Order of Detention Pending Trial — No. 8:23-cr-00249 (Dkt. 20, D. Neb.)

Summary

An AO 472 Order of Detention Pending Trial in United States v. Arvis Manvil Lewis, Jr., Case No. 8:23cr249, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, filed June 13, 2024 as Doc # 20 (1 page) and signed by Magistrate Judge F.A. Gossett. On the government's motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1), the Court marks a rebuttable presumption under § 3142(e)(2) tied to an offense carrying a maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. It finds that the defendant has not introduced sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption and orders detention on that basis, and he is remanded to the custody of the Attorney General.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

              8:23-cr-00249-BCB-MDN Doc # 20 Filed: 06/13/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 35
AO 472 (Rev. 11/16), modified by NED (9/17)



                                        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                                              FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                   v.                                                                  Case No. 8:23cr249

ARVIS MANVIL LEWIS, JR.,                                               ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
                              Defendant


                                                  Part I - Eligibility for Detention

        Upon the
              ☒ Motion of the Government attorney pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1),
the Court held a detention hearing and found that detention is warranted.

      This order sets forth the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), in
addition to any other findings made at the hearing.
                             Part II - Findings of Fact and Law as to Presumptions under § 3142(e)
   ☒ A. Rebuttable Presumption Arises Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(2) (previous violator): There is a rebuttable
     presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of any other person
     and the community because the following conditions have been met:
         ☒ (1) the defendant is charged with one of the following crimes described in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1):
              ☒ (b) an offense for which the maximum sentence is life imprisonment or death; and

   ☒ C. Conclusions Regarding Applicability of Any Presumption Established Above

            ☒ The defendant has not introduced sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption above, and detention is
              ordered on that basis. (Part III need not be completed.)

                                   Part III - Analysis and Statement of the Reasons for Detention


                                              Part IV - Directions Regarding Detention
The defendant is remanded to the custody of the Attorney General or to the Attorney General’s designated representative
for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or
being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant must be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation
with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person
in charge of the corrections facility must deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance
in connection with a court proceeding.

Date:                  6/13/2024                                                   s/ F.A. Gossett
                                                                             United States Magistrate Judge




                                                                                                                    Page 1 of 1


File and source

File

20.pdf

Size

86,145 bytes

SHA-256

dcfd3617448b2c7e1a6d9d29702e6851bab740d388906692f04ec56b5f4ec0e4

Our copy

20.pdf

Original

archive.org