Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Text of Proposed Order, State of Washington v. DeVos (later v. Cardona), No. 2:20-cv-00182 (E.D. Wash.), Doc. 55-1 (July 20, 2020)

Text of Proposed Order, State of Washington v. DeVos (later v. Cardona), No. 2:20-cv-00182 (E.D. Wash.), Doc. 55-1 (July 20, 2020)

Summary

A proposed order in State of Washington v. Betsy DeVos, et al., No. 2:20-cv-00182-TOR, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Washington, filed July 20, 2020 as ECF No. 55-1. The caption reads Order Granting Defendants' Consent Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, noted for August 19, 2020. The proposed order would grant the motion and order Defendants to respond to the complaint on or before August 28, 2020. The signature block names Thomas O. Rice, United States District Judge, and the heading lists Trial Attorney Alexander V. Sverdlov for Defendants.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Text of Proposed Order, State of Washington v. DeVos (later v. Cardona), No. 2:20-cv-00182 (E.D. Wash.), Doc. 55-1 (July 20, 2020).” Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/text-of-proposed-order-state-of-washington-v-devos-later-v-cardona-no-1ae9c4b640/, SHA-256 619ace6d2a17cb6319ce4678e41b02b57bdccf3b291186d1deef8ee530362ef8.

Full text

      Case 2:20-cv-00182-TOR         ECF No. 55-1         filed 07/20/20   PageID.939 Page 1 of 1




     ETHAN P. DAVIS
 1
     Acting Assistant Attorney General
 2   MARCIA BERMAN
     Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch
 3   ALEXANDER V. SVERDLOV
       (New York Bar No. 4918793)
 4
     Trial Attorney
 5   U.S. Department of Justice
     Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
 6   1100 L Street, NW
 7   Tel. (202) 305-8550
     alexander.v.sverdlov@usdoj.gov
 8   Attorneys for Defendants
 9                          IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10                            EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
                                        AT SPOKANE
11
       STATE OF WASHINGTON,                                  Case No. 2:20-cv-00182-TOR
12
13                    Plaintiff,                             ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
                                                             CONSENT MOTION FOR AN
14            v.                                             EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND
                                                             TO COMPLAINT
15     BETSY DEVOS, et al.,
16                                                           [PROPOSED]
                      Defendants.
17                                                           NOTED FOR: August 19, 2020
                                                             Without Oral Argument
18
19
20          Upon consideration of Defendants’ consent motion for an extension of time to respond to

21   complaint, and upon due deliberation, it is hereby
22
            ORDERED that the motion is granted; and it is further
23
            ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to the complaint on or before August 28, 2020.
24
25          SO ORDERED.

26
27   Dated: ____________, 2020                     __________________________
28                                                 THOMAS O. RICE
                                                   UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

     ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ CONSENT MOTION FOR AN
     EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [PROPOSED]
     Case No. 2:20-cv-00182-TOR

File and source

File
55-att1-text-of-proposed-order.pdf
Size
25,220 bytes
SHA-256
619ace6d2a17cb6319ce4678e41b02b57bdccf3b291186d1deef8ee530362ef8
Our copy
55-att1-text-of-proposed-order.pdf
Original
storage.courtlistener.com
Back to top