Order — No. 8:23-cr-00249 (Dkt. 26, D. Neb.)
Summary
An order in United States v. Arvis Manvil Lewis, Jr., 8:23CR249, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, filed September 10, 2024 as Doc # 26 (1 page) and signed by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. It grants the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [25] because the parties need additional time to resolve the matter short of trial. The jury trial set for October 8, 2024 is continued to December 17, 2024, and the time until December 17, 2024 is excludable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order — No. 8:23-cr-00249 (Dkt. 26, D. Neb.).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-8-23-cr-00249-dkt-26-d-neb-8873d536fd/
, SHA-256 e78ae4b4bb5d3801249a181c92aca0bd6a57a1cedd43564feeab2b61ea50e97b.Full text
8:23-cr-00249-BCB-MDN Doc # 26 Filed: 09/10/24 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 47
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff, ) 8:23CR249
)
vs. )
) ORDER
ARVIS MANVIL LEWIS, JR., )
)
Defendant )
)
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Continue
Trial [25]. The parties need additional time to resolve the matter short of trial. For good
cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [25] is granted as
follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for October 8, 2024, is continued to December 17, 2024.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of
justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests
of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as
a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date
and December 17, 2024, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation
of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a
continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective
preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
DATED: September 10, 2024
BY THE COURT:
s/ Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 26.pdf
- Size
- 113,184 bytes
- SHA-256
- e78ae4b4bb5d3801249a181c92aca0bd6a57a1cedd43564feeab2b61ea50e97b
- Our copy
- 26.pdf
- Original
- archive.org