United States ex rel. Quesenberry v. Bay Wire, Inc. — Order to Show Cause re: Statistical Closure (N.D. Cal.)
Summary
An order to show cause re: statistical closure dated February 2, 2023 in United States of America ex rel. Bryan Quesenberry v. Bay Wire, Inc., et al., Case No. 4:20-cv-06451-YGR, Document 25, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, by United States District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. The court states that it understands the remaining defendants have settled and, according to the partial stipulation for dismissal at Docket Number 23, will not be dismissed until final payments are received. It orders the parties to show cause why the case should not be closed for statistical purposes only, with written responses due by Friday, February 10, 2023. The order states that closing the case would not be a dismissal or disposition of the action and directs the parties to contact the court by March 24, 2024.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“United States ex rel. Quesenberry v. Bay Wire, Inc. — Order to Show Cause re: Statistical Closure (N.D. Cal.).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-on-stipulation-for-dismissal-no-4-20-cv-06451-dkt-25-n-d-cal-946d1f18fd/
, SHA-256 5efaf778e2aa3c18eeb7ac1da5a57b81e3f7b81189044b676aab61c823ff88de.Full text
Case 4:20-cv-06451-YGR Document 25 Filed 02/02/23 Page 1 of 1
1
2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. Case No. 4:20-cv-06451-YGR
BRYAN QUESENBERRY,
6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: STATISTICAL
Plaintiffs, CLOSURE
7 v.
8
BAY WIRE, INC., ET AL.,
9 Defendants.
10 TO THE PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
11 The Court understands that the remaining defendants have settled this case. According to
12 the partial stipulation for dismissal at Docket Number 23, the Court further understands that the
United States District Court
13 remaining defendants will not be dismissed until final payments are received on or by February
14 15, 2024. Given the procedural posture of this case, the COURT HEREBY ORDERS THE PARTIES
15 TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be closed for statistical purposes only.
Northern District of California
16 Nothing contained in the order closing the case shall be construed as a dismissal or
17 disposition of the action, and should further proceedings become necessary herein, any party may
18 initiate them in the same manner as if this Order had not been entered. By March 24, 2024, the
19 parties shall contact this Court and advise whether the case should be terminated and/or other
20 actions which should be taken. Other actions include without limitation filing a stipulation of
21 dismissal.
22 By no later than Friday, February 10, 2023, the parties shall file their written responses to
23 this order to show cause. Failure to timely respond will be construed as an admission that good
24 cause exists to close the case for statistical purposes only consistent with the terms of this order.
25 IT IS SO ORDERED.
26 Dated: February 2, 2023
______________________________________
27
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
File and source
- File
- 25-order-on-stipulation-for-dismissal-filed-02-02-23.pdf
- Size
- 61,509 bytes
- SHA-256
- 5efaf778e2aa3c18eeb7ac1da5a57b81e3f7b81189044b676aab61c823ff88de
- Original
- archive.org