Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal — No. 1:23-cv-10084 (S.D.N.Y.)
Summary
Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal in the False Claims Act case United States ex rel. Daniel Foster v. TCC International LLC, Core Gravity LLC, and Core Club Members Corp., 23 Civ. 10084 (MKV). The Government alleges that the defendants falsely certified eligibility for two PPP loans and an RRF grant. The defendants admit that TCC International received PPP loans of $960,400 and $1,344,675.50, and that Core Club Members Corp. submitted an RRF grant application for $2,303,687.00. They agree to a consent judgment of $8,189,172.10, and the Government agrees to accept $360,000 in full satisfaction, paid in installments of $30,000. Jennie Enterprise executed a Guaranty Agreement personally guaranteeing the $360,000.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal — No. 1:23-cv-10084 (S.D.N.Y.).”
Original at www.justice.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/stipulation-and-order-of-settlement-and-dismissal-no-1-23-cv-10084-s-d-6a9a9fb8e8/
, SHA-256 0a28f108d06218e2f2870f8076108a19b3b13eb0b4df24015bb2b29a591176ba.Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. DANIEL
FOSTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC d/b/a CORE: CLUB;
CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP; and CORE:
GRAVITY LLC,
Defendants.
23 Civ. 10084 (MKV)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC, CORE GRAVITY
LLC, and CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP.,
Defendants.
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL
WHEREAS, this Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal (“Stipulation”) is
entered into by and among plaintiff the United States of America (the “United States” or
“Government”), by its attorney, Jay Clayton, United States Attorney for the Southern District of
New York, and on behalf of the United States Small Business Administration (the “SBA”); the
relator Daniel Foster (“Relator”), by his authorized representatives; and defendants TCC
International LLC, Core Gravity LLC, and Core Club Members Corp. (collectively, “Defendants,”
and together with the Government and Relator, the “Parties”), by their authorized representatives;
WHEREAS, TCC International LLC (“TCC International”) is a Delaware limited liability
corporation that was responsible for payroll costs associated with The Core Club 55th Street LLC
(“Core Club 55th”), a private Manhattan-based social club. At all times between April 2020 and
April 2022 (the “Covered Period”), TCC International and Core Club 55th had operations at 66 E.
55th Street, New York, New York 10022;
WHEREAS, Core Club Members Corp. is a New York not-for-profit corporation that
previously held Core Club 55th’s liquor license. During the Covered Period, Core Club Members
Corp. had operations at 66 E. 55th Street, New York, New York 10022;
WHEREAS, Core Gravity LLC (“Core Gravity”) is a Delaware limited liability company
that owns 100 percent of TCC International LLC. During the Covered Period, Core Gravity was
located at 66 E. 55th Street, New York, New York 10022 and operated Core Club 55th;
WHEREAS, in or about October 2023, Core Club 55th moved to 711 Fifth Avenue, New
York, New York 10022, and THE CORE CLUB: FIFTH AVE., INC., a New York not-for-profit
corporation (“Core Club 711”), became the successor-in-interest to Core Club 55th, taking over
the operations of Core Club 55th;
WHEREAS, there is currently litigation between several Core entities and Jennie
Enterprise, who controls the Core entities, and the landlord of 711 Fifth Avenue, New York, New
York 10022, captioned Jennie Enterprise, et al. v. Michael Shvo, et al., No. 653221/2024 (N.Y.
Supreme Ct. N.Y. Cty.), concerning, among other things, a lease agreement entered into by Core
5th Avenue LLC on or about July 28, 2021, for the premises located at 711 Fifth Avenue, New
York, New York 10022 (“Landlord Litigation”);
2
WHEREAS, the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) was established pursuant to the
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act, which was enacted in March
2020 and was designed to provide emergency financial assistance to millions of Americans
suffering economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. One source of relief provided by
the CARES Act was the authorization of forgivable loans to small businesses for employee payroll
and certain other expenses through the PPP. SBA’s website contained information about the PPP’s
rules (the “PPP Rules”), including eligibility criteria and reference to 13 C.F.R. § 120.110, which
identified certain businesses that were ineligible for PPP loans. Among those businesses deemed
ineligible for PPP funding were “[p]rivate clubs and businesses which limit the number of
memberships for reasons other than capacity.” 13 C.F.R. § 120.110(i);
WHEREAS, to obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business was required to submit a PPP loan
application, which is signed by an authorized representative of the business. The loan application
required the business—through its authorized representative—to acknowledge the PPP Rules and
make certain affirmative certifications regarding its eligibility to obtain the PPP loan. Following
the lender approvals of loan applications, the participating lenders funded the loans, which were
100 percent guaranteed by the SBA;
WHEREAS, the Restaurant Revitalization Fund (“RRF”) was established in March 2021
through the American Rescue Plan Act, to provide emergency assistance to qualifying restaurants
and bars impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The RRF was administered by the SBA and
allowed eligible entities funding equal to their pandemic-related loss, up to $10 million per
business and no more than $5 million per physical location. The RRF grant application required
the business, through its authorized representative, to acknowledge the RRF’s rules (the “RRF
Rules”) and make certain affirmative certifications regarding its eligibility to obtain the RRF grant.
