Sentencing Memorandum — USA v. Padilla-Reyna (Dkt. 33, E.D. Wash.)

Summary

The United States' sentencing memorandum, filed March 6, 2023 as ECF No. 33 in United States v. Karla Leticia Padilla-Reyna, Case No. 1:22-CR-2059-MKD-1, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. It recommends a low-end guideline sentence of 21 months of imprisonment, three years of supervised release, restitution of $302,145.40 and a $100 assessment. The memorandum states the presentence report sets a total offense level of 16 and criminal history category I, for a range of 21 – 27 months. It states the defendant received two EIDLs and four PPP loans totaling $290,833 through Queen B Collectibles, KPR Insurance and KPR Crop and Farm Insurance, and that the total loss to the United States with lender fees was $302,145.40. It is signed /s/ Frieda K. Zimmerman, Special Assistant United States Attorney.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Sentencing Memorandum — USA v. Padilla-Reyna (Dkt. 33, E.D. Wash.).” Original at ecf.waed.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/sentencing-memorandum-usa-v-padilla-reyna-dkt-33-e-d-wash-b5400d20bb/, SHA-256 2fde726b6ec683f86f977a2cdabea45aa9bf3c779bebecb1c784e323d6c5e795.

Full text

Case 1:22-cr-02059-MKD ECF No. 33 filed 03/06/23 PageID.155 Page 1 of 7

1 Vanessa R. Waldref
United States Attorney
2
Eastern District of Washington
3 Daniel Hugo Fruchter
Tyler H.L. Tornabene
4 Assistant United States Attorneys
5 Frieda K. Zimmerman
Special Assistant United States Attorney
6 Post Office Box 1494
7 Spokane, WA 99210-1494
Telephone: (509) 353-2767
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
11
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No.: 1:22-CR-2059-MKD-1
12
13 Plaintiff, United States’ Sentencing
Memorandum
14 v.
15
KARLA LETICIA PADILLA-REYNA,
16 a.k.a. KARLA PADILLA
17
Defendant.
18
19
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through Vanessa R. Waldref,
20
United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Washington, Tyler H.L. Tornabene
21
and Daniel H. Fruchter, Assistant United States Attorneys, and Frieda Zimmerman,
22
Special Assistant United States Attorney, submits the following Sentencing
23
Memorandum. The United States recommends that this Court sentence Defendant
24
KARLA PADILLA to a low-end guideline sentence of 21 months of imprisonment,
25
three years of supervised release, restitution in the amount of $302,145.40, and one
26
mandatory special penalty assessment of $100.
27
//
28

United States’ Sentencing Memorandum - 1
Case 1:22-cr-02059-MKD ECF No. 33 filed 03/06/23 PageID.156 Page 2 of 7

1 I. Offense Level & Criminal History
2
The Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (“PSIR”) provides for a base offense
3
level of 7, PSIR, ¶¶ 4, 40; U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(a)(1), with an increase of 12 levels
4
pursuant to § 2B1.1(b)(1)(G), based on an agreed amount of actual and intended loss
5
of more than $250,000, and less than $550,000. PSIR, ¶¶ 4, 41; see also PSIR,18-
6
25; U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1. This results in an adjusted offense level of 19. PSIR, ¶ 45.
7
Additionally, the parties have agreed that if Defendant pleads guilty and
8
demonstrates a recognition and an affirmative acceptance of personal responsibility
9
for the criminal conduct; provides complete and accurate information during the
10
sentencing process; does not commit any obstructive conduct; accepts the plea
11
agreement and enters a plea of guilty, the government will recommend the defendant
12
receive a 3-level downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility, pursuant to
13
U.S.S.G. §3E1.1(a) and (b). With Defendant’s recognition and an affirmative
14
acceptance of personal responsibility for the criminal conduct, the PSIR provides a
15
total offense level of 16. PSIR, ¶ 49. Additionally, the PSIR provides that Defendant
16
has a criminal history score of 0 and a criminal history category of I. PSIR, ¶¶
17
55, 124. The United States agrees with these calculations in the PSIR.
18
This results in an advisory Guideline sentencing range of 21 – 27 months. The
19
United States recommends a low-end sentence of 21 months incarceration. 1 This is
20
a just sentence for a defendant who, while timely accepting responsibility, stole over
21
a quarter of a million dollars from a government program designed to alleviate
22
financial and economic harm to small businesses during a global pandemic.
23
24 1
As stated in the PSIR, Defendant’s Guideline range sentence is in Zone D. PSIR
25 ¶ 124. Accordingly, the Guidelines envision a sentence of incarceration. See
26 U.S.S.G. § 5C1.1(f) (if the applicable Guideline range is in Zone D of the
27 Sentencing Table, “the minimum term shall be satisfied by a sentence of
28 imprisonment”).

