RCP-038536	Salem County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12117555	7	Yes	6058777.5	2232921.56
RCP-038673	San Benito County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12199718	6	Yes	10000000	100000
RCP-049247	Shelton, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12172151.62	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-038164	Haywood County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12104347	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037976	Knox County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12105318	7	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-050910	West Melbourne City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12150209	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-037114	East Lansing, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12170077	10	No		8632045	9118910	9624494
RCP-039828	Livingston County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12220307	1	No		14161033	0	12220307
RCP-053208	City Of Conway, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12233839	7	Yes	10000000	3840380
RCP-055937	Bedford, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12177672.51	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037333	Cheyenne, Wyoming	Wyoming	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12191813	5	Yes	10000000	6392200
RCP-038397	Stanly County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12199329	6	Yes	10000000	40000
RCP-015802	City Of Boca Raton, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12199643	2	No		17441707	33196583
RCP-038625	South San Francisco, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12278941	9	Yes	10000000	12300000
RCP-050842	Palmetto Bay Village, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12282434	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-025927	Statesboro, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12306221	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-036660	Winchester City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12337682	18	Yes	10000000	2038226
RCP-025999	Woodstock, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12337963	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038072	Crawford County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12286931	14	Yes	657784	657784
RCP-039400	Lamar County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12303635	3	Yes	10000000	2431356
RCP-037035	Coos County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12525844	1	No		16206151.44	16206151.44	16206151.44
RCP-039958	Walker County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12338210	3	Yes	10000000	384988.43
RCP-032033	Town Middletown, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12363291.73	1	Yes	0
RCP-039599	Montcalm County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12409495	13	Yes	6409495	1140497
RCP-039390	Warren County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12420372	75	Yes	10000000	9337562
RCP-039432	Dothan, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12438636	3	No		6196357	0	0
RCP-039184	Pope County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12445235	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039660	Clay County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12474371	1	Yes	10000000	1246126
RCP-037059	Lake County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12506226	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037260	Palm Coast, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12501879	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040275	Starr County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12554203	14	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038228	Caldwell City, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12481887	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039741	Effingham County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12488744	12	Yes	10000000	0	0	0
RCP-038225	Sauk County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12517103	1	Yes	10000000	2717641
RCP-039580	Chaves County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12550706	2	Yes	10000000	2173661
RCP-037814	Carbon County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12466601	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-026531	Town Of Mooresville, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12471268.37	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-039357	Armstrong County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12574015	1	No		4345229	6634359	1594427
RCP-038349	Lancaster, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12556172	11	Yes	1170420.25	10000000
RCP-039788	Chippewa County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12559059	10	No		6284399	6412366	7536796
RCP-039267	Hamblen County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12612668	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039683	Carlsbad, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12615746	1	No		33039977	61819966	92729991
RCP-039588	Pulaski County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12621409	2	Yes	9818745.4	2553901
RCP-039167	Crow Wing County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12636171	24	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037311	Tehama County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12641804	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036848	Marion County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12643552	38	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039147	Ionia County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12566634	47	Yes	10000000	3002182
RCP-050844	Palm Springs Village, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12629526	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-031277	Beverly, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12606096.73	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-025660	Douglasville, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12693848	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-038733	Nacogdoches County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12665113	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-002038	City Of Mauldin, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12649717.18	6	Yes	10000000
RCP-040350	Vacaville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12675830	12	Yes	10000000	191445
RCP-038756	Jefferson County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12688615	29	No		5338544	3706653	3643418
RCP-038657	Adams County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12709982	10	Yes	703000
RCP-014283	Brentwood City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12694292.04	2	Yes	7694292.04
RCP-039211	Mccracken County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12706680	3	Yes	10000000	740381.79
RCP-037723	Athens County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12689004	10	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-049183	Enfield, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12920906.6	36	Yes	10000000
RCP-038596	Lompoc, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12908901	5	No		0	0	0
RCP-038990	Kershaw County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12926752	12	Yes	10000000	9076502
RCP-037135	Darlington County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12939766	2	Yes	9758300.92	0
RCP-037293	Marquette County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12955499	1	No		7958637	4996862
RCP-036992	Wayne County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12797195	3	Yes	10000000	1409987
RCP-050896	Tarpon Springs City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12810334	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-053224	City Of Meridian, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12845509	2	Yes	10000000	6678957
RCP-039040	Doral City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12878947	2	Yes	0	13209972
RCP-038951	Portsmouth, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12880280	3	Yes	10000000	5190068
RCP-036656	Staunton City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12955826	22	No		3551334	7210124	2194368
RCP-037363	Spalding County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12956276	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053066	City Of Largo, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12960041	12	Yes	10000000	9450685
RCP-040501	San Patricio County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12961520	9	Yes	10000000	1980517
RCP-025759	Kennesaw, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12725590	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-014355	Gallatin City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12734348.36	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-026444	Town Of Indian Trail, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12774525	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037438	Grant County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12774857		Yes	0	0
RCP-036874	Rio Rancho, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12873197	4	No		0	0	0
RCP-038265	Hattiesburg, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12875821	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037980	Harrison County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12927140	2	Yes	10000000	415672
RCP-037669	Williamson County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12935687	26	No		0	0	0
RCP-031278	Billerica, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12962692.57	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-040197	Mason County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12968901	44	Yes	10000000	1893335
RCP-038755	Edmond, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12741315	13	Yes	10000000	0	0	0
RCP-039759	Manhattan City, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12757377	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-030120	Bozeman City, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12767080.73	5	Yes	2880325.78
RCP-053207	City Of Lake Forest, Ca	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12774385	3	Yes	10000000	8247531
RCP-040053	Urbana, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12974560	2	Yes	2500000	0
RCP-040483	Oldham County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12974923	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039066	Plantation, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13042828	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040529	Hanford, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13077740	15	Yes	10000000	8200000
RCP-040039	Aroostook County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13024648	30	No		198121	273859
RCP-036778	Rapid City, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13024994	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-050714	Haines City City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13026702	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-039949	St. Francois County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13055726	13	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040162	Harrison County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13063690	14	Yes	983690	983690
RCP-036842	Catoosa County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13126623	10	Yes	10000000	1
RCP-040124	Ward County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13138471	49	Yes	10000000	3687149
RCP-039456	Blue Earth County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13140802	12	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037637	Wyoming, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13155842	7	Yes	10000000	6901653
RCP-049267	Wallingford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13118305.66	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-038571	Otero County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13109141	5	Yes	3500000	0
RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13109724	10	Yes	10000000	2543684
RCP-019361	BOONE, COUNTY OF	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13177707	6	No		10000000	0	0
RCP-038632	Corvallis, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13085521	2	No		20363281	32309463	24554687
RCP-037797	Jefferson County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12979779	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039206	Rice County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13008526	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-014525	Spring Hill City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12986851.52		Yes	10000000
RCP-037086	Butler County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12996677	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039078	Belmont County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13015130	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038514	Rutherford County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13019597	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-025668	East Point, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13023592	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-049252	Southington, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12972697.96	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-040550	Longmont, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12973267	10	No		0	0	0
RCP-037058	Jones County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13227238	7	Yes	10000000	2100000
RCP-040198	Shiawassee County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13231900	18	No	0	6481936	5448809
RCP-039590	Sanford, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13240884	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-031772	Bothell City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13248730	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-038545	Ft Myers, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15759486	2	Yes	10000000	6906475
RCP-040377	Turlock, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15753190	16	Yes	10000000	832000
RCP-026731	City Of Wilson, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15762456.88	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037512	Flagstaff, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13252816	10	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039827	Klamath County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13254432	71	Yes	10000000	4436917
RCP-037170	York County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13262590	2	No		14680254	9592842
RCP-036860	Borough Of State College, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13276247	7	No		6265795	6265795
RCP-037430	Wilkes County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13288229	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040328	Eau Claire, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13529002	1	Yes	10000000	3559866	6706068	3263068
RCP-037805	Auburn, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13545799	33	No		0	0	0
RCP-037294	Franklin County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13535494	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039682	Walker County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13550256	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037732	Iberia Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13563659	11	No		2278991	3531358
RCP-036852	Leavenworth County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15880533	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038563	Lafayette, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15881059	3	Yes	7940529.5	0
RCP-000937	Payne County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15885583	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040285	Edison, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15593864	3	No	0	4991210	5291836.58
RCP-037163	Sparks, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16230272	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039448	Valdosta, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16254692	12	Yes	10000000	971800
RCP-036893	Concord, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16255872	10	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038400	Cullman County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16270952	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038905	Bartholomew County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16273089	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037040	Yuba City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15615517	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037335	Clinton County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15633268	14	No		14181757	14181757
RCP-039586	Naperville, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13308689	1	No		20500792	0	0
RCP-037229	Owensboro, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13324175		Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036721	Anniston, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13291868	10	Yes	3592258	0
RCP-050898	Temple Terrace City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13342240	7	No	0	2100000	0	0
RCP-039033	Raleigh County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14249514	4	Yes	10000000	1555973
RCP-037569	City Of Ames, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14257623	8	Yes	10000000	1369178
RCP-038236	Melbourne, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14263027	11	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036683	Somerset County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14266219	11	Yes	7827258.54	3299435
RCP-039616	Sharon, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14382307	9	Yes	10000000	600000
RCP-037078	Walton County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14387423	2	Yes	10000000	3689384
RCP-039846	Gastonia, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15661923	19	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036785	Rockingham County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15917438	2	Yes	10000000	8448256
RCP-037185	Billings, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15940314	1	No		12742990	3197345	0
RCP-037733	Spokane Valley City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16006492	6	No		10784249	0	6348423
RCP-036914	Howard County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16033204	36	Yes	10000000	2102656
RCP-025812	Milton, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14783224	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-053085	Cattaraugus County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14784835	1	No		17268854	0	0
RCP-037816	Tracy City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14798549	10	No		0	0	0
RCP-038195	Clinton Township, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14816245	1	No		5467998	8999669	348578
RCP-037173	James City County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14863696	25	No		14545840.93	26040384.35	26689630.53
RCP-039487	Pine Bluff, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16044400	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036754	Kennewick, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16062005	18	No		12376991.57	8987346.2	0
RCP-038327	Henderson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16070692	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038109	Orem, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16087350	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037052	Gardena, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15002061	2	No		11053614	0
RCP-036801	Daytona Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15010544	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039415	Clallam County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15020640	29	Yes	7000000	0
RCP-040540	Warner Robins, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15026496	3	Yes	10000000	428883
RCP-037630	Monterey Park, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15043184	1	No		8316784	6069215
RCP-000943	City Of Santa Fe, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15049631	16	Yes	10000000
RCP-036806	Union Township, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15492274	16	Yes	5345000	0
RCP-038887	Natrona County, Wyoming	Wyoming	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15511480	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039653	Putnam County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15586651	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039121	Rancho Cordova City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15588333	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039275	Lewis County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15676389	18	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038268	St George, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15954196	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038573	Caldwell County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15962113	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038774	San Rafael City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16088886	1	No		16187373	15773808	11868170
RCP-038380	Lauderdale County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14397912	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-050652	Casselberry City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14403048	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-039299	Roseville, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14393345	12	Yes	10000000	2268431
RCP-039133	Monroe County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14417919	22	No		26194087	0	0
RCP-037178	Riley County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14418696	3	No		4143686.07	6241258.77
RCP-039591	Cathedral City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15572693	6	Yes	10000000	6119464
RCP-040278	Surprise City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15545984	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038138	Orange County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16198695	20	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038062	Chemung County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16210350	27	No		16210350	0
RCP-038932	Greene County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13415844	7	Yes	10000000	2434817
RCP-038179	West Jordan, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13388377	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039119	Johnson City, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13415440	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036873	Bossier City, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13428592	2	Yes	10000000	0	0	0
RCP-040302	San Luis Obispo City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13564467	3	Yes	10000000	8800000
RCP-039249	Isabella County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13571817	5	Yes	10000000	3557288
RCP-037262	Troup County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13581529	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-025958	Tucker, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13591216	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-039617	Wise County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13593572	2	Yes	7834497	1000000
RCP-049106	Havre De Grace City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13811367.58	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-037334	Wood County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16222392	3	Yes	10000000	250000
RCP-036773	Ashland, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13474388	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039766	Logan, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13815781	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039859	Kenner, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13833851	1	No		15838740	8344743	2598247
RCP-038385	Columbia County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13924165	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039991	Manteca City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13928377	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-037582	Union City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14099826	2	No		10889351	3210475
RCP-053182	Pottawatomie County, Ok	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14100145	12	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-050866	Rockledge City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14137596	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-037460	Santa Cruz, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14170321	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037984	Grays Harbor County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14579719	22	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037981	Steubenville, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14598300	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038447	Scioto County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14628862	37	Yes	10000000	1818016
RCP-038845	Sullivan County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14651782	3	No		14470635	0	0
RCP-037195	Augusta County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14676256	12	Yes	10000000	1896723
RCP-040391	Kankakee, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15052449	27	No		1591000	1591000	1591000
RCP-037910	Jonesboro, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15579043	4	Yes	10000000	988103
RCP-039696	Surry County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13943006	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-050815	New Smyrna Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13945267	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-053109	Robertson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13948833	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038992	Juneau City and Borough, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13949612.95	1	No		34551384	27925338	0
RCP-039079	Erie County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14425300	2	Yes	2500000	0
RCP-015611	Chatham County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14464924	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-039926	Cole County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14906817	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036710	Upland, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15213716	30	No		2894037	3554565	6822317
RCP-010714	City of Beloit, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15218991	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-037686	Amherst Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15230415	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037384	White County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15296847	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037223	Cape Girardeau County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15319767	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039627	Simi Valley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15325294	1	No	0	6734897.96	7014078.47	1576317.57
RCP-038035	Wausau, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15586461	17	Yes	10000000	2759548
RCP-036976	Deerfield Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16284885	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037808	Pittsburg, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16290477	2	Yes	8035477	2675865
RCP-039702	San Buenaventura, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16321147	1	No		19657008	6115407	5914669
RCP-036868	Indiana County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16330195	1	No		7654585.22	6996744.48	1678865.3
RCP-038032	Elmore County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15773896	13	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-049080	Aberdeen City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15782871.82	19	No		0	0
RCP-037629	Wagoner County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15789435	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-040407	Belleville, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15792501	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036738	Lewis And Clark County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13486352	51	Yes	10000000	873959
RCP-037249	Grand Forks County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13490043	23	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036922	Christian County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13686223	2	No		2231236	2818254	3367788
RCP-036924	Morgan County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13691662	1	Yes	10000000	2069327
RCP-036986	Palo Alto, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13735071	2	No		64978869	80344760	90931414
RCP-038492	Portage County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13746631	30	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053132	Putnam County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14474831	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039388	Van Buren County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14699370	10	No		4035152	4035152	4035152
RCP-038977	Vermilion County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14715103	33	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037942	Cayuga County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14873990	16	Yes	10000000	8286236
RCP-039613	Colton City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14881400	1	No		17167734	17167734
RCP-038829	Olathe City, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14918491	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053118	Anderson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14952074	25	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036761	Lake Elsinore City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14967198	10	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038896	Chino, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14978541	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-016392	Elkton Town, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15391723.8	17	Yes	2336349
RCP-037948	Clearfield County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15394355	1	No		4514692	4514692	4514692
RCP-037349	Kosciusko County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15433397	37	Yes	8235005.66	10000000
RCP-050920	Winter Park City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15438814	1	No		10119494	5319320	0
RCP-038060	Oconee County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15450878	7	Yes	4690166	1631033
RCP-025834	Newnan, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15527856	30	Yes	10000000
RCP-053266	Talladega County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15534789	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040109	Bristol Township, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15886687	15	No		2409047.68	54646.2
RCP-006372	Wilson County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15888885	14	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037428	Carteret County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13494316	21	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-000938	City Of Fort Pierce, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13502665	8	Yes	1000000	1000000
RCP-036951	Boynton Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13647904	14	Yes	10000000	1968770.47
RCP-049016	City Of Bullhead City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13654443.89	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-038246	Chicago Heights Illinois, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13654940	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039333	Allegany County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13677483	59	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038569	Greenwood County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13754207	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053116	City Of Lakewood, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13766236	32	Yes	10000000	3797405
RCP-040074	Broken Arrow City, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13768466	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036846	Fauquier County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13834039	6	Yes	3335000	12099058
RCP-037226	Kettering, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13851520	2	No		11577527	8570559	0
RCP-036908	Mckinley County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13862203	3	Yes	6931101.5	0
RCP-040547	Sandy Springs City, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13868305	1	Yes	10000000	20477207
RCP-031335	Everett, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13884521.24	14	Yes	10000000
RCP-037182	Apple Valley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14883978	3	Yes	10000000	536323
RCP-037128	Ross County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14891472	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036687	Appleton, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14891841	2	Yes	10000000	10422027
RCP-038014	Chelan County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14995195	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-038808	Poquoson City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15114864	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-039812	Napa City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15118910	18	No		22985432	11179893	22985432
RCP-039853	Umatilla County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15140874	39	Yes	10000000	4838405.72
RCP-037377	Hancock County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15183218	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039540	Floyd County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15251978	36	Yes	10000000	3749818
RCP-039178	Skokie, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15267242	7	No		12620790	0	0
RCP-037480	Clinton County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15460396	5	Yes	0	3574239.7
RCP-039283	Bulloch County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15462921	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040180	Martinsville, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15463451	8	Yes	4090412.95
RCP-039573	Madison County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13779458	21	No		10585837	3193621	0
RCP-039230	Joplin, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13779739		Yes	10000000	4100000
RCP-040467	Temple, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14170861	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040437	Walker County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14173761	17	Yes	10000000	1208234
RCP-037411	Jackson County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14174927	2	Yes	10000000	200000
RCP-039694	Wood County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14179200	33	Yes	10000000	2862573
RCP-037604	Highland City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14895107	6	Yes	1040000	1040000
RCP-038900	Yuba County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15280337	9	Yes	10000000	5291003
RCP-039314	Manitowoc County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15341133	23	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040464	Bedford County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15344241	4	Yes	5406107.86	0
RCP-039584	Rock Hill, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13179656	7	Yes	10000000	1507510
RCP-036779	Muskogee County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13207620	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037095	Citrus Heights, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15676972	12	Yes	10000000	3246927
RCP-006414	City Of Mountain View, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15679080	1	No		36121906	141721281	121907756
RCP-050800	Miami Lakes Town, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15710276	11	Yes	0
RCP-040254	Lodi, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15764793	7	Yes	6954793	6954793
RCP-039126	Cascade County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15804392	18	Yes	10000000	1883110
RCP-037043	La Habra, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15828149	31	Yes	10000000	3283788	2785581
RCP-039339	Fond Du Lac, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13792153	17	Yes	10000000	1633000
RCP-039395	Lea County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13804514	2	Yes	5554647	6902257
RCP-037037	Dekalb County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13890562	20	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039834	Creek County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13892310	27	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039439	Springfield, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13956221	22	No		8495682	5460539
RCP-039371	Apache County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13963207	2	No		6329911	5405944	637658
RCP-053081	City Of Bessemer, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13970941	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039273	Deltona, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13972193	2	No		0	0	0
RCP-036720	Hancock County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14719959	17	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039190	Auburn, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14751231	8	No		18953997	7559568	5634906
RCP-037473	Pico Rivera, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14772455	3	No		10227800	4110390
RCP-039128	Cheshire County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14778619	31	Yes	10000000	993280
RCP-049047	Town Of Oro Valley, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15377781.4	10	Yes	10000000
RCP-040528	Alliance, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15387409	83	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039809	Menifee, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13213674	13	No		18037867	0	0
RCP-039986	Silver Bow County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15727317.22	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-035267	Town Of Front Royal, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15851180	3	No		2487034	0	0
RCP-039155	County Of Bullitt, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	15864606	20	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037235	Ithaca, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16092137	25	Yes	8700000	8239256
RCP-039872	Nashua, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16138777	2	No		10426087	18406213
RCP-039189	Midland County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16152078	4	Yes	10000000	4074933
RCP-025859	Peachtree City, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13526985	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-036810	Thousand Oaks, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14008949	1	No		20788970	16126729	20909854
RCP-039546	Delano City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14030801	5	Yes	10000000	1996474
RCP-037008	Tooele County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14035464	10	Yes	9252194.3	0
RCP-037010	Bend, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14076428	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-026746	City Of Temecula, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14079507	1	No	0	38805789	19888135	72966653
RCP-038148	El Centro, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14095734	40	Yes	6329846	6329846
RCP-037278	Missoula, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14192996	26	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-049013	City Of Apache Junction, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14217868.38	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-037060	Anderson, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14507668	4	No		0	0	0
RCP-039068	Victoria, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14508296	1	No		7176453	7331843	0
RCP-050672	Dania Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16163048	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-037752	Barrow County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16168394	4	Yes	10000000	8492000
RCP-037456	Blacksburg, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13364987	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039831	Bloomington, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13386924	6	Yes	10000000	8081000
RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	13893451	65	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14239414	26	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053268	Municipality Of Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands	Northern Mariana Islands	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14241407	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-037705	Forrest County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14547864	9	Yes	10000000	3500000
RCP-026705	Town Of Wake Forest, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14541845.67	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-037342	Westminster, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14548323	1	No		19483112.42	0
RCP-039031	Valencia County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	14895745	68	Yes	10000000	562192
RCP-039490	Bowie County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18111748	15	Yes	10000000	1474635
RCP-038089	Renton City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18113855	2	No		19731051	7219870	0
RCP-037164	Crawford County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16438191	4	No		5029439	8484176.47	2924575.53
RCP-039860	Barberton, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16441150	11	Yes	10000000	1341936
RCP-039575	Murrieta, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16463101	12	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053189	City Of St. Cloud, Mn	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16463610	2	No		8948575	7515035
RCP-037053	Grafton County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17459302	44	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036977	Rochester, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17435537	1	No		17782949.33	0	0
RCP-049131	Takoma Park City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17463724.52	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-037277	Pasco, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17464312	6	Yes	5389119.11	8598490
RCP-039608	Whittier, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16360631	15	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040440	Massillon, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16373501	7	Yes	10000000	2780000
RCP-049044	Town Of Marana, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16375046.08	2	No	0	9519048	10660969	11507821
RCP-037536	Jefferson County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16465385	24	Yes	10000000	1314192
RCP-000942	Town Of Cary, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16476072	13	No		17891826	40373851
RCP-038512	Spartanburg, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16480273	2	Yes	1500000	3400000
RCP-039437	Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16493877	8	No		9396872.05	4641509.4	6858934.65
RCP-036411	Auburn, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16523077	3	Yes	2903779	2903779
RCP-038865	Island County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16537641	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040001	Michigan City, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16549045	17	Yes	10000000	3923638
RCP-037396	Lee County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16594941	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-014706	City Of Greer, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16614546.48	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-037079	Lawrence County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16609704	11	Yes	10000000	674619
RCP-036328	Frisco City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16638254	7	No		0	0	0
RCP-039746	San Angelo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16650136	2	Yes	10000000	7873699
RCP-040108	Lebanon, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16672455	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16721002	16	Yes	10000000	1820441
RCP-040175	Lincoln County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16726052	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039036	North Bergen Township, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16736740	14	Yes	10000000	4000000
RCP-037209	Wayne County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17465517	12	Yes	10000000	10312825
RCP-037252	Nampa, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17511452	1	Yes	10000000	6500000
RCP-036956	County Of Burke, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17575650	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039373	St. Croix County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17614887	18	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040558	Hillsboro, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18014829	3	No		4847608	12989145.45
RCP-039381	Milpitas City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16736815	30	No		45006853	77771438	92458278
RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16738484	13	Yes	10000000	2643419
RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16746253	25	Yes	10000000	1602807.39
RCP-038826	Montebello, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16764058	6	No		6841365.33	6841356.33	3000000
RCP-039818	North Little Rock, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16769719	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039594	Hempstead Village, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16790322	34	No		6878491	10016625
RCP-037279	Angelina County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16843372	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-037190	Mendocino County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16849976	22	Yes	10000000	2500000
RCP-050685	Estero Village, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16964413		Yes	10000000
RCP-038410	Buchanan County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16969433	26	No		0	0	0
RCP-038501	Josephine County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16993324	40	Yes	0	0
RCP-039101	New Albany, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16927916	28	Yes	10000000	1342993.79
RCP-038691	Lapeer County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17016633	4	Yes	10000000	6216583
RCP-036695	Longview, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17048510	6	Yes	6177964.94	1970377
RCP-037064	Roseville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17644859	1	No		19278632	0	0
RCP-038586	Northumberland County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17645188	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039486	Rockdale County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17655482	20	Yes	6186806	4450500
RCP-036770	Rockingham County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17677626	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035373	Town Of Vienna, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17103462	3	Yes	7100000
RCP-050847	Parkland City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17114169	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-040352	Penn Hills, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17129203	64	Yes	10000000	416777.86
RCP-040042	Hazleton, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17132482	13	Yes	2797440	2797440
RCP-040370	Liberty County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17135507	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040263	Carson, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17776763	6	Yes	1000000
RCP-032039	City Of Newark, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18094136.34	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-038480	San Marcos, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18101483	34	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039222	Beaverton, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16859058	1	No		5967105.22	10981952.78
RCP-037420	Granite City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16872443	38	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037824	Twin Falls County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16875033	3	Yes	10000000	1495664
RCP-039162	Perth Amboy, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16899892	16	No		4082037.1	5278703.27	5278703.27
RCP-040113	Lake Charles, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16918986	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038922	Hamilton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17161883	56	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038075	Christian County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17208540	27	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038998	Nassau County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17214367	3	No		16927566	9996589
RCP-039728	Bastrop County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17233403	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-050865	Riviera Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17761773	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-039868	Falls Church, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18004561	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-040038	Palm Bay, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18009865	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-025860	Peachtree Corners, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16395722	12	Yes	10000000
RCP-039883	Round Rock, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16397285	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038273	Bannock County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17055675	5	Yes	0	0
RCP-039530	Dodge County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17061696	31	No		2297293	4783840	7471603
RCP-039579	Superior, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17082059	17	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037024	Dougherty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17084422	9	Yes	10000000	365500
RCP-036662	Fajardo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17850216	11	Yes	10000000	1962344.51
RCP-036929	Rosemead, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17878653	7	Yes	10000000	3121594
RCP-038592	Victoria County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17886237	15	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039807	Benton County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18074454	33	Yes	10000000	3146847
RCP-037789	Grand Traverse County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18081253	2	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039288	Sandusky, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18091098	13	Yes	10000000	8987063
RCP-038980	City Of Clovis, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17291175	1	No		22390898	0	0
RCP-040176	Kingston, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17301385	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040166	Westfield, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17302570.99	42	Yes	10000000
RCP-037309	Tuscarawas County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17867396	48	Yes	10000000	5726059
RCP-037291	Cape May County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17877497	9	No		2529093.28	0
RCP-036775	Fayetteville, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17911418	11	No	0	6914393	0
RCP-037622	Port Huron, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17959874	24	Yes	10000000	1684804
RCP-049109	Hyattsville City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17961280.56	13	Yes	10000000
RCP-016390	Easton Town, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16425261.01	20	No		3352295	2929798	6266652
RCP-053079	Sunrise, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17326004	15	Yes	10000000	20000000
RCP-039634	Ozaukee County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17330133	23	No		5292326	10815782	1222025
RCP-039878	Avondale City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17887327	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036795	Greenville, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17908547	1	No		23919005	27876046	42072693
RCP-039692	Glynn County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16566971	10	Yes	10000000	1
RCP-037285	Bowling Green, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	16584849	5	Yes	10000000	8473050
RCP-039263	Cabell County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17859238	22	Yes	6000000	0
RCP-038877	Woodbridge, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17920419	2	No		13446777	13446777
RCP-050665	Cooper City City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17930560	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-038280	Davie, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17934700	1	Yes	10000000	14745157.43
RCP-038486	Rogers County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17959077	51	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038196	Calvert County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17971897	22	Yes	0	0
RCP-040303	National City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18010907	8	Yes	10000000	4434484
RCP-037330	Lauderdale County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18011521	19	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038165	Pottawattamie County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18104173	10	Yes	10000000	2909833
RCP-039726	Frederick County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17348003	4	Yes	10000000	4663871
RCP-038110	St. Clair County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	17386657	13	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039354	Elkhart, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18042360	13	Yes	10000000	8000000
RCP-039602	Madison County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18061635	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038558	Kissimmee, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18069843	7	Yes	5314000	5314000
RCP-050770	Lauderdale Lakes City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18127897	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18132223	17	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18140021	28	Yes	10000000	3226260.81
RCP-039080	Watsonville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18265428	7	No		2161942	12562928	3510558
RCP-039595	San Marcos City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18279146	6	Yes	10000000	7843062
RCP-037896	Monroe, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18327658	3	Yes	10000000	9587029
RCP-049137	Westminster City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18365236.96	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-039620	Walton County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18373581	1	Yes	0	0
RCP-039607	Richardson City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18285133	2	Yes	10000000	9210448
RCP-036844	Roanoke County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18294526	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-050678	Dunedin City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18299690	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-037550	Nash County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18316281	7	Yes	10000000	15095113
RCP-025665	Dunwoody, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18431324	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039820	Redwood City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18483063	1	No		16987610	65810636
RCP-038476	West New York Town, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18144801	25	No		6798345	7773205
RCP-053256	Dallas County, Ia	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18152150	8	Yes	10000000
RCP-039446	Campbell County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18177595	15	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053098	Geauga County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18190220	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040293	Williamsburg, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18419663	1	No		10866707	8305345	0
RCP-040316	Medford, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18283804	22	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039512	Lawton, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18202822	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038409	Franklin County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18495757	5	Yes	10000000	1798657
RCP-037308	Iowa City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18325190	8	Yes	10000000	10308861
RCP-050618	Aventura City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18525074	34	Yes	10000000
RCP-056032	Friendswood, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10003026.04	3	Yes	10000000			0
RCP-039307	Dubuque County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18901521	2	Yes	10000000	1793684
RCP-038120	Middletown, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18925154	10	No		8895859	5536733	0
RCP-038381	Lafourche Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18960375	5	No		3970767.87	22931142.87	0
RCP-036973	Flathead County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20163099	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038260	Walworth County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20175141	34	No		5923066	4708861	11796324
RCP-038588	Franklin County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20194371		Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039290	Indio City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20425061	7	No		23851317	0	23851317
RCP-036681	Yauco Municipality, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20431068	28	Yes	10000000	2004112
RCP-040249	Warren County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20446881	14	No		3553168.82	4321159.39	5236532.68
RCP-038049	Easton City, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20665806	38	Yes	10000000	4393064.16		0
RCP-037080	New Brunswick, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20726375	4	No	0	6000000	0	0
RCP-037146	Everett, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20695570	3	No		50967039	49951819	0
RCP-036631	City And County Of Broomfield, CO	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20727034	5	Yes	10000000	5000000	2000000
RCP-036491	Daviess County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19717322	3	Yes	9707622	10000000
RCP-040530	Davis, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19730600	2	No		13114805	5865795	0
RCP-037469	Columbiana County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19789578	94	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038902	Kokomo, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19893216	18	Yes	10000000	3633125
RCP-050853	Plant City City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19905927	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-039517	Macon County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20202529	22	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039455	Fargo, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20205034	18	No		22683410.41	0
RCP-037108	Douglas County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21556564	11	No		3308532	6584500	11663531.68
RCP-039072	Hardin County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21552291	5	Yes	10000000	97736034
RCP-050820	North Miami Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21557242	21	Yes	10000000
RCP-037012	Lakewood, Colorado, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21581066		No		16958421	9701546
RCP-037570	Steuben County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18526253	22	Yes	10000000	9102254
RCP-038876	Burleigh County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18574229	19	Yes	10000000	7445702
RCP-038412	Overland Park, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18581302	16	No		32469765	9371061
RCP-038445	San Leandro, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18639484	36	Yes	10000000	13297183
RCP-050921	Winter Springs City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18687851	5	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-038597	Redding, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18693433	16	Yes	10000000	4682799
RCP-040076	Maury County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18722045	4	No		19555351	0
RCP-037524	Fairfield, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19805577	2	No		20538784	0	0
RCP-040287	Methuen Town City, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19827491.1	11	Yes	10000000	19456647
RCP-039055	Sterling Heights, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19837262	22	No		11828172	11232505
RCP-038283	Craven County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19839303	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040564	Haverford, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19840290	24	Yes	10000000	3722256.86
RCP-040054	Tompkins County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19847267	53	No		26725860	16365712
RCP-038763	Tyler, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20211586	8	Yes	10000000	1529529
RCP-037581	Dekalb County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20375013	2	No		4160670	6517207	0
RCP-039541	Eau Claire County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20326259	38	No		4591273	1930438	4591273
RCP-037774	Rockwall County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20378509	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038495	Albany, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20398505	4	Yes	10000000	4533058
RCP-037612	Elk Grove, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21944605	43	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039427	Sheboygan, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22006206	11	Yes	563489	563489
RCP-040019	Lycoming County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22007003	22	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040163	St. Mary'S County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22047987	23	No		0	0	0
RCP-039795	Miramar, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22053169	1	No		11331537	5689475	0
RCP-050867	Royal Palm Beach Village, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20232484	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-053030	Platte County, Mo	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20281972	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039109	Whitfield County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20322762	42	Yes	10000000	800000
RCP-037464	Bangor, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20478297	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-037516	Monongalia County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20513893	11	No		3207660	3332343	0
RCP-037753	Oshkosh, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20514484	9	No		10201733	5289094	0
RCP-039170	Hemet, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21674344	19	Yes	10000000	9706743
RCP-039506	Newton County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21704962	16	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039492	Middletown, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21731554.29	7	Yes	10000000	5000000
RCP-038416	Northampton, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21747984.2	12	Yes	10000000	7138342
RCP-002001	City Of Goose Creek, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21738356.5	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-035430	Boulder City City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21773790.18	22	Yes	10000000
RCP-037947	La Crosse, City, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21748073	19	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036960	Cidra Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21782715	5	Yes	10000000	4341575
RCP-050715	Hallandale Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19957515	45	No		9556703	10400812	29573794
RCP-039196	Woodbury County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20027326	21	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039252	Bay County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20031017	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039593	Wicomico County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20124834	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040272	Odessa, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20322959	9	No		37295485	56820904
RCP-038594	Newburgh, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21814339	5	Yes	10000000	3537595.19
RCP-038969	Sumter County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20729303	16	Yes	10000000	1386195
RCP-036797	Miami County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20780971	57	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040186	Moline, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20783977	41	No		9528199	6042865	5212913
RCP-038494	Vigo County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20790877	1	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038454	Elyria, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18780812	17	No		5542256	5039374	6114406
RCP-039583	Marshall County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18797215	21	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036954	Santa Barbara, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21837523	24	No		28929690	28929690
RCP-036918	Peoria City, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20769706	20	Yes	10000000	6280000
RCP-036636	Carson City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20774006	30	Yes	10000000	1889677.99
RCP-038377	Bellingham, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20925817	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039549	Sevier County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19083911	11	Yes	10000000	8100562
RCP-040368	Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18811783	13	Yes	10000000	13490483
RCP-039250	Sutter County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18835480	10	No		13896577	4938903
RCP-036691	Story County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18863839	22	Yes	10000000	8000000
RCP-037846	Norristown, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20140217	13	Yes	10000000	2138198
RCP-038356	Tuscaloosa, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20529224	17	No		11086966.61	10426276.43
RCP-040269	Cass County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20546525	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039442	Houston County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20566337	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-050705	Greenacres City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20593599	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-038389	Yamhill County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20802919	5	Yes	9564909.65	0
RCP-037227	Poughkeepsie, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20863783	16	Yes	10000000	5135424	0
RCP-038789	Bartow County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20926843	5	Yes	10000000	5000000
RCP-039027	Hanover County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20932282	7	No		5751349	0
RCP-040532	Allen County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19880482	7	Yes	10000000	8163775.43
RCP-039331	Leominster, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19945242.96	26	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039226	Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20084821	16	No	0	2806848	4007322
RCP-039041	Boulder, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20153269	32	Yes	10000000	41650967
RCP-037876	St. Lawrence County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20927232	17	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038355	Hunt County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19150729	16	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037186	Pensacola, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19153643	15	No		11391460.37	7203058.65
RCP-037418	Cecil County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19978378		Yes	10000000	2147602
RCP-039087	Porterville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19984717	10	No	0	6175073	11878682	1930962
RCP-037109	Carver County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20412306	7	No		17640424	0
RCP-037103	Hagerstown, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20421010	24	Yes	10000000	3570262
RCP-040294	Limestone County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19213079	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037825	Federal Way, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19216886	5	No		14512696	4704190
RCP-039808	San Mateo, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19274312	1	No		13583866	11143401
RCP-050767	Lake Worth Beach City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19295888	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-040612	Lawrence, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19301467	1	No		11694722.24	5759638.48	11526448.99
RCP-036650	Petersburg, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20961839	26	Yes	6613648.01	10000000
RCP-050836	Oviedo City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20965734	27	Yes	10000000
RCP-053175	City Of Lewiston, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20970428	9	No		0	0	0
RCP-037945	Greeley, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20991595	11	No		24518952	0	0
RCP-038904	Taunton, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20992932	10	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038768	Sherburne County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18887342	145	No		18133379	28325388	0
RCP-039609	Ashtabula County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18887924	25	Yes	10000000	230049.17
RCP-037561	Paramount City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18895185	23	Yes	1500000	3609820
RCP-038529	Bellevue, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20110630	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036988	Highlands County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20632184	25	Yes	9999998	10000000
RCP-036996	Madison County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20642090	2	Yes	10000000	14742434
RCP-035436	Fernley City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20972821.5	2	Yes	8972821.5
RCP-037702	Mansfield, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20995402	23	Yes	10000000	5013194.55
RCP-053165	Bradley County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20999100	14	Yes	2702359	0
RCP-038550	Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska	Alaska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21039307	11	No		2447743	0
RCP-039387	Mercer County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21254329	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-037606	Garland County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19304565	11	Yes	10000000	9999999.99
RCP-037083	Thornton, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21001371	11	No		11798733	7655786	0
RCP-038315	Androscoggin County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21031538	53	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039329	Peabody City, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21079949.38	12	No		12353159	7762782	4636430
RCP-039803	Abilene, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21455963	1	No		15119960	0	0
RCP-037589	Grant County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	18983490	24	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037673	Cleveland County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19025057	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039085	Putnam County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19097507	5	Yes	10000000	2853914
RCP-038612	Abington, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19107973	17	No		1153002.88	0	0
RCP-037081	Lincoln Park, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19146461	14	Yes	2405000	1480000
RCP-039548	Charleston, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21092855	31	No		93105327	67784429	67784429
RCP-038759	Lasalle County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21107679	37	Yes	1000000	377429
RCP-038837	Bryan, City Of Inc, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21183735	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039635	Fort Smith, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21220634	2	Yes	6220634	9052891
RCP-039454	Albemarle County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21236071	17	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039169	St Clair Shores, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21247393	13	No		2562938	3687417	3503041
RCP-036890	Ontario County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21322895	11	No		11922945.26	3297597.69	0
RCP-038607	Jefferson County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21333967	20	No		11766919	11411858	0
RCP-037455	Kankakee County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21339406	93	No		6475228	3694268	0
RCP-036794	Auburn, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21395055	12	Yes	5354085.66	3874085.66
RCP-039014	Manassas Park, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21528613	25	Yes	10000000
RCP-039425	Navajo County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21545687	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040064	Lenawee County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19122953	23	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039636	Floyd County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19132082	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036926	Montgomery County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19139269	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037367	Homestead City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19192087	12	Yes	10000000	1558161
RCP-053068	Municipio De San German, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19193080	13	Yes	10000000	2362128
RCP-038885	Adams County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20008291	17	No	0	4479343.32	6800169	4479343.32
RCP-032053	City Of Coral Springs, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	20013374	43	No		8557164.84	11456209.16
RCP-038521	Laporte County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21344456	24	No		11228067	7186922	9368661.79
RCP-038293	Springdale, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21351596	7	No		9194245	2660615
RCP-038464	Eaton County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21418266	9	Yes	10000000	3100000
RCP-037240	Craighead County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21430698	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038751	Bellflower, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21457498	13	No		4296913	7019231	5455768
RCP-039499	Cowlitz County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21481394	18	Yes	10000000	7022423
RCP-037611	Independence, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21485924	25	Yes	5000000	10052126
RCP-039761	Antioch, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21550900	5	Yes	10000000	4000000
RCP-037761	Alhambra, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21848669	106	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039858	Laramie County, Wyoming	Wyoming	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19326709	100	No		4057523	11372206	7069797
RCP-038162	North Miami, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19354517	28	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039751	Tustin, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19380784	9	No		13512339	0
RCP-037935	Parkersburg, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21850407	16	Yes	5534227	3439602
RCP-050670	Cutler Bay Town, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21896320	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-039802	Harlingen, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21927374	12	Yes	10000000	3925182
RCP-036863	Redford, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21962768	11	Yes	10000000	5841811
RCP-016385	College Park City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21972843	11	Yes	10000000
RCP-036739	Calhoun County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22066439	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-050660	Clermont City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19359997	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-039774	Great Falls, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19472737	26	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036809	Elgin, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19501332	2	Yes	0	0
RCP-036885	Carrollton, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19571304	1	No		6721453	6241921	6607930
RCP-037996	Waukegan, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19705222	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21608872	35	Yes	10000000	5902786
RCP-040118	Alton City, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	21639201	5	Yes	10000000	1626330
RCP-037735	Madison County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19032243	2	No		9923766	8412851	0
RCP-037219	Lancaster County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19037682	17	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039687	Nevada County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19376239	15	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037791	Gulfport, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19503534	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-037922	Lewisville, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19541144	5	No		11658866	0
RCP-039684	West Covina, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19566027	11	Yes	10000000	5954141
RCP-035247	Town Of Culpeper, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19581052	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-040136	Moore County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19594757	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038496	Cumberland, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19595850	17	Yes	10000000	1224869.64
RCP-036639	Charlottesville City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19609709	47	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037228	Buena Park, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	19622863	4	No		10769854	6839570
RCP-050919	Winter Garden City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23064811	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-037811	Madera, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23070374	5	Yes	0	1000000
RCP-035921	Caddo Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46656811	8	No		20000000	2356	6653
RCP-038634	Harrisburg, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47073625	7	No		9127862	9524595
RCP-037124	Miami Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23555418	1	No		23555418	0	0
RCP-049357	Hamden, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24140337.11	1	Yes	10000000
RCP-037575	Hunterdon County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24157609	8	No		4276661	4220120	4439565
RCP-039640	Calhoun County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26058813	34	No		8215281	13985000
RCP-038570	Hoboken City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26137293	31	No		8084636.35	7734716	10014802
RCP-039458	Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26175162	13	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053127	County Of Harnett, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26411744	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039551	Florence County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26861794	19	Yes	10000000	6775297	1477928
RCP-037287	Wright County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26878110	26	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037343	Fort Collins, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28118971	34	Yes	10000000	7364908
RCP-038083	Sunnyvale, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28154030	1	No		139043214.98	160164402.47	138862414.59
RCP-038362	Kent City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28172327	2	No		14523018	17754538
RCP-040450	Monroe County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29232861	25	Yes	10000000	1687024
RCP-036707	Chester, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30357628	37	No		2640125.06	3031491.11	548413
RCP-039340	El Cajon, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30399751	18	Yes	8488000	6300000
RCP-036875	Columbia County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30439857	7	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040016	Union Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30477638	20	Yes	10000000	1098588.93
RCP-039618	Clifton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30531115	16	No		7672239.88	5377763.31
RCP-036853	Hawthorne, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30521654	13	No		17282589	0	0
RCP-036752	Battle Creek, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30545339	51	Yes	10000000	7261675
RCP-036722	Vancouver, Washington, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33135869	8	No		14027370	4376808
RCP-039452	Porter County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33096066	27	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036807	Peoria County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34803420	7	No		15644260	17277374	1881786
RCP-037838	Medina County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34913553	18	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037345	Tonawanda Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40351859	21	Yes	10000000	2960591
RCP-036143	Harrison County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40417101	31	No		9674473	4645064	0
RCP-038535	Huntington, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40628967	30	No		9330553	15491221	8895870
RCP-036437	Delaware County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40630180	6	No		12805499	2300215
RCP-039646	Missoula County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23230898	27	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039281	Jasper County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23566542	20	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038610	Ann Arbor City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24182630	15	Yes	10000000	18376457
RCP-050828	Ocoee City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24172699	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-036172	City Of Port St. Lucie, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24739425	8	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037579	Pembroke Pines, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25463361	3	No		24148595	1314766	0
RCP-040268	Bloomfield, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25827441	2	Yes	9898378	4898377.68
RCP-039069	Washington County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26423010	19	No		5718151	7869900
RCP-037061	Kaufman County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26446318	5	Yes	10000000	2059840
RCP-038684	Sussex County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27288147	7	No		3766481	6719462	9491588
RCP-037090	Warren, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27318439	9	Yes	2000000	10000000
RCP-040535	Livingston Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27346613	18	Yes	10000000	400000
RCP-037444	Galveston, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27371621	2	No		0	0	0
RCP-038987	Cedar Rapids, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28190765	52	Yes	10000000	14947584
RCP-036902	Wheeling, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28197143	17	Yes	10000000	1951717.08
RCP-038888	Pharr, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28232868	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039542	Scott County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28944028	24	No	0	0	17857899
RCP-037706	Washington County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29339498	11	Yes	10000000	10873203
RCP-039534	Merrimack County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29405927	42	No		3045257	13382069	19295338
RCP-038463	College Station, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29478326	3	No		16140725.47	0	0
RCP-039720	Madera County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30558925	16	Yes	10000000	2231703
RCP-037019	Fairfield County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30606902	43	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039057	Dorchester County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31623740	29	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039612	Charles County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31710758	38	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037274	Greene County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32814032	26	No	0	7811501.02	8569795.05	11696752.39
RCP-039356	Alamance County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32925136	13	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039443	Kenosha County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32935236	18	No	0	16694659	23270217
RCP-038842	Ellis County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35900284	24	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038959	Eugene, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35908037	1	No		50821398	33468518	39418972
RCP-038254	West Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37234783.09	27	No		8654493	19785600
RCP-037465	Livingston County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37292778	10	Yes	10000000	2706092
RCP-037166	Onslow County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38447136	16	Yes	10000000	10852061
RCP-036398	Niagara County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40650381	14	No		9642610.11	0	0
RCP-035840	County Of Johnston, NC	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40661647	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038721	Pennington County, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22099460	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-050608	Altamonte Springs City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22109182	18	Yes	10000000
RCP-036900	Irondequoit, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22454916	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036763	Wayne County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22475311	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038455	Anderson, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23105605	1	Yes	10000000	2806047.83
RCP-039077	Yuma, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23071661	15	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039930	Mckinney City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23115761	2	No		29202980	0	0
RCP-038864	Bonneville County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23126398	2	Yes	10000000	8385216
RCP-036882	North Charleston City, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24317215	4	No		2127808	13124068	7184186
RCP-037256	Lynwood, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24446961	12	Yes	10000000	9310600
RCP-038497	Dearborn Heights, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24314463		Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039153	Cochise County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24458872	10	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036887	Madison County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25167259	22	Yes	10000000	3400000
RCP-036964	Wichita County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25684127	11	Yes	10000000	1200000
RCP-040193	Vista, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26178395	27	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036815	Yakima, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26195479	7	No		11987053	0	18696034
RCP-036667	Isabela Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26221362	20	Yes	10000000	2985263
RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27427882	22	Yes	928212.34	5575128
RCP-038493	Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27457329	19	No		3063459	4640873	10066312
RCP-035433	Elko City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27476865.36	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-039755	Oceanside, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32346514	22	Yes	10000000	12294362
RCP-039436	Brookline, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32406450	58	No		10926986	2627528.01	0
RCP-037758	Shasta County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34978429	14	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037730	Waltham, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34952310.13	21	Yes	10000000	22415318
RCP-039666	Beaufort County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37317446	19	Yes	10000000	5682662
RCP-038237	El Dorado County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37457492	32	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039131	Haverhill, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37473649.09	46	No		13282626	0
RCP-037571	Springfield, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40276290	22	No		28325177	44210694	25186597
RCP-036678	Toa Baja Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40283034	4	Yes	10000000	150845
RCP-035830	City Of Fayetteville, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40427539	22	No		19181372	19181372
RCP-035989	Doña Ana County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42381821	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040288	Knoxville, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42453411	33	No		18288197	0	0
RCP-036275	Brazos County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44521550	2	No		6419821	8445192	7299824
RCP-036433	Whatcom County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44528542	50	No		8458440	19067980
RCP-035940	County Of Washington, Ar	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46459271	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038384	Berkeley County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23147570	15	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038282	Tom Green County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23153203	28	Yes	10000000	2912208
RCP-037167	Blair County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23663855	2	No		2305444	3539935	17344830.31
RCP-040059	Westminster, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23690019	6	Yes	10000000	8869280
RCP-036671	Manati Municipio City, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24470030	2	No		4396301	7695569.52	11220151.45
RCP-039739	Pompano Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25694057	19	No		11693784	2568838	2568838
RCP-037855	New London, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26223863.59	47	Yes	419782	1500000
RCP-037549	West Haven, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29008575.69	18	Yes	10000000	15527723
RCP-039265	Cumberland County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29043867	14	Yes	10000000	3669846.99
RCP-036925	Bay City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31076578	23	No		4961492.63	7253670.71
RCP-039316	Passaic, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31131607	19	No		5844418.34	9794143.26	12891188.2
RCP-039538	Salem, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31164631	2	No		6784575	16283509	8096547
RCP-037573	East Chicago, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31172909	6	Yes	10000000	0		0
RCP-037412	Stearns County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31286930	17	No		2991561	9165154
RCP-039198	Yellowstone County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31330634	10	Yes	10000000	5829560
RCP-039601	Rock County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31729599	29	Yes	10000000	5796000
RCP-040253	Inglewood, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31755095	4	Yes	10000000	17587222
RCP-037253	Guadalupe County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32408074	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036760	Licking County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34353370	19	Yes	10000000	2887294.46
RCP-038526	Shawnee County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34355895	38	No		13029411	12594517
RCP-036193	Huntsville City, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34402593	9	No		29556851	29556852
RCP-037554	Boone County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35052822	4	Yes	10000000	0	0
RCP-037692	County Of Butler, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36488243	51	No		11608474	4464777	0
RCP-037365	Outagamie County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36494459	31	Yes	10000000	2000000
RCP-039703	Hernando County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37666687	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039095	Minnehaha County, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37514015	23	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040295	Holyoke, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37686566.98	46	No		1699874.78	2017526	1677874
RCP-037129	Little Rock, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37713401	40	No		95264438	61046365
RCP-040341	Montgomery County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40594440	19	Yes	10000000
RCP-037548	Pittsfield, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40602779.37	45	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037699	Sioux City, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40618687	16	No		0	0	0
RCP-038171	Canyon County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44645474	2	No		4891173	10297493	21989501
RCP-040566	Lake County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44703745	13	Yes	0	0
RCP-053033	Hays County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44711903	28	Yes	10000000
RCP-039863	Sussex County, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45495460	18	Yes	5000000	5000000
RCP-035874	New Hanover County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45543632	35	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036811	City Of Clearwater, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22483893	1	No		34124364	39908000
RCP-050825	Oakland Park City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22639586	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-036677	San Sebastian Municipio County, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22524361	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037788	High Point, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22699511	2	No		7531359	42785940	0
RCP-036966	White Plains, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23167555	1	No	0	31644552	0	0
RCP-040242	Cayey Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23384207	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036898	Williamsport, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25477801	19	Yes	10000000	960000
RCP-036818	Black Hawk County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25489501	17	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039140	City Of Clarksville, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25531478	15	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053103	Lebanon County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27541628	9	No		0	0	0
RCP-039621	Rock Island County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27558333	22	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038976	Johnson County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29357173	24	Yes	10000000	2587425
RCP-037502	Visalia, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29364455	16	Yes	10000000	1302276
RCP-038156	Berrien County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29796346	6	No		6316102	8568354	0
RCP-038466	Ouachita Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29772649	17	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037250	Mesa County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29953485	4	No		16191196	9448824
RCP-036666	Humacao Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29998616	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037932	Fitchburg, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31238459.1	22	Yes	10000000	4986064.31	5317306.75
RCP-038965	Martin County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31272363	14	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040415	Jackson, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31444825	24	Yes	3508275.54	24136
RCP-038215	Greenwich, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31399117.31	47	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036627	Municipio De Aguadilla, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31488326	21	Yes	10000000	2331013
RCP-039754	Victorville, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33500666	12	Yes	10000000	374770	0	0
RCP-039479	Hamilton City, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33590200	1	No		30477228	27358187
RCP-039473	Covington, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35914130	32	No		3366602	1538459	12500000
RCP-037431	Desoto County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35923398	3	No		4805185	7046782	4068182
RCP-039773	Terre Haute, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35936890	5	No		8238625	8238625	8238625
RCP-039346	Grand Prairie, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36709655	17	No		28583607.45	8126047.55
RCP-039867	Charleston, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36801358	25	No		16656181.62	10901203.33	3919671.61
RCP-037217	Charlotte County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36693553	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036014	City Of Boise, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36904682	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038583	New Rochelle, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36938483	4	No		13208604	11834169
RCP-040081	Pontiac, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37717953	2	Yes	10000000	2000000
RCP-037901	Sangamon County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37812754	14	Yes	10000000	2880983
RCP-037559	Troy, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42879140	34	Yes	10000000	6468675
RCP-040575	Warren County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45568688	18	Yes	10000000	3300000
RCP-036124	Henry County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45560724	9	Yes	10000000
RCP-040610	Ontario, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45609291	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035910	Yavapai County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45665225	24	Yes	10000000	3000000
RCP-039564	Chico, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22118301	27	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037802	Lakeland, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22726368	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039850	Oswego County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22749964	17	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036821	Lowndes County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22804739	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036840	Potter County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22806487	9	Yes	10000000	1687571
RCP-036426	Midland, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24988224	17	No		21763192	31474310	17761442
RCP-039658	Mission, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25044862	18	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038392	Kendall County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25054795	88	Yes	10000000	1194706
RCP-038182	Rapides Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25182604	6	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036886	Linn County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25202222	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039464	Burbank, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25547081	15	No		17365624	0	0
RCP-040538	Tazewell County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25601188	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-053105	Sumter County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25721033	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040571	Elmira, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28270386	26	Yes	10000000	2296442.59
RCP-040276	Douglas County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28425412	10	Yes	10000000	3500000
RCP-039615	Houston County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30663037	18	Yes	10000000	580391.03
RCP-037408	Johnstown, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30716690	14	No	0	567003	1219051.34	1994246.5
RCP-039306	Centre County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31541383	15	No		7035958.2	4513185.46	5680949.45
RCP-040280	Portage County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31557116	18	Yes	2000000	0
RCP-039122	Berwyn, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31943759	11	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037856	Lakewood Township, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31890666	10	Yes	10000000	2000000
RCP-038894	Lee County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31960355	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037744	Scott County, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33592150	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040465	Bay County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33934398	14	Yes	10000000	19506117
RCP-038933	Tippecanoe County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38018646	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039365	Topeka, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45676831	70	No		6278552	3558882.12	5119454.72
RCP-036147	City of Modesto, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45897056	24	Yes	0	0
RCP-039606	Arlington County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46003782	19	No		64936560	127395951
RCP-036755	Morgan County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23246243	8	Yes	10000000	979855.53
RCP-038857	Denton, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23290438	22	Yes	10000000	5000000
RCP-037112	Green Bay, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23695516	48	Yes	10000000	10320242
RCP-036663	Guayama Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23725180	16	Yes	10000000	1808212
RCP-039276	Parma, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23734921	8	Yes	10000000	5876073	3558159	0
RCP-037757	Douglas County, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23747378	51	Yes	8974723.97	0
RCP-040062	Faulkner County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24475383	16	Yes	0	0
RCP-038811	Skagit County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25096557	42	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-049113	Laurel City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25253186.07	46	Yes	10000000
RCP-037884	Daly City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25255343	24	No	0	1114187	13606033	6243726
RCP-040581	Grayson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26457584	13	Yes	10000000	15293369
RCP-038360	Spotsylvania County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26458167	2	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038714	Sandoval County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28504079	11	Yes	10000000	1742993.46
RCP-039168	Citrus County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29069118	34	Yes	10000000	1186746
RCP-039360	Penobscot County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29552965	15	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040292	City Of Revere, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30054398.11	33	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036657	Suffolk City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30065296	11	Yes	10000000	4321097
RCP-040310	Johnson County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30722086	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036974	St. Clair County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30908749	36	Yes	10000000	4817544	3290381	0
RCP-036679	Trujillo Alto Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31586878	16	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037410	Salem, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35053419.78	27	Yes	10000000	3250428.47
RCP-037344	Pitt County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35107015	11	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038744	Amarillo, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39676317	23	No		14362120	11156799
RCP-035955	Butte County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42574311	23	No		0	43517206
RCP-038822	El Monte, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42556782	43	Yes	10000000	6479529
RCP-035929	Clay County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42587131	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036665	Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44803757	25	No		16785217	584199	0
RCP-053243	City Of Hesperia, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23403687		No		0	0	0
RCP-039554	East Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24561068.33	40	No		14602783	14758153
RCP-038981	Ascension Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24591343		Yes	10000000	13800000
RCP-037055	West Palm Beach, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24530823	9	Yes	10000000	7000000
RCP-040085	Pickens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24645730	7	Yes	10000000	2359069
RCP-037511	Chautauqua County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24649420	34	No		16857857	7791563	0
RCP-040539	Mckeesport, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24753914	5	Yes	10000000	750000
RCP-039426	Las Cruces, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24759826	17	No		6888670	0	0
RCP-040112	Champaign, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25277693	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039816	Columbia, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25284624	3	No		7875745.76	3240764.34	1285478.54
RCP-039669	Lower Merion, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25503294	1	No		12707713	6930292	9000000
RCP-035283	Town Of Herndon, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25523946	23	No		5922496.64	3681826.43	6014437
RCP-036866	Ogden, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25612830	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037833	Warren County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25813490	16	No		4819524	7376331	5708463
RCP-015436	Blount County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25850784	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-040555	Rowan County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27598928	18	Yes	0	1207631
RCP-040349	City Of Richmond, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27740723	13	No		5426213	14352627	9739630
RCP-040521	Brunswick County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27741111	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039103	Santa Monica, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28570125	1	No		139295423	143292372	70957141
RCP-036698	Alameda, City Of, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28679908	12	Yes	7480313	8487916
RCP-039083	Warren, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28680143	53	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038111	Salem, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34127916	10	No		11837064	11753251	15378584
RCP-036865	Bethlehem, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34467364	5	No		9495121	5497821	7241660
RCP-039822	Washington County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34488172	7	Yes	661329.49	0
RCP-037510	Ulster County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34491474	13	No		14031357	0
RCP-039641	Kent County, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35115561	8	Yes	10000000	1396154
RCP-035928	Santa Clarita City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35148685	25	No		15058912	0
RCP-039747	Imperial County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35198889	19	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038202	Racine County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38131110	26	Yes	6943463	6000000
RCP-040201	Trumbull County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38454129	26	Yes	10000000	2565750.69
RCP-038818	Hayward, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38465994	31	No		5046488	9311518
RCP-036117	Tuscaloosa County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40664754	34	Yes	10000000	3232005
RCP-037315	Elizabeth, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40674250	13	Yes	10000000	20725831
RCP-039100	Joliet, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22207675	2	No		14330607	14000000	0
RCP-038915	Huntington Town, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22209010	1	No		16736168	8117512	13212390
RCP-037328	Fayette County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22224938	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039045	Gallatin County, Montana	Montana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22227463	13	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039322	Norman, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22245542	8	Yes	1114329	1114329
RCP-040144	Tallahassee, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46468128	20	No		6535223	5678481	6362053
RCP-036045	Union County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46589799	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-053281	City Of Gresham, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25399647	14	Yes	10000000	1663643
RCP-037959	Wood County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25409669	12	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037374	Euclid, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25409948	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037829	Costa Mesa, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26481513	1	No		35338928	25641840	0
RCP-036634	Canovanas Municipio City, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26486925	29	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039434	Kenosha, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26488543	26	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039650	Mesquite, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27021425	8	No		14570625.27	17890027.65
RCP-036315	City Of Concord, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27040883	12	No		12634959	14405924	0
RCP-039614	Parker County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27752377	12	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036414	Town Of Babylon, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27770292	32	No		1	1	1
RCP-037263	East Providence, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27785912.31	6	No		8077399	16060841	3647672
RCP-038332	Rankin County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30159572	3	Yes	2965029	2965029
RCP-038589	Franklin County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30112177	4	No		7078583	7932693.13	15055255.86
RCP-039240	Schenectady County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30165010	3	No		17947156	0
RCP-039145	Gainesville, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32408804	19	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040161	Atlantic City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32417555	8	Yes	9600000	9600000
RCP-037636	Aiken County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33189883	5	No		4926214	6603443	1747476
RCP-037160	Muskegon County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33713161	15	No		10646762	16451469	4081202
RCP-039987	Johnson County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34150391	49	No		12908307	1849401
RCP-040069	South Gate, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34556473	44	No		8787074	3245811
RCP-035981	Lackawanna County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40726716	23	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037682	Champaign County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40729630	20	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038489	Davenport, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40896926	13	Yes	10000000	7292836
RCP-036427	Okaloosa County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40933386	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-035906	Hinds County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45032202	24	No		2901481	6614626	6614626
RCP-037140	Malden, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45774149.62	39	No	0	11114182	22260547	12399000
RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22144651	104	Yes	10000000	6200000
RCP-039005	Carroll County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23307039	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037937	Kennebec County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23755730	42	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036813	Saline County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23781952	1	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039815	Bossier Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24675836	15	Yes	10000000	318642
RCP-037264	Wauwatosa, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24663875	25	Yes	9485115.22	1640453
RCP-053244	City Of Greenville, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24689311	9	Yes	10000000	700000
RCP-036849	Cambria County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25288270	9	No		12285099	12005553
RCP-035438	Mesquite City, Nevada	Nevada	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26501498.44	31	Yes	10000000
RCP-039075	Rock Island, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26506259	8	Yes	10000000	5100000
RCP-037746	Miami Gardens City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27114344	4	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-053228	City Of Edinburg, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27132536	18	Yes	10000000	1394331	0	0
RCP-039053	Bristol, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27831925.97	46	Yes	10000000	3455867
RCP-039856	Coconino County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27868531	32	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037122	Jackson County, Mississippi	Mississippi	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27895919	7	Yes	10000000	7804170
RCP-039830	Wichita Falls, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29091650	14	No		0	0	12475286
RCP-036723	Killeen, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29117907	25	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039582	Olmsted County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30746560	10	No		7866321	17431560	5448679
RCP-038427	Sullivan County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30757243	20	No	0	9352676	30041000
RCP-037353	West Allis, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30941771	53	No	0	1769912	4843876	10030335
RCP-039234	Kootenai County, Idaho	Idaho	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32184700	12	Yes	10000000	440071
RCP-037347	Vanderburgh County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35244730	13	No		15810729	19319647
RCP-036970	East Orange, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35984210	4	Yes	8786233.92	5286233.92
RCP-040262	Lancaster, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36340561	11	No	0	16423977.05	18888934.46	1027649.5
RCP-038918	Mount Vernon, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41108657	32	Yes	10000000	500000
RCP-036513	Mohave County, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41213672	36	No	0	0	0	1482500
RCP-036127	Cabarrus County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42043458	64	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039402	Shelby County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42286061	2	No		0	1	0
RCP-036261	Smith County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45209153	14	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040330	Quincy, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45316692	12	No		14654136.6	0
RCP-038235	Tempe, Arizona	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45869312	3	No		29210898	24836127
RCP-036850	Binghamton, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46184674	31	No		13634539	8039741	13459469
RCP-039338	Racine, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46246465	20	No		8472579.85	10667526	14220871
RCP-038676	Portland City, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46290652	33	No		4618907	13344274
RCP-053128	Williamson County, Tn	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	46308736	14	No		38352420	7956316	0
RCP-049104	Greenbelt City, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22881666.47	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-036851	Muskegon, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22881894	6	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039847	Henderson County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22806876	9	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040236	Baldwin Park, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22917903	69	Yes	10000000	10132423
RCP-039335	La Crosse County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22923224	13	No		9952224	14355983
RCP-039647	Allegan County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22935850	3	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039007	Comanche County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23454078	35	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039389	Plainfield City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23801983	35	Yes	6000000	4784668.44
RCP-036645	Harrisonburg City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23834094	9	No		7212596	9193598	5669090
RCP-039496	Wayne County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23916753	17	Yes	10000000	177434
RCP-040600	Council Bluffs, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24810055	7	No		16262913	13282162	0
RCP-039697	Fayette County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25109959	2	No		9002450	14212052	1895457
RCP-053137	Town Of Cheektowaga, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25316853	30	No		10804661	7730210
RCP-039574	Asheville, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26293853	13	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037779	Humboldt County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26330552	23	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-014812	City Of Huntington Park, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27952355	7	Yes	10000000
RCP-036772	Randolph County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27905631	7	Yes	10000000	400000
RCP-039771	Orange City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28018188	1	No		27749752	24088105	0
RCP-037388	Norwalk, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28046746	15	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036642	Danville City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29142851	42	Yes	10000000	5000000
RCP-040375	Corona, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29158725	18	No		22559845	3299440	3299440
RCP-039297	Lorain, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32491585	24	No		5658572.24	5925518	5884940.09
RCP-039317	Kenton County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32437404	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039547	Davidson County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32556083	3	No		14184901	16993589
RCP-037734	Mclean County, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33315167	41	No		8069652	8094157	0
RCP-036647	Lynchburg City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33328529	1	No		9662829	16644886
RCP-037517	Brockton, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34590793	15	No		13318422	0	0
RCP-036845	Kanawha County, West Virginia	West Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34598499	50	No		3351836.15	7634999.06	7634999.06
RCP-039114	Meriden, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36359755.47	46	Yes	10000000	11046512
RCP-040267	County Of Broome New York, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37000061	42	No		34979648	0	0
RCP-039034	Chattanooga, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38640506	4	No		23922557	11285039.74	0
RCP-039667	Benton County, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39700361	16	Yes	10000000	6915121
RCP-039756	Barnstable County, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41370811	21	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040570	Yuma, County Of	Arizona	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41525619	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037338	Montgomery, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41639442	9	No		9624283.03	15709014.53
RCP-040143	Upper Darby, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41761939	7	No		6383844	9999400
RCP-039585	Cicero, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42882464		Yes	10000000	7661098
RCP-039509	Evanston, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43173654	22	No		13260956.14	7602681
RCP-039192	Jackson County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42915782	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43281853	22	Yes	10000000	937000
RCP-038606	Glendale, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43521005	1	No		33418396	17371392	6168157
RCP-036245	Gaston County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43612126	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-050819	North Lauderdale City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22168784	4	Yes	10000000
RCP-039326	Delaware County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22169386	31	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036906	Perris City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22171505	84	Yes	3964046	3964046
RCP-039637	Watertown City, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22265728	28	No		8322913	117469
RCP-039851	Flagler County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22353135	12	Yes	10000000	2000000
RCP-037565	Richland County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	23532744	25	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037854	Sebastian County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24828896	13	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037033	Fairfield, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24830565.88	25	No		15240388	24417152
RCP-037626	Robeson County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25372375	13	Yes	10000000	2311000
RCP-037336	Strafford County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25373929	12	No		3242955.33	6876467.87	0
RCP-039592	West Valley, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26512139	1	No		2826944.65	3034094	0
RCP-037969	Burlington, Vermont	Vermont	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27176144.49	65	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040323	Fairfax, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29585521	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-039679	Huntington Beach, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29606925	2	No		18138284	34573656	37471143
