Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Redacted Indictment — USA v. Hunt (No. 1:25-cr-00048, Dkt. 2, E.D. Mo.)Search ⌕

Redacted Indictment — USA v. Hunt (No. 1:25-cr-00048, Dkt. 2, E.D. Mo.)

Summary

A grand jury indictment in United States v. Adriona Kohnaja Hunt, No. 1:25-cr-00048, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, Southeastern Division, filed March 4, 2025 as Doc. 2. Count I charges a false statement to Benworth Capital Partners, LLC under 18 U.S.C. § 1014, and Count II charges wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343, both over a PPP loan application submitted on or about April 30, 2021. The indictment alleges the application falsely stated that Hunt operated a small business in Missouri on February 15, 2020, and was supported by a false 2019 Schedule C. It states that the lender transferred $19,892.00 to a bank account of Hunt and seeks forfeiture of at least $19,892.00. The 7-page indictment's signature block names United States Attorney Sayler A. Fleming.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Redacted Indictment — USA v. Hunt (No. 1:25-cr-00048, Dkt. 2, E.D. Mo.).” Original at ecf.moed.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/redacted-indictment-usa-v-hunt-dkt-2-e-d-mo-6582df4cc7/, SHA-256 76c072bcf7c7c5afa5be27c78e8236b1ae3923410915dc3b243d114bc5def8a1.

Full text

 Case: 1:25-cr-00048-JAR             Doc. #: 2       Filed: 03/04/25    Page: 1 of 7 PageID #: 9


                                                                                            FILED

                                                                                       MARO 4 lUt5
                        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                         E}§"y~Rwiwf~rc~OlRT
                        FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI                           C4.PF G/Rt;RDfA,F MO
                              SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        )
                                                 )
                        Plaintiff,               )
                                                 )
vs.                                              )           1:25CR00048-JAR-ACL
                                                 )
ADRIONA KOHNAJA HUNT,                            )       Title 18, U.S.C. § 1014.
                                                 )       Title 18, U.S.C. § 1343.
                                                 )       Forfeiture allegations.
Defendant.                                       )

                                         INDICTMENT

         THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:

             At all times material to this Indictment, unless otherwise specified below:

      1. Adriona Kohnaja Hunt, a defendant herein, was a resident of Caruthersville, Pemiscot

County Missouri, within the Southeastern Division of the Eastern District of Missouri.

      2. Adriona Hunt did not own or operate a business registered or incorporated within the

State of Missouri which was in operation on February 15, 2020.

                                The Paycheck Protection Program

      3. The United States Small Business Administration ("SBA") is an executive-branch

agency of the United States govennnent that provides supp011 to entrepreneurs and small

businesses. The mission of the SBA is to maintain and strengthen the nation's economy by

enabling the establishment and viability of small businesses and by assisting in economic

recovery after disasters.

      4. The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act, Pub. L. No.

                                                     1
Case: 1:25-cr-00048-JAR          Doc. #: 2      Filed: 03/04/25      Page: 2 of 7 PageID #: 10




116-136, 134 Stat. 281 (2020), is a federal law that was enacted in or around March 2020 to

provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of Americans suffering the economic

impact caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. One source of relief provided for in the CARES Act

was the authorization of forgivable loans to small businesses for job retention and certain other

expenses through the Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP"). The purpose of loans issued under

the PPP was to enable small businesses suffering from the economic downturn to continue to pay

salary, wages and to provide benefits, such as health insurance coverage, to their employees.

   5.   To obtain a PPP loan, a qualifying business was required to submit a PPP loan

application, signed by an authorized representative of the business. The PPP loan application

required the business to acknowledge the program rules and make certain affirmative

certifications to obtain the PPP loan. ln the PPP loan application (SBA Form 2483), the small

business (through its authorized representative) was required to certify: (a) that the small

business was in operation on February 15, 2020; and (b) the average monthly payroll expenses;

and (c) the number of employees. These certifications were used to calculate the amount of

money the small business was eligible to receive under the PPP. In addition, businesses applying

for PPP loans were required to submit documentation supportin~ their payroll expenses.

   7. A PPP loan application was then processed by a participating lender. If a PPP loan

application was approved, the participating lender funded the loan using its own monies, which

were then guaranteed by the SBA. Generally, in the event that the borrower defaulted on a PPP

loan, the SBA would purchase the bonower's debt from the lending financial institution and

assume the responsibility for paying back the loan.


                                                 2
Case: 1:25-cr-00048-JAR          Doc. #: 2      Filed: 03/04/25      Page: 3 of 7 PageID #: 11




    8. PPP loan fimds were required to be used on certain permissible expenses,

including payroll costs, mortgage interest, rent, and utilities for the business. In the PPP loan

application (SBA Form 2483), the bonower must certify that 11 [a]ll SBA loan proceeds will be

used only for business-related purposes as specified in the loan application and consistent with

the Paycheck Protection Program Rule. 11 In that same application, the b01Tower must also ce1iify

that 11 [t]he fimds will be used to retain workers and maintain payroll or make mortgage interest

payments, lease payments, and utility payments, as specified under the Paycheck Protection

Program Rule. 11

   9. Under the applicable PPP mies and guidance, the interest and principal on the

PPP loan was eligible for forgiveness if the business spent the loan proceeds on these authorized

expense items within a designated period of time and used a certain portion of the loan toward

payroll expenses.

   10. Benwmih Capital Paiiners, LLC (Benworth), a financial institution headquartered in

Coral Gables, Florida, was a participating lender and issued PPP loans guarai1teed by the SBA.

