Order of Detention Pending Trial — No. 8:23-cr-00031 (Dkt. 22, D. Neb.)
Summary
An AO 472 Order of Detention Pending Trial in United States v. Andrew Kincaid, Case No. 8:23mj48, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, filed February 1, 2023 as Doc # 22 (2 pages) and signed by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. On the government's motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1), the Court finds by clear and convincing evidence that no conditions will assure the safety of any other person and the community, and by a preponderance that none will assure the defendant's appearance. The marked reasons include the weight of the evidence, a lengthy period of incarceration if convicted and prior criminal history, and the Court adds that the defendant was out on bond when the offense occurred.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order of Detention Pending Trial — No. 8:23-cr-00031 (Dkt. 22, D. Neb.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-of-detention-pending-trial-no-8-23-cr-00031-dkt-22-d-neb-d876d5349f/
, SHA-256 2c82ac1745d72363b43428f5936f1bb93e58dfa351b379cb82c06b05de2c53d4.Full text
8:23-cr-00031-BCB-MDN Doc # 22 Filed: 02/01/23 Page 1 of 2 - Page ID # 48
AO 472 (Rev. 11/16), modified by NED (9/17)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v. Case No. 8:23mj48
ANDREW KINCAID, ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL
Defendant
Part I - Eligibility for Detention
Upon the
☒ Motion of the Government attorney pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1),
the Court held a detention hearing and found that detention is warranted.
This order sets forth the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i), in
addition to any other findings made at the hearing.
Part II - Findings of Fact and Law as to Presumptions under § 3142(e)
Part III - Analysis and Statement of the Reasons for Detention
After considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) and the information presented at the detention hearing,
the Court concludes that the defendant must be detained pending trial because the Government has proven:
☒ By clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure
the safety of any other person and the community.
☒ By a preponderance of evidence that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure the
defendant’s appearance as required.
In addition to any findings made on the record at the hearing, the reasons for detention include the following:
☒ Weight of evidence against the defendant is strong
☒ Subject to lengthy period of incarceration if convicted
☒ Prior criminal history
☒ History of violence or use of weapons
☒ History of alcohol or substance abuse
☒ Lack of stable employment
☒ Lack of stable residence
☒ Prior failure to appear in court as ordered
☒ The nature and circumstances of the offense charged.
☒ The current offense involves a controlled substance, firearm, explosive or destructive device.
☒ The nature and seriousness of the danger posed by the defendant’s release.
OTHER REASONS OR FURTHER EXPLANATION:
Defendant was out on bond when this offense occurred.
Part IV - Directions Regarding Detention
Page 1 of 2
8:23-cr-00031-BCB-MDN Doc # 22 Filed: 02/01/23 Page 2 of 2 - Page ID # 49
The defendant is remanded to the custody of the Attorney General or to the Attorney General’s designated representative
for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or
being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant must be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation
with defense counsel. On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person
in charge of the corrections facility must deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance
in connection with a court proceeding.
Date: 2/1/2023 s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge
Page 2 of 2
File and source
- File
- 22.pdf
- Size
- 115,366 bytes
- SHA-256
- 2c82ac1745d72363b43428f5936f1bb93e58dfa351b379cb82c06b05de2c53d4
- Our copy
- 22.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.