RCP-036632	Cabo Rojo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30281701	33	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036680	Vega Baja Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30218807	13	Yes	10000000	100000
RCP-037919	Waterloo, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30284282	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-038044	Arlington, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35247893	26	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039686	Sarpy County, Nebraska	Nebraska	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36360628	40	Yes	10000000	511434
RCP-038421	Warwick, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39431837.39	5	No		12638000	14113424
RCP-036063	Hall County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39710268	10	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037231	Mcallen, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	41922103	6	No		20210098	14446981	20210098
RCP-038874	Cranston, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42592330.15	4	No		12295535	20511624	4104451
RCP-040596	Baldwin County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43360588	24	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040597	Linn County Iowa, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44034983	62	Yes	10000000	6909852
RCP-035844	Montgomery County, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	43992250	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036442	City Of Fremont, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44211563	1	No		26277479	60703523	36006441
RCP-039260	Pomona, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	45366413	20	Yes	10000000	12159195
RCP-039826	Cache County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24918634	23	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038619	Washington County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25129577	2	No		11129257	15377879
RCP-053279	Town Of Stratford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25928479.41	1	No		7912144	14835494	3180841.41
RCP-037130	Wilmington, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25929952	34	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039555	Westland, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25932032	1	No		15514238	10417794
RCP-039062	Marathon County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26356580	13	No		8313632	15077870
RCP-037792	Lima, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26371401	1	No		3542645	9167555	8538335
RCP-039467	Dubuque, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26522282	59	Yes	10000000	7097780
RCP-037386	Union City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26618182	14	Yes	10000000	1726143
RCP-036668	Juana Diaz Municipio City, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26632520	10	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-037672	Port Arthur, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26731836	7	Yes	7101836	1000000
RCP-036945	Randall County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26749136	12	Yes	10000000	3856633
RCP-053196	Canadian County, Ok	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28806702	3	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037417	Monroe County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28830982	22	Yes	10000000	2465587
RCP-038717	Rialto, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29373105	2	Yes	10000000	38851844
RCP-037218	Hollywood, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29390502	76	No		14636872	10360790	4392840
RCP-036936	Stafford County, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29695536	43	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037188	Jackson County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30788709	28	Yes	10000000	6507100
RCP-036048	Rensselaer County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30828334	6	No		19931807	1959898
RCP-039370	Fullerton, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32665301	22	No		6768481.63	8775370.85	4818799.17
RCP-038930	Pueblo County, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32714388	20	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037087	Monroe County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33073146	12	No		7911832	7752896.48	7849482
RCP-038159	Hendricks County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33080915	68	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037528	York, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35304707	20	Yes	10000000
RCP-039003	Saginaw County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37009967	13	Yes	10000000	5000000
RCP-036664	Guaynabo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37101450	10	Yes	10000000	5826495
RCP-052674	Lafayette City, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38256658	15	No		19198563	18276006
RCP-038647	Deschutes County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38399353	64	No		0	0
RCP-036113	St Joseph, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38704807	48	Yes	10000000	1285700
RCP-039638	Escondido, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38808509	23	Yes	10000000	6300000
RCP-035990	Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39515058	23	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036776	Lancaster City, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39518923	2	No		4084666	4500000	11013412
RCP-036527	Elkhart County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40079320	12	No		7221383	13749999	13749999
RCP-035867	County Of Yolo, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	42829540	34	No		11561656	17649739	13618145
RCP-035957	Berkeley County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44268263	5	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037628	Saratoga County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44648193	14	No		30674734	0	0
RCP-040121	Clark County, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22978777	10	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038893	Torrance, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24074277	1	No		36256574	16920462	22087621
RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24074863	13	Yes	10000000	3566078
RCP-039060	Gadsden, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24042737	22	Yes	10000000	3613634	1671576	0
RCP-039690	San Juan County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24077388	18	Yes	10000000	3475556
RCP-053232	Murfreesboro, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24106035	4	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039471	Rome, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24134423	6	Yes	10000000	8128018
RCP-039742	Manchester, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24985218.92	28	No		7607024	12838614	4539580
RCP-036766	Sioux Falls, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25415071	9	No		19485561.57	0	0
RCP-036859	Downey, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25438407	11	Yes	10000000	19774606
RCP-037272	Cape Coral, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25439699	2	No		12629642	0
RCP-000947	City Of Jurupa Valley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28077013	7	No		361797	3712583	10565830
RCP-039708	Jamestown, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28079145	30	No		9261796	8861348	0
RCP-040498	Comal County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30341767	5	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040051	Catawba County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	30990911	15	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	31063168	43	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039116	Ector County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32286869	6	Yes	10000000	4585106
RCP-039284	Muncie, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32321058	36	Yes	6550000	2701141
RCP-037773	Carroll County, Maryland	Maryland	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32718855	23	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039714	Paulding County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	32761587	11	Yes	10000000	1000000
RCP-006371	Municipality Of Toa Alta, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33782434	4	No		2575873	2206854	6597930
RCP-038059	Springfield, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33804013	46	No		32150890	1653123	0
RCP-038118	Decatur, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33822135	9	Yes	10000000	5129754
RCP-038462	Cass County, North Dakota	North Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35336410	6	Yes	0	5574595
RCP-039522	Iredell County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35313684	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038301	Palmdale, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35445019	16	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039623	Bayonne, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35655886	10	No		4219301.34	11720409.42
RCP-037341	Woonsocket, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36388236.33	34	No		12954696	16032340	7401200.33
RCP-036744	Sumner County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37154480	9	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-040145	Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37156228	24	No		9720873	4311260	4535445.69
RCP-037011	Santa Maria, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	37190243	14	Yes	10000000	2400000
RCP-039136	Cleveland Heights, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38817062	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-035936	Clermont County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40096219	13	No		7113866	5266817	14591054
RCP-037371	Pasadena, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40199596	14	Yes	9999999.99	0
RCP-039648	Sheboygan County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	22403443	15	No		3908901	6791509	5142461
RCP-053037	City Of Danville, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	24704857	9	Yes	7890000	2614887
RCP-039518	Boone County, Kentucky	Kentucky	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	25946543	3	Yes	7346543	2000000
RCP-039510	Napa County, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26755157	16	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036675	Rio Grande Municipio City, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26780515	28	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-036746	Columbia, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	27178358	6	Yes	10000000	1230061
RCP-038481	Wilson County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28097926	13	Yes	3541319	15152956		15152956
RCP-037990	Royal Oak, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28107502	8	No		7519845	18455937
RCP-037397	County Of Kings, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29706802	21	Yes	4281131	4281131
RCP-039285	Beaumont, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33084864	2	Yes	10000000	11017196	2817315
RCP-039625	Midland County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34347543	7	No		33315233	1032310
RCP-039611	Santa Rosa, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34637465	11	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037156	Waco, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	34720687	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039782	Pueblo, Colorado	Colorado	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	36407001	89	Yes	10000000	9409304
RCP-039526	Kalamazoo, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38872877	49	No		8342881	16310779
RCP-039374	Oak Park, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	38984402	30	No		9739046	5698861
RCP-036341	Oneida County, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44416661	17	No		40956048	11093982	0
RCP-035837	Mahoning County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	44418992	57	Yes	10000000	4535552
RCP-039578	Clark County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26044051	32	Yes	10000000	1380077
RCP-039984	Taylor County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26811486	9	No		7020131	13334086
RCP-037598	Framingham, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26827697.63	7	No	0	22815565	0	0
RCP-037920	Rancho Cucamonga, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	26835530	1	No		27171372	5673134	0
RCP-037076	Norwich, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28838728.45	62	Yes	3233114	10000000
RCP-038474	Orange County, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28839722	25	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-040578	Coweta County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	28846132	24	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-039125	Milford Town, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29196724.91	36	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038004	Santa Fe County, New Mexico	New Mexico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	29205279	28	No		4202005	20940957	4062317
RCP-040557	Winnebago County, Wisconsin	Wisconsin	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33390919	24	No		5982223	16754576	29647232
RCP-036731	Provo, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	33880698	6	Yes	10000000	2037280
RCP-037065	Santa Rosa County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	35800640	7	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-038796	Norwalk, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39249678.78	43	No		0	0	7000000
RCP-039342	Altoona, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39258106	64	Yes	10000000	1000000
RCP-036170	Anderson County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	39344517	11	No		13007053	0
RCP-036712	York County, Maine	Maine	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	40331830	25	Yes	0	10000000
RCP-039429	Berkeley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66646289	4	No		49626591	14678925.26	0
RCP-036648	Newport News City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66794246	1	No		32142578.72	34651667.28	0
RCP-036633	Caguas Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66817666	42	No		14528659	5661182	382126
RCP-036635	Carolina Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72224833	17	No		31044118	19748088	15444213
RCP-036669	City Of Kansas City, Kansas	Kansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87516516	116	No		23396855	7759544	0
RCP-038944	Hammond, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51395851	15	No		17047990.2	7135500.94	20095232.51
RCP-036651	Portsmouth City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56842564	16	No	0	5853730.46	18387245.65	18387245.65
RCP-037239	Allentown, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57132604	11	No		10079420	12061844
RCP-037520	Syracuse, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123076929	56	No		36413639	12494422	13123058
RCP-036173	Oxnard City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59540662	36	No		16520363	4712379	17480193
RCP-036637	Alexandria, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	59633833	37	No		0	62439382	68493947
RCP-036567	Hialeah City, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	66834253	7	No		25200564	12241764	8820264
RCP-039187	Somerville, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77504170.23	54	No		48856319	22850596
RCP-036171	San Bernardino City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	77656407	14	Yes	0	0
RCP-037113	Peoria, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47089976	21	No		20561566	0
RCP-040396	Lansing, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49924664	15	No		14960176	0	23000000
RCP-038954	St. Louis County, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54536596	69	No		9891246.27	6308818.13
RCP-039740	Niagara Falls, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57207528	69	No		17437801	11787513	12350782
RCP-039866	Evansville, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64483775	39	No	0	14500170	0	14498168
RCP-036654	Roanoke City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64576671	27	No		11674418.74	17758133.45	3380342.36
RCP-038615	Paterson, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64668166	20	No		28094096.3	0
RCP-039533	Albany, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80725433	9	No		17575810	16387293	40000000
RCP-039483	Garden Grove, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48374570	2	Yes	10000000	18000000
RCP-036136	City Of Moreno Valley, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48481233	3	Yes	0	0
RCP-039699	Medford, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48547342.05	41	No		13121184	16876459
RCP-039355	Maui County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50042085	8	Yes	10000000	0
RCP-036803	Rockford, Illinois	Illinois	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54822355	3	No		38429055	16239987.91	0
RCP-039315	Dearborn, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47212828	5	No		19060257	23214584	4937987
RCP-035935	Clay County, Missouri	Missouri	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48549469	93	Yes	10000000	908174.03
RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50257113	22	Yes	10000000	10945638
RCP-039423	Lynn, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75134915.32	49	Yes	2933113	2933113
RCP-039790	Gary, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80345314	12	No		11013357	-1481769	8930281
RCP-036042	City Of Spokane, Wa	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	80991104	44	No		60017071	37205063
RCP-036674	Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	84809114	45	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-037930	Cambridge, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	88119386.58	17	Yes	10000000	10193322
RCP-040132	Lawrence, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57351844.87	1	No		82629738	0	0
RCP-039631	Springfield, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	123684851.87	12	No		0	12080086	0
RCP-038581	New Bedford, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	64729754	25	Yes	10000000	1203063
RCP-053134	City Of Scranton, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	68746050	25	Yes	10000000	8969321
RCP-036725	Beaver County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	91978752	28	No		9718864	9289264	35288956.17
RCP-036630	Athens-Clarke County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	57588843	19	No		10997114	31433048	15158681
RCP-039924	Schenectady, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52971798	30	No		9940467	2542661
RCP-039462	Duluth, Minnesota	Minnesota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58117859	11	No		13815533.36	19543038.55	0
RCP-039671	Trenton, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	72913998	12	Yes	10000000	27326425.46
RCP-039424	Waterbury, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75388037.99	34	No		19144145	17698007	20092644
RCP-036021	Salt Lake City City, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	85411572	19	No		9854972.96	32446793.13	17775835.82
RCP-039691	Grand Rapids City, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	92279500	15	No		21565081	43164931
RCP-024361	Town of Hempstead, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51413999.27	5	No	0	0	0	11000000
RCP-036132	City Of Garland, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	53513994	13	No		7502198	10624397	0
RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60233613	10	Yes	0	0
RCP-036670	Macon-Bibb County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	75864910	33	Yes	10000000	24066974.25
RCP-037902	City Of Lowell, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76009996.05	45	Yes	7976729	7976729
RCP-039164	Lakewood, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47219575	7	Yes	10000000	3926957	3902268	3926957
RCP-036196	Forsyth County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47443088	9	No		3000000	0	0
RCP-036644	Hampton City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	48660418	18	No		25564155	17913559	5182704
RCP-036919	Salinas, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51567313	19	No		18491697	23373476	14982293
RCP-037104	Mobile, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58203265	19	Yes	0	401747.08
RCP-040156	Pawtucket, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58270160.87	14	No		5357893	17605243
RCP-036928	Utica, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60881737	29	No		11419823	15979805
RCP-036640	Chesapeake City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76025897	33	No		36001783	34455650	18691967
RCP-040359	Erie, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	76098836	44	No		6066693	9558236	13808835
RCP-036099	Lafayette Parish, Louisiana	Louisiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	47469893	28	No		8445924	14003523
RCP-035945	Winston-Salem City, North Carolina	North Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	51732065	10	No		11915864.71	35672617.28	4143583.01
RCP-039877	Saginaw, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52089151	31	No		6126945	6578857	8788092
RCP-039008	South Bend, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	58910047	3	No		26101418	29329398
RCP-036661	Columbus City, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	78482038	14	No		3559470.84	10115312.88
RCP-040556	Municipality Of Bayamon, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	86005562	33	No		27832640	21400591	0
RCP-036090	Irving City, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	54277494	43	No		41239149.5	25188467
RCP-038020	Wilmington, Delaware	Delaware	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55345780	66	No		8670207	17896831
RCP-036861	Savannah, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	55591247	2	No		42639776	16078292	0
RCP-039791	Bridgeport, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110710612.92	32	No		10000000	15000000	16000000
RCP-039435	New Haven, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115807159.59	100	No		32334482	22608141	26563531
RCP-036333	Tacoma City, Washington	Washington	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	60969952	39	No		59413273	70804286
RCP-036897	Reading, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61134970	10	No		14028713	5907434	11478997
RCP-037169	Newton, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63589505.03	51	No		38889622	30289356
RCP-040208	Brownsville, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	65194854	11	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-039113	Fall River, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	69599142	39	Yes	10000000	10000000
RCP-038620	Youngstown, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82775370	26	Yes	3930400	3930300
RCP-036798	Flint, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94726664	14	No		32387528	37169068
RCP-035996	City Of Des Moines, Iowa	Iowa	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94824614	23	No		0	35038609	24485125.63
RCP-038428	New Britain, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	56132092.86	20	No		10074655.79	10074655.79	10074655.79
RCP-038913	Hartford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112218224.76	23	No		0	43782937	97449504
RCP-037538	Camden, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	61648323	10	No	0	26871808	26547045
RCP-039287	Canton, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	63613221	95	No		10145595.7	3938646.39
RCP-036027	Augusta-Richmond, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	82348868	3	No		44949123	37399563
RCP-037355	Manassas, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	50606650	3	Yes	10000000
RCP-040572	Pasadena, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	52625975	11	No		96354820	85465086
RCP-035851	Yonkers City, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	87486480	1	No		106373510	57429103
RCP-036169	Washington County, Pennsylvania	Pennsylvania	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	98857371	12	No		15602305	21732994
RCP-036896	Stamford, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49056682.71	12	Yes	10000000	10000000		21160000
RCP-036628	Arecibo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	49289120	9	Yes	10000000	2419556
RCP-037406	Akron, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	145337626	39	No		20630819	34261679.76	29439548.19
RCP-038102	Worcester, Massachusetts	Massachusetts	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	146634604.2	31	No	0	11289523.11	4499999.89
RCP-036092	City Of Birmingham, Alabama	Alabama	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	141272354	12	No		42603048	471779	42603048
RCP-037452	Providence, Rhode Island	Rhode Island	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	166314129.1	44	No		38394941	65269844
RCP-036649	Norfolk City, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	154141050	1	No		49332630	70526898	81169563
RCP-038999	Dayton, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	137976174	13	No		32926074	29754569
RCP-036653	City Of Richmond, Virginia	Virginia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	154879828	17	No		16013464	37350148	-29214413
RCP-036320	Rochester City, New York	New York	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	202141319	58	No		68504626	27040247	46967265
RCP-054918	Alburnett City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104516.54	1	Yes	104516.54	15000	15000
RCP-055002	Stratford City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104516.54	2	Yes	20000
RCP-056316	Avinger, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104524.04	2	Yes	104524.04	0	0
RCP-034176	Town Of Norrie, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104563.89	1	Yes	104563.89
RCP-022793	Packer Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104580.16	1	Yes	104580.16
RCP-026800	Bird Island City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104801.66	2	Yes	104801.66
RCP-027214	Scanlon City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104801.66		Yes	0
RCP-013864	Village Of Millington, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104773.44	1	No		34191	0	0
RCP-055026	Seymour City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104815.59	1	Yes	104815.59
RCP-023773	Village Of Delevan, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104820.2	6	Yes	104820.19
RCP-040782	Borough Of Audubon Park, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104877.88	1	Yes	104877.88
RCP-034562	Town Of Porter, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104773.22	3	Yes	104773.22
RCP-013849	Village Of Athens, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104668.36		Yes	104668.36
RCP-006485	City Of Colman, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104709.8	4	Yes	104709.8
RCP-026041	Byron Town, WY	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104756.75	1	Yes	104756.75	0	0
RCP-035134	Mekoryuk City, AK	Alaska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104635.39	1	Yes	104635.39
RCP-054476	Jamesport City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104920.95	1	Yes	104920.95
RCP-033642	Town Of Leroy, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104877.89	1	Yes	104877.89
RCP-001212	Castine Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104892.61	1	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-051383	Washington Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105000.16	1	Yes	0
RCP-050228	Village Of Dodge, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104953.73		Yes	104953
RCP-055109	Murray City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104965.11	4	Yes	104965.11
RCP-052170	Borough Of Falls Creek, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104895.14	5	Yes	104729.54
RCP-023571	Southwest Madison Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104895.14		Yes	104564.54
RCP-022933	Hulmeville Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	104895.14		Yes	104564.54	0	0
RCP-023175	Mcconnellsburg Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105210.16	1	Yes	104878.56
RCP-024724	Town Of Hopkinton, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105230.45	7	Yes	105230.45
RCP-003715	Village Of Lakeview, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105298.88	9	No		46860	51035	6000
RCP-050284	Village Of Greenwood, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105307.71	1	Yes	105307.71	0	0
RCP-025676	Ellenton, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105309		Yes	105309
RCP-023821	Village Of Celoron, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105333.02	4	Yes	105333.02
RCP-023981	Village Of Stamford, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105333.02	1	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-023891	Town Of Smyrna, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105127.89	4	Yes	105127.89
RCP-031595	City Of Craigmont, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105181.99	1	Yes	105181.99
RCP-033258	Town Of Big Flats, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105191.9	1	Yes	105191.9
RCP-033550	Town Of Bridgeport, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105087.23		Yes	105087.23
RCP-034405	Town Of Gilman, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105087.23	1	Yes	105087.23
RCP-007761	Town of Cole	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105114.44		Yes	105114.44
RCP-016318	Windsor Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105057.35		Yes	105057.35
RCP-003536	Lakefield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105193.8	2	Yes	105193.8
RCP-052095	Supervisors Preston Township Dba Preston Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105000.16	1	Yes	104858.89
RCP-033756	Town Of Aurora, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105401.23		Yes	105401.23
RCP-035060	Town Of Sigel, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105401.23		Yes	105401.23
RCP-051406	Borough Of South Waverly, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105420.14	1	Yes	52710.07
RCP-024184	Village Of Alexandria Bay, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105435.58	1	Yes	105435.58
RCP-026999	Houston City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105457.36		No		0	0
RCP-008495	North Carrollton, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105467.58	1	Yes	105467.58
RCP-019016	Bloom Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105379.58		Yes	105379.58
RCP-027331	Nordland Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105348.08		Yes	105348.08
RCP-032756	Cass Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105484.75	3	Yes	105484.75
RCP-019316	Perry Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105484.75	1	Yes	105484.75
RCP-032073	Village Of Grand Rapids, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105589.92		Yes	105589.92
RCP-003695	Orange Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105509.06	1	Yes	105509.06
RCP-022763	Dunnstable Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105525.16	1	Yes	105192.56
RCP-023746	Town Of East Otto, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105538.15	2	Yes	105538.15
RCP-034715	Town Of Waukechon, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105610.57	2	Yes	105610.57
RCP-003463	Chapin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105614.16	2	Yes	105614.16
RCP-032880	Lee Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105589.92	3	Yes	105379.99
RCP-022722	Walker Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105630.14		Yes	105297.22
RCP-023248	Greenwood Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105630.14	2	Yes	105297.22
RCP-017615	Alexis Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105737.77	1	Yes	0
RCP-032091	Village Of Yorkville, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105695.09	2	Yes	105695.09	0	0
RCP-003504	Village Of North Branch, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105719.24	1	Yes	105719.24
RCP-003861	Excelsior Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105719.24	3	Yes	105719.24
RCP-051572	Knox Township Road District, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105735.16	1	Yes	105735.16
RCP-018327	Milton Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105800.27	1	Yes	105379.57
RCP-019509	Town Of Bergman, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105662.23	1	Yes	105662.23
RCP-032926	Village Of Winchester, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105800.27	1	Yes	105800.27
RCP-003406	Tilden Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105824.32	2	Yes	105824.32
RCP-022303	East Mahoning Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105945.16	1	Yes	105945.16	10000	0
RCP-006504	City Of Burke, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105975.72	1	Yes	105975.72
RCP-007734	Town of Calumet	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105991.87		No		0	0
RCP-017801	Cissna Park Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106009.94		Yes	106000
RCP-039971	Howell County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7792257	45	Yes	7792257
RCP-026802	Biwabik City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105894.48	1	Yes	105894.48
RCP-014570	Woodland Mills City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105926.71	2	Yes	105926.71
RCP-054262	Sheldon City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	105939.6		Yes	105939.6
RCP-050780	Longwood City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7793784	6	Yes	7793784
RCP-031273	Belmont, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2733523.97	1	Yes	7806250.83
RCP-040527	Warren County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7801386	1	Yes	7801386
RCP-040360	Galax City, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7817948	1	Yes	7817948
RCP-038654	Oconee County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7823918	1	Yes	7823918
RCP-053216	Town Of Summerville, Sc,	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7796973	4	Yes	1193509	1239564.7	8517159.51
RCP-025934	Suwanee, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7807434	1	Yes	7807434
RCP-039704	Clatsop County, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7813040	1	Yes	7813040
RCP-038398	Susquehanna County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7833241	1	Yes	7833241
RCP-037048	Marinette County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7837514	1	Yes	7837514
RCP-048913	Alamogordo City, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7905784	4	Yes	0	0	0
RCP-037535	Gratiot County, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7907634	1	Yes	7907634
RCP-038942	Texarkana, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7915767	6	Yes	4528727
RCP-037151	Ottawa County, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7871506	1	Yes	7871506
RCP-035353	Town Of South Boston, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7872676	8	No		0	0	0
RCP-038568	Isanti County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7885297	7	Yes	7885297
RCP-039933	Orleans County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7837903	1	Yes	7837903
RCP-026453	Town Of Kernersville, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7859078.97	15	Yes	7859078.97
RCP-036768	Mcclain County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7861600	32	Yes	7662670.71
RCP-040449	Jim Wells County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7863154	1	Yes	7863154
RCP-039520	Tallapoosa County, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7840817	6	Yes	7840817
RCP-039144	Snyder County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7841788	1	Yes	7841788
RCP-037021	Saratoga Springs, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7848020	1	Yes	7848020
RCP-047016	Merrillville Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7884810.79	2	Yes	7884810.79
RCP-040621	North Kingstown, RI	Rhode Island	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7868124.48	5	Yes	7868124
RCP-038055	Harrison County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7869564	2	Yes	7869564
RCP-037245	Mckean County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7890930	1	Yes	7890930
RCP-037576	Tift County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7894621	1	Yes	7894621
RCP-038095	Mississippi County, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7895980	10	Yes	7895980
RCP-050068	City Of Wheat Ridge, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7873279.72		Yes	7873279.72
RCP-039107	Tioga County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7884326	1	Yes	7884326
RCP-038250	Nez Perce County, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7848780	2	Yes	7848780
RCP-006379	City Of Carbondale,	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7858667	7	Yes	7858667
RCP-037354	Tazewell County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7885103	1	Yes	7885103
RCP-040490	Cheatham County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7899088	1	Yes	7899088
RCP-037586	Kentwood City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7899605	3	Yes	851481
RCP-038483	Millcreek City, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7929650		Yes	7929650
RCP-037426	Mayes County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7983193	42	Yes	7983193
RCP-040104	Fountain Valley, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7952893	1	Yes	7952893
RCP-039881	Yabucoa Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7952968.72	9	Yes	6755291.72
RCP-038825	Smyrna Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7954313	1	Yes	7163313
RCP-026203	Town Of Clayton, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7931423.29	1	Yes	7931423.29
RCP-049219	New Milford, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7932955.41	5	Yes	7932955.41
RCP-040041	Preble County, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7940849	3	Yes	7940849
RCP-050831	Opa-Locka City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7957062		Yes	7957062	0	0
RCP-035515	City Of Alabaster, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7960791.98	2	Yes	7960791.98
RCP-040265	Corozal Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7961484.68	7	Yes	7961484.68
RCP-038440	Myrtle Beach City, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7920696		Yes	7920696
RCP-037299	Benton County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7942209	6	Yes	1411351
RCP-037800	Florence, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7943151	11	Yes	3040901
RCP-037269	Shawano County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7944151	27	Yes	7944151
RCP-038223	Brick Township, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7917840	1	Yes	3958920
RCP-036963	Smyrna City, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7995546	28	Yes	7995546
RCP-037230	Sanilac County, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7996790	12	Yes	7996790
RCP-050816	Niceville City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7999634	8	Yes	7999634
RCP-047077	Plainfield Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7996991.22	1	Yes	7996991.12
RCP-037254	Mercer County, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7997178	9	Yes	7997178
RCP-047090	Richmond City, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8009455.71	7	Yes	8009455.71
RCP-039012	Cooke County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8013689	1	Yes	8013689
RCP-040340	Fayette County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7989603		Yes	7989603
RCP-037923	Georgetown City, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8029506	5	Yes	7800000
RCP-047254	Dana Point City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8032332	5	Yes	8032332
RCP-038795	Yucaipa City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8017860	1	Yes	8017860
RCP-050756	Lady Lake Town, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8023675	1	No	0	600000	500000	1560669
RCP-040489	Warren County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8017573	3	Yes	8017573
RCP-031521	Wakefield, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8083935.27	1	Yes	8083935.27
RCP-026334	Cartersville, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8125975	2	Yes	8125975	0	0
RCP-037497	Longview, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8112084	1	Yes	8112084
RCP-040080	San Ramon City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8115425	12	Yes	8115425	11238625	9557987
RCP-031942	Seatac City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8115494	1	Yes	8115494
RCP-056562	Harker Heights, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8049344.93	13	Yes	8049344.93
RCP-039935	Rantoul, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8052698	5	No		2200000	1300000	600000
RCP-039035	Sequoyah County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8074291	5	Yes	8074291
RCP-047211	Beverly Hills City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8083765	1	Yes	8083765
RCP-015799	Levy County Florida Board Of County Commisioners,	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8061471	1	Yes	8061471
RCP-010707	Wharton County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8071766	10	Yes	8071766
RCP-040151	Ohio County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8043601	1	Yes	8043601
RCP-037373	Crawford County, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8059723	3	Yes	8059723
RCP-015288	Nicholasville city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8088701.18	1	Yes	7992769.66
RCP-007015	Ruston, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8095921.1	2	Yes	8095921.1
RCP-047281	Foster City City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8109840	1	Yes	8109840
RCP-037583	Upshur County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8110031	1	Yes	8110031
RCP-040442	Burnsville City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8037982	1	Yes	8037982
RCP-056416	Southlake, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8038172.52	1	Yes	8038172.52
RCP-047410	San Dimas City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8042858	1	Yes	8042858
RCP-006079	City Of Fairmont, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8128188.01	2	Yes	4064094
RCP-050892	Stuart City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8132361	18	Yes	8132361
RCP-035262	Town Of Farmville, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8140356		Yes	8140356
RCP-016421	New Carrollton City, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8164521.75	1	Yes	8164521.75
RCP-037843	Encinitas, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8142344	1	Yes	8142344
RCP-053148	Clinton County, Oh,	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8151792	1	Yes	8151792
RCP-035196	Town Of Abingdon, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8162144	1	Yes	8162144
RCP-039172	Baxter County, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8144799	1	Yes	8144799
RCP-038940	Hendry County, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8162281	4	Yes	8162281
RCP-056142	Nacogdoches, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8162558.62	2	Yes	8146458.64
RCP-035203	Town Of Ashland, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8170444	40	Yes	8170444
RCP-039207	Weston City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8173762	1	Yes	8173762
RCP-037243	Okeechobee County, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8190640		Yes	8190640
RCP-053164	Franklin County,	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8198409	1	Yes	8198409
RCP-040494	Okanogan County, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8205208	1	Yes	8205208
RCP-035780	City Of Vestavia Hills, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8180927.96	1	Yes	8180927.96
RCP-035388	Town Of Wytheville, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8218170	1	Yes	8218170
RCP-040047	Pettis County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8223854	20	Yes	8223854
RCP-038387	Troy City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8181545	3	Yes	8181545
RCP-040134	Fulton County, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8182482	1	Yes	8182482
RCP-039838	Summit County, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8186172	8	Yes	8186172
RCP-031313	Danvers, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8234584.32	14	Yes	8234584.32
RCP-036864	Fayette County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8236868	1	Yes	8236868
RCP-037986	Sweetwater County, WY	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8224631	1	Yes	8224631
RCP-050710	Groveland City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8225519	1	Yes	8225519
RCP-036652	Radford City, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8228392	1	Yes	8228392
RCP-038880	Morristown, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8234483	1	Yes	8234483
RCP-036704	Hickory, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8237002	1	Yes	8237002
RCP-024683	Town Of Clarkstown, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8237821.38	20	Yes	8237821.38
RCP-050924	Zephyrhills City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8242048	2	Yes	8242048
RCP-039731	Cerro Gordo County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8245415	1	Yes	8245415
RCP-047353	Menlo Park City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8300499	1	Yes	8300499
RCP-037193	Dubois County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8300967	1	Yes	8300967
RCP-053711	City Of Oregon City, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8293549.04	2	Yes	8293549.04
RCP-037931	Petaluma, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8303531	2	Yes	4559640
RCP-037131	Pierce County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8304463	1	Yes	8304463	3623849
RCP-039892	Erath County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8293586	1	Yes	8293586
RCP-039504	Butler County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8250854	1	Yes	8250854
RCP-055991	Copperas Cove, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8251441.31	11	Yes	0
RCP-040270	Bridgeton, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8255513	7	Yes	8255513
RCP-038884	Muscatine County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8286982	18	Yes	8286982
RCP-038661	Orange, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8289219	5	Yes	8289219
RCP-049152	Branford, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8257021.34	16	Yes	8257021.34
RCP-026126	City Of Ashboro, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8267011.69	1	Yes	8267011.69
RCP-039527	Polk County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8277076	2	Yes	8277076
RCP-038350	Cape Girardeau City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8280673	1	Yes	8280673
RCP-056426	Midlothian, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8325179.18	1	Yes	8308758.44
RCP-039414	Walnut Creek, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8327653	1	Yes	8327653
RCP-039018	Lees Summit, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8310882	3	Yes	8310882
RCP-038585	Montrose County, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8305240	1	Yes	8305240
RCP-053090	St. John The Baptist Parish,	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8320585	1	Yes	8320585
RCP-038414	Davie County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8322333	2	Yes	7578298
RCP-056007	Deer Park, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8310779.19	1	Yes	290000
RCP-040376	Folsom City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8375645	2	Yes	8375645
RCP-049100	Frostburg City, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8379631.99	1	Yes	8379631.99
RCP-025966	Union City, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8364601	2	Yes	8364601
RCP-038441	Shelby Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8374084	7	Yes	8374084
RCP-031407	Melrose, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8374173.8	35	Yes	8374173.8
RCP-056333	Weatherford, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8328903.31	3	Yes	8328903.31
RCP-047386	Pleasant Hill City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8334229	15	Yes	8334229
RCP-050617	Auburndale City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8339213	1	Yes	8339213
RCP-037139	Shawnee, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8351474	2	Yes	8351474
RCP-037847	Delaware County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8353994	16	Yes	8353994
RCP-036927	Stephens County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8380022	13	Yes	8380022
RCP-036700	Kandiyohi County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8390899	1	Yes	8390899
RCP-040511	Highland County, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8383518	1	Yes	8383518
RCP-037913	Sullivan County, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8380605	9	Yes	8380605
RCP-047081	Portage City, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8382483.94	2	Yes	8382483.94
RCP-050814	New Port Richey City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8382787	3	Yes	8382787
RCP-038778	Douglas County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8381382	2	Yes	8381382
RCP-038767	Branch County, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8452667	3	Yes	8452667
RCP-037042	Holland, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8453519	3	Yes	8453519
RCP-049178	East Haven, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8455012.29	55	Yes	8455012.29
RCP-040026	Kay County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8456746	53	Yes	8456746
RCP-050766	Lake Wales City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8393806	1	Yes	8393806
RCP-037138	Coffee County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8405273	1	Yes	8405273
RCP-049274	Westport, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8431928.13	12	Yes	8431928.13
RCP-038391	Jefferson County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8434797	1	Yes	8434797
RCP-038010	Douglas County, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8435574	1	Yes	8435574
RCP-036899	Sherman, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8437356	3	Yes	2000000	2200000	0
RCP-040216	Brown County, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8436157	6	Yes	8436157
RCP-037356	Mecosta County, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8440236	3	Yes	8440236
RCP-039138	Dekalb County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8444509	1	Yes	8444509
RCP-049032	Town Of Fountain Hills, AZ	Arizona	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8416299.44	2	Yes	8416299.44
RCP-039651	Albany, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8459912	14	Yes	8459912
RCP-037806	Bellevue, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8395637	1	Yes	8395637
RCP-038065	Miller County, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8402165	1	Yes	8402165
RCP-038197	Twin Falls, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8465111	1	Yes	8465111
RCP-037944	Moore City, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8469969	5	Yes	8469969
RCP-035374	Town Of Vinton, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8408034	1	Yes	8408034
RCP-040446	Siskiyou County, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8456940	1	Yes	8456940
RCP-047347	Manhattan Beach City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8416521	1	Yes	8416521
RCP-038229	North Port City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8427359	1	Yes	8427359
RCP-018064	Hurst City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106962.53	3	Yes	106962.53
RCP-046888	Chrisney Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106968	1	Yes	106968
RCP-051765	Royalton Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107310.16	1	Yes	107310.16
RCP-052216	Borough Of Lincoln, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107310.16	2	Yes	106971.94
RCP-025745	Iron City, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107923	2	Yes	107923
RCP-008496	Noxapater, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107680.19		Yes	0	0	0
RCP-006120	Town Of Kermit, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107683.5		Yes	0	0	0
RCP-023749	Town Of Farmersville, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107691.98	3	Yes	107691.98
RCP-023898	Village Of Champlain, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107691.98	1	No		0	0
RCP-024646	Village Of Unadilla, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107691.98		No		0	0	0
RCP-033805	Town Of Nashville, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107703.94	2	Yes	107703.94
RCP-031666	City Of Mackay, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107763.14	2	Yes	15791.45
RCP-034747	Village Of Elkhart Lake, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106343.25		Yes	106343.26
RCP-057211	Buhl City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106331.62	1	Yes	106331.62
RCP-052683	Peru Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106368.05		Yes	106343.03
RCP-025886	Rentz, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106429	1	Yes	106429
RCP-016038	Pearl City Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106554.28	1	Yes	0	0	0
RCP-016327	Woodhull Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106554.28	1	No		0	40000
RCP-049985	Town Of Morrison, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106572.3		Yes	0
RCP-055411	Adair City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106609.85		Yes	106609.85
RCP-005915	St. Joe Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107194.63		No		0	0	0
RCP-055844	Pleasant Plains Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107642.95	1	Yes	107642.95
RCP-046871	Bruceville Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107647.88	3	Yes	0
RCP-052169	Abbottstown Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107730.16		Yes	107390.62
RCP-052460	Middleville Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107752.28	1	Yes	107752.28
RCP-032379	Village Of Glandorf, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107798.48		Yes	107369.84
RCP-006977	Norwood, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107802.38	1	Yes	107802.38
RCP-055247	Fremont City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107806.04	1	Yes	107446.06
RCP-034329	Town Of Lake Tomahawk, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107808.61	1	Yes	107808.61
RCP-026975	Harmony City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107861.57		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-048032	Udall City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107894.68	1	Yes	107894.68
RCP-033792	Village Of Rosendale, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107913.28	1	Yes	107913.28
RCP-005362	Phillips Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108064.76	1	Yes	108064.76
RCP-006898	Hall Summit, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106320.55	3	No		0	0	0
RCP-018153	Tully Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106431.27	1	Yes	106008.07
RCP-018925	Washington Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106431.27		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-032873	Village Of Kingston, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106957.13	2	Yes	106531.83
RCP-031618	City Of Firth, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107332.95	1	Yes	107332.95
RCP-019122	Salem Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107377.81	4	Yes	107164.32
RCP-033527	Town Of Lowville, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107389.94		Yes	107389.94
RCP-032886	Marshall Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106010.61	1	Yes	0	0	0	0
RCP-033023	Village Of Thornville, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106010.61	1	Yes	0
RCP-034029	Town Of Carlton, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106133.91	1	Yes	106133.91
RCP-003509	Sherman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106244.68	1	Yes	106244.68	0	0
RCP-052896	Newbury Village, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106143.75		Yes	106118.73
RCP-023809	Town Of Arkwright, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106256.09	1	Yes	106256
RCP-031599	City Of Dayton, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106257.47	1	No		0	0
RCP-033123	Bear River Town Corporation, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106279		Yes	106279
RCP-025909	Scotland, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106308.66	1	Yes	106308.66
RCP-013971	California Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108031.2	1	Yes	108031.97	0	88201.92
RCP-051489	Central City Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108045.16	1	Yes	107704.62
RCP-047572	Cherokee City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108047.28	1	Yes	108047.28
RCP-056339	Angus, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106510.25	8	No	0	0	0
RCP-051877	Yoe Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106470.14		Yes	106134.58
RCP-007821	Town of Glencoe	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106518.31		Yes	106521.5
RCP-054425	Dearborn City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106550.79	2	Yes	106550.79
RCP-033012	Hopewell Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107272.64	1	Yes	107272.64
RCP-035495	Town Of Rutledge, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106739.78	4	Yes	106739.78
RCP-003819	Sherman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106770.12	4	Yes	106770.13
RCP-057199	High Forest Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107205.88	1	Yes	107205.88
RCP-032471	Village Of Mantua, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107272.64	2	Yes	107059.36
RCP-004465	Elk Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107400.66	2	Yes	107400.66
RCP-047388	Point Arena City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107410		Yes	107410
RCP-030219	Twin Bridges Town, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106838.57	6	No		0	0	0
RCP-007806	Town of Fort Cobb	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106869.28	1	Yes	106869
RCP-032579	Dublin Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106851.96	1	Yes	106851.96
RCP-019664	City Of Holland, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106852.5	2	Yes	106852.5
RCP-052282	Rush Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106878.03	1	Yes	106878.03
RCP-057164	Bay Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106878.03	1	Yes	106878.03
RCP-032938	Rarden Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106957.13	3	Yes	106957.13
RCP-018740	Homer Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107588.13		Yes	107588.14
RCP-024362	Village Of Baxter Estates, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107589.42		Yes	107589.42
RCP-003752	Grant Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107625		Yes	107625
RCP-006116	Town Of Iaeger, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106973.11	1	Yes	106973.11	15000	15000
RCP-024723	Town Of Hermon, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106974.03		Yes	106974.03
RCP-032589	Village Of Bradner, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107062.3		Yes	0
RCP-018537	Paint Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107167.47	1	Yes	42000
RCP-014193	City Of Avon, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106699.12	1	Yes	106699.12
RCP-007289	Hebron, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106723.44		Yes	106723.44
RCP-006173	Town Of Pine Grove, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107079.75	1	Yes	107079.75
RCP-057401	Forest Prairie Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107096.59		Yes	107096.59
RCP-025358	Avoca, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107112.5	3	Yes	107112.5
RCP-023816	Town Of Cherry Creek, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107281.73	5	Yes	107281.73
RCP-023850	Town Of Ashland, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107281.73		Yes	107281.73
RCP-024827	Town Of Tyre, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108102.24	1	Yes	108102.24
RCP-055030	Schaller City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108105.09	2	Yes	108105.09
RCP-013863	Brampton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108136.3	3	Yes	2000
RCP-015887	Mclean Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108187.31	1	Yes	34240
RCP-056139	Mount Enterprise, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108248.19	1	Yes	108248.19
RCP-017045	Pike Creek Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106440.9	2	Yes	106440.9
RCP-022704	Lower Augusta Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106785.14	1	Yes	106785.14
RCP-050045	Town Of South Fork, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106823.64	1	Yes	0
RCP-003556	Sherman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107926.12		Yes	107926.12
RCP-006311	City Of Newell, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107965.04	3	Yes	107965.04
RCP-024097	Village Of Northville, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107999.67	1	Yes	107999.67
RCP-004431	Elkland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108031.2	9	Yes	108031.2
RCP-055728	Ventura City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106609.85	1	Yes	0	15000	15000
RCP-052531	D'Lo, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107434.34		Yes	107434.34
RCP-033847	Village Of Dickeyville, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107180.6	2	Yes	107180.6
RCP-052578	Mclain, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107188.5		Yes	0	0		0
RCP-003534	Geneva Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107190.48	5	Yes	107190.48
RCP-019328	Fitchville Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107482.97	1	Yes	107482.97
RCP-024635	Town Of New Lisbon, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107486.86	1	Yes	107486.85
RCP-022263	Liberty Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107520.16	2	Yes	107520.16
RCP-054284	Bland City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107569.44	1	Yes	107569.44
RCP-007950	Town of Paoli	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107571.22	3	Yes	107571.22
RCP-032991	Buck Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	107588.13	7	Yes	107160.33
RCP-018346	Clinton Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106010.61	1	Yes	105589.07
RCP-023487	Pine Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106050.14	1	Yes	106050.14
RCP-047558	Canton City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106063.38	1	Yes	106063.38
RCP-047663	Frankfort City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106063.38	1	Yes	105749.9
RCP-054961	Wheatland City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108105.09		No		0	0	0
RCP-034653	Town Of Washington, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106657.26	2	Yes	106657.26
RCP-027622	Lansing Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106659.46	1	Yes	106659.46
RCP-003328	Forest Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106665.04		No		0	0	0
RCP-023832	Town Of Mina, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106666.34	8	Yes	106666.34
RCP-022488	Covington Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106680.16	1	Yes	106343.92
RCP-031712	City Of Richfield, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106687.66	1	Yes	106687.66
RCP-015477	Smithfield Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106690.15	1	Yes	106690.15
RCP-006766	Evergreen, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	106691	1	Yes	106691
RCP-025710	Graham, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108297	2	Yes	108297
RCP-023372	Upper Turkeyfoot Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109935.16	2	Yes	2087.66
RCP-056784	Follett, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109489.56	1	No		25760	21806.78
RCP-022343	Burnside Township Supervisors Dba Burnside Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109515.14	1	Yes	109169.98
RCP-031896	Nespelem Town, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109533	2	Yes	109533
RCP-025572	Sulphur Springs, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109598.67	5	Yes	109598.67	9934.45	40450.64
RCP-035680	Town Of Berlin, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109354.82	2	Yes	109354.82
RCP-052151	Neville Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109620.16	1	Yes	109274.66
RCP-034179	Town Of Rib Falls, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109692.65	2	Yes	109692.65
RCP-013875	City Of Reading, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109712.62	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-014145	Clayton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109712.62	1	Yes	109712.62
RCP-017175	Walcott Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109719.37		Yes	109719.37	0	0	0
RCP-018947	Village Of Luckey, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109796.7		Yes	109796.7
RCP-033704	Village Of Lake Nebagamon, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109797.31	5	Yes	109797.31
RCP-054907	Garnavillo City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108254.61		No	0	0	0
RCP-022723	Borough Of New Philadelphia, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108255.16	1	Yes	80000	0	0
RCP-003707	Drummond Island Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109187.18	2	Yes	109187.18
RCP-050083	Village Of Adams, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109201.44		Yes	109201.44
RCP-053949	Belle Vernon Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108255.16	1	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-007587	Town of Lahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108273.14	2	Yes	108271.86
RCP-023845	Town Of Villenova, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109435.57	2	Yes	109435.57
RCP-040885	Borough Of Califon, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109483.3		Yes	109483.3
RCP-001418	Stonington Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109122.14		Yes	109122.14
RCP-052811	Belvidere Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109133.72	1	Yes	109133.72
RCP-019665	City Of Holly Grove, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109391.49	2	Yes	109391.49
RCP-019675	City Of Huttig, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109391.49		Yes	0		0
RCP-052464	Stockholm Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109391.52	1	Yes	109391.52
RCP-035512	Town Of Louisville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109830.26		Yes	109830.26
RCP-034647	Town Of Merrimac, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109901.98	5	Yes	109901.98
RCP-035194	Whittier City, AK	Alaska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108442.27	1	Yes	108309.15
RCP-024441	Town Of Florence, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108512.49	4	Yes	108512.49
RCP-007665	Town of Earlsboro	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108975.08	1	Yes	108975.08
RCP-022733	Asylum Township Supervisors Dba Asylum Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108990.16		Yes	108646.64
RCP-054462	Hardin City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109403.01	3	Yes	109403.01
RCP-025870	Pitts, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109417	2	Yes	109417
RCP-013827	Fairhaven Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109817.72	1	Yes	109597.74	0	0
RCP-055125	Merrill City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109301.28	1	Yes	109118.79
RCP-007744	Town of Carney	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109326.04	2	Yes	109326.04
RCP-018286	Ames Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109165.68		Yes	108948.64	0	0
RCP-033721	Town Of Rock Creek, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109169.3	5	Yes	109169.3
RCP-050242	City Of Elgin, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109201.44	2	Yes	109201.44
RCP-023949	Town Of Truxton, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109230.44	1	Yes	109230.44
RCP-003778	Village Of Concord, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109292.28	1	Yes	109292.28
RCP-056331	Dish (Formerly Clark), TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108993.01	6	Yes	108993.01
RCP-002081	Town Of Stuckey, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109027.82	1	Yes	109027.82
RCP-022818	Greene Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109095.16	1	Yes	109095.16
RCP-019239	Perry Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108429.5	1	Yes	108325.31
RCP-052289	Chengwatana Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108517.26		Yes	108517.26
RCP-032372	Village Of Wakeman, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108534.67	1	Yes	108534.67
RCP-025097	Town Of Pike, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108615.06	2	Yes	0
RCP-033029	Blanchard Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108639.83	1	Yes	108423.83
RCP-014024	Sims Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108661.74	1	Yes	48678.27
RCP-026181	Town Of Cameron, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108675.83	4	Yes	106808.32	0	1500
RCP-024053	Town Of Keene, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108717.62	5	Yes	108717.62
RCP-027112	Morristown City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108735.83	1	Yes	108735.83
RCP-018231	Washington Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108745.01		Yes	108745.01
RCP-033544	Village Of Rio, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108750.63	1	Yes	108750.62
RCP-033669	Town Of Baileys Harbor, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108750.63		Yes	108750.63
RCP-033675	Town Of Gibraltar, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108750.63	1	Yes	108750.63
RCP-051297	Westfield Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108780.16	2	Yes	108780.16
RCP-022270	Mccalmont Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108780.16	2	Yes	108780.46
RCP-055722	Gilbertville, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108852.71	1	Yes	108852.71
RCP-015999	Ogden Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108867.73		No		0	0	0
RCP-024553	Village Of Otisville, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108307.37		Yes	108307.37
RCP-019682	City Of Junction City, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108355.58	2	Yes	108355.58
RCP-003379	Cleveland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108556.66	1	Yes	108556.66
RCP-022839	Mifflin Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108570.14	1	Yes	108570.14
RCP-053972	Thornhurst Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108570.14		Yes	0
RCP-033581	Town Of Dane, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109692.65	1	Yes	109692.65
RCP-003429	Sherman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108871.92		Yes	108871.92
RCP-033140	Minersville Town, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108883		Yes	108883
RCP-018555	Ward Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108955.34	4	No		0	0
RCP-027157	Parkers Prairie City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108954.39		Yes	108954.39
RCP-032739	Montgomery Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	108955.34	1	Yes	108955.34
RCP-019525	City Of Bradley, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109184.31	2	Yes	109184.31
RCP-040343	Lawrence County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8812591		Yes	8812591
RCP-038748	Goldsboro, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8813514	8	Yes	8813514
RCP-040379	Henderson, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6345733	1	Yes	6345734
RCP-039561	Barron County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8788117	1	Yes	8788117
RCP-047206	Bell City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8497378	1	Yes	8497378
RCP-049280	Windsor, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8503548.17	12	Yes	8503548.16
RCP-056118	Lufkin, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8694861.63	7	Yes	8694861.63
RCP-031413	Milford, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8698487.71	9	Yes	8698487.71
RCP-001982	City Of Clemson, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8712767.14	1	Yes	8712767.14
RCP-038948	Polk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8504334	1	Yes	8504334
RCP-047447	Temple City City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8566752	5	Yes	8566752
RCP-037743	Delaware County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8572706	1	Yes	8554806.51
RCP-037621	Columbus, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8570495	1	Yes	8570495
RCP-056097	La Porte, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8683689.23	4	Yes	380385
RCP-039213	Shelby County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8688084	1	Yes	8688084
RCP-038245	Madison County, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8688472		Yes	8688472
RCP-037718	Ravalli County, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8508802	1	Yes	8508802
RCP-054599	Wentzville City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8512654.44	1	Yes	8512654.44
RCP-038432	Jackson County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8534441	1	Yes	8534441
RCP-038750	Holmes County, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8538715	1	Yes	8538715
RCP-039030	Florence, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8546584	14	No		0	0
RCP-035545	City Of Prattville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8547979.72	18	Yes	8547979.72
RCP-049265	Vernon, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8688813.18	2	Yes	8606391.18
RCP-038270	Callaway County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8690803	1	Yes	8690803
RCP-047356	Monrovia City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8691147	1	Yes	8691147
RCP-039503	Leavenworth, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8549063	1	Yes	8549063
RCP-026686	City Of Thomasville, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8492968.18	21	Yes	8492968.18
RCP-026259	Acworth, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8521070	1	Yes	8521070
RCP-031254	Agawam, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8552621.19	1	Yes	8552621.19
RCP-031292	Burlington, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8556805.87	3	Yes	8556805.87
RCP-038848	Suwannee County, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8627482	1	Yes	8627482
RCP-037215	Brookhaven, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8471155	1	Yes	8471155
RCP-037280	Shenandoah County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8471897	4	Yes	8471897
RCP-031481	Saugus, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8477296.67	1	Yes	8477296.67
RCP-038937	Pittsburg County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8479278	8	Yes	8479278
RCP-053221	Lake Havasu City, Az,	Arizona	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8528306	4	Yes	8528306
RCP-037202	Washington County, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8528809	5	Yes	8528809
RCP-056546	Socorro, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8533234.18	45	No		0	0
RCP-047360	Moorpark City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8701673	3	Yes	8701673
RCP-038574	Richmond County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8707508	7	Yes	8707508
RCP-037486	Warren County, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8814727	3	Yes	8814727
RCP-053664	City Of Keizer, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8820849.86	26	Yes	8820849.86
RCP-039796	Laguna Niguel, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8821454	13	Yes	8821454
RCP-037714	Chambers County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8514823	8	Yes	8514823
RCP-037835	Coral Gables City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8518456	6	Yes	8518456
RCP-025716	Griffin, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8519203	1	Yes	8519203
RCP-049161	Cheshire, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8563922.1	6	Yes	8563922.1
RCP-040651	West Warwick, RI	Rhode Island	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8656939.64	35	Yes	8656939.64
RCP-038564	Phelps County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8657783	8	Yes	8657783
RCP-039675	City Of Coeur D'Alene, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8659329	19	Yes	8659329
RCP-049894	City Of Englewood, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8776379.4	7	Yes	8776379.4
RCP-035352	Town Of Smithfield, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8792954	1	Yes	8792954
RCP-037134	Centennial, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8489546	1	Yes	8489546
RCP-030164	Helena City, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8486620.42	1	Yes	8486620.42
RCP-040354	Chilton County, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8629618		Yes	8629618
RCP-037701	Thomas County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8634086	2	Yes	8634086
RCP-039421	Stephenson County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8643215	1	Yes	8643215
RCP-015145	Florence city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8649262.72	3	Yes	8546682.96
RCP-040636	Johnston, RI	Rhode Island	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8809083.23	7	Yes	8809083.23
RCP-038806	Dunn County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8812202	9	Yes	8812202
RCP-038760	Hopkins County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8679732	51	Yes	8679732
RCP-036889	Baldwin County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8719356	1	Yes	8719356
RCP-047460	West Hollywood City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8725595	1	Yes	8725595
RCP-040067	Union County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8725766		Yes	0
RCP-040015	Macoupin County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8726349	41	Yes	8726349
RCP-039698	Itasca County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8765973	47	Yes	8765973
RCP-038359	Huntingdon County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8768693	1	Yes	8768693
RCP-026667	City Of Statesville, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8773103.24	3	Yes	8773103
RCP-026524	Town Of Mint Hill, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8801467.31	5	Yes	8801467.31
RCP-039719	Greene County, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8803850	2	Yes	8803850	1890574	3846823
RCP-038399	Habersham County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8804433	1	Yes	8804433
RCP-049191	Groton, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8587894.04	19	Yes	8587894.04
RCP-047417	San Juan Capistrano City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8590675	3	Yes	8590675
RCP-053158	Jackson County,	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8591353	1	Yes	8591353
RCP-038775	Caldwell County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8481220	1	Yes	8481220
RCP-031540	West Springfield, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8523926.13	2	Yes	8523926.13
RCP-037810	Barren County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8594850	5	Yes	8594850
RCP-038132	Pleasanton City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8595930	1	Yes	8595930
RCP-037605	Vance County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8650402		Yes	8650402
RCP-039073	West Seneca, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8508246	18	Yes	8508246
RCP-040056	Titusville, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8607193	1	Yes	8607193
RCP-035649	City Of Phenix City, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8673975.48	2	Yes	8673975.48
RCP-047235	Claremont City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8675598	1	Yes	8675598
RCP-037062	St. Cloud City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8780823	1	Yes	8780823
RCP-036836	Henderson County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8781513	4	Yes	8781513
RCP-037534	City Of Coconut Creek, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8597464	9	Yes	7000000
RCP-023660	Municipio De Moca, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8601075.45	14	Yes	3647814.9
RCP-050763	Lake Mary City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8754421	6	Yes	8754421
RCP-039205	Logan County, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8871251	2	Yes	10000000
RCP-040311	Hancock County, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9251958	5	Yes	0
RCP-039777	Franklin City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9253841	7	Yes	9253841
RCP-037599	Noble County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9273712	6	Yes	9273712
RCP-039321	Waterford Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9280012	5	Yes	9280012
RCP-037141	Fremont County, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9292165	5	Yes	9292165
RCP-047464	Wildomar City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8905968	1	Yes	8905968
RCP-037873	Boyd County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9074424	1	Yes	9074424
RCP-040400	Marshall, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9078903	4	Yes	9078903
RCP-040005	Taylorsville, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8884092	1	Yes	8884092
RCP-037522	Bonner County, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8884265	1	Yes	8884265
RCP-039975	Mcdowell County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8887567	11	Yes	8887567
RCP-050897	Tavares City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8889651	23	Yes	8889651
RCP-039105	Dalton, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8873412	1	Yes	8873412
RCP-037119	Allegany County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8952636	10	Yes	8952636
RCP-002094	City Of West Columbia, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8960195.6	3	Yes	8960195.6
RCP-040083	Clinton County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9018289	39	Yes	9018289
RCP-050868	Safety Harbor City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9023379	1	Yes	9023379
RCP-026533	Town Of Morrisville, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9193146.47	27	Yes	9193146.47
RCP-039677	Perry County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8987794	1	Yes	8987794
RCP-053229	Camden County,	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8994203	17	Yes	6163005.84
RCP-039550	Osage County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9122012		Yes	9122012
RCP-047440	Stanton City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9123659	15	Yes	9123659
RCP-039242	Beaufort County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9128034	2	Yes	9128034
RCP-037881	Bolingbrook, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9140140	1	Yes	9140140
RCP-047350	Martinez City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9161456	1	Yes	9161456
RCP-037957	Greene County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9165716	13	Yes	9165716
RCP-014424	Maryville City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8824851.79	6	Yes	8824851.79
RCP-037656	Chesterfield County, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8866977	7	Yes	8866977
RCP-040334	Livonia, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8910652	1	Yes	8910652
RCP-037979	Mifflin County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8961766	1	Yes	8961766
RCP-038018	Camarillo, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8962170	1	Yes	8962170
RCP-037183	Washington Parish, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8972643	1	Yes	8972643
RCP-040524	Hoover City, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8975754	5	Yes	8975754	10555973
RCP-035337	Town Of Pulaski, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9040920	1	Yes	9040920
RCP-040091	Muncipality Of Aguada, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9043333.23	2	Yes	9043333.23
RCP-040028	Seaside, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8994311	1	Yes	8994311
RCP-036984	Mount Vernon, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9053048	1	Yes	9053048
RCP-037862	Lincoln Parish, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9079086	1	Yes	9079086
RCP-037725	Auglaize County, Oh, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8868143	1	Yes	8868143
RCP-037591	Vega Alta Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8895076.27	13	Yes	8895076.27
RCP-037158	Placentia City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9083054	1	Yes	9083054
RCP-039106	Bingham County, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9092488	9	Yes	9092488
RCP-040152	Stokes County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8855517	4	Yes	8855517
RCP-036659	Waynesboro City, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9046603	4	Yes	9046603
RCP-038064	Canton Twp, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9186398	3	Yes	9186398
RCP-039025	Bedford County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9301683	1	Yes	9301683
RCP-037476	Nye County, NV	Nevada	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9036547	13	Yes	9036547
RCP-038617	Santa Cruz County, AZ	Arizona	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9031691	1	Yes	9031691
RCP-031809	Des Moines City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9038700	36	Yes	9038700
RCP-039195	Beltrami County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9165716	1	Yes	9165716
RCP-039695	Chenango County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9169406	7	Yes	9169406
RCP-015159	Georgetown city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9170252.13	9	Yes	9061493.46
RCP-039934	Salisbury, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9188340	2	Yes	4053078	3269465.48
RCP-025931	Sugar Hill, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9192882	1	Yes	9192882
RCP-050786	Maitland City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8841069	1	Yes	8841069
RCP-053669	City Of Lake Oswego, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8845060.38	1	Yes	8845060.38
RCP-039889	Brunswick, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9212262	2	Yes	9061956.23
RCP-047377	Pacifica City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9221023	1	Yes	9221022
RCP-038889	Laurens County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9235253	1	Yes	9235253
RCP-040602	Cortland County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9242051	1	Yes	9242051
RCP-037830	Nelson County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8980218	1	Yes	8980218
RCP-037416	Jacksonville, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9000774	1	Yes	9000774
RCP-040185	Jackson County, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9015375	1	Yes	9015375
RCP-037525	Colquitt County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8857265	1	Yes	8857265	3657340
RCP-038919	Hillsdale County, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8858237	2	Yes	8858237
RCP-056903	Del Rio, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8878337.33	4	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-038898	Sandy City, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9151064	1	Yes	9151064
RCP-023658	Municipio De Las Piedras, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9141033.29	4	Yes	6334285.37
RCP-049031	Town Of Florence, AZ	Arizona	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9158403.3	9	Yes	9158403.3
RCP-040150	Borough Of Carlisle, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9186671	1	Yes	9186671
RCP-056218	San Juan, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9188185.35	2	Yes	9125062.39
RCP-036857	Gadsden County, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8868920	15	Yes	8868920
RCP-037592	San Lorenzo Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8870757.41	8	Yes	7820462.41
RCP-039596	Vernon Parish, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9212527	1	Yes	9212527
RCP-036808	Kendall County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9212916	1	Yes	9212916
RCP-040642	South Kingstown, RI	Rhode Island	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9071224.47	5	Yes	9071224.47
RCP-037191	Lexington, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9171646	2	Yes	9171646
RCP-038609	St. Bernard Parish, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9176593	2	Yes	9176593
RCP-007639	City of Stillwater	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8826630.06	2	Yes	8826893.6
RCP-039778	Kittitas County, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9310812	18	Yes	9310812
RCP-000954	City Of Cleveland, Tn,	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9313001	1	Yes	9313001
RCP-039910	Stevens County, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8881157	26	Yes	7332217.76
RCP-039921	Farmington Hills, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8911759	1	Yes	8911759
RCP-040148	Green Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8913892	3	Yes	8913892
RCP-000949	County Of Calaveras,	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8916508	4	Yes	8916508
RCP-053154	Municipality Of Dorado,	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8922898.72	9	Yes	2980000
RCP-052588	Meridian, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8935734.47	3	Yes	8935734.47
RCP-040306	Marshall County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8985074	1	Yes	8985074
RCP-038091	Monroe County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8984103	6	Yes	8984103
RCP-036745	Monroe County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9040821	12	Yes	9040821
RCP-037767	Goodhue County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9001002	1	Yes	9001002
RCP-038816	Campbell County, WY	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9001196	1	Yes	9001196
RCP-036955	Olympia, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9205624	3	Yes	9205624
RCP-040189	Wood County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8845417	5	Yes	8845417
RCP-049218	Newington, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8882660.86	1	Yes	8882660.86
RCP-036747	Grand Island, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9093880	1	Yes	9093880
RCP-037483	Martinsburg, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9111132	1	Yes	9111132
RCP-037813	Novato City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9112951	1	Yes	9112951
RCP-037234	Casper City, WY	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9115340	2	Yes	9115340
RCP-040171	Arcadia City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8864856	2	Yes	8864856
RCP-048076	Wilson City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110489.02	1	Yes	110489.02
RCP-018269	Greenwich Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110532.88		No		0	0
RCP-015081	Campton city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110592.32		Yes	109280.7
RCP-002032	Town Of Little Mountain, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110602.5	4	Yes	0
RCP-016014	Oreana Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110364.65	1	Yes	110364.65
RCP-032000	Village Of Ardentown, DE	Delaware	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110651.1	1	Yes	110651.1
RCP-035673	Town Of Fairview, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110067.98		Yes	110067.98
RCP-040671	City Of Port Republic, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110111.32		Yes	0
RCP-018010	Hamel Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110228.57	1	Yes	110228.57
RCP-035058	Town Of Seneca, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110320.66	1	Yes	104188.45
RCP-003820	Frost Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110868.6	3	Yes	110868.6
RCP-034233	Town Of Montello, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110006.65		Yes	110006.65
RCP-034455	Village Of Luck, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110006.65	2	Yes	59163
RCP-003759	Newark Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110027.9		Yes	110027.9
RCP-024188	Village Of Brownville, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110871.46	1	Yes	110871.46
RCP-023397	Borough Of Shinglehouse, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110670.14	1	Yes	110321.34
RCP-007275	Reile'S Acres, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110676.16	1	Yes	110676.16
RCP-056059	Highland Haven, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	109986.12		Yes	109769.18
RCP-033649	Town Of Theresa, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110006.65	2	Yes	110006.65
RCP-022655	Amity Township Supervisors, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110040.16	2	Yes	109693.34
RCP-024075	Town Of Chateaugay, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110050.96	2	Yes	100000	92468	92468
RCP-014157	Manistique Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110553.34		Yes	55276.67
RCP-024643	Town Of Richfield, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110563.77	3	Yes	110563.77
RCP-024804	Town Of Summit, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110563.77	3	Yes	110563.77
RCP-022462	Fairview Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110565.16	1	Yes	110216.68
RCP-022625	Oliver Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110040.16	1	Yes	110040.16
RCP-023757	Village Of Little Valley, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110666.34	1	Yes	110666.34	0	0
RCP-050648	Campbellton Town, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110689	4	Yes	110689
RCP-033909	Town Of Mineral Point, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110006.65		Yes	0
RCP-050722	Highland Park Village, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110188	1	Yes	110188
RCP-003680	Village Of Roscommon, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110343.16		Yes	110343.16
RCP-055404	Alden City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110347.93	1	Yes	55494.53
RCP-033646	Town Of Portland, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110425.33	1	Yes	110425.33
RCP-007306	Town Of Bloomfield, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110739.33		Yes	110739.33
RCP-006909	Hosston, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110766.02		Yes	56067	0	0
RCP-018878	Richland Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110217.37	2	Yes	110217.37
RCP-054152	Sunrise Beach Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110421.66		Yes	0	0
RCP-054675	Alba City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110421.66	1	Yes	110421.66
RCP-024618	Town Of Burlington, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110768.89		Yes	100000
RCP-023229	Springfield Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110880.14	1	Yes	110530.68
RCP-023299	Ashland Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110880.14	1	Yes	110530.68	0	0
RCP-007710	Town of Binger	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110905.39	2	Yes	110905.39
RCP-055262	Essex City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110497.45	1	Yes	110497.45
RCP-016085	Ridge Farm Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110500.74	1	Yes	110500.74
RCP-033163	City Of Green River, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110658	1	No		0	0
RCP-018937	Auburn Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110217.37	1	Yes	109779.11
RCP-054313	Madison City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110217.93	2	Yes	110217.93
RCP-024000	Village Of Tivoli, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110871.46		Yes	110871.46
RCP-026120	Town Of Alliance, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110692.5		Yes	110692.5
RCP-027020	Keewatin City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110702.9		Yes	110702.9
RCP-033632	Town Of Calamus, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110529.99	1	Yes	110529.99
RCP-034980	Town Of Scandinavia, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110529.99	11	Yes	110529.99
RCP-035454	Town Of Hammondville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110153.25	2	Yes	110153.25
RCP-057208	Lake Emma Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110156.5	1	Yes	110156.5
RCP-023131	Oneida Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110250.16	1	Yes	110250.16
RCP-034843	Town Of Cloverland, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110948.67	2	Yes	70000
RCP-018182	Norwich Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110953.56		Yes	110512.37
RCP-000956	Kidder County,	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481711	10	Yes	481711
RCP-026128	Town Of Atlantic Beach, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481870.54	1	Yes	481870.54
RCP-026647	Town Of Snow Hill, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481870.54	2	Yes	481870.54
RCP-054989	Tipton City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481912.44		Yes	481912.44
RCP-024542	Town Of Greenville, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481947.27		Yes	481947.27
RCP-019181	Paint Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	477889.07	1	Yes	475988.81
RCP-030181	Malta City, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	476802.34	1	Yes	476802.35
RCP-033970	Town Of Ixonia, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	476869.94	1	Yes	476869.94
RCP-035074	Town Of Menominee, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	476869.94	2	Yes	476869.94
RCP-052882	Proctor Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	476899.44		Yes	476787.03
RCP-024421	Town Of Porter, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	476921.64		Yes	476921.64
RCP-054230	Moline Acres City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	477950.59	2	Yes	477950.59
RCP-005368	Raymond Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	478255.28	4	Yes	0
RCP-024948	Town Of Tioga, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	482460.09	3	Yes	0
RCP-001295	Glenburn Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	482484.81	6	Yes	0
RCP-040801	Borough Of Mount Ephraim, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	480114.66	2	Yes	80000
RCP-037541	Graham County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	482099	3	Yes	482099
RCP-053035	Rich County,	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	482294		Yes	482294	0	0
RCP-056618	Haslet, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	477434.08	4	No		0	0	0
RCP-025238	Town Of Danville, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	476966.04	15	Yes	476966
RCP-054206	Hermann City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	477135.67	1	Yes	477135.67
RCP-032840	Columbia Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	477258.06		Yes	475360.31
RCP-035705	Town Of Collinsville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	477595.22	2	Yes	382000	0	0
RCP-033783	Town Of Taycheedah, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	477602.62	1	Yes	477602.62
RCP-052046	City Of Farrell, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	480900.68	7	Yes	480143
RCP-014490	Ridgely Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481565.95	1	Yes	481565.95
RCP-047063	Orleans Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481582.63		Yes	481582.63
RCP-035282	Town Of Haysi, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	482446	1	Yes	482446
RCP-005325	Lyman Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	477620.85	2	Yes	320176.53
RCP-047184	Jasonville Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	480902.75	3	Yes	480902.75
RCP-007046	Urania, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481961.81		Yes	481961.81
RCP-054065	Concordia City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	482025.19	2	Yes	482025.19
RCP-050559	City Of Valentine, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	478928.84	1	Yes	478928.84
RCP-052877	Alburgh Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	478992.41	1	Yes	478879.51
RCP-051840	Borough Of Donora, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	479010.68	1	Yes	479010.68	150000	150000
RCP-040890	Borough Of Flemington, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	479067.96	1	Yes	479067.96
RCP-003631	Wells Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	480558.76	3	Yes	128944.92
RCP-032619	Hamilton Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	480728.64	6	Yes	480728.64
RCP-024500	Town Of Skaneateles, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	482972.91	1	Yes	482972.91
RCP-025210	Town Of Lee, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	478327	1	Yes	239163.5
RCP-052922	Calais Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	479590.41	1	Yes	479590.41
RCP-032350	Village Of Coldwater, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	479782.12	1	Yes	479782.12
RCP-007607	City of New Cordell	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	479771.1	1	Yes	479771.1
RCP-022388	Bradford Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481215.68	1	Yes	479699
RCP-015412	Whitesburg city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	482989.67	1	Yes	246258.82
RCP-013939	Berrien Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	483092.84	1	Yes	482124.17	0	0	0
RCP-014185	Nelson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	483092.84		Yes	0
RCP-051427	Bridgeport Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	479850.68		Yes	478338.3
RCP-039659	Kiowa County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	480740	1	Yes	480740
RCP-027237	St. James City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	480841.84	4	Yes	480841.84
RCP-001958	Town Of Aynor, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481415.1	3	Yes	481415.1
RCP-022712	White Deer Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481425.68		Yes	479908.34
RCP-019771	Town Of Lincolnville, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481462.5	2	Yes	481462.5
RCP-022517	Smithfield Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481635.68	15	Yes	481635.68
RCP-032104	Village Of Plain City, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	482306.18	1	Yes	480388.36
RCP-019107	Washington Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	482306.18	4	Yes	480388.36
RCP-026110	Thermopolis Town, WY	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	479383.52	1	Yes	479383.52
RCP-019647	City Of Harrisburg, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	478380.57	1	Yes	478380.57
RCP-014741	Town Of Swansea, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	478428.04	1	Yes	478428.04
RCP-023449	Jenkins Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	478800.68	8	Yes	477291.6
RCP-047241	Colfax City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	478921	1	Yes	478920
RCP-025024	Town Of Arcadia, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	482049.83	1	Yes	482049.83
RCP-032096	Village Of Greenfield, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	479151.1	14	Yes	477245.83
RCP-052635	Shelby, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	479152.24		Yes	479152.24	5000
RCP-027311	Windom City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	479311.9	1	Yes	479311.9
RCP-051834	West York Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	479955.68		Yes	478442.96
RCP-006262	City Of Summerset, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481050.22	1	Yes	481050.22
RCP-040964	Borough Of Neptune City, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	481056.68		Yes	481056.68
RCP-022605	Liverpool Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111300.16	1	Yes	111300.16
RCP-050259	Village Of Firth, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110971.32	1	Yes	110971.32
RCP-003814	Wexford Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111052.5		Yes	111052.5
RCP-003951	Mentor Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111000		Yes	0
RCP-027538	Lake Andrew Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111030.75	1	Yes	111030.75
RCP-006313	City Of Menno, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111039.42	1	Yes	111039.42
RCP-034303	Town Of Gillett, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111053.34		Yes	100000
RCP-024109	Village Of Bergen, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111076.59		No		0	193038.88	0
RCP-006749	Dodson, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111136.47	1	Yes	111136.48
RCP-055015	Sioux Rapids City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111245.06	3	Yes	111245.06
RCP-024846	Village Of South Corning, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111179.15	1	Yes	111179.15
RCP-014556	Watauga City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110970.83	2	Yes	110970.83
RCP-023697	Town Of Clarksville, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111076.59	1	Yes	111076.59
RCP-022568	Schuylkill Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110985.16	1	Yes	110635.36
RCP-031600	City Of Deary, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	110989.58	2	Yes	110989.58
RCP-030109	Township Of White, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	487336.78		Yes	487336.78
RCP-018222	Brown Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	487669.81	4	Yes	487669.81
RCP-026893	Dilworth City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	483246.06		Yes	483246.06
RCP-022338	Borough Of Danville, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488040.7	9	Yes	486502.5
RCP-051697	Warrington Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488250.7	2	Yes	486711.84
RCP-030182	Manhattan Town, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488331.68	1	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-040940	Borough Of Brielle, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488383.48	2	Yes	488383.48	244191.74	244191.74
RCP-026448	Town Of Jefferson, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488563.18	3	Yes	488563.18
RCP-026707	Town Of Walnut Cove, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488563.18	18	Yes	0
RCP-018008	Hainesville Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	484053.09	1	No		0	0
RCP-025314	Town Of Milton, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	484084.93		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-046979	Knightstown Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	484302.16	3	Yes	484302.16
RCP-046895	Cloverdale Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	486115.17	1	Yes	486115.17
RCP-054566	Seneca City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	486303.52		Yes	486303.52
RCP-030088	Township Of Allamuchy, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488383.48		Yes	488383.48
RCP-031446	Oak Bluffs, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488488.14		Yes	488488.14	150000	338000
RCP-005326	Madison Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488511.91	1	Yes	488511.91
RCP-030113	Baker City, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	485000.98		Yes	485000.98	0	0
RCP-016000	Oglesby City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	484325.26	1	Yes	484325.26
RCP-004247	Crockery Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	484564.08	1	Yes	0	0		0
RCP-016092	Riverwoods Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	484733.51	1	Yes	484733.51
RCP-046836	Albany Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	486795.06	1	Yes	486795.06
RCP-031806	Davenport City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	487310	2	Yes	487310
RCP-031545	Westhampton, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	489310.48	8	Yes	489310.48
RCP-053706	City Of North Plains, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	489319.18	6	Yes	489319.18
RCP-024156	Town Of Frankfort, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	490049.81	8	Yes	490049.81
RCP-003800	Hayes Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	490238.88	1	Yes	490238.88
RCP-032591	Lawrence Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	486723.29	1	Yes	486723.29
RCP-047731	Holton City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	489570.16	1	Yes	489570.16
RCP-055984	Collinsville, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	486371.99	6	Yes	486371.99
RCP-022372	Borough Of Lemoyne, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	486570.68	1	Yes	486570.68
RCP-038821	Sheridan County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	489675	3	Yes	489675
RCP-003335	Kawkawlin Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	489713.44		Yes	489713.44
RCP-022912	Blooming Grove Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	489930.68	1	Yes	489930.68
RCP-032019	Town Of Frankford, DE	Delaware	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	489999.75	27	Yes	489999.75
RCP-047091	Rising Sun City, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	484755.41	2	Yes	484755.41
RCP-014300	Charlotte Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	484829.8	2	Yes	441073.82
RCP-023717	Town Of Binghamton, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	483383.17	1	Yes	483383.17
RCP-024063	Town Of Ticonderoga, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	487793.41	5	Yes	327244.43
RCP-000967	Mcintosh County,	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	485013	3	Yes	485013
RCP-032855	Chardon Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	485461.26	9	Yes	483530.89
RCP-040184	Hettinger County, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	485401	1	Yes	485401
RCP-007673	City of Marietta	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	485737.53	1	Yes	485731.78
RCP-035799	City Of Creola, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	484013.86		Yes	484013.86
RCP-026034	Bar Nunn Town, WY	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	487708.56	1	No		487708.56	0
RCP-052491	Belmont, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488740.2		Yes	488740.2
RCP-052760	Barnet Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	487962.32	2	Yes	487847.3
RCP-046796	Town Of Wilsonville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488768.44	1	Yes	488768.44
RCP-032445	Jackson Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488826.67	1	Yes	488826.67
RCP-004072	Village Of Dundee, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	483513.2		Yes	483513.2		829000
RCP-006058	Town Of Chapmanville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	483589.17	1	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-049153	Bridgewater, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	483879.2	3	Yes	483879.2
RCP-056809	Three Rivers, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	483889.25		Yes	482934.81
RCP-005312	Jay Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488829.13	1	Yes	488829.13
RCP-051633	Jim Thorpe Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488985.7	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-051727	Summit Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	488985.7	1	Yes	487444.52
RCP-035474	Town Of Thorsby, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	489006.16	1	Yes	489006.16
RCP-005349	North Berwick Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499931.67	1	Yes	499931.67
RCP-056567	Troy, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	500523.71		Yes	499536.47
RCP-014537	Three Way City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	500852.32	1	Yes	500852.32
RCP-019199	Wooster Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	501236.64	1	Yes	500240.1
RCP-051596	Royersford Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499275.7	9	Yes	499275.7
RCP-006897	Gueydan, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499373.19	1	Yes	499373.19	7000
RCP-014372	Gruetlilaager City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	500519.25		Yes	500519.25
RCP-056414	Hamlin, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	501765.1	1	Yes	501765.1
RCP-014523	Spencer Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	501742.46	3	Yes	355042.46
RCP-051291	German Township Supervisors, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	501795.7	2	Yes	500214.16
RCP-025307	Town Of Fremont, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493088.24	2	Yes	493088.24
RCP-037917	Hamilton County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493171	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-007524	City of Cache	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493283.31	5	Yes	493277.46
RCP-053762	City Of Union, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493317.24	2	Yes	493317.24
RCP-056924	Beverly Hills, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493323.72	4	Yes	492350.68
RCP-050713	Gulf Stream Town, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493341	3	Yes	493341	0	0
RCP-056286	West Tawakoni, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	498040.95	2	Yes	498040.95
RCP-015511	Owosso Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	498330.7	2	Yes	498330.7
RCP-051909	Scott Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	498435.7	1	Yes	496864.74
RCP-003994	Vergennes Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	498435.78	2	Yes	498435.78
RCP-026304	Boston, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	491816	2	Yes	491816
RCP-051349	New Freedom Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	491925.7	2	Yes	0
RCP-023342	Westmont Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	491925.7	8	No		156609.9	281577.59	296262.8
RCP-014313	Cowan City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	491950.92	2	Yes	491950.92
RCP-027210	Sauk Centre City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	492316.48	1	Yes	492316.48
RCP-032190	Village Of Lexington, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	492402.43	5	Yes	492402.43
RCP-051785	Borough Of Fountain Hill, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493395.7	4	Yes	491840
RCP-026663	Town Of Stanfield, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493343.64	5	Yes	493343.64
RCP-040949	Borough Of Highlands, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493407.56	1	Yes	0
RCP-027191	Rockford City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493409.3	1	Yes	493409.3
RCP-047676	Garnett City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493690.62		No		100000	0	0
RCP-052827	Londonderry Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495161.09		Yes	495044.38
RCP-035711	City Of Graysville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497326.64	4	No		0	0	0
RCP-049931	Town Of Hayden, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497421.16		Yes	497421.16
RCP-006948	Mansura, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	500855		Yes	500855
RCP-019305	Vermilion Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	500921.14	1	No		1	1	0
RCP-050640	Bristol City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	490837	1	Yes	490837
RCP-018180	Village Of South Lebanon, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	490930.05	1	Yes	490930.05
RCP-032210	Village Of New Lexington, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	491245.57	6	Yes	491245.57
RCP-033924	City Of Dodgeville, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	491418.86	7	Yes	491418.86
RCP-037066	Haines Borough, AK	Alaska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	491423	1	Yes	491423
RCP-039804	Rawlins County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	491423	9	Yes	252657.65	22958	229699.65
RCP-051895	Decatur Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	492450.7	1	Yes	492450.7
RCP-030022	City Of Salem, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	492570.22		No		0	0	0
RCP-024486	Town Of Lafayette, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	492716.47	4	Yes	492716.47
RCP-003893	City Of Cheboygan, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	492445.74	3	Yes	492445.74
RCP-031872	Mccleary City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	492898	1	Yes	492898
RCP-055783	Fairbury City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	492898.61	2	Yes	492898.61	0	0
RCP-052540	Eupora, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	492919.57		Yes	492919.57
RCP-040697	Borough Of Harrington Park, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495082.26	1	Yes	495082.26
RCP-027068	Luverne City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495157.81	1	Yes	495157.81
RCP-046939	Fremont Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	496313.39		Yes	496313.39
RCP-055003	Story City City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	496416.18	1	Yes	496416.18
RCP-025340	Town Of Barnstead, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	496647.69	1	Yes	496647.69
RCP-024293	Village Of Chittenango, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497434.4	2	Yes	497434.4
RCP-007549	City of Drumright	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497494.91	1	Yes	497494.91
RCP-013866	Cambridge Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497490	4	Yes	497490
RCP-056528	Goliad, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497544.4	2	Yes	497544.4
RCP-040882	Township Of Alexandria, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497594.3	3	Yes	497594.3
RCP-018249	Pleasant Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497660.88		Yes	495682.01
RCP-051907	Walker Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499380.72	1	Yes	499380.72
RCP-031994	Yacolt Town, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	501840	6	Yes	501840
RCP-040859	Township Of Greenwich, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	501885.72	1	Yes	250942.86
RCP-005307	Hollis Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	501940.7	2	Yes	501000
RCP-003405	Schoolcraft Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	500117.2		Yes	500117.2
RCP-047161	West Terre Haute Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	500392.68	1	Yes	198867.68	71733	0
RCP-034872	Village Of Bloomfield, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	496756.96	1	Yes	496756.96
RCP-016271	Wadsworth Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	496845.05		Yes	496845.05
RCP-026277	Arlington, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495177	6	Yes	495177
RCP-003676	Attica Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495283.14	7	Yes	495283.14
RCP-004086	Acme Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497700.18		Yes	497700.18
RCP-052242	Shenandoah Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499800.7	1	Yes	498225.44
RCP-022529	West Pittston Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499905.7	1	Yes	499905.7
RCP-014322	Decatur Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	494621.34	1	Yes	494621.34
RCP-034918	Town Of West Bend, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	494663.59	9	Yes	494663.59
RCP-013962	Rives Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	494757.7	2	Yes	494757.7
RCP-004174	Port Sheldon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495283.14	1	Yes	495283.14
RCP-006036	Town Of Belle, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497734.38		No		18106	48720	10000
RCP-056382	Pelican Bay, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497792.69	2	Yes	496810.83
RCP-052710	Moretown Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497829.19	2	Yes	497711.85
RCP-007653	City of Watonga	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	498547.8		Yes	498547.8
RCP-047833	Marysville City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	498879.32	1	Yes	498879.32
RCP-056801	Cooper, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	494813.38	1	Yes	494325.39
RCP-049244	Scotland, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	494829.37	1	Yes	494829.37
RCP-034361	Town Of Oneida, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495291.6		Yes	495291.6
RCP-025438	Mayflower, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495369.4	1	Yes	495369.4
RCP-004153	City Of Dexter, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495493.32	1	Yes	495493.31
RCP-014280	Bluff City City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495511.48	1	Yes	495511.48
RCP-030017	Borough Of Penns Grove, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	497908.3		Yes	497908.3
RCP-053776	City Of Willamina, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499758.58	2	Yes	0
RCP-054648	Strafford City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	501175.81		Yes	501175.81
RCP-052728	South Hero Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	494839.23	1	Yes	494722.59
RCP-056023	El Lago, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	494890.49	8	Yes	494890.49
RCP-032536	Wayne Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	501341.81		Yes	498347.12
RCP-025433	Marked Tree, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	501377.65	1	Yes	501377.65
RCP-026241	Town Of East Spencer, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	494299.74	5	Yes	494299.74
RCP-007620	City of Perkins	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	494336.21	8	Yes	494350.97
RCP-026274	Aragon, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	498911	1	Yes	498911
RCP-025261	Town Of Epsom, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499055.55	4	Yes	499055.55
RCP-003806	Allegan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493706.8	1	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-014121	City Of Gladstone, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493706.8	4	Yes	491733
RCP-051608	Mount Pleasant Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493710.7	2	Yes	493710.7
RCP-004308	Kochville Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493811.9	2	Yes	491388
RCP-018907	Granger Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493874.79	2	Yes	493874.79
RCP-030051	Borough Of Franklin, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	494140.24		Yes	494140.24
RCP-027292	Watertown City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	494939.25		Yes	494939.25
RCP-034916	Town Of Trenton, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495605.61	1	Yes	495605.61
RCP-019576	City Of Danville, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495783.76	2	Yes	495783.76
RCP-052133	Edwardsville Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495915.7	2	Yes	494352.68
RCP-032701	Hambden Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	495978.19	2	Yes	491214.29
RCP-056475	Memphis, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499530.61	1	Yes	499530.61
RCP-052798	Warren Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499623.16	1	Yes	499505.41
RCP-024831	Village Of Waterloo, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499690.8	6	Yes	499690.8
RCP-032010	Town Of Dagsboro, DE	Delaware	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	500470.37	1	Yes	500470.37	0	0
RCP-040466	Elk County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	491423	2	Yes	491423
RCP-054489	Lawson City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	491804.23	1	Yes	245902.12
RCP-052128	Brecknock Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	492975.7	1	Yes	492975.7
RCP-013739	Lasalle Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	493076.28		Yes	493076.28
RCP-056329	Pinehurst, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	490592.69	2	Yes	490592.69
RCP-026230	Town Of Dobson, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	490475.37	2	Yes	490475.37
RCP-049963	Town Of Limon, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	490634.72		No		0	0	0
RCP-015265	Midway city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	496093.03		Yes	490209.39
RCP-057020	Beulah, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	496303.51		Yes	496303.51
RCP-024364	Village Of Flower Hill, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	501434.39	2	Yes	501434.39
RCP-017742	Byron City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	499158.5	1	Yes	499158.5
RCP-054490	Leeton City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113273.88		Yes	113273.88		0
RCP-052051	Cleveland Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113295.16	1	Yes	113116.62
RCP-057230	Nevis Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113325.68		Yes	113325.68
RCP-014504	Sardis Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113344.54		Yes	113344.54
RCP-003842	Montmorency Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112234.76	1	Yes	112234.76
RCP-022524	Knox Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112245.16	1	Yes	111891.38
RCP-019409	Hopedale Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112269.83	1	Yes	112269.83	0
RCP-006053	Town Of Cairo, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112277.55	2	Yes	104331.55
RCP-018311	New Lyme Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112951.78	1	Yes	55124.34
RCP-003426	Osceola Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112970.38	1	Yes	112970.38
RCP-003481	Fife Lake Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112970.38	10	Yes	112970.38
RCP-047587	Coldwater City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112320.34	2	Yes	25000
RCP-003879	Greenwood Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112339.84	1	Yes	9497.5
RCP-019034	Tymochtee Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112951.78	3	Yes	112951.78
RCP-005295	Georgetown Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113034.46		Yes	113034.46
