Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Superseding Information, United States v. Farnsworth (S.D. Fla., December 23, 2024)Search ⌕

Superseding Information, United States v. Farnsworth (S.D. Fla., December 23, 2024)

Summary

A Superseding Information in United States of America v. Theodore Farnsworth, Case No. 22-20521-CR-LEIBOWITZ(s), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered on the docket December 23, 2024 as Document 161. Count 1 charges securities fraud in connection with HMNY common stock, and the penalty sheet also lists Count#:2, conspiracy to commit securities fraud. It states that Farnsworth served as Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of HMNY, and alleges that Farnsworth and J. Mitchell Lowe, Chief Executive Officer of MoviePass, falsely represented that the $9.95 "unlimited" plan was tested and profitable. It alleges that Farnsworth negotiated bonuses of $1,000,000 and $1,500,000 for raising capital. The penalty sheet lists maximum terms of 20 Years for Count#:1 and 5 Years for Count#:2.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Superseding Information, United States v. Farnsworth (S.D. Fla., December 23, 2024).” Original at ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/superseding-information-usa-v-farnsworth-dkt-161-s-d-fla-b529141e45/, SHA-256 8fb4f14fb466580aa65ee175596cfd333fb4d9bc2423f0f587c8324afb600727.

Full text

Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 1 of 31
                                                                                           TS

                                                                                 Dec 23, 2024
                             UM TED STATE S DISTR ICT C O UR T
                             SO U TH ER N DISTR ICT O F FL OR ID A                           Miami


                             CASE NO .:22z20521-CR-LEIBOW ITZ(s)
                                       15U.S.C.j78j(b)
                                       15U.S.C.j78ff
                                       17C.F.R.j240.10b-5
                                       18U.S.C.j371
                                       18U.S.C.j981(a)(1)(C)
      l
      i
   IJNiTED STATESoFAMERICA
      I
      1          v.
      !
      l
   THjODOREFARNSWORTH,
      j                  '
      !                 D efendant
                                                /

                                SU PER SED IN G IN FOR M ATIO N

          TheUnited StatesAtlom ey charges:

                                  G EN ER AI,AI,LE GATIO N S

          Atvarioustimesm aterialto thisSupersedingInform ation:

                                     Entities and Individuals

                 Helios& M athesonAnalyticsInc.(:1HM NY'')wasapubliclytradedcompanywith
   oo ces in M iam i,Florida,and N ew York,N ew York. HM NY'S comm on stock traded on the

   NASDAQ exchange tmtilin oraround Febnlaty 2019,after wùich itwas delisted from the
      i
   exchangeandbegantradinglçoverthecotmten''HM NY descrtbeditsproductofferingsasû;arange
   oftechnology platformsfocusing on big data,artificialintelligence,businessintelligence,social
      l

   listlning,andconsumer-centrictechnology.''

                 M oviepasslnc.(iiM oviepass'')wasapdvatelyheldcompanywithoflicesinNew
   York,New York. M oviepassoffered a subscription servicethrough which subscriberspaid a flat
        Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 2 of 31




              morlthlyfeein exchangeforacertain numberofmovieticketspermonth. Tousetheservice,a
                   !
              subjjcriberwouldselectam ovie,theater,and show' tim ethrough theM oviepassapplication on the
                   ?        ,
              subscriberssm e phone,and then use aM oviepass-branded debitcard thatwas loaded with the
               .   i
              costlofthem ovieticketto pay attheselectedtheater
                   (                                          . .
                   1 3          Vinco Ventures, Inc.(Cûvinco Ventures'') was a publicly traded company with
                   i
              officesinFairport,New York.Vinco'scommon stocktraded ontheNASDAQ exchangetmtilin
                   t
              or àround O ctober 2023, after w hich it w as delisted from the exchange and traded Ciover the
                   l

              cpuken''vincoventuresdescribed itselfasaselectiveacquisitionscompany focused on digital
    '         m edia and contenttechnologies.

                       4.       ZASH GlobalM edia and EntertainmentCorporation (CGZASH'')wasaprivately
              held com pany w ith officesin M iam iBeach,Florida.

                       5.       ZVV MçdiaPartnçrs,LLC (G1ZVV'')wasajointventurebetween VincoVentures
J         .
              and ZASH thatVincoVenturesandZASH used to acquireinterestsin othercompnnies,including

              LomotifPrivateLimited(ttomotif'),aSingapore-basedvideo-sharingandlivestreaming social
              networking platfonn.

                       6.       TheU.S.Securitiesand ExchangeCommission (G1SEC''),isallagency withinthe
              executive branch of the federalgovernmentresponsible for regulating the securities m arkets,

              including the issuance,m arketing atld trading ofsecurities. H M NY and Vinco Ventures securities
                   l                                   .
                   I
              w erç regulated by the SEC. Public com panies, like HM N Y and Vinco Ventures, provide              .
              i j                                       '
               nfonnationtotheSEC andinvestorsby 611.
                                                    112certain SEC Fonns,such astheForm 8-K andForm
                   !                                       -
                                                           ''                                 .
              DEF!14A,w ith the SEC using the agency's Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis,and Retrieval
                 1
                 :
                                               .



              (GGEDGAW ')system.EDGAR isadatabaseavailabletoinvestorsandthegeneralpublicviathe
              lntem et.


                   I                               .
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 3 of 31




               7.   D efendantTH E OD O RE FA R N SW OR TH W as an individualwho resided in the

   Southem D istrict ofFlorida and the N orthern D istrictof N ew York. FA RN SW O R TH w as the

   Co-Folm derand Chairm an ofZA SH and aM anagerofZV V,and briefly served asChiefExecutive

   O fficer ofVinco Ventures. Before ZA SH ,ZV V,and Vinco Ventures,FA R N SW O RTH served as

   the 1
      ChiefExecutiveOfficerand ChairmanoftheBoard ofDirectorsofHM NY BeforeHM NX
   FM G! SW ORTH served asChainnan ofLTS Nutraceuticalslnc.(G&LTS''),theChiefExecutive
       l
   Offig
       i
         elofPurpleBeverageCo.tGTtlrpleBeverage''),andtheChiefExecutiveOfficerofXstream
           .




   Bev'
      9rageN etwork lnc. (GGXStream'').
               8.   J.M itchellLow ew asan individualwho resided in the Southern D istrictofFlorida

   andèuertoVallarta,M exico.Loweserved astheChiefExecutiveOfficerofM oviepass.Before
   joiningM oviepass,Lowewasaco-foundingexecutiveofNetflixandformerPresidentofRedbox.
                                              C O UN T 1
                                           SecuritiesFraud
                             (ISU.S.C.jj78j(b);78ff;17C.F.R.j240.10b-5)
                    The General A llegations section of this Superseding Inform ation is hereby re-

   allejedandfullyincorporatedhereinby reference.
                    From atleastin oraroundAugust2017,and continuing through atleastin oraround

   M arch 2019,withinthe Southern DistrictofFloridaand elsewhere,thedefendant,

                                     TH E O D O RE FAR N SW O RTH ,

   together with others known and unknown to the United StatesAttorney,did knowingly and
       (
   w illfully,in cozm ection w ith the purchase and sale ofa seclzrity,thatis,cornm on stock issued by
       !

   HM NX by useofthemeansandinstrttmentalitiesofinterstatecomm erce,andby useofthem ails,
       :
   directly and indirectly,use and em ploy,and cause others to use and em ploy,m arlipulative and
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 4 of 31

       1



   deceptive devices and contrivances,in violation ofTitle 17,Code ofFederalR egulations,Section

       110b-5by:(a)employing,and causing othersto employ,devices,schemes,and artiucesto
   240.)     ,


   defraud;(b)mnklng,and causing otherstomake,untruestatementsofmaterialfactandomitting
   to stàte,and causing othersto om itto state,m aterialfactsnecessary in orderto m akethe statem ents
       f
       :
   made,in the lightofthe circumstmwesunderwllich they weremade,notmisleading;and (c)
   engaging,and causing othersto engage,in acts,practices,and colzrsesofbusinesswhich operated
       1
   andWo
      l
        uldoperateasafraudanddeceituponpersons,inviolationofTitle15,UrlitedStatesCode,
   Sectl
       ions78jand78f1)Title17,CodeofFederalRegulations,Section 240.10b-5.
       l                   PU RPO SE O F TH E SCH EM E A N D A R TIFICE       .
       !
                  Itwasthe purposeofthe scheme and artificefOrthe defendant,FARNSW ORTH
       j                                                                     '
   and'
      J.MitchellLowe,totmjustlyemichthemselvesatldothersby:(i)makingmateriallyfalseand
   m isleading representationsto investorsrelating to the businesses and operationsofHM NY and

   M oviepass,including HM N Y 'S and M oviepass's productofferings,teclm ology,and capabilities,

   inordertoartificiallyincreasethepriceof         Y commonstockandattractnew investments;(ii)
   concealingfrom investorsthetruefacts;(iii)divertingtheproceedsoftheschemeandartificefor
   their personal use and benefit through bonuses and m isuse of corporate funds for personal

   expenses'
           ,and(iv)concealingtheschemeandartificefrom regulators,law enforcement,investors,
   and the m edia.

