United States v. Luke Joselin — Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (S.D. Fla., Document 92)
Summary
A Preliminary Order of Forfeiture in United States v. Luke Joselin, Case 0:22-cr-60028-WPD, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, entered on the docket November 1, 2022. The order grants the United States' motion and recites that a jury returned a verdict convicting the Defendant on Counts 1-10 and Count 12 after a trial. It finds that the Defendant obtained $396,477 in proceeds from the loans in Counts 2, 7 and 8, including $27,005 in the Defendant's own name, $186,972 for 24Hour Printing and $182,500 for Hug a Print. It enters a forfeiture money judgment of $396,477 under Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and states that the order is final as to the Defendant.
Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“United States v. Luke Joselin — Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (S.D. Fla., Document 92).”
Original at ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/preliminary-order-of-forfeiture-usa-v-joselin-dkt-92-s-d-fla-0f9c88f78c/
, SHA-256 55a35ac2ce5651c2e40cf38f9bc06dbc8415363df80365da1329a696e873e39c.Full text
Case 0:22-cr-60028-WPD Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2022 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES D ISTRICT CO UR T
SOU TH ER N DISTRICT O F FLOR ID A
CASE N O .22-C R-60028-D 1M 1TR O ULEA S
UNITED STATES O F AM ER ICA
LU K E JOSELIN,
D efendant.
PR ELIM INA RY OR DER O F FO RFEITU RE
THIS MATTER isbeforethe Courtupon motion ofthe United StatesofAmerica(the
'CunitedStates'')forentryofaPreliminaryOrderofForfeiture($$Motion'')againstDefendantLuke
Joselin (the SsDefendant''). The Courthasconsidered the'Motion,isotherwiseadvised in the
prem ises,and finds as follows:
OnFebruary24,2022,afederalgrandjuryreturnedanlndictmentchargingtheDefendant
inCount1withConspiracytoCommitW ireFraudinviolationof18U.S.C.j1349,inCounts2-
10withwirefraud inviolationof18U.S.C.j1343,amongothercounts.Indictment,ECFNo.l.
The Indictm ent also contained forfeiture allegations, which alleged that upon conviction of a
violationof,oraconspiracytocommitaviolationof,18U.S.C.j1343,theDefendantshallforfeit
to the United States any property constituting,or derived from ,proceeds obtained,directly or
indirectly,astheresultofsuchoffenses,pursuantto l8U.S.C.j982(a)(2)(A).1d.at10.
On August18,2022,afteratrial,ajury returned averdictconvictingtheDefendanton
Counts 1-10,and Count12.See TrialM inute Entries,ECF No.54,55,57;Jury V erdict,ECF N o.
59.
From M ay 2020 through A ugust 2020,the Defendant conspired w ith others to subm it
Case 0:22-cr-60028-WPD Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2022 Page 2 of 3
fraudulentPPPloanapplications.FinalPresentenceInvestigationReport,ECFNo.87,jg19at7.
The evidence presented at trial dem onstrated that, of the loans taken through the
conspiracy,the Defendantobtained $396,477 in proceedsfrom loans in counts2,7,and 8.The
Defendantapplied forthe loan in Count2 in hisown name asasole proprietorship (Ex.2a),and
received$27,005(Ex.2f).TheDefendantappliedfortheloan inCount7inthenameof24Hour
Printing,(Ex.7a),andreceived$186,972(Ex.7h).TheDefendantappliedfortheloaninCount8
inthenameofHugaPrint,(Ex.8a),andreceived $182,500(Ex.8g).TheDefendantownsboth
24HourPrintingandHugaPrint.ECFNo,87j 16at7,!!26-27at9,!76at18.
Further,these loans im pacted financialinstitutions:Bluevine Capital,lnc.,which,with
CelticBank,offeredPPPloans,ECFNo.87!14at6;andKabbage,lnc.,whichofferedPPPloans.
1d.! 15at7.BothwereapprovedSmallBusinessAdl
ministrationPPP lenders.1d.
Based on therecord în thiscase,the totalvalue ofthe proceedstraceable to the offenses of
convictionis$396,477,whichsum maybesoughtasaforfeituremoneyjudgmentpursuanttoRule
32.2 ofthe FederalRulesofCrim inalProcedure.
Accordingly,based on theforegoing,theevidence in the record,and forgood causeshow n,
the M otion isG R ANTED,and itis hereby O RD ER ED that:
Pursuantto 18 U.S.C.j 982(a)(2)(A) and Rule 32.2 ofthe FederalRules of
CriminalProcedure,a forfeiture moneyjudgmentin theamountof$396,477 ishereby entered
againstthe Defendant,
The U nited States is authorized to conductany discovery thatm ightbe necessary
to identify,locate,ordispose offorfeited propel
-ty,andto resolve any third-party petition,pursuant
toRuie32.2(b)(3),(c)(l)(B)oftheFederalRulesofCriminalProcedureand21U.S.C.j853(m).
2
Case 0:22-cr-60028-WPD Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2022 Page 3 of 3
PursuanttoRule32.2(b)(4)oftheFederalRulesofCriminalProcedure,thisOrder
isGnalasto the Defendant.
TheCourtshàllretainjurisdiction in thismatterforthepurposeofenforcingthis
Order,andpursuanttoRule32.2(e)(l)oftheFederalRulesofCriminalProcedure,shallamend
this Order, or enter other orders as necessary, to forfeit additional specific property w hen
identified.
-
DONEANDORDEREDi
nFortLauderdale,Fl
ori
da,this l dayofOctober2022. - .#
!
j
'
,
'
.
-
'
1' r p
, .
' - .j .v .- --..-. - ''---'--
.
I tk'z
'.k rz / ....pw.
..
,
o
-
. l
t ''/4.-
.
,
.
J
t- ,,.z
.
''' 7
... . .,
(,
..
)y
.
WCCYIAW /. l
V l RX LEAS
UN ITED STATES DISTRICT JU DGE
3
File and source
- File
- 92-preliminary-order-of-forfeiture.pdf
- Size
- 119,006 bytes
- SHA-256
- 55a35ac2ce5651c2e40cf38f9bc06dbc8415363df80365da1329a696e873e39c
- Original
- PACER (login required)