Order — No. 8:23-cr-00031 (Dkt. 54, D. Neb.)
Summary
An order in United States v. Andrew I. Kincaid and Taliaferro D. Thompson, 8:23CR31, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, filed October 12, 2023 as Doc # 54 (1 page) and signed by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. At a telephone status conference, defense counsel said the defendants need more time to review plea documents with their clients to decide whether to accept the plea offer or go to trial, and moved to continue the conference; the government did not object. The Court grants the oral motion, sets a telephonic status conference for 10:00 a.m. on November 8, 2023, and excludes the time until then under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order — No. 8:23-cr-00031 (Dkt. 54, D. Neb.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-8-23-cr-00031-dkt-54-d-neb-6b1a087dae/
, SHA-256 d4661af8a4eb240ae4db1760f2707994bfc64b478a573e1b8fd1554ca6b9e7f7.Full text
8:23-cr-00031-BCB-SMB Doc # 54 Filed: 10/12/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 87
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiffs, 8:23CR31
vs.
ORDER
ANDREW I. KINCAID, and TALIAFERRO D.
THOMPSON,
Defendants.
A telephone status conference was held today. During the telephone conference, defense
counsel notified the court that the Defendants request more time to review plea documents with their
clients to determine if they want to accept the plea offer or go to trial. Defense counsel moved to
continue the telephone status conference. The government did not object. Based on the comments of
counsel, the court finds good cause has been shown and the oral motion to continue should be granted.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) A telephonic status conference with counsel will be held before the undersigned magistrate
judge at 10:00 a.m. on November 8, 2023 to discuss setting any change of plea hearing or
the date of the jury trial. Counsel will use Restricted Order [50] for conference connection
instructions.
2) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of justice will
be served by granting this motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant
in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that
is, the time between today’s date and on November 8, 2023, shall be deemed excludable
time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to
grant this motion would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective
preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, and the novelty and
complexity of the case. The failure to grant this motion might result in a miscarriage of
justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B). Failing to timely object to this order as provided
under this court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time
should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Dated this 12th day of October, 2023.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 54.pdf
- Size
- 95,869 bytes
- SHA-256
- d4661af8a4eb240ae4db1760f2707994bfc64b478a573e1b8fd1554ca6b9e7f7
- Our copy
- 54.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.