3
The RRF Rules identified certain businesses that were ineligible for funding, including not-for-
profit entities and restaurants or bars where on-site sales to the public comprised less than 33
percent of gross receipts in 2019;
WHEREAS, on or about November 16, 2023, Relator filed a complaint under the qui tam
provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., against TCC International
LLC d/b/a Core Club, Core Club Members Corp., and Core: Gravity LLC, alleging, inter alia, that
these entities violated the FCA by fraudulently obtaining PPP loans and an RFF grant by falsely
certifying in their loan applications that they were eligible to receive these funds when, in fact,
they were not (the “Relator Complaint”);
WHEREAS, the Government alleges that during the Covered Period, Defendants violated
the FCA by knowingly presenting and making, or causing to be presented and made, false claims
and statements in connection with their submission of PPP loan and forgiveness applications, and
an application for an RRF grant. Specifically, the United States alleges that (a) Defendants TCC
International and Core Gravity (collectively, the “PPP Defendants”) (i) falsely certified that they
were eligible for two PPP loans despite the fact that the PPP Defendants intended to use the loans
to operate a private club that limited membership for reasons other than capacity, and (ii)
improperly sought forgiveness for the two PPP loans despite having been ineligible to receive
those loans in the first instance; and (b) Core Club Members Corp. falsely certified its eligibility
for an RRF grant despite being ineligible for this grant because (i) on-site sales of food and
beverages to the public did not comprise at least 33 percent of its gross receipts in 2019, and (ii) it
was a not-for-profit entity. The conduct described in this paragraph is the “Covered Conduct” for
purposes of this Stipulation;
4
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2025, the Government filed a Notice of Election to Intervene in
this matter and, contemporaneous with the filing of this Stipulation, is filing a Complaint-in-
Intervention (“Government Complaint”), in which it is asserting claims against Defendants under
the FCA and common law for the Covered Conduct;
WHEREAS, the Parties have, through this Stipulation, reached a mutually agreeable
resolution addressing the claims asserted against Defendants in the Government Complaint and
the Relator Complaint, for the Covered Conduct;
NOW, THEREFORE, upon the Parties’ agreement IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. The Parties agree that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action and
consent to this Court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over each of them.
2. Defendants admit, acknowledge, and accept responsibility for the following
conduct:
a. Core Club 55th was a private, invitation-only members club based in New
York City that included, among other things, a restaurant, bar, theater, gym,
and library accessible only to fee-paying members and their guests.
b. On October 1, 2023, Core Club 711 became the successor-in-interest to
Core Club 55th at its current location at 711 Fifth Avenue, New York, New
York 10022.
c. Core Gravity LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, owns 100 percent
of TCC International LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that was
responsible for payroll for the employees of Core Club 55th and now for
Core Club 711.
d. On April 20, 2020, TCC International LLC d/b/a Core Gravity submitted,
through its authorized representative, Jennie Enterprise (“Authorized
Representative”), an application to a financial institution for a first-draw
PPP loan in the amount of $960,400 and received a PPP loan for the
requested amount that same day. On October 6, 2021, Core Gravity, through
its Authorized Representative, applied for and, on October 29, 2021,
received partial forgiveness for the loan, in the amount of $446,223.55.
5
Between October 2021 and August 2022, Core Gravity repaid the remaining
$514,176.45.
e. On March 31, 2021, TCC International LLC d/b/a The Core Club submitted,
through its Authorized Representative, an application to a financial
institution for a second-draw PPP loan in the amount of $1,344,675.50 and
received a PPP loan for the requested amount that same day. On March 25,
2022, TCC International, through its Authorized Representative, applied for
and, on April 1, 2022, received full forgiveness for the loan.
f. In both PPP loan applications, the Authorized Representative for TCC
International LLC d/b/a Core Gravity and TCC International LLC d/b/a The
Core Club certified, among other things, that the applicants were eligible
for PPP funding, that the funds would be used in accordance with the PPP
Rules, and that the information provided in the applications was true in all
material respects. In the PPP loan forgiveness applications, the Authorized
Representative for Core Gravity and TCC International certified, among
other things, that the funds as to which forgiveness was requested were used
to pay business costs that were eligible for forgiveness, and that the
information provided in the applications and supporting documents was true
and correct in all material respects.
g. However, TCC International and Core Gravity were ineligible for their PPP
loans because they intended to, and did, use the funds to fund payment of
employees who provided services to Core Club 55th, which was a members-
only club that was ineligible for PPP funds pursuant to 13 C.F.R.
§ 120.110(i). Accordingly, TCC International and Core Gravity (1)
misrepresented in their PPP applications that they were eligible for PPP
loans when, in fact, they were not; and (2) falsely certified in their loan
forgiveness applications that the funds were used to pay eligible business
expenses and that the information provided in their loan applications was
true and correct in all material respects.
h. On May 6, 2021, Core Club Members Corp. submitted an application to the
SBA to obtain a grant in the amount of $2,303,687.00 through the RRF. In
that application, Jennie Enterprise, Core Club Members Corp.’s authorized
representative, certified, among other things, that Core Club Members
Corp. was eligible for funding, that the funds would be used in accordance
with the RRF Rules, and that the information provided in the application
was true in all material respects.
i. However, Core Club Members Corp. was not eligible for its RRF grant;
specifically, both because it was a not-for-profit company, and because it
did not serve food and drink to the public.
* * *
6
j. As a result of the above-referenced conduct, TCC International and Core
Gravity improperly received $2,305,075.50 in PPP loans (of which they
have repaid $514,176.45 reflecting the unforgiven amount on the first-draw
loan), and Core Club Members Corp improperly received $2,303,687.00 in
an RRF grant.
3. Defendants shall execute and agree to the entry of a consent judgment in favor of
the Government and against Defendants in the amount of $8,189,172.10, a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Consent Judgment”). The Government may use the Consent
Judgment to obtain a security interest in any asset or property of Defendants but shall not engage
in other collection activity with respect to the Consent Judgment so long as Defendants fully
comply with the terms of this Stipulation. Pursuant to this Stipulation, Defendants, by and through
Core Club 711, the successor-in-interest to Core Club 55th, agrees to pay and the Government
agrees to accept $360,000 in full satisfaction of the Consent Judgment (the “Settlement Amount”).
