Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home United States v. Oluwatobi Sensi Seton — Petition to Enter Plea of Guilty and Plea Agreement (Document 44)Search ⌕

United States v. Oluwatobi Sensi Seton — Petition to Enter Plea of Guilty and Plea Agreement (Document 44)

Summary

A Petition to Enter Plea of Guilty and Plea Agreement in United States of America v. Oluwatobi Sensi Seton, Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD, Document 44, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division, filed August 2, 2022. The defendant petitions to plead guilty to Counts 1, 2 and 3 of an Information: conspiracy to commit wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1349, aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1) and (c)(5), and conspiracy to commit money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). The agreement is made under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B), and the parties have not agreed upon a specific sentence. It lists restitution to victims with a stated total of $4,309,027.00 and a mandatory special assessment of $300. It also stipulates to forfeiture, with the property listed in Attachment A.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“United States v. Oluwatobi Sensi Seton — Petition to Enter Plea of Guilty and Plea Agreement (Document 44).” Original at ecf.insd.uscourts.gov. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/petition-to-enter-plea-of-guilty-and-plea-agreement-usa-v-seton-dkt-44-ef4dba53d9/, SHA-256 921b55f4b1d0854fc1c292901ebeadb74147613c804e9d76e54f7160f1803f50.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:22-cr-O0099-TWP-MJD Document 44 — Filed 08/02/22
157

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,

OLUWATOBI SENSI SETON,

Defendant.

FILED

3:20 pm, Aug 02, 2022

U.S. DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Roger A.G. Sharpe, Clerk

Cause No. 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-DLP

PETITION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY AND PLEA AGREEMENT

The United States of America, by counsel, Zachary A. Myers, United States Attorney for

the Southern District of Indiana, and, MaryAnn T. Mindrum, Assistant United States Attorney

(“the Government”), and the defendant, OL. UWATOBI SENSI SETON (“the defendant”), in

person and by counsel, Dominic Martin, Indiana Federal Community Defenders, hereby inform

the Court that a Plea Agreement has been reached in this case pursuant to Federal Rule of

Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B). The following are its terms and conditions:

Part 1: Guilty Plea and Charge(s)

1. Plea of Guilty: The defendant having waived the right to indictment by a grand

jury, petitions the Court for leave to enter and agrees to enter a plea of guilty to the following

offenses charged in the Information:

a. Count | which charges that the defendant committed the offense of

conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section

1349.
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 2 of 26 PagelD #:
158

b. Count 2 which charges that the defendant committed the offense of
aggravated identity theft, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section
1028A(a)(1) and (c)(5). |

c. Count 3 which charges that the defendant committed the offense of
conspiracy to commit money laundering, in violation of Title 18, United States Code,
Section 1956(h) and 1956(a)(1)(B)(i).

2. Potential Maximum Penalties:

a. The offense charged in Count | is punishable by a maximum sentence of
twenty (20) years’ imprisonment; a $250,000 fine or twice the gross gain or loss resulting
from the offense, whichever is greater; and three (3) years’ supervised release following
any term of imprisonment.

b. The offense charged in Count 2 is punishable by a term of imprisonment
of two (2) years, concurrent with any other term of imprisonment imposed, including any
term of imprisonment imposed for the felony during which the means of identification
was transferred, possessed, or used.

& The offense charged in Count 3 is punishable by a maximum sentence of
twenty (20) years’ imprisonment; a $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property
involved in the money laundering transaction, whichever is greater; and three (3) years’

supervised release following any term of imprisonment.
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 3 of 26 PagelD #:
159

3. Elements of the Offense: To sustain the offense(s) to which the defendant is

pleading guilty, the Government must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1349):

a. The conspiracy described in Count | existed;

b. The defendant knowingly became a member of the conspiracy with an intent
to advance the conspiracy.

Aggravated Identity Theft (1028A(a)(1) and (c)(5))

a. The defendant committed the felony offense of conspiracy to commit wire
fraud, Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349, as charged in Count 1;

b. The defendant knowingly transferred, possessed, or used a means of
identification;

ei The defendant knew the means of identification belonged to another person;

d. The defendant knew that such transfer, possession or use was without lawful
authority; and

e. The defendant did so during and in relation to the wire fraud as charged in
Count 1.

Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering (18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) and

1956(a)(1)(B)(i)):
a. The conspiracy described in Count 3 existed;
b. The defendant knowingly became a member of the conspiracy with an intent

to advance the conspiracy.

