Scheduling Order, State of Washington v. DeVos (later v. Cardona), No. 2:20-cv-00182 (E.D. Wash.), Doc. 71 (September 23, 2020)
Summary
A Scheduling Order in State of Washington v. Betsy DeVos and the United States Department of Education, No. 2:20-CV-0182-TOR, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Washington, dated September 23, 2020 and issued by Judge Thomas O. Rice after a telephonic status conference that day. The order sets a deadline of October 1, 2020 to amend pleadings or add parties and November 2, 2020 for any motion to open discovery. It sets cross-motion deadlines for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52, starting with the plaintiff's motion due November 20, 2020, and Defendants' combined cross-motion due December 21, 2020. The case will be considered submitted without oral argument on February 24, 2021, unless oral argument is requested by January 29, 2021.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Scheduling Order, State of Washington v. DeVos (later v. Cardona), No. 2:20-cv-00182 (E.D. Wash.), Doc. 71 (September 23, 2020).”
Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/scheduling-order-state-of-washington-v-devos-later-v-cardona-no-2-20-c-4a1649e8b5/
, SHA-256 013a525ad226a553cc958c1755ac2e107db15826d2e0ff033d5c6188b7cbf435.Full text
1
2
3
4
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
6
7 STATE OF WASHINGTON,
NO: 2:20-CV-0182-TOR
8 Plaintiff,
vs.
9 SCHEDULING ORDER
BETSY DeVOS, in her official capacity
10 as Secretary of the United States
Department of Education, and the
11 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION, a federal agency,
12
Defendants.
13
14
15 A telephonic status conference was held in the above-entitled matter on
16 September 23, 2020. R. July Simpson and Spencer W. Coates appeared on behalf
17 of Plaintiff. Alexander V. Sverdlov appeared on behalf of Defendants. The Court
18 reviewed the Joint Status Report (ECF No. 68), heard from counsel, and is fully
19 informed.
20 //
SCHEDULING ORDER ~ 1
1 IT IS ORDERED:
2 1. General Court Procedures
3 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4), the dates set forth in this Order may be
4 amended only by Order of the Court and upon a showing of good cause. Counsel
5 are to review and employ Local Rule 83.1 (Civility) and Washington Rule of
6 Professional Conduct 3.4 (Fairness To Opposing Party And Counsel).
7 2. Mediation
8 If parties elect to proceed to mediation, it should be completed as early as
9 possible to avoid the unnecessary expenditure of judicial resources.
10 3. Rule 26(a)(1) Exchange
11 This case is exempt from the initial disclosure requirements under Federal
12 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1)(B).
13 4. Administrative Record
14 The Defendants have filed the administrative record on August 7, 2020 at
15 ECF No. 64.
16 5. Amend Pleadings or Add Parties
17 Any motion to amend the pleadings or add parties shall be filed no later than
18 October 1, 2020. Defendants reserve the right to file an Answer to the First
19 Amended Complaint, after disposition of the cross-motions for summary judgment.
20 //
SCHEDULING ORDER ~ 2
1 6. Discovery
2 Only limited discovery may be allowed in this administrative review case, for
3 good cause shown. A party seeking discovery shall file a motion seeking to open
4 discovery and show good cause. Such motion shall be filed by November 2, 2020.
5 The parties shall not file discovery, except those portions necessary to support
6 motions or objections.
7 To avoid wasted time and expense, counsel shall contact chambers to
8 schedule a telephonic conference to obtain an expedited ruling on discovery
9 disputes.
10 6. Rule 52 Cross-Motions for Judgment
11 Plaintiff shall file its motion for summary judgment under Federal Rule of
12 Civil Procedure 52 no later than November 20, 2020, limited to no more than 24
13 pages.
14 Defendants’ combined cross-motion for summary judgment and opposition to
15 Plaintiff’s motion shall be filed no later than December 21, 2020, limited to no
16 more than 30 pages.
17 Plaintiff’s combined reply in support of summary judgment and opposition to
18 Defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment shall be filed no later than
19 January 29, 2021, limited to no more than 20 pages.
20
SCHEDULING ORDER ~ 3
1 Defendants’ reply in support of cross-motion for summary judgment shall be
2 filed no later than February 19, 2021, limited to no more than 14 pages
3 The case will be considered submitted to the Court without oral argument on
4 February 24, 2021, unless either party requests oral argument no later than
5 January 29, 2021 and complies with LCivR 7(i)(3).
6 The District Court Clerk is directed to enter this Order and provide copies to
7 counsel.
8 DATED September 23, 2020.
9
10 THOMAS O. RICE
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
SCHEDULING ORDER ~ 4
File and source
- File
- 71-scheduling-order.pdf
- Size
- 35,515 bytes
- SHA-256
- 013a525ad226a553cc958c1755ac2e107db15826d2e0ff033d5c6188b7cbf435
- Our copy
- 71-scheduling-order.pdf
- Original
- storage.courtlistener.com