Certificate of Compliance — NFIB v. Department of Labor
Summary
A Rule 33.1(h) Certificate of Compliance in the Supreme Court of the United States, Nos. 21A244 and 21A247. The captions are National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and State of Ohio v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, on emergency applications for stay pending certiorari review. The certificate states that the accompanying Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief contains 564 words and the accompanying Proposed Amicus Brief contains 3,136 words, excluding portions exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d). It names Brian J. LaClair as counsel of record, is dated December 30, 2021, and identifies Counsel for Movants/Amici Local Unions 1249 and 97 of the IBEW.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Certificate of Compliance — NFIB v. Department of Labor.”
Original at www.supremecourt.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/scotus-covid-mandates/
, SHA-256 ead94f6cb6bbb3ab5fa4c195c740151ec1ccd4b84db8aebf926d329a13fc4158.Full text
Nos. 21A244 and 21A247 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS, et al., Applicants, —v.— DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, et al., Respondents. ——————————————— STATE OF OHIO, et al., Applicants, —v. — DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, et al., Respondents. On Emergency Applications for Stay Pending Certiorari Review RULE 33.1(h) CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE I, Brian J. LaClair, hereby certify pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 33.1(h) that the accompanying Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief contains 564 words, and that the accompanying Proposed Amicus Brief contains 3,136 words, excluding those portions of the respective documents exempted by Supreme Court Rule 33.1(d). I have relied on the word count feature of the word-processing system used to prepare the documents in making this certification. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Brian J. LaClair* *Counsel of record BLITMAN & KING LLP Franklin Center, Suite 300 443 N. Franklin Street Syracuse, NY 13204 (315) 422-7111 bjlaclair@bklawyers.com December 30, 2021 Counsel for Movants/Amici Local Unions 1249 and 97 of the IBEW
File and source
- File
- 21A244_036_Dec_30_2021_Other_20211230141911969_IBEW_97_1249_Vaccine_Mandate_Amicus_Certificate_of_Compliance.PDF
- Size
- 100,423 bytes
- SHA-256
- ead94f6cb6bbb3ab5fa4c195c740151ec1ccd4b84db8aebf926d329a13fc4158
- Original
- www.supremecourt.gov