Natasha Athens v. Bank of America — PPP Loan Pulled Out of Forgiveness (Document 83)
Summary
Natasha Athens responded to the judge's second order on her PPP loan being pulled out of forgiveness, saying she had already appealed the whole order and would submit an affidavit. She wrote that the judge was not allowed to make the order and called the judge biased; the response was filed 1/25/22.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Natasha Athens v. Bank of America — PPP Loan Pulled Out of Forgiveness (Document 83).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/response-no-1-21-cv-00748-dkt-83-f2d71f53e9/
, SHA-256 2a357fbcec5231636205fafff760dc040fb01d9392e7538563215c31399a044a.Full text
Case 1:21-cv-00748-SM Document 83 Filed 01/25/22 Page 1 of 1
Natasha Athens,
d/b/a Favorite Things,
Plaintiff
v. Case No. 21-cv-748-SM
Bank of America, N.A. and
Megan Scholz,
Defendants
PLAINTIFF'S RESONSE TO JUDGE'S 2ND "ORDER" ON PPP LOAN PULLED OUT OF
FORGIVENESS
Even though the Plaintiff did respond and appeal the entire order, she will repeat
as well as submit an affidavit.
The Judge is not allowed to make such and order, and the Plaintiff appealed the
whole order, and is doing that again today, as well as sumbmitting what can
legally be responded to upon this compromised order of a bias judge.
Natasha Athens
1/25/22
FILED in the court
File and source
- File
- 83-response-re-order-resonse-then-appeal-of-this-order-filed-by.pdf
- Size
- 1,542,614 bytes
- SHA-256
- 2a357fbcec5231636205fafff760dc040fb01d9392e7538563215c31399a044a
- Original
- archive.org