Order — No. 8:22-cr-00200 (Dkt. 73, D. Neb.)
Summary
An order in United States v. Mark A. Smith, 8:22CR200, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, filed November 2, 2023 as Doc # 73 (1 page) and signed by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. For the reasons in the motion, the Court finds good cause and grants the defendant's Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [72]. The jury trial set for November 28, 2023 is continued to February 27, 2024, and the time until February 27, 2024 is excludable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order — No. 8:22-cr-00200 (Dkt. 73, D. Neb.).”
Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-8-22-cr-00200-dkt-73-d-neb-656f5e5c0a/
, SHA-256 aa9c8171ea381fc2b96b0192ebe1ac002615260da4183de934ed851841e4d16a.Full text
8:22-cr-00200-BCB-MDN Doc # 73 Filed: 11/02/23 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 235
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff, ) 8:22CR200
)
vs. )
)
MARK A. SMITH, ) ORDER
)
Defendant. )
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Continue
Trial [72]. For the reasons set forth in the motion, the undersigned magistrate judge finds
good cause to grant the continuance. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [72] is granted, as
follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for November 28, 2023, is continued to February 27,
2024.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of
justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests
of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as
a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date
and February 27, 2024, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation
of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a
continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective
preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. §
3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
DATED: November 2, 2023
BY THE COURT:
s/Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 73.pdf
- Size
- 110,572 bytes
- SHA-256
- aa9c8171ea381fc2b96b0192ebe1ac002615260da4183de934ed851841e4d16a
- Our copy
- 73.pdf
- Original
- No public link identified.