Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal — No. 1:23-cv-10084 (S.D.N.Y.)Search ⌕

Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal — No. 1:23-cv-10084 (S.D.N.Y.)

Summary

Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal in the False Claims Act case United States ex rel. Daniel Foster v. TCC International LLC, Core Gravity LLC, and Core Club Members Corp., 23 Civ. 10084 (MKV). The Government alleges that the defendants falsely certified eligibility for two PPP loans and an RRF grant. The defendants admit that TCC International received PPP loans of $960,400 and $1,344,675.50, and that Core Club Members Corp. submitted an RRF grant application for $2,303,687.00. They agree to a consent judgment of $8,189,172.10, and the Government agrees to accept $360,000 in full satisfaction, paid in installments of $30,000. Jennie Enterprise executed a Guaranty Agreement personally guaranteeing the $360,000.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal — No. 1:23-cv-10084 (S.D.N.Y.).” Original at www.justice.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/stipulation-and-order-of-settlement-and-dismissal-no-1-23-cv-10084-s-d-6a9a9fb8e8/, SHA-256 0a28f108d06218e2f2870f8076108a19b3b13eb0b4df24015bb2b29a591176ba.

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. DANIEL
FOSTER,

                      Plaintiff,

               v.

TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC d/b/a CORE: CLUB;
CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP; and CORE:
GRAVITY LLC,


                      Defendants.
                                                         23 Civ. 10084 (MKV)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                      Plaintiff-Intervenor,

               v.

TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC, CORE GRAVITY
LLC, and CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP.,

                      Defendants.



          STIPULATION AND ORDER OF SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL

       WHEREAS, this Stipulation and Order of Settlement and Dismissal (“Stipulation”) is

entered into by and among plaintiff the United States of America (the “United States” or

“Government”), by its attorney, Jay Clayton, United States Attorney for the Southern District of

New York, and on behalf of the United States Small Business Administration (the “SBA”); the

relator Daniel Foster (“Relator”), by his authorized representatives; and defendants TCC
International LLC, Core Gravity LLC, and Core Club Members Corp. (collectively, “Defendants,”

and together with the Government and Relator, the “Parties”), by their authorized representatives;

       WHEREAS, TCC International LLC (“TCC International”) is a Delaware limited liability

corporation that was responsible for payroll costs associated with The Core Club 55th Street LLC

(“Core Club 55th”), a private Manhattan-based social club. At all times between April 2020 and

April 2022 (the “Covered Period”), TCC International and Core Club 55th had operations at 66 E.

55th Street, New York, New York 10022;

       WHEREAS, Core Club Members Corp. is a New York not-for-profit corporation that

previously held Core Club 55th’s liquor license. During the Covered Period, Core Club Members

Corp. had operations at 66 E. 55th Street, New York, New York 10022;

       WHEREAS, Core Gravity LLC (“Core Gravity”) is a Delaware limited liability company

that owns 100 percent of TCC International LLC. During the Covered Period, Core Gravity was

located at 66 E. 55th Street, New York, New York 10022 and operated Core Club 55th;

       WHEREAS, in or about October 2023, Core Club 55th moved to 711 Fifth Avenue, New

York, New York 10022, and THE CORE CLUB: FIFTH AVE., INC., a New York not-for-profit

corporation (“Core Club 711”), became the successor-in-interest to Core Club 55th, taking over

the operations of Core Club 55th;

       WHEREAS, there is currently litigation between several Core entities and Jennie

Enterprise, who controls the Core entities, and the landlord of 711 Fifth Avenue, New York, New

York 10022, captioned Jennie Enterprise, et al. v. Michael Shvo, et al., No. 653221/2024 (N.Y.

Supreme Ct. N.Y. Cty.), concerning, among other things, a lease agreement entered into by Core

5th Avenue LLC on or about July 28, 2021, for the premises located at 711 Fifth Avenue, New

York, New York 10022 (“Landlord Litigation”);




                                                2
       WHEREAS, the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) was established pursuant to the

Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act, which was enacted in March

2020 and was designed to provide emergency financial assistance to millions of Americans

suffering economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. One source of relief provided by

the CARES Act was the authorization of forgivable loans to small businesses for employee payroll

and certain other expenses through the PPP. SBA’s website contained information about the PPP’s

rules (the “PPP Rules”), including eligibility criteria and reference to 13 C.F.R. § 120.110, which

identified certain businesses that were ineligible for PPP loans. Among those businesses deemed

ineligible for PPP funding were “[p]rivate clubs and businesses which limit the number of

memberships for reasons other than capacity.” 13 C.F.R. § 120.110(i);

       WHEREAS, to obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business was required to submit a PPP loan

application, which is signed by an authorized representative of the business. The loan application

required the business—through its authorized representative—to acknowledge the PPP Rules and

make certain affirmative certifications regarding its eligibility to obtain the PPP loan. Following

the lender approvals of loan applications, the participating lenders funded the loans, which were

100 percent guaranteed by the SBA;

       WHEREAS, the Restaurant Revitalization Fund (“RRF”) was established in March 2021

through the American Rescue Plan Act, to provide emergency assistance to qualifying restaurants

and bars impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The RRF was administered by the SBA and

allowed eligible entities funding equal to their pandemic-related loss, up to $10 million per

business and no more than $5 million per physical location. The RRF grant application required

the business, through its authorized representative, to acknowledge the RRF’s rules (the “RRF

Rules”) and make certain affirmative certifications regarding its eligibility to obtain the RRF grant.




