Order — No. 8:22-cr-00111 (Dkt. 22, D. Neb.)

Summary

An order in United States v. Brenda K. Banks, 8:22CR111, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, filed December 1, 2022 as Doc # 22 (1 page) and signed by Magistrate Judge Susan M. Bazis. It grants the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [21], noting that discovery is voluminous and counsel needs additional time to review it, discuss it with the defendant and determine whether the matter will proceed to trial. The jury trial set for December 19, 2022 is continued to February 28, 2023.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Full text

   8:22-cr-00111-RFR-SMB Doc # 22 Filed: 12/01/22 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 45




                   IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                       FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                 )
                                          )
                   Plaintiff,             )                8:22CR111
                                          )
      vs.                                 )
                                          )
BRENDA K. BANKS,                          )                  ORDER
                                          )
                   Defendant.             )


      This matter is before the court on the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [21].
Discovery in this matter is voluminous. Counsel needs additional to review the
discovery, discuss the same with Defendant, and determine whether this matter will
proceed to trial. For good cause shown,

       IT IS ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [21] is granted, as
follows:

      1. The jury trial now set for December 19, 2022 is continued to February 28,
         2023.

      2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of
         justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests
         of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising
         as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s
         date and February, 2023, shall be deemed excludable time in any
         computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to
         grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for
         effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18
         U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).

      DATED: December 1, 2022.

                                       BY THE COURT:


                                       s/ Susan M. Bazis
                                       United States Magistrate Judge


File and source

File

22.pdf

Size

90,662 bytes

SHA-256

71aa6db7f19caa01bb477a5c0da44708737a73730a9ebc550fc4b74a65b7b90a

Our copy

22.pdf

Original

archive.org