Reply to Objection to Motion — No. 1:21-cv-00748 (Dkt. 42)

Summary

A reply brief filed November 16, 2021 as Document 42 by defendants Bank of America, N.A. and Megan Scholz in support of their November 9, 2021 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 33) in Natasha Athens d/b/a Favorite Things v. Bank of America and Megan Scholz, Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-00748-SM, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. It responds to the plaintiff's November 11, 2021 objection (Doc. No. 34), arguing that its sole argument, improper service, is baseless because filings were served via CM/ECF. The defendants state that the objection does not address their arguments that the CARES Act creates no private right of action and that the claims are inadequately pled under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b). The reply asks for dismissal in full and is signed /s/ Thomas J. Pappas.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used