Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Order That Plaintiff Natasha Collinss — Natasha Collins v. Small Business Administration (Dkt. 6, E.D. Pa.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Order That Plaintiff Natasha Collinss — Natasha Collins v. Small Business Administration (Dkt. 6, E.D. Pa.)

Summary

An Order in Natasha Collins v. Small Business Administration (SBA) Restaurant Revitalization Fund, Civil Action No. 22-CV-4104, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, dated January 6, 2023 and filed as Document 6, signed by Gerald A. McHugh, J. It grants leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, deems the pro se Complaint filed and dismisses it without prejudice for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum. The plaintiff may file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days that names all defendants in the caption and states the basis for each claim, and the Clerk is directed to send a blank form complaint. If the plaintiff instead files a Notice to Stand on Complaint or does not respond, the court will issue a final order dismissing the case.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 103 KB

Original: archive.org

Record facts

File name6-order-that-plaintiff-natasha-collinss-motion-to-proceed-in-f.pdf
SHA-2568930c3001f81f3ebedfaba1c3eb72ae8abfb66c02d2591d9add2c8ca969f1468
Size105,448 bytes
Source sitearchive.org

File and source

File
6-order-that-plaintiff-natasha-collinss-motion-to-proceed-in-f.pdf
Size
105,448 bytes
SHA-256
8930c3001f81f3ebedfaba1c3eb72ae8abfb66c02d2591d9add2c8ca969f1468
Our copy
6-order-that-plaintiff-natasha-collinss-motion-to-proceed-in-f.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top