Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order on Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Farah (Dkt. 971, D. Minn.)

Order on Motion for Preliminary Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Farah (Dkt. 971, D. Minn.)

Full text

      CASE 0:22-cr-00124-NEB-DTS          Doc. 971     Filed 04/03/26    Page 1 of 4




                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA


 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                        Case No. 22‐CR‐124 (3) (NEB/DTS)

                      Plaintiff,

 v.                                                   PRELIMINARY ORDER OF
                                                           FORFEITURE
 MAHAD IBRAHIM,

                      Defendant.



       Based on the United States’ Motion for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture; on the

Superseding Indictment; on the Plea Agreement between the United States and

Defendant Mahad Ibrahim in which Defendant pled guilty on Counts 5 and 36 of the

Superseding Indictment; on the Declaration of Pauline Roase; and on the Court having

found that certain property is subject to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) in

conjunction with 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), and 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(1), the United States has

established the requisite nexus between such property and the offenses to which the

Defendant has pled guilty, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

       1.     The United States’ Motion for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (ECF

              No. 960) is GRANTED;
CASE 0:22-cr-00124-NEB-DTS          Doc. 971     Filed 04/03/26     Page 2 of 4




2.      The following property is forfeited to the United States pursuant to 18

        U.S.C. § 982(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) in conjunction with 28 U.S.C.

        § 2461(c):

           a. The real property located at 5657 Maple Drive, Lewis Center, Ohio;

     3. The following property is forfeited to the United States pursuant to 18

        U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) in conjunction with 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c):

           a. $1,842,797.55 seized from US Bank account number 104785323379,

               held in the name of ThinkTechAct Foundation;

           b. $456,968.36 seized from Spire Credit Union account number 752231‐

               00, held in the name of MIB Holdings LLC; and

           c. $448,285.14 seized from Spire Credit Union account number 752231‐

               11, held in the name of MIB Holdings LLC;

4.      A money judgment forfeiture is entered against Defendant pursuant to 18

        U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), in the amount $7,324,412;

5.      Defendant shall receive a credit against the money judgment forfeiture for

        the net forfeiture value of each asset that is forfeited from him in connection

        with this case;

6.      Defendant is ordered to forfeit, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28

        U.S.C. § 2461(c), and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(2)(C), any property, real or

                                       2
CASE 0:22-cr-00124-NEB-DTS        Doc. 971     Filed 04/03/26    Page 3 of 4




      personal, constituting or derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or

      indirectly, as a result of the fraud scheme alleged in Count 5 of the

      Superseding Indictment;

7.    Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(3) and (c)(1)(B), and 21 U.S.C. § 853(m),

      the United States may conduct discovery as to Defendant to identify

      property subject to forfeiture under the terms of this order and to address

      any factual issues raised by a third‐party petition filed pursuant to Fed. R.

      Crim. P. 32.2(c);

8.    The United States shall, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(1), as incorporated

      by 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), publish and give notice of this Order and its intent

      to dispose of the Property in such manner as the Attorney General may

      direct;

9.    Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(b)(4)(A) and (B), this Preliminary Order of

      Forfeiture shall become final as to the Defendant at the time of sentencing,

      and shall be made a part of the sentence and included in the judgment; and

10.   This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Order, and to amend it as




                                     3
      CASE 0:22-cr-00124-NEB-DTS        Doc. 971     Filed 04/03/26   Page 4 of 4




             necessary pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(e).


Dated: April 3, 2026                           BY THE COURT:

                                               s/Nancy E. Brasel
                                               Nancy E. Brasel
                                               United States District Judge




                                           4


File and source

File
971-order-on-motion-for-preliminary-order-of-forfeiture.pdf
Size
108,415 bytes
SHA-256
9206998886c079f7fbf9a067f6eb245e028f6ef9bdc69334aed42de48e418036
Our copy
971-order-on-motion-for-preliminary-order-of-forfeiture.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top