Post-Furlough Blues: What Happened to Furloughed Workers After the End of the Job Retention Scheme? (2021)
Summary
A spotlight dated 14 November 2021 by Mike Brewer and Charlie McCurdy examines what happened to furloughed workers after the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (JRS) closed in September 2021. A survey commissioned by the Resolution Foundation suggests that 88 percent of respondents who were furloughed in September were in work in October, with 8.5 percent being inactive and 3.4 percent being unemployed. If representative, this implies around 136,000 of the 1.1 million on furlough in September were not working in October. It states that furloughed workers were six times more likely to be out of work than those employed normally, driven by fully furloughed workers.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
- Issuer
- Source documents
- Document type
- Post Furlough Blues
- Case
- Post Furlough Blues
Cite this document
“Post-Furlough Blues: What Happened to Furloughed Workers After the End of the Job Retention Scheme? (2021).”
Original at www.resolutionfoundation.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/post-furlough-blues/
, SHA-256 6fac6cf1cec946e992fb89f7376b6fa3466ee10a3c168f90eece42e1193baadb.Full text
S P OT L I G H T
Post-furlough blues
What happened to furloughed workers after the end of the Job
Retention Scheme?
14 November 2021
Mike Brewer and Charlie McCurdy
Going into the autumn, most official forecasters expected unemployment to be little
affected by the ending of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (JRS), which closed in
September 2021. However, there were still 1.1 million workers on furlough as the scheme
ended, skewed towards sectors like aviation that are still far from reaching pre-
pandemic levels of activity, and increasingly skewed to older workers, who tend to
struggle finding work after periods of worklessness. Understanding what has happened
to those furloughed workers is key to assessing the health of the labour market this
autumn. This spotlight presents the first evidence based on data collected from
workers after the JRS closed, supplementing what is already known about furloughed
workers’ expectations (measured in September), and businesses’ assessment of their
furloughed employees’ outcomes (measured in early October).
Our survey suggests that 88 per cent of respondents who were furloughed in
September were in work in October, with 8.5 per cent being inactive and just 3.4 per
cent being unemployed. If this is representative of the population, this implies around
136,000 of the 1.1 million on furlough in September were not working in October. Those
furloughed in September had worse outcomes than those employed normally in
September, with furloughed workers six times more likely to be out of work in October
than those employed normally, even after accounting for factors like age and sector.
This is driven by fully furloughed workers, as partially furloughed workers were no more
likely than those who were regularly employed in September to be out of work by early
October.
If confirmed by official statistics, this would be a good result for the UK labour market –
albeit not for the 136,000 former workers – showing the value of continuing the JRS
several months after restrictions on economic activity had been lifted. But it also
highlights that policy makers should focus a little less on headline rates of
unemployment, and instead focus on the elevated rates of economic inactivity, and on
wider challenges to the strength of the recovery through the winter, as seen in the
disappointing growth rates for the third quarter of 2021.
1
S P OT L I G H T
The UK’s labour market is in a strong position, at least when it comes to unemployment. Last
month, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecasted unemployment to peak at 5.2
per cent following the end of the JRS, down from a peak of 6.5 per cent forecast in March
(see Figure 1). Improved forecasts have been led by a more positive set of labour market
indicators than in previous forecasts: unemployment has been falling throughout 2021,
buoyed by record job vacancies, and planned redundancies were falling over the summer
even as firms faced the imminent end of the JRS.
Figure 1 The OBR has hugely revised down its forecast for unemployment
Unemployment rate, age 16+, outturn and projections: UK
Source: RF analysis of ONS, Labour Force Survey; OBR, Economic and Fiscal Outlook, various; Bank of England,
August 2021 Monetary Policy Report.
Still, as the scheme came to end in September 2021, around 1.1 million workers (about 4 per
cent of the workforce) were either fully or partially furloughed (see Figure 2), with rates of
furlough remaining very high in sectors such as passenger air transport (36 per cent) and
travel agencies (35 per cent). In addition, the profile of those remaining on furlough became
increasingly skewed towards older workers in the final few months of the scheme (rather
than being concentrated on younger workers, as was the case during the various
lockdowns): the share of employees aged 60-64 (5 per cent) and 65 and older (7 per cent) on
furlough in September were both larger than the share of employees aged under 35 (3 per
cent). This is worrying given that older workers tend to take longer to return to work than
their younger counterparts, and they often return on lower pay.