                  M ANNER AND M EAN S OF TI'
                                           IE SCHEM E AND ARTIFICE
       7 The m anner and m eans by w hich the defendant soughtto accom plish the purpose ofthe
      !
   schçm e and artifice included,butw ere notlim ited to,the follow ing:

                  To artificially inflate the price ofH M N Y com m on stock and increase the volum e
                       .




   of H M N Y shares traded by attracting new investm ents, FA R N SW OR TH and Lowe m ade
      )
      E
      l
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 5 of 31


      l
   m atçrially falseandmisleadingrepresentationsaboutthebusinessesand operationsofHM NY and
      1
   M oli
      !
        epass.Forexample,FARNSW ORTH andLowerepresentedthat:
             a. M oviepass's new $9.95 çtunlim ited''plan was tested,sustainable,and would be
                profitable orbreak even on subscription fees alone;

                HM NY had teclmology and capabilitiesitwould use,and wasusing,to generate
                revenueby analyzing andm onetizing M oviepass'ssubscriberdata;

                M oviepass ylso had multiple non-subscription revenue strenm sthatwould m qke
                M oviepassprofitableand even self-sufficientratherthan dependenton HM NY for
                funding;and

                M oviepass's costofgoods,asreflected in thenumber'oftickets each subscriber
                ptlrchased using his or her subscription, w as naturally declining over tim e
                consistentw ith FA RN SW O RTH 'Sand Low e's stated expectations.

                Al1oftheserepresentations,which werem adeto artificially inflateHM NY'Sstock

   price and increase the volum e of HM NY shares traded by attracting new investors,w ere

   m aterially false and m isleading.ln tnzth and in fact,and as'FA RN SW O RT H and Low e knew :

                The$9.95ttunlim ited''planwasatemporat'ym arketing gimm icktodrivesubscriber
                grow th,and M oviepass w as losing m oney as a result;

             b. HM NY did not possess the teclmology or capabilities to generate revenue by
                analyzing M oviepass's subscriber data and had not integrated any HM NY
                technology orcapabilitiesinto the M oviepassapplication;

                M oviepass did not have non-subscription revenue stream s that w ould m ake
                M oviepass self-sufficientorotherw ise offsetthe lossesM oviepassexperienced as
                aresultoftheunprofitable $9.95 Gçunlim ited''plan;and

             d. Behind thescenes,M oviepasswasactively preventing subscribersf'      rom using the
                purpörtedly tGulzlimited''setwiceforwhich they hadpaidbecauseFARNSW ORTH
                and Low e personally directed M oviepass em ployees to (çthrottle''subscribers who
                m ostfrequently used the service to buy m ovie tickets and then FAR N SW O R TH
                and Low e concealed the tnze nattlre of their &Gtactics'' from investors mld
                subscribers.

                In furtherance ofthe schem e,FA RN SW O R TH and Low e m ade these m aterially

   falsçandmisleadingrepresentationsinpressrefeases,SEC filings,intelwiewsonpodcastsandon
      1

      f
      1
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 6 of 31

  '


          !
          (
          .

      telel
          yision, and in printand onlinemedia,al1ofwhich wereintended toreach,and attim esdid in
          l
      facti
          reachjinvestors and the generalpublicthro'
                                                   ughouttheUnited Statek, including w ithin the
          1
      Southern DistrictofFlorida,and elsewhere. FARNSW ORTH and Lowe appeared in the m edia

      and review ed and approved the pressreleasesand SEC filings.

                                       HMN Y%Acquisition ofM oviepass
              7.        By 2017,M oviepass w as experiencing financialdifficulties. M oviepasshad been

      operating ata lossforyears and w asunableto obtain additionalfinancing. Low e w as on theverge

      ofsfmtting down M oviepass'sbusinessoperationswhen hem etFARNSW ORTH .

              8.        On or aboutAugust 15,2017,atthe direction ofFARN SW ORTH and Lowe,

      HMVY issuedapressreleasennnouncingthatHM NY hadagreedtoacquireamajorityownership
      interestin M oviepass(theGW cquisition'').HM NY alsoannouncedthatM oviepasshadlaunched
      a new nationw ide subscription program thatenabled new subscribersto see Elunlim ited''m oviesin

      theaterswith no blackoutdatesfor a flatm onthly fee of$9.95. The strategic rationale for the
      A cquisition,accordingtothepressrelease,wastoGcincreaseshareholdervalue''by using              Y's

      tGbig data'' and 'tartificial intelligence'' capabilities to m onetize M oviepass's subscriber data,

      including from the new subscribers M oviepass expected to sign up as a result of the $9.95
      çûunlim ited''plan.

              9.        A s a term of the Acquisition,M oviepass agreed, following the closing of the
          7
      Acquisition,toapplyforlistingahdseektobegintradingontheNASDAQ ortheNew YorkStock
      Exchangeby M àrch31,2018,andHMNY wouldremainthemajority shareholderofM oviepass.
          i         .

          l 10.         B egirm ing w ith the annotm cem entoftheA cquisitioù,FA R N SW O RTH alzd Low e
          I                 '
      launche'
             d a campaign to artificially inflate the price of HM NY comm on stock by publicly

      prom oting m aterially false and m isldading inform ation,as described below. FA R N SW O R TH


                                                        6
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 7 of 31




   andityow e appeared fornum erousinterview son television,and in printand orllinem edia,avail>ble
       l
   th i
     roughoutthe U llited Statesand elsew here,including w ithin the Southern D istrictofFlorida. For

   example,FARNSW ORTH wasintelwiewedbytheM iamiHeraldfoïan articletitled Ctl-lollp vood

   IsBeing Run OutofM iami.'' FARNSW ORTH atld Lowe also issued,orcaused to be issued,

   num erous press releases on behalf of HM N Y and M oviepass,m any ofw hich w ere dissem inated

   through BusinessJrzircviatheInternettomediaousletsthroughouttheUnited Statesandelsewhere,

   including w itllin the Southelm D istrict of Florida. M any of these interview s and press releases
      !
   wertfiled with the SEC on Fonn DEF 14A and Form 8-K,respectively,and available onlinevia
      l
   the SEC'SEDGAR website.
       l
               Follow ingtheA cquisition,H'
                                          M N Y raised hundredsofm illionsofdollarsfrom debt

   and equity offerings.

          12.    FA RN SW O RTH 'S com pensation w as based, in part, on the sale of HIM N Y

   securities. In oraround znid-December2017,FARNSW ORTH negotiated a $1,000,000 bonus
   for his role in raising capitalup to thatpoint.A nd in or azound M arch 2018,FA R N SW O RTH

   negotiated a $1,500,000 bonus for his role in completed offeringsofHM NY securitiestotaling
   $190,000,000 in grossproceedssincem id-Decem ber2017.
          13.     FARNSW ORTH 'S em ploym ent agreem ent also provided for the paym ent of

   m ulti-million-dollarbonusesbased on m ilestonestied to thestock priceofHM NY.

