Home/Source documents/Response to notice of case being considered for oral argument — No. 24-2355 (Dkt. 35, 9th Cir.)
Response to notice of case being considered for oral argument — No. 24-2355 (Dkt. 35, 9th Cir.)
Full text
(1 of 1), Page 1 of 1 Case: 24-2355, 08/15/2024, DktEntry: 35.1, Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Form 32. Response to Notice of Case Being Considered for Oral Argument
Inslructionsfor this farmx http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov{forms{form3Zinstructionspdf
9th Cir. Case Number(s) 24-2355
Case Name PayServices Bank V. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Hearing Location (city) San Francisco, CA
Your Name 'Jade A. Craig, Counsel for Appellant
List the sitting dates for the two sitting months you were asked to review:
December 2-6, 2024 & January 13-17, 2025
Do you have an unresolvable conflict on any of the above dates? ®Y es O No
If yes, list the specific day(s) and the specific reason(s) you are unavailable:
I have an unresolvable conflict on January 13-17, 2025. I am attending a family
vacation for which payment has already been submitted. I am a full-time law professor
and a sole practitioner who does not have someone who can take my place at
argument. I would propose as alternate dates November 11-15, 2024 and February 3
& 10-11, 2025. Opposing counsel has approved these dates. My client prefers
November 2024 due to the impact of the litigation on its operations and the interest in
an earlier resolution.
Do you have any other cases pending in this court for which you received a notice
of consideration for oral argument during the three sitting months listed above?
OYes @ No
If yes, list the number, name, and hearing city of each of the other case(s):
Signature s/Jade A. Craig Date 8/15/2024 4
(use "s/[typed name] " to sign electronically led documents)
Feedback or questions about this form? Email us at_forms@ca9.uscourtsgov
Form 32 New 12/01/2018