2
S P OT L I G H T
Figure 2 At the end of the furlough scheme 1.1 million workers were furloughed
Actual and estimated number of employees furloughed: March 2020 to September
2021, UK
Notes: Latest wave of Business Insights and Conditions Survey runs from 23 August to 5 September 2021, mid-point
(shown on chart) is 30 August 2021.
Source: HMRC, Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme statistics: 9 September 2021. RF analysis of ONS, Business
Insights and Conditions Survey.
The biggest uncertainty about the UK labour market this autumn is the fate of those who
were furloughed at the end of September. Similar to the OBR’s recent forecast, the Bank of
England is also expecting only a small rise in unemployment this quarter, with the Governor
Andrew Bailey saying “while the unemployment rate is projected to pick up in Q4 as the
furlough scheme ends, the rise is only small as most employees on the scheme are assumed
to return to work.” (see also the Bank’s November Monetary Policy Report press conference).
This assessment was based in part on the finding that around 10 per cent of furloughed
respondents to the Bank of England/ NMG survey expected to lose their job at the end of the
scheme.
There is already some indirect evidence about what happened post-furlough. Research by
Indeed shows only a small increase in the proportion of workers who are urgently searching
for a new job after the end of furlough. Evidence from the Office for National Statistics
Business Insights and Conditions Survey (BICS) suggests that 3 per cent of workers left
voluntarily and 3 per cent were made redundant (see Figure 3). Although the BICS study has
proven to be an accurate guide to the number of furloughed employees throughout this
crisis (as seen in Figure 2), this number is extremely low, and may reflect that the survey is
completed by businesses, rather than employees.
3
S P OT L I G H T
Figure 3 Business survey estimates suggest that between 3 and 6 per cent of those
furloughed in September were not working in October
Labour market outcomes in October for employees who were furloughed (either fully
or partially) at the end of September 2021 from the point of view of businesses
Notes: The figures use actual numbers of those furloughed at the end of September 2021 and estimate their
outcomes using firm-based survey evidence from the Business Insight and Conditions Survey (BICS). Following the
end of the JRS the 16 per cent of businesses were asked what had happened to those furloughed employees.
Source: RF analysis of HMRC, Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme Statistics; ONS, Business Insights and Conditions
Survey.
To help fill this gap, we fielded a survey in October that asked people about their current and
previous labour market statuses.1 This is the first survey that we know of that asks
employees themselves about their post-furlough labour market outcomes.
In line with expectations, our survey does not show a big rise in unemployment: it suggests
that the rate of unemployment among working-age adults was just 0.5 percentage points
higher in October than it was in August 2021. Looking directly at respondents who were
furloughed in September, our survey finds that the vast majority (88 per cent) were in work in
the first half of October (see Figure 4), leaving 11 per cent who were not in work (3.4 per cent
were unemployed, and a further 8.5 per cent were not active in the labour market); this is
broadly consistent with the Bank of England/ NMG survey of households in September that
showed around 10 per cent of furloughed respondents expected to lose their job at the end
of the scheme.
Applied to the 1.1 million we know were furloughed at the end of September, then that would
mean 136,000 of those furloughed in September were not working in the first half of October
(with a small rise in unemployment of around 39,000, and a larger rise in inactivity of 97,000,
something that matches the wider trend of rising inactivity over the course of this crisis).
4
S P OT L I G H T
Figure 4 Our survey of working-age adults suggests that around 136,000 of those
furloughed in September were not working in October
Labour market outcomes for respondents who were furloughed (either fully or
partially) at the end of September 2021: UK, 14-24 October 2021
Notes: The figures use actual numbers of those furloughed at the end of September 2021 and estimate their
outcomes using employee-based survey evidence from YouGov survey data. Base is all adults age 18 to 65 who were
fully or partially furloughed in September 2021 (n=113). The views expressed are not necessarily of YouGov.