RCP-033645	Town Of Oak Grove, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113042.04		Yes	113042.04
RCP-017078	Taylors Falls City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112997.83	1	Yes	112997.83
RCP-033773	Town Of Forest, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113042.04	1	Yes	113042.04
RCP-054678	Bloomsdale City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113070.15	1	Yes	113070.16	0
RCP-034220	Town Of Wausaukee, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113356.04	1	Yes	56678.02
RCP-057082	Glen Ullin, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113364.01		Yes	56682.01
RCP-015965	Newman City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113358.51	1	Yes	113358.51
RCP-034577	Town Of Flambeau, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111367.34	1	Yes	111367.34
RCP-018181	Peru Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111374.23	2	Yes	111374.23
RCP-019187	Crawford Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111374.23		Yes	110931.37
RCP-003400	Sagola Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113075.46		Yes	113075.46
RCP-052005	Borough Of Galeton, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113085.16	2	Yes	112728.74	0	0
RCP-008469	Hatley, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113088.78		Yes	0
RCP-033434	Village Of Hilbert, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113146.71	2	Yes	0
RCP-034791	Town Of Hale, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113146.71	2	Yes	113146.71
RCP-007990	Town of Savanna	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113186.68	2	Yes	113186.68
RCP-023294	Cass Township Supervisors, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113190.16	2	Yes	31495
RCP-057075	Wilton, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113205.9		Yes	0	0	0
RCP-006327	City Of Selby, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113390.42		Yes	113390.42
RCP-003777	Village Of Baldwin, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113390.72		No		55118.21	0
RCP-052389	Albany Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113434.96		Yes	113434.96
RCP-015046	Benham city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111378.52	10	Yes	110057.58
RCP-023966	Town Of Harpersfield, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111384.28	1	Yes	111384
RCP-022565	Mercer Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111405.16	2	Yes	111054.04
RCP-025359	Bauxite, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113535.1	7	Yes	113535.1
RCP-054682	Hayti Heights City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111440.31	1	Yes	111440.31
RCP-026781	Baudette City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111467.88		Yes	111467.88
RCP-056594	Skellytown, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111475.77	1	No		50678	25140
RCP-024173	Town Of Warren, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111486.84	5	Yes	111486.84
RCP-022796	Lower Tyrone Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111510.16	1	Yes	111510.16
RCP-055143	Manilla Town Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111544.11	1	Yes	111544.11
RCP-051474	Cherry Township Supervisors, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112350.16	1	Yes	112350.16
RCP-017717	Brookport City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112405.92	1	Yes	112405.92
RCP-048060	Westmoreland City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113236	2	No		0	0	0
RCP-003758	Eckford Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113250	1	Yes	113250	0	4206
RCP-014726	Town Of Olar, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113508.42		Yes	113508.42
RCP-018434	Center Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111584.57	1	Yes	111584.57
RCP-004511	Clinton Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111686.45	2	Yes	111686.45
RCP-013885	Republic Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111604.22		No		5000	7000	0
RCP-032603	Damascus Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111689.74	8	Yes	101397.48
RCP-033701	Town Of Summit, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113356.04		Yes	113356.04
RCP-033888	Town Of Kingston, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113356.04		Yes	113356.04
RCP-026103	Shoshoni Town, WY	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111694.28	1	Yes	111694.28
RCP-047625	Eastborough City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111709.9	1	Yes	111709.9
RCP-024716	Town Of Edwards, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112409.92	1	Yes	112409.92
RCP-034127	Town Of Manitowoc, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112414.03	2	Yes	112414.03
RCP-057112	Steele, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112415.36	2	Yes	112415.36
RCP-018238	Adams Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112425.92	1	Yes	111978.88
RCP-046883	Chalmers Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111727.17	1	Yes	111727.17
RCP-034286	Town Of Wilton, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111786.02	1	Yes	111786.02
RCP-032935	Florence Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111794.92		Yes	111350.38
RCP-018400	Richmond Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111794.92	1	Yes	111350.38
RCP-053884	Town Of Atkinson, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113456.29		Yes	113456.29
RCP-048985	Red River Town, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113480		Yes	113480
RCP-032998	Village Of Holgate, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111374.23		No		0	0	0
RCP-054969	West Bend City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111843.16	2	Yes	111843.16
RCP-031663	City Of Lewisville, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111849.97	1	Yes	111849.97
RCP-047787	Leon City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111862.5	1	Yes	111862.5
RCP-018287	Hartland Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112425.92	1	Yes	112425.92
RCP-014302	Clarksburg Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112454.4	2	Yes	112454.4
RCP-039515	Yakutat City And Borough, AK	Alaska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112464	2	Yes	112464
RCP-033654	Village Of Hustisford, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112518.7		Yes	112518.7
RCP-023707	Town Of Rushford, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113538.12		Yes	113538.12
RCP-016374	Burkittsville Town, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113542.3	1	Yes	113542.3
RCP-033902	Town Of Brigham, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111995.35	2	Yes	111995.35
RCP-024863	Town Of Rathbone, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111999.66	1	No		0	0
RCP-003573	Village Of Bellaire, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112024.58	2	Yes	112024.58
RCP-024680	Village Of Nassau, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112615.04	1	Yes	112615.04
RCP-023194	Penn Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112665.16	1	Yes	112310.06
RCP-017711	Brimfield Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112678.09		Yes	112678.09
RCP-015088	Centertown city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112688.85	3	Yes	111352.37
RCP-023275	Borough Of Cochranton, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112980.16	1	No		0	142193
RCP-034702	Town Of Green Valley, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111367.34		Yes	111367.34
RCP-032655	Village Of Convoy, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	111374.23		No		0	0	0
RCP-054207	Higbee City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112051.5		Yes	112051.5
RCP-031694	City Of Paris, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112065.07	4	Yes	112065.07	28000	70315
RCP-034189	Village Of Athens, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112728.03	1	Yes	112728.03
RCP-055215	Hedrick City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112740.3	1	Yes	112740.3
RCP-033457	Town Of Lake Holcombe, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112832.7	1	Yes	112832.7
RCP-034356	Town Of Hortonia, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112832.7	1	Yes	112832.7
RCP-047078	Plainville Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112860.3	1	No		0	0
RCP-033764	Town Of Alto, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112100.02	1	Yes	112100.02
RCP-032333	Ridgeville Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112110.42		No		0	0
RCP-018300	Mason Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112110.42	2	Yes	112110.42
RCP-025306	Town Of Bridgewater, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112122.61	1	Yes	112122.61
RCP-013859	Au Train Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112865.28	2	Yes	112865.28
RCP-053960	Juniata Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112875.16		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-026833	Carlton City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112888.55		Yes	112888.55
RCP-022661	West Perry Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112140.16	1	Yes	112140.16
RCP-056818	Byers, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112220.59		Yes	0
RCP-017336	Elmdale Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112232.86	1	Yes	112232.86
RCP-033040	Perry Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112951.78	1	Yes	112502.64
RCP-018197	Village Of Millersport, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	112951.78	1	Yes	112951.78
RCP-016419	Mount Airy Town, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9318584.29	9	Yes	9318584
RCP-037837	Crittenden County, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9314697	1	Yes	9314697
RCP-038636	Henry County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9317999	27	Yes	9317999
RCP-031511	Tewksbury, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9319317.2	4	Yes	9319317.2
RCP-031436	North Andover, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9322306.28	23	Yes	9322306.28
RCP-039279	Morton County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	502494	2	Yes	502494
RCP-031884	Millwood City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	502957	3	Yes	341763.98
RCP-032215	Wayne Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	503024.53	1	Yes	501024.32
RCP-026143	Town Of Belhaven, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	503223.26	1	Yes	503223.26
RCP-024740	Town Of Potsdam, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	503280.54	1	Yes	503280.54
RCP-004304	Village Of Wolverine Lake, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	502639.36	3	Yes	502639.36
RCP-003963	Henrietta Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	502744.44	11	Yes	502744.44
RCP-025403	Lavaca, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	502827.91	3	Yes	502827.91
RCP-047209	Belvedere City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	503322	3	Yes	503322	134626
RCP-047798	Lindsborg City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	502084.12	2	Yes	502084.12
RCP-014022	Royalton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	502429.18	2	Yes	251217.44
RCP-056658	Vinton, Village Of, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	502013.37	1	No		187071.22	160041.67
RCP-047416	San Juan Bautista City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	503322	1	Yes	503322
RCP-015897	Metamora Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	503377.11	2	Yes	503377.11
RCP-013984	Williams Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	504005.5	1	Yes	0
RCP-032789	Harlem Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	505969.26	1	Yes	503957.35
RCP-018068	Indian Head Park Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506098.82		Yes	506098.82			0
RCP-025115	Village Of Penn Yan, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	505126.69	1	Yes	505126.69
RCP-004239	City Of Dewitt, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	505266.56		Yes	505266.56
RCP-018872	Mantua Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	505338.25	1	Yes	503328.84
RCP-015215	Jenkins city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	505527.44	2	Yes	499531.92
RCP-025992	Willacoochee, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	505633	2	Yes	505633
RCP-050217	City Of David City, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	504769.05		No		0	0	0
RCP-026452	Town Of Kenly, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	504816.75	1	Yes	504816.75
RCP-050905	Waldo City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	504861	1	Yes	504861
RCP-025996	Woodbine, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	504886	2	Yes	504886
RCP-054589	Versailles City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	504639.22	1	Yes	504639.22
RCP-052809	Wolcott Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	504706.09	3	Yes	504706.09
RCP-016096	Rochester Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	504737.97	1	Yes	504737.97
RCP-052973	Hope Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	504925.23	2	Yes	504925.24
RCP-033178	Morgan City, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	505712	2	Yes	505712
RCP-035472	Town Of Owens Cross Roads, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506122.56	3	No		0	0
RCP-052834	Waitsfield Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506201.11	1	Yes	506081.79
RCP-031647	City Of Iona, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506336.19	1	Yes	506336.19
RCP-051804	Borough Of Hummelstown, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506415.72	1	Yes	506415.72
RCP-055771	Coal Valley Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506643.15		Yes	0
RCP-036781	Webster County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506379	4	Yes	506379
RCP-014707	Town Of Heath Springs, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507303	1	Yes	507303
RCP-041000	Borough Of Mendham, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507328.48	1	Yes	507328.48
RCP-051977	Borough Of Green Tree, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507360.72	1	Yes	505761.64
RCP-023719	Town Of Colesville, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507383.09	3	Yes	507383
RCP-025977	Walnut Grove, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506753	1	No		0	0
RCP-030055	Township Of Hampton, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506805.14	5	Yes	506805.14
RCP-035141	North Pole City, AK	Alaska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506835.1	2	Yes	506835.1
RCP-018938	Sugar Creek Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507546.8	3	Yes	505528.61
RCP-032313	Village Of West Milton, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507757.13		Yes	507757.13
RCP-006146	Town Of Monongah, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507901.24	6	Yes	507901.24
RCP-007009	Ringgold, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507523.19	1	Yes	507523.19
RCP-040573	Pawnee County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507545	3	Yes	507545
RCP-051843	Swatara Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506835.72	1	Yes	506835.72
RCP-003588	Ida Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	506947.98	2	Yes	506947.98
RCP-056742	Troup, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507475.44	5	Yes	507475.44
RCP-023167	Pocopson Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507045.72	2	Yes	505447.62
RCP-052591	Moorhead, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507178.59		Yes	507178.59
RCP-047018	Middletown Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507191.5	9	Yes	507191.5
RCP-022670	Arnold City, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507255.72	1	Yes	505656.96
RCP-032801	Hocking Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	507546.8	2	Yes	253773.4
RCP-051462	Manheim Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509145.72		Yes	507541
RCP-055280	Eagle Grove City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509275.15	1	Yes	509275.15
RCP-046931	Ferdinand Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509231.14	19	Yes	509231.14
RCP-055100	New Hampton City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509275.15	3	Yes	507575
RCP-003896	Big Rapids Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509365.02	3	Yes	509365.02
RCP-054417	Country Club Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	508713.82	2	Yes	508713.82
RCP-051520	Caernarvon Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	508725.72	1	Yes	508725.72
RCP-006982	Olla, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509375.47		Yes	509375.47
RCP-052856	North Bennington Village, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	508469.26	2	Yes	508469.26
RCP-035606	City Of Lipscomb, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	508499.84	1	Yes	508499.44
RCP-027296	Wayzata City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	508927.38	1	Yes	508927.38
RCP-051968	East Caln Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	508935.72		Yes	508935.72
RCP-056533	Yorktown, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	508965.1		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-052071	Union Township Supervisors Dba Union Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509460.72	1	Yes	509460.72
RCP-015211	Jackson city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	508148.12	1	Yes	502121.51
RCP-007544	City of Davis	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	508199.38		Yes	508193.36
RCP-050174	City Of Central City, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	508662.78	3	Yes	508662.78	0	0
RCP-032314	Village Of Whitehouse, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509545.01	2	Yes	509545.01
RCP-022503	Girard Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509670.72	1	Yes	509670.72
RCP-052771	New Haven Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509789.04	2	Yes	509668.88
RCP-052925	Poultney Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509490.06	2	Yes	509490.06
RCP-054464	Hayti City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509528.74	6	No		493265.89	342526.89
RCP-056671	Leonard, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509958.2	3	Yes	509958.2
RCP-056845	Hale Center, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509958.2		Yes	509958.2
RCP-047151	Walkerton Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511270.78		Yes	511270.78
RCP-022436	Butler Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	509985.72	2	Yes	508378.36
RCP-032595	Berne Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511227.72	2	Yes	509194.9
RCP-047123	Spencer Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511270.78	1	Yes	511270.78
RCP-056632	Stratford, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	510703.02	1	Yes	510703.02
RCP-006529	City Of Winner, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	510708.96	1	No		0	0
RCP-015850	Madison City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511406.12	8	Yes	511406.12
RCP-056154	Olton, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511447.83	1	Yes	510439.05
RCP-056531	Ganado, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	510206.46		Yes	255750
RCP-039445	Frontier County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	510264		Yes	510264
RCP-019554	City Of Charleston, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511115.15	1	Yes	511115.15
RCP-035681	Town Of Morris, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	510877.12	7	Yes	510877.12
RCP-039368	Dunkirk City, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511044.16	2	Yes	509660
RCP-032702	Cross Creek Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	510070.86	1	Yes	510070.86
RCP-056960	Mccamey, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511447.83	2	Yes	511447.83
RCP-050560	City Of Valley, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511494.59	10	Yes	511494.59
RCP-053640	City Of Gold Beach, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511752.76	2	Yes	250000
RCP-004445	City Of Ironwood, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511782.06	1	Yes	511782.06
RCP-052097	Straban Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	522690.74	5	Yes	522690.74
RCP-001263	Warren Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	512197.33	1	Yes	512197.33
RCP-040682	Borough Of Demarest, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	512247.9	1	Yes	253546.31
RCP-052129	Penn Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	512295.72	1	Yes	510681.08
RCP-013913	City Of Davison, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	512938.04	1	Yes	512938.04
RCP-033194	Elk Ridge City, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	513050		Yes	513050
RCP-053671	Town Of Lakeview, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	513085.46		Yes	513085.46
RCP-031262	Ashfield, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	513223.02	2	Yes	513223.02
RCP-026151	Town Of Bethel, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	513421.58		Yes	513421.58
RCP-032132	City Of Toronto, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	517748.21	30	Yes	515689.46	0	400000
RCP-053726	City Of Rogue River, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	517749.88	6	Yes	517749.88
RCP-023823	Town Of Ellicott, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	512818.98	3	Yes	0
RCP-022465	Franklin Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	512820.74	1	Yes	512820.7
RCP-015422	Windy Hills city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	512925	6	Yes	512925
RCP-056613	Wellington, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	513434.04	1	Yes	512421.34
RCP-031328	Eastham, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	513503.93	1	Yes	513503.93
RCP-026057	Evansville Town, WY	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514071.18		Yes	514071.18
RCP-001297	Lincoln Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514100.63	2	Yes	394343.79
RCP-040824	City Of Wildwood, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	517900	2	Yes	517900
RCP-035057	Town Of Saratoga, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518004.68	2	Yes	518004.68
RCP-037651	Harmon County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515314	8	Yes	515314
RCP-022691	Pine Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515340.74	2	Yes	513716.5
RCP-023417	Telford Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	513870.72		Yes	0
RCP-025412	Lincoln, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514015.68	2	Yes	514015.68
RCP-026157	Town Of Bladenboro, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514058.98		Yes	514058.98
RCP-015231	Lebanon Junction city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514175.66	3	Yes	516956.32
RCP-056368	Blanco, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514178.88	4	Yes	319616.9
RCP-025831	Nelson, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514222	10	Yes	514222	0
RCP-040827	Township Of Commercial, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514550.6	2	Yes	514550.6
RCP-019522	City Of Bono, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514637.22		Yes	514637.22
RCP-026694	Town Of Tryon, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514696.37	1	Yes	514696.37
RCP-034052	Town Of Shelby, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514759.95	1	Yes	514759.95
RCP-022455	Bridgeville Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514815.72	1	Yes	513193.14
RCP-024400	Village Of Sea Cliff, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514870.25	1	Yes	514870.25
RCP-052722	Middlesex Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515469.99	1	Yes	515469.99
RCP-023734	Town Of Windsor, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515485.63	6	Yes	515485.63	0	0
RCP-051680	Old Lycoming Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515550.74	1	Yes	515550.74
RCP-037392	Chase County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514343	2	Yes	514343
RCP-022707	Borough Of Sugarcreek, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	514920.74	1	Yes	513297.82
RCP-026615	Town Of Rose Hill, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515652.46	1	Yes	515652.46
RCP-056193	Jones Creek, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515668.54	2	Yes	515668.54
RCP-023727	Town Of Maine, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518767.67	3	Yes	518767.67
RCP-016162	Smithton Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	519299.02	3	Yes	519299.02
RCP-040789	Borough Of Clementon, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518842.02	1	No		0	0
RCP-052619	Quitman, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518979.16	1	Yes	518979.16
RCP-047172	Winamac Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	519429.36	3	Yes	519429.36
RCP-056123	Magnolia, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	519640.93	1	Yes	519640.93
RCP-015083	Carlisle city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	520465.27	3	Yes	514292.58
RCP-032660	Licking Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	520482.62	2	Yes	518412.99
RCP-024766	Town Of Northumberland, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	520613.82		Yes	520613.82	0	0
RCP-031965	Tenino City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521120	2	Yes	521120
RCP-046859	Bloomfield Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521242.38	5	Yes	521242.38
RCP-003913	Village Of New Haven, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515670.36	1	Yes	515670.36
RCP-027056	Lindstrom City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515812.16	5	Yes	515812.16
RCP-054713	Fanning Springs City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515879		Yes	0
RCP-025277	Town Of Newton, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515910.59	12	Yes	515910.59
RCP-026576	Town Of Pinebluff, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	515971.16	1	Yes	515971.16
RCP-053058	Cheyenne County,	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	516091		Yes	516091
RCP-014477	Pikeville City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	516578.14	1	Yes	516578.14
RCP-032226	Village Of Wellington, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	516591.35	2	Yes	516591.35
RCP-024776	City Of Mechanicville, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	516613.83		No		0	0	0
RCP-004245	Thornapple Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	516616.14	1	Yes	516616.14
RCP-047666	Frontenac City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	517039.8		Yes	517039.8
RCP-025162	Town Of Northfield, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	517376.24	1	Yes	517376.24
RCP-027171	Princeton City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	516795.7		Yes	516795.7
RCP-052160	Lower Frederick Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	517440.74	1	Yes	517440.8
RCP-035350	Town Of Scottsville, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	517515	1	Yes	517515
RCP-003408	Coloma Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	517667.04	1	Yes	0
RCP-027141	Nowthen City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518107.09	1	Yes	518107.09
RCP-019766	Town Of Gaston, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518043	1	Yes	518043
RCP-025673	Edison, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521317	1	Yes	521317
RCP-051873	Franklin Township Board Of Supervisors Dba Franklin Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521640.74	3	Yes	519996.64
RCP-052927	Starksboro Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521449.9		Yes	521449.9
RCP-054440	Forsyth City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521548.81	5	No		45208	129191	97048
RCP-003477	Grass Lake Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521660.4		Yes	521660.4
RCP-046934	Fowler Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521695.63		Yes	521695.63
RCP-031459	Phillipston, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521891.33	1	Yes	521891.33
RCP-016403	Hebron Town, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	522032.25	2	Yes	0
RCP-019562	City Of Clinton, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	522095.73	1	Yes	522095.73
RCP-050394	City Of Minden, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	522113.85	2	Yes	522113.85
RCP-035298	Town Of La Crosse, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	522288.76	2	Yes	522288.76	0	0
RCP-022258	East Allen Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	522585.74	1	Yes	522585.74	25000	25000
RCP-023720	Town Of Conklin, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	523280.47	1	Yes	523280.47
RCP-056093	Kountze, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	523365.08	1	Yes	523365.08
RCP-051593	Granville Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	523530.74	1	Yes	523530.74
RCP-052774	Dummerston Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521474	1	Yes	523646.36
RCP-031598	City Of Dalton Gardens, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518381.57		Yes	518381.57
RCP-035748	City Of Ashford, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518484.4	10	No		0	0
RCP-034546	City Of Richland Center, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518214.01	6	Yes	518214.01
RCP-055818	Marshall City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518618.6	1	Yes	518618.6
RCP-006936	Livonia, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518636.84		Yes	518636.84
RCP-035325	Town Of Onley, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	518758	1	Yes	518758	0	0
RCP-024961	Town Of Newfield, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	519690.75	1	Yes	519690.75
RCP-056498	Josephine, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	519889.22	1	Yes	519889.22
RCP-052621	Raymond, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	519962.54	1	Yes	519962.54
RCP-035252	Town Of Drakes Branch, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	519796	1	Yes	519796
RCP-005300	Harpswell Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	520021.98	1	Yes	520021.98
RCP-003912	City Of Kingsford, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	520294.24	1	Yes	520294.24
RCP-026910	Elko New Market City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521713.4	8	Yes	521713.4
RCP-023909	Town Of Schuyler Falls, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	521844.59	1	Yes	521844.59
RCP-056748	Jonestown, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	522620.24	2	Yes	522620.24
RCP-025072	Town Of Pound Ridge, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	526049.7	1	Yes	526049.7
RCP-035688	City Of Vincent, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	526091.7	2	Yes	526091.7
RCP-033081	City Of La Verkin, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	526187		Yes	0
RCP-025166	Town Of Henniker, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	525332.66	6	Yes	525332
RCP-014415	Loretto City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	525479.54	1	Yes	525479.54
RCP-025068	Town Of North Salem, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	525536.88		Yes	500000
RCP-025215	Town Of Charlestown, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	525646.72	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-051621	Swoyersville Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	525945.74	12	Yes	0		0
RCP-014497	Rocky Top City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	526369.68	2	Yes	526369.68
RCP-014428	Mcewen City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	513611	2	Yes	513611
RCP-056092	Kirbyville, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	513682.33	3	Yes	513682.33
RCP-052794	Berkshire Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	524140.86	2	Yes	524017.32
RCP-031491	Shutesbury, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	524282.57	1	Yes	525567.07
RCP-032905	Harlan Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	524584.21	1	Yes	524584.21
RCP-015907	Millstadt Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	524878.5	3	Yes	524878.5	0	0
RCP-026176	Town Of Burnsville, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	524894.69	1	Yes	524894.69
RCP-034057	Village Of West Salem, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	524912.8	5	Yes	524912.8
RCP-054546	Potosi City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	525012.22	1	Yes	525012.22
RCP-047074	Petersburg City, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	525095.04	1	Yes	290199.74	556000
RCP-018170	Jerome Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	525215.23		Yes	523126.8
RCP-016182	St. Joseph Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	525286.75		No		0	0	0
RCP-007647	City of Tonkawa	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	522939.98	1	Yes	522955.59
RCP-031333	Erving, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	523086.95	3	No		0	0	0
RCP-030216	Three Forks City, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	526506.61	1	No		0	0
RCP-050005	Town Of Pagosa Springs, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	524064.24	2	Yes	524064.24
RCP-056073	Huntington, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	524109.9	2	Yes	523076.14
RCP-022804	Vandergrift Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511875.72	5	Yes	511068.96
RCP-053002	Waterloo Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	511950.67	1	Yes	511950.67
RCP-038482	Gove County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	512012	1	Yes	512012
RCP-034308	Town Of Little Suamico, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	512038.57	3	Yes	512038.57
RCP-019598	City Of Elm Springs, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	512151.05	2	Yes	512151.05
RCP-019360	Logan County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9325574	1	Yes	9325574
RCP-040329	Carter County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9344998	28	Yes	9344998
RCP-037056	Tioga County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9362868	27	Yes	9362868
RCP-037207	Bryan County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9322466	23	Yes	9322466
RCP-038986	Grants Pass, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9373862	9	Yes	9373862
RCP-040000	Kannapolis, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9352893	2	Yes	9352893
RCP-039255	Burnet County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9353544	1	Yes	9353544
RCP-053091	Cherokee County,	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9451052	2	Yes	9451052
RCP-031321	Dracut, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9455618.72	12	Yes	9455618.72
RCP-048931	Clovis City, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9469289	1	Yes	9469289
RCP-040387	Coamo Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9471980.75	2	Yes	8649534.75
RCP-038231	Plymouth Town, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9472098	1	Yes	9472098
RCP-031860	Lake Stevens City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9475434	1	Yes	9475434
RCP-015329	Richmond city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9475560.3	1	Yes	9526803.84
RCP-047323	La Puente City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9476511	1	Yes	9476511
RCP-039209	Colonie Town, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9482071	6	Yes	9482071
RCP-037671	Le Flore County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9683361	6	Yes	5023310.57
RCP-039652	Lamar County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9684526	1	Yes	9684526
RCP-054063	Chesterfield City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9684916.87	40	Yes	9684916.87
RCP-036932	Pinellas Park, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9685810	2	Yes	9685810
RCP-049992	City Of Northglenn, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9757146.14	8	Yes	9757146.14
RCP-038019	Biddeford, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9759098	1	Yes	9759098
RCP-040648	North Providence, RI	Rhode Island	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9770068.68	6	Yes	9770068.68
RCP-040411	Queen Anne'S County, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9785919	1	Yes	9785919
RCP-037063	Somerset County, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9805925	1	Yes	9805925
RCP-038978	Winona County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9805925	1	Yes	9805925
RCP-031388	Lexington, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9903381.15	1	Yes	9903381.15
RCP-039724	Waupaca County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9904210	4	Yes	9904210
RCP-037292	Franklin County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9904404	5	Yes	9904404
RCP-014813	Edgecombe County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9997833	1	Yes	9997833
RCP-036646	Hopewell City, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9998813	11	Yes	9998813
RCP-049112	La Plata Town, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9489034.18	1	Yes	9489034.18
RCP-038925	Bensalem Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9497764	3	Yes	9497764	7732468	0
RCP-036822	Douglas County, NV	Nevada	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9499223	1	Yes	9499223
RCP-036855	Carroll County, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9500194	8	Yes	9500194
RCP-031974	University Place City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9500582	12	Yes	9500582
RCP-038123	Henry County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9500777	1	Yes	9500777
RCP-039528	Loveland, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9504879	1	Yes	9504879
RCP-039403	Curry County, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9508741	13	Yes	9508741
RCP-056211	Rosenberg, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9510695.42	5	Yes	9510695.42
RCP-037313	Newaygo County, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9513791	1	Yes	9513791
RCP-039364	North Richland Hills, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9515205	1	Yes	9515205
RCP-039505	Shelby County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9522337	35	Yes	9522337
RCP-040055	Val Verde County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9522532	1	Yes	9522532
RCP-047223	Calexico City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9526987	2	Yes	9526987
RCP-019845	Gibson County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9543509	1	Yes	9543509
RCP-047412	San Gabriel City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9544689	1	Yes	9544689
RCP-036838	Dale County, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9551085	12	Yes	9551085
RCP-038175	Attleboro, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9557617	9	Yes	8557617
RCP-038221	Montgomery County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9560602	9	Yes	9560602
RCP-052606	Olive Branch, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9569277.48	1	Yes	9569277.48
RCP-039559	St. Mary Parish, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9585270	1	Yes	9585270
RCP-026629	City Of Sanford, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9588012.6	4	Yes	9093330.9
RCP-047358	Montclair City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9588706	2	Yes	9588706
RCP-050852	Pinecrest Village, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9593852	4	Yes	9593852
RCP-025873	Pooler, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9595073	1	No		2257633	0
RCP-025650	Decatur, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9595820	2	Yes	9595820
RCP-056075	Hurst, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9597095.35	2	Yes	8729779.05
RCP-038637	Dearborn County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9606637	6	Yes	9606637
RCP-036997	Rockville City, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9619188	5	Yes	10000000
RCP-056551	Duncanville, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9620929.8	1	Yes	9601953.3
RCP-038791	Oktibbeha County, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9631693	1	Yes	9631693
RCP-031924	Pullman City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9641690	1	Yes	9641690
RCP-026218	Town Of Cornelius, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9642828.56	1	Yes	9642828.56
RCP-038878	Buffalo County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9645679	24	Yes	9645679
RCP-039032	Knox County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9653448	34	Yes	9653448
RCP-056387	Waxahachie, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9431495.48	3	Yes	9431495.48			0
RCP-050879	Seminole City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9435081	11	Yes	9435081
RCP-040141	Shelby County, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9438038	1	Yes	9438038
RCP-039928	Ypsilanti Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9439025	1	Yes	9439025
RCP-039787	Bismarck, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9656565	1	Yes	9656565
RCP-038866	Bedford County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9656167	1	Yes	9656167
RCP-026395	Town Fuquay-Varina, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9664181.29	1	Yes	9664181.29
RCP-048957	Hobbs City, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9671031	1	Yes	9671031
RCP-023657	Municipio De Hatillo, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9680781.72	1	Yes	2063144.72
RCP-038351	Venango County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9841665	1	Yes	9841665
RCP-038403	Midwest City, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9858239	1	Yes	9858239
RCP-037204	Farmington, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9862919	1	Yes	9862919
RCP-039936	Schaumburg Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9873008	1	Yes	9873008
RCP-038955	Grundy County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9916641	1	Yes	9916641
RCP-039179	Wilson County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9919749	2	Yes	9000000	0	0
RCP-037306	Darke County, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9928101	7	Yes	9928101
RCP-036949	Redmond, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9928999	13	Yes	9928999	38459484	0
RCP-047393	Rancho Palos Verdes City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9934859	12	Yes	9934859
RCP-036706	Chino Hills, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9956344	1	Yes	9956344
RCP-037437	Asbury Park, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9962705	28	Yes	2000000
RCP-049081	Bel Air Town, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9969840.81	3	Yes	9969840.81
RCP-038471	Polk County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9974718	8	Yes	9974718
RCP-039676	Walla Walla City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9974964	1	Yes	9974964
RCP-037075	Wayne County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9976272	1	Yes	9976272
RCP-039743	Port Orange, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9981987	1	Yes	9981987
RCP-037268	Palm Desert, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9983052	1	Yes	9983052
RCP-047324	La Quinta City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9987009	1	Yes	9987008
RCP-038369	Grant County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9991423	6	Yes	9991423
RCP-025799	Mcdonough, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9996144	5	Yes	9996144
RCP-040382	Warren County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9996667	16	Yes	9996667
RCP-047228	Campbell City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9997774	9	Yes	9997774
RCP-039502	Cupertino City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9694773		Yes	9694773
RCP-000966	Layton City Corporation,	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9714265		Yes	9714265
RCP-039241	Franklin County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9716187	6	Yes	9716187
RCP-038851	Lincoln County, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9704533	1	Yes	9704533
RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9713856	18	Yes	9713856
RCP-040412	City Of Marietta, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9725620	5	Yes	5913750.88
RCP-036701	Calumet County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9729201	1	Yes	9729201
RCP-053253	City Of Stonecrest,	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9730045	3	Yes	9730045
RCP-036993	Whitman County, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9732115	23	No		0	557024	0
RCP-040455	Navarro County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9733863	2	Yes	9733863
RCP-039349	Livermore, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9734726	1	Yes	9734726
RCP-056102	Lancaster, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9739357.3	2	Yes	2115581.5	0	0
RCP-047341	Los Banos City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9816683	7	Yes	6409184
RCP-039842	Southfield, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9819555	2	Yes	9819555
RCP-039214	Mission Viejo, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9829437	24	Yes	9829437
RCP-037905	Henry County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9820105	1	Yes	9820105
RCP-037400	Benton Harbor, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9825764	1	Yes	9825764
RCP-037208	Coles County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9832536	22	Yes	9832536
RCP-039353	Ogle County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9836809	63	Yes	9836809
RCP-047162	Westfield City, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9892047.19	5	Yes	9892047.2
RCP-038554	Marysville, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9417568	1	Yes	9417568
RCP-052652	Tupelo, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9418820.24		Yes	0	0	0
RCP-039940	Gobierno Municipal De Juncos, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9423168.62	1	Yes	9423168.62
RCP-047252	Culver City City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9373885	1	Yes	9373885
RCP-038928	Texarkana, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9404018	1	Yes	9404018
RCP-026903	Eden Valley City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113544.25	2	Yes	113544.25
RCP-026902	East Gull Lake City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113544.25		Yes	113544.25
RCP-003689	Sylvan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113600.9		Yes	113600.9	0	0
RCP-024411	Village Of Roslyn Harbor, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113640.68	2	Yes	113640.68
RCP-013899	Solon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113652.7	1	Yes	113652.69	0
RCP-056666	Palmer, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527089.21	1	Yes	526049.57
RCP-031721	City Of St. Maries, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	526555.22	4	Yes	526555.22
RCP-023144	West Mead Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	526890.74	1	Yes	525230.1
RCP-022715	Olyphant Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527415.76		Yes	525753.46
RCP-026541	Town Of Murphy, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	528081.66	2	Yes	0
RCP-022295	Wayne Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	528150.76	1	Yes	528150.76
RCP-031575	City Of Bellevue, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	528275.99	2	Yes	528275.99
RCP-017879	Dupo Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527600.18	1	Yes	527600.18
RCP-014065	Salem Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527860.64	5	Yes	527860.64
RCP-034952	Village Of Summit, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527634.18	5	Yes	527634.18
RCP-054133	Owensville City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527660.71	1	Yes	527660.71
RCP-034860	Town Of Geneva, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527529.52		Yes	527529.52
RCP-003728	City Of Allegan, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527545.38	1	Yes	525436
RCP-004051	Lapeer Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527545.38	4	Yes	527545.38
RCP-005352	Norway Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	527740.9	12	Yes	527740.9
RCP-053699	City Of Mount Vernon, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113722.84	1	Yes	113722.84	35000	10000
RCP-008527	Tremont, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113774.25	2	Yes	104115
RCP-001221	Solon Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113774.63		Yes	113744
RCP-055123	Milo City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113786.97	2	Yes	0
RCP-027266	Truman City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113872.1	1	Yes	113872.1
RCP-051493	Upper Yoder Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	528570.76	1	Yes	528570.76
RCP-016325	Wonder Lake Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	528280.62		Yes	528280
RCP-023132	Springfield Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	528465.74	16	Yes	528465.74
RCP-052541	Farmington, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	529796.35	1	Yes	529796.35
RCP-026844	Chisholm City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	529909.57	3	Yes	529909.57
RCP-017999	Green Oaks Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	530321.88	1	Yes	530321.88
RCP-007513	City of Atoka	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	529081.89	1	Yes	529075.64
RCP-025867	Pine Mountain, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	529159	1	Yes	529159
RCP-035588	City Of Uniontown, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	529419.88	1	Yes	529419.88
RCP-038137	Concho County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	529494	1	Yes	529494
RCP-049174	Eastford, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	529751.54	7	Yes	529751.54
RCP-006270	City Of North Sioux City, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	529516.92		Yes	529516.92
RCP-051729	Allen Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	529620.74	2	Yes	529620.74
RCP-048961	Jal City, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	529574	5	Yes	529574
RCP-034454	Village Of Frederic, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113984.06	1	Yes	113984.06
RCP-018160	Plymouth Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113898.3		Yes	113893.3
RCP-032780	Jefferson Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113898.3		Yes	113771
RCP-035168	Shaktoolik City, AK	Alaska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113996.59	1	Yes	113996.59
RCP-053635	City Of Gates, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113944.94		Yes	113944.94
RCP-033085	Town Of Mantua, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113972	1	Yes	113972
RCP-057159	Lime Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113981.37	1	Yes	113981.37
RCP-033791	Village Of Oakfield, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113879.39	1	Yes	113879.39
RCP-054279	Arcadia City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	113885.07	8	Yes	113885.07
RCP-034801	Village Of Strum, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114088.72	2	Yes	25000	0	0
RCP-003708	Wright Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114126.34	4	Yes	114126.34
RCP-052064	Thompson Township Board Of Road Supervisors Dba Thompson Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114135.16	2	Yes	114135.16
RCP-057057	Mohall, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114312.66		Yes	113517.07
RCP-006220	Town Of Wardensville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114045.71	1	Yes	114045.71
RCP-023513	West Beaver Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114030.16	1	Yes	113670.76
RCP-015735	Town Of Franklin, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114037.96	1	Yes	114037.96
RCP-035756	Town Of Glen Allen, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114109.36	1	Yes	114109.36
RCP-006233	Town Of Whitesville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114015	1	Yes	114015
RCP-023279	Taylor Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114030.16	1	Yes	114030.16
RCP-032953	Franklin Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114213.81		Yes	114213.81
RCP-055048	Riceville City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114235.54		Yes	0
RCP-030110	Alberton Town, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114268.59		Yes	0
RCP-027400	Moose Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114309.22	1	Yes	114309.22
RCP-024671	Town Of Pittstown, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	530767.64	5	Yes	530767.64
RCP-006912	Iota, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	530861.85		Yes	265430.93
RCP-051758	Scott Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	530775.74	1	Yes	529102.86	0
RCP-030211	Stevensville Town, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	530862.14		No		0	0	0
RCP-051512	Annville Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	530880.76	1	Yes	529207.54
RCP-055080	Osage City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	531554.06	1	Yes	531554.06
RCP-023927	Town Of Kinderhook, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	531690.71	1	Yes	531690.71
RCP-033790	Village Of North Fond Du Lac, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	531820.93	1	Yes	531820.93
RCP-006163	Town Of Oceana, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532213.31	1	Yes	531790.48
RCP-006259	City Of Lead, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532229.62		Yes	0
RCP-019674	City Of Huntsville, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532247.59	1	Yes	532247.59
RCP-035529	City Of York Alabama, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532272.62		Yes	532272.62
RCP-052092	Peach Bottom Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	531930.74	1	Yes	530254.22
RCP-052124	Borough Of Kutztown, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	533400.76	1	Yes	533400.76
RCP-040896	Township Of Holland, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	533495.62	4	Yes	533495.62
RCP-022307	Board Of Supervisors Lower Oxford Township Dba Lower Oxford Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	533295.74		Yes	0
RCP-024089	Village Of Saranac Lake, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	533331.73	1	Yes	533331.73
RCP-051464	Lake Township Supervisors Dba Lake Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	534870.76	2	Yes	533184.96
RCP-027425	Chisago Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532313.78	1	Yes	532313.78	0
RCP-018870	City Of Munroe Falls, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532471.91	1	Yes	530354.61
RCP-005374	Sabattus Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532499.13	3	Yes	532499.13
RCP-030132	Columbus Town, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532655.59	2	Yes	532655.59
RCP-051816	Athens Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532665.76	1	Yes	530986.92
RCP-006891	Grand Isle, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532714.13	2	Yes	532714
RCP-018517	Falls Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	534575.29	1	Yes	534575.29
RCP-035541	City Of Lineville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	534649.88	4	Yes	267048.68
RCP-047815	Lyons City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	534742.48	1	Yes	534742.48
RCP-038040	Aurora County, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	534349	1	Yes	534349
RCP-056570	Elmendorf, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	533792.65	1	Yes	533266.22
RCP-032315	Bethel Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	534154.62	1	Yes	26615.32
RCP-040516	Ness County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	534155	7	Yes	534155	67084.62	0	0
RCP-051761	Borough Of Fox Chapel, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	532980.76	1	Yes	531300.92
RCP-034520	Village Of Union Grove, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	534960.98	6	Yes	287887
RCP-038188	Ziebach County, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	535321	1	Yes	535321
RCP-025339	Town Of Wakefield, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	534964.1	2	Yes	534964.1	0	0
RCP-025053	Village Of Elmsford, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	534972.75	1	Yes	534972.75
RCP-024042	Village Of Williamsville, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	535383.01	1	No		0	0
RCP-026227	Town Of Denton, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	535411.71	1	Yes	535411.71	0	0
RCP-004136	Volinia Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114336.52		Yes	114336.52
RCP-023412	North Towanda Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114345.16	1	Yes	114345.16
RCP-056169	Patton Village, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	535530.59	4	Yes	535530.59
RCP-024187	Town Of Antwerp, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114358.63		Yes	114358.63
RCP-019256	Milford Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114424.14	1	Yes	114424.14
RCP-025240	Town Of Bath, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114425.79	1	Yes	114425.78
RCP-018897	Fairfield Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114424.14	2	Yes	114424.14
RCP-023278	West Kittanning Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114450.16	3	Yes	114450.16
RCP-057086	Mott, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114470.77	1	Yes	0	0	81525.49
RCP-033460	Town Of Sigel, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114507.4	1	Yes	114507.4
RCP-034499	Town Of Lake, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114507.4	3	Yes	114507.4
RCP-052913	Wells River Village, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114515.66	7	Yes	114515.67
RCP-025272	Town Of Center Harbor, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114844.54		Yes	0	0	0
RCP-032825	Village Of Lowellville, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114844.82	2	Yes	114388.16
RCP-027629	Belgrade Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114964.92		Yes	114964.92
RCP-014151	Medina Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114967.06	1	Yes	57484.18
RCP-054828	Wall Lake City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114983.14	1	Yes	0	0	0
RCP-054977	Walnut City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114983.14	1	Yes	114983.14
RCP-025587	Turrell, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114985.37	3	Yes	114985.37
RCP-055260	Exira City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114983.14	2	Yes	114983.14
RCP-019580	City Of De Valls Bluff, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114985.37	7	Yes	114985.37
RCP-022821	Carbondale Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114555.18		No		60000	50000	0
RCP-052627	Roxie, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114563.85		No		0	0	0
RCP-018330	Cardington Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114634.47	3	Yes	114634.47
RCP-019145	Jackson Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114634.47	1	Yes	57317.24
RCP-004295	Mcmillan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114651.78	1	Yes	114651.78
RCP-006314	Onida, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114656.32	1	Yes	114656.32
RCP-005337	Montville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114937.76	3	Yes	114937.76
RCP-034914	Town Of Kewaskum, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114821.4	3	Yes	114821.4
RCP-018065	Illiopolis Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114583.28	1	Yes	114583.28
RCP-032925	Hartford Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114634.47	1	Yes	114634.47
RCP-052616	Potts Camp, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114809.7	1	Yes	114809.7
RCP-024945	Town Of Richford, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	114768.89	1	Yes	114768.89
RCP-016200	Stonington Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115127.62	1	Yes	115127.62	0
RCP-033445	Town Of Bloomer, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115135.41		Yes	115135.41
RCP-047009	Markleville Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115095	1	Yes	115095
RCP-006475	City Of Canistota, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115018.02		Yes	115018.02
RCP-033673	Town Of Forestville, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115030.74	3	Yes	115030.74
RCP-034349	Town Of Cicero, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115030.74	1	Yes	115030.74
RCP-003693	Mellen Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115072.14		Yes	115072.14
RCP-014073	Sheridan Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115072.14	1	Yes	115072.14
RCP-053993	Rush Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115080.16	1	Yes	114717.46
RCP-034452	Village Of Clear Lake, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115449.42		Yes	115449.42
RCP-034640	Town Of Fairfield, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115449.42		Yes	115449.42
RCP-025271	Town Of Washington, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115472.68	1	Yes	115472.68
RCP-055278	Earlville City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115431.71	1	Yes	115046.27
RCP-015341	Sacramento city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115309.53	6	Yes	113941.96
RCP-046903	Cromwell Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115353.2		Yes	115353.2
RCP-023532	Miller Township Board Of Supervisors, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115395.16		Yes	115395.16
RCP-016035	Paw Paw Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115399.79	1	Yes	115399.79
RCP-019124	Dodson Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115160.33	2	No		0	2596.64	0
RCP-051486	Borough Of White Haven, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115500.18	7	Yes	115136.14
RCP-023173	Tuscarora Township Supervisors, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115500.18	2	Yes	115136.14
RCP-052228	Morris Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115185.16		Yes	114822.12
RCP-023347	South Bend Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115185.16	3	Yes	114822.12
RCP-019650	City Of Hartman, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115192.55	4	Yes	115192.55
RCP-056516	Pattison, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115220.47		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-023925	Village Of Kinderhook, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115281.7	1	Yes	115281.7
RCP-024079	Town Of Franklin, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115281.7	1	Yes	115281.7
RCP-031684	City Of New Meadows, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115506.6	1	No		0	0
RCP-055866	Spaulding Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115535.87		No	0	1756.25	0
RCP-033670	Town Of Brussels, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115554.08	1	Yes	115554.08
RCP-055153	Lowden City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115581.23		Yes	115581.23
RCP-055232	Grand Junction City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115581.23	1	Yes	115581.23
RCP-025569	Subiaco, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115606.91	1	Yes	115606.91	0	0	0
RCP-027040	Lake Shore City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115620.61		Yes	115620.61
RCP-025221	Town Of Franconia, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115682.06	1	Yes	115682
RCP-032800	Village Of Continental, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115791.34		Yes	115330.92
RCP-022789	Limestone Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115710.18	1	Yes	115345.48
RCP-034173	Town Of Marathon, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115763.42	1	Yes	115763.42
RCP-032322	Monterey Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115686.18	1	Yes	115686.18	0	0
RCP-018321	Ohio Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115686.18	2	Yes	115226.17
RCP-056711	Kosse, Town Of, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115696.45	1	Yes	115468.25
RCP-003359	Webber Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115702.68	5	Yes	115702.68
RCP-056999	Timbercreek Canyon, Village Of, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115625.25	1	Yes	115625.25
RCP-033820	Town Of Hazel Green, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115658.75		Yes	0
RCP-035004	Town Of Mount Morris, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115658.75	1	Yes	115658.75
RCP-024455	Town Of Steuben, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115691.96	7	Yes	115691.96
RCP-055301	Dayton, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115880.28	1	Yes	115880.28
RCP-018604	Jackson Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115896.51		Yes	0
RCP-006530	City Of Castlewood, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115922.26	1	Yes	115922.26
RCP-050123	Village Of Beemer, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115926.97	2	Yes	57963.49
RCP-052395	Krain Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115948.45	1	Yes	115948.45
RCP-033164	Henefer Town Inc, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115865		Yes	115865
RCP-034152	Town Of Bevent, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115868.09	1	Yes	115868.09
RCP-006113	Town Of Hundred, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115813.86	1	Yes	115813.86
RCP-023582	Borough Of Ellport Dba Ellport Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115815.16		Yes	3000
RCP-022429	Williams Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115920.18	1	Yes	115554.82
RCP-016300	West Salem Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115808.04	1	Yes	115808.04
RCP-017630	Annawan Town, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116080.21	1	Yes	116080.21
RCP-034307	Town Of Little River, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115972.76	1	Yes	115972.76
RCP-047995	Sharon Springs City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115982.96	1	Yes	115982.96
RCP-026150	Town Of Bethania, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116005.87	1	Yes	116005.87
RCP-025330	Town Of Hill, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115996.13	5	Yes	115996	0	0
RCP-024210	Town Of Rodman, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	115999.65	1	Yes	0	0	0
RCP-032285	Village Of Rockford, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116106.85	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-003740	Moffatt Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116123.02	1	Yes	116123.02
RCP-055700	Hartford City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116179.33		Yes	116179.33
RCP-056049	Gustine, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116193	1	Yes	116193
RCP-057083	Underwood, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116209.97		No		0	0	0
RCP-050312	Village Of Hershey, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	116103.96	1	Yes	116103.95
RCP-026592	Town Of Ramseur, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	538598.68	1	Yes	538598.68
RCP-033546	City Of Columbus, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	535903		Yes	535903
RCP-005399	Waldoboro Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	535988.5	1	Yes	535334.25
RCP-024777	Village Of Ballston Spa, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	535998.39	4	Yes	0	10000	10000
RCP-022470	Borough Of Schuylkill Haven, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	536130.76	5	Yes	536130.76
RCP-040206	Hitchcock County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	536486	1	Yes	536486
RCP-034022	Village Of Bristol, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	538205.71	2	Yes	538205.71
RCP-046804	Town Of Kinsey, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	538372.04	2	Yes	538372.04	46519.82	445775.83
RCP-022540	Lackawaxen Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	536130.76	1	Yes	536130.76
RCP-004033	Ira Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	536477.9		No	0	0	0
RCP-025140	Town Of Nottingham, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	537686.03	7	Yes	0
RCP-035484	City Of Aliceville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	535838.54	2	Yes	507838.54
RCP-046837	Albion Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	537786.16	1	Yes	537786.16
RCP-051377	Bedford Township Supervisors Dba Bedford Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	537915.76	1	Yes	536220.38
RCP-046956	Greentown Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	538012.78		Yes	538012.78
RCP-022739	Board Of Supervisors Middle Paxton Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	538125.76	1	Yes	538125.76
RCP-019528	City Of Brinkley, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	536598.39	6	Yes	536598.39
RCP-014119	City Of Utica, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	536688.08		Yes	536688.08
RCP-056530	Shiner, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	536771.96	1	No	0	535713	350000
RCP-056852	Whitney, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	536771.96	2	Yes	536771.96
RCP-031742	City Of Victor, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	538385.51	1	Yes	538385.51
RCP-047462	Westmorland City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	539205	2	Yes	549680.95
RCP-052819	Wilmington Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	537022.52	1	Yes	536895.95
RCP-030143	East Helena City, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	538804.57	2	No		0	0	0
RCP-026846	Circle Pines City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	539635.69	2	Yes	539635.69
RCP-035589	City Of Greensboro, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	539166.72	1	Yes	539166.72
RCP-019644	City Of Hamburg, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	539291.74	4	Yes	539291.74
RCP-051880	Turtle Creek Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	539490.78	1	Yes	537790.42
RCP-032179	City Of Nelsonville, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	539518.24	4	Yes	0
RCP-022531	Tyrone Borough Borough Of Tyrone, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	539595.76	2	Yes	43307.65	43307.65	10308.41
RCP-054667	Mountain View City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	539680.78	1	Yes	539680.78
RCP-022683	Birdsboro Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	540015.76	2	Yes	540015.76
RCP-035112	Hooper Bay City, AK	Alaska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	540111.25	2	Yes	540111.25
RCP-032212	City Of St. Clairsville, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	540675.11	2	Yes	540675.11
RCP-035577	City Of Guin, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	540830.82	11	Yes	540271.9
RCP-024925	Town Of Liberty, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	541126.58	10	Yes	541126.58
RCP-047849	Mission Hills City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	541304.68	2	Yes	541304.68
RCP-051436	Borough Of Collegeville, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	543270.76	1	Yes	543270.76
RCP-056794	Waskom, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	543723.69	1	Yes	543723.69
RCP-038264	Edwards County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	543479	1	Yes	543479
RCP-052581	Magnolia, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	543809.52		Yes	543809.52
RCP-024311	Village Of Fairport, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544100.92	1	Yes	544100.92
RCP-006204	Town Of Sophia, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544148.33	1	Yes	544148.33
RCP-049961	City Of Las Animas, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544172.22	2	Yes	544172.22
RCP-032671	Warren Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544356.03	2	Yes	542191.48
RCP-015920	Morrison City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542705.59	1	Yes	542705.59
RCP-026604	Town Of Richlands, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542741.75	2	Yes	542741.75
RCP-016424	North Brentwood Town, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542877.98	5	Yes	542877.98
RCP-031399	Marion, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	543020.46		Yes	0
RCP-054974	Waukon City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542020.68	4	Yes	542020.68
RCP-030201	Ronan City, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542135.27	1	Yes	542135.27
RCP-007530	City of Checotah	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	543120.54	1	Yes	543136.75
RCP-035311	Town Of Mineral, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542622	1	Yes	542622
RCP-014838	County Of Logan, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542702	1	Yes	542702
RCP-005185	Osceola Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542633.25	3	Yes	542633.25
RCP-025015	Town Of Kingsbury, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	541331.7	4	Yes	541331.7
RCP-007529	City of Chandler	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	541365.71		Yes	541359.3
RCP-026786	Becker City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	541384.2	1	Yes	541384.2
RCP-033021	Washington Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	541411.3	7	Yes	539258.45
RCP-015174	Greensburg city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	541430.64	2	No		79669	0	0
RCP-051667	City Of Titusville, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	541590.78	1	Yes	541590.78
RCP-013764	City Of Grosse Pointe, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	541627.26	1	Yes	541627.26
RCP-006731	Colfax, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542345.95	1	Yes	542345.95
RCP-027182	Redwood Falls City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542367.75	1	Yes	542367.75
RCP-037283	Schleicher County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542508	2	Yes	542508
RCP-032246	City Of Chardon, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542568.16	1	Yes	0
RCP-022291	Colebrookdale Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	541065.78	2	Yes	541065.78
RCP-024369	Village Of Kings Point, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	542767.6		Yes	250000
RCP-046989	Lapel Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	543451.83	3	Yes	543451.83
RCP-055864	South Chicago Heights Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544746.85		Yes	544746.85
RCP-013788	Williamstown Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544779.92	1	Yes	544779.92
RCP-047057	Oakland City City, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544811.6	3	Yes	544811.6
RCP-031729	City Of Spirit Lake, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544838.39		Yes	544838.39	0	0
RCP-056005	De Leon, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	545709.88	1	Yes	545709.88
RCP-031675	City Of Montpelier, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	545913.87	3	Yes	545913.86
RCP-026196	Town Of Chadbourn, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	545291.33	2	Yes	472152.99
RCP-054514	Montgomery City City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	545588.95		Yes	545588.95
RCP-026301	Blue Ridge, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	545590	2	Yes	545590
RCP-039941	Trego County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544450	1	Yes	544450
RCP-013817	Almena Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544464.66	3	Yes	544464.66
RCP-055812	Lakewood Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544474.68	1	Yes	544474.68	0	0
RCP-054370	Bel-Ridge Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	544977.76	1	Yes	269888.2
RCP-049194	Hampton, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	545140.97	6	Yes	545140.97
RCP-047104	Santa Claus Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	546397.98	1	Yes	546397.98
RCP-018164	Village Of Obetz, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	546459.41		No		1048487.35	0	0
RCP-032618	Russell Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	546669.76	1	Yes	546669.76
RCP-018109	Kildeer Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	545971.61	2	Yes	545971.61
RCP-035764	City Of Bridgeport, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	546060.84		Yes	546060.84
RCP-013842	City Of Springfield, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	546251.16	2	Yes	546251.16
RCP-051503	West Rockhill Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	548205.78	1	Yes	548205.78
RCP-018144	Green Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	548257.58		Yes	548000
RCP-007534	City of Cleveland	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	548385.04	2	Yes	548385.04
RCP-051354	Bangor Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	548940.78		Yes	275335.46
RCP-031387	Leverett, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	549091.84	1	Yes	274545.93
RCP-025399	Lake City, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	549029.24	2	Yes	528438.54
RCP-031487	Shelburne, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	549091.84	6	Yes	549091.84
RCP-051346	Board Of Supervisors Of Martic Township Dba Martic Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	547260.78	1	Yes	545535.94
RCP-026154	Town Of Biscoe, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	546884.81	2	Yes	546884.81	0	0
RCP-035270	Town Of Glade Spring, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1390247.25	1	Yes	547030.5
RCP-027142	Oak Park Heights City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	546739.04	1	Yes	546739
RCP-032794	Newton Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	547090.44	3	Yes	544915.01
RCP-054436	Fayette City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	547829.98	5	Yes	547829.98
RCP-026651	Town Of Sparta, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	549115.7		Yes	549115.7
RCP-014524	Spring City Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	549216.62	1	Yes	549216.62
RCP-006109	City of Okemah	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	549613.42	4	Yes	549606.92
RCP-025608	West Fork, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	550065.15	1	Yes	550065.15
RCP-051319	Londonderry Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	550095.78	4	Yes	550095.78
RCP-049969	Town Of Lyons, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	550204.62	1	Yes	550204.62
RCP-046969	Ingalls Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	549344.14	7	Yes	549344.14
RCP-033584	Town Of Dunn, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	550242.59	2	Yes	550242.59
RCP-049293	Newtown Borough, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	549457.02	1	Yes	549457
RCP-027031	La Crescent City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	549580.37	1	Yes	549580.37
RCP-027104	Montevideo City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	551110.32	1	Yes	551110.32
RCP-055264	Emmetsburg City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	550842.53		Yes	124725
RCP-018361	Lexington Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	550350.68	2	Yes	541550.68
RCP-024540	Village Of Goshen, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	550767.57	2	Yes	550767.57
RCP-038420	Clay County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	550471		Yes	275235.5
RCP-024694	Village Of Kaser, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	550562.45	3	Yes	250000
RCP-055405	Albia City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	550393.96	1	Yes	550393.96
RCP-052122	Jefferson Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	550410.76	1	Yes	548676
RCP-052236	Kelly Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	550410.76	1	Yes	550410.76
RCP-024096	Town Of Mayfield, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	551895.78	1	Yes	551895.78
RCP-025876	Porterdale, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	551939		Yes	551939
RCP-015189	Hickman city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	552437.46	1	No		100000	100000	100000
RCP-030217	Townsend City, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	551358.75	2	Yes	244720
RCP-015139	Falmouth city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	551127.12	1	Yes	544590.79
RCP-014071	City Of Eaton Rapids, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	551190.32	6	Yes	551190.32
RCP-026834	Carver City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	551438.17	2	Yes	551438.17
RCP-025245	Town Of Chester, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	551714.45	2	Yes	551714
RCP-014279	Blaine City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	551887.04	1	Yes	551887.71
RCP-025137	Town Of Jaffrey, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	552447.27	1	Yes	552447
RCP-056462	Weimar, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	552661.6	3	Yes	552661.6
RCP-051557	Redstone Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	552720.78	2	Yes	550978.74
RCP-034197	Village Of Rothschild, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	551289.28	1	Yes	551289.28
RCP-055859	Rosemont Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	553320.2	1	Yes	553320.2
RCP-014836	County Of Fallon, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	552802	1	Yes	552802
RCP-031291	Buckland, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	552977.64		No		0	0	0
RCP-024031	Town Of Marilla, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	553229.11	25	Yes	553229.11
RCP-022442	Weisenberg Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	553980.78	5	No		0	0
RCP-051814	Borough Of Greenville, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	553560.78	2	Yes	551816.08
RCP-026178	Town Of Cajahs Mountain, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	553875	6	Yes	553875
RCP-014404	Lakesite City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	553073.89	4	Yes	553073.89
RCP-038470	Beloit City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	553208.18	1	Yes	553208.18
RCP-004145	City Of St Clair, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	554763.36		Yes	554763.36
RCP-030050	Township Of Frankford, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	554848	3	Yes	554848
RCP-023776	City Of Salamanca, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	554049.62	2	Yes	554049.61
RCP-036948	Cochran County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	554162	1	Yes	554162
RCP-035533	City Of Sumiton, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	554381.3		Yes	0	0	10000
RCP-025029	Town Of Lyons, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	554562.43	1	Yes	554562.43
RCP-022401	Washington Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	554295.8	5	Yes	552548.78
RCP-024696	Village Of New Hempstead, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	554870.12	1	Yes	554870.12
RCP-040979	Borough Of Union Beach, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	555266.68	5	No		251204	534195
RCP-023219	Ross Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	555480	1	Yes	555480
RCP-049934	City Of Holyoke, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	554980.26		Yes	554980.26
RCP-040909	Borough Of Hightstown, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	555162	2	Yes	380893
RCP-014453	New Johnsonville City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	556041.03	3	Yes	556041.03
RCP-032723	Randolph Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	555714.32	4	Yes	334835.62
RCP-015157	Fulton city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	555582.26		Yes	548993.09
RCP-018476	Perry Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	556029.82	1	Yes	556029.82
RCP-037756	Perkins County, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	556493	1	Yes	556493
RCP-004199	Sparta Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	557390.56	6	Yes	555162
RCP-013729	Olive Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	557495.66		Yes	557495.66
RCP-007864	Town of Jones	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	556106.31		Yes	556099.72
RCP-046850	Avilla Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	556142.95	2	Yes	556142
RCP-008458	Durant, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	556101.78		Yes	150000
RCP-019091	Liberty Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	556976.34	3	Yes	554761.62
RCP-051485	Bethel Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	556185.8	1	Yes	556185.8
RCP-006730	Clinton, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	556423.24	2	Yes	556423.24
RCP-019148	Hubbard Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	556976.34	6	Yes	556976.34
RCP-019601	City Of England, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	557109.3	1	Yes	557109.3
RCP-052217	Borough Of Shillington General Account, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	558495.8	1	Yes	556735.54
RCP-025273	Town Of Alton, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	557786.45	6	Yes	557786.45
RCP-026722	Village Of Wesley Chapel, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	557625.75	1	Yes	557625.75
RCP-051421	Lehighton Borough Dba Borough Of Lehighton, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	557865.78		Yes	556107.52
RCP-015130	Elkton city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	557940.87	2	Yes	551323.72
RCP-055756	Anna City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	557947.06	2	Yes	0	0	0
RCP-050799	Mexico Beach City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	557950	1	Yes	557950
RCP-034858	Town Of Delavan, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	558197.4	1	Yes	558197.4
RCP-015235	Liberty city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	558202.93	2	Yes	162000
RCP-051891	Carroll Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	558285.78	1	Yes	558285.78
RCP-007553	City of Elgin	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	558563.06	1	Yes	558563.06
RCP-016041	Peotone Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	558627.48	2	Yes	558627.48
RCP-055310	Cresco City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	559066.29	1	Yes	559066.29
RCP-027036	Lake City City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	559743.62	5	Yes	0
RCP-031310	Conway, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	559852.49	7	Yes	559852
RCP-056326	Splendora, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	559861.59	1	Yes	559861.59
RCP-035694	City Of East Brewton, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	560086.78	9	Yes	326115.85	100000	50000
RCP-039629	Jewell County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	559212	3	Yes	559212
RCP-040363	Nelson County, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	559212	1	Yes	559212
RCP-017775	Caseyville Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	559307.92		Yes	559307.92
RCP-031895	Napavine City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	559121		Yes	559121
RCP-031522	Wales, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	560151.4	1	Yes	560151.4
RCP-047778	Larned City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	560228.2	3	Yes	560228.2
RCP-052125	Pequea Township Board Of Supervisors Dba Pequea Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	560595.8	1	Yes	560595.8
RCP-046806	Good Hope, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	560932.86	1	Yes	560932.86	0	0
RCP-024836	Village Of Bath, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	561229.08	2	Yes	561229.08
RCP-025776	Lincolnton, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	561275	3	Yes	561275	0	0
RCP-055838	Paxton City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	561349.18	1	Yes	561349.18
RCP-006319	City Of Milbank, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	561164.96	1	Yes	0	0
RCP-051665	Commissioners Newport Township Dba Newport Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	561015.8	3	Yes	516892.63
RCP-007594	Town of Mannford	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	560493.38	1	Yes	560486.76
RCP-014414	Lookout Mountain Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	560491.73	1	Yes	560491.73
RCP-046886	Chesterfield Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	561355.38		Yes	0
RCP-035574	Midland City, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	560562.22	2	Yes	560562.22
RCP-039188	Perkins County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	561543		Yes	561543
RCP-052995	Rockville Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	561582		No		20000	20000	0
RCP-004044	Ontwa Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	563065.36	7	Yes	563065.36
RCP-023896	Town Of Beekmantown, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	561639.34	1	Yes	561639.33
RCP-035552	City Of Henagar, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	561750.88	2	Yes	561750.88
RCP-024020	Town Of Collins, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	562357.29	2	Yes	562357.29
RCP-035578	City Of Ashville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	562226.32	1	Yes	0
RCP-032776	Fayette Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	562500	6	Yes	562500
RCP-023724	Town Of Kirkwood, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	561947.03	2	Yes	561947.03
RCP-024971	Town Of Marbletown, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	562152.15		Yes	562152.15
RCP-051348	Sayre Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	563430.8		Yes	86195
RCP-054966	West Liberty City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	563103.41	3	Yes	563000	0	0
RCP-051882	Vernon Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	563640.8	1	Yes	563640.8
RCP-025318	Town Of New Ipswich, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	564591.27	9	Yes	564591.27
RCP-007845	Town of Hinton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	564880.47	2	Yes	562215.47	857317	0
RCP-054411	Clever City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	564332.11		Yes	25000
RCP-033897	City Of Berlin, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	563640.17	1	Yes	563640.17
RCP-031500	Stockbridge, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	564933.91	1	Yes	564933.91
RCP-035560	City Of Riverside, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	565079.06	2	Yes	565079.06
RCP-022288	Dickinson Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	565215.8	3	Yes	563434.36
RCP-027403	Thomson Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	565863.43	5	Yes	565863.43
RCP-055344	Carter Lake City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	565944.34	1	Yes	565944.34
RCP-002103	Town Of Yemassee, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	565550.74	2	Yes	565550.74
RCP-007658	City of Wewoka	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	565757.88	2	Yes	565751.18
RCP-049976	Town Of Meeker, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	566039.64	1	Yes	566039.64	0	0	0
RCP-046900	Covington City, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	566567.8	1	Yes	0			0
RCP-006201	City Of Sistersville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	566692.25	1	Yes	566692.25
RCP-031864	Leavenworth City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	566944		Yes	566944
RCP-032648	Sharon Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	566967.43		Yes	566967.43
RCP-030099	Township Of Independence, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	566361.54	4	Yes	566361.54
RCP-004368	Ash Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	566848.56	1	Yes	566848.56	0	0
RCP-033360	Town Of Lawrence, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	566361.55	2	Yes	566361.55
RCP-052559	Hollandale, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	566427.28	1	Yes	566427.28
RCP-034621	Town Of Troy, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	566989.56	15	Yes	566989.56
RCP-054351	Windsor City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	567184.33		Yes	567184.33
RCP-003470	Larkin Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	568109.62		Yes	568109.62
RCP-033234	Hyde Park City, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	567728	1	Yes	567728	0	0
RCP-053688	City Of Millersburg, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	567947.86	1	Yes	567947.86
RCP-025004	Town Of Fort Ann, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	567280.34	1	Yes	567280.34
RCP-032183	Ashtabula Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	567282.93	2	No	0	282513.61	205378.83
RCP-037394	Douglas County, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	567370	3	Yes	567370
RCP-054482	Knob Noster City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	567388.06	6	Yes	567388.06
RCP-024543	Town Of Hamptonburgh, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	567485.47	4	Yes	567485.47
RCP-015358	Simpsonville city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	567702.75		Yes	567702.75
RCP-056514	Poth, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	567061.59	2	Yes	567061.59
RCP-053186	Collingsworth County,	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	567176	5	Yes	567176
RCP-019633	City Of Green Forest, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	569540.15	2	Yes	569540.15
RCP-030094	Township Of Greenwich, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	569606.26	1	Yes	569606.26
RCP-032251	City Of Canal Fulton, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	568755.3	1	Yes	568755.3
RCP-031790	Cle Elum City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	569179	1	Yes	569179	0	0
RCP-051487	Borough Of Monaca, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	569205.8	1	Yes	569205.8
RCP-006938	Logansport, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	569389.15	4	Yes	568463.09	0
RCP-034571	City Of Evansville, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	569396.94		Yes	569396.94
RCP-051810	Borough Of Coraopolis, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	569520.8		Yes	567725.8
RCP-055926	Anson, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	570289.16	7	Yes	569164.32
RCP-007928	Town of Muldrow	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	570495.92	2	Yes	570495.92
RCP-047723	Hesston City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571063.44		Yes	571063.44
RCP-007014	Rosepine, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	570130.08		Yes	570130.08
RCP-055762	Barrington Hills Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	570194.68	1	Yes	570194.68
RCP-026843	Chisago City City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	570890.41	6	Yes	570890.41
RCP-004076	Denton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571052.1	1	Yes	569907.3
RCP-022781	Carroll Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571305.8	1	Yes	569505.18
RCP-023855	Town Of Elmira, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571382.9	4	Yes	571382.9
RCP-019228	Liverpool Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	568755.3	2	Yes	568755.3
RCP-050018	Town Of Rangely, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	568804.5		Yes	284402.25
RCP-031368	Hinsdale, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571210.95	1	Yes	571210
RCP-025070	Town Of Ossining, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	568203.42		Yes	568203.42
RCP-049186	Franklin, CT	Connecticut	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	568225.12	1	Yes	568225.12
RCP-049859	Town Of Center, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	569055.84	1	Yes	569055.84
RCP-003591	Clyde Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571262.28	3	Yes	571262.28
RCP-056360	Malakoff, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571282.27	1	Yes	571282.27
RCP-053701	City Of Myrtle Point, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	568392.08	2	Yes	568392.08
RCP-018052	Hometown City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	568425.58	1	Yes	567838.96
RCP-047984	Scott City City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571979.1	5	Yes	571979.1
RCP-024966	Town Of Gardiner, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	574152.12		Yes	574152.12
RCP-022819	Quincy Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	572355.82	2	Yes	572355.82
RCP-025278	Town Of Rye, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	572652.38	2	Yes	572652
RCP-032559	Village Of Carlisle, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	572751.74	1	Yes	572751.74
RCP-056424	Idalou, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	573020.21	2	Yes	573020.21
RCP-046868	Brookville Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	573139.99		Yes	573139.99	0	0
RCP-051768	New Holland Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	573720.82	1	Yes	0
RCP-040806	Borough Of Somerdale, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	573269.66	1	Yes	573269.66
RCP-049102	Galena Town, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	573421.03	2	Yes	573421.03
RCP-039091	Brown County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	573974	3	Yes	573974
RCP-056593	Panhandle, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	574013.31	4	Yes	567006.65	0	0
RCP-056422	Tool, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571530.55	1	Yes	571530.55
RCP-040906	Township Of Union, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571594.98	1	Yes	571594.98
RCP-018978	Greenfield Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571700.04	6	Yes	569426.76
RCP-050641	Bronson Town, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	574479	1	Yes	574479
RCP-005251	Bridgton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	574583.06	1	Yes	574583.06
RCP-017859	Deer Park Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	574957.65	1	Yes	574957.65
RCP-051921	South Huntingdon Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	574350.82	2	Yes	287175.41	248279	0
RCP-024081	Village Of Malone, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	574357.25		Yes	500000
RCP-032612	City Of Northwood, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571489.71		Yes	518879
RCP-047740	Hugoton City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	571521.28	1	Yes	239193.77
RCP-040319	Glascock County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	577082	2	Yes	0
RCP-024554	Town Of Mount Hope, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	575177.76	1	Yes	252323
RCP-006978	Oak Grove, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	575316.43		Yes	575316.43
RCP-007572	City of Heavener	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	579270.08	2	Yes	579270.08
RCP-024132	Town Of Coxsackie, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	579588	2	Yes	579588
RCP-017954	Freeburg Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	577271.08		Yes	577271.08
RCP-015123	Dry Ridge city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	577857.97	1	No	0	190334.87	190334.87	190334.87
RCP-004331	City Of Swartz Creek, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	578093.06	2	Yes	578093.06
RCP-037340	Franklin County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	578636	4	Yes	578636
RCP-034469	Town Of Hull, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	576828.41		Yes	576828.4
RCP-032133	City Of Germantown, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	580429.09	8	Yes	580429.09
RCP-040424	Lincoln County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	575334		Yes	575334
RCP-002042	Town Of Meggett, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	575437.5	1	Yes	0
RCP-055042	Rock Valley City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	576261.43	2	Yes	477177.43
RCP-004026	City Of Frankenmuth, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	581035.54	1	Yes	581035
RCP-050581	City Of West Point, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	581050.77	1	Yes	581050.77
RCP-024319	Village Of Webster, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	581229.02	14	Yes	581229.02
RCP-032625	Bazetta Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	581270.44	1	Yes	581270.44
RCP-055924	Anahuac, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	580716.75	2	No		0	0	0
RCP-052240	Hopewell Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	580965.84	2	Yes	579134.76
RCP-035561	City Of Taylor, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	577203.18	1	Yes	577203.18
RCP-025413	Littleflock, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	577205.84	4	Yes	577205.84
RCP-016051	Pittsfield City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	578904.11	2	Yes	578904.11
RCP-022416	Penn Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	579075.82		Yes	577250.7	0
RCP-051336	Edinboro Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	579075.82	1	Yes	577250.7
RCP-040182	Hall County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	575722	11	Yes	575722
RCP-004265	Watertown Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	576096.36		Yes	576096.36
RCP-022913	Shippensburg Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	581070.82	3	Yes	581070.82
RCP-049858	Town Of Cedaredge, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	576847.68		Yes	576847.68
RCP-049039	Town Of Huachuca City, AZ	Arizona	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	579789.52		Yes	579789.52
RCP-052241	Adams Township Board Of Road Supervisors Dba Adams Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	579810.82	2	Yes	579810.82
RCP-047045	New Palestine Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	579938.8	1	Yes	579938.8
RCP-024584	Village Of Medina, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	580100.82	1	Yes	580100.82
RCP-030130	Colstrip City, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	575442.26		Yes	575442.26
RCP-054721	Webster, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	576483		Yes	576483
RCP-015804	Lebanon City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	576726.74	4	Yes	576726.74
RCP-055117	Monticello City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	580149.03		Yes	580149.03
RCP-040938	Borough Of Belmar, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	580387.14	2	Yes	411193.57
RCP-034521	Village Of Waterford, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	582166.5	1	Yes	582166.5
RCP-003979	Holly Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	581981.34	2	Yes	581981.34
RCP-052689	Dorset Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	582177.81		Yes	582040.88
RCP-024838	Town Of Bath, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	582254.66	3	Yes	582254.66
RCP-034924	Village Of Slinger, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	582480.51	5	Yes	582480.51	66936.02
RCP-055865	Sparta City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	581489.71	1	Yes	581489.71
RCP-004358	City Of Zeeland, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	581771.16	1	Yes	581771.16
RCP-024613	Town Of Volney, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	581434.15		Yes	0
RCP-054365	Ava City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	583686.46	5	Yes	583686.46
RCP-019311	City Of Waterville, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	582532.47	5	Yes	582532.47	0
RCP-027111	Morris City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	582802.17	1	Yes	582802
RCP-052872	Fairfield Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	583940.16	1	Yes	583940.16
RCP-023191	Stroudsburg Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	583590.82		Yes	581751.48
RCP-038194	Sierra County, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	583686	4	Yes	130510
RCP-035113	Houston City, AK	Alaska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	583804.33	1	Yes	582238.09
RCP-037378	Sherman County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	582909	2	Yes	582909
RCP-030239	Township Of Rochelle Park, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	582899.18	1	Yes	0
RCP-052687	Bethel Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	583342.19	1	Yes	583204.69
RCP-052691	Wallingford Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	583342.2		Yes	583342.2
RCP-033570	City Of Prairie Du Chien, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	583213.19	1	Yes	583213.19
RCP-014728	Town Of Pine Ridge, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	583524.24	8	Yes	583524.24
RCP-032721	Village Of Ada, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	583058.32		Yes	580739.87
RCP-018818	Newbury Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	583163.49	1	Yes	580844.62
RCP-035214	Town Of Boydton, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426420	1	Yes	426420
RCP-003455	Ray Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426555.12		Yes	426555.12
RCP-023901	Town Of Chazy, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426665.38	2	Yes	426665.38
RCP-013860	City Of Marine City, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426450.02		Yes	426450.02
RCP-054603	Willow Springs City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	427629.28	4	Yes	427629.28
RCP-051669	Borough Of Sharpsville, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	427770.62	2	Yes	426422.38
RCP-032338	Lagrange Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426776.82	2	Yes	425079.8
RCP-001230	Doverfoxcroft Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426866.36	1	Yes	426370.99
RCP-055669	Fairfax City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	427037.52	1	Yes	427037.52
RCP-056292	Whitewright, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	427282.4	1	Yes	427282.4
RCP-018157	Clark Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	427407.83	1	Yes	425708.3
RCP-051736	Boyertown Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	427455.6	1	Yes	426108.36
RCP-024914	Town Of Bethel, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426152.57	2	Yes	343356
RCP-034201	City Of Mosinee, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426210.35	7	Yes	426210.35
RCP-034623	Village Of Baldwin, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426210.35	1	Yes	426210.35
RCP-003916	Casco Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426239.86	3	Yes	426239.86
RCP-033220	Delta City, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	426299	1	Yes	426299
RCP-032376	Village Of Bluffton, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429300.87	1	Yes	427593.82
RCP-006687	Albany, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429357.22	1	Yes	429357.22
RCP-040057	Dickens County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429461	1	Yes	73423.87
RCP-032833	Clinton Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429616.39	1	Yes	427908.08
RCP-054219	Lake Lotawana City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429666.58	1	Yes	429666.58
RCP-048983	Questa Village, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	428703	1	Yes	428703
RCP-047899	Osage City City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	428679.1	12	Yes	428679.1
RCP-031961	Sumas City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	428631	2	Yes	368631
RCP-006932	Lecompte, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429727.67	1	Yes	429727.67
RCP-053672	City Of La Pine, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	428459.68		Yes	428459.68
RCP-052767	Cabot Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	428462	6	Yes	428462
RCP-024750	Town Of Charlton, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	428511.53	3	Yes	428511.52
RCP-007019	Sibley, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429727.67	1	Yes	429727.67
RCP-031512	Tisbury, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	428722.4	1	Yes	362457
RCP-034254	Village Of West Milwaukee, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	428722.4	1	Yes	428722.4
RCP-054719	Paxton Town, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	428731	7	Yes	428731
RCP-004056	City Of Fremont, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	428761.98	2	Yes	427048
RCP-024022	Town Of Concord, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429126.91	9	Yes	429126.91
RCP-026884	Deephaven City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429260.63	1	Yes	429260.63
RCP-047727	Hillsboro City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429747.38	2	Yes	429747.38
RCP-017958	Galena City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	429755.33	1	Yes	429755.33
RCP-039857	Lyon County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6447740	1	Yes	6447740
RCP-014233	City Of Sisseton, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433668.58	1	Yes	433668.58
RCP-037305	Preston County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6493774	25	Yes	6493774
RCP-038838	Platte County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6501155	1	Yes	6501155
RCP-047763	Kingman City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433715.22		Yes	433715.22
RCP-040872	Borough Of Westville, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433746.48	2	Yes	433746.48
RCP-017888	East Dundee Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	437648.24	1	Yes	437648.24
RCP-022371	Bethel Township Board Of Supervisors, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	437745.62		Yes	437745.62
RCP-024975	Town Of Olive, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	437947.41	5	Yes	397943.41
RCP-047105	Schererville Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6464991.87	1	Yes	6464991.87
RCP-016434	Riverdale Park Town, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6465638.25	1	Yes	6465638.25
RCP-056413	Sachse, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6466587.64	1	Yes	6453832.82
RCP-031344	Gill, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	437898.5	6	Yes	437898.5
RCP-056561	Shamrock, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	437958.25	1	Yes	0
RCP-025335	Town Of Moultonborough, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	438021.49	1	Yes	438021.49
RCP-053122	Garfield County,	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	432180	1	Yes	432180
RCP-054967	West Burlington City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	432121.3	2	Yes	412321.3
RCP-022287	Burrell Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	432180.62		Yes	0
RCP-022803	Paradise Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	432180.62		Yes	430818.48
RCP-051306	Monroe Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433860.6		Yes	433860.6
RCP-047052	North Liberty Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433990.94		Yes	433990.94
RCP-037201	Lumpkin County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6528348	4	Yes	6420263.18
RCP-040939	Borough Of Bradley Beach, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	434165.16	1	Yes	217082.58
RCP-035646	City Of Athens, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6505659.9	1	Yes	6505659.9
RCP-053261	City Of Cedar Falls,	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6508740		No		0	0	0
RCP-040211	Monterey, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6510461		Yes	6510461
RCP-038671	Ford County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6530097	1	Yes	3265049
RCP-038929	Wexford County, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6532427	1	Yes	6532427
RCP-006895	Gretna, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6537417.4	1	Yes	6537417.4
RCP-051309	Edgmont Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433755.62	1	Yes	216194.26
RCP-047111	Shadeland Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	434217.56	1	Yes	434217.56
RCP-003813	Deerfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	432672.76		Yes	432672.76
RCP-023923	Town Of Greenport, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	434460.24	2	Yes	434460.24
RCP-026325	Calhoun, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6449619	3	Yes	6449619
RCP-047351	Maywood City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6452515	15	Yes	6452515
RCP-038690	Opelika, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6466895	1	Yes	6466895
RCP-038734	Weakley County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6473573	1	Yes	6473573
RCP-007604	City of Muskogee	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6512708.44	3	Yes	6512708.44
RCP-025549	Sherwood, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6512937.08	1	Yes	6512937.08
RCP-015301	Paducah city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6516298.56	8	Yes	6439015
RCP-052610	Pearl, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6517355.51	1	Yes	3701125	0	0
RCP-039896	Municipality Of Añasco, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6452996.63	1	Yes	6027115
RCP-031853	Kenmore City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6453779	1	Yes	6453779
RCP-023984	Town Of Clinton, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	434460.24	15	Yes	434460.24
RCP-051296	Jersey Shore Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	434595.6	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-024709	Town Of Canton, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	434665.36	4	Yes	242084.55
RCP-007610	City of Nicoma Park	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	432917.09		Yes	432911.96
RCP-041014	Borough Of Riverdale, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	432804.46		Yes	432804.46
RCP-049828	Town Of Akron, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433075.62	1	Yes	433075.62
RCP-035745	Town Of Cedar Bluff, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433377.86	1	Yes	433377.86
RCP-017967	Georgetown City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433429.61	5	Yes	432982.31
RCP-037716	Marion County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6459005	11	Yes	6459005
RCP-039891	Chambers County, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6459200	4	Yes	6459200
RCP-037553	Daviess County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6478041	2	Yes	6478041
RCP-038735	Morrison County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6484839	1	Yes	6484839
RCP-007616	City of Owasso	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6485333.05	3	Yes	6485333.05
RCP-037298	Caroline County, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6488724	6	Yes	6488724
RCP-022409	Barrett Township Supervisors, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	434910.62	1	Yes	434910.62
RCP-024935	Town Of Barton, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	435383.31		Yes	435000
RCP-025138	Town Of Pittsfield, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	431844.8	1	Yes	431844.8
RCP-003906	Almont Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	431914.64	9	Yes	431914.64
RCP-049872	Town Of Crested Butte, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433075.62	1	No	0	0	0
RCP-037440	Hale County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6488724	1	Yes	6488724
RCP-047468	Windsor Town, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6489594	1	Yes	6489594
RCP-039721	Lee County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6537478		Yes	6537478
RCP-033772	Town Of Fond Du Lac, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	434688.51	2	Yes	434000
RCP-015281	Munfordville city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	434769.33	5	Yes	429612.99
RCP-022583	Mahoning Township Supervisors Dba Mahoning Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	434910.62	1	Yes	433539.88
RCP-049071	City Of Tombstone, AZ	Arizona	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	435176.12	1	Yes	435176.12
RCP-006929	Krotz Springs, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	435654.95		Yes	435654.95
RCP-056798	Lorena, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	435723.76	2	Yes	435723.76
RCP-052057	Fallowfield Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	435750.62	1	Yes	435750.62
RCP-031430	New Marlborough, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	435806.15	1	Yes	435806.15
RCP-019603	City Of Eureka Springs, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	436322.86	1	Yes	218162.7
RCP-030118	Big Timber City, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	435809.12		Yes	435809.12
RCP-035650	City Of Sulligent, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	435992.86	1	Yes	435992.86
RCP-050703	Grand Ridge Town, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	436744		Yes	436744
RCP-040856	Township Of Elk, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	436781.88		Yes	218390.94
RCP-051982	Aldan Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	436800.62	1	Yes	435423.92
RCP-047669	Galena City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	436156.96	4	Yes	218078.48
RCP-023113	Supervisors Tunkhannock Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	436170.62	2	Yes	436170.62
RCP-053596	City Of Canyonville, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	436455.82	3	Yes	436455.82
RCP-039664	Sedgwick County, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	436648	11	Yes	100000
RCP-014288	Burns Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	432014.8	4	Yes	432014.8
RCP-039943	Jasper County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6519025	2	Yes	6519025
RCP-026492	City Of Lumberton, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6528198.44	8	Yes	6330593.44
RCP-024116	Village Of Le Roy, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	436921.77	1	Yes	436921.77
RCP-019668	City Of Horseshoe Bend, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	436944.4		Yes	436944.4
RCP-056004	Danbury, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	436965.15	1	Yes	436965.15
RCP-000936	Rhea County,	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6442301	3	Yes	6442301
RCP-047208	Belmont City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6444860	1	Yes	6444860
RCP-001215	Oxford Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433104.93		Yes	433104.93
RCP-034617	Town Of Saint Joseph, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433223.15	2	Yes	433223.15
RCP-003539	Lee Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433280.78	1	Yes	433280.78
RCP-053199	Griggs County, Nd,	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	433346		Yes	6785.63
RCP-037648	Emmet County, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6490472	1	Yes	6490472
RCP-037928	Botetourt County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6491249		Yes	6491249
RCP-034379	Town Of Grafton, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	436886.55	1	Yes	436886.54
RCP-053687	City Of Mill City, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	437122.16	1	Yes	50000
RCP-026837	Centerville City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	437347.51	2	Yes	437347.51
RCP-014180	Chippewa Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	437373.76	8	Yes	437373.76
RCP-054635	Marlborough Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	437408.32	2	Yes	33892
RCP-053589	Town Of Bonanza, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94620.96	1	Yes	94567.76
RCP-052539	Ethel, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94650.39	1	Yes	0
RCP-052802	Westmore Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94781.89	2	Yes	94781.89	0	0
RCP-024939	Village Of Newark Valley, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94666.38		Yes	94666.38
RCP-032857	Green Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94652.33	8	Yes	94652.33
RCP-050552	Village Of Trenton, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94688.44	3	Yes	94688.44
RCP-004336	St Ignace Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94790.02	5	Yes	94790.02
RCP-023511	Beaver Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94605.14	2	Yes	94605.14
RCP-015790	Boyne Valley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94790.02		No		0	0
RCP-007679	Town of Achille	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94760.94		Yes	0
RCP-023536	Brooklyn Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94605.14		No		0	0	0
RCP-035675	Town Of Ranburne, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94615.68	7	Yes	0
RCP-023868	Town Of Columbus, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94768.95	1	Yes	94768.95
RCP-055271	Elgin City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94797.54		Yes	0
RCP-056640	Huxley, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94841.29	1	Yes	94841.29
RCP-036711	Petroleum County, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94594	1	Yes	94594
RCP-017476	Charmwood Town, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2092.5		Yes	0
RCP-055433	Beaconsfield City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2093.31		No		0	0	0
RCP-007973	Town of Renfrow	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2105.8	4	Yes	2105.8
RCP-004635	Balsam Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4589.85		No	0	8055	0
RCP-017034	Sinnott Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2622.78	1	Yes	2622.78
RCP-027579	East Valley Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4589.85	1	Yes	4589.85
RCP-000042	Wooldridge Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2182.07	1	Yes	2180.06		0
RCP-015689	Kief, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2213.53	1	Yes	2213.53
RCP-007763	Town of Cooperton	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2632.25	4	Yes	2632.25
RCP-054545	Pollock Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2931.16		Yes	0
RCP-007711	Town of Blackburn	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3000	1	Yes	3000
RCP-027582	Fork Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1092.82	1	Yes	1092.82
RCP-030068	Township Of Walpack, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1151.34	1	Yes	1151.34
RCP-026385	Town Of Fontana Dam, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2230.88	1	Yes	2230.88	96000	30000
RCP-015593	Loma, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2371.64	1	Yes	1185.81
RCP-004508	East Park Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2513.49	1	Yes	2513.49
RCP-004543	Linsell Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3169.18	1	Yes	3169.18
RCP-054536	Pendleton Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3267.72		Yes	3267.72
RCP-004537	Veldt Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3278.47	1	Yes	3278.47
RCP-019410	Kaskaskia Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1206		Yes	0
RCP-014658	Loraine, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1264.87		Yes	1256.07
RCP-008005	Town of Spaulding	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1279.25	1	Yes	1279.24
RCP-004294	Southfield Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1366.14	1	Yes	1366.14
RCP-057136	Livonia Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3442.55	1	Yes	3442.54
RCP-047804	Lone Elm City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3510.02		Yes	3510.02
RCP-046832	Town Of Dayton, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1753.94	1	Yes	876.97
RCP-007879	Town of Knowles	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1754.84	1	Yes	1754.89
RCP-004488	Eagle Point Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1857.8	1	Yes	1857.8
RCP-015655	Ayr, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2845.96	1	Yes	2845.96
RCP-026113	Van Tassell Town, WY	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3121.89	1	Yes	3121.89
RCP-017447	Correll City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3497.03	2	Yes	3497.03
RCP-015720	Amidon, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3636.5		Yes	3636.5
RCP-000043	Worthington Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3599.64	1	Yes	1799.82
RCP-047970	Russell Springs City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3662.62		Yes	3662.62
RCP-048055	Webber City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3662.62	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-001329	Moro Plantation, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3700.84		Yes	3700.84
RCP-017317	Denham City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3715.6		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-001405	Seboeis Plantation, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3595.11		Yes	3595.11
RCP-015583	Ambrose, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3794.61		Yes	3794.61
RCP-027590	Parker Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3824.88	1	Yes	3824.88
RCP-017105	Florence City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3934.16	2	Yes	3934.16
RCP-015580	Ludden, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3952.72	1	Yes	3925.21
RCP-047540	Brownell City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3967.84		Yes	3967.84	0	0
RCP-054836	Bankston City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4037.12	1	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-015663	Bucyrus, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4110.83	1	Yes	4110.83
RCP-047564	Cedar Point City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4120.44	1	Yes	4120.44
RCP-027578	Boxville Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4152.73	1	Yes	4152.73
RCP-052340	Palmville Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4043.44		Yes	4043.44
RCP-027580	Espelie Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4152.73	1	Yes	4152.73
RCP-034575	Town Of Cedar Rapids, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4396.08	1	Yes	4396.08
RCP-007251	Venturia, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	1897.3	1	Yes	1897.3
RCP-017102	Donnelly Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2076.36	1	Yes	2076.36
RCP-004549	Thief Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4043.44	1	Yes	4043.44
RCP-054041	Annada Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4054.5	3	Yes	4054.5
RCP-004655	Como Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4152.73	2	Yes	4152.73
RCP-017296	Hegne Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4152.73	1	Yes	4152.73
