Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — United States v. Darnell Lamont Jennings, No. 21-mj-2049DPR (Dkt. 14, W.D. Mo.)

Order — United States v. Darnell Lamont Jennings, No. 21-mj-2049DPR (Dkt. 14, W.D. Mo.)

Summary

Under the Due Process Protections Act, U.S. Magistrate Judge David P. Rush confirms the Government's obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to defendant Darnell Lamont Jennings under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and orders it to do so (No. 21-mj-2049DPR, W.D. Mo.). The order, dated September 15, 2021, warns that failing to do so in a timely manner may lead to exclusion of evidence, adverse jury instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings or sanctions.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
                         WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI
                              SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                           )
                                                    )
               Plaintiff,                           )
                                                    )
       v.                                           )       No. 21-mj-2049DPR
                                                    )
DARNELL LAMONT JENNINGS,                            )
                                                    )
               Defendant.                           )
                                            ORDER

       Pursuant to the Due Process Protections Act, the Court confirms the Government’s

obligation to produce all exculpatory evidence to Defendant pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373

U.S. 83 (1963) and its progeny, and orders it to do so. Failing to do so in a timely manner may

result in consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, adverse jury

instructions, dismissal of charges, contempt proceedings, or sanctions by the Court.

       IT IS SO ORDERED.

                                                    /s/ David P. Rush
                                                    DAVID P. RUSH
                                                    UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DATE: September 15, 2021


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.mowd.159812.14.0.pdf
Size
87,270 bytes
SHA-256
1e987962df07449575eba7c9c0468f84cb8e03330dd325ed0a6a579a19e15ad1
Our copy
gov.uscourts.mowd.159812.14.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top