                                                  3
The RRF Rules identified certain businesses that were ineligible for funding, including not-for-

profit entities and restaurants or bars where on-site sales to the public comprised less than 33

percent of gross receipts in 2019;

       WHEREAS, on or about November 16, 2023, Relator filed a complaint under the qui tam

provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., against TCC International

LLC d/b/a Core Club, Core Club Members Corp., and Core: Gravity LLC, alleging, inter alia, that

these entities violated the FCA by fraudulently obtaining PPP loans and an RFF grant by falsely

certifying in their loan applications that they were eligible to receive these funds when, in fact,

they were not (the “Relator Complaint”);

       WHEREAS, the Government alleges that during the Covered Period, Defendants violated

the FCA by knowingly presenting and making, or causing to be presented and made, false claims

and statements in connection with their submission of PPP loan and forgiveness applications, and

an application for an RRF grant. Specifically, the United States alleges that (a) Defendants TCC

International and Core Gravity (collectively, the “PPP Defendants”) (i) falsely certified that they

were eligible for two PPP loans despite the fact that the PPP Defendants intended to use the loans

to operate a private club that limited membership for reasons other than capacity, and (ii)

improperly sought forgiveness for the two PPP loans despite having been ineligible to receive

those loans in the first instance; and (b) Core Club Members Corp. falsely certified its eligibility

for an RRF grant despite being ineligible for this grant because (i) on-site sales of food and

beverages to the public did not comprise at least 33 percent of its gross receipts in 2019, and (ii) it

was a not-for-profit entity. The conduct described in this paragraph is the “Covered Conduct” for

purposes of this Stipulation;




                                                  4
       WHEREAS, on April 7, 2025, the Government filed a Notice of Election to Intervene in

this matter and, contemporaneous with the filing of this Stipulation, is filing a Complaint-in-

Intervention (“Government Complaint”), in which it is asserting claims against Defendants under

the FCA and common law for the Covered Conduct;

       WHEREAS, the Parties have, through this Stipulation, reached a mutually agreeable

resolution addressing the claims asserted against Defendants in the Government Complaint and

the Relator Complaint, for the Covered Conduct;

       NOW, THEREFORE, upon the Parties’ agreement IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

                                 TERMS AND CONDITIONS

       1.      The Parties agree that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action and

consent to this Court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over each of them.

       2.      Defendants admit, acknowledge, and accept responsibility for the following

conduct:

               a.     Core Club 55th was a private, invitation-only members club based in New
                      York City that included, among other things, a restaurant, bar, theater, gym,
                      and library accessible only to fee-paying members and their guests.

               b.     On October 1, 2023, Core Club 711 became the successor-in-interest to
                      Core Club 55th at its current location at 711 Fifth Avenue, New York, New
                      York 10022.

               c.     Core Gravity LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, owns 100 percent
                      of TCC International LLC, a Delaware limited liability company that was
                      responsible for payroll for the employees of Core Club 55th and now for
                      Core Club 711.

               d.     On April 20, 2020, TCC International LLC d/b/a Core Gravity submitted,
                      through its authorized representative, Jennie Enterprise (“Authorized
                      Representative”), an application to a financial institution for a first-draw
                      PPP loan in the amount of $960,400 and received a PPP loan for the
                      requested amount that same day. On October 6, 2021, Core Gravity, through
                      its Authorized Representative, applied for and, on October 29, 2021,
                      received partial forgiveness for the loan, in the amount of $446,223.55.



                                                 5
     Between October 2021 and August 2022, Core Gravity repaid the remaining
     $514,176.45.

e.   On March 31, 2021, TCC International LLC d/b/a The Core Club submitted,
     through its Authorized Representative, an application to a financial
     institution for a second-draw PPP loan in the amount of $1,344,675.50 and
     received a PPP loan for the requested amount that same day. On March 25,
     2022, TCC International, through its Authorized Representative, applied for
     and, on April 1, 2022, received full forgiveness for the loan.

f.   In both PPP loan applications, the Authorized Representative for TCC
     International LLC d/b/a Core Gravity and TCC International LLC d/b/a The
     Core Club certified, among other things, that the applicants were eligible
     for PPP funding, that the funds would be used in accordance with the PPP
     Rules, and that the information provided in the applications was true in all
     material respects. In the PPP loan forgiveness applications, the Authorized
     Representative for Core Gravity and TCC International certified, among
     other things, that the funds as to which forgiveness was requested were used
     to pay business costs that were eligible for forgiveness, and that the
     information provided in the applications and supporting documents was true
     and correct in all material respects.

g.   However, TCC International and Core Gravity were ineligible for their PPP
     loans because they intended to, and did, use the funds to fund payment of
     employees who provided services to Core Club 55th, which was a members-
     only club that was ineligible for PPP funds pursuant to 13 C.F.R.
     § 120.110(i). Accordingly, TCC International and Core Gravity (1)
     misrepresented in their PPP applications that they were eligible for PPP
     loans when, in fact, they were not; and (2) falsely certified in their loan
     forgiveness applications that the funds were used to pay eligible business
     expenses and that the information provided in their loan applications was
     true and correct in all material respects.

h.   On May 6, 2021, Core Club Members Corp. submitted an application to the
     SBA to obtain a grant in the amount of $2,303,687.00 through the RRF. In
     that application, Jennie Enterprise, Core Club Members Corp.’s authorized
     representative, certified, among other things, that Core Club Members
     Corp. was eligible for funding, that the funds would be used in accordance
     with the RRF Rules, and that the information provided in the application
     was true in all material respects.

i.   However, Core Club Members Corp. was not eligible for its RRF grant;
     specifically, both because it was a not-for-profit company, and because it
     did not serve food and drink to the public.

                                  *       *      *



                              6
                j.     As a result of the above-referenced conduct, TCC International and Core
                       Gravity improperly received $2,305,075.50 in PPP loans (of which they
                       have repaid $514,176.45 reflecting the unforgiven amount on the first-draw
                       loan), and Core Club Members Corp improperly received $2,303,687.00 in
                       an RRF grant.

       3.       Defendants shall execute and agree to the entry of a consent judgment in favor of

the Government and against Defendants in the amount of $8,189,172.10, a copy of which is

attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Consent Judgment”). The Government may use the Consent

Judgment to obtain a security interest in any asset or property of Defendants but shall not engage

in other collection activity with respect to the Consent Judgment so long as Defendants fully

comply with the terms of this Stipulation. Pursuant to this Stipulation, Defendants, by and through

Core Club 711, the successor-in-interest to Core Club 55th, agrees to pay and the Government

agrees to accept $360,000 in full satisfaction of the Consent Judgment (the “Settlement Amount”).