RCP-019663	City Of Hindsville, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4503.75		Yes	4503.75
RCP-053300	Scofield Town, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2722	1	Yes	2722
RCP-004653	Moose River Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2732.06	1	Yes	2732.06
RCP-014667	Sarles, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4268.94	2	Yes	4268.94
RCP-015726	Egeland, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4268.94	1	Yes	4268.94
RCP-050528	Village Of Stockville, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4424.69	2	Yes	4424.69
RCP-017583	Shoal Creek Estates Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4520.6		Yes	4520.6
RCP-015475	Kingsbury Plantation, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	2854.94		Yes	0
RCP-017200	Cobden City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	3824.88	1	Yes	3824.88
RCP-057361	Long Lost Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4262	1	Yes	4262
RCP-018652	Village Of Antioch, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8308.37	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-050197	Village Of Cotesfield, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8318.42		Yes	0	1000	1000
RCP-017355	Cloverleaf Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8851.86	2	Yes	8851.86
RCP-052210	Shippensburg Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	584325.82	4	Yes	582484.16
RCP-025171	Town Of Auburn, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	584377.62	23	Yes	584377.62
RCP-004210	Handy Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	587340.84	3	Yes	587340.84
RCP-007296	Wolford, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5059.48		Yes	5059.48
RCP-050210	Village Of Cushing, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5840.6	1	Yes	5800
RCP-007868	Town of Kemp	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5843.86	1	Yes	5843.86
RCP-014662	Fullerton, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8379.76		Yes	8321.44
RCP-007757	Town of Clearview	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8423.2		Yes	8423.2
RCP-016275	Walshville Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8437.24		Yes	8437.24
RCP-027287	Wanda City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8742.58	1	Yes	8742.58
RCP-014665	Great Bend, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8854.09		Yes	8854.09
RCP-015591	Hamilton, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8854.09	1	Yes	8792.47		0
RCP-005176	Centerville Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	584471.34	22	Yes	584471.34
RCP-035768	City Of Moundville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	584572.74	3	Yes	584572.74
RCP-027135	North Oaks City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	584769.25	2	Yes	584769.25
RCP-031447	Oakham, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	584960.67	1	Yes	584960.67
RCP-051987	Borough Of Hollidaysburg, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595770.84	1	Yes	595770.84
RCP-033926	Town Of Anderson, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5966.11		Yes	5966.11
RCP-007785	Town of Douglas	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5966.43		Yes	0
RCP-017038	Otter Tail Peninsula Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6229.09	1	Yes	6229.09
RCP-015536	Town Of Akaska, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8499.76		Yes	8499.76
RCP-013829	Houghton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8512.18	1	Yes	8512.18
RCP-056534	Odem, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	585930.54	2	Yes	584774.84
RCP-027243	St. Paul Park City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	585971.36	1	Yes	585971.36
RCP-051777	Oxford Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	586005.84	7	Yes	584158.88
RCP-032110	Concord Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	586318.57		Yes	583987.16
RCP-047404	Ross Town, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	586331	2	Yes	586331
RCP-013862	Groveland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595642.86	3	Yes	595642.86
RCP-040786	Township Of Berlin, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595668.74	1	Yes	595668.74
RCP-030091	Township Of Blairstown, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595668.74	2	Yes	595668.74
RCP-004185	City Of Dowagiac, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595747.96	1	Yes	595747.96
RCP-003735	Grand Island Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4605	1	No		0	0
RCP-016360	Lincoln Plantation, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4652.5	1	Yes	4652.5
RCP-057392	Strandquist City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7431.19	1	Yes	7431.19
RCP-014648	Nekoma, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7747.33	1	Yes	7693.41
RCP-015562	Donnybrook, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8379.76		Yes	8321
RCP-047579	Clayton City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8393.5	1	Yes	8393.5
RCP-027265	Trosky City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8633.29	2	Yes	0
RCP-031641	City Of Homedale, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	585061.36		Yes	0
RCP-032060	City Of Deer Park, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	585372.05	2	Yes	585372.05
RCP-026632	Town Of Scotland Neck, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	586403.3	1	Yes	586403.3
RCP-002014	Town Of Holly Hill, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	586460.18	1	Yes	586460.18
RCP-052350	Becker Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	598648.09	1	Yes	598648.09
RCP-051718	Nazareth Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	598710.84		Yes	596823.84
RCP-001989	Town Of Due West, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	598906.28		Yes	598906.28
RCP-040967	Borough Of Oceanport, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	598913.46	1	Yes	598913.47
RCP-054702	Portageville City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	599577.4	1	Yes	599577.4
RCP-017177	Third River Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5464.11		Yes	5464.11
RCP-057421	Big Woods Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5682.68	1	Yes	5682.68
RCP-007285	Landa, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5691.91	1	Yes	5652.3
RCP-027259	Taopi City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7103.35	1	Yes	7103.35
RCP-040733	Borough Of Teterboro, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7117.46		No		0	0	0
RCP-024558	Town Of Palm Tree, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7487.15	1	Yes	7487.15
RCP-014649	Prairie Rose, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7747.33	1	Yes	7693.41
RCP-001301	Hersey Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7930.39		Yes	7930.39
RCP-057372	Huntly Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8196.17	1	Yes	8196.17
RCP-055533	Dougherty City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8522.81	1	Yes	8522.81
RCP-027131	Nielsville City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8961.15	1	Yes	8961.15
RCP-032277	City Of New Carlisle, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	585582.39	2	Yes	583253.9
RCP-023739	Town Of Allegany, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	600100.76	5	Yes	15000
RCP-032594	Village Of Grafton, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	600200.91		Yes	597814.3
RCP-051606	Township Of Sewickley Dba Sewickley Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	600285.84	2	Yes	600285.84
RCP-040945	Borough Of Fair Haven, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	600378.82	1	Yes	200000
RCP-013910	Oregon Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	601317.64	1	Yes	601317.64
RCP-014643	Alsen, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5059.48	1	Yes	5059.48
RCP-047668	Galatia City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5493.92	2	Yes	5493.92	0	0
RCP-022634	New Washington Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5775	1	Yes	5756.9
RCP-027328	Beaver Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5791.96	1	Yes	5791.96
RCP-053943	Stewardson Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7140	1	Yes	7117.5
RCP-015483	Monhegan Plantation, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7190.21		No		0	0
RCP-057224	Arco City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7540.47	1	Yes	7540.47
RCP-052426	Croke Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7759.04	1	Yes	7759.04
RCP-004503	Onstad Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7759.04		Yes	7759.04
RCP-017072	St. Rosa City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7759.04	1	No		0	0
RCP-047640	Elmdale City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7935.68	2	Yes	7935.68
RCP-004606	Augsburg Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7977.6	1	Yes	7977.6
RCP-027378	Artichoke Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8414.73	2	Yes	8414.74
RCP-057322	Poplar Grove Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8524.02		Yes	8524.02
RCP-004689	New Dosey Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8524.02	1	Yes	8524.02
RCP-052371	Crane Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8961.15		Yes	8961.15
RCP-004379	Breitung Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595958.12		Yes	0
RCP-025678	Emerson, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	596004	1	Yes	596004
RCP-006953	Maurice, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	596061.92	1	Yes	596061.92
RCP-017064	Lockhart Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5136.27	1	Yes	5136.27
RCP-055507	Cotter City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5145		Yes	0
RCP-017339	Leonidas City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5791.96		Yes	800
RCP-048072	Willis City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5799.16	1	Yes	5778.16
RCP-017062	Wilder City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6229.09		Yes	0
RCP-007911	Town of May	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7194.82		Yes	7194.82
RCP-027023	Kenneth City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7212.62	2	Yes	3000
RCP-057277	Whalan City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7212.62	1	Yes	7212.62
RCP-018326	Jefferson Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7782.52		Yes	7751.58
RCP-004121	Matchwood Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8196.92		Yes	8196.92
RCP-027585	Middle River Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8414.73	1	Yes	8414.73
RCP-007300	North River, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8537.87		Yes	8537.87
RCP-017385	Seaforth City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8961.15	1	Yes	8961.15
RCP-052521	Collins, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	596174.54		Yes	596174.54
RCP-051453	Borough Of New Brighton, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	596295.84		Yes	596295.84
RCP-047958	Richfield City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5493.92		Yes	2746.96
RCP-007691	Town of Amorita	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6668.36	2	Yes	6668.36
RCP-034399	Village Of Stockholm, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6698.79		Yes	6698.79	1175.74
RCP-017236	Rogers Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7212.62		Yes	0
RCP-017253	Gully City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7212.62	1	Yes	7212.62
RCP-017356	Manhattan Beach City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7212.62	1	Yes	7212.62	0	0	0
RCP-017170	Sandsville Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7540.47	1	Yes	7540.47
RCP-050419	Village Of Norman, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7787.46		Yes	3894
RCP-014637	Barney, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8221.66	1	Yes	8221.66
RCP-015594	Brocket, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8537.87		Yes	8537.87
RCP-055550	Knierim City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8672.33		Yes	8672.33
RCP-047869	Nashville City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8698.72	1	Yes	8698.72
RCP-019512	City Of Birdsong, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8701.6	1	Yes	8701.6
RCP-031983	Westport City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	586784	11	Yes	586784
RCP-039969	Sherman County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	586988	3	Yes	586988
RCP-052252	Borough Of Media, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	596610.84	1	Yes	594730.46
RCP-016427	Oxford Town, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	597067.25		Yes	597067.25
RCP-053238	Bowman County,	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	587377	3	Yes	587377
RCP-025781	Lookout Mountain, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	587789	7	Yes	493016.01
RCP-051794	Oxford Township Supervisors Dba Oxford Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	588000.82	1	Yes	588000.82
RCP-052618	Purvis, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	588061.65		Yes	0
RCP-056636	Ponder, Town Of, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	588165.01	2	Yes	80000
RCP-035725	Town Of Trinity, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	588851.84	2	Yes	588851.84
RCP-007235	Monango, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6008.14		Yes	5966.32
RCP-017136	St. Vincent Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6010.53	1	Yes	6010.53
RCP-023443	Cherry Valley Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6510.02		Yes	0	0		0
RCP-007894	Town of Lima	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7404	1	Yes	7404
RCP-054615	Clyde Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7428		Yes	7428
RCP-015579	Niagara, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8063.55	2	Yes	8063.55
RCP-008018	Town of Strong City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8072.22		Yes	8072.46
RCP-050008	Town Of Paoli, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8545.9		No		0	0	0
RCP-055773	Cortland Town, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	599861.14	1	Yes	599861.14
RCP-050613	Archer City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	600022	1	Yes	600022
RCP-024583	Village Of Albion, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	588203.36	1	Yes	588203.38
RCP-050105	City Of Auburn, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	588307.27		Yes	588307.27
RCP-026121	Town Of Andrews, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	588315.48		Yes	588315.48
RCP-056914	Dalworthington Gardens, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	588413.3	1	Yes	587252.7
RCP-056216	Salado, Village Of, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	588413.3	4	Yes	587252.7
RCP-049954	Town Of La Salle, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	588661.12		Yes	274546
RCP-034572	City Of Milton, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	588969.96		Yes	0	0	0
RCP-054245	Penermon Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4775.33	1	Yes	4775.33	0	0
RCP-022696	Driftwood Borough Dba Borough Of Driftwood, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6090.02		Yes	6070.82
RCP-050200	Village Of Crab Orchard, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6371.56		Yes	0
RCP-017276	Wylie Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6994.06	1	Yes	6994.06
RCP-034545	Village Of Yuba, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7222.13	1	Yes	7222.13
RCP-034985	Village Of Big Falls, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7222.13	2	Yes	7222.13
RCP-001255	Lake View Plantation, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8987.77		Yes	8987.77
RCP-056148	Newton, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	588413.3	2	Yes	588413.3
RCP-034570	City Of Edgerton, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	589388.63	2	Yes	589388.63
RCP-052772	Huntington Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	589693.63		Yes	589554.65
RCP-053061	County Of Rush,	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	589707	2	Yes	589707
RCP-025275	Town Of Loudon, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	589821.48	28	Yes	589821.48
RCP-047606	Danville City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5188.72		Yes	5188.72
RCP-048005	Speed City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5188.72	1	Yes	5188.72
RCP-017858	Deer Grove Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6123.81	1	Yes	0.01
RCP-027317	Wolf Lake City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6119.8		Yes	6119.82
RCP-018122	La Prairie Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6123.81	1	Yes	6123.81
RCP-017737	Burnt Prairie Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6532.06	1	Yes	6532.06
RCP-015704	Regan, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6798.68		Yes	6798.68
RCP-017439	Beulah Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7321.91		Yes	7321.91
RCP-015589	Kathryn, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7589.22	1	Yes	7536.4
RCP-057185	Wanger Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8086.89	1	Yes	8086.89
RCP-047743	Hunter City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8240.9	3	Yes	4102.27
RCP-054608	Arbela Town, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8257.5		Yes	8257.5
RCP-047508	Aurora City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8546.12	1	Yes	8546.12
RCP-024412	Town Of Cambria, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	589229	1	Yes	589229
RCP-026090	Newcastle City, WY	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	589169.97	1	Yes	589169.97
RCP-014478	Piperton City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	589272.94	1	Yes	589272.94
RCP-035749	City Of Bayou La Batre, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	589327.3	15	Yes	588000
RCP-022718	Wright Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	591045.84	1	Yes	589183
RCP-056698	Daingerfield, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	590896.06	2	Yes	590896.06
RCP-032465	City Of Groveport, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	591156.35	1	Yes	591156.35
RCP-024986	Town Of Woodstock, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	591485.4	1	Yes	207335.14
RCP-050398	Village Of Moorefield, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5309.63	1	Yes	5309.63
RCP-055680	Rodman City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6130.45		No		0	0	0
RCP-007732	Town of Byron	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6141.91	1	Yes	6141.91
RCP-014044	Bohemia Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7251.12	1	Yes	7251.12
RCP-014675	Courtenay, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7273.01		Yes	7222.39
RCP-048015	Sun City City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7325.24		Yes	7325.24
RCP-048074	Wilmore City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7325.24	1	Yes	7325.24
RCP-018575	Village Of Lower Salem, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8623.89	2	Yes	8611
RCP-017126	Reis Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8742.58	1	Yes	8742.58
RCP-039099	Baker County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	590096	5	Yes	590096
RCP-030198	Red Lodge City, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	590046.09	3	Yes	590046	0	0
RCP-015388	Tompkinsville city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	590175.12	1	No		54917.24	121328.54
RCP-054062	Chaffee City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	590409.55	3	Yes	30000
RCP-027544	Spring Brook Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5354.83	1	Yes	5354.83
RCP-017289	Gorton Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5354.83	1	Yes	5354.83
RCP-050563	Village Of Verdel, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5309.64		Yes	5309.64
RCP-015569	Fairdale, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5375.7		Yes	5375.5
RCP-008031	Town of Texola	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6141.91		Yes	6141.91
RCP-014657	Cathay, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6166.25		Yes	6166.25
RCP-018007	Gulf Port Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6395.98		Yes	6395.98	0
RCP-017484	Milo Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6431.26		Yes	6431.26
RCP-027027	Kerrick City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6884.78	2	No		0	0	0
RCP-052299	Wilma Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6884.78	1	Yes	6884.78
RCP-015710	Woodworth, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7431.11	1	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-022650	West Pennsboro Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	590835.84	1	Yes	0
RCP-050075	City Of Wray, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	590420.58	1	Yes	590420.58
RCP-006704	Bernice, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	590505.1	4	Yes	590505.1
RCP-026233	Town Of Drexel, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	590865.06	4	Yes	590865.06
RCP-050728	Howey-In-The-Hills Town, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	591508	1	Yes	591508
RCP-024308	Village Of Hilton, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	592511.04	3	Yes	592511.04
RCP-054936	Leclaire City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	592858.48	2	Yes	216858.48
RCP-025467	Mountain View, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	593158.76	1	Yes	593158.76
RCP-003911	Carrollton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	593330.92	4	Yes	593330.92
RCP-024978	Town Of Rosendale, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	593434.11	4	Yes	593434.11
RCP-019158	Wayne Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	593680.42	1	Yes	593680.42
RCP-055873	Tuscola City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	593737.33	2	Yes	593737.33
RCP-025266	Town Of Hart'S Location, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4711.03	1	Yes	4711.03
RCP-048016	Susank City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4730.88		Yes	4600
RCP-027118	Myrtle City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4917.7	1	Yes	4917.7
RCP-055366	Blanchard City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5382.83	1	Yes	5382.83
RCP-023292	Brady Township Clarion County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5670.02	1	Yes	5339
RCP-027272	Urbank City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5682.68	1	Yes	0
RCP-057338	Hatfield City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5682.68	1	Yes	5682.68
RCP-057321	Windsor Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6884.78	1	Yes	6884.78
RCP-004659	Foldahl Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6884.78	1	Yes	6884.78
RCP-004680	Seavey Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6884.78	3	Yes	6884.78
RCP-032889	Village Of Chilo, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7046.34	1	Yes	7018.32
RCP-026897	Dundee City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7321.91		Yes	7321.91
RCP-026943	Genola City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7321.91	1	Yes	7321.91
RCP-004664	Nassau City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7321.91		Yes	1400
RCP-024234	Town Of Montague, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7794.85	1	Yes	7794.84
RCP-052284	Hickory Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8414.73	3	Yes	8414.73
RCP-048967	Lordsburg City, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	592619	6	No		131380.4	303996.72	131380.4
RCP-007577	City of Hominy	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	594537.13	4	Yes	594530.08
RCP-055552	Clayton City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5831.4	1	Yes	5831.4	5831.4	0
RCP-047834	Matfield Green City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6562.2	2	Yes	6562.2
RCP-056731	Cottonwood, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6630		Yes	0
RCP-004156	Sherman Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6935.86		Yes	0
RCP-052309	Parnell Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	6994.06	1	Yes	0
RCP-054562	Rush Hill Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7058.34	3	Yes	7058.34
RCP-015365	South Carrollton city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7800	1	Yes	1920
RCP-007820	Town of Gerty	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7815		Yes	7815	0	0
RCP-004505	Tamarac Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8305.45	1	Yes	8305.45
RCP-004507	Eckvoll Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8305.45	1	Yes	8305.45
RCP-015938	Muddy Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8573.33		Yes	8573.33
RCP-015904	Mill Creek Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	8709.41	1	Yes	4766.5	0	0	0
RCP-041001	Township Of Mendham, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	592633.36		Yes	0
RCP-005294	Gardiner City, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	597739.79	7	Yes	597739.79
RCP-022344	Cambria Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	597765.84	1	Yes	597765.84
RCP-054017	Sharon Hill Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	597345.84		Yes	595463.14
RCP-024033	Town Of Newstead, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	598254.61	6	Yes	598254.61
RCP-004490	Whiteford Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4917.7	1	Yes	4917.7
RCP-017270	Libby Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	4917.7		Yes	4917.7
RCP-016391	Eldorado Town, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5758.5		Yes	5758.5
RCP-027583	Grand Plain Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5901.24	1	Yes	5901.24
RCP-015457	Great Pond Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5921.35	1	Yes	5921.35
RCP-023466	Borough Of Saint Clairsville, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7854		Yes	0
RCP-057240	Dollymount Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7868.33	1	Yes	7868.33
RCP-018422	Village Of Deersville, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7887.69		Yes	7856.33	0
RCP-023505	Borough Of Mount Carbon, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9030.02		No		0	0	0
RCP-007548	City of Dewey	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	593835.19	1	Yes	593835.19
RCP-019497	City Of Bald Knob, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	594194.67	6	Yes	594194.67
RCP-032165	Shalersville Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	594311.43	2	Yes	0
RCP-027337	Linwood Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	594713.94	2	Yes	594713.94
RCP-016417	Millington Town, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595096.73	3	Yes	297548.37
RCP-008487	Macon, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595191.16	1	Yes	595191.16
RCP-031470	Rochester, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	595250.07		Yes	595250.07
RCP-056234	Shepherd, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	599089.15	1	Yes	599089.15
RCP-054430	East Prairie City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	599169.94		Yes	599169.94
RCP-051612	Clarion Borough Dba Borough Of Clarion, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	599235.86	1	Yes	597347.2
RCP-007618	City of Pawhuska	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	599275.17		Yes	599268.08
RCP-051483	Lewisburg Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	599340.84	1	Yes	599340.84
RCP-051394	Paradise Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	599550.84	1	Yes	599550.84
RCP-026115	Wheatland Town, WY	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	600443.46	1	Yes	600443.46
RCP-035287	Town Of Hurt, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	601098	2	Yes	601098	0
RCP-017941	Florence Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5035.14		Yes	5035.14
RCP-047554	Byers City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5036.1		No		0	0	0
RCP-055472	Ottosen City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5532.36	1	Yes	5532.36
RCP-007295	Berlin, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5533.8	2	Yes	5533.8
RCP-054470	Holliday Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	5555.26	1	Yes	5555.26
RCP-053885	Grandfather Mountain, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7648.74	1	Yes	7648.74
RCP-019297	Village Of Yankee Lake, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7887.69	1	Yes	7887.69
RCP-015721	Tolley, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	7905.44		Yes	7905.44
RCP-052006	East Rockhill Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	601440.84	1	Yes	601440.84
RCP-047655	Fairway City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	604332.24	1	Yes	604332.24
RCP-051553	Upper Pottsgrove Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	604380.86	1	Yes	604380.86	0	0
RCP-022612	Dickson City Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	604905.86	2	Yes	602999.34
RCP-014389	Jacksboro Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	610636.3	1	Yes	610636.3
RCP-040848	Borough Of Roseland, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	610741.02	1	Yes	610741.02
RCP-015208	Irvine city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	602230.21	3	Yes	595087.79
RCP-017671	Beecher Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	602446.76		Yes	602446.76
RCP-047516	Baxter Springs City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	602500.94	1	Yes	602500.94
RCP-056300	Woodville, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	602813.28	1	Yes	601624.28
RCP-004328	Fruitland Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	602999.08	8	Yes	602999.08
RCP-040905	Township Of Tewksbury, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	604565.56	6	Yes	604565.56
RCP-016146	Shelbyville City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	611700.5	1	Yes	611384.86
RCP-025819	Morgan, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	611745	3	Yes	611745		300000	300000
RCP-014161	City Of Belding, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	603209.26	1	Yes	603209.26	179554.62
RCP-016207	Sullivan City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	603263.26	2	Yes	603263.26
RCP-054911	Huxley City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	603474.6	1	Yes	603474.6
RCP-006137	Town Of Marmet, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	603823.41	15	Yes	603823.41
RCP-032257	Amherst Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	605038.69	1	Yes	605038.69
RCP-040954	Borough Of Little Silver, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	605193.58	1	Yes	605193.58
RCP-022815	Leacock Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	605220.86	3	Yes	603313.34	0	0
RCP-014608	Stanley County,	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	601750	1	Yes	0
RCP-013853	Windsor Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	605311.02	1	Yes	605311.02
RCP-047964	Rose Hill City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	605553.12		Yes	605553.12
RCP-040713	Borough Of Norwood, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	606344.94	1	Yes	606344.94
RCP-006538	City Of Hartford, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	606557.3	1	Yes	606557.3
RCP-024422	Town Of Royalton, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	606972.53		Yes	0
RCP-035510	City Of Abbeville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	608583.26	17	No		0	0	0
RCP-024779	Town Of Duanesburg, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	608613.55		Yes	608613.55
RCP-015794	Raisinville Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	608673.86	1	No	0	0	0	250000
RCP-025222	Town Of Hopkinton, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	603117.06	1	Yes	603117
RCP-032540	Pleasant Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	603881.83	2	Yes	601480.58
RCP-002054	Town Of Pamplico, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	607369.64	1	Yes	607368.84
RCP-055251	Forest City City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	601829.85	1	Yes	601829.85	0	0
RCP-007031	St. Francisville, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	601989.2	1	Yes	601989
RCP-023672	Town Of New Scotland, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	602049.47	1	Yes	602049.47
RCP-056189	Rancho Viejo, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	610758.11		Yes	609553.43
RCP-040739	Borough Of Woodcliff Lake, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	611159.68	4	Yes	611159.68	774409.63	0
RCP-032440	Saybrook Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	607352.42	1	Yes	604937.37
RCP-026560	Town Of Oakboro, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	609349.51	1	Yes	603350
RCP-030005	Borough Of Prospect Park, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	611578.36	2	Yes	530395.68
RCP-054174	Byrnes Mill City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	611597.47	23	Yes	611000
RCP-023995	Town Of Pawling, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	611690.46	2	Yes	611690.46
RCP-024700	Village Of Wesley Hills, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	607075.1	3	Yes	607075.12
RCP-052192	Springfield Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	607215.86		Yes	607215.86
RCP-056295	Winters, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	607778.8	1	Yes	607778.8
RCP-047578	Clay Center City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	607842.26	1	Yes	607842.26
RCP-005309	Houlton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	608207.9	4	Yes	608207.9
RCP-053613	City Of Dayton, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	609483.34	1	Yes	560000
RCP-003315	Grayling Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	609514.58	5	Yes	609514.58
RCP-047001	Loogootee City, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	611893.23	1	Yes	611893.23
RCP-026924	Falcon Heights City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	604112.2		Yes	604112.2
RCP-032706	Swan Creek Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	605564.54	1	Yes	605564.54
RCP-032412	Scioto Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	608298.94	1	Yes	605880.13
RCP-032270	City Of The Village Of Indian Hill, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	608509.28	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-057064	Lincoln, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	603501.28		Yes	599301.04
RCP-014343	Estill Springs Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	603515.18	2	Yes	603515.18
RCP-034051	Town Of Onalaska, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	603518.89	4	Yes	603518.89
RCP-040957	Borough Of Manasquan, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	607705.62	1	Yes	607705.62
RCP-023136	Longswamp Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	607740.86	1	Yes	607740.86
RCP-039701	Woodson County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	609520	7	Yes	609520
RCP-052001	Borough Of Crafton, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	605850.86	1	Yes	603941.36
RCP-031449	Orleans, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	605821.59	1	Yes	0
RCP-026948	Glencoe City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	605860.73	3	Yes	605860.74		1000000
RCP-035329	Town Of Parksley, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	606000	1	Yes	606000
RCP-016393	Fairmount Heights Town, MD	Maryland	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	607288.83	2	Yes	607288.83
RCP-018903	East Union Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	606195.56	1	Yes	604173.52
RCP-055882	West Peoria City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	606257.11		Yes	606257.11
RCP-007999	Town of Slaughterville	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	606310.5		Yes	606310.5
RCP-005373	Rumford Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	607361.99	1	Yes	607361.99
RCP-015241	Louisa city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	609830.15	2	Yes	602597.6
RCP-050280	City Of Gothenburg, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	610253.75	1	Yes	610253.75
RCP-051636	Caernarvon Township Board Of Supervisors Dba Caernarvon Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	438480.62	2	Yes	437098.62
RCP-022438	Franklin Township Supervisors, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	438690.62	1	Yes	438690.62
RCP-052987	New Chicago Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	439656.61	3	Yes	439656.61
RCP-056679	Sadler, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95089.58	1	Yes	95089.58
RCP-014310	Copperhill City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95245.02	2	Yes	95245.02
RCP-023239	Port Royal Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95340.14		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-034270	Town Of Jefferson, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95353.05	1	Yes	95353.05
RCP-023964	Village Of Hancock, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95692.02	2	Yes	21500
RCP-005267	Clifton Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95693.35	1	Yes	95693.35
RCP-033179	Newton Town Corp., UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96692		Yes	96692
RCP-035755	Town Of Crossville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	441460.58		Yes	441232.47
RCP-025627	Wrightsville, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	441502.38	5	Yes	441502.38
RCP-026317	Buchanan City, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	439161	7	Yes	439161	118000	300000
RCP-035630	City Of Cordova, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	439796.48	13	Yes	439796.48
RCP-019573	City Of Cushman, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95096.01	3	No		47084.04	47084.04
RCP-024902	Village Of Poquott, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95179.2	6	Yes	95179.2	0	0
RCP-017009	Nokay Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95184.83	2	Yes	95184.83
RCP-034757	Town Of Browning, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95353.05	1	Yes	95353.05
RCP-055356	Brighton City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95694.68	3	Yes	95694.68
RCP-018660	Pleasant Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95704.02		Yes	95704.02
RCP-015493	Aloha Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96261.28	1	Yes	96261.28
RCP-015203	Hustonville city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96702.76	5	Yes	95555.87	15000	10000
RCP-023237	Mcclure Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96705.14		No	0	0	96400.34	0
RCP-051566	Borough Of Millville, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96810.14	1	Yes	96505.02
RCP-034154	Town Of Cassel, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96818.41	1	Yes	96818.41
RCP-023992	Village Of Millerton, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94871.51	1	Yes	94871.51
RCP-018898	Village Of Waynesburg, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95493.68		Yes	95113.96
RCP-031746	City Of Weippe, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95502.67	1	Yes	0
RCP-025397	Lafe, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95510.37	6	Yes	95510.37
RCP-013973	Horton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95735.82	1	Yes	95735.82
RCP-031874	Mansfield Town, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95842	11	Yes	95842
RCP-033209	Annabella Town, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95864		Yes	95864
RCP-034786	Town Of Caledonia, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96818.41		Yes	96818.41
RCP-053652	City Of Huntington, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96842.1		Yes	96842.1
RCP-041007	Borough Of Mountain Lakes, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	442015.3	4	Yes	442015.31
RCP-006755	Dubberly, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95206.9	3	Yes	87826.57
RCP-019600	City Of Emmet, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95510.37	4	Yes	95510.37
RCP-034655	Town Of Winfield, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96190.4	1	Yes	96190.4
RCP-018738	Village Of Bloomingburg, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96229.86		Yes	0	0	0
RCP-057161	Blackberry Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96277.66	1	Yes	96277.66
RCP-032914	Perry Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96860.89	1	Yes	96475.73
RCP-001970	Town Of Bowman, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	442085.44	1	Yes	442085.44
RCP-022424	Millcreek Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	439740.62	1	Yes	439740.62
RCP-040252	Divide County, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	439755	1	Yes	439755
RCP-024021	Village Of Springville, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	439793.55	1	Yes	439793.55
RCP-017254	Cherry Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94966.26	2	Yes	94966.26
RCP-032172	Village Of Hopedale, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94967.83		No		0	0	0
RCP-055961	Callisburg, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95089.58	2	Yes	94902.02
RCP-055723	Moravia City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95096.59	3	Yes	95096.59
RCP-023285	Borough Of East Brady, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95130.12		Yes	94830.3
RCP-022485	Adams Township Snyder County, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95760.14	1	Yes	95760.14
RCP-033575	Town Of Blue Mounds, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95771.73	1	Yes	95771.73
RCP-018030	Hennepin Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95939.69		Yes	95939.69
RCP-026406	Town Of Goldston, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95927.93	3	Yes	95927.93
RCP-032517	Village Of Killbuck, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96650.54		Yes	96650.54
RCP-018986	Village Of Wayne, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96860.89		Yes	96475.73
RCP-052641	Soso, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96863		Yes	96863	0	10982.95
RCP-018236	Union Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94967.83		Yes	94967.83
RCP-003303	Emerson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95000.18	4	Yes	95000.18
RCP-023568	Albany Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95025.14		Yes	94725.64
RCP-033804	Town Of Lincoln, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95562.39	1	Yes	95562.39
RCP-034373	Village Of Shiocton, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95562.39		Yes	95562.39
RCP-014046	Ransom Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95946	2	Yes	95945
RCP-052267	Dane Prairie Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95949.8	1	Yes	95949.8
RCP-039417	Mcpherson County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95954	3	Yes	95954
RCP-034976	Town Of Matteson, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95981.06		Yes	95981.06
RCP-019000	Cherry Valley Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96229.86	2	Yes	95847.22
RCP-056586	Quitaque, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96579.23	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-018743	Israel Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96650.54	1	Yes	96650.54
RCP-035527	City Of Vernon, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	439796.48	1	Yes	439796.48
RCP-034711	Town Of Red Springs, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95771.73	1	Yes	95771.73
RCP-022949	Harrison Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96075.12	1	Yes	96075.12
RCP-051586	New Bethlehem Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96285.12	1	Yes	96285.12
RCP-023572	Granville Township Supervisors, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96285.12		No		0	0	0
RCP-032256	Village Of Sebring, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	440238.47	4	Yes	440238.47	22297.74	0
RCP-022323	Ruscombmanor Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	440475.62	2	Yes	439087.34
RCP-024637	Village Of Otego, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95179.2	1	Yes	0
RCP-015424	Woodburn city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95654.49	1	Yes	94520.04
RCP-023584	Mifflintown Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95655.14	1	Yes	95655.14
RCP-018838	Farmer Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95914.36		Yes	95532.97
RCP-026799	Birchwood Village City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96386.93	2	Yes	96386.93
RCP-007539	City of Commerce	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	440462.87		Yes	440457.66
RCP-022473	Salem Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	440580.62	1	Yes	439192.02
RCP-022791	Ralpho Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	440580.62	1	Yes	439192.02
RCP-035444	City Of Samson, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	440747.4	1	Yes	440747.4
RCP-019627	City Of Glenwood, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	440880.84	4	Yes	440880.84
RCP-018201	Village Of Bloomville, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95809.19		No		0	0	0
RCP-033495	Town Of Sherman, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96085.73	1	Yes	96085.73
RCP-034011	Village Of Necedah, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96085.73	1	Yes	96085.73
RCP-047062	Orland Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96089.9	3	Yes	96089.9
RCP-014430	Mclemoresville Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96728.59	1	Yes	85000
RCP-025571	Sulphur Rock, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96753.46	3	Yes	96753.46
RCP-032439	Village Of New Washington, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96755.71		Yes	96370.97
RCP-026627	Town Of Sandy Creek, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96884.02	1	Yes	96884.02
RCP-026367	Comer, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	439908	2	Yes	439908
RCP-018787	Greenville Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	439922.97	2	Yes	438173.68
RCP-025305	Town Of Strafford, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	440952.8	11	Yes	440952.8
RCP-015952	New Baden Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	441050.34	1	No		0	0
RCP-052117	Birmingham Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	440895.62	2	Yes	440200.82
RCP-026678	Town Of Swepsonville, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	441077.26	3	Yes	441077.26
RCP-014701	Town Of Fort Lawn, SC	South Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	441089.74	1	Yes	441089.74
RCP-018780	Brighton Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95809.19	4	Yes	95428.21
RCP-023798	Town Of Sempronius, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96102.28	2	Yes	96102.28
RCP-050561	Village Of Valparaiso, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96104.35	1	Yes	96104.35
RCP-018875	Royalton Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96650.54	2	Yes	96650
RCP-047170	Williams Creek Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96769.78	1	Yes	96769.78
RCP-014803	Butterfield City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96771.75		Yes	96771.75
RCP-056432	Bovina, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	441185.83	1	Yes	100000
RCP-048993	Santa Clara Village, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	441312	2	Yes	441312
RCP-047402	Rolling Hills City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	441363	1	Yes	441363
RCP-055862	Sleepy Hollow Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	441458.6	1	Yes	441458.6
RCP-018893	North Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95704.02	1	Yes	95704.02
RCP-052327	Northfield Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95731.24	1	Yes	95731.24
RCP-031973	Uniontown Town, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96121	1	Yes	96121
RCP-055008	Stanton City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96143.25		Yes	96143.25
RCP-007686	Town of Alex	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96164.8	6	Yes	95711.11
RCP-023408	Washington Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96495.14		Yes	999.99
RCP-056670	Dodd City, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96579.23		Yes	96579.23
RCP-034111	Town Of Schley, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96609.08		Yes	96609.08
RCP-034358	Town Of Liberty, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96609.08		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-003344	Star Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96891.8	1	Yes	96504
RCP-051353	Franklin Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96915.14	1	Yes	96915
RCP-038192	Jeff Davis County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	441698	1	Yes	441698
RCP-050302	Village Of Hay Springs, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95573.38		Yes	95573.38	0
RCP-050115	City Of Bassett, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95573.38		Yes	95573.38
RCP-056743	Alma, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95586.13	1	Yes	95586.13
RCP-034144	Village Of Valders, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96295.07	1	Yes	96295.07
RCP-033030	Jackson Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96335.03		Yes	96335.03		95951.97
RCP-054628	Hopkins City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96975.48	1	Yes	96975.48
RCP-024625	Town Of Exeter, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95384.33		Yes	15000
RCP-003565	Tekonsha Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95420.56	1	Yes	95039
RCP-055715	Agency City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96143.25	1	Yes	96143.25
RCP-047738	Hoyt City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96143.76	3	Yes	96143.76
RCP-023405	Addison Township Supervisors Dba Addison Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	97020.14	1	Yes	97020.14
RCP-024380	Village Of Russell Gardens, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	97025.35	1	Yes	97025.35
RCP-015502	Onekama Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94895.1	1	Yes	94516
RCP-001600	Town Of Clear Lake, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	94934.38		Yes	94934.38
RCP-018774	Green Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95598.85		Yes	95598.85	0	0
RCP-003316	Alcona Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95630.74		Yes	95630.74
RCP-003747	Friendship Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95630.74		Yes	95630.74
RCP-025114	Town Of Torrey, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96615.09		Yes	0
RCP-032185	Village Of Glenwillow, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96650.54		Yes	80000
RCP-004411	City Of The Village Of Clarkston, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96786.72		Yes	96400
RCP-004364	Ridgeway Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96786.72	1	Yes	96786.72
RCP-013793	Three Oaks Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96786.72	5	Yes	96786.72
RCP-030127	Choteau City, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	438114.99	1	Yes	438114.99
RCP-026743	Town Of Youngsville, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	438208.99	1	Yes	438208.99
RCP-003887	City Of Lowell, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	438325.06	4	Yes	438325.06
RCP-003435	Mills Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	438430.14	1	Yes	15000
RCP-034460	Town Of Alban, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95039.05		Yes	95039.05
RCP-026094	Pine Haven Town, WY	Wyoming	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95044.2	1	Yes	95044.2
RCP-034237	Town Of Oxford, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95248.38	1	Yes	95248.38
RCP-034450	Village Of Centuria, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95248.38	1	Yes	95248.38
RCP-018190	Center Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95283.34	2	Yes	94904.46
RCP-031752	City Of Winchester, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95287.57	1	Yes	95287.57
RCP-026401	Town Of Gatesville, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95290.54		Yes	95290.54	0	0	0
RCP-025542	Salesville, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95303.19	1	Yes	95303.19
RCP-018881	Washington Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95809.19	3	Yes	95428.21
RCP-000027	Oak Grove Village Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96160.56	1	Yes	96160.56
RCP-007871	Town of Keota	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96340.28	3	Yes	96340.28
RCP-034885	Town Of Bashaw, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96399.74		Yes	0
RCP-018990	Patterson Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96440.2		Yes	96440.2
RCP-027327	Aitkin Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96496.22	4	Yes	96496.22
RCP-057213	Hay Creek Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96496.22		Yes	96496.22
RCP-025908	Sasser, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95226	1	Yes	95226
RCP-056927	Chireno, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95337.84		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-057116	Elgin, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95339.6	1	Yes	95339.6			0
RCP-052171	Windham Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95340.14	1	Yes	95340.14
RCP-023231	Boggs Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95445.14		No		0	0
RCP-026194	Village Of Cedar Rock, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	95609.23	2	Yes	95609.23
RCP-027491	Leon Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96168.37	1	Yes	96168.37
RCP-034028	Town Of Ahnapee, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96190.4		Yes	96190.4
RCP-001330	Brooksville Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96539.26	2	Yes	96539.26
RCP-019656	City Of Hector, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	96546.27	7	Yes	96546.27
RCP-014636	Lehr, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11067.62		Yes	11067.62	0	0	0
RCP-024373	Village Of North Hills, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	612203.29	1	Yes	612203.29
RCP-056719	Olmos Park, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	612247.75	3	Yes	612247.75
RCP-004162	Chocolay Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	621809.96	1	Yes	621809.96
RCP-023933	City Of Hudson, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622767.35	5	Yes	622767.35
RCP-006306	City Of Mobridge, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622833.44	1	Yes	622833.44
RCP-026742	Town Of Yanceyville, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	625603.08		Yes	625603.08
RCP-051303	Moosic Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	612360.86		Yes	610430.84
RCP-041008	Borough Of Mount Arlington, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	612520.38	1	Yes	1
RCP-032022	Town Of Greenwood, DE	Delaware	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614925.3	4	Yes	75000	160000
RCP-017450	Clontarf Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9070.42	1	Yes	9070.44
RCP-035569	Town Of Petrey, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9653.78		No		0	5232	0
RCP-048024	Timken City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9919.6	1	Yes	0
RCP-033473	Town Of Butler, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9943.51		Yes	9943.51
RCP-015324	Raceland city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	617168.03	7	Yes	424790.83
RCP-026502	Town Of Mars Hill, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	617954.34	2	Yes	587954.34
RCP-033094	Perry City, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	621104	1	Yes	621104
RCP-056157	Overton, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	621433.95	5	Yes	621433.95
RCP-055720	Tiffin City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	621566.88		Yes	621566.88
RCP-033015	Washington Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	621760.6	2	Yes	309644.13
RCP-024318	Town Of Sweden, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622049.41	1	Yes	622049.41
RCP-007561	City of Frederick	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622088	1	Yes	622088
RCP-017949	Fox River Grove Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622315.11	1	Yes	622315.11
RCP-033175	Midway City Corporation, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	624891		Yes	624891
RCP-024013	Village Of East Aurora, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	631792.97	3	Yes	631792.97
RCP-014017	Bagley Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	631793.38	1	Yes	631793.38
RCP-050840	Palm Beach Shores Town, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	632077	1	Yes	632077
RCP-040866	Borough Of Paulsboro, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	612729.72	8	Yes	612729.72
RCP-004421	Peninsula Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	613718.12	4	Yes	613718.12
RCP-026824	Byron City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	616242.53	1	Yes	616242.53
RCP-054544	Pleasant Valley City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	616486.99	2	Yes	616486.98	389669	70720.15
RCP-052822	Woodstock Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	616530.8	1	Yes	616385.48
RCP-033799	Town Of Caswell, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9106.16		Yes	1000
RCP-015543	Town Of Ward, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9403.98	1	Yes	9403.98
RCP-017412	Freeland Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10272.53	3	Yes	10272.53
RCP-015550	Mantador, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10277.08		Yes	10277.08
RCP-018599	Village Of Harbor View, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11147.93		Yes	11147.93
RCP-032398	Island Creek Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	617343.49	7	Yes	617343.49
RCP-024968	Town Of Hurley, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	617434.04	1	Yes	307461.73
RCP-024466	Town Of Westmoreland, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622151.97	2	Yes	0
RCP-032113	Village Of Granville, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622181.28	3	Yes	619707.27
RCP-003736	Montrose Charter Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622545.58	1	Yes	622545.58
RCP-025372	Dewitt, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622578.44	4	Yes	622578.44
RCP-023249	East Hanover Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	625065.88	1	Yes	623095.82
RCP-004165	Laketown Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	625277.88	1	Yes	625277.88
RCP-056807	Pantego, Town Of, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	625406.37	6	Yes	625406.37
RCP-040757	Township Of Hainesport, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	625499.28	1	Yes	625499.28
RCP-026589	Town Of Princeville, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	613811.28	1	Yes	613811.28
RCP-040667	City Of Margate City, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	613881.06		Yes	81000
RCP-055458	Kirkman City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9120.9		Yes	9120.9
RCP-048047	Wallace City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9156.54	1	Yes	9156.54
RCP-014230	Town Of Nunda, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9223.14	1	Yes	9223.14		2000	0
RCP-022756	Birmingham Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9240.02	2	Yes	9210.9
RCP-055546	Varina City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9719	1	No		0	0
RCP-050338	Village Of Julian, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9734.33		No		0.01	0	0
RCP-033992	Town Of Finley, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9943.51		Yes	9943.51
RCP-015573	Jud, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11067.62		Yes	11067.62
RCP-003179	City Of Antelope, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11105.74	1	Yes	11105.74
RCP-056423	Quanah, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	617461.55	1	Yes	308121.83
RCP-025135	Town Of New Boston, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	617564.24	2	Yes	617564.24
RCP-055339	Chariton City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	619174.51	6	No	0	0	0	0
RCP-052073	Office Of The Borough Of Norwood Dba Norwood Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	619185.88		Yes	0
RCP-008819	Morrisville Village, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	619819.74	1	Yes	619819.74
RCP-034377	Town Of Cedarburg, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	634396.11	9	Yes	634396.11
RCP-024774	Town Of Waterford, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	634459.63	1	Yes	634459.63
RCP-031655	City Of Ketchum, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614099.33	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-057173	Hegbert Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9944.68	1	Yes	9944.68
RCP-017434	Salem Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9985.4	2	Yes	9985.4
RCP-050566	Village Of Virginia, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10088.3		Yes	10088.3
RCP-034504	Village Of Catawba, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10466.86		Yes	10466.86
RCP-004575	Gail Lake Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11146.79	2	Yes	2251.25
RCP-018458	Village Of Neville, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11147.93	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-053743	City Of Sisters, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	617701.6	2	Yes	0
RCP-056578	Saint Hedwig, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	617709.82		Yes	617709.82	0	0
RCP-051475	Luzerne Township Board Of Supervisors Dba Township Of Luzerne, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	619920.86	1	Yes	617967.02
RCP-003660	City Of Milan, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	634946.04	2	Yes	634946.04
RCP-015027	Anchorage city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	634988.59	1	Yes	627457.66
RCP-015198	Horse Cave city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	635512.73	1	Yes	627975.58
RCP-050795	Mayo Town, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	635583	1	Yes	635583
RCP-015087	Cave City city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	635774.8	2	Yes	628234.54
RCP-056190	Ranger, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	612992.59	5	Yes	612992.59
RCP-047188	Alturas City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	613124	1	Yes	0
RCP-057113	Milton, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9170.31		Yes	1000
RCP-019690	Town Of Lake City, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9403.98	1	Yes	9403.98
RCP-006260	Town Of Raymond, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9765.68		Yes	0
RCP-057196	St. Leo City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9944.68	1	Yes	9944.68
RCP-057125	Flaxton, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10118.97		Yes	10118.97
RCP-052308	Keystone Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10163.25		Yes	0	0	0
RCP-055453	Ralston City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10915.17	1	Yes	10915.17
RCP-035615	City Of Centreville, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	620231.92	1	Yes	620231.92
RCP-026004	Young Harris, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	620278		Yes	620278
RCP-031276	Bernardston, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	624715.27	3	Yes	624715.27
RCP-023107	Findlay Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	632415.9	1	Yes	630422.66
RCP-032434	City Of Willard, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	632698.2	1	Yes	632698.2
RCP-052889	Westford Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	632754.42	18	Yes	632605.29
RCP-030133	Conrad City, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	632832.76	1	Yes	632832.76
RCP-015278	Mount Vernon city	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	632892.06		Yes	625385.99
RCP-035783	City Of Valley Grande, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	632947.5		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-004224	Putnam Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	632949.36	1	Yes	632949.36
RCP-039327	Traverse County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	633023	1	Yes	633023
RCP-056231	Seymour, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	633102.91	9	Yes	631854.17
RCP-019566	City Of Corning, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	633144.67	1	Yes	633144.67
RCP-055197	Jefferson City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	613343.12	2	Yes	-291217.29
RCP-006187	City Of Richwood, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	613348.5	2	Yes	613348.5
RCP-014374	Halls Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	613306.73	3	Yes	613306.73
RCP-053637	City Of Gervais, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	613481.4		Yes	613481.4
RCP-025891	Richland, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	613556	1	No		0	20000	0
RCP-030047	Township Of Andover, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614404.42	1	Yes	9524
RCP-031898	Newport City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614446	2	Yes	614446	0	0
RCP-052344	Credit River Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614712.59	1	Yes	614712.59
RCP-052306	Higdem Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9288.99	1	Yes	9288.99
RCP-057181	Holloway City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9288.99		Yes	9288.99
RCP-027545	Agassiz Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10381.82	1	Yes	10381.82
RCP-006521	City Of Garden City, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10489.06		Yes	10489.06
RCP-032071	City Of Brookville, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	617764.17	2	Yes	615307.72
RCP-005394	Turner Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	618147.33	7	Yes	618147.33
RCP-051547	Reading Township Board Of Supervisors, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	618450.88		Yes	616501.66
RCP-040833	Township Of Maurice River, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	622673.22	2	Yes	622673.22
RCP-018320	City Of Geneva, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	624389.83	1	Yes	621907.4
RCP-052841	Guilford Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	630612.76	1	Yes	633239.77
RCP-006517	City Of Hot Springs, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	633322.5	1	Yes	633322.5
RCP-050432	City Of O'Neill, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	633439.15	1	Yes	633439.15
RCP-024462	Town Of Verona, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	633536.55	2	Yes	606714.97
RCP-006096	City Of Glenville, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	633881.96	8	Yes	0
RCP-014492	Ridgetop City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	634076.67		Yes	634076.67
RCP-013975	Robinson Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	633933.6	1	Yes	633933.6
RCP-038453	Shackelford County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	634188	6	Yes	634188
RCP-023414	Steelton Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626010.88	1	Yes	626010.88
RCP-025214	Town Of Littleton, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614528.24	6	Yes	614528.24
RCP-005342	New Gloucester Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614552.22		Yes	614552.22
RCP-013760	City Of Richmond, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614663.92		Yes	614663.92
RCP-032417	Morgan Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	615029.76	6	Yes	0
RCP-004346	Otsego Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	615399.56	4	Yes	615399.56
RCP-056334	Hudson Oaks, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	615475.35		Yes	614261.37
RCP-054173	Buckner City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	615672.07		No		220000	250000	100000
RCP-040715	Borough Of Old Tappan, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	616916.46		Yes	233690
RCP-016359	Pleasant Ridge Plantation, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9410.73	1	Yes	9410.73
RCP-017235	Lengby City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9507.55	1	Yes	9507.55
RCP-050032	Town Of Sawpit, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9802.64	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-055470	Dana, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10167.57		Yes	0
RCP-007929	Town of Mutual	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10325.25		Yes	10325.26
RCP-057371	Richardville Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10491.09	1	Yes	10491.09
RCP-017174	Hantho Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10600.38		Yes	10600.38
RCP-040829	Township Of Fairfield, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	618695.82	4	Yes	618695.82
RCP-034995	City Of Waupaca, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	624766.6	3	Yes	624766.6
RCP-027006	International Falls City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	635039.08	1	Yes	635039.1
RCP-035482	City Of Jemison, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	635208.78	1	Yes	635208.78
RCP-025961	Twin City, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	635215	2	Yes	635213
RCP-004019	Lenox Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	635366.4	1	Yes	635366.4
RCP-052816	Johnson Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	635666.55		Yes	635666.55
RCP-056904	George West, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	636082.22		Yes	634827.6
RCP-004215	City Of Northville, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626118.58	1	Yes	626118.58
RCP-031298	Chatham, MA	Massachusetts	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626127.29	1	Yes	626127
RCP-046985	Lagrange Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626170.74		Yes	621170.74
RCP-033986	City Of Lake Mills, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626231.96	2	Yes	626231.96
RCP-022410	Borough Of Somerset, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614775.88	2	Yes	614775.88
RCP-040861	Township Of Logan, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614823.08	1	Yes	614823.08
RCP-006165	City Of Parsons, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	614874.35	1	Yes	614874.35
RCP-053748	City Of Sublimity, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	615702.56	1	Yes	615702.56
RCP-046875	Butler City, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	615972.51		Yes	615972.51
RCP-040922	Borough Of Jamesburg, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	615974.44	1	Yes	182987
RCP-015553	Grace City, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9170.31	1	Yes	9170.31
RCP-017138	Mudgett Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9179.71	2	Yes	9179.71
RCP-017279	Greenwood Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9179.71	1	Yes	9179.71
RCP-047893	Olivet City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10224.82	1	Yes	10224.82
RCP-035101	False Pass City, AK	Alaska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10407.79	1	Yes	10407.79
RCP-018171	Brookfield Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10411.75	1	Yes	10370.35
RCP-017114	Nesbit Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10818.95	2	Yes	10818.95
RCP-035511	Eutaw, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	618805.56	2	Yes	618805.56
RCP-052863	Monkton Town, VT	Vermont	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	624902.68	4	Yes	624755.39
RCP-031939	Royal City City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	625064	3	Yes	625064
RCP-007060	White Castle, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626439.22	1	Yes	626439.22
RCP-054492	Licking City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626469.76	2	Yes	626469.76
RCP-052964	Fort Branch Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626850.61	5	Yes	626850.61
RCP-019017	Eaton Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626913.89	1	Yes	624421.06
RCP-003661	Leighton Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	626959.3	1	Yes	626959.3
RCP-047443	Sutter Creek City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	627238	2	Yes	627238
RCP-046929	Fairmount Town, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	627303.87	1	Yes	301038.64
RCP-017294	Belgium Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9070.42	1	Yes	4535.2
RCP-050370	Village Of Magnet, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9557.34		Yes	9557.34
RCP-055732	Scarville City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10018.05		Yes	6452
RCP-015723	Dawson, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10277.08		Yes	0
RCP-018392	Village Of Batesville, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10411.75		Yes	10370.35
RCP-047691	Gove City City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10682.64	1	Yes	10682.64
RCP-017228	Hazelton Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10709.66		Yes	0
RCP-007290	Golva, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10751.4		Yes	10676.57
RCP-024259	Town Of Livonia, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	627485.29	2	Yes	627485.29
RCP-016998	Cedar Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9288.99	1	Yes	9288.99
RCP-017032	Benville Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9288.99	1	Yes	9288.99	9288.99
RCP-047917	Parkerville City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9309.16		Yes	9309.16
RCP-008058	Town of Webb City	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9558.32		Yes	9558.32
RCP-031732	City Of Stateline, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10539.71		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-017472	Arrow Rock Town, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10593.96	1	Yes	10593.96
RCP-054661	Des Arc Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10804.5		No		0	0	0
RCP-022936	Atwood Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10815	1	Yes	10815
RCP-052569	Learned, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10817.19		Yes	10817.19
RCP-014371	Greenfield City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	618944.28		Yes	618944.28
RCP-025522	Prescott, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	619263.55	1	Yes	619263.55
RCP-052011	Selinsgrove Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	619710.86	1	Yes	618734.27
RCP-037143	Hand County, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	619814	1	Yes	-1496338.58
RCP-013801	Atlas Township, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	627589.82		Yes	627589.82
RCP-039102	Lipscomb County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	627972	2	Yes	627972
RCP-025233	Town Of Hillsborough, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	628347.27		Yes	628347.27	0	0
RCP-017324	Evan City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9179.71	2	Yes	9179.72
RCP-017394	Flowing Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9179.71	1	Yes	9179.71
RCP-017494	Whiteside Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9421.15		Yes	7500
RCP-000025	Lucerne Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9458.42	1	Yes	9458.42
RCP-016355	Wesley Town, ME	Maine	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9833.68	2	Yes	9833.68
RCP-017026	Zemple City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9835.4	1	Yes	9835.4
RCP-017203	Boy River Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9835.4	1	Yes	9835.4
RCP-017442	Danvers City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9835.4	1	Yes	9835.4
RCP-033477	Town Of Foster, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10048.18	1	Yes	10048.18
RCP-019078	Village Of Norwich, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10622.1	1	Yes	10622.1
RCP-057210	Alberta City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10818.95		Yes	10647.43
RCP-022495	Taylor Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	620865.88	1	Yes	618909.06
RCP-051435	Hellam Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	628635.9		Yes	626654.58
RCP-030045	Borough Of Watchung, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	628639.34	2	Yes	628639.34
RCP-019493	City Of Atkins, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	629208.23	1	Yes	629208.23
RCP-053251	Emmons County,	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	629526	2	Yes	629526
RCP-054680	Buffalo City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	629729.44	1	Yes	629729.44
RCP-048991	Ruidoso Downs City, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	630445	2	Yes	630445	0
RCP-031617	City Of Filer, ID	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	630446.63		No		0	0
RCP-022844	St Thomas Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	630525.9	1	Yes	630525.9
RCP-051735	Borough Of Hellertown, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	612255.88	5	Yes	610326.18
RCP-047511	Barnard City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9614.38		Yes	4778.76
RCP-048042	Virgil City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9614.38	1	Yes	9614.38
RCP-057225	Crosby Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9944.68	1	Yes	9944.68
RCP-027278	Viking City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11037.51	1	Yes	11037.51
RCP-023431	New London Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	628530.88		Yes	626549.9
RCP-050054	Town Of Telluride, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	623096.04	1	Yes	623096
RCP-047805	Longford City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10987.86	1	Yes	10987.86
RCP-057320	Halstad Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11037.51	1	Yes	11037.51
RCP-055220	Hampton City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	628743.98		Yes	628743.98
RCP-026133	Town Of Badin, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	628790.06	2	Yes	628790.06
RCP-017648	Auburn City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	629119.34		Yes	629119.34	0	194390.47
RCP-056181	Premont, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	631364.99	1	Yes	630119.67
RCP-022404	City Of Franklin, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	631365.9		Yes	629375.98
RCP-018803	Tuscarawas Township, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	612926.38	1	Yes	612926.38
RCP-040668	Township Of Mullica, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	612939.06	2	Yes	612939.06
RCP-050507	Village Of Smithfield, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9380.36		Yes	0			0
RCP-027185	Revere City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9616.84		No		0	0	0
RCP-027577	Bloomer Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9616.84	1	Yes	9616.84
RCP-055414	Balltown City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10317.09	1	Yes	10317.09
RCP-055446	Shannon City City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10317.09		Yes	0
RCP-008026	Town of Tamaha	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10701.75		Yes	10701.75
RCP-027380	Moonshine Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10928.22	1	Yes	10928.22
RCP-056120	Lyford, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	630620.15	3	Yes	630620.15
RCP-033456	Town Of Lafayette, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	630628.04	1	Yes	630628.04
RCP-007026	Sorrento, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	631255.12	2	Yes	630228.44
RCP-053036	Chautauqua County,	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	631274	1	Yes	631274
RCP-036736	Foster County, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	623505	1	Yes	623505
RCP-014474	Pegram Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	613603.44		Yes	613603.44
RCP-047948	Randall City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9461.78		Yes	0
RCP-047993	Seward City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9461.78	1	Yes	9461.78		0
RCP-057304	Alma Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9507.55	1	Yes	9507.55
RCP-033352	Village Of Mason, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9838.84	1	Yes	1000
RCP-056342	Oak Valley, Town Of, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9900		No	0	0	0	0
RCP-007256	Sentinel Butte, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9960.86	1	Yes	9960.86
RCP-014646	Hague, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9960.86		Yes	9960.86
RCP-015576	Douglas, ND	North Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9960.86		Yes	9960.86
RCP-057289	Fortier Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10272.53		No		0	0
RCP-017252	Mount Morris Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10272.53		Yes	10272.53
RCP-055555	Plover City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10317.09	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-050148	Village Of Bristow, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10442.28	1	Yes	10442.28
RCP-055613	Colwell City Of, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10466.6		Yes	10466.6
RCP-050158	Village Of Burr, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10442.28	1	Yes	10442.28
RCP-004573	Bruno City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10818.95	1	Yes	10818.95
RCP-017098	Leonardsville Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10928.22		No		9680.39	0	0
RCP-004572	Warrenton Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10928.22	1	Yes	10928.22
RCP-057305	Lake Pleasant Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11146.79	1	Yes	11146.79
RCP-034114	Town Of Somo, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11199.54		Yes	11199.54	0	0
RCP-051380	Harris Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	634200.9	1	Yes	634200.9
RCP-039556	Petersburg Borough, AK	Alaska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	634382	1	Yes	634382
RCP-007612	City of Nowata	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	623316.37	1	Yes	623316.37
RCP-057369	Riceville Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9507.55		Yes	9507.55
RCP-004486	Holt City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9507.55	1	Yes	9207.55
RCP-057255	Dumont City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9616.84	1	Yes	9616.84	0
RCP-000033	Umber View Heights Village, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	9982.77		No	0	0	1200	0
RCP-017331	Grace Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10053.97	1	Yes	10053.97
RCP-050057	Town Of Two Buttes, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10054		Yes	0
RCP-047478	Agenda City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10072.2	1	Yes	10072.2
RCP-027586	Moylan Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	10600.38	1	Yes	10600.38
RCP-033214	Brian Head Town, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11007	1	No		50000	0	0
RCP-004258	City Of Huntington Woods, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	658380.82	2	Yes	658380.82
RCP-031773	Brewster City, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	658595		Yes	658595
RCP-032162	City Of Ontario, OH	Ohio	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	639849.71	1	Yes	639849.71
RCP-014393	Jellico City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	642384.65	2	Yes	642384.65
RCP-004291	City Of Manistee, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	642512.44	1	Yes	642512.44
RCP-052068	Stowe Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	642705.9		Yes	640680.24
RCP-051398	Slippery Rock Township Butler Township, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	642750	2	Yes	642750
RCP-034027	Village Of Twin Lakes, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	649363.71	3	Yes	649363.71
RCP-004623	Macsville Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12239.61	1	Yes	12239.61
RCP-034421	Village Of Maiden Rock, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12246.22	1	Yes	12246.22
RCP-004472	Bear Creek Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12458.17	1	Yes	6229.09
RCP-004691	Rollis Township, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12458.17	1	Yes	12458.17
RCP-030188	Neihart Town, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12554.17	1	Yes	0
RCP-041005	Borough Of Morris Plains, NJ	New Jersey	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	654701.8	1	Yes	654701.81
RCP-055786	Flora City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	660282.72	1	Yes	660282.72
RCP-014293	Caryville Town, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	637340.52	1	Yes	637340.52
RCP-025315	Town Of Rindge, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	637559.96	22	Yes	637559.96
RCP-056407	Shallowater, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	639061.53	2	Yes	637981.04
RCP-034594	Town Of Wilson, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11304.2	1	Yes	11304.2
RCP-001601	Town Of South Fork, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11304.2	1	Yes	11304.2
RCP-027097	Millerville City, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	11365.35	1	Yes	11365.35
RCP-030190	Outlook Town, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12041.76	1	Yes	12041.75	0	0
RCP-047633	Elgin City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12056.12	1	Yes	0
RCP-047997	Simpson City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12056.12	1	No		0	0	0
RCP-047750	Isabel City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12361.34		Yes	0	7000	5000
RCP-047956	Reserve City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12361.34	1	Yes	12361.34
RCP-016214	Symerton Village, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12383.7		Yes	12383.7
RCP-050524	Village Of Steinauer, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12389.14	1	Yes	12389.14
RCP-034505	Village Of Kennan, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12560.23	3	Yes	12560.23
RCP-050376	Village Of Maskell, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12566.13	1	No		0	0
RCP-048959	House Village **, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12609		Yes	0
RCP-047475	Abbyville City, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	12971.78		Yes	0
RCP-056506	Hallettsville, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	654702.89	2	Yes	654702.89
RCP-017766	Carmi City, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	654703.25	2	Yes	654703.25
RCP-014332	Dyer City, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	654846.61	1	Yes	654846.61
[truncated: rows 5001-26540 of 26540 not shown; row cap 5000 per sheet]

Sheet: Projects (Q1 2023) Submitted
Project ID	Recipient-ID	Recipient Name	State/Territory	Reporting Tier	Recipient Type	Completion Status	Project Name	Expenditure Category Group	Expenditure Category	Project Description	Adopted Budget	Total Cumulative Obligations	Total Cumulative Expenditures	Number of Households Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Number of Workers Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Number of Gov FTE Responding to COVID-19 (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Number of Gov FTE Rehired (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Community benefit agreement? (Infrastructure Only)	Complying with David Bacon? (Infrastructure Only)	Project labor agreement? (Infrastructure Only)	Does the Project have Capital Expenditures? (Yes/No) (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Type of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Total Expected Cost of Capital Expenditures (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Primary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Secondary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Tertiary Demographic Served (Select Expenditure Categories Only)	Project is conducting an evidence based program evaluation? (Yes/No)	Project Total Spending on Evidence Based Evaluation
TPN-050004	RCP-039882	Otero County, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Otero County Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Otero County has elected the standard allowance of up to $10 million.		3550287	3550287
TPN-051276	RCP-039891	Chambers County, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Administrative Cost – IAC	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Contract with third party to provide technical and project implementation support services for the administration of SLFRF funds.		193776	193776
TPN-051289	RCP-039891	Chambers County, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Equipment Purchases	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of equipment to reduce ongoing cost of county road construction and maintenance		939872.2	939872.2
TPN-130131	RCP-039891	Chambers County, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The County is using American Rescue Plan Act fiscal recovery funds to provide premium pay to eligible employees in response to their performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency. This project is being implemented consistent with the requirements of premium pay under EC4.1.		318406.7	318406.7
TPN-130135	RCP-039891	Chambers County, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Chattahoochee Valley Water Treatment Plant Improvements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The construction of a master pump station to distribute water to the East Alabama Water, Sewer, and Fire Protection District; the Huguley Water, Sewer, and Fire Protection Authority; and the Lanett water systems more efficiently and effectively, to include the construction of two (2) new clearwells and the rehabilitation of the pumping station’s eight (8) filters.		1000000	0
TPN-160254	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Fulton County United Way	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	To supplement their campaign and repair/update necessary fixtures and equipment for office	50000	50000	50000								No
TPN-160266	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Town of Kewanna	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Generators for lift station, generator for town shop, dump truck, engineer review of town and utilities	150000	150000	150000
TPN-160241	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Historical Society	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Paving parking lot of historical society to bring it up to ADA compliant standards; may be needed later for use for emergenecies such as COVID-19	100000	100000	80716.02								No	COVID-19 vaccination sites	100000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-160260	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Aubbee Township Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.31-Rehabilitation of Commercial Properties or Other Improvements	Renovate community building as it is a rented public meeting space and is used for emergency use	150000	150000	150000								No
TPN-160274	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	RTC Broadband Expansion	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	To build approximately 383 miles of fiber in order to expand high-speed broadband to county residents.	150000	150000	150000
TPN-160233	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Affordable Housing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Funds will be used for the creation and establishment of a community housing organization	100000	100000	100000								No
TPN-160268	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Akron Revitalization Committee	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	System upgrades for the Akron Community Center and Akron Park system	150000	150000	150000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-162137	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Apache Drive Sidewalk Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Design Engineer for sidewalk project for Youth Outlet Center	66000	66000	16582.4								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-068073	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Town of Fulton Waterway Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Draining system of wastewater utility	12000	12000	12000
TPN-068147	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Recovery Cafe	1-Public Health	1.13-Substance Use Services	Recovery Services	36000	36000	36000								No
TPN-067095	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	H.O.P.E.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Rent assistance	50000	50000	50000	15							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-047972	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	NCIRPC	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	READI grant writer/consultant	5000	5000	5000
TPN-162085	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Employee Bonuses	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	One-time bonus for employees which does not include elected officials	260413.66	260413.66	260413.66		125
TPN-156159	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Kewanna Library	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Library Modernization	60000	60000	60000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-156151	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Town of Fulton	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Fire Station/EMS Expansion	150000	150000	150000								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	150000
TPN-156067	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Habitat for Humanity	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Building house; storage facility	90000	90000	90000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-156125	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	NSMLCD	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Sewer upgrades to Nyona/South Mud Lake Conservancy District	150000	150000	150000
TPN-156271	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Fulton County Fair Association	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Fairground upgrades	150000	150000	150000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-068551	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Times Theater	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Replacing lost income stalling opening	160000	160000	160000								No
TPN-070256	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Council on Aging Lost Revenue	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Replacement of lost income	60000	60000	60000								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-066827	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Compassionate Health Center	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	Healthcare to uninsured of Fulton County	15000	15000	15000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-066886	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Youth Outlet Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	Community Assistance	50000	50000	50000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-058537	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Town of Akron	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Water and sewer infrastructure upgrades	150000	150000	150000
TPN-070332	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Friends of the Park	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Repairs and equipment for parks deparment projects	18900	18900	18900								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	18900
TPN-070278	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Newcastle Township Community Center	5-Infrastructure	5.3-Clean Water: Decentralized wastewater	Township community building septic installation	22500	22500	22500
TPN-070294	RCP-036786	Fulton County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Town of Fulton Sewer Project	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Lift station	5000	5000	5000
TPN-138904	RCP-036833	Naranjito Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Academia de Policias	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Provide instruction and training services for new cadets so that they can become agents of the municipal guard	63018	63018	63018			6					No
TPN-128871	RCP-036969	Lewis County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Downtown Facade Improvements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The goal of this project is to provide funding to property owners to improve their buildings located in our core village areas. The funds will be disbursed using a competitive application process. This provides a community development general government service.		450000	226823.7
TPN-128882	RCP-036969	Lewis County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Recreational Asset Development	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds will be utilized to acquire and improve assets for recreation infrastructure or to support and enhance existing providers of recreational activities. Development of recreation and tourism assets is a key part of our county economic growth strategy.		1500000	31693.49
TPN-128876	RCP-036969	Lewis County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Childcare Infrastructure	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds will be utilized to strengthen existing childcare providers or to develop new facilities and encourage new businesses to serve families throughout the county.		200000	110921.68
TPN-128879	RCP-036969	Lewis County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Workforce Development	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project is intended to provide funding for creative solutions to increase applicants for job openings for employers of all types in Lewis County. This will be coordinated with our Department of Social Services and Employment and Training office.		457690	20000
TPN-128885	RCP-036969	Lewis County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Broadband Infrastructure	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project is intended to provide funding for various broadband infrastructure related activities. The County will partner with private service providers and other government entities to provide connectivity to underserved areas.		1500000	987309.6
TPN-128875	RCP-036969	Lewis County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Distressed Property Revitalization	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds for this project will be used to remediate and clean up strategic properties in the County that are considered blight or are in a distressed or unsafe condition. Properties will be selected by municipal leaders to ensure maximum benefit is obtained.		1000000	164063.3
TPN-049078	RCP-036969	Lewis County, NY	New York	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Revenue  Loss Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The revenue loss from 2021 through to 3/31 2022	0	0	0
TPN-071775	RCP-036946	Stoddard County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Stoddard County Special Projects	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue replacement funds are allocated to general government services, included but not limited to maintenance and repairs to county facilities, financial support for employees, repairs and replacements to roads and bridges, and pandemic related expenses that provide for the mitigation and mediation of the negative economic impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency.	5637766	2125550.56	610355.38
TPN-071796	RCP-036946	Stoddard County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Stoddard County Broadband Development	6-Revenue Replacement	6.2-Non-federal match for other Federal Programs	The County of Stoddard has applied for and been awarded a broadband development project through the State of Missouri's Community Development Block Grant - COVID Program. Stoddard County put $1,000,000.00 of their ARPA funds towards a cash match for this project.		1000000	0
TPN-140365	RCP-036946	Stoddard County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Bernie Water Basin	6-Revenue Replacement	6.2-Non-federal match for other Federal Programs	The City of Bernie is working with USDA to complete a Water Basin project for the city. The city did not have the matching funds for this project so they requested $480,000 from Stoddard County ARPA funds to complete the project. Funds will be used along side USDA's contribution to the project.		480000	0
TPN-062398	RCP-036790	Coos County, NH	New Hampshire	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Coos Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Premium pay stipends, broadband, maintenance of county facilities,  water, sewer & municipal projects.		6130743	1745013.75
TPN-058153	RCP-036839	Clarke County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Project Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Clarke County plans to use the majority of these funds to provide Broadband to  parts of the county without access to wired broadband internet. A small part of these funds have been set aside for other smaller projects such as sanitizer stations, home COVID tests for employees, water bottle filling stations to replace water fountains for the childcare program and extra cleaning to prevent the spread of the Covid virus, and installing an air filtration system in the Clarke County Communications Dispatch office to bring in outside air to increase the quality of air and mitigate the spread of the COVID virus in the small office space.		2839569	2200984.84
TPN-130705	RCP-036916	Pitkin County, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Child Care Staff Support Stipend Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	Pitkin County has granted Aspen Community Foundation 1,575,000.00 to do a distribution and administration for cash stipend for child care providers. The Child Care Staff Support Grant Program is a three year program dedicated to providing a stipend to child care staff throughout the county. Through this program, the County will provide 6,000 to each staff member of a licensed child care center located within the County in the years 2023 and 2024. The third year, 2025, staff proposes tapering the support to  3,000 per year due to the limited ARPA funding and to address concerns of the  cliff effect . A prorated amount will be provided to each part time staff member for all three years.  Funds would be distributed quarterly with each staff receiving  1500 per quarter (750 in year three). These funds will be distributed by Aspen Community Foundation directly to the child care provider on a quarterly basis for the sole intention of providing a stipend to teachers for use however individual teachers choose.		127500	127500								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-059672	RCP-036791	Callahan County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		SLFRF General Revenue Loss	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue Replacement funds are allocated to general government services provided by our jurisdiction, included but not limited to: Financial support for employees who served the public during the COVID-19 pandemic, and  Support for first responders during COVID-19 such as volunteer fire departments, emergency medical services, community meal delivery programs, and nonprofits that assisted the public with rent and utility payments, and Repairs, maintenance, and restoration of County properties, and Pandemic related cleaning and protection expenses that provide for the mitigation and mediation of the negative health impacts of COVID-19.		2708264	2708264
TPN-071422	RCP-036841	Calhoun County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Law Enforcement Protection	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Investing in technology and equipment to allow law enforcement to more efficiently and effectively respond to the rise in gun violence resulting from the pandemic.		34564.27	34564.27								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-071356	RCP-036841	Calhoun County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	EMA Covid -19	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	SCBA Packs for the emergency response team which is critical in protecting the health and well-being of citizens in the county.		10926.3	10926.3								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-071080	RCP-036841	Calhoun County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	HVAC Replacement	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Replacing HVAC units in public buildings to provide better circulation and air purification systems.		41095	41095								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-071165	RCP-036841	Calhoun County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	EMS Power Load	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Ambulance public safety system to assist with contact of patients		39485.78	39485.78								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-070975	RCP-036841	Calhoun County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay to Employees	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium Pay to employees was given on 11/12/2021		39000	39000		42
TPN-071246	RCP-036841	Calhoun County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	PPE	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	PPE to help combat the spread of Covid-19 in the workplace. Replaced anything that could not be easily sanitized after contact.		5220.01	5220.01								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-071450	RCP-036841	Calhoun County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Office Space	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Retrofitting facilities to create more space between employee workstations and meeting room space for the public.		12026.59	12026.59								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-086034	RCP-036779	Muskogee County, Oklahoma	Oklahoma	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Governement Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Muskogee Board of County Commissioners pasted a resolution to take the standard $10 million dollar revenue replacement for governmental services.		10000000	2910408.98
TPN-125846	RCP-036975	Gray County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Veterans of Foreign Wars Building	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Made structural repairs to the walls of our local Veteran's of Foreign Wars building.  Also, updated the male & female bathrooms to become ADA compliant.	47812	47812	47812
TPN-125682	RCP-036975	Gray County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This Emergency Management Services Project will include the purchase of emergency warning sirens in our out-lying rural areas and the implementation of a 911 active interface system.  Including the purchase of radios, chargers and computer software.	56780	56780	56779.98
TPN-125694	RCP-036975	Gray County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Broadband Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Erected five towers for broadband services in our rural communities.  We are a 900 square mile county with many out-lying areas.  These new towers significantly increased broadband services within the county.  Also, we are able to utilize these towers for our Sheriff's department and Precinct barns repeaters for better radio comminications during emergencies.	1350000	1350000	1350000
TPN-125769	RCP-036975	Gray County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Gray County purchased a Watchguard system, where our deputies will be able to download their body camera and patrol car video information directly to our server, then it will be stored on the Cloud.  Watchguard also provides cameras for our jailers to record their daily interactions with the inmates.  This project required the acquisition of new radios, a server and the appropriate software to operate this system.  Our constables are also able to utilize this system. We also purchased body armor, mini shields and spiked stop-strips for our deputies.	80000	80000	66644.66
TPN-061099	RCP-036975	Gray County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To purchase fire-resistant gear, rescue kits, equipment tires, repeaters, pagers and portable radios,  pressure pumps, fuel tanks, water trailers, and tool boxes for our three local volunteer fire departments.  These purchases will be for the safety of the volunteers and for the assistance to the Gray County community.	780000	780000	753018.45
TPN-079423	RCP-037022	Alpine County, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Economic Development	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Alpine County created an Economic Development Department underneath the County Administrative Officer. The goals of the program are to provide local and potential businesses with support and guidance. Alpine County is home to two major ski resorts and tourism is the main industry, which was greatly impacted by COVID-19.  The Economic Development Department is also working to attract other industries to our County and help businesses recover from the impact of the pandemic.		219295	208086
TPN-133267	RCP-037191	Lexington, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		City Staffing	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project intends to retain City Staff including the administrative costs associated with the Staff required to operate the City.  Functions include public works, sanitation, planning and development, human resources, and financial services.		9171646	3496467
TPN-078886	RCP-037213	Union County, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	SLFRF General Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Mitigation of the negative economic impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency.  Maintenance and repairs to county facilities including buildings, roads and bridges.  Financial support for county departments including necessary capital purchases to continue services to Union County citizens.		4338301	976351.81
TPN-135600	RCP-036728	Pasquotank County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Pasquotank County Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	These funds will be used for the salaries and benefits for the Sheriff's Office, Utilities Department, Finance Office and the County Manager's Office.	7735345	7735345	4294873.85
TPN-157393	RCP-036829	Jefferson County, WA	Washington	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Port Hadlock Sewer Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Irondale & Port Hadlock Urban Growth Area (UGA) sewer project will provide wastewater treatment for local residents and businesses. The sewer system has been identified as a critical element for increased regional economic development. When construction of the sewer system is completed, the Irondale & Port Hadlock UGA will be able to support affordable housing, medical facilities, higher density multifamily residences, senior housing, as well as commercial and industrial development.	2177261	2177261	772389
TPN-143483	RCP-036730	Ford County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Public Safety Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Upgrade public safety equipment such as vehicles, police dog, body & security cameras, officer vests and computers		500000	31636
TPN-143454	RCP-036730	Ford County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		IT Upgrades: Cyber Security & Managed Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The COVID-19 has exposed a need for Ford County to create a safe technological environment for citizens and commerce to conduct business virtually (Teleworking). IT Managed Services is required to maintain a safe and secure technological-teleworking system.		280000	120156.64
TPN-143463	RCP-036730	Ford County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		PC JIMS Public Defender	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Improve functionality between both the County Clerk & Court Services. This software will maximize the efficiency of the court system to expedite cases. The digital format allows the system to readily track lapsed cases and to help with the backlog of cases.		10231	8228.75
TPN-143525	RCP-036730	Ford County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Election Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Upgrade Election Equipment		220000	0
TPN-143472	RCP-036730	Ford County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Public Safety Salary & Benefits	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Provide assistance for correctional deputies salaries and health benefits.		1106000	553000
TPN-143531	RCP-036730	Ford County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Phone Systems	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Upgrade phone systems to voice over IP and allow for call transfers from home lines.		35000	0
TPN-143446	RCP-036730	Ford County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		PC JIMS Prosecutor	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Improve functionality between both the County Clerk & Court Services.  This software will maximize the efficiency of the court system to expedite cases.  The digital format allows the system to readily track lapsed cases and to help with the backlog of cases.		25538	24968
TPN-058571	RCP-036730	Ford County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Administrative Support	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	County engaged a consulting firm to provide administrative support for the American Recovery Plan SLFRF program.		20000	20000
TPN-058577	RCP-036730	Ford County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Administrative Fees	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Administrative expenses to set up bank account and checks.		20.15	20.15
TPN-060267	RCP-039418	Pope County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Replace Lost Public Sector Revenue	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace lost public sector revenue, using this funding to provide government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue experienced due to the pandemic.		300000	0
TPN-060385	RCP-039418	Pope County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Governmental Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Other Governmental Services		84986	5045.41
TPN-060171	RCP-039418	Pope County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Broadband Infrastructure	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Expand access to broadband internet within Pope County, MN.		1200000	1146966.97
TPN-060231	RCP-039418	Pope County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Public Health Expenditures	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Support of Public Health Expenditures		100000	0
TPN-060250	RCP-039418	Pope County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Negative Economic Impacts	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Address negative economic impacts caused by the public health emergency.		500000	278581.89
TPN-152017	RCP-037592	San Lorenzo Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Municipal Police Payroll	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Through the funds assigned to this project, the Municipality will cover the expenses related to the payroll of the Municipal Police.		22312.55	22312.55								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-152053	RCP-037592	San Lorenzo Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Municipal Roads	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Through this project, the Municipality will cover the costs of resurfacing municipal roads to facilitate access to the Municipality and its sectors.		898256.61	594111.9
TPN-152077	RCP-037592	San Lorenzo Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Rural Development	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Through this project, the Municipality will cover the costs of resurfacing municipal roads to facilitate access to the Municipality and the communities.		361533.82	0
TPN-152001	RCP-037592	San Lorenzo Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Techado Estadio Cristobal Caguitas Colon	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds from this project will be used to pay for the Municipal contribution to complete the roofing of the Cristóbal “Caguitas” Colón Stadium.		811023.69	0
TPN-152046	RCP-037592	San Lorenzo Municipio, PR	Puerto Rico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Solid Waste Disposal	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Through the funds allocated to this project, the Municipality will cover the expenses related to the collection of the Municipality's solid waste, thus ensuring the continuity of services and sanitation in all sectors of the Municipality.		2015877	1046157.2
TPN-001556	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Permanent Supportive Housing Construction	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	The County of Kauai is using ARPA/SLFRF funds ($2,500,000) along with HOME-ARP funds ($1,820,000) to assist in the development of a permanent supportive housing project at the Lima Ola subdivision in Eleele, Kauai, HI. An estimated 24 units will be constructed and target the following:  1) Individuals/families who are homeless  2) Individuals/families who are at risk of becoming homeless	2500000	2500000	0								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-001564	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Houseless Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The County of Kauai is using ARPA/SLFRF funds ($170,000) as flexible funding to assist homeless individuals and families as well as those who serve this demographic. Examples include efforts to assist in stabilizing those recently housed from homelessness in order to prevent a return to homelessness and efforts to help providers serve clients in ways that traditional funding struggles to do.	470000	304178.9	104178.9								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001566	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Elderly Food Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	This project will provide food support to needy older adults 60 years or older. Items to be provided include fresh produce good for one person for a week delivered every two weeks or prepared meal delivered twice a week or meal kit delivered every week.  Consumers will be referred to the respective providers. Priority are consumers in the Wainiha, Kauai, HI area and those who are below the poverty threshold.	147000	130983	53760								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-001567	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Elderly Mental Health	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	This project will provide mental health counseling. Child and Family Service thru Worklife will offer mental health counseling to older adults 60 years or older. YWCA will be awarded mental health counseling services for younger consumers. Sessions will be for sixty (60) minutes with a maximum of 3 sessions per week. Mental health counseling can be by phone, in person or via other online platforms.	100000	99940	49201.2								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-001573	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Non-Profit Economic Loss Support Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The County of Kauai’s Office of Economic Development (OED) offered grants through the Nonprofit Recovery Grant Program. The intent of the grant program was to provide funding to nonprofit organizations on Kauai that experienced an economic loss due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Eligible nonprofit organizations submitted applications along with supporting documentation to demonstrate their loss and need for grant funding.  A total of 34 nonprofit organizations were awarded funding through the grant. The individual amount of funding varied based on need and nonprofit size, with amounts up to $15,000.  Grant funds can be used for working capital to cover the day-to-day operating expenses of the nonprofit, such as rent/lease payments, mortgage payments, payroll and benefit costs and utility expenses not already covered by other grant funding.	476891	326891	326891								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-001576	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Artists and Arts Organization Economic Loss Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The County of Kauai’s Office of Economic Development (OED) is working on a project to support rebuilding of the film industry and entertainment jobs on this island which is part of our arts/creative industries sector.  This project has not started yet and is still in planning stages.	349949	205869.74	169469.74								No			13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify
TPN-001585	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Ho'ohana Kauai	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Hoomana Kaua‘i program enhances the workforce effort by creating relationships with employers.  Our team learns what the employers are looking for, intimately, then when someone contacts Hoohana Kaua‘i Hoohana Kaua‘i staff are doing a preliminary interview on the spot.  If the person looks like they qualify, they a call is made on the spot with the employer and typically the hire happens quickly.  The way the hiring works now is we just give them a list of possible jobs and the unemployed have to figure out what works for them and call employers one by one.  The staff is also assisting with several job fairs around the island.  Also, one staff member is screening everyone who comes into the American Job Center/Hale Kōkua where they are housed.	360000	254369.37	254369.37			*					No
TPN-001587	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Rise to Work	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	The Rise to Work program was created to help displaced workers on Kaua’i connect to temporary job opportunities with local employers. Participants in the program receive weekly pay, free health insurance benefits and the opportunity to learn new skills and gain professional connections. Positions are funded by the program for 12 weeks. In addition to supporting displaced workers, the Rise to Work program also benefits local businesses and nonprofit organizations on Kaua’i by allowing them to bring on new hires to increase their capacity or pivot their business model without taking on additional payroll costs.	708160	708159.52	708159.52								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-001593	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Crisis Response & Victim Support Services	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The $350,000 is being used by KPD to lease a space at the Kauai Philippine Cultural Center (KPCC) in Puhi for Youth Activities for the Kauai Police Activities League (see attached).  They are working towards providing a number of youth programs such as boxing, wrestling, jiu-jitsu, basketball, and pickleball (to name a few activities). Mentoring youth is an key component of the programs. KPAL strives to provide positive role models and activities that not only keep youth engaged and active, but helps to develop character, good sportsmanship, and good citizenship. KPAL’s motto is “filling playgrounds, not prisons.”  Funds have not moved yet because we negotiated a two month period for KPD to move in before payments begin	350000	0	0								No
TPN-114365	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	County Grant management/Audits	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Funding for staffing positions management funds, preparing reports, and providing information with regards to State and Federal audits.	125000	0	0
TPN-114353	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Piikoi Youth Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Community youth and childcare facility centrally located in Lihue	6979436	0	0
TPN-114358	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Heavy Equipment Wash Rack	5-Infrastructure	5.3-Clean Water: Decentralized wastewater	Project is for the design and construction of a centralized closed-loop heavy equipment wash rack. Wash rack would be utilized by the County’s fleet of heavy equipment, trash trucks, and haulers. System will allow filtering/treatment of water, reuse/conservation of water, and keeping property, including storm drain system, free of contaminants. Project will include obtaining a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit.	2000000	0	0
TPN-114356	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	KPAL Sports Complex	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New complex to house the KPAL sports programs for the Island of Kauai	100000	0	0
TPN-114352	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Landfill Cover	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Relocate approximately 42,000 cubic yards (cy) of soil from Grove Farm property (Waiola Site in Līhu‘e) to the Kekaha Landfill. The landfill, which has a daily need for soil to regulatory requirements for cover over solid waste received at the facility, intermediate cover, backfill, and road construction. The soil will satisfy landfill needs for eight to ten months. Soil is a rare commodity on Kaua‘i and will be continually required for the operation of Kekaha landfill as well as final closure once the facility reached capacity. Utilizing the Waiola soil source will preserve other resources so that they are available in the future.	600000	0	0