Part 2: General Provisions

4. Sentencing Court’s Discretion Within Statutory Range: The defendant agrees
and understands that: (A) the Court will use its discretion to fashion a sentence within the
statutory ranges set forth above; (B) the Court will consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. §

3553(a) in determining the appropriate sentence within the statutory ranges; (C) the Court will
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 4 of 26 PagelD #:
160

also consult and take into account the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Sentencing
Guidelines” or “U.S.S.G.”) in determining the appropriate sentence within the statutory ranges;
(D) the Sentencing Guidelines are not mandatory or binding on the Court, but are advisory in
nature; (E) restitution may be imposed; (F) by pleading “Guilty” to more than one offense
(Count), the Court may order the sentences to be served consecutively one after another; (G) the
final determination concerning the applicable advisory guideline calculation, criminal history
category, and advisory sentencing guideline range will be made by the Court; and (H) by
pleading “Guilty,” the Court may impose the same punishment as if the defendant had plead
“Not Guilty,” had stood trial and been convicted by a jury.

a Sentencing Court Not Bound by Guidelines or Recommendations: The
defendant acknowledges that this Plea Agreement is governed by Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 11(c)(1)(B) and that the determination of the defendant’s sentence is within the
discretion of the Court. The defendant understands that if the Court decides to impose a sentence
higher or lower than any recommendation of either party, or determines a different advisory
sentencing guideline range applies in this case, or decides to impose a sentence outside of the
advisory sentencing guideline range for any reason, then the defendant will not be permitted to
withdraw this plea of guilty for that reason and will be bound by this plea of guilty.

6. Plea Agreement Based on Information Presently Known: The defendant
recognizes and understands that this Plea Agreement is based upon the information presently
known to the Government. The Government agrees not to bring other federal charges against the
defendant based on information currently known to the United States Attorney for the Southern

District of Indiana. The Government will inform the Court and the defendant at the time of
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 5 of 26 PagelD #:
161

taking the defendant’s plea whether the Government has obtained any information after the Plea
Agreement was signed that may warrant bringing other federal charges against the defendant.

Te No Protection From Prosecution for Unknown or Subsequent Offenses: The
defendant acknowledges and agrees that nothing in this agreement shall protect the defendant in
any way from prosecution for any offense not specifically covered by this agreement, or not
known to the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana at this time. The
defendant further acknowledges and agrees that nothing in this agreement shall protect the
defendant in any way from prosecution for any offense committed after the date of this
agreement.

8. Rights Under Rule 11(b), Fed. R. Crim. P.: The defendant understands that the
Government has the right, in a prosecution for perjury or false statement, to use against the
defendant any statement that the defendant gives under oath during the guilty plea colloquy. The
defendant also understands that the defendant has the right: (A) to plead not guilty, or having
already so pleaded, the right to persist in that plea; (B) to a jury trial; (C) to be represented by
counsel--and if necessary have the court appoint counsel--at trial and at every other stage of the
proceedings, including appeal; and (D) to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, to be
protected from compelled self-incrimination, to testify and present evidence, and to compel the
attendance of witnesses. The defendant also understands that the Constitution guarantees the
right to be considered for release until trial'; and if found guilty of the charges, the right to
appeal the conviction on such charges to a higher court. The defendant understands that if the

Court accepts this plea of guilty, the defendant waives all of these rights.

'Title 18, U.S.C. §§ 3141-3156, Release and Detention Pending Judicial Proceedings.
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 6 of 26 PagelD #:
162

Part 3: Sentence of Imprisonment

9. Sentencing Recommendation Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 11(c)(1)(B): The parties have not agreed upon a specific sentence. The parties
reserve the right to present evidence and arguments concerning what they believe to be the
appropriate sentence in this matter.

a. Government’s Recommendation: The Government has agreed to
recommend a term of imprisonment within the advisory sentencing guidelines, as
calculated by the Court, provided that the defendant (i) continues to fully accept
responsibility for the offense, (ii) does not commit a new criminal offense before the date
of any sentencing, and (iii) does not otherwise violate the terms of any pre-trial release
before the date of sentencing.

b. Defendant’s Recommendation: The defendant understands that the
defendant is free to recommend any sentence, including one below the advisory
sentencing guidelines.

10. Placement: The defendant reserves the right to request that this Court
recommend to the Federal Bureau of Prisons that the defendant serve any sentence of
imprisonment imposed in this case at the location the defendant will provide during the
sentencing hearing. The defendant acknowledges and understands that any recommendation by
the Court is only a recommendation and does not bind the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The
Government reserves the right to agree or disagree with the defendant’s requested
recommendation after considering such recommendation.

11. Programs and/or Treatment: The defendant may also request that this Court

recommend to the Federal Bureau of Prisons that the defendant participate in specific programs
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 7 of 26 PagelD #:
163

or receive specific treatment, while serving any sentence of frapeleonmient imposed in this case.
The defendant acknowledges and understands that any recommendation by the Court is only a
recommendation and does not bind the Federal Bureau of Prisons. The Government reserves the
right to agree or disagree with the defendant’s requested program or treatment recommendation
after considering such recommendation.

