Response to Allison Baver’s Motion to Stay Forfeiture Pending Appeal — No. 2:21-cr-00520 (Dkt. 231, D. Utah)
Summary
A Response to Allison Baver's Motion to Stay Forfeiture Pending Appeal, Document 231, filed October 8, 2024 in United States v. Allison Marie Baver, Case No. 2:21-cr-00520-JNP, before Judge Jill N. Parrish in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah. Submitted by United States Attorney Trina A. Higgins and Assistant United States Attorney Travis K. Elder, it states that the United States does not oppose the defendant's motion (ECF 227) to stay the forfeiture during her anticipated appeal under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(d). It adds that, as stated in its opposition to Allison Baver Entertainment, LLC's motion for stay of proceedings (ECF 229), the stay should not prevent the court from addressing third-party petitions in the ancillary proceeding. The response is two pages.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Response to Allison Baver’s Motion to Stay Forfeiture Pending Appeal — No. 2:21-cr-00520 (Dkt. 231, D. Utah).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/response-to-allison-baver-s-motion-to-stay-forfeiture-pending-appeal-n-96a64e94b3/
, SHA-256 9fb76a1b027f22dc7fc9fe106250f17ae2b3aadf35f6aa1fd53e48d5d8d431d0.Full text
Case 2:21-cr-00520-JNP Document 231 Filed 10/08/24 PageID.3709 Page 1 of 2
TRINA A. HIGGINS, United States Attorney (7349)
TRAVIS K. ELDER, Assistant United States Attorney (11987)
Attorneys for the United States of America
111 South Main Street, Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
(801) 524-5682
travis.elder@usdoj.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
RESPONSE TO ALLISON BAVER’S
Plaintiff, MOTION TO STAY FORFEITURE
PENDING APPEAL
v.
Case No. 2:21-cr-00520-JNP
ALLISON MARIE BAVER,
Judge Jill N. Parrish
Defendant.
The United States of America submits this response to the defendant’s Motion to
Stay Forfeiture Pending Appeal (ECF 227). The motion requests that the court stay the
forfeiture during the pendency of the defendant’s anticipated appeal under Fed. R. Crim.
P. 32.2(d). The United States does not oppose this request. However, as indicated in the
United States’ Opposition to Allison Baver Entertainment, LLC’s Motion for Stay of
Proceedings (ECF 229), such a stay of the forfeiture will not and should not prevent the
Case 2:21-cr-00520-JNP Document 231 Filed 10/08/24 PageID.3710 Page 2 of 2
court from addressing third-party petitions in the ancillary proceeding. Rule 32.2(d)
provides that a stay of the forfeiture pending appeal by the defendant “does not delay the
ancillary proceeding or the determination of a third party’s rights or interests.”
Respectfully submitted,
TRINA A. HIGGINS
United States Attorney
/s/ Travis K. Elder
Travis K. Elder
Assistant U.S. Attorney
2
File and source
- File
- 231.pdf
- Size
- 122,349 bytes
- SHA-256
- 9fb76a1b027f22dc7fc9fe106250f17ae2b3aadf35f6aa1fd53e48d5d8d431d0
- Our copy
- 231.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.