Statement of Facts — USA v. CATALA et al (Dkt. 72, N.D. Fla.)
Summary
A statement of facts supporting Joe Nicholas Catala's guilty plea in United States v. Catala, Case No. 4:21cr36-AW-MAF-1, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida, filed November 19, 2021 as Document 72. It states that a TD Bank account was opened online on May 1, 2020 in the name of a former resident of the apartment Catala frequented, that the resident's $1,200 Economic Impact Payment check was deposited with a false endorsement, and that two Zelle transfers went to co-defendant Clonet Charmant on May 4, 2020. It describes Catala obtaining personal identifying information from the Dark Web, sharing debit card data with Charmant over Telegram, buying theme park tickets with other people's cards, and opening a Chase account in a former roommate's name on April 6, 2020. It closes with the elements of the charged offenses.
Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Statement of Facts — USA v. CATALA et al (Dkt. 72, N.D. Fla.).”
Original at ecf.flnd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/statement-of-facts-usa-v-catala-et-al-dkt-72-n-d-fla-306e145b2e/
, SHA-256 552b5bec172eb3669ced1f10b1b051f0aedb19e77e9a6618f26e712fc473b7ed.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
Case 4:21-cr-00036-AW-MAF Document 72 Filed 11/19/21 Page1of13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Vv. CASE NO. 4:21cr36-AW-MAF-1 JOE NICHOLAS CATALA / STATEMENT OF FACTS The parties agree with the truthfulness of the following factual basis for the seaeunts guilty plea. The undersigned parties erect agree that not all of the facts known from this investigation are contained in this brief summary. Defendant admits that, if this case were to proceed to trial, the Government could prove the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt: On March 27, 2020, Congress passed the $2.2 trillion Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act, which in part provided economic relief for taxpayers nationwide in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The aid package included an Economic Impact Payment [(“EIP”), also known as a “Coronavirus Stimulus check” or “Coronavirus Stimulus payment”] of $1,200 to individuals, so long as their last annual adjusted gross income was less than $75,000. Payments were distributed by the United States Treasury via direct ( \w- FILED IN OPEN ns THIS COURT, NORTH. DIST. FLA. Case 4:21-cr-00036-AW-MAF Document 72 Filed 11/19/21 Page 2 of13 deposit, or by mail using the latest address on file with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). On May 2, 2020, Tallahassee Police Department (““TPD”) received a report from A.H., who advised TPD that her $1,200 EIP had been mailed to an old residential address that she used for her W-2 (2700 West Pensacola Street, Apartment 1223, Tallahassee, FL 32304). Records from the United States Treasury indicated that A.H.’s EJP treasury check was placed in mail with the United States Postal Service on or about May 24, 2020. A.H. also advised that she. received a call from TD Bank (in South Carolina) informing her that an account using her name, social security number, and her old West Pensacola Street address had been created online. A.H. stated she only banked with Bank of America and had no knowledge of the TD Bank account that as epeated, Further, AH. aves, that she was told by TD Bank that her EIP check had been deposited into the TD - Bank account and that phone number (850) 462-2335 was used when the account | was a in her name. The endorsement on the rear on A.H.’s EIP treasury check purported to be that of A.H.; however, A.H. told investigators that the signature was false and not hers. TD Bank records show that the account opened in the name of A.H. (who Defendant Catala knew to be a real person), using A.H.’s Social Security number and date of birth, was opened electronically on May 1, 2020, and A.H.’s Treasury 2 (We check was deposited into that account via mobile deposit on the same day. TD Bank records further show that the phone numbers (850) 462-2335 and (786) 709- 3353 (which was later discovered to be Defendant Joe Catala’s T-Mobile phone number) were registered to the account; those phone numbers were later linked to Defendant Catala. The TD Bank records also show that two Zelle transfers were made to (Co-Defendant) “Clonet Charmant” on May 4, 2020, from that account. Law enforcement agents later interviewed Co-Defendant Charmant and he confirmed that the two Zelle transfers were sent to him by Defendant Catala. During the course of the investigation, agents learned that phone number (850) 462-2335 was one of the phone numbers belonging to TextNow, Inc. for use by its customers. TextNow, Inc. records