TPN-114354	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Kilauea Land Purchase	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	ARPA SLRF funds will be used for approximately 20% of the cost to acquire 24.2 acres of undeveloped land for the phased development of affordable workforce housing. The remainder of the acquisition cost will be covered by existing County funds.	1000000	0	0
TPN-115184	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Agricultural Assistance Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	Grants for agricultural industry business that were negatively affected by the Covid19 pandemic.	105000	0	0								No
TPN-115191	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Return of Tourism Parking Management Study	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Project to study plans for a more efficient and sustainable parking solutions for the heavy traffic tourist areas on the Island of Kauai.	30000	0	0								No
TPN-009501	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Grant Management Contingency/Overhead - Year 1	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Our Grant management Contingency/Overhead line item is an area that is designated for money to be placed in the event that areas of need during this Covid 19 pandemic arise, and funds are needed to be distributed in a timely manner.  Funds are not specifically assigned to a project, but are to be spent in line with the SLFRF spending/reporting  guidance.	0	0	0
TPN-002379	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Domestic Violence Prevention Grants	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	The Covid 19 pandemic caused a major shift in family situations at home are cared for.  An unfortunate result of the numerous Covid restriction, specifically the stay at home orders that were put in place at the onset of the pandemic, resulted in a unfortunate spike in domestic violence in homes of the lower income bracket of the population.  Government officials were asked and in many case begged to increase the efforts to combat this problem.  Kauai was not immune to this issue, so we designated funds to distribute as Non Profit grants for domestic violence prevention programs.  Providing help in understanding, recognition, treatment, and prevention.	121033	121033	96826.4								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-002377	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Emergency Operations Center Ongoing Response	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Project was created to fund Covid 19 response efforts out of the Kauai Emergency Management Agency.  This County of Kauai department had taken the lead in the response efforts since activation back in 2019 at the onset of the pandemic.  Use of funds can be applied to direct Covid response efforts (PPE, testing supplies, logistical efforts, etc.).  As well as administrative and logistical needs at the Kauai Emergency Operations Center (EOC), Covid testing centers, and various location on the Island of Kauai.	1493319	1392542.67	1392542.67								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-002367	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Extended Driver's Licenses Hours	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Under the current Covid 19 pandemic proclamation, the Governor of the State of Hawaii emergency orders temporarily waived the deadlines on driver’s licenses expirations. In the preparation for the expiration to be reinstated, early indication showed a large backlog of people who had expired licenses due to the emergency proclamation. Kauai County allowed those with expired licenses to come in during extended hours to get that done.  The assigned funds went to payroll for the extended hours of the office staff to accommodate the needs of the public.	6681	6680.58	6680.58			*					No
TPN-002374	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Adolescent Drug Treatment Support	1-Public Health	1.13-Substance Use Services	The project will be to provide cleaning and disinfecting services  and repairs to restore the Adolescent Treatment and Healing  Center to prepare it for the original intent of the center.  After the ATHC is no longer being used for a Covid-19 Isolation  Facility and prior to it being released back to it’s original purpose  as a Treatment and Healing Center for youth, the buildings and  furniture needs to be cleaned and disinfected according to the  protocols set forth by the CDC. Cleanup procedures will include  cleaning and disinfecting of Kitchen and dining room,  Bathrooms, Offices/Conference Rooms, Reception Areas,  Schools/Classrooms/Study Areas, Water Fountains,  Shelving/Racks, Desks/Counters, Tables and Chairs, Carpets and  Rugs, Stair Handrails, Youth Bedrooms and Play areas,  Equipment, Tools, Doorknobs, Light Switches, Bathroom Fixtures,  Phones, Televisions, Keyboards and Computer Monitors, Laptops,  Tablets, etc.  The building also needs some minor repairs from damages  sustained by wear and tear of occupants, and outside elements.	200000	0	0								No
TPN-013741	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	EOC Response - KEMA Staff	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Project funds are allotted to build a staff of the appropriate number of individuals to address the needs brought on by the Covid 19 pandemic.  The Kauai Emergency Management Agency (KEMA) is the lead government agency in the County of Kauai to manage the Covid 19 pandemic.  With the Emergency Operations Center being the central location for planning, coordination, and execution of  efforts.  Employing a full staff and providing the necessary logistics to meet the appropriate operation needs has been essential.	1485000	824023.46	824023.46			10					No
TPN-013742	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	EOC Response - Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Funds for this project go directly to the Covid 19 testing response associated with the Kauai Emergency Operations Center at KEMA.  May include but not limited to equipment (mobile vehicles, required testing equipment, electronics, etc.), supplies and manpower to effectively keep testing facilities running smoothly.	463000	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-013743	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	EOC Response - Safety Supplies	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Funds to purchase personal protective equipment (PPE) to effectively protect our staff during the Covid 19 response.  Include but not limited to proper masks, sanitation supplies (disinfecting wipes, clorox cleaner, disinfecting hand wash, paper towels, etc.), protective eyewear, etc.	510000	5487.35	5487.35								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-013746	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Clear Kupuna Waitlist for At-Home Meal Delivery	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	Project funds go to preparation and delivery of meals to the elderly community on the island of Kauai.  The elderly were are one of the most vulnerable group of individuals to be infected by Covid 19.  Kauai is partnering with a non-profit to provide this service and allow our elderly (Kupuna) to remain at home, stay safe, and still be able to have meals provided to them to stay healthy.	185000	185000	185000	1000							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-013748	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Agriculture Sector Job Training and Development	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	Funds are to help the economically disadvantaged famers on the western part of Kauai Island with the proper training and development skills to successfully maintain the agricultural industry for Kauai.  The pandemic has enforced the continued practices of self-sustainability, and the farming and agricultural industry are at the forefront of those initiatives.  Providing the necessary resources to enhance those ideas are a priority.	100000	100000	80000								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-013750	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Grants Management	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	The island of Kauai has received Federal funds like we have never seen before.  It is important that we provide the appropriate funding to have individuals that can monitor these funds on a consistent basis. Also to make sure funds are spent appropriately, acutely, and with the proper compliance, to be able to report back to the US Treasury on projects and progress of spending.	318000	176004.71	176004.71
TPN-013751	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Management Contingency/Overhead	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Our management Contingency/Overhead line item is an area that is designated for money to be placed in the event that areas of need during this Covid 19 pandemic arise, and funds are needed to be distributed in a timely manner.  Funds are not specifically assigned to a project, but are to be spent in line with the SLFRF/NEU spending/reporting  guidance.	2402	0	0
TPN-013735	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Cesspool Conversion	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Project line item was created for a future continued efforts to convert older houses on the Island of Kauai from under ground cesspool systems to the Kauai City and County waste management system.  The need will be a priority in future years, but as of now it is in the preliminary planning stages.	1	0	0
TPN-013736	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Waimea Levee Repairs Federal Support - CWA Compliance	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Project provides initial funding source for the Army Core of Engineers to start scope work on the of the Waimea River levees.  Current status of them fall below the National standards of protection set by FEMA.  The failure of these levees could result in major property damage or even loss of life.	33000	0	0
TPN-013737	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Orders Enforcement	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Project was created to fund Kauai County Police operations to carry out the various Covid 19 orders that have been set by either the Government of the State of Hawaii or the County of Kauai.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-013738	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Quarantine Management	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Project is to fund plans, implementation and continued monitoring of Covid 19 positive cases, and management of individuals required to quarantine from the general public.  Hence reducing the probability of community spread.	200000	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-013739	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Isolation/Quarantine Site	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Project funds will be used to secure, maintain and management of a safe Isolation/quarantine faculty to house positive Covid 19 cases that can't isolate safely in their place of residents, without infecting other individuals.  In most cases immediate family members.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-013740	RCP-037727	Kauai County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Outreach and Messaging	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Project is to assist in the public relations for the Island of Kauai in response to the Covid 19 pandemic.  Public outreach and messaging through television, print media and social media platforms to inform the public of the ongoing effort to combat the Covid 19 pandemic.  Enhancing community involvement and collaboration to keep Kauai safe and healthy.	90000	42178.04	34848.2								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-029821	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Physical Changes to Public Facilities - Change Old HVAC System at DA's Office	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Change out the very old HVAC system at the Liberty County District Attorney's Office.	7200	7200	7200								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-029952	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Physical Changes to Public Facilities - Change Old HVAC System at Justice Center	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Change out the HVAC systems/units at the Liberty County Justice Center	309550	0	0								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	309550	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-030073	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Equipment for EMS Response Units	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Equipment required for EMS response units.	200000	103180.69	103180.69								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-030038	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Construction of Health Department	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Contribute to the construction of a new Liberty County Health Department.  This project is still in the design phase, but Liberty County has committed $2M to the overall project.	2000000	0	0								Yes	Medical equipment and facilities	2000000
TPN-030083	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Small Business Assistance through Local Awards of ARP Funds	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The county will work with united way to verify the small businesses negatively impacted by COVID-19.  We have entered a contract for United Way to start the screening process, but there hasn't been any payments made to date as of 1/31/2022.	200000	53006	53006								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-029815	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Physical Changes to Public Facilities - Change Old HVAC System at Senior Center	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Change our very old HVAC system at the Liberty County Senior Center.	14500	14500	14500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-029997	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Physical Changes to Public Facilities - Change Old HVAC System at Jail	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Change out the HVAC systems at the Liberty County Adult Correctional Facility.	184500	0	0								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	184500	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-030051	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Construction of a County Fire Station	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The design for a Liberty County Fire Department has been completed and will go our for bid first week of February.  Total project cost is estimated to be $8M-$9M.  Liberty County will use $1.5M towards the overall project.	1500000	598199	598199								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	1500000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-030060	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Construction of an EMS Station	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Liberty County will contribute to the construction of a new EMS building.  This building has been designed and the bids were reviewed on 1/27/2022.  The Commissioners will award the bid at their meeting on 2/1/2022.  Total Project estimated at $2.5M	1000000	690815.13	690815.13								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	1000000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-035390	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	County Wide Sewer Project	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Concept and preliminary design of a county wide sanitary sewer system for the Liberty County unincorporated.	250000	0	0
TPN-035399	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Replace failing water lines - County Jail	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Replace existing water lines at the county jail that are failing to operate and provide clean drinking water.	160000	0	0
TPN-034427	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Outdoor Recreational Facilities - Outdoor Exercise Stations at James Brown Park	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Purchase outdoor exercise equipment to set up stations along the walking trail at James Brown Park.  This will allow parents and children the opportunity for out door exercise and activity without being in a confined area.	22000	0	0								No
TPN-025473	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Liberty County Testing Sites	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Liberty County is working with the Public Health Department to set up drive through and walk up testing sites at our recreation centers.	10530	10530	10530								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-035133	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Outdoor Recreation Facilities - Fishing Pier	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Construct a Long Fishing Pier on existing County Property at the Coast.  This will allow families the opportunity to enjoy outdoor recreation without being in a confined area.	100000	0	0								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	100000
TPN-025448	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Vaccination Incentives	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Liberty County will issue a one-time $200 payment to all employees that are fully vaccinated.  This includes the vaccines and the booster.  This is to promote a fully vaccinated workstaff.	150000	32295	32295								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-035494	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	East & West End Water System Expansion	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Expand the rural county water system to provide water to citizens that currently operate on a deep well, many of which are contaminated.	1684476	0	0
TPN-035543	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Assistance with ARPA Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Hire a qualified grant/accounting person to support the finance operations with the reporting requirements of the ARPA grant funds.	750000	1083.79	1083.79
TPN-035588	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Assistance with ARPA Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Engage with an outside agency (United Way) to help screen and administer potential awards to small businesses and non-profits that have been negatively impacted by the pandemic.	25000	0	0
TPN-035687	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Assistance with ARPA Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	This is money set aside as a contingency for the other projects that may exceed original budget estimates.	8131	0	0
TPN-025497	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Work Site & Building Improvements - Jail Cell Bars	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Install jail cell bars in one jail pod area for better segregation of inmate population.	150000	0	0								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	150000
TPN-035376	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay for Essential County Employees	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Issue a one time payment to essential county employees considered critical to operations.	1157114	1157114	1157114		565
TPN-025512	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Work Site & Building Improvements - Board Room AV & Sound for Broadcasting Live	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Install AV and Sound system in the Board Room of the County Annex where public meetings are held by the commissioners.  This will reduce the number of in person attendees and provide the opportunity for people to participate via online.	40000	36776	36776								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	40000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-025507	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Work Site & Building Improvements - County Wide Server Replacement	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Replace the various servers to one large County Wide server that will enable virtual meetings and between offices and staff members.  This will also support the streaming of public hearings and county commission meetings, thereby reducing the number of in person participants from the public.	250000	0	0								Yes	Technology infrastructure to adapt government operations	250000
TPN-025521	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Work Site & Building Improvements - Converting to ADP for Payroll Processing	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Currently employee time is tracked manually with timesheets being brought to the payroll office.  Converting to automatic timekeeping and payroll processing will reduce the number of person to person contact with submitting time, picking up checks, requesting payroll changes, and annual open enrollment for benefits can be done online through the portal.	160000	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-025536	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Physical Changes to Public Facilities - Heat & Air Ventilation System - Annex	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Change out the very old Heat & Air ventilation system in the County Annex	166364	0	0								Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	166364
TPN-032685	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Outdoor Recreational Facilities - Jones Creek Walking Trail	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Construct a walking trail at the Jones Creek Recreational Facility Trail.  This will allow parents and children to participate in outdoor activities without being confined to a small area.	400000	0	0								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	400000
TPN-030202	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Aid to Non-Profit Organizations Negatively Impacted by COVID-19	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Liberty County has engaged United Way to assist with identifying non-profit businesses that have been negatively impacted by the pandemic and that qualify for assistance with ARP funding.	50000	25000	25000								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-030348	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Outdoor Recreational Facilities - LCCC Walking Trail	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Create a walking trail around the Liberty County Community Complex for an outdoor activity.  This will allow parents and children to enjoy the outdoors without having to gather in a small area.	86620	0	0								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	86620
TPN-030370	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Outdoor Recreational Facilities - Gill Park Walking Trail	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Create a walking trail around the County's Gill Park.  This will allow parents and children to enjoy outdoor activity without being in a small confined area.	150000	0	0								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	150000
TPN-111363	RCP-040167	Liberty County, Georgia	Georgia	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Healthy Childhood Envir: Early Learning	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.14-Healthy Childhood Environments: Early Learning	Grants are allowed to assist mentorship and afterschool programs to mitigate hardships such as declines in revenues or impacts of periods of closure	100000	0	0								No
TPN-035395	RCP-040098	Iron County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Iron County Revenue Replacement Program	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Iron County Revenue Replacement Program is designed to reimburse Iron County for amount of lost revenue due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.  Iron County Government serves the entire populace of Iron County, Utah with General Government Services and also Municipal-type Services in the unincorporated area of the County.		9791833	9791833
TPN-116566	RCP-040098	Iron County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Local Match Secondary Water	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Iron County is providing SLFRF funds to an unincorporated community located within County boundaries for the purposes of improving secondary water infrastructure.  Our County has been negatively impacted in the past few years due to abnormal growth from migration due to the COVID-19 pandemic and from sustained drought potentially caused by changing global climate conditions.  This purpose of this project is to provide some assistance to an unincorporated community within the County to improve water distribution infrastructure.  This will directly benefit disproportionally impacted groups from the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as others.		50000	0
TPN-116565	RCP-040098	Iron County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Local Match Drinking Water	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Iron County is providing SLFRF funds to local governments and unincorporated communities located within County boundaries for the purposes of improving clean or culinary water infrastructure.  Our County has been negatively impacted in the past few years due to abnormal growth from migrations due to the COVID-19 pandemic and from sustained drought potentially caused by changing global climate conditions.  This purpose of this project is to provide some assistance local governments and unincorporated communities within the County to improve water distribution infrastructure to our communities.  This will directly benefit disproportionally impacted groups from the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as others.		200000	0
TPN-116562	RCP-040098	Iron County, Utah	Utah	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Local Match Storm Water	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Iron County is providing SLFRF funds to local governments and unincorporated communities located within County boundaries for the purposes of improving storm water infrastructure.  Our County has been negatively impacted in the past few years by flooding caused by irregular monsoon rain patterns potentially caused by changing global climate conditions.  These floods have exposed flaws in the storm water infrastructure within our local Cities, Towns, and Communities.  This purpose of this project is to provide some assistance to mitigate known issues.		610000	0
TPN-129227	RCP-040082	Greer County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Janitor Pay	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Payment of Janitor to complete extra cleaning due to COVID 19 policies and procedures.		42906.36	42906.36
TPN-129268	RCP-040082	Greer County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Payroll	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	General Governmental Payroll-courthouse employees.		200983.1	200983.1
TPN-129232	RCP-040082	Greer County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		OPEH&W Insurance Surcharge	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Health Insurance surcharge due to COVID 19  Expenses		31614.52	31614.52
TPN-129233	RCP-040082	Greer County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Premium Pay	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Premium Pay for employees that worked during the height of the COVID 19 Pandemic.		223201.25	223201.25
TPN-091461	RCP-040082	Greer County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Sanitation/ Janitorial Position	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Hired Janitorial Position due to COVID for additional cleaning and sanitation of the Courthouse.		24059.47	24059.47								No
TPN-091462	RCP-040082	Greer County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Greer County Ambulance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Payroll Expenditures to provide ambulance staff services during the COVID pandemic for March 3, 2021 through December 27, 2021.	220000	220000	220000								No
TPN-091464	RCP-040082	Greer County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Greer County Sheriff Department	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Public Safety Employee Payroll in response to COVID pandemic.	165349.53	165349.53	165349.53								No
TPN-013469	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES CONTRACTUAL STAFFING	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	CONTRACT EMT'S & PARAMEDICS TO SUPPLEMENT SHORT-STAFFED COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT.   EXISTING STAFFING SHORTAGE WAS EXACERBATED BY THE EFFECTS OF COVID-19 ON STAFF SERVING ON THE FRONT LINES SERVING THE COUNTY'S CITIZENS.	2700000	2700000	2610000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-013498	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	EMS POWER LOAD COTS & STAIR CHAIRS	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	POWER LOAD COTS & STAIR CHAIRS TO BETTER EQUIP EMS CREWS WITH RESPONSE TO CITIZENS' EMERGENT MEDICAL NEEDS.	137692	137692	137692								Yes	Medical equipment and facilities	137692	1 Imp General Public
TPN-013547	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	PREMIUM PAY AUG - SEP 2021	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	PREMIUM PAY FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES PROVIDING ESSENTIAL SERVICES TO COUNTY CITIZENS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC	768600	768600	768600		605
TPN-117392	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	SHERIFF'S OFFICE RENOVATION	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	RENOVATION OF SHERIFF'S OFFICE FACILITIES TO UPDATE PUBLIC & OFFICE AREAS ALLOWING FOR MORE EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF DEPARTMENTAL DUTIES & INTERACTION WITH THE PUBLIC	635097	635097	635097								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	635097
TPN-117241	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	SHERIFF'S BODY CAMERAS & TASERS	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	PROVIDE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT OFFICERS WITH PROPER BODY CAMERAS & TASERS TO IMPROVE & DOCUMENT THE INTERACTIONS WITH COUNTY CITIZENS & TRAVELERS.	1071564	1071564	1071564								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	1071564	1 Imp General Public
TPN-117140	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	WATER PARK SLIDE REPAIRS & PAINT	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	REPAIRS & PAINTING AT WATER PARKS IN ORANGEBURG & SANTEE COMMUNITIES TO ENHANCE THE ATTRACTION FOR SUMMER VISITORS TO AREA PARKS & LAKES.	150000	150000	86725								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-117625	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	MAGISTRATES' BUILDING RENOVATION	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR RENOVATION OF MAGISTRATES' OFFICES	26700	24030	24030								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	26700	1 Imp General Public
TPN-156567	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	COUNTY EMPLOYEE WALK-IN CLINIC	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	PROVIDE ACCESS TO  WALK-IN MEDICAL CLINIC SERVICES TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES TO PROVIDE FOR GENERAL MEDICAL TREATMENT	300000	300000	114752								No			13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify
TPN-061880	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	LOST REVENUE PROJECTS-JAN2022-DEC2026	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	BOWMAN LIBRARY PARK CONSTRUCTION;  HVAC UNIT FOR SHERIFF'S INDOOR SHOOTING RANGE;  EXPRESS CARE FOR COUNTY EMPLOYEE MEDICAL CARE;   GYM DIVIDER CURTAIN FOR COUNTY YMCA	10000000	3869928	3869928
TPN-061203	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	MASTER IN EQUITY OFFICE RENOVATION-DENSITY REDUCTION	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	NETWORK CABLING / RENOVATION - COUNTY MASTER IN EQUITY BUILDING UNDER RENOVATION TO PROVIDE LESS DENSITY IN STAFF OFFICES AND PUBLIC SERVICE AREAS OF THE BUILDING.	391851	391851	97161								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	391851	1 Imp General Public
TPN-058550	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	TRICOUNTY COMMISSION ON ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE/ THE DAWN CENTER	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	FUNDING TO ALLOW TRI-COUNTY COMMISSION ON ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE/ THE DAWN CENTER TO HIRE A PSYCHIATRIC NURSE PRACTITIONER TO TREAT CITIZENS OF THE TRI-COUNTY AREA (ORANGEBURG, BAMBURG & CALHOUN COUNTIES  ) WHO HAVE CO-OCCURRING DISORDERS OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE COUPLED WITH MENTAL HEALTH DISORDERS.	98656	98656	98656								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-058324	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	PREMIUM PAY JAN 2022-MAR 2022	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	PREMIUM PAY FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES PROVIDING ESSENTIAL SERVICES TO COUNTY CITIZENS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC	5595	5595	5595		8
TPN-099318	RCP-040075	Orangeburg County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT INDOOR TRAINING & SHOOTING RANGE	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	INDOOR TRAINING & SHOOTING RANGE FACILITY TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTION AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION.	356000	356000	313135								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	356000
TPN-115237	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Mobile Command Vehicle	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Vehicle to help community respond to current health crisis and future events.		949368	919897.5								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	800000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-115235	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Essential Staff Retention - Law Enforcement	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Continued staff retention to respond to negative impacts of COVID-19 in our community.		2000000	402012.37			30					No
TPN-117747	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City of Lakeport (Emer Repairs)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Emergency repairs at the City of Lakeport		23850	23850
TPN-149828	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Software Licensing Fees	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Expense associated with software licensing fees		34658.43	34658.43
TPN-009586	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Water Consultant	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Water Consultant to provide consultation, oversight, and advisory services related to water projects needed in Gregg County.	200000	200000	29792.31
TPN-009527	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Salary Gregg County Supplement Hazard Pay Health and Safety Personnel	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium/Hazard pay to Public Health and Safety employees of Gregg County.	1122709.26	1122709.26	1122709.26		270
TPN-009541	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Longview Regional Hospital Pay	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	1Q 2023 Report Error - while trying to submit the 1Q 2023 the Treasury generated an error stating the Entity Type on the subaward for Longview Regional needed to be recorded.    However, once the Entity Type was recorded and we tried to save the subaward, it gave an error that Purpose of Funds on the subaward was left blank.  When you go into the subaward for a project coded to EC 4.2, the subaward doesn't have a Purpose of Funds field to complete.  Therefore, we had to change EC to 6.1 in order to be able to submit report. Provide supplemental pay for COVID-19 Impacted Health Divisions	1000000	700000	700000								No		1000000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-009543	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Liberty City Water Supply Corporation	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Provide water and sewer infrastructure to the Liberty City Water Supply Corporation.	3000000	3000000	776906
TPN-009613	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Gary R. Traylor & Associates ARPA Consultant	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Grant administrations and programmatic compliance, reporting, project eligibility, and other ARPA team related services.	750000	750000	100662.5
TPN-009492	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Christus Good Shepherd	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Medical staffing for Christus Good Shepherd Health System to combat shortages of medical professionals in Gregg County, Texas	1000000	1000000	1000000			458					No
TPN-009644	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Motorola Communications Infrastructure	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Law enforcement, first responders, emergency personnel communications equipment. Transferring from analog to digital.	2000000	2000000	1743977.15								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	400000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-100044	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Health Advisor	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To obtain public health advisory services to the County from a licensed medical doctor.		10000	7499.94
TPN-107826	RCP-040092	Gregg County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Audit Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Single Audit for ARPA expenses		6500	6500
TPN-129932	RCP-040548	Clark County, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Salary replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Used funds for payroll replacement.  Applied the total amount for payroll to free up other funds for other projects.	725674	725674	725674
TPN-145849	RCP-036714	Mills County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Health Emergency Center	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Construction of a County wide public emergency health center.  There is space to have a drive through vaccination clinic, storage room for medical supplies, and a walk in emergency medical care treatment center.  This facility will be equipped with backup power, fiber, and bulk water availability.		547249.14	547249.14								Yes	Other (please specify)	946522	1 Imp General Public
TPN-161869	RCP-036719	Knox County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Provision of governmental service	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Lost revenue funds toward gov.services		381489.21	381489.21
TPN-067847	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Oneota Learning Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Oneota Learning Center items - such as HVAC, restrooms touchless etc.		513208	0
TPN-152430	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Zoom Subscriptions	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Zoom Subscriptions for meetings		1700	320.78
TPN-152446	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Jail Security Cameras/sytem	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Jail Security cameras		120474.63	4560.24
TPN-152476	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Life Pak AED 12 Lead	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	EMS equipment		25782.37	0
TPN-152509	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		EMS/EMT Stipend	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	EMS/EMT stipend for those who answered calls		22800	0
TPN-070248	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Scanners	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase new or update scanners for offices to make information available to public without have to come to office to view or employees to view at their desk.		20000	0
TPN-070253	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Fiber Optics	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Promote Rural Broadband		507718.75	7718.75
TPN-068519	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		EMS Building	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Building of a building to store EMS equipment and supplies in one area to easily respond to incidents.		360000	18400
TPN-069349	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Remodel of Building (Atty/VA)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Remodeling of building to house VA and Attorney Departments to give them space.		1000000	290351.25
TPN-070211	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Trails Project (Bike)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Project is to combine trails for people to enjoy outdoors and social distancing.		391737.72	50389.26
TPN-070339	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Recorder Digitizing Books	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Digitizing of Books for public to view without coming to office and for employees to view at their desk.		37020	0
TPN-070406	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Meeting Owls	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of Meeting Owls to conduct Zoom Meeting or other virtual meetings.		2978.53	2978.53
TPN-070351	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Touchless Items	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Installation of touchless items in restrooms or other shared areas.		15000	1430
TPN-070374	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Public Health Sign	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase a sign for public health to use for clinics.		5000	0
TPN-070261	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Audit cost for Single Federal Audits	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	If Federal Single Audit is required for the spending of ARPA Funds, the cost may be paid from county received ARPA funds through Dec. 2026.		75000	0
TPN-070296	RCP-037977	Clay County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Board Room Sound System/Table	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Installation of sound system in board room to allow for social distancing during meetings.		12500	0
TPN-065962	RCP-037893	Missaukee County, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		6.1  Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	SLFRF funds used for provision of government services		300000	300000
TPN-156980	RCP-037893	Missaukee County, MI	Michigan	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		6.1 Provision of Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	purchase of county building, renovation of county building, allocation to local units for fire dept. radios, infrastructure, other projects.		1200000	900000
TPN-064235	RCP-040466	Elk County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Administration	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Grant administration		24571.15	2457.12
TPN-063924	RCP-040466	Elk County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Health Department	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Expand Health Department building for social distancing and public health needs.		466851.85	234148.45
TPN-059188	RCP-040527	Warren County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Deputy Bonus Compensation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project provided a one-time bonus to all Warren County Sheriff's Deputies on November 30, 2021 to compensate for performing essential work in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. To qualify for the bonus, employees must have been designated in a "Enhanced Benefits - Sheriff's Deputy" position in the Virginia Retirement System. They must have been in active employment at the time of payment. $3,000 was given to each full-time employee meeting the qualification and $1,500 was provided to any part-time employee who worked 400 hours or more from January 1, 2021 to November 30, 2021.		92041	92041
TPN-124350	RCP-036688	Mono County, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Sustaining County Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Sustaining County services despite revenue losses. These services include law enforcement and other public safety activities, emergency medical services, information technology, tax, and accounting services to other departments and jurisdictions within Mono County, maintenance of core government facilities, certain engineering services, code enforcement, building and other development services, and economic development.		2805578	2805578
TPN-055025	RCP-036743	Lampasas County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Project Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The  project is for the purchase of 3 patrol cars and repairs to County offices.		4162138	4162138
TPN-041221	RCP-036764	Crowley County, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Broadband Project Olney Springs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	This project will provide funds to Southern Colorado Economic Development District (SCEDD) for the purpose of hiring a grant writer to apply for grants in order to raise the dollar volume that will be required to attain adequate broadband in Crowley County.	28000	0	0								No	Devices and equipment that assist households in accessing the internet	100000
TPN-041025	RCP-036764	Crowley County, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Workforce Housing Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Crowley County is participating in the Southeast Colorado Regional Workforce Housing Project to build affordable and attainable workforce housing in Crowley County. The population being served in Crowley County are employed individuals making approximately 80% AMI. The desired outcome of the project is to build affordable housing priced at attainable levels for the workforce population. Success will be measured by the usage of the units.	104932	83215.18	83215.18								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	550000	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts			No	0
TPN-041032	RCP-036764	Crowley County, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Ordway Water Bypass Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	This project will provide additional water volume and pressures to the north/northeast area of Crowley County. This area historically experiences dangerous low water pressures and lack of adequate volume. The project bypasses a city and allows higher pressures to be pumped in order to fill storage tanks. This project will be completed in multiple phases over several years.	1044346	886302.99	886302.99
TPN-115369	RCP-036744	Sumner County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	AED Purchase	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of AEDs for Sumner Emergency Medical Serivces and Sheriff office		77216	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-157434	RCP-036744	Sumner County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Hotmix for Highway Maintenance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	hotmix for highway maintenance		1250000	0
TPN-157162	RCP-036744	Sumner County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Chest Compression Devices	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	Chest compression devices for EMS		279115.2	279115.2								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-157417	RCP-036744	Sumner County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Highway Tractors	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	3 tractors and attachments for highway maintenance		379757.87	0
TPN-107808	RCP-036744	Sumner County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Forward Sumner Grant	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Multipart grant to set up capacity to assist businesses and individuals in the community. This is a place holder project that is being reported on due to a Subrecipient Agreement being in place but not enough information to report individual projects. Project is being modified with eligible programs being proposed currently and to be reobligated in 2023 CY Q1		1560000	0
TPN-022688	RCP-036744	Sumner County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA Indirect Administrative Consulting	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Consulting costs used to support effective management, oversight as well as support for legal, regulatory, and other requirements. iParametrics has been hired to assist administratively setting up needs assessments, surveys building, COVID-19 recovery frameworks, assisting and advising in general pre-project planning and strategies. Consulting includes ARPA eligibility advisement, 2 CFR 200 compliance guidance, reporting assistance and other indirect consulting. Consulting expenses are charged hourly and meet 2 CFR 200.404 and CFR 200.405 cost requirements.		473480	71515.5
TPN-022693	RCP-036744	Sumner County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Premium Pay to Essential Workers	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium pay project for Sumner County employees in the Sheriffs Department, in Other Public Safety roles, employees in the Emergency Communication Center, and Ambulance/Emergency Medical Service personnel. Consists of additional premium pay for hours worked including overtime, of 7% to the EMS and EMA director and 15% to all other employees. It was implemented starting on 9/24/2021 for EMA personnel, 9/25/2021 for ECC personnel, 9/27/2021 for Sheriff personnel and 9/27/2021 for EMS personnel. All individuals meet Premium Pay criteria 1. By being employees of the local government workforce, criteria 2 through verification that their work involves regular in person interactions and/or handling of items that have been handled by others, and criteria 3 by either being below 150% of their residing county's average annual wage (bls.gov Metro area: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin data was used), not exempt from Fair Labor Act overtime provisions or written justification establishing the premium pay is responsive to the workers performing essential work during the pandemic.		10536709.23	4711676.39		482
TPN-107746	RCP-036744	Sumner County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Architectural Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Hiring of architects to provide professional design services for a maintenance facility, an EMS building and Health Department		542025	342837.5
TPN-107766	RCP-036744	Sumner County, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Sumner County Ashley's Place Support	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	All items listed under technology will ensure that employees and the Center have the updated software needed to effectively participate in virtual trainings, meetings and sessions.  New and added technology will assist with court preparation and flexibility in child Forensic Interviews that will continue to keep children/families and CPIT team member (Law Enforcement, Child Protective Services, District Attorneys) safe and healthy with virtual capabilities.		40250	40250								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-112033	RCP-036763	Wayne County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	COVID Medical Expenses	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	Pay for COVID related medical expenses	500000	251514.68	251514.68								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-013758	RCP-036763	Wayne County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Wayne County Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To supplement day to day government operations of the County	10000000	10000000	10000000
TPN-093794	RCP-036763	Wayne County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Legal Fees	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	To pay for legal fees incurred in the administration of this grant to ensure proper spending and allocation	30000	11513.75	11513.75
TPN-039810	RCP-036735	Crisp County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Revenue Replacement for Provision of Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Electing Standard Amount for Revenue Replacement		4345499	4345499
TPN-057756	RCP-036711	Petroleum County, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Provision of Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	General government services eligible for revenue replacement from losses due to COVID-19 Public Health Emergency.		94594	0
TPN-006672	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Health Department-Contact Tracers	1-Public Health	1.3-COVID-19 Contact Tracing	The Muskingum County Health Department has managed contract tracing for all covid-19 cases within the county. In the fall of 2021, those number spiked and additional funds were needed to for full time contact tracers as well as laptops necessary to perform the work. As many as 12-20 contact tracers were working on covid-19 cases alone in the fall of 2021, putting great strain on the staff and budget. A portion of the funds were assigned to the on staff medical officer to continue his services during the pandemic.		25000	25000								No		25000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-070940	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Munson Scope Evaluation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Scope evaluation performed on an old school building to determine the cost of conversion into apartment style housing in a QCT. However, upon evaluation, inspections and estimates determined the project was not feasible.		9000.12	9000.12
TPN-009515	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Administration Cost	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Administration cost to staff assigned to ARPA responsibilities. Vetting requests, training to learn the program, determining eligibility, helping other NEUS within county, reporting and other duties pertaining to ARPA.		155072.17	155072.17
TPN-094332	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	MCF-Waterline Extension	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	MCF Waterline		50223	50223								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-094333	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	MCF Waterline Fittings	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	Cost of Fittings for the waterline extension at the Muskingum County Fairgrounds. This extension provides a viable water source for the cleanface restroom facility.		19536.95	19536.95								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-094334	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Mid East CDL Center	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other	Mid East CTC owns a CDL training and testing site, this project aims to develop the full site to maximize the number of individuals that the center can test and enter the workforce. Federal guidelines changed in February 2022 requiring more extensive testing and training.		300000	300000								No
TPN-094335	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		MCF Hydrant Work	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project installed new frost free hydrants  at the Muskingum County Fairgrounds around the barns in the livestock area of the grounds.		7846.37	7846.37
TPN-105344	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Muskingum County Center For Seniors	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Shelf Stable Meals  Two Meal Delivery Vehicles		100000	84425
TPN-003201	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Genesis Ventilators	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Genesis Healthcare System will use these new ventilators to provide care to the excessive number of covid patients under the care of Genesis. These ventilators will not only provide additional the much machine, but they also possess new technologies needed to treat patients with the many complexities associated with covid-19. As stated by the staff, some of the older vents they were currently using made it very difficult to treat the patients.		88233.21	88233.21								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	88233.21	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003185	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Honor Flight	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Muskingum County veterans have the opportunity to travel to Washington DC each year, funded by the nonprofit "Veterans Appreciation Foundation". Due to Covid-19, 2020 the honor flight for veterans was cancelled. Therefore, in 2021 flights were making twice as many trips to provide the opportunity for those veterans to travel to Washington DC that were not able in 2020.  To help ease the burden of these costs, this project was establish to provide assistance for two Muskingum County residents to participate in 2021.		1000	1000								No		1000	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-003191	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Heroes Landing	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Heroes Landing is a children's justice center located in Muskingum County. Due to Covid19,  child sexual and domestic assaults cases increased putting great strain on the resources needed to serve these victims. Outsourcing to other centers was not option as they experience the same workload.  This CJC will allow for more efficient results in cases and better serve the Muskingum County victims.		500000	500000								No		500000	28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-003199	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Health Department	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	The Muskingum County Health Department has managed contract tracing for all covid-19 cases within the county. In the fall of 2021, those number spiked and additional funds were needed to for full time contact tracers as well as laptops necessary to perform the work. As many as 12-20 contact tracers were working on covid-19 cases alone in the fall of 2021, putting great strain on the staff and budget. A portion of the funds were assigned to the on staff medical officer to continue his services during the pandemic.		75000	75000			*					No		100000
TPN-003200	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	2200 Linden Ave Cleanup	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	This site is filled with asbestos debris on the surface of the superfund site and is a blight to the neighboring QCT and the community as a whole. The material is determined to have friable hazardous material that poses a threat to those families living in the neighboring QCT. Having this site cleaned up will build healthier environments and a better community.		500000	500000								No		500000	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-003204	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Genesis Bonus Retention Program	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Genesis Retention Bonus Program is designed for the 1,263 employees directly fighting the pandemic. The strain put on employees over the length of time the pandemic has lasted is taking its toll on moral. The hospital has been forced to employee traveling employees at higher wages than the current staff. The retention plan is available to Genesis employees designed to keep these local, hardworking folks on staff at the county's largest employer and continue the fight against covid-19.		2300000	2300000								No		2300000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003209	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		MCEO-Revenue Loss	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	These funds were awarded to the Muskingum County Engineer's office to be used for ongoing operations of the office. This amount was determined from the lost gas tax revenue in 2020 due to the pandemic as well as the purchase of storm water piping. The county is responsible for many culverts in the county, management of storm water is critical to resident in our rural county.		593847	593847
TPN-105346	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Genesis Retention Bonus Round II	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	Retention Bonus Program offered to Genesis Employees who worked directly with Covid-19 patients in return for an employment commitment of two years.		2481000	2481000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-106033	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Arch Hill-Norfield Road	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Arch Hill-Norfield Road Waterline Extension		400000	12645.79
TPN-106034	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Virginia-Irish Ridge Road	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Virginia Ridge/Irish Ridge plus the Philo Hock Water Line Extension.		400000	128538.46
TPN-105653	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	MCCFA Gateway District	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Potential Gateway District development in downtown Zanesville facilitated by the Muskingum County Convention Facilites Board. Opening of a restaurant and a distillery, a public pavilion for entertainment. Street and landscape upgrades to create an outdoor entertainment and gathering site for the community. Suited to host farmers markets, concerts, and outdoor activities. Also included in the plans are upgrades to Secrest Auditorium.		150000	0
TPN-105657	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Muskingum County Agricultural Society-Clean Face Plumbing Updates	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	Plumbing repairs to Clean Face Restroom prior to the 2022 fair.		2270.52	2270.52								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-105667	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Grandstand Bleacher Installation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New bleacher installation at the grandstand on the Muskingum County Fairgrounds in Muskingum County. This location is home to many events during the fair as well as year-round.		20446.47	20446.47
TPN-105672	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		MARCS Radios (80%) Fire Departments	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	MARCS Radio Upgrades for listed township fire departments within the county. The upgrades are necessary to maintain communication with all levels of emergency response personal.		56700	4483.75
TPN-003839	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Southern-Sundale	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Southern-Sundale project is an infrastructure project that will provide clean drinking water to over 100 homes in the eastern portion of Muskingum County. Many of these homes are considered to be in a rural location which makes accessing clean drinking water more a challenge without this county infrastructure.		1723455.75	1723455.75					No
TPN-003842	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Big B-Mutton Ridge	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Big B- Mutton Ridge project is an infrastructure project that will provide clean drinking water to over 25 homes in the eastern portion of Muskingum County. Many of these homes are considered to be in a rural location which makes accessing clean drinking water more a challenge without this county infrastructure.		358300.47	358300.47					No
TPN-003846	RCP-036713	Muskingum County, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Twin Hills Drive	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Twin Hills Drive project is an infrastructure project that will provide clean drinking water to over 30 homes in the eastern portion of Muskingum County. Many of these homes are considered to be in a rural location which makes accessing clean drinking water more a challenge without this county infrastructure.		368243.78	368243.78					No
TPN-138323	RCP-036903	Hempstead County, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Road repairs, employees bonuses, improvements to Health Unit, rural water system, and computers system upgrade.		2988289.83	2988289.83
TPN-089074	RCP-036903	Hempstead County, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Premium Pay for eligible workers	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The Quorum Court finds that premium pay responds to the heightened risk faced by the county's eligible workers who must be physically present at the jobsite and who performed essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency.  (3/1/20 - 9/30/21).	1194049.17	1194049.17	1194049.17		134
TPN-107467	RCP-036774	Gurabo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Recreational Facilities	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Construction of passive parks and outdoor gyms in several communities of the municipality. This is to promote exercise and outdoor places that communities can use. Our community will benefit from physical activities outdoors where they can be outside which is not only beneficial, but a low risk for transmission setting.		320130	0								No
TPN-107476	RCP-036774	Gurabo Municipio, Puerto Rico	Puerto Rico	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Asphalt	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Improvements of the streets and roads in the municipality of Gurabo.		2970517.8	985649.66
TPN-065524	RCP-036958	Wyoming County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff of Wyoming County-Premium pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium pay for employees that were on payroll in 2020 /Covid19 /Essential workers because Commission Employees were open for business		83967	83967		100
TPN-065765	RCP-036958	Wyoming County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Maben, Otsego,Itmann, Pierpoint Water	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Sewer System Extension --customers TBD		160000	0
TPN-065783	RCP-036958	Wyoming County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Brenton/Baileysville Waterline Extension Project	5-Infrastructure	5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation	Waterline Project to extend water service to approx 254 new customers in the Brenton/Baileysville Area of Wyoming County		250000	0
TPN-065798	RCP-036958	Wyoming County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Oceana Rt 10 Water System Upgrade/Treatment Plant	5-Infrastructure	5.10-Drinking water: Treatment	Upgrade of Water Treatment Plant and Rt 10 Water System Upgrade Project to serve approx 1582 existing customers with a potential to serve several additional projects if funded		150000	0
TPN-065559	RCP-036958	Wyoming County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Upper Huff Water Project	5-Infrastructure	5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation	Services to provide water to Upper Huff Community in Wyoming County West Virginia		103961.8	103961.8
TPN-065719	RCP-036958	Wyoming County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Beartown/Herndon  Hts Waterline Ext	5-Infrastructure	5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation	Waterline Extension project to serve approx 149 customers with potential for 183		681819	681819
TPN-065734	RCP-036958	Wyoming County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Rt 97 Waterline Extension	5-Infrastructure	5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation	Waterline Extension Project to serve 45 new customers		100000	0
TPN-065749	RCP-036958	Wyoming County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Hanover Waterline	5-Infrastructure	5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation	Water Project to serve approx 213 new customers with potential to serve 580 more as extensions are funded		233333	0
TPN-137521	RCP-036958	Wyoming County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Dilapidated Structures	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	funding toward dilapidates structures		2852.72	2852.72
TPN-137531	RCP-036958	Wyoming County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Courthouse Annex Grate	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace grate at annex building behind courthouse to drain water		4500	4500
TPN-125555	RCP-038541	Marshall County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		General Governmental Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This is the total obligations and expenditures Marshall County used on general governmental services. The County broke down the expenditures into categories: -911 -County Clerk -Sheriff -Highway -Assessor -Courthouse -Camp Grove -Treasurer -AED		1104856.82	862962.11
TPN-091861	RCP-053102	Boyle County,	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	While the County has elected to take the standard revenue loss allowance, it has allocated less than 50% of the total available. To date, funds have been used on government services including drinking water infrastructure improvements. The County anticipates allocating the remaining revenue replacement funds in the coming months.		4215348.68	4215348.68
TPN-131445	RCP-006394	Hancock County, Tn, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Ambulance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Two Ambulance purchases		238994	238994
TPN-049807	RCP-006394	Hancock County, Tn, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Hero Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Hero Pay to employees and contract employees of Hancock County Govt.	284800	284800	284800		178
TPN-126618	RCP-014833	Lucas County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		FY23 SLFRF ALLOCATION AS LOST REVENUE	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	SLFRF ALLOCATION AS LOST REVENUE THAT WAS SPENT ON GOVERNMENT SERVICES IN LUCAS COUNTY FOR FY23.		992891.79	992891.79
TPN-135314	RCP-014835	East Stroudsburg Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Water Meter Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Replacement of all water meters within the Borough. Installation of an AMI meter reading system.	1900000	0	0
TPN-058473	RCP-014835	East Stroudsburg Borough, PA	Pennsylvania	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Revenue replacement general fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Borough intends to use their ARP funds under the provision of Government services for general government, public safety, public works and culture and recreation expenditures.		2813500	500000
TPN-134746	RCP-040455	Navarro County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Navarro County ARPA Projects	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Navarro County ARPA projects that provide relief from post-Covid in assisting ,  serving and protecting the citizens of Navarro County. The projects include anywhere from Sheriff Vehicles, updating software for 911, personnel for the court systems, and juvenile probation.		9295863	343575.93
TPN-046070	RCP-040455	Navarro County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	GrantWorks Administrative Fees	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	General Administrative services for the management and oversight of ARPA funded Program and Projects.		438000	65700
TPN-071134	RCP-037266	Bourbon County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Government Services - Healthcare $804,278.79		804278.79	804278.79
TPN-146644	RCP-037266	Bourbon County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Broadband Towers	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Broadband to connect radio towers together for public safety and eventually the potential to sell internet to residential areas with a partnership with a 3rd party.		221000	26367.5
TPN-146654	RCP-037266	Bourbon County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Legacy Healthcare	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Retain Emergency Room Healthcare in our rural area with a partnership with Legacy Health.		1790000	1790000
TPN-054999	RCP-037155	Lasalle Parish, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Broadband	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To expand broadband availability to all parish residents		800000	800000
TPN-055026	RCP-037155	Lasalle Parish, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Roads and Bridges	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To improve the roads and bridges within the parish		2092596	2092596
TPN-155904	RCP-037159	Buckingham County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		EMS Ambulance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchased a new EMS vehicle to help with delivery of EMS services.	300697	300697	300697
TPN-155942	RCP-037159	Buckingham County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		First Responder EMS Vehicle and outfitting	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchased and outfitted a Chevy Tahoe for EMS services and calls.  Vehicle is outfitted so that it can go on EMS calls when the larger squad vehicles are out on other calls.	49259	49259	49259
TPN-073171	RCP-037159	Buckingham County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	CVEC - Firefly	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Getting broadband to most citizens of the County.  Central Virginia Electric Co-op is also getting broadband to Dominion Power customers throughout the County	1500000	1500000	1500000
TPN-152414	RCP-037082	Union County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Maynardville Waterline	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	This project involved running water lines within the Maynardville Utility District.		225000	225000
TPN-152547	RCP-037082	Union County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	EMS Chest Compression	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	This project involved purchasing of EMS chest compression equipment		124000	124000								Yes	Medical equipment and facilities	124000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-152680	RCP-037082	Union County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Aggregate Equipment	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	This project involved the purchase of SCBA's, turnout gear, and various fire fighting tools.		181603.73	181603.73								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	181603.73	1 Imp General Public
TPN-152625	RCP-037082	Union County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sharps Chapel quad vehicle	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	This project purchased a rescue vehicle for Sharps Chapel fire department for search and rescue.		51074.99	51074.99								Yes	Other (please specify)	51074.99	1 Imp General Public
TPN-066658	RCP-037082	Union County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Maynardville Water Line	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Union County will provide funding to the City of Maynardville to extend water lines	0	0	0
TPN-133669	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Media Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Media equipment for public defender		728.97	728.97
TPN-133769	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		American Legion	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Generator for American Legion Center		70000	0
TPN-133749	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Training facility - Kenney Fire	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New bldg for training for Kenney Fire Department		100000	0
TPN-133728	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Chest compression systems	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	chest compression systems for fire departments and EMS		204908.13	204908.13
TPN-133681	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Email Migration	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Email migration to .gov domain		28706	28706
TPN-133757	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Communication/radio equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Upgrade radio/communication equipment for Farmer City police department.		17900	0
TPN-133693	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Flooring	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	replace flooring in jail		96000	96000
TPN-133730	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Simulcast Radio System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Simulcast radio system for dispatch		249935	124967.5
TPN-133723	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		GIS Map change detection service	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	GIS map change detection service		13000	13000
TPN-133741	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Playground upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	playground upgrade for elementary school		15000	15000
TPN-133768	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Teen Community Center upgrades	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Building security upgrades and equipment for Teen Community Center		25000	0
TPN-133737	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		YMCA bldg/equipment upgrades	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bldg/equipment upgrades for local YMCA		100000	16668.85
TPN-133677	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Website Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Website upgrades for cyber security		3950	0
TPN-133732	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Van	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Van for Neighborhood Care Center - provide services for low income residents		25000	25000
TPN-133770	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Economic Development	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Small business grants		30000	0
TPN-133765	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Roof replacement/security system	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace roof and security system for senior citizens organization		64000	0
TPN-133753	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Training facility - Farmer City Fire	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New bldg for training for Farmer City Fire Department		100000	0
TPN-133683	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		GIS Mapping upgrades	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	GIS mapping upgrades		9030	8447
TPN-133735	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Waterline upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	waterline upgrades for county museum		28225	13700
TPN-133726	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Dispatch Center Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	upgrade furniture/consoles in dispatch center		109476.92	109476.92
TPN-046208	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Replace gas dock	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	replacement of gas dock at county owned marina		186329.81	186329.81
TPN-046213	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Digitize County Clerk Records	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Digitize records - 3 year program		7000	4500
TPN-046217	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Historical Indexing - County Clerk	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	historical indexing of county clerk records for remote access		41222	0
TPN-046206	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Cyber Security Upgrades	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	upgrade of software and monthly services for cyber security		72476	63490.4
TPN-046222	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Imaging land records - county clerk	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Imaging Land Records		49788.61	37341.46
TPN-046230	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Sheriff dept equipment upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Upgrade Sheriff body cameras, in-car cameras and lap tops		245055	214661
TPN-046238	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Premium Pay	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	premium pay to employees/public safety employees with regular in person contact with the public		66000	66000
TPN-046240	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	COVID testing	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	COVID testing for and jail inmates		6375.9	6375.9
TPN-046199	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Program Support	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	County engaged a consulting firm to provide administrative support for the Amercian Recovery Plan SLFRF program		20000	20000
TPN-046215	RCP-037211	De Witt County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	911 Radio Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	County share of radio upgrade project		23051.54	23051.54
TPN-057049	RCP-053052	Power County,	Idaho	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	10 Mil Standard Option	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	REMODEL/UPDATE COURTHOUSE TO ALLOW FOR SOCIAL DISTANCING AND INCREASE TO SAFETY AND SECURITY PROVISIONS.	1491944	1491944	1491944
TPN-138039	RCP-038290	Golden Valley County, MT	Montana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Provision of Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Golden Valley County utilized SLFRF funds for provisions of General Government services.		159470	102369.22
TPN-087638	RCP-039334	Clay County, WV	West Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Loss Revenues	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Clay Co PSD - Repair water lines, Clay Roane PSD - install emergency generators & security fencing, Clay County Library, Clay County 4-H Camp, Broadband grant matching funds, Clay County Park and Pool - Maintenance, Soccer League, Replace Courthouse Courtyard, Remove Pine Trees, Big Otter Vol. Fire Dept., Clay Vol. Fire Dept., Lizemore Vol. Fire Dept., Election Equipment, Broadband Matching Funds, Sewage System at Maysel Park, Wilson Ridge Waterline Extension, Purchase Lot in Town of Clay.	1652579	1652579	1652579
TPN-053601	RCP-039236	Latimer County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds will be used for government service traditionally provided by the government.  They can include but are not limited to the following:  Construction of schools and hospitals, road building and maintenance and other infrastructure, health services, general government administration, staff and administrative facilities, environmental remediation and provision of police, fire and other public safety services.		1956562	277607.82
TPN-054798	RCP-039229	Caldwell Parish Police Jury, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Caldwell Parish Employees	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Eligible public sector employees of the local government entity were paid Premium Pay.	89912	89912	83124		35
TPN-055039	RCP-039229	Caldwell Parish Police Jury, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	District Attorney	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Parish allocated $24,000 for the District Attorney to hire a contract labor attorney to address case backlog caused by the delays in court proceedings caused by COVID-19.	24000	24000	24000								No
TPN-054823	RCP-039229	Caldwell Parish Police Jury, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	East Columbia Water District	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Eligible employees were paid premium pay.	3000	3000	3000		3
TPN-054838	RCP-039229	Caldwell Parish Police Jury, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Caldwell Parish Assessor	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Eligible employees were provided premium pay.	7167	7167	7167		3
TPN-054862	RCP-039229	Caldwell Parish Police Jury, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Caldwell Parish DA	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Eligible government employee was provided premium pay.	1500	1500	1500		1
TPN-137485	RCP-039229	Caldwell Parish Police Jury, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Emergency Response Command Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Emergency Response command center was designed and purchased. The mobile unit can accommodate triage healthcare and provides satellite internet communication with all first responders. The unit could also be a mobile vaccination center if necessary.	161061	161061	161061
TPN-137478	RCP-039229	Caldwell Parish Police Jury, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Courtroom Recording Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Parish upgraded the audio recording equipment in the courtroom to ensure continuity of operations as the COVID related backlog of cases were processed during 2022.	7045	7045	7045
TPN-137476	RCP-039229	Caldwell Parish Police Jury, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Road Fund Gravel and OT	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Parish allocated $300,000 for additional gravel purchased through a formal bid process to expand the annual purchase amount as a result of damage from tornado activity in the area in 2022. Also, the Parish expanded the normal operating hours of the road crew during the summer of 2022  to disburse the additional gravel purchased.	339600	339600	339600
TPN-056084	RCP-037466	Davis County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Davis County Auditor Record Preservation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Conversion of historical record books to electronic images for digital preservation	24225	24225	12112.5
TPN-056119	RCP-037466	Davis County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Davis County Recorder Record Preservation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Conversion of historical record books to electronic images for digital preservation	131138	131138	65569
TPN-060383	RCP-037466	Davis County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Davis County Broadband Expansion	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Broadband fiberoptic installation in an expansion effort to finalize complete access to all areas of the county.	110669	110669	110669
TPN-056175	RCP-037466	Davis County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Davis County Agricultural Society Public Restroom	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Construction of public restroom facility for fairground complex.	125000	125000	125000
TPN-130313	RCP-037466	Davis County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Davis County Treasurer	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Davis County Treasurer Office remodel to achieve total ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) standards for accessibility.  This office has limited space and has not been completely  ADA compliant in the past. This remodel will provide complete compliance and convenience for customers.	19483.25	19483.25	5790
TPN-130306	RCP-037466	Davis County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Davis County Road Improvement - V42	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Davis County Highway V42 pavement overlay for pronounced improvement in transportation quality of key thoroughfare within the County. No traditional funding is available or will be for several years and condition of current road is seriously deteriorated.  Continued  and worsening deterioration if not restored immediately.	586884	586884	586884
TPN-130281	RCP-037466	Davis County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Davis County Sheriff's Dept.	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Determined need for Law Enforcement officers with no traditional funding available - Purchase of personal protective equipment (face/body shields) for potentially violent situations, as life threatening school emergency, public riot, mob or gang related activity.	12204	12204	12204
TPN-130292	RCP-037466	Davis County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Davis County Lake Wapello Shelter	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Davis County community development and tourism contribution for construction of a weather protected shelter near a walking trail at a local State Park facility.  This facility will increase usability that brings current residents and visitors to the park location.	5000	5000	5000
TPN-045145	RCP-037466	Davis County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Davis County Day Care	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Appliance purchases needed in order to meet inspection qualifications for fall re-opening of facility	10000	10000	10000								No			6 Imp For services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools			No	0
TPN-122614	RCP-037750	Donley County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		County Maintenance and Operations	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Police and fire protection, jail and courthouse expenses, payroll, repairs to infrastructure - courthouse, annex, county maintenance barn		636713	636713
TPN-050786	RCP-037370	Garfield County, UT	Utah	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Salaries for county employees and funding for county offices and services.		981098	981098
TPN-080409	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Southbend Resumption of Rescue Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	A contract for resumption of rescue services by Southbend.		95000	95000
TPN-117033	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	H.A.C.T Regional Wastewater Treatment District	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Lonoke County has awarded the HACT Wastewater Treatment District $75,000.00 for a Wastewater Treatment Infrastructure Project in Unincorporated Lonoke County. HACT will use these funds to rehabilitate its wastewater treatment pond levies. The counties obligation is complete.		75000	75000
TPN-117021	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City of England	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Lonoke County has awarded the City of England $155,730.00 for a Water Infrastructure Project in Unincorporated Lonoke County. The City of England will use these funds to install a 4" water line extension on Henderson Rd. Plans submitted to ADH waiting for approval then will bid		155730	155730
TPN-117118	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Water and Wastewater Commission of the City of Cabot	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Lonoke County has awarded the Water and Wastewater Commission of the City of Cabot (Cabot Waterworks) $436,580.30 for the repair and extension of a waterline in Unincorporated Lonoke County. Surveys being conducted to determine customers currently on private water wells and their condition and interest.  The Lonoke Co Treasurer has written a check for the full award amount.		436580.3	436580.3
TPN-117178	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Furlow Public Water Authority 2	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Lonoke County awarded Furlow Public Water Authority a grand total of $429,352.87. Lonoke County had to split this award into two different disbursements from ARPA with this one coming from 6.1-Revenue Replacement in the amount of $116,826.07 and another coming from 5.11-Drinking Water: Transmission and Distribution in the amount of $312,526.80. Furlow PWA will use these funds for a water line extension project in Unincorporated Lonoke County.  The Lonoke Co Treasurer has written a check for the full award amount. ($429,352.87)		116826.07	116826.07
TPN-117105	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Lonoke County Fair and Livestock	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Lonoke County has awarded the Lonoke County Fair and Livestock $9,210.00 for the repair and replacement of wet well sewer pumps, control panels and electrical in Unincorporated Lonoke County. As of Dec. 31, 2022 Lonoke County Fair has NOT started on this project. The Lonoke Co Treasurer has written a check for the full award amount.		9210	9210
TPN-117057	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Furlow Wastewater Public Facilities Board	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Lonoke County has awarded the Furlow Wastewater Public Facilities Board $131,592.00 to address the Negative Economic Impact Furlow experienced brought forth by the COVID-19 pandemic. During COVID-19 Furlow had to continue to operate its’ treatment plant and continued to incur a vast array of operating costs, including but not limited to: plant operator hourly rate, lost hookup fees and supplies and materials.		131592	131592								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-117008	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City of Austin	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Lonoke County has awarded the City of Austin $332,828.05 for a Water Infrastructure Project in Unincorporated Lonoke County. The City of Austin will use these funds to install an 8" water main and services on Williams Rd.  Engineer RFQ's are completed, RFQ Grading in process		332828.05	332828.05
TPN-117070	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Furlow Wastewater Public Facilities Board	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Lonoke County has awarded the Furlow Wastewater Public Facilities Board $97,500.00 for a Water Treatment Infrastructure Project in Unincorporated Lonoke County. Furlow will use these funds to upgrade the wastewater treatment facility and for hookups to the facility. As of Dec. 31, 2022 Furlow has NOT started on this project. The Lonoke Co Treasurer has written a check for the full award amount.		97500	97500
TPN-117044	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City of Ward	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Lonoke County has awarded the City of Ward $300,730.00 for a Water Infrastructure Project in Unincorporated Lonoke County. The City of Ward will use these funds to replace current water meters with Automated Meter Reading or Advanced Metering Infrastructure for the Ward Water & Sewer System in Lonoke County. As of March 31, 2023 the City of the items needed for the installation of the network have not yet been delivered.		300000	300000
TPN-117080	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Grand Prairie Regional Water Distribution District	5-Infrastructure	5.14-Drinking water: Storage	Lonoke County has awarded the Grand Prairie Regional Water Distribution District $277,843.54 for the rehabilitation of two 150,000 gallon elevated water storage tanks in Unincorporated Lonoke County. As of Dec. 31, 2022 Grand Prairie has NOT started on this project.		277843.54	277843.54
TPN-117157	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Furlow Public Water Authority	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Lonoke County awarded Furlow Public Water Authority a grand total of $429,352.87. Lonoke County had to split this award into two different disbursements from ARPA with this one coming from 5.11-Drinking Water: Transmission and Distribution in the amount of $312,526.80 and another in the amount of $116,826.07 coming from 6.1-Revenue Replacement. Furlow PWA will use these funds for a water line extension project in Unincorporated Lonoke County. Currently obtaining easements. The Lonoke Co Treasurer has written a check for the full award amount. ($429,352.87)		312526.8	312526.8
TPN-117040	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Town of Keo	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Lonoke County has awarded the Town of Keo $357,138.58 for a Water Infrastructure Project in Unincorporated Lonoke County. Keo will use these funds to replace a water line and associated appurtenances from the intersection of Pecan Rd. south on Henderson Rd. and the purchase of stationary gas generator for the water treatment plant. The City has procured and Engineer.  Contract is being signed and Plans & Specs being prepared		357138.58	357138.58
TPN-116956	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Grand Prairie Bayou Two Public Water Association	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Lonoke County awarded $202,207.50 to the Grand Prairie Bayou Two Public Water Association to repair and correct out of compliance issues with the Mt. Tabor Wastewater Treatment Facilities.		202207.5	202207.5
TPN-116959	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Central Arkansas Planning Administrative Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Lonoke County has entered into a contract with Central Arkansas Planning and Development District to assist with reporting of ARPA-SLFRF funds and administrative compliance. CAPDD's allocation has been obligated but not spent as of Dec. 31, 2022.		427182.44	0
TPN-116964	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Lonoke County Courthouse HVAC & Storage Building	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Lonoke County has set aside $200,000.00 to make upgrades to the County Courthouse HVAC and upgrades to the Lonoke County Storage facility to bring it up to compliance. Funds have not been expended as of May 31, 2023.		200000	0
TPN-116965	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Lonoke County Courts Building	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Lonoke County has set aside $8,000,000.00 for the construction of a Courts building to be located on existing county property. Courts building will house new courtrooms for the county. As of Dec. 31, 2022 funds have not been expended for this project.		8000000	0
TPN-109423	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Butlerville VFD	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Lonoke County awarded $95,000.00 to the Butlerville Volunteer Fire Department to prepare for and respond to the effects caused by the COVID-19 public health emergency. Butlerville will use these funds to purchase enough SCBA masks for each volunteer so that volunteers will no longer need to share masks and an Emergency Response Vehicle as the volunteer fireman are first to the scene before paramedics arrive. Shared masks during COVID-19 drastically increased the transmission of COVID-19 among the volunteers. As mentioned before the volunteer firefighters in Lonoke County typically arrive first to the scene before any Hospital Ambulance or County Law Enforcement. Most of the Volunteer Fire Departments calls are medical emergencies and not fire related calls. These purchases will aid the department in being better prepared for these medical emergency calls.		95000	95000								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	95000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-109402	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	East Pulaski VFD	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Lonoke County awarded $95,000.00 to the East Pulaski Volunteer Fire Department to prepare for and respond to the effects caused by the COVID-19 public health emergency. East Pulaski will use these funds to purchase enough SCBA masks and air packs for each volunteer so that volunteers will no longer need to share masks. Shared masks during COVID-19 drastically increased the transmission of COVID-19 among the volunteers. East Pulaski has received the money for the purchase of the masks and will send Lonoke County a copy of the invoice and receipt upon the purchase being made.		95000	95000								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	95000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-109411	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Scott VFD	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Lonoke County awarded $95,000.00 to the Scott Volunteer Fire Department to prepare for and respond to the effects caused by the COVID-19 public health emergency. Scott will use these funds to purchase enough SCBA masks for each volunteer so that volunteers will no longer need to share masks, EMT training as volunteers also serve as paramedics until the ambulance arrives, and an Emergency Response Vehicle again as the volunteer fireman are first to the scene before paramedics arrive. Shared masks during COVID-19 drastically increased the transmission of COVID-19 among the volunteers. As mentioned before the volunteer firefighters in Lonoke County typically arrive first to the scene before any Hospital Ambulance or County Law Enforcement. Most of the Volunteer Fire Departments calls are medical emergencies and not fire related calls. These purchases will aid the department in being better prepared for these medical emergency calls.		95000	95000								Yes	Other (please specify)	95000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-109448	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	C.S & Z VFD	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Lonoke County awarded $95,000.00 to the Campground, Sylvania and Mt. Zion Volunteer Fire Department to prepare for and respond to the effects caused by the COVID-19 public health emergency. C.Z & Z will use these funds to purchase an Emergency Response Vehicle as the volunteer fireman are first to the scene before paramedics arrive. Most of the Volunteer Fire Departments calls are medical emergencies and not fire related calls. These purchases will aid the department in being better prepared for these medical emergency calls.		95000	95000								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	95000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-109454	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Mountain Springs VFD	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Lonoke County awarded $95,000.00 to the Mountain Springs Volunteer Fire Department to respond to the negative economic impacts they incurred due to the COVID-19 Health Emergency. During the COVID-19 public health emergency Mountain Springs endured a great deal of financial hardship with unexpected expenses, substantial decrease in fire dues and increased costs with items such as fuel. The $95,000.00 will allow Mountain Springs to mitigate these financial hardships and be better positioned to respond to emergency calls in Lonoke County.		95000	95000								Yes	Other (please specify)	95000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-109361	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Tri-Community VFD	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Lonoke County awarded $95,000.00 to the Tri-Community Volunteer Fire Department to prepare for and respond to the effects caused by the COVID-19 public health emergency. Tri-Community will use these funds to purchase enough SCBA masks for each volunteer so that volunteers will no longer need to share masks. Shared masks during COVID-19 drastically increased the transmission of COVID-19 among the volunteers. Tri-Community has received the money for the purchase of the masks and will send Lonoke County a copy of the invoice and receipt upon the purchase being made.		95000	95000								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	95000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-021549	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Provide premium pay to County employees and officials.		1176512.63	1173089.57		191
TPN-099354	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay Cleanup	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Provided premium pay to County Employees & Officials		6433.7	6433.7		2
TPN-099357	RCP-037755	Lonoke County, Arkansas	Arkansas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	RFP Advertisement for Administrator	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Lonoke County advertised in the state paper for the hiring of an Administrator for the County's ARPA-CSLFRF.		518.4	518.4
TPN-145798	RCP-037526	Trempealeau County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Justice Center Contingency, FFP & Radio	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Contingency Fund for Justice Center Construction	3967748.62	3967748.62	0
TPN-053748	RCP-037526	Trempealeau County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Veteran Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Wheelchairs and Walkers for disabled veterans	3698.8	3698.8	3698.8
TPN-058790	RCP-036769	Dunklin County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Dunklin County General Expenses	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Covid Safe Flooring, Highway Improvement for access to Hospital, Water Supply Improvements, Premium pay to essential workers,  Tasers for Law Enforcement	5658355	1908169.05	1908169.05
TPN-030034	RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Cancelled	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Cancelled	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-030050	RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Cancelled	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Cancelled	0	0	0
TPN-030042	RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Cancelled	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Cancelled	0	0	0
TPN-030054	RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Cancelled	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Cancelled	0	0	0
TPN-030062	RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Ambulance Replacement	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Replace ambulance that responded to COVID 19 and other related reponses	0	0	0								No	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	0	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-031884	RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Premium pay for essential employees	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Included in Revenue replacement funds	0	0	0		422
TPN-031903	RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Cancelled	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	NA	0	0	0
TPN-031935	RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Rehab Public Services Building	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Upgrade Building to accommodate Voter's registration, Veteran's, and Emergency Management for the County.	3200000	3109724	3109724
TPN-031853	RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Replace 2nd AMBULANCE.	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Replace Ambulances that respond to Medical emergencies including COVID 19	0	0	0								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	0	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-031859	RCP-039029	Laurens County, South Carolina	South Carolina	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Replace 3rd Ambulance	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Replace ambulance that responds to Covid and other medical emergencies.	0	0	0								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	250000	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-151298	RCP-037955	Appomattox County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	American Civil War Museum	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Total contribution of $20,000.	20000	20000	10000								No			9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted	1 Imp General Public
TPN-150475	RCP-037955	Appomattox County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Youth Sports Complex Lighting	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Field lighting added to existing non-lit youth baseball/softball field at the Sports Complex.  The scope of work performed by Musco Sports Lighting consisted of materials and labor to provide lighting to Field #4 at the Sports Complex.  The youth can now utilize the fields during the Fall, Spring, and Summer months, which will increase viability of the outdoor recreation and expand youth opportunities. Additionally, the adult population is utilizing these areas for family activities and increased exercising areas.	240000	240000	240000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-152551	RCP-037955	Appomattox County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	High Bridge Trail Expansion	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Creating a trail head in Pamplin, VA to connect to the High Bridge State Trail	25000	25000	25000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-058898	RCP-040010	Dolores County, CO	Colorado	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Infrastructure Improvements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds used for general Government purposes. These funds were used to fund a new Public Health building, make improvements to our fairgrounds in order for it to become an emergency shelter building, and improvements at a local park.		399160	399160
TPN-139269	RCP-000935	Faulk County,	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Revenue Replacement payroll	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds were used for Revenue replacement for government services. Payroll from Rd and Bridge and the jail were expenditures.		446378.5	446378.5
TPN-076870	RCP-000935	Faulk County,	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Eide Bailey services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	$2,000 for Eide Bailey to assist with these funds		175.5	175.5
TPN-131482	RCP-053054	Meade County,	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	VFD Radios	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Meade County purchased equipment for the rural Volunteer Fire Departments. During the COVID-19 Pandemic, Meade County Volunteer Fire Departments could not host their usual events to raise funds to replace expiring equipment. Meade County Commissioners met with the various fire chiefs to identify what the need was for their various departments, and it was decided the lost revenue would have been used to purchase much needed equipment.	300000	290871.97	290871.97								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	290871.97	1 Imp General Public
TPN-150680	RCP-038433	Breathitt County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Lost Revenue	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Worked with Compass and validated $1,000,000.00 in lost revenue. $15,000.00 for consultation/legal fees.		1015000	0
TPN-072009	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay Minor Structural Managed By: Seymour District Location: SR 129, US 50 to SR 48 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	7995902.52	7993402.52	0
TPN-072067	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Small Structure Replacement Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: SR 930, UNT of Martin Ditch, 0.10 Miles west of I469 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	10415902	10415902	0
TPN-012293	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Health Issues and Challenges Grant Program	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	This $50 million appropriation shall be used to issue grants to eligible entities to prevent and address health issues and challenges.  This program will allow grantees to develop evidence-based programming to address emerging health issues in their communities over 3 to 4 year periods.   Grants under this program are made primarily for the purpose of increasing health outcomes by, and preventing or reducing the prevalence of, the following: (1) Training concerning mental health. (2) Tobacco or nicotine use and the pulmonary and cardiac effects from the use. (3) Food insecurities. (4) Adverse behavioral and mental health outcomes. (5) Lead exposure. (6) Obesity. (7) Diabetes. (8) Cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension and hyperlipidemia. (9) Hepatitis C. (10) Cancer. (11) Other critical health issues for a specific: (A) region; (B) county; (C) sex; or (D) ethnicity; that ranks in the bottom quintile for that specific health issue metric. Funding opportunity announcements and grant application guidance is in development. Projects will be added in future reports as grants are awarded.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public			Yes	0
TPN-097102	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Indiana Law Enforcement Academy Campus Renovation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Indiana Department of Administration (IDOA), on behalf of the Indiana Law Enforcement Academy (ILEA), requests funding to initiate phase 1 construction of the campus renovation at the Indiana Law Enforcement Academy. The main building on the ILEA campus was completed in 1974, making the facility almost 50 years old.  The 200,000 sq ft main building sits on 310 acres in Plainfield, Indiana. Results of the completed design study identified operating deficiencies and lack of proper capacity to meet the current and future demands of law enforcement officers in Indiana.	15609486	13362545	0
TPN-097103	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Secretary of State Election Security	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Secretary of State requests funding for the continuation of election security and integrity improvements as required by HEA 1116-2022. These improvements include $12,361,100 for Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) equipment for county election machines. VVPAT systems connect to Direct Record Electronic voting machines and produce a paper trail verification mechanism for post-election audits. This request also includes $3,200,000 to improve the cybersecurity position of the Secretary’s office and all 92 county offices.	15561100	10180000	10180000
TPN-097105	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	State Budget Agency Subrecipient Monitoring	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Indiana State Budget Agency requests review of American Rescue Plan Act funding to contract with a vendor(s) to assist the agency subrecipient monitoring as defined in federal guidance. The U.S. Department of Treasury ARPA State Fiscal Recovery Funds are subject to the Single Audit Act and 2 C.F.R 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Noncompliance may result in a finding in the Agency’s Single Audit.	0	0	0
TPN-097108	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	State Board of Accounts Federal Audits of Local Units	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The State Board of Accounts (SBOA) requests review of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding to contract with accounting firms to perform audits on state and local units of government. Recent disbursements of federal funding to state and local units have increased the annual number of audits SBOA is required to perform. To ensure all units of government are audited in a timely manner as required by State and Federal Law, SBOA plans to contract with private examiners to complete a portion of those required audits.	0	0	0
TPN-097109	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	State Budget Agency Enterprise Grants Management	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The State Budget Agency requests funding to implement a statewide grants management system. Currently, systems are fragmented across agencies. The system will streamline grants management by creating like systems across all agencies. The system will allow agencies to manage grants through the entire grant lifecycle: application through final close-out. The funding will provide for a fit-gap analysis, project management, implementation, user licenses and training over a five-year period. Failure to implement a grant management system may lead to non-compliance issues that could result in payback of funds to the Federal Government.	5757425.67	4553703	323337
TPN-012240	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Broadband Grants	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	The $46.9 million appropriation shall be used for a program to expand the availability of broadband Internet connectivity throughout Indiana by: (1) entering into agreements with broadband service providers under which broadband service providers agree to accept subsidy payments distributed by the office as a form of payment for the provision of eligible broadband service; and (2) distributing subsidy payments to broadband service providers with whom the office enters into agreements under subdivision (1), to be used as a form of payment for eligible broadband service provided before July 1, 2025, to the following, as prioritized in this subdivision: (A) First, to public school corporations to pay for eligible broadband service to any building: (i) that is used primarily for educating students; and (ii) with respect to which a connection to eligible broadband service first becomes available at the building after December 31, 2020. (B) Second, to rural health clinics to pay for eligible broadband service for which a connection to the eligible broadband service first becomes available at a building after December 31, 2020. (C) Third, to eligible students to pay for eligible broadband service for which a connection to the eligible broadband service first becomes available at the primary residences of those students after December 31, 2020. Grant applications have been received and are under review.  Evaluation for coordination with the Capital Projects Fund award is ongoing. $203 million of this $250 million is planned to come from the Capital Projects Fund, so this budget has been adjusted to $46.9 million.	46867851	0	0					No	Yes	Yes
TPN-012251	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Trails	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project shall fund $60 million in grants for the development of regionally and locally significant trails throughout Indiana. Next Level Trails is designed to incentivize collaborative efforts to accelerate trail connections. The Department of Natural Resources will administer the program.  Projects are still under review and will be added in future reports.	60000000	59999999	5500000
TPN-012255	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Bridge, Other Managed By: Greenfield District Location: US 31, .97 miles N of SR 28 over the N/S Railroad NB Bridge This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	16327552.23	16327552.23	11385990.03
TPN-012266	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	48500000	25111370	408169.96
TPN-012277	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Conservation Land Acquisition	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	$25 million appropriation to be used for preservation, conservation and recreational projects in the state. Programming plans will include local participation and are anticipated to become part of public trusts to ensure generational enjoyment. Projects are still under review and will be added in future reports.	25000000	0	0
TPN-012268	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Flights	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	$10 million planned for the continued development of domestic and international air service to and from Indiana. Projects are still under review and will be added in future reports.	10000000	0	0
TPN-097301	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative READI program is established to provide 500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that when implemented will attract develop and retain talent in Indiana To achieve this vision regions will develop data-driven actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities To help regions achieve their goals the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to 50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth	15000000	3454562	3454562
TPN-012275	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This $231 million appropriation is planned for the non-federal matching contribution to major transit projects in NW Indiana including new service lines in Lake County and adding express lines from Gary to Michigan City.	0	0	0
TPN-075517	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Transportation and Water Infrastructure Local Grants	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	The Indiana General Assembly allocated $60 Million of federal Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to the Indiana Finance Authority (IFA) to provide grants to utilities and/or communities for stormwater/flooding projects that impact State Roads in their local communities. The IFA will administer these grants under the Transportation and Stormwater Grant program. The State seeks to make an impact on communities by providing Transportation and Stormwater Grants to communities to complete necessary projects. In order to prioritize projects for Transportation and Stormwater Grants, the IFA will first look to communities with existing plans in place to complete projects that meet the funding eligibility criteria. Grants awards are being finalized and will be added in future reports.  This project represents the amount that has not been awarded as of 3/31/2022.	2087827	0	0
TPN-072073	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Concrete Pavement Restoration (CPR) Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: I 69, From 0.41 Miles S of SR 26 to 1.29 miles N of US 35/SR 22. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	13614312.19	13614312.19	0
TPN-072044	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Small Structure Replacement Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 6, 3.90mi  W of US 31 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	1426555.48	1424628.48	0
TPN-072045	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Concrete Pavement Restoration (CPR) Managed By: Vincennes District Location: I 69, From 2.3 mi E of US 41 to I-64 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	11867006	0	0
TPN-072053	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Deck Replacement Managed By: Crawfordsville District Location: I 65, NB Bridge over SR 43, 3.13 mi N of SR 25 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	93875346.2	93875346.2	32002357.69
TPN-072060	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Functional Overlay on PCCP Managed By: Vincennes District Location: US 50, From E. Jct of US-41 SBL to 4.75 east of E Jct of US-41 SBL This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-072068	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Concrete Pavement Restoration (CPR) Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: SR 930, From 0.71 miles W of I-469 to I-469. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	2553757	2553757	0
TPN-072075	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay, Preventive Maintenance Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: US 6, From 3.52 miles East of SR 3 East Jct to I-69. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	6995199.95	6995199.95	6301744.2
TPN-072077	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace Superstructure Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: I 69, Bridge over Salamonie River, Road, 1.31 miles S of SR 5, Northbound This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	26522421.16	26522421.16	4918254.19
TPN-072082	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Small Structure Replacement Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 30, 4.73 mi E of SR 51 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-072081	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Small Structure Pipe Lining Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 30, 1.13 mi E of US 41 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	1852410	11873	11873
TPN-072160	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	4850000	1270000	25000
TPN-072161	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	19400000	14635738	550560.3
TPN-072112	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	48500000	32460961	215213.84
TPN-072117	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	29100000	17070620	150000
TPN-072120	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	19400000	13205676	100000
TPN-072133	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	29100000	26471244.8	187078.5
TPN-072140	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	48500000	29579000	1176000
TPN-072143	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	48500000	32967603	2259360.61
TPN-072135	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	14550000	8131280	75000
