Order on Stipulation, Oakley et al. v. DeVos, No. 4:20-cv-03215 (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 47 (July 16, 2020)

Summary

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order in Eloy Ortiz Oakley, et al. v. Betsy DeVos, et al., Case No. 4:20-cv-3215-YGR, Doc. 47, Northern District of California, Oakland Division, filed July 16, 2020. The Parties stipulate to postpone Defendants' deadline to respond to the complaint, which challenges alleged student eligibility requirements for Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund disbursements under the CARES Act, and to meet and confer on the administrative record, any amendment of the complaint, and cross motions for summary judgment. The [Proposed] Order names Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, United States District Court Judge. It directs the Parties to file a stipulated proposed case management order or a joint CMC statement on August 3, 2020, and grants the request to be exempted from the ADR Multi-Option Program.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order on Stipulation, Oakley et al. v. DeVos, No. 4:20-cv-03215 (N.D. Cal.), Doc. 47 (July 16, 2020).” Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-on-stipulation-oakley-et-al-v-devos-no-4-20-cv-03215-n-d-cal-doc-4dbd82e6c8/, SHA-256 de419bcfbb8e5108ddfdf79fb176cf2e2db2b53d3829d026935a30c2471340a3.

Full text

Case 4:20-cv-03215-YGR Document 47 Filed 07/16/20 Page 1 of 6

ETHAN P. DAVIS
1
Acting Assistant Attorney General
2 MARCIA BERMAN
Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch
3 KATHRYN L. WYER (Utah Bar No. 9846)
M. ANDREW ZEE (California Bar No. 272510)
4
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division
5 1100 L Street, N.W., Room 12014
Tel. (202) 616-8475
6 kathryn.wyer@usdoj.gov
7 Attorneys for Defendants

8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 OAKLAND DIVISION
10
11 ELOY ORTIZ OAKLEY, et al., Case No. 4:20-cv-3215-YGR
ORDER GRANTING
12 Plaintiffs, STIPULATION TO EXTEND
13 v. DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND SUBMIT
14 BETSY DEVOS, et al., STIPULATED CASE MANAGEMENT
SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
15 Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE AND SUBMIT STIPULATED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Case No. 4:20-cv-3215-YGR
Case 4:20-cv-03215-YGR Document 47 Filed 07/16/20 Page 2 of 6

The Parties submit this stipulation and proposed order in advance of the deadline for
1
2 Defendants’ responsive pleading in order to (1) extend the deadline for Defendants’ responsive

3 pleading; (2) inform the Court of the Parties’ intentions to negotiate a case management schedule
4
that may obviate the need for a case management conference; and (3) seek exemption from
5
alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) requirements. The Parties’ stipulation and proposed
6
7 order is based on the following:

8 1. On May 11, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint for Declaratory, Injunctive, and
9 Mandamus Relief in this Court based on Defendants’ alleged imposition of student eligibility
10
requirements for Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund disbursements under the CARES
11
Act and based on agency actions taken on or around April 21, 2020. ECF No. 1.
12
13 2. On May 13, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction (“PI

14 Motion”). ECF No. 16.
15 3. On May 13, 2020, the Court entered an Order Setting Initial Case Management
16
Conference and ADR Deadlines. ECF No. 8. Pursuant to that Order, an Initial Case
17
Management Conference (“CMC”) has been scheduled for August 10, 2020, with related ADR
18
19 Deadlines set for July 20, 2020 and a Rule 26(f) report and Case Management Statement due on

20 August 3, 2020.
21
4. On May 15, 2020, Plaintiffs effectuated service of process on the U.S. Attorney
22
for the Northern District of California. ECF No. 33. Accordingly, Defendants’ current deadline
23
to respond to the Complaint is July 14, 2020. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(2).
24
25 5. On June 11, 2020, Defendants notified the Court of the forthcoming publication

26 of an Interim Final Rule (“IFR”) addressing the student eligibility requirements challenged in
27
Plaintiffs’ complaint and PI Motion. ECF No. 39. The Department of Education officially
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE AND SUBMIT STIPULATED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Case No. 4:20-cv-3215-YGR

1
Case 4:20-cv-03215-YGR Document 47 Filed 07/16/20 Page 3 of 6

published this IFR on June 16, 2020, setting the deadline for public comments on the IFR as
1
2 July 17, 2020. IFR, 85 Fed. Reg. 36494 (June 17, 2020).