Defendants, by and through Core Club 711, shall pay to the Government the Settlement Amount
in installments as set forth below. Defendants, by and through Core Club 711, shall make the
below-referenced payments in accordance with instructions to be provided by the Financial
Litigation Unit of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. Of
the Settlement Amount, $360,000 constitutes restitution to the United States. Defendants and Core
Club 711 agree that they shall not seek indemnification from any source with respect to any portion
of the Settlement Amount. Jennie Enterprise, the Authorized Representative who signed the PPP
Defendants’ PPP loan applications and loan forgiveness applications, and Core Club Members
Corp.’s RRF grant application, has executed a Guaranty Agreement with the United States,
personally guaranteeing the Settlement Amount of $360,000, a copy of which is attached hereto
as Exhibit B.
7
a. Within fourteen (14) business days of the Effective Date (defined below in
Paragraph 29), Defendants, by and through Core Club 711, shall pay the
Government the sum of $30,000.
b. On or before 6 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and through
Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.
c. On or before 12 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and
through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.
d. On or before 18 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and
through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.
e. On or before 24 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and
through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.
f. On or before 30 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and
through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.
g. On or before 36 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and
through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.
h. On or before 42 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and
through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.
i. On or before 48 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and
through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.
j. On or before 54 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and
through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.
k. On or before 60 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and
through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.
8
l. On or before 66 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and
through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.
In the event that the Landlord Litigation resolves through any means, including settlement,
mediation, binding arbitration, court order, trial, or otherwise (the “Resolution”), Core Club 711
shall provide the United States with notice, consistent with the schedule set forth in Paragraph
3(a)–(l) above, of the amount of rent due for the premises at 711 Fifth Avenue, New York, New
York 10022 (the “Leased Premises”) for each month of that period, and the amount of rent actually
paid for each month of that period. Such notice and payments (if any) shall be provided from the
Resolution of the Landlord Litigation through the termination of this Stipulation in accordance
with Paragraph 4 below. If the Resolution is in plaintiffs’ favor such that the rent required in any
given month (“New Rent”) is less than the current monthly rent of $494,815.00, 50 percent of the
difference between the New Rent and the Current Rent (the “Windfall”) shall be due to the United
States, except as specified in the next paragraph. Such additional amount, if any, shall be payable
at the same time the applicable payments are made in the schedule set forth in Paragraph 3(a)–(l)
above. Additionally, to the extent that plaintiffs in the Landlord Litigation are awarded a lump sum
reflecting any overages for past rent, 50 percent of that amount shall be due to the United States,
up to the full amount of the Consent Judgment reflected in Exhibit A.
If, as part of a Resolution, the landlord offsets the rent in any given month by a particular
amount for the sole and specified purpose of repairing alleged infrastructure-related construction
deficiencies at the Leased Premises (a “Repair Offset”), that particular month’s Repair Offset shall
be excluded from the Windfall calculation. In this case and in accordance with the schedule set
forth in Paragraph 3(a)–(l) above, Jennie Enterprise—a plaintiff in the Landlord Litigation and a
signatory to this Agreement—shall provide a list of the alleged infrastructure-related construction
9
deficiencies to be remedied through the Repair Offset, along with a reconciliation reflecting all
invoices and payments in connection with repair of said deficiencies, to the Government in the
manner set forth in Paragraph 28 below. If, upon the Government’s review of the provided
materials, the Government determines that plaintiffs in the Landlord Litigation did not use the
funds from the Repair Offset to repair of the enumerated infrastructure-related deficiencies
(“Unused Repair Offset Funds”), Defendants shall be in default of this Stipulation and the
Government may take any of the actions set forth in Paragraph 11. Further, any Unused Repair
Offset Funds shall be included in the Windfall calculation, and 90 percent of the difference
between the Current Rent and New Rent, inclusive of the Unused Repair Offset Funds, shall be
due to the United States.
4. Should Defendants comply fully with the payment schedule set forth above as well
as the other terms of this Stipulation, the Consent Judgment shall be deemed to be satisfied in full
and, upon Defendants’ request, the Government shall file with the Clerk of the Court and deliver
to Defendants a Full Satisfaction of Judgment. In the event that Defendants, by and through Core
Club 711, fully pay the Settlement Amount faster than as provided in the payment schedule set
forth in Paragraph 3 above, and fully comply with all other terms of the Stipulation, the Consent
Judgment shall be deemed to be satisfied in full and, upon Defendants’ request, the Government
shall file with the Clerk of the Court and deliver to Defendants a Full Satisfaction of Judgment.
Should Defendants fail to comply fully with the payment schedule set forth in Paragraph 3 above
or any other term of this Stipulation, Defendants shall be in default of this Stipulation, in which
case the Government may take any of the actions set forth in Paragraph 11 below.
5. Defendants agree to cooperate fully and truthfully with the United States’
investigation of individuals and entities not released in this Stipulation. Upon reasonable notice,
10
Defendants shall encourage, and agree not to impair, the cooperation of their directors, officers,
and employees, and shall use their best efforts to make available, and encourage, the cooperation
of former directors, officers, and employees for interviews and testimony, consistent with the
rights and privileges of such individuals. Defendants further agree to furnish to the United States,
upon request, complete and unredacted copies of all non-privileged documents, reports,
memoranda of interviews, and records in their possession, custody, or control concerning any
investigation of the Covered Conduct that they have undertaken, or that has been performed by
another on their behalf.