      TkeDefendantandLoweM adeM aterially FalseandM isleadingRepresentationsAbout
                          M oviepass%SubscrktionM odel
      i
      j 14.       lnthecourseofnegotiatingtheAcquisition,FARNSW ORTH proposedtoLowe
      t
      l
   thajM oviepassslash itspricepointand oftkr an IGllnlimited''plan where,for$9.95 perm onth,
   subscriberscould see Ctany m ovie,any theater,any day.'' On oraboutJuly 6,2017,Low e em ailed

   M oviepass executives about FAR N SW O RTH 'S proposal, which Low e acknow ledged w ould
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 8 of 31




       catpe M oviepassto lose m oney,m iting:
         l
         1
         !          ok now fbrthe crazy idea Iw ould like each ofyou to tellm e w hy this is a
                                              .

                    bad idea. Iwantto changeolzroneand only pricing to $9.95 perm onth.A
                    m ovieaday.Try itforFreeforeither2 weeksor1m onth.Pleasenoreason
                    totellm ehow much money we could lose.
      ln re1sponseto Low ensem ail, and atvarioustim esthereafler,m em bersofthe M oviepassexecutive
         1

      team confinned to FARNSW ORTH and Lowethatthe $9.95 Eiunlim ited''plan waslmprofitable
      and tm sustainable.
         i
         .          Believing that H M N Y ,s stock price w as tied,in part,to M oviepass,s sujascrkbey
         1
     cotms,FARNSW ORTH andLowelaunchedthe$9.95Gçunlimited''plan asamarketing gimmick
         1
     toatiractnew subscribersandincreasethepriceofHM NY stock.In responseto questionsabout
     whetherthe $9.95 tGunlim ited''plan wastttoo good to betrtze,''FARN SW ORTH and Lowem ade
     materially falseand misleading representationsthatthe plan had been tested and was aprofitable
 '
     and sustainable business m odel,when in factthey lcnew ithad notbeen tested and was neither
                                                                                      .




     profitablenorsustainable.

             16.     Forexam ple,on oraboutAugust 16,2017,FA RN SW O RTH and Lowe appeared

     for a joint interview on Fox Business,dlzring which they were specifically asked whether
     M oviepasswould losemoney on the$9.95 Ettmlim ited''plan.Loweprom oted them aterially false
     narrative thatthe $9.95 Gltmlimited''plan would not lose m oney even though he had privately
      acknowledged w eeks earlierthatitw as a CGcrazy idea''thatw ould lose m oney:

             Low e:W e have figured outa w ay to give people a dealw herethey cannotbelieve w e can
             even afford to give.

             lnterview er:Yea,because you lose m oney.

             Low e:Yea,no,w e actually don't.U h,and.

             Interview er:H ow do you notlosem oney?


                                                    8
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 9 of 31




          Lowe:W e have builta system thata'ttractspeople-apricepointthatatlractspeoplethat
          only go threeto six tim esa year.

                  Lowe'srepresentationswerem aterially falseandm isleading because,in truth and

   in fact,and asFARNSW ORTH andLoweboth knew,neitherHM NY norM oviepasshad tested

   the $9.95 Gltm lim ited''plan,which had only been proposed for the first tim e internally weeks
   before. FAR N SW O RTH and Low e also knew Low e's representations w ere m aterially false and

   m isleading because,in reality,FARNSW ORTH and Lowe lcnew the $9.95 ilunlim ited''plan
   w ould lose m oney.

          18.     On oraboutA ugust16,2017,Low e appeared fora printinterview for Variety conl,

   w hich HM N Y filed w ith the SEC on Form D EF 14A ,and again prom oted the m aterially false

   nm-
     rativethatthe$9.95 ççtmlim ited''planwasprofitableandsustainable:

          Interviewer:You are operating at a lossand subsidizing the tickets yolzrcustom ersbuy.
          AM C claim sthat at som e pointyou willhave to raise yotlr prices or you'llgo out of
          business.Arethey correct?

          Low e:The answ eris no.They don'ttm derstand olzrbusiness m odel.

          19.     Low e'srepresentation w asm aterially false and m isleading because,in truth and in

   fact,and asFARNSW O RTH and Low:both ktlew,the $9.95 CGunlimited''plan wasa temporary
   m easurethatw asunprofitable.

                  On oraboutSeptem ber22,2017,FA RN SW O RTH appeared fora printinterview

   withPipelineData,LLC (çcpipelineData''),which HM NY filedwiththeSEC onForm DEF 14A.
   FARNSW ORTH repeated the materially false claim sthatthe $9.95 &çurtlirnited''plan had been
     I
   testèd and proven profitable:
      l
      i Interview er:How isthe$9 95 pricing going to w ork w ithin yourbusinessm odel?
                                    .
      7

          FA RN SW O RTH :M oviepass has been arolm d for five years,so we have a w ealth of
          historicaldata.At$39,theaveragecustom erwould goto fotlrm oviesam onth.At$29,the
          average dropped to three m ovies a month.W hen M oviepass wentto $19,the average
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 10 of 31




           custom er went to two m ovies a m onth. So we think we can be profitable on the
           subscriptionsat$9.95 andthen m aketherealmoney from theadditionalrevenue sources.
           The sizeofourcustom erbasewillgiveusa lotofleverage.

           Interviewer:So,you thinkyou can break even on the subscriptionsalone?

           FA RN SW O RTH : I'm confidentthatw e will.W e already see it in our first 30 days at
           $9.95.Usagewaseven lowerthanw eanticipated.
                   FARNSW ORTH 'Srepresentationswerem atetially falseand m isleading because,

   in truth and in fact,and asFARNSW ORTH and Lowe both knew,no testing had been done on
       I
   the$9.
      i
        95 Gttmlimited''plan anditwasatem porary gimm ick thatwastmprofitable.
       1
       !           W ithin w eeks of FA RN SW O R TH 'S Pipeline D ata interview , Low e pdvately
       l
       !
   inqttired aboutchanging the $9.95 Ecunlim ited''plan thathepublicly claim ed wassustainable. On
   or aboutO ctober 6,2017,Low e em ailed a tenm of M oviepass executives to request(teveryones

   gsicqfeedback onremovingtheaterswhochargeabove$12or$13.Thoughts?''lnresponse,one
   M oviepass executivew rote:

           Tricky situation.Thiscreatesa few differentissuesin afew differentareas.

           First,itremovesa majority oftheatersin large markets:NYC,LA,DC,SF,Seattle,
           Philadelphia.Acrossonlythetop 15majornetworksitimpacts,itaffects50% ofouruser
           base.
                                                  ***


           Then w e getinto the press/publicity aspectofit.Basically,'
                                                                     thatw ould giveAM C validation
           thatthey w ere righta1lalong;thattllis is nota sustainable product and itcom pletely lcills
           any credibility w e have lefl.

           23.     FARNSW ORTH and Lowe continued to make similar m aterially false and

    m isleadingrepresentationsabouttheprofitability andsustainability ofthe$9.95Cculllimited''plan.

    Forexnmple,on oraboutJanuary 9,2018,FARNSW ORTH and Lowe appeared for ajoint
    interview on YahoolFinance. W hen asked dtlring thatintetwiew whether$9.95 wasSçtoo low of
    a price point,''FA RN SW O RTH falsely responded,11N o,''while Low e m isleadingly added that

                                                   10
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 11 of 31




    thèpricepointattractedm oviegoerswho only attended m oviesfivetim esayear.

      .   24.    In that sam e intelwiew, Lowe also made the m aterially false and m isleading

   l'epresentation thatitw asCGnottnle ata11''thatM oviepassneededm ovietheatersto agreeto provide

   M oviepasswithlowerticketpricestoturn aprofit(i.e.,toreducethedifferencebetweentheprice
   M oviepasspaidforamoveticketandtheamotmtM oviepassreceivedfrom monthlysubscribers).
   LoFe knew llisrepresentation wasm aterially false and m isleading when he made itbecause,as

   desçribed in paragraph 23,Lowe had earlier explored the possibility of rem oving from the

   subscription servicetheatersthatchargedm orethan $12 or$13 foram ovieticket.

          25. On oraboutJanuary 16,2018- one week following the January 9,2018,joint
   interview w ith Yahool Finance- ïuom      texted FA R NSW O R TH and H M NY Executive

   concelming thelossescaused by subscribers'useoftheserviceforwhich they werepaying and to

   suggestM oviepasstenninatethe $9.95Giunlim ited''plan.
          26.    The nextday,on oraboutJanuary 17,2018,Low e again texted FAR N SW O RTH

   about the need to change the $9.95 çhlnlim ited'' plan. In his private communication to

   FARNSW ORTH, Lowe aclcnowledged that the $9.95 Etunlimited''plan always had been a
   tem porary m easure and thatitw as notsustainable.

                 A pproxim ately one w eek later,on or about January 26,2018,Low e appeared

   fora printinterview with The H ollywood Reporter,and again prom oted the m aterially false

   narrativethatthe$9.95 çûunlim ited''plan wastested,sustainable,and profitable:

          lnterviewer:Isthereapointwhenyou'lljustnotbeabletoaffordmoresubsgj.:.,
          subscribersjbecauseyou'rebuyingthem toomanytickets?
          Low e:N o.Idon'tknow why everybody believesthatour custom ersare w atching so
          m any m ovies.A tsom e pointw e'llshare m ore data w ith you and yoil'llbe shocked....
                                                ***
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 12 of 31




             lnterviewer:Isthereapointwhereyou'llneed to raisethepriceofasub?