TPN-072163	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	14550000	7744139	250000
TPN-072156	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	19400000	19400000	0
TPN-072162	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	29100000	23260000	273346.04
TPN-072165	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	48500000	46100000	526729.52
TPN-071820	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Thin Deck Overlay Managed By: Vincennes District Location: I 69, over Pigeon Creek, 1.75mi N SR 68- NBL This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	6561073.64	6561073.64	0
TPN-071846	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Thin Deck Overlay Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 20, US 20 WB over US 20 WB/EB LINCOLN WAY, 01.69 S I-90 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	1990768.1	1990768.1	0
TPN-071849	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Thin Deck Overlay Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: US 30, Bridge over Deeds Creek, EB, 0.96 miles E of SR 15. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	1062331.44	1062331.44	73620.42
TPN-071879	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Substructure Repair And Rehabilitation Managed By: LaPorte District Location: SR 16, 02.44 W US 31 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	298830.35	298830.35	9890.83
TPN-071953	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Substructure Repair And Rehabilitation Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: US 30, EB Bridge over SR 15, 09.12 Miles West of SR 13. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-071975	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Bridge Construction Managed By: Central Office Location: PR 69, New Terrain Approach from Indiana State Line in Vanderburgh County to I69 south of Evansville. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	19172201.34	12175851.34	5822371.69
TPN-071978	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Added Travel Lanes Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: US 20, US 20 from SR 15 to 4.14 miles E of SR 15 (CR 35) This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	48226525.66	47767755.66	9527470.57
TPN-071979	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Slide Correction Managed By: Seymour District Location: SR 156, 0.7 miles W of SR 56/SR 156 W Junction This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	13317151	0	0
TPN-071983	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay Minor Structural Managed By: Crawfordsville District Location: US 231, From 0.03 mi S of SR 240 to 1.61 mi N of SR 240 (Greencastle) This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	13902825.82	13902825.82	797157.87
TPN-071989	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay, Structural Managed By: Crawfordsville District Location: SR 55, From 0.59 mi N of US 52 N Jct to US 24 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	19917720	19917720	0
TPN-071991	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay, Preventive Maintenance Managed By: Seymour District Location: SR 156, 0.13 miles W of SR 101 to 1.8 miles E of SR 101 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	6933544.5	6933544.5	0
TPN-072004	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Auxiliary Lanes, Two-way Left Turn Lanes Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 20, US20 from 4.8 miles east of SR39 (CR300E) to 7.2 miles east of SR39 (CR500E) This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-071998	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Interchange Construction Managed By: Greenfield District Location: US 31, at 236th Street/Jackson St. 2.50 miles N of SR 38 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	21875868.34	21875868.34	12499108.52
TPN-072130	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	19400000	6014000	3106752.53
TPN-072013	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Added Travel Lanes Managed By: Seymour District Location: US 31, from South Main St. to Israel Lane This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-072028	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace Superstructure Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: SR 22, Over Central RR Co of Indy, 1.53 miles West of SR 26. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	16424586.32	0	0
TPN-072026	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Road Construction Managed By: Central Office Location: PR 69, Johnson Co Segment, From 1 mi S of SR144 to 0.5 mi N of Wicker Rd Contract 4 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	172456647.05	172456647.05	116546000.02
TPN-072030	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Interchange Modification Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: I 469, I-469 at I-69 N Jct. This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	22118680	22102180	0
TPN-072035	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Auxiliary Lanes, Passing Managed By: Crawfordsville District Location: US 231, From 4.19 mi N of I-74 to 2.53 mi N of SR 28 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	15861361.17	15861361.17	0
TPN-072024	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Road Construction Managed By: Central Office Location: PR 69, Marion Co Segment, 0.5 miles N of Wicker Rd via SR 37 to I-465 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	334585707.28	192052857.92	5516968.61
TPN-072150	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	29100000	15150000	149543.38
TPN-072152	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Regional Economic Acceleration and Development Initiative (READI) program is established to provide $500 million in grants or loans to support proposals for economic development and regional economic acceleration and development.  READI encourages neighboring communities across the state to work collaboratively to develop a bold vision for their future that, when implemented, will attract, develop and retain talent in Indiana. To achieve this vision, regions will develop data-driven, actionable and sustainable development plans that outline strategies focused on improving the quality of place, quality of life and quality of opportunity within their communities. To help regions achieve their goals, the Indiana Economic Development Corporation will award up to $50 million per region to accelerate the implementation of regional development plans and the programs and projects identified that will catalyze economic and population growth.	14550000	7829000	704670.2
TPN-072039	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Replacement Managed By: Greenfield District Location: US 31, NB over Little Cicero Creek, 06.69 N SR 38 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	34670941.14	34670941.14	10199855.02
TPN-114340	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Tippecanoe River State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Project includes analysis of a drinking water system and wastewater sanitary sewer system. This will identify existing and future system demands resulting in improvements needed for the existing utility facilities. These measures will improve the cost effectiveness of the current system and desirable methods needed for future system demands.	168059	168059	168059
TPN-114337	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Shakamak State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Project consists of analysis of decommissioning existing wastewater treatment facility that currently includes a sanitary sewer collection system consisting of a combination of grinder pump stations and low pressure sewers and gravity sewers. Regionalization with the City of Jasonville wastewater utility which will decommission the existing Shakamak State Park treatment facility.	82500	82500	79275
TPN-114335	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	McCormick's Creek State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.7-Clean Water: Energy conservation	McCormick’s Creek State Park has needed a replacement generator. This project is purchasing a new, energy efficient, generator. Removing the existing generator and preparation of the area the new equipment will be installed. Installation labor and equipment needed to install the new generator and providing an operational check on the newly installed generator.	167948	167948	167948
TPN-114333	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Lieber State Recreation Area	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	A new lift station to collect all SRA flows for pumping to the Cloverdale system. Force main routes are to be determined from the new SRA main lift station to the existing Cloverdale system. Analysis of the collection system and determine upgrades and improvements needed to convey the additional flows to the treatment facility.	48000	48000	46975
TPN-114343	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Potato Creek	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	There are two water fill stations and dump stations located at Potato Creek State Park. The location  for the main campground is split, with the water fill station on the east sid of the roadway and the dump station on the west side of the roadway. Construction appear to have been done in the late 1970's. DNR has determined that the water fill stations and dump stations require immediate replacement.	1428000	1428000	34780
TPN-116294	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Capital Reserve Projects	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The State Budget Agency requests authorization to transfer $190,134,810.53 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) dollars from the Economic Stimulus Fund to the Capital Reserve Account for identified projects.	190134810	0	0
TPN-130799	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Harmonie State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The replacement and upgrade of the wastewater master lift station which includes concrete wet well, pumps, electrical panels and controls, site piping, connection to existing force main, site construction, and demolition/removal of the existing lift station.	688777	688777	263002
TPN-073170	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Montgomery County Nucor Tempur Corridor Water Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Extending water main with approximately 22500 feet of 20-inch diameter water main. Approximately 2000 feet of pipe will be at the existing treatment plant site, approximately 15000 feet of pipe will be placed along Nucor Road and approximately 5300 feet of pipe will be placed west along CR 200S. Construction of a high service pumping station includes related electrical gear, backup generator, controls, and site access. Installing a one-million-gallon water tower, which is a critical component for fire protection and reliable water supply.	3000000	3000000	0
TPN-073220	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Montgomery County Mace Stormwater Flooding	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Installation of size-appropriate pipe, inlets, and manholes and removing obstructions to handle typical weather event caused drainage at the intersection and further downstream. Near CR200S, create a drainage outlet by installing size-appropriate pipes, inlets, riprap, headwalls, and manholes. Project design will include positive overland flow grading in the event a storm larger than the design storm occurs to safely convey flows to the downstream channel. In addition to storm sewers, vegetated swales will be installed.	466200	0	0
TPN-073359	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	New Castle Force Main Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The Force Main that is currently feeding the New Castle prison is failing. This feeds other areas and is affecting those as well as the prison. Replacing 16" failing Force Main to connect to jail. This is a partial replacement and addition of water main in the corridor. This will provide additional hook ups for county areas (subdivision) to tie in at a later date.	5500000	5500000	2835454
TPN-072773	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Atlanta Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Installation of stormwater management plan; involving drainage and stormwater system. Extend storm sewers along street sides, intersections and other critical points to properly direct storm flow. Replace and reroute under sized sewers. Replace trunk line, inlets, structures, etc. This improved drainage and storm water system will eliminate problem areas, extend storm sewers, reroute existing legal drains or drainageways and, rehab the system, which will insert erosion control.	800000	800000	800000
TPN-072800	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Bluffton Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.4-Clean Water: Combined sewer overflows	City of Bluffton improving the wastewater treatment plant that has exceeded its twenty-year usable life. Project includes a combination of new sewers, new pump station, new force main inflow/infiltration projects, complete replacement of a lift station, rehab of another lift station, and several Wastewater Treatment Plant improvements. This project will protect the environment and human health.	2000000	2000000	0
TPN-072781	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Bedford 5th Street SR 58 Flooding Minimization Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Lincoln Avenue and 5th street (SR 58) would flood during heavy rains. The City of Bedford completed a large storm water project at the intersection as well as along Lincoln Avenue North and South as part of Bedford's Agreed Order with IDEM beginning in 2014 to develop a compliance plan to resolve SSO issues with additional I/I analysis and capital projects accordingly. This Bedford project alleviated the flooding at the intersection but flooding still occurs on SR 58. There is a sanitary sewer overflow point that overflows to the storm sewer during heavy rains taking up capacity from the storm sewer to handle the SSO. Additionally, this project would allow a connection from General Motors. Currently, connection from General Motors has not been allowed, in part, because of the SSO that exists at SR 58 between the proposed connection point and Spider Creek Lift Station.	2609170	2609170	687154
TPN-072822	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Brown County SR 45 & Helmsburg School Road Flood Control Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Two issues: the safety hazard of a flooded SR 45 and the public health issues caused by standing water. SR45 and Helmsburg School RD has recently seen an unusual amount of stormwater flooding. The project will include raising SR45 bed in the area above the floodplain elevation and pavine new travel lanes. Stormwater improvements will also be made in the project area to insure proper drainage.	3049346	0	0
TPN-073411	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Parke County Little Raccoon Creek Preservation Lee Allen Bryant	5-Infrastructure	5.9-Clean Water: Nonpoint source	Project is to protect groundwater underlying the site, Little Raccoon Creek, and nearby surface waters from potential migration of contaminants. Project will complete the removal of friable asbestos containing material from the interior of the onsite powerhouse. Remove friable ACM from the exteriors of the powerhouse smokestack and complete it’s subsequent demolition. Removing and landfilling of the historical waste dumping area consisting of coal waste and trash present to the north of the onsite powerhouse per a work plan prepared by a certified engineer specializing in landfills.	3938101	3938101	3481041
TPN-073665	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	South Bend Hidden Creek & Phillips Ditch	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Construct a road that ties into Hidden Creek Dr. and modifies a portion of Jackson Rd. with multiple structures allowing Philips Ditch to flow under the roadway and maintain Jackson Rd flood-free for a 100-year design storm. New road grade will be 0.3% on Hidden Creek Dr., the lengthen of the new road will be 625 feet, the primary structure crossing Philips Ditch will be a 9 feet x 12 feet arch and 10 additional structures below the improved roadway will be boxes ranging in size from 4 feet x 10 feet to 1.5 feet x 10 feet.	0	0	0
TPN-074349	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Sunman SR 101 Stormwater Improvement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Inspect and clean current system; clearing all above ground stormwater conveyances and removal of obstructions, such as trees, large rocks, heavy vegetation and other intrusions. Jetting and inspection of all subsurface stormwater conveyances, including video of 100% of system and grading condition of existing pipes. Clearing of all outfall areas to ensure no blockages exist. Engineer to assess drainage system master plan, evaluation of current conditions based on watershed evaluation and sewer televising/cleaning.	169500	0	0
TPN-072794	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Big Cicero Creek Bank Stabilization Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Big Cicero Creek lacks the capacity to convey even the 10-year storm without flooding surrounding areas, and continuing erosion exacerbates this issue. This flooding has increased over recent years due to severe rainfall events (large volumes of rain in short time periods). And the erosion along the stream banks due to the flooding threatens several private properties as well as municipal infrastructure and utilities. Several critical facilities and major roadways are located within the floodplain, most significantly Tipton Hospital, which, if flooded, could be a major public health and safety concern. A severe flood event in May 2013 caused approximately $2.5 million in damage to the community. Tipton is a part of Block Group 5, Census Tract 204. The Big Cicero Creek Joint Drainage Board oversees the region's approximately 135 sq mi watershed.	3227625	3227625	3227625
TPN-072796	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Blackford County Culvert Replacement & Cassel Regulated Drain Flood Mitigation I	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	"Proj 1 - Industrial Park Mitigation, consists of constructing a flood mitigation. Cutting the existing embankments on the NW side of Cassel Drain and NE side of the unnamed tributary to the ordinary high-water mark and excavating an off-line flood mitigation facility to reduce peak flows from the upstream drainage area. Proj 2 - Upsizing an aluminized steel bridge on Little Lick Creek at CR N 400 E with a CON/SPAN structure and stabilizing the embankments as necessary.  "	3361500	0	0
TPN-072845	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Brownsburg Northside Drainage Project Phase IV	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Improving drainage and separation of combined sewers along US136, Grant St., and Jefferson St, which intersect on the north side of US136. Lack of a separated sewer system, during periods of intense precipitation and snow melt the street/yard drainage in this area is inadequate. When intense rain events do occur, the flows can overwhelm the combined sewer storage tank and discharges flow into White Lick Creek. The CSO discharge is upstream of a public park as well as neighboring communities causing both public health as well as water quality concerns. Drainage improvements eliminates these conditions.	793146	793146	793146
TPN-072985	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Frankton SR 128 Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Project consist of a new storm sewer system consisting of approximately 3,000 feet of 12-inch, 3,800 feet of 15-inch, 500 feet of 24-inch, 1,200 feet of 54-inch pipe and an expanded existing detention facility. The storm sewer will serve a significant area of town as it nearly extends from the west end to the east end of Frankton. The 54-inch pipe provides a means to convey runoff from SR128 to a discharge point south of town, runoff from the south central portion of town, and provides an outlet for the proposed residential subdivision.	1428334	1428334	0
TPN-072993	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Hammond US41 Calumet Avenue at 129th Street	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The project proposes to install a new storm sewer on 129th Street, from US 41 / Calumet Avenue to Sheffield Avenue to connect to an existing 42 inch storm sewer to alleviate roadway flooding of on US 41 / Calument Avenue. Installing new catch basins, inlets, manholes, curbs, and gutters to address roadway flooding of the highway and local street.	0	0	0
TPN-073415	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Pendleton Regulated Drain Reconstruction	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Reconstruct the regulated drain pipe and improve the capacity for future development. Project will abandon the existing pipe and install a new up-sized drain in place of the existing drain. New drain will be bored under SR 67 and the Indiana Railroad crossing. A pond where the drain outlets will be reconstructed to better manage the inflow of water coming from the drain.	784225	784225	206344
TPN-073506	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Portland Meridian Street Drainage	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Install a new storm sewer along Meridian St. from Race St to the Salamonie River. Replace existing lines that run along Miller Branch and will connect the existing catchments at Arch, High, and Walnut St. The storm lines will be 36-inch to 48-inch in diameter. New inlets and structures will be installed in existing locations. The outlet will be replaced with a headwall and pipe with flap gate. This will provide better drainage and reduce the backflow into the system.	780450	780450	0
TPN-074006	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	State Fair Commission Fall Creek Pavilion Stormwater	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Indiana State Fair Commission is improving the subsurface stormwater drainage system on the 200+ acre Indiana State Fairgrounds campus. A new subsurface stormwater system has been designed for the south half of the campus. It includes replacing again and undersized infrastructure with new subsurface pipes to support an existing 36" culvert pipe that runs under Fall Creek Parkway, as well as the addition of a new 42" culvert pipe (that will also run under Fall Creek Parkway and discharge into Fall Creek) and new subsurface infrastructure.	2800000	2800000	2556546
TPN-074286	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Sullivan Vigo Water Loop Completion	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Sullivan-Vigo Rural Water Corporation will extend eight miles of waterlines in Vigo County to create looping within the system. This project will create a total of eight loops. Approximately 22 miles of water lines will be installed. This will address the lack of looping within the water system and permit the utility to operate more efficiently and provide water to many unserved families. This improves quality of residual chlorine levels.	0	0	0
TPN-072761	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Adams County New Collection System	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Project involves the installation of municipal sanitary sewers in five primary areas where the residents are currently served by failing, on-site septic systems. The District plans on the installation of collection systems coupled with discharge to municipal sewers for ultimate treatment disposal in each area. This will improve environmental and public health.	3600000	3600000	1801828
TPN-072767	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Town of Arcadia Wastewater and Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Installing cured-in-place piping on the top 25% of severely deteriorated sections of an existing collection system. Disconnecting the sanitary to storm interconnections, preventing raw, untreated wastewater and water treatment plant backwash from discharging into open water bodies. Upsizing storm trunk lines through town to address reginal drainage problem, benefitting the Town and County.	3210000	3210000	0
TPN-072865	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Charlestown SP Closing Ranney Wells	5-Infrastructure	5.9-Clean Water: Nonpoint source	The Ranney Collector Wells (CW-1 through CW-7) are water wells installed during World War II to obtain water for the former Indiana Army Ammunition Plant. The seven wells are located along the Ohio River and at the time of installation was the largest single well field ever operated in the Midwest with production of 50 million gallons per day during 1942 and 1943. After the war effort, some of the wells were used intermittently for operations of the ammunition plant until operations ceased. Approximately, 5,100 acres including the Ranney well field were transferred to the State of Indiana in 1996 and 2002.  The wells are constructed of concrete walls of 18 inches thick and are 13 ft in diameter and range in depth from 67 ft to 93 ft. Today, the wells are a potential environmental problem to the integrity of the aquifer since the well pump houses contain asbestos, lead based paint, hazardous and nonhazardous fluids, liquids, fuels, oils, and sludges. The pump houses are in poor condition due to age and vandalism for salvageable metals and need to be demolished. This project will be eliminating the potential environmental hazards from migrating into the aquifer and contaminating the local drinking water supply and the Ohio River.	1983312	1983312	1983312
TPN-073604	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Posey County New Plant and Collection System	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Construction of a new Wastewater Treatment Plant capable of providing treatment to the communities of Blairsville and Wadesville. The WWTP will be build as a modular facility to enable it to be expanded as demand increases. Project will provide sanitary sewers, gravity and force main to tow communities who have been dealing with failing septic systems. This Regional Sewer District has been created to help address the lack of sanitary infrastructure through Posey County.	5000000	5000000	1954920
TPN-072991	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Gary US Hwy 20 Drainage Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Proposed project will include adding curb and gutter to the existing roadway (US Hwy 20) section including some associated adjacent pavement reconstruction. New inlets will be installed per standard INDOT gutter spread requirements. Dedicated storm sewers would be installed throughout the project limits. Due to lack of an available waterway outlet, perforated pipes, a storage/infiltration chamber system, and/or oversized storm sewers will be installed adjacent to the roadway to store and infiltrate stormwater into the soils below. This will capture all stormwater that drains into the roadway waterway and infiltrate stormwater to the maximum extent possible.	3262500	0	0
TPN-072998	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Huntingburg Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Construction of new headworks screening facility, and a new four tank Sequencing Batch Reactor. Replacing existing chlorine disinfection with a new UV system. Construction of cascade aeration and miscellaneous improvements inclusive of a new emergency generator, sludge bed roof, a non-potable water system and installation of approximately 3000 linear feet of 24 inch gravity sewer along First Street to the Wastewater Treatment Plant.	5000000	0	0
TPN-073010	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	LaGrange Region C Phase 2 Wastewater Plant	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Project includes two new pressure sewer systems with grinder pump stations serving Still Lake and CR 600N area and North Twin Lake, South Twin Lake, Pigeon Lake, and areas along SR 120 and CR 600N. Force main piping extending along a county road to the existing gravity sewer which flows to the Region C wastewater treatment plant. Expanding of the existing extended aeration Region C WWTP, including replacing pumps in main pump station.	0	0	0
TPN-073608	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Scottsburg Water and Wastewater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	First is sewer rehabilitation to address Inflow and Infiltration. This will address the current Agreed Order mandating the fixing of the sewers and pump stations in the collection system which are overflowing as SSO events. This includes sewer lining, sewer replacement, lift station rehabilitation and sump pump eliminations. Second, repairing the clear well tank at the water treatment plant. Repair leaks currently occurring which are leading to approximately leaking 100,000 gallons per day. And replacing water lines to eliminate asbestos lines and address high occurrence of water main breaks.	4000000	4000000	4000000
TPN-074360	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Trafalgar Plant and Collection System Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Project includes expanding the current Wastewater Treatment Plant. Expansion will include improvements to headworks, grit removal, oxidation ditch, construction of two clarifiers, additional of sludge lift station, replacement of UV disinfection equipment, lab remodel, installation of all necessary piping and improved sludge handling facilities. Current Inflow and Infiltration issue will be addressed by rehabilitation lift stations, force main relocation, and manhole rehabilitation.	2500000	2500000	805975
TPN-074428	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Wells County Murray Paving and Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Installing a new storm sewer mains and catch basin to adequately service the Murray community. The proposed storm sewer mains will range in tile size 12 inches - 36 inches. The catch basin structures will be placed strategically in the low areas and main drainage swales to collection the storm water runoff. The storm sewer will be aligned within the existing County rights-of-way except for the storm sewer tie into the existing tributary swale.	700000	700000	577843
TPN-071673	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Replacement Managed By: Vincennes District Location: US 41, Over CSX Railroad, SBL, 2.85 miles S of SR-64 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-072857	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Butler Storm Sewer Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Upgrade/enlarge undersized storm sewers on SR1 to eliminate local flooding that frequently occurs along SR1 and in particular at the intersection of SR1 and Monroe St., in conjunction with replacement of aging sanitary sewers. Install a storm sewer on SR1. Precipitation events and freezing during winter create unsafe conditions. Constructing a storm sewer on the south side will eliminate the flooding and icing conditions.	2625000	2625000	1828366
TPN-072859	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Camden Legal Drains Relocation Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Relocate the drains along and under SR75 / SR218 and reroute them off of SR75 so they drain to Deer Creek. This will remove drains from the State Hwy 75 and eliminate the aged and deteriorating pipe from under a major state route in central Carroll County. A new drain segment will be built off the state highway right of way. Drains will be connected to this new segment, eliminating the route where the drains travel under SR 75. The SR75 segment will be filled with flowable fill or other approved material and capped.	375000	375000	308750
TPN-072869	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Charlestown SP Water Treatment Plant and Well Field Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.10-Drinking water: Treatment	This project includes the design of water main extension from River Ridge Development Authority to serve Charlestown State Park. Project consists of water main construction and connection from Charlestown State Park to River Ridge Development Authority. Construction consists of piping and other water related materials to properly connect the State Park to the already existing River Ridge Development Authority.	6064800	6064800	4699962
TPN-073000	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Jasper SR 164 Storm Sewer Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Project will consist of replacement of failed storm sewer structures and pipes within SR 164 from the intersection of US 231 to the intersection of Mill Street. Storm sewers will be replaced and new N-12 HDPE of equal diameter allowing for improved capacity within the pipes. INDOT will be reconstructing the road in the near future and the City desires to replace storm structures prior to the INDOT project.	131250	131250	0
TPN-073006	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Kokomo SR931 Storm Sewer Extension	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Increase the size of a 36 inch storm sewer, which will improve drainage at the intersection of Boulevard Street and State Road 931. Extending a storm sewer west on Boulevard St. to connect the existing inlets west of the intersection. The City is expecting to increase the 36 inch  storm sewer to a 60 inch and extend a 30 inch storm sewer to the inlets on Boulevard. A hydrodynamic separator is proposed on the 30 inch pipe to reduce contaminants into Kokomo Creek.	562500	562500	0
TPN-073003	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Jasper SR 231 Storm Sewer Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Existing storm sewer located within the project area consist of vitrified clay and concrete, which are broken and collapsing under the State Highway. Project will consist of replacement of failed storm sewer structures and pipes within SR 231 from the intersection of Hoffman Road to the intersection of 6th Street. Storm sewers will be replaced with new N-12 HDPE of equal diameter allowing for improved capacity within the pipes.	56250	56250	0
TPN-071686	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Replacement Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 30, Us 30@.-Dyer Ditch, 01.10 W US 41 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-073012	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Lakeside Improvement Assn. I-65 Flood Mitigation Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Lakeside Improvement Assn. I-65 Flood Mitigation Project Design and install 7500 LF of low pressure sewer system piping and appurtenances. Install up to 59 grinder pump stations, lateral ines, & abandonment of septic existing septic tanks. Connection of low pressure sewer system to existing g gravity sewers. Design and site prep, install of temporary siphon system, and installation of temporary and/or permanent sheet piling in Trader's Point Lake. Stabilization of existing storm water spillway. Remove spillway, regrading and construction of concrete earthen spillway. Silt removal from Trader's Point Lake, removal of in-situ earth, and final re-grading of disposal location.	3500000	2546950	39748
TPN-073017	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Lawrence Water Main Replacement and Sewer	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Water main replacement for the current water system. This project identifies and prioritizes water mains for replacement based on the probability and consequence of failure. Replacement mains have been documented as having high number of main breaks, leaks, and customer complaints. Replacement will provide improved public health and water quality by reducing low pressure and boil orders resulting from breaks and repairs.	2050000	2050000	0
TPN-073032	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Martinsville Stormwater Control Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Martinsville is protected from flooding of West Fork White River by an inadequate stormwater control system. A new system segment will be constructed along the south section of SR 39 and will provide direct protection for approximately 15% of the population of Martinsville. This stormwater control system will tie in to the existing north segment to complete the Martinsville system from storm water flooding caused by the West Fork White River.	20191500	20191500	141881
TPN-071696	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Replacement Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 30, Us 30@.-Crooked Creek, 03.52 E SR 49 This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	5575067.91	5575067.91	139719.04
TPN-072881	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Clarksville Broadway District Basin Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Project will be completed in two phases. Phase one will provide relief within the overall system by expanding the basin to accept additional stormwater by expanding the basin and diverting the upstream convenance into the expanded basin by rerouting the primarily collector pipe into the basin instead of the trunk line. The stormwater will be pumped out of the basin and into the existing trunk line that has sufficient downstream capacity to prevent surface flooding. Phase two will provide relief within the overall system because the expanded basin will be able to accept additional stormwater at Lincoln Park neighborhood and surrounding area which experiences surface flooding during minor rain events due to the system’s undersized later pipes.	5000000	0	0
TPN-073029	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Lewisville Reconstruction Project US40 - SR103	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Provide stormwater outlets at Flatrock River and Applebutter Creek. A stormwater outlet coming from the west will follow Third Street and Cardinal Lane to reach Applebutter Creek. Most of the stormwater will flow to US40 to be captured within the storm sewers within US40. The far north portion of the project drains to a natural low area that drains to the Flatrock River.	1000000	1000000	0
TPN-071711	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Small Structure Replacement Managed By: Ft. Wayne District Location: US 31, US 31 Carries UNT of Rife Creek, 3.00 miles N of SR 218, North Junction. Un This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	20076235.26	20076235.26	132522.64
TPN-072889	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Clinton County Water Development Project	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Project is to develop a wellfield with ten high-capacity wells, permitted and constructed to public water supply well standards. The resulting wells will be ready for equipping and incorporation into a local groundwater supply system. Project is to identify areas within seven parcels for wellfield development, performing well site survey on identified parcels to ensure each property is suitable for locating a well. Wells will be placed on property within safe distances from potential sources of contamination. A drilling company will test and construct wells.	887546	887546	887546
TPN-072891	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Daleville Stormwater Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Construction of new stormwater conveyances to provide outlets for water which currently has nowhere to go. This project will address residents issues of moving water into the sanitary system to try and eliminate the standing water. Also, there are no water quality elements in the existing stormwater system. This project will address that by incorporating water quality elements such as bioswales, hybrid ditches, and stormwater detention. Some of these include new storm pipes with catch basins and bioswales near existing baseball fields. Storm pipes / catch basins / hybrid ditches is also planned to include detention for water quality improvement.	2130750	2130750	0
TPN-072892	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Elkhart County Foraker and Southwest Wastewater System	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The project includes the installation of approximately seventy-four individuals grinder pumps to collect wastewater from properties that currently have onsite septic systems that are in various stages of failure. The grinder pumps will discharge into a low-pressure sewer system that conveys sewage to a regional pump station. The regional pump station will convey the sewage to the existing wastewater system.	1875000	0	0
TPN-071590	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Bridge Rehabilitation Or Repair Managed By: Central Office Location: I 64, Sherman Minton Bridge over Ohio River 3.95 miles W of I-65, Painting, MOT, Interchanges and Pavement This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	49140218.75	49140218.75	26487527.37
TPN-072912	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Fort Wayne Arts Campus Lafayette St. Stormwater improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Design and construction of a new, separate, stormwater outfall to the St. Mary's River. The new storm sewer will remove inlets from the combined sewer system. This will also remove parking area, private storm sewers, and other hard surface drains from the combined sewer, reducing flooding and the risk of basement backups. Provide safer commutes for vehicular and non-motorized traffic.	750000	750000	0
TPN-072917	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Fountain City Stormwater Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	This project includes new storm sewers and drainage structures to reduce flooding and improve water quality in the Town of Fountain City. Including approximately 7,500 feet of new storm sewers ranging from 12 (twelve) to 60 (sixty) inches and 66 (sixty-six) new inlets. Asphalt, curb, and sidewalks will be replaced around the new improvement locations.	1800000	1800000	1800000
TPN-073072	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Mecca East Pressure Zone Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Installation of approx. 8,500 feet of water main replacement. Installing a new booster station at an elevation lower than the existing booster station and replacing 2-inch and 3-inch water main with 8-inch water main to enable booster station to pump more flow while the suction pressure remains above 40 psi. Addressing the Indiana Administrative Code requirement that water main pressure not be less than 20 psi.	950000	0	0
TPN-073076	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Michigan City White Ditch Drainage Improvement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Project consists of tree cutting, brush clearing, and sediment removal from White Ditch from Fryer Road to approximately 792 feet south to the Outfall of the Sandin Industries stormwater retention pond. Sandin Industries is located along State Road 212 and the poor drainage in White Ditch not only affects drainage along State Road 212, it also affects Sandin Industries.	120452	120452	0
TPN-073311	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Nashville Plant and Collection System	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	This project includes cast in place pipe lining of the gravity collection system, lining of existing manholes, and raising of existing manhole castings. Additionally, treatment capacity improvements are included for the sludge treatment portion of the existing Wastewater Treatment Plant. The relocation of the Wastewater Treatment Plant phosphorus removal chemical storage tanks outside the floodplain are included in this project. Finally, a new lift station and force main to the WWTP are included.	0	0	0
TPN-073122	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Michigan City US Hwy 12 Stormwater Drainage Improvement Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Various locations are affected in this one project identified as the US Hwy 12 Stormwater Drainage Improvement Project. Raise shoulder and sidewalk and slope runoff to storm drain on Custer Ave. and install a new drainage system and connect this system to existing storm infrastructure on south side of US Hwy 12 near Custer Ave. To address water ponds after rainfall at intersection of US Hwy 12, install new stormwater inlets that could be connected to this storm sewer.	62370	62370	62370
TPN-074364	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Upland Jefferson Street Storm Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Upland Jefferson Street Storm Improvements Installation of approximately 4,520 feet of pipe, 11 inlet structures, and 11 storm manholes. The proposed facilities will replace the existing, undersized storm sewers and will extend storm sewer to a few areas. The new facilities will have capacity for the 10-year design storm and will reduce flooding and associated hazards in the Jefferson Street Drainage Basin during common rain events.	1175105	1175105	0
TPN-071738	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Bridge Construction Managed By: LaPorte District Location: US 31,  NB At Elkhart Western Railroad This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	29437511.68	29363011.68	0
TPN-130800	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Hamilton County	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	The county intends to create a Regional Utility District to serve the US 31 corridor in northern Hamilton County with water and sewer service. To provide financial flexibility the County intends to construct the project in two phases. Phase 1 will serve the existing residents in Bakers Corner community, 234th Street and the 236th Street interchange. The phase of the project will include new water mains, water booster pumps and an elevated water storage tank to provide storage and fire protection, a new sanitary sewer system and a 0.50 Million Gallon per Day (MGD) Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Install. The County will purchase water wholesale via a metered connection. Phase 2 will serve the planned Indiana National Guard Armorey and residents at the 276th Street interchange. This phase of the project will include new sewer and water infrastructure from Bakers Corner north to the 276th Street interchange and install a second elevated water storage tank at 276th St interchange to provide storage and fire protection. Sewage will be pumped from 276th St interchange back to the WWTP.	10000000	10000000	0					Yes	Yes	Yes
TPN-110143	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Health Issues and Challenges Grant Program	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This $50 million appropriation shall be used to issue grants to eligible entities to prevent and address health issues and challenges. This program will allow grantees to develop evidence-based programming to address emerging health issues in their communities over 3 to 4 year periods. Grants under this program are made primarily for the purpose of increasing health outcomes by, and preventing or reducing the prevalence of, the following: (1) Training concerning mental health. (2) Tobacco or nicotine use and the pulmonary and cardiac effects from the use. (3) Food insecurities. (4) Adverse behavioral and mental health outcomes. (5) Lead exposure. (6) Obesity. (7) Diabetes. (8) Cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension and hyperlipidemia. (9) Hepatitis C. (10) Cancer. (11) Other critical health issues for a specific:                 (A) region; (B) county; (C) sex; or (D) ethnicity;                 that ranks in the bottom quintile for that specific health issue metric.	50000000	35893842	4203127
TPN-110144	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Mental Health Grants	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The appropriation shall be used to address a range of mental health needs across the state. Planned program areas include 988 Crisis Hotline establishment, a competency restoration pilot, assessments and technical assistance, development of regional and local capacity building grant program, and workforce development initiatives.	100000000	58084180	10047751
TPN-109802	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	State Budget Agency Subrecipient Monitoring	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	"The Indiana State Budget Agency requests review of American Rescue Plan Act funding to contract with a vendors to assist the agency subrecipient monitoring as defined in federal guidance The US Department of Treasury ARPA State Fiscal Recovery Funds are subject to the Single Audit Act and 2 CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards Noncompliance may result in a finding in the Agency's Single Audit"	500000	138000	27521
TPN-094293	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Columbus Collection System Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	The Southeast Sanitary Sewer Improvements project will upgrade lift stations, install higher head individual grinder pumps for homeowners with septic tank effluent pumps, and install new force mains to improve capacity constraints in the southeast portion of the collection system. The Westside Interceptor project will eliminate the State Road 46 lift station and force main and replace it with a new interceptor sewer to the Southside lift station. Improvements to the Southside lift station are also included to allow it to accept the new interceptor.	470000	470000	0
TPN-094311	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Fort Wayne/Allen Co.	5-Infrastructure	5.4-Clean Water: Combined sewer overflows	The project updates infrastructure  combined sewer overflows in 9 locations and will reduce overflows to the St. Mary's, Maumee, and St. Joseph Rivers. Flow will be diverted from CSOs into the consolidated sewer where it will then be conveyed into the 3RPORT tunnel at various shaft locations. All nine locations include installation of piping, tunnel vent piping, diversion structures, floatables control and screens at gate structures. Pump station and water main upgrades are neccssary to support the CSO updates.	5000000	5000000	0
TPN-094315	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Jasonville, Town of	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Project includes rehabilitating approximately 3745 LF of 6" thru 12" gravity sewers in Shakamak's collection system and upgrading Lift Station No. 5 and installing approximately 6,000 LF of 6" force main and 10,000 LF of 8" force main to Jasonville's WWTF for regionalization. Also includes improvements to Jasonville's WWTF consisting of removal of the lagoon cover system	318000	318000	144653
TPN-094328	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Ridgeville, Town of	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	Project improves the WWTP including phosphorus removal, headworks rehabilitation/reconstruction, sludge handling improvements, replacements of skimmer and clarifiers, digester tank rehabilitation, chlorination system replacement, and effluent piping/outfall rehabilitation	1406500	1406500	0
TPN-094330	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	West Terre Haute, City of	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	The project will include improvements to the WWTF inclusive of the installation of a new influent macerator, flowmeter and mechanical fine screen; replacement of DO sensors and effluent weir; conversion of the current chlorine tank to manually cleaned UV disinfection; and replacement of the sludge transfer pumps, diffusers and decant weir gates.	1652000	1652000	172463
TPN-083318	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Water Infrastructure Grant Fund	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	As directed by the Indiana Legislature via HEA 1001 2021 the Indiana Finance Authority “IFA” will make available 100 million of the state-allocated federal American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 funds to eligible entities for drinking water wastewater and stormwater infrastructure projects via a new program called the State Water Infrastructure Fund or “SWIF” Program The goal of the program will be to finance projects that protect and improve Indiana’s water resources and provide substantial rate relief to Indiana utility customers most in need The funds will be provided in the form of matching grants to communities Funds on hand a community’s allocation of their own American Rescue Plan Act funds or a State Revolving Fund loan may be used to match an awarded SWIF Grant Grant awards have been announced and projects will be added in future reports as the awards are finalized  This project represents the amount that has yet to be awarded as of 3312022	8861457	0	0					Yes	Yes	Yes
TPN-105318	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will expand the South Shore Line commuter service by 8 miles and establish 4 new service stations between Dyer, IN and Millennium Station in Chicago. Collectively, the Double Track and West Lake Corridor will induce an estimated $2.7 Billion in capital investment in Northwest Indiana, improve access to the Chicago Labor Market, and improve local environmental outcomes by increasing ridership.	32882475.34	32882475.34	31959969.22
TPN-105320	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Northwest Indiana Regional Development Authority	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will extend parallel tracks from Gary to Michigan City to allow for express routes and increased reliability. Three high level platforms will be installed at Michigan City, Portage/Ogden Dunes and Miller in Gary to reduce boarding times. Additional platform improvements will be performed at Dune Park and Beverly Shores. Tracks in Gary and Michigan city will be rerouted to speed up travel times. Collectively, the Double Track and West Lake Corridor will induce an estimated $2.7 Billion in capital investment in Northwest Indiana, improve access to the Chicago Labor Market, and improve local environmental outcomes by increasing ridership.	198117524.66	198117524.66	190027102.2
TPN-073802	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Spurgeon Collection System and Regionalization with Lynnville	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	A low pressure collection system with lift station and force main to pump collected wastewater to neighboring town, Lynville Wastewater Treatment Plant. 14,400 feet of sewer main, 27,500 feet of force main to convey wastewater. Grinder stations and lift stations. This project will eliminate the failing septic systems in the Town of Spurgeon.	1150000	1150000	623957
TPN-074121	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Sullivan Industrial Park and Hospital Lift Station Improvements	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Replace and upgrade two lift stations, eliminate double pumping, provide force main re-direction for Hospital, and provide a new gravity sewer service line extension north along Section Street. Project will serve the new county jail and will allow for additional development of the close-by nursing facilities and the construction of 26 additional assisted living and independent living projects serving the elderly community. New sewer line will allow for additional sewer line service connections for businesses located in the county that are currently serviced by septic facilities.	2300000	2300000	258991
TPN-074806	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Whitley County New Collection and Interceptor Sewers	5-Infrastructure	5.4-Clean Water: Combined sewer overflows	Dunfee, Coesse, Churubusco (W & S), and E County Line Road S. are residential communities that have existing septic systems is desperate need of repairs or are non-compliant. Project consists of pressure sewer systems in all 5 communities involving approx. 14,700 (combined) LFT of mainline pressure sewer and 97 grinder station units. Dunfee will connect to a private utility, Aqua Indiana. Coesse will connect to the municipality of Columbia City, Churubusco, West & South, will connect to Town of Churubusco WWTP, and East County Line Road South community will connect to Aqua Indiana, all providing wastewater treatment for the service areas.	4400000	4400000	769498
TPN-074600	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Western Wayne WTTP Plant Upgrade	5-Infrastructure	5.1-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater treatment	All parts of treatment train will be addressed. Upgrades to the headworks screening and grit removal processes. Improved raw wastewater pumping and influent and effluent flow metering. Additional of a new extended aeration system and replacing the existing clarification system with new circular clarifiers. Rehabilitating the existing Biolac basin as a sludge storage tank. Upgrading the UV disinfection system to treat proposed peak flows. Replacing the existing solids handling processes with updated facilities and equipment and rehabilitating the existing digesters. Replacing the genset and automatic transfer switch. Along with electrical system improvements and adding supervisory control and data acquisition system.	2000000	2000000	0
TPN-074730	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Westport Wastewater Utility Improvements Project	5-Infrastructure	5.2-Clean Water: Centralized wastewater collection and conveyance	Collection system improvements including CIPP for non-lined sewers, point repairs, addressing manhole lining, grout existing liners, and sewer lateral repairs. Collection system improvements for new lift station and an additional force main will include new force main, wet weather pumping station, generator, electrical and controls. Wastewater Treatment Plant improvements; SAGR Treatment system, sludge removal, influent force main connection, influent flow meter and structure for new force main to plant. Chemical feed system improvements, lagoon maintenance device, mechanical screen, generator, electrical and controls.	2500000	0	0
TPN-003189	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Indiana Internet of Things (IoT) Lab - Statewide Initiatives	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will foster the collaboration of Indiana’s entrepreneurs, startups, and established partners for the development of Internet of Things (IoT) solutions to bring to the market and programming for workforce, education and citizen engagement.	1000000	1000000	100000
TPN-003195	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Indiana State Police COVID-19 Hazard Pay Stipends	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	This appropriation shall be used to provide a pandemic related premium pay to 1,285 state troopers and state capitol police officers.	2089879.2	2089879.2	2089879.2		1285
TPN-003196	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Department of Correction COVID-19 Hazard Pay Stipends	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The IDOC will pay each person who acted in the capacity of correctional officer a one-time hazard pay bonus of $1,600. The eligibility for this hazard bonus was primarily derived from the eligibility of the State’s Temporary Conditions Pay and from there, individuals were deemed eligible  if they served in the capacity of a correctional officer between March 2020 and July 1, 2021.	8500000	7619600	7619600		5312
TPN-002241	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Stab Vests	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This appropriation shall be used to purchase stab vests for Indiana Department of Correction personnel.	7000000	2048029	2023678.45
TPN-002245	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Indiana State Police Body Cameras	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The above appropriation are to be used for the acquisition of body and in-car cameras and peripheral equipment for Indiana State Police.	19910121	18729610	10859989
TPN-002247	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Local Unit Body Camera Grants	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The above appropriations are for the purpose of providing matching grants to city, town, and county law enforcement agencies for the acquisition of body cameras.  Grant proceeds may only be used for the purchase of body cameras and may not be used to purchase video storage equipment or services. Eligible law enforcement agencies may apply for grants in accordance with procedures established by the Indiana State Police.  The grant opportunity has been published and the application period is open.	10000000	1118526	854205
TPN-002277	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Deposit to Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.28-Contributions to UI Trust Funds	Deposit to Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund	500000000	500000000	500000000								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-002279	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Mental Health Grants	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The appropriation shall be used to address  a range of mental health needs across the state. Planned program areas include 988 Crisis Hotline establishment, a competency restoration pilot, assessments and technical assistance, development of regional and local capacity building grant program, and workforce development initiatives.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-002288	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Inter-modal Transportation Study	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The appropriation shall be used to fund the final analysis for a light manufacturing, warehousing, distribution, and logistics district along Buffington Harbor. The study must be conducted to determine the expected market demand, provide transportation and logistics operational modeling, and analyze the need for environmental remediation. The project shall be accomplished through a public private partnership to further advance the development opportunities.	1200000	1100000	299288
TPN-093063	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay Managed By: Vincennes District Location: SR61 from SR 241 to 0.20 miles E of US 41, US41 from 0.58 miles S of intersection with US50, US41 over Snapp Creek This $1.105 billion appropriation shall be used for the purpose of paying the costs of construction for a range of road and bridge infrastructure projects.	0	0	0
TPN-105550	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Concrete Pavement Restoration Managed by LaPorte District	381703	0	0
TPN-105552	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Next Level Connections Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HMA Overlay Managed by Vincennes District	7837122	0	0
TPN-110867	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	State Board of Accounts Federal Audits of Local Units	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	The State Board of Accounts SBOA requests review of American Rescue Plan Act ARPA funding to contract with accounting firms to perform audits on state and local units of government Recent disbursements of federal funding to state and local units have increased the annual number of audits SBOA is required to perform To ensure all units of government are audited in a timely manner as required by State and Federal Law SBOA plans to contract with private examiners to complete a portion of those required audits.	6200000	6200000	6200000
TPN-003827	RCP-036489	State Of Indiana	Indiana	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Not Started	Multi Agency Academic Cooperative (MAAC) Firefighter Regional Training Pilot	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project shall provide training opportunities for firefighters, first responders, and EMS through the offerings of combined classroom and practical application programs that provide advanced levels of critical thinking and functioning in preparedness and response.  It is a collaborative process that allows for better coordination of efforts.	500000	500000	0
TPN-088426	RCP-039235	Buchanan County, VA	Virginia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		ARPA Funding	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funding for fire departments and rescue squads for use in providing emergency services to the general public	4079781	4079781	3259544.78
TPN-071395	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Human Resource Management	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of County Human Resource Management services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 5 staff members.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		139663	0
TPN-071431	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Register of Deeds Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of County Register of Deeds services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 6 staff members.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		186921	0
TPN-071348	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Environmental Health Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of Environmental Health services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s staff members.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		259158	0
TPN-071353	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Tax Administration Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of Tax Administration services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 20 staff members.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		703655	0
TPN-071366	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Fire Marshal Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of County Fire Marshal services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 1 staff member.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		43204	0
TPN-071456	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Emergency Paid Sick Leave	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds will be used to cover the COVID related sick leave hours used by employees rather than having to use personal accrued leave.  Policies were developed along the same guidelines as Federally approved Covid leave regarding quarantine hours and medical attention.		200000	0
TPN-071374	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		ITS Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of County ITS services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 4 staff members.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		161018	0
TPN-071382	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Economic Development Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of County Economic Development services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 2 staff members.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		133666	0
TPN-071388	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Finance Department	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of County Finance Department services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 8 staff members.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		324953	0
TPN-070697	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Detention Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of detention services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 32 detention officers.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		816954	0
TPN-071116	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		General Administrative Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of General Administration services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s General Administrative staff.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		387880	0
TPN-071358	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		County Legal Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of County Legal services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 3 staff members.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		159304	0
TPN-070933	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Planning & Development Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of Planning & Development services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 5 Planning & Development staff.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		217042	0
TPN-071133	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Public Library Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of the Public Library services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 5 branches with 11 staff members.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		311095	0
TPN-071144	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Animal Control Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of Animal Control services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 5 staff members.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		145002	0
TPN-071478	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Broadband Infrastructure Development	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Develop infrastructure through partnership with one or more ISP providers under the GREAT Grant Program pursuant to G.S. 143-B-1373 and/or participation in the state Completing Access to Broadband (CAB) under G.S. 143-B 1373.1 .		2500000	0
TPN-070636	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Law Enforcement Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County's 71 sworn law enforcement officers and support staff.   Covered salaries are based on Halifax County's current pay schedule and fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		2561323	0
TPN-071427	RCP-037357	Halifax County, NC	North Carolina	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		County Operations Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The funds will be used to cover staff costs for the provision of County Operations services.  The funds will cover the regular and routine overtime salaries and corresponding fringe benefits for Halifax County’s 17 staff members.  Covered salaries are based on the Halifax County’s current pay schedule and the fringe benefits are based on the written benefits policy.		463018	0
TPN-060652	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	ARPA ELIGIBILITY CONSULTING	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Funds may be used to support pandemic response efforts and address related public health challenges.	178026	178026	178026								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-060653	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	DMH NURSE STAFFING	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	Funds may be used to support pandemic response efforts and address related public health challenges.	70000000	38525922.2	38525922.2								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-060654	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	BROADBAND CAPACTY BLDG EE	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Administrative expenditures to rapidly deploy ARPA funding requested in the State FY 2023 budget.	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-113741	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Gallatin	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Gallatin city sewer connection project to MoDOT facility.	850000	70311	0
TPN-114005	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Community Provider Capital Improvement Contracts	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Capital improvement grants to Federally qualified health centers/Certified Community Behavioral Health Organizations and CMHC's capital improvements grants. Grants would support COVID accommodations and allow programs to meet increased demand for mental health/SUD services. A match is required from FQHC/CCBHO.	148713118	148713118	24443814.32					Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Medical equipment and facilities	148713118	1 Imp General Public
TPN-117468	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Conduct the ARPA Procurements for Product and Services required by Chapter 34	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Conduct the ARPA Procurements for Product and Services required by Chapter 34	541044	541044	12902.19								No
TPN-117511	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Jefferson City Special Learning Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	The project will provide 50 percent funding, up to the award amount, for a new facility for the Capital City Area Council for Special Services, known as the Jefferson City Special Learning Center (JCSLC). The JCSLC serves over 800 children and young people with disabilities annually. The COVID-19 Pandemic restricted JCSLC's ability to deliver services to their clients, often because parental concerns prevented them from sending their children for help. The reduced level of services drove a significant increase in need, outstripping JCSLC's capacity and creating a waiting list.	3500000	3500000	10916.9								Yes	Schools and other educational facilities	3500000	10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-117740	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	F230201 - Improvements to Storm Water and Wastewater Collection Systems	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Storm Water Study: Identify location of existing storm water systems. Investigate the existing conditions and sizes of them and determine the appropriate actions for repair or for required upgrades. The study shall include detailed drawings of existing sewer/storm systems, estimated probable design and construction costs. Wastewater Collection System: Eliminate the direct discharge downspouts in the infill portion of Cattle barn, Rabbit & Poultry Bldg and Donnelly Arena. The wash racks shall be fitted with a gutter system that discharges away from wash area. Ensure existing sanitary sewer lines are connected to sanitary sewer system and all storm water lines are connected to the storm water system. Identify additional sources of inflow and infiltration. Plan corrective actions for items identified such as demolished bldgs that need to have floor drains capped with non-shrink grout or floor slabs that need to be removed and sewer services that need capped at sewer main. Storm Sewer System Improvements: Replace all lateral connections from older bldgs to new sewer mains to ensure that only water entering sanitary sewer system is from sanitary sewer laterals. Replace the sanitary sewer network in the Carnival Midway area and along Maple Str. Properly cap or abandon floor drains where the floor slabs from previously demolished bldgs remain. Install gutters and downspouts on all wash racks and regrade the areas around the wash racks to prevent surface water from entering system.	3211602	174005.63	0
TPN-119838	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Northern Region Security Camera Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacing security camera systems at Northern region facilities.	5841759.5	5586074.39	0
TPN-120069	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Digital Gov Transformation Citizen Journey Mapping	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Customer Journey Mapping of the most common Government services to aid in digital government transformation from the Citizen’s Perspective.	13215750	13215750	115203.59
TPN-119847	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	O230101 - Construct New Laboratory Campus Multi Agency	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Design and construct a centralized state laboratory campus housing multiple agencies to provide one approach to human, animal, environmental, and criminal testing in Missouri	170000000	4628455.55	714104.57
TPN-120067	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Auto Child Support System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Missouri Automated Child Support System (MACSS) has been used to distribute more than $750 million dollars annually, for over 20 years.  MACSS handles collection and disbursement of child support through enforcement of existing judicial and administrative orders; location activities; paternity establishment; establishment of orders; and various other activities. Since implementation of centralized collections, this system distributes child support for all of Missouri's children, not just those receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).  The current system has been in production since 1997 and was the consolidation of multiple county run applications across the state into a single unified system.  Due to the age of the system, the language it was written in, has since fallen out of use, and likewise, has seen a drastic decrease in IT professionals who are able to work within a system written in the language. DSS is seeking to have their current system rewritten in a modern programming language that will ensure that this system is supported for the foreseeable future.	24900260	24900260	355219.62
TPN-120075	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Digital Gov Transformation Citizen Portal Development	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Implementation of online portal giving citizens more direct access to government services in one place making the citizen experience more streamlined and effcient	34715750	34715750	60931.45
TPN-120088	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Digital Gov Transformation O365	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Implementation of Microsoft 365 enterprise wide to support improved efficiency and collaboration across the public sector workforce with the use of modern productivity and collaboration tools	24715750	24715750	29191.58
TPN-119841	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Southern Region Security Camera Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacing security camera systems at our southern region facilities.	5841759.5	5528563.53	0
TPN-120079	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Digital Gov Transformation Infrastructure	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Implementation of modern enterprise-level architecture to support the digital government transformation that focuses on increasing the usability of the State’s Information Technology (IT) systems from the citizen’s perspective. Will enhance citizen experience and support improved efficiency and collaboration across the public sector workforce.	53452750	53452750	8530311.05
TPN-119849	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Folly Theater	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Payment of Funds Appropriated to the Office of Administration in House Bill 3020, Section 20.894 from the Coronavirus State Fiscal Recovery – Revenue Replacement Fund, pursuant to Agreement entered into between the Missouri Arts Council, the Office of Administration, and the Folly Theater, dated October 18, 2022, for Enhancements to the Venue	400000	400000	400000
TPN-119853	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	East Prairie School Building Remediation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The East Prairie R-II School District intends to provide the City of East Prairie with land and a building for use as a health clinic. This building may either be remediated and remodeled or may be demolished for new construction purposes.	0	0	0
TPN-119850	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Missouri Home Visiting Outcomes Rate Card Contractor - Social Finance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Missouri Children's Trust Fund Statewide Home Visiting Initiative	500000	500000	198074
TPN-120146	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Modernize Missouri Job Centers	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	"1) Learning Management System (LMS) software for Job Centers. This will provide E-Learning opportunities for clients who utilize the Job Centers. 2) The LightCast Labor Insights tool provides job posting data used to support workforce research products, comprehensive program review, tracking the economy, and data for the Department’s strategic plan.  3) Virtual Job Fair Software will be purchased to assist the linkage between employers and job. 4) The purchase of updated headsets needed for transition to softphone in the job centers. "	500000	348113.21	210855.12								No			1 Imp General Public	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment		No	0
TPN-119844	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	O230102 - ALTA Survey for New Laboratory Campus Multi Agency	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Perform an ALTA survey for the new Laboratory Campus Multi-Agency	27090	23750	9016.25
TPN-120064	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Child Support Portal	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Today, Department of Social Services (DSS), Family Support Division (FSD), Child Support (CS) clients have limited points of contact to obtain information about their case and/or update their demographics or request a review of their order. FSD CS operates a call center for incoming inquiries and has 15 locations offering walk-in service throughout the state to service approximately 766 clients monthly. This volume causes client frustration with long wait times and/or long drive times to be seen in person. It is vital FSD CS remain accessible to clients to provide a positive customer experience in a timely manner. This request is to use American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for a self-service portal to be added to the Missouri Automated Child Support System (MACSS) to provide an additional point of contact clients can access any time of day without long drive times or long call center wait times. A self-service portal will improve communication with clients, timeliness of information received and reduce the number of phone calls and written requests to the agency	2349740	2349740	3905.3
TPN-119845	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Capital City MOSWIN	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will enhance the coverage and capacity of the Missouri Statewide Interoperability Network throughout Missouri's Capital City by adding 4 radio sites, adding available channels, and simulcasting the radio transmissions from the transmitter sites.	4000000	2848119.87	0
TPN-119855	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	O230103 CONSTRUCT NEW FMDC GROUNDS & MAINTENANCE BUILDING FOR AGENCY	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Construction of a new Grounds and Maintenance building to be located at FMDC Industrial Drive Complex.  Existing Grounds and Maintenance buildings must be demolished to make space for the new One Health Lab Complex	4000000	267250	57725
TPN-119889	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Capital City FirstNet	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will enhance the public safety dedicated FirstNet commercial service in the capital city in state facilities and outdoor throughout the capital city.	12326602	0	0
TPN-127125	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	STL Family Forward	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	"For the establishment of a campus providing training and research on trauma informed services as well as expending access to services to children and families who are victims of severe trauma, in any county with more than one million inhabitants, provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds. "	1200000	1200000	1200000								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	1200000	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-127034	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	LTC Facility Payments	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	"This funding will provide repair and renovations for transitional living and supportive housing for individuals in recovery from alcohol and drugs. Recovery Lighthouse (Warrensburg) helps individuals and families find and sustain recovery from substance use disorders by providing services in a safe and supportive environment, collaborating with community partners, and engaging in advocacy.  They offer individual/group counseling, faith-based programs, recovery housing, recovery court counseling, and related parenting/anger management courses for individuals in recovery. "	607524	607524	206204								Yes	Behavioral health facilities and equipment	607524	1 Imp General Public
TPN-127035	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Housing Provider Capital Improvements	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Capital improvements to the Amethyst Place in Kansas City.	2000000	2000000	146417.02								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	2000000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-127036	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Ferguson Homeless Shelter (The Center of Hope and Peace)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	"For a nonprofit organization that provides summer food programs, food pantry and safe houses for men and women who are victims of abuse located in any city with more than eighteen thousand but fewer than twenty thousand inhabitants and located in a county SS SCS HCS HB 3020 41 with more than one million inhabitants, provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds."	300000	300000	123807.5								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	300000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-128704	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Generator	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The generator replacement provides power redundancy in the case of a utility outage to one of the Judiciary's primary data centers.  The system is designed with the capacity to maintain an operational status for all Court related systems statewide that are hosted in our primary facility.	108950	108950	0
TPN-128706	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Security Improvement-video intercom system	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacement of gate and rear door video intercom system	11460	11460	0
TPN-128698	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Port Capital Improvement Grants - 2181-0000	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Capital Improvement grants to public port authorities in Missouri.	25000000	25000000	1285474.93
TPN-128682	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The MACCO grant funds will be intended to fund the renovation and equipment needed to begin a secondary welding program at Eldon Career Center. ECC has solicited bids for the following: construction and installation of 15 welding booths, 2 grinding stations, an instructor station, a fume control system, electrical upgrades, gas installation, 2 downdraft tables, 16 welders, a plasma table and student safety materials (helmets, gloves, coats).	400000	400000	199097.38
TPN-128708	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Security Improvement-camera on roof	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install a camera on the SW corner of the roof of the Supreme Court building	3605	3605	0
TPN-128705	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Security Improvement-camera 2nd floor	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install a camera on the 2nd floor of the Supreme Court building.	1365	1365	0
TPN-128712	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Security Improvement-panic buttons	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install wireless and wired panic buttons throughout the building	3220	3220	0
TPN-128236	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230301 - Womens Eastern R&D Correctional Center-Rebuild Cooling Tower Building	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	The Consultant shall provide a design to rebuild the existing 2 cell cooling tower and repair the structural system supporting it. The Consultant's design shall include but not be limited to the repair or replacement of the fans fill basin piping and any necessary electrical or control system modifications. The Consultant's design shall also include an evaluation of the structural integrity of the concrete and steel support structure and provide the design for any improvements necessary to ensure the safety and continued operation of the specified equipment.	528939	53800	0								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	528939	1 Imp General Public
TPN-128237	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	E190401 - HVAC Replacement Parkview School	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Replace inefficient ventilation system in State School for the severely disabled.	1344500	1225000	0								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-128238	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	M230701 - Replace Boiler & HVAC	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Replace existing steam heating boilers in warehouse (2) industries bldg (2) and multi-purpose bldg (2) with high efficiency heating hot water boilers. Abate asbestos and demolish existing steam and condensate distribution piping. Install new heating hot water Distribution piping in warehouse and industries bldg. Replace existing Unit heaters (18) with heat only fan coil units. Demolish existing steam to water heat exchangers (6) in multi-purpose bldg install two Domestic hot water boilers. Expand the existing building automation System from multi-purpose bldg to warehouse and industries bldg. Connect new and existing HVAC equipment and boilers to building automation system. Include fire safety code review with fire barriers Exit discharge and area of refuge.	5240763	384300	0								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	5240763	1 Imp General Public
TPN-128239	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Aid to Local Public Health	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	This funding will be used to support LPHAs. In addition to GR federal funding is made available to LPHAs for costs they submit for reimbursement through the CHIP program in four service areas (immunizations lead testing/prevention newborn home visiting and school health screenings and education).	2300000	2300000	314213.7								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128617	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		St. Louis County Law Enforcement Complex	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For providing a matching grant to a county with more than one million inhabitants to establish a regional intelligence and information center, a property control facility, and a training facility and range for law enforcement.	23000000	0	0
TPN-128689	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Discovery Center of Springfield	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Remodel, repair and replacement of exhibits, roof, and infrastructure of Discovery Center in Springfield.  HB3020, Section 20.640.	500000	500000	0
TPN-128688	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		DYS Case Management	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For the development of a case management system within DSS, Division of Youth Services (DYS) Division.	7000000	727200	60600
TPN-128699	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Security improvements in the front entrance of the Eastern District courthouse	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Security improvements in the front entrance of the courthouse for the Eastern District Court of Appeals.	270714.67	270714.67	0
TPN-128644	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		STL Regional Crime Commission Vacancy Mitigation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Includes the demolition of vacant and hazardous buildings, particularly in high-crime areas in St. Louis City.	15000000	15000000	70297.6
TPN-128687	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Missouri Biofuel Infrastructure Incentive Program (BIIP)	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The purpose of the Biofuel Infrastructure Incentive Program (BIIP) is to increase the distribution and use of biofuels in the state of Missouri. Funds from the program will be awarded to fuel retailers, fuel distributors, terminal companies, and fleet operations that are dispensing, or have plans to store or dispense ethanol blends of E15 or higher, or biodiesel blends of B6 or higher.	4000000	4000000	4607.63
TPN-128018	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	12941.14	12941.14	12941.14								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128019	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENTS PAYMENTS	49665.98	49665.98	49665.98								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128020	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA REIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	41971.25	41971.25	41971.25								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128021	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESiDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	8394.25	8394.25	8394.25								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128022	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT	13990.42	13990.42	13990.42								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128023	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	17488.02	17488.02	17488.02								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128031	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Rural Citizens Telehealth Access	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	For the Department of Social Services. For providers of Medicaid services in rural counties for the purchase of necessary equipment and trainings for the purpose of increasing access to telehealth services for MO HealthNet participants.	8500000	8500000	136895.25								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128032	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	18537.3	18537.3	18537.3								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128033	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	19936.34	19936.34	19936.34								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128034	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	16088.98	16088.98	16088.98								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128041	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	34276.52	34276.52	34276.52								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128042	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	ARPA RESIDENITAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY  OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENITAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY  OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	10000000	10000000	1270233.37								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128043	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTEDLIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	10000000	139554.4	139554.4								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128044	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Crisis Response Referral System	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	On going maintenance and software enhancement of bed registry that will allow agencies to see which entities have available beds for consumers that need immediate services.	1081500	437500	131250								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-128045	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	FQHC Repair and Renovation	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	"Capital improvement of FQHC to increase safety and security. The security upgrades and improvements may include, but not be limited to, the following examples: lighting and signage in place, including sidewalks, parking lots and new pathways, to deploy illuminated and interactive signature to improve visibility and safety, for additional gating and security housing for the campus and new security camera detail to better capture images."	500000	500000	0								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	500000	1 Imp General Public			Yes	500000
TPN-128046	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	DED/DPS ARPA Staffing	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	"For the Department of Public Safety administration of programs appropriated in HB 3020 (2022 Reg. Sess.), authorized by Interagency Spending Agreement Between the Department of Economic Development, The Department of Natural Resources, and the Department of Public Safety signed and executed on January 11, 2023.  The agreement was entered into to provide ARPA program administration personnel for the Department of Public Safety for the remainder of FY 2023 (ending June 30, 2023), with the Department of Economic Development providing the Department of Public Safety the authority to use PS funds from its HB 3020 § 20.900 appropriation."	56250	56250	11339.55								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128007	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	NG911 GIS Enhancements	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	For support of the statewide implementation of Next Generation 911.	10000000	0	0								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	500000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-128010	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	ARPA Residential Care / Assisted Living Facility Operator Reimbursement Payments	27980.83	27980.83	27980.83								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128011	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	E190501 - Replace Rooftop Units - New Dawn State School	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	"Remove and replace the existing eight (8) rooftop AC units, including building automation system controls."	1015000	1015000	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128692	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Chesterfield Sports Complex	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Missouri General Assembly appropriated, and the Governor approved HB3020, Section 20.868, $2,000,000 for DED “for the planning, design, maintenance or improvements to an athletic complex located on approximately eleven acres located in any city with more than forty-six thousand but fewer than fifty-one thousand inhabitants, provided that local match be provided in order to be eligible for state funds” for State Fiscal Year 2023 (July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023, “FY 23”) (House Bill 14, 14.215) (“Appropriation”).	2000000	2000000	2000000
TPN-128628	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Correctional Facilities Radio Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacing radios at correctional facilities.	4652237	4652236.15	0
TPN-128701	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Kirksville Area Technical Center will use the funds to build a shop/classroom for our Construction Trades program.  This facility will be across the street from our center in a space that will provide opportunity for growth and area to store building supplies and materials.  This facility will have a shop for woodworking equipment and storage areas for the supplies needed for the house build.  There will be two classrooms that will be on each side of a corridor entering the facility.  This construction will alleviate some congestion in our east wing and agriculture shop.  A subsequent part of the project will include the updating of the space that was vacated by the Construction Trades that will be designed around improving our ability of offer up-to-date programs through the Agriculture Program.  This will include the updating/relocation of the computer lab, expansion/updating of the Agriculture Kitchen and the ability to improve our advance agriculture offerings.	400000	400000	2821.5
TPN-128680	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Historic Courthouse Museum	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace windows, doors and sidewalk at the McDonald County Historic 1871 Courthouse Museum and to replace windows, bathroom flooring and porch area at the McDonald County Historic 1920 Sheriff's House which is the Society headquarters.	200000	100000	18029.37
TPN-128012	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE/ ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	77646.81	77646.81	77646.81								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128013	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA Residential Care/Assisted Living Facility Operator Reimbursement Payments	13990.92	13990.42	13990.42								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128014	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTAL CARE/ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REMIBURSMENT PAYMENTS	9793.29	9793.29	9793.29								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128015	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE/ASSISTED LIVING FACILIYT OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	23433.95	23433.95	23433.95								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128016	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	29030.11	29030.11	29030.11								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128017	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	20985.62	20985.62	20985.62								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128024	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	12941.14	12941.14	12941.14								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128026	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM	260221.75	260221.75	260221.75								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128027	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	27980.83	27980.83	27980.83								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128028	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	15389.46	15389.46	15389.46								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128029	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE/ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	54912.39	54912.39	43461.31								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128036	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LVIING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSMENT PAYMENTS	14689.94	14689.94	14689.94								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128037	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	21335.39	21335.39	21335.39								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128038	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBRUSEMENT PAYMENTS	41971.25	41971.25	41971.25								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128039	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed 50% or more	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	34276.52	34276.52	23084.19								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128040	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	Residential Care & Assisted Living Centers	1-Public Health	1.10-COVID-19 Aid to Impacted Industries	ARPA RESIDENTIAL CARE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY OPERATOR REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS	38823.41	38823.41	38823.41								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128047	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	E231901 - Prairie View SS Replace HVAC System	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	"Replace the HVAC system, including the boiler air handlers and building automation system. The installation shall include fresh air requirements and conditioning of the fresh air to maintain humidity levels."	1204606	60000	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-128745	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Kirkwood Amtrak-2604	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project is to make improvements to the historic train station in Kirkwood, MO.	2500000	2500000	0
TPN-128748	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Missouri Area Career Center Opportunities	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Update and maintain equipment needed in high demand occupation areas that include a frame rack for auto collision, lift and press for auto technology, update welders in welding, additional equipment in precision machining including a surface grinder and lathe package, modules for diesel technology, new equipment in culinary such as a smoker, grinder and sausage stuffer  and a renovation to create a new health occupations laboratory that will require equipment, wall gas panel and bathroom/shower for clinical practice.  Funds will also be utilized for necessary purchases to start up an aircraft maintenance program.	400000	400000	0
TPN-128749	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Northland Tech Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project is for the construction of a new building, including acquisition of land, to provide advanced workforce development for Platte Co. R-III schools and the schools served by its Area Career Center. The project provides fifty percent of the cost of the center up to the award amount.	30000000	5000000	0
TPN-134096	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Small Business Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	"The Small Business Grant Program (Program) provides assistance to small businesses that were negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.  Small businesses receive grant funds equal to decrease in gross revenues pre-pandemic to 2021, not to exceed $25,000."	10000000	10000000	7588052								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-134058	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"C230501 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, Maryville Treatment Center"	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint/repair interior and exterior of water towers at the Maryville Treatment Center.	150864	2273	0
TPN-134059	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"C230601 - Repairs to Storm Drainage and Sewer Pipes, Algoa Correctional Center"	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Algoa upgrade sewer system and storm drain system	367502	25674.58	0
TPN-134060	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"C230501 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, Ozark Correctional Center"	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint/repair interior and exterior of water towers at the Ozark Correctional Center	1073	1073	0
TPN-134061	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230601 - Repairs to Storm Drainage and Sewer Pipes, Tipton Correctional Center	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Repairs to Storm Drainage and Sewer Pipes at the Tipton Correctional Center	384812	26883.9	0
TPN-134062	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"C230501 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, Chillicothe Correctional Center"	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint/repair interior and exterior of water towers at the Chillicothe Correctional Center	196939	1073	0
TPN-134063	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230601 - Repairs to Storm Drainage and Sewer Pipes, Boonville Correctional Cntr	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	"Repairs to Storm Drainage and Sewer Pipes, Boonville Correctional Cntr"	847974	59241.52	0
TPN-134064	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C230501 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, Jefferson City Correctional Center	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	"Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, Jefferson City Correctional Center"	457550	1073	0
TPN-134065	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"C230501 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, Western  MO Correctional Center"	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	"Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, Western Mo Correctional Center"	338132	1073	0
TPN-134066	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"C230501 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, Eastern Reception & Diagnostic CC"	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	"Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, Eastern Reception & Diagnostic Correctional Center"	457550	1073	0
TPN-134067	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"C230501 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, Moberly Correctional Center"	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers at Moberly Correctional Center	338238	1073	0
TPN-134068	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"C230501 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, MO Eastern Correctional Center"	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers at the MO Eastern Correctional Center	366636	2146	0
TPN-134069	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"C230501 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, Southeast Correctional Center"	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers for the Southeast Correctional Center	271191	1073	0
TPN-134070	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"C230501 - Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers, Women's Eastern RDCC"	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Paint and Repair DOC Water Towers for the Women's Eastern RDCC	204143	1073	0
TPN-134071	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230101 - Connect Sites Water System to MO American Water & Rebuild Lagoon	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Connect water system to Missouri American Water. Rebuild Lagoon for Babler State Park	3600000	104558	0
TPN-134072	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"X230501 - North Water and Wastewater Improvements, Knob Noster State Park"	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Knob Noster State Park Rebuild group camp water system in order to maintain the aging system. Campground lagoon repairs or connect to City if possible.	1392000	25714.29	0
TPN-134073	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230601 - East Water and Wastewater Improvements Onondaga State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Onondaga Cave State Park Replace well house. Repair replace water storage system and controls. Rebuild lagoon.	1958000	40364.12	0
TPN-134074	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230801 - Truman State Park Repair Replace Lagoon	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	"Repair replace lagoon, it has reached the end of its useful life"	1800000	134520	0
TPN-134075	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"X230201 - Replace Lift Stations, Thousand Hills State Park"	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Thousand Hills State Park - Replace sewage lift stations throughout park.	1050000	48670.14	0
TPN-134076	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230501 - North Water and Wastewater Improvements, Bothwell Lodge State Historic	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Bothwell Lodge State Historic Site: Rebuild lodge water system in order to maintain the aging system. Evaluate sewer septic tanks at day use area.	768000	22095.23	0
TPN-134077	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230601 - East Water and Wastewater Improvements Meramec State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Meramec State Park: Replace well house. Repair campground sewer lift station. Construct the replacement of water lines throughout the park	1572000	32439.88	0
TPN-134078	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"X230201 - Rebuild Sewer System, Battle of Athens State Park"	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Battle of Athens State Historic Site - Rebuild sewer system in order to maintain the aging system and bring it up to current codes and regulations.	780000	36156.04	0
TPN-134079	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230501 - North Water and Wastewater Improvements Confederate Memorial State His	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Confederate Memorial State Historic Site: Rebuild water system in order to maintain the aging system. Rebuild sewer system and connect to Higginsville wastewater system.	1620000	12190.48	0
TPN-134469	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Intercom-paging-audio system	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install new intercom/paging/audio system in the Court of Appeals building	76977.72	76977.72	0
TPN-134479	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Laptop computers	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Laptop computers to allow marshals to access security system remotely	3947.55	3947.55	0
TPN-134471	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Intrusion alarm	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install new intrusion alarm to replace obsolete system and rewire existing BA points to new panel.  Includes 5 year monitoring service.	13895.25	13895.25	0
TPN-134476	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		Fire Alarm	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace current combination fire/intrusion alarm panel and rewire new panel.  Includes 5 year monitoring service and inspections.	12637.75	12637.75	0
TPN-135200	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"F230101 - MO State Fair-Design & Construct New, Covered Arena"	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	"This includes demolition of the existing arena and bleachers and design/construction of the new covered arena. The 300 x 400 ft. structure will all be under roof. The covered arena will include bleachers and seating for 3,000-5,000 spectators, concessions, restrooms, and office space. This includes all electrical, lighting, ventilation, and plumbing expenses."	29391000	531000	258750					No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	29391000	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-135218	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	X230401 - Southeast Water and Wastewater Improvements, Echo Bluff State Park	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Echo Bluff State Park: Install water tower to eliminate need for generator. Upgrade phase converter controls in campground well house.	1320000	50000	0
TPN-137833	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC		East Prairie School Building Remediation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The East Prairie R-II School District intends to provide the City of East Prairie with land and a building for use as a health clinic. This building may either be remediated and remodeled or may be demolished for new construction purposes.	250000	189750	94875
TPN-112549	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	C180601 - Improvements to Wastewater System, Lagoon, Replace Sewer Line Laundry	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Remove sludge from existing lagoon cells and repair/sea/ all perimeter berms to correct leeching issues. Replace worn components of the wastewater system such as lift pumps, aerators, grinders, bar screens, etc. Install ultra violet (UV) disinfection in discharge outfall. Bring the wastewater system into full compliance with all current USEPAIDNR regulations at the time of bidding/construction of the project. Replace sewer line from Laundry and Sign Shop north to manhole then east to the main.	4601907	4527232.22	634332.69
TPN-112553	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	"X230201 - Replace Lagoon, Sewage Lift Stations, and Sewer System"	5-Infrastructure	5.15-Drinking water: Other water infrastructure	Long Branch State Park - Replace lagoon	1200000	55623.82	0
TPN-095694	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed	MVC NURSE STAFFING	1-Public Health	1.6-Medical Expenses (including Alternative Care Facilities)	Funds may be used to support pandemic response efforts and address related public health challenges.	2350607.11	2347512.84	2347512.84								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-095695	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Broadband Capacity E&E	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	ARPA Broadband Administration Expense & Equipment	8539655	650277.5	377959.44								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-095696	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	ARPA DEVELOPMENT PS	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	ARPA Development Administration Personal Service	2204313	733173.46	724394.97								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-095697	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	ARPA WATER/WASTE WATER	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	"Assist with the administration of drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure projects in communities across Missouri, including identifying water service lines containing lead"	2542000	2542000	231241.81								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-095698	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	WEB OA-IT ARPA WEB APP	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	"Online application/system for managing agency ARPA grant requests, awards and progress"	777156.45	777156.45	450401.26								Yes	Technology and tools	777156.45	1 Imp General Public
TPN-108179	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	BROADBAND CAPACITY PS	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	ARPA DEVELOPMENT/BROADBAND CAPACITY Personal Service	2103654	2103654	475939.59								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-108180	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	Department of Mental Health Timekeeping System Upgrade	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	"This will implement a new time keeping system in all Department of Mental Health (DMH) state-operated programs.  The DMH state-operated programs in the Divisions of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) and Behavioral Health (DBH) employ over 5,700 employees, with nearly two-thirds being direct service professionals who provide around-the-clock care in state-owned settings for individuals with developmental disabilities and mental illness. Conversion to the new time keeping system will provide an electronic method for keeping employee time and attendance, as well as upload information to the state's accounting system so that payroll can be processed more efficiently and accurately. The system includes various technologies for logging time worked, including a biometric clock system as the primary means for timing in and out on our habilitation center campuses, as well as an app system on a tablet or cell phone for the waiver homes."	600000	600000	46695.1								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-108181	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	ARPA Consulting Services	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	ARPA Grant Management	4783630	1751565.5	1751565.5								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-108177	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Cancelled	ARPA DEVELOPMENT/BROADBAND CAPACITY E&E	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	ARPA DEVELOPMENT/BROADBAND CAPACITY E&E	0	0	0								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-108178	RCP-036451	State Of Missouri	Missouri	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	State/DC	Completed less than 50%	ARPA Development E&E	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	ARPA Development Administration Expense and Equipment	319640	278649.1	215909.6								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-149603	RCP-040325	Wayne County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Health Facility	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchased, renovated & relocated to County Owned Public Health Facility		226025	226025								Yes	Other (please specify)	223361	1 Imp General Public
TPN-149658	RCP-040325	Wayne County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Replace Courthouse HVAC	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Courthouse HVAC		52442	52442								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	1500000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-125518	RCP-040210	West Feliciana Parish Police Jury, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sligo Road - Bayou Sara	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Bored main water transmission line which was exposed and prone to line breaks in order to improve water pressure and prevent contamination from continued line breaks.		162800	162800
TPN-125535	RCP-040210	West Feliciana Parish Police Jury, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sligo Road - Walters Creek	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Bored main water transmission line which was exposed and prone to line breaks in order to improve water pressure and prevent contamination from continued line breaks.		24900	24900
TPN-125540	RCP-040210	West Feliciana Parish Police Jury, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sligo Road - Gales Creek	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Bored main water transmission line which was exposed and prone to line breaks in order to improve water pressure and prevent contamination from continued line breaks.		62600	62600
TPN-049799	RCP-040210	West Feliciana Parish Police Jury, LA	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Water System Improvements - Weyanoke Well No. 2	5-Infrastructure	5.13-Drinking water: Source	Drilling a 1,000 ft deep test hole, performing an electric log, taking sand and water samples, setting a final 350 gpm well and appurtenances and adding chemical feed equipment in order to add a second water well in the Weyanoke area of the Parish to allow for additional water supply to the area.		1408035	200349.21
TPN-072627	RCP-053061	County Of Rush,	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Rush Co. Sheriff Body Armor	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of replacement Airius Level 111A Concealable Armor for Sheriff, Undersheriff, and 5 additional officers.	9485	9485	9485
TPN-086938	RCP-053061	County Of Rush,	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Emergency Communications System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of 800 MHz radios for all county emergency vehicles - fire, police, EMS - master console for central dispatch, county-wide repeater, and hand-held radios for Police, Fire, EMS personnel and for county public service. Project will allow all county agencies to communicate directly within the county and also with agencies out of the county in emergency situations requiring mutual aid between counties.	554532	554532	544893.09
TPN-141268	RCP-053062	Bienville Parish,	Louisiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Water Sector Program Projects	5-Infrastructure	5.11-Drinking water: Transmission & distribution	Water Sector Program Projects for Cypress Water System, Village of Castor Water System and Jamestown/Fryeburg Water System		175000	175000
TPN-130389	RCP-038773	Bradford County, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Standard Allowance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The entity's expenditures in accordance with the standard allowance for revenue replacement will be used to provide general government services, specifically to cover payroll and benefits for the entity during the period of April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2022.		5477714	5477714
TPN-044277	RCP-038771	Harrison County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Harrison Co ARPA Admin	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	ARPA funds administration and reporting by BGADD.		36684	3668.4
TPN-044285	RCP-038771	Harrison County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Cynthiana - Industrial Park Water Tank and WTP Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Harrison County Fiscal Court commits $500,000 of ARPA funding to the cost of the Water Tower and UV upgrade project. The addition of UV (Ultraviolet) purification systems at the city Water Treatment Plant will improve the quality of the water produced for all customers (business and residential) throughout the service area.		500000	500000
