Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — No. 6:23-cr-00085 (Dkt. 54, M.D. Fla.)

Order — No. 6:23-cr-00085 (Dkt. 54, M.D. Fla.)

Summary

An order in United States v. Nabil Dajani, Case No: 6:23-cr-85-GAP-EJK, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, filed November 4, 2024 as Document 54 (2 pages). Responding to the Government's opposition (Doc. 53) to the defendant's Motion for a Sentence Reduction, the Court orders that he may file a Reply within twenty-one days, not to exceed fifteen pages without leave and not raising new grounds. After that time the Motion for Modification of Term of Imprisonment (Doc. 46), the Response and any Reply will be taken under advisement.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — No. 6:23-cr-00085 (Dkt. 54, M.D. Fla.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-6-23-cr-00085-dkt-54-m-d-fla-c14a8e6905/, SHA-256 f1db2ab5caf235e0a58648ee2a81fceba95be27666ad0256490ccee15625e3ad.

Full text

Case 6:23-cr-00085-GAP-EJK Document 54 Filed 11/04/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID 542




                       UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                        MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
                            ORLANDO DIVISION


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                    Plaintiff,

v.                                                     Case No: 6:23-cr-85-GAP-EJK

NABIL DAJANI,

                    Defendant.
                                       /

                                       ORDER

      This cause is before the Court on the Government’s Response in Opposition

to Dajani’s Motion for a Sentence Reduction (“Response,” Doc. 53). Upon

consideration, it is ORDERED that, within twenty-one days from the date of this

Order, Petitioner may file a Reply to the Response if he chooses. The Court will

not address new grounds raised in the Reply. Oliveiri v. United States, 717 F. App’x

966, 967 (11th Cir. 2018) (citing United States v. Evans, 473 F.3d 1115, 1120 (11th Cir.

2006) (“[A]rguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are not properly before

a reviewing court.”)). The Reply shall not exceed fifteen pages without leave of

Court. Upon expiration of this time, the Motion for Modification of Term of

Imprisonment (Doc. 46), the Response, and the Reply (if filed) will be taken under

advisement by the Court, and an order will be entered without further notice.
Case 6:23-cr-00085-GAP-EJK Document 54 Filed 11/04/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID 543




      DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on November 4, 2024.




Copies furnished to:

Counsel of Record
Nabil Dajani




                                     2

File and source

File
54.pdf
Size
105,075 bytes
SHA-256
f1db2ab5caf235e0a58648ee2a81fceba95be27666ad0256490ccee15625e3ad
Our copy
54.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top