Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — No. 5:22-cr-00028 (Dkt. 75, E.D. Ky.)

Order — No. 5:22-cr-00028 (Dkt. 75, E.D. Ky.)

Summary

An order in United States v. Anthony Harris, Criminal No. 5:22-28-KKC-MAS-1, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Central Division, filed November 15, 2024 as Doc 75 (1 page). With no objections filed, the Court adopts the magistrate judge's recommendation (DE 74) that the defendant's motion to vacate his sentence be denied, and denies the motion (DE 67) under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. It declines to issue a certificate of appealability because he has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, and states that a consistent judgment will be entered.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — No. 5:22-cr-00028 (Dkt. 75, E.D. Ky.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-5-22-cr-00028-dkt-75-e-d-ky-8f58fec974/, SHA-256 23c3f6c8395c60e17797ecff0a9e7c7e8f982e4014b2fd71a04958ed3b55c0f9.

Full text

 Case: 5:22-cr-00028-KKC-EBA             Doc #: 75 Filed: 11/15/24        Page: 1 of 1 - Page
                                            ID#: 478



                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
                            CENTRAL DIVISION -- LEXINGTON
                                                     CRIMINAL NO. 5:22-28-KKC-MAS-1
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
         Plaintiff,

 v.                                                                  ORDER

 ANTHONY HARRIS,
         Defendant.

                                           *** *** ***

         The matter is before the Court on the defendant Anthony Harris’s motion to vacate

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (DE 67.) The magistrate judge recommends the defendant’s motion

be denied. (DE 74.) The defendant filed no objections to the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that

      1. the report and recommendation (DE 74) is ADOPTED;

      2. the defendant’s motion to vacate his sentence under § 2255 (DE 67) is DENIED;

      3. a certificate of appealability will not be issued, Harris having failed to make “a

         substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); and

      4. a judgment consistent with this order and the report and recommendation will be

         ENTERED.

      This 15th day of November, 2024.

File and source

File
75.pdf
Size
221,535 bytes
SHA-256
23c3f6c8395c60e17797ecff0a9e7c7e8f982e4014b2fd71a04958ed3b55c0f9
Our copy
75.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top