12. Supervised Release: Both parties reserve the right to present evidence and
arguments concerning whether the Court should impose a term of supervised release to follow
any term of imprisonment in this case, the duration of any term of supervised release, and the
terms and conditions of the release.

13. | Conditions of Supervised Release: The parties understand and agree that the
Court will determine which standard and special conditions of supervised release to apply in this
case. The parties reserve the right to present evidence and arguments concerning these
conditions.

Part 4: Monetary Provisions and Forfeiture

14. | Mandatory Special Assessment: The defendant will pay a total of $300 on the
date of sentencing or as ordered by the Court to the Clerk, United States District Court, which
amount represents the mandatory special assessment fee imposed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013.

15. Fine: The parties reserve the right to present evidence and arguments concerning
the issuance of a fine and amount of such fine.

a. The parties understand and agree that federal law requires mandatory
restitution for the offenses charged in Counts | and 3 of the Information. Additionally,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(3), the parties further stipulate and agree that the
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44

164

Filed 08/02/22 Page 8 of 26 PagelD #:

defendant’s criminal conduct caused monetary losses to victims, and therefore the

defendant agrees to pay restitution as follows:

Victim Restitution Amount
Arkansas Division of Workforce Services $1,454,616.00
Small Business Administration (SBA) $1,223,400.00
Illinois Department of Employment Security $960,500.00
Indiana Department of Workforce Development $646,150.00
Other $12,300.00
Colorado Department of Labor and Employment $5,416.00
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) $2,600.00
Massachusetts Department of Unemployment Assistance $2,139.00
Kansas Department of Labor $1,006.00
Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency $900.00
Total $4,309,027.00

b. The defendant agrees that, while the District Court sets the payment

schedule, this schedule may be exceeded if and when the defendant’s financial

circumstances change. In that event, and consistent with its statutory obligations, the

Government may take any and all actions necessary to collect the maximum amount of

restitution in the most expeditious manner available.

17. No Effect on Other Claims: Nothing in this agreement prevents any identified

or unidentified victim of these offenses from seeking additional restitution or other civil relief if

they choose to do so and can demonstrate losses higher than the amount of the agreed restitution.

However, at the present time, the United States has not received any such claims for additional

restitution.

18. Obligation to Pay Financial Component of Sentence: If the defendant is

unable to pay any financial component of the defendant’s sentence on the date of sentencing,

then the defendant agrees that the payment of the financial component should be a condition of

supervised release. The defendant has a continuing obligation to pay the financial component of
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 9 of 26 PagelD #:
165

the sentence. The defendant further agrees that as of the date of filing this Plea Agreement the
defendant will provide all requested financial information, including privacy waivers, consents,
and releases requested by the Government to access records to verify the defendant’s financial
disclosures, to the Government for use in the collection of any fines, restitution, and money
judgments imposed by the Court and authorizes the Government to obtain credit reports relating
to the defendant for use in the collection of any fines and restitution, and money judgments
imposed by the Court. The defendant also authorizes the Government to inspect and copy all
financial documents and information held by the United States Probation Office. If the
defendant is ever incarcerated in connection with this case, the defendant may participate in the
Bureau of Prisons Inmate Financial Responsibility Program.
19. Forfeiture: The defendant understands that any forfeiture order entered by the
court is mandatory and is a part of defendant’s sentence. The defendant stipulates and agrees to
the immediate entry of a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 32.2(b)(2), against the defendant, directly forfeiting each of the following property
items, which the parties stipulate and agree:
(1) consist of property items, real or personal, involved in the money laundering
transactions that the defendant conducted as a part of the money laundering
offense of conviction, or any property traceable to such property, and are
therefore forfeitable under 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1);
(2) consist of property items, real or personal, involved in a transaction or
attempted transaction in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1956, or any property traceable to
such property, and are there therefore forfeitable under 18 U.S.C. 18 U.S.C.
981(a)(1)(A).

The property to be forfeited includes: SEE ATTACHMENT A

20. The defendant acknowledges and agrees that any and all property in which the

defendant has an interest, and that is not already subject to direct forfeiture, is subject to
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 10 of 26 PagelD #:
166

forfeiture as substitute assets under Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), as incorporated
by Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(b)(1) and Title 28, United States Code,
Section 2461.

21. The defendant agrees not to oppose, and to withdraw any previously filed
opposition to, any administrative or judicial forfeiture action related to the conduct described in
the Information filed in this case. The defendant waives any right to receive any notices or
pleadings filed in any forfeiture action related to the conduct described in the Information and
agrees that a default or final judgment of forfeiture may be entered against the defendant’s
interest without further notice to the defendant or the defendant’s attorney.