3 6. On June 17, 2020, the Court entered an Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for
4
Preliminary Injunction. ECF No. 44.
5
7. Plaintiffs anticipate that they may seek to amend their complaint in this case, but
6
7 Plaintiffs will be unable to make this determination until after they are able to review the

8 administrative record that Defendants plan to produce.
9 8. The parties agree that, in the interest of judicial economy and litigation efficiency,
10
the date of the filing of Defendants’ responsive pleading should be postponed until after
11
Plaintiffs determine whether they will amend their complaint.
12
13 9. The parties have begun conferring regarding further proceedings in this case and

14 anticipate reaching agreement on a schedule under which Defendants will file an administrative
15 record, Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint, and the parties will set forth a schedule by
16
which the case may be resolved on cross motions for summary judgment.
17
10. The Parties have conferred regarding the suitability of this case for the Court’s
18
19 ADR Multi-Option Program, and have agreed that the case is unlikely to be resolved on a

20 voluntary basis, and that that no ADR process is therefore likely to deliver benefits to the Parties
21
sufficient to justify the resources devoted to that process.
22
THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
23
1. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Defendants’ deadline to answer or otherwise
24
25 respond to the complaint is postponed.
26 2. The Parties will meet and confer and endeavor to reach agreement regarding the
27
production of the administrative record and timelines for Plaintiffs’ amendment of the complaint
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE AND SUBMIT STIPULATED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Case No. 4:20-cv-3215-YGR

2
Case 4:20-cv-03215-YGR Document 47 Filed 07/16/20 Page 4 of 6

(if any), Defendants’ answer or other response to the complaint, and cross motions for summary
1
2 judgment.

3 3. The Parties will file either a stipulated proposed case management order or a joint
4
CMC statement on August 3, 2020, setting forth a proposed case management schedule or their
5
respective positions regarding case management, including whether there is a need to keep the
6
7 August 10, 2020 CMC on the calendar.

8 4. The Parties respectfully request that this case be exempted from the ADR Multi-
9 Option Program consistent with Local Rule 16-8(d)(3).
10
11
DATED: July 13, 2020 Respectfully submitted,
12
ETHAN P. DAVIS
13 Acting Assistant Attorney General
14 MARCIA BERMAN
Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch
15
/s/ Kathryn L. Wyer
16 KATHRYN L. WYER (Utah Bar No. 9846)
17 M. ANDREW ZEE (California Bar No. 272510)
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division
18 1100 L Street, N.W., Room 12014
Tel. (202) 616-8475
19
kathryn.wyer@usdoj.gov
20
Attorneys for Defendants
21
22 XAVIER BECERRA
23 Attorney General of California
CHERYL FEINER
24 MICHAEL NEWMAN
Senior Assistant Attorneys General
25 CHRISTINE CHUANG
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
26 JULIA HARUMI MASS
JASLEEN SINGH
27 SHUBHRA SHIVPURI
JOSHUA SONDHEIMER
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE AND SUBMIT STIPULATED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Case No. 4:20-cv-3215-YGR

3
Case 4:20-cv-03215-YGR Document 47 Filed 07/16/20 Page 5 of 6

/s/ Lee I. Sherman
1
LEE I. SHERMAN
2 Deputy Attorneys General
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Eloy Ortiz Oakley
3 and Board of Governors of the California
4 Community Colleges

5
6 ATTESTATION
7
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that I am the ECF user whose user ID and
8
password are being used in the electronic filing of this document, and further attest that I have
9
10 obtained the concurrence in the filing of the document from the other signatory.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE AND SUBMIT STIPULATED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Case No. 4:20-cv-3215-YGR

4
Case 4:20-cv-03215-YGR Document 47 Filed 07/16/20 Page 6 of 6

[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2 Upon stipulation of the Parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that:

3 1. The Parties shall meet and confer regarding deadlines for production of the
4
administrative record, Plaintiffs’ amendment of their complaint (if any),
5
Defendants’ answer or other response to the complaint, and cross motions for
6
7 summary judgment.

8 2. On August 3, 2020, the Parties shall file either a stipulated proposed case
9 management order or a joint CMC statement.
10
3. The Parties’ request to be exempted from the ADR Multi-Option Program
11
consistent with Local Rule 16-8(d)(3) is GRANTED.
12
13
14
15
16
Dated: July 16 , 2020
17
18
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
19 United States District Court Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE AND SUBMIT STIPULATED CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Case No. 4:20-cv-3215-YGR

File and source

File: 47-order-on-stipulation.pdf
Size: 55,186 bytes
SHA-256: de419bcfbb8e5108ddfdf79fb176cf2e2db2b53d3829d026935a30c2471340a3
Our copy: 47-order-on-stipulation.pdf
Original: storage.courtlistener.com