Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Jonathan Ramaci — No. 2:22-cr-00993-RMG (Dkt. 120, D.S.C.)

Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Jonathan Ramaci — No. 2:22-cr-00993-RMG (Dkt. 120, D.S.C.)

Summary

This preliminary order of forfeiture, Entry Number 120 filed May 28, 2024 in United States v. Jonathan Ramaci, Criminal No. 2:22-cr-00993-RMG in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, Charleston Division, is signed by United States District Judge Richard M. Gergel. It grants the government's motion after reciting the January 10, 2024 superseding indictment, which charged wire fraud, money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1957 and tax offenses and sought a minimum of approximately $851,461.00 in proceeds. It records Ramaci's April 25, 2024 guilty plea to one count of wire fraud and one count of filing a false individual tax return under a written plea agreement. The order enters a forfeiture judgment of $214,340.00 for the United States, lets the government move to substitute property, and states that it becomes final as to Ramaci upon entry of the criminal judgment.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

    2:22-cr-00993-RMG        Date Filed 05/28/24   Entry Number 120       Page 1 of 4




                       IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
                                CHARLESTON DIVISION


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                ) CRIMINAL NO.: 2:22-cr-00993-RMG
                                        )
              v.                        )
                                        )
JONATHAN RAMACI                         )


                      PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE AS TO
                                JONATHAN RAMACI

      This matter is before the court on the motion of the United States for a Preliminary

Order of Forfeiture as to Defendant Jonathan Ramaci (“Ramaci”, “Defendant”), based

upon the following:

      1.     On January 10, 2024, a Superseding Indictment (“Indictment”) was filed

charging Ramaci with:

             Counts 1-10:         Wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343;

             Counts 11-13:        Wire fraud and attempted wire fraud, in violation of 18
                                  U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1349;

             Count 14:            Money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957;

             Counts 15-17:        Filing a false individual income tax return, in violation
                                  of 26 U.S.C. § 7206;

             Counts 18-19:        Failure to file an individual income tax return, in
                                  violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203; and

             Counts 20-24:        Failure to file a corporate income tax return, in
                                  violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203.




                                     Order, p. 1 of 4
       2:22-cr-00993-RMG      Date Filed 05/28/24   Entry Number 120      Page 2 of 4




         2.     Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(a), the Indictment contained a forfeiture

allegation providing that upon Ramaci’s conviction, certain properties enumerated

therein, or equivalent substitute assets, would be subject to forfeiture to the United

States. As specified therein, such assets include, but are not limited to the following:


         A.     Proceeds/Forfeiture Judgment1:

                A sum of money equal to all proceeds the Defendant obtained,
                directly or indirectly, from the offenses charged in the Superseding
                Indictment, that is, a minimum of approximately $851,461.00 in
                United States currency, and all interest and proceeds traceable
                thereto, and/or such sum that equals all property which constitutes
                or is derived from proceeds traceable to his violations of 18 U.S.C.
                §§ 1343 and 1349.

         B.     Money Laundering /Forfeiture Judgment:

                A sum of money equal to all property involved in the money laundering
                offense charged in the Superseding Indictment, and all interest and
                proceeds traceable thereto, for which the Defendant is liable as the result
                of his violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957.

         C.     Vehicle2:

                2017 Alfa Romeo Giulia
                VIN: ZARFAECN7H7555208
                Asset ID: 23-FBI-000900




1
 The government is pursuing a $214,340.00 forfeiture judgment which is the loss
amount attributed to the Defendant for the wire fraud offense.
2
    The 2017 Alfa Romeo Giulia has been administratively forfeited.
                                      Order, p. 2 of 4
     2:22-cr-00993-RMG      Date Filed 05/28/24    Entry Number 120     Page 3 of 4




       3.     On April 25, 2024, Ramaci pled guilty to one count of wire fraud and one

count of filing a false individual tax return, and pursuant to a written plea agreement,

agreed to forfeiture.

       4.     Based upon Defendant’s conviction, the court has determined that the

property described above is subject to forfeiture, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C)

and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c).

       Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED,

       1.     The below-described property, and all rights, title, and interest of the

Defendant, Jonathan Ramaci, in and to such property, is hereby forfeited to the United

States of America, for disposition in accordance with law.

       2.     FORFEITURE IS ORDERED against Ramaci and in favor of the United

States for $214,340.00. The United States may at any time move pursuant to Rule

32.2(e) to amend this Order of Forfeiture to substitute property to satisfy the forfeiture

judgment.

       3.     The United States may sell or otherwise dispose of any substitute assets in

accordance with law as required to satisfy the above imposed forfeiture judgment.

       4.     Upon the entry of this Order, the United States Attorney is authorized to

conduct proper discovery in identifying, locating, or disposing of the described property,

or other substitute assets, in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3); and to

commence proceedings that comply with statutes governing third party rights, if

applicable.




                                     Order, p. 3 of 4
     2:22-cr-00993-RMG         Date Filed 05/28/24   Entry Number 120    Page 4 of 4




       5.     The government is not required to publish notice regarding the personal

forfeiture judgment against Defendant; however, the Order shall be recorded in the

records of the County Clerk’s Office in the County of the debtor’s residence, place of

business, and any and all other counties in which the debtor has either real or personal

property, as a lien thereon.

       6.     Upon entry of the criminal judgment, this Order becomes final as to

Defendant and shall be made a part of the sentence and included in the criminal

judgment.

       7.     The court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order and to amend it as

necessary, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(e).

       8.     The Clerk, United States District Court, shall provide one (1) certified copy

of this Order to the United States Attorney’s Office.

       AND IT IS SO ORDERED.



                                           s/ Richard Mark Gergel
                                           RICHARD M. GERGEL
                                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
May 28, 2024
Charleston, South Carolina




                                       Order, p. 4 of 4


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.scd.276291.120.0.pdf
Size
116,879 bytes
SHA-256
32aac29711b650c6de8844be275797f0c20457db788b69d8482af6234e595a53
Our copy
gov.uscourts.scd.276291.120.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top