22. The defendant waives the requirements of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
32.2 and 43(a) regarding notice of the forfeiture in the Information, announcement of the
forfeiture at sentencing, and incorporation of the forfeiture into the judgment. The defendant
waives all rights to any further notice or right to participate in any ancillary proceeding or any
other proceeding pertaining to this forfeiture. The defendant waives the right to be informed of
any potential forfeiture at the time the defendant’s guilty plea is accepted, pursuant to
Rule 11(b)(1)(J).

23. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to settle any disputes arising from application
of this cause. The defendant agrees that forfeiture of substitute assets, as authorized in this Plea
Agreement and by 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), shall not be deemed an alteration of defendant’s sentence
and that forfeiture of the assets described above shall not be treated as satisfaction of any
restitution, fine, cost of imprisonment, or any other penalty the Court may impose upon the

defendant in addition to forfeiture.

10
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 11 of 26 PagelD #:
167

24. The defendant hereby waives any and all constitutional and statutory challenges
the defendant could raise on any ground and in any manner (including by direct appeal, habeas
corpus, or any other means) to any forfeiture carried out in accordance with this plea agreement,
including any argument that the forfeiture constitutes an excessive fine or punishment.

25. The defendant waives any right to receive notice or a hearing with respect to any
motion, pleading, order, or any other action that the Government might take to carry out the
abandonment, disposition, and/or destruction of the property. The defendant’s waiver includes,
without limitation, all common law, statutory, and constitutional claims or challenges, on any
grounds, arising at any time from, or relating to, the seizure, abandonment, disposition, and
destruction of the listed property. The defendant further agrees to hold the United States of
America, its agents and employees, harmless from any claims whatsoever in connection with the
seizure, abandonment, disposition, and destruction of the listed property.

Part 5: Factual Basis for Guilty Plea

26. The parties stipulate and agree that the following facts establish a factual basis for
the defendant’s plea(s) of guilty to the offense(s) set forth in Paragraph One, above, and that the
Government would be able to establish the following facts beyond a reasonable doubt in the
event this cause was to proceed to trial. The following information is only a summary of the
Government’s evidence. This Plea Agreement is not intended to foreclose the presentation of and
the Government reserves the right to present additional evidence at the time of sentencing.

27. Between in or about February 2020 and in or about January 2021, the defendant
and others, known and unknown, conspired to commit, and did commit, an international scam to
defraud multiple state unemployment offices and other agencies in the United States, and

conspired to launder the proceeds of that scam.

11
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 12 of 26 PagelD #:
168

28. Conspirators in Nigeria provided the defendant with personally identifiable
information (“PII”) of GoBank Victims, consisting of hundreds of individuals residing in
locations throughout the United States. The defendant and other conspirators used that PII to
purchase, open, and register GoBank prepaid debit cards and associated GoBank bank accounts.
The purpose of these accounts was to receive stolen unemployment and other government
benefits.

29. Conspirators submitted false and fraudulent unemployment applications and other
state and federal benefit applications to unemployment agencies throughout the United States in
the names of Benefit Victims, consisting of hundreds of individuals residing in locations
throughout the United States, including in Indiana. The conspirators used PII of Benefit Victims
to apply for unemployment benefits without the Benefit Victims knowledge or authorization.
The applications directed that the benefits be deposited on the GoBank prepaid debit cards that
the defendant and other conspirators opened.

30. For instance, on or about June 16, 2020, the defendant purchased a GoBank card
and, on or about June 18, 2020 activated and registered the card in the name of S.W. (a GoBank
Victim and Benefits Victim) using, among other things, S.W.’s name, date of birth, and social
security number. Between June 22, 2020 and December 29, 2020, approximately $16,722 of
funds were deposited into the S.W. GoBank account from multiple state employment agencies,
including $8,388 in unemployment benefits from the Indiana Department of Workforce
Development based on an application in the name of S.W. containing, among other things,
S.W.’s name, date of birth, and social security number. The defendant and other conspirators

used that GoBank card to withdraw funds and make purchases throughout Indiana and Illinois.

12
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 13 of 26 PagelD #:
169

31. The real S.W. did not apply for unemployment nor was S.W. aware of or
authorized the filing of such application. The real S.W. also did not register the GoBank card,
nor was S.W. aware of or authorized such registration.

