Pandemic Darlings The pandemic economy, in original documents
Home Source documents Order — No. 4:25-cr-03009 (Dkt. 27, D. Neb.)

Order — No. 4:25-cr-03009 (Dkt. 27, D. Neb.)

Summary

An order in United States v. Jacob Smith, 4:25CR3009, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, filed March 11, 2025 as Doc # 27 (1 page) and signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. DeLuca. It grants the defendant's unopposed motion to continue the pretrial motion deadline (Filing No. 26) because the defense needs more time to review discovery, and sets pretrial motions and briefs for April 16, 2025. The conference call scheduled for March 19, 2025 is continued to a telephonic conference at 10:15 a.m. on April 21, 2025, and the time until April 21, 2025 is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act.

Summary drafted by a model from the document's text below and checked by script against that text before publication. It is a navigation aid, not a reading of what the document proves. Where AI is used

Cite this document

“Order — No. 4:25-cr-03009 (Dkt. 27, D. Neb.).” Archived at Pandemic Darlings, https://pandemicdarlings.com/source-documents/order-no-4-25-cr-03009-dkt-27-d-neb-a591a247f7/, SHA-256 fb579044a255ea92f1e963680efac414a10967a591db65f8411bac5d98b38a40.

Full text

 4:25-cr-03009-SMB-JMD             Doc # 27   Filed: 03/11/25      Page 1 of 1 - Page ID # 45



                         IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                             FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                      Plaintiff,                                      4:25CR3009
        vs.

JACOB SMITH,                                                            ORDER

                      Defendant.


       Defendant has moved to continue the pretrial motion deadline, (Filing No. 26), because
Defendant and defense counsel need additional time to fully review the discovery. The motion to
continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds good cause
has been shown and the motion should be granted in part and denied in part. Accordingly,

       IT IS ORDERED:

       1)     Defendant’s motion to continue, (Filing No. 26), is granted.

       2)     Pretrial motions and briefs shall be filed on or before April 16, 2025.

       3)     The conference call previously scheduled to be held on March 19, 2025, is
              continued. A telephonic conference with counsel will be held before the
              undersigned magistrate judge at 10:15 a.m. on April 21, 2025 to discuss setting
              any pretrial motion hearing needed, a change of plea hearing, or the date of the
              jury trial and deadlines for disclosing experts as required under Rule 16. Counsel
              for all parties shall use the conferencing instructions provided by the court to
              participate in the call.

       4)     The court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the motion to continue
              outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, and the
              additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, the time between
              today’s date and April 21, 2025 shall be deemed excludable time in any
              computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because
              although counsel have been duly diligent, additional time is needed to adequately
              prepare this case for trial and failing to grant additional time might result in a
              miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1) & (h)(7). Failing to timely object to
              this order as provided under this court’s local rules will be deemed a waiver of any
              right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial
              Act.

       Dated this 11th day of March, 2025.
                                                    BY THE COURT:
                                                    s/ Jacqueline M. DeLuca
                                                    United States Magistrate Judge

File and source

File
27.pdf
Size
85,134 bytes
SHA-256
fb579044a255ea92f1e963680efac414a10967a591db65f8411bac5d98b38a40
Our copy
27.pdf
Original
No public link identified.
Back to top