Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order on Appearance for Supervised Release Violation — No. 8:21-cr-00290 (Dkt. 66, D. Neb.)

Order on Appearance for Supervised Release Violation — No. 8:21-cr-00290 (Dkt. 66, D. Neb.)

Summary

An order on appearance for supervised release violation in United States v. Jermaine Lewis, 8:21CR290, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, filed July 24, 2026 as Doc # 66 (2 pages) and signed by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. The defendant appeared on July 24, 2026 on the Amended Petition for Offender Under Supervision [63], the government's oral motion to dismiss the earlier Petition [49] is granted, and he waived a preliminary hearing. The Court finds probable cause, sets a final dispositional hearing before Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. at 9:00 a.m. on September 9, 2026, and after a detention hearing grants the government's motion for detention on risk of flight and danger.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order on Appearance for Supervised Release Violation — No. 8:21-cr-00290 (Dkt. 66, D. Neb.).” Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-on-appearance-for-supervised-release-violation-no-8-21-cr-00290-785aa2597a/, SHA-256 97608e23d3b5ee3ca2f67225c84191275ebc226dba641d4f00a9a7ca9bbb2fdf.

Full text

8:21-cr-00290-RFR-MDN                Doc # 66   Filed: 07/24/26   Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 172




                         IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                        Plaintiff,                                     8:21CR290

        vs.
                                                          ORDER ON APPEARANCE FOR
JERMAINE LEWIS,                                         SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION

                        Defendant.


       The defendant appeared before the Court on July 24, 2026 regarding Amended Petition for
Offender Under Supervision [63].          Yvonne Sosa represented the defendant.      Jody Mullis
represented the government. The defendant was advised of the alleged violation(s) of supervised
release, right to retain or appointment of counsel, and any right to a preliminary hearing in
accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(3).
       The government made an oral motion to dismiss Petition for Offender Under Supervision
[49]. The government’s oral motion to dismiss Petition for Offender Under Supervision [49] is
granted without objection.
       The defendant freely, knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to a
preliminary hearing. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(b)(1)(A). The Court finds probable cause as alleged
in the petition to believe the defendant violated the terms of supervised release and the defendant
should be held to answer for a final dispositional hearing. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(b)(1)(C). The
defendant shall appear personally for a final dispositional hearing before U.S. District Judge
Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. in Courtroom No. 4, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Courthouse, 111 South 18th
Plaza, Omaha, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on September 9, 2026.
       The government moved for detention based upon risk of flight and danger. The defendant
requested a detention hearing which was held. The court finds that the defendant failed to meet
his burden to establish by clear and convincing evidence that he will not flee or pose a danger to
any other person or to the community. Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(6); 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1). The
government’s motion for detention is granted as to risk of flight and danger, and the defendant
shall be detained until further order of the Court.
8:21-cr-00290-RFR-MDN           Doc # 66     Filed: 07/24/26     Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 173




       The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General or designated
representative for confinement in a correctional facility and shall be afforded a reasonable
opportunity for private consultation with defense counsel. Upon order of a United States court or
upon request of an attorney for the government, the person in charge of the corrections facility
shall deliver the defendant to the United States Marshal for an appearance in connection with a
court proceeding.


       IT IS SO ORDERED.


       Dated this 24th day of July, 2026.

                                                    BY THE COURT:

                                                    s/ Michael D. Nelson
                                                    United States Magistrate Judge




                                               2

File and source

File
66.pdf
Size
97,524 bytes
SHA-256
97608e23d3b5ee3ca2f67225c84191275ebc226dba641d4f00a9a7ca9bbb2fdf
Our copy
66.pdf
Original
archive.org
Back to top