32. The defendant had over 1,400 GoBank cards in her possession in the names of
others.

33. | Once the government benefits were transferred to the GoBank accounts, the
defendant used the GoBank prepaid debit cards to withdraw the funds in the form of U.S.
Currency, bring the currency to Walmart locations throughout Indiana and Illinois, and convert
the cash to money orders. The defendant used fictitious driver’s licenses to show proof of
identification for the withdrawal of the money. ATM withdrawals using GoBank prepaid debit
cards in Indiana caused wire transmissions in interstate or foreign commerce.

34. | The defendant then, at the direction of her co-conspirators in Nigeria, provided
the money orders to other individuals whose role in the scheme was to send or transfer the stolen
funds back to the conspirators, including those in Nigeria. The defendant conversed and
coordinated with these other individuals, meeting them at various locations in Indiana and
Illinois to deliver the money orders.

35. The defendant retained a portion of the proceeds for her participation in the
scheme.

36. The conspiracy caused at least $5,475,459.00 in actual and attempted identified

losses to state and federal agencies, including the following:

Victim Actual Loss Attempted Loss
Arkansas Division of Workforce Services $1,454,616.00 $154,356.00
Small Business Administration (SBA) $1,223,400.00
Illinois Department of Employment $960,500.00 $3,876
Security

13
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 14 of 26 PagelD #:

170

Indiana Department of Workforce $646,150.00 $260,900.00
Development
Other $12,300.00
Colorado Department of Labor and $5,416.00
Employment
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) $2,600.00 $717,642.00
Massachusetts Department of $2,139.00
Unemployment Assistance
Kansas Department of Labor $1,006.00
Michigan Unemployment Insurance $900.00 $29,658.00
Agency

Total $4,309,027.00 $1,166,432.00

Part 6: Other Conditions

37. Background Information: The defendant acknowledges and understands that no
limitation shall be placed upon the Court’s consideration of information concerning the
background, character, and conduct of the defendant for the purpose of imposing an appropriate
sentence. The defendant acknowledges and understands that the Government is not prohibited
from providing information concerning background, character, and conduct of the defendant for
the purpose of recommending or advocating an appropriate sentencing guideline calculation and
sentence.

38. | Good Behavior Requirement: The defendant agrees to fully comply with all
conditions of release imposed by the Court during all stages of this case. If the defendant fails to
fully comply with such conditions, then the Government may withdraw from this Plea
Agreement.

39. | Compliance with Federal and State Laws: The defendant understands that the
obligations of the Government in this Plea Agreement are expressly contingent upon the

defendant abiding by federal and state laws.

14
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 15 of 26 PagelD #:
171

Part 7: Sentencing Guideline Stipulations

40. Guideline Computations: Pursuant to Section 6B1.4 of the Sentencing
Guidelines, the parties agree to the Stipulations below. The parties understand and agree that
these Stipulations are binding on the parties but are only a recommendation to the Court and that
the Court will determine the advisory sentencing guidelines applicable in this case. The parties
agree that no stipulation regarding any factors in Chapter 4, Criminal History Category, of the
Sentencing Guidelines has been made, and that such determination will be made by the Court.
The 2021 version of the Sentencing Guidelines has been used by the parties to make the
stipulations set forth below.

Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud and Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering

41. | Applicable Guidelines: The applicable guideline for Count | (Conspiracy to
Commit Wire Fraud) is U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 and Count 3 (Conspiracy to Commit Money
Laundering) is U.S.S.G. § 281.1. U.S.S.G. § 2S1.1(a)(1) incorporates U.S.S.G. §§ 2B1.1.

42. Grouping: The parties stipulate that Count | (Conspiracy to Commit Wire
Fraud) and Count 3 (Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering) are grouped together into a
single Group, pursuant to and 3 are grouped together U.S.S.G. § 3D1.1.

43. | Base Offense Level: The parties stipulate that the base offense level is seven
(7), pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(a)(1).

44. Loss: The parties stipulate that the actual and attempted loss exceeded
$3,500,000.00 [$5,475,459.00]. Accordingly, the offense level is increased by eighteen (18)

levels, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(1)(J).

15
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 16 of 26 PagelD #:
172

45. 10 or More Victims: The parties stipulate that the offense involved ten (10) or
more victims. Accordingly, the offense level is increased by 2 levels, pursuant to U.S.S.G. §
2B1.1(b)(2)(A)(i).

46. Sophisticated Means: The parties stipulate that a substantial part of the
fraudulent scheme was committed from outside the United States or the offense involved
sophisticated means and the defendant intentionally engaged in or caused the conduct
constituting sophisticated means. Accordingly, the offense level is increased by 2 levels,
pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(10)(B), (b)(10)(C).

47. | Money Laundering: The parties stipulate that the defendant was convicted
under 18 U.S.C. § 1956. Accordingly, the offense level is increased by 2 levels, pursuant to
U.S.S.G. § 2S1.1(b)(2)(B).