Defendants, by and through Core Club 711, shall pay to the Government the Settlement Amount

in installments as set forth below. Defendants, by and through Core Club 711, shall make the

below-referenced payments in accordance with instructions to be provided by the Financial

Litigation Unit of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. Of

the Settlement Amount, $360,000 constitutes restitution to the United States. Defendants and Core

Club 711 agree that they shall not seek indemnification from any source with respect to any portion

of the Settlement Amount. Jennie Enterprise, the Authorized Representative who signed the PPP

Defendants’ PPP loan applications and loan forgiveness applications, and Core Club Members

Corp.’s RRF grant application, has executed a Guaranty Agreement with the United States,

personally guaranteeing the Settlement Amount of $360,000, a copy of which is attached hereto

as Exhibit B.




                                                7
a. Within fourteen (14) business days of the Effective Date (defined below in

   Paragraph 29), Defendants, by and through Core Club 711, shall pay the

   Government the sum of $30,000.

b. On or before 6 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and through

   Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.

c. On or before 12 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and

   through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.

d. On or before 18 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and

   through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.

e. On or before 24 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and

   through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.

f. On or before 30 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and

   through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.

g. On or before 36 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and

   through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.

h. On or before 42 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and

   through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.

i. On or before 48 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and

   through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.

j. On or before 54 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and

   through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.

k. On or before 60 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and

   through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.




                            8
                   l. On or before 66 months from the Effective Date, Defendants, by and

                       through Core Club 711, shall pay the Government the sum of $30,000.

       In the event that the Landlord Litigation resolves through any means, including settlement,

mediation, binding arbitration, court order, trial, or otherwise (the “Resolution”), Core Club 711

shall provide the United States with notice, consistent with the schedule set forth in Paragraph

3(a)–(l) above, of the amount of rent due for the premises at 711 Fifth Avenue, New York, New

York 10022 (the “Leased Premises”) for each month of that period, and the amount of rent actually

paid for each month of that period. Such notice and payments (if any) shall be provided from the

Resolution of the Landlord Litigation through the termination of this Stipulation in accordance

with Paragraph 4 below. If the Resolution is in plaintiffs’ favor such that the rent required in any

given month (“New Rent”) is less than the current monthly rent of $494,815.00, 50 percent of the

difference between the New Rent and the Current Rent (the “Windfall”) shall be due to the United

States, except as specified in the next paragraph. Such additional amount, if any, shall be payable

at the same time the applicable payments are made in the schedule set forth in Paragraph 3(a)–(l)

above. Additionally, to the extent that plaintiffs in the Landlord Litigation are awarded a lump sum

reflecting any overages for past rent, 50 percent of that amount shall be due to the United States,

up to the full amount of the Consent Judgment reflected in Exhibit A.

       If, as part of a Resolution, the landlord offsets the rent in any given month by a particular

amount for the sole and specified purpose of repairing alleged infrastructure-related construction

deficiencies at the Leased Premises (a “Repair Offset”), that particular month’s Repair Offset shall

be excluded from the Windfall calculation. In this case and in accordance with the schedule set

forth in Paragraph 3(a)–(l) above, Jennie Enterprise—a plaintiff in the Landlord Litigation and a

signatory to this Agreement—shall provide a list of the alleged infrastructure-related construction




                                                 9
deficiencies to be remedied through the Repair Offset, along with a reconciliation reflecting all

invoices and payments in connection with repair of said deficiencies, to the Government in the

manner set forth in Paragraph 28 below. If, upon the Government’s review of the provided

materials, the Government determines that plaintiffs in the Landlord Litigation did not use the

funds from the Repair Offset to repair of the enumerated infrastructure-related deficiencies

(“Unused Repair Offset Funds”), Defendants shall be in default of this Stipulation and the

Government may take any of the actions set forth in Paragraph 11. Further, any Unused Repair

Offset Funds shall be included in the Windfall calculation, and 90 percent of the difference

between the Current Rent and New Rent, inclusive of the Unused Repair Offset Funds, shall be

due to the United States.

       4.      Should Defendants comply fully with the payment schedule set forth above as well

as the other terms of this Stipulation, the Consent Judgment shall be deemed to be satisfied in full

and, upon Defendants’ request, the Government shall file with the Clerk of the Court and deliver

to Defendants a Full Satisfaction of Judgment. In the event that Defendants, by and through Core

Club 711, fully pay the Settlement Amount faster than as provided in the payment schedule set

forth in Paragraph 3 above, and fully comply with all other terms of the Stipulation, the Consent

Judgment shall be deemed to be satisfied in full and, upon Defendants’ request, the Government

shall file with the Clerk of the Court and deliver to Defendants a Full Satisfaction of Judgment.

Should Defendants fail to comply fully with the payment schedule set forth in Paragraph 3 above

or any other term of this Stipulation, Defendants shall be in default of this Stipulation, in which

case the Government may take any of the actions set forth in Paragraph 11 below.

       5.      Defendants agree to cooperate fully and truthfully with the United States’

investigation of individuals and entities not released in this Stipulation. Upon reasonable notice,




                                                10
Defendants shall encourage, and agree not to impair, the cooperation of their directors, officers,

and employees, and shall use their best efforts to make available, and encourage, the cooperation

of former directors, officers, and employees for interviews and testimony, consistent with the

rights and privileges of such individuals. Defendants further agree to furnish to the United States,

upon request, complete and unredacted copies of all non-privileged documents, reports,

memoranda of interviews, and records in their possession, custody, or control concerning any

investigation of the Covered Conduct that they have undertaken, or that has been performed by

another on their behalf.

       6.      Subject to the exceptions in Paragraph 10 (concerning reserved claims) below and

subject to Paragraph 11 (concerning default), Paragraph 15 (concerning bankruptcy proceedings),

and Paragraph 16 (concerning disclosure of financial information) below, and conditioned on

Defendants’ full compliance with the terms of this Stipulation, including full payment of the

Settlement Amount to the United States pursuant to Paragraph 3 above, the United States releases

Defendants, including their subsidiaries and corporate predecessors, successors and assigns, from

any civil or administrative monetary claim that the United States has for the Covered Conduct

under the FCA, the Civil Monetary Penalties Law, the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act, 31

U.S.C. § 3801–12, and the common law theories of fraud, payment by mistake, and unjust

enrichment. For avoidance of doubt, this Stipulation does not release any current or former officer,

director, employee, or agent of Defendants from liability of any kind.

