Order Vacating Order on Petition for Review of Detention Order Modifying Conditions of Release — United States v. Nathan Reardon, No. 1:21-cr-00061-LEW (Dkt. 66, D. Me.)
Summary
In this order of September 30, 2021 in United States v. Nathan Reardon (D. Me., 1:21-CR-00061-LEW), U.S. District Judge Lance E. Walker vacates the court's September 27, 2021 order on Reardon's petition for review of a detention order modifying conditions of release. The judge writes that the record the magistrate judge reviewed included a police report of a 2005 road rage incident in which, it was alleged, Reardon aimed a loaded firearm at another driver, and that the judge was unaware of the report when entering the earlier order. Given the report, the judge agrees with Magistrate Judge Nivison that the 7(k) restriction is appropriate. Reardon's request for relief is denied, and the 7(k) condition of release stands.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Case 1:21-cr-00061-LEW Document 66 Filed 09/30/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )
)
v. ) 1:21-CR-00061-LEW
)
NATHAN REARDON, )
)
Defendant )
ORDER VACATING ORDER ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF DETENTION
ORDER MODIFYING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE
The September 27, 2021, Order on Petition for Review of Detention Order Modifying
Conditions of Release is hereby VACATED. It has come to my attention that the record reviewed
by the Magistrate Judge included a police report concerning a road rage incident in 2005 during
which, it was alleged, Defendant Nathan Reardon aimed a loaded firearm at the driver of another
vehicle. When I entered the September 27, 2021 Order I was unaware of the Incident Report. The
minute entry for the July 9 hearing makes no mention that the Report was introduced for the
Court’s consideration and the Government did not file a brief in opposition to Defendant’s request
for review, which request made no mention of the Report. Given the Report, I concur with
Magistrate Judge Nivison that the 7(k) restriction is appropriate. The September 27, 2021 Order is
VACATED. Defendant’s Request for Relief is DENIED and the Magistrate Judge’s Order
imposing the 7(k) condition of release will stand.
SO ORDERED.
Dated this 30th day of September, 2021.
/s/ Lance E. Walker
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
File and source
- File
- 66-order-vacating-order-on-petition-for-review-of-det.pdf
- Size
- 195,268 bytes
- SHA-256
- aa998b65d083d0b1a284b126a5d12b8196974ba5b035faece5e70ec642b955d6
- Original
- No public link identified.