Order — No. 8:21-cr-00290 (Dkt. 21, D. Neb.)
Summary
An order in United States v. Jermaine Lewis, 8:21CR290, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, filed February 28, 2022 as Doc # 21 (1 page) and signed by Magistrate Judge Michael D. Nelson. It grants the defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [20] because counsel needs additional time to resolve the matter short of trial. The jury trial set for March 7, 2022 is continued to May 23, 2022, and the time until May 23, 2022 is excludable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“Order — No. 8:21-cr-00290 (Dkt. 21, D. Neb.).”
Original at archive.org. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-8-21-cr-00290-dkt-21-d-neb-dfc59a82e4/
, SHA-256 df7c050a5b845e92eb47e532897b2c9abb5106d3d6f13720d0fc8666a9a1ee11.Full text
8:21-cr-00290-RFR-MDN Doc # 21 Filed: 02/28/22 Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 37
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )
)
Plaintiff, ) 8:21CR290
)
vs. )
)
JERMAINE LEWIS, ) ORDER
)
Defendant. )
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s unopposed Motion to Continue
Trial [20]. Counsel needs additional time to resolve the matter short of trial. For good
cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [20] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for March 7, 2022, is continued to May 23, 2022.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of
justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests
of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as
a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today’s date
and May 23, 2022, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time
under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance
would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation,
taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) &
(B)(iv).
DATED: February 28, 2022.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Michael D. Nelson
United States Magistrate Judge
File and source
- File
- 21.pdf
- Size
- 103,016 bytes
- SHA-256
- df7c050a5b845e92eb47e532897b2c9abb5106d3d6f13720d0fc8666a9a1ee11
- Our copy
- 21.pdf
- Original
- archive.org