6. Subject to the exceptions in Paragraph 10 (concerning reserved claims) below and
subject to Paragraph 11 (concerning default), Paragraph 15 (concerning bankruptcy proceedings),
and Paragraph 16 (concerning disclosure of financial information) below, and conditioned on
Defendants’ full compliance with the terms of this Stipulation, including full payment of the
Settlement Amount to the United States pursuant to Paragraph 3 above, the United States releases
Defendants, including their subsidiaries and corporate predecessors, successors and assigns, from
any civil or administrative monetary claim that the United States has for the Covered Conduct
under the FCA, the Civil Monetary Penalties Law, the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 31
U.S.C. § 3801–12, and the common law theories of fraud, payment by mistake, and unjust
enrichment. For avoidance of doubt, this Stipulation does not release any current or former officer,
director, employee, or agent of Defendants from liability of any kind.
7. Defendants fully and finally release the United States, its agencies, officers,
employees, servants, and agents from any claims (including attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses
of every kind and however denominated) that Defendants have asserted, could have asserted, or
may assert in the future against the United States, its agencies, officers, employees, servants, or
11
agents related to the Covered Conduct or the United States’ investigation, prosecution and
settlement thereof.
8. Subject to the exceptions in Paragraph 10 (concerning reserved claims) below and
subject to Paragraph 11 (concerning default), Paragraph 15 (concerning bankruptcy proceedings),
and Paragraph 16 (concerning disclosure of financial information) below, and conditioned on
Defendants’ full compliance with the terms of this Stipulation, including full payment of the
Settlement Amount to the United States pursuant to Paragraph 3 above, Relator, for himself and
his heirs, successors, attorneys, agents, and assigns, releases Defendants, including their
subsidiaries and corporate predecessors, successors and assigns, as well as all of their current and
former officers, directors, employees, attorneys, and other agents, from any and all manner of
claims, proceedings, liens, and causes of action of any kind or description that Relator has against
Defendants related to or arising from the Relator Complaint; provided, however, that nothing in
this Stipulation shall preclude Relator from seeking to recover his reasonable expenses and
attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d).
9. In consideration of the execution of this Stipulation by Relator and the Relator’s
release as set forth in Paragraph 8 above, Defendants, including their subsidiaries, corporate
predecessors, successors and assigns, as well as all of their current and former officers, directors,
employees, attorneys, and other agents, release Relator and his heirs, successors, attorneys, agents,
and assigns, from any and all manner of claims, proceedings, liens, and causes of action of any
kind or description that Defendants have against Relator related to or arising from the Relator
Complaint.
12
10. Notwithstanding the releases given in Paragraph 6 above, or any other term of this
Stipulation, the following claims of the Government are specifically reserved and are not released
by this Stipulation:
a. any liability arising under Title 26, United States Code (Internal
Revenue Code);
b. any criminal liability;
c. except as explicitly stated in this Stipulation, any administrative liability or
enforcement right, including but not limited to the suspension or debarment
rights of any federal agency;
d. any liability to the United States (or its agencies) for any conduct other than the
Covered Conduct;
e. any liability based upon obligations created by this Stipulation; and
f. any liability of individuals.
11. The Settlement Amount represents the amount the United States is willing to accept
in compromise of its civil claims arising from the Covered Conduct, due solely to Defendants’
financial condition as reflected in the Financial Disclosures referenced in Paragraph 16 below.
Defendants shall be in default of this Stipulation if Defendants fail to pay the Settlement Amount
as provided in the payment schedule set forth in Paragraph 3 above or if they fail to comply
materially with any other term of this Stipulation that applies to them (“Default”). The Government
will provide a written Notice of Default to Defendants of any Default in the manner set forth in
Paragraph 28 below. Defendants shall then have an opportunity to cure the Default within seven
(7) calendar days from the date of receipt of the Notice of Default by making the payment due
under the payment schedule and paying any additional interest accruing under the Stipulation up
13
to the date of payment. If Defendants fail to cure the Default within seven (7) calendar days of
receiving the Notice of Default and in the absence of an agreement with the United States to a
modified payment schedule (“Uncured Default”), the remaining unpaid balance of the Settlement
Amount shall become immediately due and payable, and interest on the remaining unpaid balance
shall thereafter accrue at the rate of 12 percent per annum, compounded daily from the date of
Default, on the remaining unpaid total (principal and interest balance). In the event of an Uncured
Default, the United States may initiate a collection action or take any other action with respect to
the unpaid portion of the amount specified in the Consent Judgment attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Defendants also agree that the United States, at its sole discretion, may (i) retain any payments
previously made, rescind this Stipulation, and reinstate the claims asserted against Defendants in
the Government Complaint or bring any civil and/or administrative claim, action, or proceeding
against Defendants for the claims that would otherwise be covered by the releases provided in
Paragraph 6 above, with any recovery reduced by the amount of any payments previously made
by Defendants to the United States under this Stipulation; (ii) take any action to enforce this
Stipulation in a new action or by reinstating the Government Complaint; (iii) offset the remaining
unpaid balance from any amounts due and owing to Defendants and/or affiliated companies by
any department, agency, or agent of the United States at the time of Default or subsequently; and/or
(iv) exercise any other right granted by law, or under the terms of this Stipulation, or recognizable
at common law or in equity. The United States shall be entitled to any other rights granted by law
or in equity by reason of Default, including referral of this matter for private collection. In the
event the United States pursues a collection action, Defendants agree immediately to pay the
United States the greater of (i) a ten percent (10%) surcharge of the amount collected, as allowed
by 28 U.S.C. § 3011(a), or (ii) the United States’ reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred
14
in such an action. In the event that the United States opts to rescind this Stipulation pursuant to
this paragraph, Defendants waive and agree not to plead, argue, or otherwise raise any defenses of
statute of limitations, laches, estoppel or similar theories, to any civil or administrative claims that
(i) are filed by the United States against Defendants within 120 days of written notification that
this Stipulation has been rescinded, and (ii) relate to the Covered Conduct, except to the extent
these defenses were available on November 16, 2023. Defendants agree not to contest any offset,
recoupment, and/or collection action undertaken by the United States pursuant to this paragraph,
either administratively or in any state or federal court, except on the grounds of actual payment to
the United States.
