Rule 5(f) Order on Disclosure of Exculpatory Evidence — United States v. Lisa Smith (Dkt. 6, D.N.J.)
Summary
An order under Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in United States v. Lisa Smith, Mag No. 23mj2052(AMD), U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. As set forth on the record at the initial appearance of the defendant on the 26 day of July, 2023, the Court confirms the continuing obligation of the United States to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant under Brady and its progeny, and orders the United States to do so. It warns that failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences including exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings or sanctions. The signature block names Hon. Sharon A. King, United States Magistrate Judge.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Rule 5(f) Order on Disclosure of Exculpatory Evidence — United States v. Lisa Smith (Dkt. 6, D.N.J.).”
Original at ecf.njd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/rule-5-f-order-on-disclosure-of-exculpatory-evidence-united-states-v-l-c5d1edb76b/
, SHA-256 23f9033ba83b964c210ce94c9533ddd7b57d40636680683f6e6f236ecc446fe2.Full text
Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Mag No. 23mj2052(AMD) y, ORDER Lisa Smith Defendant. Pursuant to Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and as set forth on the record during the initial appearance of the defendant on this 26 day of July , 2023, in the presence of both the prosecutor and defense counsel in this matter, the Court confirms the United States’ continuing obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to the defendant pursuant to Brady vy. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to do so. Failing to do so in a timely manner may result in consequences, including, but not limited to, the Court’s order to produce information, the granting of a continuance, the exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions by Hon. Sharon A. King a United States Magistrate Judge the Court.
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.njd.551908.6.0.pdf
- Size
- 34,343 bytes
- SHA-256
- 23f9033ba83b964c210ce94c9533ddd7b57d40636680683f6e6f236ecc446fe2
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.njd.551908.6.0.pdf
- Original
- PACER (login required)