Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Order — Abrams v. Division of Unemployment Insurance (D. Colo.)Search ⌕

Source documents · Archived capture

Order — Abrams v. Division of Unemployment Insurance (D. Colo.)

Summary

An Order Denying Motion to Amend Judgment in Joshua Abrams v. Division of Unemployment Insurance, et al., Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-03390-RMR, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, filed and dated September 21, 2026 as Document 61 by United States District Judge Regina M. Rodriguez. The court had dismissed the case in an order dated September 2, 2025 (ECF No. 50); the plaintiff's amended complaint alleged that the Division miscalculated unemployment benefits by excluding income earned in North Carolina. The order finds the proposed second amended complaint still seeks damages barred by the Eleventh Amendment and holds that Williams v. Reed, 604 U.S. 168 (2025), does not apply. It denies the Motion to Amend Judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), ECF No. 54, and denies ECF Nos. 55, 58, and 60 as moot.

Summary drafted by a model from the text of the original file linked on this page and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Archived source document. Preserved source.

View original PDF · 203 KB

Original: ecf.cod.uscourts.gov

Record facts

File name61-order-on-motion-for-order-motion-for-ruling-motion-for-tro-a.pdf
SHA-2569df2ae04887e7b291f47e49acd76f6ff906426fd82db3c44b6e5a82530c27251
Size207,795 bytes
Source siteecf.cod.uscourts.gov

File and source

File
61-order-on-motion-for-order-motion-for-ruling-motion-for-tro-a.pdf
Size
207,795 bytes
SHA-256
9df2ae04887e7b291f47e49acd76f6ff906426fd82db3c44b6e5a82530c27251
Our copy
61-order-on-motion-for-order-motion-for-ruling-motion-for-tro-a.pdf
Original
PACER (login required)
Back to top