Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Timothy Boyle, No. 23-cr-20253 (Dkt. 246, E.D. Mich.)

Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Timothy Boyle, No. 23-cr-20253 (Dkt. 246, E.D. Mich.)

Summary

This Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, signed by United States District Judge Judith E. Levy on December 31, 2025 in the Eastern District of Michigan, Case No. 23-cr-20253 (ECF No. 246), grants the application of the United States following the conviction of Defendant Timothy Boyle for conspiracy to commit wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1349. It orders Boyle to forfeit any property constituting or derived from proceeds of that offense and imposes a personal forfeiture money judgment of $41,666.00. The judgment may be satisfied from any property of the Defendant, including substitute assets under 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), and the order becomes final as to the Defendant upon entry. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce and amend the order.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Case 5:23-cr-20253-JEL-DRG ECF No. 246, PageID.2025 Filed 12/31/25 Page 1 of 3




                          UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                          EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
                               SOUTHERN DIVISION

United States of America,

             Plaintiff,                      Case No. 23-cr-20253
                                             Honorable Judith E. Levy
vs.

D-4 Timothy Boyle,

             Defendant.


                            Preliminary Order of Forfeiture


      Based upon Defendant Timothy Boyle’s conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. §

1349 (Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud), Count One of the Indictment (ECF No. 1),

the Rule 11 Plea Agreement (ECF No. 237), the Application for Preliminary Order of

Forfeiture, and other information in the record, and pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2,

18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), together with 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:

      1.     The United States’ Application for Entry of Preliminary Order of

             Forfeiture is GRANTED; and

      2.     Defendant shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §

             981(a)(1)(C), together with 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), his interest in any and

             all property, real or personal, which constitutes proceeds obtained or
Case 5:23-cr-20253-JEL-DRG ECF No. 246, PageID.2026 Filed 12/31/25 Page 2 of 3




            derived, directly or indirectly, from his violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349

            (Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud).

      3.    A personal forfeiture money judgment in the amount of Forty-One

            Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Six Dollars and 00/100 ($41,666.00) is

            imposed against the Defendant in favor of the United States.

      4.    The forfeiture money judgment may be satisfied, to whatever extent

            possible, from any property owned or under control of the Defendant. To

            satisfy the money judgment, any assets the Defendant has now, or may

            later acquire may be forfeited as substitute assets as allowed under 21

            U.S.C. § 853(p).

      5.    Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture

            shall become final as to the Defendant upon entry and the personal

            forfeiture money judgment shall be made part of the Defendant’s sentence

            and included in his Judgment.

      6.    Upon entry of this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, the United States may

            conduct discovery in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil

            Procedure.

      7.    The provisions of this Order will survive the Defendant, notwithstanding

            the abatement of any underlying criminal conviction after the entry of this

            Order. The forfeitability of any particular property pursuant to this Order



                                          2
Case 5:23-cr-20253-JEL-DRG ECF No. 246, PageID.2027 Filed 12/31/25 Page 3 of 3




            shall be determined as if the Defendant had survived, and that

            determination shall be binding upon the Defendant’s heirs, successors,

            and assigns until the forfeiture money judgment amount is collected in

            full.

      8.    The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this order, and to amend it

            as necessary, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(e).

Date: December 31, 2025                       s/Judith E. Levy
                                              JUDITH E. LEVY
                                              United States District Judge




                                          3


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.mied.369469.246.0.pdf
Size
284,521 bytes
SHA-256
b9b13c4a36be6ef528c356ee11e97ec30e57cec1d4bb50ba4687932a9ae9e601
Our copy
gov.uscourts.mied.369469.246.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top