             Low e:W e don'tneed to raise the price.1 spent a yearstudying how 1can getpeople who
             spend $50 ayeargoing to moviesto spend $120 ayear,and $9.95 isthe price pointthat
             gets them into the theatersm ore oflen.
                                '

             28. Lowe'srepresentationswerematerialiyfalseandmisleadingbecause,in truthand
   in fact,and as FARNSW ORTH and Lowe both knew,no testing had been done on the $9.95
                                    '
         ,


   çGunlim ited''plan and itwasatem porary m easurethatwasunprofitable.lhdeed,bythetim eofthis

   interview, FARN SW ORTH and Lowe had already agreed privately to abandon the $9.95
          i
   ttttlllirrlite(1:'ln1E:11.
        1
        i
        !
        I               on oraboutFebruary 18, 2018,whileappearing on an episodeoftheRecodeu edia
         !
   podcast,Low e again falsely represented thatM oviepassçGtested like crazy tm tilw e w ere ready to

   roll outthe$9.95plan.''AtthetimeLowem adethisrepresentation,heknew thatM oviepasshad
   nottestedthe $9.95 ççtmlim ited''plan.

             30.        On or about April 13, 2018, M oviepass annotmced it was retiring the $9.95
        l
   lGunlim ited''plml.FARNSW ORTH andLowe,however,continued tom akematerially falseand
        t
   m isleading representationsaboutM oviepass'ssubscription plan to artificially inflate the price of
                 '
        .



   HMXY'Sstock. Forexnmple,on oraboutApril27,2018,Lowe texted FARNSW ORTH to
   suggestM oviepassreintroduce the $9.95 (sunlim ited''plan to artificially inflate HM NY'S stock
        l
   price and cause investorswho speculated thatthe price ofHM NY would decline (commonly
        )
        '

   referredto asGtshol'
                      tsellers''orGsshorts') toE1panic''-
                                                        .
             Lowe:W ecouldblow peopleaway ifon W ednesday wedoUnlimited for$9.95
             FA R N SW O R TH :1lcnow

             Löw e:W e should

             FARNSW ORTH:Changethewholestoryg.qlagreel.)Andjustkeepthrottleingg.)And
             nottellanyone
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 13 of 31




              Lowe:The shortswillparlic

                                        :#
                                        O                                           .
              FARNSW ORTH:Omg                listentoyou!!!!Your(sicjstartingtoscazeme1oI
              Low e:Learning

              FA R N SW OR TH :Lo1

       On oraboutM ay 2,2018,fewerthan threeweeksafteritwasretired,the$9.95 llunlim ited''plan
       w as reintroduced forthis fraudulentpup ose.

          TlteDefendantandLoweM adeM ateriallyFalseandM isleading RepresentationsAbout
          6
          i                HMNYSDataAnal
                                       kticsTechnolog.vandCapabilities
          !
                     FARNSW ORTH and Lowe repeatedly m ade the m aterially false claim thatthe

       strategic rationale behind H M NY 'S acquisition ofM oviepassw asto enable       Y to leverage its

       data analytics technology and capabilities to increase shareholder value by m onetizing

   M oviepass'ssubscriberdata.

                     Forexnm ple,in H M NY 'SA ugust 15,2017,pressrelease,which w as dissem inated

   to investors tllrough Business W ire and filed w ith the SEC on Fol'
                                                                      m 8-K ,FAR N SW O RTH was

   quoted as saying: (G1believe the technology platform sthatHelios and M atheson hasbuiltoverthe

   yeaisare aperfectfitfortheM oviepassfamilyg.) With ol.
                                                        lrbig dataand adificialintelligence
   platfolnnsandotherteclmologiesthatwe own,wewillbeabletobring a significanttechnological

   advantage to M oviepass.''
   '

                     These representations in H M N Y 'SA ugust 15,2017,press release w ere m aterially
          )
   falseî and m isleading because,in truth and in fact,and asFA R N SW O RTH and Low eboth knew,
          !
   HM N Y did notpossessorotherw ise Ctown''thetypesoftechnologiesdescribed in thepressrelease,

   including (tbig data''and Elartificialintelligence''platformsorany othertechnologies capable of

   m onetizing M oviepass's subscriber data.
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 14 of 31



       i
       l 34. Following the Acquiskion,FARNSW ORTH and Lowe repeatedly made the
       f
   m aterially false claim that HM N Y 'S technologies w ere being used to analyze M oviepass's

   subscriber data and integrated into the M oviepass application. For example, on or about

   Septem ber 14,2017,H M N Y issued a press release that w as dissem inated to investors and the

   m arketonlinethrough Business JKrc,TheM iam iHerald website,and an 8-K filed with the SEC,

   am ong otherm eans. The pressrelease stated:

           U sing the H elios and M atheson A nalytics resottrces,M oviepass Inc.analyzes consum er
           trends, patterns and activities to engage subscribers with m ovie related m erchandise,
           advedising,andconcessionsrelevanttotheirM oviepass'experiences.HeliosandM atheson
           believesitstechnology stack com binedwith theM oviepassbusinessmodelwilltransform
           the m ovie going experience and create greatvalue for both com panies. ...Helios and
           M atheson's technology learns individualm oviegoer'stastes and m akesl'ecom m endations
           based on recorded preferences for specific gem'es,actors and even the opinionsof friends
           w ith sim ilarlikings....

   A lso in the pressrelease,FA RN SW O R TH w asquoted as saying:Gc-
                                                                    l-his explains our sustainable

   business model:Helios and M atheson is incorporating advertising m odels with the M oviepass

   application using artificial intelligence, algorithms, and m achine learning so we can provide

   studiosw ith m ore precise data fortheir advertising eflbrts.''

       .   35.    These representations in H M N Y 'S Septem ber 14, 2017, press release w ere

   m atprially falseand misleading beoause,in truth and in fact,and asFARNSW ORTH and Lowe
       l
   both knew,HM NY didnotpossessthetypesoftechnologiesdescribed inthepressrelease,HM NY

   had notused any ofitstechnologiesto analyze M oviepass's subscriber data,and H M N Y had not

   integrated any ofitstechnologiesinto theM oviepassapplication.

       i j6* OnoraboutOctober24720177HM NY issuedapressreleasethatwa'
                                                                    sdisseminated
       t
   to i/vestorsandthem arketonlinethroughBusiness m rc,TheM ialniHerald website,and an 8-K
       :
   filed w ith the SEC,am ong otherm eans. The pressrelease stated:



                                                    14
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 15 of 31




           FollowingHM NY'Spurchaseofamajoritystakein M oviepass,wilichrem ainssubjectto
           the approvalofHM N Y 'S stockholders,HM N Y plansto further integrate its data analytics
           capabilitiesw ith the M oviepass service to analyze m oviegoer'sbehaviorsand preferences,
           w ith the goalof helping the film industry better understand what audiences w ant.W ith
           HM N Y 'S capabilities,H M N Y believesthatM oviepass can bridge an intelligence gap for
           them ovietheaterindustry so theentirefilm ecosystem can betterserveaudiencesin areas
           ranging from productionto advertising.

   In the pressrelease,FA R N SW O R TH w as quoted as saying:CûW lzen you apply com puterscience

   and m achine learaing to an industry that w e believe has lacked significant innovation,useful

   patterns start to em erge.     Together, 1 believe H M N Y and M oviepass can offer im po/ant'

   analyticsto m ovie sttzdiosand exhibitorswhile serving the interestsofm oviegoersin theprocess.''

                  These representations from H M N Y 'S October 24, 2017, press release w ere

   m aterially false and m isleading because,in tnzth and in fact,and as FA RN SW O RTH and Low e

   both knew ,HM N Y did notpossessthe typesoftechnologiesdescribed ih thepressrelease,H M N Y

   had notused any ofitstechnologiesto analyzeM oviepass'ssubscriberdata,and HM NY hadnot

   integrated any ofitstechnologiesinto theM oviepassapplication.

           38.    FAR N SW O RTH and Low e also repeatedly m ade the m aterially false

   representation thatHM N Y 'Stechnologiesw erebeing integrated into the M oviepass application to

   createarevenue stream based on aisNightattheM ovies''conceptwhereby M oviepassintegrated
       i
       I
   data,aboutsubscribers'activitiesbefore and afterthey attended am ovie into itsbusinessm odel.