       7.      Defendants fully and finally release the United States, its agencies, officers,

employees, servants, and agents from any claims (including attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses

of every kind and however denominated) that Defendants have asserted, could have asserted, or

may assert in the future against the United States, its agencies, officers, employees, servants, or




                                                11
agents related to the Covered Conduct or the United States’ investigation, prosecution and

settlement thereof.

       8.      Subject to the exceptions in Paragraph 10 (concerning reserved claims) below and

subject to Paragraph 11 (concerning default), Paragraph 15 (concerning bankruptcy proceedings),

and Paragraph 16 (concerning disclosure of financial information) below, and conditioned on

Defendants’ full compliance with the terms of this Stipulation, including full payment of the

Settlement Amount to the United States pursuant to Paragraph 3 above, Relator, for himself and

his heirs, successors, attorneys, agents, and assigns, releases Defendants, including their

subsidiaries and corporate predecessors, successors and assigns, as well as all of their current and

former officers, directors, employees, attorneys, and other agents, from any and all manner of

claims, proceedings, liens, and causes of action of any kind or description that Relator has against

Defendants related to or arising from the Relator Complaint; provided, however, that nothing in

this Stipulation shall preclude Relator from seeking to recover his reasonable expenses and

attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d).

       9.      In consideration of the execution of this Stipulation by Relator and the Relator’s

release as set forth in Paragraph 8 above, Defendants, including their subsidiaries, corporate

predecessors, successors and assigns, as well as all of their current and former officers, directors,

employees, attorneys, and other agents, release Relator and his heirs, successors, attorneys, agents,

and assigns, from any and all manner of claims, proceedings, liens, and causes of action of any

kind or description that Defendants have against Relator related to or arising from the Relator

Complaint.




                                                 12
       10.     Notwithstanding the releases given in Paragraph 6 above, or any other term of this

Stipulation, the following claims of the Government are specifically reserved and are not released

by this Stipulation:

               a. any liability arising under Title 26, United States Code (Internal

                   Revenue Code);

               b. any criminal liability;

               c. except as explicitly stated in this Stipulation, any administrative liability or

                   enforcement right, including but not limited to the suspension or debarment

                   rights of any federal agency;

               d. any liability to the United States (or its agencies) for any conduct other than the

                   Covered Conduct;

               e. any liability based upon obligations created by this Stipulation; and

               f. any liability of individuals.

       11.     The Settlement Amount represents the amount the United States is willing to accept

in compromise of its civil claims arising from the Covered Conduct, due solely to Defendants’

financial condition as reflected in the Financial Disclosures referenced in Paragraph 16 below.

Defendants shall be in default of this Stipulation if Defendants fail to pay the Settlement Amount

as provided in the payment schedule set forth in Paragraph 3 above or if they fail to comply

materially with any other term of this Stipulation that applies to them (“Default”). The Government

will provide a written Notice of Default to Defendants of any Default in the manner set forth in

Paragraph 28 below. Defendants shall then have an opportunity to cure the Default within seven

(7) calendar days from the date of receipt of the Notice of Default by making the payment due

under the payment schedule and paying any additional interest accruing under the Stipulation up




                                                   13
to the date of payment. If Defendants fail to cure the Default within seven (7) calendar days of

receiving the Notice of Default and in the absence of an agreement with the United States to a

modified payment schedule (“Uncured Default”), the remaining unpaid balance of the Settlement

Amount shall become immediately due and payable, and interest on the remaining unpaid balance

shall thereafter accrue at the rate of 12 percent per annum, compounded daily from the date of

Default, on the remaining unpaid total (principal and interest balance). In the event of an Uncured

Default, the United States may initiate a collection action or take any other action with respect to

the unpaid portion of the amount specified in the Consent Judgment attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Defendants also agree that the United States, at its sole discretion, may (i) retain any payments

previously made, rescind this Stipulation, and reinstate the claims asserted against Defendants in

the Government Complaint or bring any civil and/or administrative claim, action, or proceeding

against Defendants for the claims that would otherwise be covered by the releases provided in

Paragraph 6 above, with any recovery reduced by the amount of any payments previously made

by Defendants to the United States under this Stipulation; (ii) take any action to enforce this

Stipulation in a new action or by reinstating the Government Complaint; (iii) offset the remaining

unpaid balance from any amounts due and owing to Defendants and/or affiliated companies by

any department, agency, or agent of the United States at the time of Default or subsequently; and/or

(iv) exercise any other right granted by law, or under the terms of this Stipulation, or recognizable

at common law or in equity. The United States shall be entitled to any other rights granted by law

or in equity by reason of Default, including referral of this matter for private collection. In the

event the United States pursues a collection action, Defendants agree immediately to pay the

United States the greater of (i) a ten percent (10%) surcharge of the amount collected, as allowed

by 28 U.S.C. § 3011(a), or (ii) the United States’ reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred




                                                 14
in such an action. In the event that the United States opts to rescind this Stipulation pursuant to

this paragraph, Defendants waive and agree not to plead, argue, or otherwise raise any defenses of

statute of limitations, laches, estoppel or similar theories, to any civil or administrative claims that

(i) are filed by the United States against Defendants within 120 days of written notification that

this Stipulation has been rescinded, and (ii) relate to the Covered Conduct, except to the extent

these defenses were available on November 16, 2023. Defendants agree not to contest any offset,

recoupment, and/or collection action undertaken by the United States pursuant to this paragraph,

either administratively or in any state or federal court, except on the grounds of actual payment to

the United States.

       12.     Defendants, having truthfully admitted to conduct set forth in Paragraph 2 hereof

(the “Admitted Conduct”), agree that they shall not, through their attorneys, agents, officers, or

employees, make any public statement, including but not limited to, any statement in a press

release, social media forum, or website, that contradicts or is inconsistent with the Admitted

Conduct or suggests that the Admitted Conduct is not wrongful (a “Contradictory Statement”).