12. Defendants, having truthfully admitted to conduct set forth in Paragraph 2 hereof
(the “Admitted Conduct”), agree that they shall not, through their attorneys, agents, officers, or
employees, make any public statement, including but not limited to, any statement in a press
release, social media forum, or website, that contradicts or is inconsistent with the Admitted
Conduct or suggests that the Admitted Conduct is not wrongful (a “Contradictory Statement”).
Any Contradictory Statement by Defendants, their attorneys, agents, officers, or employees, shall
constitute a violation of this Stipulation, thereby authorizing the Government to pursue any of the
remedies set forth in Paragraph 11 hereof, or seek other appropriate relief from the Court. Before
pursuing any remedy, the Government shall notify Defendants that it has determined that
Defendants have made a Contradictory Statement. Upon receiving notice from the Government,
Defendants may cure the violation by repudiating the Contradictory Statement in a press release
or other public statement within four business days. If Defendants learn of a potential
Contradictory Statement by their attorneys, agents, officers, or employees, Defendants must notify
the Government of the statement within 24 hours. The decision as to whether any statement
15
constitutes a Contradictory Statement or will be imputed to Defendants for the purpose of this
Stipulation, or whether Defendants adequately repudiated a Contradictory Statement to cure a
violation of this Stipulation, shall be within the sole discretion of the Government. Consistent with
this provision, Defendants may raise defenses and/or assert affirmative claims or defenses in any
proceeding brought by private and/or public parties, so long as doing so would not contradict or
be inconsistent with the Admitted Conduct.
13. Relator and his heirs, successors, attorneys, agents, and assigns shall not object to
this Stipulation; Relator agrees and confirms that the terms of this Stipulation are fair, adequate,
and reasonable under all the circumstances, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(2)(B).
14. Defendants waive and shall not assert any defenses Defendants may have to any
criminal prosecution or administrative action relating to the Covered Conduct that may be based
in whole or in part on a contention that, under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the Fifth Amendment
of the Constitution, or under the Excessive Fines Clause in the Eighth Amendment of the
Constitution, this Stipulation bars a remedy sought in such criminal prosecution or administrative
action.
15. In exchange for valuable consideration provided in this Stipulation, Defendants
acknowledge the following:
a. Defendants have reviewed their financial situation and warrant that they are
solvent within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. §§ 547(b)(3) and 548(a)(1)(B)(ii)(I)
and shall remain solvent following payment to the United States of the
Settlement Amount.
b. In evaluating whether to execute this Agreement, the Parties intend that the
mutual promises, covenants, and obligations set forth herein constitute a
16
contemporaneous exchange for new value given to Defendants, within the
meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(1), and the Parties conclude that these mutual
promises, covenants, and obligations do, in fact, constitute such a
contemporaneous exchange.
c. The mutual promises, covenants, and obligations set forth herein are intended
by the Parties to, and do in fact, constitute a reasonably equivalent exchange of
value.
d. The Parties do not intend to hinder, delay, or defraud any entity to which
Defendants were or became indebted on or after the date of any transfer
contemplated in this Stipulation, within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(1).
e. If Defendants’ obligations under this Stipulation are avoided for any reason
(including but not limited to through the exercise of a trustee’s avoidance
powers under the Bankruptcy Code) or if, before the Settlement Amount is paid
in full, Defendants or a third party commences a case, proceeding, or other
action under any law relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, or
relief of debtors seeking any order for relief of Defendants’ debts, or to
adjudicate Defendants as bankrupt or insolvent, or seeking appointment of a
receiver, trustee, custodian, or other similar official for Defendants or for all or
any substantial part of Defendants’ assets:
(1) the United States may rescind the releases in this Stipulation and bring any
civil and/or administrative claim, action, or proceeding against Defendants
for the claims that would otherwise be covered by the releases provided in
Paragraph 6 above;
17
(2) the United States has an undisputed, noncontingent, and liquidated allowed
claim against Defendants in the amount of $8,189,172.10, less any
payments received pursuant to the Stipulation, provided, however, that such
payments are not otherwise avoided and recovered from the United States
by Defendants, a receiver, trustee, custodian, or other similar official for
Defendants; and
(3) if any payments are avoided and recovered by Defendants, a receiver,
trustee, custodian, or similar official for Defendants, Relator shall, within
thirty days of written notice from the United States to the undersigned
Relator’s counsel, return any portions of such payments already paid by the
United States to Relator.
f. Defendants agree that any civil and/or administrative claim, action, or
proceeding brought by the United States under Paragraph 15(e) above is not
subject to an “automatic stay” pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) because it would
be an exercise of the United States’ police and regulatory power. Defendants
shall not argue or otherwise contend that the United States’ claim, action, or
proceeding is subject to an automatic stay and, to the extent necessary, consents
to relief from the automatic stay for cause under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1).
Defendants waive and shall not plead, argue, or otherwise raise any defenses
under the theories of statute of limitations, laches, estoppel, or similar theories,
to any such civil or administrative claim, action, or proceeding brought by the
United States within 120 days of written notification to Defendants that the
18
releases have been rescinded pursuant to this paragraph, except to the extent
such defenses were available on November 16, 2023.
