United States v. Sandybell Fierro — Order (E.D. Ky., Doc. 34)
Summary
An Order in United States v. Sandybell Fierro, Criminal No. 5:23-84-KKC-MAS-1, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Central Division at Lexington, filed October 27, 2023 (Doc #: 34). The order states that the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett for rearraignment proceedings and that the Magistrate Judge filed a recommendation (DE 33) that the Court accept the guilty plea and adjudge the defendant guilty of Counts 1 and 3 of the indictment. No objections were filed within the allotted time of three (3) days. The Court adopts the recommendation, accepts the defendant's plea of guilty and adjudges the defendant's interest in the property listed in the forfeiture allegation of the indictment forfeited.
Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used
Cite this document
“United States v. Sandybell Fierro — Order (E.D. Ky., Doc. 34).”
Original at storage.courtlistener.com. Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-5-23-cr-00084-dkt-34-e-d-ky-0681bd1f2e/
, SHA-256 088cab75e4dab9f10155d28d9041072869f63ca642f16e714422fdd68ba55503.Full text
Case: 5:23-cr-00084-KKC-MAS Doc #: 34 Filed: 10/27/23 Page: 1 of 2 - Page ID#: 94
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
CENTRAL DIVISION AT LEXINGTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CRIMINAL NO. 5:23-84-KKC-MAS-1
Plaintiff,
V. ORDER
SANDYBELL FIERRO,
Defendant.
*** *** ***
This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Matthew A. Stinnett for the purpose of
conducting rearraignment proceedings for the above defendant. After conducting the
rearraignment in open court, the Magistrate Judge filed a recommendation (DE 33) that the Court
accept the defendant’s guilty plea and that the defendant be adjudged guilty of Counts 1 and 3 of
the indictment. Pursuant to the stipulation entered into in the plea agreement and at the
rearraignment, the Magistrate Judge further recommends that the Court adjudge the defendant’s
interest in the property listed in the forfeiture allegation of the indictment forfeited. No objections
were filed within the allotted time of three (3) days and no extensions of time were sought by any
party. Having reviewed the record, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge satisfied all
requirements of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and the United States Constitution.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (DE 33)
and ACCEPTS the defendant’s plea of guilty. The Court further ADJUDGES that the defendant’s
interest in the property listed in the forfeiture allegation of the indictment is hereby FORFEITED.
1
Case: 5:23-cr-00084-KKC-MAS Doc #: 34 Filed: 10/27/23 Page: 2 of 2 - Page ID#: 95
This 27th day of October, 2023.
2
File and source
- File
- 34-plea.pdf
- Size
- 95,436 bytes
- SHA-256
- 088cab75e4dab9f10155d28d9041072869f63ca642f16e714422fdd68ba55503
- Our copy
- 34-plea.pdf
- Original
- storage.courtlistener.com