Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (Dkt. 36, W.D. Mo.)

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (Dkt. 36, W.D. Mo.)

Summary

Judge Douglas Harpool (W.D. Mo.) denied a motion by Brandon McDaniel for a reduced prison term under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) on 05/07/2024, using form AO 247 in Case No. 6:21-CR-03154-MDH(1). The motion, marked as the defendant's, sought a reduction based on a guideline sentencing range later lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission. The order states that all provisions of the judgment dated 08/18/2022 remain in effect.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

AO 247 (Rev. 03/19) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Western District of Missouri

United States of America
v.
BRANDON MCDANIEL
Case No: 6:21-CR-03154-MDH(1)
USM No: 31430-045
Date of Original Judgment: 08/18/2022
Date of Previous Amended Judgment:
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any)
Defendant's Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of ☒ the defendant ☐ the Director of the Bureau of Prisons ☐ the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:
☒ DENIED. ☐ GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of ________ months is reduced to ________.
(See Page 2 for additional parts. Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 08/18/2022 shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: 05/07/2024
s/ Douglas Harpool
Judge's signature
Effective Date:
(if different from order date)
Douglas Harpool
Printed name and title

Case 6:21-cr-03154-MDH Document 36 Filed 05/07/24 Page 1 of 1


File and source

File
gov.uscourts.mowd.161392.36.0.pdf
Size
158,254 bytes
SHA-256
c22f9f3051d52f0277b9150a629ddd103f9c39d4d36336143d34eef59c81acd7
Our copy
gov.uscourts.mowd.161392.36.0.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top