16. Defendants have provided sworn financial disclosures and supporting documents
(“Financial Disclosures”) to the United States and the United States has relied on the accuracy and
completeness of those Financial Disclosures in reaching this Stipulation. Defendants warrant that
the Financial Disclosures are complete, accurate, and current. If the United States learns of assets
in which Defendants had an interest at the time of the execution of this Stipulation that were not
disclosed in the Financial Disclosures, or if the United States learns of any false statement or
misrepresentation by Defendants on, or in connection with, the Financial Disclosures, and if such
nondisclosure, false statement, or misrepresentation changes the estimated net worth of Defendants
as reflected in the Financial Disclosures by $18,000 or more, the United States may at its option:
(a) rescind this Stipulation and reinstate its lawsuit based on the Covered Conduct, or (b) let the
Stipulation stand and collect the full Settlement Amount plus one hundred percent (100%) of the
net value of Defendants’ previously undisclosed assets. Defendants agree not to contest any
collection action undertaken by the United States pursuant to this provision, and agree that they
will immediately pay the United States the greater of (i) a ten percent (10%) surcharge of the
amount collected in the collection action, as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 3011(a), or (ii) the United
States’ reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in such an action. In the event that the
United States pursuant to this paragraph rescinds this Stipulation, Defendants waive and agree not
to plead, argue, or otherwise raise any defenses under the theories of statute of limitations, laches,
estoppel, or similar theories, to any civil or administrative claims that (a) are filed by the United
States within 120 calendar days of written notification to Defendants that this Stipulation has been
19
rescinded, and (b) relate to the Covered Conduct, except to the extent these defenses were available
on November 16, 2023.
17. Defendants agree to the following:
a. Unallowable Costs Defined: All costs (as defined in the Federal Acquisition
Regulation, 48 C.F.R. § 31.205-47) incurred by or on behalf of Defendants and
their present or former officers, directors, employees, shareholders, and agents
in connection with: (i) the matters covered by this Stipulation; (ii) the United
States’ audit(s) and civil investigation(s) of the matters covered by this
Stipulation; (iii) Defendants’ investigation, defense, and corrective actions
undertaken in response to the United States’ audit(s) and civil investigation(s)
in connection with the matters covered by this Stipulation (including attorney’s
fees); (iv) the negotiation and performance of this Stipulation; (v) the payment
Defendants make to the United States pursuant to this Agreement and any
payments that Defendants may make to Relator, including costs and attorneys’
fees, are unallowable costs for government contracting purposes (hereinafter
referred to as “Unallowable Costs”).
b. Future Treatment of Unallowable Costs: Unallowable Costs will be separately
determined and accounted for by Defendants, and Defendants shall not charge
such Unallowable Costs directly or indirectly to any contract with the United
States.
c. Treatment of Unallowable Costs Previously Submitted for Payment: Within 90
days of the Effective Date of this Stipulation, Defendants shall identify and
repay by adjustment to future claims for payment or otherwise any Unallowable
20
Costs included in payments previously sought by Defendants or any of their
subsidiaries or affiliates from the United States. Defendants agree that the
United States, at a minimum, shall be entitled to recoup from Defendants any
overpayment plus applicable interest and penalties as a result of the inclusion
of such Unallowable Costs on previously submitted requests for payment. The
United States, including the Department of Justice and/or the affected agencies,
reserves its rights to audit, examine, or re-examine Defendants’ books and
records and to disagree with any calculations submitted by Defendants or any
of their subsidiaries or affiliates regarding any Unallowable Costs included in
payments previously sought by Defendants, or the effect of any such
Unallowable Costs on the amount of such payments.
18. This Stipulation is intended to be for the benefit of the Parties only. The Parties do
not release any claims against any other person or entity except as otherwise provided herein.
19. Each Party shall bear its own legal and other costs incurred in connection with this
matter, including the preparation and performance of this Stipulation; provided, however, nothing
in this Stipulation shall preclude Relator from seeking to recover his expenses or attorneys’ fees
and costs from Defendants, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d).
20. Any failure by the Government to insist upon the full or material performance of
any of the provisions of this Stipulation shall not be deemed a waiver of any of the provisions
hereof, and the Government, notwithstanding that failure, shall have the right thereafter to insist
upon the full or material performance of any and all of the provisions of this Stipulation.
21
21. This Stipulation is governed by the laws of the United States. The exclusive
jurisdiction and venue for any dispute relating to this Stipulation is the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York.
22. For purposes of construing this Stipulation, this Stipulation shall be deemed to have
been drafted by all Parties to this Stipulation and shall not, therefore, be construed against any
Party for that reason in any subsequent dispute.
23. This Stipulation constitutes the complete agreement between the Parties with
respect to the subject matter hereof. This Stipulation may not be amended except by written
consent of the Parties. No prior agreements, oral representations or statements shall be considered
part of this Stipulation.
24. The undersigned counsel and other signatories represent and warrant that they are
fully authorized to execute this Stipulation on behalf of the persons and the entities indicated
below.
25. This Stipulation is binding on Defendants’ successors, transferees, heirs, and
assigns.
26. This Stipulation is binding on Relator’s successors, transferees, heirs, and assigns.
27. This Stipulation may be executed in counterparts, each of which constitutes an
original and all of which constitute one and the same Stipulation. E-mails that attach signatures in
PDF form or facsimiles of signatures shall constitute acceptable, binding signatures for purposes
of this Stipulation.
28. Any notice pursuant to this Stipulation shall be in writing and shall, unless
expressly provided otherwise herein, be delivered by hand, express courier, or e-mail transmission
followed by postage-prepaid mail, and shall be addressed as follows:
22
TO THE UNITED STATES:
Jessica Rosenbaum
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
Southern District of New York
86 Chambers Street, Third Floor
New York, New York 10007
jessica.rosenbaum@usdoj.gov
TO DEFENDANTS:
Louis A. Pellegrino, Esq.