Source: RF analysis of HMRC, Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme Statistics; YouGov, adults age 18-65 and the
Coronavirus (COVID-19), October 2021 wave.
Part of the reason why a relatively high fraction of those furloughed in September were in
work in October is that some had already found another job: estimates from the four surveys
we have fielded during the pandemic (shown in Figure 5) show that around 15 per cent of
workers on furlough since June 2021 were furloughed in one job and working in another.2
But the more important reason is that post-furlough outcomes vary considerably between
partially and fully furloughed workers. Regression analysis shows that, even after controlling
for age, education, industry group and pre-crisis pay, those furloughed in September had
worse outcomes in October than those employed normally in September, with furloughed
workers six times more likely to be out of work than those employed normally.3 This result is
being driven entirely by fully furloughed workers, with partially furloughed workers – who
comprised 44 per cent of the total on furlough at the end of September – no more likely than
those employed normally in September to have lost their job in October.
5
S P OT L I G H T
Figure 5 Around 15 per cent of furloughed workers have had another job since June
2021
Proportion of furloughed employees who were also working in another job: UK, data
collected 14-24 October 2021
Notes: Base is all adults age 18 to 65 who were fully or partially furloughed in July 2020 (n=529), January 2021 (n=340),
June 2021 (n=150), September 2021 (n=113). The views expressed are not necessarily of YouGov.
Source: RF analysis of YouGov, adults age 18-65 and the Coronavirus (COVID-19), October 2021 wave.
Overall, it appears that the end of the furlough scheme has brought poor labour market
outcomes for some (fully) furloughed workers, particularly as this coincides with the cut to
core levels of Universal Credit by £20 a week. For the labour market as a whole, though, the
impact is small, chiefly reflecting the decision taken by the Chancellor in March to continue
the JRS well after all restrictions on economic activity had been lifted.
But there are two important considerations for policy makers. First, much of the focus on
worklessness during this crisis has been on unemployment, with those leaving the labour
force entirely and becoming inactive receiving much less attention. It seems that furloughed
workers who have lost work have moved mostly into inactivity; elsewhere, Resolution
Foundation has highlighted that economic inactivity has increased for groups like the retired
and students. So inactivity – rather than unemployment – is what policy makers need to
focus on. Second, having deliberately focused attention on post-furlough outcomes when
presenting last week’s Monetary Policy Report, the Bank of England should instead be more
mindful of wider challenges to the strength of the recovery this winter. Last week’s GDP
data, in particular, showed that combined growth in July, August and September was no
better than its pre-financial crisis average, suggesting that supply-chain disruptions and
shortages have derailed the recovery.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 The survey was designed and commissioned by the Resolution Foundation, in partnership with the Health
Foundation (although the views in this note are not necessarily those of the Heath Foundation). It was
conducted using an online interview administered to members of the YouGov Plc UK panel, which is made up
6
S P OT L I G H T
of 800,000+ individuals who have agreed to take part in surveys. The total sample size was 6,100 adults, aged 18-
65 and fieldwork was undertaken during 14-25 October 2021. The figures presented here have been analysed
independently by the Resolution Foundation and are not the views of YouGov.
2 Neither the HMRC’s administrative data nor the BICS survey is able to provide an equivalent estimate of the
fraction of furloughed employees who had another job.
3 Predicted out of work (either unemployed or inactive) rates are based on the results of logistic regressions
looking at furlough status, holding constant the following personal and job characteristics: age, industry,
education and pre-crisis pay. Having controlled for these, the underlying risks were 6.6 per cent for furloughed
workers and 1.1 per cent for regular employed workers.
7
File and source
- File
- post-furlough-blues.pdf
- Size
- 384,782 bytes
- SHA-256
- 6fac6cf1cec946e992fb89f7376b6fa3466ee10a3c168f90eece42e1193baadb
- Our copy
- post-furlough-blues.pdf
- Original
- www.resolutionfoundation.org