   For exam ple,on or about O ctober 16,2017,Lowe appeared for all interview on F ox Business
       !

   during which he explained the IcN ightofthe M ovies''irlitiative:

           lnterdew er:A nd you said thatyour com pany M oviepass is planning to m ake a profitby
           selling user-data to U ber,H ollywood Studios,restaurants close to the theaters.B asically,
           botlom line is,you say you're notselling data butyou're using the datato inform .

           Low e:Right.You know,people w antto go to the m ovies m ore often butthey don'tw ant
           to take therisk ofabad m ovie.So,w hatw e do atM oviepass isw e help them m ake a better
           decisionasfarasenjoyingthemovie.Butgoingtothemoviesthere'smuchmoretoitthan
           justgohlgstraighttothemovietheater.Yougotodinner.Youmighthavedrinks.Youmight
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 16 of 31




           use U berorLyft.So,w e're going to help our subscriberto getto al1those businesses and
           getdiscountand benefits and -

           Interviewer:So,willUber pay forthat information? Do the Hollyw ood restaurants - 1
           m ean,are they paying forthatdata?

           Lowe:They will.A swe drivemore and m ore ofoursubscribersto theirbusinesseswe'll
           take a share ofthe increm entalprofit.

           Interview er:And how do you know w herepeople are going afterthey go to the m ovies?

           Lowe:W ell,youknow,today withyotlrphonein yourpocket,peoplecantrack pretty much
           whereyou are.You 1og on toFacebook,they know whereyou are.W hen you 1oginto our
           app,w e know w here you are.Because w e autom ate yourm ovie subscription by essentially
           w hattheateryou're close to.

           39.    Low e's representations w ere m aterially false because, in truth and in fact, and

   FA R N SW OR TH and Low e both knew,neitherHIM N Y norM oviepasstracked or collected data

   on the location ofM oviepasssubscribers atany pointwhen .the M oviepass application was

   notactiveforthepurposeofsearching foranearby theaterorchecking into atheater. M oreover,

   asFA R N SW OR TH and Lowe also ktlew,H M N Y had notused any ofitstechnologiesto analyze

   M oviepass's subscriber data, and H M NY had not integrated any of its teclm ologies into the

   M oviepass application.

                   D uring their January          2018,          interview   on Yahoo! Finance,
       ;
       l
   FAIJNSW ORTH and Lowe were specifically asked about the source of HMNY'S and
       i
   M oviepass'srevenues.FAR N SW O RTH and Low e prom oted them aterially false and m isleading

   narrative thatHM N Y 'Sm onetization ofM oviepass's subscriberdata w as driving the com panies'
       1
   revenlles:

           lntetwiew er:H ow are you possibly m aking m oney?

           FAR N SW O RTH :Stzre.W ell,1thirlk,people ask us that allthe tim e.A nd w e've know n
           fn'om day one,H elios is a ...analytics com pany.So w hen 1 first gottogetherw ith M itch,
           and w e looked at a11the data,the analytics,whatitw as,that's really w hatm ade us m ake
           the decision to investin M oviepass.
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 17 of 31




                                                         +


           lnterviewel':Let'swork olzrway tluough a couple ofthe shol'targtlmentsoutthere. The
           idea ofselling data istotally overvalued. There so m uch dataoutthere,nobody wantsto
           buy it.You can'tm onetizethedatapart.''

           FA R N SW OR TH :lçW hen w e look atthe data side,it's a di/erent story ...that's w here
           you're m aldng yourm oney,on,on the data,the advertising.



           Interviewer:So,whatdoesHelios& M atheson do?Becausewereporton the stock a11the
           time,arldwejokeGtheyshouldjustchangetheirnametoM oviepass...'
           FA RN SW O R TH : ...l-lelios is really a data analytics com pany,w hich really m ade the
           perfectm arriage ofM oviepass and the data analytics ofhow w e're driving the revenues of
           the com pany rightnow ....

           41.      Theserepresentationswerem aterially falseand misleadingbecause,in trtzth andin

   fact, and as FARNSW ORTH and Lowe both knew, HM NY did not possess the types of

   teclmologiesthatcould be used to monetize M oviepass's subscriberdata,HM NY had notused

   any ofitstechnologiesto analyze M oviepass'ssubscriberdata,and HM N Y had notintegrated any

   ofitsteclm ologies into the M oviepass application.

       ! 42.        FARNSW ORTH andLowealso knew theserepresentationswere materially false
       1
   and m isleading because,in reality,dataanalyticswerenotdriving thecompanies'revenues. For
       1


   the fiscalyearthatended nine dayspriorto thatinterview,M oviepassrepol-ted only revenue from

   subscriptions.     ln the first quader of 2018, M oviepass reported revenues com posed

   overwhelm ingly of subscription revenue. lndeed, after one M oviepass executive notified

   FARNSW ORTH andLoweaboutclosingadeal,hejokedthatitwasin anamotmtthat&r oesn't
   Pay anyone's salary yet.''

           #J.      On or about M arch 2,2018,Lowe spoke at the Entertainm ent Finance Foplm ,

   giving a speech titled,Cr ata is the N ew Oi1:H ow W illM oviepassM onetize It?''Low e repeated
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 18 of 31




   hisp aterially false claim thatM oviepass gathered data aboutits subscribersby tracldng,them

   through theirsm artphonesaspal4ofitsEtN ightattheM ovies''initiative.Lowefalsely stated:

          W egetan enorm ousam ountofinfonnation....becauseyou arebeingtracked in you.     rGPS
          by the phone,ourpatentbasically turns on mld offourpaym entsystem by hooking that
          card to the deviceID on yourphone,so w ew atch how you drivefrom hom e to them ovies.
          W e w atch w here you go afterwards,and so w e know the m oviesyou w atch.W e lcnow a11
          aboutyou.

   Aftertheinterview,when itwaspointedoutthattracking subscribersviolated M oviepass'sprivacy

   policy,am ediabacklash ensued.

          44.    On or about M arch         2018, one of FA RN SW O RTH 'S assistants texted

   FA RN SW O R TH a statem ent to m ake to a reporter, which FAR N SW O R TH approved. The

   statem ent, w llich further supported FA RN SW O R TH 'S and Low e's m aterially false nal-rative

   aboutHM NY'SuseofdataanalyticstomonetizeM oviepass'ssubscriberdata,readasibllows:
          ltisamysterytomewhy somanypeoplearesulmrisedthatHMNY (abigdataanalytics
          company)and M oviepassm'eusing datato innovatethemovieindustly ...Formonths
          w e'vebeen hearing Ethow doesM oviepassplan to m ake a profit,''thisishow .The analysis
          and 'understanding ofconsum erbehaviorisprecisely how w e are able to delivera m ovie a
          day for$9.95 a month to 2 m illion subscribers....W hatw ewilldo istttt'
                                                                                 n yourdata into
          valuablem arketplace inform ation so thatw e and everyonew ew ork w ith can createthebest
          possible experience foraudiences,the studios,and theexhibitors. Thatsaid,Our gsic)
          m em bers willalw ays have the option to choose the location-based services that are right
          forthem today and in the future.

                 On or about M arch 12, 2018, Low e issued an em ail apology to M oviepass's

   subscribers,partners,and em ployees.Low e adm itted thatM oviepassçldoesnottrack and hasnever

   tracked orcollected data on the location ofourm em bers atany pointw hen the app is notactive,''

   andtKdoesnotuseandhasneverused (backgrotmdtrackingcapabilitiesl.''Loweclaimedthathe
   was(jokingaround''whenhestatedotherwise.
          46.    On or aboutM arch 13,2018,FA R N SW O RTH privately texted Low e,adm itting:

   Ir ur stock istanking on thatletterthat w ent out.They're saying the exactthing 1w as afraid of
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 19 of 31



       J


   that!
       Iwe are notabig data company and wejustadmitted itin theletter W e gotto getyou on
                                                                              .


      l
   CNb'C stal'tchanging thenarrative.''
           47.    Throughouttherem ainderof2018,through atleastM arch 2019,FARNSW ORTH

   andLowecontinuedtopromotethemateriallyfalsenarrativethatHM NY possesseddataanalytics
   technology and capabilities thatit w as using to m onetize M oviepass's subscriber data w hen,in

   truth and in fact, and as FA RN SW O RTH and Low e knew ,H M N Y did not possess any such

   technology and capabilities.