Dentons US LLP
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020
louis.pellegrino@dentons.com
TO RELATOR:
Rolando G. Marquez
Kirk Chapman Law LLC
415 E. 37th Street, #29K
New York, New York 10016
rolandomarquez@aol.com
Zahra S. Karinshak
Krevolin & Horst, LLC
1201 W. Peachtree Street, N.W.
Suite 3250, One Atlantic Center
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
karinshak@khlawfirm.com
29. The effective date of this Stipulation is the date upon which the Stipulation is
approved by the Court (the “Effective Date”).
23
Agreed to by:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dated: New York, New York
August 7, 2025
JAY CLAYTON
United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
By:
JESSICA F. ROSENBAUM
Assistant United States Attorney
86 Chambers Street, Third Floor
New York, New York 10007
Tel.: (212) 637-2777
j essica.rosenbaum@usdoj.gov
Attorney for the United States ofAmerica
24
RELATOR
Dated: August j_, 2025 DANIEL FOSTER
By:
Daniel Foster
Relator
Dated: August 18 ,2025 KIRK CHAPMAN LAW LLC
By: R~ z r
415 E. 37th Street, #29K
New York, New York 10016
rolandomarquez@aol.com
DEFENDANTS
Dated: August 6, 2025 TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC
By:
Jennie Enterprise
Manager
Dated: August 6, 2025 CORE GRAVITY LLC
By:
Jennie Enterprise
Manager
Dated: August 6, 2025 CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP.
By:
Jennie Enterprise
President
Dated: August 6, 2025 THE CORE CLUB: FIFTH AVE., INC.
By:
Jennie Enterprise
President
Dated: August 6, 2025 DENTONS US LLP
By:
Louis A. Pellegrino
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020
louis.pellegrino@dentons.com
Attorneys for Defendants
26
DEFENDANTS
Dated: August 6, 2025 TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC
By:
Jennie Enterprise
Manager
Dated: August 6, 2025 CORE GRAVITY LLC
By:
Jennie Enterprise
Manager
Dated: August 6, 2025 CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP.
By:
Jennie Enterprise
President
Dated: August 6, 2025 THE CORE CLUB: FIFTH AVE., INC.
By:
Jennie Enterprise
President
Dated: August 6, 2025 DENTONS US LLP
By:
Louis A. Pellegrino
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020
louis.pellegrino@dentons.com
Attorneys for Defendants
26
SO ORDERED:
HON. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: August 13
___, 2025
27
Exhibit A
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. DANIEL
FOSTER,
Plaintiff,
23 Civ. 10084 (MKV)
v.
CONSENT JUDGMENT
TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC d/b/a CORE: CLUB;
CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP; and CORE:
GRAVITY LLC,
Defendants.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC, CORE GRAVITY
LLC, and CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP.,
Defendants.
Upon the consent of Plaintiff the United States of America and Defendants TCC
International LLC, Core Gravity LLC, and Core Club Members Corp., it is hereby:
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff the United States of America is
awarded judgment in the amount of $8,189,172.10 jointly and severally against TCC International
LLC, Core Gravity LLC, and Core Club Members Corp., as well as post-judgment interest at the
rate of 12 percent per annum compounded daily.
2
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dated: New York, New York JAY CLAYTON
August 7, 2025 United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
By:
JESSICA F. ROSENBAUM
Assistant United States Attorney
86 Chambers Street, Third Floor
New York, New York 10007
Tel.: (212) 637-2777
j essica.rosenbaum@usdoj.gov
Attorney for the United States ofAmerica
3
DEFENDANTS
Dated: August 6, 2025 TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC
By:
Jennie Enterprise
Manager
Dated: August 6, 2025 CORE GRAVITY LLC
By:
Jennie Enterprise
Manager
Dated: August 6, 2025 CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP.
By:
Jennie Enterprise
President
Dated: August 6, 2025 THE CORE CLUB: FIFTH AVE., INC.
By:
Jennie Enterprise
President
Dated: August 6, 2025 DENTONS US LLP
By:
Louis A. Pellegrino
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020
louis.pellegrino@dentons.com
Attorneys for Defendants
4
DEFENDANTS
Dated: August 6, 2025 TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC
By:
Jennie Enterprise
Manager
Dated: August 6, 2025 CORE GRAVITY LLC
By:
Jennie Enterprise
Manager
Dated: August 6, 2025 CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP.
By:
Jennie Enterprise
President
Dated: August 6, 2025 THE CORE CLUB: FIFTH AVE., INC.
By:
Jennie Enterprise
President
Dated: August 6, 2025 DENTONS US LLP
By:
Louis A. Pellegrino
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020
louis.pellegrino@dentons.com
Attorneys for Defendants
4
SO ORDERED:
HON. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
August 13, 2025
Dated: ____________________________
5
Exhibit B
GUARANTY AGREEMENT
This Guaranty Agreement is entered into by and among Jennie Enterprise (the
“Guarantor”), an owner of TCC International LLC, Core Gravity LLC, and Core Club Members
Corp. (collectively, the “Core Entities”), acting in her personal capacity, and the United States of
America (the “United States” or “Government,” and together with the Guarantor, the “Parties”).