United States’ Sentencing Memorandum - 2
Case 1:22-cr-02059-MKD ECF No. 33 filed 03/06/23 PageID.157 Page 3 of 7

1 II. Departures
2
The United States is not seeking a departure or variance from the Advisory
3
Guideline range.
4
5 III. 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)
6
The United States respectfully submits that a sentence of 21 months
7
incarceration, followed by a 3-year term of supervised release, would be a reasonable
8
sentence under the facts and circumstances of this case and would not be greater than
9
necessary to promote the purpose and policy of the Federal Sentencing Act, 18
10
U.S.C. § 3553(a).
11
The applicable sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) are: (1) the
12
nature and circumstances of the offense and history and characteristics of the
13
defendant; (2) the need for the sentence to reflect the seriousness of the offense, to
14
promote respect for the law, and provide just punishment for the offense, as well as
15
to afford deterrence, protect the public from further crimes of the defendant and
16
provide the defendant training and treatment; (3) the kinds of sentences available;
17
(4) the established Guidelines sentencing ranges; (5) the need to avoid unwarranted
18
sentence disparity between defendants with similar records convicted of similar
19
crimes; and (6) the need to provide restitution to victims of the offense. 18 U.S.C. §
20
3553(a).
21
The United States submits that consideration of the Section 3553(a) factors
22
warrants a guideline sentence as the guidelines substantially do reflect the nature and
23
circumstances of the offense and the defendant’s background. In this case, the
24
section 3553(a) factors support a sentence of 21 months of incarceration.
25
With regard to the nature and circumstances of the offense, the charges
26
against the Defendant stem from her submission of various applications for funding
27
under the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) and the Economic Injury Disaster
28

United States’ Sentencing Memorandum - 3
Case 1:22-cr-02059-MKD ECF No. 33 filed 03/06/23 PageID.158 Page 4 of 7

1 Loan (EIDL) program, using materially false and fraudulent information. 2
2 Defendant first applied for Covid Relief funding on April 2, 2020, when she
3 submitted an EIDL application containing false statements and certifications to the
4 SBA under the name of her purported company, Queen B Collectibles (hereinafter
5 “Queen B”). Defendant subsequently submitted EIDL applications on behalf of
6 Queen B containing false and fraudulent statements and certifications on April 6, 7,
7 and 14, 2020, January 4, 2021, and April 22, 2021.
8 Additionally, Defendant submitted applications for PPP funding containing
9 false and fraudulent statements and certifications to the SBA in the name of her
10 purported company on August 7, 2020, January 19, 2021, and April 22, 2021. Two
11 of these applications were approved, and in October of 2021, Defendant falsely and
12 fraudulently requested loan forgiveness of the full amount of PPP funds she received
13 on behalf of Queen B by falsely representing that the PPP funding had been used for
14 eligible uses and expenses.
15 In addition to Defendant’s fraudulent applications in the name of Queen B,
16 Defendant also fraudulently applied for and received 2 PPP loans in the name of
17 KPR Insurance, and one EIDL in the name of KPR Crop and Farm Insurance. All
18 told, Defendant received two EIDLs and four PPP loans totaling $290,833, under
19 three different business entities: Queen B Collectibles, KPR Insurance, and KPR
20 Crop and Farm Insurance. PSIR, ¶ 16. Together with the lender fees, the total loss
21 to the United States was $302,145.40.
22 Thus, the nature and circumstances of the offense in this case indicate a
23 deliberate and ongoing effort to defraud the United States. More specifically,
24 Defendant repeatedly elected to fraudulently exploit a program intended to prevent
25 individuals from being financially ravaged by the impact of a global pandemic. This
26
27 2
A more detailed recitation of the underlying factual allegations can be found in
28 the Plea Agreement. ECF No. 26 at 5-10.