Any Contradictory Statement by Defendants, their attorneys, agents, officers, or employees, shall

constitute a violation of this Stipulation, thereby authorizing the Government to pursue any of the

remedies set forth in Paragraph 11 hereof, or seek other appropriate relief from the Court. Before

pursuing any remedy, the Government shall notify Defendants that it has determined that

Defendants have made a Contradictory Statement. Upon receiving notice from the Government,

Defendants may cure the violation by repudiating the Contradictory Statement in a press release

or other public statement within four business days. If Defendants learn of a potential

Contradictory Statement by their attorneys, agents, officers, or employees, Defendants must notify

the Government of the statement within 24 hours. The decision as to whether any statement




                                                  15
constitutes a Contradictory Statement or will be imputed to Defendants for the purpose of this

Stipulation, or whether Defendants adequately repudiated a Contradictory Statement to cure a

violation of this Stipulation, shall be within the sole discretion of the Government. Consistent with

this provision, Defendants may raise defenses and/or assert affirmative claims or defenses in any

proceeding brought by private and/or public parties, so long as doing so would not contradict or

be inconsistent with the Admitted Conduct.

          13.   Relator and his heirs, successors, attorneys, agents, and assigns shall not object to

this Stipulation; Relator agrees and confirms that the terms of this Stipulation are fair, adequate,

and reasonable under all the circumstances, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(2)(B).

          14.   Defendants waive and shall not assert any defenses Defendants may have to any

criminal prosecution or administrative action relating to the Covered Conduct that may be based

in whole or in part on a contention that, under the Double Jeopardy Clause in the Fifth Amendment

of the Constitution, or under the Excessive Fines Clause in the Eighth Amendment of the

Constitution, this Stipulation bars a remedy sought in such criminal prosecution or administrative

action.

          15.   In exchange for valuable consideration provided in this Stipulation, Defendants

acknowledge the following:

                a. Defendants have reviewed their financial situation and warrant that they are

                   solvent within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. §§ 547(b)(3) and 548(a)(1)(B)(ii)(I)

                   and shall remain solvent following payment to the United States of the

                   Settlement Amount.

                b. In evaluating whether to execute this Agreement, the Parties intend that the

                   mutual promises, covenants, and obligations set forth herein constitute a




                                                 16
   contemporaneous exchange for new value given to Defendants, within the

   meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(1), and the Parties conclude that these mutual

   promises, covenants, and obligations do, in fact, constitute such a

   contemporaneous exchange.

c. The mutual promises, covenants, and obligations set forth herein are intended

   by the Parties to, and do in fact, constitute a reasonably equivalent exchange of

   value.

d. The Parties do not intend to hinder, delay, or defraud any entity to which

   Defendants were or became indebted on or after the date of any transfer

   contemplated in this Stipulation, within the meaning of 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(1).

e. If Defendants’ obligations under this Stipulation are avoided for any reason

   (including but not limited to through the exercise of a trustee’s avoidance

   powers under the Bankruptcy Code) or if, before the Settlement Amount is paid

   in full, Defendants or a third party commences a case, proceeding, or other

   action under any law relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, or

   relief of debtors seeking any order for relief of Defendants’ debts, or to

   adjudicate Defendants as bankrupt or insolvent, or seeking appointment of a

   receiver, trustee, custodian, or other similar official for Defendants or for all or

   any substantial part of Defendants’ assets:

(1)    the United States may rescind the releases in this Stipulation and bring any

       civil and/or administrative claim, action, or proceeding against Defendants

       for the claims that would otherwise be covered by the releases provided in

       Paragraph 6 above;




                                 17
(2)    the United States has an undisputed, noncontingent, and liquidated allowed

       claim against Defendants in the amount of $8,189,172.10, less any

       payments received pursuant to the Stipulation, provided, however, that such

       payments are not otherwise avoided and recovered from the United States

       by Defendants, a receiver, trustee, custodian, or other similar official for

       Defendants; and

(3)    if any payments are avoided and recovered by Defendants, a receiver,

       trustee, custodian, or similar official for Defendants, Relator shall, within

       thirty days of written notice from the United States to the undersigned

       Relator’s counsel, return any portions of such payments already paid by the

       United States to Relator.

f. Defendants agree that any civil and/or administrative claim, action, or

   proceeding brought by the United States under Paragraph 15(e) above is not

   subject to an “automatic stay” pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) because it would

   be an exercise of the United States’ police and regulatory power. Defendants

   shall not argue or otherwise contend that the United States’ claim, action, or

   proceeding is subject to an automatic stay and, to the extent necessary, consents

   to relief from the automatic stay for cause under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1).

   Defendants waive and shall not plead, argue, or otherwise raise any defenses

   under the theories of statute of limitations, laches, estoppel, or similar theories,

   to any such civil or administrative claim, action, or proceeding brought by the

   United States within 120 days of written notification to Defendants that the




                                   18
                   releases have been rescinded pursuant to this paragraph, except to the extent

                   such defenses were available on November 16, 2023.

       16.     Defendants have provided sworn financial disclosures and supporting documents

(“Financial Disclosures”) to the United States and the United States has relied on the accuracy and

completeness of those Financial Disclosures in reaching this Stipulation. Defendants warrant that

the Financial Disclosures are complete, accurate, and current. If the United States learns of assets

in which Defendants had an interest at the time of the execution of this Stipulation that were not

disclosed in the Financial Disclosures, or if the United States learns of any false statement or

misrepresentation by Defendants on, or in connection with, the Financial Disclosures, and if such

nondisclosure, false statement, or misrepresentation changes the estimated net worth of Defendants

as reflected in the Financial Disclosures by $18,000 or more, the United States may at its option:

(a) rescind this Stipulation and reinstate its lawsuit based on the Covered Conduct, or (b) let the

Stipulation stand and collect the full Settlement Amount plus one hundred percent (100%) of the

net value of Defendants’ previously undisclosed assets. Defendants agree not to contest any

collection action undertaken by the United States pursuant to this provision, and agree that they

will immediately pay the United States the greater of (i) a ten percent (10%) surcharge of the

amount collected in the collection action, as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 3011(a), or (ii) the United

States’ reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in such an action. In the event that the

United States pursuant to this paragraph rescinds this Stipulation, Defendants waive and agree not

to plead, argue, or otherwise raise any defenses under the theories of statute of limitations, laches,

estoppel, or similar theories, to any civil or administrative claims that (a) are filed by the United

States within 120 calendar days of written notification to Defendants that this Stipulation has been




                                                 19
rescinded, and (b) relate to the Covered Conduct, except to the extent these defenses were available

on November 16, 2023.