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2025, the Government, through the Office of the United States
Attorney for the Southern District of New York, filed a Notice of Intervention in an action filed
by a relator under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et
seq., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, United States ex.
rel. Daniel Foster v. TCC International LLC d/b/a CORE: Club, et al., 23 Civ. 10084 (MKV);
WHEREAS, the Government is filing a Complaint-In-Intervention in the above-referenced
qui tam action (the “Government Complaint”), in which it is asserting, inter alia, claims against
the Core Entities under the FCA for allegedly fraudulently obtaining two loans under the Paycheck
Protection Program and a grant under the Restaurant Revitalization Fund;
WHEREAS, the United States, the Core Entities, and the relator in the qui tam action wish
to settle claims related to the aforementioned allegations through the execution of a Stipulation
and Order of Settlement and Dismissal (the “Stipulation”), dated as of the Effective Date as such
term is defined in Paragraph 29 of the Stipulation, and the Exhibits thereto, including this Guaranty
Agreement;
WHEREAS, the specific claims being resolved are set forth in the Stipulation;
WHEREAS, the Core Entities have executed the Stipulation, incorporated by reference
herein, under which the Core Entities, by and through THE CORE CLUB: FIFTH AVE., INC.,
shall pay the United States $360,000(the “Settlement Amount”) as set forth in Paragraph 3 of the
Stipulation; and
WHEREAS, the Guarantor is not a party to the Stipulation;
IT IS HEREBY AGREED that, in exchange for adequate consideration, the Parties shall
undertake the following obligations:
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
1. Statement of Guaranty. The Guarantor unconditionally and personally guarantees
the prompt payment of the Settlement Amount of $360,000 by the Core Entities as set forth in
Paragraph 3 of the Stipulation.
2. Nature of Guaranty. The Guaranty set forth in Paragraph 1 of this Agreement
constitutes a personal guaranty by the Guarantor of payment of the Settlement Amount of $360,000
by the Core Entities as set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Stipulation and shall not be affected by any
2
event, occurrence or circumstance which might otherwise constitute a legal or equitable discharge
or defense of a guarantor or surety (other than full and complete payment of the Settlement
Amount). In the event that any payment by the Core Entities pursuant to the Stipulation is
rescinded or must otherwise be returned by virtue of any action by any bankruptcy court, the
Guarantor shall remain personally liable hereunder with respect to the $360,000 Settlement
Amount as if payment had not been made. The Guarantor agrees that the United States may resort
to the Guarantor for payment of any unpaid portion of the Settlement Amount without regard to
whether the United States shall have proceeded against any other person or entity primarily or
secondarily obligated with respect to any of the Settlement Amount.
3. Acceleration. The Guarantor agrees that, within 30 days of receipt of written notice
from the United States that the Core Entities (i) have failed to make any payment required by the
Stipulation, and (ii) have not cured their Default as provided for under Paragraph 11 of the
Stipulation up to $360,000, minus any payments already made pursuant to the Stipulation, the
Guarantor will be jointly and severally obligated to pay in full the amount then due under the
Stipulation. The Guarantor understands that the failure to adhere fully to the terms of this paragraph
would be a material breach of this Guaranty Agreement.
4. No Waiver; Cumulative Rights. No failure on the part of the United States to
exercise, and no delay in exercising any right, remedy or power hereunder shall operate as a waiver
thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise by the United States of any right, remedy or power
hereunder preclude any other or future exercise of any right, remedy or power. Each and every
right, remedy and power hereby granted to the United States or allowed by law or other agreement
shall be cumulative and not exclusive of any other, and may be exercised by the United States
from time to time.
5. Effective Date. This Guaranty Agreement shall become effective on the Effective
Date, as defined in Paragraph 29 of the Stipulation.
6. Subrogation. The Guarantor shall not exercise any subrogation rights she may
acquire against the Core Entities as a result of this Guaranty Agreement until all of the Settlement
Amount owed to the United States has been paid in full.
7. Waiver of Notice. The Guarantor waives notice of the acceptance of this Guaranty,
presentment, demand, notice of dishonor, protest, and all other notices whatsoever.
8. Duration. This Guaranty shall continue in full force and effect until all of the
Settlement Amount has been paid in full.
9. Entire Agreement. Each Party hereto represents and warrants that this Agreement
constitutes a valid and binding agreement enforceable against each Party in accordance with its
terms. This Agreement embodies the entire guaranty agreement between the Parties. There are no
promises, terms, conditions or obligations other than those contained in this Agreement. This
3
Agreement supersedes all previous communications, representations or agreements either verbal
or written between the Guarantor and the United States.
10. Severability. Should any one or more provisions of this Agreement be determined
to be illegal, unenforceable, void or voidable, all other provisions shall remain in effect.
11. Assignment. No Party hereto may assign its rights, interest or obligations hereunder
to any other person or entity without prior written consent of the other Party. The provisions of
this Agreement shall be binding on the Parties hereto and their successors and assigns. This
Agreement is to continue in full force and effect notwithstanding a change in the composition,
ownership or corporate structure of any of the Core Entities.
12. Miscellaneous. This Agreement shall not be amended except in a writing signed by
all Parties. Each signatory hereto represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to execute
and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she is purporting to act. This
Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of
which shall constitute one and the same agreement.
13. Governing Law; Consent to Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with federal common law. The Parties consent to the jurisdiction of the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in any action to enforce any
term of this Agreement.
GUARANTOR
Dated: August 6, 2025
_____________________
JENNIE ENTERPRISE
4
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dated: New York, New York
August 8, 2025
JAY CLAYTON
United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York
By:
JESSICA F. ROSENBAUM
Assistant United States Attorney
86 Chambers Street, Third Floor
New York, New York 10007
Tel.: (212) 637-2777
j essica.rosenbaum@usdoj.gov
Attorney for the United States ofAmerica
5
File and source
- File
- doj-1411071-stipulation-and-order-of-settlement-and-dismissal-doj-releas.pdf
- Size
- 1,127,087 bytes
- SHA-256
- 0a28f108d06218e2f2870f8076108a19b3b13eb0b4df24015bb2b29a591176ba
- Original
- www.justice.gov