   TheDefendantandLoweM adeM ateriallyFalseandM isleadingRepresentationsAboutNon-
                              Subscr+tion Revenue
           48.    ln addition to m aterially rnisrepresenting thatdata analytics w as a revenue strenm

   forM oviepass,FAR N SW O RTH and Low e prom oted a m aterially false and m isleading narrative

   about the existence of m ultiple other non-subscription stream s of revenue to help persuade

   investors thatM oviepass could build a sustainable and profitable business. For exam ple,w hen

   aSkCd during the September22, 2017, interview with Pipeline Data how M ov'iepassw ould be

   Profitablewiththe$9.95CGunlipited''plan,FARXSW ORTH responded:
           W e'1lgenerate revenue from m any sources.Tickets,èoncessions,advertisem ents...W e
           already have dealsin place.W e can also sellsoundtracks,posters,and otherm ovie-related
           products,right from their phones.A s soon as they're w alking out of the theater, we'll
           contactthem .W etested itand 5-8% ofpeople buy productfrom us.

           49.    FA RN SW O RTH 'S representations in this interview w ere m aterially false and

   misleading. In truth and in fact,and asFARNSW ORTH and Lowe both knew,atthispointin
       !
   timt! FARNSWORTH andLowestilldidnothaveaplanforhow tobridgethegapbetweenthe
   '




   cost'ofgoodsassociated with the$9.95 Gtunlimited''plan and achievingprofitability. On orabout
   October 8,2017,Low e w rote FAR N SW O RTH and a team ofM oviepass executivesto ask them

   to brainstorm itideas''abouthow to gençrate revenue:ççso now thatw ehave gotten into m onth 2


                                                   19
'



           )
    Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 20 of 31
           f

           1                                                                                                    .



          I w pricingm odelw ew illneedtocreateaplan onhow w egetfrom theusagelevelnow
       ofourne
           i
       t l
        o the desired profitable m odelin the ftzttlre.This w illbe critical to have wellg'
                                                                                          rounded

       assum ptionsin orderto raise g'
                                     row th capitalearly in 2018.''

               50. During the January 9,2018,YahoolFinancejointinterview,FARNSW ORTH
       falsely statedthat,ltwithinthenextsixtydays,gM oviepassjshouldbeself-sufficientonits0w11.5'
       W hen asked whatrevenue strenm sw ould make thatpossible,Lowe misleadingly claim ed that

       therewereûûM ultiplerevenuestreams.W e'resigning dealswith studios.W e're getting discounts

       from exhibitors.''

               51.    FAR N SW O RTH and Low e knew thatthe claim thatM oviepass should be self-

       sufficientwithin 60dayswasm aterially falseand misleadingbecause,in truth and in fact,around

       the same time thatFARNSW ORTH and Lowe were publicly claim ing thatM oviepasswas60

       daysfrom being self-sufficient,they w ereprivately discussing in textm essagesthefactthat,every

       w eek,M oviepass required m illionsofdollars from HM N Y to survive. A sFAR N SW O RTH and

       Low e also knew,the few deals thatM oviepasshad signed could notclose the com pany's m ulti-

       m illion-dollarweekly cash shortfall.And,asdiscussedin thetextm essagedescribedin paragraph

       26 above,FAR N SW O RTH privately acknow ledged to Low e thatH NIN Y w as notprepared to
           ;

       covdr the grow th in costs resulting from the millions of subscribers a'
                                                                              ttracted by the $9.95
           I
           I
       Ghlnlim ited''plan.                                                                                  .
           I
           r 52. OnoraboutM arch 23,2018,HMNY and M oviepassissued ajointpressrelease
           1
       thatw asdissem inated to investorsthrough Business I'
                                                           K rc and the South Florida BusinessJournal
           !

       w ebsite,am ong other m eans. The press release alm ounced that,for a lim ited tim e,M oviepass              '

       was öffering itsnnnualsubscription to new subscribersfor$6.95 permonth. The pressrelease
       stated:ççM bviepass has gained m om ent'um in diversifying its revenue stream s due to a series of


                                                      20
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 21 of 31


       )
       i
       1
   m arketing agreem entswith studios and distributors,as wellas partnershipswith a ntzm ber of
       l
   theater exhibitors. This recent success in forming relationships with studios,exhibitors,and

   m arketing partners has encouraged M oviepass to offer an even m ore attractive deal to

   consum ers.'' Also in the pressrelease,Low e w as quoted assaying:çtW ith the currentgrow th and

   supportthatwe've seen within the lastseveralm onths,our studio and exhibitorrevenues and

   othermarketing partnerships have motivated us to lowerthe price once again,offering movie

   loversgreater accessto M oviepass.''

                  These representations w ere m aterially false and nzisleading because,in truth and

   in fact,and as FA RN SW OR TH and Low e both knew,FA RN SW O RTH 'S and Lowe's reason

   forlowering the price was notM oviepass's ability to generate non-subscription revenue but,

   rather,its need to receive the fu11year's subscription paym ents up front in order to try to ease

   HM N Y 'S and M oviepass's cash sho/falls. Indeed,as early as Janua!y 2018,FA RN SW O RT H

   and Low e w ere texting abouttheirdesperate need to accessGlm assive calh''and how an EcAnnual

   P1m1can provide cash flow .''

    TheDefendantandLoweM adeM ateriallyFalseandM isleadingRepresentationsAboutthe
   NatureandCauseofM oviepassSubscribers'LowerUsageRatesandAssociatedDrop in Cost
                                      of Goods
           54.    FA R N SW O R TH atld Lowe repeatedly publicly assured investors that,based on

   histtricaldata,lubscriberusage ofthe $9.95 çtunlimited''plan would nattlrally decline overtim e
       i
       l
                                                                                   .
   assubscriberssettled into a predictable,low rate ofusage.Theirtalkingpointswereintended to
   reco1
       ncile forinvestorshow M oviepass's subscriber grow th rate could increase atbrenkneck speed

   w itho
        :utthe com pany rllnning outofm oney. A s FA RN SW O RTH and Low e knew,how ever,this

   explànation lacked any basis in fact, and subscriber usage did not naturally decline as
       i
       :
   FA R N SW O R TH and Low e had falsely claim ed itw ould.
       l




                                                  21
'




    Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL
           !               Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 22 of 31


            l

                 55.    Begimiing in or arotmd January 2018, FARNSW ORTH and Lowe agreed to

        artificially reduce subscriber usage through behind-the-scenes tactics aimed at reducing the

        am ountofmoney thatM oviepassspentbuyingm oviçtickets.Forexnmple,on January 24,2018,

        Loletexted FARNSW ORTH to discusswhich tacticsthey should useagainstsubscribers:
            :
            1
                                                        .


            ' Lowe:Ineed yourdirection in orderto givem etimeto im pactcash flow needs.Ifw ecant
            '

            ! gsicj getsuo cient ftmding ican slow.down new sub acquisition by reducing card
            : shipm ents.
            1
            k FA RN SW O R TH :Ok
                                                      *++

                 Low e:Ok so w e w ill reduce new card m ailings w eekly by 60k which w ill reduce btu.
                                                                                                      n
                 starting in 2 weeksby $600k weeldy and in 5weeksexceed $2m lowerweekly burn

                 FAR N SW O RTH :W ow

                 Lowe:Second weareremoving15Amegsicj,RegalandCinemarksthatwillreduce$50011
                 weeklyl.)3rdwewillcondtrain (sicjusageof 10plusysersgsic)probably saving $500k
                 w eekly in nextw eek

                 56.    In or around April 2018, as M oviepass's cash-flow situation worsened,

        FARNSW ORTH andLowe directed M oviepassemployeesto resetthepasswordsofthehighest

        volume usersto disruptorslow theitusage ofthe M oviepass application to buy movie tickets.

    '   One M oviepass executive w arned Low e in bolded textthatGtthere is high risk thisw ould catch

        theFTC'Sattention(andtheStateAG'sattentionl''becauseM oviepasswouldbeCGtargetinga11
            ;

        ofoùrheavyusers.''Loweresponded,ûtok Igetit''and selectedthetop 2% ofthehighestvolume
            l
        usersforthe password reset. Lowe then reconsidered and selected the 75,000 highestvolllme
            i
        userj,increasing thepercentageoftop userswho were targeted fw m 2% to approxim ately 3.4% .

