Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — United States v. Jaree Jalon Jackson, No. 1:20-CR-00302-ELR-1 (Dkt. 46, N.D. Ga.)

Order — United States v. Jaree Jalon Jackson, No. 1:20-CR-00302-ELR-1 (Dkt. 46, N.D. Ga.)

Summary

In this order of June 25, 2021, U.S. District Judge Eleanor L. Ross of the Northern District of Georgia adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III [Doc. 43] that Jaree Jalon Jackson be found competent to stand trial. The order lists Jackson's aliases as Jaree Jalon Jackson, Jr., Jaree Jerome Jackson and Ola Runt. No objections to the recommendation were filed, so the court reviewed it for plain error, found none and adopted it as the opinion of the court in case 1:20-CR-00302-ELR-1.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

            IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
                   NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
                         ATLANTA DIVISION


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                 *
                                         *
                                         *
      v.                                 *        1:20-CR-00302-ELR-1
                                         *
JAREE JALON JACKSON,                     *
a/k/a Jaree Jalon Jackson, Jr.,          *
a/k/a Jaree Jerome Jackson,              *
a/k/a Ola Runt,                          *
                                         *
             Defendant.                  *
                                         *
                                   _________

                                   ORDER
                                   _________

      This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Report and

Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. [Doc. 43].

Judge Larkins recommends that Defendant be found competent to stand trial, as he is

able to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him and to

assist properly in his defense. After conducting a careful and complete review of a

magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, a district court judge may accept,

reject, or modify a magistrate judge’s R&R. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (C); Williams v.

Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). No objections to the magistrate judge’s

R&R have been filed, and therefore, the Court has reviewed the R&R for plain error.
See United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093, 1095 (11th Cir. 1983). The Court finds no

error.

         Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R [Doc. 43] as the opinion of this

Court.

         SO ORDERED, this 25th day of June, 2021.



                                            ______________________
                                            Eleanor L. Ross
                                            United States District Judge
                                            Northern District of Georgia




                                        2


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.gand.280080.46.0.pdf
Size
112,525 bytes
SHA-256
92135b6f64a48777fd9c112014296f07e194c9e2519a16826235ab64573ae2b6
Our copy
gov.uscourts.gand.280080.46.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top