TPN-147318	RCP-038771	Harrison County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Broadband Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Harrison County Fiscal Court has review the project(s) to be submitted by Applicant: All Points Broadband and is satisfied that All Points Broadband is hereby authorized to apply to the Kentucky Better Internet Program for funding for this project. The Harrison County Fiscal Court conFirms its commitment as a Contributing Partner to the project: in the amount of S2,557,500.00,		2557500	2557500
TPN-020612	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Advertising Support for Bloomington Businesses	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Advertising Support for Bloomington Businesses		8000	0								No
TPN-020639	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Bloomington Remote Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Bloomington Remote Grant		30000	30000								No			1 Imp General Public			Yes	30000
TPN-020654	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Reboot Grant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Reboot Grant for employment		20000	20000								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-020601	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Canopy of Lights 2021	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Canopy of light to support Locally Owned Business		2000	2000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-020628	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	2022 FreezeFest Sponsorship	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	2022 FreezeFest Sponsorship		1800	1800								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-133656	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BGHIP Rebate Alex Jorck	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Green Home Improvements Rebates	1000	1000	1000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134328	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Emerging Artist Arts Project- Music Industry Creatives	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BAC Emerging Artist Arts Project- Music Industry Creatives		2000	2000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134233	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Corinne Jones	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Bloomington Arts Commission Emerging Artist Grant		500	500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134333	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Arts Project Grant - Shakespeare's Ear- Musical Arts Youth Organization	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BAC Arts Project Grant - Shakespeare's Ear- Musical Arts Youth Organization		2000	2000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134358	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BGHIP Rebate - Patrick Shih	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BGHIP Rebate - Patrick Shih		1000	1000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134280	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Arts Project Grant - Humanetrix Foundation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BAC Arts Project Grant - Humanetrix Foundation		2550	2550								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134204	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Allison Strang	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Bloomington Arts Commission Emerging Artist Grant		500	500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134209	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Annie Stout	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Bloomington Arts Commission Emerging Artist Grant		500	500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134225	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Consulting Services for public art - C.Elam	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Consulting Services for public art		360	360								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134394	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - University Players	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - University Players		2000	2000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134320	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Meris Drew	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Meris Drew		750	750								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134278	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Arts Operations Grant - Girls Rock Bloomington	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BAC Arts Operations Grant - Girls Rock Bloomington		2000	2000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134217	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Trade's Disrtict Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Developing a Trade's District in the City to promote new business and employment.		8450	8450								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134262	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Photoboth Canopy of Light 22	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Photoboth at the Canopy of Lights to aid Local tourism		150	150								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-134415	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	for Affordable Housing- Summit Hill Communtiy Devepolement Corp	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	For development of additional Affordable Housing and rental assistance		250000	250000								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-134199	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Go Bloomington Advert 23	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	IU Sports Prop-GoBloomington Adv-22'-23' IN Sponsorship	20000	20000	20000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134247	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BGHIP Rebate - Dave Debikey	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Green House Improvement Program Rebate		1000	1000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134427	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Marketing - Social Media Services for the HAND Dept.- Winslow Ranch Marketing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Marketing - Social Media Services for the HAND Dept.		1160	1160								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-134286	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Arts Operations Grant - Indiana Heritage Quilt Show	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BAC Arts Operations Grant - Indiana Heritage Quilt Show		750	750								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134312	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Zucchini Arts Collection	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Zucchini Arts Collection		500	500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134305	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Hideout Press	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Hideout Press		1000	1000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134220	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Emerging Artist Grant - Caleb Poer	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Bloomington Arts Commission Emerging Artist Grant		1600	1600								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134228	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BBAC Emerging Artists Grant - Christopher Simanton	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Bloomington Arts Commission Emerging Artist Grant		1500	1500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134399	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Arts Operations Grant -WFHB	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BAC Arts Operations Grant -WFHB		2500	2500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134365	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	SEEL Grant - Realife Media dba the Warehouse	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	SEEL Grant - Realife Media dba the Warehouse		10000	10000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134371	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	-BAC Arts Grant - Reimagining Opera for Kids	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	-BAC Arts Grant - Reimagining Opera for Kids		3850	3850								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134265	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Several Downtown pubic art installations	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Several Downtown pubic art installations		110000	110000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134324	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Arts Education Grant - MCCSC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Arts Education Grant - MCCSC Monroe County Community School Corp		30000	30000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134274	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Arts Operations Grant - Forgotten Clefs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BAC Arts Operations Grant - Forgotten Clefs		750	750								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134318	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Kyle Quass	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Kyle Quass		675	675								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134367	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	-BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Rebecca Woodward	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	-BAC Emerging Artists Grant - Rebecca Woodward		1500	1500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134293	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Grant for Arts Communication Platform - IU	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Grant for Arts Communication Platform - Indiana University		72500	72500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-134298	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Grant 2023- Archives of African American Music & Culture Indiana University	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Grant 2023- Archives of African American Music & Culture Indiana University		15000	15000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-115297	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Solar & Energy Efficiency IFF	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Solar & Energy Efficiency		12286.25	10888.75								No			28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-115300	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Solar & Energy Assessment - Stone Belt ARC, Inc.	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Solar & Energy Assessment Grant - Stone Belt ARC, Inc.	10000	10000	10000								No			28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-115306	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	BGHIP Rebate  Beth Underdahl-Peirce	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BGHIP Rebate - 2411 S. Milton	1000	1000	1000								No
TPN-115302	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Solar & Energy Efficiency - WFHB	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Solar & Energy Efficiency Program for WFHB	10000	10000	10000								No			28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-115310	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Marketing Services for GoBloomington- TEN  Marketing LLC	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Marketing Services for GoBloomington	79500	10000	9500								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-115308	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	BGHIP Rebate- Angela Sturdevant	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BGHIP Rebate - A Sturdevant	1000	1000	1000								No
TPN-115301	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Solar & Energy Efficiency - Tandem Community Birth Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Solar & Energy Efficiency  Grant - Tandem Community Birth Center	10000	10000	10000								No			28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-115299	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Solar & Energy Efficiency - Bloomington Montessori	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Solar & Energy Efficiency Grant	10000	10000	10000								No			28 Dis Imp Other NPs Dis Imp by the pandemic specify
TPN-115304	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	BGHIP Rebate  Artur Luhur	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	BGHIP Rebate - Arthur Luhur-1307 S Valley Forge Road	1000	1000	1000								No
TPN-048470	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Waldron - Gas	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Natural Gas Utilities for the Art Center		5000	3888.88								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-048489	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Waldron - Water Sewer	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Water and Sewr Uitlities at the Art Center		1267.48	1267.48								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-048523	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Lead Testing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.20-Social Determinants of Health: Lead Remediation	Environmental Lead testing from house fire		27171.19	27171.19								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-048735	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Encampment Clean Up- Bulter Park	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Homeless Encampment cleanup and disposal at Bulter Park		540.63	540.63								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-048560	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Lead Remediation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.20-Social Determinants of Health: Lead Remediation	Lead Remediation from areas that tested positive for Lead		94700	94700								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-048801	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	All Parks Security	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	Security for Switchyard Park to help reduce the violence and vandalism at the park		278821	95122.88								No			1 Imp General Public	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-048625	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Working Bonus Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium bonus pay for Workers that working form their normal work station during covid-19		455346.3	455346.3		700
TPN-048845	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Revenue Replaces	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue replacement to various funds		10000000	1957894.6
TPN-050709	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Crestmont Park Equipment 1 - Parks Wifi	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Crestmont Park Equipment 1 - Parks Wifi		1600.58	1600.58
TPN-050716	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	3rd Street Park Equipment 1 - Parks Wifi	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	3rd Street Park Equipment 1 - Parks Wifi		255.68	255.68
TPN-050542	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BGHIP- Smith	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Energy efficient home to reduce energy usage		1000	1000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-050578	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Staples Marketing, LLC (Affirm)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Naming and Branding the City's Transportation Management Plan		75000	74951.43								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-050634	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Supplies for Direct Employment Workers	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Supplies for Direct Employment Workers (DPW)		1044.89	1044.89								No			13 Imp Industry outside the travel tourism or hospitality sectors specify	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors	1 Imp General Public
TPN-050655	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Peoples Park Equipment 1 - Parks Wifi	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Peoples Park Equipment 1 - Parks Wifi		1345.76	1345.76
TPN-050669	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Butler Park Equipment 1 - Parks Wifi	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Butler Park Equipment 1 - Parks Wifi		6563.02	6563.02
TPN-020857	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Brighten Btown DPW labor funding	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Brighten Btown DPW labor funding unemployed  persons		220000	154672.59								No			14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-100268	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Solar Rebate - Smith	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Energy efficient home to reduce energy usage	1000	1000	1000	1							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-100309	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	2022 Reboot Tech Center The Mill	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Reboot program to give formerly incarcerated, eligible participants entrepreneurship support and training	30000	30000	30000								No			11 Imp Classes of NPs designated as negatively economically impacted
TPN-100313	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Code/IT Academy Grant (The Mill)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Code/IT Academy is a free upskilling program for new economy jobs in web development. Take a step toward a brighter future!	75000	75000	75000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-100290	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Solar Rebate Roeder Chad E	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Energy efficient home to reduce energy usage	1000	1000	1000	1							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-100293	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Solar Rebate - Fogleman, Paul	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Energy efficient home to reduce energy usage	1000	1000	1000	1							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-100298	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Solar Rebate - Mendota Amelia	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Energy efficient home to reduce energy usage	1000	1000	1000	1							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-100302	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Solar Rebate - Rebate - Daniel Niederman	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Energy efficient home to reduce energy usage	1000	1000	1000	1							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-107439	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	BGHIP - Mariyappa	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Energy efficient home to reduce energy usage		1000	1000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-021345	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Vintage Window Restoration	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Replacement  Windows		99855.98	99855.98								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	99855.98	1 Imp General Public
TPN-021352	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Waldron Maintenance Paint Supplies	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron Maintenance Paint Supplies		148.95	148.95								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	148.95	1 Imp General Public
TPN-021362	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Waldron Mechanical Repairs - Misc HFI 353.00	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron Mechanical Repairs - Misc		353	353								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	353	1 Imp General Public
TPN-021426	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Waldron Pre-Open Deep Clean	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron Pre-Open Deep Clean		825	825								No
TPN-021368	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Paint for Waldron Deferred Maintenance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Paint for Waldron Deferred Maintenance		552.64	552.64								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	552.64	1 Imp General Public
TPN-021376	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	RFP Ad for Waldron	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	RFP Ad for Waldron		98	98								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	98	1 Imp General Public
TPN-021381	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Tuck Pointing at Waldron (Deferred Maintenance)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Tuck Pointing at Waldron (Deferred Maintenance)		34200	34200								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	34200	1 Imp General Public
TPN-021400	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Waldron Stairs & Doors Repairs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron Stairs & Doors Repairs		55000	37000								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	55000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-021436	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Waldron HVAC Replacement	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron HVAC Replacement		47800	47800								Yes	Other (please specify)	47800	1 Imp General Public
TPN-023537	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Park WIFI Digital Equity- Butler Park deployment	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Park WIFI Digital Equity- Butler Park deployment		28409.5	8490.96
TPN-023538	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Park WIFI Digital Equity- Crestmont Park deployment	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Park WIFI Digital Equity- Crestmont Park deployment		8611.11	2148.18
TPN-023557	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Park WIFI Digital Equity- Peoples Park Fiber Extension	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Park WIFI Digital Equity- Peoples Park Fiber Extension		3997.37	3997.37
TPN-021384	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Waldron IT cable & jack upgrades	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron IT cable & jack upgrades		2093	0								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	2093
TPN-021396	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Waldron Condensing Units & AC Coils (HFI)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron Condensing Units & AC Coils (HFI)		11500	11500								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	11500	1 Imp General Public
TPN-021389	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Waldron Interim Management (BCT)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron Interim Maintenance Labor (BCT)		10517.18	10517.18								No		31525	1 Imp General Public
TPN-021397	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Waldron Backflow Preventer (HFI)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron Backflow Preventer (HFI)		1950	1950								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	1950	1 Imp General Public
TPN-021446	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Lead Remediation from T&D Water Lines	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	Lead Remediation from T&D Water Lines		700000	0
TPN-021392	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Waldron Interim General Operations Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron Interim General Operations Support		26000	2570.31								No		26000	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-021453	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Landlord Risk Mitigation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Landlord Risk Mitigation		200000	105000								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-021455	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	United Way for homelessness assistanc	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	United Way for homelessness assistanc		1200000	1200000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-021459	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Landlord Participation Efforts	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Landlord Participation Efforts		250000	250000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-021414	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Waldron Fire & Security System Replacement (Koorsen)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron Fire & Security System Replacement (Koorsen)		5366.85	5366.85								No		5366.85	1 Imp General Public
TPN-021417	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Waldron Fire Inspection Services (Koorsen)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron Fire Inspection Services (Koorsen)		715	0								No		715
TPN-021422	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Arts Feasibility Study 2022	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Arts Feasibility Study 2022 (50% of total)		100000	95049.85								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-021429	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Waldron Mechanical Repairs - Misc HFI 1647.00	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Waldron Mechanical Repairs - Misc		1647	296								No		1647	1 Imp General Public
TPN-107734	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Facility Energy Assessments	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Energy assessments of facilities.	36000	36000	11962.52								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-107748	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Indiana University - Granfalloon	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Help to support the Granfalloon concerts to promote tourism in the community.	5000	5000	5000								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-107756	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	New Hope Family Shelter 2022	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.17-Housing Support: Housing Vouchers and Relocation Assistance for Disproportionately Impacted Communities	Housing Support Services to the unhoused families	250000	250000	250000								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-023175	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Park WIFI Digital Equity -BDU Manhole Duct/Fiber Search	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Park WIFI Digital Equity -BDU Manhole Duct/Fiber Search		10357.56	10357.56					No
TPN-107778	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Habitat for Humanity - Hopewell	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	To create an affordable neighbor the the unhoused,  Hopewell Neighbor		136394.25	136394.25								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-023520	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Park WIFI Digital Equity- Cabling work for Bloomington PD	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Park WIFI Digital Equity- Cabling work for Bloomington PD		2905.4	2905.4
TPN-023524	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Park WIFI Digital Equity-  3rd Street Park deployment	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Park WIFI Digital Equity-  3rd Street Park deployment		11681.34	4233.78
TPN-023527	RCP-038696	Bloomington, Indiana	Indiana	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Park WIFI Digital Equity- Peoples Park deployment	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Park WIFI Digital Equity- Peoples Park deployment		8032.22	2146.35
TPN-064353	RCP-038693	Unicoi County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Emergency Communications	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Emergency Communications Project. This project will be done in phases. Phase I is road repair, building construction with wiring and electrical including purchase of generators. Phase II will be bidding required equipment out. Phase III will be installation of the equipment and final inspection. The project will take approximately 18 Months.		646017	278137.25
TPN-064377	RCP-038693	Unicoi County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium/Part Time Pay	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Premium/Overtime pay for essential workers. This pay was for workers on the front line with personal contact with citizens.		469295.23	469295.23
TPN-064408	RCP-038693	Unicoi County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Recreational Maintenance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Maintenance/Upgrades to existing recreational area for access to the Nolichucky River. Outdoor recreation was vital during the pandemic and continues to be helpful for mental health during this time.		15530	15530
TPN-144239	RCP-038693	Unicoi County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Misc. Government Expenditures	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Employee Bonus, Railroad spur repair, Jail & Health Depart. HVAC, Copier, Video Recorder, Roof Replacement, Non Profits, Sheriff Vehicles, Sheriff supplies. Solid Waste expenditure.		655543.02	650543.07
TPN-044310	RCP-038738	Thayer County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Upgrade Drinking Fountains	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Upgrade drinking fountains for public use in the courthouse.	4587.62	4587.62	4587.62
TPN-044327	RCP-038738	Thayer County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Camera Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Upgraded security cameras for courthouse and law enforcement.	38531.73	38531.73	38531.73
TPN-044331	RCP-038738	Thayer County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	District court update and consulting	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Update to District courtroom for electronics compatibility and consulting.		0	0
TPN-044365	RCP-038738	Thayer County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Courthouse Air Conditioning	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Total upgrade of the air conditioning system of courthouse.	42342	42342	42342
TPN-161818	RCP-038738	Thayer County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Broadband	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Feasible study for Broadband countywide		1000	1000
TPN-139644	RCP-038695	Newton County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Tax Office Comp Time Payment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To reimburse the County for Tax Office Comp Time payroll expenses.		1651	1651
TPN-139639	RCP-038695	Newton County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	County Payroll Expenses	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To reimburse the County for payroll expenses.		1246132.69	1246132.69
TPN-139652	RCP-038695	Newton County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Solid Waste	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To provide solid waste services in the County.		200000	0
TPN-139649	RCP-038695	Newton County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Netdata Software Update	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To purchase update for Netdata software.		34965	0
TPN-139641	RCP-038695	Newton County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	County Bill Payments	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To reimburse the County for account payable expenses.		764599.44	764599.44
TPN-139642	RCP-038695	Newton County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Nutrition Services Dept	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To reimburse the County for Nutrition Services Department expenses.		100000	69337.28
TPN-139647	RCP-038695	Newton County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Camera Surveillance Equip - Sheriff's Office	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To purchase camera surveillance equipment for the Sheriff's Office.		15000	0
TPN-139651	RCP-038695	Newton County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Insurance Deductible for MOW Facility	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To allocate funds to pay an insurance deductible for repairs to the County Meals on Wheels facility that was damaged during recent storms.		51000	0
TPN-139645	RCP-038695	Newton County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	District Attorney Bldg.	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To purchase and renovate a building for the District Attorney.		79000	0
TPN-067077	RCP-038695	Newton County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Grant Administration	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Assisted recipient with administration of CSFRF/CLFRF program, including effective management and oversight and ensuring compliance with legal, regulatory and other requirements.		131000	65500
TPN-044252	RCP-038698	Morgan County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Morgan County Governmental Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Morgan County will be spending their American Rescue Plan funding on the following: County Executive Projects that includes premium pay for employees that has already been paid; helping finish a county-owned RV Park that will be completed this summer, and other tourism-based projects. Solid Waste Department is getting new equipment and vehicles. Recycling Department is getting equipment and vehicles. Morgan County EMS is getting two ambulances, a new EMS Building and other equipment for better services. Morgan County Sheriff's Office is getting new vehicles. Morgan County E-911 is getting equipment updates at their tower sites. Election Commission is getting new voting machines. Highway Department is getting vehicles and equipment. Circuit Court Clerk is getting an updated courtroom. The Health Department is getting help with updates to their facility. The public libraries are getting improvements and equipment. Various non-profits, including our local volunteer fire departments will be getting donations to help them replace revenues lost during Covid-19. The rest of the funding that is left will go towards courthouse maintenance projects.		4157282	2777488.16
TPN-024001	RCP-038691	Lapeer County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Payroll Cost Public Safety	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Public Safety Wages		22606.5	22606.5			42					No
TPN-023974	RCP-038691	Lapeer County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Lapeer County Tourism	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Tourism		1191343.1	779500.6								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	899137	1 Imp General Public
TPN-024041	RCP-038691	Lapeer County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Evaluation and Data Analysis	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Data Analysis		42419.02	42419.02								No
TPN-084801	RCP-038691	Lapeer County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Physical Plant 44	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	physical plant upgrades		2331200	1464666.11
TPN-067706	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Non Profit Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Council designated funding to support those local, non-profit organizations who serve the needs of the community and were negatively impacted due to the COVID-19 pandemic.  Non profit subrecipients will receive funding via a contract for service and provide monthly activity reports when requesting reimbursement to track expenditures.		384898.3	384898.3								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-067750	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Job Training Program	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	In an effort to support youth and young adults return to employment post COVID-19 closures, the City of Merced and Merced County Workforce Development have partnered to create a job training program.  Students and young adults will register for job training, receiving resume and career technical education and support, job placement services, and mentorship to ensure job retention.  Ages 16 to 21 will be eligible for the program, running for two fiscal years.  Local high schools and the community college will refer job seekers to the program.  The program will be managed by a contract for service with Merced County, who will provide regular invoicing and participant reporting that tracks the utilization and success of the program.		550000	0
TPN-067444	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Utility Bill Relief	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	During the COVID-19 pandemic, 300 customers fell behind in their utility bill payments to do loss of income or financial hardship.  The City Council set aside $1 million to allow for residents to apply for funding to cover overdue bills.  To qualify, residents will apply for the program, provide hardship documents and receive funds to bring their account current. The funds distributed will be tracked and by the City’s Finance Department.		189889.39	189889.39	137							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-067781	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Water Infrastructure	5-Infrastructure	5.8-Clean Water: Water conservation	To increase residential water conservation, the City of Merced is bidding out an opportunity to perform water efficiency evaluations in disadvantaged communities and then securing the necessary energy efficient appliances for installations.  Several homes in these communities are 50 to 75 years old and have not received the necessary upgrades to conserve the use of groundwater as part of daily activities. In addition, these families lack the resources to hire a contractor to install and make necessary repairs to achieve conservation goals.  As a result of this contract, monthly invoices will be received that track outreach and income qualifications, evaluation of property and water use, supplies and appliance purchases, and installations.  In addition, the City’s Water Department will be able to track the decrease in water use because of this program.   These findings will be updated in the Annual Water Report provided to the City Council for adoption each year.		0	0
TPN-067784	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Broadband Infrastructure Needs Assessment	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	During the COVID-19 pandemic, it became abundantly clear that access to broadband was not evenly available across disadvantaged communities.  Nearly 56% of all residents were employed as essential workers during the pandemic and had limited resources to secure access to internet services their children needed during remote learning times.  As a result, Merced County, the City of Merced, and the local school districts have formed a partnership to evaluate the infrastructure needs of the County to increase access to broadband for underserved communities.  A needs assessment study is currently underway to develop a plan for investment in infrastructure and to secure a local service provider.  The result of the study will be bid out for grant submission, construction, and operations through a public-private partnership to provide no or low-cost broadband services to all members of the community.  Moving forward, a contract will dictate the tracking of this service and the access for disadvantaged communities.		69030	0
TPN-067865	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Applegate Zoo Renovation/Expansion	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	During the COVID-19 pandemic, one of the only recreational opportunities available to the community was access to the City’s municipal zoo at Applegate Park.  Applegate Zoo was heavily visited by families seeking educational and recreational opportunities for home-bound children.  Although temporary measures were put in place to protect residents, it was clear by the regular usage that fixed upgrades would be needed to ensure continued access to the public with future COVID-19 outbreak cycles.  In addition, renovation plans also include the ability to provide online enrichment activities for those community members who are unable to attend in-person.  This project protects access to outdoor activities for youth and parents for years to come.  Guests visiting the zoo are counted and aggregated into monthly and annual reports provided to the City Council.  Utilization of this facility upon completion of the project can be compared to prior years to detail increase use because of this investment.		97000	51577.41								No
TPN-067886	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Community Park #42	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	During the COVID-19 pandemic, many of the school facilities the community relied on for safe, outdoor play were closed.  As a result of closures, the City worked to identify a shovel-ready project that would provide expanded outdoor recreation space to community of South Merced, a disadvantaged community within Census Tract 16.02.  Elements of the planned Community Park-42 include:  six full-sized outdoor soccer/football fields, an outdoor walking track, outdoor sand volleyball courts, outdoor basketball courts, tennis/pickle ball courts and an ADA outdoor Futsal court for modified soccer play.  In addition, recreational spaces for the community include play equipment and picnic structures to ensure families of safe, outdoor spaces to gather.  The Parks & Recreation department will track the use of each space and ensure that access is provided to all sport organizations and community groups seeking to take advantage of this new space.   The City Council has an adopted field use policy that allows for reduced rental rates for those groups providing assisting underserved populations.  Annual reports of rental activity will be provided to the Parks & Recreation Commission to memorialize the success of the new facility going forward.		5000000	349205.92								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	5000000	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-067872	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Downtown Public Space and Street Scape/Flow	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	During the COVID-19 pandemic, several merchants opened sidewalk storefronts to continue to provide goods and services during closures.  In addition to this change in business approach, an outdoor open- air market was established to allow for increase in access to local, small businesses through street closures.  To support future access to local, small businesses, a permanent location was identified, and project establish to create a safe, accessible space in the heart of downtown Merced.  This project includes traffic enhancements to the street to slow down vehicular traffic, and encourage an increase in pedestrian flow, the creation of parklets for outdoor dining and the creation of an open-air common space to be used for outdoor merchants and local, small business activity.		67466.75	24523.49								No
TPN-067489	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Affordable Housing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	During the COVID-19 pandemic, many families within Merced experience an increase in homelessness.  Due to this need the City is looking to invest in the construction of housing projects that expand access. The plan will include collaboration with developers to build projects that create pathways to housing and homeownership for disadvantaged community members.  Funding provided will directly offset the cost of constructing affordable housing at all Average Median Income Levels within approved Census Track areas of the City of Merced, and in compliance with the City’s approved HUD annual Action Plan.  In addition, each identified project will have a locally approved Development Agreement specifying affordability covenants and required tracking mechanisms to span 55 years, recorded against the property.  Progress of construction will be reported quarterly through both ARAP and HUD requirements.		0	0								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	6500000
TPN-067815	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	COVID-19 Paid Sick Leave	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Employees paid sick leave per Covid-19 supplemental paid sick leave law went into effect February 2022 retroactive to January 1, 2022.		75000	75000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-067831	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Stimulus Payments	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.3-Household Assistance: Cash Transfers	In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the City Council has authorized the creation of an essential worker stimulus program.  This one-time payment of $500 will be vetted through an application process.  To be eligible for the payment, each household will need to be at or below 300% of the Federal Poverty Level, live within the City of Merced.  Payments will be processed and tracked by the City’s Finance Department.		770000	770000	1540							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic
TPN-139655	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Parklets/Beautification	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Parkelets/Beautification project will establish new open spaces in the Downtown business areas along Main Street.  These open space projects will provide safe, outdoor public spaces for patrons of local, small business within the City of Merced.		0	0
TPN-139654	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Mainstreet Directional	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Mainstreet Directional Project reduces the traffic flow on Main Street from two lanes to one lane, allowing for an increase in diagonal parking in the Downtown business corridor by over 40%.  This project will aim to increase the flow of customers to the storefronts of local, small businesses.		9829.59	9829.59
TPN-094759	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Expanded Youth Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Measure Y provides funding for the City's public safety, parks, and recreation services.  City Staff plans to collaborate with partner agency programs based on equity, healing, public health, and trauma-informed practices to build safer neighborhoods today, which will pay more profound dividends. In combination with previous Measure Y investments, this area of funding will support a pilot creation of the Office of Neighborhood Safety within the City Manager's Department.  In partnership with the California Board of State Community Corrections and Merced County Probation, four Peer Support Specialists will be hired to provide enhanced mentorship to prevent violent crime within the City's disadvantaged communities.		0	0
TPN-037045	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Employee Payroll Costs	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Personnel to help with virtual meetings, and public safety impacts due to Covid		113384.45	113384.45			175					No
TPN-037053	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Payroll Costs	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Payroll for substantially dedicated employees		203916	203916
TPN-037049	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Unemployment Costs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.9-Unemployment Benefits or Cash Assistance to Unemployed Workers	Unemployment Insurance for temporary personnel let go due to COVID		184	184								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-037056	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Administrative Expenses	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Costs to administer ARPA funding		115937.68	115937.68
TPN-036972	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Vaccination Clinic	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Administered vaccination clinics		4637.62	4637.62								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-037014	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Employee Testing Kits	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Self test kits for employees		1817.95	1817.95								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-037020	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Worksite Mitigation	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	To prevent the spread of the virus in the workplace		7229.03	7229.03								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-037024	RCP-038740	Merced, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Protective Equipment	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	PPE for employees		938.79	938.79								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-158193	RCP-038688	Bell County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Variety of governmental services		950018.68	500000
TPN-039419	RCP-038778	Douglas County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		SLRFR Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue replacement for Governmental Services	8381382	24728	24728
TPN-134759	RCP-038778	Douglas County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Project Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Various Health Related projects -Courthouse HVAC upgrade  - Courthouse & Government Center Drinking Fountain upgrade -Park restroom and shower upgrades -Highway well backup and HVAC upgrade - Broadband infrastructure -Jail Lobby reconfiguration and upgrade.		8306654	1015008
TPN-013282	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Academy Building Remodel	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Building remodel to provide additional space for mental and public health services.		1305000	1301023.84								Yes	Behavioral health facilities and equipment	1300000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-013453	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Staffing	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Additional staffing to address public health and safety needs.		800000	595836.98			*					No
TPN-013325	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Broadband	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	To expand broadband to rural areas.		450000	11564.02					No
TPN-013374	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Water	5-Infrastructure	5.13-Drinking water: Source	County wide water resource study.		350000	170615.22
TPN-013333	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		FCO Building	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Construction of a new community outreach facility.		573622.25	573622.25
TPN-013338	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Cyber Security	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To enhance cyber security in the county.		172023.36	172023.36
TPN-097429	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Transitional Housing	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Housing for those in the community that are in transition.		649576.81	649576.81								Yes	Transitional shelters	1000000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-097430	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Grand Ronde Sanitary District	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	First part of the project is a facilities plan that outline future growth/needs of the community/district. It will also look at assessing existing infrastructure. Second part of the project is fixing everything that is outlined in the facilities plan.		750000	130999.73
TPN-013344	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	HVAC	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other	To upgrade HVAC in buidlings.		488188.87	488188.87								Yes	Other (please specify)	2100000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-072107	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Transfer to Fair	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Transfer to the Fair Fund.		300000	300000
TPN-072113	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Transfer to PW	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Transfer to Public Works Fund.		1100000	1100000
TPN-050507	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Emergency Communication	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To address gaps and upgrade emergency communications throughout the County. This system upgrade enables the County to move to digital communications, improve reception for public safety, fire and emergency response providers.		1551837.74	1551837.74
TPN-050414	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Business Relief	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	To pay restaurant licenses in the county.		98740	98740								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-050489	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Childcare	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	Assist with expanding childcare services in Polk County		381208.93	381208.93								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-106639	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Management Services	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Expenses paid to to the management team for oversight of the fund (employee time, etc.).		243749.97	243749.97
TPN-106707	RCP-038699	Polk County, Oregon	Oregon	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Transfer to Bldg. Improvement Fund	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Transfer to Bldg. Improvement Fund.		250000	250000
TPN-122737	RCP-038707	Polk County, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		selected county offices payroll	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds were used for payroll and regular  benefits in key county offices where retention was difficult. These funds  provided us the opportunity to retain employees with specific skills that may have been looking for employment elsewhere or loss of employment due to cuts.		1970794.77	1970794.77
TPN-044418	RCP-038707	Polk County, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	6.1 Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	purchase of 3 mobile heart monitors, upgrade broadband in county buildings, salary and benefits to essential employees		490302.2	490302.2
TPN-063478	RCP-038704	Quay County, NM	New Mexico	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Quay County Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Premium pay, extra janitorial supplies and equipment provided for employees performing in-person essential governmental services.  Incentive pay for safety sensitive employees and purchase of a vehicle.	515350	354349	354349
TPN-120155	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Vaccine Incentive	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other	Vaccine Incentive for Employees	527454.43	527454.43	527454.43								No
TPN-153514	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Accela	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Accela will be used to facilitate all daily aspects of managing the issuance of permits for all parcels, buildings, land-use, and other development/building activity in the city. Primary users of the system include Building and Safety, Engineering Services, Planning, Public Works, Code Enforcement, Fire, and the general public.	3600000	2939552.42	2596119.29								Yes	Technology and tools	3600000
TPN-153483	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Fontana 311	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The 311 Customer Relationship Management system will help residents, visitors and businesses locate services, information, file forms/complaints, or report problems like graffiti or road damage. This new system will vastly improve our customer’s, visitors, and businesses online experience when interacting with our city.	3150000	954652.59	586652.59								Yes	Technology and tools	3150000
TPN-157452	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Storm/Sewer Masterplan Update	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	The master plan update will assist in the development of a comprehensive plan for the stewardship of the storm drain system to identify and prioritize deficiencies and improvements, cost information, and overall planning and maintenance of the syste	375130	375130	180903
TPN-110646	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Ventilation Upgrade for Public Facilities	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Upgrades to existing HVAC systems at various city facilities.	2500000	2322150	1561612.5								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	2500000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-110648	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Homeless Prevention Resource and Care Center	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	The design and construction of a homeless shelter to serve the homeless population of the City.  The project may include land acquisition, design and construction costs.  Once completed the project will include “wrap around social services”, including but not limited to ; society integration, help to get identification cards, enrollment into social security if applicable, family reconnection, psychological counseling, therapy, jobs training, addiction counseling, educational counseling.	8000000	100	100								Yes	Other (please specify)	3000000
TPN-110649	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Park Improvements	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Various projects to replace infrastructure in city parks.  Most of the project improvements are within “Qualified Census Tracts” or defined disproportionately impacted communities.	4079892	105160	105160								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	4079892	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-110656	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Support Government Employment	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The city will use this funding to hire above the pre pandemic baseline	2245474	2245474	1863694.71								No
TPN-110658	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Septic to Sewer	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	The project entails septic to sewer conversion in disproportionately affected areas of the community.  The project includes public coordination, design, environmental compliance processing, and regulatory permitting for sewer system improvements for the area bounded by Alder, Merrill, Locust, and Randall Avenues.  The work includes expansion of the sewer system including service laterals, septic system abandonments, and related work.	2000000	0	0
TPN-110663	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Masterplan update	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	The city will retain a consultant to map out the entire network of facilities and confirm capacities of each segment of the system in an effort to identify any deficiencies and provide accurate baseline data for ongoing development to ensure our infrastructure is keeping up with the growth of the city.	424870	424870	210457.07
TPN-110665	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) - Sewer	5-Infrastructure	5.18-Water and Sewer: Other	Purchase and installation of a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition  (SCADA) system to monitor the city’s sewer lift/pump station network	0	0	0
TPN-110668	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Fiber to City Facilities	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	This project would run City owned fiber optic cabling to our 6 facilities with leased lines, 1police substation with a leased line, 4 of our larger parks that currently have no connectivity, and 1 police substation that currently has no connectivity. This would help facilitate the use of technology at the locations (Wi-Fi, security cameras, irrigation systems, etc.) and broaden the services that we can offer the public at these locations.	2000000	7041.18	7041.18
TPN-110670	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Data Security and Threat Detection	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Acquire software suite that integrates with the city's servers  to detect, report, and alert on permissions and activity to help detect unauthorized access.   This will increase the reliability of the city's connectivity.  The enhanced security features will provide necessary enhancements for the remote users of the network and the city’s overall network.	250000	157927	157927
TPN-110675	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Network Detection and Response Solution	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	This project will fund a cyber security solution that will proactively monitor the City’s network traffic and server activity and alert on suspicious activity. As the City’s network expands and more services are provided by the network, such as public Wi-Fi, public computer labs, public programming at City facilities, etc., the need to keep a more vigilant watch on network activity increases. This solution includes 24x7x365 monitoring and protection.	154806.29	154806.29	154806.29
TPN-110678	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Cypress Storm Drain Project	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Construct Storm Drain Facility along Foothill Blvd, Juniper Ave, and Cypress Ave which connects to the newly constructed West Fontana Channel along the Metrolink railroad track. The project also includes landscaped median on Foothill Blvd, reconstruction of AC pavement, and ADA compliant sidewalks and curb ramps upgrades. First phase will be on Foothill Blvd between Sierra Ave and Cypress Ave, and on Cypress Ave between Foothill Blvd and Orange Way.	5840000	0	0
TPN-108876	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Fontana Forward Grant Program-Fontana Eats	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	This program is  available to residents negatively impacted by COVID-19 for the creation of a food assistance program to provide direct benefit to eligible households.	3000000	216560	186560	6000							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-108908	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Administrative Expenditure	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	To cover the administrative direct and indirect costs associated with the ARPA program. This includes legal or administrative expenditures to cover implementation  and oversight of the City's  ARPA  Programs (consultants, city staff time)	250000	12046.5	12046.5
TPN-108997	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	This funding will be used to provide premium pay to eligible employees performing essential duties.	1549486	887901	887901		197
TPN-109023	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Metrolink Station Security	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	Installation of cameras at the Fontana Metrolink station.  The city indicates that during the Pandemic there has been an increase in violent crime, including the use of weapons at the Fontana Metrolink station.	60000	60000	60000								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	60000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-097593	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Cancelled	Helicopter Acquirement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	the helicopter purchase was identified as a priority for funding to enable the City to continue to provide valuable public safety air support response services with its existing fleet that are unique to the City as detailed below: • Allows for a more available fleet and readied aircraft while one or more are down for scheduled or unscheduled maintenance.  • The A-Star can fly in windy conditions and eliminate the current loss of approximately 30% of hours due to inclement weather.  • Provides an enhanced public safety response including officer down rescue incidents. • The increased functionality of the A-Star will allow for integrated maps to support in pursuits and tactical situations; recording capabilities to assist in evidence, training, and civil litigations; the ability to fly at higher altitudes to assist in covert surveillances to aid the Narcotics Unit, Fugitive Apprehension Team, and other units in the special operations division.  • Provides air support to the Fire District including fire patrol and real-time tactical assessments in response to the City’s unique and demanding wildlife interface thus improving response times and decreasing loss of property. The helicopter has been an identified capital investment priority and due to the economic impacts of COVID, planning for the project was delayed.	0	0	0								Yes	Other (please specify)	3000000
TPN-111432	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Retention	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	These funds will be used for retention of employees in order to support and retain employees.	250000	250000	77609.28								No
TPN-110681	RCP-036085	Fontana City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Parking Structure	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The proposed project is to be constructed within the existing parking lot of the City’s Human Resources Department Building located at 8491 Sierra Avenue, Fontana, CA 92335, and shall consist of a 4-tier parking structure. Each tier will have a footprint of approximately 130 feet by 230 feet with one vehicle entrance and exit at a location not yet determined. The City anticipates the structure to include 330 - 350 parking spaces and one elevator. The intent of the structure is to serve as both public and employee parking for the civic center campus as well as the planned downtown area which is to be revitalized.	10000000	10000000	169896
TPN-048789	RCP-038686	Cass County, IL	Illinois	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		SLFRP - Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Government Services includes salaries along with Public Safety Equipment.		2359412	1546679.8
TPN-043868	RCP-038798	Roger Mills County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	OPEH&W Covid Surcharge	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	OPEH&W Covid Surcharge (insurance)		89780.76	89780.76
TPN-130152	RCP-038798	Roger Mills County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS		4380	4380
TPN-130166	RCP-038798	Roger Mills County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		TREE TRIM/ REMOVAL	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	TREE TRIMMING AND REMOVAL AT COURTHOUSE		10000	9000
TPN-130161	RCP-038798	Roger Mills County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		WATER HEATER REPLACEMENT	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	WATER HEATER REPLACEMENT IN COURTHOUSE		12424	12424
TPN-130164	RCP-038798	Roger Mills County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		RADIO REPEATER	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	NORTH TOWER RADIO REPEATER		10582	10582
TPN-130149	RCP-038798	Roger Mills County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		HVAC REPLACEMENT	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	REPLACED 26 HVAC UNITS		178124	178124
TPN-130156	RCP-038798	Roger Mills County, OK	Oklahoma	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		CONCRETE WORK	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	CONCRETE WORK AT COURTHOUSE		12500	10400
TPN-044221	RCP-038797	St. Francis County, AR	Arkansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	County Employee Payroll & Benefit Reimbursement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	County Employee Payroll & Benefit expenses incurred from October 2021- April 2023 Excluding all Elected officials	4854791	4854791	4854791
TPN-096655	RCP-038684	Sussex County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Provision for Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	General Government Services including but not limited to Asset Management Program, Site Remediation, Tree Elevation Program, Pay-As-You- Go Capital, etc.  Next quarter will have a large increase in the obligations as we are currently going out to bid for many of the pay-as-you go capital.	7777000	1385027.32	426988.75
TPN-113550	RCP-038684	Sussex County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Vac-Con Sewer Cleaner Vehicle	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	The Sewer Jet will allow the county to Clean basins, unclog and clean pipe runs and hydro-excavation of stormwater basins on County property and along County roadways. The vehicle has been ordered and will take some time for delivery due to supply chain issues.		572317	0
TPN-113568	RCP-038684	Sussex County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	HVAC Replacement/Upgrades	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Replacements of HVAC equipment to the OEM/911 Building, Grand Jury Building, Sheriff's Office and Library to allow for greater airflow and prevent the spread of COVID and other illnesses.		230660	0								Yes	Acquisition of equipment for COVID-19 prevention and treatment	250000
TPN-113577	RCP-038684	Sussex County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Food Pantry Improvements	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	Purchase of Equipment, Supplies and Food for the Food Pantry.  Equipment includes additional Freezers, Refrigerators and Shelving to facilitate the collection and distribution of food to those who suffer from food insecurity.		60000	6975.33	361							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-095758	RCP-038684	Sussex County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Premium Pay	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium Pay to County Employees that performed essential work during the pandemic.	4250000	3990535.69	3990535.69		563
TPN-105372	RCP-038684	Sussex County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Roadway Sweepers	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Purchase of two (2) Roadway Sweepers to assist in the cleaning of the County's 620 lane miles as governed by the Sussex County Highway Agency Pollution Discharge Permit related to the County's Stormwater Management Plan. Vehicles were  ordered as of 12/31/2022.		719621.05	0
TPN-130808	RCP-038684	Sussex County, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Small Business Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Reimbursement of expenses for Small Businesses/Non-profits impacted by COVID up to $15,000 per business/organization.	2000000	776538.75	481059.99								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-068035	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Hybrid Testing & Vaccination (COVID-19 At Home Testing Kits)	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	The funding for the At-Home COVID-19 Testing for the Hybrid Testing and Vaccination Clinic Initiative to address the COVID19 surge in Out-Wayne County of positive cases.	52000	52000	52000								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-068036	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Managing COVID-19 Congregate Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	"Delivering COVID-19 testing to staff, inmates and youth at the Wayne County Jail system."	1000000	1000000	90282.8								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public
TPN-117402	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	City of Detroit Joe Louis Greenway	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Project Description To create a comprehensive recreational path that will connect neighborhoods previously separated by freeways and discontinuous transit via new and existing pedestrian and bike paths, creating a total of 27.5 miles of accessible connected pathways.	20000000	20000000	0								No
TPN-118270	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		City of Taylor Lange Park Action Adventure Park	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Project Description City of Taylor will develop its 33-acre parcel, Lange Park, turning this urban forest into an action-adventure-style park. The addition of items to include pavilions, BMX pump track, slackline course/adventure park, geo climbers, disc golf, footie golf, walking pathways, fitness challenge course, skateboard park, cross country skiing and sled hill to Lange Park to provide a great outdoor/recreation opportunity for Wayne County residents.	2326230	0	0
TPN-118254	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Marygrove Community Association Kentucky Street Lots Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	"Development of three vacant lots on the east side of Kentucky Street for beautification of lots, and sustainable additions such as rainwater collection, flower gardens that incorporate butterfly plants, wildflowers and other native plants for flood prevention and beautification. "	47500	40094.17	40094.17								No			15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-118255	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	City of Lincoln Park Downtown Outdoor Fitness Court	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	"The project will entail the acquisition of a privately-owned vacant lot, as well as the development of the lot, including the construction of 38’ x 38’ concrete slab, and the installation of the fitness court equipment. The fitness area will be used by residents for recreation, sport, and leisure activities."	124865	124865	0								No			15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-118256	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	City of Wayne Goudy Park Amphitheater Pavilion Rehabilitation Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	"The Goudy Park Amphitheater is a staple of Wayne City. The space has hosted numerous music, art, and cultural events. Over the last three decades the amphitheater has exhibited overall deterioration. This renovation will include demolition and removal or concrete features showing signs of deterioration, wall removal, replacement of seating and reshaping of amphitheater, and reroofing and rehinging of the pavilion."	250000	250000	0								No			15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-118272	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Van Buren Township Community Center Project & Senior Center Improvements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project includes the construction of a Community Center in Van Buren Township in addition to necessary upgrades to the existing Senior Center. This project is a partial renovation of existing spaces as well as expansion of the footprint of the current structure to allow for construction of new community spaces.	4500000	420920.1	420920.1
TPN-118261	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		City of Belleville Victory Station	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Project Description Village Park has a brick building called Victory Station which has outdoor and indoor access to rustic bathrooms and an indoor meeting area used by residents for small gatherings. Victory station will receive a complete restroom restoration, new flooring, painting, heating and cool system and more.	176800	0	0
TPN-118271	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	City of Trenton Demolition of Riverside Hospital	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project is described as the demolition of Riverside Hospital, the structure at the property of 2205 Riverside and 2171 W. Jefferson, Trenton, MI 48183, to create new opportunities for such land redevelopment.	1500000	231772.47	231772.47
TPN-118267	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	City of Ecorse Mill Street Redevelopment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Currently, Mill Street requires substantial work in order for the land to be developed. However, this project will prepare 67-acre Mill Street site to be able to market the site for new developments. Project includes costly above ground environmental remediation, which will substantially aid future development of the land.	3500000	1259769.32	1259769.32
TPN-118248	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	SEMCA Workforce Development	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Tiered program where partner organization will administer various programs to assist households currently facing unemployment or underemployment by providing tailored wraparound and training services to allow residents to access higher quality careers. The program objective is to help rebuild Wayne County's workforce and help residents who were negatively impacted economically by the Covid-19 pandemic through workforce training and development.	50000000	50000000	3000000								No			3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment			No	0
TPN-118269	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		City of Northville Daylighting the Rouge River Park	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project includes daylighting the Rouge River Park which entails restoring 1200 lineal feet of the Middle Rouge River that was enclosed under the Northville Downs Racetrack property in the 1960’s. Approximately 12 acres of land surrounding this section of the river will be converted into public parkland and provide connections to Hines Park and Johnson Creek.	2500000	0	0
TPN-118263	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Industry Clubs with Boys & Girls Club of Southeastern Michigan	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Open an Industry Club location in Detroit which acts as a youth workforce development and training center as well as a social incubator and accelerator for this demographic of youth over the age of 14. Industry Club will focus on youth entrepreneurial development in entertainment, fashion, design, data science, risk management and sports.	500000	0	0
TPN-118268	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Motown Museum Expansion Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project will work on the expansion of the Motown Museum, a non-profit, one of Detroit’s and Wayne Counties greatest public attractions. The Wayne County ARPA funding request will specifically go toward supporting the expansion of the museum campus’s footprint with the construction of a new building for museum purposes.	2500000	0	0
TPN-118265	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		City of Dearborn Parks Equity and Access for Citizen Engagement (PEACE) Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project will focus on ensuring equity in access to parks and recreation for lower-income residents. Specific improvements include caisson abandonment, broadband WiFi access for 9 parks, solar panel installation, improvements to Dearborn Hills Golf Course, land acquisition for creation of parks, land for existing parks, tree work and stormwater study, South End park funding, splash and installation.	9619765	0	0
TPN-150878	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Kessey Fieldhouse Improvements and Boat Launch	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Melvindale proposed project is to rehabilitate the existing Kessey Fieldhouse facility through capital improvements including the roof, parking lot, indoor-turfs, interior hall, concession, offices and the adjacent boat launch.	2000000	2000000	2000000
TPN-150950	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Garden City Community Center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	After renovation and expansion of the 60-year-old former Schoolcraft College facility is completed, the Radcliff Center will become the much-needed Garden City community center. The Center will host all types of new programming and community activities for people of all ages, abilities, and income levels from throughout the region. Unfortunately, there are numerous issues that require major investment, including the construction of a secured entrance, full-sized athletic gym, replacement of the HVAC systems and roof, ADA compliant restrooms, and development of specialty rooms.	4000000	4000000	4000000
TPN-150919	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Centennial Community Plaza	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of River Rouge seeks to add a plaza centrally-located in the City’s downtown. The addition of a plaza would catalyze further development of an urban downtown area by creating a space for everyone to gather, relax, and play. River Rouge, a city of over 7,000 residents, have suffered from disinvestment and systemic challenges associated with deindustrialization. Plaza concept includes archway to distinguish identity and create congregation area.	275000	275000	275000
TPN-150890	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Cherry Hill Village Renewal	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Canton’s Town Square is at the heart of the Cherry Hill Village District project. This space will be reconfigured and outfitted to support a variety of outdoor activities and events. Along with the recreational cultural programming, Canton’s Town Square will be a destination and gathering place for area residents and visitors alike, featuring green areas, natural attractions and historic sites.	4750000	4750000	4750000
TPN-150832	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Southgate Tower Park & Pedestrian Bridge	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The park will include a pedestrian bridge spanning Trenton Rd, tennis/pickle ball courts, a walking path, putting greens, pavilions, an outdoor fitness circuit, and a beautiful landscape design. The City of Southgate is also partnering with the land owner and developer to renovate the existing Southgate Tower 14-story building to create 213 new residential units.	5000000	5000000	5000000
TPN-150908	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Huron Charter Township Downtown Development Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This project aims to completely redevelop downtown New Boston. The downtown streets will be resurfaced, bike lanes will be added connecting to the Metropark, new lighting and landscaping installed, utilities will be buried and a small park overlooking the Huron River will be constructed. The final phase of this project will connect the downtown to a small, new, riverside park, thereby enhancing the walkability of downtown.	275000	275000	275000
TPN-150935	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Blighted Property Demolition Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Wayne County Land Bank plans to use funds to remove dangerous and blighted properties and structures from Wayne County communities, to assist the County in remediating the negative impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic. The Covid-19 pandemic increased the number of structures that have been in decline and now pose a dangerous and monetary threat to neighboring homes. WCLB will oversee the demolition and cleanup of each site.	7498625	7498625	7498625
TPN-150924	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		North Branch of Ecorse Creek Drain Maintenance Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The project entails professional services for drain maintenance and to help facilitate a larger drain project when that becomes feasible. The maintenance project will manage stormwater by maintaining the drain’s ability to convey flow. Anticipated maintenance activities include but are not limited to: tree clearing, open channel cleanout, obstruction removal, drain crossing cleaning, and bank erosion stabilization.	10000000	10000000	10000000
TPN-150867	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Downtown Wyandotte Capital Improvements and Infrastructure Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Downtown Development Authority (DDA) is pursuing a long-term capital improvements plan and downtown infrastructure plan that will reconstruct all its primary alleyways and parking lots which are in a significant state of disrepair. The project will construct an interconnected network of greenways and thoroughfares. The project will beautify and activate the alleyways and parking lots, public spaces, pocket parks throughout the community.	3950000	3950000	3950000
TPN-109750	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Airtable License	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Licensing access to Airtable which is used to track SLFRF projects. The system created in Airtable creates a single source of information so all Wayne County Departments can see the current status of SLFRF projects and have access to any collected information regarding that project.	34272	34272	34272
TPN-024161	RCP-035873	Wayne County, Michigan	Michigan	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Guidehouse Contract	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	To ensure proper federal reporting for ARPA funds.	4000000	4000000	2594527.81
TPN-055032	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Dept. Corrections PPE	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Operating within the jail requires the use and purchase of PPE items, such as masks, gloves, gown, washable uniforms.  The level of PPE needed is predicated by the tier system of outbreak status. Replacing dry clean-only uniforms with updated washable uniforms are especially important in the correctional setting, where the highest risk workers take their uniforms home. There is a possibility they could be leaving traces of the virus in their homes and other places throughout the work environment.	866025	178139.4	178139.4								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-055042	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Sheriff's Office Community Engagement Program	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	Consistent with the Final Rule, the County is taking comprehensive approaches to increased violence resulting from the COVID-19 public health crisis.  It is imperative that law enforcement agencies seek and create opportunities in the community for positive, non- law enforcement interactions with community members. This is particularly important in the youth and senior communities where it is critical that a level of trust and understanding exists between members of these groups and law enforcement officers.  This project is to implement a community engagement program focused on increasing and improving law enforcement interaction with youth and senior citizens. Proposal meets the criteria in the SLFRF Final Rule under “Preventing and Responding to Violence”.  Program costs will include the creation of a temporary (through the period of performance) full-time Deputy under special assignment as a Community Engagement Officer to this program, vehicle, training and incidental costs. Capital costs include purchase of vehicle to be used by Comm. Engagement Deputy.	815822	128058.7	128058.7								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	52038	1 Imp General Public			Yes	815822
TPN-055065	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	County Attorney - Temp. Staff	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	During the COVID-19 public health emergency, many courts were unable to to operate safely during the pandemic and, as a result,  now face significant backlogs.  NH courts, like most, suspended in person activities and now continue to experience periodic disruptions, such as jury trial suspensions.  These disruptions continue to compound the original backlog.  Project includes hiring four (4) temporary additional Assistant County Attorneys and two (2) temporary Legal Secretaries to reduce the backlog of court cases that occurred due to the pandemic.  The positions would be filled until the case backlog due to the pandemic is addressed or through the period of performance (December 31, 2026), whichever occurs first, as indicated through periodic assessments of need.	3413358	387768.16	387768.16								No
TPN-054702	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Dept. Corrections COVID-19 Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	The Hillsborough County Correctional Facility utilizes both polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and rapid tests to mitigate and contain COVID-19 outbreaks within the facility.  Project costs cover both PCR and Rapid test kits for inmates and staff, per state and CDC guidelines. SLFRF funds enable the County to ensure adequate supplies are on hand.	633336	88887.37	88887.37								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-054990	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Sheriff's Office Transport Vehicles	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office provides a variety of law enforcement services throughout the county. These services include prisoner transportation and the arrest of wanted individuals or those that commit crimes in the presence of a deputy. HCSO personnel regularly respond to assist local and state agencies with dangerous situations to include active shooter scenes. Additionally, the agency is often called upon to assist with large community events, which can include large scale sporting events, vaccination sites, concerts, fairs, etc.  They are a critical partner in many local and municipal emergency management plans.  Deputies regularly execute search and arrest warrants involving dangerous criminals.  The COVID pandemic highlighted the health, safety and logistical challenges of transporting incarcerated or arrested individuals that have a high likelihood of having been exposed to COVID or other communicable diseases and viruses. It is imperative that these individuals be separated from other incarcerated individuals being transported or from individuals that have been arrested.  This separation is critical for deputy safety as well as for the safety of the incarcerated individuals being transported. Project includes the purchase of two (2) cruisers and one (1) transport van specifically outfitted for the safe transport of individuals with COVID or other easily transmittable viruses. Purchase one (1) Incident Response Vehicle (SUV or pick-up) outfitted with appropriate storage drawers, shelves and lockers to store pandemic and crime scene response and evidence collection equipment, personal protective equipment and ballistic shields.	290402	281446.85	281446.85								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	232402	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-054935	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Nursing Home Mobile Device Tech	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	COVID-19 mitigation strategies require the implementation of mobile video telecommunication options to allow residents and family members to communicate regardless of COVID-19 status.   One measure that was implemented to achieve compliance with this requirement was the purchase of five (5) cellular phones with phone service plans.  These phones are utilized for both telehealth and family visits.	11100	5321.4	5321.4								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-054769	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Nursing Home HVAC Improvements	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	To make necessary heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) improvements at the nursing home facility to improve air quality, while mitigating the risk of airborne pathogen transmission.	10000000	382000	106302.8					No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Installation and improvement of ventilation systems	12500000	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-055017	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff's Office Uniforms	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	The COVID pandemic highlighted the need for the HCSO's emergency personnel to have wash and wear uniforms. During the early stages of the pandemic it became clear that traditional uniforms that need to be dry cleaned are not practical when faced with operating in a pandemic environment. In addition to providing safe clothing when operating in a pandemic environment this project has an additional benefit of providing safe, easily cleaned uniforms for personnel to change into when they have been exposed to other potentially hazardous environments (meth labs, communicable disease situations, biohazards, etc.).  Sworn and dispatch personnel are available 24/7 and need to have access to clean, safe uniforms to wear.  Dispatch personnel work in close quarters and it became necessary that their uniforms be washed in between shifts. It is not practical to rely on dry cleaning services for everyday uniform cleanliness. Dry cleaning is extremely expensive and is subject to time delay is cleaning. Traditional uniforms are very expensive and the COVID pandemic has served to highlight the fact that the traditional uniform should really be used for formal and ceremonial affairs.	60110	59933.39	59933.39								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-132125	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Nursing Home COVID Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	This program provides funding for required testing for COVID testing for employees, residents, visitors and vendors that is not reimbursed through other funding sources. Testing Expenses include specimen collection materials, testing supplies, Personal Protective Equipment, Specimen storage equipment, Record Keeping and Reporting supplies, and biohazard waste management.	1500000	4118.26	4118.26								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-115643	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Non-Profit Negative Economic Impact Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Community support directed to non-profits that experienced a direct negative impact from the COVID-19 public health emergency.	10111075	10110805	10110805								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-115605	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Non-Profit Health Mitigation Support	1-Public Health	1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits	Community support directed to non-profit entities that experienced a negative health impact due to COVID-19.	2308569	2306778.42	943091.97								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	2304410	1 Imp General Public
TPN-116315	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Registry of Deeds - Book Preservation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Under the Provision of Government Services, the County is undertaking preservation of approximately 663 original deed records books, and an additional 35 records books. The Registry of Deeds is the keeper of hundreds of thousands of original property records, including deeds and plans.  These records date back to the 1700’s. The original pages and book bindings are subject to deterioration, fading and damage. The preservation process includes creating an informational log for each volume; dismantling the bindings; surface dry cleaning of all paper; mend/reinforce as needed; trim/flatten by hand; de-acidification; re-sew/rebind; title stamping; and prepare a treatment report.  The work will be conducted in accordance with generally accepted standards of conservation and restoration practices.	1944620	1944620	1064000
TPN-116746	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Sheriff's Office First Responder Mental Health & Wellness Program	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	HCSO personnel have been on the front-line of the COVID-19 pandemic and there is a considerable level of additional stress borne by our first responders. The pandemic has really highlighted the need to have mental health and resources available to personnel. HCSO personnel regularly respond to stressful, troubling and gruesome incidents and crime scenes. It is critically important to support HCSO employees and offer them support and check in services that are specifically tailored to the first responder.	20000	1084.91	1084.91								No
TPN-116747	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Nursing Home Transport Vehicles	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	HC will replace two patient transport vehicles nearing end of useful life; both passenger vans will be equipped with a wheel chair lift.  Project is carried out as a provision of government services.	200000	186680	186680
TPN-136448	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Nursing Home Mitigation & Infection Control	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Mitigation & prevention at the County Nursing Home through the use of UV air filters, sanitization materials, purchase of items to reduce cross contamination (such as stainless steel food carts), room air purifiers, and more.	300000	24528.72	24528.72								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-133341	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Sheriff's Office Emergency Communications Infrastructure	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	To improve the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office emergency communications system and equipment. The current emergency communication radio system is obsolete and in need of upgrade and replacement. Addressing the needed radio system upgrades and replacement will strengthen the community-based infrastructure and enhance public safety for residents throughout Hillsborough County.	3385442	4232	4232								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	3385442	1 Imp General Public
TPN-133435	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		County Complex Vehicles & Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of a tractor, pick-up and plow for use in maintaining County complex grounds (lawn mowing, snow removal, hauling, etc).	109000	97040	97040
TPN-133420	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		County Pole Barn Roof	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacement of roof on historic pole barn, situated on County complex in Goffstown. Maintenance and preservation of this building is the County's responsibility.	76238	76238	76238
TPN-133325	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Nursing Home PPE & Medical Supplies	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	This project provides funding for required Personal Protective Equipment necessary for mitigating the risk of COVID-19 transmission in the long term care setting.	1500000	15039.01	15039.01								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-133308	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Hillsborough County Main Campus Modifications	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Improvements to the Bouchard and Administration buildings to mitigate and contain the spread of COVID-19 through social distancing, ventilation and air quality enhancements, and expanded use of existing facilities.	5484720	6800.39	6800.39								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	5484720	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-136271	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	DOC Airborne Mitigation & Containment	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	The HCDC is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy recommended by the CDC to help reduce the risk of airborne infectious aerosol exposure through  multiple mitigation strategies, including improvements to building ventilation.	208775	197818.12	197818.12								Yes	Adaptations to congregate living facilities	208775	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-099844	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Sheriff's Office Remote Learning	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	Project includes purchase of equipment, videos and online law enforcement training resources that will facilitate virtual learning and law enforcement training.	57000	7662.96	7662.96								No
TPN-099848	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff's Office Trauma Kits	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	This project provides individual trauma kits to each deputy. Additionally, HCSO will be able to have several advanced trauma kits available for deployment at involved critical incident scenes, crime scene/incident response vehicle, command post and the cell blocks where we provided security and custody and control functions. The funding would also allow HCSO to provide basic life-saving/trauma treatment training for individual deputies as well as allow us to send a couple of deputies to advanced train the trainer type sessions.	9000	8998	8998								No
TPN-099836	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	DOC Inmate Mental Health	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Universally, correctional facilities are seeing the stressors associated with Covid-19 restrictions exacerbate mental health issues that disproportionately impact incarcerated people. This project is directly linked to addressing Inmate mental health impacts due Covid-19.  Project includes improving access to physical fitness to improve mental health through installation of exercise equipment.	265530	265527.2	265527.2								Yes	Behavioral health facilities and equipment	265530	7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic			No	0
TPN-002941	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Premium Pay - Hillsborough County employees	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	Premium Pay to eligible Hillsborough County (recipient government) employees, including Nursing Home staff, Sheriff's Office, Department of Corrections, and other office personnel.  Additional funding for FY23 approved. See additional narrative for full details.	12317778	5971167.2	5971167.2		627
TPN-002946	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA Program Administration	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Direct administrative costs to carry out the ARPA Program.  Costs include salary and related payroll costs for a limited-term position (ARPA Program Manager), office supplies, printing, mileage, etc.	872000	224937	224937
TPN-002957	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Mitigation & Prevention - Hillsborough County Depts.	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Mitigation and prevention of the spread of COVID-19 within County Departments.  Costs may include cleaning supplies, PPE, decontamination equipment and services, air filters, UV filters and other system modifications (not to include new systems).	20940	3761.87	3761.87								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-107990	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Sheriff's Office Community Violence Intervention (focused patrols)	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	To address the prevalence of violent crime in communities throughout Hillsborough County, funds will be used for focused deterrence efforts to mitigate violent crime in specific targeted areas.	276522	41731.91	41731.91								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	109600	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-107818	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	DOC Sanitization & Infectious Disease Source Controls	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Mitigation strategies, to include touchless fixtures, sanitization supplies, replacement of bacteria-prone surfaces.	212667	32224.48	32224.48								Yes	Adaptations to congregate living facilities	139237	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-107827	RCP-038700	Hillsborough County, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	DOC Prevention Through Physical Distancing	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Mitigation strategies related to physical distancing for the Department of Corrections; project includes rental and increased operating fees for the Academy, critical repair of existing elevators in the jail, and separation of booking holding cell area.	995000	695322.94	356152.94								Yes	Adaptations to congregate living facilities	955000	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-077547	RCP-038729	Mcpherson County, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Consulting Costs	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Eide Bailey consulting fee to interpret Treasury guidance and advise the county.		2000	2000
TPN-077983	RCP-038729	Mcpherson County, SD	South Dakota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Payroll for Traditional Government Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Payroll expenses for providing traditional government services		460093	460093
TPN-137483	RCP-038734	Weakley County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue Replacement was used for COVID mitigation, preparedness, and governmental services. Governmental services with expenses include PPE, Congregate Living Prevention, Medical Expenses, Communications, Education, Non-Profit support, Tourism support, Job Training Assistance, Impacted Community support, and Premium Pay for Essential public sector employees.		6473573	6473573
TPN-065831	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Fairgrounds Audio Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Expenses are for an upgrade to the speaker system at the county-owned fairgrounds for safety and functionality for patrons.  Currently patrons are unable to hear if a storm warning has been issued and unable to hear events being held within certain buildings.  This is intended to enhance the experience of those attending the fair or events had at the fairgrounds.  Output has been measured by attendees and testing of the new system.		11664.75	11664.75
TPN-065901	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Election Machine Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The County is replacing 30 election machines for use within the individual voting municipalities within the County.  This will benefit all of the voting population with electronic ballot counting, and an increased ease of use for all persons. Data will be measured with staffing time savings and individual municipal clerk feed-back.		225000	218123
TPN-065869	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Trails End Camp - Nature Trail Upgrades	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The County is upgrading and expanding the hiking trail and installing a new boardwalk and signage at a county-owned campground for public use.  This campground has capital upgrade needs and will enhance safety and increase the ease of use for all those accessing the camp.  Output is measured by finished product safety and review by the individual oversight committee.		13200	1594.27
TPN-065815	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Master Plan Facilities Study	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Master planning study for general courthouse and highway department for facility renovation needs and developing organizational efficiencies to better meet public services.  Key outcomes are increased efficiencies for public entering the facilities and to increase space in outdated buildings for highway staff.		40000	33139.69
TPN-065065	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Wage & Staffing Study	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Development of new compensation plan to attract and retain staffing in addition to an organizational analysis on staffing.		50000	48397.33
TPN-137566	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Concrete in Fairgrounds Multipurpose Building	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cost is to prepare and pour concrete in the existing multipurpose building located at the fairgrounds to be utilized by fairgrounds users.		60000	0
TPN-137529	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Trails End Camp Log Pavilion	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cost is for construction of a log pavilion at Trails End Camp to be utilized the the users of Trails End Camp.		55000	0
TPN-137541	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Server Room Upgrades	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Project involves replacing the existing post units and rewiring the server AC units that serve the County's server system.		10000	3831.86
TPN-137467	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Courtroom 1 Sound System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Upgrading the sound system in the courtroom to better allow for virtual access to court sessions.  Key outcomes revolve around fewer people attending court sessions in person.		81586.07	81586.07
TPN-137493	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		2 Servers for IT Department	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of 2 new servers for the Information Technology Department to utilize for County business.		232382.4	0
TPN-137488	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Land Conservation/Information GPS Unit	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchased new GPS unit for the Land Conservation/Information department to replace an outdated unit.		13000	13000
TPN-137559	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Reroute Fairgrounds Electrical System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cost is to upgrade existing electrical system at the fairgrounds to provide more reliable electrical service for the users of the fairgrounds.		5000	0
TPN-137498	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Results, Tally, Reporting Election Kit	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of Results, Tally, Reporting kit for election administration.  The kit includes a workstation, computer, software and license for the software.		15000	0
TPN-137512	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Courtroom 2 Wiring Upgrades for DAR System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cost is for upgrading wiring in Courtroom 2 to install the Digital Audio Recording (DAR) system provided by the state.		4218	3828.98
TPN-137482	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Ariel Topography & Air Web Base	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of additional layers for Ariel Topography & Air Web Base for Land Conservation/Information.		66693.75	0
TPN-137554	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Exterior Work on Log Building at Fairgrounds	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cost is for performing exterior work on the existing log building at the fairgrounds to preserve the building for use by users of the fairgrounds.		15000	0
TPN-137561	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Fairgrounds Grandstand Rehabilitation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cost is for rehabilitating the existing grandstands at the fairgrounds to be utilized for various events at the fairgrounds.		290000	0
TPN-137535	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		IP Camera Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Project involves upgrading the existing Government Center cameras and adding additional cameras as funding permits.		120000	0
TPN-137571	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Additional Courtroom 2 Upgrades	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cost is for upgrading the video/audio system in Courtroom 2 to allow for better virtual access for staff and court participants.		63421.54	0
TPN-137501	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Sheriff's Department South Tower Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Costs include moving the communications tower from Sheldon to the Enbridge tower plus licensing fee.		20000	0
TPN-137547	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Cybersecurity Vulnerability Assessment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cost is for performing a cybersecurity assessment/audit to help mitigate the risk of being the victims of a cyber attack.		18000	0
TPN-137550	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		IT Disaster Recovery Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cost is for 3 years of offsite backups for the County's computer system.		95000	0
TPN-137553	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		State Approved Plans for Bathrooms at Fairgrounds	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cost is for obtaining State approved plans for building a new restroom/shower house building at the fairgrounds to be utilized by users of the fairgrounds.		8000	300
TPN-137463	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Courthouse Water Fountain Upgrades	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of water fountains with water bottle fill stations for each floor of the government center (3 fountains purchased).		8730	8730
TPN-137515	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Maintenance Truck with Plow	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of new truck with a plow to be used by the maintenance department for maintenance and plowing activities.		58000	57859.7
TPN-137520	RCP-038803	Rusk County, WI	Wisconsin	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Register of Deeds Back Scanning Project	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Costs are for hiring a vendor to create digital copies of historical records and index them into the current Register of Deeds digital archives.		44815.11	0
TPN-067751	RCP-038694	Jefferson County, NE	Nebraska	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Revenue replacement #1 to #10	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Mental, emotional, social and physical health services - #1 & #4; Professional fees for administration of ARPA with Lutz #3; premium pay governmental #2; load assist for ambulances #5, #6 community foundation - school supplies; #7 mental, emotional, social and physical support programs/services; #8 communications countywide radio system; #9 public/private partnership for broadband expansion; #10 support for needed supplies to BVCA FYI Center - emotional, social programs/services		993497.06	993497.06
TPN-078172	RCP-038780	Wheeler County, OR	Oregon	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Wheeler County Last Mile Broadband Project	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	The following is a description of the ongoing broadband expansion project in Wheeler County. SLFRP funds have been dedicated to this project. Goal = 90 – 100% access to broadband services with speeds equaling or exceeding 25mbps, 100mbps being the target speed wherever possible  Completed • Fiber run into all three incorporated cities = access for approx. 49.9% of widely dispersed population. Increased speeds from “best effort” 5mbps wireless to 100mbps fiber.  • 5 Solar-Powered Broadband Repeater Trailers  (SBRT) built out and deployed = access for estimated addtl. 7 - 10% of rural pop. Speeds increased from “best effort” 5mbps to 25 – 50mbps In progress • Deployment of another completed SBRT unit. Note: Waiting for weather to permit access to deployment site after experiencing significant delays associated with procurement of components. • Installation of short fiber line running from ODF office outside of Fossil to Kinzua Lane community • Design of smaller repeater units to cost effectively provide connectivity to one or two households per unit Note: Many remote ranches are located up isolated canyons with no line of site locations to communications towers from which other dwellings can also be seen, necessitating a smaller, less costly, model as compared to SBRTs. Planned/Needed • 6 additional SBRTs to serve unincorporated areas with significant residential uses. The areas targeted for this deployment are: South of Fossil along HWY 218 and connecting county roads; the Winlock area; the area east of Spray along HWY 19-207 and the John Day River; Service Creek community; Kahler Basin community; area west of Mitchell along HWY 26. • Approx. 1 mile of fiber constructed connecting Kinzua Golf Course, RV Park and the only Rural Residential zone in Wheeler County   • A small fiber island to connect the residents and businesses in the unincorporated Service Creek & Alder Creek communities using a high capacity wireless backhaul link   • Approx. 4 miles of fiber constructed east of Spray connecting this portion of the county to the existing fiber serving Spray and facilitating the use of SBRT for residences further east.   POCs: Judge Lynn Morley – lmorley@co.wheeler.or.us  Commissioner Shaffer – rshaffer@co.wheeler.or.us  Matt Davis, Planning & Econ. Dev. – mdavis@co.wheeler.or.us	258725	59845.77	59845.77
TPN-160135	RCP-038737	Cook County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Public Sector Worker Retention Incentive	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Public Sector worker incentive pay to retain public sector employees who have been working through the pandemic.	62572.25	62572.25	62572.25
TPN-160072	RCP-038737	Cook County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Public Health Pandemic Response Staffing	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Staff 2 full time Public Health Educators who maintain training and coverage for contact tracing, support outreach and registration for vaccination, expand availability of surveillance testing and document lessons learned during the pandemic related to communications, contract tracing , mass vaccination, and partnerships.	116000	58297.79	58297.79
TPN-083532	RCP-038737	Cook County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		PPE & COVID Prevention supplies	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To mitigate and mediate the spread of COVID-19 through providing PPE and informing the residents of our county of the status of the pandemic and current safety protocol.		2387.6	2387.6
TPN-157769	RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Broadband - symmetrical bandwith connectivity	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Overall Project Information The County of Hawaii Research & Development and Department of Information Technology are partnering to deploy symmetrical bandwidth connectivity that exceeds 100Mbps download and upload for all projects detailed.  As a requirement for all connectivity projects, service providers are being required to participate in the Federal Communications Commission Affordable Connectivity Program.		991089.58	0
TPN-025978	RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Vehicle Registration and Licensing Backlog	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Overtime to process the increase in vehicle registration received via USPS and drop box due to the discontinuation of in-person registration renewals during the pandemic and the requirement of appointments for all other transactions.  Pre-pandemic, one location received between an average of 5-10 transactions per day via drop box with an average turn-around time of one day.  Now in the pandemic, they receive an average of 40 transactions per day with an average turn-around time of 4-6 weeks.  USPS mail varies depending on the time of the month but one location has received as much as 200 pieces of mail daily.   Overtime also needed to renew expiring and expired driver’s licenses.  Due to the pandemic, offices were periodically closed or short staffed either due to exposure by employees or official proclamations that closed offices countywide, which resulted in backlogs of licenses throughout most of the pandemic.  As of 1/1/22, the number of active licenses that were expired or expiring totaled 33,306.		15897	15897			30					No
TPN-026581	RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Civil Defense Contract Hires	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Contract employees hired specifically in response to the COVID pandemic.  Duties include: staffing the Civil Defense COVID-19 call center to maintain situational awareness of the evolving situation, polices, and events to provide accurate information to individuals calling the COVID-19 information line and staffing the Civil Defense warehouse of COVID supplies.		10783.44	10783.44			*					No
TPN-099599	RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Civil Defense Civil Service Staff	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Overtime pay and other pay related extras as necessitated by Bargaining Unit Agreements and/or County pay policies for County Employees in performance of duties related to the County's response to the Covid 19 pandemic.		31156.4	31156.4			9					No
TPN-087065	RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Fire Shift OT	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	The County of Hawaii Fire Department incurred overtime costs for its firefighters that were required to work overtime to replace entire shifts due to members being unable to work due to either infected with COVID or being quarantined and/or isolated due to their contact with an infected individual in accordance with State of Hawaii Department of Health guidelines.		36437.03	36437.03			306					No
TPN-087128	RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Countywide PPE	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	Personal Protective Equipment is needed on a Countywide basis in order to minimize the spread of the virus .		34535.02	34535.02								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-021918	RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Community Recreational Activities	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	In response to the pandemic, the County undertook efforts to ensure proper sanitization and social distancing in regards to County sponsored/owned community recreational activities, including contracted employees (2 FTEs at 12/31/21) and additional transportation services.		57918.41	57918.41								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-008004	RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	COVID Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	Testing will be provided throughout the County at various degrees during the pandemic in response to periods of rising case counts and demand from the community.  The County plans to contract third party vendors to provide the testing services but may also incur costs related to employee payroll and fringe costs to support the operations. Anticipated County staffing will vary throughout the period of performance from day to day and will range from 0 to 10 FTEs.  Testing at the airports throughout the County was the first to be implemented with approximately 100,000 tourists arriving in the month of May 2021 on an island of approximately 200,000 residents.		1072650	1072650								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-100411	RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Early Childhood Resource Coordination	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	Support the development and implementation of an early childhood strategy framework and action roadmap that lays the foundation for and informs the establishment of a coordinated system of early childhood services in the County of Hawai`i.		119078.18	119078.18								No			7 Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a negative economic	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-098193	RCP-035926	Hawaii County, Hawaii	Hawaii	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Feed the Community	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	Address the food insecurity for community members, including children, who qualify for other federal food programs and thus, are eligible for SLFRF funded programs that are identified by the US Department of Treasury's Final Rule for SLFRF.		1110000	1050000	1500							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-057862	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Mini Ward Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	These funds are being used to make available mini-grants within the different wards of the city.	180000	21000	21000								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-096877	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Covid Isolation	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	The funds will be used for Covid Isolation	400000	253424.96	253424.96								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-096879	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Healthcare Management Services	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	These funds are being used for Healthcare Management Services	1000000	800000	800000								No