48. Acceptance of Responsibility: To date, the defendant has demonstrated a
recognition and affirmative acceptance of personal responsibility for the defendant’s criminal
conduct. Based upon the defendant’s willingness to accept a Plea Agreement and enter a plea of
guilty to the criminal conduct noted in this agreement and the Defendant’s agreement to
cooperate in and not to contest the forfeiture of the property described above, the Government
agrees that the defendant should receive a two (2) level reduction provided the defendant
satisfies the criteria set forth in U.S.S.G § 3E1.1(a) up to and including the time of sentencing.
The defendant timely notified the Government of defendant’s intention to enter a plea of guilty,
thereby permitting the Government and the Court to allocate their resources efficiently. After
the defendant enters a plea of guilty, the Government intends to file a motion pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b) requesting that the Court decrease the offense level by one (1) additional

16
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 17 of 26 PagelD #:
173

level. The parties reserve the right to present evidence and arguments concerning the
defendant’s acceptance of responsibility at the time of sentencing.

49. _ Final Offense Level: The Final Offense Level for Counts | and 2 is twenty-
eight (28).

Aggravated Identity Theft

50. | Applicable Guidelines: The applicable guideline for Count 2 is U.S.S.G. §
2B1.6.

51. Aggravated Identity Theft: The parties agree that the guideline sentence is the
twenty-four (24) month term of imprisonment required by statute.

Part 8: Waiver of Right to Appeal

52. Direct Appeal: The defendant understands that the defendant has a statutory
right to appeal the conviction and sentence imposed and the manner in which the sentence was
determined. Acknowledging this right, and in exchange for the concessions made by the
Government in this Plea Agreement, the defendant expressly waives the defendant’s right to
appeal the conviction and sentence imposed in this case on any ground, including the right to
appeal conferred by 18 U.S.C. § 3742. The defendant further expressly waives any and all
challenges to the statute to which the defendant is pleading guilty on constitutional grounds, as
well as any challenge that the defendant’s admitted conduct does not fall within the scope of the
applicable statute. This waiver of appeal specifically includes all provisions of the guilty plea
and sentence imposed, including the length and conditions of supervised release and the amount
of any fine.

53. Later Legal Challenges: Additionally, the defendant expressly agrees not to

contest, or seek to modify, the defendant’s conviction or sentence or the manner in which either

17
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 18 of 26 PagelD #:
174

was determined in any later legal proceeding, including but not limited to, an action brought
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 or 28 U.S.C. § 2255, except as follows:

a. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: As concerns the Section 2255 waiver,
the waiver does not prevent claims, either on direct or collateral review, that the
defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel.

b. Retroactive Sentencing Guidelines Reductions: As concerns this
Section 3582 waiver, should the United States Sentencing Commission and/or Congress
in the future amend the Sentencing Guidelines to lower the guideline range that pertains
to the defendant’s offense(s) and explicitly make such an amendment retroactive, the
Government agrees that it will not argue that this waiver bars the defendant from filing a
motion with the district court pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on that retroactive
Guidelines amendment. However, if the defendant files such a motion, the Government
may oppose the motion on any other grounds. Furthermore, should the defendant seek to
appeal an adverse ruling of the district court on such a motion, this waiver bars such an
appeal.

ec Motions for Compassionate Release: As concerns the Section 3582
waiver, the defendant reserves the right to file motions seeking a “compassionate release”
sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018 and 18 U.S.C. §
3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Any such motion must be based on one or more “extraordinary and
compelling reasons” set forth in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13 and the governing interpretations of
that provision and its application notes (or, in the event of amendment of that U.S.S.G.
provision or the relevant application notes, the provision(s), if any, with the same effect

at the time of the filing of the motion for sentence reduction). The defendant further

18
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 19 of 26 PagelD #:
175

agrees that under application note 1(D), as it appears in the 2018 Guidelines Manual, the

defendant may assert only those reasons set forth in the relevant Bureau of Prisons

program statement in effect at the time of the defendant’s motion (currently Program

Statement 5050.50). The government further reserves the right to oppose any motion for

compassionate release on any other grounds.

54. | No Appeal of Supervised Release Term and Conditions: The defendant
waives the right to appeal the length and conditions of the period of supervised release.

Part 9: Presentence Investigation Report

55. The defendant requests and consents to the commencement of a presentence
investigation by probation officers of the United States District Court for purposes of preparing a
Presentence Investigation Report at this time and prior to the entry of a formal plea of guilty.

56. The defendant further requests and consents to the review of the defendant’s
Presentence Investigation Report by a Judge, defendant’s counsel, the defendant, and the
Government at any time, including prior to entry of a formal plea of guilty.