Benworth processed applications for PPP loai1s that were submitted through an internet-based

web pmial, which affected interstate commerce.

                                      The Scheme to Defraud

                                           COUNT!
                               False Statement (18 U.S.C. § 1014)

11. Paragraphs 1-10 are realleged and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

12. On or about April 30, 2021 , in the Southeastern Division of the Eastern District of Missouri

and elsewhere, the defendant, Adriana Hunt, knowingly made a false statement to Benworth

                                                 3
Case: 1:25-cr-00048-JAR          Doc. #: 2      Filed: 03/04/25      Page: 4 of 7 PageID #: 12




Capital Partners, LLC, a financial institution, for the purpose of influencing the action of Benworth

Capital Partners, LLC upon an application for a SBA backed PPP loan, in violation of Title 18,

United States Code, Section 1014 and punishable under Title 18, United States Code, Section

1014.

                                      Manner and Means

13. It was a part of the scheme that, on or about April 30, 2021, AdrionaHunt submitted and caused

to be submitted a fraudulent PPP loan application on behalf of Adriona Hunt, which falsely stated:


   a) That Adriona Hunt was the owner / operator of a small business that was in operation in
      Missouri on February 15, 2020.

   b) That any funds received by way of a PPP loan would be spent on permissible expenses,
      such as payroll costs, mortgage interest, rent and utilities for the business which she
      claimed.

14. Further, Adriona Hunt knowingly submitted and caused to be submitted certain documents in

support of the fraudulent PPP loan application, including a materially false and fraudulent Internal

Revenue Service (IRS) Schedule C (Form 1040) Profit or Loss From Business form (Schedule C)

for 2019 which falsely represented specified income and expenses.

        When in truth and fact, there was no such business and Adriona Hunt had not obtained the
income listed, nor incurred the expenses claimed, and Adriona Hunt did not spend the proceeds of
the loan in a manner consistent with the rules of the program.


                                           COUNT II
                                  Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343)

15. Paragraphs 1-10 are realleged and incorporated by reference as if fully set fo1ih herein.

16. On or about April 30, 2021 , in the Southeastern Division of the Eastern District of Missouri

                                                 4
Case: 1:25-cr-00048-JAR          Doc. #: 2      Filed: 03/04/25      Page: 5 of 7 PageID #: 13




and elsewhere, the defendant, Adriona Hunt voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated

in a scheme to obtain money by means of material false representations, namely the submission of

a fraudulent PPP loan application, with the intent to defraud, and the defendant used, or caused to

be used an interstate wire communication, that is the electronic submission of a fraudulent loan

application via the internet, for the purpose of obtaining an electronic deposit of funds into a bank

account of Adriona Hunt, in furtherance of the scheme, and the scheme affected Benworth Capital

Partners, LLC, a financial institution, in violation of Title 18 United States Code, Section 1343

and punishable under Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.

17. It was a part of the scheme that, on or about April 30, 2021, AdrionaHunt submitted and caused

to be submitted a fraudulent PPP loan application on behalf of Adriona Hunt, which falsely stated:


   a) That Adriona Hunt was the owner / operator of a small business that was in operation in
      Missouri on February 15, 2020.

   b) That any funds received by way of a PPP loan would be spent on permissible expenses,
      such as payroll costs, mortgage interest, rent and utilities for the business which she
      claimed.

18. Further, Adriona Hunt submitted and caused to be submitted certain documents in support of

the fraudulent PPP loan application, including a materially false and fraudulent Internal Revenue

Service (IRS) Schedule C (Form 1040) Profit or Loss From Business form (Schedule C) for 2019

which falsely represented specified income and expenses.

       When in truth and fact, there was no such business and Adriona Hunt had not obtained the
income listed, nor incurred the expenses claimed and Adriona Hunt did not spend the proceeds of
the loan in a manner consistent with the rules of the program.
19. As a result of the materially false and fraudulent application for a PPP loan, the lender did

                                                 5
Case: 1:25-cr-00048-JAR           Doc. #: 2      Filed: 03/04/25       Page: 6 of 7 PageID #: 14




electronically transfer $19,892.00 to a bank account of Adriona Hunt.

                                       Forfeiture Allegations

        The Grand Jury frniher finds by probable cause that:

        Pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(A) and (a)(3)(F), upon

conviction of an offense in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014 and/or

Section 1343, as set fmih in the Indictment, the defendant shall forfeit to the United States of

America any property constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as

a result of such violation. Subject to forfeiture is a sum of money equal to the total value of the

prope1iy, real or personal, constituting or derived from any proceeds traceable to such violation,

which is at least $19,892.00.

        If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant:

        a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
        b. has been transfe1Ted or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;
        c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the comi;
        d. has been substantially diminished in value; or
        e. has been conm1ingled with other prope1iy which cannot be divided without
difficulty,
        the United States of America will be entitled to the forfeitme of substitute property

pursuant to Title 21 , United States Code, Section 853(p).


                                               A TRUE BILL


                                               Foreperson



                                                  6
'   .   Case: 1:25-cr-00048-JAR            Doc. #: 2   Filed: 03/04/25   Page: 7 of 7 PageID #: 15




        SAYLER A. FLEMING
        United States Attorney


        Tim J. Willis, # 62428MO
        Assistant United States Attorney




                                                       7


File and source

File
2-redacted-indictment-as-to-adriona-kohnaja-hunt.pdf
Size
130,613 bytes
SHA-256
76c072bcf7c7c5afa5be27c78e8236b1ae3923410915dc3b243d114bc5def8a1
Our copy
2-redacted-indictment-as-to-adriona-kohnaja-hunt.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top