revealed that on November 21, 2019, at approximately 8:05 AM UTC, user account “drewhunchie” was created utilizing email address drewhunchie@gmail.com, and that on April 22, 2020, at — approximately 3:00 AM UTC, “drewhunchie” took ownership of phone number (850) 462-2335. TextNow, Inc. also provided IP logs for recent activity associated with the username “drewhunchie” for April 2020 and May 2020 that reflected the same two IP addresses being used — 184.102.14.253 and 71.209.94.161. TextNow, Inc. also provided call and message logs for phone number (850) 462-2335 which revealed at least one call to Kiku Japanese Fusion in Tallahassee, FL. TextNow, Inc. also provided call logs that reflected phone number (850) 462- 2335 also made calls to TD Bank. On May 13, 2020, agents went to Kiku Japanese Fusion in Tallahassee. An employee there provided a copy of an order invoice dated April 30, 2020, fora customer whose initials were “A.C.” with a phone number of (850) 462-2335. The order was paid for using a debit/credit card ending in 1419 (belonging to Defendant Catala) with a billing ZIP code of 34953 (associated with the Port St. Lucie, FL area). CenturyLink records indicated that IP addresses 184.102.14.253 and 71.209.94.161 were assigned to a subscriber whose billing name is “Villa Del Lago” with a service address of 2700 West Pensacola Street, Unit 1223, Tallahassee, FL (which is now known as “The Social 2700 Student Spaces” apartment complex) since July, 26, 2010. The Social 2700 used to be known as “Villa Del Lago.” Co-Defendant Ramirez, Co-Defendant Charnaat, and Defendant Catala were all friends and graduates of (St. Lucie West) Centennial High School in Port St. Lucie, FL, and Defendant Catala was a frequent guest of Co-Defendant Ramirez’ at 2700 West Pensacola Street, Apartment 1223, Tallahassee, FL 32304. Each resident of Apartment 1223 had a mailbox key for the locked mailbox assigned to that apartment unit, but Ramirez and a former roommate, A.I., lost 4 (we Case 4:21-cr-00036-AW-MAF Document 72 Filed 11/19/21 Page5of13 theirs. Before another roommate moved out of Apartment 1223 in March 2020, he gave his mailbox key to Defendant Catala. Co-Defendant Ramirez and Defendant Catala were involved in a credit card scam since August 2019, and Defendant Catala, using his laptop, searched the “Dark Web” to obtain unknown persons’ personally identifiable information (“PII”) at the apartment in Tallahassee as part of the credit card scam. Further investigation revealed a scheme to defraud multiple U.S. bank customers using Zelle, fraudulent account applications, and through fraudulent use ~ of debit card numbers to make purchases. These customers banked with Austin Telco Credit Union, Bank of America, Bank of Hawaii, BB&T, Discover Bank, Frist Republic Bank, GBC International Bank, Innovations Federal Credit Union... - (headquartered in Panama City, FL), JPMorgan Chase, TD Bank, and UMB Bank. -. — all were federally insured at al! times relevant to this investigation. The defendants used Zelle to transfer funds from victim accounts (with financial institutions located nationwide) into the — of the defendants. Additionally, search warrants were issued to Google for email accounts of Defendant Catala, including drewhunchie@gmail.com. A search of those accounts revealed communications that established that Defendant Catala had custody/control of the email accounts. Further, confirmation emails for fraudulent purchases were found in the email account of drewhunchie@gmail.com. Two such emails were confirmations of theme park ticket purchases in the names and addresses of, and using the debit cards of, victims R.H. and L.P. Records obtained from Busch Gardens reflected that park tickets and wristbands were activated at the park, and one of the wristbands were linked to a food purchase at the park using the debit card of Defendant Catala’s mother. Defendant Catala’s mother and step-father would testified that Defendant Catala bought the tickets to Busch Gardens for the family to reimburse his parents for money that he owed them. Defendant Catala’s mother and step-father would also testify that while in the park, Defendant Catala’s mother purchased food using her credit card and that they did not know who R.H. or L.P. were. Further, on May 18, 2020, a search warrant was obtained from Southern District of Florida Magistrate Judge Shaniek M. Maynard (case number 20-040- SMM) authorizing a search of Co-Defendant Charmant’s parent’s residence in Port St. Lucie, FL, for items of evidence, including documents and electronic devices. During that search, Co-Defendart Charmant’s blue iPhone was located and seized, and a digital forensic examination was performed on it. In particular, a conversation between Co-Defendant