Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — USA v. Joseph Ransome, No. 3:21-cr-00022-RJC-DSC (Dkt. 39, W.D.N.C.)

Order — USA v. Joseph Ransome, No. 3:21-cr-00022-RJC-DSC (Dkt. 39, W.D.N.C.)

Summary

In this order signed January 25, 2023 in USA v. Joseph Ransome (W.D.N.C., No. 3:21-cr-00022-RJC-DSC), the Court rules on Ransome's pro se motion for an order releasing frozen funds (Doc. No. 37). The order notes that the restitution of $44,172 the Court imposed (Doc. No. 33) has been paid in full, and that Ransome seeks the release of funds frozen by NASA Federal Credit Union. The government reported that the credit union told it the funds are frozen for reasons unrelated to the criminal case, so the order finds that Ransome has not shown the Court has authority to order their release, and the motion is dismissed.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                                      UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                   WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
                                          CHARLOTTE DIVISION
                                           3:21-cr-00022-RJC-DSC

                USA                                       )
                           vs.                            )                   ORDER
                                                          )
                JOSEPH RANSOME                            )

                       THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se

               requesting an order to release frozen funds, (Doc. No. 37), and the government’s

               response, (Doc. No. 38).

                       The Court imposed restitution in the amount of $44,172, (Doc. No. 33), which

               has been paid in full, (Doc. No. 37-1: Inmate Financial Responsibility Statement;

               Doc. No. 38: Response at 1). The defendant now seeks the release of funds frozen by

               NASA Federal Credit Union (NASA FCU). (Doc. No. 37 at 1). However, the

               government reports that NASA FCU has informed it that the funds are frozen for

               reasons unrelated to this criminal proceeding. (Doc. No. 38: Response at 1).

               Accordingly, the defendant has not shown that this Court has authority to order

               their release.

                       IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, that the defendant’s motion, (Doc. No. 37),

               is DISMISSED.

                       The Clerk is directed to certify copies of this order to the defendant and the

               United States Attorney.


Signed: January 25, 2023




                       Case 3:21-cr-00022-RJC-DSC Document 39 Filed 01/26/23 Page 1 of 1


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.ncwd.103245.39.0.pdf
Size
60,837 bytes
SHA-256
635c1a989f624008ae797c2f5466028244f8c87ffbcb3062034235cbd58af3aa
Our copy
gov.uscourts.ncwd.103245.39.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top