United States’ Sentencing Memorandum - 4
Case 1:22-cr-02059-MKD ECF No. 33 filed 03/06/23 PageID.159 Page 5 of 7

1 of course informs the nature and seriousness of the Defendant’s offense as well. She
2 did not choose to exploit a private company, which would have been bad enough,
3 nor did she choose to defraud an essential government program only a single time.
4 Instead, Defendant elected to defraud and attempt to defraud essential government
5 programs multiple times over the course of a year and a half. The Defendant’s crime
6 required planning, reflection, and a disregard for the well-being of others during a
7 time of international crisis. A sentence of 21 months of imprisonment, followed by
8 a term of supervision of 3 years, would reflect the serious nature of the conduct and
9 be appropriate to deter the Defendant from engaging in future criminal acts. Further,
10 this sentence falls within the established guideline range. Finally, the need to provide
11 restitution in this case is adequately addressed in the plea agreement.
12 IV. Restitution
13
Restitution is mandatory for the Defendant’s offense conduct. 18 U.S.C.
14
§ 3663A(a)(1) and (c)(1)(A)(ii) (the court “shall order” restitution to the victim of
15
any offense “against property under [Title 18] . . . including any offense committed
16
by fraud or deceit”). Mandatory restitution shall be awarded to any victims of the
17
offense conduct, which means “a person directly and proximately harmed as a result
18
of the commission of an offense” or in the case of a conspiracy offense, “any person
19
directly harmed by the defendant’s criminal conduct in the course of the scheme,
20
conspiracy, or pattern.” 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a)(2). Here, the parties have agreed that
21
Defendant will pay restitution to the SBA in the amount of at least $302,145.40. See,
22
ECF No. 26 at 14; PSIR, ¶ 4.
23
V. Conclusion
24
The United States recommends that this Court impose a low-end guideline
25
sentence of 21 months incarceration, all mandatory and appropriate conditions of
26
probation under U.S.S.G. § 5B1.3, three years supervised release, $302,145.40 in
27
restitution, and a $100 special penalty assessment.
28

United States’ Sentencing Memorandum - 5
Case 1:22-cr-02059-MKD ECF No. 33 filed 03/06/23 PageID.160 Page 6 of 7

1 DATED: March 6, 2023
2
VANESSA R. WALDREF
3 United States Attorney
4
5
6 /s/ Frieda K. Zimmerman
Daniel Hugo Fruchter
7 Tyler H.L. Tornabene
8 Brian Donovan
Assistant United States Attorneys
9 Frieda K. Zimmerman
10 Special Assistant United States Attorney

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

United States’ Sentencing Memorandum - 6
Case 1:22-cr-02059-MKD ECF No. 33 filed 03/06/23 PageID.161 Page 7 of 7

1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
3 I hereby certify that on March 6, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with

4 the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System which will send notification of
5
such filing to Defendant’s counsel of record using the CM/ECF system.
6
7
8 /s/ Frieda K. Zimmerman
Frieda K. Zimmerman
9
Special Assistant United States Attorney
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

United States’ Sentencing Memorandum - 7

File and source

File: 33-sentencing-memorandum-by-usa-as-to-karla-leticia-padilla-rey.pdf
Size: 168,802 bytes
SHA-256: 2fde726b6ec683f86f977a2cdabea45aa9bf3c779bebecb1c784e323d6c5e795
Our copy: 33-sentencing-memorandum-by-usa-as-to-karla-leticia-padilla-rey.pdf
Original: PACER (login required)