Order of Forfeiture — United States v. Sharrell Harrison, No. 21-cr-20510 (Dkt. 228, E.D. Mich.)
Summary
U.S. District Judge Judith E. Levy's Order of Forfeiture in United States v. Sharrell Harrison (E.D. Mich., Case No. 21-cr-20510), dated August 9, 2023, enters a forfeiture money judgment of $91,974.00 against defendant D-3 Sharrell Harrison in favor of the United States. It is based on Harrison's guilty plea to Count One, conspiracy to commit wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1349, and Count Four, aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1), and the amount represents the proceeds of the Count One violation. Any assets the defendant has now or later acquires may be forfeited as substitute assets, and the government may take discovery to locate property. The order becomes final at sentencing and is not subject to ancillary proceedings, as the forfeiture consists entirely of a money judgment.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Full text
Case 5:21-cr-20510-JEL-EAS ECF No. 228, PageID.1477 Filed 08/09/23 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
United States of America,
Plaintiff, Case No. 21-cr-20510
Honorable Judith E. Levy
vs.
D-3 Sharrell Harrison,
Defendant.
Order of Forfeiture
Based on defendant Sharrell Harrison’s (“defendant”) guilty plea to Count
One, Conspiracy to Commit Wire Fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 and
Count Four, Aggravated Identity Theft, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1),
the Government’s Application for Entry of Order of Forfeiture, all information
contained in the record, and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) together with
28 U.S.C. § 2461, and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
1. The defendant shall forfeit to the United States any and all property, real or
personal, which constitutes proceeds obtained or derived, directly or
indirectly, from the defendant’s violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 as charged in
Count One of the Superseding Indictment, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.
Case 5:21-cr-20510-JEL-EAS ECF No. 228, PageID.1478 Filed 08/09/23 Page 2 of 2
32.2, 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(l)(C) together with 28 U.S.C. § 2461.
2. A forfeiture money judgment in the amount of $91,974.00 is granted and
entered against the defendant in favor of the United States of America which
represents the amount of proceeds the defendant obtained or derived,
directly or indirectly, from his violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349.
3. To satisfy the money judgment, any assets that the defendant has now, or
may later acquire, may be forfeited as substitute assets under 21 U.S.C.
§ 853(p)(2). The United States is permitted to undertake whatever discovery
is necessary to identify, locate, or dispose of property subject to forfeiture, or
substitute assets under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(b)(3).
4. This Order of Forfeiture shall become final at sentencing and entry of the
forfeiture money judgment shall be made part of the defendant’s sentence
and included in the Judgment and shall not be the subject of ancillary
proceedings given that the forfeiture consists entirely of a money judgment.
5. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce this Order, and to amend it as
necessary, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2(e).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: August 9, 2023 s/Judith E. Levy
JUDITH E. LEVY
United States District Judge
2
File and source
- File
- gov.uscourts.mied.356240.228.0.pdf
- Size
- 283,296 bytes
- SHA-256
- 50515e38eadd21261e7e02a1b56c4711a8002e8d573c7cf5e22f9b64c954efd7
- Original
- archive.org