Charmant and Defendant Catala using the Telegram messaging application was discovered. The conversations between Co- Defendant Charmant and Defendant Catala included the sharing of personal identification information (names, dates of birth, addresses) and photos of 6 (\n iL identification documents, and credit/debit card numbers (including expiration dates, CVVs/security codes, and billing ZIP codes), and photographs of such access devices. Further, the coordination of fraud activity in Florida and nationwide, and the sharing of fraud proceeds were discussed by Co-Defendant Charmant and Defendant Catala using the Telegram app. Specifically, on April 15, 2020, around 1:31 AM, Defendant Catala sent a Telegram message to Co-Defendant Charmant that asks “Your head ready for the zelle/chimenplay” to which Co-Defendant Charmant replied “Duhh.” Defendant Catala then sent a message that read “Sending info now” followed by the name, address, First Republic Bank debit card number, expiration date, and CV V/security code of E.G., who was a resident of Connecticut (and who Defendant Catala knew to be areal person). In response, Co-Defendant Charmant sent a message back that read “Send other info for the piece.” During the execution of the search warrant at 2700 West Pensacola Street, Unit 1223, Tallahassee, FL (issued by Magistrate Judge Martin F stepatutale on May 15, 2020 in case #4:20mj125-MAF), : agents located a takeout bag from O.G. Subs to which a sales receipt was attached. The receipt was dated April 18, 2020, and reflected the customer name, “E.G.,” and phone number (727) 317-1564. This phone number was determined to belong to TextNow, Inc. and records revealed that this particular phone number was assigned to the “drewhunchie” account on or between April 6, 2020, and April 22, Case 4:21-cr-00036-AW-MAF Document 72 Filed 11/19/21 Page 8of13 2020. Records from First Republic Bank for E.G.’s account show the fraudulent charge at O.G. Subs and E.G.’s subsequent dispute thereof. Also, on April 15, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Co-Defendant Charmant sent a Telegram message to Defendant Catala that read “I need the other piece so I can work rn [right now] to which Defendant Catala replied “Waiting on Site.” About thirty minutes later, Defendant Catala sent a message to Co-Defendant Charmant that contained the name, address, First Republic Bank debit card number, expiration date, and CVV/security code of P.F., who was a resident of New York . (and who Defendant Catala knew to be a real person). In response, Co-Defendant : Charmant replied “appreciate that kid” and a screenshot of a web form for Zelle in which the address of P.F. was typed into the fields. Records from First Republic .. - Bank for P.F.’s account show several fraudulent charges totaling $645.02 which P.F. disputed. Further, in the early morning hours on April 21, 2020, Defendant Catala sent a Taleeeati message to Co-Defendant Charmant that contained the — address, Pacific Premier Bank debit card number, expiration date, and CV V/security code: -: of D.C., who was a resident of California (and who Defendant Catala knew to be a real person). Defendant Catala then said “break me off [o]f it” to which Co- Defendant Charmant replied “I gotchu.” Defendant Catala also directed Co- Defendant Charmant to “[o]nly send [$]250.” Later that day, Defendant Catala sent a photo of a food delivery order confirmation from O.G. Subs addressed to. [D.C.’s first name] to Co-Defendant Charmant. Records from Pacific Premier Bank for D.C.’s account reflect the fraudulent charge at O.G. Subs and D.C.’s subsequent dispute thereof. Further, on April 27, 2020, around 4:16 PM, Defendant Catala sent a Telegram message to Co-Defendant Charmant that read “I ready You Ready?” to which Co-Defendant Charmant replied “Hell yeah Yessssssirrr.” In response, Defendant Catala sent a message to Co-Defendant Charmant that contained the name, address, email address, First Republic Bank debit card number, expiration date, and CVV/security code of A.C., who was a resident of Arizona (and who Defendant Catala knew to be a real person). In response, Co-Defendant Charmant replied “Appreciate that fam Ima get right rn [right now].” Co-Defendant Charmant also asked Defendant Catala to “Send me that number so I can send bread [money] [to Defendant Catala via Zelle] too.” As noted above, A.C.’s name was used on the food order at Kiku oe in Tallahassee, Florida on April 30, 2020. Records from First Republic Bank for A.C.’s account show several fraudulent charges on the account and A.C.’s subsequent dispute thereof. Records obtained from Zelle (Early Warning Services) reflect that Defendant Catala and Co-Defendant Ramirez fraudulently received funds from a customer account at