Source documents · Archived capture
Response — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 92)
Summary
Defendants Bank of America, N.A. and Megan Scholz's Response to Plaintiff's Supplementation of the Record in Natasha Athens d/b/a Favorite Things v. Bank of America and Megan Scholz, Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00748-SM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire, filed January 31, 2022 as Document 92. It recounts that the court's order of January 21, 2022 (Doc. #78) granted dismissal of the claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and fraud and let the plaintiff supplement the record on the breach of contract claim over PPP loan forgiveness. The defendants argue that the plaintiff's filing (Doc. #83) does not address the court's questions. They ask the court to grant their motion to dismiss the remaining breach of contract claim. The response is signed /s/Thomas J. Pappas of Primmer Piper Eggleston & Cramer PC.
Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Archived source document. Preserved source.
Original: storage.courtlistener.com
Record facts
| File name | 92-response-re-83-response-not-to-motion-plaintiff-s-supplement.pdf |
|---|---|
| SHA-256 | a2466ef38f717eba437aa7feb26708ff7e3846d4a87f15ada2df52961e17a1c7 |
| Size | 24,838 bytes |
| Source site | storage.courtlistener.com |
File and source
- File
- 92-response-re-83-response-not-to-motion-plaintiff-s-supplement.pdf
- Size
- 24,838 bytes
- SHA-256
- a2466ef38f717eba437aa7feb26708ff7e3846d4a87f15ada2df52961e17a1c7
- Original
- storage.courtlistener.com