Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order of Continuance and Excludable Delay — No. 1:21-mj-05198 (Dkt. 8, D. Mass.)

Order of Continuance and Excludable Delay — No. 1:21-mj-05198 (Dkt. 8, D. Mass.)

Summary

An Order of Continuance and Excludable Delay in United States v. Danielle Miller, M.B.D. Case No. 21-91400-IT (criminal complaint 21-mj-5198-JGD), in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, filed June 11, 2021 as Document 8 (2 pages), with the signature block of Judge Indira Talwani. On the parties' assented-to motion, the Court finds the parties need time for the defense to review early discovery and hold pre-indictment discussions about the potential charges. The date by which an indictment or information must be filed is continued to August 5, 2021, and the period from May 11, 2021 through August 5, 2021 is excluded from the speedy trial clock.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order of Continuance and Excludable Delay — No. 1:21-mj-05198 (Dkt. 8, D. Mass.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-of-continuance-and-excludable-delay-no-1-21-mj-05198-dkt-8-d-mas-5668ae902b/, SHA-256 7fdef560e1f03b62c43733dc7c2be5226529afe2698fd97a8adf35c5ead3d6e3.

Full text

Text recognized from a scanned document; may contain errors.

Case 1:21-mj-05198-JGD Document 8 Filed 06/11/21 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA __)
)

V. ) M.B.D. Case No. 21-91400-IT
)
DANIELLE MILLER, )
)

Defendant

ORDER OF CONTINUANCE AND EXCLUDABLE DELAY

J. TALWANI

Upon consideration of the assented-to motion seeking an order of continuance and
excludable delay, the Court finds as follows:

1. The defendant has been charged via criminal complaint in case 21-mj-5198-JGD.

2, The parties require additional time for the defense to review early discovery in
subsequent pre-indictment discussions regarding the potential charges and counts to be included in
the indictment.

3. The requested exclusion of time will permit the parties to confer, and will permit
defense counsel to adequately confer with the defendant, before the United States is required to seek
an indictment. The parties expect that such discussions are likely to further the interests of justice and
promote judicial efficiency.

4. Accordingly, the ends of justice served by granting the requested continuance, and
excluding the time period from May 11, 2021 through and including August 5, 2021 from the speedy
trial clock, outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial pursuant to

the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§3161(h)(7)(A), and Sections 5(b)(7)(B) and 5(c)(1)(A)of the
Case 1:21-mj-05198-JGD Document 8 Filed 06/11/21 Page 2 of 2

Plan for Prompt Disposition of Criminal Cases for the United States District Court for the District
of Massachusetts (effective December 2008).

Accordingly, the Court hereby grants the parties’ joint motion and ORDERS that, pursuant to
the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§3161(h)(7)(A), and Sections 5(b)(7)(B) and 5(c)(1)(A)of the Plan
for Prompt Disposition of Criminal Cases, (1) the date on which an indictment or information must be
filed is continued to August 5, 2021; and (2) the period from May 11, 2021 through and including
August 5, 2021 is excluded from the speedy trial clock and from the time within which an indictment

or information must be filed.

HON. INDIRA TALWANI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


File and source

File
8.pdf
Size
82,717 bytes
SHA-256
7fdef560e1f03b62c43733dc7c2be5226529afe2698fd97a8adf35c5ead3d6e3
Our copy
8.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top