Innovations Federal Credit Union (headquartered in Panama Case 4:21-cr-00036-AW-MAF Document 72 Filed 11/19/21 Page 10 of 13 City, Florida) into their bank accounts using Zelle. Specifically, Defendant Catala fraudulently received two transfers of $150 each into his BB&T account from the account belonging to S.P., and Co-Defendant Ramirez fraudulently received a transfer of $200 into his Chase account from the account belonging to S.P. Further, a checking account at J.P. Morgan Chase was fraudulently opened on April 6, 2020, in the name of A.I. (Defendant Catala’s former roommate in Apartment 1223, and who Defendant Catala knew to be a real person) and using A.I.’s date of birth, Social Security number, and Drivers License number. During a Telegram conversation on April 12, 2020, Defendant Catala told Co-Defendant Charmant that he opened the Chase account with A.I.’s social security number, and that A.I. did not know. Co-Defendant Charmant transferred $50 into the Chase account in the name of A.I. using Zelle on or about April 12, 2020. ELEMENTS OF THE OFFENSE Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud and Wire Fraud — 18 U.S.C. § 1349 Bierienes to be proven besa a reasonable doubt: 1) two or more persons, in some way or manner, agreed to try to accomplish a common and unlawful plan to commit bank fraud and wire fraud, as charged in the indictment; and 2) the Defendant knew the unlawful purpose of the plan and willfully joined in it; Adapted from 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions § O54. 10 /\We Case 4:21-cr-00036-AW-MAF Document 72 Filed 11/19/21 Page 11 of 13 ii, Bank Fraud - 18 U.S.C. § 1344 Elements to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt: 1) the Defendant knowingly carried out or attempted to carry out a scheme to defraud a financial institution or to get money, assets, or other property from a financial institution by using false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises about a material fact; 2) the false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises were material; 3) the Defendant intended to defraud the financial institution or someone; and 4) the financial institution was federally insured. 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions § O52. iii, Theft of Mail - 18 U.S.C. § 1768 Elements to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt: T= 1) the letter or mail matter described in the indictment was in the United States mai!, a letter box, or a mail receptacle; and = 8 & 2) the Defendant knowingly stole the mail. 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions § 66.1. 1 / We Case 4:21-cr-00036-AW-MAF Document 72 Filed 11/19/21 Page 12 of 13 iv. Fraudulent Endorsement of Treasury Check — 18 U.S.C. § 510 - - Elements to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt: 1) the Defendant forged the payee's endorsement on a United States Treasury check having a face value of more than $1,000; and 2) the Defendant forged the endorsement with the intent to defraud by getting (or enabling someone else to get) money directly or indirectly from the United States. 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions § 18.1. v. Aggravated Identity Theft —18 U.S.C. § 1028A Elements to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) The Defendant knowingly transferred, possessed, or used another person’s means of identification; C8 (2) The Defendant did so without iawful authority’, ne gage gant (3)The Defendant knew the means of identification belonged.to an actual person’, and (4) The Defendant dia so in relation to bank fraud. 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions § 040.3. ' In United States v. Zitron, 810 F.3d 1253, 1260 (1 1th Cir. 2016) (per curiam), the Eleventh Circuit found that the defendant used the victim’s identity “without lawful authority” i two ways: (1) the defendant did not have permission to use the victim’s identity, and (2) the defendant used the victim’s means of identification for an unlawful purpose. See also United States v. Joseph, 567 F. App’x 844, 848 (11th Cir. 2014) (per curiam) (unpublished). ? Does not appear in the 1 1th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions. Case 4:21-cr-00036-AW-MAF Jeff, . Gorman orney for Defendant Date | Nicholas Catala Defendant Date Document 72 Acting/United States A Re? Justin M. Keen | “~ Florida Bar No. 021034 Assistant United States Attorney Northern District of Florida 111 North Adams Street, 4" Floor Tallahassee, FL 32301 850-942-8430 Justin. Keen@usdoj.gov Date" 13
File and source
- File
- 72-statement-of-facts-by-usa-as-to-joe-nicolas-catala.pdf
- Size
- 2,120,942 bytes
- SHA-256
- 552b5bec172eb3669ced1f10b1b051f0aedb19e77e9a6618f26e712fc473b7ed
- Original
- PACER (login required)