Order Relating Cases — No. 2:22-cr-00015 (Dkt. 41, E.D. Cal.)

Summary

An order relating cases in United States v. Eric Michael Jaklitsch, Nos. 2:22-cr-00015 WBS and 2:22-cr-00239 JAM, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, filed December 8, 2022 as Document 41 (2 pages) and dated December 7, 2022. The Court finds the two actions related under Local Rule 123(a) because they involve the same parties and overlapping evidence for similar charged crimes. The second case is reassigned to Judge William B. Shubb, its dates are vacated, and its captions will read 2:22-cr-00239 WBS, but no consolidation of the actions is effected.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

      Case 2:22-cr-00015-WBS Document 41 Filed 12/08/22 Page 1 of 2


1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9                       EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
                                  ----oo0oo----
11

12   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,               No. 2:22-cr-00015 WBS
13                Plaintiff,
14       v.
15   ERIC MICHAEL JAKLITSCH,                 ORDER RELATING CASES
16                Defendant.
17

18   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,               No. 2:22-cr-00239 JAM
19                Plaintiff,
20       v.
21   ERIC MICHAEL JAKLITSCH,
22                Defendant.
23

24                                ----oo0oo----

25             Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that

26   they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a), because

27   they involve the same parties and involve overlapping evidence

28   for similar charged crimes.     Accordingly, the assignment of the
                                         1
      Case 2:22-cr-00015-WBS Document 41 Filed 12/08/22 Page 2 of 2


1    matters to the same judge is likely to effect a substantial

2    saving of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for

3    the parties.

4                The parties should be aware that relating the cases

5    under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that both actions are

6    assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the actions is

7    effected.    Under the regular practice of this court, related

8    cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to

9    whom the first filed action was assigned.

10               IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated

11   United States v. Jaklitsch, 2:22-cr-00015 WBS, and United States

12   v. Jaklitsch, 2:22-cr-00239 JAM, be, and the same hereby are,

13   deemed related.    The case denominated United States v. Jaklitsch,

14   2:22-cr-00239 JAM, shall be reassigned to Judge WILLIAM B. SHUBB.

15   Any dates currently set in the reassigned case only are hereby

16   VACATED.    Henceforth, the captions on documents filed in the

17   reassigned case shall be shown as United States v. Jaklitsch,

18   2:22-cr-00239 WBS.

19               IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make

20   an appropriate adjustment in the assignment of cases to
21   compensate for this reassignment.

22   Dated:   December 7, 2022

23

24

25

26
27

28
                                         2


File and source

File

41.pdf

Size

68,254 bytes

SHA-256

cf361636c7afe0358f7fb532136865ff53c634533541fa8fc358c4165bace110

Our copy

41.pdf

Original

No public link identified.