        In addition,Low e also added arequirem entthatthetop 7% ofthellighestvolum eusersberequired
            l
        to vçrify theirptlrchasesby requiring them to take apicture ofthe movieticketthey purchased.
            l
            I.
                                                                      .
            û
            i                                         22
'




    Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL
           ;               Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 23 of 31



           ;
       Lowe
          I'sdecisiontodramaticallyexpandthenumberofuserswhoweresubjecttoservicedisnzption
           i                                        ''l
       promptedoneM oviepassexecutivetowrite: ol,project2% -7% -11% 101.',
               57.    o n or aboutA pril14,2018,the day af.terthepassw ord resetand ticketveriucation

       measures were implemented,Lowe texted FARNSMI R'I-I-
                                                          I to intbrm him that they had
       successftllly prevented paying subscribersfrom buyinghlmdredsofthousandsofdollars'wol'th of

       tickets.FARNSW ORTH respondedwith approvalandthen sentLoweaphotooftheprivatejet
       thathe rentedusing investorm oney to fly him selfand som eM oviepassexecutivesto theC oachella

       M usic Festival:

               Lowe:W ethink thetacticswelatmchedyesterday saved $400k

               FAR N SW O RTH :O h w ow

               Low e:Iw ashoping form ore.Today w illhave lessim pactbecause w ithin m inutesReddit
               posted solution to resetting passwordl.) We did though greatly expand the ticket
               verification which reduces alm ost by 1 m ovie w eekly forthose in the program

                                                      ***

               FARNSW ORTH:Youwouldhavehadablastonthejet
                                                      ***

               Low e:Lookslike fun.

                                                      ***

               Lowe:1hopeyou know how much iadmire you.Every day iam moreproud tobeyolzr
               pm neron thism ission.
           T
              58.      FA R N SW O RTH and Low e subsequently m ade m aterially false and m isleading
           E
           :
       representations reporting thatthe first quarter reduction in subscriberusage w as the result of a

       m attzration of the subscriber base and natural decline over tim e as subscribers settled into a

       predictable,1ow rate ofusage. For exnm ple,on or aboutM ay 16,2018,H M N Y and M oviepass

       issuedajointpressreleasetitled (GLHM NYqand M oviepassReportFirstQuarterEarnings''that

                                                      23
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 24 of 31




   wasjdisseminated to investors through Business Wire,the 50uth Florida Business Jèz/rnlf
       l
   webkite,andan 8-K filedwiththeSEC,among othermeans.Thepressreleaseannouncedthat
   H M N Y and M oviepasshad their (Ebiggestquarter''in theircom bined llistory and stated:

            0 1.
               11.core strategy hasalw aysbeen to provide a com pelling valueproposition to consum ers
           thatvastly improvestheirm ovie-going experience.As oursubscriberbaserapidly grows
           and m atures,ourfinancialgoalisto breakeven on subscribers and generate alternative
           revenue stream s...Recenttrendsrelated to averageticketpurchases,churning netgro< h
           and reducing abuse has bolstered olzr confidence in oureconom ic m odelbeing viable and
           showssigrlificantimprovementin achieving ourobjectives.M oviepassisreleasing key
           m etricsthatdem onstrate significantim provem entsto itseconom icm odeland strong appeal
           to custom ers.The trendline based on our data suggests this figure w illbe reduced f'urther
           in the com ing m onths.A s olzr subscriber base m atures, w e are also natlzrally seeing
           significantly reduced usage overtim e.

                  Theserepresentationswerem aterially falseandrnisleading because,in truth and in

   fact,andasFARNSW ORTH andLowebothinew,thereductioninsubscribers'usageandm ovie
   consum ption w as a'
                      ttributable to a forced reduction in subscriber usage,not a m aturation of the

   subscriber base or naturalcycle of use. These representations were also m aterially false and

   misleading because they om ited mention of the factthat,as FARNSW ORTH and Lowe also

   knew,M oviepasshadselectedpaying subscribersforinvollmtary inclusion inprogrnmstoprevent

   orslow useofthe servicetobuy m ovieticketsbased exclusively on thefactthat,in thepast,these

   subscribershad used the service them ost.

           A11in violation ofTitle 15,United StatesCode,Sections78j(b)and 78f1)Title 17,
                                                                                       'and
   Code ofFederalRegulations,Section 240.10b-5.




                                                  24
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 25 of 31




                                             CO UN T 2
                              C onspiracy to C om m itSecurities Fraud
                                          (18U.S.C.j371)
           1.     The GeneralA llegations section of this Superseding lnform ation is hereby re-

   alleged and fully incorporated herein by reference.

                  From atleastin oraround November2020,and continuing through atleastin or

   around September2024,within theSouthem DistrictofFloridaand elsewhere,the defendr t,

                                    TH E O D O R E FA RN SW O RTH ,

   didwillftzlly,thatis,withtheintenttoful4hertheobjectoftheconspiracy,andlcnowinglycombine,
       1
   conspire,confederateand agreewith otherslcnown and unknowntotheUnited StatesAttol-ney,to

   lcnowingly and willftzlly,in cozm ection with thepurchase and saleofa security,thatis,com mon

   stock issued by Vinco V entures,by use ofthe m eans and instrum entalitiesofinterstate com m erce,

   and by use of the m ails,directly and indirectly,use and em ploy, and cause others to use and

   employ,m anipulative and deceptive devicesand contrivances,in violation ofTitle 17,Code of

   FederalRegulations,Section240.1017-5,by:(a)employing,andcausingotherstoemploy,devices,
   schemes,and al-tificesto defraud;(b)making,and causing othersto make,untruestatementsof
   m aterialfactand om itting to state,and causing othersto om itto state,m aterialfactsnecessary in

   orderto m ake the statem entsm ade,in the lightofthe circum stancestm derwhich they w ere m ade,

   notmisleading;and(c)engaging,andcausing otherstoengage,in acts,practices,andcoursesof
   businessw llich operated and w ould operate asafraud and deceitupon persons,in violation ofTitle

   15,UnitedStatesCode,Sections78jand78ff,andTitle17,CodeofFederalRegulations,Section
   240.10b-5.




                                                  25
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 26 of 31




                                PUR PO SE OF TH E C O N SPIR ACY

          3.      Itwas the puzpose of the conspiracy for the defendant,FA R N SW O RTH ,and his

   coconspirators to tmjustly enrich themselves by:(i) making materially false and misleading
   representationsto investorsrelatingtothebusinessesand operationsofVinco Venturesin orderto

   adificially increasetheprice ofVincoVenturescom m on stock and increase the volum e ofVinco

   Venturessharestraded;(ii)concealingfrom investorsthetnzefactsrelatingtothebusinessesand
   operationsofVincoVentures'
                            ,(iii)divertingtheproceedsoftheconspiracyfortheirpersonaluse
   and1
      benefit;and (iv)concealingtheconspiracy from regulators,1aw enforcement,investors,and
   them edia.

                        M ANNER AND M EANS OF THE CONSPIM CY
          The m almer and m eans by which FARNSW ORTH and his coconspirators soughtto

   accomplishthepurpose oftheconspiracy included,butwerenotlim itedto,thefollowing:

                 To concealthe truenature ofFARNSW ORTH 'Srole in,and actualcontrolover,

   Vinco Venttlres,FAR N SW O RTH selected individuals to serve as Vinco Ventures'officers and

   directors w ith the understanding thatthose individuals w ould actatFA RN SW O R TH 'Sdirection.

                 To artificially inflate the price ofVinco Ventures com m on stock and increase the

   volti
       m eofVincoVenturessharestraded,FARNSW ORTH andhiscoconspiratorsm adem aterially
       l
       i                                                  'b i
   falseandm isleading representationsaboutVinco Venttlres usnessstrategy,businessoperations,

   and FAlkN sw o R-l-l'
                       l's role in transactions.

                 In furtherance of the conspiracy,FA R N SW O RTH and his coconspirators m ade

   these m atedally false and m isleading representationsin pressreleasesand SEC filings,a11ofw hich

   wereintended to reach,and attim esdid in factreach,investorsandthegeneralpublicthroughout

   the United States, including within the Southern District of Florida, and elsewhere.


                                                   26
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 27 of 31




   FARNSW ORTH andhiscoconspiratorsdrafted,reviewed and/orapprovedthepressreleasesand
       f
       l
   SEC filings.

                                             O V ERT A C T

           lnfurtheranceoftheconspiracyandtoachievetheobjectsandpurposethereof,atleastone
   conspirator com mitled and caused to be com mitted,in the Southern District of Florida and

   elsew here,atleastthe following overtact,am ong others:

           On oraboutApril7,2023,VincoVenturesfiled aForm 10-Q,which wasreviewed and
   appfoved by FARNSW ORTH and signed by one of FARNSW O RTH 'S coconspirators. This

   form wasdisseminatedthroughouttheUaitedStates,includingtoinvestorsin theSouthel.
                                                                                  n District

   ofFlorida.

           A llin violation ofTitle 18,U nited States Code,Section 371.

