[Proposed] Order Granting Defendant United States Small Business Administration’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint — Brandon Joe Williams v. United States Small Business Administration, No. 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK (Dkt. 8-1, C.D. Cal.)
Summary
Proposed order filed November 12, 2024, as Document 8-1 in Brandon Joe Williams v. United States Small Business Administration, No. 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK, in the Central District of California, with a hearing date of December 23, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge R. Gary Klausner. The draft recites that the Small Business Administration moved to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), on the ground that the United States and its agencies have not waived sovereign immunity for certain asserted claims, and under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state any actionable claim. As proposed, the order would grant the motion in its entirety and deny leave to amend because the deficiencies cannot be cured. The date and signature lines are blank.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Case 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK Document 8-1 Filed 11/12/24 Page 1 of 2 Page ID
#:116
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14 BRANDON JOE WILLIAMS, No. 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK
15 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT UNITED STATES
16 v. SMALL BUSINESS
ADMINISTRATION’S MOTION TO
17 UNITED STATES SMALL DISMISS THE COMPLAINT
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION,
18 Hearing Date: December 23, 2024
Defendant. Hearing Time: 9:00 a.m.
19 Ctrm: 850
20 Honorable R. Gary Klausner
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case 2:24-cv-09553-RGK-SK Document 8-1 Filed 11/12/24 Page 2 of 2 Page ID
#:117
1 On November 12, 2024, defendant United States Small Business Administration
2 (“Defendant”) filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed by plaintiff Brandon Joe
3 Williams (“Plaintiff”). Defendant seeks dismissal of Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to
4 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) on the grounds that the United States and its
5 federal agencies have not waived sovereign immunity to permit certain asserted claims.
6 Defendant also moves to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)
7 on the ground that Plaintiff fails to state any actionable claim upon which relief can be
8 granted.
9 The Court, having considered the Motion, as well as the arguments of the parties
10 and the papers submitted, and finding good cause, it is hereby ordered that:
11 The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in its entirety. Granting leave
12 to amend the Complaint is not appropriate as the deficiencies cannot be cured.
13 IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15 Dated: _____________ _________________________________
16 Honorable R. Gary Klausner
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.cacd.947250.8.1.pdf
- Size
- 84,576 bytes
- SHA-256
- 8f9fa164dfc785f35a8c972f190e27f2b5d9c685a7b86c3ebadef8404e8c791f
- Our copy
- gov.uscourts.cacd.947250.8.1.pdf
- Original
- storage.courtlistener.com