Part 10: Immigration Consequences

57. The defendant recognizes that pleading guilty may have consequences with
respect to the defendant’s immigration status if the defendant is not a citizen of the United States.
Under federal law, a broad range of crimes are removable offenses, including the offenses to
which the defendant is pleading guilty. The defendant also recognizes that removal will not
occur until service of any sentence imposed in this case has been completed. Removal and other
immigration consequences are the subject of a separate proceeding, however, and the defendant
understands that no one, including the defendant’s attorney or the Court, can predict to a

certainty the effect of the conviction in this case on the defendant’s immigration status. The

19
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 20 of 26 PagelD #:
176

defendant nevertheless affirms that the defendant wants to plead guilty regardless of any
immigration consequences that this plea may entail, even if the consequence is the defendant’s
removal from the United States.

Part 11: Statement of the Defendant

58. By signing this document, the defendant acknowledges the following:

a. I have received a copy of the Information and have read and discussed it
with my attorney. I believe and feel that I understand every accusation made against me
in this case. I wish the Court to omit and consider as waived by me all readings of the
Information in open Court, and all further proceedings including my arraignment.

b. I have told my attorney the facts and surrounding circumstances as known
to me concerning the matters mentioned in the Information, and believe and feel that my
attorney is fully informed as to all such matters. My attorney has since informed,
counseled and advised me as to the nature and cause of every accusation against me and
as to any possible defenses | might have in this case.

c. I have read the entire Plea Agreement and discussed it with my attorney.

d. I understand all the terms of the Plea Agreement and those terms correctly
reflect the results of plea negotiations.

e. Except for the provisions of the Plea Agreement, no officer or agent of any
branch of Government (federal, state or local), nor any other person, has made any
promise or suggestion of any kind to me, or within my knowledge to anyone else, that I
would receive a lighter sentence, or probation, or any other form of leniency, if I would
plead “Guilty.” I respectfully request that the Court consider in mitigation of punishment

at the time of sentencing the fact that by voluntarily pleading “Guilty” I have saved the

20
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 21 of 26 PagelD #:
177

Government and the Court the expense and inconvenience of a trial. I understand that
before it imposes sentence, the Court will address me personally and ask me if I wish to
make a statement on my behalf and to present any information in mitigation of
punishment.

f. I am fully satisfied with my attorney’s representation during all phases of
this case. My attorney has done all that anyone could do to counsel and assist me and
that I fully understand the proceedings in this case against me.

g. I make no claim of innocence, and I am freely and voluntarily pleading
guilty in this case.

h. I am pleading guilty as set forth in this Plea Agreement because I am
guilty of the crime(s) to which I am entering my plea.

i. I understand that if convicted, a defendant who is not a United States
Citizen may be removed from the United States, denied citizenship, and denied admission
to the United States in the future.

j. My attorney has informed me, and I understand, that I have the right to
appeal any conviction and sentence that I receive, unless I have waived my right to
appeal as part of this Plea Agreement. If I have not waived my right to appeal, I
understand that I must file a Notice of Appeal within fourteen (14) days of the entry of
the judgment in this case; | further understand that the Clerk of the Court will prepare and
file a Notice of Appeal on my behalf if I ask that to be done. I also understand that the
United States has the right to appeal any sentence that I receive under this Plea

Agreement.

21
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 22 of 26 PagelD #:
178

k. My attorney has informed me, and I understand, that if I provide or cause
to be provided materially false information to a judge, magistrate-judge, or probation
office, then Section 3C1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines allows the Court to impose a
two-level increase in the offense level.

I. If this cause is currently set for trial on the Court’s calendar, I request that
this date be continued to permit the Court to consider this proposed guilty Plea
Agreement. I further understand that any delay resulting from the Court’s consideration
of this proposed guilty Plea Agreement, up to and including the date on which the Court
either accepts or rejects my guilty plea, will be excluded in computing the time within

which trial of this cause must commence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(G).

[INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 23 of 26 PagelD #:
179

Part 12: Certificate of Counsel

59. By signing this document, the defendant’s attorney and counselor certifies as
follows:

m. I have read and fully explained to the defendant all the accusations against
the Defendant which are set forth in the Information in this case;

n. To the best of my knowledge and belief each statement set forth in the
foregoing petition to enter plea of guilty and Plea Agreement is in all respects accurate
and true;

0. The plea of “Guilty” as offered by the defendant in the foregoing petition
to enter plea of guilty and Plea Agreement accords with my understanding of the facts as
related to me by the defendant and is consistent with my advice to the defendant;

p- In my opinion, the defendant’s waiver of all reading of the Information in
open Court, and in all further proceedings, including arraignment as provided in Rule 10,
Fed. R. Crim. P., is voluntarily and understandingly made; and I recommend to the Court
that the waiver be accepted by the Court;

q. In my opinion, the plea of “Guilty” as offered by the defendant in the
foregoing petition to enter plea of guilty and Plea Agreement is voluntarily and
understandingly made and I recommend to the Court that the plea of “Guilty” be now
accepted and entered on behalf of the defendant as requested in the foregoing petition to

enter plea of guilty and Plea Agreement.