       17.     Defendants agree to the following:

               a. Unallowable Costs Defined: All costs (as defined in the Federal Acquisition

                   Regulation, 48 C.F.R. § 31.205-47) incurred by or on behalf of Defendants and

                   their present or former officers, directors, employees, shareholders, and agents

                   in connection with: (i) the matters covered by this Stipulation; (ii) the United

                   States’ audit(s) and civil investigation(s) of the matters covered by this

                   Stipulation; (iii) Defendants’ investigation, defense, and corrective actions

                   undertaken in response to the United States’ audit(s) and civil investigation(s)

                   in connection with the matters covered by this Stipulation (including attorney’s

                   fees); (iv) the negotiation and performance of this Stipulation; (v) the payment

                   Defendants make to the United States pursuant to this Agreement and any

                   payments that Defendants may make to Relator, including costs and attorneys’

                   fees, are unallowable costs for government contracting purposes (hereinafter

                   referred to as “Unallowable Costs”).

               b. Future Treatment of Unallowable Costs: Unallowable Costs will be separately

                   determined and accounted for by Defendants, and Defendants shall not charge

                   such Unallowable Costs directly or indirectly to any contract with the United

                   States.

               c. Treatment of Unallowable Costs Previously Submitted for Payment: Within 90

                   days of the Effective Date of this Stipulation, Defendants shall identify and

                   repay by adjustment to future claims for payment or otherwise any Unallowable




                                                20
                   Costs included in payments previously sought by Defendants or any of their

                   subsidiaries or affiliates from the United States. Defendants agree that the

                   United States, at a minimum, shall be entitled to recoup from Defendants any

                   overpayment plus applicable interest and penalties as a result of the inclusion

                   of such Unallowable Costs on previously submitted requests for payment. The

                   United States, including the Department of Justice and/or the affected agencies,

                   reserves its rights to audit, examine, or re-examine Defendants’ books and

                   records and to disagree with any calculations submitted by Defendants or any

                   of their subsidiaries or affiliates regarding any Unallowable Costs included in

                   payments previously sought by Defendants, or the effect of any such

                   Unallowable Costs on the amount of such payments.

       18.     This Stipulation is intended to be for the benefit of the Parties only. The Parties do

not release any claims against any other person or entity except as otherwise provided herein.

       19.     Each Party shall bear its own legal and other costs incurred in connection with this

matter, including the preparation and performance of this Stipulation; provided, however, nothing

in this Stipulation shall preclude Relator from seeking to recover his expenses or attorneys’ fees

and costs from Defendants, pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d).

       20.     Any failure by the Government to insist upon the full or material performance of

any of the provisions of this Stipulation shall not be deemed a waiver of any of the provisions

hereof, and the Government, notwithstanding that failure, shall have the right thereafter to insist

upon the full or material performance of any and all of the provisions of this Stipulation.




                                                21
         21.    This Stipulation is governed by the laws of the United States. The exclusive

jurisdiction and venue for any dispute relating to this Stipulation is the United States District Court

for the Southern District of New York.

         22.    For purposes of construing this Stipulation, this Stipulation shall be deemed to have

been drafted by all Parties to this Stipulation and shall not, therefore, be construed against any

Party for that reason in any subsequent dispute.

         23.    This Stipulation constitutes the complete agreement between the Parties with

respect to the subject matter hereof. This Stipulation may not be amended except by written

consent of the Parties. No prior agreements, oral representations or statements shall be considered

part of this Stipulation.

         24.    The undersigned counsel and other signatories represent and warrant that they are

fully authorized to execute this Stipulation on behalf of the persons and the entities indicated

below.

         25.    This Stipulation is binding on Defendants’ successors, transferees, heirs, and

assigns.

         26.    This Stipulation is binding on Relator’s successors, transferees, heirs, and assigns.

         27.    This Stipulation may be executed in counterparts, each of which constitutes an

original and all of which constitute one and the same Stipulation. E-mails that attach signatures in

PDF form or facsimiles of signatures shall constitute acceptable, binding signatures for purposes

of this Stipulation.

         28.    Any notice pursuant to this Stipulation shall be in writing and shall, unless

expressly provided otherwise herein, be delivered by hand, express courier, or e-mail transmission

followed by postage-prepaid mail, and shall be addressed as follows:




                                                   22
       TO THE UNITED STATES:

       Jessica Rosenbaum
       Assistant United States Attorney
       United States Attorney’s Office
       Southern District of New York
       86 Chambers Street, Third Floor
       New York, New York 10007
       jessica.rosenbaum@usdoj.gov

       TO DEFENDANTS:

       Louis A. Pellegrino, Esq.
       Dentons US LLP
       1221 Avenue of the Americas
       New York, New York 10020
       louis.pellegrino@dentons.com

       TO RELATOR:

       Rolando G. Marquez
       Kirk Chapman Law LLC
       415 E. 37th Street, #29K
       New York, New York 10016
       rolandomarquez@aol.com

       Zahra S. Karinshak
       Krevolin & Horst, LLC
       1201 W. Peachtree Street, N.W.
       Suite 3250, One Atlantic Center
       Atlanta, Georgia 30309
       karinshak@khlawfirm.com

       29.    The effective date of this Stipulation is the date upon which the Stipulation is

approved by the Court (the “Effective Date”).




