Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Plea Agreement — United States v. Cortez T. Harris, No. 7:25-CR-06-DLB (Dkt. 21, E.D. Ky.)

Plea Agreement — United States v. Cortez T. Harris, No. 7:25-CR-06-DLB (Dkt. 21, E.D. Ky.)

Summary

In this plea agreement filed 06/04/25 in United States v. Cortez T. Harris (E.D. Ky., Criminal Action No. 7:25-CR-06-DLB), Harris agrees to plead guilty to the indictment's charge under 21 U.S.C. § 841 of possession with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture containing methamphetamine. Harris admits that on or about January 17, 2025, at a traffic stop in Magoffin County, law enforcement found 843.2 grams of actual methamphetamine in two vacuum sealed bags in the vehicle Harris was driving alone, and that Harris intended to deliver it to another individual. The charge carries 10 years to life in prison, a fine of up to $10,000,000 and at least 5 years of supervised release. The parties recommend a base offense level of 34 with a decrease for acceptance of responsibility; Harris waives appeal of the plea and conviction but keeps the right to appeal the sentence.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case: 7:25-cr-O0006-DLB-EBA Doc#:21_ Filed: 06/04/25 Page: 1of4-Page
ID#: 41

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
SOUTHERN DIVISION
PIKEVILLE

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 7:25-CR-06-DLB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF
Ws PLEA AGREEMENT
CORTEZ T. HARRIS DEFENDANT

i. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c), the Defendant will
enter a guilty plea to the Indictment, which charges a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841,
possession with the intent to distribute 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance
containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, a Schedule II controlled substance,
Pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(A), the United States will not bring additional charges against
the Defendant based upon evidence in its possession at the time of the execution of this
Agreement and arising out of the Defendant’s conduct within the Eastern District of
Kentucky, unless the Defendant breaches this Agreement.
2. The essential elements of the Indictment:
(a) The Defendant knowingly and intentionally possessed a mixture or

substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, a
Schedule II controlled substance;

(b) The Defendant had the intent to distribute such substance;

(c) The offense involved 500 grams or more of a mixture or substance
containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine.

us
Case: 7:25-cr-O0006-DLB-EBA Doc#:21_ Filed: 06/04/25 Page: 2 of 4- Page
ID#: 42

cs As to the Indictment, the United States could prove the following facts,
among others, that establish the essential elements of the offense beyond a reasonable
doubt, and the Defendant admits these facts:

On or about January 17, 2025, in Magoffin County, in the Eastern District of

Kentucky, law enforcement conducted a traffic stop on a vehicle driven and

solely occupied by the Defendant, a resident of Detroit, Michigan. During a

subsequent search of the vehicle, law enforcement located and seized 843.2

grams of actual methamphetamine in two vacuum sealed bags. The

defendant knowingly possessed this methamphetamine and intended to

deliver it to another individual.

4, The statutory punishment for the Indictment is imprisonment for not less than
10 years and not more than life, a fine of not more than $10,000,000, and a term of
supervised release of at least 5 years. A mandatory special assessment of $100.00 applies,
and the Defendant will pay this assessment to the U.S. District Court Clerk as directed by
the Court.

Ds Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B), the United
States and the Defendant recommend the following sentencing guidelines calculations, and
they may object to or argue in favor of other calculations. This recommendation does not
bind the Court.

(a) The United States Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.S.G.) manual in effect
at the time of sentencing will determine the Defendant’s guidelines
range.

(b) Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3, the Defendant’s relevant conduct
includes at least 500 grams but less than 1.5 kilograms of

methamphetamine (actual), which corresponds to a base offense level
of 34.

(c) Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 and unless the Defendant commits

LTH
Case: 7:25-cr-O0006-DLB-EBA Doc#:21_ Filed: 06/04/25 Page: 3 of 4- Page

ID#: 43

another crime, obstructs justice, or violates a court order, decrease the
offense level by 2 levels for the Defendant’s acceptance of
responsibility. If the offense level determined prior to this 2-level
decrease is level 16 or greater, the United States will move at
sentencing to decrease the offense level by 1 additional level based on
the Defendant’s timely notice of intent to plead guilty.

6. No agreement exists regarding the Defendant’s criminal history category
pursuant to U.S.S.G. Chapter 4.

4 The Defendant will not file a motion for a decrease in the offense level based
ona mitigating role pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2.

8. The Defendant waives the right to appeal the guilty plea and conviction. The
Defendant reserves the right to appeal the sentence. Except for claims of ineffective
assistance of counsel, the Defendant also waives the right to attack collaterally the guilty
plea, conviction, and sentence.

9, If the Defendant violates any part of this Agreement, the United States may
void this Agreement and seek an Indictment for any violations of federal laws, and the
Defendant waives any right to challenge the initiation of additional federal charges.

10. This document contains the complete and only Plea Agreement between the
United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Kentucky and the Defendant. The United
States has not made any other promises to the Defendant.

11. This Agreement does not bind the United States Attorney’s Offices in other

districts, or any other federal, state, or local prosecuting authorities.

CTH
Case: 7:25-cr-O0006-DLB-EBA Doc#:21_ Filed: 06/04/25 Page: 4 of 4- Page
ID#: 44

12. The Defendant and the Defendant’s attorney acknowledge that the Defendant
understands this Agreement, that the Defendant’s attomey has fully explained this
Agreement to the Defendant, and that the Defendant’s entry into this Agreement is

voluntary.

PAUL C. McCAFFREY
ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

Date: ful ex By: ASTizx>

“Andrew H. Trimble
Assistant United States Attorney

Cortéz T. Harris
Defend

Date:

Sebastian M. Joy G
Attorney for Defendant


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.kyed.107483.21.0.pdf
Size
1,367,349 bytes
SHA-256
3a1ae634f4b6c844badbfbfbbb6be4b2850674a2febcf5c1757709dd2edc2af9
Our copy
gov.uscourts.kyed.107483.21.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top