Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — United States v. Carlos Alston, No. 5:23-CR-00021-FL-RN-1 (Dkt. 21, E.D.N.C.)

Order — United States v. Carlos Alston, No. 5:23-CR-00021-FL-RN-1 (Dkt. 21, E.D.N.C.)

Summary

In this order in United States v. Carlos Alston, No. 5:23-CR-00021-FL-RN-1 (E.D.N.C.), United States Magistrate Judge Robert T. Numbers, II scheduled a hearing on the defendant's motion to dismiss. According to the order, a federal grand jury returned a two-count indictment in January 2023: one count of knowingly receiving a firearm while under state felony indictment and one of possessing a firearm while addicted to marijuana. Alston moved to dismiss a month later, contending that 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3) and 922(n) are facially unconstitutional under Bruen, in which the Supreme Court ruled that modern firearms regulations must accord with both the text and the historical understanding of the Second Amendment. The in-person hearing was set for 11:00 a.m. on May 31, 2023 in Raleigh, North Carolina.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

                      IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                  FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
                               WESTERN DIVISION
                             No. 5:23-CR-00021-FL-RN-1

 United States of America,

 v.
                                                                      Order
 Carlos Alston,

                        Defendant.



       In January 2023, a federal grand jury charged Defendant Carlos Alston with a two-count

indictment. Indictment, D.E. 11. The first count charges Alston with knowingly receiving a firearm

while under state felony indictment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(n). And the second charges

him with possessing a firearm while addicted to marijuana, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3).

Alston moved to dismiss his federal indictment a month later, contending that §§ 922(g)(3) and

922(n) are facially unconstitutional under New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, 142

S. Ct. 2111 (2022). Mot. Dismiss, D.E. 17. In Bruen, the Supreme Court held that modern firearms

regulations must accord with both the text and the historical understanding of the Second

Amendment. Id. at 2131.

       To give the parties an opportunity to be heard before issuing its ruling, the court will hold

a hearing to discuss Alston’s motion to dismiss. This hearing will take place in person at 11:00

a.m. on Wednesday, May 31, 2023 at the Terry Sanford Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in

Raleigh, North Carolina.

Dated:
Dated: April 26, 2023

                                             ROBERT T. NUMBERS, II
                                             ______________________________________
                                             U      STATES
                                              NITEDT.
                                             Robert         M II
                                                              AGISTRATE JUDGE
                                                       Numbers,
                                             United States Magistrate Judge



        Case 5:23-cr-00021-FL-RN Document 21 Filed 04/27/23 Page 1 of 1


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.nced.198716.21.0.pdf
Size
648,207 bytes
SHA-256
6e1b0bc719b4cd47f8c4e6b0290c287b69520ab2fac1df1313a4a74b164340c1
Our copy
gov.uscourts.nced.198716.21.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top