Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home United States v. Max Alberto Mera Ulloa — Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (S.D. Fla., Document 135)Search ⌕

United States v. Max Alberto Mera Ulloa — Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (S.D. Fla., Document 135)

Summary

A Preliminary Order of Forfeiture in United States of America v. Max Alberto Mera Ulloa, Case No. 25-CR-20178-ARTAU, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered on the docket January 27, 2026 as Document 135. It recites the April 17, 2025 Indictment charging conspiracy to commit wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1349 and the Court's acceptance of the guilty plea to Count 1 on October 15, 2025. Citing the declaration of Special Agent Lavoro, IRS-CI, it states that law enforcement confirmed materially false representations on Covid relief loans for entities including Max Mera Corporation and Ungar Assets LLC, with disbursements into accounts the defendant controlled. The order enters a forfeiture money judgment of $405,400.00 under Rule 32.2.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“United States v. Max Alberto Mera Ulloa — Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (S.D. Fla., Document 135).” Original at ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/preliminary-order-of-forfeiture-usa-v-ulloa-et-al-dkt-135-s-d-fla-02b28fd8ad/, SHA-256 de32deb61eb5cda76fe277cc9752bc8ce9a3d34cd52aa0b1b94f1fc8303df2d2.

Full text

Case 1:25-cr-20178-EA Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2026 Page 1 of 3




                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                                  CASE NO. 25-CR-20178-ARTAU


   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

   v.

   MAX ALBERTO MERA ULLOA,

                  Defendant.


                           PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

         THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the United States for entry of a

  Preliminary Order of Forfeiture ("Motion") against Defend~         Max Alberto Mera Ulloa (the

  "Defendant"). The Court has considered       th~[t!,"t{ otherw~ e advised in the premises, and
  finds as follows:

         On April 17, 2025, a federal grand jury returned an Indictment charging the Defendant in

  Count I with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § I 349, among other

  counts. Indictment, Dkt. No. 3. The Indictment also contained forfeiture allegations, which alleged

  that upon conviction of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349, the Defendant shall forfeit any property

  real or personal , which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to such offense, pursuant

  to 18 U.S.C. § 98l(a)(l)(C). See id. at 3.

         On October 15, 2025, the Court accepted the Defendant' s guilty plea to Count 1 of the

  Indictment. See Minute Entry, Dkt. No. 93 .

         According to the attached declaration of Special Agent Lavoro, IRS-CI, beginning

  sometime in 2020, the Defendant and Guillermo Lopez Carrazana (collectively, "Defendants"),

  submitted and caused the submission of false and fraudulent Covid relief loan applications, on
Case 1:25-cr-20178-EA Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2026 Page 2 of 3




  behalf of themselves and other corporate entities. See Attachment 1 (Declaration of Special Agent

  Lavoro) In furtherance of the scheme, Defendants submitted and caused the submission of false

  and fraudulent loan applications for their corporations and other b_orrowers ' corporations. Id.

         The Defendants and their co-conspirators used the proceeds from the scheme to enrich

  themselves and others, and to further scheme. Id. at 3.

         Law enforc::ement has reviewed financial records for the Defendant. Based on that review,

  law enforcement has determined that Defendant obtained Covid . relief loans on behalf of the

  corporate entities listed below. Law enforcement was further able to confirm that there were

  materially false representations on those loans, and loan disbursements were made into accounts

  controlled by the Defendant. Id.

            Business Name                       Approximate Loan Date             Loan Amount
            MaxMeraJrCorp                           May 28, 2020                    $62,400.00
       MAX MERA CORPORA TJON                         June 4, 2020                   $95,000.00
           MaxMeraJr Corp                          March 12, 2021                  $128,000.00
           Ungar Assets LLC                          July 8, 2020                  $120,000.00
                                                                  TOTAL            $405,400.00

         Based on the record in this case, the total value of the proceeds traceable to Count 1 is

  $405 ,400.00, which sum may be sought as a forfeiture money judgment pursuant to Rule 32.2 of

  the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

         Accordingly, based on the foregoing , the evidence in the record, and for good cause shown,

  the Motion is GRANTED, and it is hereby ORDERED that:

         1.      Pursuant 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(l)(C), 21 U.S.C. § 853, and Rule 32.2 of the Federal

  Rules of Criminal Procedure, a forfeiture money judgment in the amount of $405,400.00 is hereby

  entered against the Defendant.




                                                   2
Case 1:25-cr-20178-EA Document 135 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/27/2026 Page 3 of 3




          2.      The United States is authorized to conduct any discovery that might be necessary

  to identify, locate, or dispose of forfeited property, and to resolve any th ird-party petition, pursuant
                     .                                    .
  to Rule 32.2(b)(3), (c)(l)(B) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and 21 U.S.C. § 853(m).

          3.      Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Order

  is final as to the Defendant.

          4.      The Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter for the purpose of enforcing this

  Order, and pursuant to Rule 32.2(e)(l) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, shall amend

  this Order, or enter other orders as necessary, to forfeit additional specific property when

  identified.

          DONE AND ORDERED in West Palm Beach, Florida, this ,:2./;tfiday of \Jllll"'i

  _ _ 2026




                                                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE




                                                      3


File and source

File
135-preliminary-order-of-forfeiture-granting-113.pdf
Size
164,812 bytes
SHA-256
de32deb61eb5cda76fe277cc9752bc8ce9a3d34cd52aa0b1b94f1fc8303df2d2
Our copy
135-preliminary-order-of-forfeiture-granting-113.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top