TPN-005904	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Summer Youth Employment Programming	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	These funds will be used to pay for a summer youth program	756662	756661.77	756661.77								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-060212	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government		Revenue Losses & Espenses Due to Covid & Impacted City Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	These funds will be used to cover revenue losses experienced by the City due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The revenue streams impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic were special taxes, hotel taxes, payroll taxes, motor vehicle rental taxes, property taxes, court fees, water and sewer fees, etc. The expenses the City incurred are related to the closure of city services, Covid-19 testing of residents, employee hazardous pay, and reporting compliance associated with Covid stimulus funding, amoung others.	93245000	93245000	93245000
TPN-113688	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Safe Summer	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	Funds to be used for summer youth programs such through the City’s Recreational Centers providing activities to keep children off the streets	500000	451337.92	451337.92								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-113685	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Homelessness Prevention	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Funds will be used to cover the costs associated with City-wide Homelessness, including, but not limited to, homeless shelter operations, development of additional container homes, supportive services, mental health services, bed nights, etc	8000000	2711943.54	2711943.54								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-113686	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Invest Newark	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Funds will be use to rehabilitate dilapidated buildings to convert them to affordable housing, as well as renovations of abandoned properties to make available to families in the City’s Rent-to-Own program through Section 8	3000000	2600000	2600000								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-113687	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Public Access Upgrades	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Funds to be used to provide affordable internet access to Newark residents	1448000	1436547.18	1436547.18								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-124811	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Auditing and Compliance	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	These funds will be used to pay for accounting and audit fees associated with the administration of and compliance with ARP funds	100000	4166.66	4166.66
TPN-124814	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Newark Academy Scholarship	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other	The project is to enhance the Newark Police Division's efforts to have more Newark residents apply to become police officers.	200000	11595	11595								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	No	0
TPN-124812	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Arts Catalyst	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	These funds will be used for the support of the City's Creative Catalyst Fund, which provides artists and cultural groups	750000	750000	750000								No			1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	1 Imp General Public	No	0
TPN-005823	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Auditing and Compliance	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	These funds will be used to pay for accounting and audit fees associated with the administration of and compliance with ARP funds	600000	296241.67	296241.67
TPN-005827	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Broadband and internet upgrades	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	These funds will be used to cover City-wide free broadband service	354840	163143.79	163143.79
TPN-005830	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Covid 19 Preventative Measures	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	These funds will be used to cover City-wide vaccine administration and any other cost associated with Covid-19 preventative measures. Vaccine incentive	1857000	414524.94	414524.94								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-005832	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Universal Basic Income	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.3-Household Assistance: Cash Transfers	These funds will be used to cover funding to support the City's Plan for Universal Basic Income for residents	3800000	3375000	3375000	430							No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-005833	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Parks and Recreation Upgrades	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	These funds will be used to cover upgrades to City Parks and Recreation, such as rehabilitation of recreational facilities, upgrades to the parks; better access, programming and security at the City's Watershed; and improved recreational services delivery and services, among others.	1750000	1348995.93	1348995.93								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-005846	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Small Business Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	These funds will be used to cover small business assistance within the City, to include, but not limited to Small Business Loans, etc.	3000000	1959890.04	1959890.04								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-005847	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Workforce/Micro-Enterprise Development	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	These funds will be used to cover workforce development for ex-offenders who are City residents and micro-enterprise development for small City-owned businesses. The services provided by the ex-offenders and micro-enterprises will be focused to directly on maintaining a safer and cleaner Newark.	1988910	1988909.29	1988909.29								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-005854	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Invest Newark	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	These funds will be used to offset revenue losses to the City's Motor Vehicle Tax Fund, which is used to fund Invest Newark Operations. These revenue losses were a direct result of the Covid-19 pandemic.	3300000	3300000	3300000								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-005848	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Access Upgrades	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	These funds will be used to cover upgrades to technology and public facilities that will increase community access and allow for more and better remote access to City services.	2077021	1900625	1900625								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-005850	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	City Cleanliness and Economic Stimulus	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	These funds will be used for City-wide blight abatement, lot clean-up, and demolition of hazardous buildings; as well as, development of structures to increase resident access and stimulate the local economy, amount others, and gift cards.	1981000	1774105	1774105								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-005852	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Greater Newark Visitor's Bureau/SIDs and BIDS	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	These funds will be used to offset revenue losses incurred by the City's six SIDs and BIDs and the GNVB that have resulted from the Covid-19 pandemic.	500000	500000	500000								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-106303	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	City Cleanliness	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	These funds will be used for City-wide blight abatement, lot clean-up, and demolition of hazardous building; as well as, development of structures to increase resident access and stimulate the local economy, among others.	5210803	3159260.19	3159260.19								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-106307	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Anti Violence Campaign	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	These funds will be used to provide needed funds to entities with programs focusing on violence prevention and that have been adversely impacted by the COVID-19 public health emergency.	500000	435000	435000								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-106310	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Summer Youth	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	These funds will be used to pay for a summer youth program	500000	500000	500000								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-106312	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Safe Summer 2022	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	These funds will be used to provide a Safe Summer 2022 of programs for the residents.  Providing pop-up play streets, movie nights,  virtual summer camps and family fun activities. Residents learn new skills and create memories, with enjoyable, safe and family and youth-oriented activities.	700000	293024.5	293024.5								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-106314	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Nourishing Newark Community	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	The Nourishing Newark Community Grants is an initiative designed to support community based organizations to combat hunger and eradicate food deserts negatively impacting our community.	1000000	73172.6	73172.6	50000							No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-106315	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Office of Violence Prevention	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	These funds will be used to provide Youth and Adult Development and Violence Prevention Programs.	1750000	587500	587500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-106317	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Nourishing Newark Community	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	The Nourishing Newark Community Grants is an initiative designed to support community based organizations to combat hunger and eradicate food deserts negatively impacting our community.	1000000	1000000	1000000	321986							No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-008127	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Infrastructure Fire Apparatus	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Purchase Fire Apparatus	1000000	999998	999998								Yes	Other (please specify)	999998	1 Imp General Public
TPN-008140	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Newark Parking Authority	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	These funds will be used to offset NPA revenue losses that have resulted from the Covid-19 pandemic	500000	500000	500000								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-008143	RCP-038794	Newark City, New Jersey	New Jersey	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Homelessness Prevention	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	These funds will be used to cover costs associated with City-wide Homelessness, including, but not limited to, homeless shelter operations, the development of additional container homes, supportive services, mental health services, bed nights, etc.	7202000	6697595.63	6697595.63								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-019713	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Par Excellence Academy Roof Repair Assistance	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Par Excellence Academy is a tuition-free, public charter school located in our city. It's student population has several youth experiencing at-risk environments. Leaks in the aged flat roof system prevented use of many areas inside the structure. As a result children were not able to safely distance throughout the facility. With the roof repaired, the entire building could once again be utilized providing proper social distancing for the students and faculty. The school contracted with the vendor and paid the vendor. We reimbursed the school for the exact amount of the invoice.		147294	147294								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-067142	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Website Upgrade	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Upgrade City website to offer additional services and information to citizens without the need to visit City Hall.		67000	67000								No
TPN-112915	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Police Vehicles	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	Purchase police patrol vehicles.		254822.88	254822.88								No
TPN-112914	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Fuel	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Fuel for city vehicles.		58012.16	58012.16
TPN-112913	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Police Body Cameras	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Purchase body cameras for police patrol.		145000	145000								No
TPN-112917	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Streets & Bridges - CV Road	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Build temporary bridge to reopen closed road.		1441335.91	1441335.91
TPN-121297	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Buildings - Improvements	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	Various improvements to city buildings to provide safer environment for employees and citizens.		32655.38	32655.38								No
TPN-072981	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Police Communication Equipment	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Replace obsolete and failing communication equipment, including police handheld radios.		320000	320000								No
TPN-075523	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Police - Citizens Reporting Software	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Software program to be used by citizens to begin incident reporting without the need for immediate officer on-site assistance.  Will only be used for non-critical situations.		50000	50000								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	50000
TPN-073048	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Newark City Schools Assistance - Hillview	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Assist local public school to enlarge its drop-off and pick-up area, allowing for proper social distancing of parents and students during those more congested times.		105364.27	105364.27
TPN-109114	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Buildings - Radon Testing	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	City Buildings - Radon Testing		6050	6050								No
TPN-094862	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Hall - Floor covering replacement	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Replace floor covering in areas of heavy public usage.		8426.97	8426.97								No
TPN-094902	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Hall - Community Service Center	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Purchase office/public service space in existing adjacent building to allow for safer environment to deliver public services.		1561478.46	1561478.46								Yes	Improvements to existing facilities	1500000
TPN-107432	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Website Maintenance	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Maintenance and upgrade of City website.		6439	6439								No
TPN-107438	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Parks - Safety & Improvements	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	City Parks - Safety & Improvements		250525.2	250525.2								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-107443	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Miscellaneous	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Updated signage for city park		47191	47191
TPN-107445	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Traffic Control Supplies	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Traffic Control Supplies		99638.6	99638.6
TPN-107449	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Land Purchase	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase of land allow improvement of dangerous vehicle intersection.		229745.34	229745.34
TPN-107450	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Hall - Public Entrance Improvements	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	City Hall - Public Entrance Improvements		774682	774682								No
TPN-107453	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Law Office - Technology Upgrades	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	City Law Office - Technology Upgrades		46308	46308								No
TPN-107456	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Engineering Office - Technology Upgrades	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	City Engineering Office - Technology Upgrades		58411.96	58411.96								No
TPN-107465	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Fire Department Payroll Overtime	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Fire Department Payroll Overtime		237252.48	237252.48			80					No
TPN-011834	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Downtown Small Business Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Downtown restaurants were negatively impacted by COVID, experiencing significant sales declines. With the assistance of local leaders and organizations, new downtown events were designed to encourage customer visits to the downtown area. Supplies were purchased to assist with the events so that the cost burden would not be placed on the struggling small businesses. The events were successful and did raise sales in the downtown area. The associated businesses were very grateful for the assistance.		13777.78	13777.78								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-012055	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Hall - Remote Working Technology Upgrades	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	Upgrade technology used in City Hall (hardware/software) to allow employees to work remotely to reduce onsite staff. These expenditures included battery back-up units for servers, human resource software to allow remote job applications, processing and onboarding, and offsite work training.		143263.25	143263.25								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-011903	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Hall - Asbestos Remediation	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	Newark is the county seat with City Hall providing facilities for municipal courts and adult probation services. Throughout the COVID crisis, it has been necessary for City Hall to remain open for essential court services, for example, arraignments. To facilitate proper social distancing for employees, asbestos flooring was replaced with updated flooring to allow for regular deep cleaning.		16612	16612								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-011927	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Hall - Elevator Flooring	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The two elevators in City Hall have heavy usage as courts services are on upper floors. Flooring was upgraded to a material that allowed for regular deep cleaning.		889.51	889.51								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-011987	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Residential Lead Service Line Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.12-Drinking water: Lead Remediation including in Schools and Daycares	This covered costs for initial engineering work to ultimately replace lead service water lines to approximately 2,000 residential homes in our city.		891168.19	891168.19					No
TPN-011994	RCP-038726	Newark, Ohio	Ohio	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	City Hall - Elevator Walls Panels and Ceiling	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The two elevators in City Hall have heavy usage as courts services are on upper floors. Walls and ceiling panels were upgraded to a material that allowed for regular deep cleaning.		34565	34565								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-008836	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Vaccination Programs	1-Public Health	1.1-COVID-19 Vaccination	Working in partnership with community providers, the vaccination project aims to vaccinate the County's 1.7 million residents against COVID-19, focusing particularly on African-American and Latino/a/x residents in economically disenfranchised neighborhoods hardest hit by the pandemic.   Funds will be used to contract with mobile vaccination providers who provide end-to end vaccination services that can be deployed to community organizations, schools, businesses or faith-based organizations across the County.  The clinics are typically open to the public and serve between 20-200 people per day, and will be an integral part of the Community Coalitions work described below.  Additional vaccination providers will be funded to serve homebound individuals and residents of congregate care facilities.  These contractors will primarily serve the ongoing vaccination and booster needs of Alameda County's long-term care facilities (LTCFs).  As vaccine response continues to evolve, these providers will also serve affordable housing developments, individuals unable to leave their homes, and other priority settings.	28880000	15898297.45	4886296.28								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	1 Imp General Public
TPN-008872	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Testing	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	The testing project aims to provide free accessible COVID-19 testing to underinsured and uninsured County residents regardless of documentation status.   Community testing ensures that the most vulnerable and most impacted communities, essential workforces, and working families can test, take steps to address their health needs while minimizing further spread.   The testing project will fund 11 organizations that provide testing with linkages to whole person health care, social services and early access to COVID-19 treatment; response driven testing, and mobile testing.  It also funds lab services that can accommodate culturally congruent mobile and response based testing, with registration, resulting with COVID-19 information in multiple access formats.  Testing sites reflect the communities they serve and have established trust and relationship to combat COVID-19 misinformation and promote health education and guidance.  Services address language and digital access barriers, as well as racial, economic, and health disparities.  Sites utilize a diverse battery of testing options (PCR, rapid antigen/PCR, at home kits, etc.) to best meet communities.  Testing aims to meet a daily surveillance goal to assess and address emerging COVID-19 spread, variants, and surges.	18600000	12179990	6787247.34								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-057459	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Housing and Child Care Capital Development	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Issue a Request for Proposals to identify possible affordable housing and child care development Projects in the hardest hit areas of the Unincorporated County.  Community meetings to identify priorities have been held, and the RFP is expected to be released this summer.	3000000	0	0								No
TPN-057465	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Community Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators	The RFP for Community Services including Public Benefit Navigators has been released, with proposals due on April 11th.  The County Selection Committees will begin review at the end of April and beginning of May.  Staff report will go to the July Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee, and then to the Board for approval at the end of July.	3500000	0	0								No
TPN-059018	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Staf Minor Home Repairs Lead Abatement	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Project will provide funds to cover the staffing costs of healthy housing repair program for those communities hardest hit by the pandemic, where low-income renters were unable to pay rent, and where landlords did not maintain their properties during the pandemic due to lack of financial resources. Healthy Housing programs are intended to reduce lead hazards and ensure children in these homes are protected from environmental hazards that disproportionately impact lower income communities.	625000	0	0								No
TPN-059042	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Staff Minor Home Repairs Rental Registry	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	This project will provide funds to cover the staffing costs of developing a rental registration database and implementing a proactive rental inspection program, increasing healthy housing in the Unincorporated County.   This includes development of policies and procedures for those communities hardest hit by the pandemic, where low-income renters were unable to pay rent, and where landlords did not maintain their properties during the pandemic due to lack of financial resources.	475000	0	0								No
TPN-058987	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Community Financial Services	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Provide services through nonprofit/CBOs that will provide fair, equitable, and non-predatory check cashing and lending practices, small business lending, lending circles, and other financial education services in the Eden Municipal Advisory Council (EMAC) communities.   Any service provider would be required to have physical office and staff presence in the EMAC communities, with a focus on Ashland or Cherryland.	535000	535000	11250								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-059067	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Staff Minor Home Repairs - Code Enforcement	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	This project will provide funds to cover the staffing costs of developing a proactive rental inspection program – including hiring inspectors to visit homes and ensure that homes are healthy and free of lead paint hazards.   Targeting those communities hardest hit by the pandemic, where low-income renters were unable to pay rent, and where landlords did not maintain their properties during the pandemic due to lack of financial resources.	665000	0	0								No
TPN-059003	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Minor Home Repairs - Lead Abatement	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.20-Social Determinants of Health: Lead Remediation	This project will provide funds to cover the repair costs of healthy housing program for those communities hardest hit by the pandemic, where low-income renters were unable to pay rent, and where landlords did not maintain their properties during the pandemic due to lack of financial resources. Healthy Housing programs are intended to reduce the hazards and ensure children in these homes are protected from environmental hazards that disproportionately impact lower income communities.	1950000	0	0								No
TPN-059133	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Supervisorial Community Needs Grants/Chamber of Commerce	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Alameda County ARPA Supervisorial District Community Needs Cash Aid Grants are in response to the Negative economic, health, and safety impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on local non-profit and business organizations.   $3.1 million of funds has been allocated to each of the five Supervisorial Districts for Community Needs Cash Aid Grants.  The goal of each Supervisorial District is to provide Cash Aid Grants that reflect the geographic and cultural diversity of the County, with a priority for organizations operated by or serving populations and communities that were disproportionately impacted by COVID-19.   To be eligible to apply for a Cash Aid Grant, organizations must have experienced a negative economic impact created by COVID-19, for the period from March 1, 2020, to the present.	15500000	11327483	11327483								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify		No	0
TPN-116516	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Emergency Shelter	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	TBD	1500000	225000	225000								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	No	0
TPN-008954	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Nursing Registry	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	The County will utilize registry nurses to significantly reduce the spread of COVID-19 by providing clinical outreach and guidance to populations most at risk for severe health outcomes, hospitalizations and/or death; investigate reports of individuals with confirmed COVID-19 and warn relevant contacts of their exposure and how to support their health and the health of others; refer economically disadvantaged individuals and families for social services and supports; to investigate, manage and mitigate outbreaks in schools, workplaces, shelters, health care facilities and correctional institutions to prevent future outbreaks; to manage the COVID vaccination program, the COVID testing program and the antiviral administration program involving unsheltered populations; administer COVID-19 tests and vaccinations, and provide health information to all residents within communities disproportionately impacted by the disease (e.g., African Americans/Latinx, unsheltered individuals, children 5 years of age and younger, individuals 65 years of age and older); to provide clinical supervision, patient education and counseling, vaccine management and post-vaccination observation at the community-based points of dispensing sites and in the homes of medically vulnerable individuals; to assess and manage the medical needs of individuals living in unsheltered, overcrowded, or congregate settings who require isolation or quarantine due to COVID infection or exposure; to ameliorate economic hardship by submitting documentation to excuse work absences and issue return to work authorizations.   The goals are to:  reduce community transmission of COVID-19 among vulnerable populations; increase vaccination rates amongst those disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 to the county vaccination average of 80% for all groups/populations.	10800000	4935000	4331510.91								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-009105	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Emergency Food	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.1-Household Assistance: Food Programs	The Emergency Food Distribution & Meal program includes meal preparation, meal or grocery delivery, ‘brown bag’ food distribution, grab-and-go meals, and other food distribution services to residents experiencing food insecurity due to the COVID-19 emergency.  Providers in this program will also perform outreach activities and leverage other food assistance programs and resources.	45400000	25460200	11280420.56	47000							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			Yes	0
TPN-008976	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Health Care Staff	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Personnel costs for COVID-19 response include positions dedicated to the Public Health COVID Division, as well as positions in information systems, finance and contracts administration, communications, policy and homelessness. The COVID Division maintains five units of critical response functions to the on-going pandemic.  Community Vaccinations Unit staff maintain established Points of Dispensing (PODs) for COVID-19 vaccines in neighborhoods with high transmission and low vaccination rates.  Staff prioritize vaccinations in school districts and other vulnerable settings, such as small long term care facilities, conduct outreach and coordinate with community partners, collect and manage data for decision making, distribute vaccine to health providers, and communicate with the public to increase vaccine acceptance and counter misinformation.  Case Investigation and Community Support Unit staff manage case investigators who reach out to COVID positive residents, draft and update protocols to align with State and federal guidance, manage community partner contracts, provide clinical guidance, address complex cases and connect individuals and families to resources.  Testing Unit staff establish and manage community testing contracts for services accessible to priority populations experiencing access barriers.  Outbreak Investigations Unit staff investigate outbreaks, support prevention in high-risk settings including long-term care facilities, homeless/unsheltered populations, mental health facilities, schools, workplaces and correctional facilities.  Data Unit provides data entry and epidemiology support, develops and maintains data dashboards, and conducts all case closures submitted through state platforms.  The goals of the COVID Division are to prevent COVID infection and mitigate its effect on all residents, with an equity focus on the most vulnerable.	22815600	6593136.21	6593136.21			150					No
TPN-009217	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Work Force Training Programs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.10-Assistance to Unemployed or Underemployed Workers (e.g. job training subsidized employment employment supports or incentives)	Provide residents who have been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 with job training assistance. After a series of public hearings and extensive public input, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors approved the project budgets for SLRFRF on December 21, 2021.  This short project description is being provided as a placeholder.  A more robust project description and description of population being served will be provided in future reporting periods.	1000000	0	0								No
TPN-009254	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	CDA Business Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Small Business Grants: Provide funding for a small business grant program to provide cash grant assistance to small businesses throughout the Unincorporated County. Façade Improvement Loans (FIP): Provide forgivable loans to COVID impacted landlords with vacant commercial space.  The priority for funding will be in the Ashland and Cherryland communities and within Qualified Census Tracts.  Loans will allow for improvement to vacant spaces to assist COVID impacted landlords get their commercial space rented. Small Business Assistance: Provide funding for the expansion of small business assistance and entrepreneur training.  Service providers would be required, in most cases, to have a physical office and staff presence in the Eden Municipal Advisory Council (EMAC) communities, with a focus on Ashland or Cherryland, and would require culturally relevant programming and language support.  Marketing and outreach will focus on the EMAC communities.	2250000	1831800.54	1266825.53								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-009258	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Arts Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.36-Aid to Other Impacted Industries	The Alameda County Arts Relief Grant Program – Round Two will assist nonprofit arts and cultural organizations affected by the negative economic impact of COVID-19.   Through an open application process, it is anticipated that approximately 200 nonprofit arts and cultural organizations will receive an estimated grant award of $2,000 to $20,000 each.  Award amounts will be based on the organization’s operating budget size.   Grants will be awarded to qualifying Alameda County organizations who have experienced a negative economic impact from COVID-19, and who are providing arts and cultural programs such as visual art, dance, theater, music, and cultural traditions.  The majority of Alameda County nonprofit arts and cultural organizations provided programs and services to BIPOC communities who are disproportionally impacted by COVID-19.   The grant program goals are to provide support to organizations who experienced a negative economic impact from COVID-19.  The intended outcomes are to assist the grantee organizations with survival and sustainability, and to support the overall economy and community of Alameda County.	1000000	1000000	1000000								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-009178	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	ARCH Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.3-Household Assistance: Cash Transfers	Provide cash assistance to individuals negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Alameda County Responsibility to Community Health (ARCH) program provides cash assistance to COVID positive County residents who do not have paid sick leave or similar assistance.  The $1,250 one-time stipend is intended to help cover expenses while the individual self-isolates due to COVID-19.	1500000	1500000	1500000	1200							No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-009270	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	East Bay EDA Business Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The Alameda County Small Business Grants Program will provide grants for small, local and emerging businesses within Alameda County that have faced widespread challenges due to the pandemic, including periods of shutdown, declines in revenue, or increased costs.   Eligible businesses shall have no more than 500 employees and are a “small business concern” as defined in section 3 of the Small Business Act. Grants awarded through this program must be used to mitigate financial hardship, including elements such as payroll and benefit costs, employee retention costs, and mortgage, rent, utility, or other operating expenses.  Businesses operating in qualified census tracts that have been disproportionately impacted by the pandemic may also use these funds to rehabilitate commercial properties or make façade or storefront improvements.	10000000	9685000	9685000								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-008892	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Hoteling/Services	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Project Roomkey (PRK) is part of Alameda County’s COVID-19 response to prevent community spread of the virus by providing temporary emergency shelter locations for homeless people who are COVID+ or exposed to safely isolate or quarantine, and for homeless people at high risk for complications from the disease to shelter in place.   Services include shelter management including overseeing building operations and contractor relationships (security, transportation, nursing and personal caregivers), meals, social support connections to physical and mental health services, and housing support to identify options and maintain permanent housing.  In addition to shelter management, the county-owned Homekey sites also require property management (maintenance, janitorial, housekeeping), and enhanced medical support services for medically frail homeless individuals and families	24878000	22990127	15507124.4								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-009041	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Communications	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The communications project will develop and implement a comprehensive communications plan, including a plan for crisis communications, for COVID-19 response.   The implementation of the plan will ensure that programs responsible for the countywide COVID-19 response efforts can disseminate relevant and culturally competent communication, including information on the Health Care Services Agency's (HCSA’s) external website.   The forms of communication dissemination that may be used include social media, digital newsletters, posters, billboards on and around public transportation, websites and existing community partners.  Central to the plan is building a cohesive brand and visual identity alignment to integrate all of the programs within HCSA, so that the community better understands HCSA as a single County agency and resource. Using census tract data, the project will focus on communities of color disproportionately impacted by COVID-19.  The goal of the project is to build awareness around current COVID-19 resources and guidelines and for the community to see HCSA as the trusted messenger of information regarding COVID-19.  This project will also build on existing efforts already underway with our community partners.  Key stakeholder feedback will be gathered to improve HCSA’s external website and messaging.  The communication work will set a tone and look, and provide a familiar voice that educates the public on COVID-19 and continues to deepen and build the public’s trust in the agency.	3500000	1992382	1085355								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-009111	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Child Care Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.11-Healthy Childhood Environments: Child Care	Provide Child care grants to families in need due to COVID-19 pandemic. After a series of public hearings and extensive public input, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors approved the project budgets for SLRFRF on December 21, 2021.  This short project description is being provided as a placeholder.  A more robust project description and description of population being served will be provided in future reporting periods.	5000000	3736050	3736050								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations			No	0
TPN-009056	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Capacity Building	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Improve access to services for Alameda County residents.	10000000	0	0								No
TPN-009067	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Outreach Navigation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators	Provide assistance to residents to navigate available public health services. After a series of public hearings and extensive public input, the Alameda County Board of Supervisors approved the project budgets for SLRFRF on December 21, 2021.  This short project description is being provided as a placeholder.  A more robust project description and description of population being served will be provided in future reporting periods.	5000000	0	0								No
TPN-085211	RCP-036012	Alameda County, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Claiming standard allowance for revenue replacement.	10000000	0	0
TPN-042666	RCP-038697	Tippah County, MS	Mississippi	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Tippah County Loss Revenue	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Standard loss revenue for government services.		4269674	4269674
TPN-060116	RCP-038783	Nodaway County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Small Business Grant	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue Replacement funds are allocated to general governmental services provided by our jurisdiction, including but not limited to helping small business in Nodaway County with financial support for their businesses to pandemic related expenses and the negative impacts of COVID-19 public health emergency.		135000	135000
TPN-060850	RCP-038783	Nodaway County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Non Profit Organizations	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue Replacement funds are allocated to general governmental services provided by our jurisdiction for updating and perservation of the County organizations that support the welfare of individuals and groups. These funds will provide for the mitigation and mediation of the negative economic impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency.		180661.92	180661.92
TPN-060727	RCP-038783	Nodaway County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - County Records Preservation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue Replacement funds are allocated to general governmental services provided by our jurisdiction to preserve the records of our county offices so make our records available to the general public to protect from the negative impact of COVID-19 public health emergency.		125000	125000
TPN-060631	RCP-038783	Nodaway County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Small Town Water - Infracture Allowance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Allowance to help with repair and maintance in small town water and infracture revenue loss due to the negative economic impacts of COVID-19 public health emergency.		549620	549620
TPN-060818	RCP-038783	Nodaway County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Mental Health Initiation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue Replacement funds are allocated to general governmental services provided by our jurisdiction for help in mitigiation for the Mental Health problems that were created by the negative economic impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency.		20000	20000
TPN-060782	RCP-038783	Nodaway County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Coroner Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue Replacement funds are allocated to general governmental services provided by our jurisdiction for updating and perservation of the County Coroner's records so that they would be available to be used for court and law enforcement official as well as other people needing access to the records that were only availble by hand.  These new records will provide for the mitigation and mediation of thenegative economic impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency.		2459.82	2459.82
TPN-060867	RCP-038783	Nodaway County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - Tourism	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue Replacement funds are allocated to general governmental services provided by our jurisdiction for updating and perservation of the County so  that Nodaway County can rebuild and grow so that we can support our patrons . These funds will provide for the mitigation and mediation of the negative economic impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency.		52000	52000
TPN-153019	RCP-038783	Nodaway County, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Electing the standard Allowance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Electing the Standard Allowance for Under $10 Million		1783814.22	1783814.22
TPN-047039	RCP-038722	Haskell County, KS	Kansas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Replacement Revenue	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds were used to maintain current levels of staffing for critical areas like law enforcement, emergency medical services, and the health department.	770737	770737	770737
TPN-039732	RCP-038728	St. Charles City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	CyberSecurity	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	CyberSecurity hardware	207324.36	207324.36	189174.57
TPN-039737	RCP-038728	St. Charles City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Police Radios	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Police Radio portable radios with increased encryption security	600000	565046.16	565046.16
TPN-162206	RCP-038728	St. Charles City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		New ERP	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New City ERP	1000000	1000000	0
TPN-162186	RCP-038728	St. Charles City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Stipend	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	For City employee stipend paid.	800654.81	800654.81	800654.81
TPN-162187	RCP-038728	St. Charles City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	City Hall Improvements	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To relocate departments to make space more efficient in City Hall.	200000	200000	97737
TPN-162185	RCP-038728	St. Charles City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Fiber Infrastructure	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Fiber infrastructure and mapping to connect all City facilities.	75000	75000	18675
TPN-162189	RCP-038728	St. Charles City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Active Shooter Gear	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replacement of active shooter gear for the Police department.	18000	18000	0
TPN-162188	RCP-038728	St. Charles City, MO	Missouri	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Fingerprint Scanner	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Police department fingerprint scanner	17500	17500	15973
TPN-055013	RCP-038682	Pocahontas County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Phone system	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	A new phone system for the county was purchased.  The new system allows for employees to take their work phone home and conduct county business from home on their work phone the same way as if they were at work.		41917.49	41917.49
TPN-054993	RCP-038682	Pocahontas County, IA	Iowa	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	EMA Building	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	An EMA building was built to assist in storage of COVID equipment and supplies.  This building will also aide in any future pandemics or emergencies the county will face.  The cost for the whole building was $243,321.24		247091.24	247091.24
TPN-055737	RCP-038777	Deland City, FL	Florida	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Standard Allowance	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The entity's expenditures in accordance with the standard allowance for revenue replacement will be used to provide general government services, specifically to cover payroll and benefits for the entity, including public safety, during the period of March 3, 2021 through March 31, 2022.		5883695	5883695
TPN-055090	RCP-038690	Opelika, AL	Alabama	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		6.1 Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	City Council has elected to take the standard allowance but has not determined the details of the expenditures at this time. Meetings will be held in the coming weeks.		6466895	0
TPN-092519	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	IRC - ESD Expenses 2	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Electronic Scheduling and Report Services		35515	35515								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-092474	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	IRC - SHARP Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Downpayment and rehab assistance for those who qualify for the County's regular SHIP program.		240687.33	240687.33								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-092475	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Tax - Meeting Space	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	AV/Meeting/Conference Room equipment to promote social distancing and allow for remote meetings.		9081.84	9081.84								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-064285	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Sheriff - Miscellaneous Expenses	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Miscellaneous expenses for COVID19 related items such as disinfectant and other cleaning supplies.		46697.52	46697.52								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-064304	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff - X-Ray/Metal Detector Machines	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	X-Ray/Metal Detectors for jail expansion/remodel.		33289.15	33289.15								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-064219	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	IRC - Fellsmere Inn	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Purchase and rehab of historical inn in an economically disadvantaged community.  This inn will serve as an educational facility to teach hospitality and culinary skills to the community.		27400	27400								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-064232	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff - COVID19 Tests	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	COVID19 Tests for inmates & employees		25266.63	25266.63								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-064244	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff - Special Management Construction	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Expansion and remodel of special management unit at the jail to allow for social distancing.		75983.23	75983.23								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-064331	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Tax - Lockers	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Smart lockers for the public to order items online and pick up at the locker instead of interfacing with personnel.		27951.13	27951.13								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-111832	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	IRC - South RO Water Treatment	5-Infrastructure	5.10-Drinking water: Treatment	Water treatment enhancements to improve water quality.		97000	97000
TPN-111831	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	IRC - Septic to Sewer	5-Infrastructure	5.5-Clean Water: Other sewer infrastructure	Septic to sewer connections to enhance lagoon health.		428321.8	428321.8
TPN-064104	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Clerk - IT Storage Expansion for Remote Work	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Expansion of IT storage for remote working.		184106.71	184106.71								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-064114	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Clerk - Additional Employee Assistance	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.5-Public Sector Capacity: Administrative Needs	Additional employees needed to help keep up with increased case load.		36330.71	36330.71								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-046329	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff - Decontamination Labor	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Additional payroll needed for straight and overtime for corrections staff to decontaminate facility.		32276.72	32276.72			80					No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-107326	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Clerk - Computer Replacement	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Computer replacement to accommodate IT upgrades and remote working.		125650	125650								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-107328	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Elections - Misc. Expenses	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Miscellaneous purchases to  accommodate the new mailing laws and promote social distancing with vote-by-mail.		38531.23	38531.23								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-107329	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Sheriff - IT- Dell	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Computer upgrades and replacements to accommodate IT upgrades and remote working.		868428.06	868428.06								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-107330	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Sheriff - IT - GovDirect	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Computer upgrades and replacements to accommodate IT upgrades and remote working.		318179.66	318179.66								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-107332	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Sheriff - IT - Insight Public	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Computer upgrades and replacements to accommodate IT upgrades and remote working.		5461.92	5461.92								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-107333	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff - Server	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Server replacement to accommodate IT upgrades and remote working.		35000	35000								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-011742	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	IRC - Advanced CPR Equipment	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Advanced CPR equipment to help with response to patient's and allow for less person-to-person interaction and reduce the spread of COVID19 from patients to first responders.		67183.09	67183.09								No		67183.09	1 Imp General Public
TPN-011829	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	IRC - Miscellaneous Purchases	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Miscellaneous purchases, such as cleaning supplies, social distancing tools, masks, etc. to mitigate the risk of COVID19 to County employees.		5930.74	5930.74								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-012018	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue replacement to be used for road restriping & resurfacing.		10000000	3414033.16
TPN-011837	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	IRC - IT Upgrades	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Software and hardware to allow for remote work if an employee is either infected with or exposed to COVID19.		160070.04	160070.04								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-011842	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	IRC - Munis Modules	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Additional modules within the government accounting system to allow for teleworking capabilities and paperless transactions to prevent the spread of COVID19.		35000	19115.62								No		19115.62	1 Imp General Public
TPN-011848	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	IRC - Small Business Grants	1-Public Health	1.8-COVID-19 Assistance to Small Businesses	Small business grants awarded up to $10,000. Recipients must show < 25 employees along with a revenue loss during COVID19 effected times.		246187	246187								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact			No	0
TPN-011870	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	IRC - Non-Profit Grants	1-Public Health	1.9-COVID-19 Assistance to Non-Profits	Grants up to $10,000 for non-profit 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) companies that have previously done business with the county, are within county limits, have less than 25 employees, and have been vetted.		370000	370000								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-011872	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	IRC - Broadband Advertising	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Advertising for Broadband Infrastructure project.		11756	11756					No
TPN-011727	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff - Classification Expansion	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Expansion of Sheriff's Office Classification Unit to allow for proper social distancing.		352357.26	352357.26								No		56290.97	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-011735	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff - Medical Expansion	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Expansion of Sheriff's medical unit to allow for proper social distancing while medically attending to inmates.		174468.84	174468.84								No		174468.84	1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-011756	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	United Way - Mental Health Services	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	Partnered with our local United Way to provide mental health services to individuals impacted from the COVID19 pandemic.		1040750	260187.5								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-011776	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	IRC - Broadband	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Study and infrastructure installation to bring broadband to rural areas to allow for remote education and work.		74500	74500					No
TPN-011779	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Clerk - COVID Sick/Quarantine Time	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	COVID Sick/Quarantine time for effected employees.		40020.09	40020.09								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-011797	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff - Payroll for Expanded Cell Security	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Additional payroll needed for straight and overtime for corrections staff to accommodate opening additional cells to allow for social distancing and reduce outbreaks.		1911988.96	1911988.96								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-011802	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Sheriff - Vaccine Employee Oversight	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Payroll for staff overseeing and coordinating vaccinations for staff and inmates.		85461.43	85461.43			*					No
TPN-011832	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	IRC - COVID Sick Pay	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Up to 80 hours of sick time given to new employees that were not yet employed before August 1, 2021.		2047.97	2047.97								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-011806	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Tax Collector - COVID19 Tests	1-Public Health	1.2-COVID-19 Testing	COVID19 tests for working staff.		407.83	407.83								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-011808	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Tax Collector - Fogging	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Fogging for COVID19 to reduce the transmission to customers and other employees.		23200	23200								No			1 Imp General Public			No	0
TPN-011822	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	IRC - Worker's Compensation	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Worker's compensation for first responders that contract COVID19.		258273.44	258273.44								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-011821	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	IRC - Straight & Overtime	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Staff time dedicated to reviewing invoices, reimbursement requests, grants etc. that are utilizing ARP funds to ensure they fit within the proper guidelines and following procurement rules.		62171.62	62171.62
TPN-011824	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	IRC - ESD Expenses	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	Chest compression system to mitigate the risk and exposure to patients and first responders.		582816.91	48657.17								No		48657.17	1 Imp General Public
TPN-012147	RCP-038702	Indian River County, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Chamber of Commerce - Tourism Promotion	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Tourism promotion to bring the County back to pre-COVID levels.		206250	206250								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-085076	RCP-038683	Marshall County, TN	Tennessee	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	General Provisions	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue replacement for the  provision of government services is claimed using the standard allowance.  Expenditures for the provision of government services include but are not limited to payroll, benefits and other departmental expenses for our Health Department, Ambulance Service (EMS), Emergency Management (EMA), Sheriff and Jail offices, etc.		6676941	6676941
TPN-159331	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		new AC at Farmers Market	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New AC replacement for Farmers Market Office.	3307.34	3307.34	3307.34
TPN-097012	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		The Ned - Production Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Ned - Production Equipment	22000	3022	0
TPN-097028	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		IS - Equipment Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	IS - Equipment Upgrade	52000	48560	48560
TPN-097041	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		IS - Computer Lab equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	IS - computer Lab equipment	40000	40000	38243
TPN-097042	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Resurface Tennis Courts	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Resurface Tennis Courts	33500	33500	0
TPN-097045	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Central Dispatch - Upgrade Radio System	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Central Dispatch - Upgrade Radio Systems	87502	87502	0
TPN-097049	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		North Park - Soccer Goals	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	North Park - Soccer Goals	10000	10000	0
TPN-097052	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		The Ned - Curtains	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Ned - Curtains	35874	35874	0
TPN-096948	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Traffic Signalization - Back Plates	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Traffic Signalization - Back Plates	25000	11566	0
TPN-096985	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Traffic Signalization - Back Plates	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Traffic Signalization - Back Plates	25000	11566	0
TPN-030010	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Core Switch Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	This infrastructure would expand the communications capacity between all key departments. This expanded data backplane would be the medium used to coordinate a response to any ongoing or future public health emergencies or outreach efforts.	450000	450000	95767
TPN-097000	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Ballistic Vests	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Ballistic Vests	31080	31080	0
TPN-097002	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		The Ned - Production Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Ned - Production Equipment	22000	4151	0
TPN-063241	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Computer Lab Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Create a computer lab at T.R White sports plex to be used by youth and other community members for research, resumes, job applications.	40000	38317.36	30717.87								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-065481	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		The Ned Spotlight Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Ned Spotlight Upgrade	47760	7730	0
TPN-065500	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		The Ned LED Lighting	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The Ned LED LIghting	22000	17574	0
TPN-064224	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Park Pavilion And Tables	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Park Pavilion And Tables	30000	7744.86	0
TPN-064313	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Civic Center HVAC Equipment	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Civic Center HVAC Equipment	36000	35980	0
TPN-064255	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Farmers Market Replace AC	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Farmers Market Replace AC	8000	4692.66	4692.66
TPN-118072	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		zero turn mowers	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	replace four zero turn mowers	130000	66000	0
TPN-118173	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		senior activity center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	senior activity center	2500000	4000	0
TPN-118175	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		senior activity center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	senior activity center	2500000	4000	0
TPN-118184	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JPD Eye in the Sky	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JPD Eye In The Sky Security System	10000	9967.48	0
TPN-118208	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JFD ESO Software Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JFD ESO Software Upgrade	60000	49750	0
TPN-118204	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JPD Helmet Cameras	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JPD Helmet Cameras	20000	6495.86	0
TPN-118174	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		senior activity center	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	senior activity center	2500000	4000	0
TPN-118198	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JFD EMS Equipment Training	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JFD EMS Equipment & Training	721810	93252.65	0
TPN-063498	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Power Protect Backup	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Power Protect Backup.	86000	85365.95	85365.94
TPN-063411	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Telephone System Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace and update telephone system.	206000	202179.78	50810.52
TPN-063750	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JPD Motorola Portable Radios	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JPD Motorola Portable Radios	83996.2	83996.2	80610.4
TPN-063889	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Toro Procore 648 Aerator	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Toro Procore 648 Aerator	35970	35970	0
TPN-063768	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JPD Unmarked Vehicles	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JPD Unmarked Vehicles	35000	34622.9	0
TPN-063912	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Sportsplex WFR Spreader	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Sportsplex WFR Spreader	7325	7325	0
TPN-063927	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Sportsplex Mower Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Sportsplex Mower Replacement	82803.52	82803.52	0
TPN-063520	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Jackson Police Department View Commander	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Jackson Police Department View Commander	28000	25110.82	0
TPN-063952	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Street Department Truck Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Street Department Truck Replacement	57000	56946	0
TPN-064122	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Traffic Signalization LED Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Traffic Signalization LED Replacement	30000	29972	0
TPN-063447	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Jackson Police Department Combined Virtual	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Jackson Police Department Combined Virtual	46000	44600.01	0
TPN-064134	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Traffic Signalization Signal Head Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Traffic Signalization Signal Head Replacement	30000	28646	0
TPN-063465	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Arrays JPD Video	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Arrays JPD Video	365000	357649.08	0
TPN-064144	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Traffic Signalization Cabinet Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Traffic Signalization Cabinet Upgrade	115000	113040	0
TPN-063800	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JPD Unmarked Vehicles	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JPD Unmarked Vehicles	37517.58	37517.58	33878
TPN-063981	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Train Depot Repairs	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Train Depot Repairs	8200	7000	0
TPN-063694	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JPD Tasers	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JPD Tasers	14816.9	14816.9	14816.9
TPN-063995	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Municipal Maintenance Replacement Truck	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Municipal Maintenance Replacement Truck	46000	45657.3	0
TPN-064177	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Stella Duncan Park Pavilion New Roof	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Stella Duncan Park Pavilion New Roof	7800	2023.36	0
TPN-063840	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JPD Stalker Radar	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JPD Stalker Radar	5540	5480	0
TPN-064038	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Street Maintenance Tractor Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Street Maintenance Tractor Replacement	110832.38	110832.38	0
TPN-013924	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Financial Empowerment Services	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	To address the negative impact of COVID and promote economic recovery and resiliency, the City of Jackson proposes to invest in establishing a Financial Empowerment Center to provide financial counseling and connect residents to other resources.	300000	300000	0								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-030430	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Jackson Fire Department personal protection equipment.	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The purchase of the turnout gear will directly enhance the personal safety of the firefighters and the public. The turnout gear will establish two sets of gear for each firefighter. One set for primary and the second available in the event the first set needs requires decontamination. due to limited exposure to transmittable diseases such as COVID, blood borne pathogens, carcinogens contained with in smoke and other hazardous chemicals.	250676	250627	7290
TPN-110863	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		New Scissor Lift Fairgrounds	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace Lift at Fairgrounds	13000	13000	13000
TPN-110869	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Production Equipment NED	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Production Equipment for NED Performing Arts Center	2430.51	2430.51	2430.51
TPN-110873	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Sportsplex Shade Structure's	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Sportsplex Shade Structures	306000	31500	4900
TPN-110909	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Information Technology JPD	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Information Systems Technology JPD	354233	58500	58500
TPN-110884	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JFD EMS Equipment Training	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JFD EMS Equipment & Training	721810	1324.04	1324.04
TPN-110977	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Street Department Truck  Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Street Department Truck Replacement	61728	61728	61728
TPN-110853	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Garage Enlightement Lift	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	New Alignment Lift for City Garage	73141.22	73141.22	73141.22
TPN-110859	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Fairgrounds LED lights	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Install LED lights at Fairgrounds	20005.92	20005.92	20005.92
TPN-110856	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Mayor's Office Vehicle	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Replace Mayor's Office Vehicle	42250	42250	42250
TPN-110964	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JFD Foam Eductor	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JFD Foam Eductor	6480	5912	5912
TPN-110895	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Westwood Computer Lab	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Westwood Computer Lab	38400.08	38400.08	38400.08
TPN-110902	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Central Dispatch Technology Upgrade	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Central Dispatch Technology Upgrade	16329.73	16329.73	16329.73
TPN-110913	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Cypress Grove  Park Gazebo Roof	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cypress Grove Park Gazebo Roof	20960	20960	20960
TPN-110903	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JFD Capital Upgrades	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JFD Capital Upgrades	1850	1850	1850
TPN-110970	RCP-038712	Jackson, Tennessee	Tennessee	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		JPD Falcon Trailer	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	JPD Falcon Trailer	48000	47900	47900
TPN-043102	RCP-038735	Morrison County, MN	Minnesota	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Morrison County Loss Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Morrison County Loss Revenue Replacement  (Standard Allowance) Funds are being used to maintain current levels of services, as well as fund initiatives and projects that the County would not otherwise had the funds to pursue. These projects include: -Mental Health services in schools and the community. -ARMER system 800mhz radios for first responders. -County cyber security initiatives. -Fiberoptic to get internet access to the County Solid Waste Facility.		6484839	6484839
TPN-018497	RCP-038733	Nacogdoches County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Administration Professional Services	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	General Administrative services for the management and oversight of ARPA funded Programs and projects.  Services provided by consultants, contractors and/or staff and may include public notices, accounting and audit support, disbursement of funds, monitoring, reporting, or any other general administrative or grant management services. Development of internal policies and procedures that are compliant with ARPA guidelines which may include procurement, financial management, labor monitoring, oversight of subrecipient awards, etc.	543500	543500	81525
TPN-052802	RCP-038733	Nacogdoches County, Texas	Texas	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Case Load Reductions - District Attorney Staff Salaries	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.3-Public Sector Workforce: Other	Funds will be utilized for the salaries of one additional prosecutor and two paralegals for the Nacogdoches County District Attorney’s office. The COVID-19 pandemic brought a paralysis of the County court system. Local and state emergency orders and various pandemic safety limitations have resulted in a backlog of pending cases. As of November 2021, 200 pre-trial felons were awaiting a court date, leading to overcrowding at the jail which presents additional safety risks. Even prior to the pandemic, the County identified a need for an additional prosecutor and paralegals on staff. Additional District Attorney staff will increase the number of trials that the County is able to facilitate, therefore reducing jail overcrowding and mitigating the risk of disease transmission. Open positions were advertised internally and on various online job boards. ARPA monies will fund salaries from 04/04/2022 to 09/30/2026.		100238.01	100238.01								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-011767	RCP-038774	San Rafael City, California	California	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue Replacement seeks to allocate funds to government services negatively impacted by the pandemic.  These areas include housing and homelessness, mental health, equity related work, economic recovery, climate change, sustainability and adaptation, special projects, deferred projects and maintenance, the funding of frozen or eliminated positions as a result of the pandemic and public safety needs.	16088886	16088886	16088886
TPN-059492	RCP-038775	Caldwell County, TX	Texas	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		ARP - 6.1 Revenue Replacement Caldwell County	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Caldwell County revenue replacement ARP funds were allocated to a donation to a Nonprofit, veterans assistance, law enforcement supporting software, radio system, city of Lockhart EMS, and equipment for our unit road department to improve road infrastructure.		8481220	3206064.75
TPN-059775	RCP-038730	Posey County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Consulting	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Posey County has contracted with Barnes and Thornburg for consulting on use of ARPA funds.		22500	22500
TPN-059712	RCP-038730	Posey County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Broadband	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Posey County is working with Mainstream Media to expand access to broadband throughout the rural areas of the County.		1082670	785680
TPN-054703	RCP-038730	Posey County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Lucas Devices	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Posey County purchased Lucas Devices for all fire stations located within the County. These devices will help protect first responders and the public from COVID-19 by keeping the first responders out of patients faces while preforming CPR.  This will also help the general public by providing more consistent chest compressions during the long transport to the local hospitals in a neighboring county due to the rural nature of Posey County.		133821	133821
TPN-059751	RCP-038730	Posey County, IN	Indiana	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Posey County Regional Sewer District	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Posey County has partnered with the Posey County Regional Sewer District to expand access to sewer throughout the rural areas of Posey County.		2000000	2000000
TPN-071517	RCP-038792	Bacon County, GA	Georgia	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		SLFRP 6.1 Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	SLFRP funds used for salaries and benefits.		2168476	893241.39
TPN-025029	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Fire Apparatus	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	Based on Stockton's local conditions, community demand, and maintenance costs, it is recommended that six (6) existing Pierce Enforcer Pumper Engines are immediately replaced from front line status. The second round of funding would be used to further support the department's operation by purchasing additional fire engines, a ladder truck, or other equipment. This final apparatus and equipment purchase is pending the outcome of an existing grant submittal and potential re-opening of Fire Station 1.	6030000	4406095.43	4106401.1								Yes	Other (please specify)	4400000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-025110	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Vehicles & Equipment for Clean City Initiative	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	This line item would purchase and replace equipment to support the City's Clean City Initiative, in particular homeless encampment cleanup activities. Vehicles and equipment to include: a tracked loader, heavy duty pickup, trailer, skip loader, dump trucks, trash truck with grapple, and a street sweeper. Homeless encampment cleanups average approximately 50-tons of waste removed by utilizing front loaders, bobcats,  dump trucks, and trailers. This equipment is also utilized to support regular road maintenance.	1350000	1111317.39	96248.79								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	1350000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-025404	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Animal Shelter Upgrades	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	This project proposes to improve the quality of life for our shelter animals, while advancing facility operations by expanding the existing Animal Shelter to increase animal capacity and upgrade medical care facilities, while creating a more friendly experience for prospective pet owners. Stockton PD works closely with community partners while operating the shelter. These stakeholders have been engaged about the proposed project and their needs and requests have been incorporated into the preliminary planning process.	5400000	737183.11	148702.36								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	6100000	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment
TPN-025415	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Police Equipment	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The American Rescue Plan (ARP) provides much needed funding to the SPD for items such as: firing range maintenance, specialty safety equipment, additional training ammunition, portable radios, special team vehicles, and a voicemail option for every officer to provide improved service delivery to the Stockton community.	1260000	618215.17	473830.62								Yes	Technology and equipment to allow law enforcement	1192068	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-025434	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Waterfront Towers HVAC Upgrade	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	This project proposes to upgrade the existing HVAC system at both of the waterfront tower buildings serving as the City Hall campus. The replacement of the existing rooftop units will provide better filtration,  improving air quality within the buildings with more energy efficiency than the current equipment.	1350000	1350000	0								Yes	Rehabilitations, renovation, remediation, cleanup, or conversions	1350000	1 Imp General Public
TPN-025447	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	ERP Project Over-Runs	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	This line item will help offset unanticipated delays in implementation due to COVID travel and gathering restrictions, as well as support additional training as implementation plans were adjusted to accommodate social distancing.	0	0	0
TPN-020658	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Safe Camping & Parking	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Assess the feasibility of a Safe Parking Site Demonstration Project that includes access to services and pathways to permanent housing.	1800000	9871.25	1865.25								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	5 Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs	Yes	1800000
TPN-092389	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Program Delivery Assistance - Procurement	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	To provide administrative procurement assistance to ARPA funded projects.	300000	300000	59432.32
TPN-024702	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Touchless Restroom	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	The project proposes to install Exeloo Automatic Public Toilets at eight (8) public parks: Oak Park, Harrell Park, Victory Park, Legion Park, Peterson Park, Paul E Weston Park, Brotherhood Park, and Louis Park. The prefabricated restrooms offer a unisex public toilet system that provides accessibility for all users. The units are resilient, hygienic, and offer a safe solution for availability of public restrooms.	3150000	272448.65	272448.65								Yes	Parks, green spaces, recreational facilities, sidewalks	1206000	1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-024243	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Fiber Master Plan	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	The City has an incomplete fiber network. A master plan is needed to determine where fiber gaps exist in the network and identify key areas for expansion. A consultant will identify key buildout areas that will increase the City's capacity for delivering services, enhance economic development, and connect with other institutions.	450000	268001.97	43914.47
TPN-024251	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Fiber Segment Construction	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	Based on the results of the Fiber Master Plan, this construction and equipment fund will be used to build out key segments of the City's existing, but incomplete fiber network. Selected projects will prioritize the deployment of Smart City technologies, focus on downtown core and other business areas, and be used to provide incentives for economic development and other City Council priorities.	2610000	0	0
TPN-024162	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	COVID Paid Leave to Employees	1-Public Health	1.7-Other COVID-19 Public Health Expenses (including Communications Enforcement Isolation/Quarantine)	The Federal and State governments have required employers to provide supplemental leaves when employees or their families are impacted by COVID-19. Since March 2020, the City has paid over $1.8M for COVID related employee leaves. It is estimated that the City's American Rescue Plan Act Funding will offset approximately $1.1M in supplemental leave expenses for calendar year 2021 and $1.3M for calendar year 2022. COVID related workers' compensation claims are in addition to the supplemental leaves. Based on information from the City's workers' compensation administrator, just under $600,000 was incurred in the first six months of the year for COVID claims and administration.	1400000	1400000	896651.66								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-024211	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	One-Time Essential Worker Premium Payment to All Staff	4-Premium Pay	4.1-Public Sector Employees	The  Federal government supports hazard pay to compensate or incentivize workers who have been exposed to additional risk while providing essential services. Employees of the City have, and continue to, remain at work to provide services to the community, including services funded by State and Federal relief dollars. Without the efforts of our employees, programs like Clean City Initiative, Rental and Mortgage Assistance, Small Business Support, and Community Support and Essential Services would not be possible. These programs have all been successfully implemented while continuing their regular duties and projects.	3190500	3190500	3190500		1932
TPN-021200	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Event Programming	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Staff will work with partners to drive traffic to the Downtown Core, which was negatively impacted by the pandemic, by hosting a free anchor event for the community. At a minimum, this will take place on an annual basis and will include ancillary events, marketing, and small business activation.	1800000	1594757.41	735536.07								No	Other (please specify)	500000	9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-021251	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Uplift Downtown Initiative	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Support Downtown Core recovery through increased cleaning, security, cameras, and an expansion of the Downtown Stockton Alliance Ambassador Program.	2850000	519087.59	519087.59								Yes	Other (please specify)	900000	1 Imp General Public	8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors
TPN-021333	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Business Facade & Outdoor Dining Programs	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	Focuses on businesses harmed by the pandemic, this program will provide businesses the ability to upgrade storefronts, add outdoor seating, or address COVID mitigation needs.	2150000	2042500	510625								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted		No	0
TPN-020950	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Community Well Being - Crisis Intervention	1-Public Health	1.12-Mental Health Services	The City of Stockton has partnered with Community Medical Centers for the design and launch of a pilot crisis assistance and family support program as additional resources for community members with problems related to mental and behavioral wellness, substance abuse, and homelessness. Community-based and other organizations will provide plans on communication with police and fire departments and referrals. The design of hotlines/warmlines, and outreach and intervention support, are a part of the design and program. Other goals of achievement are training of crisis intervention and de-escalation, as well as good interactions with partner agencies.	5760000	5760000	364375.93								No	Other (please specify)	108102.76	1 Imp General Public	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	Yes	5760000
TPN-020958	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Health & Housing/Homelessness Dashboards	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.4-Public Sector Capacity: Effective Service Delivery	The OPDA is building a public health dashboard & a housing/homelessness dashboard leveraging open data from outside sources to help push information to the community. Complex data will be presented in a visual format to allow any reader to understand and interpret the information. The following is a non-exclusive list of indicators that a public health dashboard of this nature would likely include: Number of total cases, number of total deaths, number of hospitalizations, number of hospital beds, number of total people served, demographics of people served, number of services provided by type of service, number of sheltered, and number of unsheltered.	100000	64000	64000								No
TPN-021096	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Personal Protective Equipment Supply for City facilities	1-Public Health	1.5-Personal Protective Equipment	The City will purchase inventory to disinfect facilities, supply City facilities with appropriate PPE, and testing kits to employees.	100000	24405	24405								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-021192	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Community Support Grants	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	With the success of the Community Support NOFA issued in the Fall of 2020, and understanding that City nonprofits have a deep reach into the community, the City would like to issue a second Community Support NOFA requesting submissions that support households who may have barriers accessing health care support, childcare, groceries and transportation. This NOFA would provide funding to address food insecurities, provide household supports for utilities, medicine, and childcare, and also provide support to our local food pantries.	2700000	50000	50000								No			1 Imp General Public	11 Imp Classes of NPs designated as negatively economically impacted		Yes	2700000
TPN-024477	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Cancelled	Public Wi-Fi Pilot Program	5-Infrastructure	5.19-Broadband: Last Mile projects	This pilot project will extend free and outdoor accessible Wi-Fi in gathering places in the downtown core, key neighborhood business districts, and high traffic parks with the goal of enhancing the economic environment and quality of life for Stockton residents.	0	0	0					No
TPN-024658	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Connectivity Support - Device & Mobile Hotspot Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.4-Household Assistance: Internet Access Programs	This program will focus on underserved households in Stockton that lack internet access and for whom affordability is out of reach. Up to 2,300 qualified households (including an estimated 500 senior households) will receive a free hotspot capable of serving multiple users, one free computer, and three years of free Wi-Fi services.	2970000	2425497.51	2412169.5	2050							Yes	Devices and equipment that assist households in accessing the internet	371437.5	20 Dis Imp Other HHs or populations that experienced a disproportionate	1 Imp General Public	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	No	0
TPN-024680	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Not Started	Digital Traffic Camera Replacement	5-Infrastructure	5.21-Broadband: Other projects	The vast majority of traffic cameras in Stockton are analog, greatly limiting their functionality and use. This project replaces them with digital cameras at City intersections. Digital cameras allow for a greater number of camera features, such as traffic flow, monitoring simultaneous viewing of multiple cameras, traffic management, data analysis, and retention of backup footage.	1440000	3413.21	3413.21
TPN-021359	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Marketing	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	To combat the negative impacts COVID has on tourism and economic development, staff will engage agencies to conduct business and event attraction campaigns, create videos and host industry specific Virtual Summits and site visits.	450000	375500	51506								No			12 Imp Travel tourism or hospitality sectors	1 Imp General Public	8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-021428	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Business Attraction & Expansion Incentives	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Develop a streamlined program to incentivize the relocation or expansion of businesses in the Downtown Core that will drive recovery and mitigate the impacts of the pandemic.	1800000	220000	81500								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts		Yes	720000
TPN-021378	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Chamber & Business District Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Provide financial support to organizations that aid in business recovery efforts.	660000	540000	270000								No			9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted
TPN-021437	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	EDD Staff Augmentation	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Procure additional staff support that augments the Economic Development Department's capacity to respond to COVID impacts on homelessness and housing.	540000	309947.14	240717.14
TPN-021383	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Non-Profit Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.34-Assistance to Impacted Nonprofit Organizations (Impacted or Disproportionately Impacted)	Provide technical assistance and capacity building for the network of local nonprofit businesses.	765000	727000	55819								No			10 Imp NPs that experienced a negative economic impact specify
TPN-021445	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Support for Low Barrier Shelter Beds	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	Assist shelter providers in adding 100-125 additional low-barrier shelter beds to the City's inventory.	3600000	0	0								No			2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	No	3600000
TPN-021403	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Entrepreneurship Support	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Augment the existing Entrepreneurship Grant Program with additional annual funding and provide resources to nonprofits that support small businesses and entrepreneurship.	450000	75000	15400								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations		Yes	450000
TPN-021419	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Economic Development Strategic Action Plan	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	Fund a portion of the Plan and the initial implementation steps focused on recovery and growth.	360000	155000	155000								No			1 Imp General Public	9 Imp Classes of SBs designated as negatively economically impacted	21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts	Yes	216000
TPN-093985	RCP-038692	Stockton City, California	California	Tier 1. States, U.S. territories, metropolitan cities and counties with a population that exceeds 250,000 residents	Local Government	Completed	Project Homekey	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.16-Long-Term Housing Security: Services for Unhoused persons	To use ARPA funds as a match to maximize the amount of funding directed toward the City for homelessness for the successful creation of housing.	6050000	6050000	6050000								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	6050000	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	3 Imp HHs that experienced unemployment	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	Yes	6050000
TPN-003824	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Emergency Management Coordinator	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Extension of funding to support the Emergency Management Coordinator through 2026.		601518.8	176969.79			*					No
TPN-003557	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Director of Homelessness Initiatives	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	To extend the funding for an existing grant-funded Director of Homelessness Initiatives position, administered by the Fire Department, to facilitate housing and social service opportunities for individuals experiencing homelessness.		566847.36	2342.8			*					No
TPN-007479	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Community Event and Activation Grants	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Facilitate an RFP process for organizations, individuals and neighborhood groups that have been negatively impacted by COVID-19 to apply for grant funding ($1,000 to $10,000) for events or physical investments.		0	0								No
TPN-007434	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	NEIGHBORHOOD ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	Complete improvements in City neighborhoods that are negatively impacted by violent crimes and reduce the City's crime rates.		792317.71	364447.5								Yes	Other (please specify)	370000	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations	16 Dis Imp HHs that qualify for certain federal programs
TPN-001666	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	ARPA - City Services Fee Waivers	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Program intended to absorb credit card fees for residents opting not to make in-person payment for city fees and services. From October to December the City absorbed $337,366.64 in credit card fees for residents making payments for City services and taxes with the intent to reduce congregate activity.		593484.38	593484.38								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-012247	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Park Rangers (staff hiring)	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Project to support hiring of public safety/human services staff dedicated to mitigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.		1293399.47	332265.8			*					No
TPN-007449	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	CITY HALL VENTILATION UPGRADES	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Perform the necessary ventilation upgrades to City Hall to improve the prevention of contagious diseases.		727499	209041.5								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-012271	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Small Business Grants & Program Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.29-Loans or Grants to Mitigate Financial Hardship	The City intends to offer an application-based assistance program to small businesses disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. The City will model its assistance as an extension and expansion of the successful program funded with CDBG-CV funding. It would widen the eligibility and uses for small business grants to not only cover demonstrated losses due to COVID-19, but improvements to outdoor spaces and additional support for business planning and technical assistance.		2000000	1125187.28								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact
TPN-143104	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Homelessness Response & Emergency Shelter Operations	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.18-Housing Support: Other Housing Assistance	Funding to support emergency shelter operations and the City’s response to the homelessness crisis by providing services to approximately 50 unduplicated homeless individuals. Response to include reimbursement of various City Department details and expenditures.		398000	398000								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-004666	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Additional Planning Administrative Support	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Payroll expenses for two (2) full-time staff individuals hired to manage the ARPA program, beginning in Q4 2021.		1250262.38	207258.01
TPN-004674	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Law Enforcement Support for Violent Crime Reduction & Prevention	1-Public Health	1.11-Community Violence Interventions	Increase the number of foot patrols in high crime neighborhoods to support investigative overtime intended to reduce violent crime.		2708333.33	917524.82								No			1 Imp General Public	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-004819	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ACERT Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.13-Healthy Childhood Environments: Services to Foster Youth or Families Involved in Child Welfare System	To support children and families exposed to violence through the operation of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Response Team (ACERT). ACERT involves the coordinated efforts of local law enforcement, health care, and social service providers.		2272156.25	484471.81								No			1 Imp General Public	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-004824	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	READY, SET, LAUNCH	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.12-Healthy Childhood Environments: Home Visiting	Ready Set LAUNCH, a universal Newborn Home Visit Program for new mothers with the aim of reducing child maltreatment. This program aligns with the ARPA’s eligible public health uses due by: 1) addressing disparities in public health that have been exacerbated by the pandemic; and 2) facilitating access to resources that improve health outcomes, including services that connect residents with health care resources and public assistance programs and build healthier environments among populations disproportionately impacted by the pandemic. In general terms, home visit programs have been shown to promote effective parenting and healthy family functioning.		1073839.2	136053.95								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-003514	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Community Health Worker Program	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.19-Social Determinants of Health: Community Health Workers or Benefits Navigators	The Community Health Worker (CHW) Program initiated staff hiring efforts. Thus far, MHD successfully hired for a Supervisor position and 4 CHWs. The new team is multicultural and collectively speaks 11 languages, in addition to English (Spanish, French, Nepali, Hindi, Swahili, Kinyarwanda, Kurundi, Mandinka, Fula, Wolof, and Yoruba). In addition, the MPD successfully hired for a Coordinator position.  The primary work of this quarter (and next quarter) focused in on-boarding staff via trainings and skill development. From January-February 2022, the CHW staff are participating in a CHW Certificate program hosted by the Southern NH AHEC. The Program will also be working closely with the Harvard School of Public Health to provide occupational health and safety training and technical assistance. Additionally, staff are proactively learning more about their assigned neighborhood areas in the City, including conducting asset mapping, reaching out to local community groups and organizations, and beginning to get a sense of neighborhood concerns and needs. The CHW Program also conducted research on other model practices across the country to inform local policies and procedures, and will create a draft of policies/procedures for the Program in the second quarter. This will include a set of metrics for program evaluation and performance measurement. The Program will be utilizing a results-based accountability framework to support ongoing monitoring toward objectives and performance targets. Lastly, as this Program is a joint effort between the MHD and MPD, the two Departments will be creating a structure to support linkages and coordination of efforts across their respective disciplines of public health and public safety.		6000000	769820.52								No			15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-003510	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Healthy Food Access Strategic Plan & Implementation	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	The Manchester Health Department (MHD) has engaged the Manchester Food Collaborative (MFC) as a key partner in the Healthy Food Access Strategic Planning Initiative.  The Collaborative includes a broad range of stakeholders in the health and wellbeing of Manchester residents, including healthcare systems, managed care organizations, refugee and immigrant resettlement organizations, public schools, universities, several City departments, senior-service agencies, behavioral health service providers, New Hampshire Food Bank, and others.  The MFC meets monthly and will dedicate 30 minutes of each meeting to the strategic planning effort.  MFC members have also agreed to participate in stakeholder interviews, which will be conducted during the second quarter and used to identify priorities for addressing healthy food access in Manchester. MHD is partnering with Dartmouth College to develop a plan for resident engagement, including focus groups, resident interviews, and surveys aimed at collecting input from a diverse population of community members.  Data collection will take place during the third quarter and be incorporated into the final strategic plan.  Priorities for action will be adjusted, if necessary, to reflect resident recommendations. MHD is conducting a review of best practices in healthy food access to present to the strategic planning team as potential options for addressing the priorities identified through the planning process.  We are also working with MFC partners to conduct a landscape analysis of existing healthy food access programs and resources in Manchester and identify critical gaps in services or populations served.		412404	76112.16								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-003512	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Healthy Corner Stores Project	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.22-Strong Healthy Communities: Neighborhood Features that Promote Health and Safety	MHD has engaged Fresh Start Farms, a program of the Organization for Refugee and Immigrant Success (ORIS), to serve as the Fresh Food Hub for the Healthy Corner Stores (HCS) Initiative.  Fresh Start Farms, established in 2008, expands access to healthy, affordable, culturally appropriate food. ORIS develops local markets and trains farmers in business planning, which builds competency and integration into New Hampshire’s vibrant and growing local food system. Markets include Community Supported Agriculture (CSA), farmers markets, and wholesale contracts. MHD and ORIS have adopted the HCS best practice model of DC Central Kitchen (dccentralkitchen.org), which has nearly 70 participating stores in Washington, DC. This model is being utilized to craft policies and procedures for a HCS project in Manchester. A draft of policies/procedures will be created by the end of the second quarter. Marketing materials are also in development for promotional purposes, as well as to provide point of decision prompts in stores to denote healthy choices. In addition, a listing of 35 corner stores has been identified within Manchester’s 7 Qualified Census Tracts as potential participants in a local HCS model. Outreach to these stores has begun and will continue through the end of January 2022.  Store owners who indicate a willingness to participate in the program will undergo an in-depth assessment to better understand the store's food landscape and business sustainability. Each store will be assigned a priority score for inclusion.  The HCS project anticipates on-boarding at least 5 stores annually, which will appropriately pace project growth while providing the adequate level of ongoing technical assistance and feedback required of the DC Central Kitchen model.  The first cohort of stores will be announced by the end of the second quarter.		572200	106519.25								No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-007456	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	RINES CENTER VENTILATION UPGRADES	1-Public Health	1.4-Prevention in Congregate Settings (Nursing Homes Prisons/Jails Dense Work Sites Schools Child care facilities etc.)	Perform the necessary ventilation upgrades to the Rines Center to improve the prevention of contagious diseases.  It involves the replacement of HVAC units with new units which have increased air filtration, efficiency and controls.  Increased filtration can help mitigate airborne viruses.		350000	0								No
TPN-007463	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Clean Water State Revolving Fund Projects	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Funding for the implementation of storm water drainage projects and other water quality protection efforts.  Improve the City's sewer and storm water drainage infrastructure.This project helps to address climate change and benefits disadvantaged communities in line with the Justice40 initiative by increasing capacity of the stormwater systems throughout the City reducing flooding and damage to roadways and properties from the increased intensity of storms. These adjustments/changes are focused primarily in the older sections of the city where there is a lower median income and a higher percentage of disadvantaged people.		4000000	332754.63
TPN-011748	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Manchester Economic Development Office (staff hiring)	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.2-Public Sector Workforce: Rehiring Public Sector Staff	Re-hiring two (2) public sector staff to fulfill the roles of Economic Development Director and Business Liaison.		1334286.26	268339.5				*				No
TPN-011759	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Manchester Economic Development Office (Branding & Promotion)	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.35-Aid to Tourism Travel or Hospitality	Initiative to update and modernize City of Manchester’s branding strategy, to better support the Manchester-Boston Regional Airport and our local hospitality and tourism industries that have been heavily impacted by COVID-19.		2000000	18880								No
TPN-003828	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Job Resource Coaching & Higher Education Partnership	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.37-Economic Impact Assistance: Other	This program, beginning in partnership with Southern New Hampshire University, will be designed to bring college education within reach for every Manchester public high school student, regardless of finances, to give students who normally wouldn’t have the opportunity, the chance to pursue higher education and job training within fields located right here in our city. The program will provide a holistic approach to the application process by offering assistance with financial aid and admissions applications, class selection and registration. After other aid programs are applied toward tuition, this program will fill in the gaps. Conversations are ongoing to extend this program to other colleges, community colleges, and universities within the City, as well as incorporating a job training component for students interested in pursuing a trade. $3,000,000.00 (Funded through December 2026)		2240234	144747								No			25 Dis Imp NPs operating in Qualified Census Tracts	1 Imp General Public
TPN-003831	RCP-038781	Manchester, New Hampshire	New Hampshire	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Affordable Housing Trust Fund	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.15-Long-Term Housing Security: Affordable Housing	Makes investments in the existing Affordable Housing Trust Fund, to increase access to safe affordable housing. These funds can be made available to organizations to develop new affordable, transitional, and supportive non-congregate housing projects, as well as provide grants for individuals to apply for assistance in order to stay in their homes as they age, grants for emergency home repairs for low income individuals, grants for landlords to make improvements to their properties if their properties remain affordable for a prearranged time, make their units eligible for the Housing Choice Voucher Program, and other eligible uses to increase the amount of affordable housing within the City.		3000000	368072.58								Yes	Affordable housing, supportive housing, or recovery housing	1000000	2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations	4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity
TPN-136751	RCP-038721	Pennington County, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	ARPA Consulting	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	ARPA consulting		2040.26	2040.26
TPN-136725	RCP-038721	Pennington County, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Administrative payroll expenses for checks dated 04.02.2021 - 11.10.2022		10000000	10000000
TPN-140740	RCP-038721	Pennington County, South Dakota	South Dakota	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Direct Payroll Expenditures	3-Public Health-Negative Economic Impact: Public Sector Capacity	3.1-Public Sector Workforce: Payroll and Benefits for Public Health Public Safety or Human Services Workers	Direct payroll expenditures		6720390	6720390			125					No
TPN-067227	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Caterpillar 416 Loader	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Ground maintenance equipment.  City was unable to purchase equipment due to revenue loss as a result of COVID		180500	180500
TPN-067375	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Toro Multi Pro 5800-G WIT	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Ground maintenance equipment.  City was unable to purchase equipment due to revenue loss as a result of COVID-19		105664.29	0
TPN-035764	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Employee Buyback Vacation and Sick Hours	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Employees sell their vacation and sick hours per City's policy.  They were not allow to sell time due to revenue loss resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.		46428.71	46428.71
TPN-067325	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	John Deere Mower 2930M	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Ground maintenance equipment.  City was unable to purchase equipment due to loss of revenue due to COVID-19		176964.04	114931
TPN-117119	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Police Station Rehabilitation	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Offset cost for Rehabilitation to Lauderhill Police Station due to shortfall in revenue as a result of COVID-19	400000	63372.25	63372.25
TPN-117628	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Small Business Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.33-Enhanced Support to Microbusinesses	Providing assistance to business that negatively impacted by COVID-19	1000000	367024.95	367024.95								No			8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	8 Imp SBs that experienced a negative economic impact	21 Dis Imp SBs operating in Qualified Census Tracts
TPN-117176	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Household Assistance	2-Negative Economic Impacts	2.2-Household Assistance: Rent Mortgage and Utility Aid	Provide housing assistance to homeowners and renters	1000000	316398.77	316398.77	12							No			4 Imp HHs that experienced increased food or housing insecurity	15 Dis Imp HHs and populations residing in Qualified Census Tracts	14 Dis Imp Low income HHs and populations
TPN-117130	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Kronos Clock Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Cost to Upgrade kronos system as a result of shortfall in revenues due to COVID-19		232166.3	232166.3
TPN-118281	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Police & Fire Operating Cost	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Funds allocated to offset public safety cost due to shortfall in revenue as a result of COVID-19		4320800	2331598.5
TPN-066737	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Fire Station 30	1-Public Health	1.14-Other Public Health Services	Fire Station 30 is under construction and the purpose of this capital project is to provide  public safety services such as fire rescue and ambulance services to the residence of Lauderhill		2227969.95	2227969.95								Yes	Emergency operations centers and acquisition of emergency response equipment	5000000	1 Imp General Public		2 Imp Low or moderate income HHs or populations
TPN-032054	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed 50% or more	Public Safety Vehicle Police	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase Police vehicles to enhance public safety service to the residents of Lauderhill.		1860566	1758656
TPN-099707	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	John Deere Mower	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Ground maintenance equipment.  City was unable to purchase equipment due to revenue loss as a result of COVID		59928	59928
TPN-099722	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Public Safety Vehicle Police	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	xxx		294711.96	294711.96
TPN-077431	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	COVID-19 Incentive Check	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	The City of Lauderhill offered check in the amount of $250 to each employee who is fully vaccinated and provided proof of the vaccination.  This was an incentive to encourage employees to fully vaccinate, which will result in decreasing the  spread of the disease.		87500	87500								No			1 Imp General Public
TPN-037147	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Fire Public Safety Vehicle	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Purchase vehicle to enhance public safety services		74560	74560
TPN-036962	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	JET-VAC Equipment	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Purchased Sewer Cleaner to improve stormwater system		431000	431000
TPN-037000	RCP-038731	Lauderhill, Florida	Florida	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed	Furlough	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Reimbursement of furlough days that were not paid due to loss of revenue due to COVID 19		474257.77	474257.77
TPN-044180	RCP-038681	Bourbon County, KY	Kentucky	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Completed less than 50%	Admin by BGADD	7-Administrative	7.1-Administrative Expenses	Administration by BGADD	38436	38436	3844
TPN-064593	RCP-038795	Yucaipa City, CA	California	Tier 5.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents which received less than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government		Revenue Replacement	6-Revenue Replacement	6.1-Provision of Government Services	Revenue loss, add staffing to pre-pandemic levels, Wilson III drainage project, employee stipend, and police services.		5246309.18	5246309.18
TPN-035105	RCP-038796	Norwalk, Connecticut	Connecticut	Tier 2.  Metropolitan cities and counties with a population below 250,000 residents that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding, and NEUs that are allocated more than $10 million in SLFRF funding	Local Government	Not Started	Coastal Resiliency-Various Citywide Locations	5-Infrastructure	5.6-Clean Water: Stormwater	Projects to protect vulnerable coastal areas from flooding and beach erosion damage resulting from more frequent and powerful storms resulting from climate change		350000	0
[truncated: output stopped at 2057508 bytes; size cap per file]

File and source

File

April-2023-Reporting-Data-through-March-31-2023.xlsx

Size

19,966,271 bytes

SHA-256

9380d35794bd1dfbf0b09de4b99b58d58f512e70dc1738c6d17a009873c1a6b2

Our copy

April-2023-Reporting-Data-through-March-31-2023.xlsx

Original

home.treasury.gov