                                   FO RFEIT UR E A LLEG ATIO N S
                                     (18U.S.C.j981(a)(1)(C))
                  The allegationsofthis Superseding Inform ation arehereby re-alleged and by this

   reference fully incorporated herein for the pup ose of alleging forfeitlzre to the U rlited States of

   America of certain propeo in which the defendant,THEODORE FARNSW ORTH ,has all
   interest.

                  Upon conviction of a violation of Title 18,United States Code,Section 371,as

   alleged in this Superseding lnform ation,the defendant shall forfeit to the United States mly

   property,realorpersonal,w hich constitm es orisderived from proceedstraceable to such offense,

   ptlrsuanttoTitle18,UnitedStatesCode,Section981(a)(1)(C).
                  Ifanyofthepropertysubjecttoforfeiture,asaresultofany actoromissionofthe
   defendant:

                      a. cnnnotbe located upon the exercise ofdue diligence;
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 28 of 31




                      b. hasbeen transferred orsoldto,ordçposited with,athird party;

                          hasbeenplacedbeyondthejlzrisdiction ofthecourt;
                      d. hasbeen substantiallydimtnishedinvalue;or
                          hasbeen comm ingledwith otherpropeo which carmotbedivided without
                          difficulty.

   the U nited States shallbe entitled to forfeiture ofsubstitm e property tm derthe provisions ofTitle

   21,UnitedStatesCode,Section 8531).
          A11pursuanttoTitle18,UnitedStatesCode,Section981(a)(1)(C),Title21,United States
   Code,Section 853,andTitle28,UnitedStatesCode,Section2461(c).

                                                             ç'                   l
                                                M AR KEN ZY LA P IN TE
                                                UN ITED STATES ATTO RN EY
                                                SOU THE RN D ISTRICT OF FLORIDA


                                                                              (
                                                G LE   S.L
                                                CH IEF
                                                FR AUD SECTIONg CR IM IN A L D IV ISION
                                                UNITEP STATESDEPARTM ENT OF JUSTICE
                                                By:


                                                CH       OPH ER EN TON
                                                L        & ARCHER
                                                K ATE T.M CCA RTH Y
                                                M ATTHEW REILLY
                                                TRIM ATTORN EY S
                                                FR AU D SECTIONJ CR IM IN A L D IV ISION
                                                UN ITED STATES D EPA RTA N T OF JU STICE




                                                    28
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 29 of 31
                                    U NITED STA TES DISTR ICT CO URT
                                    SOU TH ERN D ISTRICT OF FL ORIDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                          cAsE NO.:22-20521-CR-Leibowitz(s)

                                                  CER TIFICATE O F TR IAL ATTO R NE Y
TheodoreFarnsworth
                                                  Superseding Case Inform ation:
                                                  New Defendantts)(YesorNo) NO
CourtDivision (selectone)                         Num berofN ew D efendants
    M M iami       L'.Key W est IQ FTP            Totalnum berofnew counts 1
    L FTL          I.
                    ZIW PB
1do hereby certify that:
 1. Iia
      !
        vecarefully consideredtheallegationsoftheindictment,thenumberofdefendants,thengmberofprobable
       witnessesandthelejalcomplexitiesofthelndictment/lnfonnationattachedhereto.
       1ainawarethatthelnformationsupyliedorfthisstatementwillberelieduponbytheJudgesofthisCourtinsetting
       thlircalendarsandschedulingcrimmaltrialsunderthemandateoftheSpeedyTrialAct,28U.S.C.j3161.
       Interpreter:(YesorNo) No
       Listlanguageand/ordialect:
       Thiscasewilltake    0 daysforthepartiesto try.
      Plèasecheck appropriatecategory andtypeofoffenselisted below:
       (Cleckonlyone)                      (checkonlyone)
      1 , EI 0to 5 days                  E1Petty
      11l L 6to 10 days                  E':IM inor
      111 EI11to20 days                  CQ M isdem eanor
      IV EI21to 60 days                  E'xZIFelony
      V t lZl61daysandover

      HasthiscasebeenpreviouslyfiledinthisDistrictCourt?(YesorNo) Yes
      Ifyes,JudgeD avid S.Leibowitz               Case N o.22-20521-CR-Leibow itz
      Hasacomplaintbeenfiledinthismatter?(YesorNo) No
      Ifyes,                                      M agistrate CaseN o.
 8. DqesthiscaserelatetoapreviouslyfiledmatterinthisDistrictCourt?(YesorNo) Yes
    Ifyes,JudgeDavid S.Leibowitz             CaseN o.22-20521-CR-Leibowitz(s)
 9. Dpfendantts)in federalcustody asof08/09/2023
 l0. Drfendantts)instatecustodyasofN/A
 11. Ru'le 20 f'
               rom the               Districtof
 12. Isihisapotentialdeathpenaltycase?(YesorNo) No
 13. Dàesthiscaseoriginatefrom amatterpending intheNorthernRegion oftheU.S.Attorney'sOffice
      PriortoAugust8,2014(Mag.JudgeShaniekMillsMaynard)?(YesorNo) NO
      D oesthiscase originate from am atterpending in the CentralRegion ofthe U.S.Attom ey's Office
      priortoOctober3,2019(Mag.JudgeJaredM .Strauss)?(YesorNo) No
      D id this m atter involve the participation of or consultation with M agistrate Judge Eduardo 1.Sanchez
       dttringhistenureattheU.S.Attorney'sOftke,whichconcludedonJanuary22,2023? No
 16. Did this m atter involve the padicipation of or consultation w ith M agistrate Judge M arty Fulgueira
     Elfenbein during hertenure atthe U .S.Attorney's Office,which concluded on M arch 5,2024? N o


                                                  B y: -
                                                       K ate .M ccarthy
                                                       D OJTrialAttorney
                                                       SDFL CourtID N o.           A 5502801
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 30 of 31


                             U NITED STA TES DISTRICT C O UR T
                             SO U TH ER N DISTR ICT O F FLO R IDA

                                        PENALTY SHEE:
   D efendant'sN am e:    THEORD ORE FA RN SW ORTH

   CaseNo:           22-20521-CR-Leibowitz(s)
   Count#:1

   Tîlle15UnitedStatesCodeoSections78i(b)and78f1)17C.F.11.5240.10b-5
   SectuitiesFraud
   *Mlax.Term oflmprisonment:20Years
   *MlandatoryM in.Term ofImprisonment(ifapplicable):N/A
   *M ax.Supervised Release:Tllree(3)Years
   * M ax.Fine:$5M illion ortwicetheGrossGain orGrossLoss               .
   Count#:2

   Title 18aU nited States CodesSection 371                       .-




   Conspiracy to Com m itSecuritiesFraud                           --


   * M ax.T erm ofIm prisonm ent:5 Y eazs
   *M andatoryM in.Term ofImprisonm ent(ifapplicable):N/A
   *M ax.SupervisedRelease:Tllree(3)Years
   * M ax.Fine:$250,000 ortwicethe GrossLossorGrossGain




     frRefersonly to possibleterm ofincarceration,supervised releaseand fines. Itdoesnotinclude
            restitution,specialassessm ents,paroleterm s,orforfeituresthatm ay beapplicable.
Case 1:22-cr-20521-DSL Document 161 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/23/2024 Page 31 of 31

AO 455(Rev.01/09)WaiverofanIndictmcnt

                                U NITED STATES D ISTRICT C OURT
                                                     forthe
                                           Southern DistrictofFlorida

               United StatesofAm erica                 )
                           V                           )     CaseNo. 22-20251-CR-Leibowitz(s)
                                                       )
                Theodore Farnsw orth,                  )
                        Defendant                      )
                                         W AW ER OF AN INDICTM ENT

       lunderstand thatlhavebeen accused ofone orm oreoffensespunishableby imprisonmentformorethan one
year. 1wasadvised in open courtofmy rightsandthenature ofthe proposed chargesagainstme.

       Afterreceiving thisadvice,lwaivemy rightto prosecution by indictm entand consentto prosecution by
information.



D ate:    '
                                                                              De#ndant'ssignature



                                                                         Signatureofdefendant'
                                                                                             sattorney


                                                                        Printedname(Ttfc-
                                                                                        /èntïlnf'
                                                                                                sattorney


                                                                                Judge'
                                                                                     ssignature


                                                                          Judge'
                                                                               sprintednameand title


File and source

File
161-superseding-information-as-to-theodore-farnsworth.pdf
Size
1,647,725 bytes
SHA-256
8fb4f14fb466580aa65ee175596cfd333fb4d9bc2423f0f587c8324afb600727
Our copy
161-superseding-information-as-to-theodore-farnsworth.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top