                                                23
Agreed to by:



THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA



Dated: New York, New York
       August 7, 2025

                                  JAY CLAYTON
                                  United States Attorney for the
                                  Southern District of New York




                            By:
                                  JESSICA F. ROSENBAUM
                                  Assistant United States Attorney
                                  86 Chambers Street, Third Floor
                                  New York, New York 10007
                                  Tel.: (212) 637-2777
                                  j essica.rosenbaum@usdoj.gov
                                  Attorney for the United States ofAmerica




                                    24
RELATOR


Dated: August j_, 2025           DANIEL FOSTER


                           By:
                                 Daniel Foster
                                 Relator


Dated: August   18 ,2025         KIRK CHAPMAN LAW LLC



                           By:   R~              z     r
                                 415 E. 37th Street, #29K
                                 New York, New York 10016
                                 rolandomarquez@aol.com
DEFENDANTS


Dated: August 6, 2025          TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC

                        By:
                               Jennie Enterprise
                               Manager


Dated: August 6, 2025          CORE GRAVITY LLC

                        By:
                               Jennie Enterprise
                               Manager


Dated: August 6, 2025          CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP.

                        By:
                               Jennie Enterprise
                               President


Dated: August 6, 2025          THE CORE CLUB: FIFTH AVE., INC.

                        By:
                               Jennie Enterprise
                               President


Dated: August 6, 2025          DENTONS US LLP

                        By:
                               Louis A. Pellegrino
                               1221 Avenue of the Americas
                               New York, New York 10020
                               louis.pellegrino@dentons.com

                               Attorneys for Defendants



                          26
DEFENDANTS


Dated: August 6, 2025          TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC

                        By:
                               Jennie Enterprise
                               Manager


Dated: August 6, 2025          CORE GRAVITY LLC

                        By:
                               Jennie Enterprise
                               Manager


Dated: August 6, 2025          CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP.

                        By:
                               Jennie Enterprise
                               President


Dated: August 6, 2025          THE CORE CLUB: FIFTH AVE., INC.

                        By:
                               Jennie Enterprise
                               President


Dated: August 6, 2025          DENTONS US LLP

                        By:
                               Louis A. Pellegrino
                               1221 Avenue of the Americas
                               New York, New York 10020
                               louis.pellegrino@dentons.com

                               Attorneys for Defendants



                          26
SO ORDERED:


HON. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Dated: August 13
             ___, 2025




                               27
Exhibit A
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. DANIEL
FOSTER,

                      Plaintiff,
                                                         23 Civ. 10084 (MKV)
               v.
                                                         CONSENT JUDGMENT
TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC d/b/a CORE: CLUB;
CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP; and CORE:
GRAVITY LLC,

                      Defendants.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                      Plaintiff-Intervenor,

               v.

TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC, CORE GRAVITY
LLC, and CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP.,

                      Defendants.


       Upon the consent of Plaintiff the United States of America and Defendants TCC

International LLC, Core Gravity LLC, and Core Club Members Corp., it is hereby:

       ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Plaintiff the United States of America is

awarded judgment in the amount of $8,189,172.10 jointly and severally against TCC International

LLC, Core Gravity LLC, and Core Club Members Corp., as well as post-judgment interest at the

rate of 12 percent per annum compounded daily.




                                              2
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA



Dated: New York, New York         JAY CLAYTON
       August 7, 2025             United States Attorney for the
                                  Southern District of New York

                            By:
                                  JESSICA F. ROSENBAUM
                                  Assistant United States Attorney
                                  86 Chambers Street, Third Floor
                                  New York, New York 10007
                                  Tel.: (212) 637-2777
                                  j essica.rosenbaum@usdoj.gov
                                  Attorney for the United States ofAmerica




                                     3
DEFENDANTS


Dated: August 6, 2025         TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC

                        By:
                              Jennie Enterprise
                              Manager


Dated: August 6, 2025         CORE GRAVITY LLC

                        By:
                              Jennie Enterprise
                              Manager


Dated: August 6, 2025         CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP.

                        By:
                              Jennie Enterprise
                              President


Dated: August 6, 2025         THE CORE CLUB: FIFTH AVE., INC.

                        By:
                              Jennie Enterprise
                              President


Dated: August 6, 2025         DENTONS US LLP

                        By:
                              Louis A. Pellegrino
                              1221 Avenue of the Americas
                              New York, New York 10020
                              louis.pellegrino@dentons.com

                              Attorneys for Defendants



                          4
DEFENDANTS


Dated: August 6, 2025         TCC INTERNATIONAL LLC

                        By:
                              Jennie Enterprise
                              Manager


Dated: August 6, 2025         CORE GRAVITY LLC

                        By:
                              Jennie Enterprise
                              Manager


Dated: August 6, 2025         CORE CLUB MEMBERS CORP.

                        By:
                              Jennie Enterprise
                              President


Dated: August 6, 2025         THE CORE CLUB: FIFTH AVE., INC.

                        By:
                              Jennie Enterprise
                              President


Dated: August 6, 2025         DENTONS US LLP

                        By:
                              Louis A. Pellegrino
                              1221 Avenue of the Americas
                              New York, New York 10020
                              louis.pellegrino@dentons.com

                              Attorneys for Defendants



                          4
SO ORDERED:


HON. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


        August 13, 2025
Dated: ____________________________




                                      5
Exhibit B
                                  GUARANTY AGREEMENT

       This Guaranty Agreement is entered into by and among Jennie Enterprise (the
“Guarantor”), an owner of TCC International LLC, Core Gravity LLC, and Core Club Members
Corp. (collectively, the “Core Entities”), acting in her personal capacity, and the United States of
America (the “United States” or “Government,” and together with the Guarantor, the “Parties”).