23
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 24 of 26 PagelD #:
180

Part 13: Final Provision
60. Complete Agreement: The defendant acknowledges that no threats, promises, or
representations have been made, nor agreements reached, other than those set forth in this
document, to induce the defendant to plead guilty. This document is the complete and only Plea
Agreement between the defendant and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of
Indiana and is binding only on the parties to the Plea Agreement, supersedes all prior
understandings, if any, whether written or oral, and cannot be modified except in writing, signed

by all parties and filed with the Court, or on the record in open court.

Respectfully submitted,
ZACHARY A. MYERS
United States Attorney
DATE pee Mindrum
tstant United States Attorney
DATE Nicholas J. Linder
Criminal Chief
DATE Oluwatobi Sensi Seton
Defendant
08/01/2022 Demnee D. Wart
DATE Dominic Martin

Counsel for Defendant

24
Case 1:22-cr-0O0099-TWP-MJD Document 44

Item

181

Filed 08/02/22

ATTACHMENT A

Description

Location Seized

No.
$2,091.00 USD Seized by the Monroe County
l Sheriff's Department on January 12,
2021
. Seized by the Monroe County
2 noel pseatel ads Sheriff's Department on January 12,
2021
Seized by the Monroe County
3__| Fifty-two (52) sealed Visa prepaid cards Sheriff's Department on January 12,
2021
One (1) sealed American Express card and Seized hy the Mentor County
4 . Sheriff's Department on January 12,
one (1) American Express card 2021
5 Black and Red Acer laptop computer S/N Sti tio aiesnor mat 12
NHQSWAA001927032B33400 5021 P ion
Seized by the Monroe County
6 | Thirty-two (32) Visa prepaid cards Sheriff's Department on January 12,
2021
Seized by the Monroe County
7 | Black USB Drive Sheriff's Department on January 12,
2021
; i Seized by the Monroe County
g Four (4) Alcatel cell phones with batteries and Sheriff's Department on January 12,
charger
2021
Seized by the Monroe County
9 | White HP laptop computer S/N 5CD74614D | Sheriff's Department on January 12,
2021
Twelve (12) sealed GreenDot Visa cards and pela ny the Monte Coanty
10 . Sheriff's Department on January 12,
One (1) sealed MyVanilla card 3021
Three (3) New York identification cards, Five | Seized by the Monroe County
11 | (5) Texas identification cards, and Two (2) Sheriff's Department on January 12,
California identification cards. 2021
19, | One (1) black iPhone & | Silver iPhone, FCC Seti ren Monroe al -
800 E. North Street, Storage Unit
13, | $63,260 Cash 2041, Crown Point, Indiana
. ; 7937 West 19th Street, Unit D47,
14 | Silver Meizu Phone; Pro5 TD-LTE Indianapolis, Indiana

a

Page 25 of 26 PagelD #:
Case 1:22-cr-00099-TWP-MJD Document 44 _ Filed 08/02/22 Page 26 of 26 PagelD #:
182

Item
No.

Description Location Seized

Black LG Cell Phone; Model LM-X420MM;,__| 7937 West 19th Street, Unit D47,
IMEI: 359962-10-383255-4 Indianapolis, Indiana
7937 West 19th Street, Unit D47,
Indianapolis, Indiana

15

16 | Black Coolpad Phone

Grey iPhone S, Model A1688, FCC ID: BCG- | 7937 West 19th Street, Unit D47,
E2946A, IC: 579C-E2946A Indianapolis, Indiana

7937 West 19th Street, Unit D47,
Indianapolis, Indiana

1330 Morton Avenue, Unit A3,
Martinsville, Indiana

17

18 | $19,800 Cash

19 | $1,500 Cash

GoBank Accounts — Seizure Warrant
(21-mj-0073)

GoBank Accounts — Seizure Warrant
(21-mj-0745)

20 | $210,840.08

21 | $261,093.39

26


File and source

File
44-petition-to-enter-plea-of-guilty-and-plea-agreement.pdf
Size
11,852,215 bytes
SHA-256
921b55f4b1d0854fc1c292901ebeadb74147613c804e9d76e54f7160f1803f50
Our copy
44-petition-to-enter-plea-of-guilty-and-plea-agreement.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top