        WHEREAS, on April 7, 2025, the Government, through the Office of the United States
Attorney for the Southern District of New York, filed a Notice of Intervention in an action filed
by a relator under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et
seq., in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, United States ex.
rel. Daniel Foster v. TCC International LLC d/b/a CORE: Club, et al., 23 Civ. 10084 (MKV);

        WHEREAS, the Government is filing a Complaint-In-Intervention in the above-referenced
qui tam action (the “Government Complaint”), in which it is asserting, inter alia, claims against
the Core Entities under the FCA for allegedly fraudulently obtaining two loans under the Paycheck
Protection Program and a grant under the Restaurant Revitalization Fund;

         WHEREAS, the United States, the Core Entities, and the relator in the qui tam action wish
to settle claims related to the aforementioned allegations through the execution of a Stipulation
and Order of Settlement and Dismissal (the “Stipulation”), dated as of the Effective Date as such
term is defined in Paragraph 29 of the Stipulation, and the Exhibits thereto, including this Guaranty
Agreement;

       WHEREAS, the specific claims being resolved are set forth in the Stipulation;

        WHEREAS, the Core Entities have executed the Stipulation, incorporated by reference
herein, under which the Core Entities, by and through THE CORE CLUB: FIFTH AVE., INC.,
shall pay the United States $360,000(the “Settlement Amount”) as set forth in Paragraph 3 of the
Stipulation; and

       WHEREAS, the Guarantor is not a party to the Stipulation;

       IT IS HEREBY AGREED that, in exchange for adequate consideration, the Parties shall
undertake the following obligations:

                                  TERMS AND CONDITIONS

       1.     Statement of Guaranty. The Guarantor unconditionally and personally guarantees
the prompt payment of the Settlement Amount of $360,000 by the Core Entities as set forth in
Paragraph 3 of the Stipulation.

        2.      Nature of Guaranty. The Guaranty set forth in Paragraph 1 of this Agreement
constitutes a personal guaranty by the Guarantor of payment of the Settlement Amount of $360,000
by the Core Entities as set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Stipulation and shall not be affected by any


                                                 2
event, occurrence or circumstance which might otherwise constitute a legal or equitable discharge
or defense of a guarantor or surety (other than full and complete payment of the Settlement
Amount). In the event that any payment by the Core Entities pursuant to the Stipulation is
rescinded or must otherwise be returned by virtue of any action by any bankruptcy court, the
Guarantor shall remain personally liable hereunder with respect to the $360,000 Settlement
Amount as if payment had not been made. The Guarantor agrees that the United States may resort
to the Guarantor for payment of any unpaid portion of the Settlement Amount without regard to
whether the United States shall have proceeded against any other person or entity primarily or
secondarily obligated with respect to any of the Settlement Amount.

        3.     Acceleration. The Guarantor agrees that, within 30 days of receipt of written notice
from the United States that the Core Entities (i) have failed to make any payment required by the
Stipulation, and (ii) have not cured their Default as provided for under Paragraph 11 of the
Stipulation up to $360,000, minus any payments already made pursuant to the Stipulation, the
Guarantor will be jointly and severally obligated to pay in full the amount then due under the
Stipulation. The Guarantor understands that the failure to adhere fully to the terms of this paragraph
would be a material breach of this Guaranty Agreement.

         4.    No Waiver; Cumulative Rights. No failure on the part of the United States to
exercise, and no delay in exercising any right, remedy or power hereunder shall operate as a waiver
thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise by the United States of any right, remedy or power
hereunder preclude any other or future exercise of any right, remedy or power. Each and every
right, remedy and power hereby granted to the United States or allowed by law or other agreement
shall be cumulative and not exclusive of any other, and may be exercised by the United States
from time to time.

       5.      Effective Date. This Guaranty Agreement shall become effective on the Effective
Date, as defined in Paragraph 29 of the Stipulation.

       6.      Subrogation. The Guarantor shall not exercise any subrogation rights she may
acquire against the Core Entities as a result of this Guaranty Agreement until all of the Settlement
Amount owed to the United States has been paid in full.

       7.     Waiver of Notice. The Guarantor waives notice of the acceptance of this Guaranty,
presentment, demand, notice of dishonor, protest, and all other notices whatsoever.

       8.    Duration. This Guaranty shall continue in full force and effect until all of the
Settlement Amount has been paid in full.

        9.     Entire Agreement. Each Party hereto represents and warrants that this Agreement
constitutes a valid and binding agreement enforceable against each Party in accordance with its
terms. This Agreement embodies the entire guaranty agreement between the Parties. There are no
promises, terms, conditions or obligations other than those contained in this Agreement. This




                                                  3
Agreement supersedes all previous communications, representations or agreements either verbal
or written between the Guarantor and the United States.

         10.     Severability. Should any one or more provisions of this Agreement be determined
to be illegal, unenforceable, void or voidable, all other provisions shall remain in effect.

       11.     Assignment. No Party hereto may assign its rights, interest or obligations hereunder
to any other person or entity without prior written consent of the other Party. The provisions of
this Agreement shall be binding on the Parties hereto and their successors and assigns. This
Agreement is to continue in full force and effect notwithstanding a change in the composition,
ownership or corporate structure of any of the Core Entities.

        12.     Miscellaneous. This Agreement shall not be amended except in a writing signed by
all Parties. Each signatory hereto represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to execute
and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she is purporting to act. This
Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of
which shall constitute one and the same agreement.

       13.     Governing Law; Consent to Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with federal common law. The Parties consent to the jurisdiction of the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in any action to enforce any
term of this Agreement.

                                                     GUARANTOR



Dated: August 6, 2025
                                                     _____________________
                                                     JENNIE ENTERPRISE




                                                4
                                  THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Dated: New York, New York
       August 8, 2025
                                  JAY CLAYTON
                                  United States Attorney for the
                                  Southern District of New York

                            By:
                                  JESSICA F. ROSENBAUM
                                  Assistant United States Attorney
                                  86 Chambers Street, Third Floor
                                  New York, New York 10007
                                  Tel.: (212) 637-2777
                                  j essica.rosenbaum@usdoj.gov
                                  Attorney for the United States ofAmerica




                              5


File and source

File
doj-1411071-stipulation-and-order-of-settlement-and-dismissal-doj-releas.pdf
Size
1,127,087 bytes
SHA-256
0a28f108d06218e2f2870f8076108a19b3b13eb0b4df24015bb2b29a591176ba
Our copy
doj-1411071-stipulation-and-order-of-settlement-and-dismissal-doj-releas.pdf
Original
www.justice.gov
Back to top